Slashdot Mirror


Early Details On Courier, Microsoft's Take On a Tablet

rbanffy points out an article on Gizmodo about Courier, a tablet (or more accurately, a booklet) in development at Microsoft. "The dual 7-inch (or so) screens are multitouch, and designed for writing, flicking and drawing with a stylus, in addition to fingers. They're connected by a hinge that holds a single iPhone-esque home button. Statuses, like wireless signal and battery life, are displayed along the rim of one of the screens. On the back cover is a camera, and it might charge through an inductive pad, like the Palm Touchstone charging dock for Pre." A concept video shows off the ability to use the two different screens for separate purposes, like browsing the web or a photo album on the left and using the right as a notepad or workspace.

175 comments

  1. Looks like a nice device by sopssa · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Courier actually does look really nice. I have been thinking of buying a eBook reader, but the fact this has dual screen with multitouch makes me want to wait for this one, and that it can act as a tablet too. It makes it a lot more book like which you can see from the pictures too.

    Besides eBook reader this would be a nice device to browse the web or do some work in the bed or sofa.

    And I'm suprised to say this but compared to Apple's tablet this will probably be more open (in the not-restricted-to-apples-store way) and have a Windows platform. I hope they reveal more details soon.

    1. Re:Looks like a nice device by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This looks vaguely like the OLPC, no?

    2. Re:Looks like a nice device by manekineko2 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      To me this thing is in a completely different category from eBook readers.

      What you're really paying for on eBook readers and the real benefit is an e-ink display, which this most certainly does not have unless Microsoft has made some technological breakthroughs they're not sharing. If you get an eBook reader that uses regular LCDs you're right back in the realm of trying to read a book that's printed on top of a lightbulb that's switched on, with the accompanying battery requirements of powering said lightbulb.

    3. Re:Looks like a nice device by Raumkraut · · Score: 4, Informative

      The XO-2, most definitely: http://wiki.laptop.org/go/XO-2
      Asus are also working on something with a similar form-factor, last I heard.

      It's almost like companies noticed that the original XO laptop spawned the whole netbook craze, and decided they wanted to be in on OLPC's next big idea.

    4. Re:Looks like a nice device by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yep. Anyone who likes a device and can think of why they'd like it is obviously a plant.

    5. Re:Looks like a nice device by schnikies79 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It still has a backlit screen. I have yet to be able to read any ebooks on lcd or any other backlist screen. I've tried on my desktop, my netbook and my iphone.

      At this point, it's e-ink for ebooks or nothing.

      --
      Gone!
    6. Re:Looks like a nice device by sopssa · · Score: 1

      I guess it depends on how you use it too. Myself I probably have little use to carry it around, so I would mostly be using it in a bed to read something or surf the web and so on. This probably dont have the same battery requirements as normal laptops, so the battery life would still be many hours.

      The added advantage is that its not just eBook reader, but you can do a lot more with it. Personally I dont like using laptop in bed, its too clumsy or you cant get yourself in good position. If this is more book like, it works better.

    7. Re:Looks like a nice device by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It still has a backlit screen. I have yet to be able to read any ebooks on lcd or any other backlist screen. I've tried on my desktop, my netbook and my iphone.

      At this point, it's e-ink for ebooks or nothing.


      Yep. Only e-ink for me for future readers. What's funny is that the only people that I know who have bad things to say about ebook readers are those who don't actually read. For some reason, they seem the most opposed to this change, yet they're the ones who won't be affected by it in any way (sort of like the hyper-religious and gay marriage). Everyone else seems at least interested, and when they see how you can use an e-ink device in full sunlight, they're pretty much convinced that's the way to go. That's not to say that other devices won't work for casual reading (iThings, netbooks, this thing, etc), but as far as truly dedicated reading devices go, e-ink has a HUGE advantage.

    8. Re:Looks like a nice device by halfloaded · · Score: 1

      Just wait til they release their Times New Roman eBook reader.

    9. Re:Looks like a nice device by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For the lazy ones who dont RTFA here are the images:

      [img]http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_courier8.jpg[/img]
      [img]http://cache-foo-08.gawkerassets.com/gawker/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_courier1_01.jpg[/img]
      [img]http://cache-foo-06.gawkerassets.com/gawker/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_courier3_01.jpg[/img]
      [img]http://cache-foo-09.gawkerassets.com/gawker/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_courier0_01.jpg[/img]
      [img]http://cache-foo-01.gawkerassets.com/gawker/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_courier5_01.jpg[/img]
      [img]http://cache-foo-04.gawkerassets.com/gawker/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_courier4.jpg[/img]
      [img]http://cache-foo-07.gawkerassets.com/gawker/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_courier2.jpg[/img]
      [img]http://cache-foo-10.gawkerassets.com/gawker/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_courier6.jpg[/img]
      [img]http://cache-foo-02.gawkerassets.com/gawker/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_courier7.jpg[/img]

    10. Re:Looks like a nice device by wvmarle · · Score: 2, Interesting

      on eBook readers [...] the real benefit is an e-ink display, which this most certainly does not have unless Microsoft has made some technological breakthroughs they're not sharing.

      I'd say they for sure do not have such a tech. MS doesn't develop hardware, they are primarily a software company that is also putting together hardware devices. They do not develop hardware tech really - they use off-the-shelf (a PC with nice case = XBOX) tech and use that to build their stuff. That is not meant negatively; Apple is doing much of the same, just a bit more successful. It's like playing with legos, the creativity is in how you put the parts together.

    11. Re:Looks like a nice device by Old97 · · Score: 0

      And I'm suprised to say this but compared to Apple's tablet this will probably be more open (in the not-restricted-to-apples-store way) and have a Windows platform. I hope they reveal more details soon.

      What an interesting conclusion especially since it is completely contrary to the current state. In the hand held computer market Apple encourages anyone and everyone to write applications for the iPod Touch and iPhone. Their only restrictions are related to digital signing (a reasonable restriction) and the use of the App store (a less reasonable restriction). By contrast Microsoft won't allow any 3rd party applications for their new Zune (their iPod Touch competitor) except from a few select partners.

      In the personal computer market both Apple and Microsoft encourage any and all developers to write applications for their respective platforms. Apple's platform includes far more open source pieces than Microsoft's. For example, Mac OS X is built on BSD and Safari on Webkit and Apple makes considerable contributions to the open source community. Microsoft, not so much.

      So what evidence led you to your conclusion?

      --
      Very often, people confuse simple with simplistic. The nuance is lost on most. - Clement Mok
    12. Re:Looks like a nice device by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What does an eBook have over say a real book. I read quite often and really the cost and limited benifits (I really don't read more than 2 books at once) of multiple books don't justify an electronic device.

      When you start talking magazines, and newspapers I'll start talking formatting problems on a smaller screen and you won't get any where.

      All you do is pay $200+ to have all your books with you at all times (as long as Amazon doesn't take them back one night) and for what?

      Not to mention that you eBook device won't last more than 4 years.

    13. Re:Looks like a nice device by Golias · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Perhaps not, but I find it hard to fathom why anybody would want a 7-inch tablet from ANY company.

      There are situations where I don't mind carrying a book-sized gadget around. In those situations, a small laptop is FAR superior in almost every way.

      There are situations where I would rather not carry a book-sized gadget around. In those situations, an iPhone or Blackberry slips in your pocket and can do pretty much everything a tablet can do (and then some).

      Tablets & eBooks are neither fish nor foul. Too big for a pocket or purse, but very limited compared to laptops or even netbooks.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    14. Re:Looks like a nice device by Golias · · Score: 5, Funny

      I would mostly be using it in a bed to read something or surf the web and so on.

      You can just come out and say that you want it for porn. It's okay.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    15. Re:Looks like a nice device by jim_v2000 · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      No one cares if you understand why someone else would want something. Thanks.

      --
      Don't take life so seriously. No one makes it out alive.
    16. Re:Looks like a nice device by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget battery life though. On eBook readers you're looking at life measured in days, not hours. Not likely with two back-lit screens - not without a heavy battery that will make single-hand-holding impossible, another perk (esp. for commuters) of eBooks.

      "Full disclosure" for the haters: I own a netbook instead of an eBook but I'm thinking of switching for the above reasons.

    17. Re:Looks like a nice device by Golias · · Score: 2, Funny

      You apparently cared enough to reply. Just not enough to explain.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    18. Re:Looks like a nice device by Bat+Country · · Score: 2, Informative

      If you turn the brightness all the way down then read on a tight format black on white (like Microsoft Reader's default format) with a good print font (not a screen font) in a room that's comfortably lit, it's really no different from reading from a printed page. The light levels are identical and the contrast is just as good as reading a low quality paperback. I read on my laptop that way and have for years. It's quite comfortable, as soon as you figure out how to hold the laptop for maximum relaxation (actually less effort than reading a hardback book).

      I keep seeing people on Slashdot complain about how intensely bright the screen is and how it's just terrible. Has it not occurred to anybody to turn down the backlight and then read in a well-lit room (which you should be doing if you're reading anyway?)

      I can't read outdoors on a sunny day either because of the intensity of the light reflecting from the page, why should I expect to be able to comfortably read from a screen without turning the backlight down to minimum?

      --
      The land shall stone them with the bread of his son.
    19. Re:Looks like a nice device by cnvandev · · Score: 1

      I saw it and immediately though Hitchhiker's Guide (the version from the movie). How long do you think it'll be before someone programs one for it, probably based off of Wikipedia?

    20. Re:Looks like a nice device by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was also surprised the Microsoft's tablet would use the Windows platform.

    21. Re:Looks like a nice device by ozmanjusri · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Anyone who likes a device and can think of why they'd like it is obviously a plant.

      In this case. it's pretty likely.

      Anyone who's been around long enough will see this footage has all the signs of a typical Microsoft marketing puff piece.

      Check out this video. See any similarities? Can you tell us what happened to the innovative product being marketed? Do you remember Origami? Natal? Surface?

      Microsoft operating systems are too bloated and slow to make an interface like this work, it's just another attempt to convince shareholders that their research money isn't being wasted.

      Ignore it. Nothing of value will come of it.

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    22. Re:Looks like a nice device by larry+bagina · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Ladies love my 7-inch tablet. Whip out your 3-inch smart phone and they'll just laugh at your equipment. A 11-inch netbook? Sure, it looks good in the movies, but even size queens get a little scared at that size. And forget about anal!

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    23. Re:Looks like a nice device by lysergic.acid · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's hard to fathom that there may be a product out there that doesn't fit your personal preferences?

      I have no use for a smartphone personally. But I'm not going to be so presumptuous as to say that there's no place for such devices. I mean, it's neither a cellphone nor a laptop, but that has no bearing on the utility of such a device. Every new category of products exists to cater to a previously unfilled niche. It was the same with netbooks. And just as now, there were shortsighted/close-minded individuals who dismissed the device for not fitting into one extreme or another (palm pilot/organizer and laptop).

      I mean, what is so difficult to grasp about the reasoning that: since there are people who have uses for screens sizes 4" and less as well as those that measure over 9", there might also be a market for screens in between those ranges? If there are people who enjoy reading books on a tiny cellphone screen, then why not a device with a larger screen that is still portable? Frankly, 7" diagonal is about the size of a small netbook. That can easily fit into a purse or any of the pouches or pockets on a standard backpack. Heck, that's smaller than a small paperback novel that can easily fit in the side pockets of most of my pants.

      Your skewed sense of proportions aside, the functionality of a tablet/ebook is geared towards different applications from a netbook or laptop. Sure, you can read ebooks on a similar-sized netbook, but an ebook reader would benefit far more from dual screens than a keyboard. Likewise, there are people who require tablet functionality and not the extra features that come with a netbook. Some people might prefer taking hand-written notes or being able to highlight passages in books they're reading. A laptop that weighs much more, is far less portable, has a shorter battery life, costs more, and is inferior for what you need it for just doesn't make sense.

      Step outside of that solipsistic head space once in a while.

    24. Re:Looks like a nice device by Abreu · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Devices with LCD screens are still way cheaper and easier to read on than those darkgrey-on-lightgrey, expensive and slow e-ink displays.

      (unless of course, some breakthrough improvements have appeared and no one told me)

      --
      No sig for the moment.
    25. Re:Looks like a nice device by mobets · · Score: 1

      That would be a few years ago when Amazon released the Kindle. It has a built in WLAN adaptor and unlimted access to Wikipedia. Access to http://www.bbc.co.uk/dna/h2g2/ might be more apropriate, but Wikipedia is close.

      --

      It was me, I did it, I moved your cheese
    26. Re:Looks like a nice device by mobets · · Score: 2

      Funny how you neglected to mention Windows Mobile phones. Anyone with a copy of Visual Studio can write apps for them. No signature or app store required.

      --

      It was me, I did it, I moved your cheese
    27. Re:Looks like a nice device by amplt1337 · · Score: 1

      the only people that I know who have bad things to say about ebook readers are those who don't actually read.

      Then allow me to shake your world.
      I'm a reader. I've read around twenty-five books so far this year (and some of them should probably count double, since they were Robert Jordan (embarrassed cough)).
      I am not a fan of ebooks, principally because paper is such a wonderful interface. You can make notes on it. You can skim through it easily. It has a great feeling of weight in the hand. You can put stickies on it. You can find an interesting passage by remembering where on the page it was located, what the surrounding text looked like. You can reread a book and find little food stains or stray marks and remember the exact circumstances under which you were reading it the first time through (rereading books is actually a pretty profound way to recall your real life).
      Plus, no one will ever be able to surreptitiously delete your paper copy of 1984.

      I know these don't seem like terribly compelling arguments -- they're about emotional quality and reading experience, not rationality. And I know that there's some real pluses for e-readers too, mostly in the area of portability and storage, and if I had an e-reader and had an accompanying e-book for every real book I have, I'd probably take the e-copies with me if I went on a trip... etc. But I just like real books, and I don't think an e-reader will replace them for me any time soon.

      Add to which that ebooks are typically sold at hardcover prices. Screw that. If I'm paying hardcover money, I want a nice-quality book I can keep forever. Ebooks need to be sold at mass-market prices to be worthwhile; but they won't be, because most of the cost in putting out a book come from editing and marketing (which, naysayers aside, is actually really important). So, frankly, I don't see ebooks going anywhere for a while (short of as a lower-barrier-to-entry form of samizdat, which would be a good thing).

      --
      Freedom isn't free; its price is the well-being of others.
    28. Re:Looks like a nice device by Abreu · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The ability to use an e-ink device in the sunlight does not change the fact that when it comes to reading indoors (or in public transportation, etc) a regular LCD usually blows it out of the water when it comes to readability, price and speed.

      IMHO, the most critical aspect of E-ink that needs to be improved is the on-screen contrast (the current "grey-on-grey" screens are nearly unusable on regular indoors light)

      --
      No sig for the moment.
    29. Re:Looks like a nice device by hey · · Score: 1

      It would be cool if one side was e-ink and the other was regular (LCD?).

    30. Re:Looks like a nice device by Old97 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Who uses Windows mobile phones anymore?

      --
      Very often, people confuse simple with simplistic. The nuance is lost on most. - Clement Mok
    31. Re:Looks like a nice device by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      What does an eBook have over say a real book.

      Convenience of carrying your entire library in your pocket. This is especially handy on vacations.

      as long as Amazon doesn't take them back one night

      There are many choices out there apart from Kindle.

      Not to mention that you eBook device won't last more than 4 years.

      Why?

    32. Re:Looks like a nice device by value_added · · Score: 1

      Turning down the brightness, adjusting contrast, selecting a good font, and ensuring the right level of ambient light, those are all good things to do regardless. They do mitigate the problems of LCD screens, but "no different [than] reading from a printed page"? Hardly.

      I think for you, things may be fine, or you may simply not notice enough to care. CRT users (even those with monitors set to a 60Hz refresh rate) said similar things. That Kindle users unanimously rave about the readability of their e-Ink display I think is evidence enough that they're as close to ideal as we can get.

      Me, I'm still holding off on buying a Kindle. Until Amazon or someone else can come up with a better version, Microsoft and everyone else can continue to market as many new "readers" as they want and I'll ignore all of them. That's not to say I don't get a chuckle out of seeing a mockup that consists primarily of thumbnail images with some text thrown in.

      The OP was dead-on. These devices are for people who don't read.

    33. Re:Looks like a nice device by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They haven't been a software company for ages. They had been into outsourced marketing. Now they are purely a (outsourced) lobbying organization, working through professional lobbyists and proxies.

      A political movement in all but name.

    34. Re:Looks like a nice device by Golias · · Score: 1

      It probably would have been possible for you to make the case for the utility of such a device without resorting to personal attacks. You had some good points wedge in there between the cheap shots.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    35. Re:Looks like a nice device by geekoid · · Score: 0

      Yes, it's the same marketing.. wait no it's not.
      I would also like to point out the everything in that video was in fact released. It is called Vista.

      MS has problems, but lets try to stick to those instead of making pointless and incorrect posts.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    36. Re:Looks like a nice device by Wingsy · · Score: 1

      "... but the fact this has dual screen with multitouch makes me want to wait for this one"

      Fact? What fact? This is a cartoon! Regardless, it certainly had the intended effect... "want to wait for this one".

      --
      If I didn't have absolutely NOTHING to do, I wouldn't be here.
    37. Re:Looks like a nice device by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if ya don't want to be treated like a dick, stop acting like a dick.

    38. Re:Looks like a nice device by ozmanjusri · · Score: 1, Insightful
      I would also like to point out the everything in that video was in fact released. It is called Vista. MS has problems, but lets try to stick to those instead of making pointless and incorrect posts.

      Are we watching the same video?

      Did you see the bit where it said "Coming October 2003"?

      Did you notice that the UI in the Longhorn marketing video was responsive and fast, even in 2003? Do you remember Microsoft being subjected to a class-action lawsuit over its "Vista Capable" campaign? Have you ever used Vista? Was it even vaguely similar to the marketing? On ANY hardware?

      This video IS a marketing exercise and this discussion IS full of MS "Reputation Managers". No doubts.

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    39. Re:Looks like a nice device by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      I've seen Surface in action and used it. It is very fast and responsive and actually everyone who used it was greatly impressed. Resolution was great...good enough to inspect x-rays and MRIs in detail.
      As far as the other projects you mention: not every R&D project becomes a product...that is the nature of R&D. I, for one, am glad to get a glimpse into what people are working on and thinking about. If MS didn't show these R&D efforts, you'd be the first one complaining how secretive they are.
      You are clearly too biased against MS (yeah, I know, welcome to /.)

    40. Re:Looks like a nice device by BrokenHalo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I guess its antecedents are open to debate. One thing that concerns me (but only a little) is from having looked at the demo video, it looks rather as if Microsoft have adopted the finger gestures (or whatever they're called) that Apple just nabbed a patent for a couple of months ago. IIRC there was a /. thread about it, but I can't find it at the moment.

      OT: Given how long Slashdot has been in existence, one might be forgiven for getting a bit cranky over Slashcode's inability to perform a simple keyword search on their own content.

      Anyway, back on-topic, the patent might only extend to mobile phones, but in a way (for once) I hope it doesn't. Having a 400-lb legal team with Microsoft's budget behind it might be just what it takes to nuke the patent from orbit.

    41. Re:Looks like a nice device by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

      Apart from your excellent points, there is the pleasure in serendipity to be found when a friend lends you a book which finds resonance in your being (incidentally, I found this just recently when I read Vikram Seth's "An Equal Music"), and there is much pleasure to be found in passing on your own discoveries likewise.

      E-books with proprietary formats just don't fill that space. Sure, sometimes you can manage to snag a PDF or whatever of your text, but many (I would say most) people would say reading a text of any length on a computer screen sucks.

    42. Re:Looks like a nice device by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      What's wrong with Surface?

      Our company has one, it's really nice. Are you trying to imply that it doesn't exist except in marketing, or something?

    43. Re:Looks like a nice device by Atlantis-Rising · · Score: 1

      Check out this video [youtube.com]. See any similarities? Can you tell us what happened to the innovative product being marketed? Do you remember Origami? Natal? Surface?

      A variety of Origami devices were launched, and continue to be launched. Natal has been announced, but not released: Nobody expected it to be, and Microsoft did not claim it was. I've seen multiple Surface installations, and it was in any case never targeted to consumers but to corporate markets (A price point of $25,000 per unit does that.)

      --
      "It is possible to commit no errors and still lose. That is not a weakness. That is life." -Peak Performance
    44. Re:Looks like a nice device by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I also don't care if you understand something, but hey, pointless replies are part of the charm of Slashdot. Just doin' my part to keep Slashdot great...ish...

    45. Re:Looks like a nice device by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Before it broke, I used my palm TX for reading ebooks exclusively. I am a voracious reader, averaging 2-3 books per week. My only complaint was the screen size. Since my TX died, I've been actively searching for a replacement, but until this announcement I've been stuck with a variety of products that miss my needs entirely.

      I don't want a smartphone. Believe it or not, I can read and talk at the same time, but if my book is stuck to my ear it kinda makes it difficult.

      I don't want an e-reader, for the amount of money to buy one? I'd expect it to do a lot more.

      I don't want a netbook. All the versatility of a laptop is wonderful. But I really don't want a keyboard, or the bulk. Capacitive multi-touch + stylus makes me a happy camper.

      My only question is: How often can I expect Courier to BSOD?

    46. Re:Looks like a nice device by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dual screen porn in bed! Ponder the possibilities ...

    47. Re:Looks like a nice device by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm a reader. I've read around twenty-five books so far this year

      Pfft. Lightweight.

    48. Re:Looks like a nice device by insertwackynamehere · · Score: 1

      I think that for text books and other non-enjoyment reading stuff these things have potential. I'd love to have my text books and references guides packed onto a futuristic ebook. Hell the whole hitchhikers guide thing is just too cool, I'd love some sort of futuristic encyclopedia I can throw in my bag and get whatever I need from.

    49. Re:Looks like a nice device by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 1

      I doubt an Apple Tablet wouldn't be anything *but* a standard computing device running on standard OSX. I just wouldn't want to play games on it.

      --
      Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
    50. Re:Looks like a nice device by mr_lizard13 · · Score: 1

      I hope they reveal more details soon.

      I hope they reveal a product at all.

      At present what we have is a collection of renders and a conceptual video.

      --
      "We live in a global world" - Harvey Pitt, former Securities and Exchange Commission Chairman
    51. Re:Looks like a nice device by xrayspx · · Score: 1

      Depends on your definition of Value. OSS people saw Surface, and said "but wait, we can do that too, watch this...", and so a group of developers set off in that direction.

      A group of developers will see this (IMHO incrementally cool) product mockup and say "exactly, we should try and bring Linux to this". This specific device doesn't seem to be so much a radically different device as much as it is bringing together a bunch of pieces that currently exist and integrating them into one small tablet.

      Other people can and should do this. If the only thing to come of it is inspiration to get people moving on a project, and that is value enough.

    52. Re:Looks like a nice device by bertoelcon · · Score: 1

      Have you not seen this xkcd: http://xkcd.com/548/

      --
      Anything can be found funny, from a certain point of view.
    53. Re:Looks like a nice device by lysergic.acid · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I wrote that pretty early in the morning when I was still kinda grumpy, so I apologize if my post came off as a personal attack. I just get short with people sometimes when I see what seems to be an obvious flaw in logic. But I realize that what seems obvious to me isn't necessarily obvious to others, and vice versa.

      However, I still maintain the position that you shouldn't dismiss an entire category of products based on your own personal preferences. It comes off as very self-centered.

    54. Re:Looks like a nice device by manekineko2 · · Score: 1

      They are, however, a very open platform to develop for, and the clearest analogy.

    55. Re:Looks like a nice device by jamiethehutt · · Score: 1

      Resolution was great...good enough to inspect x-rays and MRIs in detail.

      Rubbish. I've worked in veterinary imaging and the common screen we installed for viewing X-Rays was a 22" wide screen that had a resolution in the region of 2500x1500 and was black and white. Speaking to a vet using it she said this was "ok" but having to zoom in and out was annoying. Last time I spoke to that company to save money (for the customer) they were starting using 23 and 30 inch Apple displays but the contrast and DPI "are a bit crap". So ether you don't know what your talking about or your hospital is a death trap.

  2. I don't believe in dogs by For+a+Free+Internet · · Score: 0, Insightful

    They are very bad animals. Also, is the tablet chewy or do you have to swallow it. Thank you for your trim.

    --
    UNITE with the Campaign for a Free Internet because today, our future begins with tomorrow!
  3. Most important question... by Toe,+The · · Score: 2, Funny

    Does it come in brown?

    1. Re:Most important question... by Canazza · · Score: 4, Funny

      You can have any colour you like, so long as it's Beige

      --
      It pays to be obvious, especially if you have a reputation for being subtle.
    2. Re:Most important question... by Ronald+Dumsfeld · · Score: 2, Funny

      You can have any colour you like, so long as it's Beige

      They've been working to make 'that damn colour' acceptable for decades.

      But first they had to ban smoking everywhere so it doesn't go nicotine yellow in a few weeks.

      --
      Where's the Kaboom?
      There's supposed to be an Earth-shattering Kaboom.
    3. Re:Most important question... by dtolman · · Score: 1

      No... the real most important question is if it comes in Cornflower Blue.

    4. Re:Most important question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, most important question is: Does it run linux?

    5. Re:Most important question... by Penguinisto · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Even better question: Will they ever bother selling it?

      Microsoft has a nasty habit of fending off emerging threats by promising vaporware products that do the same job, only somehow better. In many of these cases, it's main job isn't to do $functionality, but distract attention and hype away from competitors (like, say, Apple's rumored tablet thingy), then the proposed product gets quietly buried once the hoopla is over.

      It's a great way to suck the oxygen out of an emerging concept that threatens any sort of status quo... after all, Microsoft's profit margins got socked in the gut pretty hard by the whole netbook emergence.

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    6. Re:Most important question... by tdobson · · Score: 1

      It will once I install Ubuntu.

    7. Re:Most important question... by ciaohound · · Score: 1

      Brown will be available as zune as possible.

      --
      Oh, yeah, it's not easy to pad these out to 120 characters.
    8. Re:Most important question... by mr_lizard13 · · Score: 1

      No, but the screen is blue.

      --
      "We live in a global world" - Harvey Pitt, former Securities and Exchange Commission Chairman
  4. Courier? No thanks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I'll stick with Vera Sans Mono.

  5. Ergo Proxy by bhima · · Score: 1

    There is a pretty good Anime named "Ergo Proxy". The main character Re-l Mayer, has a folding e-folio like device with translucent screens which I have coveted since I saw the series.

    Oh... and the sound track is pretty good too.

    --
    Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity.
    1. Re:Ergo Proxy by Webcommando · · Score: 1

      Not to mention it would be nice to have a Entourage to take care of mundane tasks and access global information networks. Of course, I prefer not to have the Entourage go crazy with a virus...

      BTW, one of my favorite Animes

      --
      I love the sound of distortion in the morning -- webcommando
    2. Re:Ergo Proxy by bhima · · Score: 1

      It's not immediately clear to me that an Entourage going crazy with the cognito virus while managing my mundane tasks and access global information networks would be substantially worse than what's going on now with me & my ISP.

      --
      Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity.
  6. Knowledge Navigator by Toe,+The · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Ya know... it looks a little bit like the Apple Knowledge Navigator, a 1987 concept.

    1. Re:Knowledge Navigator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not really.

    2. Re:Knowledge Navigator by CannonballHead · · Score: 2

      It does? They both have screens, yes. I don't see too much similar other than that..

    3. Re:Knowledge Navigator by Anonymous+Codger · · Score: 1

      The Knowledge Navigator concept had a screen that folded out like a book, as does Courier. It also supported multi-touch, as does Courier. It also did a lot of things that Courier can't do (but of course it didn't really do any of them since it was only a concept). So I think the GP is correct about Courier looking a bit like the Knowledge Navigator.

      --
      No sig? Sigh...
  7. Re:Looks very nice but... by Brandee07 · · Score: 1

    At this point, it's still some designers throwing around ideas with some fancy CG mockups.

    The iPhone and the Kindle were both introduced to the world as working physical devices on a stage. This is just awesome-looking vaporware, much like the following:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_vBb3_aZN7g (first 30 seconds or so of the video are blank, for some reason)

  8. Looks really cool by wvmarle · · Score: 1

    But then it's Microsoft and it is not a release version so likely all the cool features will be removed by then.

    Ok, joking aside: what OS will they be running? Is Win7 capable of such neat touch-screen tricks already? Is such a tablet (which looks a bit like a double PDA to me) powerful enough for such a big system? I don't think I have ever seen or heard about a system that can do the things they demoed (well it was a complete mock-up: the user's hand was even drawn so it was for sure not a video of a real-life demo), so not sure whether MS actually has a system that can do what they showed in that video.

    1. Re:Looks really cool by NoYob · · Score: 1, Troll

      You see, MS is planning different versions of Win 7 for this. Aside from the Win 7 Home Basic, Home, Standard, Business, business Ultimate, Ultimate and Ultimate Top versions of the OS; they will have the Win 7 Tablet touch Home Basic, Tablet writable Home basic, ...well just calculate the combinations (nCr) of "Win 7", "Home", "Tablet", "Business", "Standard", "Ultimate", "Pen", and "Premium". Run all the combinations and you'll get the editions that are offered by MS when this is ready.

      --
      It's NOT me! It's the meds! I'm on 1000mg of Fukitol.
  9. To make this device truly useful... by Bicx · · Score: 4, Funny

    one of the screens could be replaced by a full Querty keyboard for rapid word processing. You could then hold it in your lap while typing with the speed of both hands.

    1. Re:To make this device truly useful... by Foofoobar · · Score: 3, Funny

      Querty? I think you put your keys back in the wrong order after cleaning your keyboard.

      --
      This is my sig. There are many like it but this one is mine.
    2. Re:To make this device truly useful... by Bicx · · Score: 5, Funny

      Uhat are you talking about?

    3. Re:To make this device truly useful... by pavon · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hou did yow end wp with tuo 'w' keys?

    4. Re:To make this device truly useful... by rvw · · Score: 1

      Hou did yow end wp with tuo 'w' keys?

      Yow mean: Hou did yow end wp with tuo 'u' keys?

    5. Re:To make this device truly useful... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      querty != qwerty

    6. Re:To make this device truly useful... by LordSnooty · · Score: 1

      Typing on a screen sounds like the least appealing activity I can think of. Fine for the odd text message, or quick search on Google, but word processing would be a nightmare.

    7. Re:To make this device truly useful... by pwfffff · · Score: 1

      You both missed the 'w' in 'with'. Fail.

    8. Re:To make this device truly useful... by VisceralLogic · · Score: 1

      Hou did yow end wp with tuo 'w' keys?

      Yow misspelled "uith."

      --
      Stop! Dremel time!
    9. Re:To make this device truly useful... by bar-agent · · Score: 1

      Did you not get the joke, or are you just putting your opinion of screen keyboards out there as an opinion that indirectly supports the joke's meta-meaning?

      A tablet-esque computer as described in the summary, where one of the screens was a keyboard, would be a normal laptop.

      --
      i'd hit it so hard, if you pulled me out you'd be the king of britain [bash.org]
    10. Re:To make this device truly useful... by sootman · · Score: 1

      Why is this like the fifth person I've seen in the last two months misspell QWERTY?!?!? Did Dell ship a bad batch of keyboards or something?

      That said--great post. You deserve your +5. :-)

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
  10. About Time... by ReverendDC · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Two screens double the size of an iPhones. Very nice. The pocket in the middle...very nice. the folding (a 15" combined screen area in a package the size of a small netbook)...very, very nice. If this thing even thinks about supporting Office, Apple may have a tough time competing with this thing if it is all as listed here. Of course, as with any company, things change before release (anyone remember WinFS?).

    1. Re:About Time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By the time MS has an OS that comes close to the demo, Apple will already have defined the market.

    2. Re:About Time... by BlackSmithNZ · · Score: 1

      You forgot: two screens, twice the size, twice the cost and twice the power consumption of an iPhone/iPod Touch, (the screen is a key component in these devices for power and cost). I guessing that when people buy e-book readers, size, cost and power consumption are all important. And screen size does not seem critical - my daughter reads most of her online books on a current generation iPod, so any future Apple device that is bigger would probably be 'enough'.

      Microsoft at this point has to support Office on the iPhone (like they do with OSX) as that device is quickly becoming a bigger market than Microsoft Mobile. Otherwise, people will turn to competing products.

      Some of us remember Steve Ballmer laughing at the Apple iPhone, or MS claiming the Zune (and before that 'Plays for Sure') would take on Apple iPods, so any time somebody thinks that a new bit of Microsoft Vapourware is going to give "Apple a tough time competing with this thing", then I would take it with a big grain of salt.

      Besides.. you think Nintendo might give this thing some competition as well should they wish.

    3. Re:About Time... by ReverendDC · · Score: 1

      The power draw in the iPhone is from the cell radios primarily. Turn them off and you triple your battery life. The screens are not the main source of power consumption, at least on the iPhone. Yes, the power consumption goes up, but this is a decent trade-off for the extra screen size. Also, remember that as the thing folds and has two sides, so does it have room for two batteries. Might make it a bit more heavy, but the convenience factor can more than likely make up for this. As for someone reading on an iPhone, that is all well and good, but when I can't even read a full paragraph due to size constraints before moving to the next "page," in addition to the small text size to do any type of serious reading, it really isn't the best form factor for reading or textbooks.

  11. OS and Software are the biggest question marks by mantis2009 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The video provided by Gizmodo shows a revolutionary multitouch UI. It might be more related to the system Microsoft developed for its Surface computers, rather than Windows 7's built in multitouch. Whether the mockup described in the video represents an entirely new Microsoft OS or an application running on top of an existing OS will be an interesting clue as to Microsoft's strategy for the tablet market.

  12. The Origami Project by p0 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Remember that? Wasn't it supposed to do this shit 3 years ago? Here we go again.

    --
    This is my sig. There are thousands more, but this one is mine.
    1. Re:The Origami Project by Sockatume · · Score: 1

      Not really. Origami was basically a way of reviving Windows XP Tablet Edition in something resembling a Game Gear, where you have a two-hand grip and do most of your control through the thumbs. This seems to be more of a bespoke OS, in a proper tablet form factor.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    2. Re:The Origami Project by cepayne · · Score: 1

      It's a way to generate kickbacks from all of the future carpel-tunnel surgeries
      from the users who try to gesture instead of using a keyboard to enter text
      into this device.

    3. Re:The Origami Project by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Vaio-UX is origami

    4. Re:The Origami Project by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes I do remember and there are shipping Origami PCs now -- called Ultra-Mobile PC. See http://www.microsoft.com/windows/products/winfamily/umpc/default.mspx.

  13. Someone over there heard "e-books"... by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

    ... and decided they had to look just like a book!

    I don't see a significant advantage to this two-page style of design, but do see significant disadvantages - the big one being the awkwardness of holding it. It's only going to be comfortable to use if you're basically in those positions where a paper book is easy to hold, which pretty much means sitting down. There's probably a good reason the photo and demo video don't show an actual person using the device.

    Books weren't designed with "mobility while using" in mind. To follow the book paradigm so closely smells a lot like upper-management "innovation". You know, as in "we need something to differentiate our tablet from the other guys' tablets! I got it - it should look exactly like a book!"

    --
    #DeleteChrome
    1. Re:Someone over there heard "e-books"... by badboy_tw2002 · · Score: 1

      Well, I'm guessing it flips around and you can hold it like a laptop - maybe use the lower screen for typing (which would probably be miserable). What would be really cool is if the second screen could go all the way around like a spiral notbook, so it holds the form factor of a single screen device.

      And as for upper management, I think the thinking goes more like: Apple has a single screen tablet device? Fuck it, we're doing two screens!

    2. Re:Someone over there heard "e-books"... by manekineko2 · · Score: 1

      I see a number of significant advantages to a two-page style design:
      -Twice the screen size in the same form factor. That's a pretty big deal.
      -Built in screen protection
      -Last I checked, paperbacks can be held one handed if they're not too thick such that the binding closes itself.
      -Familiar and attractive design.

    3. Re:Someone over there heard "e-books"... by bdsesq · · Score: 2, Informative

      I see a number of significant advantages to a two-page style design:

      Having a hinge with all the necessary wires going thru it is not an advantage. Laptops have similar designs but this looks like it will be flexed a lot more often than people move their laptop screens.

    4. Re:Someone over there heard "e-books"... by Abreu · · Score: 1

      Actually, it should fold over like a book and have pleasant cornflower blue covers with "Don't Panic" written in friendly yellow letters...

      --
      No sig for the moment.
    5. Re:Someone over there heard "e-books"... by TheUser0x58 · · Score: 1

      it will be flexed a lot more often than people move their laptop screens.

      You mean more often than people close the lid of their laptop to put it in their bag and carry with them? Suffice it to say, running video signals through a regularly exercised hinge is a solved problem.

      --
      -- listen to interesting music, support independent radio... WPRB
    6. Re:Someone over there heard "e-books"... by manekineko2 · · Score: 1

      I dunno, my flip phone seems to be holding up fine after many years, and my laptop opens and closes many times a day, since I like to close the top whenever I leave it, and it seems to be doing fine as well. I'm not sure this thing would be opened up more than a flip phone.

  14. Re:Looks very nice but... by nomadic · · Score: 1

    At this point, it's still some designers throwing around ideas with some fancy CG mockups.

    It's not a intergalactic starship; is there anything in it that you think would be non-trivial to implement if they decided to build it? The hard part in these things, and the thing that will make or break them, is the user interface. That's what they're showing here. The fact that they haven't built a physical protoype yet is not that big a deal.

  15. Can't Wait... by swanzilla · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...dual blue screens of death

  16. It sucks by JustNiz · · Score: 0, Troll

    Microsoft keep making products that assume or even enforce a particular work flow.
    What about those of us that aren't sales droids or road warriors?
    Where is the command line interface? where is the C compiler and ssh app and X server?

    1. Re:It sucks by Diabolus+Advocatus · · Score: 2, Informative

      Sure MS might suck as a corporation, and release dodgy software and charge more then acceptable for it, but their hardware division is actually quite good. I have plenty of MS hardware and it [i]is[/i] good quality, far better than the software. Don't paint all their products with the same brush.

    2. Re:It sucks by dtolman · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah - what is MS thinking, trying to sell to hundreds of millions of customers, when they could go after a market of a few hundred thousand.

    3. Re:It sucks by Bat+Country · · Score: 1

      That's a very good point. So you can't get your programming on the machine? So what? Don't buy it. It's not for you.

      You already have access to netbooks, laptops, cell phones (if you were mad enough to do your programming work on one).

      This seems to be a stab at what the PDA originally was - a personal organizer that can blend seamlessly with work space. A majority of the people in the working world who would see a device like this as practical are exactly the sort of people who have to maintain calendars, make meetings, find locations, and just generally keep their world organized.

      When I was working as a spotter for a utility locating company I could certainly have used something like this. Naturally, the computer maps were terrible back then (1997 or so) however, and an always-on internet connection was unheard of. Somebody who works for a living on the road and needs to find unfamiliar places on tight time schedules would love a device that worked as demonstrated.

      This is also not to say that there'd be only one mode. They're showing the applications which are likely to catch the attention (and maybe pre-orders) of big business.

      For consumers, how about some sort of fully integrated painting application using some of the physically-simulated painting research that has been done at the UW and Microsoft Research? How about taking that notebook metaphor along with tablet sketching and selling it to math majors? How about integrating Microsoft Visio and some sort of commercial drafting software with drawn shape recognition and intelligent snap settings to produce the ultimate portable CAD device for architects, landscapers, network specialists who need to sketch up a quick organizational chart, etc?

      Students and professionals of virtually every kind could come up (with a little imagination) with a way that a device like this could be handy. Does hat mean it WILL be handy in those ways? No, but we're talking about the potential of a device and some rough interface concepts that MS has put out, not Microsoft's actual implementation once the marketers have gotten through with it.

      If they found some alternate way to monetize it (as with the Amazon Kindle and its bundled store), they might even decide to subsidize some sort of cellular data service (like the Kindle). Would you see value in it then? I don't think it's likely that Microsoft would do something like that, but then again, I'm not that sure they could monetize the use of the device to the extent that Amazon has the Kindle.

      --
      The land shall stone them with the bread of his son.
    4. Re:It sucks by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Where is the command line interface? where is the C compiler and ssh app and X server?

      I would assume that the thing will be running Windows 7 under the hood, just with customized UI. If so, everything that you've listed is available, in many options in fact.

    5. Re:It sucks by geekoid · · Score: 1

      It's not for you?

      Lets see, we can have a product that has features 1000 people may want, or we can have a product millions of people may want.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    6. Re:It sucks by JustNiz · · Score: 1

      I think you're being very naive in assuming there's only a few thousand technical people in the world.
      Think of all the net admins, sys admins, web developers, app developers, DBAs etc etc.
      I bet if you added them all up there's probably as many if not more of us than there are travelling salesmen in the world.

      My actual point is this: This is YET ANOTHER product in an already overcrowded market of personal organizer-type products, that all have almost identical features (internet browsing, exchange integration, appointment management etc etc). Its almost a given that the target purchaser of this product will already own a cell phone, a laptop and at least one other device from a ton of similar organiser-based products that all come with identical functionality that covers exactly the same needs.

      Yet with this product's release, there continues to be approximately zero convenient hardware platforms with the features that address my and probably many other more technically-centred people's needs. Whether you acknowledge it or not, us geeks are still a large market that all the big OEM's like Microsoft and Apple are continuing to totally alienate.

  17. Re:Looks very nice but... by Brandee07 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The UI is just another part of the mock-up. It looks to be very dependent on handwriting recognition for character input, like entering the URL, which is very, very difficult to do right. (Has anyone done this well enough to be useful yet?)

    There's no evidence that the UI in general is any more developed than the hardware side of the device- and until someone actually gets their hands on one, we won't know if the UI is any good or not. Remember, this is the same company that produced Vista's shutdown menu.

  18. Why? by miffo.swe · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Reporting on Microsoft vapourware is just plain silly considering how little of their announcements that reach the market. Considering how much specs that gets tossed out the window to get it out after delays upon delays makes it even more pointless.

    --
    HTTP/1.1 400
    1. Re:Why? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      It's not vaporware.
      There are actual working prototypes.

      WIll it reach the market? I don't know. It might be crap to use, it might not have a market, but it's not vaporware.

      The more you attack someoneusing incorrect information, the less people take you seriously.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  19. "booklet" computer a great idea by peter303 · · Score: 1

    A screen that folds up would simultaneously solve two problems: First, be smaller for easy carrying. Second, be large enough for viewing whole documents and for older people.
    I've seen "scoll" computers depicted in scifi: screens that roll up into a compact cylinder. But they sound further in the future.

    1. Re:"booklet" computer a great idea by S1ngularity · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I have to agree with you on this one. The fact that it can look like a book sitting in your hands, with what looks like nice leather bindings, adds to a certain aesthetic snoot that usually only applies to Apples products.

  20. cool by OrangeMonkey11 · · Score: 1

    This looks pretty neat, i would like to have one; it's about time someone come up with something that's dual screen and look like a compact day planner

  21. I like it... but by rAiNsT0rm · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I've always been a huge proponent of a dual screen laptop. A ton of people cry about the lack of a tactile keyboard and it always ends there. Haptic feedback is getting better and I can see that as the future but for now something like this is needed. A single screen tablet just isn't useful or natural and they never truly caught on. This type of device is. I think it should actually be oriented as a regular laptop with a simple sensor to know the orientation change to portrait mode and function as shown in the demo videos. Just having the option is better than making it a portrait only device for no real reason.

    My other concern is that Microsoft is not good at UI design. Occasionally they have flashes of brilliance but on the whole they fail miserably in this regard. Apple is not always better, so this isn't some fanboy argument. What they should do it farm out the UI to a design firm, something along the lines of Art Lebedev. Let it be truly revolutionary instead of being handcuffed by old ideas and methodologies.

    Foe me, you give me those two things and make it a bit thinner but strong and I'm totally sold. I don't think it needs to be netbook cheap even, a fair range of $1200-$1600 and I think it is a winner. Teachers, students, professionals, ebooks, etc. in one device is a disruptive technology.

    --
    http://teasphere.wordpress.com - A little spot of tea
    1. Re:I like it... but by Sockatume · · Score: 1

      It's not just "haptic feedback" which befuddles touch keyboards. You also have the issue of keeping your hands oriented on the keyboard, which is difficult when you can't feel it. Then there's ergonomics. To operate a touch keypad, you hold your fingers off the keypad when you're not actively pressing the buttons. That's the reverse of a mechanical keypad, and it's going to be exhausting. These are fixable (Nokia's tactile screen concept for the former, the Blackberry click-screen idea for the latter) but aren't ready for market.

      However this all assumes that keys are necessary for text entry. Why not use handwriting recognition instead?

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    2. Re:I like it... but by CannonballHead · · Score: 1

      Who is good at UI design, in your opinion, then? I certainly don't think Gnome or KDE are particularly good at it (or, honestly, most open source ... and closed source ... applications). I don't like Apple's, but I guess it works. I don't like the iPhone, but mainly because of the lack of multitasking. Personally, I have found Win 7 to be decent (better than Vista). I like Gnome better than KDE. I'd say Gnome and Win 7's are my favorites... and while agree MS isn't particularly good at it, I haven't really found one that IS. So I'll take the "best available." ...

    3. Re:I like it... but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Handwriting recognition is a great idea, yes, absolutely, and it's even what they showed in the video—but I can bet you that it's going to get tiring. Courier apparently supports handwriting recognition for URLs in its browser—I'd bet some people here would find that inherently annoying!

    4. Re:I like it... but by Brandee07 · · Score: 1

      Handwriting for the URL may be tiring, but at least it's not voice recognition.

      H T T P colon slash slash W W W dot slash dot dot org

    5. Re:I like it... but by rAiNsT0rm · · Score: 1

      umm, that is exactly what haptic feedback is. It would allow the screen to have feel to it. Ex: raised bumps for each key that have a click to them when depressed (sort of like the BB Storm screen), or a raised ridge on the "F" and "J" just like a real keyboard for orientation, or tons of other unique and new methods.

      Ergonomics of it is no different than current laptop keyboards or Apple keyboards with very thin keys. Those tolerances are within specs of what a feedback enabled screen could do.

      The big advantage comes from new and creative interfaces which can be designed for each app/game using the lower screen like a DS on crack. You could have perfectly customized controls instead of key bindings and "gaming" keyboards. No more: "is the fireball spell on Q or 4?" you could touch the little fireball icon.

      --
      http://teasphere.wordpress.com - A little spot of tea
    6. Re:I like it... but by YourExperiment · · Score: 1

      What they should do it farm out the UI to a design firm, something along the lines of Art Lebedev.

      I agree, my main problem with Microsoft stuff is that it is far too cheap.

    7. Re:I like it... but by rAiNsT0rm · · Score: 1

      A design firm, even the likes of Art Lebedev Studios is a drop in the bucket compared to the R&D and design work that goes into something like this. Just because Art Lebedev has created expensive items directly (which was never meant for production and housed over a hundred OLED screens) doesn't mean that everything they do is expensive to that level. Lots of major companies do this kind of design work outside of their normal product lines.

      --
      http://teasphere.wordpress.com - A little spot of tea
    8. Re:I like it... but by YourExperiment · · Score: 1

      I freely admit my ignorance, I was judging the studio in question solely by the product you allude to, since I am entirely ignorant of their other work. Could you point me to some of their designs that have been realised in an affordable form?

    9. Re:I like it... but by rAiNsT0rm · · Score: 1

      The best place to start is their website: http://www.artlebedev.com/ you will see that they do indeed do design work for UI's like the GPS navigation system and T&C Amplifier on the front page. They have a store link which has a bunch of their work.

      --
      http://teasphere.wordpress.com - A little spot of tea
    10. Re:I like it... but by YourExperiment · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the link. I see that the GPS system you mentioned is just a concept design. The pre-amplifier is indeed commercially available, at just under $10,000.

      However, I did note that the Art Lebedev site has a variety of fridge magnets and a Tetris-themed ice cube tray for sale at fairly reasonable prices. :)

    11. Re:I like it... but by rAiNsT0rm · · Score: 1

      Heh, yes, but their stuff is expensive to begin with no matter who designed the interface. The thing I was getting at is that Art Lebedev is just one such company, I actually think there are better firms out there for a thing like this. Even better let a few young and hungry firms work on it and see what they can come up with.

      The big picture is to get away from coders and techies creating interfaces, they aren't good at it. We like to think we have skillz in this area but the reality is just as much dedication and effort as it takes to design code is required to be even decent at design and layout. Artists have a big place in software design, we've just kept them out of it mostly thinking we can do it all. Apple has taken this approach and it has paid off in spades.

      Microsoft gets hate from geeks and Apple-types both. No matter what Microsoft designs those folks will hate it. But if you make a big deal out of a partnership with some well-respected design firm or hip new one, then you will win over some of those people and start to change your image.

      --
      http://teasphere.wordpress.com - A little spot of tea
    12. Re:I like it... but by dargaud · · Score: 1
      I've had a touchscreen phone for a week and I must say I hate the greasy finger marks and I hate the sensation of swiping my finders on its surface. I spend half my time wiping the screen and the rest of the time wiping my fingers on my pants so as to leave a few marks as possible.

      What I don't understand is why they don't make a tablet with the keyboard on the back, meant to be used with your 4 fingers while your thumb holds the front. Make the keys visible on the screen so that you don't need to turn it over to see them. After little training it'll be natural, and you get full screen + double real estate + real keyboard. That's a winning solution.

      --
      Non-Linux Penguins ?
  22. Okay - I feel dirty for saying this but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This actually looks pretty cool - I would actually buy one if MS released it...

  23. it's nice but by Anivair · · Score: 1

    Looks neat, but can it run Linux?

    1. Re:it's nice but by mcnazar · · Score: 1

      Looks neat, but can it run Linux?

      I am thinking that extra effort has been made to ensure that it can never run Linux...abit like the xbox and then more successfully the xbox360.

      Shame as it is what I love about my PRS-505.

    2. Re:it's nice but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you stole my comment!

  24. It sounds good until.... by Stu101 · · Score: 1

    you think how DRM crippled this will be. IF it becomes a must have item, it is a chance to get DRM firmly entrenched via the back door. Especially when you consider the studios that MS has done deals with, and their love of Digital restrictions. It will be the kick start for DRM. Approved content only, from the MS Store, no loading your "downloaded" ebooks on this baby. Its the perfect platform for strategy shift without too much whinging from us freedom lovers.

    It breaks the concept of MS = PC Only. It allows them to start again, with DRM at the core, much like the Xbox 360. Dump all the last 20 years of legacy and go "apple" style with heavy restrictions, especially music. And will it sync to Linux, will it heck!

    --
    http://www.writeitfor.us - Writing IT for the IT generation.
    1. Re:It sounds good until.... by lenkyl · · Score: 1

      will it blend?

    2. Re:It sounds good until.... by Abreu · · Score: 1

      Don't worry... if this becomes even mildly popular, we will soon be seeing dozens of cheap knockoffs made in China without the DRM

      Remember the first wave of Chinese multi-region DVD players?

      --
      No sig for the moment.
    3. Re:It sounds good until.... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      MS has moved away from DRM and control. They still do it, but it's trended away from it. Which makes sense since it gets them nothing and impacts there operation.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  25. Re:Looks very nice but... by Manax · · Score: 1

    Handwriting recognition is actually pretty good. I've got a MotionComputing LE1700 with Vista Business, and use it exclusively with a pen. I use Onenote, and push todo items to RTM via a custom add-in that I wrote. Now, it's by no-means perfect, but it is generally pretty good. It could be significantly better if it gave me an easier way of helping teach it my writing style, adding new vocabulary, that sort of thing, but I think the tech has gotten to the point of being generally usable. Also, to see some good development MS is able to apply to a product, Onenote is actually quite good (and looking around at forums you'll see lots of comments to the effect "I hate most MS products, but LOVE Onenote...") And the prototype they did with InkSeine was quite a break from traditional UI design... So, I personally think we are at a point where tablets with useable handwriting rec are here, and are more a matter of refinement.

    --
    "Why should I be content to simply live in this world, when I, as a human being, can CREATE it?" - Oertel
  26. From the makers of Zune by mcnazar · · Score: 1

    Brought to you from the makers or successful and well beloved products such as the Zune.....

    Looks nice but I'm not holding my breath on this one as I expect it to be hobbled/crippled and DRMed to infinity and beyond!

  27. marketing trick to keep people thinking MS is rele by Locutus · · Score: 1

    is there really a consumer level need for a dual screen tablet? On top of that, if you look at the costs of netbooks, the screen and touchscreen are a huge expense when you look at netbooks in the sub $300 range. I really think what we have here is Microsoft marketing attempting to pump up their falling brand name by making a device they can show "pushing" windows from one screen to the next screen. In the real world, it's just not going to cut it except for those Microsoft lemmings who buy everything with Microsofts name on it. You know, you people with the Zune.

    And FYI, Microsoft is doing a lot of marketing to get the netbook segment pushed into the low-end laptop segment and that includes setting hardware limits on what is considered an MS Windows capable netbook and what pricing they'll give for Windows 7. Those low end, low power devices are a threat to Microsoft because Windows still does not scale down below the low-end laptop segment very well at all and they don't want to be in the sub $300 pricing segment or want it around.

    At Microsoft, smoke and mirrors is job #1.

    LoB

    --
    "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
  28. Maybe if it behaved like a choir music folder by TrogL · · Score: 1

    Hinged design that opens up fairly flat.
    A strap to prevent it opening too far and damaging the hinge.
    Another strap on the back where you hold it.
    Maybe something like this.

  29. Am I the only one... by Comboman · · Score: 2, Funny

    Am I the only one who expected the logo for a Microsoft product called Courier to use a different font?

    --
    Support Right To Repair Legislation.
    1. Re:Am I the only one... by mr_lizard13 · · Score: 1

      A different font will be used for the second revision, the Courier New.

      --
      "We live in a global world" - Harvey Pitt, former Securities and Exchange Commission Chairman
  30. there isa consumer niche by peter303 · · Score: 1

    I'd love to have a 20" diagonal screen (17x11x1.5) that fits in a backpack (9x11x3).

    1. Re:there isa consumer niche by Locutus · · Score: 1

      but you would not want the battery needed to power it and the GPU needed to drive it.

      LoB

      --
      "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
    2. Re:there isa consumer niche by treeves · · Score: 1

      Well, if you have the technology/magic you'd need to make a 17x11 object fit into a 9x11 container, you should not want for anything - you should be very rich!

      --
      ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
  31. Interesting, but by geekoid · · Score: 1

    can it switch sides for lefties?

    I have doubts that the commands used for tiny device with be desirable for larger devices since that aren't as economical to use.

    Also, does Apple own the Patent on using two touch point to adjust a screen?

    I'd like to play with one for a bit.

    If it had a phone and room for mp3s, this could become very ubiquitous in the business enviroment. replacing Franklin.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  32. Re:marketing trick to keep people thinking MS is r by geekoid · · Score: 1

    Actually it's the vendors that are pushing for a price and size increase in netbooks, not MS.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  33. Yes, nice... but... by Hymer · · Score: 1

    ...does it run Linux ?

    1. Re:Yes, nice... but... by Tweenk · · Score: 1

      This one does, and it's very similar:
      http://wiki.laptop.org/go/XO-2

      --
      Those who would give up liberty to obtain working drivers, deserve neither liberty nor working drivers.
  34. Oh. Apparently it IS brown. Who woulda thunk? by Toe,+The · · Score: 1

    Sorry, I flippantly posted without really R'ingTFA. Apparently is really is Zune-brown:
    http://gizmodo.com/5365297///gallery?selectedImage=4

  35. Naybe MS is anticipating Pixel Qi? by terminalhype · · Score: 1

    Mary Lou Jepson's Pixel Qi screens are coming soon. Then screens that are readable in any light will be available, the demo is pretty impressive.
      Demo: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mm8WoItVRn0 In the demo she also explains how her team has found a way to mass produce these screens using existing manufacturing techniques, so they can get to market very fast.

    I think it will toss a huge wrench into Microsoft's plans for products like the Courier (supposing it's real at all). Pixel Qi is hardware that Microsoft can't control. So, it wouldn't surprise me to see them using the same methods they used against the OLPC and netbooks to squelch this new technology. Which could partially explain this current Courier hype.

    About Pixel Qi: http://www.pixelqi.com/about_us

    1. Re:Naybe MS is anticipating Pixel Qi? by Manax · · Score: 1

      While that is some excellent technology, they are just a _display technology company_. They don't make computers. And a good chunk of the discussion by Mary Lou is about wanting to be a _drop in replacement_ for the existing screen technology...

      So I don't see how this is a wrench at all, if anything, it'll be a big wrench in the works of e-ink readers, such as, say, the Kindle... that's their big selling point, the image quality (and battery life) and if the Pixel Qi screens can be run without a backlight (which they talk about in the first part of the interview), that'll increase the runtime dramatically.

      --
      "Why should I be content to simply live in this world, when I, as a human being, can CREATE it?" - Oertel
  36. Re:Looks like a nice device but screws Skype by Informative · · Score: 1

    Except that Ballmer has told analysts and investors that they need to put Win7 on the netbooks so they start raking in the dogh again, but the price of the machines has to come up before they can sell the pricier OS.

    Now, what about the camera being on the wrong side? Would anybody want that knowing they're screwed with Skype?

  37. Re:Looks very nice but... by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

    Handwriting recognition is actually pretty good.

    In my case, it would have to be. No tablet machine I've come across has been able to cope with my generally italic script, which is generally regarded as attractive but not always easily readable for those unfamiliar with it. And I'm too old to learn how to print, given that I can manage a keyboard reasonably well.

  38. Re:marketing trick to keep people thinking MS is r by Locutus · · Score: 1

    so that's why the prices jumped and the hardware jumped when they started loading Microsoft Windows XP on them. I had no idea.

    LoB

    --
    "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
  39. Cool video but... by Drone69 · · Score: 1

    ...has anyome else picked up on the fact a REAL hand isn't being used to manipulate the Courier? Food for thought.

  40. Ah, but... by Briareos · · Score: 1

    ...can it also receive, store and send email? No? Didn't think so...

    (Just moving my courier setup from one machine to another, incidentally...)

    np: Yagya - Their Blood Is Black And Yellow (Will I Dream During The Process?)

    --

    "I'm not anti-anything, I'm anti-everything, it fits better." - Sole

  41. Microsoft's Take on the Tablet? by im_thatoneguy · · Score: 1

    I thought the tabletPC was Microsoft's take on the tablet.

  42. Tag; Story by DavidD_CA · · Score: 1

    Did I miss the memo where all stories on Slashdot are tagged as "story" ?

    Perhaps we should also tag them as "slashdot" too. Or "content".

    --
    -David
  43. Re:Looks like a nice device but screws Skype by digitalgiblet · · Score: 1

    p>Now, what about the camera being on the wrong side? Would anybody want that knowing they're screwed with Skype?

    That TOTALLY depends on who you are talking to and what you want to show them...

  44. but does it run... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but does it run linux?

  45. More Open? by theolein · · Score: 1

    I don't know which world you live in, but the only time Microsoft ever allows things to be more open is because it makes a profit for them or because they have no choice. This has no bearing on the Courier which looks very interesting, but I'm troubled with the idea of a book type split screen with a hinge, which, I think, could close on your hands while you're writing/tapping, if you hold it one handed. The interface and the mix of writing and touching is pretty nice. In fact the only thing about the Courier UI which troubles me is that it's complex and users will take a while to get to feel comfortable with it.

  46. Awesome! by ucblockhead · · Score: 1

    When can I get one running OSX?

    --
    The cake is a pie
  47. vaporware by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    vaporware, just like ~90% of stuff MS announces or "leaks"

  48. Re:Looks very nice but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It looks to be very dependent on handwriting recognition for character input, like entering the URL, which is very, very difficult to do right. (Has anyone done this well enough to be useful yet?)

    Yes, Apple. They got it very much right (fast, highly accurate, flexible writing styles, etc.) in the late 90s and have only improved since then... but I'm not sure where that leaves Microsoft. ;)

  49. Mobile Payments by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey Guys,
    There is an interesting event at Stanford GSB on Oct 20 about Mobile Payments, thought it might interest some of you here. Check it out http://www.vlab.org/article.html?aid=283

  50. Re:Looks very nice but... by fouleaf · · Score: 1

    Handwriting recognition is more error prone then just typing in things, however, I think that once users get used to the quirks of the software, they should be alright with it. Although, there are a lot of people who prefer typing and MS probably should make allowances for those people who want to type.

    Perhaps they could do some sort of on screen keyboard. Perhaps even turning the left page of the device into a keyboard and have the text on the right page in a landscape view. After someone was done with editing, they could press a button and the document would convert to portrait format for reading.

    As to the UI challenges, while I was watching the Gizmodo video, the user was doing a lot of flicking of the screen on the right. I am betting that unless those are shortcuts and that there are more menus then they're showing, many people could get quite confused.