Slashdot Mirror


Real-World Synthehol In Development

Ada_Rules writes "Researchers at the Imperial College London have announced development of an alcohol substitute that has many of the same properties as the Synthehol from the series Star Trek, in that one will get a buzz from it but will not end up with a hangover. In addition you will have the option of getting immediately sober if you so desire it. Let's hope this is not the typical vaporware. It is not that I really want a drink of Synthehol, but with its release I assume Romulan Ale won't be far behind."

273 comments

  1. Headache? by Colin+Smith · · Score: 0

    What junk are you drinking? Smirnoff?

    It isn't the alcohol which gives you a headache. It's the alcohol in combination with the rest of the crap in the beverage.

    Either buy decent quality and/or drink a glass of water for each drink and take two paracetamol before you go to bed.
     

    --
    Deleted
    1. Re:Headache? by White+Shade · · Score: 5, Informative

      I was always under the impression that taking paracetamol and other similar drugs along with alcohol was rather unhealthy to the liver and whatnot...

      Drinking lots of water is always good though!

      --
      ìì!
    2. Re:Headache? by maxume · · Score: 3, Informative

      Mixing acetaminophen with alcohol is terrible advice.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    3. Re:Headache? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is also the metabolites of ethyl alcohol (such as methyl "wood" alcohol) which cause the hangover.

    4. Re:Headache? by Lord+Byron+II · · Score: 1

      and take two paracetamol before you go to bed.

      That's two Tylenol to us Yankees.

    5. Re:Headache? by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1, Funny

      Drinking lots of water is always good though!

      Great. You'd better just stick to the water then.

       

      --
      Deleted
    6. Re:Headache? by wizardforce · · Score: 4, Informative

      You are correct. Paracetamol which is better known as Tylenol, metabolises into N-acetyl-p-benzoquinoneimine which is what actually damages the Liver.

      --
      Sigs are too short to say anything truly profound so read the above post instead.
    7. Re:Headache? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      This is the stupidest post I've ever read on /. That's saying something.

    8. Re:Headache? by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1

      Mixing acetaminophen with alcohol is terrible advice.

      It does however work quite the thing after drinking a cheap red for example.

       

      --
      Deleted
    9. Re:Headache? by HornWumpus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Ethanol does not metabolize into methanol.

      Further Smirnoff is perfectly fine Vodka.

      Anybody who spends more then about $US12 on a 750 of Vodka is just a moron who watches too much TV and believes what he sees on commercials.

      Save your money for booze where quality is harder to achieve. Vodka is just pure Ethanol and water.

      Some of the most toxic components of booze are leached out of the char in the barrels. If you must get drunk do it on clear booze for lesser hangovers.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    10. Re:Headache? by Abcd1234 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Uh, no. Put down the drink, it seems to have damaged your brain.

      The primary cause of most hangover symptoms is very simple: Dehydration. The rest are caused by the presence of metabolic by-products of alcohol, which cause, among other things, a decline in available glucose for use by the brain, inhibition of liver function, and vitamin B12 deficiency.

      For more information, wikipedia is your friend.

    11. Re:Headache? by Forge · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Never underestimate the value of a tall glass of Dihydrogen Monoxide. What bugs me though is the original stories implication the Romulan Ale dose not yet exist.

      On the contrary, I was able to buy Romulan Ale AND Klingon Blood wine at the Star Trek Museum.

      Of course this facility also hosts a Bar called "Quark's at which you are encouraged to drink a "Warp core breach", so some of these beverages may not be exactly as advertised.

      --
      --= Isn't it surprising how badly I spell ?
    12. Re:Headache? by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1

      Further Smirnoff is perfectly fine Vodka.

      Smirnoff is paint remover. Try Samson instead. It's not in fact very expensive.

      Vodka is just pure Ethanol and water.

      Clearly you know your vodkas.

       

      --
      Deleted
    13. Re:Headache? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Try Hertikamp (sp?) it's ten bucks/750ml and recommended by Russians.

      I generally find that people who 'know their vodkas' are idiots who think that advertising and spending a lot makes a product better.

      I bet you can't tell Smirnoff from your favorite vodka double blind.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    14. Re:Headache? by peragrin · · Score: 1

      after a night of heavy drinking, a tall glass of dihydrogen monoxide, along with a bottle of gatorade. means I haven't had a hangover in years. That means I can drink a whole bottle of rum, and then shots of tequila, and wake up happier than most people.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    15. Re:Headache? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I live in Ontario - if you can get 750 of Vodka for less than $12 US, you're making it in your bathtub. I think $24-$30 is about typical on the low end.

    16. Re:Headache? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Drinking lots of water is always good though!

      But drinking too much water is also deadly.

    17. Re:Headache? by 7-Vodka · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Actually, other major components of your hangover include:

      1. dehydration
      2. Capillaries in your skull that dilate and expand and put your brain under pressure due to..
      3. acetaldehyde, a metabolite of ethanol
      4. Loss of vitamins and other important materials which get excreted
      5. Liver stress and alcohol poisoning itself

      For most of these it doesn't matter what quality vodka you drink.

      --

      Liberty.

    18. Re:Headache? by causality · · Score: 4, Interesting

      What junk are you drinking? Smirnoff?

      It isn't the alcohol which gives you a headache. It's the alcohol in combination with the rest of the crap in the beverage.

      Either buy decent quality and/or drink a glass of water for each drink and take two paracetamol before you go to bed.

      There seems to be reason to believe that the hangover is caued by acetaldehyde. Though, I have noticed that some drinks are worse than others. For example, I think red wine has very small amounts of alcohols other than ethanol, alcohols which are a bit more toxic. It's probably also why I seem to get much more subjectively drunk from red wine than an equivalent amount of most liquors. Beer has a similar effect with me, and I assume that's because of the hops. Hops alone are sedating, and in fact hops tea (non-fermented, non-alcoholic) can be used as a natural sleep aid or a way to relax.

      From that Wiki article:

      Most people of East Asian descent have a mutation in their alcohol dehydrogenase gene that makes this enzyme unusually effective at converting ethanol to acetaldehyde, and about half of such people also have a form of acetaldehyde dehydrogenase that is less effective at converting acetaldehyde to acetic acid.[16] This combination causes them to suffer from alcohol flush reaction, in which acetaldehyde accumulates after drinking, leading to immediate and severe hangover symptoms. These people are therefore less likely to become alcoholics.[17][18]

      The drug disulfiram (Antabuse) prevents the oxidation of acetaldehyde to acetic acid, and it has the same unpleasant effect on drinkers. Antabuse is used as a deterrent for alcoholics who wish to stay sober.

      --
      It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
    19. Re:Headache? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      "Warp core breach" - A 50/50 shot of vodka and castor oil.

      Served at an event with 1,500+ people and about 10 porta potties.

    20. Re:Headache? by adamchou · · Score: 3, Informative

      and yet the article in wikipedia clearly says...

      "Hypoglycemia, dehydration, acetaldehyde intoxication, and vitamin B12 deficiency are all theorized causes of hangover symptoms".

      so how can you authoritatively assert what causes a hangover when the scientists, at least according to that article, aren't even sure?

    21. Re:Headache? by Colin+Smith · · Score: 4, Informative

      Paracetamol which is better known as Tylenol

      Paracetamol is not better known as Tylenol, only a tiny proportion of the world population know paracetamol as Tylenol.

      And the GP is not correct.

      along with alcohol was rather unhealthy to the liver

      Paracetamol is metabolized whether there is alcohol involved or not; Paracetamol is unhealthy for the liver regardless.

         

      --
      Deleted
    22. Re:Headache? by Abcd1234 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So I suppose, then, that you have a citation or two that demonstrates that alcohol plays on role, whatsoever, in the development of a hangover? I know I've never come across such a thing, which seems to suggest such a theory is *highly* unlikely, but hey, I could certainly be wrong.

    23. Re:Headache? by adamchou · · Score: 1

      i don't need to provide a citation to anything. you're the one that cited wikipedia and misrepresented what it said.

    24. Re:Headache? by earnest+murderer · · Score: 1

      Ibuprofen is metabolized in the kidneys and gets you the same result.

      --
      Platform advocacy is like choosing a favorite severely developmentally disabled child.
    25. Re:Headache? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This isn't the world, it's slashdot.

    26. Re:Headache? by JWeinraub · · Score: 1

      yes drinking water after each drink is good, i also might add drinking a litre before bed to be a good option as well. and if your stomach can tolerate it, taking two ASA tablets wouldn't be a bad idea either.

    27. Re:Headache? by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      No, I found the perfect solution. Tested an proven many, manyy times by me and friends of mine:

      Eat a really nice filet steak *before* going out! Or something similar. The redder, the better! (Less destroyed molecules.)

      I never have hangovers anymore. I can’t remember the last time I had one. Even if I drink like a hole.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    28. Re:Headache? by zippthorne · · Score: 2, Informative

      All American vodkas are equivalently tasteless due to stringent industry regulations on filtering for products bearing the label of vodka. American vodkas are, in fact, pretty much pure ethanol and water.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    29. Re:Headache? by wizardforce · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Paracetamol is not better known as Tylenol, only a tiny proportion of the world population know paracetamol as Tylenol.

      Nonsense. Slashdot is a US centric site and here the brand name is Tylenol.

      Paracetamol is metabolized whether there is alcohol involved or not; Paracetamol is unhealthy for the liver regardless.

      both of them are bad for the liver. The combination of the two is worse than either of them by themselves. The maximum dose of Tylenol is cut in half if it is taken with a reasonable amount of Alcohol. SO the statement that taking Tylenol and Alcohol together is bad for your Liver is still true.

      --
      Sigs are too short to say anything truly profound so read the above post instead.
    30. Re:Headache? by Random5 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Your thinking this is a US centric site does not make it a US centric site. This is the Internet - people from everywhere read (and submit) articles from everywhere

      I still don't get why you Americans insist on naming things after the most popular brand name when they already have proper names either, to the rest of the world it's like calling all card Fords or all computers IBMs.

    31. Re:Headache? by Sir_Lewk · · Score: 3, Informative

      Your thinking this is a US centric site does not make it a US centric site.

      You are correct. This however does make slashdot US centric.

      From the slashdot FAQ: Slashdot is U.S.-centric.

      --
      "linux is just DOS with a UNIX like syntax" -- Galactic Dominator (944134)
    32. Re:Headache? by Random5 · · Score: 1

      And you're obviously not a scientist - gravity is also a theory. Also you seem to think wikipedia is the be all and end all of knowledge when in fact it usually ends up stating conservative theories like this because everyone and their dog can edit the article and they have to compromise to avoid an edit war. You've also missed the point, which was the poster who said alcohol played no role in a hangover - despite the myriad varieties of alcohol all managing to cause one with the common ingredients being ethanol and water.

    33. Re:Headache? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tall glass wtf? Just drink from the fucking tap.

    34. Re:Headache? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Is your liver carry-on luggage?

    35. Re:Headache? by 19thNervousBreakdown · · Score: 5, Insightful

      As someone who's drank practically every type of ethanol under the sun, from Busch beer to Johnny Walker Blue to fortified "wine" to home-brewed mead to gluten-free beer to Cristal to Everclear, in every combination imaginable, getting blackout drunk on nothing but neat Jim Beams all night or Guinness or a different drink every time, who's tried every hangover cure, multivitamins, aspirin, Vicodin, hair of the dog, bacon and eggs, a gallon of water before bed, drinking a large glass of water between every alcoholic beverage, you name it, I can say with the utmost confidence that the "impurities" have fuck-all effect on your hangover.

      Try evaporating all the alcohol out of the worst possible plastic-bottle booze, and drink the remains all the way down. You won't feel a thing. Now go raise your BAC to 0.25% with 100% pure lab-grade ethanol, drink a bottle of water between every serving, take a four Tylenol before bed, and tell me how you feel in the morning.

      You get hung over because you drank poison. The perfect hangover cure is morphine. Thread over.

      --
      <xml><I><am><so><damn>Web 2.0</damn></so></am></I></xml>
    36. Re:Headache? by wizardforce · · Score: 3, Funny

      The FAQ seems to disagree with you.

      Slashdot seems to be very U.S.-centric. Do you have any plans to be more international in your scope?

      Slashdot is U.S.-centric. We readily admit this, and really don't see it as a problem. Slashdot is run by Americans, after all, and the vast majority of our readership is in the U.S. We're certainly not opposed to doing more international stories, but we don't have any formal plans for making that happen. All we can really tell you is that if you're outside the U.S. and you have news, submit it, and if it looks interesting, we'll post it.

       

      I still don't get why you Americans insist on naming things after the most popular brand name when they already have proper names either, to the rest of the world it's like calling all card Fords or all computers IBMs.

      Because Paracetamol isn't just paracetamol; it's also called acetaminophen and on occasion Panadol. Technically the proper chemical name for it is N-acetyl-p-aminophenol so why not use any of those names instead? The reason being that most people in the US know what Tylenol is. The rest of the English speaking world could call it whatever it wants but the majority of Slashdot's readership consists of Americans.

      --
      Sigs are too short to say anything truly profound so read the above post instead.
    37. Re:Headache? by Random5 · · Score: 0, Troll

      52% isn't really an overwhelming majority and likely won't be for much longer as overseas readership continues to grow.

    38. Re:Headache? by adamchou · · Score: 5, Funny

      And bbviously, you're not a good reader. The dude authoritatively said that dehydration is the primary cause of a hangover, based on a wiki link that he cited. However, the wiki link doesn't say that and is in fact inconclusive about what the primary cause of hangover is, let alone what causes a hangover.

      besides that, the original poster's point may actually be correct too. There are other things in different types of alcohol that cause hangovers to be worse/better than others, which the dude citing wikipedia is trying to discredit. however, the wikipedia article even specifically mentions white wine causing less of a hang over than red wine because of content other than alcohol (and subsequently ethanol dehydration).

      finally, that dude citing wikipedia decided to go off and be a pompous fucking ass by saying the original poster had brain damage. so i felt the need to put him in his place instead of misrepresenting what the wikipedia article said, which he originally cited, not me.

    39. Re:Headache? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And intentionally so. If you want flavor, drink something that isn't vodka. Vodka is for mixing into things to make them alcoholic.

    40. Re:Headache? by wizardforce · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I'm curious where you got the 52% figure from; or was that something you've pulled out of thin air? Perhaps we should have a poll.

      --
      Sigs are too short to say anything truly profound so read the above post instead.
    41. Re:Headache? by endymion.nz · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I feel like punching people when they call their SUV's Jeeps.

      --
      mediocrity rules, man
    42. Re:Headache? by Random5 · · Score: 1, Troll

      Hint: It was from a poll. Admittedly the pizza poll but it's practically the same thing as a location poll. 52% for north america, which would include canada. http://slashdot.org/pollBooth.pl?qid=1900&aid=-1 The poll may be slightly slanted to Europe for everyone who went to italy and had expensive pizza but since there are gourmet pizzas on every continent most people will have voted where they live.

    43. Re:Headache? by Vintermann · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The definition of vodka is water + alcohol. Anything more makes it less of a vodka. The only thing sillier than a wine snob is a vodka snob.

      --
      xkcd is not in the sudoers file. This incident will be reported.
    44. Re:Headache? by FST777 · · Score: 1

      That bet is on. Name a time and a place. If distance is a problem, we'll organize something with an alternative control group or whatnot.

      Anyone who tells you that wodka is just ethanol and water is talking nonsense and taste definitely does matter with some (if not most) brands. Hell, you'll probably have to blindfold me since I'm probably able to see the difference by the slight variation in color and I'm not even a wodka-fan (my last wodka was years ago).

      Oh, I am talking "the real deal" here, not that American filtered crap. Do you do the same thing with whisk(e)y and cognac?

      --
      Free beer is never free as in speech. Free speech is always free as in beer.
    45. Re:Headache? by Sir_Lewk · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      What I would find really interesting is a poll that showed how many people that visited slashdot actually participated in the polls.

      Oh wait...

      --
      "linux is just DOS with a UNIX like syntax" -- Galactic Dominator (944134)
    46. Re:Headache? by zill · · Score: 1, Redundant

      Whoosh!

    47. Re:Headache? by Alphathon · · Score: 1

      Anyone else thinking about a certain Wii related competition?

    48. Re:Headache? by Froboz23 · · Score: 1

      Three percent of slashdot readers said Antarctica has the best pizza. It therefore stands to reason that three percent of slashdot readers are Antarctican.

      --
      Take off every Sig. For great justice.
    49. Re:Headache? by Bigjeff5 · · Score: 1

      You're close, it isn't the alchohol, it's the impurities.

      Generally, really high quality alchohol (wine in particular, but any aged liquor will too) has some bitchin impurities that give it such wonderful flavors and aromas. The sole purpose of the aging process in any fine liquor is to add impurities from the barrels they are aged in - the aging serves no other purpose and aging in anything that does not impart impurities does nothing at all to the alchohol. Stuff like good scotch, bourbon, rum, gin, brandy, all wines, spiced drinks like ciders and mulled wines, etc. will all give you nasty hangovers if you over do it. The longer it is aged the higher the impurity, and the higher the impurity the better the quality. In other words, Quality = Hangover.

      Because of this, low-impurity alchohols like vodka or beer (different kind of impurities there), and cheap kill-you-if-you-over-drink stuff like grain alchohol will rarely give you a hangover.

      If you finish off the night with a glass of milk or some ice cream the enzymes therein will take care of a lot of the impurities, taking the edge off the hangover. Egg-nog is great for this if you want to keep getting drunk ;).

      --
      Security is mostly a superstition... Avoiding danger is no safer in the long run than outright exposure. - Helen Keller
    50. Re:Headache? by jez9999 · · Score: 1, Informative

      Drinking lots of water is always good though!

      That's what Leah Betts thought.

    51. Re:Headache? by Hatta · · Score: 1, Informative

      Paracetamol is metabolized whether there is alcohol involved or not; Paracetamol is unhealthy for the liver regardless.

      Acetaminophen (*ahem*) is metabolized through two pathways. One uses reducing equivalents (-SH groups) and the other not. The first produces a non-toxic metabolite, the other does not. (check out this diagram) As long as you have reducing equivalents, you're fairly safe. Metabolizing alcohol uses up those reducing equivalents, so it makes acetaminophen toxicity a lot worse.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    52. Re:Headache? by Merls+the+Sneaky · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Dihydrogen Monoxide - two hydrogen one oxygen. H2O.

    53. Re:Headache? by palegray.net · · Score: 1

      It's rather watered down, I'd imagine.

    54. Re:Headache? by SteveFoerster · · Score: 1

      Beer has a similar effect with me, and I assume that's because of the hops. Hops alone are sedating, and in fact hops tea (non-fermented, non-alcoholic) can be used as a natural sleep aid or a way to relax.

      Yup, if I drink a lot of beer I fall asleep too. Must be the hops.

      -=Steve=-

      --
      Space game using normal deck of cards: http://BattleCards.org
    55. Re:Headache? by Cillian · · Score: 1

      In the UK you can get that for £6, which probably works out to about $10ish

      --
      -- All your booze are belong to us.
    56. Re:Headache? by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      The U.S. centric entry is nearly 6 years old. Slashdot was quite different back then.

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    57. Re:Headache? by Bigjeff5 · · Score: 1

      Is there something wrong with your "V" key? Cause that ain't how you spell vodka. You may pronounce it that way... if you have a Russian accent.

      --
      Security is mostly a superstition... Avoiding danger is no safer in the long run than outright exposure. - Helen Keller
    58. Re:Headache? by guyminuslife · · Score: 1

      I think you're full of shit.

      But I'll at least test this before I can definitively determine whether or not you actually are full of shit. I don't have anything to do tonight, or tomorrow, so what I'm going to do is drive down to the liquor store and buy myself a bottle of Everclear. I am going to take that Everclear and mix it with water (actually, probably lemonade), and I am going to get piss-off drunk. I'll finish off the night with a bigass glass of milk.

      Tomorrow, I will come onto this board, and depending on how I feel, I'm going to tell you whether or not you're full of shit.

      --
      I don't believe in time. It's a grand conspiracy designed to sell watches.
    59. Re:Headache? by johanatan · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Actually, Acetaminophen is what I normally call it (and would perhaps be a more neutral word than either Paracetamol or Tylenol).

    60. Re:Headache? by Rakshasa+Taisab · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You get hung over because you drank poison. The perfect hangover cure is morphine. Thread over.

      Try this, and then tell me morphine is the only cure for a hangover. Seriously, drinking that stuff before you start drinking leaves you without any hangover at all the next day.

      --
      - These characters were randomly selected.
    61. Re:Headache? by JRR006 · · Score: 1

      Yes, it's a specifically American phenomenon, because they're all stupid. I've never heard a Brit call their vacuum a Hoover, or refer to 'hoovering' or an announcement on the Tannoy. Not that I'm assuming you're British. Just providing examples. And maybe your arrogance is well-deserved in that you're more vigilant than most and always say 'vacuum flask' instead of 'thermos'.

    62. Re:Headache? by crescente · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually you wouldn't want to drink a bottle of lab ethanol--it's probably denatured, i.e. made unfit to drink by addition of nasty stuff like methanol. This is because most places exempt denatured alcohol from the extra taxes on drinkable alcohol.

    63. Re:Headache? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for spoiling the FUCKING JOKE!

    64. Re:Headache? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nonsense. Slashdot is a US centric site and here the brand name is Tylenol.

      Not nonsense. That doesn't change the fact that "Paracetamol is not better known as Tylenol, only a tiny proportion of the world population know paracetamol as Tylenol."

    65. Re:Headache? by Random5 · · Score: 1

      That would be the fairly constant 2-3% donkey vote, look it up, it's fairly consistent across all types of election.

    66. Re:Headache? by Random5 · · Score: 1

      a) Americans do it regularly, other countries hardly at all b) I'm not British
      c) I always say vacuum for vacuum cleaner
      d) Yes I say 'Thermos' but Thermos is closely associated with the function of the device (as i'm sure you're aware, knowing what a thermometer is) and also a shortening of 'thermal flask' which also allows the word to be used for flasks which perform the same function but with solid insulation rather than a vacuum.

    67. Re:Headache? by the+biologist · · Score: 1

      A minor byproduct of alcohol metabolism is formaldehyde. There is some methanol produced in reactions to make ethanol. The methanol is converted to formaldehyde by an enzyme called alcohol dehydrogenase. Formaldehyde exposure causes bad headaches and other symptoms normally associated with a hangover. (reference, pay attention to the symptoms not caused by external exposure.)

      Treatment for formaldehyde exposure (or hangover)? Consume lots of water to help flush the toxin out of your system... or consume lots and lots of ethanol to swamp out your alcohol dehydrogenase, so it won't have the opportunity to metabolise the methanol before it gets flushed out of your system.

      The profuse vomiting often involved in a hangover your body convulsively shedding the destroyed surface of your stomach. This is caused directly by high concentrations of alcohol killing the cells of your stomach lining.

    68. Re:Headache? by Froboz23 · · Score: 1
      The slashdot poll disclaimer should also be taken into consideration:

      This whole thing is wildly inaccurate. Rounding errors, ballot stuffers, dynamic IPs, firewalls. If you're using these numbers to do anything important, you're insane.

      --
      Take off every Sig. For great justice.
    69. Re:Headache? by kklein · · Score: 1

      What junk are you drinking? Smirnoff?

      Ahem:

      A Humble Old Label Ices Its Rivals (January 26, 2005)

      Any vodka is basically just pure grain alcohol mixed with mineral water. It's virtually impossible to get a hangover from it, aside from just drinking a lot of it.

      "Brown goods" like whiskey are a lot more likely to leave you in a poorly state, and lower-quality ones have more junk in them that will mess you up. It is therefore true that drinking cheap crap will result in more hangovers, but it really doesn't apply to vodka, and anyway, Smirnoff is not even a bad vodka.

    70. Re:Headache? by Random5 · · Score: 1

      I'd hardly call posting on slashdot important :P

    71. Re:Headache? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for pointing out that you "put him in his place". I, for one, didn't notice.

    72. Re:Headache? by reboot246 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I always buy my Dihydrogen Monoxide dehydrated. Just add one quart of water to one quart of Dihydrogen Monoxide and stir until mixed.

      Ahhhh, refreshing!

    73. Re:Headache? by Kjella · · Score: 1

      Actually you wouldn't want to drink a bottle of lab ethanol--it's probably denatured, i.e. made unfit to drink by addition of nasty stuff like methanol. This is because most places exempt denatured alcohol from the extra taxes on drinkable alcohol.

      Not likely. Most lab ethanol is made "undrinkable" by adding crappy tasting shit or laxatives, very rarely methanol as that'll actually blind/kill you. I know because we had to look up WTF was in it before we drank it, it tasted like crap but got you drunk and otherwise no ill effects. And there's two kinds, the "regular" kind which is corrupted like that and the 96% pure ethanol variety, which contains nothing of the sorts though only doctors get the latter in small quanities. It was never much but enough to get us started with perfect taste, it contained nothing but alcohol and could be mixed with anything.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    74. Re:Headache? by Khyber · · Score: 1

      No, it's the alcohol, which fucks your internal pH, along with the other shit in the drink.

      The trick is to drink enough water to keep your pH from going off - this is how you die from alcohol poisoning.

      Paracetamol EXACERBATES the problem by causing irregular pH fluctuations in your blood.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    75. Re:Headache? by dotgain · · Score: 1

      What a worthwhile argument to be having!

    76. Re:Headache? by trapnest · · Score: 1

      He's trying to be a pretentious douche by misspelling the Polish word "Wódka*".

      I suppose I shouldn't say "trying" because he is doing just fine at that.

      (Let's hope this unicode works, preview says it should.)

    77. Re:Headache? by sjames · · Score: 1

      If your stomach is up to it, regular old aspirin is a much better choice. If your stomach can't handle the aspirin you probably shouldn't be filling it with alcohol either.

    78. Re:Headache? by agrif · · Score: 1

      (In generally agreement with the parent, I'll elaborate...)

      Generally speaking, what causes a hangover is the ugly toxins in most drinks that come along with the alcohol. Unfortunately, these toxins also come from what gives your drink it's flavor. Unless you're drinking vodka, of course, which is basically diluted ethanol.

      Drinking water will flush it out of your system a bit faster, but there are also some types of food that help it along, like, say, eggs. So, get in the holiday spirit and make a batch of eggnog! (sans alcohol, of course)

    79. Re:Headache? by sjames · · Score: 1

      Ethyl alcohol does not metabolize to methyl alcohol. However, most distilled spirits have some tiny amount of methanol and higher alcohols. Poorly distilled spirits may contain acutely toxic amounts, for example if the distiller doesn't discard the heads. The higher alcohols are from the tails. They also can contribute significantly to a hangover.

      The hangover part of the methanol BTW is that it metabolizes to formaldehyde. Since ethanol competitively inhibits methanol metabolism, if you keep well hydrated, it will wash out before it can cause a problem.

    80. Re:Headache? by smithy242 · · Score: 1

      n-acetylcysteine plus vitamin b1 plus vitamin C, pre and post ethanol ingestion. I usually take 600 mg n-acetylcysteine for two drinks, 1000 mg vitamin C, and a generic B-complex vitamin, before and after. I wouldn't believe everything this guy has to say (fundamentalist in his own respect), but the point about acetaldehyde and antidote should be remembered. http://www.ceri.com/alcohol.htm

    81. Re:Headache? by Phroggy · · Score: 1

      I still don't get why you Americans insist on naming things after the most popular brand name when they already have proper names either, to the rest of the world it's like calling all card Fords or all computers IBMs.

      The generic name used in the US is acetaminophen; this is the first time I've ever heard of paracetamol. Strangely, though, the most common labeling used by generic brands is "non-aspirin", with "acetaminophen" in tiny print. That's obviously dumb.

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    82. Re:Headache? by msgyrd · · Score: 1

      But us beer snobs...we're legit.

    83. Re:Headache? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's like calling all card Fords

      What is this supposed to mean, besides that you're an idiot?

    84. Re:Headache? by Forge · · Score: 1

      That sounds more potent than this version

      --
      --= Isn't it surprising how badly I spell ?
    85. Re:Headache? by w0mprat · · Score: 1

      The point is to not load up the liver with a multi-part biochemical assault with various drugs and alcohol on top.

      Combinations of nasty chemicals are known to react in the liver and result in increased damage. Some compounds can tie up pathways that would be otherwise used to rapidly break down something harmful.

      OFTOMH, for example BHT, a widely used food and drink additive (E321), is metabolised by the liver and blocks up the livers capacity to process alcohol and recreational drugs. A big dose of BHT could mean you get dangerously drunk off a small amount of alcohol.

      --
      After logging in slashdot still does not take you back to the page you were on. It's been that way for 20 years.
    86. Re:Headache? by w0mprat · · Score: 1

      "Hypoglycemia, dehydration, acetaldehyde intoxication, and vitamin B12 deficiency are all theorized causes of hangover symptoms".

      so how can you authoritatively assert what causes a hangover when the scientists, at least according to that article, aren't even sure?

      Presumably because they don't get invited to the right kind of parties at university to gather data.

      There is no substitute for field work.

      --
      After logging in slashdot still does not take you back to the page you were on. It's been that way for 20 years.
    87. Re:Headache? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're doing it WRONG. Don't mix the Everclear with lemonade. Lemonade is sugary, and the sugar will SLAY you. In fact, try both. Get a syringe or some similarly accurate measurement device. Eat your meals at the same time two different days at least a few days apart, and drink the same amounts of Everclear at the same times both nights, mixing it with water one night and with lemonade another. Assuming you're getting very drunk, and not a little drunk, the lemonade hangover will slay you, and the water hangover will be a short period of slight mental fuzziness, if anything.

      In my experience, anyway. I've tried a LOT, and liquor (usually straight 151, or standard 80-proof rum when cash is low) produces no hangover whatsoever, while beer/mixed drinks/wine produce KILLER hangovers. I have to get near blackout-drunk for straight liquor to cause me any problem, as long as I stay adequately hydrated. With anything sugary, hydration doesn't make a damn bit of difference (it does once I wake up, but that's not prevention).

    88. Re:Headache? by Nirvelli · · Score: 3, Informative

      And the GP is not correct.

      along with alcohol was rather unhealthy to the liver

      Paracetamol is metabolized whether there is alcohol involved or not; Paracetamol is unhealthy for the liver regardless.

      Yes.
      Alcohol is unhealthy for the liver.
      Paracetamol is unhealthy for the liver.
      Alcohol + Paracetamol is rather unhealthy for the liver.

    89. Re:Headache? by UncleTogie · · Score: 1

      I feel like punching people when they call their SUV's Jeeps.

      That's OK. I get the same feeling when I hear soccer moms call it an SUV when you know good and well that less than 1% use the "S" part of it. Almost EVERY vehicle has utility, so the "U" is obvious. What's left? A vehicle... but Marketing wouldn't stand for that, would they? Many "SUV" drivers are the same people that'd buy Brawndo because "it has electrolytes!"

      --
      Don't tell me to get a life. I'm a gamer; I have LOTS of lives!
    90. Re:Headache? by lindseyp · · Score: 1

      Drinking a litre before going to bed is a great way to ensure you have to get up in the middle of the night to go to the bathroom, or wake up in a puddle of piss in the morning.

      --
      j'ai découvert une démonstration vraiment admirable (de ce théorème général) que cette si
    91. Re:Headache? by lindseyp · · Score: 1

      idiot. You can drink pure ethanol and you'll still get a hangover if you drink enough of it. "all the other crap"... what other crap do you think is in vodka, beer, wine etc. that you don't get in other foods or fruit juices? I never heard of anyone getting a hangover from a non-alcoholic food or beverage.

      Also, taking paracetamol (2, for chrissakes!) whilst drunk is a certain recipe for liver trouble.

      If that's how you've been avoiding hangovers up to now, I'd get checked up ASAP... there's a strong chance you already have irreversible damage.

      --
      j'ai découvert une démonstration vraiment admirable (de ce théorème général) que cette si
    92. Re:Headache? by Eivind+Eklund · · Score: 2, Informative

      I was always under the impression that taking paracetamol and other similar drugs along with alcohol was rather unhealthy to the liver and whatnot...

      If you're at a level where you're hung over, Paracetamol will damage your liver.[1] However, the liver regenerate quickly, so if you only do this occasionally and have nothing that blocks liver regeneration generally, this should be relatively safe. My wife is an MD; her toxicology teacher recommended use of Paracetamol against hangover rather than Ibuprofen or other NSAIDs, as the increased risk of stomach damage from the alcohol/NSAID combination was more of a problem than the liver damage.

      Eivind.

      [1] Alcohol is converted to acetaldehyde as a part of the breakdown process; cystein is consumed by the process that handle acetaldehyde safely (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cysteine) and the poisonous effects of breakdown products of acetaldehyde when you lack cystein seems to be a large part of being "properly hung over". Paracetamol poisoning comes from lack of glutathione in the handling of paracetamol breakdown products; glutathione is made from cystein in the body, so having a hangover (lacking cystein) implies that paracetamol will rapidly deplete glutathione and the breakdown will be poisonous.

      --
      Doubting the existence of evolution is like doubting the existence of China: It just shows that you're uninformed.
    93. Re:Headache? by sFurbo · · Score: 1

      Actually, paracetamol seems to be less toxic if taken while drunk, but more so if taken the day after. The enzyme (a cytochrome P450 oxidase) that transforms paracetamol to the toxic substance (N-acetyl-iminoquinone) can also oxidize alcohol. If there is alcohol present, the transformation of paracetamol goes slower and/or by other routes, so taking it while drunk leads to lower blood concentrations of N-acetyl-iminoquinone*. However, when there is alcohol present, the liver produces more cytochrome P450 to detoxify it quicker, and that surplus is still there the day after, so the degradation of paracetamol to N-acetyliminioquinone is faster, making paracetamol more toxic. So don't use it to combat hangovers.

      *This have been investigated in a double-blind experiment, where people either got a alcohol-contaning og non-alcoholcontaining intravenous drop (IIRC). When I first read this article, I was rather amused about the idea that people should be unable to tell the difference, but placebo intoxication seems to be rather powerful.

    94. Re:Headache? by sFurbo · · Score: 1

      There seems to be a better explanation than the one I gave for the heightened toxicity of paracetamol while having a hangover. However, that does not explain the data for people being drunk...

    95. Re:Headache? by FST777 · · Score: 1

      Actually, wodka is the Dutch spelling. Sorry for that.

      --
      Free beer is never free as in speech. Free speech is always free as in beer.
    96. Re:Headache? by sFurbo · · Score: 1

      Ahh, thank you for the explanation for the heightened toxicity while being hung over, I think I have heard it before, but have forgotten it (and thus made a rather erroneous post), and for the toxicological angle on which NSAID to take against hangovers.

      However, your explanation does not explain the lower level of p-acetyl-benzoquinone in the blood if paracetamol is taken while drunk.
      IANAToxicologist, so I might have missed something in the article, though, or it might just be a type I error.

    97. Re:Headache? by sFurbo · · Score: 1

      It seems to be closer to the polish spelling. But that will just lead us to a violent discussion of whether russian or polish vodka is better/truer/more original...

    98. Re:Headache? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the majority of Slashdot's readership consists of Americans.

      {{citation needed}}

      Seriously, did anyone ever check if this is actually true? Maybe it was once, but is it still?

    99. Re:Headache? by Sir_Lewk · · Score: 1

      I'm curious as to why this is modded troll. The Tylenol/paracetamol discussion aside, he is very correct. Mixing alcohol and Tylenol/paracetamol is extremely dangerous, particularly over an extended amount of time. Both alcohol and Tylenol/paracetamol by themselves are indeed bad for your liver, but the combination of the two, particularly in cases where painkillers are actually warranted (very heavy drinking scenarios, if you've just had a single drink you really shouldn't be worried about a hangover...) is very liable to destroy your liver. If you've ever seen someone die, waiting for a liver transplant, you'll have an understanding of what a terrible fate that is.

      As far as all of this Tylenol/paracetamol nonsense is concerned, all I have to say is that, as an American, I had no idea what paracetamol was until it was originally pointed out that it was "better known" as Tylenol. I think that the "-1 Troll" moderation is being used a bit too lightly around here right now.

      --
      "linux is just DOS with a UNIX like syntax" -- Galactic Dominator (944134)
    100. Re:Headache? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh yeah, what the fuck is a hoover, bitch?!

    101. Re:Headache? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But it's enough to invade your shit-hole country, bitch!

    102. Re:Headache? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All vacuum cleaners aren't Hoovers so why not call them Roosevelts?

    103. Re:Headache? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm Canadian and I voted for an Australian Pizza

    104. Re:Headache? by guyminuslife · · Score: 1

      GP is full of shit.

      Ow, my freaking head...I think I'm going to go lie down now.

      --
      I don't believe in time. It's a grand conspiracy designed to sell watches.
    105. Re:Headache? by nahdude812 · · Score: 1

      There's some sort of genetic predisposition to various types of hangover. My wife drinks a small glass of water and has no problems no matter how much she had the night before (her brother is the same way).

      Headaches are typically dehydration headaches, and what you suggest works well for me for that. But alcohol can irritate the GI tract in some people (such as me), and this can lead to nausea and vomiting, and these things can themselves produce a second kind of headache not cured by hydration. The only way I've found around this second set of symptoms is moderation.

    106. Re:Headache? by badkarmadayaccount · · Score: 1

      Are you stupid? APAP(paracetamol)+alcohol=poisoning.

      --
      I know tobacco is bad for you, so I smoke weed with crack.
    107. Re:Headache? by badkarmadayaccount · · Score: 1

      Then you didn't drink enough. Then again, so did I. Cheers!

      --
      I know tobacco is bad for you, so I smoke weed with crack.
    108. Re:Headache? by ewanm89 · · Score: 1

      Because Paracetamol isn't just paracetamol; it's also called acetaminophen and on occasion Panadol. Technically the proper chemical name for it is N-acetyl-p-aminophenol so why not use any of those names instead?

      Paracetamol is the Official International Non-Proprietary name as given by the World Health Association (as it does for all pharmaceuticals) and is therefore perfectly valid in official international use for a pharmaceutical standpoint. The International Union for Pure and Applied Chemistry name (the official name used in chemistry, and generated according to specific rules is N-(4-hydroxyphenyl)ethanamide and is considered the official chemical name for it.

      Anything with acet is the United States Adopted name and is not official in anyway on the international scale, and goes back to a naming system that chemists threw out years ago with international standardization and a chemist would only use it as a name for acetone now just because it's shorter than it's actual chemical name and doesn't include the eth carbon grouping that all other acet did it was confusing and so acet was thrown out in favour of true systematic naming.

    109. Re:Headache? by ewanm89 · · Score: 1

      Sorry "World Health Organisation" it should read. Maybe I should have used the acronyms.

    110. Re:Headache? by AthanasiusKircher · · Score: 1

      I certainly agree with you that anyone who claims that a $40 bottle of vodka is generally "better" than a $20 bottle is generally full of crap. Vodka is essentially supposed to be close to pure ethanol and pure water. Smirnoff and similarly priced vodkas get close enough to this ideal that expensive vodkas are not actually "better."

      That isn't to say that they aren't quite different in character. Potato vodkas, for example, are often quite different from grain-based vodkas. And the kind of water that is used can make a big difference in flavor.

      So, while I agree with you that Smirnoff is a perfectly fine vodka, I also think people can prefer some of the subtle variations of flavor offered by different brands. If you want to pay a premium of a couple hundred percent for that subtle flavor, that's your choice. You may not be getting any closer to the "ideal" vodka, but if you're drinking it straight, you can tell the difference with many brands. (If you're just mixing it, I agree that you're an idiot to throw expensive vodka in.)

    111. Re:Headache? by AthanasiusKircher · · Score: 1

      I generally find that people who 'know their vodkas' are idiots who think that advertising and spending a lot makes a product better.

      That's true of just about everything. Studies have shown that even wine judges in major competitions (who certainly are supposed to "know they wines") display enough variance as to make their collective ratings almost meaningless. And wines usually have much more variation than vodka. Most people who think they have "taste" in anything are like this, so it's not unique to vodka.

      I bet you can't tell Smirnoff from your favorite vodka double blind.

      Perhaps for some or even most. Not for me. My favorite vodka is fermented from potatos, rather than grain-based, and it tastes quite a bit different from Smirnoff. But I generally don't care enough to pay the premium for it. Vodkas can be remarkably different in taste due to variations in distillation and the type of water used. Yes, they're all very close to pure ethanol plus water, but the little bit of junk left in can sometimes make a big difference in flavor. I'm not saying that makes it worth paying ridiculous amounts of money for it -- Smirnoff is perfectly fine for most purposes -- but if someone wants to pay a premium for that subtle flavor that they may or may not actually taste, who am I to judge?

      That said, I did a little blind tasting a few years back after I first bought my favorite potato vodka. Three friends tried four vodkas blind. One of them considers himself a bit of a booze snob, one drinks quite a bit but has little "taste", and one has probably had less than a dozen drinks in his entire life. The four vodkas were a premium mainstream vodka, my premium potato vodka, Smirnoff, and a really cheap vodka (cheaper than Smirnoff). They all made their decisions privately before sharing them.

      All three caught the really cheap vodka and declared it awful (not as smooth as the others, a bit caustic and astringent). All three also declared the potato vodka to be one of the premium ones (probably for its distinctive flavor), though they couldn't agree on whether it actually tasted "better" -- it was just "different". As for the remaining two vodkas, my booze snob friend identified the Smirnoff correctly (and said it wasn't as good), my drinker friend with no "taste" liked the Smirnoff better, and my friend who doesn't drink expressed a mild preference for the premium, though he really didn't know.

      So, say what you will, but I think there is at least an argument to be made that some premium vodkas have distinctive flavors, even though they are all trying to be pure ethanol and water. Whether it's worth spending $25-40 on a bottle instead of $10-15... well, that's your choice. But that doesn't mean that there isn't a difference, at least among some.

    112. Re:Headache? by stonewallred · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Everclear and orange juice. never a hangover.

    113. Re:Headache? by Dahamma · · Score: 1

      People say the same thing about wines, coffees, cheeses, or anything else for which they haven't acquired a taste.

      If you can't tell the not-very-subtle difference between Smirnoff and a good potato vodka like Chopin, then by all means you should stick to the cheap stuff, but that doesn't mean that other people shouldn't enjoy what they like.

    114. Re:Headache? by jabelli · · Score: 1

      The stuff we used in the chem lab in college was 190 and 200 proof USP grade ethanol. It was tightly controlled and not worth going through the trouble of sneaking out of the lab to drink. If you really wanted Everclear, you could drive an hour South and pick some up in Pennsylvania.

    115. Re:Headache? by danbert8 · · Score: 1

      I buy BRAWNDO because it's like having sex with a tractor trailer in a parking lot!

      --
      Yes it's an anecdote! Were you expecting original research in a Slashdot comment?
    116. Re:Headache? by guyminuslife · · Score: 1

      I don't believe this either, so when I've got enough energy to endure another killer hangover, I'll test it empirically, also.

      --
      I don't believe in time. It's a grand conspiracy designed to sell watches.
    117. Re:Headache? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but the majority of Slashdot's readership consists of Americans.

      AMERICUHH!!! FUCK YEAH!

    118. Re:Headache? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is still incorrect to say Paracetamol is better know as Tylenol. What would be correct however, is to say Paracetamol is better know as Tylenol in the US. It also would have saved argument, because you can't really disagree with that.

  2. Instant by Entropy98 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    you will have the option of getting immediately sober if you so desire it
     
    Can I get drunk again later that night?

    1. Re:Instant by nametaken · · Score: 1

      Who cares, no more drunk driving or DUI's?! BRILLIANT!!!!

  3. Synthetic scotch, synthetic commanders by fotbr · · Score: 1

    We're (apparently) close to the first, time to start making some serious progress towards the second.

  4. Missing the point... by tyroneking · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Having the option of getting immediately sober is rather missing the point of drinking alcohol ... it is the assured descent into a carefree state with no possibility of reversal that is one of the last few pleasures left in life.
    Throwing the car keys onto the dining table, pulling a bottle of vodka from the freezer and taking a few shots ... the perfect end to a usually cold, wet and crappy day in the so-called western-civilisation.

    1. Re:Missing the point... by negRo_slim · · Score: 0, Troll

      Having the option of getting immediately sober is rather missing the point of drinking alcohol ... it is the assured descent into a carefree state with no possibility of reversal that is one of the last few pleasures left in life. Throwing the car keys onto the dining table, pulling a bottle of vodka from the freezer and taking a few shots ... the perfect end to a usually cold, wet and crappy day in the so-called western-civilisation.

      Spoken like a true alcoholic!

      --
      On the Oregon Cost born and raised, On the beach is where I spent most of my days
    2. Re:Missing the point... by wizardforce · · Score: 1

      If you don't want to be sober until later then you shouldn't take the antidote. Alcohol doesn't give you a choice in the matter, synthehol just might.

      --
      Sigs are too short to say anything truly profound so read the above post instead.
    3. Re:Missing the point... by Nethead · · Score: 2, Interesting

      No, he said a few shots, not the whole bottle. If you have the bottle already in the cooler, and not had just bought it, then you're not quite an alkie yet.

      --
      -- I have a private email server in my basement.
    4. Re:Missing the point... by girlintraining · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Throwing the car keys onto the dining table, pulling a bottle of vodka from the freezer and taking a few shots ... the perfect end to a usually cold, wet and crappy day in the so-called western-civilisation.

      "I asked many people why they drank so much but never received an explanation that I fully understood. It was the tales of their escapades while under the influence of drink that brought me nearest to comprehending their need for it. It seemed to give them a few hours of freedom from rules which, during the rest of their lives, they reluctantly obeyed. If this was true, then in the example of my life lay a cure for drunkenness... never to conform at all." ~ Quentin Crisp, The Naked Civil Servant

      --
      #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    5. Re:Missing the point... by tyroneking · · Score: 2, Informative

      You're the kind of guy that pisses on rugs :)

      Changed my mind ... anyone, and I mean anyone, who links to a ska punk band in their sig, is a freakin' god ...

      Oh, and here is my retort:
      http://artists.letssingit.com/bad-manners-lyrics-special-brew-sjbnxkj

    6. Re:Missing the point... by tyroneking · · Score: 1

      Seriously man - haven't you ever had a wife/girlfriend/etc. moan at you for being a bit drunk? Now, you can shrug your shoulders and smile sweetly at the Fait Accompli that life has sold her.
      In the future she can just slip you a reverse micky (and by which I don't mean some sort of sexual position). Instant disaster.

    7. Re:Missing the point... by tyroneking · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ... but we're not all writers or rock stars.

    8. Re:Missing the point... by plopez · · Score: 1

      Alcoholics go to meetings.

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    9. Re:Missing the point... by popo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Was that completely depressing for anyone else?

      --
      ------ The best brain training is now totally free : )
    10. Re:Missing the point... by hitmark · · Score: 1

      maybe not, but with the workforce surplus that this planet is experiencing, "cheap" entertainment is a must have unless the elite wants a big rebellion on their hands...

      --
      comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
    11. Re:Missing the point... by epine · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I'm waiting for the first published life reflection on the topic of wife-beater interruptus by a man whose blood-honey got wise to syntheholic Narcan. I'd dearly love to read an explanation by a man who experiences a sudden return to clarity mid swing.

      The mind reels at the possibilities. If synaloxone is designed to be easily absorbed through eye membranes (there's another criteria for the designer checklist), it will soon become the feature ingredient in Pepperpoison H. This could lead to the baning of real alcohol. If real alcohol is banned, then only the alcoholics will have it.

      Speaking of roids, how many drunks are going to drive home under the influence to maintain the party atmosphere, and quickly jab themselves at the first sign of traffic surveillance or air bag deployment? How is that going to be regulated?

      Should this comes to pass, the law of unintended consequence is going to be working double shifts for several decade.

    12. Re:Missing the point... by ascari · · Score: 1

      Wow. Some people drink alcohol to celebrate things you know.

    13. Re:Missing the point... by MartinSchou · · Score: 1

      Speaking of roids, how many drunks are going to drive home under the influence to maintain the party atmosphere, and quickly jab themselves at the first sign of traffic surveillance or air bag deployment? How is that going to be regulated?

      Depending on how quickly it works and a test of syntheol in the blood/breath, it is entirely plausible to have the car automatically dose the drive if needed before it can start.

    14. Re:Missing the point... by Cyberax · · Score: 1

      Yep.

    15. Re:Missing the point... by daveime · · Score: 1

      ... or scary old-aged purple haired ass bandits.

      Anyone with a teenage son who is having an "identity crisis", let him watch a few hours of Quentin Crisp interviews and stage shows. It'll put him off homosexuality for life.

    16. Re:Missing the point... by rastoboy29 · · Score: 2, Funny

      You need to move away from England!

    17. Re:Missing the point... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, just get some bloody Prozac already.

      You are only helpless if you choose to be.

    18. Re:Missing the point... by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      Agreed. I'm pretty sure I used to drink because other people would give me a free pass for my atrocious behavior while under its influence.. and, of course, I engaged in that atrocious behavior because it feels good to flaunt social norms and get away with it. There's so many things in polite society that one simply must not do.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    19. Re:Missing the point... by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

      You were "flouting" social norms, not "flaunting" them. Unless of course you liked to drink because it made you dress in modest attire, speak quietly and respectfully, and engage in politeness and courtesy. ;-)

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    20. Re:Missing the point... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm waiting for the first published life reflection on the topic of wife-beater interruptus by a man whose blood-honey got wise to syntheholic Narcan. I'd dearly love to read an explanation by a man who experiences a sudden return to clarity mid swing.

      What? Seriously, I can't make head or tail of that.

    21. Re:Missing the point... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would explain that why some people seem to be able to use alcohol as an excuse for doing things, where I have never been drunk enough to not know what I'm doing and do things I really didn't want to do, and I used to drink as much as my body would let me at times. I just used to assume I was a bit different in that regard though if these people are actually aware of what they are doing and alcohol is an excuse to do what they want it make more sense.

  5. Whats Next? by Entropy98 · · Score: 1

    How about Synthcrack, or Synthheroin?

    1. Re:Whats Next? by ceoyoyo · · Score: 2, Informative

      The second is already done. It's given to addicts to ease them off the real stuff.

    2. Re:Whats Next? by ascari · · Score: 2, Informative

      Heroin was actually an early attempt at "synthmorphine". Didn't work as intended though.

    3. Re:Whats Next? by Trinn · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually, methadone is not a synth-anything, its a damn potent mu-opiod agonist in its own right, the difference is it doesn't cross the blood-brain-barrier in one big rush like dimethylmorphine(heroin) does. The reason heroin is "special" is that unlike morphine, methadone, etc., it manages to find a carrier protein that will preferentially transfer it across the BBB. Dimethylmorphine itself isn't terribly active, but once it crosses the barrier, the methyl groups are rapidly cleaved off, leaving, you guessed it, a ton of morphine. The only other way to get this particular effect would be via trepannation (i.e. cutting a hole in your skull and injeting it into the brain). This is why there's nothing else out there quite like it. For the record, I have never tried it (though I have tried methadone, didn't find it all *that* compelling) and never will. Heroin is a drug you do when you are 100% finished with life, on your deathbed, because if you do it before that, you'll quickly find yourself on said deathbed. It is one of the few drug scares where the government propaganda isn't all *that* far off from the truth. Mind you, there are people who manage to quit, or even moderate their use, but these people are few and far between. It simply is not worth the risk, I am sure the high is indescribably amazing, but its just not worth it. I'll stick to ecstasy and raving, thanks.

    4. Re:Whats Next? by lskovlund · · Score: 1

      Heroin is diacetylmorphine, not dimethylmorphine. You're probably mixing it up with codeine, which is (mono-)methylmorphine.

    5. Re:Whats Next? by Trinn · · Score: 1

      Damnit, yeah, that's my bad, diacetyl...the rest still stands though. I wish Slashdot had an edit button :/

    6. Re:Whats Next? by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Methadone is literally a synthetic opioid - that is, made by man, as opposed to sourced from a plant. Since it's an opioid and heroin is an opioid (but a semi-naturally sourced one), methadone could quite accurately be labeled as synth-heroin. Being synthetic has nothing to do with it's potency. Since heroin isn't actually entirely natural I suppose you could call heroin synth-opium.

      The article is really talking about using diazepam or a diazepam relative to replace alcohol. Diazepam is also a synthetic compound, but it's not nearly as closely related to alcohol as methadone is to heroin, so calling it synthahol is a bit more of a stretch, relying entirely on similar effects.

    7. Re:Whats Next? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    8. Re:Whats Next? by winwar · · Score: 1

      "It's given to addicts to ease them off the real stuff."

      Or more correctly, it gets them addicted? to legal drugs. You may not get the same high from methadone as you would heroin but it does have addictive potential and you do develop a tolerance.

      It's a useful drug for things like chronic pain but its side effects are not always pleasant. And withdrawing from methadone isn't inherently any more pleasant than heroin. It just happens to be legal.

    9. Re:Whats Next? by badkarmadayaccount · · Score: 1

      Methadone withdraw is worse, AFAIK.

      --
      I know tobacco is bad for you, so I smoke weed with crack.
    10. Re:Whats Next? by Nazlfrag · · Score: 1

      Well this is advocating replacing alcohol with benzodiazapines, potent anti-psychotic prescription medication. I'd say synthetic cocaine or herion wouldn't be out of the question for Professor Nutt.

  6. Antidote by proficiovera · · Score: 5, Funny

    So if some drunk is being obnoxious at the bar you can now slip the antidote in his drink?

    1. Re:Antidote by Renraku · · Score: 1

      That wouldn't be a bad idea actually.

      "Calm the hell down, get the hell out, or take this antidote."

      The drunk would have three choices. To stop being loud and obnoxious, to leave the establishment, or to take the antidote. Knowing most drunks, he'd take a swing at someone, but then it crosses into the legal territory and is no longer a civil matter. Then there would be even fewer excuses for synthehol-related crimes. Drunk driving? Stupid, you get a year in jail for not taking the antidote. Drinking and dialing? Stupid, don't call me ever again. Drinking and deriving? Stupid, get out of my math class.

      --
      Job? I don't have time to get a job! Who will sit around and bitch about being broke and unemployed then?
    2. Re:Antidote by The+Wild+Norseman · · Score: 1

      Drinking and deriving?

      Is that what alcoholic mathematicians do?

      --
      "A government is a body of people usually -- notably -- ungoverned." -Shepherd Book
    3. Re:Antidote by ImprovOmega · · Score: 1

      It's an integral part of the discipline.

  7. Not really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Prof Nutt and his team are concentrating their efforts on benzodiazepines, of which diazepam, the chief ingredient of Valium is one. Thousands of candidate benzos are already known to science. He said it is just a matter of identifying the closest match.

    From my benzo experience, I doubt any benzo will replace alcohol. Alcohol effects a whole range of neurotransmitters, not just GABA.

    And this is the "we can just turn it off" part:

    “I’ve been in experiments where I’ve taken benzos,” said Professor Nutt. “One minute I was sedated and nearly asleep, five minutes later I was giving a lecture.

    Since good old valium, benzos have been getting shorter and shorter acting with faster and faster clearances, but you can get such short actions that to get any sort off effect you have to shovel the stuff in IV just to keep up with the clearance. I don't know of any oral approach than can be turned off like a switch.

    And doesn't someone already have an "off-switch" type pill for good old ethanol. It doesn't turn off the liver processing or clear the acetylaldehyde souring your stomach, but it would clear your head enough to drive.

    1. Re:Not really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And this is the "we can just turn it off" part:

      “I’ve been in experiments where I’ve taken benzos,” said Professor Nutt. “One minute I was sedated and nearly asleep, five minutes later I was giving a lecture.

      I think we've seen this show before. It was called the 1950's and 60's.

      Can't sleep? Take a pill to sleep. Trouble waking up? Take a pill to wake up. Now you're really awake and agitated and jittery? Take a pill to calm you down.

      Be sure to wash those pills down with a nice distilled beverage of your choice and don't forget have a refreshing smoke.

    2. Re:Not really by larry+bagina · · Score: 4, Funny

      That's weird. One minute, I was in his lecture. Five minutes later, I was nearly asleep.

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

  8. No thanks, I'm drinking. by Tackhead · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Let's read between the lines here...

    From TFA:

    Professor Nutt believes that the new drug, which would need licensing, could have a dramatic effect on society and improve the nation's health

    In this one sentence we see: (a), an appeal to the neo-prohibitionist/nanny-stater lobby to spin this story into a positive, and (b), because you can't make this stuff at home, a pharmaceutical company is going to get a cut. Alcohol's easy to make - take some yeast and just about any form of sugar (or starch that can be converted via enzymatic action into sugar) - and you've got yourself the foundations of beer, wine, and distilled spirits. Synthetic valium, not so much.

    Net effect here is that we all wind up hooked on benzos as depressants, rather than alcohol. Hey, that's fine if valium's his depressant of choice, but it's not one of mine. What's next, a move to replace the caffeine in coffee (my stimulant of choice :) with slightly-modified speed?

    From the TFsummary:

    It is not that I really want a drink of Synthehol, but with its release I assume Romulan Ale won't be far behind.

    As cool as it sounds, that's not a feature, that's a bug.

    Allow me to nerd out for a bit: When Synthehol was invented, Romulan Ale (which presumably contained real alcohol) became illegal.

    And if you go back and re-read TFA, you'll see that's pretty much where this is goin. This guy's not interested in an alternative to alcohol, he's looking for a substitute for alcohol. Even if he is working in good faith, his efforts will be used to help the neo-prohibitionists. And I can't get down with that. Because I like real ale, Romulan or not. (Homebrewing is like turning half the basement into a mad scientist's chemistry lab for a day, and it's all the more fun because you get to consume the product of your experiment when it's done!)

    Around this time of year, I usually say "A drink? No thanks, I'm driving." But on this one, I'm gonna have to say "Benzos? No thanks, I'm drinking."

    1. Re:No thanks, I'm drinking. by hitmark · · Score: 2, Insightful

      meh, just wait for the recipe to hit the net, and for someone to come up with a way to make it in a bathtub...

      --
      comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
    2. Re:No thanks, I'm drinking. by King_TJ · · Score: 5, Interesting

      You make a valid point about the potential killing off of the art of home-brewing ... but other than that (very valid) issue, I'm not so sure your other complaints would really matter in the long-run. At the end of the day, the drugs society considers "more acceptable to consume regularly" are really just a matter of how popularized they've become. Caffeine, for example, is pretty much treated like a major food group, since it's found in everything from soda to cappuccino. Heck, they've even got caffeinated water you can buy. But if some other drug (like a small dose of the contents of ADD/ADHD medications, perhaps?) was the drug of choice to insert into carbonated beverages and such, instead? It might have been caffeine people generally thought was a little "unsettling" or "weird" to ingest as part of recreational drinking.

    3. Re:No thanks, I'm drinking. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Caffeine, for example, is pretty much treated like a major food group, since it's found in everything from soda to cappuccino...But if some other drug...was the drug of choice to insert into carbonated beverages and such, instead?

      I agree with your point, but if there's any one drug that deserves a "more acceptable to consume" label it's caffeine. I mean, with exceptions (such as the caffeinated water that you mentioned, and many energy drinks which have been created specifically to try to get you awake, and apparently frigging shampoos), the caffeine wasn't "inserted into carbonated beverages" so people can get a dose of the caffeine. It's in cappuccino because caffeine is naturally occurring in coffee, which is a major ingredient (and don't make the point that people drink coffee for the caffeine effects...people do, but that's not the only reason, or there would be no market for decaf. As a coffee drinker, I'll say that I drink it because it tastes good). It's in sodas because it's naturally occurring in the ingredients for those as well (caffeine isn't just in coffee...it's in a whole lot of stuff, so many that it might as well BE considered a major food group. Most leaves used for tea also contain caffeine.

      You could almost make the same argument for pot, but the mind-altering substance is only common to specific families of plants, which are not in your common diet, nor would be even if pot was legal. The stuff in ADHD medications requires a whole lot of processing. Probably very hard to make in your home, although I'll admit I'm not sure.

      I'm pretty much against the banning of any drug, even if it's guaranteed to kill you (hey, it's your life, if you want to end it who am I to tell you not to?), but all the people who keep making the point that caffeine is a nasty drug miss one important point: it's damn hard to avoid it. It evolved in plants as a natural pesticides (it kills small insects, and you should google what caffeine does to spiders, their webs while hyped up on caffeine are frigging awesome).

    4. Re:No thanks, I'm drinking. by Urkki · · Score: 1

      And if you go back and re-read TFA, you'll see that's pretty much where this is goin. This guy's not interested in an alternative to alcohol, he's looking for a substitute for alcohol. Even if he is working in good faith, his efforts will be used to help the neo-prohibitionists.

      Ah ha haa. Well, ok, maybe on the western side of Atlantic, but just try to imagine removing wine from French or Italian food table, or beer from English or German pubs... Things might get medieval for the politicians who put such a law into effect.

    5. Re:No thanks, I'm drinking. by Cyberax · · Score: 1

      How many people get regularly drunk on homebrew?

    6. Re:No thanks, I'm drinking. by Patch86 · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure it'd be realistically possible to ban home-brewing. Leave a bottle of apple juice out at room temperature and you'll end up (if it doesn't go rancid first) with what is essentially cider. Controlling something so incredibly simple would be impossible.

    7. Re:No thanks, I'm drinking. by amRadioHed · · Score: 2, Informative

      Most leaves used for tea also contain caffeine

      There's only one leaf used to make tea, and that would be the tea leaf. But yes, it has caffeine.

      Pretty much none of the other common herbal infusions have any caffeine in them. In fact Yerba Mate is the only one I know of that does have any caffeine.

      --
      We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
    8. Re:No thanks, I'm drinking. by WillDraven · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Well, that depends on how strictly you're defining 'tea'. Other beverages made by steeping plant matter are called 'teas' even though they are not made using leaves from the tea plant. Chamomile is a good example.

      --
      This is my sig. There are many like it but this one is mine.
    9. Re:No thanks, I'm drinking. by amRadioHed · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Yeah, herbal infusions are frequently called teas, but it's an annoying misnomer along the lines of calling all types of soda "coke" as is inexplicably done in some parts of the country. The correct terms for herbal tea would be tisane, or infusion.

      --
      We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
    10. Re:No thanks, I'm drinking. by amRadioHed · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      And, the AC is still wrong even allowing for a loose definition of "tea" since practically all "teas" aren't caffeinated.

      --
      We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
  9. Missing the point by nielsenj · · Score: 1, Funny

    Who cares about getting sober instantly ? I'd rather get instantly wasted. I'll take a Pan Galactic Gargle Blaster over romulan ale any day!

    1. Re:Missing the point by JustOK · · Score: 1

      Fresh out, sir. How about a Synth and Tonic?

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
  10. Oops by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "I've been in experiments where I've taken benzos," said Professor Nutt. "One minute I was sedated and nearly asleep, five minutes later I was giving a lecture."

    But the students couldn't figure out why he insisted on being called Mr. Hyde. Or why he kept throwing chairs.

  11. Romulan Ale? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But Bones, you know that stuff's illegal!

  12. Better Profit Through Pharmaceuticals by handy_vandal · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "Prof Nutt and his team are concentrating their efforts on benzodiazepines, of which diazepam, the chief ingredient of Valium is one."

    In other words, let's invent another Happy Pill that will make big profit for Big Pharmco. And we'll call it an "alcohol substitute" because alcohol is well-known as the active ingredient in alcoholism, and you're in favor of a cure for alcoholism, right?

    Good thing they're not calling it a "Valium analog", what with Valium's well-known and deserved reputation for causing addiction, tolerance, and withdrawal.

    --
    -kgj
    1. Re:Better Profit Through Pharmaceuticals by couchslug · · Score: 1

      A "happy pill" is a reasonable goal, as is chemical pleasure (well, all pleasure is chemical) in general.

      Information wants to be free, and information that valuable will be free in short order after the product is invented.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    2. Re:Better Profit Through Pharmaceuticals by Hurricane78 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Benzoes? How did a friend say: I tried everything. Even Heroine. But that benzo shit? That’s even worse!

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    3. Re:Better Profit Through Pharmaceuticals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Alcohol has the same well-known and deserved reputation for causing addition, tolerance, and withdrawal. Alcohol withdrawal can kill an addict. Valium withdrawal is just unpleasant for the user and those around him.

      This is the same crowd that argues so fervently for the legalization of pot because (partly) it's safer. Why is there such a strong objection to a "safer" alcohol?

    4. Re:Better Profit Through Pharmaceuticals by jez9999 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Your friend was talking out of his or her ass.

      I take benzos on a relatively regular basis (like once or twice a month) as a useful anti-anxiety tool, and they have improved my life. Don't demonize them because some people think it's a good idea to pop them like candy.

    5. Re:Better Profit Through Pharmaceuticals by vorpal22 · · Score: 1

      Agreed. I've been taking benzos (alprazolam aka Xanax and lorazepam aka Ativan) for generalized anxiety disorder for a little more than 10 years now, and despite availability to large quantities of both and a highly addictive personality (former addictions to alcohol and nicotine, and currently to opiates, but for medical reasons), never have I felt any danger in becoming addicted to them or desire to abuse them.

      Opiates, on the other hand, strike me as dramatically addictive: when I was taking Oxycontin regularly for pain due to Crohn's Disease, I swear that half my day, my brain chanted "oxycodone" over and over again like it was some kind of mantra that would bring me inner peace (and good god, did it ever - like being wrapped up in a lovely warm blanket of "do not care"). I am not lying or exaggerating or bending the truth: seriously, my thoughts over and over were that single word, which could lift me to the highest clouds (if I knew that oxycodone time was nigh) or plunge me into the pits of despair (if oxycodone time was far off, or my supply was running low). What a horrible waste of CPU cycles.

      Benzos, on the other hand, in low doses are excellent at making me feel calm. At higher doses, they put me to sleep. Nowhere in there are there good feelings: indeed, my only recreational experiment with 25 mg of Valium back when I was a teenager had me remarking that it was a lot like alcohol, only without any good feelings and the typical painful hangover. (Note that there is a hangover nonetheless: I felt groggy and out of sorts upon awakening from benzo-sleep.)

    6. Re:Better Profit Through Pharmaceuticals by Hurricane78 · · Score: 0, Troll

      Says the guy who pops them like candy...
      My friend did take them exactly once. And never again.

      Of course, now your ability to handle anxiety without it is (at least partially) gone.
      But it’s oh so nice to just pop a pill and be done with it.
      Also, what an epic fail is it, to just run away from your fears all your life? In reality, you would have to face them. And grow in the process. Being prepared for the future. Like a muscle.

      Oh, and wanna know why you take them on a regular basis? Because you can’t do without them anymore! That’s half the point of those pills. After all they are a addictive drug.

      Good luck with the incredible fear and uneasiness that will overcome you, as soon as you try to stop taking them. Go ahead. Try it. lol.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
  13. Romulan Ale by feldhaus · · Score: 1

    Romulan Ale is alcoholic, not sythoholic and a cocktail recipes are available at that link to those with no sense of self-preservation.

  14. Toxicity by hwyhobo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If it is ingested orally, then it will be metabolized in the liver. What about its toxicity? If it's the same or higher than alcohol, then the illusion of safety may in the end be detrimental to the health of the user.

    --
    End anonymous moderation and posting on /.
    1. Re:Toxicity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IMO, there should be no illusion of safety to begin with. Why? Because, in a statistical overview kind of way, people are stupid, and they'll do the same stupid things with a new chemical that they do with the old ones - all these things that aren't supposed to be taken with anything else end up being taken with every imaginable combo of other things anyway. We'll be seeing the same celebrity autopsies where this stuff is in their bloodstream along with cocaine and alcohol and the relaxant/antidepressant of the day :|

    2. Re:Toxicity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oral ingestion has little to do with whether the liver metabolizes something...

      However, your concern is valid; these substances are toxic to the liver, although they don't metabolize into a toxic substance like alcohol (which is part of the cause of hangovers).

      I'm not sure whether sufficient doses can even cause acute toxicity (which alcohol doesn't do, but your common analgesics do), which would make this substitute considerably more dangerous than alcohol. Alcohol is fairly difficult to overdose on, since you tend to pass out first and it's easy to develop tolerance to its effects including the lethal ones, whereas with something else you could develop tolerance to the noticeable effects but not the ones that have the potential to cause death.

    3. Re:Toxicity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure these guys have considered the possibility, but at the moment all they have is a goal of what they are looking for, and which group of drugs they are hope to find it in. No doubt they'll look into its safety once they have found a suitable candidate.

  15. Alcohol didn't exist more than 3,000 years ago? by RNLockwood · · Score: 1

    The article says that alcohol has only been around for 3,000 years. This implies that leavened bread has only been around for that long. Wonder what the yeasts were producing before and why so many animals have the enzyme alcohol dehydroginase.

    --
    Nate
    1. Re:Alcohol didn't exist more than 3,000 years ago? by couchslug · · Score: 1

      Fruit ferments naturally without human intervention.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
  16. Please tag such stories "Telegraph (UK)." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This would make it clear that the degree of correlation between scientific assertion and journalistic conclusion in the article might not be actually be high enough to support any conclusion of statistical significance, let alone causality.

  17. The Puritans won't like this. by plopez · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Or the Catholics. If you're going to have fun, the punishment must be built-in.

    --
    putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    1. Re:The Puritans won't like this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One word: faggots.

    2. Re:The Puritans won't like this. by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      Seems like a lot of people dont like this. But dont let that stop you from bashing groups you dont like, im sure Microsoft wont like this either. (did I do that right?)

  18. The real questions by mmmmbeer · · Score: 1

    Can I blame my mistakes on my friends and a case of synthehol? Can I drink a girl pretty with synthehol? Will this help ugly people get laid? These are the important questions!

  19. From the article... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Professor Nutt got sacked.

  20. I'm not alone by 7-Vodka · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You know the first thing I'm gonna fucking do, is mix this shit in my rum and cokes while chewing some nicotine gum and smoking a fat joint.
    And I know I'm not the only one.

    --

    Liberty.

  21. What for? by bistromath007 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    To avoid a hangover with the real stuff, just stay hydrated. Not difficult.

    1. Re:What for? by bkpark · · Score: 1

      To avoid a hangover with the real stuff, just stay hydrated. Not difficult.

      That sounds easy on paper, but try staying hydrated after you've passed out.

    2. Re:What for? by bistromath007 · · Score: 1

      If you aren't getting pissed on enough to take care of it whenever you pass out, then what are friends for?

    3. Re:What for? by kchrist · · Score: 1

      If you're drinking enough to pass out, you're already doing it wrong and no amount of water is going to help.

    4. Re:What for? by MightyDrunken · · Score: 1

      It's easy but doesn't work. Even if I hydrate myself with 10 pints of beer I still get a hang over.

  22. Re:Head researcher by Doug+Neal · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It seems that the head researcher on this project is David Nutt, who was sacked by the British government over his "controversial" views on drugs like THC and ecstasy. What a bunch of blowhards; but then I'm not one to talk, since the teabaggers here hold the same rigid views.

    The guy is awesome. Having been sacked in a purely political manoeuvre by Jacqui Smith (spit) it sounds like he now leads an Alexander Shulgin-like life of synthesising new chemicals and trying them out faster than the government can ban or control them. Sadly the same reasons for him being sacked will probably mean that this project doesn't gain any traction. Politics trump science and reason...

  23. Thanks but No Thanks! by Vinegar+Joe · · Score: 1

    I'll just stick with Saurian Brandy.

    --
    "The average reporter we talk to is 27 years old......They literally know nothing." - Ben Rhodes
  24. Vaporware?? by davidwr · · Score: 1

    It better be vaporware.

    I love the aroma of a good glass of real wine. If the synthetic stuff doesn't measure up then what's the point?

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  25. Containers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't forget to sell it in Transparent Aluminum cans.

  26. GHB/GBL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have always found GHB and/or GBL to be excellent alcohol substitutes. They wear off in a few hours and leave you with no hangover. Unless you mix it with other depressants (alcohol, I'm looking at YOU!) or otherwise overdose you are fine the next day. Not sure about the sobering up-pill though, I don't know enough about the selectivity of their action on GABA. My guess is that it's similar to bensodiazepines.

  27. Overdosing on antidote? by AliasMarlowe · · Score: 1

    If you take the antidote without consuming the synthehol, will you become excessively sober?

    --
    Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire
    1. Re:Overdosing on antidote? by Dragonslicer · · Score: 1

      If you take the antidote without consuming the synthehol, will you become excessively sober?

      So the antidote to Romulan ale is Klatchian coffee?

  28. slip the antidote in his drink? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The antidote for being drunk or the antidote for being obnoxious?

  29. Like this will be accepted. by TheRealGrogan · · Score: 1

    Yeah, right. Like society is going to suddenly get over their prejudices about "drugs" and it's going to be acceptable to consume this, take an antidote and drive or go to work or other drinking taboo. In societies where they still criminally prosecute and jail people for the mere possession of marijuana. (which to an established, regular user is relatively harmless)

  30. Re:And yet, whisky causes worse hangovers than vod by Abcd1234 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Clearly Wikipedia is the font of all knowledge (that was sarcasm (for the Americans)). You haven't had your brain replaced by a parrot brain have you?

    Huh, clearly you're not illiterate, yet you apparently didn't even read the article I posted, which explicitly mentioned cogeners as exacerbating hangover symptoms.

    Meanwhile, nowhere in the article you linked to do I see text which suggests that "It isn't the alcohol which gives you a headache"... probably because that's completely false.

  31. Actually, we do have safe alcohol substitute by lawpoop · · Score: 5, Informative

    We already have alcohol substitutes ( read: recreational drugs ) that are safer than alcohol. Only problem is, they're illegal.

    You can't handle the truth. Dr. David Nutt, the British government scientist that was recently fired, did an exhaustive study of the real impact of recreational drugs. Herion was 8.32, alcohol 5.54, Cannabis 4.00, LSD 3.68 and Ecstacy 3.27. A higher score is worse.( Many other drugs were in the study).

    So we already have several safer alternatives to alcohol.

    --
    Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
    -- Pablo Picasso
    1. Re:Actually, we do have safe alcohol substitute by Johnno74 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Did you RTFA?

      "The new alcohol is being developed by a team at Imperial College London, led by Professor David Nutt,"

    2. Re:Actually, we do have safe alcohol substitute by lawpoop · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I didn't read the article. Does the fact of whose doing the research really have any bearing on the fact that we do have safer alternatives to alcohol already?

      --
      Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
      -- Pablo Picasso
    3. Re:Actually, we do have safe alcohol substitute by Zouden · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Perhaps Professor Nutt knows a little bit more about drug safety and legislation than you. He knows there are safer drugs, yet he also knows that they're not going to be legalised anytime soon.

      --
      "A week in the lab saves an hour in the library"
    4. Re:Actually, we do have safe alcohol substitute by lawpoop · · Score: 1

      Perhaps Professor Nutt knows a little bit more about drug safety and legislation than you.

      If he knows so much, why'd he get fired? :D I guess he knows so much now...

      --
      Computers are useless. They can only give you answers.
      -- Pablo Picasso
    5. Re:Actually, we do have safe alcohol substitute by Kjella · · Score: 1

      Speaking as one that got very drunk on it tonight, the better question is if alcohol "should" be illegal. On that scale it's high but all things considered, prohibition would be worse. Letting every other drug free would be worse. We're living in a little bubble where we do one unhealthy thing and you put it up as if we'd do alcohol or cannabis or LSD or ecstacy. Truth is there'd probably be a lot of ands in there. Living without stimulants is hard, if you took away coffee most people would freak. I've "picked my poison", and I know it's not ideal. But somehow I don't thing letting every lesser drug free would improve the situation. My 0,02c, YMMV.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    6. Re:Actually, we do have safe alcohol substitute by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Long term use of ecstacy (MDMA) is quite bad for you:

      http://www.drugabuse.gov/nida_notes/nnvol14n4/Ecstasy.html
      http://www.mdma.net/toxicity/damage.html
      http://faculty.washington.edu/chudler/mdma.html

      I'd like to see the report in detail to know why he scored it so low.

    7. Re:Actually, we do have safe alcohol substitute by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      no, but the point is, David Nutt has TRIED to get the safer alternatives to be seen sensibly, and that's failed, so now he's trying something new.

    8. Re:Actually, we do have safe alcohol substitute by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because the stupid politicians have an agenda which doesn't fit with what is best for the public, and he disagreed with it by attempting to do his job and advising on actual science.

      I don't see getting fired for advocating common-sense science based policies as a bad thing. It is far better that than lying to keep your job when the result of your lies can affect society as a whole.

  32. I'll drink with Scotty... by thewiz · · Score: 1

    from a bottle of very old Scotch whiskey!

    --
    If "disco" means "I learn" in Latin, does "discothèque" mean "I learn technology"?
    1. Re:I'll drink with Scotty... by arthurpaliden · · Score: 1

      "It's uh ... (sniffs contents of bottle) It's green. ...

    2. Re:I'll drink with Scotty... by BluBrick · · Score: 2, Informative

      No, no you won't.

      If it's Scotch you drink, it's called Whisky. If it's whiskey you drink, it's no' Scotch!

      --
      Ahh - My eye!
      The doctor said I'm not supposed to get Slashdot in it!
  33. I am not a doctor by vorlich · · Score: 1

    but I know someone who is. They would advise all slashdotters (and anyone else for that matter) that it is an incredibly bad idea to take any paracetamol when you have been drinking alcohol http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paracetamol.
    It is very toxic to your liver. Better to drink responsibly, consume quality products and remember that a reasonable consumption of water only protects you from the effects of hydration but has no real effect on the contaminants that cause the headache and nausea. Wait until the alcohol has been metabolised (2 hours per unit) and then take the lowest dose possible or some other analgesic.

    --
    Posts, MyBio or Sig, may contain satire, sarcasm, bolded nouns be sardonic or even witty & be Church of SD
  34. So I can bed green women with no ill effects now? by howardd21 · · Score: 1

    Capt Kirk did it, so now I can too.

    --
    no comment
  35. The only problem is... by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

    ...that in the real world, alcohol making you drunk is the whole point! We certainly don’t drink it because of the bitter, burning taste. ^^

    If this had any chance of being a success, then people would already prefer non-alcoholic cocktails and brews for a looong time.
    And I don’t see that being the case, or ever happening.

    --
    Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    1. Re:The only problem is... by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      Aaah, shit. I forgot to read TFS.

      Now where is the delete button for my comment??
      Or: What is the ^H equivalent for whole comments?

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
  36. Do Not Mix With Alcohol? by Plekto · · Score: 1

    If you read the article, they are using substances that are related to the same family or compounds that you find in Valium and other depressants. You very well might see them succeed, but I can't imagine drinking beer that has a warning label to not mix with (real)alcohol.

  37. Re:And yet, whisky causes worse hangovers than vod by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

    I'm sorry, where did I misread? Your initial post flat out state that alcohol plays no role in hangovers. Your subsequent post was to cite an article which does nothing to support that claim, instead identifying an additional factor (cogeners) which plays a role in the product of hangovers. And your last post was entirely content-free.

    So, please, enlighten me. What did I miss?

  38. Re:And yet, whisky causes worse hangovers than vod by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

    Ah, yes, I see, you seem to believe that the statement:

    "It isn't the alcohol which gives you a headache. It's the alcohol in combination with the rest of the crap in the beverage."

    Is more accurate than simply:

    "It isn't the alcohol which gives you a headache."

    Of course, it's not. Both are false, and for the exact same reason: They both imply that alcohol, alone, doesn't play a causative role in the production of hangovers, which is silly, given that it's the dehydration caused by alcohol which creates headaches, and the metabolites of alcohol which create many of the other symptoms.

  39. Re:And yet, whisky causes worse hangovers than vod by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

    That’s simple to explain: Good alcohol has little fusel alcohols. Which are a product of incomplete transformation to alcohol. Or of adding sugar to it. And whiskey simply has more of them, as the strongly distilled vodka.

    The sugar (and cheap alcoholic products) inside is why cocktails can be even worse.

    --
    Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
  40. Obligatory Quote by jonadab · · Score: 1

    What's this stuff?

    It is... [pause] [sniff] It is green.

    --
    Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
  41. Don't lump us Catholics in with the Puritans. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Three words: Wedding at Cana.

    1. Re:Don't lump us Catholics in with the Puritans. by base3 · · Score: 1

      Two words: Grape juice

      --
      One CPU cycle wasted on digital restrictions management is ONE TOO MANY.
  42. Synthehol? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This many comments, and not a single /. nerd has corrected the article's total misunderstanding of Synthehol from Star Trek?

    Synthehol is what Starfleet crews can drink while on duty because it tastes like the real thing but DOESN'T give you a buzz or get you drunk.

    1. Re:Synthehol? by mujadaddy · · Score: 1

      I came here to post this exact thing. Philistines, the lot of you.

      --
      Populus vult decipi, ergo decipiatur...
      "Force shits upon Reason's back." - Poor Richard's Almanac
    2. Re:Synthehol? by rantingkitten · · Score: 1

      Uhm, no. Data said that with synthehol, the "intoxicating effects can be easily dismissed". That means it does intoxicate you -- it's just that you can shake off the intoxication somehow.

      Plus, Scotty was whining about the lack of any real alcohol. If a member of the crew was off-duty, why shouldn't he or she be allowed to have a real drink? Synthehol was a replacement to alcohol.

      Synthehol is what Starfleet crews can drink while on duty because it tastes like the real thing but DOESN'T give you a buzz or get you drunk.

      While on duty? Pretty sure Starfleet doesn't want their crews drinking anything that could intoxicate them while ON DUTY, even if you can dismiss the effects.

      --
      mirrorshades radio -- darkwave, industrial, futurepop, ebm.
  43. Benzos? by rodarson2k · · Score: 1

    Somehow, the chemists in my lab have been making benzodiazapines for years without ever once mentioning that they're good for getting drunk off of.

    I suppose its the part where they make about a gram of it in a month that kills the temptation to drink it.

  44. Synthehol is so next century... by GrahamCox · · Score: 1

    Synthehol is so next century. Wake me up when someone can import real Pan-Galactic Gargle-Blasters to Earth.

    1. Re:Synthehol is so next century... by walter_f · · Score: 1

      "Wake me up when someone can import real Pan-Galactic Gargle-Blasters to Earth."

      Those pre-mixed, ready to pour Pan-Galactic Gargle-Blasters don't even come near the real thing.

      Believe us.

      Yours sincerely,

      Zaphod B., Ford P. and Arthur D. ;-)

  45. Re:And yet, whisky causes worse hangovers than vod by moortak · · Score: 1

    Cogeners have a stronger impact than metabolites when it comes to hangovers.

    --
    Xavier Rabourdin for president 2012
  46. Why Bother? by flajann · · Score: 1

    Why bother with creating synthehol when legalizing marijuana would have the same effect -- plus, we know marijuana won't destroy your body. Who knows what this synthehol will do to you in 10 years?

    1. Re:Why Bother? by sexybomber · · Score: 1

      Because marijuana grows like, well, a weed. Anyone with the palest of green thumbs can grow it easily, and that doesn't sit well with the people who would like to make money off of you altering your consciousness and the people who would prefer to keep tabs on what you're putting into your body. Why buy Synthehol (a registered trademark of Pfizer) when you can grow your own danky buds in your backyard?

  47. Re:And yet, whisky causes worse hangovers than vod by spydum · · Score: 1

    Most people attribute the headaches from red wines to the oak, but I'm pretty sure nobody has quite nailed down the problem..

  48. Saving a life ain't always the smartest thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When we save lives of people who are on the path to self-implosion, we also preserve the attached mouths that will need feeding and the "private bits" that will need fucking. Does it actually cure them of self-implosive behavior? Guess who ultimately loses in the end from that bit of philanthropy?

  49. of course you didn't by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    n/t

  50. Hangovers and Romulan Ale by Nitewing98 · · Score: 1

    1. Hangover cure - B vitamin complex and 2 aspirin before bed. Next morning you're good to go. 2. Recipe for Romulan Ale: 2 quarts of Kool-Aid Berry Blue and grain alcohol (or vodka) to your taste. For hangovers, see item 1.

    --

    Nitewing '98

    Everything works...in theory.

  51. What is it? by p51d007 · · Score: 1

    It...it...it....it is green!

  52. Schedule I, anyone? by NewWazoo · · Score: 1

    Okay, so let me get this straight:

    it's a chemical,
    that's meant to be ingested, (and thus a drug)
    and that has no medical use,
    and (presumably, like alcohol) is likely to be abused,
    and that (presumably) can cause damage or death if abused.

    By US law at present, this should be Schedule I and banned immediately.

    1. Re:Schedule I, anyone? by badkarmadayaccount · · Score: 1

      Same for alcohol.

      --
      I know tobacco is bad for you, so I smoke weed with crack.
  53. I don't get it ? by daveime · · Score: 1

    Why is is acceptable for scientists to produce synthetic alcohol, whne in the same week the FDA have just banned another set of synthetic / natural marijuana substitutes ?

    Alcohol is well known to cause aggression and does untold damage to the liver. Whereas most soft drugs make you passive and give you the munchies, yet there is little proven research on the long term effects to the body.

    Could it be that if we actually applied some common sense (i.e. ignored the Americans), there'd be one less "war on [topic]" for them to fuck up ? Prohibition didn't work in the 20's, you'd think they'd have learnt SOMETHING from that ?

  54. To quote Worf by gyrogeerloose · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Less talk, more synthehol!"

    --
    This ain't rocket surgery.
  55. Better Living Through Chemistry. by KneelBeforeZod · · Score: 1

    I move to add this title as a tag.

    But seriously, I'm curious. How much of this synthehol can you drink before overdosing? And what about the effects of mixing it with REAL alcohol? There isn't anything you can't consume too much of, even water.
    The alcoholic in me says I'm gonna try some as soon as it comes out.

  56. I read TFA. There's not much there. by Harvey+Manfrenjenson · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Basically, Dr. Nutt is proposing that we legalize one or two benzodiazepenes as a sort of replacement for alcohol (which could then, he suggests, be gradually marginalized and outlawed). Benzodiazepenes are a class of fast-acting drugs which includes Klonopin, Valium, Xanax, and Ativan (also a number of less-used ones like Librium and Tranxene).

    And the problem with that is it's just not going to work. Leaving aside the fact that benzos don't feel the quite the same as alcohol (most people would find them overly sedating-- not really the thing you want to take before a night of clubbing), you have the problem that benzos are themselves very addictive. Ask any doctor. (They've all had to deal with the benzo-seeking patient who "lost his prescription" for the third time this month). I guess you could speculate that benzos taken ad libitum might prove to be somewhat *less* addicting than alcohol, relatively speaking, but there's no data to support that happy hypothesis, and good luck trying to design a study to prove it.

    The rest of the article is full of irrelevancy and hand-waving. Dr. Nutt states that you can "sober up immediately" from a benzo, I guess by taking flumazenil-- and so what? Heroin addicts can sober up immediately with Narcan. That doesn't make heroin particularly safe.

    He also says that his team is going to "identify the closest match to alcohol" from among "thousands" of benzos. The closest in what sense? Time of onset? Half-life? Xanax is close enough already. Receptor-binding profile? Not going to work, since no benzo will duplicate the multiple actions of alcohol on the neuron(which IIRC include effects on membrane fluidity). Anyway Dr. Nutt says that he wants his drug to be more "focused in its effects" than alcohol, so he wouldn't want a close analog even if he could find one.

    In short: TFA is politically-motivated bullshit which might win Dr. Nutt some publicity and funding but will never produce anything useful. A previous poster got it right. If you want a safer alternative to alcohol, legalize pot. We already fucking *know* it's less addictive (and have the studies to prove it).

  57. Safe Alcohol wouldn't get licensed by physburn · · Score: 2, Informative
    The politics of the world is such that if a drug that mimics alcohol except for all its bad point was produced, it wouldn't be legalised, it would just be lumped in with all the illegal recreation drugs, governments don't have a set safety limit for recreational drug, they are normally against them on principle, however safe they are.

    But its also a concern that if synthehol was produced, how would we know if it was safe of not, it would take usage by milliions over they adult lifetime, before we genuinely know weather the chemical was safe.

    But good luck to Prof, Knut, who will probably have some very wild parties testing outs his candiate benzodiazepines.

    ---

    Drug Addiction Feed @ Feed Distiller

  58. Metabolizing acetaldehyde by jones_supa · · Score: 1

    I actually recently found a quite interesting technique to avoid a hangover. It basically involves taking cysteine with vitamin C to neutralize acetaldehyde, while drinking. I already did some experimenting and I think there might be something to this.

    The guy was a couple of days ago on a Google Tech Talk in which he discussed about other nutrients for the mind too.

  59. Hangover Cure: Research in wrong direction? by w0mprat · · Score: 1
    Wouldn't boosting the function of acetaldehyde dehydrogenase enzyme help mitigate the damaging effects of alcohol and lessen your hangover? As acetaldehyde is theorized to the be the primary cause of a hangover and at least the primary cause of long term harm, this strikes me as an obvious target for harm reduction research. Especially since this would not mess with the metabolism of ethanol directly (alcohol dehydrogenase - which could make you dangerously drunk, or sober and hungover too fast). The final stage, acetic acid is next to harmless, well it's vinegar basically. To quote wikipedia:

    Ethanol is converted to acetaldehyde by the enzyme alcohol dehydrogenase, and then from acetaldehyde to acetic acid by the enzyme acetaldehyde dehydrogenase.

    --
    After logging in slashdot still does not take you back to the page you were on. It's been that way for 20 years.
  60. I Feel Fantastic! by AP31R0N · · Score: 1

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zidiWe9yq88

    I get up early when the sleeping pill wakes me
    I take a wake up pill and fill with energy
    I power on hard and I check my messages
    But I don't have any messages
    I take a driving pill and head to my car
    I drive around a bit cuz work isn't very far
    I call my phone and I check my messages
    But I don't have any messages

    All I know is driving on drugs feels better when they're prescription
    All I know is the world looks beautiful, the world looks so damn beautiful

    And I feel fantastic
    And I never felt as good as how I do right now
    Except for maybe when I think of how I felt that day
    When I felt the way that I do right now, right now, right now.
    And I feel fantastic
    And I never felt as good as how I do right now
    Except for maybe when I think of how I felt that day
    When I felt the way that I do right now, right now, right now.

    Work is anything but quiet these days
    I try to medicate my concentration haze
    I can feel the day unfold in front of me
    So I take the stairs and hit the gym
    The phone is ringing when I get to my desk
    What was a stinging's now a sharp pain in my chest
    So I take a Calminex and just chill
    And then it's time for lunch again

    All I know is work is easy when you don't stress out about deadlines
    All I know is I take my medicine I always take my medicine

    And I feel fantastic
    And I never felt as good as how I do right now
    Except for maybe when I think of how I felt that day
    When I felt the way that I do right now, right now, right now.
    And I feel fantastic
    And I never felt as good as how I do right now
    Except for maybe when I think of how I felt that day
    When I felt the way that I do right now, right now, right now.

    Sometimes I'd like to slow things down
    Enjoy the moment
    But when I look the moment's gone

    Work is over but I can't stay to work late
    Got to leave and get ready for my second date
    With a pretty girl that I met at the pharmacy
    Right in the prescription line
    I take a pill for my social anxiety
    I get a table and a nice bottle of chablis
    Now it's getting late and there's still no sign of her
    I have another glass of wine

    All I know is the wine lasts longer when you don't gotta share it with someone
    All I know is my steak tastes better when I take my steak tastes better pill

    And I feel fantastic
    And I never felt as good as how I do right now
    Except for maybe when I think of how I felt that day
    When I felt the way that I do right now, right now, right now.
    And I feel fantastic
    And I never felt as good as how I do right now
    Except for maybe when I think of how I felt that day
    When I felt the way that I do right now, right now, right now.

    --
    Utilizing the synergization of benchmark e-solutions to pre-workaround action items!
  61. Surprisingly large & small gaps by swb · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm surprised that cannabis did only marginally better than alcohol and that the gap between heroin and alcohol was so large.

    I've never known anyone to fight or commit vandalism after smoking pot and while I'd agree its inadvisable, I think stoned drivers are less risky than drunk ones, especially at the low end of drunkenness/stonedness. Pot also is much easier on your body and does not produce a physical dependence or illness to the same magnitude that alcohol does (even if you factor in high cholesterol from snacking).

    Heroin addiction I can see being destructive, but much of that seems to be a result of legal sanction, not the inherent danger of the drug (interaction with criminal enterprise, impure/uncertain quality, high prices leading to theft, etc). True it is addictive and many addicts chase the "rush" of injection (as opposed to the high itself) which ends up resulting in overdoses, the opiates are not corrosive to the body and in fact are tolerated very well for long periods of time.

    I suspect these "scores" factor in maleable social and legal circumstances as constant factors and do not weight the actual pharmacological properties enough.
     

  62. You shouldn't be getting a headache anyway by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 1

    Don't drink shit and replace the water you piss out. A pint of water just before bed will stop virtually all headaches.

  63. Re:Head researcher by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm not completely sure, but I think the parent here was insulting the British government, not Dr. Nutt.

  64. They might end up banning this instead! by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

    As bizarre as it sounds, the drug laws are so batshit and inconsistent in many countries that it wouldn't surprise me that it's actually the new synthehol that gets banned, whilst alcohol remains legal! This is commonly the case with any new chemical (e.g., the recent UK's criminalisation on "legal highs"). All it takes is single death that can be indirectly related to it, a scaremongering campaign by a grieving mother, and it'll be banned.

    Indeed, from TFA:

    "No ones ever tried targeting this before, possibly because it will be so hard to get it past the regulators. Most of the benzos are controlled under the Medicines Act. The law gives a privileged position to alcohol, which has been around for 3,000 years. But why not use advances in pharmacology to find something safer and better?"

    Also note that Professor Nutt, who is quoted, was recently sacked as a Government advisor, because the factual scientific evidence he presented was deemed incompatible with the Government's views on drugs.