Slashdot Mirror


SA's Largest Telecomms Provider vs. a Pigeon

dagwud writes "Just a few days after this Slashdot article, South Africa's largest telecoms provider, Telkom (which has been taking flak for years for its shoddy and overpriced service), is being pitted against a homing pigeon to see which can deliver 4GB of call centre data logs quickest over a distance of around 80km (50 miles). According to the official website, the race is set to take place September 10."

31 of 149 comments (clear)

  1. The question is... by UncHellMatt · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...African or European?

    1. Re:The question is... by Yvan256 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Soldier #1: Oh, yeah, an African swallow maybe, but not a European swallow. That's my point.
      Soldier #2: Oh, yeah, I agree with that.
      Soldier #1: But then of course African swallows are non-migratory.
      Soldier #2: Oh, yeah...
      Soldier #1: So, they couldn't bring 4GB of call centre data logs anyway...

    2. Re:The question is... by LaminatorX · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I would assume African, given the locale.

  2. Homers rule! by certain+death · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I wonder if they will be using an RFC compliant pigeon... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IP_over_Avian_Carriers

    --
    "My immediate reaction is "WTF? What kind of moron doesn't make things 64-bit safe to begin with?" Linus
    1. Re:Homers rule! by Aim+Here · · Score: 2, Insightful

      From TFA:

      Anyway I read a Aprils fools white paper about Avian carrier networks a couple of years ago. Basically it is a protocol that uses racing pigeons as a network layer.

      So in all probabilities, yes, it's an RFC1149 compliant pigeon.

  3. To paraphrase Andrew Tanenbaum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Never underestimate the bandwidth of a station wagon full of pigoens hurtling down the highway.

  4. So that explains by jcochran · · Score: 2, Funny

    the order for a large shipment of Ospreys, peregrines, and other raptors to South Africa.......

  5. Doesn't mention their monopoly by LordAndrewSama · · Score: 3, Informative

    South Africa's largest telecoms provider, Telkom (which has been taking flak for years for its shoddy and overpriced service)

    It should be mentioned that they have a monopoly on landlines and that's why they're still the largest despite all the flak. 39% state owned, and ICASA(south africa's communications regulator) is practically telkoms bitch.

    1. Re:Doesn't mention their monopoly by JavaBear · · Score: 2, Interesting

      They should have tested this on the Comrades Marathon 2009 (89km), giving one of the runners the memory stick, and see him/her finish before the 4GB download completes at the finish line.

  6. Real time of sneaker net by Anonymous+Cowar · · Score: 2, Insightful

    will they be counting the time it takes to get the data from the computer, put it on the 4gb media, strap it to the bird, send it off, retrieve it, and load it onto the end computer or will they just do a door-to-door race?

    RTFA? ME? Do you know what site you're reading?

    1. Re:Real time of sneaker net by AndGodSed · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well the "get the data to the pigeon" is probably a moot point since you can release the pigeon from right next to the laptop where you will be sending the data from. Also you can start the send the moment you start uploading the data to a memory drive. 4gb should not take that long to load onto a newish flash disk...

      And then the pigeon will probably land next to the laptop receiving the data.

      And, come to think of it, who says the data via pigeon needs to be computer to computer? If a sysadmin receives it, it is received no?

      Whatever, I root for the pigeon.

  7. Not a fair competition... by JavaBear · · Score: 2, Funny

    Knowing Telkom, this is not a fair competition at all. The Pigeon have an unfair advantage of being faster, and not having the 3GB bandwidth cap that is (were 2 years ago) the norm on Telkom's ADSL accounts.
    And I know I mentioned the information was 2 years old, but when talking about SA Telcom, that makes the it practically fully up to date

  8. Get ready to be... by dreemernj · · Score: 3, Funny

    pigeowned.

    --
    1 (short ton / firkin) = 89.1432354 slugs / keg
  9. My money is on the pigeon by wvmarle · · Score: 3, Informative
    In their trial run, the pigeon took 48 mins to transfer 4 GB of data. That is a sustained 12 Mb. Quite a decent speed, even for a 80-km link that they are renting for roughly USD 6000 per month.

    The show-down is set for tomorrow (Wed 9 Sep) so we even don't have to wait long for the final results!

  10. here in the US by i.r.id10t · · Score: 2, Funny

    They should do it here in the US - dove season just opened in many states. Sure, you'll have a lot of packet loss, but the ones that make it thru will be going really really FAST

    --
    Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos
  11. Re: Old News by JavaBear · · Score: 3, Funny

    As someone else mentioned, it would be RAIP, not RAID
    RAIP: Redundant Array of Independent Pigeons.

  12. Re:Telkom play fair? by wvmarle · · Score: 3, Informative

    RTFA: they had a trial (pigeon won), got in the news, quickly got a call from the telco's rep to get their circuit number so telco could make sure they had good service. Fair? Well not as long as telco is not giving them more bandwidth than they are supposed to have... in which case telco is just doing their job (which they are obviously not doing now). The best part of the article is the implicit suggestion to switch from ADSL to pigeons: the blogger claims they would save more than 80% cost compared to the existing line, or about USD 4600 per month savings.

  13. Not practical by d-r0ck · · Score: 2, Funny

    The carrier pigeon is not a practical replacement for a high speed link. For one the latency is quite high compared to DSL. Also it may be less secure since it is using a wireless solution.

    1. Re:Not practical by Chatsubo · · Score: 3, Funny

      So now you won't using ethereal to sniff packets. But a shotgun.

      --
      > no, yes, maybe (tagging beta)
  14. Re:Bandwidth? by gclef · · Score: 4, Funny

    No, but they were allowed to assume a spherical truck.

  15. HP's CPIP in the 80's by woboyle · · Score: 4, Interesting

    In the 70's and 80's, HP in Cupertino used to send engineering drawings (as microfich) to a facility near Santa Cruz, on the other side of the Santa Cruz mountains using carrier pigeons. It was faster and more reliable than using motorcycle courier, and in those days the Darpa-Net wasn't fast enough for the purpose. CPIP - Carrier Pigeon Internet Protocol - good bandwidth, not so good latency, though a packet ACK is easily accomplished with a phone call... :-)

    --
    Sometimes, real fast is almost as good as real-time.
  16. They're not that bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I've been a customer for years, and I haven't noticed any problems. (Oh, and first post BTW.)

  17. The Pigeon Cannot Win... by manoova · · Score: 2, Insightful

    No doubt Telkom will dig up some arcane legislation whereby it is illegal to pit a pigeon against this heavily state-funded telecoms provider. Further, the people organising this will be served legal papers from ICASA ordering them to cease their operations immediately. After many years of lawsuits (and counter-lawsuits) it will be deemed that the organisers do actually have a right to strap USB sticks to pigeons but by that time Telekom will have bred flocks of the creatures thereby preventing any meaningful and productive competition.

  18. A new meaning to the expression.. by mike_slashing · · Score: 2, Funny

    Hope the pigeon wins, but this really does gives a new meaning to the expression 'dropped packet'...

  19. Re:Bandwidth? by natehoy · · Score: 2, Funny

    Given the fact that this sort of question usually results in two trains colliding, I'd say no. :)

    Otherwise, you'd have to add any number of considerations, such as how much of the road was under construction, whether the driver encountered bad chili at a truck stop that necessitated a lot more stops shortly thereafter, and how bumpy the road was (one good solid pothole and you can consider the need for a "resend" request for at least some of the data!)

    --
    "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
  20. Reminds me of the quote... by mrops · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Don't underestimate the throughput of a wagon full of data tapes speeding down a freeway.

    1. Re:Reminds me of the quote... by MrNaz · · Score: 2, Funny

      If it's a South African freeway, you'll have to factor in some serious packet loss due to carjackings.

      Disclaimer: I'm from South Africa.

      --
      I hate printers.
  21. Re:Bandwidth? by jcochran · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I doubt it. But assuming current technology, the 18 wheeler wins hands down easily. I'll use Seagate Barracuda 1TB drive as my baseline. Looking at it's size and weight, it turns out that the weight is the main limiting factor. Without special permits, a semi-tractor trailer is limited to 80,000 lbs gross weight. Assuming 50,000 lbs is actually usable for cargo, then at 1.371 lbs per drive, the truck can carry 36,500 drives. The volume that many drives is far less than the volume of a 28 ft trailer. So we're talking a single truck load of drives is about 36.5 petabytes.

    Now how long would that take to transmit at T1 speeds? 1544000 bits per second = 193,000 bytes per second (yes, I'm ignoring any framing or overhead. Shame on me). Doing the math, I get a transmission time of almost 5993 years.

    With that amount of time, I'll assume the truck can travel cross country in 3 days. But to be generous, I'll give it a week. I'll assume assume the handling time for the hard drives is the same at both ends. So in order for the truck to be faster, I have to handle 36,500 hard drives in a total time of less than 2996 years at each end. So I have a budgeted time of only 29.98 days per hard drive at each end.

    Somehow, I suspect it would take a lot less time than that.......

  22. Re:Bandwidth? by Twylite · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Not relevant. The truck wins.

    Let's make some conservative assumptions:

    • The distance from New York to San Francisco is 3,000 miles (Google Maps says 2,905).
    • The truck can only manage an average of 18 mph.
    • The truck driver is unionized and will only drive for 8 hours a day (he'll drive weekends for overtime pay though).
    • Loading takes a day (8 hours) and the truck leaves the following morning; unloading takes a day. If the truck is over half-full we will add an additional day each for loading and unloading, just to be sure.
    • Each hard drive is 40 GiB and individually packaged in protective foam, totalling 30cm x 20cm x 6cm in size.
    • All rounding and all interpretation of SI prefixes favours the T1.
    • After unloading the HDDs must be manually plugged in (1 hour overhead per drive) and transferred at 10MB/sec.

    Time on the road is 166.667 hours or 20.833 days at 8 hours per day, which we'll round up to 21. Add a day each for loading and unloading and we're at 23 days.

    In the same 23 days the T1 is busy for 3600 seconds an hour, 24 hours a day. That's a total of 1987200 seconds at 1.544 Mbps (202375 B/s), or 402159.6 million bytes, or just under 403 Gigabytes.

    To beat the T1, the truck needs to carry 11 hard drives. They will fit comfortably on the passanger seat.

    Each HDD will take 1.2 hours to download, plus 1 hour overhead for connecting and disconnecting. That's 24.2 hours total but the IT monkey only works 8 hours a day so it's going to take 4 days to transfer onto the servers (damn that 0.2 ...).

    During those 4 extra days the T1 is still busy and gets another 69.94 Gigabytes. Looks like we'll actually have to pack _12_ drives into the truck for a total of 480 Gb, beating the T1's 473 Gb over the same period (27 days).

    Less conservative assumption: using a 320Gb external USB drive and a motor cycle at 50mph (8 hours per day) you'll make the trip in 8 days, more than doubling the T1's bandwidth.

    --
    i-name =twylite [http://public.xdi.org/=twylite], see idcommons.net
  23. Re:Lunch... by wvmarle · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Yes fried pigeon is quite yummy. Unfortunately since a serious bird flue outbreak a few years ago all over Mainland they tripled in price so we don't eat pigeon so often any more, maybe a few times a year, down from twice a month at least. They haven't come down in price really. You can still get them fresh in the market as well (the vendor will kill and pluck the pigeon for you). I live in Hong Kong, for the record.

  24. Re:Lunch... by FireFury03 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Yes fried pigeon is quite yummy. Unfortunately since a serious bird flue outbreak a few years ago all over Mainland they tripled in price so we don't eat pigeon so often any more, maybe a few times a year, down from twice a month at least. They haven't come down in price really. You can still get them fresh in the market as well (the vendor will kill and pluck the pigeon for you). I live in Hong Kong, for the record.

    And you have to remember to remove the SD cards from the pigeon before chucking it in the pan.