eBay vs. Craigslist Courtroom Fisticuffs Start Today
davekleiman writes with news that former eBay chief exec Meg Whitman took the stand today to kick off the battle that has been brewing between Craigslist and eBay. The waters are further clouded by Whitman's upcoming bid for governor of California. "eBay wants to shed light on the 'coercive plan' that it has said Newmark hatched with Craigslist Chief Executive Jim Buckmaster to dilute eBay's ownership stake, ultimately stripping eBay of its seat on the Craigslist board. Craigslist has hit back that eBay used its board seat to glean information to launch its own classified site, Kijiji. Craigslist also claims that eBay used deceptive tactics to direct traffic away from its site."
It always struck me as a little weird that major competitors should have a seat on the board.
It would be like Microsoft having a board seat at Apple. Or Google at Microsoft. It just doesn't happen.
What made eBay and Craigslist different? Or think they were different?
OK, I use Ebay a lot, and Craigslist even more, and this is the first time I've ever heard of Kijiji.
Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kijiji) says it's been up since 2007 in the US.
Sounds like an epic failure to me. I wonder if it carries any Zune ads?
And the worms ate into his brain.
Craigslist is big in large markets, but in small markets, no one uses it. Kijiji rules the roost in small markets.
IE in my homedown, of about 100,000 people, there are less than 200 posts right now in craigslist ForSale section.
Kijiji has over 24,000.
It is because of the classic dillema that keeps users on Craigslist (despite it being a steamping pile of crap), and keeps people on eBay (despite them charging a fortune). People searching need a critical mass of people selling, and people selling need a critical mass of people searching. It is a self-renforcing monopoloy that is a tough nut to crack.
Craigslist has always been unpopular in small markets, that is where Kijiji got its foothold.
Craigslist was not selling ownership and ebay bought it from a former Craigslist Employee through a suspicious deal. After how ebay has made numerous decisions at the expense of their users it is hard to believe that they would complain when someone tries to correct something they should not have done in the first place.
This sounds like dirty pool all the way around.
1). Decided to Create competing site
2). Buy shares from a shareholder to gain a seat on the board
3). (possibly) use information gleaned from meetings of the board towards own good
4). (possibly) use seat on board to negatively influence decisions
As others have mentioned there is certainly a conflict of interest here and while Ebay has every right to own shares, sitting on the board is just unethical and its surprising that the other shareholders would stand for it....
Antitrust concerns.
The World Wide Web is dying. Soon, we shall have only the Internet.
WTF is a "Kijiji"?!? It looks like a name attempt at a logo by someone with an obsession with dotted letters.
"Ow, man! You kicked me right in the kijiji!"
I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
NASCAR would be cooler if half the cars went one direction, half in the opposite direction. Geeks would love it because it resembles the LHC. Oooh! Look at those particles!
....and yet its easier to get screwed on eBay!!