Slashdot Mirror


Digsby IM Client Quietly Installs Badware

An anonymous reader writes "IM company Digsby has quietly included malware in an update to their client software that utilizes users' computing power and bandwidth while idle for a quick buck. When questioned, developers at Digsby claim that they have done no wrong and that users should not complain because the client software is 'free.'" The money-making distributed computing software is in addition to six "crapware" apps that users must refuse during installation. The terms of service that no one ever reads does describe the CPU- and bandwidth-robbing moneymaker, and its off switch is located behind the "Support Digsby" menu item.

46 of 259 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Nuisance of free software by Brian+Gordon · · Score: 4, Informative

    Again, Ubuntu didn't do anything wrong. They just changed the default "new tab" page from about:blank to the Ubuntu-themed Google search page that's already the default home page. They log usage of their web search service, like everyone else.

    Also paying for software doesn't protect you from crapware. Just because they have less incentive to include that stuff doesn't mean they don't.

  2. Re:Nuisance of free software by marc.andrysco · · Score: 3, Informative

    Did we already forget that Ubuntu also installed such and without consent [slashdot.org] (and Linux Mint) - here you atleast have the change to disallow installing it.

    As someone mentioned here, it's not alarming as you make it seem. It's only in the alpha version and not meant for the release version. Granted, I would have liked them to be a bit more forward about it, I'm not terribly upset.

  3. Re:Nuisance of free software by Darkness404 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    However, open source means that if enough people complain, someone is going to release a fork of it removing those "features", maintain compatibility for patches, and end up with a better product. For example, Chrome had some annoyances, for one its privacy was questionable at best and it had no adblocker, but since Chrome had an open source project (Chromium) developers were able to fork that and make SRWare Iron ( http://www.srware.net/en/software_srware_iron.php ) which removes these privacy issues and adds in an adblocker. Forks are a natural part of software development and occasionally are forked to prove a point to the often stubborn developers, after the fork gets popular usually the developer relents and adds in or removes the offending code and the fork ceases to exist.

    --
    Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
  4. Use Pidgin ... by Zen-Mind · · Score: 5, Informative

    The power of choice: change IM client. There are tons of free IM client, just change it to something else like Pidgin.

    1. Re:Use Pidgin ... by nametaken · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Agreed, and in the meantime, let them know why nobody is going to use their IM Client anymore.

      bugs@digsby.com

      http://forum.digsby.com/

    2. Re:Use Pidgin ... by spyrochaete · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you use Windows you should try Miranda. It's got a low footprint, it has all the great features you could wish for from an IM client (except video chat), and it's free. Plus it supports Jabber and Gtalk whereas the free version of Trlilian does not.

  5. Re:Nuisance of free software by MistrBlank · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Agreed, Digsby on the other hand is utilizing what should be idle horsepower. While this may seem innocuous since it is not being used by other stuff, it does not come without cost.

    I have a computer tuned to speedstep down and use less power when idled. That means I spend less money per month to run that system. Power costs money, so in effect, Digsby is costing you money by doing this. Granted this may only be a fraction of a cent, multiplied by a few people monthly...well I'm sure you all saw the movie.

    IT IS A BIG DEAL.

  6. Free or not... by netruner · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Free or not, hiding (or not mentioning it, or putting it in the .000001 point fine print, or burying it in a 100 page EULA - IOW: obscuring the truth) something that you know people will object to is deceptive, dishonest and wrong. You have to ask yourself, would people not install my "free" software if they knew what it was doing - if the answer is anywhere close to yes, you have a moral obligation to reveal the details.

    This is part of the bargain - if you give away something for "free" and advertise it as "free", it needs to be "free" - as in not just that the costs are hidden. Otherwise, it really is a Trojan Horse.

    Don't reap the goodwill of the public when you're secretly using them.

    --



    DISCLAIMER: This post was not checked for speling and grammar- if you complain- you're a whiner
    1. Re:Free or not... by TheRealMindChild · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Nice little rant that I completely agree with. But I honestly think this needs some legal power behind it. Not just for software either. I don't want anymore "Fat free" foods that aren't fat free. I don't want anymore "Free trials" that automatically sign me up for a pay service that I have to cancel. And I definitely don't want anymore "Buy one get one free" where the "free" ends up being a mail in rebate.

      --

      "When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade. Make life take the lemons back!" -- Cave Johnson
    2. Re:Free or not... by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 2, Funny

      I think they mean if you eat the product while in virtual reality, it is "fat free".

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    3. Re:Free or not... by nacturation · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You have to ask yourself, would people not install my "free" software if they knew what it was doing - if the answer is anywhere close to yes, you have a moral obligation to reveal the details.

      I take a bit of a different angle. From the T&C they post:

      "15. USAGE OF COMPUTER RESOURCES.
      You agree to permit the Software to use the processing power of your computer when it is idle to run downloaded algorithms (mathematical equations) and code within a process. You understand that when the Software uses your computer, it likewise uses your CPU, bandwidth, and electrical power. The Software will use your computer to solve distributed computing problems, such as but not limited to, accelerating medical research projects, analyzing the stock market, searching the web, and finding the largest known prime number. This functionality is completely optional and you may disable it at any time."

      Why not honestly promote this in a completely transparent way, and do it with some class? Something like:

      "We hope you enjoy this software, which you are receiving at no charge. In order to help us fund continued development we've partnered with a company that is making great strides in coming up with research into a number of medical conditions. You probably know someone who has a family member who has cancer/Parkinson's/Alzheimer's/whatever. By allowing calculations to run on your computer when it's not doing anything else, you can help put a stop to these diseases and find a cure. It's a win-win. Your computer is being used for good, and Digsby gets a penny now and then. It's our hope that if enough people participate, those pennies will add up and, besides, helping out is the right thing to do. Would you like to participate?"

      Appeal to their emotions, up-front and honestly, and I think you'll see voluntary adoption for things like this.

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
  7. FOSS, maybe? by k33l0r · · Score: 5, Informative

    Perhaps this is a good point in time to switch to Pidgin (multi-platform and my personal choice), Adium (Mac OS X), Empathy (Gnome), Kopete (KDE), or some other, more trustworthy client?

    1. Re:FOSS, maybe? by Sir_Lewk · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Kopete is a really terrible application that I could never suggest anybody use, unless they really hate the alternatives.

      --signed, a kopete user...

      --
      "linux is just DOS with a UNIX like syntax" -- Galactic Dominator (944134)
    2. Re:FOSS, maybe? by bitt3n · · Score: 3, Funny

      Why people never mention Miranda? It's probably the best free & open-source client for Windows, so much better than Pidgin.

      because anything you say via Miranda can and will be used against you in a court of law

    3. Re:FOSS, maybe? by Ambiguous+Puzuma · · Score: 2, Interesting

      As of a few months ago, kopete occasionally dropped messages silently (confirmed via other channels). I switched to pidgin and no longer had to restart the program each time a "still there?" question went unanswered.

      For webcam support on yahoo, gyachi works nearly flawlessly for me.

  8. Free competitors are equal or better than Digsby by spyrochaete · · Score: 3, Informative

    Why not use one of the many free competing IM clients?

    My favourite is Miranda (Windows only, free but not open source)) because it's incredibly lightweight, uses the default Windows UI, and has an incredibly active plugin community.

    Then there's Pidgin (multiplatform, free open source) which is also an excellent and mature IM which is also very extensible.

    No crapware whatsoever on these similar apps. Support the projects that contribute to the initiatives of free software with your downloads and your dollars. Snub the software that steals control of your computer for monetary gain.

  9. correction by spyrochaete · · Score: 3, Informative

    My mistake! I'm happy to state that Miranda is both free and open source!

  10. Re:You get what you pay for... and then some more. by Flea+of+Pain · · Score: 4, Funny

    free as in Willy

    --
    Do not argue with an idiot. He will drag you down to his level and beat you with experience.
  11. Re:Nuisance of free software by mcgrew · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If you've paid for your software, you can usually [expect] that they wont fuck you over with that crap

    So why are there ads in some PC games that cost over fifty bucks to buy?

  12. It Would Be A Bad Thing by DynaSoar · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ... if someone were to hack the malware. It would be very bad if they changed it so it downloaded copyrighted stuff, say whole CDs of recent music, to Digsby's machines, and then sent email to RIAA saying it's there. It would be a very, very bad thing indeed if this were then redistributed and thousands of unsuspecting people installed it and remained unsuspecting as the usually do, while it did its job then erased itself, because otherwise it would have been a Simply Awful very, very bad thing.

    --
    "I may be synthetic, but I'm not stupid." -- Bishop 341-B
  13. Due diligence by DaveV1.0 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Here's your problem:

    The terms of service that no one ever reads does describe the CPU- and bandwidth-robbing moneymaker

    In other words, they told you about it in documentation you agreed to and said your read but didn't. This sounds kind of familiar. I think it is because of all the people I have heard say "I didn't know that was in the contract. I signed it but didn't read it. You know, just like all those people with the "sub-prime" adjustable rate mortgages that ballooned after 2 years.

    It is called due diligence and everyone should practice it, not just lawyers and businesses.

    --
    There is no "-1 offended" or "-1 you don't agree with me" mod options for a reason.
    1. Re:Due diligence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      There is such a thing as a reasonable expectation of the program's functionality. You can't legally put "if you do 100mph for 10 minutes, then a hidden bomb in the tank explodes" in a car rental contract, and neither can you legally add unrelated stealth functions to a program just because you said so in the ToS.

    2. Re:Due diligence by umrain · · Score: 2, Informative

      Existing users who recieved automatic updates never recieved an updated EULA or any kind of notice of this addition and it was not even mentioned in the changelog.

    3. Re:Due diligence by The+Moof · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Maybe. If the contract is intentionally written in such a way that no layman can understand it and it's designed to take advantage of you, there is a valid argument against the company (IANAL, but people keep telling me this is true).

      And, as one person who replied to you also pointed out, if this was done via an automatic update without you clicking through to agree with a new EULA stating this, they're in trouble.

    4. Re:Due diligence by Belial6 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Calling due diligence is like complaining about spelling. At the end of the day you just end up being a hypocrite. There is no way that any person can fully read every contract, warning, recall, EULA, instruction manual, etc.. There simply isn't enough time in the day to accomplish this and still function in society. So, what intelligent people do is make the best guess they can as to what has the greatest risk, and read those. This software is a perfect example of something that doesn't cause great harm, so it would have been a bad idea for most people to spend hours reading the TOS when they installed it, and re-read it every time they loaded the software to make sure the TOS didn't change. That doesn't mean that they shouldn't get up in arms about bad behaviour. It doesn't mean that they shouldn't feel that the company behaved unethically. It doesn't mean that they shouldn't complain as loudly and frequently as they feel the ethical infraction warrants. Just because something isn't technically illegal doesn't mean that it isn't unethical or harmful.

      As for the sub-prime adjustable rate mortgages that ballooned after 2 years... The number of people that didn't know EXACTLY what they were getting is so small as to be irrelevant. People getting sub-prime ARMs just let greed get in their way and made the stupid prediction that housing prices would always increase dramatically faster than inflation. Of course some people got 3 of them, and when the short term housing price increase happened, they massively mortgaged two of them, put the money into the third, and when prices dropped, they cried that they didn't understand as they walked away from the two massively mortgaged houses with the third being free.

  14. Badware? by RaceProUK · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I know in computing it's fashionable to make up words, but badware? That's just crap. Besides, there's already a suitable word: malware.

    --
    No colour or religion ever stopped the bullet from a gun
    1. Re:Badware? by Ankur+Dave · · Score: 2, Interesting

      While I agree with you that making up words is annoying, badware is different from malware: http://stopbadware.org/home/badware

      It's a broader term that includes adware as well as directly malicious software. I don't think malware has the same scope.

  15. N ot free by zzyzyx · · Score: 2, Informative

    It's not free if it costs you electricity to run the CPU at full power 24/7. All modern processors have idle states in which they reduce energy consumption. These are not just "wasted cycles" that could be put to some use anyway.
    A large amount of people also have metered bandwidth connections which might get impacted by this.

    1. Re:N ot free by nedlohs · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Laptop users also get less battery life.

  16. users should not complain by Culture20 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    users should not complain because the client software is 'free.'

    A malware spreader saying this is like a person who knowingly spreads HIV saying his victims shouldn't complain because they got sex for free. I was going to say "rapist" but digsby doesn't install via drive-by download.

    1. Re:users should not complain by Culture20 · · Score: 2

      I was going to say "rapist" but digsby doesn't install via drive-by download.

      Apparently, it installed via auto-update with no warning for those who already had it. Is that close enough for you?

      Good call. Date Rape! Date Rape!

  17. Re:Nuisance of free software by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Unfortunately, paying for software protects you from "that crap" to roughly the same degree that paying for cable protects you from ads, or paying for DVDs protects you from involuntary trailers...

  18. The FTC by earnest+murderer · · Score: 2

    The FTC gets around to doing something about it when a Senator falls victim to it.

    Since the state and federal computers are fairly tightly controlled, and most of their "computing" is done by interns, don't expect much to happen for a while. Unless a lot of people make a lot of noise.

    Cynical yes, but not exactly a rare circumstance.

    --
    Platform advocacy is like choosing a favorite severely developmentally disabled child.
  19. Re:Nuisance of free software by Sir_Lewk · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Bullshit, they'd cost the same as they ever did except they figured out they could add ads for just about nothing and increase their profit margins even more.

    If you really believe that in-game advertisements subsidize the cost of games then you really are ignorant.

    --
    "linux is just DOS with a UNIX like syntax" -- Galactic Dominator (944134)
  20. Re:What is the point of this program anyway? by Mean+Variance · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Aren't there about for zillion great free IM applications out there already? Why would someone use this one? What is the specific draw?

    I used it to combine my Yahoo IM and Twitter feeds (yes, I follow certain people/things in Twitter). Also, it notified me about emails. Alas, I speak of it in the past tense. It was a nice program, but I was always a little leery about whether Digsby was doing something I didn't like. I noticed on IE, which I rarely use, that the search said "Google Search powered by Digsby." I knew that meant I missed a checkbox during the annoying install process.

    I uninstalled using Revo. The Digsby uninstaller left a bunch of crap leftover. I've tried different IM clients and I still end up back at Yahoo's default IM with its flaws. For Twitter feeds, I have moved to Thwirl which uses Adobe AIR. I'm not sure if AIR has any negative issues yet. For email notifications, I've fallen back to Gmail Manager as a Firefox add-on.

    I'm one of those who likes to try the next popular shiny object, e.g. Digsby, but I often fall back to some old reliable source.

  21. LOL! by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 5, Funny

    users should not complain because the client software is 'free.'

    Oh, I'd love to kick that guy in the nads and when he says "Dude! What up?" I'll say "Shut up! It was free!" and then he'd be all weepy like and I'd be all laughin' up in his face. Yeah, good times.

  22. fyi by BattleApple · · Score: 3, Informative
    http://forum.digsby.com/viewtopic.php?id=4708
    From steve: digsby developer

    @All: This issue will be addressed first thing in the morning. As for performance, the functionality has actually been off this entire time. It is in the TOS because it was planned for the future and Digsby has not been using your CPU/Bandwidth when idle so if you have had performance issues it is not Digsby related.

  23. Old news by TheHawke · · Score: 4, Informative

    This started up back in December of last year according to the forum posts. To top it off, Steve the administrator, shut off the research module since then. Why the stir now? Plura is the one that needs to be hammered that provided the software for this.

    --
    First rule of holes; When in one, stop digging.
  24. Re:Nuisance of free software by qoncept · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Unless you've done the market research, studied the budgets of the developers, guaged the economy, researched the public willingness to buy games that have ads, and considered inflation and any number of other factors, your opinion is worth about as much as anyone else's. Acting like it's so blatantly obvious that your opinion is better than his doesn't put you in a very good light.

    --
    Whale
  25. Re:Nuisance of free software by sabt-pestnu · · Score: 2, Funny

    > Power costs money

    Knowledge is power.

    I KNOW how you can save money...

  26. Re:Nuisance of free software by NeverVotedBush · · Score: 2, Interesting

    For me it's about a $30-$40/month bump when I run BOINC. Granted it is on multiple computers but that also includes the extra air conditioning to keep the place cool. At least during the winter they all act like heaters - something I would be doing anyway.

  27. Re:Better This Than Ads by twidarkling · · Score: 2, Informative

    Except it wasn't transparent until they got called on it. It's #15 in the TOS. The way to opt-out was to go to "Help" then click on "Support Digsby" then find it in the list of 12 or so options.

    If this had been an "opt-in" via check-box, similar to the crapware with the installer, I wouldn't be searching for a new multi-client IM program now.

    --
    Canada: The US's more awesome sibling.
  28. Am I missing something? by dummptyhummpty · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm not sure what the issue is. When I opened Digsby today, it updated and with in a few mins it displayed a message directing me to a FAQ. It clearly tells you how to disable the feature if you don't want it.

  29. Re:Terms of Service by bluesatin · · Score: 4, Insightful

    How many people do you know that actually ready the TOS before they purchase the product?

    How many products do you know, that have a TOS you can read before purchasing?

  30. They were caught doing this before... Nothing new. by Jackie_Chan_Fan · · Score: 2, Insightful

    They were caught doing this before, so much that users made a big stink on their forums and they had to respond with a public statement. Apparently they havent learned their lesson.

    Then again its probably the only way they can stay in business so they'll do whatever it takes to make some money.

    Either way... I dont care. I dont use the software. I did install it recently while looking for an alternative to pidgin.... I now regret that greatly.

  31. Re:Nuisance of free software by Gandalf_Greyhame · · Score: 2, Funny

    Knowledge = Power
    Time = Money

    Substitute into the equation "Power = Work/Time":
    Knowledge = Work/Money

    Rearrange:
    Money = Work/Knowledge

    Therefore as
    Knowledge --> 0
    Money --> Infinite
    Regardless of the amount of work done

    --
    I am not stubborn. I am right!