Slashdot Mirror


What If They Turned Off the Internet?

theodp writes "It's the not-too-distant future. They've turned off the Internet. After the riots have settled down and the withdrawal symptoms have faded, how would you cope? Cracked.com asked readers to Photoshop what life would be like in an Internet-addicted society learning to cope without it. Better hope it never happens, or be prepared for dry-erase message boards, carrier pigeon-powered Twitter, block-long lines to get into adult video shops, door-to-door Rickrolling, Lolcats on Broadway, and $199.99 CDs."

21 of 511 comments (clear)

  1. (And now with more Pants!) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If it gets Idle off /., it wouldn't be a complete loss.

    1. Re:(And now with more Pants!) by sopssa · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Sad thing is that this story *is not* in idle, but entertainment.

  2. Uhm... wrong site. by nametaken · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What is this, digg? Cracked joke pages don't belong here.

    1. Re:Uhm... wrong site. by wizardforce · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Idle and Slashdot 2.0 don't belong on Slashdot either. Unfortunately, someone behind the scenes thought that the best way to lure new users was to emulate Digg instead of doing what Slashdot did best; allow nerds and geeks to discuss interesting articles and thus provide intellectual entertainment. I think that they'll find that the whole charm of Slashdot was the discussion after the article and it is what made Slashdot worth returning to on a daily basis.

      --
      Sigs are too short to say anything truly profound so read the above post instead.
    2. Re:Uhm... wrong site. by altek · · Score: 5, Insightful

      +1000

      I have been on /. since it launched (yeah, back then we nerds were quite resistant to ever creating logins for sites, hence my non-low account ID). And it seems in the last 6 months or so it's been going this way - I have gone to reading it in Google Reader and also have Gizmodo and Engadget in there as well. It seems like at least a third of the posts lately are just regurgitated from Giz and Engadget, a day or so later.

      My thought is that the internet has grown so huge, that /. can't compete with sites that have pageviews hundreds of times higher, and this is their way of sucking in some extra pageviews.

      The content on here has definitely changed. I still find some engaging comment threads, but it just seems like the truly geeky content has gotten watered down with posts about new products, jokes, etc.

      Part of it may just be that the tech world as a whole has transformed from what it was in the mid-nineties. Back then, everything was awe-inspiring and amazing in the tech world, and now it's all pretty pedestrian, we've become quite jaded.

      And, our attention spans have gotten so short, that spending a half hour reading an article about a distributed network cracking the latest encryption algorithm gets pushed under the three posts about new cell phones. And a simple yet brilliant idea is no longer brilliant, it's just expected from middle management in the outsourced development sweatshops.

      --
      THE MAGIC WORDS ARE SQUEAMISH OSSIFRAGE
    3. Re:Uhm... wrong site. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      While much of you may lament the current days of slashdot, when I started visiting it ~4-6 years ago it was filled with memes (I havn't seen a soviet russia joke in quite some time), first post jokes (GNAA) and dupes. Now it seems like most days most of the memes have rightfully left for reddit/digg. So while the comments have gotten better, the articles have probably gotten worse. What slashdot needs to do is evaluate the story submission process and the mods currently in control to emphasize less bullshit and more tech.

    4. Re:Uhm... wrong site. by JustOK · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What slashdot needs to do is evaluate the story submission process and the mods currently in control to emphasize less bullshit and more tech.

      What slashdot needs is a beowulf cluster of hot grits poured over Natalie Portman

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
    5. Re:Uhm... wrong site. by ZipprHead · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Being a long time reader myself, I'll have to say /. does have some strong competition of late with Engadget scooping stories first and BoingBoings editorial staff. But what makes this site awesome, is the commenting, moderation and user community. To this day, I often get what I need to know from the article and summaries. Engadget and other sites can not hold a candle to this community.

      Kudos to us all!

    6. Re:Uhm... wrong site. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Me three. Except what's with this "were" stuff?

      I've been reading /. since 1997, and I still refuse to get an account. /. has became THE case for how accounts and overmoderation and silly tech tool limiting speech seriously degrades the overall quality of the discussion. Yeah, you have less goatsex posts, but you have far, far less high end posts of incredible quality these days as well. The +5s these days are like the +3s when the mod system originally came out.

      The posting limit and "error" machine massively detracts from helpful discussion; there are many articles where information is just wrong, and I can provide a link to correct or original source (as in real print citation), but can't submit it because of the posting limit.

      Worse, with this JS heavy crap that is /. nowadays, it's hard to read threads. Really hard. Which sucks, because a lot of people who don't read /. all the time (because they do other, real world interesting things), will post really late in the discussion with incredibly insightful information. The new system buries it. Even under the old system, because posts to old stories never got moderated, they came up at 0, BUT you could still see them. Now, they are really, really buried; you can change the view to -1 still, but it could be buried in a thread 400 long and you can never see the damn thing, or your browser will choke. /. is like MS. Runs slower while giving you more useless features. I use to read /. on crap hardware successfully. I have what is nowadays an 8 year old machine fully topped out and /. runs like crap on it. Opera on XP chokes like bloody hell (when I close the /. pages, the browser speeds up so what's that tell you), and on Firefox on Ubuntu, it's definitely faster but a pain in the ass to navigate.

      Worse, editors don't give a crap about AC. You can't submit bug reports, feedback, or suggestion without an account nowadays either (I submitted several successful fixes back in the day of the early slashcode, while even complimented on by an editor). You can't even suggest simple fixes that ACs run into--like when you post too fast, there's no countdown alert, or if you reach your posts per day by IP which number you're at or when you can post again, any other reason for the error or delay in posting (which is on top of a "bug" from the early days that still remains, where the countdown is reset if try again to early and are still unsuccessful), or suggestion (having posts go by absolute count per day by IP, since often times people don't read /. on some days but want to reply relevantly to old posts, which count against new posts too (as in Rollover for /. not AT&T a la old Cingular)).

      Nowadays, it's rare to read /. in its entirety anymore like I use to. I barely browse all the stories anymore. The phrackin continuous update makes 3 day old articles nearly impossible to find and read in sequence with surrounding articles; I'm waiting for the damn browser to update, or the stupid /. site to figure out what listing it wants to give, before kicking over to some sloppy summary page that doesn't properly show article listings--hit the damn story, read it, close it, and the damn page bounces back to the top, so you have to scroll ALL the way down again.

      And don't get me going about page resizes changing where the right scrollbar, and the right scrollbar jumping on top of that, it's like a game of whack a mole to find a story sometimes.

      Back in the day, we criticized the editors, thought they were naive morons, now we just know they are people who want self-realization and continuous self-evolution, but who stupidly think they've reached their past concept of it, while moving on to another goal without realizing how far off they were in the past making their choice to move on all the more sillier and obtuse when past obligations where never met.

  3. Re:It's not so bad. by eln · · Score: 4, Insightful

    True, life was just fine before the Internet. Now, though, the Internet has infiltrated almost every aspect of our daily lives. Given that, if the Internet were to be shut off permanently, we would have to do without a lot of conveniences we've become accustomed to, which would make it a lot more painful than life before the Internet was. To throw in the requisite car analogy, life without cars probably wasn't all that horrible (at least, not due to the lack of cars specifically). However, now that cars are a major part of the fabric of our everyday lives, it would be substantially more painful to give them up completely now.

    Add to all this the fact that a large percentage of us would have to find something else to do for a living, and many of us would have to emerge from the basements we've been in since 1987, and you have a real problem.

  4. There is no point in this. by Hurricane78 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Because it would never happen.

    Why I'm so sure? Because there is no "they" in the Internet. Everybody can connect to his neighbors' wifi router, if needed. And the moment when no company on the planet is interested in using the now unused wires and cell phone towers, to sell services to customers, is the moment when humanity itself ceases to exist.

    I don't see a point in imagining not having the Internet. And I know how it would look anyway, since I already lived when there was no such thing. I even know how life in a monastery without electricity is. Or in a hut in the middle of nowhere.

    Now, that we know of the concept of a Internet, as long as there is a critical mass of humans exists, there will be such a network. :)

    --
    Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
  5. Re:What I would do? by tftp · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I was only picking on GP's mistake of calling ammunition "bullets" - this mistake is quite popular. Bullets alone won't do you much good, unless you are familiar with the reloading press.

    But with regard to leftover ammo and guns in case of major troubles ... ok, let's assume some people decide to abandon their homes and go ... where? Ok, let's assume they are gone. You are standing on the road, and there are presumably empty houses around you. You can break into some, but if the house is not empty you will be very dead. If you are lucky and the house is empty you can start searching. The house is large, and ammo is usually stored hidden and locked. You can spend a lot of time searching for something that may not even exist. Your time is not free because in a conflict zone there is always something hunting you, be it zombies or just gangs. So here you are, in an abandoned house, with little ammo of your own, holding a position that the owner himself saw as indefensible. Instead of moving on you are searching for ammo and guns; meanwhile zombies come closer and closer...

    Also about the weight. I think I have about 2,000 rounds of 17HMR made by Hornady, all ready for the spring squirrels. The box is not that heavy, maybe 14 lbs. If you escape in a car you can load ten times as much. If you escape on foot, I'd probably dump some food items and take all the ammo because food is easier to find; you can always shoot a bird if you have to, but you can't defend yourself with a can of beans.

  6. What would happen if Microsoft turned it off by Animats · · Score: 5, Insightful

    All it would take is one really bad Windows Update to turn off 70% of the Internet.

    Question for Homeland Security: who has access to the master signing key for Windows Update? Who does the background check on those people?

  7. Re:Arrr by wizardforce · · Score: 3, Insightful

    More like trade DVDs, books etc. with your friends. Don't copy them, just engage in some barter for the physical DVDs/books etc. The legal way to tell the RIAA + MPAA and such to frak themselves.

    --
    Sigs are too short to say anything truly profound so read the above post instead.
  8. Re:It's not so bad. by Molochi · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I started out on a BBS in the mid 80s and later BBS networks like fido and WWIV. Back then I paid for longdistance. The main allure of the internet, that came along later, was being able to access a computer outside of my area code without a per minute fee or paying the BBS's longdistance fee. Bandwidth of the internet then wasn't all that special. Pirate BBSs were common. Porn BBSs were common. "EMail" and messageboards and turn based games on BBSs were common. Of course you had CompuServe as well. All of that folded their tents when almost anyone could set up a server to the internet and talk to anyone else on the internet.

    I guess if I woke up tomorrow and there was just no internet anymore, I'd set up a BBS network. I'd expect it to be really busy since long distance is so cheap and data is so bloated now. But it's really a ridiculous question unless it's specified what it is that no longer works. No DNS? That just requires ip addresses. Cumbersome, but doable. Go much further than that and nothing works, including phones and BBSs. In which case my basic engineering, practical fabrication, and hunting/looting skills should become useful.

    --
    "The Adobe Updater must update itself before it can check for updates. Would you like to update the Adobe Updater now?"
  9. Re:It's not so bad. by warGod3 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Which side of the fence?

    I was in Cuba (Gitmo) in the 80s. We went to the beach, we played D&D, we skated, we did all kinds of things. You read a lot. Hell, we didn't even have cable or a McDonalds until 1986 or so. You really have to make do with what you have.

    It's amazing what you learn to live with and what you find to entertain yourself with.

    --
    "Be polite, be professional, but have a plan to kill everybody you meet." General James Mattis
  10. Goods times bring back BBS'S by genner · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I remember the good old days before the internet was everywhere. We had ascii and RIP graphics, door games, and FIDOnet.

    If anyone needs me I'll be leveling my L.O.R.D. character.

  11. Re:It's not so bad. by evilviper · · Score: 2, Insightful

    However, now that cars are a major part of the fabric of our everyday lives, it would be substantially more painful to give them up completely now.

    It wouldn't be too bad. Bicycles work as well now as they ever did. Without cars filling up the streets, we'd have plenty of open road to bike to/from work, stores, etc.

    Supply and demand would kick in, and in short order, instead of mega shopping malls on the edge of cities, there would be a large number of smaller stores throughout each town. Instead of people driving 60 miles each day to work, they'd stick to slightly lower-paying jobs in-town, or else move to the city where they work... Horror of horrors, I know.

    Of course, these analogies all fall down because you can't single out an object, and remove it. The technology behind it will just be developed into slightly different imitators (bicycles with gas engines, or computer WANs simply being interconnected in a more ad-hoc way). You really can't get rid of device X without getting rid of the decades of technological development that created it.

    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  12. So what is meant by 'turning off the internet'? by w0mprat · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The internet is really a collection of communications protocols. So what is meant by 'turning off the internet'?

    The reality is all the worlds communication infrastructure could be considered "Teh Internets" with the exception of traditional systems, the postal service, telegraph, analog and early digital phone exchanges. At a fundatmental level these systems are information networks just the same.

    So where do you draw the line?

    Are we cutting out HTTP + HTML and friends?
    Is this extending to international internet routing, BGP, etc etc?
    International links only? WAN? LAN? or...
    ...hypotheticall would we shut down any direct computer to computer communication? This would have to include modem communication, as this could be used for internet-like networking.

    What no one has pointed out is how the postal service and telephony systems would collapse without internet. Since these services depend on on infromation services and connectivity to transport data, manage inventory, and other aspects of such operations.

    So not only is switching off the internet possible, but we wouldn't have the faintest idea where to begin.

    --
    After logging in slashdot still does not take you back to the page you were on. It's been that way for 20 years.
  13. Re:Slashdot by PFI_Optix · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Right up until someone decides that "misbehaving" includes "submitting content of which we do not approve." The last thing we need is for the internet to give some powermonger the tools to easily silence dissent.

    --
    120 characters for a sig? That's bloody useless.
  14. Re:Slashdot by maxwell+demon · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Actually more trouble would come from the fact that many banks are not any more set up to handle all customers mailing payment orders or standing in line in the bank.

    --
    The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.