Slashdot Mirror


The Mice That Didn't Make It

Harry writes "For every blockbuster of the mouse world (such as Microsoft and Logitech's big sellers) there have been countless mice that flopped, or never made it to market. Mice shaped like pyramids; mice shaped like Mickey; mice that doubled as numeric keypads or phones. Even one that sat on your steering wheel. I've rounded up some evocative patent drawings on twenty notable examples."

202 comments

  1. Not Reading It by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm not reading this article because it's on 20 different pages. STOP THAT SHIT.

    1. Re:Not Reading It by Aphoxema · · Score: 1

      I found it interesting, though it would have been a little easier in larger doses.

      --
      "Most people, I think, don't even know what a rootkit is, so why should they care about it?"
    2. Re:Not Reading It by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      because clicking on the word "next" 20 times is too laborious? You, sir, need a better mouse.

      Come to think of it, perhaps your current mouse is listed in the article...

    3. Re:Not Reading It by Timothy+Brownawell · · Score: 1, Informative

      I'm not reading this article because it's on 20 different pages. STOP THAT SHIT.

      Seriously. There really needs to be some way to administer a small electric shock to both the submitter and the editor for things like this.

    4. Re:Not Reading It by AlHunt · · Score: 2, Insightful

      >There really needs to be some way to administer a small electric shock to both the submitter and the editor

      Why "small"? I say give'em a Dr Emmett Brown 1.21 jiggowatt sized shock.

      --
      1 in 4 Maine children in struggle with hunger.
    5. Re:Not Reading It by thisnamestoolong · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yes -- things like this have me working on perfecting the technology to deliver a punch to the face via TCP/IP.

      --
      To the haters: You can't win. If you mod me down, I shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine
    6. Re:Not Reading It by jerep · · Score: 0

      I thought comments on sites such as youtube and whatnot were the incentive to develop such technology.

      Of course, when you lack the technology, you can still visit people and facepunch them yourself, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MjWFZPJZTxU.

    7. Re:Not Reading It by rainmaestro · · Score: 1

      Apparently, it's all in the hips...

      http://www.penny-arcade.com/comic/2005/05/11/

    8. Re:Not Reading It by gandhi_2 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Meme error.
      <Zybl0re> get up
      <Zybl0re> get on up
      <Zybl0re> get up
      <Zybl0re> get on up
      * nmp3bot dances :D-<
      * nmp3bot dances :D|-<
      * nmp3bot dances :D/-<
      <[SA]HatfulOfHollow> i'm going to become rich and famous after i invent a device that allows you to stab people in the face over the internet

    9. Re:Not Reading It by Afforess · · Score: 2, Informative

      Go get autopager (for firefox). It solves that problem.

      --
      If our elected representatives no longer represent us, do we still live in a Democracy?
    10. Re:Not Reading It by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hate it too. But considering the current state of news media, if this kind of trick helps save a few people from getting laid off, I'm not gonna bother getting all pissy. I'd probably do the same.

    11. Re:Not Reading It by Pharmboy · · Score: 1

      So just tie them to a cable, climb up and connect it to a clocktower, and wait for a storm? Too much work. Think Indiana Jones, where you simply shoot the guy and walk away, machete or not.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    12. Re:Not Reading It by timothy · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      It's an annoying set-up, I agree. However, it's pretty neat information (for those of us obsessed w/ input devices) -- so, a dilemma. I'd enjoy seeing some sort of script / plug-in that would seek "next" links on such sites and string them together into one big vertical page, but I don't know of such a thing yet.

      Any suggestions, other than "don't ever run links to sites with stories spread over more than one page," that might make this easier on everyone's eyeballs?

      timothy

      --
      jrnl: http://tinyurl.com/c2l8yr / foes: http://tinyurl.com/ckjno5
    13. Re:Not Reading It by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then your input, good or bad, would have been useless anyways. Do better or complain elsewhere. STOP THAT SHIT.

      (as if caps will make a difference)

    14. Re:Not Reading It by d0rp · · Score: 1

      I just tried that add-on because it looked really cool, but I couldn't seem to get it to work. It claims it works with google, but it never loaded the next page. Is there some sort of trick that I am missing? (I even played with the settings, but that proved to be futile as well).

    15. Re:Not Reading It by Nicolay77 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I love to read in a lot of different media. I can enjoy reading a novel in a web browser without any problem at all. I have done it.

      However, for every user like me there are thousands who cry: 'Wall of text!' everytime they encounter some text that's more than 10 lines long.

      So, complain to these lazy users that can't read, instead of complaining to the webmasters. The webmasters are simply doing what the masses ask.

      Also, the game.

      --
      We are Turing O-Machines. The Oracle is out there.
    16. Re:Not Reading It by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      it will stop soon. Big ad companies are already changing their rankings from page impressions to unique users.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    17. Re:Not Reading It by pjt33 · · Score: 1

      At 3 minutes to load each page, no-one is going to click through 20 times.

    18. Re:Not Reading It by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      There's an RFC for that!

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    19. Re:Not Reading It by steelfood · · Score: 1

      No, great minds just think alike. Or annoyed ones anyway.

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
    20. Re:Not Reading It by geekoid · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It does not solve the problem. It works around it.
      Unless it ahs an option to slap the developer in the back of the head.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    21. Re:Not Reading It by Darkness404 · · Score: 1

      Another poster recommended AutoPager ( https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/4925 ) I can't really say if it works or not because I run Firefox development builds.

      --
      Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    22. Re:Not Reading It by hurfy · · Score: 1

      Hey, I am designing a mouse to find and click 'next' to read long inane articles you insensitive clod!

    23. Re:Not Reading It by christianT · · Score: 2, Funny

      What??? Larger chunks??? And lose out on ad impressions? NEVER!

      1. Build Website
      2. Sell ad space on it
      3. Write Article
      4. Split it into 90 pieces
      5. Post article to said website
      6. ???
      7. Profit

    24. Re:Not Reading It by iron-kurton · · Score: 1

      I love the bash reference, wish I had mod points.

      --
      Change is inevitable, except from a vending machine -- Robert C. Gallagher
    25. Re:Not Reading It by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

      At 3 minutes to load each page, no-one is going to click through 20 times.

      Well, the thing most people do if they don't want to wait is, open in a new tab! I saw 23 links along the bottom, one for each page (except the first), doesn't mean you can't middle-click them all and while they load, you read the first one.

      Most browsers should handle 24 open tabs quite easily.

    26. Re:Not Reading It by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some hate flash enabled websites, some hate 24 pages of the same article. Some people are never happy. Yes I'm trolling.

    27. Re:Not Reading It by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What ads? Oh you mean you don't block at the hosts level? silly human.

    28. Re:Not Reading It by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

      Timothy, as a person in a slashdot sized and popular site, can you tell if it is really "ad impressions" they are looking for or is it "omg too long, can't read" to be prevented?

      I think what will make everyone happy is, "Print" function of site but on that particular site, it doesn't exist. As it is "proudly powered by Wordpress", someone should fix or enhance the "kernel" of these technology blogs.

      The functionality you talk about has been implemented on Opera for a long time. It is at View/Toolbars/Navigation (toolbar). Wonder if it is covered by some standard (w3c) or their extra? It doesn't really work on that 20 page thing for sure.

    29. Re:Not Reading It by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      If I go to read an article, and find that there's only a paragraph or two on the first page with large pictures and ads and a "NEXT PAGE" link, I stop reading and make a mental note not to visit that site again.

      Technologizer dot com is now on my black list. I just don't need whatever information is at their site that badly.

      On the other hand, I've seen sites that break up long articles, especially hardware reviews, into several pages, with ads on each page. But at least there's a significant amount of information on each page, including comparison charts, etc. I don't mind a setup like that, and since I'm getting information that has some value to me, I'll click through.

      Technologizer dot com is not such a site. To expect me to click a half-dozen or more times just to see a thinly illustrated history of failed mouse designs is a little bit much.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    30. Re:Not Reading It by socz · · Score: 1

      i just got it recently on someones recommendation and it seems to work! autopager ftw? yah

      --
      My abilities are only limited by my imagination
    31. Re:Not Reading It by LostCluster · · Score: 1

      Have some care for whomever is paying for the upbound bandwidth... if you ball out midway through, having each item on separate pages means they don't have to send what you don't look at.

    32. Re:Not Reading It by Shin-LaC · · Score: 2, Funny

      Actually, the first dance move is "* nmp3bot dances :D\-<", with a backslash. It doesn't show up in the current version of bash.org because programming is hard.

    33. Re:Not Reading It by iYk6 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      An interesting theory, but no. Webmasters do it to increase ad views.

    34. Re:Not Reading It by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Punch to the FACE? Perhaps you missed the whole "20 pages" bit... Aim lower.

    35. Re:Not Reading It by vux984 · · Score: 1

      Have some care for whomever is paying for the upbound bandwidth... if you ball out midway through, having each item on separate pages means they don't have to send what you don't look at.

      Interesting theory. But how would doling out 4 more paragraphs per page, and making a 20 page article 4 pages break the bank? In fact, I'd argue that on the vast majority of sites all the 'structure' (javascript, html tables, classes names, ids, spans, menu items, etc) that goes with each page makes it take far more bandwidth to send 20 separate pages than the 4 extra paragraphs would.

    36. Re:Not Reading It by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      > Most browsers should handle 24 open tabs quite easily.

      Some of them (Opera) can do it with a 4GB address space too.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    37. Re:Not Reading It by mobets · · Score: 1

      Well, it would have been simpler if the next button was in the same place every time...

      --

      It was me, I did it, I moved your cheese
    38. Re:Not Reading It by hobo+sapiens · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No! Wrong, all of you!

      If it takes that much effort to read what is essentially a fluff piece, I for one will not read it. Not preloading the pages in different tabs, not clicking next 20 times. Stupid web developers. grumble grumble. No sense of usability. grumble grumble grumble.

      --
      blah blah blah
    39. Re:Not Reading It by BlitzBrain · · Score: 1

      No worries bud, they have already patented a mouse that will read the article for you.

    40. Re:Not Reading It by pinkushun · · Score: 1

      I vote "One of the top 20 /. articles that didn't make it"

    41. Re:Not Reading It by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      I knew I shouldn't have bought that face stabbing peripheral. Now I make a whistling sound every time I breath out.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    42. Re:Not Reading It by Dan541 · · Score: 1

      Are you blind?

      It's on 24

      --
      An SQL query goes to a bar, walks up to a table and asks, "Mind if I join you?"
    43. Re:Not Reading It by Dan541 · · Score: 1

      Even simpler to just post it as a single page.

      --
      An SQL query goes to a bar, walks up to a table and asks, "Mind if I join you?"
    44. Re:Not Reading It by cffrost · · Score: 1

      However, for every user like me there are thousands who cry: 'Wall of text!' everytime they encounter some text that's more than 10 lines long.

      Perhaps this misinterpretation is the root of the problem; those are cries of ecstasy.

      --
      Thank you, Edward Snowden.

      "Arguments from authority are worthless." —Carl Sagan
    45. Re:Not Reading It by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just buy my 20 button mouse then.

    46. Re:Not Reading It by Zaph0dB · · Score: 1

      http://blog.andreineculau.com/2008/06/repagination/ - Repagination hacked to work in FF3.5. Enjoy. (not that the article was worth the effort)

      --
      When in danger or in doubt, run in circles, scream and shout [Robert Heinlein]
    47. Re:Not Reading It by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or you can make an end-run around the problem and use the AutoPager plugin for Firefox. Once told how to do so, it grabs the *content*" of the "next" page from a website and inserts it under the content for the current page. Kind of like what the slashdot frontpage does when you scroll to the bottom, but generalized to websites in general. I have to admit Technologiser doesn't have a preset, but it took me about a minute to set one up for the article.

    48. Re:Not Reading It by Shin-LaC · · Score: 1

      No, seriously. The current version of bash.org strips backslashes, but you can see the original text on qdb.us.
      Strangely, searching for "\" on either site finds all quotes containing a percent sign.

    49. Re:Not Reading It by jorgevillalobos · · Score: 1

      There's another one on the top that doesn't move. FWIW, I had the same problem for the first 10 pages or so.

    50. Re:Not Reading It by Chabo · · Score: 1

      The guy didn't have a machete; it was a scimitar.

      Maybe you're thinking of my next film project, "Freddy vs. Jason vs. Ash vs. Indy"?

      --
      Convert FLACs to a portable format with FlacSquisher
    51. Re:Not Reading It by SmitherIsGod · · Score: 0

      It also has " and DANCE" before that line.

    52. Re:Not Reading It by SnEptUne · · Score: 1

      Let me guess... those who think unalike have no great minds?

    53. Re:Not Reading It by Xyrus · · Score: 1

      Anyone else read the title and immediately think this was going to be an article about some of the more interesting way lab mice didn't make it through an experiment?

      ~X~

      --
      ~X~
    54. Re:Not Reading It by badkarmadayaccount · · Score: 1
      --
      I know tobacco is bad for you, so I smoke weed with crack.
  2. Well actually... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't forget to add the Novint Falcon!

  3. Split article by Brian+Gordon · · Score: 3, Insightful

    And it's split across 24 different pages. ... now where are all of the slashdotters who were arguing with me about ad-supported content last night? :)

    1. Re:Split article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No kidding. I saw the first page then left immediately. I'm not clicking through all that crap, one 640x480 frame at a time.

    2. Re:Split article by BikeHelmet · · Score: 4

      Haha! And I got modded troll for saying 30 page articles are common and make me want to throttle someone. ;)

    3. Re:Split article by Kayden · · Score: 0

      Funny... I didn't see any adds. >_>

    4. Re:Split article by MyLongNickName · · Score: 4, Funny

      Did you see the subtracts?

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    5. Re:Split article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While i wasn't there, i certainly don't support such things like this.
      This is just plain abuse of page views.

      Ad-supported content is fine* when done nicely, but this is just taking the fucking biscuit.

      * for me.
      I don't see why people hate it so much, i certainly love seeing ads if they are related to the actual content, as long as it isn't just tacked on for the sake of getting money.
      Only people i block are GIF and Flash abusers.

    6. Re:Split article by EchaniDrgn · · Score: 1

      OK, now that moderation is funny. Don't Mod Parent up, keep the troll tag. :-)

    7. Re:Split article by BikeHelmet · · Score: 1

      You should mod up as underrated. That way it keeps the troll tag, but more people will see it. :P

      And I was serious - it was just a couple days ago!

  4. Next.. Next.. Next... by rihkama · · Score: 4, Insightful

    20 pages for 20 smallish pictures? Really? The site must be desperate for ad revenue.

    1. Re:Next.. Next.. Next... by jDeepbeep · · Score: 2, Interesting

      20 pages for 20 smallish pictures? Really? The site must be desperate for ad revenue.

      AdBlock Plus claims it is actively blocking four scripts when I land on the first page, all of them from static.fmpub.net

      --
      Reply to That ||
    2. Re:Next.. Next.. Next... by Ohio+Calvinist · · Score: 1

      It isn't just ad revenue, in some of these cases you can gather useful information as to "which" page in the series lost interest, which ones were linked to by third parties. This can also be done for performance in the case of large-ish images or for pages that scale well (or better) to mobile devices.

      Not to say that any of these reasons of-necesity warrant this sort of design, but it isn't always simply revenue. My biggest complaint is where there is a complete lack of a "printer-friendly" option.

      --
      Forgive my spelling from time to time. I'm often posting during short breaks.
    3. Re:Next.. Next.. Next... by Mozk · · Score: 1

      But did you see the picture on page 3? How many fingers does that hand have? Are those even fingers?

      --
      No existe.
  5. He forgot one by grub · · Score: 4, Informative

    Don't forget this one. The only manufacturers' mouse which is usually replaced by a 3rd party one within minutes.

    .

    --
    Trolling is a art,
    1. Re:He forgot one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean that was a mouse? I figured it was the footpedal!

    2. Re:He forgot one by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I assume you're talking about the hockey puck mouse, rather than the ADB Mouse II that's pictured on the top of the page. The former was a disaster, of course; the latter was actually quite a good mouse and very pleasant to use.

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    3. Re:He forgot one by Hatta · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      No mouse with only one button is "good" or "pleasant to use".

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    4. Re:He forgot one by infalliable · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yes, the most god awful mouse ever made and sold in "large" quantities. Why would you ever make a mouse that had no tactile feel to let you know which was was up, make it really light, and then put a really heavy cord on it so that the cord was always trying to make it rotate? Not to mention it was too small and just uncomfortable.

    5. Re:He forgot one by Chyeld · · Score: 4, Insightful

      On a system designed with it in mind, yes it was. I'm possibly a rare individual who grew up starting with an Atari ST (two buttoned mice that were made out of bricks it seemed), moved on to a Mac (the famous ACB one button mouse), and then to the PC (cheap as shit multi-button mice).

      While having more buttons in the Windows world was definately a must, back in the System 7 days and before, having one button was not an issue and given most PC mice in the day were made of plastic that felt as if it would shatter if sneezed at forcefully, having a mouse that had 'heft' meant I actually felt as if I had better control on those rare few games that were worth playing than I did on the PC games that came later.

    6. Re:He forgot one by pjt33 · · Score: 1

      Your first computer had a mouse? Get off my lawn!

    7. Re:He forgot one by Briareos · · Score: 1

      I assume you're talking about the hockey puck mouse, rather than the ADB Mouse II that's pictured on the top of the page.

      How's this for a replacement?

      I got one of those for free, but "painful" doesn't begin to describe it...

      np: Orbital - Lush (Herve's Tree And Leaf Remix) (2Orbital (Disc 2))

      --

      "I'm not anti-anything, I'm anti-everything, it fits better." - Sole

    8. Re:He forgot one by Chyeld · · Score: 1

      My very first computer was actually a Timex/Sinclair ZX81 with a membrane Dvorak keyboard and a port for 16K ram upgrades. However given the games for it consisted of things that would make a WarioWare minigame look complex, I chose not to mention it. ^_^

    9. Re:He forgot one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I remember this mouse, it didn't actually have a button, the whole mouse formed the button, which you clicked by tilting the mouse in a forward motion, it was not only a funny uncomfortable shape it was weird to click that way, and I only used it the once, but everyone I knew who had one, replaced it as soon as they could.

    10. Re:He forgot one by Blain · · Score: 1

      Mine had the Qwerty keyboard, but, yeah. Who could afford the extravagance of 16k of ram, though?

    11. Re:He forgot one by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      Its a bit strange that in the original patent application the cord comes out under the users wrist.

    12. Re:He forgot one by Samgilljoy · · Score: 1

      I'm glad I'm not the only one who replaces them almost instantly. On the other hand, I can't understand why anyone would use any mouse you actually have to move around, even if it has two buttons.

      Do you think the discarded Apple mice end up in the same place as missing dryer socks? There must be a million-strong herd of them out there somewhere?

    13. Re:He forgot one by Z00L00K · · Score: 1

      And then we have the SpaceNavigator and it's siblings, but that is actually used by a lot of CAD users. And if you use Google Earth you will love it.

      The sad thing with it is that the default drivers doesn't allow it to be used as a joystick. There are thirdparty drivers but I haven't been able to make them work.

      --
      If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote programs, then the first woodpecker would destroy civilization.
    14. Re:He forgot one by 0racle · · Score: 1

      I like the ADB mouse that came with the MacSE.

      --
      "I use a Mac because I'm just better than you are."
    15. Re:He forgot one by mqduck · · Score: 1

      I know that if I bought a Mac, the first thing I'd do is buy a mouse that wasn't designed for the imaginary person who never existed that can't handle multiple buttons.

      --
      Property is theft.
    16. Re:He forgot one by Richy_T · · Score: 1

      I actually had 64k. I purchased a 32k but it didn't work and the company replaced it with a 64k. I don't think I ever used that much though (it definitely worked though).

    17. Re:He forgot one by drew · · Score: 1

      Not sure about the older mice, but it seems to me that every USB mouse made by Apple has been roughly equally bad for different reasons. Scratch that, the hockey puck was by far the worst. But the Apple Pro Mouse and Mighty Mouse still rank up there as the second and third worst mice I have ever used by a fair margin.

      --
      If I don't put anything here, will anyone recognize me anymore?
  6. CueCat missing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Guess it didn't count as a mouse...

  7. Note to the submitter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Too many pages, not so great content. Although some designs, apparently authored by an emulator of Rube Goldberg, are hilarious.

    1. Re:Note to the submitter by oenone.ablaze · · Score: 1

      I particularly enjoyed the "child-friendly" mouse shaped like the head of Tweety Bird, where you click by jabbing his(?) eyes.

  8. uhh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    shouldn't it be 'mouses' ?

    1. Re:uhh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      meeses, surely.

    2. Re:uhh by need4mospd · · Score: 0

      Actually, like the plural form of the word child, the plural of mouse is mouseren.

    3. Re:uhh by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 1

      meeses, surely.

      What are you, an idiot? That's the plural of moose.

      --
      This guy's the limit!
    4. Re:uhh by ZERO1ZERO · · Score: 2, Insightful
      We'll begin with box, and the plural is boxes ,
      But the plural of ox is oxen , not "oxes"
      Then one fowl is a goose and two are geese ,
      Yet the plural of moose would never be "meese,"

      You may find a lone mouse or a whole lot of mice ,
      But the plural of house is houses , not "hice."
      If the plural of man is always men ,
      Why shouldnt the plural of pan be "pen"?

      Cow in the plural may be cows or kine .
      But the plural of vow is vows , not "vine."
      I speak of a foot and you show me your feet .
      I give you a boot ; would you call a pair "beet"?

      If the singular is tooth and the plural teeth ,
      Why shouldnt the plural of booth be "beeth"?
      If the singular is this, and the plural is these ,
      Should the plural of kiss rightly be "keese"?

      Then, with ONE you use that and with THREE, those ,
      Yet the plural of hat is never called "hose."
      We speak of a brother and also of brethren ;
      But though we say mother , we never say "methren."

      The masculine pronouns are he, his and him ,
      But imagine the feminine as she , "shis," and "shim."
      So English, I think -- and you must agree
      Is a language as queer as any youll see.

  9. Now is the time fob by wjousts · · Score: 0

    Does anybody know WTF "Now is the time fob" is supposed to mean on this one?

    1. Re:Now is the time fob by FooAtWFU · · Score: 1

      Now is the time for all good men to come to the aid of their country.
      Also, the quick brown fox jumped over the lazy dog.

      --
      The World Wide Web is dying. Soon, we shall have only the Internet.
    2. Re:Now is the time fob by geekoid · · Score: 3, Funny

      the "b" was the typo he was fixing for the demonstration.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    3. Re:Now is the time fob by wjousts · · Score: 1

      Okay, now it makes sense.

    4. Re:Now is the time fob by Red+Flayer · · Score: 2, Informative

      Typo.

      s/B/R

      "Now is the time for all good men to come to the aid of their country." is a sentence that used to be used a lot in typesetting -- it's exactly 70 characters (including the period), the width of one standard line.

      Note that the original quote was "Now is the time for all good men to come to the aid of the party", it was part of a typing exercise, not sure if it was originally a political quote...

      Why yes, I do have recollection of random factoids from elementary school typing class, why do you ask?

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    5. Re:Now is the time fob by Scarletdown · · Score: 1

      the quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog.

      Fixed that for you. That phrase is supposed to include all 26 letters of the English alphabet. Your version was missing the s.

      --
      This space unintentionally left blank.
    6. Re:Now is the time fob by pjt33 · · Score: 1

      It's a mouse which also serves as a model of the Time Cube and can be hung from a key chain.

    7. Re:Now is the time fob by SpectreBlofeld · · Score: 1

      I wonder if that was going to be 'Now is the time for all good men to come to the aid of their country'. I would be amused if it were - that happens to be the phrase I type whenever I'm testing a new (computer or cell phone) keyboard. I don't know why that phrase became my standard Keyboard Testing Phrase, but I've been using it since my early teens.

    8. Re:Now is the time fob by sconeu · · Score: 1

      Or the quick brown fox jumped over the lazy dogs.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    9. Re:Now is the time fob by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 1

      I think it's an R with an underscore representing what we now recognise as a cursor. Looks like a B though.

      --
      Drill baby drill - on Mars
    10. Re:Now is the time fob by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      Increase the zoom, it's definitely a B with a cursor underneath.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
  10. I'll stick with my blue M&M mouse . . . by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 4, Funny
    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    1. Re:I'll stick with my blue M&M mouse . . . by jwdb · · Score: 1

      I think it would be hilarious to show up to work with bright blue skin.

      Any word on when they're moving to human testing?

    2. Re:I'll stick with my blue M&M mouse . . . by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      I really don't think you want blue skin. Read this.

      http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22536241/

  11. Did one of them actually make it? by lmpeters · · Score: 1

    Is it just me, or does the mouse on page 4 bear a striking resemblance to Logitech's current line-up of ergonomic mice?

    1. Re:Did one of them actually make it? by Pharmboy · · Score: 1

      I used to have a trackball mouse that also looked familiar. (90s) I think it was a logitech. Complete and utter POS. I got it figuring it would be better for graphics, but the lack of fine detailed control made it useless.

      As much as I despise Microsoft, I still love their mice, in particular the 5 button versions, which are handy for throwing F and G grenades in Team Fortess Classic. (and yes, I still have a couple of servers for this 11 year old game...)

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    2. Re:Did one of them actually make it? by denzacar · · Score: 1

      Phone mice did.

      And so did many a car mouse.

      --
      Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    3. Re:Did one of them actually make it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  12. Article that didn't make it by syousef · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Spread across 24 pages and about as interesting as a dry dog turd. When you submit to slashdot and it gets rejected then some story about loser designs that didn't make it for good reason winds up as front page news it's quite an insult. What's the next article going to be about? Drug addicts that didn't make it to CEO of large tech companies? How about abacus designs that didn't sell? Not inane enough for you? Let's try pocket protector manufacturers that went broke.

    --
    These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    1. Re:Article that didn't make it by Pharmboy · · Score: 1

      While the formatting sucked, the actual content was pretty good. Good quality images, simple text describing, to the point. I gave it a 5 star rating for the content.

      As for being spread over 20+ pages, Tom's and everyone else has been doing this for years, albeit, not as drastically. Gaming sites are just as bad, or worse. I expect it. Fortunately, my mouse just clicked next a couple dozen times, no worry.

      Perhaps the next article submitted and accepted by /. editors will simply have one paragraph per page (plus 4 banner ads and 3 seperate google adword text positions...)

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    2. Re:Article that didn't make it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      your sig is wrong... you need a || not a &&

    3. Re:Article that didn't make it by Prien715 · · Score: 1

      You could have provided the article in question you submitted along with your summary.

      Otherwise, it just reads as bitter criticism.

      --
      -- Political fascism requires a Fuhrer.
    4. Re:Article that didn't make it by syousef · · Score: 1

      You could have provided the article in question you submitted along with your summary.

      Otherwise, it just reads as bitter criticism.

      Yeah much better to be accused of off topic bitter criticism, than just bitter criticism. I'd actually argue if I'd provided a specific article, it'd be grousing. I was speaking generally.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    5. Re:Article that didn't make it by not-my-real-name · · Score: 1

      Hey, I can still buy pocket protectors at Staples. I can see four of them from where I'm sitting right now.

      --
      un-ALTERED reproduction and dissimination of this IMPORTANT information is ENCOURAGED
    6. Re:Article that didn't make it by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

      Not inane enough for you? Let's try pocket protector manufacturers that went broke.

      Wasn't that a "What was your favourite..." Slashdot poll recently?

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    7. Re:Article that didn't make it by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      Hey, get back to work.

  13. :CueCat by thecross · · Score: 0

    It's not a mouse, but the :CueCat failed more spectacularly than all of those mice combined.

  14. Slow news day? by geekoid · · Score: 3, Insightful

    For every blockbuster of the X world there have been countless X that flopped, or never made it to market.

    No. Shit.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    1. Re:Slow news day? by jayme0227 · · Score: 1

      That doesn't mean that it is not interesting to attempt to see the thought processes that went into the attempted creation of that one blockbuster. Just because you don't like it doesn't mean the rest of us are all curmudgeons.

      --
      But then I realized the cable was blue, so I only gave it one star. I hate blue.
    2. Re:Slow news day? by Pharmboy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The point here is the guy actually collected the images from the original patents, which took a little work (and a lot of weeding out). The concept wasn't original (and the formatting over many pages sucked) but the actual content was pretty good, and yes, interesting.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    3. Re:Slow news day? by mqduck · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure how you couldn't figure it out, but the interesting part isn't that it's news that there were mice that didn't make it.

      --
      Property is theft.
  15. 24 fucking pages for 20 mice? by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 3, Informative

    Fuck that shit in the ass. I refuse to read something in such a shit layout design for maximum ad views while ignoring a user's needs.

    Seriously, 24 pages for 20 nice is a flipping joke.

    1. Re:24 fucking pages for 20 mice? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't

    2. Re:24 fucking pages for 20 mice? by laktech · · Score: 1

      I can't comment on your experience, but with NoScript the layout is quite nice. I don't see a single ad and the "Next" button is aligned neatly so no need to exert the effort to scroll.

  16. Creative? by OrangeMonkey11 · · Score: 1

    these are some wacky ass design for mice the hand held trackball design, i have a small travel mice for my laptop a few years ago that can go on this list. It is very similar to this hand held trackball but on a small scale and shape like a tiny gun

    1. Re:Creative? by pjt33 · · Score: 1

      Do you know what the brand/product name is? My previous handheld trackball broke, partly because its design encouraged placing it on a desk in an unstable position, so I'm interested in alternative (and preferably cheaper) models.

    2. Re:Creative? by OrangeMonkey11 · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately I do not remember what the brand was, I kept thinking it was Targus but i know it was some really cheap generic brand

  17. I wish this one made it... by Geak · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I purchased a Logitech Trackman Marble FX a number of years ago for about $60. Logitech discontinued it a long time ago. Personally I think it's the best mouse I have ever used. When friends of mine use the computer though they don't like it. It does take getting used to but it's extremely comfortable. Great for first person shooters. Eventually playing Unreal Tournament killed the right mouse button. I went looking for a replacement online and found some on ebay priced at over $300. I guess I'm not the only one that thinks this mouse rocks, but I'm not about to fork over $300 for a mouse. To keep mine alive I took a button out of a $10 mouse and soldered it into the old one. Someday I hope Logitech will bring this design back in a wireless version. As a side note, I think console systems would be improved if the right analog joystick on the controller was replaced with a trackball. Aiming is next to impossible with a joystick.

    1. Re:I wish this one made it... by Obfuscant · · Score: 1
      AMEN! I'm using one now. I have one on my main system at home. I have one sitting here not being used right now. I have one on the shelf, ready to replace any of those four. I LOVE my trackman marble.

      There IS no mouse that could deal with the clutter of my desk. Moving from the bottom of the screen to the top requires PUSHING crap out of the way, and still it takes three or four pushes to get to the top.

      Logitech, PLEASE start making these again!

    2. Re:I wish this one made it... by Ant+P. · · Score: 1

      As a side note, I think console systems would be improved if the right analog joystick on the controller was replaced with a trackball. Aiming is next to impossible with a joystick.

      Your thumb would hurt after a while. A joystick has a mostly flat top, a trackball is more curved so it has less contact area and more pressure. The idea would be perfect if not for that.

    3. Re:I wish this one made it... by Alamais · · Score: 1

      Logitech's entire marble trackball line is awesome. I hate using mice on foreign systems now, it feels so...clunky. And I can't even imagine gaming with a standard mouse.

    4. Re:I wish this one made it... by isaac338 · · Score: 1

      why don't you clean your desk?

    5. Re:I wish this one made it... by RogerWilco · · Score: 1

      The Trackman Marble FX was indeed a very nice trackball. Mine also broke, I'd buy one again if they still sold them (especially a left-handed version).

      --
      RogerWilco the Adventurous Janitor
    6. Re:I wish this one made it... by tick_and_bash · · Score: 1

      While ditching the current console systems' trends in using joysticks, using a trackball would be an utter nightmare. Think of how much dirt and crap will get in there if your friends are half as messy as mine. Cleaning out your controller just to play would be a nuisance. Opening up the controller just to clean it would inevitably lead to warranty issues. I'll deal with the current setup. It's not too bad.

    7. Re:I wish this one made it... by Richy_T · · Score: 1

      +1

      Are you listening, Logitech?

  18. Best mouse... by nscheffey · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ....is not a mouse at all. It's the RollerMouse, which lets me mouse without taking my hands off the keyboard. I have used this for 10 years and continue to be amazed that its not the standard in computing.

    1. Re:Best mouse... by BabyDuckHat · · Score: 1

      That's an interesting design. I'd love to try one. But that price would have to come way down for a purchase to happen.

    2. Re:Best mouse... by arclyte · · Score: 1

      I'm with you on that one... I used one of these at MacWorld a few years back and quickly fell in love with it. Asked the guy how much it was and just as quickly fell out of love with it...

    3. Re:Best mouse... by Oewyn · · Score: 3, Informative

      I have used this for 10 years and continue to be amazed that its not the standard in computing.

      Hrmm... At $220, i too am surprised that it isn't the standard in computing...

      pfft.

    4. Re:Best mouse... by Francis · · Score: 1

      You know, that's what I've always thought about pointing sticks.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pointing_stick

      Unlike the rollermouse, I think the price would be pretty marginal to add to a regular keyboard, but I've only ever seen one external keyboard design that incorporated a pointing stick. (Lenovo/IBM design.)

      Personally, having a trackpoint was a deciding factor in choosing my laptop.

      --

      --
      #include <malloc.h>
      free(your.mind);
    5. Re:Best mouse... by xSauronx · · Score: 1

      meh, i had a Thinkpad for a couple years and i really ,really miss the trackpoint. id damn near kill to have one in the middle of my wireless logitech keyboard. i found a few that were wired (ps/2? no fucking thanks, bud) and overpriced. half the time when i was on my thinkpad, even if i had a mouse handy, id just use the trackpoint. its such a wonderful input device and one of the main reasons i went with thinkpads. i *hate* touchpads, the multitouch ones are ok but nothing compared to a trackpoint for me.

      --
      By and large, language is a tool for concealing the truth. -- George Carlin
    6. Re:Best mouse... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I find a properly equipped Model M with the built in nipple mouse to be far more usable. The best keyboard for general web browsing, IMO.

  19. Pocket Protectors by jDeepbeep · · Score: 1

    Let's try pocket protector manufacturers that went broke.

    We cannot allow such a travesty to occur. They are too big to fail.

    --
    Reply to That ||
  20. Sturgeon's law in action by Whatsisname · · Score: 1

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sturgeon's_Law

    What do you really expect? The light bulb wasn't perfected on the first try either.

  21. Back in the day by cromar · · Score: 1

    Apple Desktop Bus for the win! Hell, I even liked the original ADB mouse. And those old ADB keyboards... I have nostalgia for those like others do for the Model M.

    1. Re:Back in the day by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      There are ADBUSB adapters. I am typing this on an "Apple Keyboard" with a Kensington Turbomouse on a Mac Pro.

  22. Pyramid shaped rodents by Falstaft · · Score: 1

    I neglected to see the "Hardware" tag for this article and immediately assumed the article was about freaks of biological science, the mice that were engineered into crazy shapes but that didn't get the positive press that the mouse-with-ear-on-back (http://meredith007.files.wordpress.com/2009/02/mouse-human-ear.jpg) got. You know, rodents shaped like pyramids, steering wheels, trackball rats. Why, I once saw a mouse genetically engineered to have a little phosphorescent red light on its belly that lit up when ever someone dragged it along a flat surface.

  23. WORST. MOUSE. EVER. by operagost · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The pear-shaped, ridged piece of garbage that came with Packard Bells in the 1990s. I know you're surprised-- Packard-Bell made crappy hardware? But instead of durable grey rubber like most decent mice of the time, the ball on this thing was made of some porous black fake-rubber product that disintegrated in about a month on the display model. It's hard to demo a product when it just came out last month and the customers can see the mouse is already broken.

    --

    Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  24. Sorry, Harry by jjohnson · · Score: 1

    I took one look at the front page, realized that you created 24 pages to show 20 slides, understood that your main point here was maximizing ad revenue, and closed the tab.

    --
    Anyone who loves or hates any language, platform, or manufacturer, doesn't know what they're talking about.
    1. Re:Sorry, Harry by BabyDuckHat · · Score: 1

      So, the ROI and Ad spend decreased despite content integration and sponsored recommendations. Perhaps if we incentivize the inclusion of web-facing strategy indicators? Hold on, the webinar about how to get people to punch the monkey is starting...

    2. Re:Sorry, Harry by Civil_Disobedient · · Score: 1

      Completely agree. This is so fucking flagrant I want to kick the submitter in the knees from the front. Hard.

  25. is it just me? by Khashishi · · Score: 1

    I find myself really wanting one of those number pad mice.

    1. Re:is it just me? by Pharmboy · · Score: 1

      Then buy one for $30. That was just the first I found, I bet there are others. And 30 bucks aint bad for any optical mouse. It doesn't even require special drivers. Not a bad idea for a laptop, actually.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    2. Re:is it just me? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here is another one (linked to a retailer's site: http://www.cyberguys.com/product-details/?productid=12655 ) for about $40. It doesn't seem to have a cover for the keys though, so you might accidentally hit them.
      "iOne Scorpius keypad" can find the same one on a few other sites (sometimes it seems like you need to add "N4" or "N4U") if you want to search for this one.

  26. Witty Mouse by fnord_uk · · Score: 1

    The mouse I got with my 386DX40 was called a Witty Mouse. I think it was rhyming slang though. Sometimes the cursor would move by itself - it was very erratic, but then work normally for a while the next day. Eventually i discovered that the translucent plastic case was a little too transparent - it was my angle-poise lamp shining through the mouse body and affecting the sensor. It worked fine after I painted it ;-)

    fnord

    --
    In theory, theory and practice are the same. In practice, they're not.
  27. Tut tut tut! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Remember the rules -- no grousing!

  28. Technologizer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why do articles from Technologizer keep getting posted? They're almsot always awful and spread across 30 pages with 10000 ads per page.

    1. Re:Technologizer by Pharmboy · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Now now, come on. There were barely 10000 ads over the entire 24 pages. I think you are exagerating just a bit.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    2. Re:Technologizer by Tehrasha · · Score: 1

      The site must have something going for it, as it is blocked at my workplace.

  29. Next worst thing to lack by tepples · · Score: 2, Insightful

    My biggest complaint is where there is a complete lack of a "printer-friendly" option.

    Do you also complain when a web site makes printer-friendly versions of its articles available at a low, low price per month?

  30. Mouse with joystick by TheTick21 · · Score: 1

    I've always wanted a mouse with a joystick where the thumb goes for gaming. Why waste 4 keys when your thumb would be plenty? Also would give you analog control for movement. I'm just too lazy to build one myself.

  31. Logitech iFeel by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

    The real mystery is how Logitech iFeel didn't make it. I got that thing right here but it has no support to OS X.

    It is immersion powered which can do little vibrates which everyone goes crazy about these days. "Haptic feedback" is the term I guess.

    While I was on Windows, it was a real intutive thing which caused no kind of system instability. I would say "because of software", no it is not the case. Unreal (2?) made use of it and it was the only game I could experience real feedback.

    Here is its review from 2001
    http://www.dansdata.com/ifeel.htm

    BTW, hope current Logitech owners don't go mad at me... I just plugged it to my Mac and it works. 8 years :)

    1. Re:Logitech iFeel by Oewyn · · Score: 1

      Black and White was another game that supported the iFeel, unfortunately, i never had one so i can't say how well it worked there.

      Honstly, i'd be happy if logitech would start replacing the plastic that hits the microswitches with metal so that they wouldn't wear down after a while and require manual modifications to make them click properly again.

  32. Keyboard/mouse combos by fuckface · · Score: 1

    Years ago I had a keyboard that had a trackball mouse built into it just below the space bar. It was fantastic because I could put it on my lap and do all the modern computing I needed. In this day and age of mediacenter PCs and the like I'm shocked that there aren't more keyboard/mouse combos out there. Trying to work an optical mouse on the arm of the sofa just isn't natural. Would it really be so hard to tack a trackpad onto a wireless keyboard?

    1. Re:Keyboard/mouse combos by RogerWilco · · Score: 1

      If you make it a multitouch touchpad then I'm sold.

      --
      RogerWilco the Adventurous Janitor
  33. worst slashdot link ever! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm pissed I looked at the pictures.

  34. I can't be the first to ask by Eil · · Score: 1

    I've rounded up some evocative patent drawings on twenty notable examples.

    Uhh, why?

    1. Re:I can't be the first to ask by Supurcell · · Score: 1

      Why do anything?

  35. Sweet sweet mice phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wait a minute.... Mice that double as phones... It's just so quirky it might work...
    You wouldn't believe how many times I've reached for the mouse and gotten a hold of the cell phone instead and wondered why the cursor ain't moving.

  36. The Mice that didn't make it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The mice that didn't make it -- they're known as lab rats. You know, the 85.4% where the cancer treatment didn't help, or the drugs had no effect...

  37. hmmm by thatskinnyguy · · Score: 1

    I seem to remember trying out a mouse like device in the 90's that moved the courser with thought. Whatever happened to those?

    --
    The game.
    1. Re:hmmm by lilo_booter · · Score: 1

      I seem to remember trying out a mouse like device in the 90's that moved the courser with thought. Whatever happened to those?

      Probably failed cos the marijuana required to use it is illegal in the majority of countries?

    2. Re:hmmm by Samgilljoy · · Score: 1

      I'm just guessing, but thought-controlled mice probably went away, when you graduated from college and stopped dropping all that acid.

      Just saying...

      :)

  38. Hershey Chocolate Mouse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm using a mouse right now that I thought would be a piece of junk but actually is quite nice. My Mom (age 82 - I'm NOT living in her basement) went on vacation and visited the chocolate factory in Hershey, PA and brought me back this. It's a standard 2-button mouse with the click/scroll wheel dressed in the Hershey colors of chocolate and silver, but the front half is clear and is filled with some sort of thickish clear liquid. Floating around in that is a miniature Hershey bar, a Kiss, and a Reese's Peanut Butter Cup. Works as well as any other mouse and is pleasant to look at. Hey, I could use a snack right about now.

  39. I have that one by nomorecwrd · · Score: 1

    Number 12...
    Actually is not mine.. is my cat's

  40. Tin foil hat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't know why you linked to that site, and it's better that way. But it has awful trustworthiness/reliability/privacy ratings, and many scam/click-fraud reports.
    I wouldn't touch it with a barge pole. Nor should anyone.

  41. Here I come to save the day by tepples · · Score: 1

    I think console systems would be improved if the right analog joystick on the controller was replaced with a trackball.

    But how big of a trackball? Look at how thin the Wii Classic Controller is. Wouldn't a trackball have to be as small as the trackball in the middle of an Apple Mighty Mouse in order to fit?

  42. Other weird mice by Ritchie70 · · Score: 1

    I don't have any idea what model it was, but a co-worker used to have a very small HP laptop with a mouse on a little arm that came out the right side of it.

    --
    The preferred solution is to not have a problem.
  43. DEC Station 3000 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Early 90's.

    School got a lot of DEC Stations 3000 to replace a whole bunch of Sun3 boxens.

    The mouse was about the same size as a CD, and maybe an inch thick. We called it the "puck".

    As all unix mice, it had 3 buttons.

    Positioned at 90 degree stride around the edge of the "puck".
    I.e. one button to the north of the puck, one button on the east and one button to the west.
    Obviously, since the mouse was slightly larger than a hockey puck, it meant that the buttons where spaced about 2 (perhaps 3) inches apart from eachother.

    If you take a pile of some 15 CDs then this would be a pretty good approximation of this monstrosity.

    For a normal human hand it was basically impossible to leave one finger on each mousebutton for more than a minute before you got severe cramps.

    In order to keep a finger on each button, your index finger and your ring finger had to point to 180 degrees different directions.
    Try make your index finger and ring finger point in completely opposite directions. You cant? It hurts? It hurts a lot? It sure did. What kind of deranged person would design a mouse like this?

    I always saw this as one of the earliest attempts to build hardware for the handicapped. This mouse was designed only for people with severe hand deformities.

    I so hated this mouse. I wanted nothing more than grab the cord, swing it around faster and faster and then smash it into the wall.
    I hated this mouse with a passion.

  44. Spot on! by Peter+(Professor)+Fo · · Score: 1

    Absolutely agree. Just watch people struggling with mice and you wonder how 99.9% of educated, wealthy people don't use trackballs as standard.

  45. That would have been a whole lot more interesting by imakemusic · · Score: 1

    ...if they had included the annotations. Most of them don't really make sense without knowing what (2) is.

    --
    Brain surgery - it's not rocket science!
  46. Ok I feel I must respond! by AbRASiON · · Score: 1

    I'm not going to format this so it's easy to read, I'm tired - so I'm getting straight to the point, I pray there's a billion to once chance a mouse manufacturer is listening.

    For high end fingertip gamers (google it) this is the best shaped mouse ever made.
    http://www2s.biglobe.ne.jp/~yav/comp/pc/mouse/ltmm3u.jpg
    Sadly, no wheel, not optical, old as hell (PS/2!)

    All the modern laser or optical mice for gamers are absoloutely and utterly ridiculously huge for fingertip grip gamers, they are far too large or oddly shaped, they are great for browsing, bad for gaming.
    I have just purchased this mouse for Warcraft 3 gaming and while it's good - it could do with a thumb button
    http://images.google.com/images?hl=en&safe=off&ei=F_17SqSJE4vq6APotOVf&sa=X&oi=spell&resnum=0&ct=result&cd=1&q=razer+salmosa&spell=1&start=0
    There always seems to be a fear of putting a lot of buttons on a small mouse, it's unfortunate - we don't all have giant hands.

  47. "Surfaceless" mouse by DynaSoar · · Score: 1

    I remember selling a few of a device that was a hand held mouse/game controller (for the Atari 400/800, VIC29 and C=64). It was more like a joystick without a base, just a handle with buttons on the top. Inside were mercury switches that detected when it was tilted.

    Since it had no tactile feedback nor accelerometer type detection for greater tilt, it wasn't long before the user started trying harder and harder to make it go faster (especially for games) by tilting it farther and farther, until they eventually (like 15 minutes eventually) turned it upside down and hosed the mercury switches.

    I thought it was a pretty cool idea. My employees thought it was a techno-turd. But we all agreed it was hilarious to load up a fast game, plug this thing in, and let a customer play with it. Within minutes they were twisting their arm like a pretzel and dancing around trying to get body language or position to add to the speed, while cussing the device (but refusing to give up).

    It really would have been a good hack except for one thing missing -- something to hold it while you typed. When you went two handed at the keyboard you had to lay it down, thereby positioning your cursor at one edge of the screen as well as ruining the merc switches.

    --
    "I may be synthetic, but I'm not stupid." -- Bishop 341-B
  48. You whore out your own website and spread... by RichiH · · Score: 4, Informative

    ...your "article" over 24 pages? Other submitters go to the trouble of linking a print page to spare us this crap and you link an ad-riddled pos like that on purpose? I don't say that often, but: fuck you.

    1. Re:You whore out your own website and spread... by mqduck · · Score: 1

      Other submitters go to the trouble of linking a print page

      Uhh... where?

      --
      Property is theft.
    2. Re:You whore out your own website and spread... by RichiH · · Score: 1

      Not everyone does it, but some do. I try to do the same when I submit stuff.

  49. The plural... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    of mouse is "mouses". Mice are the rodents that chew through your computer cables.

  50. YES! by Chris+Pimlott · · Score: 1

    Ah, the classic Mouseman 96. I loved that thing so much back in my Quake days. I used to collect them so I'd always have a spare, I still have one or two of them tucked away amidst my old PC stuff (although it's quite likely they've already been picked over and scavenged for replacement parts over the years). You could practically forget it was under your hand, it was perfectly shaped and effortless to move.

    They did make a USB version called the Wingman but I never tried it; you can still find PS/2 ports on a surprising number of PCs.

    1. Re:YES! by AbRASiON · · Score: 1

      Yeah but realistically, ball mice are dead - and no mousewheel or thumb button is absoloutely killer.
      Such a shame because it's such a slick mouse.

    2. Re:YES! by Chris+Pimlott · · Score: 1

      You're right; it's a shame they don't make it today, but it's hard to go back from laser mice and scroll wheels. Thumb button I could care less about, though; I always used ESDF instead of WASD so I had Q/A/Z available for convenient macros.

  51. 24 pages article by dominious · · Score: 1

    ZOMG! Let the paranoia spread on /.

  52. Not a different KIND of mouse,... by Yewbert · · Score: 1

    ... but my favorite mouse ever was just a branded plain-ol' two button, roller-ball mouse. Branded with the underrated 90's Nickelodeon cartoon character Cat-Dog. A Cat-Dog Mouse.

  53. Not just me then... by An0maly · · Score: 1

    Came to bitch about formatting and ads. Sent them some feedback in "Contact Us" to let them know they failed.

    --
    "...if you don't like your job, you don't strike. You just go in every day and do it really half-assed..." -Homer
  54. Mice are the used car of computers..... by kc0dby · · Score: 1

    I've done a bit of B2B work, and eventually, most of my really successful clients start looking into technology investments, and like all tech-related business, they bring me in. I would say that out of the last 100 products I've reviewed for clients, 98 of which required having my lawyer parse through lengthy NDAs, 95 were "input devices", 90 were "mouse replacement" input devices, and 75 have failed- 20 are waiting to fail, 4 are **LONG** shots, and 1 has actually turned a profit. I'm just glad I recommended against everything but the profitable one, with the exception of one extremely qualified recommendation on one of the long shots- (i.e. you have a 2% chance of getting your money back, but if you make it through that lottery, it'll be 200 times what you put in)

    Mice are like a gallon jug of milk. Everybody's got one, but they rarely stray from what they are used to when shopping, unless you can really blow somebody out of the water.

    --
    I apparently forgot that sig != uptime...
  55. I've actually seen the phone one! by supernova_hq · · Score: 1

    When I was shopping for the mouse I have now, I was in London Drugs and actually SAW the phone/mouse combo! It plugs into the usb port and comes with software so you can use it as a soft-phone.

    Doubt they sold many though :p

  56. The best mouse that you never had to clean by alerma · · Score: 1

    A mouse that did not make this story and was the very best mouse of all before there were optical ones was called The HP Wheel Mouse. This mouse from I believe 1990 had two nylon wheels, on its underside, mounted at a 45 degree angle,which where spring loaded, and each touched the pad or table at 90 degrees from the other. The HP wheel mouse was only available in RS-232, and it worked on anything, even upside down, and never got clogged up. Inside it used an optical encoder wheel... I was told that HP sold the patent, when I tried to buy more of them, and the best mouse that you never had to clean, which worked upside down and without a mouse pad disappeared,

    --
    I'd prefer to die speaking my mind that live fearing to speake The Internet is the liberty tree