Slashdot Mirror


Scientology Charged With Slavery, Human Trafficking

eldavojohn writes "A formal complaint was filed in California (caged PDF) last week by John Lindstein naming David Miscavige and the Church of Scientology International as defendants. Lindstein claims that for sixteen years (from age 8) he was forced to work as a slave at Gold Base, a secret CoS site run by Golden Era Productions with 'razor wire, security guard patrols, surveillance posts, and three roll calls each day.' The pay was $50 a week. The allegations include 'Violations of wage and hour laws as well as unfair/illegal business practices actionable under California B&P 17200 Et. Seq.' and a complaint under the 13th Amendment of the US Constitution, which abolished slavery. Members of the group Anonymous praised the summons."

171 of 802 comments (clear)

  1. really? by sopssa · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Was this a surprise to anyone?

    1. Re:really? by Narcocide · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I hate those motherfuckers and I live right in their neighborhood but seriously, it was a surprise to me.

    2. Re:really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative
      Posting anonymously because... well... I'm anonymous, and this information has been removed from slashdot before due to COS C&D letters.

      In the words of Trey Parker and Matt Stone, 'THIS IS WHAT SCIENTOLOGISTS ACTUALLY BELIEVE!!'

      As quoted from L. Ron Hubbard:

      The head of the Galactic Federation (76 planets around larger stars visible from here) (founded 95,000,000 years ago, very space opera) solved overpopulation (250 billion or so per planet, 178 billion on average) by mass implanting. He caused people to be brought to Teegeeack (Earth) and put an H-Bomb on the principal volcanos (Incident II) and then the Pacific area ones were taken in boxes to Hawaii and the Atlantic area ones to Las Palmas and there "packaged".

      His name was Xenu. He used renegades. Various misleading data by means of circuits etc. was placed in the implants.

      When through with his crime loyal officers (to the people) captured him after six years of battle and put him in an electronic mountain trap where he still is. "They" are gone. The place (Confederation) has since been a desert. The length and brutality of it all was such that this Confederation never recovered. The implant is calculated to kill (by pneumonia etc) anyone who attempts to solve it. This liability has been dispensed with by my tech development.

      One can freewheel through the implant and die unless it is approached as precisely outlined. The "freewheel" (auto-running on and on) lasts too long, denies sleep etc and one dies. So be careful to do only Incidents I and II as given and not plow around and fail to complete one thetan at a time.

      In December 1967 I knew someone had to take the plunge. I did and emerged very knocked out, but alive. Probably the only one ever to do so in 75,000,000 years. I have all the data now, but only that given here is needful.

      One's body is a mass of individual thetans stuck to oneself or to the body.

      One has to clean them off by running incident II and Incident I. It is a long job, requiring care, patience and good auditing. You are running beings. They respond like any preclear. Some large, some small.

      Thetans believed they were one. This is the primary error. Good luck.

    3. Re:really? by DA_MAN_DA_MYTH · · Score: 2, Informative

      [This comment has been removed due to legal action by the Church of Scientology]

      --
      "It takes many nails to build a crib, but one screw to fill it."
    4. Re:really? by interkin3tic · · Score: 2, Interesting

      ...so how much do I now owe the church of scientology for reading that?

    5. Re:really? by jcr · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Was this a surprise to anyone?

      No surprise that they did it, but I'm a bit surprised that someone finally filed the charges. Most Scientology escapees just want to be left alone.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    6. Re:really? by NitroWolf · · Score: 4, Informative

      If your question is serious, the serious answer is about $500,000.

      That's about how much you have to pay to get to that "level" of information.

    7. Re:really? by wiredlogic · · Score: 2, Informative

      That's part of the appeal. The Scientology texts are written with obtuse "tech" that is akin to gnostic religious writings in that is is intended to solidify group identity through secret knowledge. To understand this nonsense means that one is an insider and part of an elite group different from "normal" people who can't understand what is being written about. That being said, even with the tech, Hubbard's grammar is notably poor and the line of discussion meanders everywhere. It definitely seems like it was written while he was spaced out on drugs. I certainly have no interest in reading any of his fiction if this is what he typically writes like.

      --
      I am becoming gerund, destroyer of verbs.
  2. I love it! by mcgrew · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Now if we can see a slashdot article saying that they were found guilty and someone went to prison for it... the fat lady ain't sang yet, boys.

    1. Re:I love it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Sorry, that won't happen. The Co$'s lawyers will ensure that they get off. Not only that, but they've infiltrated the government and justice system to the point where I'm surprised they don't have laws exempting them from these types of charges.

  3. That's pretty evil. by FatSean · · Score: 3, Funny

    First the Catholics with child rape, now the Scientologists with slavery and human trafficking.

    Any wagers on which one true religion will be busted next?

    --
    Blar.
    1. Re:That's pretty evil. by Darkness404 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It isn't religion that is the problem, it is organization and trust. Take any group of trusted people and you will find that a minority want to use their trust for personal gain. In America, corporations, schools, etc. are all looked at pretty thoroughly for abuses, religion usually isn't.

      --
      Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    2. Re:That's pretty evil. by Xtravar · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Hmm, how come every Scientology story must have some post diverting attention to Catholicism, trying to lend legitimacy to Scientology as a religion?

      Let's stick to the topic at hand, shall we? And that topic is that Scientology apparently enslaved this person.

      --
      Buckle your ROFL belt, we're in for some LOLs.
    3. Re:That's pretty evil. by houstonbofh · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think you started a little late. The Muslim crusades. The Catholic crusades. The Inquisition. (What a show...) The common thread is people... A corrupt person has no problem using anything as an excuse from religion, to communism, to security, to social justice. No "idea" stays pure once people start to use it.

    4. Re:That's pretty evil. by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Religions, though, have the unpleasant architectural problem of (in the vast majority of cases) coupling social and organizational power with strongly implied, or even overt, assertions of trustworthiness.

      Because they purport to deal in moral and divine matters, those who have power within the organization generally(either as an official point of doctrine, or in lay understanding) tend to be imbued with greater "goodness" or "holiness" or access to divine command, or whatever. Priests and CEOs are both potentially dangerous, and quite likely to cover for their buddies; but you don't generally tell children that CEOs are trusted authority figures who deserve their respect and obedience.

    5. Re:That's pretty evil. by WarwickRyan · · Score: 5, Funny

      > but you don't generally tell children that CEOs are trusted authority figures who deserve their respect and obedience.

      Well, unless their name is Steve Jobs.

    6. Re:That's pretty evil. by elrous0 · · Score: 5, Funny

      I have it on good authority that the Amish are running a dog fighting ring.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    7. Re:That's pretty evil. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If you learn more about the inquisition and compare it with the other trials of the time (that is, not by today's standards), you'll surely prefer to be judged by the inquisition; and the spanish one which so much bad publicity was better than the anglican one, which burnt the most witches.

    8. Re:That's pretty evil. by Anachragnome · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Sticky subject that is likely to insult somebody, no matter how you approach it.

      I can say that I have met some Jewish people with questionable business morals, but then again I've met people with NO religious beliefs that are far worse.

      As far as slavery and forced labor goes, the long-running genocide in Darfur is essentially Muslim controlled militias attacking indigenous tribes-people, people that have been a source of slaves for Muslim slavers for hundreds of years.

      The rallying cry for some of the Janjaweed (means "devil on horseback") militia forces has been "Kill the slaves, kill the slaves!"

      But then again, the region where the Janjaweed are killing defenseless, unarmed villagers also happens to center around a government-held oil pipeline that sends 80% of the regions oil to China.

      So maybe religion has nothing to do with it? Maybe some people are just assholes?

      And to complicate matters, some people seem to feel compelled to put Scientology in the same group as Christianity and Islam when we ALL know Scientology is just a big SCAM. It is NOT a religion just because they say it is. It is a scam disguised as a religion.

      Oranges and Apples, my friends...Don't give them the credit they so desire.

    9. Re:That's pretty evil. by tbannist · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Many people would say some organizational structures are better able to resist corruption than others. It's been my perception that (monotheistic) religion is particular vulnerable to corruption since it's trivially easy for the organization to be corrupted from the top down. In most cases the leader is expected to be the holiest of people and thus even questioning the leader can easily be cast as lack of faith in the entire religion.

      Even if everything can be corrupted, but it might useful to look at how easily corrupted different organizational structures are.

      --
      Fanatically anti-fanatical
    10. Re:That's pretty evil. by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hmm, how come every Scientology story must have some post diverting attention to Catholicism, trying to lend legitimacy to Scientology as a religion?

      Snicker, snort. You're mistaking digs at Catholic Cultism for ascription of legitimacy.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    11. Re:That's pretty evil. by camperdave · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I wish Acts 17:11 would get preached more: "Now the Bereans were of more noble character than the Thessalonians, for they received the message with great eagerness and examined the Scriptures every day to see if what Paul said was true."

      Healthy skepticism is part of a noble character.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    12. Re:That's pretty evil. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Let's stick to the topic at hand, shall we?

      Well, not everyone is using Verizon's FiOS, like you are.

    13. Re:That's pretty evil. by Capt.DrumkenBum · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Hmm, how come every Scientology story must have some post diverting attention to Catholicism, trying to lend legitimacy to Scientology as a religion?

      I believe you have it backwards. I think the post you reference is trying to point out that there is really no reason not to treat catholicism with the same utter contempt that we treat scientology.
      I personally think it should be taken one step further than that. All organized religion should be treated with utter contempt.

      --
      If I were God, wouldn't I protect my churches from acts of me?
    14. Re:That's pretty evil. by Capt.DrumkenBum · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Forgot this:
      Q: What is the difference between a religion and a cult?
      A: Time.

      --
      If I were God, wouldn't I protect my churches from acts of me?
    15. Re:That's pretty evil. by syousef · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It isn't religion that is the problem

      I disagree. Religions all require you to believe in things that cannot be proven, despite their being unlikely. Religion requires that you leave your brains at the door, at least on certain points. So when something damaging or wrong is suggested it can be justified or endorsed based on fantasy/fiction, and you're left without the defense of common sense or scientific method.

      "With or without religion, you would have good people doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to do evil things, that takes religion. " - Steven Weinberg

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    16. Re:That's pretty evil. by osu-neko · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I wish Acts 17:11 would get preached more: "Now the Bereans were of more noble character than the Thessalonians, for they received the message with great eagerness and examined the Scriptures every day to see if what Paul said was true." Healthy skepticism is part of a noble character.

      I don't think examining the Scriptures to see if something is true can be reasonably considered "healthy skepticism". This would more properly be described as an unhealthy skewing of the meaning of "skepticism". Someone with a healthy level of skepticism would not consider examining the scriptures as a means of verifying truth. At best it can uncover contradictions, but proving that what Paul said was consistent would in no way indicate whether what Paul said was true. The Bereans, it appears, suffered from some very unhealthy misconceptions

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
    17. Re:That's pretty evil. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It isn't religion that is the problem, it is organization and trust.

      The Catholic Church has the additional problem that they prohibit their authority figures from engaging in normal heterosexual relationships. To put it bluntly, one of the key criteria they use to select authority figures is abnormal sexuality. Many of the Catholic Church's authority figures are probably just asexual and some are probably homosexual - but there are also obviously quite a few who are pedophiles. That's not to say that people with abnormal sexuality are bad - just that the child molesting by authority figures in the Catholic Church wasn't just random chance (it was a direct result of their celibacy requirements).

    18. Re:That's pretty evil. by cyber-vandal · · Score: 2, Funny

      Scientology is a religion in the same way as Dunkin Donuts is a restaurant

    19. Re:That's pretty evil. by Kreigaffe · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I personally think you took one step too far when you afforded the CoS the respect of referring to them as an organized religion. They're not, catholicism is, there's a huge difference.

      --
      ... still waiting for this free-as-in-beer free beer I keep hearing about. :|
    20. Re:That's pretty evil. by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I nowhere said that all religious people suffer from misplaced trust problems, or even all religious organizations exhibit pernicious hierarchical trust. I do say, though, that religious organizations are markedly more likely than other organizations to couple trust and power(In the sense that the powerful are trusted, not that the trusted are made powerful) which makes them particularly vulnerable to problems of that flavor.

    21. Re:That's pretty evil. by jimicus · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I personally think you took one step too far when you afforded the CoS the respect of referring to them as an organized religion. They're not, catholicism is, there's a huge difference.

      Yep, about two thousand years and a few million followers.

    22. Re:That's pretty evil. by WarwickRyan · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Is it implied that you're refering to the first subject (i.e. the children) and not the second (the CEOs)?

      I don't know the rules for English, but I do know that the grammar's pretty forgiving when it comes to the subject. Or at least it is when compared to dutch (and german / other germanic languages). That's what allows a lot of british humour (and it's why you don't see much German humour - the language it too precise for it).

    23. Re:That's pretty evil. by Xtravar · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You don't start a Scientology debate when Catholicism is in the news, so you shouldn't start a Catholicism debate when Scientology is in the news. It's completely asinine, and it's what the Scientologists want to 'legitimize' their organization. Whether you think the Catholic Church is more or less legitimate is irrelevant.

      --
      Buckle your ROFL belt, we're in for some LOLs.
    24. Re:That's pretty evil. by interkin3tic · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I personally think it should be taken one step further than that. All organized religion should be treated with utter contempt.

      That's an interesting thought, I'd like to hear more. Actually, no, I'll just blindly follow your authority. Could I give you money? If I treat all other organized religions with utter contempt, maybe declaring a holy war against them, will I go to some type of pleasurable afterlife?

    25. Re:That's pretty evil. by MightyMartian · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I've seen $cientologists use the reasoning "Well Catholics believe in Zombie Jesus, so our beliefs aren't really any worse." On a purely metaphysical level, they're right, of course, it all looks like outrageous bunk. But Catholicism (and Christianity in general) has long been an integrated, and for a long time integral part of the wider Western society. What that generally means is that whatever cultish aspects may have been present in Early Christianity were pretty much paved over as the Church became more closely aligned with the State and with the wider society.

      As goofy as Catholic beliefs can appear to the non-believer, they are indeed more mainstream, and as we can see by the vast amounts of money paid to victims of abuse, they are, in the long run, anyways, more willing to admit their complicity in criminal acts. $cientology's leaders have yet to come to that point yet, and maybe never will. I really doubt that the cult will be much of a force in 50 years. Other cultish groups like the Jehovah's Witnesses are already in a bit of a nosedive.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    26. Re:That's pretty evil. by Xtravar · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't really care if it was light-hearted or not. Associating the two followings, even through satire and jokes, only makes things worse. We all can agree that Scientology is bad. We all can't agree that Catholicism is bad. If we confuse the two, we end up with both in the end. If we focus on Scientology, we all are better off.

      --
      Buckle your ROFL belt, we're in for some LOLs.
    27. Re:That's pretty evil. by AlXtreme · · Score: 4, Insightful

      In empirical science, we accept that the observations of our senses is real (at least at some level), even though we have no "proof" that anything outside our thoughts is really real (remember DeCartes?)

      Except that science only requires observation as a postulate and no other 'leaps of faith'. That is the difference between science and religion. Science doesn't expect you to believe in a bearded man on a cloud that watches your every move, or in angels or in eternal damnation. Observation and thought, that's it.

      But as long as your religion doesn't condone those slaves in the basement, that's fine with me.

      --
      This sig is intentionally left blank
    28. Re:That's pretty evil. by Obfuscant · · Score: 3, Insightful
      You don't like Scientology, but you like your religion of choice, therefore Scientology is not a religion, in spite of sharing many similar characteristics.

      It would be easy to respond to such a statement in kind. You don't like any kind of religion, so you fail to discern the differences in your attempt at lumping them all together as worthless and meaningless.

      Yes, scientology and any real religion share "certain characteristics". They are made up of people. That's the main one. They believe in things you can't prove (but then, doesn't everyone?) They get together to meet with like-minded believers. All very damning similarities, I know.

      This does not mean that others cannot make the discernment. For example, cults which have "secret handshakes" or require payments to achieve various levels of "salvation", versus religions that don't.

      Go to a tent meeting sometime and ask the people there what their religion is about. You'll walk away having been told just about everything you need to know, and what you weren't told you can ask and find out. (I didn't say you'd believe it or understand it yourself, but the information will be made freely available.) Try the same thing at a Scientology meeting. Apples and rutabagas.

    29. Re:That's pretty evil. by dbIII · · Score: 2, Informative

      Hmm, how come every Scientology story must have some post diverting attention to Catholicism, trying to lend legitimacy to Scientology as a religion?

      Australia had a court case like that that played right into the hands of this Dianetics scam with a new name. It didn't help that the lapsed Catholic Judge wanted to take a dig at real religeons by comparing them with these scammers.
      The deliberately try to escalate these disputes into Church vs State instead of organised crime vs State.
      We should give up on their trap of trying to define religeon and showing they are not because we've seen where this scam has come from. They've had decades to some up with confusing arguments and can play the game for years and get all kinds of unlikely allies on their side if they frame it as Church vs State.

    30. Re:That's pretty evil. by StarWreck · · Score: 2, Informative

      The Scientologists are pretty good with the whole "child rape" thing too: http://sexual.taxexemptchildabuse.net/

      --
      ... and in the DRM, bind them.
    31. Re:That's pretty evil. by TheoMurpse · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Like it or not, Catholicism is considered to have legitimacy and be a religion. By comparing Scientology to Catholicism, you imbue Scientology with some of Catholicism's legitimacy. You'd be a fool to deny that Catholicism has legitimacy. Ever been outside your little world and seen how many adherents it has? It has its own country for friggin sake.

    32. Re:That's pretty evil. by Pfhorrest · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It would be easy to respond to such a statement in kind. You don't like any kind of religion, so you fail to discern the differences in your attempt at lumping them all together as worthless and meaningless.

      Except that he's not, as far as I can tell at least, failing to discern the differences; he's saying the differences are negligible in light of their similarities.

      To borrow the theme of another analogy:
      Say one group of people thinks that all puppies should be brutally tortured to death. Another group used to do that, but now they only advocate that puppies should all just be taken out and shot in the head, quick and (relatively) painless. Clearly there is a difference here, and I'm confident most people would object <em>more</em> to the former group than the latter, but hopefully most people would likewise condemn them both and ask "why would you want to kill puppies to begin with!?"

      The people condemning other religions in the same broad brush as they condemn scientology may very well agree that mainstream religions are generally less harmful today than scientology is, and yet see them both as sharing the same intolerable flaws despite their other differences.

      --
      -Forrest Cameranesi, Geek of all Trades
      "I am Sam. Sam I am. I do not like trolls, flames, or spam."
    33. Re:That's pretty evil. by Omestes · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You don't like any kind of religion, so you fail to discern the differences in your attempt at lumping them all together as worthless and meaningless.

      A bit of a strawman there; I never said or implied that I didn't like religion. I think religion, like all human endeavors, is capable of wonderful things, and terrible things alike. My own faith, or lack thereof, doesn't play into this.

      If Scientology isn't a religion, then what is it? This is a simple question. If you claim it is a cult, not a religion, then we run into the problem that there isn't really a good definition for either that excludes the other. If we claim it is a "for profit scam" we still have to include some very popular Christian sects in America (think TV evangelism, and mega churches), not to mention the pre-reformation Catholic church.

      Scientology is a religion. This doesn't say that all religions are bad, or that your particular brand of religion is bad, it just says (barring further evidence) that SOME religions can be bad. This shouldn't be shocking to anyone.

      --
      A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government. -edward abbey
    34. Re:That's pretty evil. by 1800maxim · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The misconceptions are in you.

      The Beroeans were already believers in the scriptures existing prior to the writings of Paul (Hebrew scriptures). They verified everything that Paul wrote by comparing and referencing what they already believed.

      They were skeptical within the context of what they believed.

      Just because you have different beliefs, doesn't change the course you'd take if you came across something new. You would verify against what you already believe.

  4. Classified as a religion? by guruevi · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Since they are classified as a religion (thanks to infiltration of CoS into the IRS) wouldn't his service be considered 'worship' and 'volunteering'. However it wouldn't surprise me if they actually were actually doing much worse than just killing people.

    --
    Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    1. Re:Classified as a religion? by poetmatt · · Score: 3, Insightful

      what do you mean? they already had some kind of formal document about shooting people when necessary, there isn't much more out there. CoS needs to be gone, period.

    2. Re:Classified as a religion? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Its called audit method R2-45. Two .45 cal slugs to the chest will release the thetans inhabiting even the most infected person.

    3. Re:Classified as a religion? by asdf7890 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Since they are classified as a religion (thanks to infiltration of CoS into the IRS) wouldn't his service be considered 'worship' and 'volunteering'. However it wouldn't surprise me if they actually were actually doing much worse than just killing people.

      It wasn't infiltration, though I'm not saying they didn't try that too. They basically said "give us religious status for tax purposes or we'll all misfile out forms and delay payments as long as possible, good luck finding the resources to pursue even a fraction of our members", and the IRS conceded that it would cost less to let them have their way than to try force them to behave.

    4. Re:Classified as a religion? by houstonbofh · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The key is consent... By your definition, they can make rape OK. Doesn't work for rape, and we have lots of case law supporting that. (Even if you are "married" to that 14 year old.)

    5. Re:Classified as a religion? by Vindicator9000 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      modded funny, but R2-45 is actually documented Scientology scripture, explained in exactly the same way as the parent post. It's funny because it's 100% true.

    6. Re:Classified as a religion? by LandDolphin · · Score: 2, Funny

      Ha. Ha. It's funny because it's true.

      I read it like that in the voice of the character from Family Guy. It gave me a good laugh.

      --
      Spelling and Grammar errors have been added to this post for your enjoyment
    7. Re:Classified as a religion? by AioKits · · Score: 3, Informative

      Since they are classified as a religion (thanks to infiltration of CoS into the IRS) wouldn't his service be considered 'worship' and 'volunteering'.

      Interesting point, but the document linked by Iphtashu Fitz (the complaint filed) addresses this as follows:

      The First Amendment does not exempt purported religious organizations from Minimum Wage and Child Labor Laws. Elvig v. Calvin Presbyterian Church, 397 F.3d 790, 792 (9th Cir 2003).

      Bottom of page 6, top of page 7 in the Complaint (look for Iphtashu Fitz's link further down). It also details his age at the time of said service and the extent of services rendered.

      --
      "Quote me as saying I was mis-quoted." -Groucho Marx
    8. Re:Classified as a religion? by Vindicator9000 · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Yes, in the context it was written and referred to by LRH, it's very easily written off as a joke. The problem is that in courtroom testimony, former COS members have, on a few occasions, admitted that COS management had at least *suggested* that they R2-45 someone, in contexts that could be construed as being serious.

      Hubbard himself gave the order on 6 March 1968, referring to *specific people* in an HCO Ethics order that was seized during an FBI raid. Referring to these once valued Scientologists, LRH said, and I quote, "They are declared Enemies of mankind, the planet and all life." ... " They are fair game." ... and "Any Sea Org member contacting any of them is to use Auditing Process R2-45."

      Would you consider that a joke? If so, it's a pretty bad one.

    9. Re:Classified as a religion? by DiLLeMaN · · Score: 4, Informative

      R2-45 is more of a joke than anything else and should be taken as such. It should be taken in the same vein of the Darwin Award.

      From Teh Wiki (WITH citations, it seems):

      On March 6, 1968, Hubbard issued an internal memo titled "RACKET EXPOSED," in which he denounced twelve people (Peter Goodwin, Jim Stathis, Peter Knight, Mrs. Knight, Nora Goodwin, Ron Frost, Margaret Frost, Nina Collingwood, Freda Gaiman, Frank Manley, Mary Ann Taylor, and George Wateridge) as "Enemies of mankind, the planet and all life," and ordered that "Any Sea Org member contacting any of them is to use Auditing Process R2-45."[7][8] Former Scientologist Bent Corydon wrote that in late 1967 at Saint Hill, he personally received a copy of an order naming four former Scientologists as enemies and "fair game" and ordering any Sea Org member who encountered them to use R2-45.[9][10]

      Yeah, that sounds real fucking funny to me. I LOL'd.

      --
      /var/run/twitter.sock is a twitter socket puppet.
    10. Re:Classified as a religion? by nog_lorp · · Score: 4, Interesting

      And L. Ron Hubbard apparently ordered it used on several occasions by Sea Org on certain individuals!

      I need to look at the refs on this fucking wikipedia article this is unbelievable...
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R2-45

  5. Re:If he was paid $50, he wasn't a "slave" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    Historically, American slaves were fed and clothed, and occasionally paid. A few saved up to buy their freedom (less of the agricultural variety, more of the city-dwellers who could collect tips.)

  6. Re:If he was paid $50, he wasn't a "slave" by elrous0 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Silly fool, working for $50 a week. Lord Xenu pays *his* slaves $100 a week.

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  7. About damn time. by NotBornYesterday · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It looks like it's just a civil complaint, though. I'd love to see these guys brought up on criminal charges. If this suit makes any headway, I wonder if criminal charges will eventually follow? I can't imagine the DA would refuse to prosecute for slavery. It will be interesting to see what Scientology goodies come to light in the discovery process.

    --
    I prefer rogues to imbeciles because they sometimes take a rest.
    1. Re:About damn time. by Red+Flayer · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I can't imagine the DA would refuse to prosecute for slavery.

      Are you kidding? What does a prosecutor have to gain from prosecuting CoS for slavery? A little publicity for prosecuting on hearsay? You think he'll get warrants to investigate the tight-as-a-witches-bum CoS? Likely to backfire.

      What do they have to lose? Credibility? Their career? Personal safety?

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    2. Re:About damn time. by Patch86 · · Score: 3, Informative

      If the civil suit is successful, that implies that the plaintiff (who obviously shoulders the burden of proof) was able to convince a judge that a major American and multi-national organization illegally enslaved him in a secure compound for a decade and a half.

      The DA might take an interest considering a lot of the leg work will already have been done for them.

    3. Re:About damn time. by phantomcircuit · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But is still higher than that required for a warrant.

  8. Re:If he was paid $50, he wasn't a "slave" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Slavery actually connotes a position of involuntary servitude rather than one where payment is withheld. That is, it is the lack of freedom that is the main attribute of slavery, not the lack of compensation.

  9. Re:How Is This Nerd News??!! by Old97 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Of course it belongs. Didn't you notice the reference to "science" in "scientology"? BTW, Scientology liberally uses lawyers and law suits to intimidate and silence its critics - including the on-line critics.

    --
    Very often, people confuse simple with simplistic. The nuance is lost on most. - Clement Mok
  10. Re:How Is This Nerd News??!! by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 5, Informative

    Scientology has become relevant to Slashdot and its readership ever since CoS removed content from Slashdot under DMCA. It's quote obviously News for Nerds now, and, noting the DMCA reference (and the fact that it's common CoS practice, not a single isolated case), definitely related to Your Rights Online. If it's still not clear, try posting OT-III materials in a /. comments and see how that goes.

  11. Re:If he was paid $50, he wasn't a "slave" by Suiggy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Pay as meager as $50 is similar to the allowance given to indentured servants back in old times. He was also forced into labor, he couldn't leave. That $50 had to be spent on the compound at the canteen. It was slavery.

  12. Charged or charging? by vvaduva · · Score: 3, Funny

    I think the headline is wrong...they usually charge people for services, not vice versa! wtf?

  13. FLSA by Lord+Ender · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There is no law against working in a compound which has barbed wire. So that sounds like some crap to feed the media.

    The $50/week pay could be grounds for him to sue them for back wages, supposing he has proof that he worked more than 10 hours per week and that they only paid him $50 during such weeks.

    For the slavery charge, he would need to prove that he tried to quit/leave but was forcibly prevented from doing so. Did he call the police on such occasions?

    I'm thinking he may have a hard time proving his case. Accusations alone won't do it; he'll need evidence.

    --
    A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    1. Re:FLSA by LOLLinux · · Score: 2, Insightful

      For the slavery charge, he would need to prove that he tried to quit/leave but was forcibly prevented from doing so. Did he call the police on such occasions?

      Yes because when you are held captive against your will somewhere the people holding you there will make sure you have ready access to phones so that you can call the police.

    2. Re:FLSA by Lord+Ender · · Score: 2, Informative

      it sounds like he was forced to live in a place described as similar to a prison camp

      Having guards and fences is not illegal. Being "forced" to live somewhere is a crime (called "kidnapping"). There needs to be sufficient evidence to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he was kidnapped, and not staying voluntarily.

      I seriously doubt they would have let him have access to a telephone

      Well, if there's no evidence that he was forcibly detained, there will be no successful prosecution.

      Unfortunately, I'm not sure the CoS will get a free trial according to US law. Religion is quite popular here, and the majority of the religious dislike the CoS passionately enough they may be predisposed to overlook the letter of the law. Think about black men on trial for violent crimes in the segregated South back in the day...

      I have no sympathies for any particular religious group. I just hope the law is upheld and no prosecution based solely on unsupported claims is successful.

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    3. Re:FLSA by schon · · Score: 2, Informative

      There needs to be sufficient evidence to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he was kidnapped, and not staying voluntarily.

      No, there doesn't.

      "Beyond reasonable doubt" is reserved for criminal cases. This is a civil suit, in which the standard of proof is "preponderance of the evidence".

      if there's no evidence that he was forcibly detained, there will be no successful prosecution.

      Again, this is a civil suit, so there is no prosecution.

    4. Re:FLSA by mcrbids · · Score: 4, Informative

      There needs to be sufficient evidence to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he was kidnapped, and not staying voluntarily.

      Did you miss the point that he was eight years old at the time?

      Well, if there's no evidence that he was forcibly detained, there will be no successful prosecution.

      Yep. you missed the point that he was eight years old at the time!

      Eight-year-olds do not have free will under California law. They have the legally recognized ability to tattle, and that's about it. On the other hand, there *are* strict child-labor laws in effect.

      I have no sympathies for any particular religious group. I just hope the law is upheld and no prosecution based solely on unsupported claims is successful.

      First is the question: are they actually a regligious group? See France's recent rulings for more information. There's certainly reasonable doubt on the question!

      Second: The claims are very, VERY widely supported. Literally hundreds of people (and I mean literally, not figuratively) have come forth with their stories of harrassment, false imprisonment / kidnapping, extortion, and plenty more.

      Just take a look for yourself...

      --
      I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
    5. Re:FLSA by Lord+Ender · · Score: 2, Funny

      One of the more amusing bullshit-internet-debate tactics is the classic "my opponent is a plant!" This is obviously false to all readers, as plants are unable to type.

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
  14. Original complaint by Iphtashu+Fitz · · Score: 3, Informative

    For those of you who are interested, you can read the original court complaint filing here:

    http://www.scribd.com/doc/23175190/Complaint-filed112509

  15. Yes... by SuperKendall · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'm not fan of scientology, or any cult really - but a mainstream organization with illegal work camps? I just never expected that, at all. You'd think the lid would have come off something that extreme some time ago. And what are they even having them do in these camps, build the theta monitors?

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Yes... by royallthefourth · · Score: 4, Informative

      I think you're confusing "mainstream" and "infamous"

    2. Re:Yes... by Penguinisto · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Dude - there are (and were) cults out in the US today that do much, much worse. Past examples? Branch Davidians (Waco), the SunYungMoon group during the 1980's ("Moonies"), and the recent polygamy compound in Colorado City, Arizona. They all stand out as some rather egregious examples, and I don't doubt there are more of 'em out there today.

      They don't have barbed wire and guards per se, but I'm willing to wager that their denizens are brainwashed enough that none of the fencing and such is necessary.

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    3. Re:Yes... by eldavojohn · · Score: 5, Informative

      And what are they even having them do in these camps, build the theta monitors?

      From the Infinite Complacency Link:

      At 12, he was “deemed finished with schooling” and Golden Era Productions, an unincorporated division of Church of Scientology International (CSI) hired him as a messenger and errand boy.

      But in 1997, at the age of 15, he was demoted to the post of dishwasher. “He worked 16-hour days cleaning pots, pans and the dining facilities,” says the lawsuit.

      And soon afterwards, he was assigned to do construction at the base near Hemet, California.

      So the answer to your question is messenger, dish washer then construction worker. I mean, why use all the money you take from your followers to hire people to do this work when you can force the followers to do it for less or even free? L Ron Hubbard's Get Rich Quick Scam is yet another valid title for Scientology.

      --
      My work here is dung.
    4. Re:Yes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Sounds like grad school to me...

    5. Re:Yes... by dreamchaser · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Quite right. GP also referred to the CoS as 'mainstream'. There is nothing mainstream about them. Most other countries don't even recognize them as a religion. They are a money making / power grabbing scheme dreamed up by a second rate megalomaniac science fiction author that has now taken on a life of its own.

    6. Re:Yes... by KiloByte · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yes, for example church-run (ie, most of them) orphanages in Ireland. All of physical abuse, sexual abuse and forced labor.

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    7. Re:Yes... by Runaway1956 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yes, please, define "mainstream". Just because an organization makes the news frequently doesn't make them "mainstream". Take a hard look at the people who claim to be Scientologists. Fringe freaking element, all around. Huh? You point to some celebrity or other? Your point being what, exactly? Whoa, dude, you need to look at those celebrities again. We make celebrities out of people like Roman Polanski, who likes little girls. We make celebrities out of the likes of Michael Jackson, who liked - uhhh - sleepovers with little boys. We make celebrities out of rap singers who "sing" about killing cops. We make celebrities of other "singers" who celebrate gang raping little girls. Just because Tom Cruise happens to be in movies, people like his movies, does NOT make CoS "mainstream".
      America worships freaks, but that worship doesn't make them "mainstream".

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    8. Re:Yes... by ravenshrike · · Score: 4, Interesting

      AFAIK, there was never any sort of actual evidence of this. It was merely rumors without an established source. Of course, the rumors did give the .gov the excuse to attempt to invade the compound during which they killed off most of the Branch Davidians and then managed to lose the 6 separate locations worth of film that was running during the process so that they couldn't be released through FOIA requests.

    9. Re:Yes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      It did. The debt slavery in $cientology has been documented by its former members for years, including the child labor used to keep their buildings intact. Young $cientologists grow up with quite a large debt to the cult for their "auditing" sessions, during which they also confess any crimes with the e-meter, actually a primitive polygraph test whose results are often faked, and those confessions can be used to blackmail members into remaining in the cult or remaining silent if they ever escape.

      Details are over at www.factnet.org and www.xenu.net, it's fascinating material.

    10. Re:Yes... by couchslug · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "Mainstream" does not at all exclude abusing the flock.

      Note the HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS of dollars paid by the Catholic Church to dampen the scandal caused by their decades-long support of rampant pedophilia.

      Given the lawyers such money would buy, the willingness to hand out that level of settlement/hush money is telling.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    11. Re:Yes... by corbettw · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Most other countries don't even recognize them as a religion. They are a money making / power grabbing scheme dreamed up by a second rate megalomaniac science fiction author that has now taken on a life of its own.

      So how are they not a religion? Just substitute "science fiction" with "fantasy" and you have pretty much every religion out there.

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
    12. Re:Yes... by gknoy · · Score: 4, Informative

      What did the Branch Davidians do that was so much, much worse?

      Er, killed a load of people and set fire to the compound.

      From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Waco_Siege :

      Besides allegations of sexual abuse and misconduct, Koresh and his followers were accused of stockpiling illegal weapons....

      It is not known who fired the first shots, but each side later claimed it had been the other.[20] It is reported that the first firing occurred at the double front entry doors. (One door, riddled with bullet holes, was removed and lost very shortly after the siege's end). ATF agents stated they heard shots coming from within the compound, while Branch Davidian survivors claimed that the first shots came from the ATF agents outside...

      The deaths that resulted were because the Davidians thought they were defending themselves from an assault. Several parts of the FBI and ATF forces wanted to negotiate more, but another faction wanted to ramp up the use of force. Tanks and CEVs were brought in. At some point, the compound was heavily tear-gassed.

      After more than six hours no Davidians had left the building, sheltering instead in a cinder block room within the building or using gas masks. The official FBI claim is that CEVs were used to punch large holes in the building to provide exits for those inside. Most Davidians dispute this claim because the "exits" were blocked by debris, structurally unstable, elevated and largely inaccessible due to smoke and large quantities of tear gas.[citation needed] Several Davidians were blocked when a floor above collapsed, and nearly all Davidians said they feared being shot were they to leave.[citation needed]

      At around noon, three fires broke out almost simultaneously in different parts of the building. The government maintains the fires were deliberately started by Davidians.[20][45] Davidian survivors maintain the fires were accidentally or deliberately started by the tank assault.

      I think it's safe to say that it's a tragedy, no matter how you look at it, but I certainly feel that a large portion of the blame for the deaths at the Waco siege were caused by the unwillingness of the ATF/FBI to negotiate, and their eagerness to push with force against a target that they knew would interpret that as requiring self-defense.

      The Davidians' "wrongdoings" were small change compared to what happened there. Koresh was a polygamist, and I certainly don't condone his actions, but I don't think it's fair to blame him and his followers entirely for the deaths during the siege.

    13. Re:Yes... by royallthefourth · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes, of course. But consider that Catholicism is both mainstream and infamous while Scientology is still a cult and most people don't really know what it is except that Tom Cruise joined it and went nuts.

    14. Re:Yes... by ted.hansson · · Score: 5, Funny

      Tom Cruise joined it and went nuts

      You could question the order of these two events.

    15. Re:Yes... by Belial6 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I work with a woman who was a neighbor of the Dividians at the time. Her telling of the story is that they were decent neighbors who didn't bother anyone. They did have large stockpiles of guns, but that as far as anyone could tell, they were legal firearms delivered through normal channels, and that having a bunch of guns wasn't all that unusual for that area.

      According to her telling of events, the altercation started when one of the Dividians neighbors complained about the noise from their target practice. The local sheriff went out and asked them to keep it down. She claims the sheriff had already resolved the issue before the Fed decided they had an excuse to assault the church.

    16. Re:Yes... by StarWreck · · Score: 2, Informative

      Forget the celebrities. Here's a conversation with a "mainstream" scientologist. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zyUAVz414_M

      --
      ... and in the DRM, bind them.
    17. Re:Yes... by Noren · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Considering that the FBI pumped 77 pounds of a flammable aerosol into the compound, you might want to rethink who was to blame for the fire. But I do agree, it was "pretty harsh".

    18. Re:Yes... by LihTox · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The distinction between a religion and a cult, to my mind, isn't the quality of their beliefs-- we all believe utterly ridiculous things. (Do you actually believe in the *electron*? Or that we're all actually collections of waves? Quantum mechanics is as ridiculous as the virgin birth-- in fact, quantum mechanics ALLOWS for the virgin birth, since everything is possible (if highly improbable) in quantum mechanics). The difference is in the sincerity of the religion/cult's founders and leadership: do *they* believe in what they're saying, and are they primarily motivated by their belief? I personally think that Judaism, Christianity, Islam, Baha'i, Buddhism, etc were founded in all sincerity, and even through the contempt I feel for the evangelical Christian movement, and for the Pope (speaking as a Catholic), I think they are acting from a position of sincerity.

      Scientology, on the other hand, was founded by a science fiction writer who is on record saying that founding a fake religion would be a great way to make money. Now, I think there are a number of Scientologists who are sincerely so, but I don't trust their leadership, and that makes them a cult to me.

    19. Re:Yes... by lennier · · Score: 5, Informative

      "I'm not fan of scientology, or any cult really - but a mainstream organization with illegal work camps? I just never expected that, at all. You'd think the lid would have come off something that extreme some time ago."

      It has, if you were paying attention.

      CoS's 'Rehabilitation Project Force' labour camps and other extreme 'Ethics' measures have been common knowledge since the 1990s - just check the extensive files on Operation Clambake - http://xenu.net/ .

      However, CoS tends to sue massively and engage in lots of dirty tricks whenever the mainstream media cover them at all negatively, which is why you may not have heard about this stuff if you don't get your news from the Net.

      They tried to censor Usenet back in the early 90s. It didn't work so well for them. Anonymous is just the latest round in a long battle of CoS Versus The Internet.

      --
      You are not a brain: http://books.google.com/books?id=2oV61CeDx-YC
    20. Re:Yes... by asaz989 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Just because they're a nut job cult doesn't mean they're automatically guilty of every offense they're accused of.

    21. Re:Yes... by TubeSteak · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And confusing "Charged with" with "Found guilty of".

      I think you're confusing "not found guilty" and "not charged" with "innocent"

      Either all these former Scientologists are in some kind of multi-decade conspiracy to slander CoS
      OR the CoS really has been doing horrible things since its founding.
      Which is the more plausible proposition?

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    22. Re:Yes... by plover · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Cult: n, A small, unpopular religion.
      Religion: n, A large, popular cult.

      --
      John
    23. Re:Yes... by trajanus22 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Dude - there are (and were) cults out in the US today that do much, much worse. Past examples? Branch Davidians (Waco)

      Slow down there friend and check this documentary out before you write off the Davidians as a bunch of psychos. Normal? No. But worse than slave labor, I think not.

    24. Re:Yes... by JumperCable · · Score: 2, Informative

      At gold base? Yes. They have built e-meters there. I'm not sure if it's still done at that base. They also produce their books, CDs, DVDs, promotional material. It is also the location of Golden Era Productions where promotional films are made. Also fun stories of cleaning out their shit pond & septic systems by hand... no seriously with their hands.

      In the The Big Blue building in LA they make the RPF workers build furniture in confined spaces.

    25. Re:Yes... by JumperCable · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The cult claims more than 6,000 churches missions & related groups, but I don't see anywhere near that amount listed on their website. And they claim 8-12 million Scientologists, but there are only about 25,000 in the US. http://www.timesanddemocrat.com/articles/2009/11/06/features/14122340.txt> .

      If you really think there are 8 million Scientologists, then were the heck are they all? Shouldn't those Orgs be packed full? Seriously, how many should be in any major city in the US. They just aren't there. They are lying to you & all you have to do is a little basic research. Start of with the question of 6,000 churches, missions & related groups. That should be simple to verify from the scientology.org website alone.

    26. Re:Yes... by corbettw · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sure, nowadays. But the Catholic Church once required prompt payment of various fees to gain forgiveness of sins; and many smaller churches and cults have demanded tithes on a regular basis. Though it is true that other religions aren't nearly as money grubbing as the CoS is. Instead, the older ones just go for the real goods: power and devotion. With enough of those, you don't need money.

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
    27. Re:Yes... by skine · · Score: 2

      The problem is not religion necessarily, but that religion, by its very nature, can very easily be corrupted.

    28. Re:Yes... by Meski · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So how are they not a religion? Just substitute "science fiction" with "fantasy" and you have pretty much every religion out there.

      With the exception of The Church of the flying spaghetti monster. You've pretty much got to accept that one as genuine. :^) {1]

      [1] I feel unclean, putting the tongue-in-cheek emoticon there.

    29. Re:Yes... by seebs · · Score: 4, Informative

      The big difference is that we have the founder on record, in writing, claiming that:

      1. He came up with this stuff under the influence of drugs.
      2. That this is not a religion, in any way, shape, or form.
      3. Later, that there is now a "religion angle" which exists only for tax and legal reasons, but that there is no change at all of the underlying facts.

      They have written documents saying that they are not a religion, are not intended to be a religion, and are purely scientific. That does go a long way towards suggesting that they are perhaps not a religion. Generally, if you put in writing that you are filing forms saying you're a religion only for tax reasons, and not because you actually think you're a religion, that's a big sign.

      --
      My blog: http://www.seebs.net/log/ --- My iPhone/iPad app: http://www.seebs.net/seebsfrac/
    30. Re:Yes... by loutr · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well for starters mainstream christianity and islam don't make you work for fifteen fucking hours a day for $200/mo against your will. Oh, and they also didn't organize "the single largest infiltration of the United States government in history".

    31. Re:Yes... by mlush · · Score: 2, Interesting
      its one of those irregular verbs:
      • My Faith
      • Your Religion
      • His Cult
    32. Re:Yes... by ultranova · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Why, it's simple: it lets butthurt atheists to put two snipes about religion into a single unit, therefore being twice as effective in making themselves feel superior.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    33. Re:Yes... by conureman · · Score: 2, Informative

      Perhaps my information is faulty, all I know about it was from the news, and the film "Rules of Engagement". I've seen FLIR imagery of firefights in our Asian colonies, and the film showed a remarkable simulation of submachine gun bursts being directed into the windows and escape routes of the burning Branch Davidian residence, at least until the tank was able to knock down and seal up that end of the building.

      --
      The cost of that cleanup, of course, will be borne by taxpayers, not industry.
    34. Re:Yes... by operagost · · Score: 2, Insightful

      These people didn't lead an armed rebellion, Captain Fascist. They broke some serious laws, but were not a danger to anyone outside their compound.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    35. Re:Yes... by BobMcD · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The social workers claimed at the time there was not sufficient ability to prosecute. They had been out to the compound on a number of occasions, had the sense that it was going on, but had not yet been able to act.

      The order of events, then, was:

      1) Children being abused. Can't roll tanks in and burn them alive, yet.

      2) Taxes allegedly not paid on guns (some of the guns alleged were never found there)

      3) Meth lab alleged to exist (which was also never found)

      4) Stand-off and seige

      5) Reno says we can roll tanks and burn them alive because children inside need saving

      To me this DOES NOT make sense.

  16. Re:How Is This Nerd News??!! by multisync · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Please stop this Scientology bashing. We know its a kooky scam, but it sure as hell doesn't belong on this site

    Hmmm ...

    You don't think a story about a religion that was founded by a science fiction writer, teaches that we are from some other planet and uses something called an "E-meter" to locate and eliminate "engrams" in its followers belongs on Slashdot?

    I must be new here.

    --
    I don't care why you're posting AC
  17. Ah My Homeland by BJ_Covert_Action · · Score: 4, Interesting

    As a Californian I wonder how much interest this is going to garner in my home state regarding the abuses of Scientology. On the one hand, my state is populated with pipe dreamers, smoked out idealists, flower children, hippy nutjobs, and all sorts of other forms of extreme liberalism. On the other hand, we have very rich communities like Hollywood, the OC, and Roseville. We also, apparently, have enough orthodox, classic right wingers that we voted down legalizing gay marriage recently. We have farmers. We have students. We have programmers. We have ranchers. We have movie stars. We have one of the most diverse culture mixtures in the world I bet. That's part of why I love it here...

    Of course, along with that diversity is an unfathomable tolerance for some particularly poignant cases of stupidity...like our state budget. There is no doubt that the strong and vocal religious groups here in California would raise exception and a helluva kerfuffle over their church being towed to court for slavery. But I wonder if any of those groups see a case regarding Scientology as a threat. After all sometimes the most belligerent opposition to one religion comes from another religion. I have seen folks in Fawkes masks walking around my local famer's market protesting Scientology. However, I have also had Scientologists try to recruit me both in my home town and when I wander the rest of the state. So this will certainly be an interesting case to watch. I hope it garners some attention and noise in this state and, perhaps, even in our country. Exposing Scientology for the cult and crime syndicate it is certainly is, in my opinion, a righteous cause....

    Well if there's one thing we Californians know how to do, its garner attention and make some noise. I'm gonna go pop some popcorn...

  18. Re:How Is This Nerd News??!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Why does it have to be about something online to be of relevance to nerds?

    The war between Scientology vs. The Internet has been going on pretty much since there was an Internet.

    The Co$ practically invented the Hipcrime sporgery attack technique that still plagues USENET to this day. It was directly responsible for taking down the world's first anonymous remailer (anon.penet.fi) in 1996, and compromised every user of that service. Its shill legislator got his name stamped onto the Mickey Mouse Protection Act in 1998.

    It has been a consistent and implacable foe of the free exchange of information on the Internet for the better part of 20 years, and it will not stop until it - either the Cult or the Internet - ceases to exist in its current form. Anything that could deplete the cult's financial reserves is a priori a good thing for Your Rights Online, and anything that the cult wants is a priori a threat to Your Rights Online.

    Asking "What does the Co$ have to do with YRO?" is like asking "What does NSA have to do with surveillance?" Both are threats to your ability to speak freely. NSA may break the law from time to time, but for all we bitch about it, at least it acknowledges the existence of legal restrictions on its ability to carry out its mission. Co$ doesn't even recognize the concept of law, except as a means of filing strategic lawsuits against public participation, or as a means to otherwise harass its critics.

  19. ok by JeanBaptiste · · Score: 5, Informative

    link 1
    link 2
    link 3

    "If you want to control your child, simply break him into complete apathy and he'll be as obedient as any hypnotized half-wit. If you want to know how to control him, get a book on dog training, name the child Rex and teach him first to "fetch" and then to "sit up" and then to bark for his food. You can train a child that way. Sure you can. But it's your hard luck if he turns out to be a blood-letter. Only don't be half-hearted about it. Simply TRAIN him. "Speak, Roger!" "Lie down!" "Roll over!" Of course, you'll have a hard time of it. This - a slight oversight - is a human being. You'd better charge right in and do what you can to break him into apathy quickly. A club is best. Tying him in a closet without food for a few days is fairly successful. The best recommended tactic, however, is simply to use a straight jacket and muffs on him until he is docile and imbecilic. I'm warning you that it's going to be tough; it will be tough because Man became king of the beasts only because he couldn't as a species be licked. He doesn't easily go into an obedient apathy like dogs do. Men own dogs because men are self-determined and dogs aren't. --Official church documents

    I got nothing better going on.

    1. Re:ok by LanMan04 · · Score: 2

      Wow, that makes me sick to my stomach. Literally.

      --
      With the first link, the chain is forged.
  20. Re:Scientology as a force for good? by MightyMartian · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I think the bad reputation marks against Scientology are getting a lot of press, but in defense of the poor guy getting beat up, are there any good things to say about Scientology?

    That's really hard, because the benefits of most religions are often highly subjective. The only defense I can think of is that they could be a lot worse (ie. Jonestown, Heaven's Gate), and they certainly aren't worse than the TV evangelist types who also rake in obscene amounts of money from the True Believers.

    I remember one article I read on them stated that their biggest problem is their intense paranoia of the outside world. A lot of the reasons they've done some of the nasty things they've done (like infiltrating Ontario government offices in the 1970s) are ill-informed and misjudged attempts at security.

    L. Ron Hubbard was most certainly a con artist, but he was also a bit of a paranoid type, not to mention the self-aggrandizing that he got out of a lot of the cloak-and-dagger bullshit. The problem for $cientologists after him is that I think a lot of them didn't get the joke. In short, their inheritors of L. Ron's madness, but in a more pure and fanatical form.

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  21. Re:If he was paid $50, he wasn't a "slave" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Slavery actually connotes a position of involuntary servitude rather than one where payment is withheld. That is, it is the lack of freedom that is the main attribute of slavery, not the lack of compensation.

    Slavery actually connotes a position of involuntary servitude rather than one where payment is withheld. That is, it is the lack of freedom that is the main attribute of slavery, not the lack of compensation.

    The barbed wire at Gold Base is on the inside of the fence not on the outside.

  22. Re:If he was paid $50, he wasn't a "slave" by elrous0 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You don't count being held in a compound surrounded by razor wire and forced to work 16-24 hours a day at age 8 as "involuntary servitude"? Wow, you must have had a much rougher childhood than me.

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  23. Gold Base (Gilman Springs, CA) by Ohio+Calvinist · · Score: 5, Informative

    I live near this facility (map/image) and it looks more like a gated-resort community than anything. I haven't seen any razor wire, but there are high fences and access is controlled through a gate, and there are cameras on the road and on the fence. For the interested, there is a wiki page that strikes me as being pretty accurate and NPOV.

    --
    Forgive my spelling from time to time. I'm often posting during short breaks.
    1. Re:Gold Base (Gilman Springs, CA) by TheHawke · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Barb wire can be laced just under the top of the wall, and be observant of any narrow trails leading up to and around the inside perimeter of the wall.

      I'd suggest that you open your eyes further more, look for odd things that appear out of place.

      --
      First rule of holes; When in one, stop digging.
    2. Re:Gold Base (Gilman Springs, CA) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      That is so cool - followed your link to Gold Base then switched to Google street view. At the corner of their property I saw a small compound with a cement block building - surrounded by a barbed-wire fence facing inward!

    3. Re:Gold Base (Gilman Springs, CA) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      and it looks more like a gated-resort community than anything. I haven't seen any razor wire, but there are high fences and access is controlled through a gate, and there are cameras on the road and on the fence.

      It depends where you look. Here is a collection of photos of various parts of the Gold Base security. From what I've been able to make out, it sounds like the blade fences (not razor wire) are concentrated in the north-east part of the base, around where their detention facilities are thought to be.

  24. No difference than the Christian cult by mlawrence · · Score: 5, Insightful

    My parents forced me to go to church every week, then sunday school, and during the week I would be forced to work as an altar boy for no pay. All the time I was brainwashed with repetitive prayers and actions. A cult is a cult is a cult. It doesn't matter that here in North America we tend to be fond of a particular one.

    1. Re:No difference than the Christian cult by Literaphile · · Score: 5, Insightful

      My parents forced me to go to church every week, then sunday school, and during the week I would be forced to work as an altar boy for no pay. All the time I was brainwashed with repetitive prayers and actions. A cult is a cult is a cult. It doesn't matter that here in North America we tend to be fond of a particular one.

      That's a very poor argument. You can swap out "church" for almost any other childhood activity. For example, soccer:

      My parents forced me to go to soccer every week and play a game on saturday, and during the week I would be forced to go to soccer practice for no pay. All the time I was brainwashed with repetitive stretches and drills.

      In other words, equating Sunday school and being an altar boy to doing film editing production is silly. The former are childhood activities, not jobs. But I suppose most Slashdotters take any opportunity to bash Christianity (note: I am not a Christian).

    2. Re:No difference than the Christian cult by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yeah, my parents had me in church a lot as a kid. As an adult, I pretty much stopped going. Know what? My mom still likes me and I still have plenty of friends who go to church, and as far as I know none of them have shunned me as a pariah. I don't think you can really give a group "cult" status when there's no penalty for leaving and they're still nice to you afterward.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    3. Re:No difference than the Christian cult by Literaphile · · Score: 4, Interesting

      A cult by definition is a religious group - it's silly for you to equate a religious activity with a sports activity.

      A cult is a religious group, but a religious group is not necessarily a cult. If all 'A's are 'B's, all 'B's are not necessarily 'A's. As another poster mentioned, Christianity is far from a cult. Yes, it has rituals, as does any religion. But rituals do not make a cult. You're free to leave the Christian church at any time. Blame your parents for keeping you in church as a kid, just as a kid who doesn't like soccer might blame his parents for keeping him in the sport against his will.

  25. Re:If he was paid $50, he wasn't a "slave" by Chris+Burke · · Score: 5, Funny

    You don't count being held in a compound surrounded by razor wire and forced to work 16-24 hours a day at age 8 as "involuntary servitude"?

    No, obviously they do count that as involuntary, since the point was to contradict a post claiming this wasn't slavery due to him being paid. In other words, they are saying he was a slave.

    This post has been brought to you by the Center For Explaining the Obvious to the Reading Comprehension Impaired, a tax-exempt religious charity organization that you can join and learn more about for the low low cost of $5000.

    --

    The enemies of Democracy are
  26. I Was Surprised by eldavojohn · · Score: 5, Informative

    Was this a surprise to anyone?

    As the submitter, yeah I have to admit it kind of was. This is a really unique opportunity for a case against CoS because normally the cases come from outsiders.

    Lindstein was eight years old and says he was forced to work for 16 years. He was removed from school at age 12. Now, if you were removed from school at age 12, you probably aren't very well suited for a high paying job. So you have someone who's lost much of their youth to Scientology and has the motivation to see this suit through to the end.

    You see, when you sue or slander Scientology, you might not realize what you're getting yourself into. People end up doing jail for posting verbal attacks on Scientology online. To quote the late L. Ron Hubbard on his policy:

    This is the correct procedure: Spot who is attacking us. Start investigating them promptly for felonies or worse using our own professionals, not outside agencies. Double curve our reply by saying we welcome an investigation of them. Start feeding lurid, blood sex crime actual evidence on the attackers to the press. Don't ever tamely submit to an investigation of us. Make it rough, rough on attackers all the way. * "Attacks on Scientology" (25 February 1966)

    That's what you're dealing with. That's what Lindstein has in his future. He probably knows it, his lawyer probably knows it. But he will soon be subjected to character assassination, harassment of just barely legal amounts, indirect threats and the same for any family he may have.

    So yeah, I'm a pleasantly surprised that such an opportune individual has stepped forward to speak and let us know what Scientology is. Because in so many other cases, the individual has been silenced one way or another. And scientology has refined it's processes to force its members quiet and they have the resources and legal representation to make magic happen in the courts.

    I hope Lindstein is telling the whole truth and nothing but the truth. I wish him the best of luck in the courtroom and for justice to be brought against those who forced him into labor and stripped him of his right to knowledge.

    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:I Was Surprised by Culture20 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I hope Lindstein is telling the whole truth and nothing but the truth.

      I hope he's lying, and that they really aren't that terrible. But if they are, CoS will soon have its own Waco.

    2. Re:I Was Surprised by Thagg · · Score: 5, Insightful

      They're really that terrible. Sorry.

      The very first thing that happens when you're brought into Scientology is that they convince you that all that money you're spending on doctors is wasted, that Scientology will fix everything. Some people with actual life-threatening problems don't survive this phase. Doesn't bother Scientology a bit, though.

      --
      I love Mondays. On a Monday, anything is possible.
    3. Re:I Was Surprised by Culture20 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      There's is nothing bad about that prospect except the possibility of government casualties.

      And all of the Church's slaves. I'm sure there's some "kill all believers" doomsday scenario that L Ron set up for when the Feds come (it would keep the head honchos on their toes).

    4. Re:I Was Surprised by Rakarra · · Score: 4, Informative

      You see, when you sue or slander Scientology, you might not realize what you're getting yourself into. People end up doing jail for posting verbal attacks on Scientology online. ...

      That's what you're dealing with. That's what Lindstein has in his future. He probably knows it, his lawyer probably knows it. But he will soon be subjected to character assassination, harassment of just barely legal amounts, indirect threats and the same for any family he may have.

      I think most people also don't realize just how much worse a situation Lindstein is in. For non-Scientologists, the Church really has to work to try to dig up skeletons in the closet, to figure out just what could possibly embarrass and discredit you. But for ex-Scientologists, it's much worse, because they already know everything about you. You see, confession is part of the religion. That's hardly abnormal, but the difference is that you must confess something new. And you have to confess. So you'll be in a room with a dozen people screaming at you to confess some past sin. Something. And then that information is written down. Over the years they wring everything out of you, and it's all documented. Then when you turn against the church later in life, that information is released. Did you ever have a romantic affair with a fellow staffer? That will come out. Maybe when you were really young you curiously touched the family pet when he was humping your leg? Oh, you bet that will be shown. Everyone has something that they're not proud of that they don't want anyone to know. And the church will have confessionals for all of it. Of course they don't WANT to do this. " Yingling and Davis said the church doesn't relish using documents from ethics files. But after the four defectors spoke out against Miscavige, the lawyer and spokesman said they had no choice." That statement and others can be found from the amazing St. Petersburg Times series on Scientology: http://www.tampabay.com/news/article1012148.ece. Utterly amazing.

      So yeah, Lindstein is in for a rough time.

  27. Re:How Is This Nerd News??!! by Vindicator9000 · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Because it's a common tactic used by Scientologists in all negatively-slanted Scientology stories.

    Look around for COS stories on the internet, and read the comments. You'll find some derivation of that exact comment over and over in every single one of them.

  28. Fighting Cults: Rick Ross by reporter · · Score: 5, Interesting

    If you know anyone who is trapped -- physically or mentally -- inside a cult like the Church of Scientology, then please contact Rick Ross. The life of the victim may depend on your getting Ross' help as soon as possible.

  29. This isn't the first time by smellsofbikes · · Score: 3, Informative

    It sounds like Lindstein was caught in the Rehabilitation Project Force program, which is where Scientology dissidents are placed until they get better, where 'better' is defined by the people who put them there. Gold Base is by no means the only such place people are kept: the first RPF people were on ships, cleaning out the sewage systems by hand. Sort of hard to call the police when you're being held on a ship in international waters...

    --
    Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
  30. Those are not mainstream by SuperKendall · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Dude - there are (and were) cults out in the US today that do much, much worse.

    Yes there are, but nothing on the scale of Scientology. The bigger the group the bigger the target, the harder to keep secrets.

    That's what I mean by being surprised. A local compound in one city? Zero information coming out of that would surprise me. But again, for something as large and well known as scientology... it is odd to me that this has not come forward before and is being practiced at all. They don't need to do this after all, they are making money hand over fist as it is.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Those are not mainstream by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      People have known about the forced servitude of scientology for a long time. Its just that this is perhaps the first time anyone has had the combination of resources and bravery to stand up against it. And this is an example of bravery, some people that speak out against scientology have found themselves mysteriously dead.

    2. Re:Those are not mainstream by Toonol · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I am suspicious. I don't think your error was an error at all.

      Wow, you just exude Tom Cruise level craziness.

    3. Re:Those are not mainstream by Bourbonium · · Score: 3, Informative

      Look, it took almost a hundred years for the courts in Ireland to finally investigate the Catholic Church, and specifically the Christian Brothers organization, which just last week admitted to having known for decades about well-documented cases of child molestation, flogging, child slavery and horrible physical abuse at the hands of priests in their midst all through the 20th century (and probably earlier, but those victims are long dead). The church leaders knew about it and covered it up. It took some brave people to sue them and shame them in public to bring this out into the open. Now, the Christian Brothers have agreed to pay over $240,000,000 in damages to the surviving plaintiffs (some of which are now in their seventies and retired) to compensate them for the abuse they suffered as children.

      Go to Netflix and rent "The Magdalene Sisters" for an eye-opening expose of what the church has done to children for many, many years. The film is fictitious, but based upon actual accounts of what went on in the Magdalene Asylums, as admitted by a number of nuns who left the order and wrote confessions about them.

      The Church of Scientology is an evil organization, but they take inspiration from cults that are much older, and far more skillful at hiding their evil and masquerading themselves as "divinely ordained to save mankind." Too many people in this sick world are as stupid as cattle, and willing to believe any nonsense someone in authority spouts into their ears, especially when they are impressionable children. The fact that they continue to believe this garbage into their adulthood is a scathing indictment of our broken educational system.

  31. Re:I know, I know! by sorak · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The Religion of Anthropogenic Global Warming...! :)

    Right, because you never hear criticism of that!

  32. how is that different from old mining towns? by ChipMonk · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "You load sixteen tons, and what do you get?
    Another day older and deeper in debt.
    Saint Peter, don'tcha call me 'cause I can't go,
    I owe my soul to the company store."

    That song reflected the reality of tens of thousands of people in Appalachia.

  33. Congratulations Scientology... by Null+Perception · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...you are now officially a religion.

    --
    Great new book on Evolution: The Greatest Show on Earth by Richard Dawkins
  34. Re:How Is This Nerd News??!! by greywire · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I think most nerds are interested in a lot of topics beyond computers, sci-fi and anime. Thats the only reason needed. News for Nerds, stuff that matters... thats potentially everything, but with a nerd bias.

    In other words, intelligent news.

    If you want news about a cute doggy that's adopted a litter of kitty cats, then watch TV. If you want news about a study of inter-species social interactions, read slashdot.

    --
    -- Senior Software Engineer, Attorney appearance services, locallawyerapp.com.
  35. CoS "base" in Colorado by macraig · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I once had the opportunity to read part of the diary of a teenage girl who had been at a Scientology "Base" in Colorado. I don't recall the name of it, or even whether she mentioned it by name (this was 20 years ago). The disruptive, corruptive effects her involvement with this Base and the CoS had on her state of mind were obvious from what she wrote. While I don't recall whether she described any physical enslavement, the mental enslavement was apparent.

    Why they're still getting away with it mystifies me; pretty much everyone now knows what they're doing and how they're doing it.

    1. Re:CoS "base" in Colorado by mathx314 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Christians, for the most part, don't rape young boys, so stop lumping them all together. According to Wikipedia, 76% of the US population identifies as Christian. Do you really believe that 76% of Christians rape young boys? Yes, it does happen sometimes. When it comes to light, though, those responsible have been brought to justice. That hasn't happened yet for Scientology's crimes.

  36. Re:If he was paid $50, he wasn't a "slave" by lwsimon · · Score: 2, Informative

    Contrary to popular culture, most slaves in the US where fairly well taken care of. It was an enormous investment to purchase and maintain slaves, and the owner wouldn't risk that lightly.

    Of course, there were horrific exceptions to this.

    --
    Learn about Photography Basics.
  37. The form? It's right here: by Weaselmancer · · Score: 4, Informative

    Principia Discordia.

    Disorganized religion. There you go. Read it now, thank me later fnord.

    --
    Weaselmancer
    rediculous.
  38. Re:Fighting Cults: Rick Ross by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    And in fact, this is even more enlightening - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jason_Scott_case

    Yeah, I wouldn't be going anywhere NEAR this fellow.

  39. Re:Scientology as a force for good? by Culture20 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Have you ever put a square mustache on El Ron? It'll shock the thetans right out of you.

  40. freeloader's debt by un1xl0ser · · Score: 2, Informative

    So if the defendant is trying to get back pay, then aren't they just going to pull the "freeloader's debt" thing, and sue him for unpaid auditing?

    --
    v4sw6PU$hw6ln6pr4F$ck 4/6$ma3+6u7LNS$w2m4l7U$i2e4+7en6a2X h
  41. Re:If he was paid $50, he wasn't a "slave" by Richy_T · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So the government decided that only the government can own slaves. Quel surprise

  42. Oblig. Fraiser quote by AgentPhunk · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Fraiser (to Niles): "Remember Niles, that which doesn't kill you only makes you stronger."

    Nile: "Yes, but what about the people that don't make it into that second group?"

    1. Re:Oblig. Fraiser quote by Anti_Climax · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "That which doesn't kill you only makes you stronger."

      "Tell that to someone with Polio"

      --
      Even people that believe in pre-destiny look both ways before crossing the street.
  43. Re:If he was paid $50, he wasn't a "slave" by jcr · · Score: 2, Informative

    Contrary to popular culture, most slaves in the US where fairly well taken care of.

    Considerably better than Irish day laborers. There are many stories of Irishmen being given tasks to do that were too dangerous to risk losing a slave.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  44. Re:How Is This Nerd News??!! by Arthur+Grumbine · · Score: 3, Funny

    Geez, Tom, no need to take it personally.

    --
    Now that I think about it, I'm pretty sure everything I just said is completely wrong.
  45. Re:Fighting Cults: Rick Ross by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Here here. I know Rick (personally). While I don't agree with him on all matters, he is a good man and has helped countless people. While he was unable to help my friend (Dawn Ward...she's referred to on his site), I stand by my statements.

  46. Re:Scientology as a force for good? by Cal27 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Well... it's better than vista.

  47. Re:Fighting Cults: Rick Ross by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Actually, your link is amazingly enlightening.

    In the trial, Jason Scott was represented by Kendrick Moxon, a prominent Scientologist attorney.

    ...

    In November 1996, the CAN name, logo and telephone number were bought in Bankruptcy Court by another Scientologist attorney, Steven Hayes, whose partner Timothy Bowles had at one time been partners with Moxon.

    ...

    The Jason Scott case brought about the demise of the "Old CAN", marking the end of the cult wars in North America.[1][2] Controversies surrounding new religious movements have continued, but the debate has mostly moved to other arenas than the courts.[1][38] With the Scott decision, deprogramming came to an almost complete halt in North America,[38][39] and the practice was largely given up in favor of voluntary exit counseling.[40] Following the acquisition of the CAN name and number by Scientologists, a "New CAN" was established with their backing, which serves as an information and networking center on nontraditional religions;[41] it is managed by former opponents of the "Old CAN".

    Sounds like if you're trying to escape Scientology, this guy is exactly the person you need to talk to.

  48. Re:How Is This Nerd News??!! by Larryish · · Score: 3, Funny

    I actually read the first half of Dianetics during a stint in a county jail, and quite a bit of it made sense.

    Engrams, IIRC, are things that have happened to people during their childhood and are repressed to the point that they are damaging. A lot of what goes on in the "auditing" (again, IIRC) is equivalent to regressive hypno-therapy. Breaking down those walls could possibly open people up to entirely new aspects of life, and worlds of possibility.

    Of course once the walls are broken down, they lay on the sci-fi-churchy-brainwashing-crapola. That is where I stopped reading.

    When wikileaks first got famous in relation to Scientology, I grabbed copies of every available piece of CoS literature that I could download. Upon skimming through it I found there are some methods that seem quite useful as tools for training salespeople.

    There are protocols where people train one another, for example one shouts obscenities at the other person nonstop for hours on end, and then the roles reverse and the training continues. Imagine how valuable this could be to salespeople, to make them immune to criticism and unafraid of verbal confrontation.

    There are some good bits in the CoS materials, don't dismiss it out of hand.

    The cult part of it is crap though. :)

    And here is one for you, CoS - L. Ron Hubbard was a drunken pedophile who wishes he could lick the sweat out of my asscrack. Your religion is a cult, and your cult is worthless. Get a life, losers.

    Word.

  49. Not everyone is so nice by sjbe · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I don't think you can really give a group "cult" status when there's no penalty for leaving and they're still nice to you afterward.

    Except that they often aren't nice to those who do not share their religion. Think about how many wars have been started over religion. There have been polls that clearly show that the most hated "religion" in the US is atheism - much more so than islam. I've seen with my own eyes discrimination and even brutality against those who are of a different religion. There are copious recent examples of muslims being assaulted and castigated even though they have no association besides their faith with a group of terrorists.

    Your mom is nice but don't be lulled into thinking that everyone feels the same way. There are places in this world I would be killed if I said I did not believe in a god at the wrong time. The only difference between a religion and a cult is how accepted it is in society.

  50. Re:If he was paid $50, he wasn't a "slave" by grcumb · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Allow me to re-phrase that for you:

    Contrary to popular culture, most livestock in the US where fairly well taken care of. It was an enormous investment to purchase and maintain livestock, and the owner wouldn't risk that lightly.

    The problem wasn't the conditions in which slaves were kept; the problem is that human beings were indistinguishable from livestock in the minds of their owners.

    You ought to learn about what the loss of liberty does to a human being before you trot out this useless tripe again.

    --
    Crumb's Corollary: Never bring a knife to a bun fight.
  51. Re:Fighting Cults: Rick Ross by metalhed77 · · Score: 2, Funny

    I had no idea Rick Ross went after the CoS when not rapping.

    --
    Photos.
  52. Re:Scientology as a force for good? by MightyMartian · · Score: 2, Insightful

    They're recognized as a religion by the IRS, so they couldn't use charitable tax breaks, because they get the best tax break there is.

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  53. Re:If he was paid $50, he wasn't a "slave" by Chris+Burke · · Score: 4, Funny

    Do you have a pop psychology book and a secret black box with some electrodes I could tape to my skin?

    I'm normally not supposed to answer questions like this until you pay the initial $5000 fee, but the answers respectively are "no, psychology is a mole-men conspiracy" and "yes, but the electrodes don't go on your skin, and you need lube not tape".

    --

    The enemies of Democracy are
  54. Re:Wage and Hour? by Scrameustache · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Really? It took Wage and Hour to bring down these guys?

    WTF?

    Al Capone got caught over taxes.

    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

  55. Cross - Crusade, ergo... "Muslim" crusades? by zooblethorpe · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The etymology of the word "crusade" arises from the word "cross", so on that basis alone I don't know if the term "Muslim crusade" makes much sense. Perhaps there's a different term you'd like to use?

    (NB: Some reference material for those so inclined -- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islam#History)

    Cheers,

    --
    "What in the name of Fats Waller is that?"
    "A four-foot prune."
  56. Re:Fighting Cults: Rick Ross by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Oh and don't go to the Cult Awareness Network. It was bought by Scientology after they and Landmark Education sued them into bankruptcy and bought their name and records of people seeking to leave a cult, including Scientology.

    I'm not going to post a source. Anyone who rose an eyebrow at the headline, you failed.

  57. Re:German Documentary on Gold Base by JumperCable · · Score: 5, Informative

    Its not like no-one knew about Scientology work camps - some german documentary team went out to go visit it and got stopped by a bunch of armed men (this was in the early 90's) - wish I could remember the title.

    Missing in Happy Valley
     

    http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=2742505831051424517

  58. Re:Fighting Cults: Rick Ross by Hucko · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Thank you Mr Coward, we'll be in contact should we have further questions.

    --
    Semi-automatic amateur armchair Australian philosopher; conjecture ready at any moment...
  59. Re:serious question: Isnt this a "Monastary"? by JumperCable · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Monasteries typically don't have:
    * Sniper nests
    * Double bladed razor fences
    * Motion sensors facing inside
    * Armed security guard preventing people from leaving
    * A full arsenal of guns
    * People are allowed to leave
    * Phone calls & mail are not monitored & prefiltered
    * Phone calls from concerned relatives are not coached
    * People inside are not punished when someone leaves
    * Nunneries don't coerce females to have abortions to keep up productivity
    * Emergency calls to the police actually go to the police & not internal security
    * Don't make 'bad' monks clean septic tanks with their hands (no tools, JUST their hands).
    * Don't throw members into a shit pond for not behaving by their standards.
    * Get to see their family
    * Are not physically beat, kicked or strangled by their leader David Miscavige.
    * Are not asked by their leader David Miscavige to beat/attack other members who are not living up to the leader's standards.
    * Are permitted time for personal hygiene when being punished for information leaks.
    * Do not go into lock down when information leaks