Slashdot Mirror


Universal Phone Charger Approved By UN Body

andylim writes "Plans for a universal mobile phone charger have been approved by the International Telecommunication Union (ITU), a United Nations body. The charger has a micro-USB port at the connecting end, using technology similar to what is commonly used with digital cameras. It is not compulsory for manufacturers to adopt the new chargers, but the ITU says that some have already signed up to it. 'We are planning to launch the universal charger internationally during the first half of 2010,' Aldo Liguori, spokesperson for Sony Ericsson told the BBC."

220 comments

  1. Huh? by XPeter · · Score: 0

    My last three phones have all had a mini-usb charge/data port.

    It's pretty much the standard already.

    --
    "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has it's limits" - Albert Einstein
    1. Re:Huh? by sa1lnr · · Score: 2, Informative

      My last two digital cameras had mini-usb ports, neither was physically the same.

    2. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      My last two digital cameras had mini-usb ports, neither was physically the same.

      Then, by definition, they were not mini-usb ports.

      Both Micro and MiniUSB jacks are standardized. If your two cameras didn't use a common connector, then there's a good chance that at least one of the two was using a proprietary jack for USB.

    3. Re:Huh? by RDW · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Now all we need is a universal standard of (in the words of Douglas Adams) 'little dongly things' for everything else:

      http://www.douglasadams.com/dna/980707-03-a.html

      'The little dongly things I am concerned with (and they are by no means the only species of little dongly things with which the micro-electronics world is infested) are the external power adaptors which laptops and palmtops and external drives and cassette recorders and telephone answering machines and powered speakers and other incredibly necessary gizmos need to step down the mains AC supply from either 120 volts or 240 volts to 6 volts DC. Or 4.5 volts DC. Or 9 volts DC. Or 12 volts DC. At 500 milliamps. Or 300 milliamps. Or 1200 milliamps. They have positive tips and negative sleeves on their plugs, unless they are the type that has negative tips and positive sleeves. By the time you multiply all these different variables together you end up with a fairly major industry which exists, so far as I can tell, to fill my cupboards with little dongly things none of which I can ever positively identify without playing gizmo pelmanism. The usual method of finding a little dongly thing that actually matches a gizmo I want to use is to go and buy another one, at a price that can physically drive the air from your body...It's hard to imagine that some of the mightiest brains on the planet, fuelled by some of the finest pizza that money can buy, haven't at some point thought 'Wouldn't it be easier if we all just standardised on one type of DC power supply?'...I strongly suspect that if you stuck a hardware engineer in a locked room for a couple of days and taunted him with the smell of pepperoni, he'd probably be able to think of a way of making whatever gizmo (maybe even the new gizmo Pro, which I've heard such good things about) it is he's designing, work to a standard DC low-power supply.'

    4. Re:Huh? by he-sk · · Score: 1

      So your last three phones weren't Sony Ericcson models, I gather.

      Good for vou!

      --
      Free Manning, jail Obama.
    5. Re:Huh? by cynyr · · Score: 1

      there are micro A and micro B ports, so they could have been those he was referring too

      --
      All of the above was encrypted with a Quad ROT-13 method. Unauthorized decryption is in violation of the DMCA.
    6. Re:Huh? by lastchance_000 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'd be happy if they simply killed off the wall wart.

    7. Re:Huh? by MrNaz · · Score: 3, Informative

      The wall-wart contains the circuitry that converts 110vac/240vac to low voltage DC. Killing the wall wart means that same circuitry goes into the device, meaning that devices will now be larger by the size of the wall wart.

      More sensible would be to simply make everything charge via USB, as USB is already a low-power DC source, and most low power (say 10W and under) devices can be made to work from it. Future versions of USB could even be made to allow higher current delivery, allowing higher draw devices to be connected.

      Devices like modem routers though will always have a wall wart, unless you want them to be obscenely large and heavy. I'm happy for those devices to stay as-is however, as the vast majority of them are 12V 1A or below, so I just bought a dozen 12V 1A adapters from eBay once, and now I don't have to worry about losing them as they all work with each others' adapters.

      Just remember, as long as the voltage is the same, the adapter can work. Most devices will have their input voltage stamped on them near the power jack, match it with an adapter and off you go. Just make sure that the adapter is capable of delivering as much or more current than necessary.

      E.g., a modem router than says "Input 12v 500mA" will work just fine with my standard 12v 1A adapters.

      --
      I hate printers.
    8. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you mean most low power devices that use 2.5 Watts according to the standard.

    9. Re:Huh? by BrokenHalo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Manufacturers don't actually need to use a wall-wart as such. They could easily use a length of cable terminated by a normal plug, with the "wart" part of it at some point on the cable away from the socket.

      That way, we wouldn't have that continual problem with running out of usable power outlets because of some fucking wall-wart taking up more than its fair share of space.

    10. Re:Huh? by XDirtypunkX · · Score: 1

      If they standardized the power supply, then you could build it into the wall in the same way we already have standardized high voltage AC power (well, standard for a particular region). In fact, there is enough room on most wall socket panels that you could add something similar to a USB connector on them.

    11. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If Douglas Adams finds a laptop who requires the same energy to use than a external drive, and a powered speaker, and a palmtop, and a cassette recorder, I think he should post a review in Slashdot.

      Or maybe in a theoretical physics journal, I'm not sure.

    12. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A review by Douglas Adams is expected no earlier than Oct 31.

    13. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are a number of connectors that are all compatible with mini-usb cables, even though they are physically distinct.

    14. Re:Huh? by evilviper · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Now all we need is a universal standard of (in the words of Douglas Adams) 'little dongly things' for everything else

      Scott Adams is a comedian, not an electrical engineer.

      The amperage only matters if it isn't high enough... A 10amp wall-wart can power your low-power devices just fine.

      That just leaves polarity, connector, and voltage. There are PLENTY of universal power supplies out there which come with a dozen connectors, and the ability to switch polarity and voltages from 1 to 12 volts, covering just about everything but laptops...

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    15. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Small switching power supplies can operate from 100 to 400 volts at 50 or 60 HZ or DC already.

      There is a current push to develop a single power plug than can work in any country.

      By using a standard USB connector then the voltage would be 5 volts DC @ 500 MA.

      There would be no need for small dongly things unless the device being powered required somthing other than what the USB specs permit.

      About friggin time.

    16. Re:Huh? by dangitman · · Score: 1

      What the hell does Scott Adams have to do with anything?

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    17. Re:Huh? by petermgreen · · Score: 3, Informative

      Devices like modem routers though will always have a wall wart, unless you want them to be obscenely large and heavy.
      I don't see any real gain from the users point of view in having that bulk and weight in an extra box.

      The real reason so much stuff uses wall warts is because it makes the regulatory compliance issues much easier/cheaper to deal with.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    18. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A review by Douglas Adams is expected no earlier than Oct 31.

      "And another thing..."

      "And another thing, I have this laptop that runs on less than 12V and draws less than 500mA..."

    19. Re:Huh? by phoenix321 · · Score: 1

      It probably also has to do with different standards for AC-connected equipment in every country. The router is the same the world over, but the wall warts are all different, because every national regulating body thought of different requirements for them.

    20. Re:Huh? by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      It's perfectly feasible to design a device to meet all the regulatory regimes anyone cares about it's just expensive.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    21. Re:Huh? by Fred_A · · Score: 1

      The usual method of finding a little dongly thing that actually matches a gizmo I want to use is to go and buy another one, at a price that can physically drive the air from your body...

      Whenever I get a new gadget, the first thing I do is always to write its name with a permanent pen on its power supply (usually black on black but it's still legible enough).
      Failing that, I'm stuck with yet another "Celestial Happy Power Co (ROC)" gadget with no obvious clue as to what it's supposed to be paired with. I sometimes experimented which has on several occasions let the magical smoke out and finally decided on my current methodology which has proved to be effective so far.

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    22. Re:Huh? by Meski · · Score: 1

      The wall-wart contains the circuitry that converts 110vac/240vac to low voltage DC. Killing the wall wart means that same circuitry goes into the device, meaning that devices will now be larger by the size of the wall wart.

      It's worse than that, the device would now have to comply with the standards of individual countries power authorities, rather than just the plug-pak (aka wallwart) having to comply. Making mobile phones or digital cameras comply with double-insulated standards would be a nightmare.

    23. Re:Huh? by Meski · · Score: 1

      I haven't noticed this being an issue since switchmode power supplies being used inside plugpaks. The older ones that housed 50Hz transformers were a problem for this, and sucked at regulation too.

    24. Re:Huh? by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

      You make one device for every region and package a different AC adapter for each. Its simple, easy and makes things work.

      Personally I'd just like to see maximum size limitations on them -- if it weighs more than "x" make it a power block (sits on floor with normal power cable, like laptops usually have), etc.

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    25. Re:Huh? by Mattsson · · Score: 1

      There is one big plus when using external power-adapters; When the original one dies outside of warranty, you can simply get another.

      What's really needed, though, is to get the producers of wall warts to give them a cord and a hole for wall-mounting.
      The really annoying thing about most wall warts today is that you can't use all the outlets, since most are too bulky.

      --
      /.Mattsson - My native language is not English, so please don't whine over linguistic errors. (That's lame anyway...)
    26. Re:Huh? by Painted · · Score: 1

      I do this as well, though I've graduated to a label maker for legibility. I also check the device itself, and if it only has a polarity indicator or is just marked "DC IN" I stick a label there as well, identifying exactly what volts/amps the wall wart is spec'ed at.

      --
      http://marsandmore.com - Posters of space, spacecraft, and astronomy.
    27. Re:Huh? by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      Whenever I get a new gadget, the first thing I do is always to write its name with a permanent pen on its power supply (usually black on black but it's still legible enough).

      Spoilsport !
      Doing things like that takes all the fun out of it.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  2. Great! by Grimnir512 · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Now I can take my UK charger to America and still have to but a new adapter/charger!

    1. Re:Great! by Plunky · · Score: 2, Informative

      Now I can take my UK charger to America and still have to but a new adapter/charger!

      Well I'm not sure your comment makes a lot of sense, since you can already take your UK based charger (240v, 50Hz) to America and plug it in the nearest wall socket (110v, 60Hz) with a travel adaptor and it will work just fine! This is not a new thing, nearly all PSU's produced in the last 10-15 years have been light switch mode voltage converters rather than the older transformers which were heavy and expensive to make..

    2. Re:Great! by commodore64_love · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Or... you could just carry a USB-to-microUSB adapter cable, and plug it into the laptop you brought with you, or your American friends' PCs.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    3. Re:Great! by Grimnir512 · · Score: 1

      I know that, but if you read my post I said that you'd have to buy an adapter or charger. Either way you'd still end up paying money. However I suppose if you brought a laptop (it's certainly the sort of thing I'd take to America) then you could charge using USB.

    4. Re:Great! by smoker2 · · Score: 3, Informative

      My HTC charger comes with several separate pin configurations in the box. I just attach the correct one to the charger and off I go. Welcome to the 21st century. I don't need a different charger and I don't need to buy a travel adaptor.

    5. Re:Great! by Plunky · · Score: 1

      I know that, but if you read my post I said that you'd have to buy an adapter or charger. Either way you'd still end up paying money. However I suppose if you brought a laptop (it's certainly the sort of thing I'd take to America) then you could charge using USB.

      Frankly, after reading stories on slashdot, I wouldn't recommend you take a laptop to America anyway but if you did, how were you proposing to charge it without a travel adaptor? Its a different country and there is always going to be some expense when travelling..

    6. Re:Great! by ivan_w · · Score: 1

      Uh ?

      And how in the world are you going to recharge your laptop if you don't have an adapter ?

      Btw.. power socket adapters cost like .99€ a piece (just don't buy them at the airport where they'll probably charge you 20€ for a crappy universal travel adapter).

      If you're planning on traveling aboard, I suggest you look a bit ahead and buy a handful of those before you leave. And you don't have top throw them away.. you can use them the next time you go back.. 5€ investment for a lifetime of travel!

      --Ivan

    7. Re:Great! by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Not all phones will recharge this way without extra work. A co-worker and I just had a look at his new Blackberry, which refused to charge from his laptop unless proprietary software was also installed, and it refused to work with a discharged battery until at least 10 minutes after he first reconnected power and it had recharged the battery somewhat. Every other phone or portable device I've worked with worked _immediately_ after providing external power.

      Standards are helpful, and I'd love to see a drop in the number of stupid adapters on the shelves of hardware stores and Staples, but amazingly stupid behavior like that Blackberry's can still be layered on top of good standards.

    8. Re:Great! by Abreu · · Score: 1

      This is also true for my Palm Centro, I think it does not send the proper amount of juice until the driver is installed...

      --
      No sig for the moment.
    9. Re:Great! by MPAB · · Score: 2, Insightful

      (just don't buy them at the airport where they'll probably charge you 20€ for a crappy universal travel adapter).

      Don't worry. Someone will find the way to make a terrorist threat out of socket adapters and they'll be forbidden to travel with unless bought sealed at the airport.

    10. Re:Great! by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

      Oh, I'm sure the USB device _sends_ the juice: USB specs are well known and maximum voltages and currents cannot be normally exceeded with just software. No, the device is not _accepting_ the juice, probably as part of its need for quick-charge controller cleverness.

    11. Re:Great! by wwwillem · · Score: 2, Informative

      Even better: don't buy the travel adapter for your laptop, but after arriving just ask your host if he has a local power cord lying around (and steal that from him for your next trip :-). Alternatively go to the local electronics store (or dollar store) and buy one, they're two to five bucks.

      Which would be the same if you would travel from the UK to let's say Germany or France, all with different wall outlets.

      I live in Canada and over the years I've built up a small collection of European power cords. My laptops upgrade, but the power cords (mostly) stay the same.

      --
      Browsers shouldn't have a back button!! It's all about going forward...
    12. Re:Great! by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      >>>A co-worker and I just had a look at his new Blackberry, which refused to charge from his laptop unless proprietary software was also installed,
      >>>

      That's frakked up. The whole idea of the Universal (keyword) Serial Buss is to provde a non-proprietary interface and allow devices to retrieve power while connected. It might only be a trickle but it's enough to fill the battery on my iPod, my camcorder, my FM radio, my MP4 player, my external drive, and so on. I'm amazed your phone refused to accept power from the USB.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    13. Re:Great! by davester666 · · Score: 1

      You can totally strangle everybody on a plane with a regular USB cable. That's why the cable this adapter uses is only 3 inches long.

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    14. Re:Great! by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      You're lucky, not all power supplies have the same input socket. Some are figure 8 shaped (like small portable stereos have), some are like a fat V (some desktop machines & printers have these) and some are entirely different (I have a stinkpad that has three round connectors).

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    15. Re:Great! by BrokenHalo · · Score: 1

      I once thought to consolidate my charging solutions by using my iPod charger plug (which has a standard USB socket in the back) with a mini-USB cable connected via Motorola's mini-to-micro USB adaptor to my phone.

      The cable arrangement (IMO) should have worked, given that it does when connected to a computer, but it didn't with the standalone charger. I have had similarly inconsistent results when attempting to use powered USB hubs to do the job.

    16. Re:Great! by seinman · · Score: 1

      I think it's a problem with your computer. I have the first generation Sprint-branded Centro, and it begins charging immediately when I plug it in to any USB port. I've tried it on my (Windows) desktop, (Mac) laptop, a USB AC adapter for an iPod, and even a powered USB hub that wasn't actually plugged into a computer. It worked every time. Either the specific port(s) you're using have something wrong with them, your phone has something wrong with it, or maybe if you have it from a different provider it's crippled (like how the AT&T Centro is EDGE, whereas the Sprint and Verizon models are 3G).

    17. Re:Great! by paeanblack · · Score: 0, Troll

      Not all phones will recharge this way without extra work. A co-worker and I just had a look at his new Blackberry, which refused to charge from his laptop unless proprietary software was also installed

      >Hey Doc, it hurts when I do this!

      >Then stop plugging your brand-new Blackberry into a USB v1.1 port.

    18. Re:Great! by Antique+Geekmeister · · Score: 1

      Paenblack wrote:

      > >Then stop plugging your brand-new Blackberry into a USB v1.1 port.

      Nice try. As the confirmation of several other posters shows, it's a problem for several other devices. And no, it's not restricted to a problem with USB 1.1 ports.

    19. Re:Great! by wwwillem · · Score: 1

      I have a stinkpad that has three round connectors

      You mean a Micky-Mouse :-) plug. Yep, I've got some of those too. Toshiba is using them as well for their (some?) netbooks.

      Friend of mine came over from Europe with her netbook and I still could borrow her the right powercord. This time I didn't let her steal it, because I don't have that many.

       

      --
      Browsers shouldn't have a back button!! It's all about going forward...
    20. Re:Great! by AmberBlackCat · · Score: 1

      It gets worse. My brother's HTC Touch was doing GPS and, apparently, it was drawing more power than powered USB 2.0 could provide. All I know for sure is the phone and its battery actually died while the phone was plugged in.

    21. Re:Great! by petermgreen · · Score: 2, Informative

      You're lucky, not all power supplies have the same input socket.
      There are three common ones afaict

      the figure eight connector (2 pin 2.5A, seen on laptop PSUs and quite a bit of AV gear)
      the "IEC" connector (3 pin 10A, seen on most desktop PCs, monitors, HDTVs etc)
      the cloverleaf connector (3 pin 2.5A, seen on laptop PSUs)

      In my experiance most stuff that has a detatchable mains lead uses one of the above three connectors

      The figure eight and the IEC are very common and I'd think you'd have very little trouble borrowing a lead. Cloverleaf leads don't tend to be seen hanging around so much since they are mostly associated with newer laptops.

      There is also a 16A variant of the IEC connector seen on some high end servers and workstations but not many people are likely to be traveling with those.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    22. Re:Great! by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      The 16A IEC is the one sometimes found on kettles?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    23. Re:Great! by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      no the one sometimes (though rarely nowadays, most kettles are "cordless" with the cord permanently attatched to a manufacturer specific base) found on kettles etc is the "hot condition" 10A variant (note: the above is the situation in the UK, I can't comment on kettles in other countries). It is like the regular IEC but with a notch cut out of the connector on the lead and a corresponding peice of plastic on the inlet (so you can use a hot condition lead with a regular inlet but you can't use a regular lead with a hot condition inlet).

      the 16A variant seen on high end workstations has a larger rectangular profile and has the pins turned through 90 degrees relative to the regular 10A connector..

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
  3. Go for it ITU! by mango9 · · Score: 1

    Make a whole lot of sense to me... could use more of the same in other areas.

  4. I hope Apple adopts this by Idimmu+Xul · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Although it is funny to watch all the iPhone users I work with scrabble about sharing one cable at work between them whilst we drown in a sea of standard USB cabling!

    --
    The problem with slashdot is that most of its users were bullied and stuffed into lockers as kids!
    1. Re:I hope Apple adopts this by jipn4 · · Score: 0

      I doubt you have a lot of micro USB connectors around either; currently, they are mostly used by Nokia phones and little else.

    2. Re:I hope Apple adopts this by XPeter · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not true at all.

      My blackberry Tour has it. My Blackberry Storm had it, and so did my LG Dare.

      Definitely not limited to Nokia.

      --
      "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has it's limits" - Albert Einstein
    3. Re:I hope Apple adopts this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Wait is micro usb different from the "mini" usb that's on my camcorder, extnl hard drive, and several other things i've got lying around?

      I guess so; wik has "the now-deprecated (but standardized) Mini-A and the currently standard Mini-B, Micro-A, and Micro-B connectors"

      wtf? After standardizing *on the micro connector, someone will need to look into standardizing *it.

    4. Re:I hope Apple adopts this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not true at all.

      My blackberry Tour has it. My Blackberry Storm had it, and so did my LG Dare.

      Definitely not limited to Nokia.

      My LG Lotus has it as well. The Lotus still flashes a message on the screen if you end up plugging the USB cable into any USBWallWart other than the one that came with the phone. *le sigh*

    5. Re:I hope Apple adopts this by Twinbee · · Score: 0, Troll

      Every time I hear nokia, it's always positive. They like open source and dislike lock in, have the best phones, and have standard connectors.

      --
      Why OpalCalc is the best Windows calc
    6. Re:I hope Apple adopts this by Linker3000 · · Score: 1

      ..and pretty much most, if not all, HTC models produced in the last 4+ years.

      OP is very wrong.

      --
      AT&ROFLMAO
    7. Re:I hope Apple adopts this by Plunky · · Score: 2, Insightful

      After standardizing *on the micro connector, someone will need to look into standardizing *it.

      Yes, reading the wikipedia page it seems that the micro socket is rated for many many more insertions than the older "mini" socket

      On the other hand, I would prefer that my mobile phone in the future didn't have any kind of socket. I want to see induction charging where you just lay it on a charging plate (possibly with other devices at the same time) and just use Bluetooth or whatever for data connectivity.

    8. Re:I hope Apple adopts this by MartinSchou · · Score: 3, Informative

      Well, Nokia uses the Micro USB connector. And Sony Ericsson seems to be on board as well.

      Just by market share alone those two make up more than 45% of the world wide market for new phones.

      Get any of LG, Samsung or Motorola to sign up for this, and you're looking at more than 50% of the market for new cell phones.

      But even with 45% of the market for new phones, it's still a massive incentive for the rest of the market. You could end up with a situation where new phones don't come with a charger, and you pay maybe 10 bucks for a new one if you need it. After all, with 45% of new cell phones needing this kind og charger, that's a huge opportunity for selling them separately.

      I, for one, would like to see something similar happen to laptops as well, even though my 95W power brick is over sized for a netbook, it'd be nice not to have to pay a minor fortune to find the right one.

    9. Re:I hope Apple adopts this by Plunky · · Score: 1

      In fact, the HTC models use a proprietary 11-pin connection that happens to be backwardly compatible with the 5-pin micro-USB. The extra 4 pins are for audio, presumably because providing a USB stack would be a bit expensive for a headset..

    10. Re:I hope Apple adopts this by Jesus_666 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well, they did sell internet surveillance equipment to Iran and successfully lobbied for a law in Finland that allows them to spy on their employees. Nobody's perfect and Nokia happens to be into surveillance. Still one of the less appalling mobile phone manufacturers, though.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    11. Re:I hope Apple adopts this by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      I remember that Apple commented they'll stick with their dock connector but plan on making an adapter available. This will definitely become supported by virtually everyone within two or three years.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    12. Re:I hope Apple adopts this by BobisOnlyBob · · Score: 1

      Nokia's here in the UK are almost entirely still circular jacks, mostly 3.5mm jacks with a smattering of 2mm jacks. I found a lovely charger that's a 3.5mm with a 3.5-2mm adaptor and I'm making do with it. Still, if the fragile 2mm pin breaks like my last one, I'll definitely be craving a standardised USB one.

    13. Re:I hope Apple adopts this by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      Except for helping Iran with censorship. Minor details.

    14. Re:I hope Apple adopts this by Twinbee · · Score: 1

      I don't know the story there, but was it no worse than when Google helped China with censorship? To me that was a grey area as it was the better of the two 'evils' in my opinion.

      --
      Why OpalCalc is the best Windows calc
    15. Re:I hope Apple adopts this by fermion · · Score: 1
      What many forget is that the dock connector was not originally a USB solution, it was a firewire connector. This was because USB was so slow. My first player was a USB device and I hardly ever changed the music because it took forever to load.

      Of course Apple has left the firewire world, so there is no reason to keep the fancy connector except for backward compatibility and to earn licensing fees. I assume that the later will motivate them to maintain the standard, at least for while longer. I do suspect they will supply a dock connector to micro USB connector.

      On another note, phones has had USB type adapters since at least 2003. Not all of these would charge without the proprietary adaptor, so although the presence of the connector is nothing new, the ability to charge from any device is a welcome develoment.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    16. Re:I hope Apple adopts this by jipn4 · · Score: 1

      Oh, don't get me wrong: I think it's a good thing, and I hope this will accelerate adoption. It is, after all, the new USB standard.

      I'm just saying that most people don't have micro-USB cables lying around just yet.

    17. Re:I hope Apple adopts this by jimicus · · Score: 1

      Nokia's here in the UK are almost entirely still circular jacks, mostly 3.5mm jacks with a smattering of 2mm jacks. I found a lovely charger that's a 3.5mm with a 3.5-2mm adaptor and I'm making do with it. Still, if the fragile 2mm pin breaks like my last one, I'll definitely be craving a standardised USB one.

      Funny, I was under the impression they'd been moving away from the larger jacks for some years. My last Nokia also had a micro USB port but it couldn't charge from it for some odd reason.

    18. Re:I hope Apple adopts this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      it's nice to see octal system used once in a while

    19. Re:I hope Apple adopts this by Dun+Malg · · Score: 1

      Oh, well "those guys did it too" makes it not a jerky thing to do, right?

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    20. Re:I hope Apple adopts this by wwwillem · · Score: 1

      Ehhh, Motorola is also using them already for years. At least my KRZR (two years old) has mini-USB and I'm pretty sure the RAZR is the same.

      --
      Browsers shouldn't have a back button!! It's all about going forward...
    21. Re:I hope Apple adopts this by aeson25 · · Score: 1

      It's pretty amazing. Sony doing something non-proprietary. What are they going to do next, use SD cards?!

    22. Re:I hope Apple adopts this by Twinbee · · Score: 1

      No, it's just that I didn't think the Google thing was as bad as some people here on /. thought, so because I didn't know much about this Nokia/Iran story, I was using that as a yardstick comparison so that I can judge whether this is as bad as some people think too.

      So... in your opinion, was it worse than the Google/China deal?

      --
      Why OpalCalc is the best Windows calc
    23. Re:I hope Apple adopts this by Gonoff · · Score: 1

      Completely wrong. You will find such cables with any old external drive for a laptop floppy drive, digital camera, blackberry, small external mass storage devices, Blackberry and even nerf gun/rocket launchers.

      Not sure where you have been for the last 5 years...

      --
      I'll see your Constitution and raise you a Queen.
    24. Re:I hope Apple adopts this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple's dock connector still has provisions for firewire signaling, but currently it carries USB, audio, NTSC video, and component video, so unless they plan to drop all of that, they will be sticking with their dock connector. All their iDevices come with a dock-to-USB cable used for charging and data. Basically, Apple is already there when it comes to USB chargers. I imagine their future chargers/cables will sport the micro connector (I hope not), or they'll just use an adapter (I hope so).

      I'm a little disappointed that micro USB is the choice for the 'standard' charger, since everyone already has a standard USB to micro USB cable to plug their devices into their computers, which sport standard USB ports, not micro ones. This will require everyone to buy micro to micro cables, a waste since we'll all still need std USB to micro USB for data connections. :(

    25. Re:I hope Apple adopts this by paul248 · · Score: 1

      And you're wrong too.

      Most HTC phones use mini USB, not micro USB. Here's a photo of both.

    26. Re:I hope Apple adopts this by St.Creed · · Score: 1

      My RAZR (V3) has mini-USB. I can charge it while driving, on the plug normally used to charge my navigation (also micro-USB). And I can charge it from my laptop. I haven't used the recharger that came with it for the last few years.

      --
      Therefore, by the (faulty) logic you're using, you're just a cow with a keyboard - osu-neko (2604)
    27. Re:I hope Apple adopts this by LurkerXXX · · Score: 1

      Funny, my Palm Pre and most other smart phones I've looked at recently all come with one.

    28. Re:I hope Apple adopts this by LurkerXXX · · Score: 2, Informative

      Get a Palm Pre with a touchstone today then. No need to wait for the future.

    29. Re:I hope Apple adopts this by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      IMO, yes, because Nokia was selling a censorware product for Iran to use as their main censorship system, not requiring Nokia to censor their products to do business in Iran.

    30. Re:I hope Apple adopts this by amRadioHed · · Score: 1

      Motorola already standardized on mini-USB at least 3 years ago.

      --
      We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
    31. Re:I hope Apple adopts this by adolf · · Score: 1

      Barely. You'd think it would be as simple as supplying +5VDC and ground to make it charge, like most other mini-USB-equipped devices with a rechargeable battery. But in Motorola's infinite wisdom, this will only result in the screen displaying "Unauthorized Charger."

      According to pinouts.ru, and my own experience, Motorola's mini-usb plug is anything but universal. It takes some cross-pinning and a resistor to make the phone charge from a dumb +5VDC power source, or the correct driver installed on an attached computer.

    32. Re:I hope Apple adopts this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Motorola V190, 2005

      Micro-USB charger? Check.

      Regarding Apple, they said they wouldn't adopt the USB charger standard a while ago, didn't they?

    33. Re:I hope Apple adopts this by amRadioHed · · Score: 1

      I don't know about that, maybe only some of their hardware have that problem. I can charge my phone and my Moto headset from a USB cable plugged into my Linux box and I'm pretty sure I didn't install any special drivers.

      --
      We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
    34. Re:I hope Apple adopts this by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      Wait is micro usb different from the "mini" usb that's on my camcorder, extnl hard drive, and several other things i've got lying around?
      Yes

      P.S. it's only mini A (pretty rare) and mini AB (combination socket for both mini A and mini B used on a USB OTG device) that is deprecated, mini B is still current.

      P.P.S. A connectors are for connecting to hosts B connectors are for connecting to devices.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    35. Re:I hope Apple adopts this by adolf · · Score: 1

      That you didn't install any drivers yourself, does not mean that your Linux box didn't already have one to begin with.

      Look at the output of dmesg after you've plugged your phone in to see for sure.

    36. Re:I hope Apple adopts this by amRadioHed · · Score: 1

      It installs drivers, but that is because it shows up as a storage device. I have no idea if it needs those for charging at full speed.

      I don't have any USB wall chargers to test with other than the one that came with the phone, so I can't say if it works or not with a generic USB charger.

      --
      We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
    37. Re:I hope Apple adopts this by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

      You mean like the PS3 using standard USB, OpenGL, HDMI, SATA and a variety of other standards? Or their music players supporting everything from their recommended AAC down to MP3? Just because Sony is an innovative company constantly trying to come up with new and better ways to do things doesn't mean they're proprietary-only.

      Before you say it, when Sony came out with the memory stick, there was nothing comparable on the market in size, speed and features.

      PS my PS3 supports CompactFlash and SD cards as well, and actually allows me to copy the music I rip from CDs with it to other devices or memory cards unlike other lock-in manufacturers.

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    38. Re:I hope Apple adopts this by Macgrrl · · Score: 1

      I recently purchased a USB charger which came with 2 cables. 1st cable was an iPod/iPhone cable and the 2nd cable was a micro-USB cable. There are 2 USB ports on the wall-wart component. Simple.

      --
      Sara
      Designer, Gamer, Macgrrl in an XP World
    39. Re:I hope Apple adopts this by psm321 · · Score: 1

      Linux kernels that I've used do include some sort of charging-only driver. Try plugging it into a Windows box without drivers installed and it won't charge.

    40. Re:I hope Apple adopts this by Painted · · Score: 1

      I have never understood this desire of yours- why would you want a solution that is 90-95% of the hassle of corded power, and 40% of the efficiency? If you have to put your device in a cradle, on a pad, or any other setup that requires the device in a particular, fixed location, how is that different than the one extra step of nabbing the cable and inserting it? It seems a hideously complicated and inefficient solution to a pretty much non-existant problem.

      One man's opinion...

      --
      http://marsandmore.com - Posters of space, spacecraft, and astronomy.
    41. Re:I hope Apple adopts this by amRadioHed · · Score: 1

      I have a windows laptop for work which I'm certain I didn't install any drivers on and it charges. Also works on a Mac laptop. Both of them mount it as a disk, so maybe it's the generic USB storage drivers that allow it to charge.

      --
      We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
  5. Finally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    If Apple would now implement a micro-USB port onto the iPhone instead of that dock connector.

    And preferably something easy to take out. The end of the cable that came with my iPhone is rather small and hard to pull compared to the one that came with my 2nd gen. Nano.

    1. Re:Finally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because the EU thought that it would be faster to reach a voluntary standard:
      http://www.euractiv.com/en/infosociety/eu-threatens-new-legislation-universal-mobile-chargers/article-180693

      And by the way, I already have this on my Nokia N86.

    2. Re:Finally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "...The end of the cable that came with my iPhone is rather small and hard to pull compared to the one that came with my 2nd gen. Nano."

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8r1CZTLk-Gk

    3. Re:Finally by SimonTheSoundMan · · Score: 5, Informative

      Apple have already signed an agreement and stated they will be using a standard micro-usb socket on the iPhones in the future. I believe Apple will introduce this socket in 2010.

      Source: http://uk.reuters.com/article/idUKTRE55S1XZ20090629

    4. Re:Finally by commodore64_love · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Because the UN was never given the power to mandate an electronic design. They can offer an opinion (recommendation) but that's it.

      Nor should the UN make that grab for power, because once you go down that road, eventually the UN will start mandating what kind of roof you can install on your house. It's bad enough I have Congress telling me how much corn/potatoes I can or cannot grow in my own backyard. They were never granted that power under the Constitution, but since the mid-1930s they've exercised the power. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wickard_v._Filburn

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    5. Re:Finally by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      Didn't the last /. story mention that Apple signed the agreement but wanted to keep the dock connector? IIRC they wanted to make an adapter.

      I wouldn't complain if they did just switch to micro-USB, though. Essentially they trade one socket for which cheap cables are available for another with more ubiquitous cheap cables.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    6. Re:Finally by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'd have rather that they licensed the dock connector. It's a nice design and can carry power, FireWire, USB, audio and video signals. Going to USB seems like a step backwards.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    7. Re:Finally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think it should be mandatory -- for accessibility reasons. I have a friend with Parkinson's disease that had a really difficult time with the micro-usb. Luckily there were alternatives available that he could manage better.

    8. Re:Finally by Hurricane78 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      What twisted your mind into thinking, a non-elected group, that is not even remotely connected to the constitutions of the countries in it, and is none of the 3 pillars of a government, would have any jurisdiction in those countries?

      That would be totalitarian dictatorship. Plain and simple.

      Additionally, where would you go, if that totalitarian global, all-encompassing dictatorship, would happen to not like your views and actions?? There would be not other country to flee to. The concept of asylum would cease to exist.

      And you just talked about it, like it were something normal...
      I fear for this world...

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    9. Re:Finally by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      It is really that big of deal? I have never really been bothered by a variety of Cell Phone chargers. I get a new phone every 3 or 4 years, my charger that comes with the phone usually lasts longer then the phone. The only charger I had problem with wasn't with the charger but stupid engineering by the part of Motorola where they made the connector on the phone not click in well and make it difficult to get a full charge as it will wiggle out after a few minutes. However even with standard phone chargers the same thing can occur.

      For the most part my phones I had for the past 11 years all kept their charge for the full day. When I got home I plugged them in and when I got up the next morning I had a fully charged phone for the day. This push for standardizing phone charges just seems silly and not worth the effort.

      I have more issues with standard sizing for plumbing fittings. Where the hose that goes to the toilet doesn't fit the hose that goes to the sink, and if you took a look at them and eyeballed it you probably wouldn't see the difference, inconsistent combinations of male and female connectors.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    10. Re:Finally by wwwillem · · Score: 1

      Where the hose that goes to the toilet doesn't fit the hose that goes to the sink

      Did you try USB .... Universal-Sink-Bath connectors. For the toilet, better don't use mini-USB. :-)

      --
      Browsers shouldn't have a back button!! It's all about going forward...
    11. Re:Finally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dear lord. I own apple products, but that level of fanboy is just bordering absurd!

    12. Re:Finally by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      How is that fanboyism? The dock connector is physically small and carries a variety of signals, including power (at a higher level than USB requires), FireWire, composite view, audio, and RS-232 signals (possibly a few more I've forgotten). In what way is replacing this with a USB connector better?

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    13. Re:Finally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd have rather that they licensed the dock connector. It's a nice design and can carry power, FireWire, USB, audio and video signals. Going to USB seems like a step backwards.

      Perhaps it will only need to carry power? Maybe Light Peak will replace the other functions?

    14. Re:Finally by amRadioHed · · Score: 1

      It's not small compared to USB. Right both my phone and wireless headset use the same USB charger so I only need one charger in my car. I really can't imagine ever being able to squeeze a dock connector plug onto the headset.

      --
      We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
    15. Re:Finally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's bad enough I have Congress telling me how much corn/potatoes I can or cannot grow in my own backyard.

      Answer: as much or as little as you want, unless you formally agreed to do something else.

      I, for one, grow none.

    16. Re:Finally by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

      Its not small compared to USB and there's no need for most of it, since USB can already handle most of its functionality.

      For the rest, there's a headphone jack.

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
  6. ITU, the folk who should run the WWW. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This folks is one of the two UN organisations (both older than the UN) who could run the WWW better than ICANN. The other being the Postal Union (UPU or IPU I think they changed their name).

    So, there you go, the UN is not just the political shit. The ITU is what means that you can phone from point A to point B, they are the logical choice for control over the WWW and domain name system.

    1. Re:ITU, the folk who should run the WWW. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lay off the Kool-Aid, please.

    2. Re:ITU, the folk who should run the WWW. by ivan_w · · Score: 1

      Cough cough !!!

      Since when does ICANN run the WWW ? (and what the heck is "The WWW" ? - No The internet is not *only* about HTML transiting over HTTP thank you..)

      But this put aside, I don't think it is the role of the ITU to govern over anything like HTTP, HTML, the Domain Name System (which is only governed by ICANN up to the point where you pick their root servers as a hint).

      ITU is about telecommunication. It describes how information gets from point A to point B - and NOT the actual payload.. For example, the ITU does lay out the groundwork so that someone in some part of the world can make a call to someone else in another part of the world, but they do NOT specify what language you then use on the phone, what a standard greeting message is and the protocol used when talking with one another over the phone line.. Same for the IPU.. They ensure postal service is carried within their jurisdiction (which is something like 95% countries) - but certainly does not state how you should write a letter !

      --Ivan

    3. Re:ITU, the folk who should run the WWW. by raddan · · Score: 1

      Some people apparently can't believe that a decentralized, peer network can run itself.

      We have got to get this thing under control, people!

    4. Re:ITU, the folk who should run the WWW. by convolvatron · · Score: 1

      obviously you haven't worked with the itu in the past. they had a whole replacement for the internet worked
      out. trees worth of documnets written in languages and metalanugages where the shift was not entirely clear. all
      just to describe an ananlogue of tpc/ip

      despite is inherent us-centrism i think the ietf did a great job.

    5. Re:ITU, the folk who should run the WWW. by XPulga · · Score: 4, Interesting


      Hell, no! ITU has a known history of

      a) writing unreadable standards (such as G.711, the a-law, mu-law telephony codec)

      b) retarded protocols (H.323, where messages are formatted according to an hierarchy defined in 3+ different standards, and call initiation sequences have so many alternatives that it is common to have two certified H.323 endpoints refuse to talk to each other. Implementing H.323 involves thousands of lines of code. While SIP (a non-ITU protocol) uses text headers similar to email and http, can be understood from a single RFC and can be correctly implemented in a few hundred lines.)

      c) favoring patented cash troll codecs such as G.729 instead of similar patent-free ones. (Meanwhile, a lot of international phone traffic is performed in roughly-uncompressed G.711, using 10x the bandwidth because the licensing fees of G.729 are outrageous)

      That's ITU for you, and these people should be forbidden from publishing any standard whatsoever.

    6. Re:ITU, the folk who should run the WWW. by raju1kabir · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This folks is one of the two UN organisations (both older than the UN) who could run the WWW better than ICANN

      1. ICANN doesn't run the www.

      2. ITU is incredibly internet-hostile. The ITU's vision of the internet is a closed network run by national telco monopolies where everything is charged for. If they had their way you'd be paying $10,000 for copies of each IETF document.

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
    7. Re:ITU, the folk who should run the WWW. by Fjan11 · · Score: 1

      d) they propose to standardize on a 2.5W version of micro-USB to charge phones, while most modern smart phones need around 5W and future fast-charging phones will need even more

      --
      This sig is just as redundant as the rest of this posting
    8. Re:ITU, the folk who should run the WWW. by TheMysteriousFuture · · Score: 1

      HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.
      SIP. Understood from a single RFC? A few hundred lines of code? HAHAHAHAHAH BWAHAHAHAHAHA. Are we talking about the same SIP here?

      --
      .sig
  7. similar to? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The charger has a micro-USB port at the connecting end, using technology similar to what is commonly used with digital cameras.

    Well, cameras tend to use mini-USB, so it's "similar to" insofar as they're both USB variants. In which case they may as well have said that it's "similar to" just about anything that hooks up to a computer via any form of USB. Also interesting that they've gone with micro-USB, as I've never seen a micro port on anything except for a tiny flash drive I have. The plug is almost too small, quite honestly.

    1. Re:similar to? by Larryish · · Score: 1

      My wife's new phone has a micro-USB port for the charger, but the only way to add data is via a micro-SD card.

      My Motorola RAZR V3r is mini-usb, as well as my chi-pod and the digital camera that I use at work. One charger to rule them all, one charger to bind them.

      With the seem editor and file manager in moto4lin I can tweak the RAZR as much as I want, as a result of which I have avoided getting a new phone for several years. Motorola doesn't make RAZR anymore, afaik.

      Mini-USB is convenient and I wouldn't mind seeing it in everything. The micro-USB doesn't seem as robust, but it may simply be unfamiliar.

    2. Re:similar to? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Theoretically, MicroUSB is a lot more robust than MiniUSB. According to Wikipedia, MicroUSB is designed to withstand 10,000 connect/disconnect cycles, vs. MiniUSB's 500.

  8. Re:The UN? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, the ITU has such a terrible track record. /facepalm

  9. I wish they had an international charger for all by rolfwind · · Score: 1

    voltages. You know, without lugging various plugs along and all that.

    The closest to this is the humble car charger, but as far as I can tell, sadly airports and hotels I've been at don't have 12v sockets handy (maybe I didn't look hard enough and be wrong). There isn't always access to a car and in a lot of places, you don't exactly want to leave expensive electronics in one.

  10. Finally by hcdejong · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's good to have a standard, pity it's 10 years late. Also, why the hell is this not mandatory?

  11. Re:I wish they had an international charger for al by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This should hopefully get you one step closer to that. Assuming the phones don't require a "smart" USB connection, all you should need is a USB wall plug (of the correct type, obivously). From there, you just use your USB-microUSB cable.

  12. Micro-USB? by __aagctu1952 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Great. Now I can have everything limited to charging at, at a maximum, 500 mA @ 5 V! Just what I've always want... oh wait, I think the charging times for most of my gadgets are already too long. If you can't charge to full capacity within a lunch break, it takes too damned long.

    1. Re:Micro-USB? by vadim_t · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That's just what the current USB standard says a port must provide.

      But it doesn't stop a wall charger from providing as much as the cable can bear, which has got to be quite a bit more.

    2. Re:Micro-USB? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If your computer can only give 500 mA @ 5 V via USB does not mean that you cannot have external charger that can give more via electric socket.

      Those phones come with charger that takes power from electric socket and it is attached to same USB port.

    3. Re:Micro-USB? by jo_ham · · Score: 1

      But if it's a USB connector on the end, it will have to abide by that standard, since the spec says "maximum 5V, 500mA" and this universal connector can then be hooked up to your other device, that is not expecting a non standard voltage across those pins and dies when you plug it in.

      The whole point about it being standard is that you can absolutely rely on the specification when you make a product that fits with it - wether that be the width of a rack mount unit, the voltage across 2 pins in a connector, or the diameter of the tyres for your car.

      If they're going to use the microUSB connector and then just supply any old voltage and current that they want, then we're worse off than before!

    4. Re:Micro-USB? by vadim_t · · Score: 1

      But if it's a USB connector on the end, it will have to abide by that standard, since the spec says "maximum 5V, 500mA" and this universal connector can then be hooked up to your other device, that is not expecting a non standard voltage across those pins and dies when you plug it in.

      The reason for that requirement is to specify that an USB device can demand at most 500mA of current from the port. So any normal USB device must work with that much, unless external power is provided.

      It also makes life much easier for laptops. 2.5W * 4 ports = 10W, which is quite a bit, considering some laptops use just 20W by themselves.

      There's nothing wrong with providing more than necessary though. If something happens to be willing to give you 5W, there's nothing wrong with using it. It's very common already. There are universal chargers that will provide 10W from an USB socket.

      BTW, nobody said anything about non-standard voltages. Providing more current never hurts anything. (Yes, I know some things like LEDs do care, but you never plug those directly into a power supply without current limiting circuitry in the middle)

      The whole point about it being standard is that you can absolutely rely on the specification when you make a product that fits with it - wether that be the width of a rack mount unit, the voltage across 2 pins in a connector, or the diameter of the tyres for your car.

      But it does fit the spec exactly. The connector is the right shape, the wiring is what it should be, the voltage is 5V, and it will provide 500mA.

      The rack has a specified width, height, screws, etc. But I bet the standard doesn't forbid making the rack out of titanium to make it bear more weight than a rack made of steel would. If the standard says "Rack must bear 20KG in each 1U slot", it doesn't mean you can't make a rack that can bear 40KG.

    5. Re:Micro-USB? by Ant+P. · · Score: 1

      Is there a problem with using USB3 instead?

    6. Re:Micro-USB? by Yvan256 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      By using micro USB, they did paint themselves in a corner for the 5 volts. However, the current provided has to be a minimum of 500mA according to the USB specs.

      Having a power adapter able to supply more than 500mA won't blow up anything since the device should also work within spec and work with a minimum of 500mA.

      Chargers being able to supply 5 volts at 2A won't blow up anything and recharge devices four times faster, if required/supported by the device. If not, the device will only take 500mA and the charger just won't be working at its full capacity of 2A.

      I wonder if the new phone charger standard mentions a "from 500mA up to X amps" specification or not.

    7. Re:Micro-USB? by jo_ham · · Score: 1

      But *voltage* is important. I know that a device will only draw as much current as it needs, even if the PSU can deliver more, but if the device is expecting 5V across the pins and in reality it is 9V or 12V, then it has the potential to damage the device.

      I don't think you understand electronics, you MUPPET, current is irrelevant (as long as the PSU can satisfy the demand of the device, ie available I > load I), if the voltage is wrong.

      Try putting 48V into a system designed for 12V and see what happens, or connect a non-switching PSU set up for 120VAC into a socket that provides 230VAC.

      Voltage matters. That will have to be a potential difference between us, Mr AC. Ha.

    8. Re:Micro-USB? by jo_ham · · Score: 1

      As long as it is only 5V - continuing the rack mount analogy, greater current from the port is fine, that's like building the rack from a stronger material, but making the rack 19.5" wide so you can fit custom shock absorbers or some other reason breaks the spec irrevocably, requiring spacers for all standard 19" equipment now, or a potential divider between your PSU and device expecting 5V.

    9. Re:Micro-USB? by jo_ham · · Score: 1

      My original post should have mentioned that only the voltage is a fixed requirement, as long as the minimum current is 500mA per port.

      The USB spec defines that minimum current, just as defines a fixed 5V. The problem with such a small voltage is that you really extract a lot of energy, you have to ramp the current up if you want to power more thirsty devices.

      It shouldn't affect mobile phones, but a laptop needs a little more juice - 5V at 2 amps isn't really going to cut it, 5 V at 5 amps might, but then your cabling has to be able to deal with the higher current - it's much easier to just up the voltage a little and keep the current low.

    10. Re:Micro-USB? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      USB 3 uses light to obtain faster data speeds.. no change in power specs

    11. Re:Micro-USB? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's probably better to have two standards, one for phone-like devices, and one for laptops. This way if you're traveling with just a phone, you don't have to carry with you a laptop-able power supply that is 2x the size of your phone.

    12. Re:Micro-USB? by Lvdata · · Score: 1

      My palm pre uses a AC to USB jack with 1 amp out. It goes to my touchstone - a induction charger and will charge it at 680ma. I have 120v in my car and use the touchstone to charge the phone and avoid the oops I stopped to quick, the phone hit the floor and BROKE the connector in the phone.

    13. Re:Micro-USB? by TorKlingberg · · Score: 1

      This requires the phone to figure out how much current it can draw. USB has a mechanism for this, but I don't know if it works above 500 mA.

    14. Re:Micro-USB? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      However, the current provided has to be a minimum of 500mA according to the USB specs.

      You mean maximum, not minimum.

      USB provides 100mA. The current can be boosted to 500mA upon request. Sadly, the request must come from a device driver (rather than from the device itself), and that's why your BlackBerry, iPod, whatever won't charge when connected to the USB port on a computer that doesn't have device drivers for it.

    15. Re:Micro-USB? by evilviper · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Chargers being able to supply 5 volts at 2A won't blow up anything and recharge devices four times faster

      If you design a phone to be charged at 5V@2,000mA, and plug it into an adapter or USB port which can only provide 5V@500mA, your adapter (or USB port) will soon catch fire, or burn out.

      The device has no way to know what current the power supply can provide, and only high-end power supplies have any form of current regulation/overload protection built-in.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    16. Re:Micro-USB? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's why there's negotiation in the protocol.

    17. Re:Micro-USB? by Agripa · · Score: 1

      USB provides 100mA. The current can be boosted to 500mA upon request. Sadly, the request must come from a device driver (rather than from the device itself), and that's why your BlackBerry, iPod, whatever won't charge when connected to the USB port on a computer that doesn't have device drivers for it.

      If you enumerated as a secondary device like a disk could you then request 500mA without having to install a specialized device driver? I know my Sansa does this but not if it takes advantage of a higher charging current.

    18. Re:Micro-USB? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There actually is a handshake that takes place before any significant current is drawn. The source can just deny the request for 2A, and any USB-standard conforming device has to shut itself off immediately.

      The 2.5" USB-Harddrives with a second power connector are not conforming to the standard. They claim to use just 500mA while actually using a lot more, and don't announce any power use at all at the 2nd connector.

    19. Re:Micro-USB? by Fjan11 · · Score: 1

      It's not that simple: if you provide 2A to a cheap phone without any form of rate limiting then that phone will indeed blow up. Granted, that's pretty rare on modern phones, however as a safety measure a lot of phones will simply refuse to charge if you supply too much current.

      --
      This sig is just as redundant as the rest of this posting
    20. Re:Micro-USB? by TheMysteriousFuture · · Score: 1

      Dumbass. Totally wrong. Go back to electronics 101

      --
      .sig
  13. Finally EU (future) regulations can be useful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Remember this February news: http://mobile.slashdot.org/story/09/02/16/206213 "EU Commissioner Wants Standard For Mobile Phone Connectors"

  14. only half the battle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    next up is convicing manufacturers to NOT put chargers in every phone package. Nor the stores to offer them for free. If its free, you'll take it for a spare.

    if they put a charger in every package then there will be zero fewer chargers floating around in the world.

    flood the market with a decent, efficient charger say for £5/$10 and then things will start to improve.

  15. Whew! by Cornwallis · · Score: 2, Funny

    Glad to see the UN is tackling the important stuff first.

    1. Re:Whew! by bloobloo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Because ITU members would otherwise be working on world peace?

    2. Re:Whew! by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Well, they've got all of the world's telephone systems connected together, and communication is an important step towards peace...

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    3. Re:Whew! by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The ITU is a pretty decent organization going back to 1865 with establishment of international standards for telegraphy.

      One proposal was to put them in charge of the root name servers. It wouldn't be the worst thing that could happen.

    4. Re:Whew! by raju1kabir · · Score: 1

      One proposal was to put them in charge of the root name servers. It wouldn't be the worst thing that could happen.

      It probably would be. Within a few years, you could say goodbye to any domain name connected to content that offended anyone or facilitated end-user VoIP. Domain-name registration would cost $1000 and would require thumbprints and photocopies of your passport.

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
  16. Important by tsa · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why this was tagged !important is beyond me. This only has plus points! It is a very important step in reducing carbon- and other needless emissions. Imagine how much this saves in copper and other materials! The price of phones and other appliances can go down a small bit because the consumer doesn't have to pay for a charger every time it buys a new one. Packages become smaller so shipping new phones costs less energy. Shops can store more phones in the same space, so the chance that the phone you want is out of stock will become smaller... I could go on and on. This is a giant leap for the environment and the consumer!

    --

    -- Cheers!

    1. Re:Important by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am also disappointed in and baffled by the tags currently assigned Why oneworldgovernment is even coming up shows to what degree conspiracy and fear of globalisation have fed into the public conscience.

      I just hope it's a joke, because as oneworldgovernments go, the ITU's pretty solid as other comments have highlighted. I'm fairly certain from my telco work that you're likely to find someone who actually knows what telecoms and communications are about in the ITU decision making hierarchy as opposed to standard decision-making hierarchies that promote on the basis of popularity...

    2. Re:Important by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1

      The price of phones and other appliances can go down a small bit because the consumer doesn't have to pay for a charger every time it buys a new one.

      This assumes that the phone manufacturers will stop including a charger in every phone they sell.

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
    3. Re:Important by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      The price of phones and other appliances can go down a small bit because the consumer doesn't have to pay for a charger every time it buys a new one.

      This assumes that the phone manufacturers will stop including a charger in every phone they sell.

      Uh, just why did you think they were doing this? Most consumers will buy the official charger even if it costs three times as much... and usually, it's at least three times as good... original chargers usually outlast phones :p

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:Important by MattskEE · · Score: 1

      "Packages become smaller so shipping new phones costs less energy. Shops can store more phones in the same space, so the chance that the phone you want is out of stock will become smaller..."

      The boxes for small but expensive things usually has little to do with the size of the product being sold. USB keys are typically sold in large plastic blister packs, my latest Logitech mouse game in a (compared to the mouse) gigantic box. People just aren't as happy when something expensive comes in a tiny box, or at least that is what retailers and manufacturers assume.

    5. Re:Important by theCoder · · Score: 1

      It's not just the "something expensive in a small box", it's to prevent a customer from sneaking a small package into their pocket and walking out with it. It's a lot easier to see a bulging plastic package than something tiny that just wraps the device.

      --
      "Save the whales, feed the hungry, free the mallocs" -- author unknown
    6. Re:Important by sydb · · Score: 1

      I've never (knowingly) been in a store where I could pick a mobile phone off the shelf and take it to the checkout. They're always "through the back". I'm in the UK, maybe it's different where you are.

      --
      Yours Sincerely, Michael.
    7. Re:Important by Fjan11 · · Score: 1

      It is also a missed opportunity to provide a better standard. This was the cheapest alternative on the table for the phone companies. The other proposals that offered multiple voltages would have cost a few dollars more but saved a lot more of the environment. So it does not only have plus points.

      --
      This sig is just as redundant as the rest of this posting
  17. South Korea and China led the way on this by haruchai · · Score: 3, Informative

    The Koreans carriers back in late 2005 and China a year later. It's about bloody time - the world needs less junk.

    --
    Pain is merely failure leaving the body
    1. Re:South Korea and China led the way on this by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      Yeah. Let's throw away all those proprietary chargers, and buy some new USB ones! Oh, wait...

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    2. Re:South Korea and China led the way on this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Korean phones are only semi-standard. The basic plug is standard, but there are several different size adapter plugs, depending on your manufacturer and model. It's annoying, because most new phones don't fit the standard size plug, which is pretty large, and need a small plastic adapter.

    3. Re:South Korea and China led the way on this by haruchai · · Score: 1

      How about this? Keep your phone instead of getting the new hotness every year or two, potentially acquiring yet another charger ( proprietary or not )

      For fuck's sake people, we managed to cross the oceans, explore uncharted territory, and go to outer space without a cell phone in every pocket.

      --
      Pain is merely failure leaving the body
  18. Re:I wish they had an international charger for al by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Informative

    The plugs are annoying, but you can literally get a set for under ten bucks. It's usually not that hard to plan ahead and carry the one or two you will need for the countries you're visiting. Practically all phone chargers run on 100-240V, anywhere fom 50-60 Hz (and probably then some!) and all you need is the plug.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  19. much as I really support the idea of the standard by lordandmaker · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What was wrong with the already approaching-de-facto standard of mini usb? Or is it only that popular where I am?

    Mini USB is one of those things that *everyone* has a lead for, they come with cameras and mp3 players and the like. What's better about micro usb?

  20. Mobile phones are getting more expensive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mobile phones can either habe one combo-connector for power, recharging, pc sync, headsets, mike, volume control etc.
    or several connectors, each with its own purpose. but to have several connectors would be more expensive.

    So if manufacturers now move towards the micro usb connector, they need a second connector for headset,
    mike etc.two is more expensive than one.

    so when you buy a new phone, and you have old cables for $manufacturer you can thrown them away.
    but you can buy chargers for micro usb, yay! as if you didn't already have one for your usb mp3 player
    or other gadgets.

    and isn't having a standard good? well, the problem isn't solved. htc for example has a connector that
    covers both usb and headset/mike etc. so unless there is also a new standard for headset/mike/etc,
    every manufacturer will now move to micro-usb plus his own proprietory headset/mike/etc. connector.
    not much of an improvement.

    but of course it is change, and change always has the great option to throw away your old stuff and buy
    new stuff. if everyone needs to buty new stuff: great for the economy! yay!

    1. Re:Mobile phones are getting more expensive by lordandmaker · · Score: 1

      so unless there is also a new standard for headset/mike/etc

      3.5mm jack?
      bluetooth?

  21. Must be a Chapter VII resolution by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

    > "We are planning to launch the universal charger internationally during the first half of 2010,' Aldo Liguori, spokesperson for Sony Ericsson told the BBC."

    Wow. This must be one of those UN resolutions that are enforced by the USAF.

    --
    echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
  22. Universal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Universal standard?

    Somebody please tell the UN that their jurisdiction is limited to this planet only, and they can't go round telling G'ould, Klimgons, Kzinti, Minbari, Mersians and Moties what to do.

  23. Re:much as I really support the idea of the standa by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1, Informative

    More plug cycles. Mini is rated for 5,000 plug/unplug cycles, micro is rated for 10,000.

    --
    USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
  24. Great! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The UN has nothing else to worry about!

  25. Microsoft's using Vibrant to astroturf Bing? by argent · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    This is getting as bad as X10 and Netflix, we've got Microsoft using those nasty Vibrant in-page popups, to generate hits on Bing I assume... every time someone's mouse drifts over one of those popups they get another hit on Bing to inflate their popularity.

    1. Re:Microsoft's using Vibrant to astroturf Bing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and what does this have to do with universal phone chargers?

      popups

      Firefox and Adblock Plus. 'nuff said.

    2. Re:Microsoft's using Vibrant to astroturf Bing? by argent · · Score: 1

      .and what does this have to do with universal phone chargers?

      The linked story was full of popups.

      Firefox and Adblock Plus. 'nuff said.

      Just remember they're pulling this shit when they start crowing about how many hits they're getting on Bing. They way they're doing it, people don't even have to click on anything to count as a hit.

  26. Re:Huh? I mean...HUH? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 0, Troll

    Thank gawd the UN is on top of the really important issues affecting humankind.

    I was worried they'd be effin' around with stuff like climate change, human rights and nuclear proliferation.

    I can sleep peacefully in the knowledge that the world is in capable hands.

    Now I hope they do something about those flimsy little plastic caps on the milk jugs that are always falling into the garbage disposal. And the floor mat on the passenger side of my BMW M5 that always gets knocked askew when someone gets in or out.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  27. They picked the wrong connector? by argent · · Score: 1

    Oh well, this just means we'll see overpriced micro-mini adapters from Monster Cable with oxygen free dual overhead cam gold plated contacts in every phone store.

  28. Durability by Yvan256 · · Score: 4, Informative

    The newer Micro-USB receptacles are designed to allow up to 10,000 cycles of insertion and removal between the receptacle and plug, compared to 500 for the standard USB and Mini-USB receptacle. This is accomplished by adding a locking device and by moving the leaf-spring connector from the jack to the plug, so that the most-stressed part is on the cable side of the connection. This change was made so that the connector on the (inexpensive) cable would bear the most wear instead of the micro-USB device.

    - Wikipedia

    1. Re:Durability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to mention that micro-USB is much much smaller, making it more suitable for tiny devices.

  29. An Urgently Needed Tool by hcgdietadvisor · · Score: 1

    I like it! It will surely save us lot of money while on international business traveling. Phone communication expenses is my large bill during trips.

  30. Universal? by bhebing · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Surely they mean terrestrial, not universal. Or are we really hoping that the Xymoleians from Sirius B will adapt to this standard?

  31. Re:much as I really support the idea of the standa by SimonTheSoundMan · · Score: 1

    I have had 4 digital cameras that have failed after a couple of hundred insertions using mini-USB. I know people who have gone through 3 or 4 Playstation Dualshock 3 controllers as the socket damaged in the same way. The pins usually bend downwards.

  32. So this means the story should be tagged by unixan · · Score: 1

    as: suddenoutbreakofcommonsense

    --
    This signature intentionally left unblank.
  33. If it is not compulsory for phone manufacturers to by amn108 · · Score: 1

    If it is not compulsory for phone manufacturers to include it, what is the point of approving it?

  34. Yippie by drmitch · · Score: 1

    That is so awesome. Too bad this is still 5 years out in the US. At least we have standardized the AC outlet side of it. We're half way there!

  35. Why stop at cell phones? by Vexorian · · Score: 1

    I hope and kind of know that they will use this for non-cellphones like mp3 players and other gadgets. It is seriously stupid the amount of chargers that exist at home...

    --

    Copyright infringement is "piracy" in the same way DRM is "consumer rape"
    1. Re:Why stop at cell phones? by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      I hope and kind of know that they will use this for non-cellphones like mp3 players and other gadgets. It is seriously stupid the amount of chargers that exist at home...

      Actually, depending on the devices you have now and how they charge, you might actually be able to eliminate some of them.

      Jut last week I bought a Kensington wall-charger that has four powered USB ports. I can charge my Motorolla phone, my Tom Tom, and two different generations of iPods at the same time.

      If your gadgets all charge off 5V USB, you can have a lot of them charging from the same charger. It may not do everything, it actually does charge everything that I have that needs charging. For me, it was money well spent and fit exactly what I needed -- literally the day before I had said "what I really want is a wall charger with four USB ports", so when I found it in the store I bought it immediately.

      Cheers

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    2. Re:Why stop at cell phones? by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      Oh, and according to Kensington, it'll do "Input: 100-240VACm, 50-60Hz, 0.3A Max".

      So, it's also a travel charger, which is pretty sweet.

      Cheers

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  36. Re:Huh? I mean...HUH? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When you drive a wankers' car you get what you deserve.

  37. Re:Huh? I mean...HUH? by Goaway · · Score: 1

    Do you have even the slightest idea what the ITU is?

  38. why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is the UN even getting involved? is there imminent danger of war or conflict over this? no? then why.

  39. Water resistant. by TechwoIf · · Score: 1

    Is this new standard water resistant? It has to be if it ever gets to military devices. I always though the Apple MAC power connector could easy be water resistant just by sealing the edges around where the connector meets the body during assembly. Just think, expanding that could have a universal connector for mobile devices that can survive a dunk in the pool or toilet.

  40. Re:much as I really support the idea of the standa by Savior_on_a_Stick · · Score: 1

    Just because it has the same form factor doesn't make the chargers compatible.

    Output power makes a huge difference.

    I have chargers going from 300 to 1000 milliamps, and the low powered charges don't work well in higher power draw devices.

    Moto nerfed the chargers for some of it's phones by adding a resistor that allows the phone to recognize an "unauthorized" charger.

  41. standard good, wrong standard bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I like the idea of a voluntary standard, but going with micro USB is the wrong direction. Use a standard USB *port* on the charger. No cable, no weird stuff. Everyone already has a standard USB to whatever-your-device-uses cable. Go with that. Standard USB is now universal. The other advantage with that is USB ports are everywhere and you can charge your device without buying a charger at all. Now that's a better standard. If you must buy a charger, a perfect example of the right device is the Apple USB charger that you can get for every iDevice they make. It has internation input voltage support (100-240v) with clip-on plug adapters (so you can plug it in to your type of outlet) and the output is a standard USB port. Bingo. In fact this existing adapter will work with tons of existing devices of all brands by using your standard USB to whatever cable that you already have.

  42. Re: SIP? a single RFC? LOL! by neutrino38 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Hahahahaha !

    SIP a single RFC? Can you imagine the number of SIP related RFCs and associated drafts? SIP WAS simple, it is now a mess. Even if we restrict to RFC 3261, if you can asnwer the following questions you are already a MASTER in SIP:

    - what is the difference between request URI and the "To" header? Are they redundant?
    - what is the difference between the "Contact" header, the "P-Asserted-Identity" header and the "From" header?
    - what is the loose routign mechanism and what is the relationship with the "Via" headers?
    - what is the need for "from tags" and 'to tags".

    If we go a bit further:

    - Why is SIP/SIMPLE do we need to introduce an "etag" and why not resuing the callid ?
    - etc.

    We are a company that is based on SIP and very in favor of this protocol mostly form market reasons but one should not be blind: this protocol has its problems like any other. At the beginning, it was sooo "simple" that it could not even support "announced transfer" or line supervision which is a must for corporate telephony then the real people jumped in and added what it takes to make it usable and added complexity.

    Even the big telco that are hated so much in this forum jumped in and created the IMS standards based on SIP (under the ETSI Umbrella = European ...). They took it to the next level of complexity but they NEEDED IT because they are the guys who enable you and me to call from A to B without even thinking about how this is done (since more that 100 years).

    If you imagine one second that you can only read ONE RFC to start working on the real SIP world, you are VERY WRONG (see RFC 3581, RFC2327, RFC 3264, RFC 3550 + all the RFC dedicated to packetization, SIP/SIMPLE, MESSAGING, ....)

    Now if you compare SIP with H.323, I agree that initially, one can see a lot of advantages.
    - H323 has a stupid protocol layering
    - slow dialog establishment, etc?
    and although they have improved this, this is still not perfect but they have advandages as well:

    - camera control and double video streams are a reality in H.323 world wher in SIP it is still on paper only and badly documented.
    - screen and application sharing are a reality on H.323 world. They are non existant in SIP
    - H.323 has defined a clean standard for NAT traversal where SIP has a set of "best practices" spread in various RFC (keepalive, rport, symetric RTP, etc.).

    if you cannot read the ITU standards that is basically because:
    - most of them need to be bought
    - they have a strong culture of separating the function and the encoding, which renders them difficult to grasp for field hackers
    - ITU protocols are often based on ASN.1 BER encoding and therefore are compact an binaries and cannot be test with a simple TELNET connection, which seems to trouble a lot of Internet gurus.

    Emmanuel
    http://www.ives.fr/

  43. Just sayin.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Should we call it UUSB now then?

  44. Blackberry charging by idji · · Score: 1

    My Blackberry 8700v (yes, it's old) rejects my Tomtom-USB car charger after 5 seconds. So I can't charge my Blackberry in the car.

    My solution to Blackberry on WindowsXP and Windows7, is simply to connect the Blackberry, then the Windows hardware wizard asks if it can connect to Windows Update for a driver - say "yes" and a simple and unobtrusive "RIMUSB.sys" on XP (RimUsb_AMD64.sys on Windows7_64) will get installed automatically. Then you can charge your Blackberry normally without any annoying Blackberry software being installed.

    1. Re:Blackberry charging by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      - say "yes" and a simple and unobtrusive "RIMUSB.sys" on XP (RimUsb_AMD64.sys on Windows7_64) will get installed automatically.

      You're missing the point. This is a hardware issue, not a software issue.

      A USB cable has +5V sitting on one of its pins, and can deliver up to 500mA of it, at all times. Doesn't matter whether the host PC is running Windows 7 or DOS 3.11. If the host PC is powered up, the device is getting +5V on the +5VSB line, is grounded through the GND line, and that's all that's required to charge a battery. The two data lines are irrelevant.

      No battery-powered USB device should ever require software support - of any type - for charging. The Blackberry (and a lot of other wireless phones; Motorola's a particularly egregious offender), by requiring communication with the host in order to charge, has defective(-by design) firmware.

    2. Re:Blackberry charging by Agripa · · Score: 1

      A USB cable has +5V sitting on one of its pins, and can deliver up to 500mA of it, at all times.

      This is incorrect. A USB port can deliver 100mA at all times but the standard requires enumeration before delivering 500mA because not all sources (unpowered hubs for example) can supply 500mA. It's actually a lot like the new PoE standard where a minimum power is guaranteed and higher power is available after some type of handshaking.

  45. mini USB != MICRO USB by jipn4 · · Score: 1

    You're talking about mini USB That's a different standard.

    The UN standard is for micro USB. The micro USB standard was adopted in 2008. It's a different connector.

  46. Re:Huh? I mean...HUH? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 0, Troll

    No, but I know how it's paid for, and who's paying for it.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  47. whoosh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your KRZR uses a MINI USB connector.

    The new standard is for MICRO USB. The two are not compatible.

  48. Re: SIP? a single RFC? LOL! by XPulga · · Score: 1


    Mostly agreed. Still, it is possible to write a SIP endpoint based on a couple of well delimited RFCs (SIP, authentication, RTP), while even decoding the hierarchy of an H.323 message is a mess.

    As for the culture of writing in a language developers can't read, and charging for access to standards: if it depended on the ITU the Internet would not exist and sending bits across continents would be considered an expensive technological miracle, much like international phone calls 30 years ago.

  49. Great start... by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    Now can we please have carrier connect standards so i can move from one carrier to another without having to get new hardware 1/2 the time?

    I don't have that problem with my land line and can choose any model i want, so why should i have it with my cellular 'line' ?

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:Great start... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Move to the EU - GPS (and GPRS, for data) fixed this ages ago. ;)

  50. Re:Huh? I mean...HUH? by Goaway · · Score: 1

    So in other words, you don't know shit about shit, but that won't stop your from shooting your mouth off.

  51. am I missing something? by Nyder · · Score: 1

    I'm sorry, but I seem to be missing something here.

    these work by magnets, as I understand.

    While I'm not sure that that magnets are bad for electronics/flash type drives, they sure as hell can't be good for my ipod classic (120gb).

    --
    Be seeing you...
  52. wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    HTC uses a proprietary variant of the mini USB connector that's compatible with standard mini USB. HTC does not use micro USB.

  53. Re:I wish they had an international charger for al by mjwx · · Score: 1

    voltages.

    Blame the Yanks for that one. Most of the world operates on 210-240v. As an Australian I can take a 240v Australian power pack to any country in Asia except Japan (even then its mostly OK because 110v will not cause much damage to a PSU expecting 240v). My biggest issue is that Most of SE Asia use the NEMA plug (which will fall out if a slight breeze passes it) or the even more annoying UK plug.

    12v is almost never used although most hotels in the Philipines will have a 12v plug in their bathrooms.

    --
    Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
  54. how about outlets? by j1mmy · · Score: 1

    could we at least get an international standard outlet? same prongs? same voltage?

  55. Korea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    South Korea currently uses a standard phone charger, and then the phone company gives you a gender with your phone purchase.

    Everyone just carries around their gender (lol) and can use any charger.

    You actually no longer get a charger with a new phone because they assume you already have one with your previous. They just give you your gender (lol).

    I wonder if there's a better term than gender. Your adapter?

    "Hey, lemme borrow your gender"

    Am I not funny?

  56. Thanks to the European Union by Dr.+Hok · · Score: 1

    That's pretty old news, actually. The European Union already convinced phone makers to agree on a standard charger a few months ago.

    --
    Say out loud: I'm an Aspie and I'm somewhat proud, I guess. Uh. Can I write an email in all caps instead? Hm...