Slashdot Mirror


Did Chicago Lose Olympic Bid Due To US Passport Control?

An anonymous reader writes "Yesterday, Chicago lost its bid for the 2016 Olympics (which went to Rio de Janeiro instead), and it's looking very likely that US border procedures were one of the main factors which knocked Chicago out of the race: 'Among the toughest questions posed to the Chicago bid team this week in Copenhagen was one that raised the issue of what kind of welcome foreigners would get from airport officials when they arrived in this country to attend the Games. Syed Shahid Ali, an I.O.C. member from Pakistan, in the question-and-answer session following Chicago's official presentation, pointed out that entering the United States can be "a rather harrowing experience." ... The exchange underscores what tourism officials here have been saying for years about the sometimes rigorous entry process for foreigners, which they see as a deterrent to tourism.'"

182 of 1,040 comments (clear)

  1. I'm sure it didn't help. by jcr · · Score: 5, Informative

    Everyone I know who visits the USA these days tells me what a pain in the ass it is to travel here now. I'm sure everyone on the IOC knows all about that.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    1. Re:I'm sure it didn't help. by rotide · · Score: 5, Interesting

      We once took pride in saying we were a melting pot of nations (racism aside). Now we're about the same, except we're a melting pot of xenophobes (maybe not at the citizen level, but definitely at the administrative/political level.

      Sad to see the great American nation turn from something I was once very proud of to one that I've considered, quite a few times, to up and leave.

    2. Re:I'm sure it didn't help. by Ambient+Sheep · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It doesn't surprise me. I'm from the UK, and "Visiting the US" was always one of those things on my life's "to-do" list - seeing New York, going to the West Coast, visiting friends in Washington state, maybe even driving Route 66 one day if I had money enough and time.

      But now? Well, I've heard enough horror stories by now from friends and colleagues about entering the USA that, despite me having no criminal convictions whatsoever, I'm afraid it ain't on my "to-do" list any more.

    3. Re:I'm sure it didn't help. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This European long ago decided to stay the hell out of xenophobia central, only to find that our beloved MEPs followed its lead and demands and did a good copycat of the whole security theatre, and thorougly exceeding in roll-out of mandatory RFIDed passports (without tin-foil to boot) with fingerprints and so on. Oh, and all that talk about "data sharing"? It's one-way, all the way, baby.

      If Europe had a spine they'd've "reciproced" (see the relevant department of state website) the whole encilada across the entire EU, but instead they thought it a good idea. We're still thorougly protected against rogue nail clippers and exploding bottles of water. Useful, that.

    4. Re:I'm sure it didn't help. by h4rm0ny · · Score: 5, Informative


      And let me tell you, if people from the UK are telling you that your border-control is unwelcoming, then it must be! I also live in the UK. You can bounce around Europe crossing borders with little more than a wave of your passport and a friendly nod. Then when you come back to the UK, it's a bit of a shock. Most of the EU find Britain rather silly with how worked up about its borders it gets, given that the rest of it manages with less pomp *and* has direct land passage to outside countries. I've also heard some strong complaints from people I know about entering the US. Aren't they asking for retinal scans or fingerprints in some places, now?

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    5. Re:I'm sure it didn't help. by gilgongo · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Everyone I know who visits the USA these days tells me what a pain in the ass it is to travel here now. I'm sure everyone on the IOC knows all about that.

      -jcr

      I flew 8 hours from London to Dallas this year. On arrival, I then waited 2 hours at the airport, along with about 300 other aliens, while sullen border guards slowly checked passports, took photos and fingerprints (this often took several attempts per person), and asked seemingly innocent questions in slow, menacing voices. If I didn't know better, I would have thought they'd been trained in military interrogation techniques.

      --
      "And the meaning of words; when they cease to function; when will it start worrying you?"
    6. Re:I'm sure it didn't help. by roystgnr · · Score: 5, Funny

      We once took pride in saying we were a melting pot of nations (racism aside).

      Yeah, but that was before we realized that the tired, poor, huddled masses yearning to breathe free might take our jobs!

    7. Re:I'm sure it didn't help. by z_gringo · · Score: 5, Interesting

      entering the US. Aren't they asking for retinal scans or fingerprints in some places, now?

      no. not some places. Every entry point takes fingerprints of every visitor who is not a US Citizen or legal US Resident.

      There is also some pain in the ass procedure that people have to do online. 24 hours before they get on the plane.

      The US has just totally lost it both on the entry procedures AND airport security. The only place where the airport security is more of a useless pain in the ass is the UK, but it is a close race. The UK and the US seem to be competing with each other on who can make the most worthless security procedures.

      --
      -- -- Warning. Do not stare directly at the sun.
    8. Re:I'm sure it didn't help. by E+IS+mC(Square) · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Do you any pattern here? UK and the US. Two countries with stupidest border security checks at the ports. Both leading "war" against terrorism.

      Looks to me that the "war" is already won - by the terrorists.

    9. Re:I'm sure it didn't help. by Snarfangel · · Score: 3, Insightful

      We once took pride in saying we were a melting pot of nations (racism aside).

      I've always preferred the image of a multicultural tapestry. Better a colorful display of individual threads than a gray, undifferentiated mass.

      --
      This tagline is copyrighted material. Please send $10 for an affordable replacement.
    10. Re:I'm sure it didn't help. by E+IS+mC(Square) · · Score: 2, Informative

      If we take facts into account, I think you are wrong. (Hint - spain)

      And in no way I am in favor if killing a single human, but I think whatever happened was reciprocation (right or wrong, I am not in favor of any) of certain foreign policies of certain western nations. Nobody is innocent here.

    11. Re:I'm sure it didn't help. by cheesybagel · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Spain was also attacked by Al-Qaeda and have ETA bombings every now and then. But they actually care about their tourist industry.

    12. Re:I'm sure it didn't help. by tim_uk · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Getting into Israel is no more difficult than anywhere else. Leaving is another story altogether ...

    13. Re:I'm sure it didn't help. by A+beautiful+mind · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Not wanting to get blown the fuck up is not the same as xenophobia.

      And the appearence of security is not security.

      --
      It takes a man to suffer ignorance and smile
      Be yourself no matter what they say
    14. Re:I'm sure it didn't help. by rotide · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You'll have to explain to us who the "crazy fuckers" are. Because I seem to remember it was a group of mostly Saudi's who happened to be fundamentalists (notice how I separate the two?!) that decided it would be a good idea to hijack our airplanes and ram them into our buildings.

      This wasn't the work of a government who sent an army after us. This isn't WW3.

      It was a group of sick individuals who meant to destroy us to fulfill their _personal_ and fundamentalist religious ideals.

      This is _not_ how to act after a _small_ group of people do something terrible.

      Lets also enact broad stroke laws any time a single child gets hurt. Oh wait. God damnit.

    15. Re:I'm sure it didn't help. by gangien · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The thing is, we had all the intelligence to know what was going to happen, but didn't. I don't think clamping down on border control helps anyone. It hurts the tourism industry at home, and give people a worse impression of us. And it certainly would not have caught the terrorists. What we should have done is looked at why they attacked us and figured out why the intelligence failed. But instead we'll add on a huge bureaucracy that just complicates things and increase the policing of innocent people. Fuck the terrorists were all here legally for something like 5 years? they certainly could have passed just about any checkpoints we might put up.

    16. Re:I'm sure it didn't help. by pjt33 · · Score: 4, Informative

      According to Wikipedia, ETA has killed "over 800 individuals" since 1968 and the IRA has killed "around 1,100 members of the British security forces, and around 630 civilians" since 1969. On that measure having the IRA is twice as bad as having ETA.

    17. Re:I'm sure it didn't help. by horza · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Same here. I've always wanted to visit the States, especially New York and Las Vegas, but it was knocked indefinitely off my to-do list by the biometric controls. I don't see why I should be treated like a criminal when I haven't done anything wrong. UK is now attempting to be the least friendly place in the world, with every person entering and leaving cataloged by the government eBorders system. I even have to enter my passport number when I book a plane ticket online. Much as I love London, if it wasn't for my family being there I wouldn't go back to the UK any more. I am English through and through, but for now I will try and change things from a distance. London in the 90's was one of the best places in the world to be. The government has taken it on a roller-coaster downhill and now the place is barely recognisable.

      Phillip.

    18. Re:I'm sure it didn't help. by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I think it was in Gatwick, I was passing through the airport and I noticed that you could purchase a "token" for an express passage. When you used this token, it skips one of the checkpoints.

      This was not so much of a security checkpoint, but a cash-grab checkpoint. I had my computer in my arm and a wheeling suitcase, which sums up to two pieces of luggage. This not only exceeds airline baggage allowance, but it violates a security policy.

      Fortunately, there was a coffee shop next to the entry point, so I deeked out the lady working security and had a coffee while thinking about how to squeeze my laptop into my carry-on.

      She was working alone and couldn't do much when she was trying to explain the one-bag policy. It seemed lots of people could slip past her, some had more than one bag.

      So I waited for somebody to get stopped...

      ... then I slipped through the turnstile.

      Next time, I pay for the token.

      Of course reporting this or complaining about this could get me banned from flights and labelled a terrorist.

    19. Re:I'm sure it didn't help. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Before, it was both fun and funny: I've visited the US once and that was as a kid in 1992 and at the time, I, as a European, didn't need a visa but one did have to fill out a form which was pure comedy gold. It actually had questions such as "Have you participated in terrorist actions against the United States of America prior to 1986?" and then "...after 1986?" That's the one I remember clearly since I was wondering why 1986 was such a pivotal year but the rest were just as ridiculous. I think I have a copy of it somewhere since my mother, who was also on the trip, accidentally checked yes to some terrorist organization membership question and had to request a new one from the flight attendant but we could keep the other one. Maybe I should scan it in and post it somewhere for the amusement of everyone.

      One question on it, however, did cause us some trouble since it was about how much money we brought into the country and what we estimated the value of our belongings to be and we had just bought a new, fancy camcorder. Since we tried to be honest, we probably overestimated everything a little and the customs agent actually asked why the total value of our belongings and cash was so high. Later on, it became clear to us that Americans probably don't carry as much cash on them as we usually do in Europe since at a shopping mall during the first day of our trip, a cashier almost told us we were nuts when we paid for ice cream with a $ 100 bill. My impression has become that Americans are much more fond of paying with credit cards than we are in Europe since noone I know thinks it's unusual to have 100-200 euros in your wallet.

    20. Re:I'm sure it didn't help. by FonzCam · · Score: 5, Informative

      US immigration and security go beyond being serious to the point that they come across as rude and unhelpful. UK airport security have pulled me aside for a random search whilst joking that it was due to the sports team jersey I was wearing. On a quiet day arriving in amsterdam I've had a guy call over his supervisor just so they could make make stern faces make me worry and then crack a joke about my passport photo. I've chatted with Polish boarder guards about their visits to my home country and had a French immigration officer laugh at my appalling French. Entering the US I've see people infuriated by officers who will tell them only that they have filled in the wrong green form, or filled the right one incorrectly but will offer no more help to non-english speaking visitors then to send them back to the back of the line. I've waited hours whilst people attempt to have their fingerprints scanned whilst having orders barked at them because they misunderstood the instructions. Most immigration officers I've encountered try to ask questions in a friendly conversational style but in the US it's a cross between an interrogation and a telemarketing script. After a few visits you learn the keywords for your answers and they let you through no problem!

    21. Re:I'm sure it didn't help. by Nicopa · · Score: 4, Funny

      There is also some pain in the ass procedure

      Eww... I won't be travelling there soon....

    22. Re:I'm sure it didn't help. by RDW · · Score: 2, Insightful

      'It doesn't surprise me. I'm from the UK, and "Visiting the US" was always one of those things on my life's "to-do" list - seeing New York, going to the West Coast, visiting friends in Washington state, maybe even driving Route 66 one day if I had money enough and time...I'm afraid it ain't on my "to-do" list any more.'

      If you've crossed these off your list then you're really missing out. New York alone, even to someone used to big cities like London, is an extraordinary place to visit, and the West Coast has some absolutely spectacular scenery and great cities. I'm sure that bad things occasionally happen (I've also read a few horror stories) but frankly US Immigration (usually polite enough, or at least efficient) has so far ranked pretty low on my list of annoyances. The airlines, with their unexplained multi-hour delays, double booked seats, arbitrary baggage charges, lost luggage, broken entertainment systems, and strange and terrible food, I'd rank much higher. Airport security (everywhere) isn't much fun either, while even returning to the UK as a citizen can be a bit of a pain (particularly the interminable queues at Heathrow). But none of these should put you off travelling. Getting to the US is no longer a 6 week ordeal in a sailing ship with a 1% mortality rate, after all.

    23. Re:I'm sure it didn't help. by Joce640k · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Me too. I went there a couple of times in the early 90's and security was a complete pain (they took everything out of my luggage and every last little paper out of my wallet to read it), and a couple of minutes asking dumb questions. Not just me, everybody on my flight.

      If it's got worse than that then count me out. I'm not going through fingerprinting and having my laptop/iPod confiscated when there's plenty of other countries in the world who'll just check whether my passport's valid then wave me through.

      --
      No sig today...
    24. Re:I'm sure it didn't help. by Lumpy · · Score: 5, Informative

      Every entry point takes fingerprints of every visitor who is not a US Citizen or legal US Resident.

      Incorreect. there are at least 20 entry points at the northern border that are unmanned and simply have a phone there asking you tell them you are crossing the border.

      If you fly into Canada and then drive to the USA, you can bypass all that crap, hell you can easily enter and leave without anyone knowing you were here in a few places.

      Our security is a complete and utter dog and pony show that is 100% worthless in stopping the Evil-guys.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    25. Re:I'm sure it didn't help. by tunapez · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Not wanting to get blown the fuck up is not the same as xenophobia.
      And the appearence of security is not security.

      The use of fear mongering is not fear.

      I say "Good" to the Olympics not coming to the US, we don't deserve them. Maybe our political system can be fixed, but until then let the camps on either side of the aisle drool in hunger as the big ticket items of the world go elsewhere. They shat on us, the people, for the last 8+ years it's about f'in time they see the fruits of their selfish deeds. VOTE OUT THE INCUMBENTS! Red, Blue or pink: Those who value the power more than their duty deserve neither.

      --
      Imagination drew in bold strokes, instantly serving hopes and fears, while knowledge advanced by slow increments...
    26. Re:I'm sure it didn't help. by HangingChad · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'm afraid it ain't on my "to-do" list any more.

      It may be faint consolation, but TSA and DHS are just as thugish and dickish to US citizens as they are to our guests.

      I remember coming back to the U.K. from France and one of the customs guys dashed over to me. I thought it was a passport check, even though everyone else was just walking by. He wasn't checking my passport, he was running over to open the gate for me because I was dragging a suitcase and had my hands full with my passport, which he didn't even look at.

      Fingerprints, retinal scans, confiscating laptops and other portable data devices. The way we treat people coming here, I don't blame them for not wanting to visit. Not one bit.

      What I think is astounding is the pure gall of the conservatives, blaming president Obama for not getting the Olympics when it was their crap ass policies and politics that put in place the anal probe, 3rd world border treatment afforded our guests these days. Like we're going to forget who was behind it all. But that's been the pattern right along. Absolving themselves from any accountability by trying to pin it on someone else. Pathetic.

      I really don't blame you for not wanting to visit. We've brought this on ourselves.

      --
      That's our life, the big wheel of shit. - The Fat Man, Blue Tango Salvage
    27. Re:I'm sure it didn't help. by Plunky · · Score: 4, Funny

      Of course reporting this or complaining about this could get me banned from flights and labelled a terrorist.

      Not to mention admitting actually being "Dr. Evil"

    28. Re:I'm sure it didn't help. by Kizeh · · Score: 2, Interesting

      US Residents are also fingerprinted and photographed routinely upon re-entry.

    29. Re:I'm sure it didn't help. by apoc.famine · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I'm from the US, and I worry about crossing the border! Should I bring a laptop? Do I need to delete all personal information off it in case they take it at the border? If I get harassed at the border, and stick up for my constitutional rights as an American citizen, will I get tossed in jail?
       
      When citizens have those sorts of concerns, I don't blame non-citizens for not wanting to come here. We've made the US completely hostile to tourism, because a dozen people came in LEGALLY, and launched a terrorist attack. which killed less people than a month's worth of auto accidents in this country.
       
      Really, I wonder if it wouldn't be better for tourists to land in Mexico and just illegally enter the country. A ten hour hike through the desert seems less painful than trying to deal with the Border agency legally.

      --
      Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
    30. Re:I'm sure it didn't help. by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You can bounce around Europe crossing borders with little more than a wave of your passport and a friendly nod.

      A little less, in my experience. While walking around in Basel last December, I didn't even realize that I walked all the way to Germany, until I saw a sign that read "France this way," "Switzerland that way." I used process of elimination to discern my location. On my way back, I located the border by observing the changing proportion of license plates, and finally a change in street sign styles. The only distinctive feature at the frontier was a section of sidewalk being replaced. I wondered if there had been a little shack for border agents once on that spot.

      --
      I am not a crackpot.
    31. Re:I'm sure it didn't help. by lysergic.acid · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I think they should have 2 sets of flights/gates/check-in lines at the airport: one for regular people who would like for their total check-in time to take less than their flight time, and one for the paranoid "OMG! that brown person is speaking in something other than English!" crowd.

      This would greatly improve the traveling situation in the U.S. in several ways:

      1. Air travel could once again be painless for those who value convenience/dignity/privacy over the negligible improvements in safety provided by excessive security procedures. (Especially if you don't want your wife/children to be virtually undressed by airport security.)
      2. As a corrolary to #1, there would be less lawsuits and complaints filed against retarded airport staff (e.g. from a TSA goon forcing a mother to drink her own breast milk) since those subjected to these ridiculous security procedures are now willing participants.
      3. If you're a busy person or you're in a rush to get somewhere, you can always hop on a "less secure" flight and skip the 2-hour check-in time caused by someone leaving a nail clippers in their check-in luggage.
      4. If the TSA inspectors have less people to search, they can be much more thorough. (mandatory strip searches and cavity checks, anyone?)
      5. Since a terrorist is more likely to choose one of the "less secure" flights to hijack, those who are taking the "high security" flights can rest a little easier knowing that their chances of being hijacked have dropped from 0.000001% to 0.0000001%. Also, since those belonging to profiled social groups would likely opt for the less intrusive check-in lines, those on the "high security" flights would also feel safer sharing their plane with fewer Arabs/Egyptians/Persians/Mexicans/etc.

      This way, airline passengers get a choice in whether or not they want to take part in the elaborate security theater, and everyone is happy. Heck, even the airlines will be happier since fewer people would be deterred from traveling so their profits would go up.

    32. Re:I'm sure it didn't help. by erroneus · · Score: 3, Insightful

      We're not xenophobes. Our government, or more specifically, the closed group of people that run the government and their keepers, are responsible for the state of things. Most people in the U.S. merely parrot what they hear on Fox news and simply don't care about anything beyond their favorite TV shows. Most people I know generally agree that even early on, the reaction to the events of 9-11 were simply too much of an overreaction and characterize the responses as little more than a power grab leveraging fears of the people which was spread effectively by added security measures and, of course, Fox news.

    33. Re:I'm sure it didn't help. by Vellmont · · Score: 4, Interesting


      You can bounce around Europe crossing borders with little more than a wave of your passport and a friendly nod.

      Sometimes even less than that. I visited The Netherlands and Germany in 2008. When crossing from The Netherlands into Germany I expected some big stop to at least check my passport. Nothing. The train was out between the countries (track work), so they had a bus. It never stopped, nobody asked me anything, and I got on the train in Germany without so much as a peep.

      Meanwhile I took a separate trip to Tuscon Arizona this past spring. Driving around in my own country I was stopped at least 4-5 times by Homeland Gestapo to make sure I was still an American. They were nice and all, a friendly wave and "Are you a US Citizen?". Being a white guy with a US accent they just waved me through.. but still. For those of you that don't know, Homeland Gestapo sets up stops on northbound highways perhaps 20-30 miles from the U.S. Border (at least they do in Arizona). I find it absurd to be stopped IN MY OWN COUNTRY just to make sure I'm still a US Citizen.

      --
      AccountKiller
    34. Re:I'm sure it didn't help. by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's not that bad. The U.S. threatened to tighten the Canada/U.S. border with the claims you describe.

      The trouble is that Canada depends on trade with the U.S., so when faced with the option of tightening up the ten or so major international airports v.s. the 49th parallel, the great lakes seaway and Quebec/New England states, Canada opted for the former.

      So now Canadian border guards also ask stupid questions, but they're less overworked, better educated, better trained and better paid, so they tend to be more sane about border crossings. You still get checked carefully at Canada/U.S. border crossings if you don't have Canadian ID... and it's not quite so easy to get over the 49th as people might think. Sure you can throw a backpack on at night and walk along a dirt road for a while, but people do look for that sort of thing, and you have to know the area really well and blend in so as to pick the right place to cross and not upset the land owners.

      Terrorist: "Hello Greyhound, you drive busses right?"
      Greyhound: "Yep"
      Terrorist: "I want to go to this place."
      Greyhound: "Is that a satellite photo?"
      Terrorist: "no, Google maps"
      Greyhound: "What's it called? that place?"
      Terrorist: "Canada"
      Greyhound: "No the place on the map"
      Terrorist: "It's a place in Canada, near the U.S. border, how do I get there?"
      Greyhound: "I think you can take the bus to Sherbrooke and find a taxi maybe, but it will be expensive"

      Terrorist: "Take me to this place on the map.
      Taxi driver: "Pardon? Ques-ce Anglais, Pourquois? Ou?"
      Terrorist: "Eee Cee?"
      Taxi driver: "Ou?"
      Terrorist: "Tabernac!"
      Taxi driver: "We have er, English, er where is the um map?"
      Terrorist: "I am travelling to the U.S. to do nefarious things, like... I'm not quite sure, but I'll know when I get there, and I won't be able to get into the country because... umm, because... I don't know why exactly, but I decided to walk the Appelacian trail or something"
      Taxi driver: "oh kay!"

      Point is, if you know enough to get over the border through a backcountry crossing, you're probably not going to be stopped by the U.S. border guards anyway.

    35. Re:I'm sure it didn't help. by Linux+Ate+My+Dog! · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Every entry point takes fingerprints of every visitor who is not a US Citizen or legal US Resident

      Strike that last part: I am a Legal Permanent Resident, and the last time I came in they wanted my picture and fingerprints too.

    36. Re:I'm sure it didn't help. by 2phar · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Every entry point takes fingerprints of every visitor who is not a US Citizen or legal US Resident.

      Actually, the DHS at Chicago O'Hare electronically fingerprint all fingers of both hands and take a face photograph of returning legal US permanent residents.

    37. Re:I'm sure it didn't help. by Bigjeff5 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You know what? If you are lucky to come from certain "non aryan" place and do couple of things very wrong, that "pain in the ass" could become literal.

      You're actually more likely to have an easy time than us "aryan" types, at least in the airports, as racial profiling is pretty much illegal in the US, and the ACLU is even fighting to allow burkas for photo ID's.

      Since you can't be racist to a white man in the US, grandma gets strip-searched while the nervous looking arab with full beard and head wrap coasts on through.

      All of which ignores the REAL security breakdown that day, which was that 19 people managed to sneak box cutters onto airplanes. And you know what? You can -still- sneak box cutters onto airplanes, I know because a former co-worker of mine who traveled frequently left one in his bag for several trips and was never tagged. He did a major "oh shit!" when he realized it was in there.

      Harassing foreigners happens because for some reason Immigration hates immigrants, and anybody who could potentially become an immigrant, regardless of your intentions or value to society. I don't know why, 90% (at least) of the people in this country are descended from immigrants, you'd think we'd love them. Apparently we only love the illegal immigrants, legal visitors can go screw themselves.

      --
      Security is mostly a superstition... Avoiding danger is no safer in the long run than outright exposure. - Helen Keller
    38. Re:I'm sure it didn't help. by Nevyn · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Do you have a really old green card? Because my green card has my picture and fingerprints on it already.

      --
      ustr: Managed string API with ave. 44% overhead over strdup(), for 0-20B
    39. Re:I'm sure it didn't help. by Cassini2 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Incorreect. there are at least 20 entry points at the northern border that are unmanned and simply have a phone there asking you tell them you are crossing the border.

      In times past, that might have used to be the case. Nowadays, people near the border are reporting that those "defenceless" border posts aren't completely defenseless. If you cross-over and do not call, then you get pulled over by U.S. police or border patrol shortly afterwards. Granted, it isn't perfect security, but it is enough of a deterrent to make sure you use that phone.

      The serious drug runners have other routes that they use. The U.S.-Mexico border has scary levels of security, and both drugs and illegal immigrants get through. The U.S. Navy patrols the sea routes into the U.S., and both drugs and illegal immigrants get through. Additionally, on a smaller scale, the U.S. can't even keep drugs out of its own jails.

      More crime occurs across state lines than across the Canada-U.S. border. From a statistical point of view, the U.S.-Canada border is the safest border in the world. After a certain point, I think you need to ask: With all the security proposals, is anyone actually getting protected?

    40. Re:I'm sure it didn't help. by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 3, Informative

      It was a security policy. The implication was that by reducing the volume of carry-on, they could examine carry-on luggage more closely. The U.K. has been diddling with this policy on a daily basis, it's hard to know what the rules are on any given day.

      Last I checked it was one bag, and nail scissors were approved the day after thye were taken away from me.

      Can I take a handbag and a piece of hand luggage? Yes, but not yet at Stansted Airport, where the airlines continue to implement the 'one carry-on bag rule'. At Stansted, your handbag does count as the single item of hand baggage, unless you put it in your cabin bag.

      link

      It's lunacy. Normally I just throw up my arms and let them do what they like to my luggage.

      So Gatwick is okay now. Stansted is still broken.. at least according to gatwickairport.com, which well, probably isn't updated frequently on Stansted policies.

    41. Re:I'm sure it didn't help. by inicom · · Score: 3, Insightful

      One glaring hole in the pseudo-increased-security is the major vector for most smuggling - Airline and Airport employees. Baggage handlers, flight crew, cleaners, food service and ground workers all have less per entry security screening than you or I. "Oh", I hear some of you, "They passed background checks!". So did every terrorist or would-be terrorist at least once.

      --
      -a.e.mossberg
    42. Re:I'm sure it didn't help. by commodore64_love · · Score: 5, Insightful

      >>>US Residents are also fingerprinted and photographed routinely upon re-entry.

      I'm surprised no one's discussed the *internal* border checks... even if you've never crossed an international border you can still be stopped and forced to submit to a search (in contradiction of constitutional law). It's ridiculous. http://www.aclu.org/privacy/37293res20081022.html

      MAP of Constitution Free Zone: http://www.aclu.org/privacy/spying/areyoulivinginaconstitutionfreezone.html

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    43. Re:I'm sure it didn't help. by commodore64_love · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The Homeland Gestapo wanted to search the trunk of my car. Why I have no idea. Maybe because it was 10 o'clock at night and they thought it odd a Marylander was driving through Texas, and just assumed I was transporting Mexicans. (shrug)

      In any case the bastards made me stand in the cold night air for an hour while I steadfastly refused to open my trunk, and then finally let me go.

      I should have filed a lawsuit - C64love v. United States

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    44. Re:I'm sure it didn't help. by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 2, Informative

      There are no requirements for fingerprints or retinal scans in the US, at least not from canadians.

      There are, they just aren't enforced against Canadian citizens and permanent residents . However, citizens of others countries residing in Canada will be forced through a fingerprint scan if they try to cross that border (I know from personal experience, I did that twice myself, and I know quite a few people on work visas in Canada who also cross relatively frequently).

      However, they still can require any Canadian citizen to go through a scan if they deem you suspicious or something. That said, since you're still on Canadian soil before they let you through, you can refuse the scan and walk away undisturbed (under Canadian privacy laws), and they cannot detain you for investigation - only prevent you from crossing the border.

    45. Re:I'm sure it didn't help. by jcr · · Score: 2, Informative

      19 people managed to sneak box cutters onto airplanes

      No, it was permitted at the time to carry a box cutter onto an airplane. Nobody had ever attempted a hijacking with a knife before that.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    46. Re:I'm sure it didn't help. by DaHat · · Score: 2, Informative

      What I think is astounding is the pure gall of the conservatives, blaming president Obama for not getting the Olympics when it was their crap ass policies and politics that put in place the anal probe, 3rd world border treatment afforded our guests these days. Like we're going to forget who was behind it all. But that's been the pattern right along. Absolving themselves from any accountability by trying to pin it on someone else. Pathetic.

      Actually the pathetic thing is you doing just what you are accusing conservatives of doing... blaming someone else.

      Were US entry policies to blame... perhaps. Has President Obama done anything to make things easier? Not really.

      The President does get a fair bit of blame for spending something on the order of $1.2 million dollars for the quick day trip involving several planes (why can't he and the wife carpool anyway?), obviously contributing to global warming along the way while spending millions of US tax payer dollars for transportation and security (in the middle of a recession when unemployment continues to rise) and trying to leverage his much touted international appeal... all to an embarrassing end.

      Had the President been as experienced as some like to think he would know that one does not lend his stature to negotiation of this type, instead only appearing when the deal was done and lending his stature to the final successful closing of it... because anything else is a waste of his time and credibility.

      Face it... the President failed at something he decided to inject himself into. Do other parties and other reasons share some blame? Perhaps. However that does not change the fact that the President of the United States decided to inject himself into yet another issue that he had no direct responsibility to (as his is pattern), and once again failed miserably to deliver.

      Say... how's that Gitmo closing thing going? Or the economy? Iran? Jobs? I'm sorry friend, but the past 9.5 months have not exactly been a bunch of wins for this new administration... and the sooner you realize the actual cause of many of these things, the easier you will sleep at night because HopeNChange... have failed.

    47. Re:I'm sure it didn't help. by ImdatS · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually, throughout Schengen countries (this is around 23 in Europe), you don't need any ID to travel except for airline travel where they check your name on your boarding pass against your name on a photo ID (but this could also be just a drivers license, or any other official looking photo ID) - and this check is done by airline personnel only.

      When you travel by car, feet, train or ship throughout Schengen countries, you will notice the border crossing only by change of street signs, language or car plates - or by the ratio of beer:wine, good cuisine:bad cuisine, and so on.

    48. Re:I'm sure it didn't help. by maxume · · Score: 4, Informative

      There won't be an oil shortage any time soon, but if there is a shortage, the problem will be more severe than you think, tractors are currently machines that turn diesel into food, with no oil, getting food to market won't be the problem, growing it at all will be the problem.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    49. Re:I'm sure it didn't help. by HangingChad · · Score: 4, Informative

      Were US entry policies to blame... perhaps. Has President Obama done anything to make things easier? Not really.

      He's had 9 months, inheriting a cratering economy, failing banking sector, automotive sector and a health care crisis. I think he's done damn job with what he was given to work with. You don't change direction in a bureaucracy like DHS overnight. Besides, as soon as he starts looking at it or proposing changes, you'll be screaming about how Obama is leaving the country open to attack.

      Pathetic AND predictable. Maybe you noticed it was people from outside the US raising this issue? No? That's not surprising.

      Nothing but criticism and negativity. I'm sick of it, sick of you. This country would be farther ahead if we carved off a section and let you have your own space. I'd be all for that. You already have a propaganda cable channel and chain of newspapers you can take with you. Vile, disgusting, angry, small-minded, pathetic people. It sucks to have to call you countrymen.

      --
      That's our life, the big wheel of shit. - The Fat Man, Blue Tango Salvage
    50. Re:I'm sure it didn't help. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      But none of these should put you off travelling.

      Too many good alternatives. The US is just not worth the extra hassle.

    51. Re:I'm sure it didn't help. by ceoyoyo · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I don't recall any Olympics in Japan recently either.

      Brazil doesn't fingerprint visitors (well, they were fingerprinting Americans for a while as revenge), and getting an entry visa is much easier, particularly if you're from certain parts of the world that the US doesn't like.

      I have colleagues who can't travel to the US for scientific meetings because they can't get a visa, because of where they were born. Some others can get in, but they have to apply six months in advance and then it's kind of a crap shoot whether they actually get it in time or not.

    52. Re:I'm sure it didn't help. by ceoyoyo · · Score: 2, Interesting

      When I wandered around western Europe in 2005 the only crossings where I needed a passport were into and out of France, to (from) the UK.

      I've actually flown into Spain (from Canada) twice, and the booth for the passport guy was empty. Straight off the plane and onto the street with no passport check.

    53. Re:I'm sure it didn't help. by innocent_white_lamb · · Score: 5, Interesting

      A few months ago a friend of mine decided to take his family (wife and two little kids) to the USA for a day of shopping. They recently moved to a town in Manitoba, not too far from the US border.
       
      When he got to the border there was nobody at the checkpoint. He sat there for some number of minutes, nobody seemed to be around and nothing moved at all, so he continued on his way into the USA.

      A couple of miles further along the highway he saw a large truck stopped on the shoulder of the road ahead of him. As he approached it, the truck suddenly swung across the highway to block it and three unmarked police cars came roaring up from somewhere behind him and boxed him in. His car was surrounded and he was ordered out at gunpoint (which terrified everyone in the car, of course).

      He was ultimately taken back to the checkpoint in one of the police cars while his wife had to drive their car with the kids in it back to the checkpoint behind him -- she had a police car in front and behind all the way. They questioned them there for a couple of hours before they decided they were just dumb and not terrorists, then they released them at the border and they had to return home. (It was too late in the day for any shopping and who's in the mood after that, anyway.)

      He asked them if he would be allowed back into the USA in the future and they said he would be, but never go through an apparently unmanned checkpoint again. I don't think he's ever gone back, though.

      --
      If you're a zombie and you know it, bite your friend!
    54. Re:I'm sure it didn't help. by AlamedaStone · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That all sounds good - let the Neocons and the psychotic Religious Right fight it out - until you try and figure out the geography of such a move. The country is just too purple to carve off some red states and let them have at it.

      Maybe we could send them all "Free Boat Winner!" postcards that can only be redeemed in Alaska, and then shut the border?

      --
      "All these years believing you're the signified monkey, only to find out you're just a big hunk of nobody cares."
    55. Re:I'm sure it didn't help. by plsavaria · · Score: 2, Informative

      Correct me if I'm wrong, but at least when entering the US by car, you're already on american soil when talking to the border patrol. On a ski trip to Jay Peak, two stupid heas brought marijuana with them. But was searched, border patrol found it. All three were then detained for investigation.

      --
      The answer IS 42.
    56. Re:I'm sure it didn't help. by mikael · · Score: 2, Informative

      Stansted and Edinburgh airport do that as well (perhaps all airports). You go into the airport, check in your hold luggage and keep your laptop with you using a laptop bag. No problem. Go shopping, buy a newspaper, a Wired magazine and some shortbread biscuits for gifts. Still no problem. Put these items into a plastic bag. Now, we have a problem. You now have *TWO* bags.

      Normally, security would just put these into separate plastic trays and scan them separately. Now, the airline companies like Virgin and Easyjey employ some smart-asses (usually in yellow or orange T-shirts) to *ENSURE* that *EVERYONE* puts everything into the largest bag before being allowed through to
      security, so that everyone is carrying only one bag. What do the security people do? Require that everything is taken out of the bag and scanned separately.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    57. Re:I'm sure it didn't help. by Frostalicious · · Score: 2, Informative

      In the crossing points I've been through, you are on US soil when questioned by US guards. So if they don't like something you can be detained.

      I find it somewhat strange that US guards could operate on Canadian soil.

    58. Re:I'm sure it didn't help. by neurovish · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Switzerland isn't in the Schengen zone though. I went through the swiss "border control" coming from France and it was basically a couple of border officers grabbing every few people out of the crowd rushing by and checking their passport. On the train from Switzerland -> Germany, somebody came through and checked our passports, but no stamps or anything. Driving between Belgium and Germany, I couldn't even find where the border was since the area on the Border is germany speaking anyways. The other Schengen areas are the same...it's just like going from one state to another except the language on the signs change.

    59. Re:I'm sure it didn't help. by m0! · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Ditto. And it's not just once but every time you re-enter. I've re-entered the US about a dozen times in the past few years with a green card and photo and fingerprints are taken every time.

    60. Re:I'm sure it didn't help. by Concerned+Onlooker · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "...a former co-worker of mine who traveled frequently left one in his bag for several trips and was never tagged. "

      Similar experience here. I had completely forgotten about a pair of scissors left in the back pocket of my laptop bag. After flying out and returning I noticed them in there and couldn't believe that I hadn't been taken down at the airport.

      On another note, I realized on my last trip that apparently they don't think terrorists will be flying first class. I noticed that when you get a meal in first class they serve it up with a nice set of stainless steel ware, including two forks and a knife (not to mention the nice little wine glass made of actual glass). I wonder how they got them past airport security?

      --
      http://www.rootstrikers.org/
    61. Re:I'm sure it didn't help. by raju1kabir · · Score: 2, Informative

      As far as I can remember, the same roughly applies to the rest of western Europe.

      Border formalities have been dismantled for almost all of continental western Europe (excepting Gibraltar, where you still have to show your passport, and Switzerland, where they almost always wave you through and are often out to "lunch"). The German-Danish border you visited many years ago is now just a signpost, with nobody to even wave your passport at.

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
    62. Re:I'm sure it didn't help. by raju1kabir · · Score: 3, Funny

      By the way, whats the right word to describe people from Belgium? Belgians?

      Phlegms was a leading proposal, but eventually it was determined that nothing would be more cruelly accurate than simply calling them Belgians.

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
    63. Re:I'm sure it didn't help. by Teancum · · Score: 2, Informative

      I guess I happen to live in one of those shitholes you are complaining about.

      Please, get a life. Get out and smell some fresh (and not so fresh due to cattle and other farm animals) air!

      More importantly, get out to where the only other human within 20 miles are any companions you brought with you.

      I've been to 3rd world countries and even lived in them, and you don't have a stinking clue as to what exists within this country if you think your twisted vision of the USA outside of the metro areas is anything like what you are talking about.

    64. Re:I'm sure it didn't help. by couchslug · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "This country would be farther ahead if we carved off a section and let you have your own space. I'd be all for that"

      That idea has been obsolete since the War Between the States, when Washington decided that Americans have no right to secede. The only alternative left was for those forcibly retained to expand their political base, so they did.

      People will behave as they wish. If you let anyone into your country who wants in, expect them to make your society in their image to the extent they have the power to do so.

      If you forcibly incorporate or retain people in your country, expect them to make your society in their image to the extent they have the power to do so.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    65. Re:I'm sure it didn't help. by theolein · · Score: 2, Informative

      Switzerland joined the European Schengen Agreement a few years ago, which means no more direct border controls. This applies to most of the EU with the exception of the UK and a couple of other places.

    66. Re:I'm sure it didn't help. by Culture20 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That story sounds really fake. Why would the border patrol ever set up an "apparently unmanned checkpoint"? How many other people would have been passing through? And if it wasn't fake, then they've got the manpower to stage a block-truck and police, but not to sit someone in the checkpoint?

    67. Re:I'm sure it didn't help. by sumdumass · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The CDC did a study and estimated that 36,000 people in the US die from the flue each year. This estimate includes people dieing from other diseases while having the flue since the flu compromises the immunity system and allows other chronic illnesses to set in or strengthen. I'm going to assume the numbers for Sweden do the same.

      Also, the population of US is more around 33.20 times that of Sweden. 30 times is enough for a rough estimate but seeing how we got real numbers from the CDC, I figure pointing this out too could be helpful. The 33.20 cam from dividing the population of the US by the population of Sweden as reported in their respective Wikipedia entries. OF course we should know to take Wikipedia with a grain of salt but I have no reason to think the numbers aren't real.

    68. Re:I'm sure it didn't help. by DaHat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      >Nowhere else in the world, or at least nowhere that anyone wants to live, would most of the "left leaning media" that you describe be considered "left leaning".

      Sadly much of Europe has skewed pretty far to the left over the years (but parts are showing promise)... so yes by comparison the bulk of our media is fairly 'centrist' by comparison... granted I suspect you'd be hard pressed to find a non state run media as compliant and supportive of given government as we have in this country today... take Charlie Gibson for example, a given unemployment rate is bad under Reagan... but good under Obama?

      >The only way to make them appear "left leaning" is for you to stand extremely far to the right.

      Sadly correct... as many on the left in this country like to remind us when a conservative or right-ish government is elected over there... their conservative is more like one of our classical liberals.

      >Heck if you're all the way to The Right then even "Freedom of the Press" becomes a rebellious liberal idea.

      You'll have to provide a citation or example better than a whole Wikipedia entry that has not a single instance of the word 'press' or even 'media' within the article itself (excluding the notes section and footer).

    69. Re:I'm sure it didn't help. by KDR_11k · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yeah, with all the lockable cockpit doors and whatnot I've always been wondering how feasible it would be for a terrorist organization to get pilots hired into an airline and have them be on the same flight on attack day, engage all the anti-hijacking measures and then go fly into whatever they feel like.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    70. Re:I'm sure it didn't help. by 3247 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Switherland became part of the Schengen Area on 2008-12-12, which is not exactly âoea few years agoâ. It's less than one year. However, not being a member of the European Union or the European Economic Area, Switzerland is still supposed to check for goods that have to be declared.

      The UK is a partial member of the Schengen Agreement.

      --
      Claus
  2. I'd *love* to be a tourist in the States by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...but you ain't gettin' my fingerprints for the privilege. What am I, a criminal?
    Reform your system, and you'll see an increase in tourism, with all the good that that does your economy.

    1. Re:I'd *love* to be a tourist in the States by Col.+Bloodnok · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I won't be going anywhere. I refuse to let my government have my fingerprints, in order to renew my passport.

      I'll just stay in dear old blighty.

    2. Re:I'd *love* to be a tourist in the States by fbjon · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Nevermind tourism. I recently had to transfer via Detroit (first time in US) when going from Vancouver to Europe. I had to fill out all customs forms, and have my photo and all fingerprints taken, even before I had left Vancouver, even though I was just transiting.

      Unless something spectacular happens, the US is now on my permaban list.

      --
      True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
    3. Re:I'd *love* to be a tourist in the States by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Goverment won then :(

    4. Re:I'd *love* to be a tourist in the States by conureman · · Score: 2, Informative

      We may not be as state-of-the-art as Japan, but I just bought one with a 3" flush valve. WHOOSH!

      --
      The cost of that cleanup, of course, will be borne by taxpayers, not industry.
    5. Re:I'd *love* to be a tourist in the States by jez9999 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's easier for dogs to lap water up from them.

  3. I'm not looking forward to going to the US by rundgren · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'm a peaceful Norwegian with two (many years ago) convictions for possession of small amounts (1-2 joints) of marihuana. My grandmother wants to take me to visit our family in Boston next year, and I'm not looking forward to it at all because of one thing only: US border control and visa stupidity. The US is the only country in the world to care about a stupid posession misdemeanor - I could go anywhere else without issue at all..

    1. Re:I'm not looking forward to going to the US by garcia · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The US is the only country in the world to care about a stupid posession misdemeanor - I could go anywhere else without issue at all..

      And yet Canada won't let Americans in who have a DUI (also a misdemeanor here in MN at least and no, I've never had a DUI). I don't agree with the border policies in place in the US but I also don't think your comment is as insightful as others believe it to be either.

    2. Re:I'm not looking forward to going to the US by badger.foo · · Score: 4, Informative

      Even without any sort of criminal record it's not a pleasant experience to enter the US, even as a Norwegian citizen entering via Canada. This May the robots routed me back form BSDCan (in Ottawa) through Washington, DC. It's possible that the fact that I did not apply for a visa (this was transit only, planning to stay on the ground roughly one hour between flights) complicated things a bit. As it turned out, in addition to the ordinary three forms (with more or less the same info in all of them) I needed to fill in a separate 'visa waiver form' (identical to at least two of the other forms in all other things than paper thickness, sheet size, color of paper and print and font) before getting to the fingerprinting, retina scanning and oral examination to check the validity of the information that I'd filled in, performed by a border guard who seemed to have been trained to appear hostile but was obviously monumentally bored by the whole process. This was after clearing the ordinary pre-boarding security theatre, mind you. And of course I would need to pick up the boarding passes for my connecting flights at the Washington, DC airport. That meant getting from one end of the airport to the other to pick up boarding passes and clearing another full act of security theatre in order to get back to where I could board the transatlantic flight. I did make my connecting fligh, running pretty much all the way except for the time spent lining up for the various security checks on the way. So yes, I can believe in a theory that US border control was a factor in deciding to place the next Olympics elsewhere.

      --
      -- That grumpy BSD guy - http://bsdly.blogspot.com/
    3. Re:I'm not looking forward to going to the US by orzetto · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Heisann, en av dine nye landsmenn her.

      I heard from a guy who was in a similar situation at a julebord a few years ago. He (a researcher at NTNU) had to go to a conference, and when entering the US he was asked whether he had previous convictions. He had, for "civil disobedience" (he did not specify, but I suppose it was bad enough to worry about). Realising that, had he answered "yes", he would have been denied admission and would have missed the conference, he managed to contact the Norwegian embassy or a consulate, and asked whether he really had to mention that. The embassy told him (not sure how explicitly) that he could say he had not, with the understanding that had the US border authorities checked with the embassy they would have backed him.

      So, congratulations US border authorities: you are being so much of a pain in the ass that even the institutions of satellite countries tell their citizens to lie to you. I suppose this will help catching whomever you are looking for.

      --
      Victims of 9/11: <3000. Traffic in the US: >30,000/y
    4. Re:I'm not looking forward to going to the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm fairly certain you can get a quick answer at the US embassy in Oslo just by calling them.

      Nice idea, but no.

      There is no circumstance in which a US embassy can tell you for sure that you will be allowed into the USA.

      The guy at the border can always turn you away. Even if you've done nothing wrong. Even if you have a valid visa. Even if you're the fucking Pope. If the guy at the border doesn't want to let you in, you don't come in.

  4. UI Border controls aimed at stopping tourism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I thought that was the whole point.

    What's that? They're for stopping TERRORISM, you say? Naaaaah, can't be.

    (I once went one a round-the-world holiday. At Fiji's passport control, they gave us garlands, and serenaded us with guitars; at US passport control they growled at us.)

    1. Re:UI Border controls aimed at stopping tourism by cptdondo · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I carry both a US and a Czech passport. I can travel anywhere in the former communist nations without a second look. Heck, this last time I didn't even get a stamp. We went through Amsterdam and it took a few seconds and I got a smile from a pretty cute immigration lady.

      But on coming back to the States, I'm treated like a criminal - where have you been, what did you do, what are you bringing back, did you do this or that, what's in that bag....

      I hate it.

      And the irony isn't lost on me - we (the US) pride ourselves on our freedoms, but we have instituted what is probably the most draconian entry system in the free world. And the former communist nations, which boast no claims of freedom, allow me to travel unhindered, with a wave and a smile.

      Maybe this will be a wakeup call to the US that we've gone completely off the deep end here.

  5. I'm sorry, is that surprising how? by A+beautiful+mind · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I've read it years ago that the USA is losing billions per year in tourism after the 9/11 border restrictions.

    The Olympics became a disgustingly commercial event for the past few decades and corporations are going to put pressure towards a location where prospective visitors aren't put off by over the top security measures...

    The next time someone asks what's the harm in the security theatre, point them towards the loss of tourism. I have to say I'm one of those people who deeply resent the invasive fingerprint taking entrance to the USA. It's a shame that stupid border procedures prevent me from visiting an otherwise beautiful country...

    --
    It takes a man to suffer ignorance and smile
    Be yourself no matter what they say
  6. Border Control only? by AndGodSed · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Well it could also be because a Rio olympics would be really awesome. I don't think Chicago could compete on atmosphere with Rio.

    1. Re:Border Control only? by mc+moss · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And the fact that South America never held the Olympics before.

    2. Re:Border Control only? by adamkennedy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Indeed, not to mention the rise of Brazil in the world in general (much like China before it) and the chance to finally have one in South America now there's a country competent enough to make it work. Plus the better weather, plus it's cheaper to go to, plus you don't need crazy-priced "Platinum (US Only)" grade medical and lawsuit travel insurance, plus how awesome a Brazillian opening and closing ceremony will be, plus America has had it relatively recently, and on and on.

    3. Re:Border Control only? by ThePhilips · · Score: 4, Funny

      how awesome a Brazillian opening and closing ceremony will be,

      Rest of the world would never know about it - because it would be rated 18+/21+ and would never be aired.

      --
      All hope abandon ye who enter here.
    4. Re:Border Control only? by NoYob · · Score: 4, Informative
      Unlike China, Brazil actually has a thriving world class aeronautical industry . I see in the business press how the Boeing and Airbus needs to watch out for the Chinese and I think , "Chinese?! The Brazilians are well on their way."

      Although Brazil has quite a few social problems, they're well on their way to getting their shit to together and I'm thinking in the not too distant future, they'll be a very large power house in the World Economy. I may start taking Portuguese!

      --
      It's NOT me! It's the meds! I'm on 1000mg of Fukitol.
    5. Re:Border Control only? by the_humeister · · Score: 2, Informative

      I just heard this on NPR this morning. You know what else the Brazilians are pledging? $14 Billion! What was Chicago going to pledge? $5 Billion to this event.

    6. Re:Border Control only? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Does "rest of the world" mean just the USA, to you?

    7. Re:Border Control only? by cdrnet · · Score: 2, Informative

      Don't worry, it's only Americans who have such weird issues with nudity. No problem airing it in the rest of the world...

  7. Personal Example by inicom · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I can give you a personal example of this - my father is a 76-year old western european citizen, and has been to the US easily a hundred times and was a US resident for over a decade. And as a merchant, he's spent easily many hundred of thousands on goods in the US over the past 40 years. Last Christmas, he came over to see us, and at the local International Airport he was pulled aside, patted down, his baggage and items gone over in detail, and interrogated for 20 minutes. Why? No reason given. As a result, he doesn't want to come to the US at all any more, so we have to go visit in Europe or rendezvous in another 3rd country. Yea, I know, we get to go to Europe more often, but it's a lot more expensive & difficult to coordinate schedules and take the family than to have one person travel here.

    I spent a lot of last year overseas on projects - and I heard over and over again from people that no longer think it's worth it to come to the US for shows/conferences/travel because of the travel restrictions and attitude toward non-US citizens by customs and immigration.

    --
    -a.e.mossberg
    1. Re:Personal Example by BradMajors · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It is not a non-citizen vs. citizen thing. I am a US citizen and I have been questioned for over an hour, my address book copied, my carry on papers have been copied, and my checked baggage gets opened and searched every time I fly.

    2. Re:Personal Example by Derosian · · Score: 2, Insightful

      My father is actually a US citizen but he went out to Iraq working for KBR as a contractor, then later on switched to a better paying company that hires people out to other locations, now he nearly refuses to come back to the states, because he says the security and the people are such a pain. The good side is, he flies the family out to other countries now so we can visit him.

      I think the US needs to see the bigger picture more, and the individual event less. How many lives have we lost to terrorism in how many years of history?

  8. Re:No. by Jaysyn · · Score: 3, Funny

    That's just retarded. Odds are about even he won't even be president in 2016.

    --
    There is a war going on for your mind.
  9. more likely reason: by MickyTheIdiot · · Score: 2, Insightful

    More likely, part of the reason Chi. lost the Olymipic bid had something to do with an honor's student getting hit on the side of the head with a railroad tie (as captured and shown on CNN and youtube.

    There are people out of control in Chicago right now and I have to say I can't blame the IOC for not wanting to go there. Along with the traffic issues and overwhelming government corruption there are too many problems for Chicago to have an Olympics in the near future.

    1. Re:more likely reason: by wickerprints · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Who the hell modded you up?

      Rio de Janeiro is one of the most violent cities in the world. You think one sensationalist news story compares to what goes on in the favelas of Rio? What's worse is that the proximity of poor areas to rich ones means you're not safe anywhere. People regularly get mugged and kidnapped, tourists especially.

      Rio's murder rate: 37.7 per 100,000 (2006)
      Chicago's murder rate: 15.7 per 100,000 (2005)

    2. Re:more likely reason: by Foolicious · · Score: 2, Funny

      There are people out of control in Chicago right now

      Like its mayor, Richard Daley.

      --
      Please don't use "umm" or "err" or "erm".
    3. Re:more likely reason: by Haffner · · Score: 2, Informative

      As someone who lives blocks from where the new Olympic Village would be held, I can assure you that it really isnt a safe place (right now). Too bad we didnt win the bid, as it would have really helped to clean up the area. Washington Park, the intended site, IIRC had multiple shootings over the summer. The Olympics would be hosted in a pretty bad part of town - Some of the worst neighborhoods in the city are literally right down the street.

      --
      "Going to war without the French is like going deer hunting without your accordion." ~General Norman Schwarzkopf
  10. Re:Chicago lost it because it didn't deserve it. by _merlin · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Rio has pretty high crime, too, you know, and slums. I doubt Chicago's worse.

  11. Re:Chicago lost it because it didn't deserve it. by Bieeanda · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Because it would be an excuse to move 'undesirables' out of the city in large numbers, make a spike in capital spending and construction, and then cause the city and its environs to implode when the Olympic venues turn out to be unrentable and the tourists vanish again?

    Hosting the Olympics might be an honour on the national level, but locally... you've got to figure out which city you can afford to disrupt over the long term.

  12. I don't blame them by Aurisor · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The amount of man-handling and smug stares I have to endure from thick-necked, multi-chinned police academy rejects is bad enough when flying domestically. That's no way to welcome the largest tourist event in the world.

  13. They may be lucky! by gilgongo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I live in London, where just about anyone you ask who lives here will tell you they don't want the games, never wanted the games, and are angry that money to fund the building of venues and facilities is being taken from National Lottery funds and (possibly) direct taxation.

    Mileage varies considerably in the short and long-term economic and social effects of hosting an Olympics. London doesn't need it, and Chicago may well not have done either.

    --
    "And the meaning of words; when they cease to function; when will it start worrying you?"
    1. Re:They may be lucky! by zmollusc · · Score: 4, Funny

      The London Olympics have epic potential for showcasing the UK. The cycling events should all be on the pot-holed, speed-bumped, litter-filled streets and have to comply with all road laws, the weight lifters would all be subject to health and safety legislation, as would the hammer and javelin throwers. Runners would struggle down the uneven, excrement-smeared pavements, dodging around the lamp-posts, bollards and fencing etc.

      --
      They whose government reduces their essential liberties for temporary security, receive neither liberty nor security.
  14. Why not fly into Canada or Ireland first by Rogerborg · · Score: 4, Interesting

    And get precleared through US immigration while still within a civilised country? No joking: if the Security Theatre misidentifies me as a notorious enemy of Freedemocracy, I'd rather prove my innocence to just about anyone except US "Homeland Security".

    --
    If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    1. Re:Why not fly into Canada or Ireland first by jcenters · · Score: 3, Funny

      Or even easier: Fly to Mexico and jump the border. I find it interesting that legitimate visitors have such a hard time getting into the country when our southern border is Swiss cheese.

      --

      vi ~/.emacs

  15. Easily the most unfriendly airports in the world by Ovspec · · Score: 2, Informative

    Travelling through the US (spending a night there) is one of the worst things that can happen to you. I now avoid it at all costs, even if the other alternative is alot more expensive, hell its even worse that going through Venezuela. You don't need to make people jump through hundreds unnecessary hoops, treat them like some kind parasite/criminal you don't want anywhere near your country and employ the stupidest, most incompetent, pettiest little assholes to handle them in order to protect your country from the big bad terrorism. If a terrorist wants in, its not going to be hard, airports that treat people like scum are just further isolating your country from the rest of the world.

  16. Re:Easily the most unfriendly airports in the worl by MickyTheIdiot · · Score: 4, Informative

    Just so you know, people at American airports don't treat *Americans* very well either.

  17. "The most ridiculous interview..." by Guppy · · Score: 5, Informative

    "The most ridiculous interview I heard with my own ears:
      Interviewer: "What did you have this morning as breakfast?"
      Applicant: "Bread." I: "Nothing else?"
      Applicant: "No."
      Interviewer: "According to American law, we cannot grant you a visa."
      Applicant: "....".

    I was sitting beside the person when he was rejected. You know, it is funny to reject someone according American law just because he only had bread in the morning."

    From http://home.wangjianshuo.com/archives/20060519_getting_us_visa_in_china.htm

    1. Re:"The most ridiculous interview..." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I am a greencard holder, and this is how it went at the Newark airport on my return after a long break I took to visit my family in India:

      The Lady in Uniform: How long were you there?
      me: About 3 months.
      TLIU: Why 3 months? That's too long.
      me: Because I had not visited my family for a while and I needed a break.
      TLIU:What were you doing there?
      me: Being with family, visiting friends, seeing places.
      TLIU: But 3 month is a long time for that.
      me: Er..

      It went on for 2 more minutes like this. I have no idea what she was trying to do there. I mean, which law I might have breaking for taking three months off work?

    2. Re:"The most ridiculous interview..." by easyTree · · Score: 5, Funny

      I mean, which law I might have breaking for taking three months off work?

      Guilty of having more holidays than her?

    3. Re:"The most ridiculous interview..." by z_gringo · · Score: 4, Funny

      Sorry. The correct answer was Bacon. Remember that for next time. Bacon.

      --
      -- -- Warning. Do not stare directly at the sun.
    4. Re:"The most ridiculous interview..." by Ihmhi · · Score: 3, Funny

      I live in Newark, so I'd understand how you'd catch some shit. I know it smells bad, but the gas mask was probably a bad idea.

    5. Re:"The most ridiculous interview..." by PCM2 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I am a U.S. Citizen who travels on a U.S. passport. The last time I came back from an overseas trip, I showed the security guy my passport and was subjected to the following interview:

      Interviewer: Where will you be going once you land?
      Me: Uh. Home?
      Interviewer: And what will you do once you're in the U.S.?
      Me: ...

      I had been hopping between airports for a long time that day and was tired and eager to get home, so you can imagine how ridiculous this situation seemed. Part of me wanted to say, "Oh, you know, the usual... smoke some weed, hang out with my buddies at the mosque, maybe get on welfare..." I mean, technically I could have said "rob banks" and as a U.S. citizen I would still have every right to return to my own country! (And I mean that literally...the Right to return to my country.)

      But you can fill in my real answer yourself; I'm sure you get the idea. Expedience was necessary here, as I had a connecting flight to catch. But it still galled me that I had to talk to some droid as if I were interviewing for a job at McDonald's just to return home after a trip.

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    6. Re:"The most ridiculous interview..." by grotgrot · · Score: 2, Interesting

      When I came through SFO last time their computers read my British passport and Green Card and then decided that meant I was American which resulted in ever increasing numbers of supervisors being called over. At some point one of them started arguing with me as I was born in an African country but was only there for one month after my birth. He was insisting I must have a passport from there as well. No amount of pointing out that the US is one of the few countries with a policy of being born there means automatic citizenship appeased him. (They eventually worked out the computer system was being stupid.)

      BTW the time limit for outside visits with a Green Card is 6 months. You can go for up to a year if you fill out lots of paper work in advance.

    7. Re:"The most ridiculous interview..." by zuperduperman · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This kind of thing was one of the factors that made me decide not to apply for a green card when it was offered. Once I looked into it I realized it was an untenable way to live my life - settling in a country but living forever knowing that a breach of any of a whole raft of obscure and ambiguous constraints and restrictions might see me kicked out of the country despite having maybe a house, family, job, kids or all kinds of other commitments. In fact, the way I understood it at the time, they could basically terminate your greencard for *any* reason - just because they felt like it. No one should live with that threat hanging over their head. Of course, one can (and probably should) apply for citizenship eventually, but that might be 10 years down the track.

  18. Good for Rio (good for Chicago) by RealityProphet · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You know, as much as I hate how Obama continually sets himself and America up for trampling on by all members of the international community, Rio deserves this, and so does Chicago for that matter.

    The Olympics belong to the emerging economies, not the first world. Western nations whine so much about the possibility of hosting the Olympics, why on earth should they choose any western nation? London has cried from the get go of how much it'll cost, how other large scale projects have failed miserably, even how much traffic it would bring and how much it would, oh gasp, inconvenience the local populace. F em. Half of Chicagoans didn't even *want* the Olympics hosted there. WTF? Why have it there then? What a welcome!

    Contrast the western media's handling of the London bid, the Chicago bid with that of the Beijing games and their exuberance. It was the most spectacular games in history, and they were positively giddy to be hosting it. Contrast Chicago's reception of their own bid with Rio's. You get the feeling that all of Brazil wants to host it, so let them! While I don't think it'll be as big as the Beijing olympics, it will be far more spectacular, optimistic, and inviting than anything any of the other condenders would have been able to muster.

    1. Re:Good for Rio (good for Chicago) by hamburger+lady · · Score: 2, Informative

      Obama just wanted it there because he lived there once

      "lived there once"? what the hell does that mean? outside of 4 years at harvard he lived in chicago from 1985 until he became president.

      --

      ---
      Is this the MPAA? Is this the RIAA? Is this the DMCA? I thought it was the USA!
  19. Mod this up by gerddie · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Then again, when I'm already in Canada, why would I want to go to the US ;)

    1. Re:Mod this up by royallthefourth · · Score: 4, Funny

      So that you can get access to the best healthcare system in the world. Duh.

    2. Re:Mod this up by AceofSpades19 · · Score: 2, Funny

      First you need to sacrifice your first born child and your right hand before you can even get within 50 feet of a hospital

  20. Thank you, border patrol by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm grateful for the men and women who patrol our borders. If this report is true, their hard work has kept us safe from another potential disaster: Having to endure 7 years of unrelenting hype, having to witness multiple late and overbudget Stalinesque construction projects, all capped off by an orgy of hypocritical corporate-sponsored "amateur" contests and overblown nationalism. Good job!

  21. Is it Ironic or not ? by atlmatt36 · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Really, is it all that ironic that the IOC would consider our immigration and the recent crime statistics as reasons to not come here over RIO ? For me at least, I can see their point on a few issues :

    1) The U.S. has the highest incarceration rate when measured against citizen head count to incarcerated or otherwise restricted status citizenry (Parole/Probation) of ANY country in the world.

    2) A convicted U.S. felon can still travel internationally to other countries, yet the U.S. refuses to consider allowing another country's citizens to arrive here for what constitutes a misdemeanor or less, regardless of time passed

    3) Getting back into the country as a citzen or "worse" GC or other status holder is worse than painful if singled out for secondary. I am non-white and get profiled every time I come back, despite having served and having no "reasons" to be flagged other than my last name which is clearly non-american originated.

    4) While requiring a VISA or fingerprinting itself is not counter-intuitive to travel, the manner and inconsistency is. Having said that, for being touted as "the land of the free" and "a shining beacon of democracy" is ironic itself when our policies at the border (or even non-border with the TSA and Border Agents) clearly indicate that we are profiling even inside our borders. How do you explain roving road blocks for "immigration" checks just because you happen to be on a road within 100 miles of a border....

    5) To host in Chicago, we'd be doing the same things we did in Atlanta. We'd be buying the homeless once again a 1-way ticket to nowhere (or anywhere but "here"), we'd be tearing down projects and displacing people/families to make way for the Olympic Village, and you can be damn sure that the average "Chicagoan" (sp?) would not be able to even get into the venues, much less afford the cost of the tickets being hosted in their own city. This happened in Atlanta where I live in 1996....

    6) We just had the summit in Pittsburgh that was shameful in the way it's citizenry were treated as well as most of the peaceful demonstrators. Beatings, the use of a sound cannon and extensive use of tear gas, etc had me thinking initially this was some other country where liberty and democracy/freedom of speech was supressed.... Turns out I was right, but had the wrong country in mind, which was depressing and downright scary

    The list could go on with examples, but it would be unfair to clutter the Slashdot database with further examples that are easily googled.
    I do love my country and the people in it for the most part, but I'd be lying if I said I believed 95% of the hype that our Tourism Board spews out to attract visitors. I think the loss of tourism and downturn in visitors since we enacted the failed Patriot Act speaks volumes, the rest of the tidbits I shared just add further fuel to the reasons why those who would like to see us (the U.S.) just stay the hell away.
    Suffice it to say in my opinion that on the one hand we have U.S. which has clearly become a very dim shadow of itself and the other hand we're trying to portray ourselves, or at least that's my impression as a U.S. Citizen.....

  22. Did Tokyo lose because of this as well? by antifoidulus · · Score: 3, Insightful

    As a visitor entering Japan, you are subject to being fingerprinted and having your picture taken at border control as well as a bunch of harassing questions such as, "Where are you staying and who are you staying with?"(I always make up a fake address). I don't know how much different it is compared to the US, but if they rejected Chicago because of these restrictions, they probably rejected Tokyo for a lot of the same reasons.

    1. Re:Did Tokyo lose because of this as well? by Jeeeb · · Score: 2, Informative

      When I entered into Japan it was really extremely easy. I showed my visa and was then asked if I spoke Japanese. I said yes and was directed in Japanese to place my hands on the finger print scanner and look into the camera. The entire immigration process took about a minute and before I was cleared to go through. The only question I was asked is if I spoke Japanese. Which I presume had to do with working out whether to direct me in English or Japanese.

      Of course as an anti-terror policy it is somewhat silly. The only terrorist attacks I know of in Japan have been committed by Japanese. About the only outside group that might consider a terror attack on Japan is North Korea and being a tall white guy, I don't exactly look North Korean... But I guess applying it fairly beats racial profiling.

      On the other hand, crime by Chinese residents is a big and growing problem in Japan. So I can understand them wanting to clamp down on immigration procedures and so on. It's just a matter of executing it in a fair, professional and efficient way which from what I've seen they're doing.

    2. Re:Did Tokyo lose because of this as well? by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No, of course not! It is only evil when the US does it! Other countries are perfectly justified in doing it, the US is the only bad guy.

      I'm quite sure the border control was a very small issue especially since such a thing could be laxened specifically for the Olympics (China did) and likely would be since the president was keen on having them.

      No my guess is the most important consideration was that South America has never had an Olympic games. That gives them a leg up on getting them, presuming they are ready to host them. The Olympics is, after all, an INTERNATIONAL competition. Seems only fair that it should get hosted everywhere in the world then, no region that is capable of hosting it (it does take a certain amount of infrastructure) should be excluded. The US has gotten the Olympics more than any other country I'm aware of, so it seems reasonable to give others a chance.

      There's also the matter of location. Chicago seems like a pretty shitty place to host the summer Olympics just climate wise. Not really one of the top summer destination spots in my book. Rio is a MUCH nicer location. Let's face it, the Olympics being a big tourist event, that sort of thing matters.

      While the issue of border control may have been discussed, I doubt it was any serious consideration. Like I said, you've got the president pushing for it. If they go and say "Well ok, we'll give it to Chicago, but you have to do away with the fingerprinting and such for the people coming to see it," the president will say "No problem."

      This is just people trying to twist things to push their agenda of getting rid of the new border controls. Now don't get me wrong, the new border controls are BS and should be done away with. However, trying to make up bullshit reasons makes you no better than the people who made up bullshit reasons to justify them int he first place.

    3. Re:Did Tokyo lose because of this as well? by thewils · · Score: 2, Informative

      I visited Japan during the initial H1N1 scare and even then it was a fairly pleasant experience. I was concerned about missing our connecting flight from Tokyo to Osaka but we were processed and had our luggage within 20 minutes of disembarking and checked in 10 minutes later. We even managed to get a plastic bottle of water air-side. It was taken from us, put through a sniffer machine and very politely handed back.

      I wasn't looking forward to the new passport/fingerprint restrictions, but they were all done in a typically low-key Japanese way and I didn't have a problem with any of it.

      --
      Once I was a four stone apology. Now I am two separate gorillas.
    4. Re:Did Tokyo lose because of this as well? by dimension6 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Really? I've been living in Japan for two years now (I'm a US citizen), and I absolutely dread going back to the States. Arriving in the US feels like a madhouse by comparison. As a Japanese multiple-exit visa holder (most long-term residents have this), I have a separate line at immigration that usually has no line. There is the fingerprinting and photo (which was a point of contention with the American Chamber of Commerce, I remember), but I've never been asked any background questions on any of my 10+ entries into the country. The entire process takes no more than 5 minutes as opposed to the hour-plus ordeal that I face at any US international entry point. You don't have to remove your shoes, and at least for domestic flights, it's no problem to bring a bottle of liquid (tea, etc.) right through security).

    5. Re:Did Tokyo lose because of this as well? by HonIsCool · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yeah, same experience here. I visited Japan first time before the new fingerprint checks were put in, and it was supremely simple procedure to enter. The customs staff were very polite (of course) and friendly, and just waved me through. I was actually worried because I had brought a big perfume bottle which I realized on the plane to be over the allowed duty-free size, but no problem! I don't consider having to give an address of residence for the stay to be harrassment either. This is given on a disembarkment card and not in a interrogation by officials by the way. I do hate the new fingerprinting checks, no doubt about that, but the procedure itself is very smoothly implemented and going through takes about no time.

      --
      "Give me six lines of C++ code written by the most competent programmer, and I will find enough in there to hang him."
  23. Re:No. by easyTree · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This thread seems to nicely demonstrate the national arrogance..

    Could it possibly be that Rio won rather than the USA losing it?

    After all, it's not like you deserved it at all. Invading lots of countries to do who-knows-what isn't consistent with the spirit of international harmony spread by the Olympics.

    Feel free to mod me troll for telling it like it is :D

  24. The Sad Thing... by IonOtter · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...is that the Republicans-and probably more than a few Democrats-are going to blame Obama and his administration for something THEY ruined.

    --
    [End Of Line]
  25. Actually... by denzacar · · Score: 4, Insightful

    From all those cities listed in the report linked above, only Athens seems to have failed to properly exploit the effect of hosting the Olympic Games.
    All other cites (Barcelona, Atlanta, Sidney, Beijing) reported nothing but growth.

    London doesn't need it, and Chicago may well not have done either.

    Nonsense.
    A global metropolis that can say "I'll pass" to billions invested in the infrastructure, millions of visitors and billions of pounds/dollars/euros spent by everyone?
    No such place on this planet.
    The effect on the crime and pollution alone (clean streets) is worth the trouble for the average Tom, Dick and Harry.
    Those must be some crazy conservative xenophobes you talked to.
    Not wanting money during a global economic crisis. Mad as bicycles that lot.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    1. Re:Actually... by zippthorne · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You can clean your streets without having the banner of five rings looming over them. Do you think that the olympic committee comes in and does the work?

      You can invest money in infrastructure without an international committee overseeing the work, too. Where do you think those "billions invested" come from? It's not the organization that runs the olympics.

      Instead of adding those billions to the "benefits", you should subtract them. And when figuring the boost, you have to recall six years of spending with no payoff until the end. What would that spending have gone towards if it hadn't been directed at grown men playing children's games? Growth, I'll bet.

      There is no economic reason for any city to host any sporting event. Let the event organizers pay for and reap the profits if it's so great.

      That said, Chicago didn't lose. Rio won the decision. They weren't voting against chicago. Are we really so vain that we probably think the choice was about US?

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    2. Re:Actually... by adamkennedy · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Speaking as a long-time "Sidney" resident, I gotta say we were all a bit annoyed by the whole damned thing too, the fact they ripped up half the CBD, the endless news stories, the drama bombs, the wasted money, the roads that were all going to be closed, and all the general getting ready crap. People were wearing "Fuck The Olympics" shirts openly in the streets.

      And then the games started.

      And it was a fucking awesome enormous city wide party that lasted for 2-3 weeks, all the horrible concrete repeatedly torn up footpaths had been replaced with highly skatable and cable-friendly slate all through the centre city, there were no building sites anywhere, the pubs and bars were all full, and it just generally kicked ass.

      While I don't by any means underestimate the ability of Londoners to put a negative light on something, I have this suspicion that it's the same for every city that hosts it. A sort of preparation and drama filled pregnancy, filled with hormonal outbursts and morning sickness.

      Wait till the games actually start, it will be a different place.

  26. Probably not by moosesocks · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Unless something's changed in the past two years, this probably didn't have a huge effect, given that the next two games following Vancouver are going to be held in London and Moscow respectively. Neither the UK nor Russia have a reputation of being particularly welcoming to travelers.

    Although not as bad as the US, border security in the UK is by far the most invasive in the EU, opting to screen people arriving from within other parts of the EU. Back when I used to hold a multiple-entry visa to the UK, it was treated as a point of suspicion every time I crossed the border (despite the fact that I had to provide the consulate with every shred of information about my private life in order to get the visa). This policy is completely and entirely illogical -- odds are that the border agencies knew more about me than they do about their own citizens.

    On the other hand, Russia takes the cake for bizarre and restrictive immigration procedures. The US state department's page describes these in detail, as there are far too many peculiarities and specifics to list here.

    If this was an issue, I seriously doubt that the UK or Russia would have been selected by the IOC. As it stands, Chicago didn't lose by that many votes, and the IOC's voting rules and distribution of membership are hardly fair. An IRV system is definitely needed to prevent the sort of gamesmanship that likely caused Chicago to lose, and somehow made Tokyo lose votes in the second round.

    That all said, Rio will be a fantastic host for the games. This will be the first time ever that the Olympics have been held on the South American continent, which is a pretty cool milestone all in itself. I'm fairly confident that the US will be first in line for 2018.

    --
    -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
  27. Re:Brazil's passport system is no picnic either by JamesP · · Score: 5, Informative

    No, they just make you go through the exact same thing a Brazilian citizen goes while going to your contry.

    If you're from a Schengen country, come on in. If you're from the US, you need a visa, you need to have your fingerprints taken, etc, etc

    Reciprocity's a bitch, isn't it.

    --
    how long until /. fixes commenting on Chrome?
  28. yes, probably by jipn4 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I've organized some international events, and US border control policies and visa requirements are a big argument against holding them in the US.

    Border control in Europe is very simple in my experience; people check whether your passport is on a list, and if it's not, they just wave you through. No fingerprinting, photographs, long lines, tricky questions, pre-registration, or interrogation booths. And despite that, Europe seems to have been doing no worse on terrorism or illegal immigration than the US.

  29. Re:Puhleez... by jonbryce · · Score: 2, Informative

    As a matter of fact, yes I do.

    I struggle think of countries where I would expect a worse welcome than the USA. Maybe Zimbabwe as Mugabee blames the British for all the problems it is facing at the moment.

  30. Bad for Permanent Residents too by evilned · · Score: 4, Interesting

    My wife has permanent residency here in the US and I am a citizen . We used to be able to go through border control together and she was treated quite well. Now, she has to be fingerprinted (the fact that her fingerprints are already on file with immigration, has been through the interview process for permanent residency seem to make no difference).

    I have permanent residency in her country, Singapore, as well. When we enter or exit Singapore, its quick and easy. Even before I had PR status, it was easier to get in and out of the country as a tourist than it was to get in and out of the US as a citizen. Land of the Free, my ass.

    --

    "My head hurts, My feet stink, and I dont love Jesus." -Jimmy Buffett

    1. Re:Bad for Permanent Residents too by MeNeXT · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The US has lost the title of land of the free unfortunately its citizens have not yet realized it.

      --
      DRM? No thanks, I'll just get it somewhere else...
  31. Border patrol employees are dickheads by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm sure there's a requirement that only only douche bags can work within border control in the US. They do treat everyone, American or foreigner like a piece of shit. It's because if it wasn't for their cushy little job as a government bully, they'd probably be a toilet clear for Wal-Mart.

    Being an American who has opted to live outside of the US seems to be some sort of crime in their eyes. At least I can take comfort in the fact my life means something unlike theirs.

  32. US Customs Isn't Kind To US Citizens, Either by damn_registrars · · Score: 5, Informative

    They are concerned about what US Customs would do to foreigners, they should look at what they do to citizens. I was born and raised in the states, and still live in a state near a border. I recently crossed back into the states (by car) after 5 days in a neighboring country. I pulled up to customs and had to turn off my car and hand my keys to a leather-gloved customs officer so he could search my trunk, while I stayed in my car. I was not allowed to see what he was doing; he could have easily taken items from my trunk or placed items in my trunk without my knowing it. Eventually they cleared me but offered no explanation for what they were doing.

    I have had similar experiences in the past as well, I once had to pull from the customs booth to the "additional screening" building (single car garage with doors on both ends) where I had to empty my trunk for a customs agent.

    So I can't say I'm surprised if the security theater here was a deciding factor against having another Olympics here. Certainly our procedures have changed a fair bit since 1996.

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    1. Re:US Customs Isn't Kind To US Citizens, Either by richmaine · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Amen. I'm a US citizen (by birth, and I've lived here all 59 years of my life). The border folk of my own country give me far more hassle than I've ever had with any other country. I don't even fit any particularly common "bad guy profile" (independent of any questions about the use of such profiles). I'm quite the nerdy, white middle-class American image. They don't pick on me in particular; its just that the way they are to most people is so much worse than the border folk of most other countries.

      This summer I had my first trip to Russia. The cruise ship folk warned us about how painful the border folk were. This appeared to be mostly a push to buy the cruise ship tour excursion so that they could help you smooth it. I didn't do that; did have my own Visa. Went through the Russian officials more quickly and easily then the US ones when I returned home.

      As far as so-called security goes, if someone in my family mysteriously disappeared, never to be heard from again, agents of my own government would be a lot higher on my list of likely culprits than foreign terrorists. I don't really run around every day worried about either possibility (and I don't even brink my tin foil hat with me when I travel), but I sure know which one is higher on my concern list.

  33. Funny by copponex · · Score: 5, Insightful

    A DUI is something that carries the stigma of the high probability of the offender killing themselves or someone else. Having a joint is literally not a crime to anyone, and yet which one gets American nuts in a twist?

    The disconnect in moral reasoning is getting ridiculous.

    1. Re:Funny by frieza79 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Having a joint is literally not a crime to anyone, and yet which one gets American nuts in a twist?

      Do you know what the word literally means?

  34. Not to mention by markov_chain · · Score: 3, Interesting

    At the Olympics which did happen to be hosted in USA, in Atlanta, after all the nasty border control security the one terrorist act that actually occured was performed by a domestic terrorist.

    --
    Tsunami -- You can't bring a good wave down!
  35. I hate your guards, I hate your border by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I didn't do anything. Leave me alone, don't steal my goddamn laptop. Don't harass me. Don't treat me the way you do.

  36. Re:Passport Control? by Anne+Onymous · · Score: 2, Informative

    Chicago is known for being wet, cold, windy, and expensive.

    Actually, Chicago in the summer is know for being miserably, even deadly, hot.

  37. Re:No. by pjt33 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Speaking as a European who has experienced US border controls on connecting flights (i.e. not even properly entering the country): whatever the actual reasons for the decision, US border controls are sufficient reason not to host it there.

  38. Re:Puhleez... by markov_chain · · Score: 3, Informative

    I had far less trouble getting a tourist visa for China than US. And their border control was far less invasive. The only unusual step was getting checked via remote IR thermometer, due to the swine flu epidemic.

    --
    Tsunami -- You can't bring a good wave down!
  39. I've had this experience in heathrow by way2trivial · · Score: 2, Interesting

    requiring a visa to change planes-and that was pre 9/11

    JFK-london-BUD

    --
    every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
  40. I, for one, boycott the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Once on a flight from Australia to Canada, my plane stopped to refuel at Hawaii airport.

    When we were about an hour out approaching Hawaii, the flight attendants came around with US immigration cards for us to fill out. I was completely baffled and started to get seriously worried that I was on the wrong flight or some shit. I said to the attendant "But, we're going to Vancouver, right?". She replied "Yes, I'm sorry, everyone has to fill out a US immigration card". She seemed kinda puzzled by the whole thing too.

    Not entirely put at ease, I started filling out the form, which was probably the most poorly laid-out and silliest form I've ever encountered in my life. Am I affiliated with the Nazi party? WTF is the matter with these people? I felt like I was being interrogated like a criminal suspect. Do I intend to commit acts of terrorism against the United States? Well right up until I was forced to fill out that form, I would have categorically said "no", but afterwards I have to admit my inclinations were changing in that regard.

    My favourite question was "Why do you wish to enter the United States". I wrote down the only reasonable answer under the circumstances: "I don't".

    So we all got off the plane, milled around Hawaii airport in swelteringly humid conditions for TWO HOURS, were forced to remove our shoes and finally, when it was my turn to meet the immigration official and hand in my stupid form, she looked at my answers, scowled at me and said "What does this mean, 'I don't'?".

    I'm totally fucking serious. That's what she said.

    I replied "It means just what it says. I don't wish to enter the United States."

    She said, I shit you not, "Well why are you here then?".

    Wow. Just ... wow. Here is a person whose job it is to enforce immigration policy and she doesn't even know that they force transit passengers who are not bound for the US to go through immigration? I feel an intense fury at the level of stupidity on display, but I clench my teeth and force myself to stay calm. After all, I don't want to get on the wrong side of this person/vegetable and get a finger stuck up my ass for my trouble.

    After thinking for a moment about how I can explain the situation to a person of such ... limited mental faculty, I say "I'm going to Vancouver. My plane is refuelling here and apparently that means we have to go through US immigration?"

    She levelling her blank stare at me for a few seconds, then shuffled some papers around while I stood there wondering what the hell kind of Twilight Zone bullshit I'd just wandered into. Then she stamped my passport, stapled the stupid form to it, muttered something at me and let me through. I had successfully visited the United States! Absent any consent or intention to do so! After all, it's not like travellers actually know which countries they want to go to. Better decide these things for them.

    I then got back on my plane, sat in the exact same seat I had occupied two hours earlier, and we made our way to Vancouver.

    When we arrived at Vancouver airport, a nice man in a suit asked me if I was a Canadian resident. I said "no" and with a polite "this way please sir" he directed me to the non-residents line. After waiting in the queue for about 5 minutes, the guy at the desk said "Oh you're from Australia. What brings you to Canada?" I said "Just here on holiday.". He asked "Gonna do any skiing while you're here?". I said "Maybe." He said "Cool.", stamped my passport and in I went.

    Let's look at the contrast here. Canada treated me like a welcome visitor and the process was efficient and friendly. The US forced me to enter their country against my will whilst demanding that I explain why I was entering their country, and expected me to be grateful for the whole experience.

    So in conclusion, I refuse to visit the US as long as this idiotic attitude prevails, and I think the IOC has made an eminently sensible choice regarding the 2016 Olympic Games.

    1. Re:I, for one, boycott the US by Kagato · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You're forced to enter the US because that's the way your airline set it up. The reason you had to get off and clear immigration is because an airline has to have a special agreement with the country in question to do that. The airport also has to be set up to allow for people connect to connect that way. HNL is a fairly small airport. It's not set up to have people connect that way because it's 99.9% of the flights HNL is the final destination. So, you might have a point about gruff gov't employees, but you having to get off the plane and then clear immigration is entirely the fault of the airline you traveled on.

    2. Re:I, for one, boycott the US by nojayuk · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I flew from the UK to Montreal recently. My local airport has no direct flights to Canada but there is a daily flight to Newark and I could have easily bought a through ticket to Montreal, changing planes in Newark. But... that would mean jumping through all the Immigration hoops in the US, including registering on a US government website at least a week in advance to pre-clear my arrival. It was entirely possible that on my arrival at Newark I could be refused entry to the United States and repatriated back to the UK on a whim even if I had spent hours filling in all the details on the required forms.

      Instead I found another flight to Montreal via Schiphol in the Netherlands. On arrival in Schiphol I stayed airside and passed through security only when embarking on the second leg of my flight. I did not have to pass through Immigration or Customs.

      The last time I was in the US was 2004. I don't see myself going back again any time soon although I really enjoy my visits to America and would like to go again. It's the getting there that hurts.

    3. Re:I, for one, boycott the US by 4D6963 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Regarding the immigration form, one thing that was must puzzling wasn't what they asked, but how they asked it. They had 5 boxes to tick (hint: don't tick any), and under one box they were asking both if you worked for the Third Reich between 1933 and 1945 or if you were looking for work in the USA. In the same fucking question!!

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    4. Re:I, for one, boycott the US by martin-boundary · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, in this case the correct answer to the question "why do you wish to enter the US" is "so that the plane doesn't crash", but sometimes telling the truth is... counterproductive.

    5. Re:I, for one, boycott the US by rtb61 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, Australia it's just a warmer Canada, without the cranky neighbour ;D.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    6. Re:I, for one, boycott the US by rtb61 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Australia is an island, no neighbours ;).

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
  41. It's bad even if you're a citizen... by Entropius · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm a US citizen who recently went to China for a scientific conference. China has a reputation, no doubt well deserved, as a police state. But in terms of ridiculous airport security and immigration control, it's nowhere *near* as bad as the Americans. The Chinese are bureaucratic as all hell with their regs, but they're at least friendly about it.

    When I got my passport checked back in the US, the fellow looks at my passport, notices the Chinese visa, and says "Welcome home" in this smug tone, as if to say "Aren't you glad you're back in the Land O' Freedom?"

  42. Re:Brazil's passport system is no picnic either by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 3, Interesting

    They could really do us a solid if they were to make a big todo about the reciprocity. Most americans have no clue how bad it is because they don't have to suffer through it. If the brazilians would take the time to explain exactly why each american gets a symbolic anal cavity search, it would go a long way towards getting the problem fixed back here.

    --
    When information is power, privacy is freedom.
  43. Re:Chicago lost it because it didn't deserve it. by swillden · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Hosting the Olympics might be an honour on the national level, but locally... you've got to figure out which city you can afford to disrupt over the long term.

    Not necessarily. It is possible to have a well-managed Olympics that makes the event a net short- and long-term benefit to the area.

    Salt Lake City's 2002 Winter Olympics turned a significant net profit, even after the state was reimbursed for all of the infrastructure investment (other than transportation improvements; those were needed anyway). The money left over was put into a fund which should be able to maintain all of the specialized venues for decades -- except that many of the venues have proven to be profitable on their own. The bobsled and luge tracks, for example, are operated year-round for tourists, who ride sleds (wheeled in the summer) that move at much slower but still exciting speeds. Taken as a whole, the olympic venues and museum operate at a very slight loss, which the fund should be able to maintain for a very, very long time.

    The long-term effects on Utah's tourism industry, both summer and winter, have been significant, and would have justified a fair amount of taxpayer investment even if the direct revenues hadn't been able to repay the state.

    --
    Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
  44. Re:Chicago lost it because it didn't deserve it. by MaskedSlacker · · Score: 4, Informative

    http://www.areaconnect.com/crime/compare.htm?c1=Chicago&s1=IL&c2=Los+Angeles&s2=CA

    Kiss my Angeleno ass. Los Angeles has lower rates of murder, robbery, assault, theft, and burglary.

    When Los Angeles, gang ridden shit hole that is, has a not just a lower crime rate, but fewer actual crimes despite its larger population, than your city, you need to shut up.

  45. Good publicity for once. by zmollusc · · Score: 2, Funny

    Hooray! At last the strict border controls have a positive outcome, saving millions of taxpayer dollars and billions of man-hours of inconvenience from the craptacular olympics.

    --
    They whose government reduces their essential liberties for temporary security, receive neither liberty nor security.
  46. Re:Passport Control? by footNipple · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What sane person would choose "Chicago" over "Rio de Janiero"? Passport control? Are you kidding me? Chicago is known for being wet, cold, windy, and expensive.

    You're must not be from Chicago. Because if you were, you'd know that there's nothing better than a summer day downtown and along the lake front.

    Maybe this will be the wakeup call for Chicago, that their culture of bribery is actually costing them business. But I doubt it.

    What is causing the absence and flight of business in Chicago is high taxes, unions and democrat governance in general of which bribery and graft are a prominent feature.

  47. Compare Beijing and Vancouver.... by canadian_in_beijing · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Lived in Beijing for 5 years then the Olympics came around and the Chinese government decided to switch around the visa regulations. Myself and lots of expats on a T/F visa had no choice but to leave the country during the Olympics (many never went back). Had a friend that was in the Olympics for rowing and his grandparents were denied a visa to come watch him in Beijing!.

    Now living in Costa Rica and wanted to take my girlfriend to NY and Vancouver. US was relatively easy to get her a visa. Canada was not... they required original bank statements, property titles, etc... so she didn't get a visa. Ridiculous! I'm Canadian and ashamed of our visa policy.

    Both these countries got the Olympics with very bad visa policies... Maybe US visa policy is brought up to cover the other problems such as the US shrinking international reputation...

  48. Then there's this jewel by bradley13 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    "International travel to the U.S. declined by 10 percent in the first quarter of 2009 according to the U.S. Department of Commerce. To lure visitors back, U.S. Travel has been pushing the Travel Promotion Act, which recently was passed in the Senate and is awaiting action in the House, to create a campaign to strengthen the image of the United States abroad."

    The US has just announced a $10 fee that any visitor to the US must pay to enter the country. This is to be used to fund an internation publicity campaign. Putting two-and-two together, I assume this is the campaign that the fee is going to.

    Draw footgun, fire!

    --
    Enjoy life! This is not a dress rehearsal.
  49. Maybe but.... by ibm1130 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Its entirely possible border issues were a consideration but I would hope that the committee also pondered Chicago's well deserved reputation as the most corrupt large municipal entity (New Orleans is most corrupt of any size) in the US.

  50. 2nd hand smoke causes cancer by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 3, Informative

    There, didn't think about that did you? Care about your enviroment, shoot crack.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  51. Not just the olympics... by codegen · · Score: 4, Informative

    It is not just the olympics. International scientific conferences are tending to shy away from the US as well. I'm involved in the organization of three computer science conferences that traditionally alternate between North America and Europe. The North American Slots are ending up in Canada because it is to much of a hassle for the European participants to enter the US. I was at one conference in the US several years ago, and several of us were in the security lineup to leave the country, and one of my colleagues remarked to me, that "it just isn't worth the hassle anymore". Throw in the drama that happens if you happen to take a picture in public (omg a picture of a library or a hotel), and you have to wonder why anyone would visit the USA.

    --
    Atlas stands on the earth and carries the celestial sphere on his shoulders.
    1. Re:Not just the olympics... by cgomezr · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I go to 3-4 computer science conferences a year. Last year, I went to one in the US. At the customs, I got singled out for no reason and taken into a room with other 50-60 people. I had to wait for a long time while a bully guard was saying that we were not American citizens so they had the right to search our luggage and retain us for as long as necessary (no one had asked him anything, he was just saying it out of sheer pleasure, it seems). They interrogated me and didn't want to tell me why I was taken there. They wouldn't let us use our mobile phones. I spent like 3 hours there until they let me go, fortunately I was able to catch my connecting flight (to a different US city) in the last minute (since I had been told that if I missed it due to the interrogation no one would pay anything, since it was "for security".

      After the experience, I decided not to go to the US anymore unless it is strictly necessary. This year I have not submitted papers to any conference taking place in the US, and I don't plan to do so in the future, unless I have a coauthor willing to go. Sorry guys, it's not that I don't like your country, in fact everyone was really nice to me once I was *inside* the US. But being treated like a piece of sh*t at the customs without even being given a reason is not a nice experience. Perhaps if you haven't gone through it you may think that it's just a minor nuisance, but it really gets to your nerves being there, waiting, unable to do anything, surrounded by heavily armed guards as if you were a criminal, receiving no explanation whatsoever for your situation, and getting nervous as the time for your next flight is approaching and they don't let you go. Even if the country is nice, it's just not worth it.

      So yes, I'm sure these kinds of border controls harm tourism. I don't want to go to the US while the situation is like that, and I'm aware of more people of the same opinion.

      PS: I have been to like 20 or 30 countries, including poor and rich countries, and I haven't been treated so badly in any other place, only in the US customs.

  52. Trade by zogger · · Score: 3, Interesting

    At this time Canada relies on trade with the US, but if they were smarter, and thought more long range, they wouldn't need to at all. They could be completely independent on energy and (most) manufactured goods and agriculture, then they would have the luxury of charging heavy premium prices for any exports, because they really wouldn't need exports then, nor much in the way of imports. Plus they could ignore all that border crossing nonsense for the most part. It is potentially the richest nation on earth per capita if you take their low population and compare it to land mass and available natural resources, including the largest amount of freshwater. They just need to diversify even more then they are now and stop selling off all their resources at sub wholesale rates for short term profits like some third world poverty stricken developing nation. They could go high end and develop the best quality this or that manufactured thing, and not even try to compete at the low range. If they don't watch it, they will become just a colony to be exploited by the US and China for all that wealth. They are half way there now as it is.

  53. London and regeneration. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 3, Informative

    The Olympic games in London will take place mostly in East London, an area famous for its gangsters and low lifes of all kinds.

    The idea is that by hosting the games in that area they will be an incentive to regenerate it, creating new jobs and businesses and replacing ugly industrial areas with liveable areas and sporting facilities.

    This has worked, with varied degrees of success in other venues, for example the are around the Olympic Stadium in Barcelona is now a tourist attraction, before the Olympics it was a very ugly neighbourhood that you wanted to avoid by all means.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  54. Yes, SO much safer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...and who the hell modded you up? Are you really arguing Chicago is "twice" as safe as Rio? Yay Chicago, only three times the national average.

    Homicide rates, 2006, per 100,000 people:

    Singapore: 0.39
    Japan: 0.44
    Norway: 0.71
    Netherlands: 0.78
    Germany: 0.88
    Italy: 1.06
    UK: 1.37
    Australia: 1.42
    Canada: 1.80
    China: 2.36
    United States: 5.7

  55. Don't forget previous Olympics in USA. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The Olympic games in Atlanta are generally cited as some of the worst in all history.

    The over commercialism, failure of public transport (including athletes and officials being delayed for their competitions) and plain going around IOC's commercial interests left the IOC very hurt (and Samaranch, the IOC's President at the time, was in Copenhagen to remind everybody of that when promoting Nadrid's bid).

    As for Salt Lake City winter Olympics, there was a corruption scandal, that led to a wide reform in the IOC.

    Add to that the asinine US immigration policies, a very capable bid from Rio de Janeiro (including Brazil's President spending lots of time promoting Brazil's bid) and the result is not so surprising.

    What baffles me is how meretricious so many people in the US are in regards to President Obama trying to help with Chicago's bid, all the other countries sent their heads of government (and in the case of Spain, also the head of state) to help with the bid, 4 years ago Tony Blair, former UK's Prime Minister, was widely credited with having helped with London's bid. That so many US people are blaming President Obama for Chicago's failure just show how pathological politics have become in the US....

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
    1. Re:Don't forget previous Olympics in USA. by fluffy99 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Per the interview with the Chicago mayor I heard on NPR this morning, it was two main reasons. Rio put a $14 billion of government back funding on the table and Chicago only presented $5 billion of mostly private funding (some of which was questionable). Plus the IOC really wanted to host the games in a non-major country or area such as South America or Africa. Personally I found it odd that the White House had a task force assigned to try to get the games to Chicago, which was actually a turn-off to the IOC. Chicago was never a serious contender as they started lobbying so late and really didn't have any actual plans to make it happen well, just as Atlanta was ill prepared..

  56. Re:It is worth it by AlamedaStone · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Yes, border crossing into the U.S., especially by air, can be "harrowing" sometimes - but the experiences can be very rewarding. Reconsider putting a trip over-the-pond back onto your to-do list.

    It really comes down to how much public humiliation is worth a few days as a tourist. Some people don't seem to mind it, but personally I don't even fly inside the US anymore.

    If I wanted to pay to be insulted, demeaned, and harassed I'd want it done by a professional - preferably in full leather.

    --
    "All these years believing you're the signified monkey, only to find out you're just a big hunk of nobody cares."
  57. Re:Chicago lost it because it didn't deserve it. by drsquare · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That's the winter olympics, it doesn't involve the construction of a white elephant athletics stadium. You can re-use a ski slope, but outside of the olympics, 90,000 people aren't going to watch athletics.

  58. China worse? You know not of what you speak... by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 3, Informative
    I am a natural born US citizen who lives half-time in Shanghai, China. I travel every month one way (one month US, one month China). As a US citizen - with a multiple-entry, one year Chinese visa (for which I write a letter inviting myself to go to China), I have considerably LESS issues entering China as opposed to the US. My visa takes approximately 1 week to get, including delivery to and from the processing center. And on entering China immigration is quick, efficient, simple; I wish I could say the same about the US.

    .
    Coming into China at 5:45 AM or 11 PM, I have never had to wait for immigration officers to get to their stations; officers are ready any time passengers are arriving. Contrast that to the last time I entered the US - September 14th, 2009 at LAX on NWA flight 002. The entire plane - a full 747-400 with 403 passengers - had to wait for 40 minutes until 9 AM, when immigration officers finally started their shift. And we then queued into line while the officers strolled out one at a time, took 5-10 minutes to get their station ready, then started processing.

    China worse than US? Not by a mile. The US simply sucks in terms of immigration, even for US citizens. But as a US citizen, I've come to expect nothing less of any Federal employee or department; we citizens exist to serve and support them, not the other way around!

    --
    Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
  59. Simple: no one takes 3 months off of work. by maillemaker · · Score: 2, Informative

    >I mean, which law I might have breaking for taking three months off work?

    In the United States, the concept of taking three months off of work is inconceivable. The idea of taking a full two weeks off is borderline lunacy. The idea of taking a whole week off is borderline fantasy.

    --
    A work that expires before its copyright never enters the public domain and thus enjoys eternal copyright protection.
  60. Re:It is worth it by Macgrrl · · Score: 2, Informative

    If I wanted to pay to be insulted, demeaned, and harassed I'd want it done by a professional - preferably in full leather.

    If you're in Australia, I can get you a number on that. Though most of the Dommes I know prefer Latex.

    --
    Sara
    Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World