Slashdot Mirror


Giant Rift In Africa Will Create a New Ocean

Hugh Pickens writes "Researchers at the University of Rochester believe that a 35-mile rift in the desert of Ethiopia will likely become a new ocean in a million years or so, connecting the Red Sea with the Gulf of Aden. Using newly gathered seismic data, researchers have reconstructed how the rift tore open along its entire 35-mile length in just days. Dabbahu, a volcano at the northern end of the rift, erupted first, then magma pushed up through the middle of the rift area and began 'unzipping' the rift in both directions. 'We know that seafloor ridges are created by a similar intrusion of magma into a rift, but we never knew that a huge length of the ridge could break open at once like this,' says Cindy Ebinger, professor of earth and environmental sciences at the University of Rochester. The results show that highly active volcanic boundaries along the edges of tectonic ocean plates may suddenly break apart in large sections, instead of in bits, as the leading theory had previously held. The sudden large-scale events pose a much more serious hazard to populations living near the rift than would several smaller events."

168 comments

  1. Scam coming in your inbox today! by MickyTheIdiot · · Score: 4, Funny

    BUY beachfront property NOW!

    After a while* you'll be sitting on a goldmine!

    (* definition of "while" might be different in your state)

    1. Re:Scam coming in your inbox today! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      And new waters for Somali Pirates. This will solve global warming problem.

    2. Re:Scam coming in your inbox today! by Chrisq · · Score: 1

      And look forward to sitting on the ocean-front and using a laptop running the stable release version of HURD.

    3. Re:Scam coming in your inbox today! by dkf · · Score: 1

      BUY beachfront property NOW!

      After a while* you'll be sitting on a goldmine!

      There was a documentary on this business strategy a while ago.

      --
      "Little does he know, but there is no 'I' in 'Idiot'!"
    4. Re:Scam coming in your inbox today! by larpon · · Score: 1

      Oh my.. that crack sure looks like something else...

    5. Re:Scam coming in your inbox today! by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      SOLVE global warming? I was just starting to scan down for the post that BLAMES global warming!

      Hell, I feel obligated to make the assertion now.

      IT'S ALL THE FAULT OF BUSH AND BIG OIL!!! GO GREEN TODAY!! Help prevent the desert from falling into the ocean!

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    6. Re:Scam coming in your inbox today! by eleuthero · · Score: 1

      Aside from the parent being ridiculously offensive, has it ever bothered anyone else that the term refers to people from Niger and possibly Nigeria because of high influx from that region during the slave trading period and is for whatever reason used to refer to anyone with African heritage?

    7. Re:Scam coming in your inbox today! by ozbird · · Score: 1

      Right... With the bandits, pirates and other assorted villainry in the area, you could build your own replica of Mos Eisley.

    8. Re:Scam coming in your inbox today! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think it had anything to do with Niger or Nigeria as such. Even if it is somewhat out-of-favour now, the word "negro" (simply meaning black) was once an acceptable word for anyone with African heritage. Mispronunciation by some southerners led to the word being pronounced "nigger". The fact that slavery was so prevalent in the south is very likely the reason that the southern pronunciation became so offensive.

    9. Re:Scam coming in your inbox today! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hope you like desert heat - In the hot season there they get median high temps of 126F (~52C). I've been in the vicinity in the "cool" season, when temps were only in the low 100s (~40C).

    10. Re:Scam coming in your inbox today! by kurzweilfreak · · Score: 1

      Otisberg?!

      --

      kurzweil_freak

      5th Kyu Genbukan Ninpo/KJJR student

      Be the darkness that allows the light to shine.

    11. Re:Scam coming in your inbox today! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think it had anything to do with Niger or Nigeria as such. Even if it is somewhat out-of-favour now, the word "negro" (simply meaning black) was once an acceptable word for anyone with African heritage. Mispronunciation by some southerners led to the word being pronounced "nigger". The fact that slavery was so prevalent in the south is very likely the reason that the southern pronunciation became so offensive.

      Clarification: negro = black in Spanish.
      Clarification 2: anything coming from the south is offensive. Even the people are an offense to humanity.

    12. Re:Scam coming in your inbox today! by jimicus · · Score: 1

      IT'S ALL THE FAULT OF BUSH AND BIG OIL!!! GO GREEN TODAY!! Help prevent the desert from falling into the ocean!

      Why? It could do with some more water.

  2. "In a million years or so" by denzacar · · Score: 4, Funny

    Nothing to see here folks... move along. Come back in a million years or so.

    What's next? Another story about Duke Nukem Forever?

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    1. Re:"In a million years or so" by gmuslera · · Score: 1, Redundant

      Considering that both events will happen approximately at the same year, yes, would be stuff that matters here.

    2. Re:"In a million years or so" by SEWilco · · Score: 1, Funny

      Why so disparaging? You're not interested in breaking news?

    3. Re:"In a million years or so" by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      Actually, DNF is really really really officially dead. I have a screenshot from the model and lighting guys from right before they turned off the lights and closed down the offices. It's really sad.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    4. Re:"In a million years or so" by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      Pfft, a million years? Clearly these are the birth pangs of the cataclysm of 2012.

    5. Re:"In a million years or so" by eleuthero · · Score: 1

      Did you read the post last week? it's 2020, there was a math error discovered by some Dutch researchers.

    6. Re:"In a million years or so" by yurtinus · · Score: 1

      Screenshot or it never happened.

      --
      +1 Disagree
    7. Re:"In a million years or so" by cailith1970 · · Score: 1

      I thought Blizzard was releasing Cataclysm next year. ;)

      --
      I intend to live forever, or die trying. - Groucho Marx
  3. This Friday! On SyFy! A rift opens in Sheffield! by wiredog · · Score: 1

    Swallowing up thousands of hectares of the English countryside! With no warning! On the Most Dangerous Cheesiest Night on Television!

  4. Noah's flood and a massive deluge by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There is a theory that the flood story of Noah is based on the actual deluge which created the Black Sea.

    Before the Flood, this area was simply a low-lying area, but approximately 5000 years ago waters from the Mediterranean Sea spilled over the Bosporus and rapidly filled the Black Sea area within days. The massive influx of water wiped out many local civilizations and probably gave rise to the Flood legend.

    If this rift is going to become a new ocean, the water must come from somewhere. If it all comes at once, we could see a massive loss of life and property, especially as the problematic area lies in some of the poorest parts of the globe. In another 5000 years, we could be debating if the Savior Adibi Christ walked with elephants!

    1. Re:Noah's flood and a massive deluge by pe1rxq · · Score: 5, Informative

      Except that it didn't happen in just a few days....
      It is still a nice theory though... just not as dramatic.
      Another nice theory is that the 'flood' was just a local one.
      Not so long ago the world ended at the horizon for most people since they never traveled far from home.
      And since a lot of civilizations started in river deltas (which tend to flood now and then) it is not a surprise that many religions contain some flooding in their myths.

      --
      Secure messaging: http://quickmsg.vreeken.net/
    2. Re:Noah's flood and a massive deluge by Enleth · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's going to be even more interesting than that. The area is reatively close to the shore, and the pit is actually volcanic. Guess what happens when a big mass of water spills over and enters the pit.. Well, it's a shame this is Ethiopia and not Nigeria, because if it were the latter, it would be raining scammers after the massive steam explosion that is bound to happen there...

      --
      This is Slashdot. Common sense is futile. You will be modded down.
    3. Re:Noah's flood and a massive deluge by slim · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Except that it didn't happen in just a few days....

      There are fairly mainstream theories that as the Ice Age ended, ice deposits in the Arctic melted into enormous lakes. Really enormous lakes. All that was holding this water in was ice. When finally the ice holding all this water in melted and cracked, all that water was released in a sudden catastrophic event. Rivers to dwarf anything we have today. Sea levels globally rising by several metres, in a matter of days.

      I was always dubious about the idea that a gradual rise in sea levels would result in all those deluge myths worldwide (Atlantis, Cantre'r Gwaelod, Noah, etc.). I'm much more convinced if it can be sudden. That would certainly enter into oral history.

      Unfortunately the best source I can offer right now is the Beringia Museum in Whitehorse, British Columbia. A bit of a trek for most people. I guess if I were to Google a bit I could find something online, but hey, I ain't gonna.

    4. Re:Noah's flood and a massive deluge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would rather see it be east Somalia.

    5. Re:Noah's flood and a massive deluge by solevita · · Score: 1

      If it all comes at once, we could see a massive loss of life and property, especially as the problematic area lies in some of the poorest parts of the globe. In another 5000 years, we could be debating if the Savior Adibi Christ walked with elephants!

      Except this is forecast to happen in roughly a million years time, so really you would say that in 1,000,500 years there might be such debates, if we haven't been wiped out by a comet, or zombies, or all gone to live on Mars. And, of course, you're also assuming that in a million years this sea will be "in some of the poorest parts of the globe". Not sure how you can look so far ahead...

    6. Re:Noah's flood and a massive deluge by dbIII · · Score: 1

      People have read the Sumerian version, we don't have to try putting it all in a modern context where "the entire world" has a functionally completely different meaning to what it meant to people at the time. Like a lot of the Bible it's a good story in there to make a point, but unfortunately people entirely miss the point and go after minor bits of the story.

    7. Re:Noah's flood and a massive deluge by MoellerPlesset2 · · Score: 0, Troll

      There is a theory that the flood story of Noah is based on the actual deluge which created the Black Sea.

      Yeah there are lots of stupid theories from Christian apologetics who want scientific proof that the Old Testament really happened in one way or another.

      Anyone who doesn't have a religious agenda to promote tends to find it pretty dang obvious that the Jewish flood story was based off the Babylonian/Sumerian one. Why any rational person (without an agenda) would need to look for a big, epic reason for why people who were living on a floodplain would have a folk-tale about a giant catastrophic flood, is beyond me.

    8. Re:Noah's flood and a massive deluge by rossdee · · Score: 1

      I heard it was a bit further back than 5000 years ago, butit still gave rise to all of the Flood legends.
      In addition to the rise in water level, the new water was salty, so the fish that were in the lake and the plants would have died too. The (human) survivors of the even would have had to migrate quite a ways to find somewhere else to live, spreading the story with them.

      (The story of Atlantis however probably was due to the Thera/Santorini eruption.

    9. Re:Noah's flood and a massive deluge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      The geologic evidence is pretty clear that these huge "Missoula Floods" repeatedly blew through the southeast quadrant of Washington State, sometimes covering about a third of the state.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Missoula_Floods

    10. Re:Noah's flood and a massive deluge by MrMr · · Score: 0, Troll

      The point being that ethnic cleansing is ok?

    11. Re:Noah's flood and a massive deluge by alen · · Score: 2, Interesting

      there was an 1800's geologist in the US who studied strange markings on the great plains. his theory was that at the end of the last ice age the ice burst and a huge avalanche of water hit the ground going so fast that it created water tornadoes that tore up the ground. the kids cartoon Ice Age copied his theory

    12. Re:Noah's flood and a massive deluge by Malc · · Score: 1

      Isn't Whitehorse in the Yukon territory, not BC?

    13. Re:Noah's flood and a massive deluge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      avalanche of water = flood?

      water tornadoes = whirlpools?

      Surely we don't have to create new terms for things we already have words for.

    14. Re:Noah's flood and a massive deluge by JerkBoB · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I believe you might be referring to the Channeled Scablands in Washington State? I remember seeing a documentary about that. Interesting stuff. The research happened a bit later than the 1800s, unless you're referring to something else. More pictures and information.

      --
      A host is a host from coast to coast...
      Unless it's down, or slow, or fails to POST!
    15. Re:Noah's flood and a massive deluge by MBGMorden · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think you're being too harsh on the OP. He specifically mentioned other flood stories in his post.

      The simple fact is that oral stories and traditions (Christianity aside) usually have SOME basis in reality. Christianity isn't the only religion with a flood story. The Greek's also had a flood story where Zeus flooded the world. As you mention there is also the Babylonian flood story. Countless other cultures in that area have a flood story. It's not being a "Christian apologetic" to look for real events that may have inspired such stories - it's researching history.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    16. Re:Noah's flood and a massive deluge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is also a theory, and evidence, that something similar happened in Europe, separating Britain from the continent and forming the Straits of Dover. Modern civilization would see something like this coming, as the article itself shows, but there is little chance our progeny will still be around when it happens.

    17. Re:Noah's flood and a massive deluge by radtea · · Score: 5, Insightful

      There is a theory that the flood story of Noah is based on the actual deluge which created the Black Sea.

      No, the flood story of Noah is based on the Sumerian story of Utnapishtim. The Sumerian story of Utnapishtim may be based on the Black Sea (or even Mediterranian) inundation, but the Noah story is just a copy of the Sumerian story, with all the roles of the various Sumerian gods subsumed by a rather confused and contradictory Hebrew god.

      Given the Sumerians were a river culture (think about what "Mesopotamia" means) it is at least as plausible that the Sumerian flood story, which is what the biblical flood story is based on, arose from plausible fears of a great innundation, much as zombie stories arise today from a plausible fear of Republicans.

      --
      Blasphemy is a human right. Blasphemophobia kills.
    18. Re:Noah's flood and a massive deluge by the_arrow · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yeah, I saw a movie about this once. Ice Age 2 I think it was called...

      --
      / The Arrow
      "How lovely you are. So lovely in my straightjacket..." - Nny
    19. Re:Noah's flood and a massive deluge by Dragonslicer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Anyone who doesn't have a religious agenda to promote tends to find it pretty dang obvious that the Jewish flood story was based off the Babylonian/Sumerian one.

      Sure, plenty of cultures in western Asia at the time had similar flood stories. How do you leap to the conclusion that these stories weren't based on some real event?

    20. Re:Noah's flood and a massive deluge by SteveFoerster · · Score: 1, Funny

      much as zombie stories arise today from a plausible fear of Republicans

      Republicans, you say?

      "Hooooooooooooooooooope... Chaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaange...."

      --
      Space game using normal deck of cards: http://BattleCards.org
    21. Re:Noah's flood and a massive deluge by T.E.D. · · Score: 1

      No, the GP is entirely correct.

      Atlantis was a story made up by Plato in his dialogs to make a rhetorical point. It doesn't even qualify as a "myth". Either way, its story bears no resemblance whatsoever to the story of Noah (other than there was water involved I suppose). That Welsh myth might be similar to Plato's story, but that means it also bears no resemblance whatsoever to Noah's flood.

      There are some similarities between the Jewish flood myth and the Sumerian one. However, the two peoples lived awfully close together (they shared a border), so it could just be a story one picked up from the other.

      If we apply Occham's razor, the simplest explanation is that the Jews borrowed the Sumerian flood myth. Plato made Atlantis up, and the Welsh had a completely unrelated submerged city story. Oh, and all these stories are myths. They aren't history.

      But don't let that stop you from renting subs and searching for Lemuria...

    22. Re:Noah's flood and a massive deluge by slim · · Score: 1

      My mistake. It had been a long drive :)

    23. Re:Noah's flood and a massive deluge by need4mospd · · Score: 1

      I think it was actually Sumerian God Gozer.

    24. Re:Noah's flood and a massive deluge by EvilBudMan · · Score: 1

      Yeah, Troy was thought to be a joke at one time. Some of it is made up metaphor and some things are probably fact in these stories. I cn't see where the bible would be any more or less accurate than other writings found from the period.

    25. Re:Noah's flood and a massive deluge by slim · · Score: 1

      Oh, and all these stories are myths. They aren't history.

      What's suggested is that they're myths grounded in events that happened at some point in human history. If the sea level rose suddenly, there would, 50 years later, be *lots* of old people telling rapt children "We had a big settlement, but one day there was a great flood, and now that settlement is under the sea".

      Over centuries, you'd get embellishments to make the fully formed myths that exist to this day.

      I take your point about Plato and Atlantis, although I suspect he'd have been informed by an existing meme.

      You can dive to actual pre-deluge settlements: http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2009/oct/16/lost-greek-city-atlantis-myth

    26. Re:Noah's flood and a massive deluge by LordKronos · · Score: 1

      avalanche of water = flood?

      No, not really. If anything, it would be closer to a tsunami than a flood. It would be a enormous amount of water moving very rapidly...enough to transform the landscape, doing way more damage than a tsunami. Further more, a tsunami is the water being pushed by displacement, where as these type of events have a massive surge of water moving under the force of gravity (much like an avalanche does).

      I suppose the definition of flood does cover such an event, but it's on a scale much larger than what we typically think of as a flood. Typically a flood is associated with rising water levels, where as that's not the case with this sort of thing.

    27. Re:Noah's flood and a massive deluge by G-Man · · Score: 2, Informative
      Yeah there are lots of stupid theories from Christian apologetics

      Yeah, like those fundies at PBS!

      Or those zealots at National Geographic!

      Or all those bible thumpers at Columbia University! Buncha holy rollers!

    28. Re:Noah's flood and a massive deluge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whitehorse, Yukon.

    29. Re:Noah's flood and a massive deluge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny, because all cultures everywhere have a flood story. There are two possible reasons:
      1) There really was a deity-caused flood, or
      2) Floods happen wherever there is water and people like water, darn it all.

      Choose wisely.

    30. Re:Noah's flood and a massive deluge by Chyeld · · Score: 1

      PBS had a fairly (to my laymen eyes) informative and accessible NOVA episode concerning the megaflood.

    31. Re:Noah's flood and a massive deluge by SnarfQuest · · Score: 0

      much as zombie stories arise today from a plausible fear of Republicans

      Republicans, you say?

      "Hooooooooooooooooooope... Chaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaange...."

      Universal Health Careeeeeeeeeeeee

      Globallllllll Climateeeeee Changeeeeeeeee

      It's all George Bushes Faulttttttttttt

      Use my mop. It's a soviet mop.

      --
      Who would win this election: Andrew Weiner vs Andrew Weiner's weiner.
    32. Re:Noah's flood and a massive deluge by Opyros · · Score: 1

      This is the Black Sea deluge hypothesis, originated by William Ryan and Walter Pitman. (Although they argued that the Black Sea already existed before the flood, but was signinficantly smaller.) Incidentally, Orson Scott Card wrote a story which postulates that the Flood legends started with a prehistoric flood which filled the modern-day Red Sea.

    33. Re:Noah's flood and a massive deluge by Chyeld · · Score: 1

      Ah, the fresh smell of snide asshats in the morning, so much the better when they are willing to spout out shit without even thinking.

      There are several possibilities that could account for the facts as they were presented, your two listed possibilities are not the complete set. And yes, one of those possibilities is that at least a few of the groups of people who pass down these legends are descended from people who did witness a megaflood.

      No that doesn't mean that the great JC walked on water or Moses parted the sea with a wave of his hand. It doesn't have to. It simply means that there are people who beleive parts of the Bible speak of events that actually occured.

    34. Re:Noah's flood and a massive deluge by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      Why don't we just build a time viewer, then we don't have to keep guessing.
      We can just peer through something like a tv and see what happened.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    35. Re:Noah's flood and a massive deluge by ShakaUVM · · Score: 1

      >>No, the flood story of Noah is based on the Sumerian story of Utnapishtim.

      Yeah, those damn native Americans totally ripped off the Sumerians with their story of the flood, too. Giant canoe? How derivative!

    36. Re:Noah's flood and a massive deluge by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      That darn squirrel and his acorn.

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    37. Re:Noah's flood and a massive deluge by Ambitwistor · · Score: 1

      Actually, in my other comment I completely forgot about Meltwater Pulse 1A, about 14,500 years ago. Like the last interglacial event I mentioned, MP 1A also had average sea level rise rates of 4-5 centimeters per year, except it was sustained for 500 years instead of 50.

      Again, though, it wasn't a few-day deluge.

    38. Re:Noah's flood and a massive deluge by eleuthero · · Score: 1

      Yet, we still do have a word for it, or ... two words: "Flash flood" anyone?

    39. Re:Noah's flood and a massive deluge by mikael · · Score: 1

      If an 5 megaton underground text explosion can create a new lake, what could a massive volcanic eruption do:

      Cannikin test

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    40. Re:Noah's flood and a massive deluge by Ambitwistor · · Score: 1

      I found this paper which suggests 1.4 meters of sea level rise over 500-600 years 8500 years ago, the largest freshwater pulse into the North Atlantic in 100,000 years. However, some parts of that rise were rapid and they calculate that it could have caused massive flooding around the Black and Mediterranean Seas over a period of 120 years. I wonder if that's fast enough, recent enough, and global enough to account for global flood myths. The worst effects were localized around the Black Sea which would have been flooded, see here. But the last link suggests that the flooding wasn't so abrupt after all.

    41. Re:Noah's flood and a massive deluge by anaesthetica · · Score: 1

      I think you'll find this old Bob Hope movie clip about zombies apropos.

    42. Re:Noah's flood and a massive deluge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good. That's really nice. Now why should someone be chastised just because they couldn't think of the proper term at the time they were typing?

    43. Re:Noah's flood and a massive deluge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>> much as zombie stories arise today from a plausible fear of Republicans

      > Republicans, you say?

      Republicans... that's another can of worms.

    44. Re:Noah's flood and a massive deluge by Kagura · · Score: 1

      Given the Sumerians were a river culture (think about what "Mesopotamia" means)

      You have to hand it to them, though. They laid down the law in Meso. Potamia.

    45. Re:Noah's flood and a massive deluge by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      heck, the Ne'ah'kah'nie Tilamook have similar legends- only all of theirs are about the ocean disappearing over the horizon and then coming back to inundate several miles inland.

      If you're going to live on a coast with a fault line, Tsunamis will happen.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    46. Re:Noah's flood and a massive deluge by ChameleonDave · · Score: 1

      Yeah, those damn native Americans totally ripped off the Sumerians with their story of the flood, too. Giant canoe? How derivative!

      You seem to have trouble distinguishing between "the flood story of Noah" and "all flood myths".

    47. Re:Noah's flood and a massive deluge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A very important thing to consider about these flood myths and sunken city myths is that there have, self-evidently, been scores of large flood events that have affected whole civilazations. There have also got to be at least a dozen ancient submerged cities that archaeologists have found over the years.

    48. Re:Noah's flood and a massive deluge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, of course, because a tiny, tiny fraction of the population consists of pirates, and the country is in political turmoil and, oh yeah, they're mostly muslim so they all obviously deserve to die or at least suffer horribly. What were those of us who aren't xenophobic bigots thinking?

    49. Re:Noah's flood and a massive deluge by RockDoctor · · Score: 2, Interesting

      There is a theory that the flood story of Noah is based on the actual deluge which created the Black Sea.

      You've missed out the "discredited" in "a discredited theory".

      OK, that's maybe being a bit harsh on Ryan & Pitmann, whose ideas you refer to. Their theory was reasonable, plausible, and testable. It has been tested and found to be at the least flawed, if not completely unworkable. As I recall - and I'm only working from memory - one of the predictions of the Ryan/ Pitmann theory was that there would be, amongst other things, mega-dunes and other evidence of upper-flow regime erosion and redeposition in the throat of the Bhosporous. But what has been found, by shallow seismic imaging, is evidence of multiple strong flows form the Bhosporous, at multiple times, with variable spacings. So the Ryan/ Pitmann hypothesis of one Black Sea flood is disproved by the evidence. That their broader hypothesis (that the level in the Black Sea has risen substantially in pre-to-peri-historic times) is supported, but it may well have been a case of getting a couple of metres rise every few years, with a particularly midi-flood.
      To the best of my knowledge, one of the original authors (Ryan, or Pitmann ; I don't recall which) has dropped the idea after working it for a half-decade or so, while the other is continuing to try and work variations on the idea.
      Science is like that - attractive hypotheses get slain (or at least, maimed) by ugly facts.

      If this rift is going to become a new ocean, the water must come from somewhere.

      Yes, the water must come from somewhere. But to make a volume below sea level into which sea water can flood, you'll have to move one or two blocks of crust to the sides to make that "accommodation space". That space will come by moving the other sides of the appropriate continental blocks into the oceans. Which will raise the level of the seas in those oceans (probably the global ocean system). Which will make the breach of the spill point happen all the sooner.
      Geologically, the working assumption is that the volume of water in the oceans is constant. What can change more easily is the volume of the ocean basins. The largest contribution to changing that is by varying the density of rock in the seabed, either by temperature changes (which is what is happening with the rifting) or by hydration of rocks (which takes water out of the oceans ... quid pro quo).

      If it all comes at once, we could see a massive loss of life and property,

      We'd see massive movement of people and property into the highly active volcanic region first. At which point, you tell people "if you go there, you will die. Or any descendants you have who remain there will die there. you may as well face your problems here rather than try to run away there. Besides, life is probably easier here than down in that rift. Seriously - there won't even be any soil for a half-millennium or so. Spider soup (made without any drinking water ; there isn't any) is going to be your main food."
      I'd make humanitarian aid available - a sufficient number of body bags with a nice flammable lining which will make cremation easy. One would need a timing mechanism, so that the last person to die could put on the lights.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    50. Re:Noah's flood and a massive deluge by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      Republicans, you say?

      "Hooooooooooooooooooope... Chaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaange...."

      It's funny you should mention that, because around late October 2008 I was desperately moaning "Braaaaaaaains!"

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    51. Re:Noah's flood and a massive deluge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Give me a break, Republicans are nothing like zombies. Republicans have no interest in brains whatsoever.

    52. Re:Noah's flood and a massive deluge by JeanPaulBob · · Score: 1

      It simply means that there are people who beleive parts of the Bible speak of events that actually occured.

      Actually, everyone believes that parts of the Bible speak of events that actually occurred. (The Bible talks about some things that we also know about from non-biblical sources.)

      It would be better to say: Some people believe that there are so-far-uncorroborated parts of the Bible that actually occurred.

  5. poor somalis by ionix5891 · · Score: 1

    the future is not much brighter

  6. and ... Torchwood is there by SimonInOz · · Score: 1

    Ohmigod don't open the rift, captain ....

    --
    "Cats like plain crisps"
  7. how come we have only 3 oceans? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if we observed one ocean in a few decades of satellite observations (or if you want replace with "in a few thousand years of written history"..we should have more than 3 oceans right now.

    1. Re:how come we have only 3 oceans? by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 1

      Oceans start out as seas, and we have seven of those. So just give it a little more time.

    2. Re:how come we have only 3 oceans? by CuriHP · · Score: 3, Informative

      We already have more than 3. Try again.

      --
      If it's not on fire, it's a software problem.
    3. Re:how come we have only 3 oceans? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm trying to decide if you're being funny with a musical reference. There are more than seven seas, and less than seven oceans. They aren't necessarily related (e.g. the Caspian Sea won't turn in to an Ocean, unless sea levels rise and it merges in to an existing one, such as the Indian Ocean), and nor seas necessarily span two or more continental plates.

    4. Re:how come we have only 3 oceans? by Dragonslicer · · Score: 1

      We really only have one ocean, it's just convenient to apply different names to parts that have a large continent between them. There may have been the belief at some time in history that the oceans weren't all connected (I find this highly likely, but I don't feel like searching for proof).

    5. Re:how come we have only 3 oceans? by rossdee · · Score: 1

      There is geological evidence that the Mediterranean and Black Seas were once cut off from the rest of the worlds oceans in (relatively recent) times. Its possible that the Arctic ocean was also cut off during the ice age, but then it was more an ice shelf than an ocean/sea.Anyway in a million years we may have managed to melt all the (land supported) ice and most of africa would be underwater before the rift opens wide. On the other hand if we cause enough of a greenhouse effect, all the water could be boiled off, and the planet resembles venus.

    6. Re:how come we have only 3 oceans? by LordKronos · · Score: 1

      Well, we already took the land from the "Indians", so why not the Ocean too?

    7. Re:how come we have only 3 oceans? by slim · · Score: 1

      We really only have one ocean, it's just convenient to apply different names to parts that have a large continent between them.

      Although where oceans meet, you can sometimes actually see the boundary - different temperature water, currents colliding etc.

      Yes, those natural boundaries move, and it's fairly arbitrary which ones we call ocean boundaries. A bit like countries, really :)

    8. Re:how come we have only 3 oceans? by SnarfQuest · · Score: 1

      We should send explorers to go there, and plant a flag claiming the land in the name of our emperor (the reborn Jesus, Abe Lincoln, Malcom X, Michael Jackson, etc.) in the middle of the largest village we can find, just like our European ancesters did.

      --
      Who would win this election: Andrew Weiner vs Andrew Weiner's weiner.
    9. Re:how come we have only 3 oceans? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or if could be halfway between, which resembles my penis.

  8. Slashdot's missing statement by suso · · Score: 1

    I would say that this doesn't really fall under the category of "stuff that matters".

    1. Re:Slashdot's missing statement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "stuff that matters ... eventually ... in a million years or so"

  9. Wrong story title by Malc · · Score: 4, Informative
    1. Re:Wrong story title by gzipped_tar · · Score: 1

      Your long chunk of text inside the "a" tag has given us an intimidating sense of another goatse link.

      --
      Colorless green Cthulhu waits dreaming furiously.
    2. Re:Wrong story title by khallow · · Score: 1

      The big news is that a 35 mile long section of the rift formed in days.

    3. Re:Wrong story title by Chyeld · · Score: 1

      Bigger news is that his anchor text for his link is 35 words long and happened in less than a day!

    4. Re:Wrong story title by khallow · · Score: 1

      Bigger news is that his anchor text for his link is 35 words long and happened in less than a day!

      I know. In the past, scientists thought links of that length would take years to form. Our infrastructure is in so much peril!

    5. Re:Wrong story title by Kagura · · Score: 1

      Bigger news is that his anchor text for his link is 35 words long and happened in less than a day!

      Uh, the biggest news is that the event in question happened in 2005... the event is not new, but some additional rationale behind the ocean hypothesis is new.

  10. Rising Sea Levels by Fez · · Score: 5, Funny

    There's the answer to rising sea levels... Divert the water into what will eventually become an ocean basin anyway.

    1. Re:Rising Sea Levels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wish I had mod points. mod funny! :-)

    2. Re:Rising Sea Levels by phorest · · Score: 1

      Vanuatu will love you.

      --
      God: When you do things right, people won't be sure you've done anything at all.
    3. Re:Rising Sea Levels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A public works project! Get them to dig a useful hole from the coast to this area!

    4. Re:Rising Sea Levels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Any change in Ethiopia would probably be positive at this point I agree with fez a new ocean with manmade fishing estuaries and other food producing features might be a good thing lets accelerate this.

    5. Re:Rising Sea Levels by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Also solves the drought in East Africa ;)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  11. Re:This Friday! On SyFy! A rift opens in Sheffield by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Swallowing up thousands of hectares of the English countryside! With no warning! On the Most Dangerous Cheesiest Night on Television!

    This made-for-TV movie is brought to you by Cheetoes, they're dangerously cheesy.

  12. Poor Headline by dkf · · Score: 5, Informative

    The news is not that the East African rift will form a new ocean - that's been known for a few years - but that it can happen very quickly. A timescale of days for an event of that scale is really rather significant, since it means that if something like it were to happen anywhere near existing infrastructure, our ability to adapt to it would be extremely limited. Well, not until afterwards anyway.

    Another geographical blunder in the article is saying that the rift will connect the Red Sea and the Gulf of Aden. That's because they're already connected.

    --
    "Little does he know, but there is no 'I' in 'Idiot'!"
    1. Re:Poor Headline by jc42 · · Score: 1

      Another geographical blunder in the article is saying that the rift will connect the Red Sea and the Gulf of Aden. That's because they're already connected.

      Yeah; I was sorta wondering what map they're using. Another channel linking the Red Se and the Gulf of Aden wouldn't really do much to either of those bodies of water, though it might sorta change property values along the length of the rift.

      In any case, I've been noticing that we seem to have this sort of wide-eyed "OMG Africa is splitting apart and we're gonna have a NEW OCEAN!!!" sort of report at least once a year. The nature of Africa's Great Rift has been pretty much understood for at least a century. And the "new ocean" idea is sorta silly. It'll split off a new small continent about the size of Australia, though longer and narrower. There'll be a watery passage that's comparable to the Mediterranean or Baltic. It'll be much like what formed Madagascar, but on a scale 2 or 3 times bigger. And it'll slowly happen over a few million years, with lots of major earthquakes and volcanic eruptions along the way. Just as the geological record says has been happening for several million years of the past. This is intro geology text material, not news. There are much better articles on the subject in National Geographic from 20 or 40 years ago.

      One interesting aspect to the whole story is that it's the main environment where our earliest ancestors split off from the other great apes. This has been observed by any number of paleontologists, though so far there's not really all that much evidence of a cause-and-effect relation between Great Rift conditions and human evolution. But it is our species' home turf.

      The speed of this event is interesting, and possibly a news story. But the geological record shows lots of earlier events that were equally fast and catastrophic. It's a major fault zone, with a string of huge live volcanoes and several large calderas. Of course there are going to be big, catastrophic events now and then.

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    2. Re:Poor Headline by devonbowen · · Score: 1

      The news is not that the East African rift will form a new ocean - that's been known for a few years

      In order for an ocean to form, the plates on either side need to have somewhere to move to. That requires not only the local rift dynamics but also a shift in all the surrounding plates so they "get out of the way". I don't know of any evidence that this is happening. If others do, I'd be happy to have references.

      Similarly, the nearby Red Sea was able to start spreading because the plate to the north was being subducted near Iran. But since that subduction has likely stopped, it's questionable whether the Red Sea will continue spreading into anything much bigger than it is today.

      Devon

  13. Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it's about goddamn time!

  14. fights global warming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since the sea level is supposed to rise from melting ice due to global warming, the new proposed sea created at the behest of Al Gore, can be used to offset the extra water. Besides there will extra ocean front property for beach houses. On the other hand I'll be dead so it will be some else's problem.

  15. Meanwhile... by martin-boundary · · Score: 2, Funny
    Meanwhile, in deepest Africa....

    "M'gulu gulu mulugu lugulugu" (*)

    "lugulugu um'gulu lulu?"

    "gugu"

    "gugu lulu gugu?"

    "gugu kaboom"

    (*) Translation:

    "There's something very important I forgot to tell you."

    "What?"

    "Don't cross the streams."

    "Why?"

    "It would be bad."

    1. Re:Meanwhile... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know Slashdot laughs at this, but they really do sound that stupid, in real life. Go have a look for yourselves.

  16. Maybe by jav1231 · · Score: 1

    Perhaps nature itself is tired of all the in-fighting and is simply dividing the region for them.

    On a more serious note, what could an ocean and life-giving water mean for a harsh region like this? Perhaps some prosperity in the form of much needed farm land.

    1. Re:Maybe by JasterBobaMereel · · Score: 2

      Millions of Tonnes of Salt water .... would do very little

      The region in question is in places very low in population simply because it is a volcanic arid wasteland .... other parts however are lush and full of life which would be wiped out by this new ocean ...

      Rapid change on this scale is always bad news in the short term ... (short term measured in 1000's of years)

      --
      Puteulanus fenestra mortis
    2. Re:Maybe by PHPNerd · · Score: 1

      This comment might be insightful if this rift event was going to happen any time soon. As it stands, it's going to be millions of years before it happens. I bet by the time this happens the Somalis won't even live there anymore. In fact, there probably won't even BE a Somali people in a million years....much less a human race (at the pace we're going towards self-destruction).

  17. Great Lakes are in a "Failed Rift" by piotru · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Not every rift is going to become an ocean like Atlantic. Some fail, as did the rift under the Big Lakes. Correct my rusty geology if I'm wrong.

    1. Re:Great Lakes are in a "Failed Rift" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I wouldn't say it is failed. It did create a body of water that was filled by the ice sheet from the last ice age.

    2. Re:Great Lakes are in a "Failed Rift" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Sort of...2 actually...

      From Wikipeida..

      "It has been estimated that the foundational geology which created the conditions shaping the present day upper Great Lakes was laid from 1.1 to 1.2 billion years ago,[4][8] when two previously fused tectonic plates split apart and created the Midcontinent Rift. A valley was formed providing a basin that eventually became modern day Lake Superior. When a second fault line, the Saint Lawrence rift, formed approximately 570 million years ago,[4] the basis for Lakes Ontario and Erie were created, along with what would become the St. Lawrence River.

      The Great Lakes are estimated to have been formed at the end of the last ice age (i.e. about 10,000 years ago), when the Laurentide ice sheet receded. The retreat of the ice sheet left behind a large amount of meltwater (see Lake Agassiz) which filled up the basins that the glaciers had carved, thus creating the Great Lakes as we know them today.[9] Because of the uneven nature of glacier erosion, some higher hills became Great Lakes islands. The Niagara Escarpment follows the contour of the Great Lakes between New York and Wisconsin. Land below the glaciers "rebounded" as it was uncovered.[10] Because the glaciers covered some areas longer than others, this glacial rebound occurred at different rates. Some researchers believe that differential has contributed to fluctuating water levels throughout the Great Lakes basin."

      Whole page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_lakes

    3. Re:Great Lakes are in a "Failed Rift" by thickdiick · · Score: 1

      I was under the impression that the great lakes were carved out by glaciers. The badlands in places like Idaho seem to support that theory, as the glaciers grinded away topsoil too.

    4. Re:Great Lakes are in a "Failed Rift" by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 1

      Not every rift is going to become an ocean like Atlantic. Some fail, as did the rift under the Big Lakes. Correct my rusty geology if I'm wrong.

      I live by the Great Lakes, and I have always understood that the lakes were carved out by glaciers during the last ice age. I've never heard this failed rift explanation. What's your source for this info?

      --
      You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
    5. Re:Great Lakes are in a "Failed Rift" by adavies42 · · Score: 1

      The (scientifically abysmal, BTW) miniseries 10.5: Apocalypse ended with that rift cracking wide open, creating an inland sea running straight from South Dakota to the Gulf of Mexico. (This was a step up from the first miniseries, 10.5 , which merely turned a chunk of southern California into an island. I suppose a followup about the breakup of Africa will be coming any season now....)

      --
      Media that can be recorded and distributed can be recorded and distributed.
      -kfg
    6. Re:Great Lakes are in a "Failed Rift" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The interesting thing about the Great Lakes is that they're going to eventually vanish due to pressures forcing the ground upward closing off streams that feed it water. Each year Lake Michigan is getting more and more shallow. Also, as the water is vanishing, the reduced weight of the water is allowing this process to happen even faster.

    7. Re:Great Lakes are in a "Failed Rift" by Knara · · Score: 1

      I happen to have taken a number of college level geology courses at University of Minnesota - Duluth. My memory is a little rusty, but it is indeed true that, at least in the case of Lake Superior, it's very obvious that the lake was created by magma subsidence. The basin still has magma tubes that lead to the lake (you can see them on the shore, as they erode much slower than the surrounding rock), and you can very easily see the igneous rock layers sloping (at remarkably steep angles) towards the lake basin from the surrounding hillsides (particularly where the rock was cut through to make paths for rail beds -- the metamorphic joints are particularly cool looking).

      Glaciers made a lot of lakes in the upper mid-west of the US, but the Great Lakes required a different process.

      I also seem to vaguely recall a rift valley that extended from the general area around Lake Superior down through Missouri, but I can't remember details about that.

    8. Re:Great Lakes are in a "Failed Rift" by Knara · · Score: 1

      Oh, I forgot to mention, but you can see some pretty neat pillow lava formations sticking up from the foliage on the wide dividers between N and S-bound I-35 between Duluth and Minneapolis (prolly about 20-30 miles south of Duluth) if you know what you're looking for and where.

    9. Re:Great Lakes are in a "Failed Rift" by penguinchris · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It often takes several combined factors to form features like the great lakes. The glaciers played a huge role in shaping the landscape, but that's just on top of the rifting etc. I might mention also that the rifting stuff is limited to the western great lakes (particularly Superior) - lakes Erie and Ontario were formed essentially exclusively by glacial and other erosional processes. There has been a lot written on this topic - it's pretty interesting to read through the understood history of the region, and how these ideas were formed.

      As the other guy mentioned, there are a lot of interesting geology field trip stops around the great lakes that help one to understand how this works. The University of Rochester itself is basically a field trip stop - it's built on a glacial moraine. The adjacent Mt. Hope Cemetery, which dates back to the founding of the city in the early 1800s, is extremely hilly and jam-packed full of interesting glacial features. And it's quite easy to see the difference between Erie/Ontario and Superior just by visiting both areas - and not hard to imagine that they were formed by a variety of different processes.

      Source & disclaimer: I am a geology grad student, I'm originally from Buffalo, NY - on lake Erie - and I got my B.S. in geology at the University of Rochester, actually; so I'm familiar with geology of the great lakes region (particularly New York and its adjacent lakes Erie and Ontario).

    10. Re:Great Lakes are in a "Failed Rift" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Salton sea would be a more correct example.

      it's interesting because it's where a rift zone ends and a transform boundary begins, under continental crust, the san andreas is said transform boundary.

      There may be water there but it's only there due to un-natural causes. Otherwise, it'd be an empty failed sea, and a desert of seashells (you can still find shells in the sands in the surrounding basin when it was actually full of water due to glacial run-off upstream of the colorado river, which overflowed for a period of time into the salton basin for a few thousand years, up until a few hundred years ago.

      Granted, the parts of the basin that are below sea level will become filled completely with water again, just not in our lifetimes. it will happen once the imperial valley sinks low enough and all its sediment will be washed away by the sea of cortez, which is formed due to the same rift.

  18. Brilliant insight comes decades too late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A local herdsman's once in a lifetime eureka moment of envisioning the Earth as massive plates of goat's dug layered over a molten core was shattered by a school child explaining plate tectonics to the excited goat herder.

  19. New ocean connecting what now? by Gorath99 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Researchers at the University of Rochester believe that a 35-mile rift in the desert of Ethiopia will likely become a new ocean in a million years or so, connecting the Red Sea with the Gulf of Aden.

    Wow! This is a revolution!

    1. Re:New ocean connecting what now? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Researchers at the University of Rochester believe that a 35-mile rift in the desert of Ethiopia will likely become a new ocean in a million years or so, connecting the Red Sea with the Gulf of Aden.

      Wow! This is a revolution!

      I think the word he was searching for was "merging" not connecting.

    2. Re:New ocean connecting what now? by Linker3000 · · Score: 1

      There was a bit missing....

      "..connecting the Red Sea with the Gulf of Aden VIA A SECOND PATHWAY"

      A kind of Spanning-Sea protocol

      --
      AT&ROFLMAO
    3. Re:New ocean connecting what now? by elnyka · · Score: 1

      I dunno, my geography might be rusty, but if and when the Rift goes split like Jenna Jameson, wouldn't that either simply create an inland sea going either inland into Mozambique or opening up again on the Indian Ocean (and south of Somalia), with either scenario starting off the Bab-el-Mandeb strait????? It kinda like doesn't look like creating a new pathway, but a widening of the strait basically merging the Red Sea with the Gulf of Aden into a new and wider waterway?

    4. Re:New ocean connecting what now? by NotBornYesterday · · Score: 4, Funny

      Water views land as damage and routes around it.

      --
      I prefer rogues to imbeciles because they sometimes take a rest.
    5. Re:New ocean connecting what now? by randall77 · · Score: 1

      Looking at the map, it appears the rift would indeed connect the Red Sea to the Gulf of Aden via a second pathway, making (very approximately) an island out of half of Eritrea and all of Djbouti.

  20. million years?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    searchers at the University of Rochester believe that a 35-mile rift in the desert of Ethiopia will likely become a new ocean in a few years or so

    There fixed that for you

  21. Surfin' Ethiopia! by captainpanic · · Score: 5, Funny

    If everybody had an ocean
    Across the desert sands,
    Then everybody'd be surfin'
    Like Ethiop-I-A
    You'd see 'em wearin' their baggies
    Huarachi sandals, too
    A bushy bushy blonde hairdo
    Surfin' Africa.

    1. Re:Surfin' Ethiopia! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...with really great coffee!

    2. Re:Surfin' Ethiopia! by natehoy · · Score: 1

      In order to get the rhyme and meter to work, I'd change "Ethiopia" to "Ethiopians". Other than that, well done, sir!

      --
      "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
    3. Re:Surfin' Ethiopia! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because Ethiopians is so much more like Californ-eye-ay than Ethiop-eye-ay is.


      Idiot!

    4. Re:Surfin' Ethiopia! by A12m0v · · Score: 1

      Ethiopia is landlocked.

      --
      GENERATION 25: The first time you see this, copy it into your sig on any forum and add 1 to the generation.
  22. The same one as last year's? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's the same Ocean as the one from one year ago?

    http://news.slashdot.org/story/08/10/05/1824237/Birth-of-a-New-African-Ocean?art_pos=3

    And, in fact, what is an Ocean? If this will be an Ocean, the Mediterranean Sea, right now, is a Mega Giga Ocean!

  23. Whitehorse, Yukon by justthinkit · · Score: 2, Informative

    Whitehorse is the capital of the Yukon territory, that borders the northern part of British Columbia and borders the eastern part of Alaska. [map]

    --
    I come here for the love
    1. Re:Whitehorse, Yukon by slim · · Score: 1

      As I followed up another correction - my mistake.

      If it's any consolation, I bloody loved Yukon.

  24. Real State Boom!!!(10+1) by elnyka · · Score: 1

    Can't wait to see another Aussie-sounding infomercial guy selling you the one book on how to me a fuckzillion dollars in buying fixer-uppers for a fraction of a penny in the someday-to-be Ethiopian Riviera!

  25. Headlines: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    New ocean born within Africa.

    Duke Nukem Forever development taken up again, should launch later next year.

  26. Land Before Time... by Jamori · · Score: 3, Interesting

    As a child, I had nightmares about the giant rifts dramatically opening in the ground like they did in the Land Before Time movie. I had since convinced myself this was unlikely to happen, and assuaged my fears.
    Thanks a lot, "Researchers at the University of Rochester"...

    1. Re:Land Before Time... by SnarfQuest · · Score: 1

      No need for nightmares. Africa isn't going to split up. It's just another one of those Godzilla type monsters breaking free. It should head over to Japan before starting its killing spree, with atomic bombs being dropped on it all along its path. Nothing to worry about at all.

      --
      Who would win this election: Andrew Weiner vs Andrew Weiner's weiner.
    2. Re:Land Before Time... by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Maybe you'd seen "Crack in the World"
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crack_in_the_world

      This was preceded by the Mohole project, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mohole

      Of course, they are both wrong. Nope, when they drill too far, what'll happen? All the air will get out, and the world will go flat.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    3. Re:Land Before Time... by H0p313ss · · Score: 1

      No need for nightmares. Africa isn't going to split up. It's just another one of those Godzilla type monsters breaking free. It should head over to Japan before starting its killing spree, with atomic bombs being dropped on it all along its path. Nothing to worry about at all.

      Oh crap not again. Do you have ANY idea how long it takes to concoct a viable cover-up story every time Godzilla comes into Tokyo?

      --
      XML is a known as a key material required to create SMD: Software of Mass Destruction
  27. Aroused by troll8901 · · Score: 1

    ... unzipping ... tore open ... pushed up ... erupted ...

    I feel strangely aroused ...

  28. Poetic language by tepples · · Score: 1

    Surely we don't have to create new terms for things we already have words for.

    It's called "poetic language". Back in the day, when verse was based on alliteration as opposed to rhyme, these new terms were called kennings.

  29. Cleansing by tepples · · Score: 1

    The point being that ethnic cleansing is ok?

    If you have a light-skinned actress portraying a dark-skinned character, is it "ethnic cleansing" when the actress removes her makeup?

  30. Re:google wave invite requested by gomiam · · Score: 1

    Sorry, no waves expected until several hundred thousand years in the future ;)

  31. REPEAT by Jedi+Holocron · · Score: 1

    How many times is this going to be reposted?

  32. Obvious Earth Inflation by mujadaddy · · Score: 1

    This is yet another feather in the cap of the Earth Inflation camp that the Geo-Educational Complex can't just explain away!

    --
    Populus vult decipi, ergo decipiatur...
    "Force shits upon Reason's back." - Poor Richard's Almanac
  33. A proposed map of the new ocean by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  34. Problem solved! by maillemaker · · Score: 1

    >If it all comes at once, we could see a massive loss of life and property, especially as the >problematic area lies in some of the poorest parts of the globe. New solution for poverty!

    --
    A work that expires before its copyright never enters the public domain and thus enjoys eternal copyright protection.
  35. Red Sea and Gulf of Aden connected? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't the Red Sea already connected to the Gulf of Aden? The summary makes it sound as if this is currently not the case.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gulf_of_Aden

  36. An Inconvenient Rift by commodore64_love · · Score: 0, Troll

    Al Gore is already campaigning to stop this change to earth's structure, and will soon be releasing his new documentary "An Inconvenient Rift" to educate people and gather support.

    Scientists tried to explain to Mr. Gore that it's a natural event, not man-made, but he isn't listening.

    --
    "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
  37. ditto NM, AZ and NV in USA by peter303 · · Score: 1

    The "basin and range" area in the USA is a slow tectonic spreading ridge. It has nearly doubled in width in the past 50 million years, resulting in down-dropped valleys and significant volcanism. Sometimes these spreading regions eventually stop as the tectonic plates alter configuration. Or they progress into full-fledged oceans.

  38. A not so massive deluge by Ambitwistor · · Score: 1

    If you're talking about the Missoula Floods, they couldn't have contributed "several meters" of sea level rise. Lake Missoula only had a volume of about 2200 cubic kilometers. The Greenland ice sheet (2.8 million cubic kilometers) is thought to hold an extra 7 meters worth of sea level. Using that scaling factor and ignoring density differences between water and ice, that works out to about 0.5 centimeters of potential sea level rise from Lake Missoula. And it's also contested whether the whole lake could have drained "in a matter of days", or in smaller bursts spread out over a century.

    I know of other abrupt drainage events as the last glacial period ended, which ultimately released volumes of water similar to Missoula (e.g., from Lake Agassiz). But I've never heard of and can't imagine any drainage event that could release millions of cubic kilometers of water in a matter of days.

    This paper (summarized here) is of interest. It's not talking about "abrupt" drainage, but "rapid" sea level rise. It goes back to the last interglacial, i.e., after the end of the next-to-last glacial period. This was about 115,000 years ago, too early to be related to global flood myths. The paper describes evidence for 5 centimeter/year sea level rise sustained for 50 years, amounting to at least 2.5 meters (8 feet) of sea level rise over half a century. That's the fastest multi-meter sea level rise event I know of. It's really rather tremendous if you think about it, equivalent to a third of the entire Greenland ice sheet disintegrating in a few decades. It will be interesting to see if this interpretation is confirmed by other researchers.

    1. Re:A not so massive deluge by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Given the speed at which the Greenland Ice Sheet is now melting, we might see this paper confirmed within our lifetimes.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  39. ummm by redmoss · · Score: 1

    The Red Sea and the Gulf of Aden are *already* connected. Previous poster hinted at it with a map, but it's blindingly obvious, so I will be too. Maybe talking about some *other* body of water? The African rift-valley lakes perhaps? (didn't RTFA, shame on me)

  40. Re:This Friday! On SyFy! A rift opens in Sheffield by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ugh, another boring British film. Everybody knows nobody important lives in Sheffield. (Just kidding, I have friends there.)

    And I still can't get over the asinine change to the "siffie" channel. I want some of what those idiots are smoking, it must be good stuff.

  41. Its time ... by PPH · · Score: 1

    ... to have some arms manufacturers try to sell Ethiopia equipment for a coast guard.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  42. That's somewhat different actually by penguinchris · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The basin and range represents continental crustal extension, which is spread out across the entire region. This is more-or-less driven by pulling on either end. Actually, the driving forces are not completely understood (which is why I'm using "more-or-less" to describe these things).

    Oceanic crustal extension, on the other hand, is more-or-less being pushed apart from the center. So the rifting and so on is focused in one area - the rift zone. That's why the Mid Atlantic Ridge or the East African Rift - spreading centers - are (more or less) linear features and not spread out like the basin and range is.

    Note that while I call it "oceanic crustal extension", it is obviously not limited to oceanic crust - it is rifting the continental crust in Africa. But, this is why we say a new ocean will form here, but not in the western US. When the continental crust is pushed open enough, oceanic crust will begin to form. Oceanic crust is thin and dense, which is why it's topographically lower than continental crust, which tends to form more thickly and is less dense.

    I'm a geology grad student (and my B.S. in geology is from the University of Rochester, where this latest research is from) studying tectonics, but I'll admit freely that my explanation may be wrong as this isn't really my focus (I'm more interested in compressional, rather than extensional, tectonics). So I welcome any corrections anyone can offer.

  43. We Did This... by Dausha · · Score: 1

    It's quite obvious that we caused this rather significant change. When will we step up and take responsibility for this climate change and do something to reverse it?

    And, why can't the Sumerian story follow the Biblical one?

    Or, better yet, if all the people in the world experienced the same event, why can't they each have a different perspective on it?

    --
    What those who want activist courts fear is rule by the people.
  44. More Info by futurity.org · · Score: 1

    Check out more information on this article at futurity.org: http://futurity.org/earth-environment/seafloor-dynamics-at-work-splitting-continent/

    --
    Futurity. Discover the Future.
  45. old? by RichiH · · Score: 1

    I learned about this in _grammar school_...