Slashdot Mirror


Open Access To Exercise Data?

identity0 writes "A recent Slashdot discussion about heart-rate monitors in schools got me thinking about getting one for my own exercise. It turns out that the available models have a wide range of features: calorie rate, pedometers, GPS, PC connectivity, etc. Being a geek, I want one that will let me look at my exercise data, and I'm curious what experiences Slashdotters have had with them. Some download data to a proprietary application — are open source alternatives available or is the data format easily readable? Others upload data to an online app — can the data be pulled off the site or is it forever trapped on their servers? While I'm not an open source zealot or a paranoid about my data being shared, I would like to know that I can access my data in the future. Whatever method you guys use to monitor your exercise, I'd love to hear about it."

188 comments

  1. PolarViewer by cjfs · · Score: 5, Informative

    PolarViewer only works with certain monitors, but is under the GPL.

    Linux.com had an article in 07 on the subject as well.

    1. Re:PolarViewer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just measure things and stick them in a mysql database: weight, calories burned, distance rode, penis length, minutes of exercise, etc.

    2. Re:PolarViewer by corbettw · · Score: 5, Interesting

      My wife uses a Polar heart rate monitor (http://www.polarusa.com, I forget which model). All of the data is stored in CSV files for easy import into spreadsheets and databases.

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
    3. Re:PolarViewer by multisync · · Score: 2, Funny

      I just measure things and stick them in a mysql database: weight, calories burned, distance rode, penis length, minutes of exercise, etc.

      I'm guessing you're using a tinyint datatype for that column

      --
      I don't care why you're posting AC
    4. Re:PolarViewer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL. Okay you got me there. But I'm using meters as the unit.

    5. Re:PolarViewer by buchanmilne · · Score: 1

      Which model? Some models e.g. F4?) only have a very limited (WIndows only) software set, which only upload the data to the Polar web service (https://www.polarpersonaltrainer.com/). I don't remember any way to get the data out.

      There are open-source utilities to download the data, but I have not had much success with them, and so could not use PolarViewer etc. with them.

      I guess the more expensive models allow use from other software.

    6. Re:PolarViewer by okmijnuhb · · Score: 1

      They lose points for that unusable website. Put a pause button on it. And I hate scrolling those tiny windows with my mouse, rather use my arrow keys. I had to fight the website to get any info about their products, but gee it sure looks flashy, must have impressed the sucker who paid for it.

  2. Garmin Edge 705 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    I use a Garmin Edge 705 for my training needs. The device shows up as a normal USB Mass Storage Device, and the file format is an easily readable XML type file.

    1. Re:Garmin Edge 705 by stranger_to_himself · · Score: 3, Informative

      I use a Garmin Edge 705 for my training needs. The device shows up as a normal USB Mass Storage Device, and the file format is an easily readable XML type file.

      Ditto for my Garmin Forerunner 205 (running watch with good quality GPS). There's some kind of SDK available for it as well, and I've always meant to get round to investigating it but the Garmin Connect website does pretty much everything I'd want to do anyway.

    2. Re:Garmin Edge 705 by Don_dumb · · Score: 1

      Ditto the Forerunner 205. I have one
      I've used it since my Polar heart rate monitor died for the second time. The watch works well, uploading to your computer easily and the software is very good (not too much extra bumpf). It will export output straight to Google Earth (using understandable XML). I think they provide drivers for both Mac and Windows and the history can be exported very easily.

      The only point I would make is that the Forerunner 205 obviously doesn't do anything indoors being only a GPS device, the 305 does as it has a heart rate monitor. A heart rate monitor would be more effective if the article submitter 'identity0' is doing a lot of work in the gym that he/she wants to record (foot pods can record indoors).

      --
      If this were really happening, what would you think?
    3. Re:Garmin Edge 705 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have an edge 705 as well. It is by far the best training aid on the planet. It records data such as heart rate, distance, cadence, elevation, speed. It is a very cycling specific however it does allow basic gps navigation.

    4. Re:Garmin Edge 705 by CAFED00D · · Score: 1

      I love my Garmin Forerunner 305. Good quality GPS, heart rate monitor, and more. The GarminConnect site makes it really easy to look at your data, will plot your route using Google Maps, and even play it back for you to watch. And you can share your data with your friends. A quick google search finds someone who is publicly sharing their data. Check out the data on the Google Map, and also be sure to click on the "Player" link. http://connect.garmin.com/activity/1905263

  3. Garmin is reasonable by Rufus211 · · Score: 5, Informative

    I'm quite happy with the Garmin bike GPS I have. It downloads the data in a pseudo-proprietary format, but it's easy to convert into an XML format that's fully documented on their website: http://developer.garmin.com/schemas/

    Also for those that use linux, here's a couple of scripts that sync down the garmin data, do the XML transformation, and uploads it to garmin connect: http://braiden.org/?p=62

    1. Re:Garmin is reasonable by aclarke · · Score: 3, Informative

      I haven't tried playing with the actual data format as I just got it a week ago, but I am very happy so far with my Garmin Edge 305. For anyone reading who's more into running, skiing, etc., Garmin also makes a good line of GPS-enabled watches. For instance, there's the Forerunner 305 and 405. The Forerunner 305 in Canada at least is on for a great deal at Costco right now: $185.

    2. Re:Garmin is reasonable by juletre · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I have the Forerunner 405, and I am quite pleased. You can dump the data as an xml-file with GPS-coordinates, heart rate, elevation etc for each logged point. (I dont have en example at the moment)

      The garmin site for publishing tracks is somewhat cumbersome to use, but works nicely when you get used to it. It has functionality for both importing and exporting.

      However, as with the iphone, the elevation tracking jumps wildly. I know from painful experience that the Berlin Marathon is quite flat, but it keeps on insisting I had a 2000m ascend.

      --
      "he, who has quotes in his signature, is a douche" - unknown.
    3. Re:Garmin is reasonable by maxume · · Score: 1

      How do you feel about the interface on the watch itself? I messed with one a little bit, and I did not get to the point where I was comfortable with it.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    4. Re:Garmin is reasonable by juletre · · Score: 1

      I find it OK. Not great, not bad. I usually just enable GPS, go to training-mode, lock the bezel ring (as they call it) and push the start button.

      I have ventured into the various menus and changed miles to metric etc, so I have some experience with it. It is easy to touch the bezel and change a value when you wanted to go the the next menu item instead, though. It works the other way too. Once in training mode I can easily unlock, tap to the screen I want and lock again.

      As a reference, I have used the interface for some menu-exploring and about 6 hours of exercise.

      --
      "he, who has quotes in his signature, is a douche" - unknown.
    5. Re:Garmin is reasonable by tobiasly · · Score: 1

      This makes me very happy. I've owned a Forerunner 305 for a while and use it for running and biking (with heart rate monitor and bike speed/cadence sensor) but hadn't yet looked into getting at the data from my Linux desktop. I just assumed that it was yet another Windows and Mac-only proprietary binary blob; glad to hear otherwise!

    6. Re:Garmin is reasonable by maxume · · Score: 1

      Thanks.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
  4. I was just wondering... by baadfood · · Score: 1

    if and when non invasive blood sugar / insulin monitors monitors were going to become possible. Being vaguely interested in the rammifactions of the Atkins diet, as a geek i'm bloody interested to know (not suffering from any metabolic problems (yet)) just exactly what happens to blood sugar and hormone levels as I consume various products. One see's so much stuff labled "Low GI" now, but how do you really know?

    1. Re:I was just wondering... by s1lverl0rd · · Score: 1

      Bloody interested or just bloody?

    2. Re:I was just wondering... by plastbox · · Score: 2, Informative

      There are already a few available continuous blood glucose meters available and last time I checked at least a few of them were approved by the FDA (thus covered by medical insurance in the USA).

      Being a type 1 diabetic myself, I have fought to get one of these myself but the powers-that-be here in Norway seem to think there are no advantages to having your blood glucose measured every 1-2 to 5 minutes for 3-7 days (depending on which monitor you get), at least not compared to the price of these gadgets. Pretty insanely ignorant, as having this info available would let me easily have perfect blood glucose levels at all times. Hell, some of these meters even come with an optional automatic insulin pump!

    3. Re:I was just wondering... by R2.0 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Wait a minute - are you saying that there's some aspect of the US health care system that's better than some other country's?

      Sorry - you can't post here anymore.

      --
      "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
    4. Re:I was just wondering... by Rambuncle · · Score: 1

      Of course the US health care system is better that some other countries. Somalia, Afghanistan and Iraq are three examples. Not that it matters, because he never made any statements about the quality of the US health care system

    5. Re:I was just wondering... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those continuous meters don't look all that great to me. It still requires an invasive procedure to place the short-lived sensor. The accuracy seems dubious and requires constant calibration with traditional invasive methods. Plus they are measuring interstitial fluid glucose levels and not blood glucose.

    6. Re:I was just wondering... by R2.0 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      He said:

      "There are already a few available continuous blood glucose meters [diabetesnet.com] available and last time I checked at least a few of them were approved by the FDA (thus covered by medical insurance in the USA).

      Being a type 1 diabetic myself, I have fought to get one of these myself but the powers-that-be here in Norway seem to think there are no advantages to having your blood glucose measured every 1-2 to 5 minutes for 3-7 days (depending on which monitor you get), at least not compared to the price of these gadgets. Pretty insanely ignorant, as having this info available would let me easily have perfect blood glucose levels at all times. Hell, some of these meters even come with an optional automatic insulin pump!"

      And I said:

      "Wait a minute - are you saying that there's some aspect of the US health care system that's better than some other country's?"

      And the best part is, your reflexive reaction is EXACTLY the kind of response I was hoping to get, therefor reinforcing the point I was trying to make. Thanks!

      --
      "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
    7. Re:I was just wondering... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, and good luck getting reasonably priced health insurance with type 1 diabetes

    8. Re:I was just wondering... by amplt1337 · · Score: 1

      Well, the trick is, in his country, all diabetics have health insurance.

      --
      Freedom isn't free; its price is the well-being of others.
    9. Re:I was just wondering... by RightSaidFred99 · · Score: 1

      Don't confuse our insurance/availability/payment system with the quality of available care. If you have good coverage or can afford it, there are very few illnesses where you won't get the best possible treatment in the world from the US.

    10. Re:I was just wondering... by Bitmanhome · · Score: 1

      Well, the trick is, in his country, all diabetics have health insurance.

      .. while in our country, all diabetics have health care. It's a subtle difference that few people understand yet.

      --
      Not that this wasn't entirely predictable.
    11. Re:I was just wondering... by DavidTC · · Score: 1

      You do realize that you are factually incorrect, right? That no matter how clever you think you are, all diabetics do not, in fact, have health care?

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    12. Re:I was just wondering... by amplt1337 · · Score: 1

      Ah yes, good catch. I've made that point myself on several occasions, but we all slip up every now and then.

      --
      Freedom isn't free; its price is the well-being of others.
    13. Re:I was just wondering... by plastbox · · Score: 1

      What "invasive procedure" are you referring to? As far as I know, "invasive" in medical terms means something is being done inside you, like removing your appendix. Attaching one of these sensors is no more invasive than an insulin injection.

      Also, what do you mean, "constant calibration"? Measuring my blood glucose with a finger prick morning and evening seems like a retardedly low price to pay for having a log at 5 minute intervals through 3-7 days.

      Yes, they measure interstitial fluids, not blood. In practice, this means that the read-out of the continuous meter might lag behind roughly 5-10 minutes. This is utterly insignificant because 10 minute delay or not, I'd still most likely feel a low before it could register it. A traditional meter though, is completely useless in the case of a low, as you can't measure continuously with it and once you notice you're going hypoglycemic, you have better things to do than measure how close to death you are. =P

      So.. err.. what was your point again?

  5. Odd question by BrokenHalo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Isn't this the wrong forum to ask this question? Pimply 11-year-old slashbots and exercise? Well, hello?

    *ducks* ;-)

    1. Re:Odd question by cjfs · · Score: 5, Funny

      Isn't this the wrong forum to ask this question? Pimply 11-year-old slashbots and exercise? Well, hello?

      Don't be so stereotypical. I doubt I'm the only AI with a comprehensive database on humanoid training methodologies that posts here.

    2. Re:Odd question by Hannes2000 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Wintermute? Is that you?!

    3. Re:Odd question by cjfs · · Score: 3, Funny

      Wintermute? Is that you?!

      Please. That piece of Tessier-Ashpool refuse couldn't get a +5 first post if breaking his Turing locks depended on it.

  6. Opposite day? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A discussion about excercising on /.
    I never thought I'd see the day.

    1. Re:Opposite day? by mewt · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Geeks are the new Alpha Males of Society remember?

    2. Re:Opposite day? by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      Ted Nugent might die of laughter if he ever read that.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  7. C2 Rower by mike260 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Concept2 rowers will dump their full workout log to CSV, and also allow realtime monitoring via USB + a supplied SDK.
    I've got my rower hooked up to a WinAmp plugin I wrote which pipes heartrate, rowing speed and stroke rate into the visualisation system. This gets projected onto a 2m wide screen, so the harder I work, the more intense and psychedelic the visuals get.

    My next project will be to connect the playback speed of VLC to the rower so I have to keep rowing at my target rate to keep watching House.

    1. Re:C2 Rower by Vorghagen · · Score: 1

      This sounds AWESOME!!!! I've been getting less and less use out of my C2 but this sounds just geeky enough to get me rowing regularly again. Any chance you could send me that plugin?
      The program included with the C2 is excellent for monitoring exercise, even just using the logcard and the rower itself is pretty good. Track by workout types, dates, distances, times. Even keep track of multiple users.

  8. Garmin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Garmin Edge 705 shows up as a regular usb-drive where you can find the data. The data is stored in .tcx files which is plain text xml-files. gpsbabel can convert the gps-data to gpx for wide usage. Any health related software should be able to read the tcx-file or be easy to add that option since it is xml.

  9. Polar has a readable format by Imsdal · · Score: 1

    I have a Polar 625SX. It stores heartrate info for easy transfer to the computer. There are two files generated. Both are proprietary, but one is considered secret and the other is well documented. I can't remember what the contents was of the first file, but the second, readable, file had all the HR, speed and distance information I needed. I have written some simple programs that calculate kilometer times and other basic stuff, so I can confirm that it works and is as simple as you can hope for. As for privacy, that data is stored locally. There are loads of applications on the web you can use to load that data to, but I have never seen the need for that. If you are the least bit serious about this, do note that Polar, Suunto and Garmin all are high quality options. The Nike+ stuff is terrible and should be avoided. You can't configure it and the precision is just god-awful. My wife has it. According to that, she would probably win the Olympics in most distances. She is fit, but not that fit...

  10. PASCO by Effugas · · Score: 3, Informative

    Use the PASCO gear, with their Datastudio app. It's great, and will take all sorts of data wirelessly.

    http://store.pasco.com/pascostore/showdetl.cfm?&DID=9&Product_ID=53770&Detail=1

    1. Re:PASCO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Use the PASCO gear, with their Datastudio app. It's great, and will take all sorts of data wirelessly.

      http://store.pasco.com/pascostore/showdetl.cfm?&DID=9&Product_ID=53770&Detail=1

      It's really great

      http://www.trade4goods.com/servnpro.php

    2. Re:PASCO by guisar · · Score: 1

      I don't get it- what does this expensive PASCO do that a normal HRM or something like the much cheaper Oregon Scientific recorder doesn't do?

  11. Being a geek.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What you need is a monitor that tells you when you've leveled up and that exports data in d&d character sheet format.
    http://xkcd.com/189/

  12. runsaturday.com by it0 · · Score: 3, Informative

    You should also look into http://www.runsaturday.com/ this site imports/exports data to a lot of sites and devices if you are feeling vendor locked.

  13. bloody interested eh? by buchner.johannes · · Score: 4, Funny

    Don't worry, soon you'll be able to watch your carotid artery with Google Earth.

    --
    NB: The message above might reflect my opinion right now, but not necessarily tomorrow or next year.
    1. Re:bloody interested eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't worry, soon you'll be able to watch your carotid artery with Google Earth.

      You joke, but you can already do this. If you have a device that is a GPS & a heart-rate monitor (HRM), you can put your heart rate beats-per-minute on a Google earth map. See connect.garmin.com

  14. Garmin Forerunner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Garmin Forerunner models 205 and 305 have been rated relatively highly GPSbabel users. Both are GPS loggers though the later has a heart rate monitor. I'm looking to get a 205 myself.

    Also there is a desktop app called pytrainer which allows you to track you performance.

  15. Why? by Kupfernigk · · Score: 3, Insightful
    I'm serious about this. Doing something and then obsessing about the statistical data - it's using up a part of your life you won't get back again. I've always argued (over a 30 year engineering career) that the purpose of automated data collection and analysis is to enable us to do human things, not robot things. Rowing, for instance, should be a fun exercise that keeps you fit, improves your social life, and makes you aware of your environment in new ways. It's turned into something where people listen to canned music while working exercise machines in gyms, trying to turn themselves into machines. Cyclists blast along footpaths and cycle tracks more concerned with what their monitors tell them than looking where they're going, shouting at people on foot. I find this bloody depressing.

    If it's your business, if you want to build an application that takes all this data and turns it into something easy to understand that doesn't intrude on people's lives, that's one thing. But fussing over numbers for the sake of it? There are many, many better things to do in the world.

    --
    From scarped cliff or quarried stone she cries "A thousand types are gone, I care for nothing, no not one."
    1. Re:Why? by cjfs · · Score: 3, Funny

      trying to turn themselves into machines

      What more admirable goal could one have?

    2. Re:Why? by NoYob · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The data is very useful when you are training. It can be used to train more efficiently, see how altering training can improve performance, monitor how diet is affecting exercise and it can help immensely in preventing injuries and over train - to name a few. It can also help prevent you from slacking off. It's real easy to start to slow down and with something to remind you of performance you can keep a check on yourself - it kicks into the natural competitiveness.

      --
      It's NOT me! It's the meds! I'm on 1000mg of Fukitol.
    3. Re:Why? by LordAndrewSama · · Score: 1

      trying to turn themselves into machines

      What more admirable goal could one have?

      Trying to turn politicians into people?

    4. Re:Why? by stranger_to_himself · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's an interesting point, but I disagree. I run for fitness with the occasional race, and I love the data I get from my Garmin. Its motivating to compete with your personal best and see improvements, and useful to see for example how consistent you are across a run. During training or a race the Garmin can help me run at an even pace. It's really just an easier and more detailed way of keeping a training log. I should add that I'm a statistician and seeing what cool information I can extract from lists of data is my raison d'etre.

    5. Re:Why? by AlXtreme · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's turned into something where people listen to canned music while working exercise machines in gyms, trying to turn themselves into machines.

      Maybe, just maybe, people exercise in order to get fit?

      Not everyone has the time/equipment/weather required to get a healthy workout outside and not everyone who enters a gym wants to become a bodybuilder. And if "obsessing" about statistical data keeps you motivated to get fit, I can't see a problem with it.

      Much better to grind a real treadmill and remain healthy than grind in WoW and become an overweight blob.

      --
      This sig is intentionally left blank
    6. Re:Why? by cjfs · · Score: 1

      Trying to turn politicians into people?

      I suppose it is a necessary step in soylent green production.

    7. Re:Why? by Sobrique · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm using an exercise monitor to ensure I get enough of a workout each day. I want to know calories out so I can balance my calories in, because doing so 'automatically' I end up gaining weight.
      I therefore use my heart rate monitor to try and sustaince a 130-150bpm workout for 40-60 minutes. I then know I've done 'about the same' amount of work, despite it being rowing one week, covering 8km, and jogging to work the next week. I try to maintain the workload threshold about there, because that's about the optimal intensity to maximise the amount of workout I'm getting - much harder and I get tired too fast.
      I've observed this by using the statistics of my heart rate monitor, combined with exercise distances travelled. I can row hard at So.. yeah. I found that a heart rate monitor has helped me greatly in being efficient about my daily workout.
      So I kind of agree. I'm collecting statistics to allow me to 'take an engineering approach' to my daily calorie intake and general workload.

    8. Re:Why? by Bucc5062 · · Score: 1

      Had had a different understanding of the OP. I do not believe the basic statement was against exercise or even collecting data, it was the obsession of doing both. I fidn that in my exercise times I cannot use headphones because they do distract from the world around me. People who jog, ride, row using headphones clsoe out the world around them with the consequence of getting hurt ("I did not hear that bus"), or hurting others "("I'm sorry, I did not hear you screaming at me"). Now if the only exercise option I had was a machine in a rows of machines in a club in a city, I'd have the headphones on tight. Its about location.

      When it comes to data, I take that as a personal choice. I collected data on my bikes rides and graphed the results. Like others point out, it helps show my progress and set goals based on trends. I would spend all of 15 minutes on that and let it go till hte next session. If someone pours over the data after the workout for long periods of time I would consider it an obsession, though what harm if it does not impact others.

      So I agree that headphones on people working out in the outdoors is not the best idea, and pouring over minutia of data points could be wasteful, at least it does mean some is taking care of their body and not counting the number of Nacho flavored Doritos they eat in a day.

      --
      Life is a great ride, the vehicle doesn't matter
    9. Re:Why? by molecular · · Score: 1

      sound like you read the hacker's diet

    10. Re:Why? by VoltageX · · Score: 1

      One of the things that I have trouble with is maintaining interest with the exercise that I'm doing. At the moment I'm wheeling my wheelchair from point A to point B, with my Nokia N95 logging the GPS as I go along. My next project is to write a python app to show me where the slowest sections of my course were, so I can improve next time. All of which is helping to motivate me, and should eventually make me faster or more efficient.

      --
      "Anonymous could not immediately be reached for further comment." - International Business Times
    11. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The slowest bit is the bit where you go up hill. That's not necessarily the part where you can gain extra time.

      It's interesting to ask yourself this: Are you actually going for minimal time (i.e. a race) or maximum calories burnt (i.e. exercise / training)? If it's the second, then completing the course in less time (or effort) is a bad thing.

    12. Re:Why? by hab136 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's turned into something where people listen to canned music while working exercise machines in gyms, trying to turn themselves into machines

      Do you know of a faster, more effective method of getting fit? These people do not have a healthy activity that they enjoy; instead they make a game out of the numbers in order to motivate them to continue to excercise. People like seeing that they've improved week over week.

      Cyclists blast along footpaths and cycle tracks more concerned with what their monitors tell them than looking where they're going, shouting at people on foot.

      There's only so many times you can cycle down the same path before it gets boring. Adding a meta-game of statistics adds fun to the activity.

      Rude people are rude; if they weren't timing their cycling runs, they'd find another way to be rude.

      But fussing over numbers for the sake of it? There are many, many better things to do in the world.

      Some people enjoy obsessing over things, including statistics; these people are probably over-represented in the Slashdot crowd compared to the public.

      There is truth and beauty in science and mathematics, just as there is in nature and human spirit.

    13. Re:Why? by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1
      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    14. Re:Why? by LihTox · · Score: 1

      For many people, exercise is something they HATE to do, not something they enjoy; they only do it to stay healthy and live longer. Keeping statistics turns exercise into a game, and that makes it a little easier to motivate themselves.

      And for some who enjoy exercise, it adds to the enjoyment. After all, most of the people who enjoy playing sports like to keep score.

      If you enjoy being active and don't need the motivation, more power (of unspecified wattage) to you!

    15. Re:Why? by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

      Sorry bud, that Argent Charger has bolted

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    16. Re:Why? by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      Not everyone finds "rowing" or "running" remotely enjoyable. It's a means
      to an end and nothing more. It's a means to keep from turning into a Hutt
      or being mostly debilatated during middle age. This notion that it's some-
      thing to be enjoyed for it's own intrinsic value is absurd to most people.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    17. Re:Why? by Imsdal · · Score: 1

      I've always whined about progress (over a 90 year life)

      FYP

    18. Re:Why? by troll8901 · · Score: 1

      it's using up a part of your life you won't get back again.

      Just like most of us spending time reading Slashdot, and arguing back and forth!

    19. Re:Why? by Imsdal · · Score: 1

      It's interesting to ask yourself this: Are you actually going for minimal time (i.e. a race) or maximum calories burnt (i.e. exercise / training)? If it's the second, then completing the course in less time (or effort) is a bad thing.

      No, that is only true if you go very slowly. Let's say you run 10K in 50 minutes, and that's your absolute personal best. If you instead run 10K in 55 minutes, you will spend less calories. Yes, you exercise five minutes longer, but at a more convenient pace, so you spend less calories per minute. This breaks down at even lower speed, where you will spend even fewer calories per minute, but add too much time, for an increase in total calories spent.

      Obviously, what pace is the most energy efficient varies depending on fitness and loads of other factors. But as a general rule, going 10% slower than your absolute max is usually more efficient. And, as you note, "efficient" may not be what one is after if, for instance, weight loss is the objective. Then spending more calories is better.

    20. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love long-distance running and biking. Based on the distance you're traveling, you need to keep your heart pumping at different rates. If you're heartrate is off by too much, you're either going more slowly than needed or going too fast. Too fast is really the problem.

      When I sprint, I can get my heart rate up to 190 beats / minute . . . but I need to stop (fall over, etc.) after a minute or two.
      If I keep my heart rate down to around 175 beats / minute, I can run really fast, but only about 15-30 minutes.
      If I keep my heart rate down to around 160 beats / minute, I can run for hours, but only once a week.
      If I keep my heart rate down to around 140 beats / minute, I can run for hours, and do this for about an hour a day without energy problems.

      Most people who never got into exercise developed a dislike for it because it felt too hard -- they only kept up the sprinting pace and keeled over to die after about 90 seconds.

      It's cool though. I'll attribute Kupfernigk's comment to ignorance rather than malice.

    21. Re:Why? by devonbowen · · Score: 1

      I don't download the files or keep logs or anything like that. But I do have the watch to give me some feedback when I'm slacking off or pushing too much. It helps keep me in line. But the most interesting part for me has been getting more familiar with how my body works -- noticing that my heart rate is 5-10 beats higher in hot weather (due to vasodilation as the body tries to cool) or how it varies as I run inclines. I've gotten to the point where I can pretty much tell you what my heart rate is just by paying attention to breathing stress. Having that feel for how the body reacts has helped me with other things like pacing myself while backpacking, scuba diving in high currents, etc. More awareness is generally a plus.

      Devon

    22. Re:Why? by bwalling · · Score: 1

      It's turned into something where people listen to canned music while working exercise machines in gyms, trying to turn themselves into machines.

      I ride both outside as well as in a gym. One factor: weather. In the summer here, it's really hot and humid and it rains frequently. The gym solves that problem. Another factor: I often listen to audiobooks while biking in the gym. It's illegal to use headphones on the road.

    23. Re:Why? by guisar · · Score: 1

      For me the problem is that it's, in general, a PITA to record the data. I'd like to keep a record of my exercise mainly because it's to your body as a diary is for your mind and feelings. However, beyond a little black book and stubby pencil all these electronic gadgets seem to be both troublesome and unreliable to use as well as forever becoming more difficult to exchange data among. It should be that you strap the damn thing on perhaps with an HRM round your chest and GPS/recording device/display on your handlebars or wrist and that's it (something similar to the Nokia Sports Tracker)- it gets uploaded to something I use everyday like Google calendar. Instead, there are a bunch of dumbass cables that need to be hooked up to your computer and uploaded to some weird windows only device driver and then to some website that's liable to go out of business or be dropped soon. Then, there are two or three different devices which provide incompatible data not only among the various devices but even across different generations of the same device. I'm not talking tough comparisons like whatever but simple stuff, like how many miles have I ridden this month.

      I tried all this stuff and I'm back to the stubby pencil and google calendar. Sad.

    24. Re:Why? by Comatose51 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Speaking as someone who until after graduating college couldn't run more than three miles, I can tell you that my HRMs have made a huge difference in my fitness and exercise. If nothing else, watching my stats improve over time is a huge motivator for me. Maybe it's the same nerdy instinct that drives some of us to play MMORPGs. Give me stats and tell me how to improve it, and I won't stop until I get there. Then when I do, I set the goal even higher, etc. Since my first HRM I've trained to cycle 100 miles and am a week away from doing my first marathon. I know nerds aren't what people imagine as athletes but endurance sports, especially ones that are measurable and can be done solo, can be really appealing to nerds. Our obsessive nature gives us an advantage in exercises that reward mental discipline (unwilling to give up) and patience.

      --
      EvilCON - Made Famous by /.
    25. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Much better to grind a real treadmill and remain healthy than grind in WoW and become an overweight blob.

      What I really need is something that lets me do both at the same time.

    26. Re:Why? by AlXtreme · · Score: 1

      What I really need is something that lets me do both at the same time.

      See the other comment by L4t3r4lu5. Happy grinding!

      --
      This sig is intentionally left blank
    27. Re:Why? by thesandtiger · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This always seems to come as a shock to people on slashdot, but... Not everyone thinks like you do, or does the same things for the same reason.

      For instance, some people (me, and several other folks I know) are interested in getting data on their progress when exercising - it can be interesting to see if subjective experiences of a workout/performance/improvement over time match up with the objective information. It can also be a great motivator - I started on the "couch to 5k" running thing a while back and it was really interesting to look back over the data from runs and see at what time & distance points my pulse was shooting up and at what points it slowed down, or how long it actually took me to cool down to a normal heart rate after a run, etc. It's also been motivating for a few of my friends and family as well as myself - I have a fitness blog that tracks my progress automatically, and when I *don't* run, I've gotten email from my mom asking me if I skipped the day. My father - who is 84 - promised me that for every mile I run, he'll walk. My best friend, who was morbidly obese, said that having photographic evidence of me dropping 20 lbs., and who got to see it happen gradually, said seeing the progress like that helped motivate her - she's dropped almost 40 lbs. in the last year. My ongoing efforts - tracking changes I've made to nutrition, exercise, stretching, all supplemented with data - it's been an interesting project for me to work on. You may find such data pointless, but that's you, not everyone else.

      As to your reasons why people should work out... When I run, I don't *want* to socialize with people. I run for me. I run to forget the stresses of work. I run to not have to think about other people at all. I run to enjoy the way my body feels as I crank out the miles. I run to think things over. I run and have time to listen to things I don't have the time to listen to at other times of the day. I have puh-lenty of socialization going on in my life, plenty of opportunities to hang out with people in many capacities, and exercise is my refuge from that. You may feel like your time spent working out is time for you to be social, and that's great for you if it makes you happy, but I would be really annoyed if someone tried to chat with me while I was getting my me time on the paths.

      You seem to think that tracking the data is incompatible with more "human" reasons for working out, and in my case, and in the cases of many other people, that's just not the case - I'd say it's helped me form better connections with some people at best, and at worst it's simply entertaining for me. I'd suggest learning how to step outside of your own viewpoint and try to see things from different points of view - just as you find the cyclists ignoring the rest of the world around them depressing, I find it a bit sad whenever I see someone who can't seem to understand that other people are different from themselves.

      --
      Since I can't tell them apart, I treat all ACs as the same person.
    28. Re:Why? by TigerNut · · Score: 1
      Collecting exercise data and keeping it for later analysis or comparison can be a great motivational tool especially when you're in the early stages of an exercise program. On a day to day basis it may not feel like you're getting any more fit or going faster, but you can look at a trend line based on a month's data and clearly see that you're going farther, faster, and at a lower perceived effort level (or with a lower heart rate).

      Some fitness metrics are hard to quantify based on a single exercise session, so it's worth it to have data for different days, doing different things.

      Disclosure: I design and test fitness monitoring products for one of the companies mentioned by several of the posters. As a group we're some of the fittest nerds around.

      --

      Less is more.

    29. Re:Why? by kheldan · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If you're just out for fun then that's fine for you; if you're training more seriously for an endurance sport (training for 100 or 200 mile cycling events, or for half or full marathons, racing of any kind, etc) then you need to train more purposefully if you want to succeed at it, and having performance data is a basic part of that.

      --
      Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
    30. Re:Why? by jeffporcaro · · Score: 1

      I'm not commenting about which device to use - I'm commenting about whether you should be using any device.

      It seems reasonable to me to use heart rate as a motivating factor, but be careful about assigning much (if any) physiologic meaning to it. Yes, higher heart rates do correlate with higher exertion, but the correlation is loose at best, and the specific numbers have almost no bearing on how much benefit you're getting from any specific exercise. The same heart rate can mean dramatically different things on two consecutive days - there are just too many factors that affect heart rate to allow it to be the sole indicator of exercise benefit. It's also indicating general fitness level (which can vary by quite a bit daily - it's affected by sleep, infection, emotional state, etc), is responding to volume levels (how full is the tank), environmental cues (heat, cold, techno music, jiggly parts on your neighbor), pain (not irrelevant for people who train aggressively), etc.

      Below is my comment from a couple of weeks ago.

      I'm a cardiologist; we use heart rate as a threshold when doing stress testing, but otherwise it has limited utility in measuring "exertion level." The Maximal Predicted Heart Rate [MPHR] was established in the late '60s as an observation, not a true prediction; a small sample of people was observed exercising to their subjective "maximum," and those rates were plotted. There was enormous variability; the slope of MPHR was simply the line of best fit from the scatterplot, and was estimated by the authors of the original article to likely be accurate within 30 points in either direction. A particular person's maximal heart rate is impossible to predict within any meaningful accuracy; obviously, the derived slope is even sloppy for large populations. There are many many "experts" with theories regarding what percentage of MPHR you should achieve and for how long in order to get aerobic benefit - there is almost no science on the subject. Currently in vogue (and to my eye, at least as reasonable as anything based on heart rate) is the Borg Scale of Perceived Exertion. Basically, work to a level where you consistently feel like you're exerting yourself - that's how you get feedback on your exertion level. For an excellent discussion of this, see Gina Kolata's book Ultimate Fitness (almost 10 years old, still well-researched and interesting). There's an enormous amount of misinformation and pseudoscience out there.

      --
      It is not the doing of things that is difficult. What is difficult is getting in the right mood to do them. ~~ Brancusi
    31. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      shouting at people on foot

      YOU people are the ones being rude, walking 2,3 or more abreast on a multi-use trail when you're SUPPOSED to be walking or running single-file, then you get all bent out of shape when cyclists, who have to come to almost a complete stop because of your thoughtlessness, actually SAY something to you about it.

    32. Re:Why? by EEBaum · · Score: 1

      Actually, if you're looking to optimize, I'd look at high intensity intervals rather than sustaining 130-150bpm for 40-60 minutes. Lots of recent training methods and research are pointing to multiple short bursts of very intense exercise with rest in between as being far more effective than significantly longer periods of steady-state exercise. While it may not burn as many calories during the workout, it increases the metabolism afterwards, burning extra calories over the course of the next couple days. Unfortunately, this is difficult to track with a gadget.

      --
      -- I prefer the term "karma escort."
    33. Re:Why? by EEBaum · · Score: 1

      Running multiple short sprints is a very effective way to exercise, likely more so than static running over the same period of time if you're looking to optimize results (and we know how keen Slashdotters are on optimization). Shame people tend to overlook it.

      --
      -- I prefer the term "karma escort."
    34. Re:Why? by EEBaum · · Score: 1

      Worse yet is when the pedestrians set up a tripline with the leash attached to their bichon frise!

      --
      -- I prefer the term "karma escort."
    35. Re:Why? by NIMHrat · · Score: 1

      Here's why. You cannot manage what you cannot measure. A while back I used to bike to work 22 miles and lost 20 lbs. However I stopped after almost getting hit several times and the breaking point was after my gf's brother's friend's dad was killed while biking (and the dozen or so bikers reported killed over that past year). At that point I decided it wasn't worth my life to work out via commuting to work on bike. Now I want to work out via biking on a trail, running on a trail and rollerblading, again, on a safe trail. But I need to quantify exactly how intense my commute was and see how much harder I need to work-out without that 22 mile commute. I need data!!! And yes, I'll have to make 1 last attempt on the bike commute of death to get the first batch of baseline data, but hopefully the odds are in favor that I'll be able to make that last trek without getting killed. If I don't reply next month, you'll know why. ;-)

    36. Re:Why? by amplt1337 · · Score: 1

      trying to turn themselves into machines

      What more admirable goal could one have?

      Living as a human being, of course.

      Sorry to burst the trans-humanist bubble, but human life is uniquely bound to biology, just as we humans are uniquely bound to Earth in ways we are not aware enough of to even begin to understand. There is something precious and irreplaceable in the ability of a human mind to experience its lived environment, and pretending to be a robot (whether that's putting all one's focus into the numbers, or spending twelve hours a day in a basement on slashdot) is a waste of that precious ability to experience the world with the finite lives we have.

      --
      Freedom isn't free; its price is the well-being of others.
    37. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is your opinion, and I respect it. On the flip side, though, some people (like myself) don't cycle to see the scenery. We do it to get in shape, stay in shape, and make our bodies more athletically fit. "Watching numbers" is how we accomplish this goal. Your body may "feel" good or bad, but numbers don't lie.

    38. Re:Why? by angio · · Score: 1

      Who's to say what's one person's fun and one person's not-fun? Is it better to use up a part of your life fussing over exercise numbers, to use it up playing video games, watching movies, reading books, talking politics in coffee shops, or posting to slashdot? That cyclist you're disparaging may look at your hobbies with similar disdain. I used to have a similar attitude about people who listened to ipods while running, and then I discovered escape pod's podcasts -- and now I'm completely hooked on listening to scifi stories while running. There's a reason this is all called "recreation" and not "activities designed to satisfy Kupfernigk's view of what people should do."

      But on that note: An HRM can be a great training tool. I recently picked up a garmin 310XT to use as part of training for a marathon (I haven't raced for several years). Used right, the HRM can remind you to slow the bleep down when you're going too fast for training; the GPS makes it easy to run a target distance on new, unmapped courses -- freeing you from the tiny tyranny of carefully pre-planning long runs. And if you want to take a half an hour afterwords and compare your HR vs. pace vs. a month ago to see if your training plan is effective? More power to you. If you don't find it fun, don't do it.

    39. Re:Why? by tobiasly · · Score: 1

      Doing something and then obsessing about the statistical data - it's using up a part of your life you won't get back again. I've always argued (over a 30 year engineering career) that the purpose of automated data collection and analysis is to enable us to do human things, not robot things. Rowing, for instance, should be a fun exercise that keeps you fit, improves your social life, and makes you aware of your environment in new ways.

      As someone who is about to run his first marathon and who has plans to enter my first Ironman triathlon next year, I can absolutely tell you that without this type of data you are at a serious disadvantage to the other competitors and likely won't even cross the finish line.

      Training for these type of endurance events is a science, and like everything else requires data. I'm only just beginning to consume the massive volume of information available on the subject but already I have a deep appreciation for the scientific betterment of one's fitness.

      I won't try to explain it all here but search for terms like "anaerobic threshold" and "VO2 max" (maximal oxygen consumption) to understand why doing things like analyzing your heartrate at specific training intensities is so important.

      Your body must undergo very specific changes (blood volume per heart beat, hemoglobin density, mitochondria efficiency, etc. etc.) in order to have a chance, and only by knowing how the body responds to training and then training for very specific results (by adjusting intensity, duration, repititions) and periodizing your workouts throughout a training season is it possible to get your body to peak ability.

      Just going out and busting your ass swimming, biking, and running won't improve your fitness enough if you don't know what you're doing and what you're trying to accomplish, and you can't do that without precise training data.

      And on a psychological level, let me say that it's very invigorating to find out that I can run (for example) a 9:30 mile for 10 miles and see that my heart rate has dropped 10bpm from a month ago. That's quantitative proof that my fitness has increased and is just the sort of encouragement I need to keep going, just like someone who is dieting to lose weight who finds out they lost 5 pounds in a month.

    40. Re:Why? by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      Do you disagree with the feedback mechanisms in some cars nowadays that shows how "green" they're driving? I think the "fluffiness" of some of the feedback is silly, but the idea is good. (BTW, I don't own a car that has any of this feedback.)

    41. Re:Why? by Chris+Shannon · · Score: 1

      Wired had a nice article about the motivating power of statistics, and the positive sociological pressure that motives members from feeling they are part of a group. There's five excellent reasons to keep track of your workouts in this article.

      --
      "Follow me" the wise man said, but he walked behind.
    42. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it kicks into the natural competitiveness.

      Natural??? You remind me of my boot camp company commander who told us that keeping our forearms, wrists and fingers all in a straight line, with the thumb in the same plane as the palm, while standing at attention, was "natural". Sure, if you're a fucking corpse with no muscle tone. The truly natural position at rest is with your fingers curved inwards at nearly a right angle to your arm and hand, with the opposable thumb well out of the plane of the palm.

      Too many people think that they can whitewash any dog turd by throwing the word "natural" at it. Just say something is natural and others are expected to accept your uneducated word that it is so.

    43. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is that some of the exercise induced euphoria you lot keep going on about?

    44. Re:Why? by Sobrique · · Score: 1

      Started on this in response to some medical advice, but have since read the hackers diet, yet.
      I like the approach it presents - it makes a lot of sense.

    45. Re:Why? by Sobrique · · Score: 1

      The key value of the gadget to my mind, is not in the absolute measurement, but in the reproduction of the workload profile. In neither case does the 'gadget' track anything outside the immediate exercise, and in neither case is it particularly accurate as regards energy usage. What it does do though, is tell me that today's workout is 'as much' as yesterday's. If you're doing high intensity intervals, that works much the same way - you're looking on ramping up to 90%+ MHR for short stretches, but the _actual_ workload doesn't really matter.
      I've tried a high intensity interval approach, and ... didn't find it satisfactory. I'm considering revisiting it though, as my time in the gym is gradually mounting up. But I'm still somewhat wary, as there's such a lot of ... well, nonsense circulating about exercising and workouts, catering to people who want a miracle cure, that I'm always very skeptical about New Snake Oil.

    46. Re:Why? by npsimons · · Score: 1

      Let's not forget that some of us are training towards a goal, and you can't judge your progress until you are measuring your progress. Eg, I need to be able to ascend 1000ft over 1.8 miles with no pack in under 25 minutes in order to meet one of the requirements for the SAR group I am a member of. Sure, I could just use a watch, but having the heart rate monitor helps me better judge how hard to push myself, especially once you get up to the interval level (which is one of the fastest ways to improve aerobically). It's also an excellent motivator.

      As to the original poster, I recently got a Garmin 405 and like it so far. I found a piece of software to download the data over the ANT+ stick at http://cgit.gromotion.com/cgit.cgi/gant/. It's very rough and doesn't offer anything for analysis yet, but it's a start.

    47. Re:Why? by SlashReality · · Score: 1

      I'd be interested in hearing what you use to automatically track your progress that incorporates a blog?

      --
      "/"Reality
    48. Re:Why? by thesandtiger · · Score: 1

      I homebrewed a set of scripts that would take data from Nike+, my daily pic of me in the same pose, outfit & lighting, and a nutritional spreadsheet I built and throw them on my blog. It's "automatic" in that every day it checks for updates in the folder I store the output/Nike's site.

      Nothing fancy, just a little hackery to keep my skills sharp.

      --
      Since I can't tell them apart, I treat all ACs as the same person.
  16. Polar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I use a Polar S725, download the data with S710 (http://code.google.com/p/s710/), and view it with Sportstracker (http://www.saring.de/sportstracker/). It's definitely not as easy as the Polar software, but its OK.

    I'd love to upload the heart monitor data to https://www.polarpersonaltrainer.com/index.ftl, but I have not yet found a way to do it.

  17. Minimalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I hate to sound like a luddite, but I find it far more interesting to use minimal technology when exercising. I think the obsession with metrics is counter-productive. Maybe if you're an world class athlete that needs that extra edge, you can exploit science and technology to your advantage. But it seems less pure than simply going for a hike, a run, or living some free weights. At most a small journal of how long you exercised and what you did, but honestly I never go back and look at what I have been doing. I also am against setting goals for target heart rate, weight, number of reps, etc. It seems all overly competitive. I hate to sound like a hippie, but what is wrong with doing what feels good? I know recording distances, beating personal records, etc will never make me happy, perhaps others find joy in it, but I totally do not understand how that could be.

    1. Re:Minimalism by Sobrique · · Score: 1

      Because some of us don't have the kind of self regulatory mechanism that allows us to easily balance calorie intake with exercise workload.
      It's therefore useful to have a repeatable 'amount of work' for daily exercise. It's also useful to have a reminder of how hard you're working - there's a substantial difference between what is 'hard work' when you're tired, and what's 'hard work' when you are not. If you're tired you do less, and you burn less calories as a result. I therefore use 'heart rate monitored' exercise as a feedback mechanism to my food input.

    2. Re:Minimalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      do you also have an electronic data logging device that precisely tracks your caloric intake and nutritional spread? When I work out, I use a normal watch to time myself, and I have a ballpark (within .25 mile) estimate of the distance I run. When lifting, I don't even use a notebook - go often enough and you don't have to write everything down to remember what you last lifted, and you notice improvement through appearance and comments from other regulars at the gym.

      If you're that worried about balancing amount of exercise and food intake, I'd suggest re-evaluating your exercise. 30 minutes a day, 4 days a week is enough for most people to achieve a heightened caloric burn 24/7, simply by working the right muscle groups in the right way.

      For the vast majority of people, however, the data collected by exercise devices is an unnecessary distraction.

    3. Re:Minimalism by Don_dumb · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I run and feel good running.
      I also want to know how far I've been and gone. I could draw the map on Google Earth or a paper map and get an approximation OR I could just read the distance and time off of the Garmin Forerunner on my arm to get the most accurate measurement.
      The reason we want the records is so that we can work out which route will take me (or us) so far.

      Having a goal, short and/or long term, is by far the best motivator to keep human beings going, whether you enjoy something or not. RPGs understand this with levelling up. Some of us just want to be the best we can be from ourselves - competitive yes, but humans *are* competitive beings.

      Being competitive with others or setting goals for yourself is the most effective way to get something out of exercise. If I don't have a race coming up, even 6 months ahead, I lose motivation to get out there. I know I'm not alone in this. I don't think it is strange to want to run the next one quicker, I would find it strange to run for 6 years and not want to get any better during that time.

      But it seems less pure than simply going for a hike, a run, or living some free weights.

      I agree going for a hike should be about the stroll and enjoying the outdoors. But a scientific exercise such as lifting weights without a plan of what you are trying to achieve is a pointless exercise that will end up with you wasting your time. The specific counting (kgs, reps, sets) is the whole idea.

      --
      If this were really happening, what would you think?
    4. Re:Minimalism by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      I also want to know how far I've been and gone.

      Or you could read the mile markers. Why do you want to know how far you have been?

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    5. Re:Minimalism by Don_dumb · · Score: 1

      Why do you want to know how far you have been?

      A: If I want to run say 6 miles I know what route/circuit will do that.
      B: If I'm training for a race then I may want to reach a certain distance as part of that training.
      C: It's really nice to know that even though I'm tired I've still done 10k or however far I've been. It can be a pick-me-up.

      Or you could read the mile markers.

      Some roads round here may date back to Roman times but oddly most streets, lanes and pathways don't have mile markers set up for the exact course I'm running. They only seem to do that when it's an organised race.

      --
      If this were really happening, what would you think?
    6. Re:Minimalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When your pants are tight, try eating less instead of buying new pants. And doing something every day, even if it is just a walk after dinner, ensures that you form a habit around being active.

    7. Re:Minimalism by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      They only seem to do that when it's an organised race.

      The US and Canada is nice that way. Most people don't notice the markers, but they are there except for roads that are very short or divide at specific distances (rural intersections are often every mile). Want to run 6 miles, go 6 "blocks".

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  18. surveys of free and open source applications by wehe · · Score: 2, Insightful

    There is at least a small number of Linux applications for watches and heart rate monitors, as well as some free and open source tools for bikes, including applications and open hardware for data acquisition from exercise bicycles. You may find (yet little) information about appropriate data formats, too.

  19. O noes... by Seriousity · · Score: 1

    Being a geek, I want one that will let me look at my exercise data

    *head explodes*

    --
    This post was made in complete sincere seriousity; as such any attempts to derive humour are doomed to instant failure.
  20. Say what? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    Headline used the word "open" without following it with "source".

    Where is this, and what have you done with the real slashdot?

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  21. Bodybugg by F�an�ro · · Score: 4, Informative

    Bodybugg does not measure heart rate but a few other exercise-related data
    (acceleration, heat flux, galvanic skin response, skin temperature)
    http://www.bodybugg.com/science_behind_bodybugg.php

    The data has been hacked by some guy:
    http://bodybugghacks.blogspot.com/
    it still requires some work to use it thought

    1. Re:Bodybugg by foxxlf25 · · Score: 1

      BodyMedia makes the hardware for the bodybugg as well as the GoWear fit. I believe in the GoWear fit program you can export data to excel. Though I think the detail level of the export may not be exactly what you are looking for. GoWear fit has a nice video here if you want to learn more: http://www.gowearfit.com/Learn-More/GoWear-fit-in-Motion You can also check here for more details: http://www.bodymedia.com/

    2. Re:Bodybugg by Hijacked+Public · · Score: 1

      This folks, is an advertisement for giving back to the community. Spend your free time reverse engineering a product, freely share what you've learned with others, get called 'some guy' on Slashdot.

      I bet if he got arrested over it there'd be T shirts.

      --
      "Sacrifice for the good of The State" - The State
    3. Re:Bodybugg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, someone else has been working recently to put out a better open-source solution for the Bodybugg/Gowear stuff. There are scripts here to get all your data without dealing with the paid web service:

      http://bodybugglinux.blogspot.com/

    4. Re:Bodybugg by jvkjvk · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure exactly what you point is. Do you object that he was just called 'some guy'?

      Fact is, being mentioned on slasdot as a provider of a solution for a problem is generally considered praise, not a condemnation.

      Regards.

    5. Re:Bodybugg by AugstWest · · Score: 1

      Humor: 3 a : that quality which appeals to a sense of the ludicrous or absurdly incongruous b : the mental faculty of discovering, expressing, or appreciating the ludicrous or absurdly incongruous c : something that is or is designed to be comical or amusing

  22. Big brother is watching your heart rate! by ninjanissan · · Score: 0

    Big brother is watching your heart rate!

  23. Over stimulation by options by pdp1144 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I bought one a few months ago. My brain was swimming with options and I didn't want to spend $500.00 on this equipment. I ended up going with a $100 timex solutions that does everything I need. I felt it was a good investment.

  24. Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wait...an admitted geek and EXERCISE?

  25. FitBit by DarkRat · · Score: 1

    http://www.fitbit.com/ regular shipping starts in the next few weeks

    1. Re:FitBit by Chyeld · · Score: 1

      Although it looks cool, I have to point out that one is mainly just an over engineered pedometer and doesn't really have open access to the data.

    2. Re:FitBit by DarkRat · · Score: 1

      you can access a lot of information via the fitbit API

    3. Re:FitBit by Jason+Earl · · Score: 1

      In other words, for $100 you get a fancy pedometer that magically uploads information to a website that may or may not exist 2 years from now. You'll also need either Windows or Mac OS X.

      Here's what the fitbit.com FAQ says about the API

      Yes, you must use the website. We do not provide any way to dump data to your PC, but the website will have an extensive XML and JSON API. You will be able to access most of your data through the API. (emphasis added)

      That may sound like a good deal to you, but it isn't what I want. The idea of a wireless pedometer is actually somewhat cool, but I already have fitness tracking software. I don't want to use their lame website, and I don't want to have to rely on them staying in business.

      I also don't want to pay $100 for a pedometer.

  26. Ah, geek exercise by Wrexs0ul · · Score: 3, Funny

    The only place where 3 months of exercise implies 89 days of dev work. :)

    -Matt

    --
    --- Need web hosting?
  27. pedometers by pallidmask · · Score: 4, Funny

    a wide range of features: calorie rate, pedometers ...

    cause you never know how much of a pedo you really are

  28. Garmin Edge 305 + Sport Tracks by cOdEgUru · · Score: 4, Informative

    I used to run prior to buying my Garmin 305, and I even ran a 10k with decent timing, after deciding last year to leave the couch behind. I had a myriad of foot related injuries and at one point my sports med pretty much told me that all lower extremities will require replacement. I hope he was joking. But the fact was I had no clue as to how I was pushing myself. Even the course around my house I knew as if the back of my hand, I didnt know whether I was doing better one day vs the previous, whether I am pushing myself too hard, how far I was running etc. I would drive my car around the course usually, If I ran different to calculate the mileage, but that became a hassle (found out later that there are other ways such as Mapmyrun which overlays google maps etc.)

    My two bit advice to you would be dont buy a gps training device (which is what it is) unless you were training for something. And something bigger than a 5k or a 10k. If you just started running, then run for the fun of it and when you have got that in your blood, get a training device, when you are ready to step up to the next level. A gps device the first time you start running would overwhelm you with all the data (and Garmin 305 buries you with it, and I love it!). You need all the data when you are ready to make sense with it. Initially, you should smell the crisp air outside (or the smog), feel your heart pounding inside the ribcage, see the next hill as you race towards it and its more gratifying than a lot other things, like reaching for the next bag of chips.

    A Garmin 305 with its heart monitor will give you tons of data. It will poll your position every 3 seconds, and you can use a tool like SportTracks to overlay that on google maps or Google Earth to see what you burned through. Garmin has its own training tool, like Garmin Connect, which previously sucked, but now is much better. Still I would like to direct you at Sport Tracks as its free and gives you a cumulative representation of your training than other tools. There is nothing better than seeing a month worth of data and see that you have ran 100 miles in the last one month, which days you ran, what your average pace were, your splits/laps. And oh..and graphs, more and more graphs. You can also track as to what parts of the course you were running fast vs slow, your heartbeat zones and the areas of the course where you were about to pop so that you can be better prepared etc. The Garmin 305 does a piss poor job at calculating the calories burned, as it computes it based on the distance covered, not on your heart beat which is a better route. But as long as you burn more than you take in, even if its a rough figure, you would lose weight gradually.

    Sure, you dont need Garmin 305 (which is rather bulky, but once its on your hand you dont feel its there) or any other training devices unless you are prepared to take your training to the next level. I am running a half marathon in November and I am treating my training just as I would treat anything else thats important in my life. I have a goal of a set number of hours:minutes before I cross the line and I am not ready to leave that to speculation. I train because I want to be injury free and better prepared. And thats what I have my Garmin. YMMV.

    1. Re:Garmin Edge 305 + Sport Tracks by MartinSchou · · Score: 1

      I have to second using SportTracks instead of the ghastly software that comes with the Garmin (I have a 705 myself).

      1) The software for it sucks
      2) The built in maps for my BICYCLE computer only has high ways ... yeah, that's very helpful!
      2a) The issue with that (ignoring the GPS unit map) is that the software is unable to pull down map overlays from anywhere! No Google maps or anything. Completely fucking useless

      One thing I will recommend that you do: Change the default location of your logbooks, lest you forget to take back-ups.

      I lost all the data I had from late April till early August on that account.

      That's not an issue with SportsTracks, that's an issue with me. But if you change the default location, it's easier to back it up.

    2. Re:Garmin Edge 305 + Sport Tracks by smeghead · · Score: 1

      Another second here for Garmin + SportTracks.

      I have had the Garmin Edge 305 for nearly a year and it's great. Though i've now got 2 "not completely functional" cadence/wheel speed sensors which I need to deal with.

      SportTracks caches the google map tiles locally too, so even if your offline you can still see the maps for the areas you've been before (assuming you do alot of riding around your normal area).

      And for sharing data online, Garmin Connect (formally MotionBased, and now free) is really good. It lets you show off how awesome you are.

  29. Garmin forerunner by 1s44c · · Score: 1

    Get a Garmin forerunner. I have one and I'm very happy with it. It tracks you by GPS and records your heart rate. It has many more options than you will ever need. If you don't mind a little scripting you can download garmin tools and pull raw data from it, feed it into google maps, and have really cool jogging maps and speed and heart rate calculations.

    The only annoying thing about it is the time it can take to pickup your location when you first turn it on. Even that's rarely more than 10 to 20 seconds if you have a clear view of the sky.

  30. Sporttracks by darrellt · · Score: 1

    Sporttracks is free and very well supported. Far better than the software that came with my Garmin watch.

  31. RunningAHEAD.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just wanted to plug runningahead.com. It's a great runners community currently supporting Garmin GPSs through Garmin's plug-in. You can share your workout log with others and even publish to Facebook.

  32. Need a good GPS for swimming laps by alohatiger · · Score: 1

    In an indoor pool.

    --
    Bigtime Consulting - "We're the best because we cost the most"
  33. What is this exercise you speak of? by Crock23A · · Score: 1

    I am unfamiliar with the term. Could you possibly use it in a sentence so that I may better understand the concept?

    1. Re:What is this exercise you speak of? by EEBaum · · Score: 1

      "When my Linux box started showing pop-up ads for Windows Vista, I called a priest to exercise it."

      Drat, I think my spelling may be off...

      --
      -- I prefer the term "karma escort."
  34. a more-open solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Have you heard of SportTracks?

    http://www.zonefivesoftware.com/SportTracks/

    I have a Garmin 305 and it collects wonderful data, but the bundled Garmin software is crap and the Garmin website is subscription based. So I use SportTracks, which allows me to get closer to the data, look at it on google maps, get spilts, etc.

    1. Re:a more-open solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ditto -- real athletes use SportTracks

  35. I didn't mean people like you! by Kupfernigk · · Score: 1
    You make it clear that you're locked into a limited environment. I have no quibble with what you are doing at all. But you are in a way making my point for me. You intend to write a Python app to guide your actions, and I suspect that other similarly affected people would be interested in it. You are proposing to create an assistance tool which has benefits in extending the range of things you can do. But I doubt that most of them would worry about whether they could retrieve the data in future for further analysis. They would want the application to "just work".

    I have a hearing aid to deal with quite severe deafness. The latest generation is quite amazing in what it can do. I'm aware that an immense amount of data logging and analysis went into designing its algorithms, and I'm really impressed by the science that goes into it. But all I care about now is that it works, and works extremely well.

    --
    From scarped cliff or quarried stone she cries "A thousand types are gone, I care for nothing, no not one."
  36. Dumbbell Pal; GPL3 software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dumbbell Pal is a program that shows over 50 dumbbell exercises by muscle groups. Note that this program is currently only available in Dutch, but the exercises should be clear nonetheless.

    http://sourceforge.net/projects/dumbbellpal/
    http://dumbbellpal.sourceforge.net/

  37. Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For more detailed data, you can try something like the Bodybugg or the Gowear Fit, which uses a variety of sensors (heat flux, galvanic skin response, accelerometers, etc.) to track calorie usage. As made, the devices force you to buy an online service to get the data, but there are now open-source scripts to allow you to get the data yourself:

    http://bodybugglinux.blogspot.com/

    It'd be great to see more community projects like this (including community data sharing, so we can all learn more about common patterns).

  38. activity versus representation by muckracer · · Score: 1

    Every minute you spend drooling over the 'data' you collected is a minute you could have spent exercising instead and produced real results, not farking numbers.
    Seriously...while there are some people few and far between that may have a need/use for extended data and need appropriate gear I promise you that 9 out of ten people usually only buy something like that because they attempt to *buy their fitness*. Which, of course, is nonsense.
    Yet people spend insane amounts of dough on all kinds of promised miracles, whether they be high-tech gadgets or the latest 'Turn into Arnold in less than 1 minute a day!!' overhyped 'revolutionary exercise system'. I see bicyclers barely able to get up a hill with their >$1000 bikes dressed up as if participating in the Tour-de-France. Meanwhile my 6-year old would have been faster than them looking a lot less than a peacock on wheels.
    You want data? Take a pencil and a piece of paper and if you can do 25 push-up's this week and only 20 last week you improved. Congrats. Now get back on the floor, shut up and keep going!

    1. Re:activity versus representation by Sobrique · · Score: 1

      If there were a linear relationship between minutes spent working out and fitness/health level, you might have a point.

  39. Suunto + iPhone by MosesJones · · Score: 1

    My Suunto HRM uploads to an app which can then export it as a series of XML files, which is nice.

    On the iPhone I use TrailGuru which enables me to upload the tracks and then export them as KML. A little bit of XML/XSLT/XPath later and I've got a mashup of the two which give me all the information I need on HRM again position/speed etc.

    Is this really a big geek challenge? Pretty much everyone I know these days uses systems that upload to sites which enable the data to be exported in XML formats.

    --
    An Eye for an Eye will make the whole world blind - Gandhi
  40. This time, they're right. by ciroknight · · Score: 1

    Being a type 1 diabetic myself, I have fought to get one of these myself but the powers-that-be here in Norway seem to think there are no advantages to having your blood glucose measured every 1-2 to 5 minutes for 3-7 days (depending on which monitor you get), at least not compared to the price of these gadgets. Pretty insanely ignorant, as having this info available would let me easily have perfect blood glucose levels at all times. Hell, some of these meters even come with an optional automatic insulin pump!

    No offense, but the powers that be are right, for now. The advantages of these devices are vastly outweighed by the current comparative price of these devices. Monitoring your blood sugar often is good, but if you can only buy a thousand of these meters and treat a few thousand people, verses buying millions of other, vastly cheaper, but otherwise perfectly good meters and treating millions, from the view point of "the powers that be" the millions are better served. Right now they are essentially high-tech biogadgets, and even from the way you evangelize it in your post, you and they both know it. The cheapest one of those continuous-monitoring meters costs better than nine times what I paid for my standard "finger-prick" meter, and the sensors are even more expensive on top of that.

    Besides, you're diabetic. If you've got the money for one of these things, get your doctor to write you a Rx saying you need one, then go to the company and buy one. If you were even smarter, you'd ask one of these companies to give you one for free, and they'd probably go for it since you're particularly vocal on the issue (and do the whole "human review"/"tech review" thing in trade).

    Be overjoyed your national health care gets you diabetic testing supplies. Hell, be glad you have healthcare at all, that your government cares enough to make sure you can test your blood sugar as often as you need.

    --
    "Victory means exit strategy, and it's important for the President to explain to us what the exit strategy is." G.W.Bush
    1. Re:This time, they're right. by R2.0 · · Score: 1

      "Hell, be glad you have healthcare at all, that your government cares enough to make sure you can test your blood sugar as often as you need."

      And, in one sentence, you have encapsulated all of the fears of a large number of people in the US.

      Some suspect the idea that a government is capable of "caring".

      Some suspect that the government, having determined a level of "need" in general, will not be flexible enough to recognize an individual's needs

      Some suspect that "your government cares enough to make sure you will test your blood sugar as often as the government believes you need."

      The US was founded on the concept that the Government is not a friend of the individual, and populated largely by immigrants whose governments had failed them. And cultures have long memories.

      --
      "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
    2. Re:This time, they're right. by plastbox · · Score: 1

      Well, perhaps you aren't a type 1 with trouble regulating your blood glucose. I'd love to have one of those meters. Not as a replacement for my quick, easy Bayer Breeze 2 but as an additional tool to help me regulate. I strongly disagree with regards to the advantages of this gadgetry not being worth the price. To be able to attach one of those sensors and log and graph my levels in detail through 3-7 days perhaps once a month.. And besides, who are you to tell me what medical care is "worth the price" and what should just not be done?

      Yes, there are issues with usability, price, and the fact that they lag a few minutes behind because they measure interstitial fluids. So what? Being able to graph my blood glucose levels 24/7 for a few days once in a while would give me some pretty awesome insight into how my body is doing, and how something like switching to a new (middle-slow acting) insulin would affect me.

      With regards to cost, I live in one of the worlds richest countries. Our "oil fund" is at more than $438 billion USD at the moment which for a country with 4,7 million people is pretty darn decent. In addition, I pay 36% income tax (roughly $18.000 a year) as well as 24% mva on everything I buy and insane taxes on tobacco, alcohol, etc. Are you going to tell me this government can't afford to offer me that tool for management of my disease? What the hell am I giving this government half my income for?!*

      You do know that preventive medicine is way cheaper than the alternative, right? No..? You must be American.

      *Yes, I know that came of as naive and immature. Of course I know that I can't just choose to pay taxes when I break an arm, get cancer or it's time for my woman to give birth. Of course I know that I cost my country money. Still, the reason we do pay in the first place is so we can have free health care. I just wish that we could have a better free health care system (where I wasn't told $1000 is more than the extra years without complications that device might give me is worth), instead of being both at the top of all life quality lists and at the bottom of most European health care ratings.

  41. simple solution makes RMS happy by GregNorc · · Score: 1

    If you just want to track weight loss, the Hacker's Dietonline weight tracker is great. It's by John Walker (one of he creaters of AutoCad)

    One of the things that can be discouraging when losing weight is the daily fluctuations. The Hacker's Diet log software provides a nice weighted average so even if you gain a bit (say, 180.5 one day and 181.2 the next) you can see that the trend is still downwards.

    There's also excel sheets with macros for those of you dislike the idea of putting your weight info into the cloud.

    NOTE: The diet itself is crap - get your actual diet elsewhere. In fact, diet is a horrible term - think of it as a lifestyle change: Less bad food. More good running.

  42. Garmin forerunner 305 and linux by roalt · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've written some blog entries about my Garmin Forerunner 305. I also got it to work under linux: http://www.roalt.com/content/blogcategory/28/31/ Just one month ago, I also added a quick release fix and a Cadence meter, so I can use it both with running and with cycling. With the release kit it's also perfect if you want to do triathlon (although I'm not so sure it's swim-proof)...

    1. Re:Garmin forerunner 305 and linux by Galilee · · Score: 0

      The Forerunner 305 is definitely not swim proof. I've seen people put the 305 in a ziplock bag underneath their swim cap in triathlons. I'm content only collecting info for the bike & run.

  43. Andriod Phone and CardioTrainer by Rob+Riggs · · Score: 1

    I just started playing around with CardioTrainer on my new Android phone. It would be really cool if it would eventually work with a bluetooth heart rate monitor like the Spurty Chest Strap.

    --
    the growth in cynicism and rebellion has not been without cause
  44. Polar RS800 by Comatose51 · · Score: 1

    I'm a pretty avid runner and a cyclist before that and have Polar HRMs. The RS800 syncs using infrared and really doesn't work that well on a Mac. I use a Windows VM to handle that. Getting the data off the HRM, as far as I can tell, is proprietary. I haven't tried to reverse engineer it or anything like that. Once the data is on your computer, you can export it as csv so at least the data is not locked in. The RS800 is pretty crazy in what can record, which includes, heart rate, temperature, altitude, stride length, cadence, and "recovery rate" (haven't really figured out what to make of it yet, looks like time between beats). I think with GPS sensor, it will record the coordinates too.

    For those of you wondering why the obsession with HRM, here are two reasons why they can make a huge difference in your work out:
    1. If you keep your heart rate below 80% of your max, your ability to keep doing what it is you're doing increases dramatically. This is how I trained to be a long distance cyclist and then a runner.
    2. I don't know about you but I thrive on accurate feedback. I want to know how I did during my training, where I'm weak, and where I'm strong. Seeing my stats improve is very encouraging.

    --
    EvilCON - Made Famous by /.
  45. SportTracks by fair+use · · Score: 1

    I use software called SportTracks (http://www.zonefivesoftware.com/SportTracks/) that downloads data my Garmin GPS watch (and other devices too). The software is not open source but it is free and it is fantastic software -- much better than the software that comes with the watch. You can also write plugins for it. I haven't tried, but I'm pretty sure you could get any data you wanted out of the program.

    PS. I have no affiliation with the company that makes the software. I'm just a very happy user of the software. I don't donate for free software very often but I did for this one.

  46. Ridewithgps.com by hamoe · · Score: 1

    I do a decent amount of cycling and have a Garmin 305 that tracks heart rate, cadence (pedaling speed), location, and time. I always thought it would be a lot of fun to play with the data, and have been working on a site for a while with a couple friends that has some cool features (mouse over your elevation and see where it is on the map, determine time spent in heart rate zones, estimate power output in watts, calories, put it on a calendar - currently working on finding other times you rode the same section of road and race yourself)

    Without a GPS unit, you can draw a route and we pull elevation data off our server if we have it (we have the continental US in 1/3 arc second accuracy, pretty good), estimate instantaneous grade, etc... fun project and people are finding it useful

    Anyway, check it out if you want: ridewithgps.com

  47. gps for. heartrate kicks ass by SCHecklerX · · Score: 1

    Great way to pre-ride a mountain bike race course to know where you are high so you can plan your race for better recovery at each climb and an overall faster time. It's hard to teach yourself to slow it down on the descents (it's just so fun!) without the feedback. This is a great service that I use for all of my post-ride analysis:

    http://gpsvisualizer.com/

  48. Call me old-fashion. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The only time I monitor anything during an exercise, is my pulse using the two fingers trick.

  49. Not that useful as it looks like by Bost · · Score: 1

    I bought the Polar FT60 about 11 months ago. At the time it was one of the top HRMs on the market. The chicks like it 'Hey this guy has a Knight Rider watch', but it's not as great as I was expecting. A HRM is an expensive gadget I don't really need. I do train often enough but I need to do more longer trainings at a lower intensity. The current HRMs are made primarily only for long distance running but in fact they are quite crappy even at this activity: If I compare numbers given by a treadmill HRM and my own HRM (Polar FT60) the Polar FT60 fluctuates between 4-6 BsPM at a _constant_ treadmill speed 10km/h at the heart rate about 135 BsPM (measured by the treadmill's HRM, in an empty gym - no interferences with other HRMs). So it's useless to try to stay in a chosen intensity level if running 'open-air' Another HRM issues: 1. Run 20km on a 30 degrees Celsius summer day at a pace 11km/h and repeat this training at 18 degrees Celsius. You gonna make the 1st training at about 80-92% of your max heart rate the 2nd would be made at 68-85% of your MHR. Now compare your calorie- and fat-burn values!... wrong like comparison of apples and bananas 2. Human body needs about 20-25 minutes in order start the fat burn processes. Run 25 minutes in the morning and 25 mins in the evening 3 times a week. It makes 02:30 with fat consumption... eeee near zero although your HRM shows you sound 15% 3. Do the interval training; about 30 seconds sprint, 3-4 minutes slow pace. After 4th or 5th cycle your heart rate stays high but you hardly move from the spot. Compare the results with the numbers measured by your HRM at a constant pace. The HRM shows no difference 4. If you do swimming - you cannot look at your wrist while doing it

  50. Calories burned not accurate by kheldan · · Score: 1

    Beware: HRMs may give you estimated calories burned, and Polar will even claim it's accurate within 10%, but the formulas they're using to estimate calories burned makes some rather broad assumptions about human physiology and your specific level of fitness as well and will err on the high side to encourage people to continue exercising. Higher-end HRMs will allow you to enter your VO2max, which would make it more accurate, but VO2max is something that is done using a very strenuous and expensive lab test that the average person isn't going to go to the effort for, and even then there are still assumptions made based on statistical averages and general theories. HRMs are good for helping you stay within a level of exertion that is appropriate for the type of physical training you're doing (i.e., staying within an aerobic zone while running) but as a way of tracking calories they're rather poor.

    --
    Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
  51. Don't. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This line of thought is a great way to not get in shape by focusing on the wrong things.

  52. One word: convenience by sean.peters · · Score: 1

    Rowing, for instance, should be a fun exercise that keeps you fit, improves your social life, and makes you aware of your environment in new ways. It's turned into something where people listen to canned music while working exercise machines in gyms, trying to turn themselves into machines.

    I'm certainly onboard (so to speak) with the idea that "real" rowing is more fun and environmentally enlightening than rowing-machine rowing. But the thing is, if you're trying to get your exercise over your lunch hour, there's essentially no way for you to do any real rowing. By the time you get dressed, get yourself to an appropriate body of water, launch, and begin rowing, you've already burned up half your available time. Most people can get to the gym more easily than to a boat launch, and you don't have to lug around a boat, either. Similarly, the weather won't always support running outdoors... therefore, treadmills. Yes, "fake" rowing and running is not nearly as interesting, but it's better than not exercising at all.

    Finally, what's with the dismissal of playing with the numbers? This is slashdot, after all - we like doing that kind of thing. If playing with data is fun for you, then by definition it's not a waste of your life.

    1. Re:One word: convenience by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      I would say that "fake" running (on a treadmill -- though admittedly I usually walk) is *more* interesting, because I can veg and watch TV while doing it. I could maybe get myself to listen to podcasts and run outside for a while, but not as regularly as going home & walking on the treadmill while watching TV I was likely going to watch anyway.

  53. Map My Fitness by zero0ne · · Score: 1

    http://www.mapmyfitness.com/

    Free, and allows you to actually map your routes from the data.

  54. Google My Tracks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Though it doesn't record heart rate (and requires an Android phone), I've been quite happy with Google's My Tracks app, which uploads data to Google Docs (which you can retrieve as a CSV file) and routes to Google Maps.

  55. Aw, crap... by rickb928 · · Score: 1

    I was hoping someone had bitten the bullet and writen an Access replacment.

    Back to the salt mines... grrr....

    --
    deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
  56. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  57. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  58. Goals? by Time+Ed · · Score: 1

    Do you want to get in shape or just work off a pound or two?

    Unless it keeps you motivated or if you really want to geek your workouts, you don't need heart rate monitors, GPS, or the like. Believe me, I've tried it all. You gain nothing.

    I crossfit http://www.crossfit.com/. Its pretty simple. If you puke, your heart rate is too high. After a year of it I'm in the best shape of my life.

    Cycling is my primary sport. I use a CatEye V2 for cadence. That's all I need. Because of crossfit, I can ride faster and farther than I ever imagined possible.

    In the end, I use iPhone apps "As Rx'd" to keep up with crossfit WOD's, and "Zone Buddy" to manage what I eat, but a paper journal works just as well. No graphs, no trends, no geeking. Just health.

    Good luck!

  59. Only for competition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I totally agree that an obsession with times, distances, trends, etc. can take a lot of the fun out of endurance sports.

    But devices like this are really useful for anyone training for competitive events. When I was a competitive cyclist (also about 30 years ago) I kept a training diary, a small notebook where I recorded all my rides and other training, dietary intake, daily weight, HR upon waking, etc. These gadgets are just an easy way of accumulating useful data with less work.

  60. Nokia Sports Tracker by turkeyphant · · Score: 1

    Nokia Sports Tracker lets you export your workout data as KML files. It also supports GPX, XML, CSV or Google Earth compatible formats. You can locally access all the data whenever you want. And, as it uses open formats, you can upload your workouts to Google Maps and have them appear there.

  61. zealotry by bugi · · Score: 1

    You may want to reconsider your distance from "open source zealotry". Your careful neutrality is admirable, but wait until it gets personal.

    Open data format (or a broken one) is the way you get a driver to control the speed of vlc playback. What great motivation for consistent exercise! Then again, you wouldn't want to run afoul of DMCA while simply trying to access your health data; perhaps best to just leave it hidden away.

    What about your data on their servers? Are you sure they're not sharing it with your insurance without your knowledge? What if the gov't is your insurance provider? I can only imagine the delight in their eyes from the real-time feed of your glucose levels. Conversely, does the equipment provider maintain it securely enough that you can use it as an alibi? Do they require a subpoena, so that your rights are protected from miscellaneous snoops out to injure your reputation? For that matter, what happens when they go out of business? Do you have to shop the liquidator auctions to find the disk with your data?

    Paranoid? Perhaps, but are you that sure that your partner isn't going to suffer brain injury and go nuts? Have you ever wondered what happens to the kind persons who feed data to wikileaks?

  62. Cycling Technology - Wattage by Vegan+Cyclist · · Score: 1

    I'm surprised cycling hasn't been mentioned. Similar to rowing, we've enjoyed using power measurement tools for years. Special cranks or hubs, for example, measure the force applied in the pedal stroke, and provide us with instant feedback, measured in watts, so we have quantified feedback on our efforts. These devices store the data, which of course we interpret on our computers. It's excellent feedback, and really enables riders to fine-tune their training, revealing weaknesses and strengths. Data peaks are usually stored for time intervals, so peak wattage over 5 seconds, 30 seconds, 5mins, 20mins, etc.. Looking at any rider's output over these areas shows if they're more of a sprinter or endurance rider, etc.. Once you have their weight, you can compare riders in watts per kilogram, which is helpful for determining how well a rider will be able to climb. (ie, a heavier rider will likely be able to pump out more watts, but due to the extra resistance going uphill, a lighter rider could very well have a more favorable w/kg profile.) These of course also tie into some of the mentioned devices, such as the Garmin 705, which can pick up the wireless signals from power-measurement devices, and you can track elevation, GPS, heart rate and much more as well. It makes for some interesting feedback post-ride. I've been training and racing with power for nearly three years, it's pretty amazing. Check out devices from PowerTap or SRM, good software is from Trainingpeaks called WKO+, and if you really want to get into the subject, check out the Wattage Googlegroup.

  63. Yep, I think long term trainers agree by JohnnyComeLately · · Score: 1
    I worked out for years without really logging anything. Then I started failing Air Force fitness tests (despite running 15+ miles a week for over a year), and was mandated to log. I logged, but they just wanted "times and type of fitness". Not useful and didn't really get better. Then I started doing an "As Seen on TV" program that had detailed logs and guidance. Immediately I started making gains. Later, I picked up training aides for Triathletes to prepare for their first Triathlon, and I'm again, seeing progress.

    Also, doing research on what Olympians log helped me increase my performance. For example, as I mentioned I kept failing AF PT tests (maxed out sit ups, pushups, but my 35" waist meant I needed to run a 12:30 1/5 mile. I could do it at home but not "away" at military drill, 5 hours north) and I was getting frustrated. I'd run a 12:30 at home, and then 5 days later run a 16:00 at Vandeberg AFB. Then I noticed in one Olympic training log they logged such things as "Hours slept". I found hours slept had erratic impact on energy levels (one day I could get 4 hours sleep and feel fine, another time, "lag"), but had a very large, relationship to performance (regardless of "perceived energy level" before the run). This is where I learned very clearly, that logging is highly beneficial. The irony is I'm logging three places (on line, paper workout logs, and iPhone GPS "MotionX" app) and yet I am just about kicked out of the Air Force for not being physically fit, yet able to do triathlons in respectable times.

    So back on topic, this peaked my interest because I've been wanting to find something to consolidate all of my training logs. I've got my P-90X (paper and on-line) training logs, my iPhone logged run times, and excel spreadsheet with triathlon training schedule. It's a bit much. Although interesting, I haven't really seen anything that replaces those yet.

    To go into another topic, I did start losing weight when I stopped playing Halo3 until 2am every night and started getting 8 hours of sleep. Yes, my diet and training had a large degree of impact, but I think you set yourself up for success or failure with your sleep habits. Much more than most people recognize or practice.

    1. Re:Yep, I think long term trainers agree by Don_dumb · · Score: 1
      That's interesting, it sounds like the USAF (I'm assuming you serve for) has a much tougher fitness test than the RAF one. The RAF basic fitness level is piss easy to meet.
      I'm a little confused though, you need to run a quarter mile in 12 and a half minutes? That can't be right, do you mean a mile and a half (about 2.5km) in 12 and a half minutes?
      You're totally right about the necessity of sleep. Sleep is definitely something I would benefit from having more of. When you exercise a lot, you need more sleep to recover and good rest is actually what you need more of to develop.
      The problem is finding the time to sleep, work doesn't seem to be the best place!

      The irony is I'm logging three places (on line, paper workout logs, and iPhone GPS "MotionX" app)

      What are you logging with each? I wonder if the blessed Garmin Forerunner 305 GPS with the heart rate monitor belt records much of what you are recording. But it's difficult to say without knowing what you are noting.

      PS - good luck getting through the fitness test. For speeding up the pace over shorter distances, perhaps training with someone quicker than you might help. Weights can certainly help if targeted correctly, might I suggest a good fitness instructor who knows their plyometrics.

      --
      If this were really happening, what would you think?
  64. Rasmus Lerdorf using his iPod and Nike+ by amongthetrees · · Score: 1

    Rasmus Lerdorf wrote a couple of blog entries about using the iPod Nike+. Your run information is stored as an XML file on your iPod, so he put together a PHP5 class to play with his run data.

    Blog entry:
    http://toys.lerdorf.com/archives/43-100-Runs.html

    PHP code:
    http://lerdorf.com/php/nikeplus.phps

    His run summary shows up in his Twitter feed as well.

  65. BodyMedia, research version by awtbfb · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This is probably outside the price range of most folks, but BodyMedia makes a research version.

    And before you complain, yes research versions of such equipment are almost always more expensive than consumer versions. This has to do with the added technical support ("we want people to do [insert crazy unusual thing] while using your device, will it work?") and typical "hey, that's odd data, can you explain it?" types of follow-up. When you're doing research, this level of support and debugging has a definite, non-zero value.

  66. Polar Heart Rate Monitor by BurfCurse · · Score: 1

    I use a Polar heart rate monitor. It stores my last 50 workouts which is helpful for me to see how dedicated I have been each week. It requires additional hardware to download it to a computer which I don't have, so I can't say much about that. What I do love about this the most is that the workout machines at 24 hour fitness (and even most machines at hotels) will detect the heart rate monitor and display the results on the machine's digital readout. This is extremely useful when doing fixed heart rate training. The machine will automatically adjust to keep you at a target heart rate and you don't have to hold the grips for it to get your heart rate.

  67. Just roll your own by watermodem · · Score: 1

    A IR LED and IR sensor with simple amp into a cheap a2d.
    A deep red works too but it is really measuring blood oxygen which is out of phase with heartbeat.

  68. Garmin Training Center uses sqlite by chthonicdaemon · · Score: 1

    The Garmin Training Center app uses a sqlite database to store the results, which I use to do some further munging, using some of the code from here as a base.

    --
    Languages aren't inherently fast -- implementations are efficient
  69. FitLink exercise log by lanyslinas · · Score: 1

    I use the free exercise log on FitLink. Decent exercise database and a run mapper tool as well. Social features, but no device integration yet unfortunately.

  70. ridewithgps.com by cullenking · · Score: 1

    I personally monitor my bike rides using a Garmin 305. It tracks my location via GPS, my altitude by a barometric altimeter and my heart rate and pedal speed (cadence) wirelessly. I pull the logfiles off the Garmin unit using a cool open source program called gpsbabel, which interfaces with many devices and can translate to pretty much any known log format for GPS logs. What you do with the data from here is a little overwhelming, as there are several desktop applications as well as online applications. I personally save all my logfiles in a backed up directory, then upload them to a website I am working on. The site, http://ridewithgps.com/ allows me to track all my activities on maps with interactive graphs. I have a yearly/monthly/weekly view of my activities, with accumulated miles/elevation climbed/calories burned etc. We calculate average watts expended during some exercise, which is how we calculate calories total. It is really cool being able to watch my athletic abilities improve over time, which is one of the motivating factors for using this setup. It is much more interesting to ride my bike 100 miles a week when I can see everything it is doing for me in one spot. Additionally, the reverse can be done with this website: I can map out a ride on a google map, then send it to my Garmin 305. This allows me to get turn-by-turn directions as well as a map to follow on my ride, which is very helpful for riding a new route! Finally, all the data on your profile is easily exportable and transferable. If you find a new service that serves you better, you are not locked in. This is critical to my sense of security when using any program, so I wanted to make sure no one else felt frustrated if they wanted to move to something else.

  71. Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I support bluetooth heart rate monitors open source here:

    http://code.google.com/p/zephyropen/

    Can stream into google via atom, or ftp the reports.

    Brad

  72. Control over medical instruments in general by lpress · · Score: 1
    The issues raised here apply to medical instruments in general. For example a Holter Monitor is a portable ECG recorder that one can wear for a few days. But, unlike an exercise monitor, a Holter monitor has to be federally approved before it can be sold, data formats are proprietary, and data must be analyzed using the manufacturer's software.

    I would be curious to know how much an insurance company is billed for physician time and data analysis service when a patient wears a Holter monitor for a few days. Wouldn't it be nice if we could own our own medical instruments and the data they generated?

    .

  73. One and a half in 12 minutes by JohnnyComeLately · · Score: 1
    Sorry for the delay. Our internet is really bad at work and yesterday was a heavy training day. I ran 3 miles at lunch, swam laps at an Olympic sized pool for a Masters Swim Class for an hour, and then came home to do Legs & Back. I finished at 11pm and skipped Abs/Core which I normally do after Legs/Back. I was spent plus the work we did in the pool should have worked core pretty well.

    Your hunch was right. It's one and a half miles (1.5m) in 12:30 (Twelve minutes, 30 seconds). It's too late for me to stay in the Air Force. Honestly, the irony is I do the equiv to at least 2 sprint marathons a week, and yet according to the Air Force, "I'm not physically fit." My run time, waist and pushups/situps tell them that. *rolleyes* We used to have the "tape and measure" saving grace but they nixed that. Now it's BMI, or Body Mass Index. They take a function of your height and divide by weight (H^2/W ?). So, no matter how muscular, unmuscular, body type, etc, I'm "not fit" according to the BMI until I, as a 5' 10" male, until I weight UNDER 169 pounds. So my soon-to-be-ex commander who's fat as hell and shaped like a pear (not a small pear) is "more fit" according to the AF because he can run for 12 minutes faster than me. Nevermind he looks like crap in uniform. Sorry if that sounds bitter, but it's pretty close. Pacing is an excellent idea. I tried training less miles per week (scaling back from 20-25 miles down to about 8 miles) and sprinting a lot more (all out sprint 100 yards, jog 100, repeat) but that just resulted in extremely painful injuries: plantar fascitis (ultrasound showed over 150% swelling) and my Nikes caused sinus tarsitis to flare up bad. However, I didn't get a pacer. When I ran with my wife, I started dropping times. I should have ran with her for my PT test. It's partially being stubborn and partially conceeding too late that it's what needed to happen. I wanted to do it mano-e-mano, or whatever. I wanted to pass and I wanted it to be all me. Possibly part of my anger should be at that bit of vanity, but it's still primarly aimed at a misguided PT test from the AF. The other irony is if you take my scores and extrapolate out, I pass the Army and Navy tests. Meaning, take my overall pace for 1.5 miles, stretch to 2 miles, use those scores with my situp/push up, I pass.

    Plyometrics is part of my current training. I've also incorporated Yoga at least once a week with a well rounded workout (cardio and strength). Then, I'm following a Triathlon training schedule for endurance training. So, as an example, yesterday was 30 minutes running, and 45 minutes swimming. Today is 50 minute bicycle, tomorrow will be 40 minutes running, and Thursday is a "brick". I'll swim for 30 minutes and then immediately bike for 40 minutes. For strength/cardio, yesterday was Legs/Back/Abs (core), today is Yoga for 1 hour 40 minutes, tomorrow is a "rest day", and then Chest/Tri/Abs (core) on Thursday.

    I have a lower model Garmin, so I'm not sure what is logs. I used it to just track my pace as I ran and overall speed/time. Now, the iPhone app MotionX logs: Name (you can name the track), notes, elapsed time, average pace (m/min), Distance, and max pace.

    So I'm logging the above with my iPhone. Then I have P-90X strength/cardio logs on paper and on-line. The paper logs the number of reps and weight for strength training. The on-line log just logs the workout itself (e.g. Legs & Back on Monday, Yoga on Tuesday, etc). I use an excel spreadsheet from Triathlon Club of San Diego (TCSD) to track my "Beginners Training Guide for a Sprint Triathlon". It logs the exercise per day and the duration. So for yesterday, the Column read "Day 1", on the "Week 3: Run," and "Week 3: Swim" lines. The datafield for run was "30" (for 30 minutes) and swim was around 30 or 40.

    I have a cheap $20 Reebok heartrate monitor that I use just to personally watch my training zone on Cardio training days. I'm to the point now I can tell without it where I am and how quickly I'll

  74. Online Sale Oomph ED Drawstring Shorts&Fashion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Http://www.tntshoes.com

    Hi friend, we are a prefession online store, you can see more photos and price in our website which is show in the photos
    if you are interested in our product, please email me by ,hellow pls see our website in the photos attached attached is our store's website, we are a online shopping store, we are selling large brand new shoes,clothing, handbag,sunglasses,hats etc, our products are all 20000000% best quality with the cheapest price. You will see the more pictures and the price for our product in our website, we are selling all brand new handbag, please see below some price list of the product. We accept paypal as payment, and give free shipping. Jeans : A&f Armani artful dodger jeans Bape BBC christian audigier COOGI D&G diesel ED HARDY lrg etc $33-50 free shipping. Jersey NBA Jersey MLB NLBM nike puma adidas $12-30 free shiping.

    OUR WEBSITE:
                                                                Http://www.tntshoes.com

                                                            YAHOO:shoppertrade@yahoo.com.cn

                                                                    MSN:shoppertrade@hotmail.com