Slashdot Mirror


LHC Has First Collisions After Years of Waiting

An anonymous reader writes "Only four days after the first attempt to send a particle beam around the LHC, we have arrived at the point when all four experiments got their first real collisions from the machine. This was met by celebrations and champagne, as people have been waiting years and years for this moment. It is a testament to the engineering of the machine that collisions were reached already, so few days after restarting. The LHC had already demonstrated ca 10h stable beams, and now also stable beams in both directions at the same time. In the coming weeks, we need only wait for increased intensity and the first attempts at acceleration."

69 of 324 comments (clear)

  1. The real question is... by gyepi · · Score: 2

    ...when should we throw our end-of-the-world parties?

    --
    Attitudes make the difference between Space and Time: we want to MAX our temporal, and MIN our spatial extension.
    1. Re:The real question is... by Shakrai · · Score: 4, Funny

      ...when should we throw our end-of-the-world parties?

      Today. I've already maxed out my credit cards and slept with the neighbors wife. I'd imagine he's gonna be pretty ticked off when he finds out but I'm hoping the LHC destroys the planet before he gets home ;)

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    2. Re:The real question is... by oldspewey · · Score: 5, Funny

      A few small points of information for you:

      Your neighbor actually won't be ticked off when he finds out. Quite the contrary, he's gonna be highly aroused and in the mood for a wet & messy threesome. He's also extremely well endowed and has been eyeing you for some time already.

      So in summary, you're still hoping the LHC destroys the planet before he gets home.

      --
      If libertarians are so opposed to effective government, why don't they all move to Somalia?
    3. Re:The real question is... by Lumpy · · Score: 3, Funny

      Isn't that what the Windows 7 release parties were for?

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    4. Re:The real question is... by Lumpy · · Score: 2, Informative

      Nothing is special about 2012.. Or are you still working on the really in-accurate assumptions of the Mayan calendar?

      2012 has no relevance to anything.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    5. Re:The real question is... by PalmKiller · · Score: 2, Funny

      This puts another spin on the black hole theories I guess...Now I am recalling images of goatse.cx, damn you, damn you all

    6. Re:The real question is... by Beardo+the+Bearded · · Score: 4, Funny

      Read carefully:

      It's a HADRON collider.

      --

      ---
      ECHELON is a government program to find words like bomb, jihad, plutonium, assassinate, and anarchy.
    7. Re:The real question is... by evilwraith · · Score: 3, Funny

      Leave it to dyslexics to have a large hadron colliding with things....

    8. Re:The real question is... by maxwell+demon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Nothing is special about 2012

      That's not true. It's one of the years which ended up in movie titles, along with 1984, 2001 and 2010.

      But of course it won't be the end of the world, because that will be 2038, as predicted by the Unix calendar.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    9. Re:The real question is... by jamesh · · Score: 2, Funny

      2012 has no relevance to anything.

      It's almost a palindrome. That's gotta mean something.

      It's also nearly 13 years after the year 2000, and we all know how unlucky the number 13 is.

  2. Obligatory by Yvan256 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Is the LHC insured for collisions?

    1. Re:Obligatory by daeley · · Score: 5, Funny

      Boy, you sure lepton that joke in a hurry.

      --
      I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate.
    2. Re:Obligatory by Nadaka · · Score: 3, Funny

      woosh!

      Its a particle physics thing.

    3. Re:Obligatory by smash · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yeah, but surely 99.999% of them know how google works.

      --
      I run: Windows, OS X, Linux, FreeBSD. Just because you have a hammer, doesn't mean everything is a nail.
    4. Re:Obligatory by Geoffrey.landis · · Score: 5, Funny
      and whoosh to you, too. He was pointing out that this is a hadron collider, so lepton jokes don't make any sense.

      I could say, I suppose, that if he wants to talk about leptons, you need to give him some SLAC... but I won't.

      (typos, on the other hand-- the one where the "r" and the "d" switch order in the word "hadron"-- would be appropriate... but still tasteless.)

      --
      http://www.geoffreylandis.com
    5. Re:Obligatory by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 4, Funny

      Boy, you sure lepton that joke in a hurry.

      He's strange like that.

    6. Re:Obligatory by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 4, Funny

      Boy, you sure lepton that joke in a hurry.

      You're a quarky one, aren't you...

    7. Re:Obligatory by 42forty-two42 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      When hadrons collide, leptons certainly do come out as debris; I'm sure the LHC will be dealing with plenty of them soon enough.

    8. Re:Obligatory by tool462 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Let me guess, as a practical joke you loosen the covalent bonds in the secretaries dress just before the friday staff meeting.

      Are you kidding me? That kind of crap is for chemists. We physicists just let our wave functions interact until there is barrier penetration through tunneling. We enforce strict segregation of fermions, but boson-on-boson action is encouraged. As a fermion, I'm usually spin-up when I see their wave functions collapsing.

    9. Re:Obligatory by maxwell+demon · · Score: 2, Funny

      But doesn't his joke have some charm nevertheless?

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    10. Re:Obligatory by NotBorg · · Score: 2, Funny

      WRONG!!!

      Leptons go PEW PEW not woosh!

      --
      I want this account deleted.
    11. Re:Obligatory by fractoid · · Score: 2, Funny

      Mutter mutter...

      Look, everyone, he's discovered dark mutter!

      --
      Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
  3. Data from first collision through CMS detector by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 5, Informative
    http://cmsdoc.cern.ch/cms/performance/FirstBeam/pictures221109/CollisionEvent.png

    The beams aren't squeezed right now, just centered. You have a higher probability of collisions when they're squeezed (which will be coming up shortly). It was very cool to be in the control room when the first collision took place =)

    1. Re:Data from first collision through CMS detector by baldass_newbie · · Score: 4, Funny

      It was very cool to be in the control room when the first collision took place =)

      I have to say, you kept the coffee fresh, even though you forgot to add sweetener to mine.

      --
      The opposite of progress is congress
    2. Re:Data from first collision through CMS detector by siddesu · · Score: 5, Funny

      And there is a live video feed available here: http://www.cyriak.co.uk/lhc/lhc-webcams.html

    3. Re:Data from first collision through CMS detector by pwfffff · · Score: 2, Funny

      Cool picture. My particle physics is a bit rusty, but let's see now... green line distribution seems normal... yellow squiggles there and THERE... hmmm... I see there's more red blocks than blue blocks... ah, yes...

      Congratulations, it's a boy!

    4. Re:Data from first collision through CMS detector by 42forty-two42 · · Score: 4, Informative

      And here are the real webcams.

  4. Since the world is about to end... by dan_sdot · · Score: 5, Funny

    LAST POST!!!!1

  5. There's a nice formula to show the world won't end by Xeriar · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The formula: N(>E) = k(E + 1)^-a

    N is impacts per second
    E is the impact energy in in GeV
    k is ~5,000 particles per steradian per square meter per second
    a is about 1.6.

    So the ground your feet occupy get a dozen or so such collisions per day, and so on.

  6. Crossing the Streams by sexconker · · Score: 5, Informative

    Despite all the hoopla, all they've really done is cross the streams.

    Today the LHC circulated two beams simultaneously for the first time, allowing the operators to test the synchronization of the beams and giving the experiments their first chance to look for proton-proton collisions. With just one bunch of particles circulating in each direction, the beams can be made to cross in up to two places in the ring. From early in the afternoon, the beams were made to cross at points 1 and 5, home to the ATLAS and CMS detectors, both of which were on the look out for collisions. Later, beams crossed at points 2 and 8, ALICE and LHCb.

    An important step, sure. But low-speed collisions and beam tuning are not what the LHC is designed to do. It's akin to a pitcher throwing a few warmup pitches - he won't be bringing the heat til he's out on the mound, he's just trying to make sure he shoulder is fucking healed after he blew it out in his first opening game.

    By the end of the year we should have some real info about the first useful collisions.

    1. Re:Crossing the Streams by macbeth66 · · Score: 4, Funny

      It's akin to a pitcher throwing a few warmup pitches...

      Huh?

      Could you put that into a car analogy?

    2. Re:Crossing the Streams by Nadaka · · Score: 5, Funny

      Its like a weabo revving the engine of his pimped out ricer at a stoplight. Don't worry, there is a pretty decent chance it will throw a rod when he actually puts it in gear.

    3. Re:Crossing the Streams by Bucc5062 · · Score: 4, Funny

      its like the warm up laps at Talledega (NASCAR) before they throw the green flag. You know there is going to be a big collision after the start, you just don't know when and how big. For the End of the World it would be if all 43 cars got wrecked so bad that not one could continue the race. Game over.

      --
      Life is a great ride, the vehicle doesn't matter
    4. Re:Crossing the Streams by kungfugleek · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's akin to a car throwing a few warmup pitches.

    5. Re:Crossing the Streams by courtjester801 · · Score: 2, Informative

      You hope not if you're at bat, but that's why they wear cups.

    6. Re:Crossing the Streams by TopSpin · · Score: 3, Funny

      Could you put that into a car analogy?

      Certainly.

      A particle bunch in the LHC is presently being handled as though it were a young driver that has recently been issued a provisional drivers license. In the same way that smart parents will provide their new commuters with low power, unexciting vehicles to discourage reckless behaviour, the LHC particles are being denied high levels of energy to prevent any additional unintended excursions.

      Just as new drivers suffer a high probability of making mistakes due to inexperience, high energy particles in the LHC are liable to reveal (additional) unknown flaws in the design or construction of the facility. By limiting energy levels the effects of any failures will hopefully be minimal, just as a Volvo 740 wagon that can barely break 60mph due to its 190K miles is less likely to kill you when it slides into a ditch than is a Turbo Carrera disintegrating as it rolls at 210mph.

      Note that this analogy fails when one considers that drivers are trained to avoid collision, whereas LHC particles are intended to experience many collisions.

      BadAnalogyGuy is supposed to be handling these sort of illustrations, but he has been slacking of late.

      --
      Lurking at the bottom of the gravity well, getting old
  7. Hmm... by mea37 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Apparently the future has given up its battle against the LHC. Take that, Nature!

    1. Re:Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No, we just live in the quantum reality in which they failed. Sucks to be (this version of) us.

  8. That was... quick by tsa · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I don't understand all this hoopla about why it took so long. When a new machine is brought into our clean room, it usually takes three months before it runs more or less smoothly. The LHC is a bit bigger than our cleanroom and has many more parts. So much more has to be tested, finetuned, etc. before it can even be brought up after a big repair like it had. I think almost two years is a good time in which to do the repair and all that tweaking.

    --

    -- Cheers!

  9. I other news... by webdog314 · · Score: 5, Funny

    "The LHC was shut down again today due to an accident involving a champagne cork."

  10. Banging rocks together... by White+Shade · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I think what I love most about the LHC and whatnot is that, despite all the incredible and amazing science and technology and innovation and potential for learning behind it, what it really comes down to is just us banging rocks together and watching what happens, just like humans have been doing throughout history. It just happens that this time, the rocks are incredibly tiny and incredibly fast.

    Kinda puts it all in perspective, in kind of a cool way, IMO.

    --
    ìì!
    1. Re:Banging rocks together... by Gryle · · Score: 4, Informative

      Scientific research often usually comes down to "what happens when I mix these two things together?" and "poke it with a stick and see what happens." The biggest variation is the type of stick we use.

      --
      Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not entirely sure about the universe - Einstein
    2. Re:Banging rocks together... by NotBornYesterday · · Score: 2, Informative

      "Just kick the system and see what it does". Isn't that usually how we start figuring out how stuff works?

      In physics, kicking it will tell you what something does.

      In compsci, kicking it will tell you what something did.

      --
      I prefer rogues to imbeciles because they sometimes take a rest.
    3. Re:Banging rocks together... by khallow · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What I love so much about the LHC is that despite all these theories about everything, one may actually get to become proven.

      Aside from the point that we falsify not "prove" theories, there's the point that we may end up with many valid theories explaining the same thing. There need not be only one way to explain the universe, but many equivalent ways.

  11. GNOME by Ivan+Stepaniuk · · Score: 4, Informative

    Some screenshots at the CERN site show GNOME's 'Clearlooks' window manager theme. At least BSOD will not be a source for further delays.

    --
    My other signature is a car
    1. Re:GNOME by FST777 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      --
      Free beer is never free as in speech. Free speech is always free as in beer.
  12. Re:So how much longer... by MaggieL · · Score: 2, Informative

    Probably more like this. It's a better film, too.

    --
    -=Maggie Leber=-
  13. And Fermilab is on board with it by liquiddark · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Despite the so-called "rivalry" too many science "news" outlets have played up, Fermilab puts it on the front page. Always nice to recall that in the end everyone benefits from this big boy coming online.

  14. First Collisions? by sconeu · · Score: 4, Funny

    Sounds like they should have used a switch instead of a hub. Then there wouldn't be collisions.

    --
    General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
  15. Good for them by jeffmeden · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The black holes or universe-ending paradoxes are still a few months off, at least. They are colliding at a paltry 450 GeV, a level we have been able to produce at other colliders for many years. Wake me when they are passing 1 TeV, on their way to 8...

  16. Re:There's a nice formula to show the world won't by sconeu · · Score: 4, Funny

    What about the Poop concentration?

    --
    General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
  17. LHC@Home! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I just want to say, you can also contribute your CPU power for LHC calculations, by joining LHC@Home.

    I'm in awe of this machine, no other monkey species on this planet has been able to make what those scientists made....

    1. Re:LHC@Home! by DerekLyons · · Score: 2, Informative

      I just want to say, you can also contribute your CPU power for LHC calculations, by joining LHC@Home.

      LHC@home was used during the construction of the collider to test and validate magnet calibration scenarios - that phase was completed over three years ago. LHC@Home is no longer associated with the LHC *or* CERN (beyond website hosting) and has not provided [BOINC] work units for over two years.

  18. Re:Portal by Mikail · · Score: 2, Funny

    Hurp durp two year old video game reference. i get it. you're so funny.

    According to xkcd, he's still three years early.

    --
    If life is a waste of time and time is a waste of life, let's all get wasted and have the time of our lives.
  19. Yay, another solid page of black hole jokes. by PaganRitual · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why even bother posting LHC news on /. anymore. It's just top to bottom black hole and collision jokes. The bottom of the barrel has been scraped, and you guys have worked your way through the wood and there is light peeking through on the other side. No funny can escape from this. These are the same jokes that occur every day in the upper atmosphere at much higher humor levels than we can manage. The universe is actively avoiding the discovery of a funny black hole joke, and will mysteriously break any attempts to discover it.

    1. Re:Yay, another solid page of black hole jokes. by meringuoid · · Score: 3, Funny
      It's just top to bottom black hole and collision jokes.

      I know. You'd have to be a really strange person to think this sort of thing is in any way charming. If it were up to me, I'd moderate all of them down.

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
  20. when does the gift shop open? by FudRucker · · Score: 2, Funny

    I want to buy a snowglobe with a miniature blackhole in it.

    --
    Politics is Treachery, Religion is Brainwashing
  21. An open letter to Slashdotters. by The+Archon+V2.0 · · Score: 4, Funny
    Sorry, I've got some bad news for you all. The world did end, and everyone died. "But," you ask, "if I'm dead, why am I still at work?"

    Uh, yeah, about that. We're kind of swamped up here with all the new souls looking to get in, so we've decided to fast track certain predominantly Godless groups to eternal damnation. You're now stuck at work.

    Forever.

    Respectfully yours,
    The Archon V2.0
    Trainee mortal/immortal liason, New Media Department, Heaven.

  22. Re:I for one... by buswolley · · Score: 2, Funny

    I welcome our future past overlords. Anyone wanna bet it will be sabotaged by the future, and not run right?

    --

    A Good Troll is better than a Bad Human.

  23. High Speed Collisions by Roger+W+Moore · · Score: 2, Informative

    But low-speed collisions and beam tuning are not what the LHC is designed to do.

    You do realize that even at the injection energy the speed of the protons is 99.99978% of the speed of light in vacuum and at full energy the speed of the protons has only increased to 99.9999991%? The collisions are both equally high speed thanks to relativity: what is interesting is the collision energy.

  24. Cross border paperwork by Alain+Williams · · Score: 3, Funny

    Given that the LHC is under the French/Swiss border, I was wondering what import/export paperwork the CERN operators need to fill in (and tariffs to pay) every time the beam travels from one country to another .... :-)

  25. The Real Question Is by Flere+Imsaho · · Score: 2, Funny

    Will it blend?

    --
    It gripped her hand gently. 'Regret is for humans,' it said.
  26. Re:As I learned in driver's education by More_Cowbell · · Score: 4, Funny

    we're still two years away from Dec 21st 2012

    I applaud your math skills, good sir!

    --
    Experience teaches only the teachable. -AH
  27. Re:I for one... by dougisfunny · · Score: 3, Informative

    Do you think, if somehow the sun were turned into a black hole, it would suck in the earth?

    How about if we turned a pound of bricks, or a pound of feathers into a black hole with the LHC?

    What's that? It would still only have the mass of a pound and not have the gravitational pull to suck 'everything' into it, outside of a radius of ~6.71316708 × 10^-28.

    --
    This is not the funny you're looking for.
  28. Re:I for one... by fractoid · · Score: 3, Informative

    If the sun turned into a black hole, I believe the Earth would become somewhat colder and less comfortable fairly rapidly. That's besides the point, though - the most reassuring argument I've heard for the LHC not turning the Earth into a black hole is that collisions far more energetic occur all the time, when high-velocity cosmic particles collide with our upper atmosphere. If such collisions had any appreciable chance of creating a microscopic black hole, and that black hole had any appreciable chance of then going all super-happy-meal on the Earth, then it would have already happened.

    --
    Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
  29. Re:I for one... by x2A · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What have logical arguments got to do with scared idiots?

    --
    The revolution will not be televised... but it will have a page on Wikipedia
  30. Where's the kaboom? by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 2, Funny

    There was supposed to be an earth-shattering kaboom!

  31. Re:I for one... by insertwackynamehere · · Score: 2, Funny

    whats this in womprats?

  32. Re:As I learned in driver's education by depsax · · Score: 2, Funny

    True for large values of "two"