Slashdot Mirror


Geoengineering a Snow-Free Winter Fails In Moscow

dinoyum writes "Moscow Mayor Yury Luzhkov's promise of a winter without snow in the capital city has fallen short. While cloud seeding is not a new concept for Russia, often used on major holidays, geoengineering snow has never been done to that magnitude. Carrying off the $6 million procedure required jets to spray silver iodide into coming clouds, ensuring that all precipitation fell before it reached the capital. However a combination of disrupted radar, wind control, and faulty weathermen have been blamed by Luzhkov for his failed attempt at playing with mother nature. For now, Russia can go back to enjoying snow."

202 comments

  1. Snow! by F0RR · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Fuck yeah

  2. The first time... by natehoy · · Score: 0, Redundant

    The first time this meme has ever made sense!

    In (former) Soviet Moscow, Snow come to YOU.

    --
    "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
    1. Re:The first time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How does that make any sense? You're implying that in other parts of the world, YOU come to snow... wha?

    2. Re:The first time... by deathlyslow · · Score: 1

      Sure, it happens all the time. The south west US deserts come to minds as well as the folks from Florida going to Aspen, Vail, etc.

      --
      Don't blame me for redundant posts. I can't type very fast. Hence the user ID.
  3. "Faulty weathermen" is a bit redundant by ShaunC · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I didn't think they came in any other variety.

    --
    Thanks to the War on Drugs, it's easier to buy meth than it is to buy cold medicine!
    1. Re:"Faulty weathermen" is a bit redundant by oodaloop · · Score: 0, Redundant

      That's because you don't understand Chaos theory, and that weather is inherently unpredictable.

      --
      Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
    2. Re:"Faulty weathermen" is a bit redundant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Their job is to predict the weather. They typically fail miserably. Hence faulty. Whether (tee hee, no pun intended) or not their job is inherently flawed is another matter entirely.

    3. Re:"Faulty weathermen" is a bit redundant by Ethanol-fueled · · Score: 1

      So that's where all the laid-off Wall Street guys went...

    4. Re:"Faulty weathermen" is a bit redundant by siride · · Score: 3, Insightful

      They typically do really well, actually. People just remember the abject failures and overgeneralize.

    5. Re:"Faulty weathermen" is a bit redundant by aliquis · · Score: 3, Funny

      They typically do really well, actually. People just remember the abject failures and overgeneralize

      That's what I've been telling the ladies.

      (No, just kidding, virgin in reality.)

    6. Re:"Faulty weathermen" is a bit redundant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +1 funny, had I mod points. I lol.

    7. Re:"Faulty weathermen" is a bit redundant by NeutronCowboy · · Score: 1

      Chaos theory is not inherently unpredictable - it is quite predictable. The problem is that prediction cannot be done an arbitrary amount of time in the future, but instead has to be done iteratively. Furthermore, there's a difference between the difficulty of predicting the location of a particular O2 molecule 2 weeks in the future, and the statistical prediction of the average kinetic energy of O2 molecules 2 weeks in the future.

      --
      Those who can, do. Those who can't, sue.
    8. Re:"Faulty weathermen" is a bit redundant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      yup. idiot humans have terrible memory and they blow things all out of proportion when they remember the anomalies. Guess what? Predict tomorrow will be like today and you instantly have 70% accuracy. Most people agree that is pretty good and all "weathermen" do better than that. Or more recently, meteorologists exquisitely predicted the gigantic storm x-mas storm that stretched from Mexico to Canada. In fact, all models converged and gave very accurate predictions of all vector/scalar quantities, like moisture content, local precip, velocity, vorticity, pressure etc. Really climate science has advanced tremendously in the last decade or two do to good funding and awesome increases in computing power. I could take these criticisms in stride if this widespread ignorance wasn't holding back society at large...

    9. Re:"Faulty weathermen" is a bit redundant by Ihmhi · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Back when I was in elementary school, my school was privaledged to have a special weather program for the more advanced students. A special satellite dish was installed on the roof hooked up to special terminals in our classroom; we had a direct downlink from the satellite.

      I recall seeing a big hurricane coming towards us. With the data we had (a few hours worth), I knew it would hit by tomorrow. The meteorologists said it was a low chance of it coming in, but the basic signs - cold fronts, warm fronts, wind, the path of the hurricane, etc. - indicated to me that it was more likely that it would hit us. In short, I stayed up late and got two days off from school due to heavy rain. It was fun indeed.

      Even with the limited data I had (compared to modern meteorologists), though, it still could have passed us by. It just would have been more and more unlikely.

      The parent(s) are right about the unpredictability of weather, though. I generally don't trust forecasts beyond the next day (and sometimes not even then), because a shift in air pressure, wind, temperature, etc. can divert an incoming storm miles and miles away. It all falls down to computer models and what is "most likely", but until they invent magic crystal balls it will never really be accurate enough to satisfy the people who would depend on long-range forecasts. Not without human intervention (cloud-seeding, etc.) at least.

    10. Re:"Faulty weathermen" is a bit redundant by PitViper401 · · Score: 1

      Stating that you're a virgin on slashdot is redundant. This IS slashdot after all.

    11. Re:"Faulty weathermen" is a bit redundant by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      Yes and no. They're typically accurate to within a given margin of error (uncertainty) for temperature and precipitation, but that margin is fairly wide where the average person is concerned. From a historical perspective, weather prediction is more accurate now than ever before, but for many laypeople, five degrees (67F to 72F) can mean the difference between wearing a jacket or not, so small variations are often viewed as being "wrong."

      Additionally, geography can contribute to substantial inaccuracies in prediction systems. What's easy to predict over flat, dry land can become quite difficult in mountainous areas or land near large bodies of water. In either case, the wind shifting a few degrees in direction can mean the difference between getting soaked (or snowed in, as the case may be at this time of year) or receiving no precipitation whatsoever. In the case of mountains, they may either prevent or exacerbate the mixing of warm/wet air with cold/dry air, and in the case of lakes and certain coastal areas, a shift in wind direction can change the "shadow" of such lake/sea/bay effect precipitation.

      Of course the downside to living in flat land areas away from water is that such places are prime breeding grounds for tornadoes, which are even more difficult to predict more than a few minutes out with useful accuracy, so pick your poison.

    12. Re:"Faulty weathermen" is a bit redundant by siride · · Score: 1

      You also have to distinguish between the local weather faces, many of whom don't even have a meteorological degree, and folks at the National Weather Service or AccuWeather or other companies that employ professionals.

      The precision problem is a big one. Where I'm from, if there is a winter storm, my area is frequently on the boundary between rain, wintry mix and snow. Determining where the lines between those precipitation types will fall is very difficult and they always get it wrong...not because they suck, but because you can't really know until the stuff is falling out of the sky. No production model has resolution anywhere near on the level of, say, a small city, so there is a lot of estimation and looking at analog storms, etc. Now, of course, from a larger perspective, they do a pretty good job. If the rain/snow line is off by a few miles or tens of miles, it's really not a big deal compared to the size of the storm. But if you live where it was supposed to snow and you get rain, or vice versa, it's a pretty big deal to you and, for all it matters to you, the weathermen failed miserably.

      One of the problems I see is that it's not acceptable for weathermen to express uncertainty, or alternate possibilities. They have to make a call, one call. And if they do try, people just misinterpret what they are saying. The reality is that a forecast is actually probabilistic. Any number of scenarios can play out, and a few of them are very likely, and hopefully one of them is considerably more likely than the others. But even if it seems to be a straightforward forecast, no forecast is ever 100% likely. Perhaps the solution, then, is to try to alter communication with the public so that the probabilistic nature of forecasting can be effectively communicated and people can know what to expect (where "know what to expect" means that they expect more than one possible outcome and aware of what the likelihoods for the various outcomes are). Grand task, I know, for the lay population who has enough trouble with a single, non-probabilistic forecast.

  4. Huh by nametaken · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Given what it costs to deal with snow in a major city each year, $6 million sounds like money very well spent. Now if only someone would get the dome cities idea back on the table...

    1. Re:Huh by godrik · · Score: 1

      I was wondering if we have accurate estimation of the cost of snow in large cities.

    2. Re:Huh by xutopia · · Score: 3, Informative
    3. Re:Huh by godrik · · Score: 1

      so the cost would be roughly equivalent to 200km of streets which is quite small for a city like Moscow. And this just consider the cost of removing the snow, not the broken bones to people slipping, car accident, traffic jam...

    4. Re:Huh by poetmatt · · Score: 0

      only until you look at the fact that silver iodide is hazardous, and so you're basically turning rain into poison rain.

    5. Re:Huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Do you understand the concept of varying levels of concentration?

    6. Re:Huh by truthsearch · · Score: 5, Funny

      Dome cities...

      EPA Soldier: I'm afraid we lost them, sir.
      Russ Cargill: Damn it! Well, then you find 'em, and you get 'em back in the dome! And to make sure nobody else gets out, I want roving death squads around the perimeter 24-7! I want 10,000 tough guys, and I want 10,000 soft guys to make the tough guys look tougher! And here's how I want them arranged: tough, soft, tough, tough, soft, tough, soft, soft, tough, tough, soft, soft, tough, soft, tough, soft!
      EPA Soldier: Sir, I'm afraid you've gone mad with power.
      Russ Cargill: Of course I have! Have you ever tried going mad without power? It's boring, no one listens to you!

    7. Re:Huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Silver iodide is hazardous? Or is it just homeopathic?!? Hmmmmmmmm?

      ...

      okay, we'll do it your way. :b

    8. Re:Huh by ccarson · · Score: 0, Insightful

      Why introduce it at any concentration if it's bad for you?

    9. Re:Huh by Rockoon · · Score: 3, Informative

      Oxygen is poisonous too.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    10. Re:Huh by pwfffff · · Score: 1

      Cause you can overdose on water, yet you drin--

      Actually nevermind. Bad things are B A D bad and that's just the way it is.

    11. Re:Huh by Keep+Six · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      ..."Under the guidelines of the Clean Water Act by the EPA, silver iodide is considered a hazardous substance, a priority pollutant, and as a toxic pollutant. Chronic Exposure/Target Organs: Chronic ingestion of iodides may produce "iodism", which may be manifested by skin rash, running nose, headache and irritation of the mucous membranes. Weakness, anemia, loss of weight and general depression may also occur. Chronic inhalation or ingestion may cause argyria characterized by blue-gray discoloration of the eyes, skin and mucous membranes. Chronic skin contact may cause permanent discoloration of the skin." DO NOT WANT!

    12. Re:Huh by aliquis · · Score: 1

      I read in a news paper that "Enköping", a small city (or maybe the meant the municipality) with around 20.000 inhabitants here in Sweden at close to the same latitude as Stockholm budgeted 8 million SEK (1.12 million USD) / year for snow control. I can't find the paper but I thought it was quite a small area of roads.

    13. Re:Huh by aliquis · · Score: 2, Informative

      Over here a city with 20.000 inhabitants budgeted 1.12 million USD / year for snow removal so yes, 6 million to clear whole fucking Moscow would be very cheap indeed.

      But well, snow lighten things up so when controlled it's not that bad. Cold dark misery with no snow would be even worse.

    14. Re:Huh by aliquis · · Score: 2, Funny

      Wouldn't homeopathic silver iodide have such low concentrations that there wouldn't actually be any silver iodide at all and therefor safe? :D

    15. Re:Huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Given what it costs to deal with snow in a major city each year, $6 million sounds like money very well spent.

      You are assuming that cloud seeding actually works. It is far from a proven science. Or that is to say although theoretically possible, getting the cloud dropplets to condense to the "sweet" goldilocks size for percipitation takes a lot more than just crop dusting them with condensation nuclei.

      Just because you can sell someone snake oil, doesn't mean it is actually going to do anything.

      Pure gold (silver?) for politicians trying to show they are doing something though.

    16. Re:Huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wish I could mod you up.

    17. Re:Huh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but the EPA doesn't have jurisdiction over Russia, so their analysis is invalid in that application.

    18. Re:Huh by baegucb · · Score: 1

      What about the cost of no snow? It insulates pipes and lowers heating costs.

    19. Re:Huh by mqduck · · Score: 1

      Sadly, the closest we'll ever get to a return of Scorpio!

      --
      Property is theft.
    20. Re:Huh by Ginger+Unicorn · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      that's the closest a slashdot comment ever gets to containing sexual tension

      --
      (1.21 gigawatts) / (88 miles per hour) = 30 757 874 newtons
  5. Hmph by InlawBiker · · Score: 1

    If they want to avoid the snow they should just invade Spain and move there. Of course, their hockey tradition would die pretty quickly.

    1. Re:Hmph by nametaken · · Score: 1

      Spain would be a little bit of a hike for Russia.

      Also, I don't think they've figured out how to control the temperature... at least not safely.

    2. Re:Hmph by F0RR · · Score: 1

      Well, sometimes Luzhkov is just crazy. Like, he wanted to re-conquer Crimea.

    3. Re:Hmph by QuantumRiff · · Score: 1

      But I hear it rains, mainly on the plain, in spain..

      --

      What are we going to do tonight Brain?
    4. Re:Hmph by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Context is everything. Crimea is complicated since it was the location of the Soviet Baltic Fleet, and Ukraine and Russia have a long running dispute over ownership of ships, shipyards etc. Also, it is the "spiritual" home of the Imperial Russian navy, which makes it even more important to Russia. Given the strong feelings on both sides of the dispute, Luzhkov's statement is not unusual.

    5. Re:Hmph by aliquis · · Score: 2, Funny

      Baltic fleet? Seems rather inconvenient.

    6. Re:Hmph by pjt33 · · Score: 1

      Would this be the same Spain that had to close several motorways due to snow this month? The same Spain whose capital city had snow in May this year?

  6. In Soviet Russia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Winter geoengineers YOU!

    1. Re:In Soviet Russia by DriedClexler · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Nah, I would have gone with:

      In Soviet Russia, weather complains about YOU!

      --
      Information theory is life. The rest is just the KL divergence.
  7. Moscow without snow? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    That would be like Paris without dogshit.

    1. Re:Moscow without snow? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's funny because it's true.

    2. Re:Moscow without snow? by Lord+Ender · · Score: 1

      Bangalore without cow patties.

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    3. Re:Moscow without snow? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or Utah without... well...

    4. Re:Moscow without snow? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mormons?

    5. Re:Moscow without snow? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Morons?

    6. Re:Moscow without snow? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Morans?

    7. Re:Moscow without snow? by Arthur+Grumbine · · Score: 1

      For Hilton and France.

      --
      Now that I think about it, I'm pretty sure everything I just said is completely wrong.
    8. Re:Moscow without snow? by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Can we please stop with the constant flow of unreasoning right-wing hatred of the French on slashdot? We get it, surrender monkeys. You don't have to throw it in to totally unrelated discussions about other European nations. Kthx.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    9. Re:Moscow without snow? by demonlapin · · Score: 3, Insightful

      What's right-wing about dissing the French? English-speaking nations have been doing it since AT LEAST 1066.

    10. Re:Moscow without snow? by misexistentialist · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Typical French petulance to take insult at a joke that is not particularly derogatory towards France, while weakly labeling it as right-wing!

    11. Re:Moscow without snow? by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Uh, that's not from dogs

    12. Re:Moscow without snow? by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      For Hilton and France.

      The battle-cry of the Gallic hotelier!

    13. Re:Moscow without snow? by Tynin · · Score: 1

      Can we please stop with the constant flow of unreasoning right-wing hatred of the French on slashdot? We get it, surrender monkeys. You don't have to throw it in to totally unrelated discussions about other European nations. Kthx.

      I'm going to have to refer you to the irrefutable wisdom of Thomas Jefferson.

      - "Every man has two countries: his own and France."

      So, since Jefferson has asserted that we're all of both our nation and of France, I think it is only fair that we are allowed to talk down about either location. Given that France is much smaller than the rest of the world, if everyone spoke out against their own country and that of France equally, it begins to make sense why we see so much more vitriol toward France.

    14. Re:Moscow without snow? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      slashdot without the nerds

    15. Re:Moscow without snow? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOLWUT?!

    16. Re:Moscow without snow? by Idiomatick · · Score: 1

      The french actually insult the french more than those in the states.

    17. Re:Moscow without snow? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes but occasionally we've gotten along...

      ---Says a decendant of French who came to America in late 1770's or early 1780's.

    18. Re:Moscow without snow? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really! Right-wing hatred of Paris is reserved for the rest of France. Right-wing hatred of *Quebec* is reserved for the people of Paris.

    19. Re:Moscow without snow? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just wait until they find a new nation to hate, it shouldn't take too long.

      Evil Drunk Commie

    20. Re:Moscow without snow? by Sloppy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That's what's right-wing about it: it's old and safe. I would give an example of left-wing dissing, but I can't think of any groups that haven't been dissed.

      Alpha-Centurians, maybe? Naah, Douglas Adams already did it.

      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    21. Re:Moscow without snow? by hkz · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And to think their refusal to validate the UN resolution against Iraq because of doubts about the intelligence (which was the direct cause for all the vitriol against the French in the past few years like the "Freedom Fries") turned out to be *completely justified*. Who's the funny guy now?

    22. Re:Moscow without snow? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In this case, the comparison is not mindless French bashing and is quite funny and appropriate. I respect the French a lot for their strengths (nuclear power for one) but the first time I visited Paris I was struck by the freedom and enthusiasm with which the dogs there (encouraged by their owners, no doubt) relieved themselves on every ground level surface of the city, with no apparent process in place to clean it up. The ubiquity of it does seem an apt comparison to winter snow in Moscow.

    23. Re:Moscow without snow? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you think France's opposition to Iraq was founded on intelligence reports, then you're just as stupid as your beret makes you look. Gaullist foreign policy since WWII was founded on kneejerk opposition to anything the Anglo-Saxons did, and Chirac was the epitome of enervated 90s Gaullism. I bet you don't even know what Gaullism is, eh? FRANCE AND UN GOOD, AMERICA BAD

    24. Re:Moscow without snow? by Darkman,+Walkin+Dude · · Score: 1

      They weren't speaking English as you'd know it back then. In fact it was the Norman conquest of England that lead directly to the formation of the modern English language, so the French are in fact responsible for the language you are dissing them in.

    25. Re:Moscow without snow? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, since 1066 the english elite was speaking french and sucking up to french culture. This is now limited in the US to the east-coast cultural elite, which the right-wing hates, leading to the french-bashing.

    26. Re:Moscow without snow? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Direct cause for all the US vitriol against the French in the last few years - we in the UK (each individual country has it's own individual reasons as well :)) have our own reasons and have done for a good long while.

    27. Re:Moscow without snow? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jerry Lewis?

    28. Re:Moscow without snow? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      That's what's right-wing about it: it's old and safe. I would give an example of left-wing dissing, but I can't think of any groups that haven't been dissed.

      In these parts it's the people who call themselves 'left' who are very much into trying to achieve perfect safety.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    29. Re:Moscow without snow? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can we please stop with the constant flow of unreasoning right-wing hatred of the French on slashdot? We get it, surrender monkeys. You don't have to throw it in to totally unrelated discussions about other European nations. Kthx.

      French faggot.

    30. Re:Moscow without snow? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In these parts it's the people who call themselves 'left' who are very much into trying to achieve perfect safety.

      Because they don't have the ovaries to face the real world.

  8. good job russia? by xch13fx · · Score: 1, Redundant

    seems weird they would be messing with cold weather precipitation cycles while the rest of the world is up in arms about the effects of global warming...

    In soviet Russia we welcome global warming overlords....

    3)profit!

    1. Re:good job russia? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      seems weird they would be messing with cold weather precipitation cycles while the rest of the world is up in arms about the effects of global warming...

      Groan. And time for... yet another idiot confusing weather and climate.

    2. Re:good job russia? by maxume · · Score: 1

      Worry when they start trying to control tens of thousands of square miles, not a few dozen.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    3. Re:good job russia? by bondsbw · · Score: 0, Troll

      Groan. And time for... yet another idiot confusing weather and climate.

      You are so right... they have ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to do with each other. In fact, I would bet that every snow storm means that the climate is actually getting much hotter... sort of an inverse relationship. Except for in the summer (of course)... that's just the beginning of a 50,000 year global heat wave caused by cars and incandescent light bulbs.

      Every stinkin' year, it gets cold and snows in Russia... will global warming ever end?

      --
      All my liberal friends think I'm a conservative, all my conservative friends think I'm a liberal.
    4. Re:good job russia? by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1

      Climate produces weather. They're not trying to change the climate. They're not even necessarily trying to change the weather--they're not trying to make it not snow. What they're trying to do is make it snow someplace else. And we're talking that someplace else being, say, 30 or 40 miles away.

    5. Re:good job russia? by Clandestine_Blaze · · Score: 1

      Groan. And time for... yet another idiot confusing weather and climate.

      You are so right... they have ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to do with each other. In fact, I would bet that every snow storm means that the climate is actually getting much hotter... sort of an inverse relationship. Except for in the summer (of course)... that's just the beginning of a 50,000 year global heat wave caused by cars and incandescent light bulbs.

      Every stinkin' year, it gets cold and snows in Russia... will global warming ever end?

      Local weather conditions have absolutely nothing to do with global climate trends. Global mean temperatures can go up, but locally, you may be experiencing the coldest day of your life. Snow storms in colder, local regions of the globe are not mutually exclusive to warmer global temperatures.

    6. Re:good job russia? by bondsbw · · Score: 1

      They're not trying to change the climate.

      I never said they were. I was merely highlighting the OP's point (what I got from it), which is that global warming is a nice conjecture, but really there's no evidence of it (more precisely, there's no evidence that people are the cause of it).

      But let's assume we are the cause... I once looked it up, and 15 cargo ships produce as much greenhouse gas as all the cars in the world combined. There are 90,000 cargo ships in the world that operate all the time. Do the math. Now, ask yourself why politicians care nothing about regulating overseas shipping, but want desperately to milk an extra couple of miles out of your gas tank at a price of hundreds or thousands of dollars to you?

      --
      All my liberal friends think I'm a conservative, all my conservative friends think I'm a liberal.
    7. Re:good job russia? by lyml · · Score: 1

      I once looked it up, and 15 cargo ships produce as much greenhouse gas as all the cars in the world combined. There are 90,000 cargo ships in the world that operate all the time. Do the math.

      Lies.

    8. Re:good job russia? by Cimexus · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I once looked it up, and 15 cargo ships produce as much greenhouse gas as all the cars in the world combined.

      As much as I despise the phrase ... lolwut?

      Just think about that for a second. Use your sense of natural intuition, your common sense, your sense of proportions and orders of magnitude. Does that statement seem even remotely plausible. That 15 ships emit the same volume of GHGs as a billion cars?

      For the record, what you are thinking of is this: http://www.greencarreports.com/blog/1020063_pollution-perspective-one-giant-cargo-ship-emits-as-much-as-50-million-cars ...which is talking about the volume of ~pollution~ (e.g. sulfur, particulates, other 'dirty' stuff etc), not greenhouse gas emissions (most GHGs aren't dirty and cannot really be called pollutants, as they occur naturally in decent concentrations anyway). When we are talking about pollution (rather than GHG emissions), modern cars are in fact very clean indeed due to the tough emissions standards in most countries in the last several decades.

      Having said that shipping is still a substantial slice of the greenhouse gas pie (the above article attributes 3-4% influence to total anthropogenic GHGs). But it's nowhere near the huge difference between cars and ships as you make out.

    9. Re:good job russia? by smashin234 · · Score: 1

      seems weird they would be messing with cold weather precipitation cycles while the rest of the world is up in arms about the effects of global warming...

      Groan. And time for... yet another idiot confusing weather and climate.

      He may be confusing them, but who is to say that changing weather will NOT effect climate? Any studies to show it doesn't? Seems like he might have a point even as you claim he does not....

      Now I was being the devil's advocate there, and more then likely such a small change in weather will not effect climate, but then again, stranger things have happened....

    10. Re:good job russia? by smashin234 · · Score: 1

      Groan. And time for... yet another idiot confusing weather and climate.

      You are so right... they have ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to do with each other. In fact, I would bet that every snow storm means that the climate is actually getting much hotter... sort of an inverse relationship. Except for in the summer (of course)... that's just the beginning of a 50,000 year global heat wave caused by cars and incandescent light bulbs.

      Every stinkin' year, it gets cold and snows in Russia... will global warming ever end?

      Local weather conditions have absolutely nothing to do with global climate trends. Global mean temperatures can go up, but locally, you may be experiencing the coldest day of your life. Snow storms in colder, local regions of the globe are not mutually exclusive to warmer global temperatures.

      Maybe so on the local conditions at one location, but playing the devil's advocate again, if you change the weather, won't it effect temperatures at some point? Since the reliable models use tree rings and glaciers as their data, if you changed enough snowfall those could be affected at some point and all you have left is 200 years of maybe reliable data based on different gathering methods across the globe ....so yea weather patterns could affect climate potentially based on the premise that taking weather patterns from around the globe produces accurate climate models....

      And then again, another way to look at it, no matter what technique you use to figure out the climate data, you run into the issue that climate is nothing more then the summation and average of local WEATHER temperatures.

    11. Re:good job russia? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wethers, and their species, produce climate change according to some

  9. Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    At least Russia doesn't hide the fact that it's spraying Chem Trails... :)

  10. Weather Dominator? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shrinkage on an epic scale!!!

  11. Madness by iamacat · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Russia is reverting to its industry-over-humans ways. Sure road cleaning might cost a bit, but who would to spend 5 months with subfreezing temperatures but no snow (which would accidentally raise temperatures a bit). No snowmen, no snowballs, no sledding, no respite from pollution by covering up the accumulated gunk with white? And in spring city landscaping will suffer from lack of moisture in soil.

    1. Re:Madness by zlogic · · Score: 1

      Yup, I confirm that a snowless winter is much colder. The snow acts as a thermal insulator, so that a -3C without snow feels like -10C with snow.
      Also, snow is aesthetically nice, covering up all the dirt and old brown grass etc.

    2. Re:Madness by Lord+Ender · · Score: 1

      The people who don't die in car accidents would want to spend 5 months with subfreezing temperatures but no snow, actually.

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    3. Re:Madness by qoncept · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Really? A lot of people hate snow and would presumably be more than willing to go without. Myself included. Unfortunately, living in a tiny town just west of a larger city, if this were to ever happen I'd probably be a little unhappy.

      --
      Whale
    4. Re:Madness by Trent+Hawkins · · Score: 1

      well, most people have to do just that. In big cities you don't see any of those things, instead you get sludge, traffic and giant mountains of black/brown snow. If you wanted to go tobogganing you'd have to find a skiing facility, everything else is just plain unusable.

    5. Re:Madness by ALeavitt · · Score: 1

      I don't know about the place where you live, but here in Minnesota we get about two hours of glistening, beautiful, white snow followed by a matter of months of dirty, disgusting, brown or black slush and enormous grey snowbanks. Personally, I think that it would be a much less dreary place in winter if we didn't have all of this accumulated snow.
      Having said that, I'm also an avid skier, so it should go without saying that I don't want to see snow-free winters. Ideally I would just like snow to stay where it belongs.

      --
      This sig has been stolen. Return it to its original user for a reward.
    6. Re:Madness by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1

      respite from pollution by covering up the accumulated gunk with white?

      I guess you have never seen snow in a city. Hint: it won't stay white for long...

    7. Re:Madness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if I ever have an option to select winter with snow or without. I would take the snow. specially on higher latitudes snow provides additional light and does not suck all to darkness like November water rain.

      Even if heavy snowfall would mean cleaning driveway one hour at morning and two at night and using double of time to travel to work by bicycle. If you have problems with show, you just do not know how to dress yourself.

      (posting as ac because can't type my password on phone keyboard)

    8. Re:Madness by Robotbeat · · Score: 5, Funny

      Russia is reverting to its industry-over-humans ways.

      That always was my favorite part about the Soviet Union. None of this whiny "but we'll get cancer" crap. In Russia, a guy would be lucky to see his sixties and not die of alcohol-related disease.

      My favorite was Nuclear Explosions for the National Economy, which was a much bigger version(i.e. over 200 nuclear explosions!) of the US's Operation Plowshare (a mere 28). They made a lake, went prospecting for diamonds and oil and gas and all sorts of neat things to do with "peaceful nuclear explosions." I believe the Soviets also found a way to make cattle feed directly out of petroleum (though I haven't been able to source this), I suppose in case of nuclear winter. I think the Soviets were also thinking of working with the USA to intentionally melt the Arctic ice sheet via damming up the Bering Strait or something. They were going to use the Energia rocket (designed for their Buran Space Shuttle) to orbit a giant orbiting mirror to illuminate arctic/Siberian towns during the cold, dark winters there.

      You learn how to fight to win in the struggle of Man vs Nature when you live in a place as cold and desolate as Russia.

      I think the Russians actually WANT global warming. I doubt they'll ever start doing anything meaningful to stop it. Heck, an ice-free Arctic would mean a lot more viable trading ports for Russia, something it has always been in very short supply of (compared to the United States, which has ginormous, ice-free trading ports on the two busiest oceans... this has been an enormous engine of growth and geopolitical power for the USA). Also, they would likely substantially increase how much arable land they have available if the temperature rose a few degrees. The only people who have more to gain from Global Warming is probably Canada.

      And if global warming is ever a big enough problem that we just HAVE TO lower the temperature a few degrees via some geoengineering scheme, the Russians are the ones to go to who have the gonads to do it and the industrial capability to pull it off, although China could probably do it just as well.

    9. Re:Madness by EvilNTUser · · Score: 1

      Traditionally, when someone dislikes something that others like, we prefer to let things be as they naturally are. Your right to swing your fist... face... etc.

      This means people who like graffiti don't get to impose it on others' buildings, and likewise people who hate snow don't get to remove it from others. While this is seemingly illogical, since one action adds and the other removes, the point is that clean buildings and snowy winters are the default state.

      Even from a practical viewpoint, trying to decide which amoral position is "correct" would just result in endless arguing while we could be doing something more productive.

      Plus there's the fact that the rest of the world is trying to fight pollution while these geniuses are regularly spraying chemicals into the air because they think rain is unpleasant. Thanks guys!

      --
      My Sig: SEGV
    10. Re:Madness by snowraver1 · · Score: 1

      Whoah there... Tobogganing at a skiing facility? I have never seen this. Are there actually places that you can ski/toboggan on the same hill? Can you take the toboggan up the lift? Ever since I was little, I have liked toboganning, but hate walking up steep hills in the winter... This could change everything.

      About the brown/black snow... Yes, snow that has been removed from streets is gross and should be left alone, but once you leave the sides of the road, even by 5 feet, the snow is nice and white again. Personally, I love snow. I have a good foot covering my backyard, and that is much better than brown grass and dead (hibernating) plants. Plus when it melts the snow slowly seeps into the grass/gardens and adds a ton of water to the soil.

      --
      Copyright 2010. All rights reserved. This comment may not be copied in any way including, but not limited to caching.
    11. Re:Madness by Zibben · · Score: 0

      Being one that moved from Minnesota to Oklahoma, I'll take snow any day (even if no one down here knows how to drive in it.) And seeing as it usually doesn't get cold enough for snow to accumulate we get ice instead.

    12. Re:Madness by cjb658 · · Score: 1

      Move somewhere where it doesn't snow.

    13. Re:Madness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Yup, I confirm that a snowless winter is much colder. The snow acts as a thermal insulator, so that a -3C without snow feels like -10C with snow.

      -3 is warmer than -10. Or is it backwards day again?

    14. Re:Madness by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Plus there's the fact that the rest of the world is trying to fight pollution while these geniuses are regularly spraying chemicals into the air because they think rain is unpleasant. Thanks guys!

      You mean the rest of the world like the USA, where cloud seeding is completely and totally unregulated, and it's not even illegal to do it over someone else's land? And where it proceeds in great volume in spite of there being no evidence that it actually works on the kind of scale usually employed by private contractors working for farmers...

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    15. Re:Madness by moosesocks · · Score: 1

      If you hate snow, I'd strongly advise leaving Russia.

      --
      -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
    16. Re:Madness by Bigjeff5 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The reason people die when it snows is because people are dumbasses. People die in car accidents in the summer also because they (or people who hit them) are dumbasses.

      What's this white stuff? Made of ice you say? Well that can't mean it's slippery, and if it isn't slippery why should I slow down and give everyone around me more room?

      Dumbasses.

      Also, the snow in cold climates is very important to keep plants from dieing in the extreme cold season. For something buried in snow, -20 outside will be right around freezing inside - snow is a fantastic insulator.

      --
      Security is mostly a superstition... Avoiding danger is no safer in the long run than outright exposure. - Helen Keller
    17. Re:Madness by Bigjeff5 · · Score: 1

      Having said that, I'm also an avid skier, so it should go without saying that I don't want to see snow-free winters. Ideally I would just like snow to stay where it belongs.

      The snow was there first.

      Anyway where I live it's 4 or 5 months of glistening white snow, if you like the white stuff but hate the brown, you just need to move further north, that's all. Of course, we still get about a month of nasty brown shit, but it also means things are warming up, and we aren't too upset about that when it comes. ;)

      --
      Security is mostly a superstition... Avoiding danger is no safer in the long run than outright exposure. - Helen Keller
    18. Re:Madness by stephanruby · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I believe the Soviets also found a way to make cattle feed directly out of petroleum (though I haven't been able to source this),

      It's not much of a stretch. In the West (probably everywhere), we use petroleum to make artificial flavors. For instance, strawberry flavored gum or strawberry flavored ice cream just wouldn't exist at the consumer level without faking it with Petroleum-based esterification (there are just not enough strawberries in the World to make that a viable option).

    19. Re:Madness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Needs Citation

    20. Re:Madness by Lord+Ender · · Score: 0

      What you posted is fantastically stupid. Really. You implied that people who aren't skilled at driving deserve to die.

      That's utter fucking bullshit. You're a bad person.

      Anyone with an ounce of moral decency would say "contrary to what you claim, helping save the lives of people is a good thing!" but it seems so self-evident to those of us who are not sociopaths, writing the words feels awkward.

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    21. Re:Madness by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      They were going to use the Energia rocket (designed for their Buran Space Shuttle) to orbit a giant orbiting mirror to illuminate arctic/Siberian towns during the cold, dark winters there.

      They actually launched a prototype of that. It didn't deploy right and ended up being just a big shiny thing in the sky confusing lots of people.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    22. Re:Madness by Cimexus · · Score: 1

      Given the same conditions. Temperatures (particularly at night) are significantly colder if there is a ground cover of snow, than if there isn't (because as you said, snow is a thermal insulator that keeps the heat in the ground, and thus out of the air). Read the 'forecast discussion' on any NOAA forecast for an area that has a good snow cover and a clear, still night and they often mention things like "bumped temps down a few degrees from guidance, due to snow cover".

      The effect during the day will also be to reduce or delay heating (and thus reduce Tmax). Snow (water) has a very high specific heat capacity. That is, snow covered ground can absorb a crapload more heat from the sun before it starts radiating significant amounts of that heat back to the air, than ground can. Furthermore the white colour of snow reflects more incidental radiation from the sun that brownish ground would.

      So all things being equal, the GP is correct - no snow on the ground will raise temps a bit compared to what they would have been in the same situation with snow cover.

    23. Re:Madness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't need to be a dumbass to be killed by one.

    24. Re:Madness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Citations?

    25. Re:Madness by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Many states have regulations against cloud seeding, but there are no federal statutes whatsoever. So completely and totally unregulated is some bullshit that I heard somewhere. Around a third of states have no regulations; in those states it's totally unregulated :P

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    26. Re:Madness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, it's warmer when it's -3C, but doesn't feel like it because the snow isn't there. It feels colder, like -10C, and the reason it feels COLDER when it feels like -10C is that -3C is WARMER than -10C.
      Thanks for wasting a second of my time looking for a sign error. Maybe you can reread that post standing on your head and you'll know what day it is.

    27. Re:Madness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...ginormous, ice-free trading ports on the two busiest oceans... this has been an enormous engine of growth and geopolitical power for the USA

      That's also why Mexico, Guatemala, Honduras, Nicaragua, Panama, and Columbia are so powerful.

    28. Re:Madness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While I certainly agree that stupidity should be painful, and, in extreme circumstances lethal, I think you're forgetting the collateral damage... that is to say, YOU, the cautious driver who happens to be in the wrong place at the wrong time.

    29. Re:Madness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just a tip on how russian cities work.

      Hot water pipes are layed underneath major roadways for convenient fixing. On a certain day every year, the entire city is tested for breaks in this system (generally fall-ish). This lets everything get fixed before the snow.

      Now, because the water pipes are under roads, the roads are constantly "warm". No white snow there, just mud. The ugly kind that keeps traffic down for hours.

      If you're complaining about "city spirit" and general happiness at snow...visit siberia. they've got enough snow there. Snow's essential to harvesting crops but the city can do well enough without it.

    30. Re:Madness by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      Lots of ski resorts have little side hills where you can go toboganning. Most of the places are actually tubing, where you sit on an inflated tube and go down the hill. There's even some hills that offer only tubing. A rope tows you up the top, and some hills have moving walkways. Lots of fun for everyone.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    31. Re:Madness by FragHARD · · Score: 1

      I am curious..... what ever happened to the 'woodpecker' ???

      --
      FragHARD or don't frag at all
    32. Re:Madness by iamacat · · Score: 1

      Ah, but practically speaking snow cover will be established during 5 months of subzero temperatures cloud seeding or not. So what remains is raise in temperature from phase transition of lots of water and a heavy cloud cover that keeps the heat from dissipating. Look at thermometer sometime - it gets 10C warmer in 20 minutes once heavy snowfall starts.

    33. Re:Madness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Soviet Russia, moisture-deprived soil landscapes you.

    34. Re:Madness by Pareto+Efficient · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Absolutely correct!

      After I get off work I make many esters at home, Fischer Esterification is the name of the process. I make rum, cherry and banana flavors regularly. I purify them via vacuum distillation. I make more exotic ones such as pineapple, honey and various other fruits/flavors.

      All you need is a copy of Vogel's 3rd Edition Practical Organic Synthesis (written in plain english), the webpage on wikipedia about esterification and the reagents (ingredients you buy in a walmart) plus a little sulfuric acid drain cleaner as a catalyst (gets things started). Only a few eye drops worth are required.

      Its safe, simple, harmless fun with chemistry and a great way to get kids into science by having them make pleasant smells. (Use supervision)

      It beats the stuffing out of those so called chemistry sets that are sold and for a fraction of the price.

       

    35. Re:Madness by Issarlk · · Score: 1

      I don't understant your post, can you explain with a car analogy ?

    36. Re:Madness by aclarke · · Score: 1

      Try doing something winter-related. I live in Canada and I get this attitude all the time from people. They hate the winter and complain about the snow, and basically the only time they go outside is when walking to or from their cars.

      IF you have the correct gear, tobogganing, skating, cross-country or downhill skiing, snowshoeing or just making snow angels are all fun and enjoyable activities. As an added bonus, they're also far healthier than sitting around in the house. This is both from the point of view of getting you some exercise as well as making you a happier person.

      I'm not trying to attack you personally, but I don't really understand why people hate the snow so much, yet refuse to either engage the winter and enjoy it, or move somewhere else.

    37. Re:Madness by qoncept · · Score: 1

      I live in Iowa and the only of those activities I could really do is cross country skiing. I've done it, it's alright. Downhill skiing I love, but it's not really an option here. It's an inconvenience, causes accidents, and my dog comes back in the house with wet feet all the time. My friends from Alabama that think it's beautiful haven't seen the disgusting, filthy snow on the side of the road.

      I'm not a bitter, unhappy person. I just don't like snow. Incidentally, it's less of an inconvenience than mowing the lawn during the summer.

      My point wasn't to complain about snow or even imply that we should engage in trying to eliminate it. The OP thought everyone liked snow.

      --
      Whale
    38. Re:Madness by shaitand · · Score: 1

      "Even if heavy snowfall would mean... using double of time to travel to work by bicycle."

      If you are traveling to work on a bicycle in snow, or a winter cold enough for there to be snow you have more important things to do than Slashdot. Like counseling.

  12. Does this EVER work? by dtolman · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Is this used successfully anywhere, regularly?

    I remember China making mention of doing this for the 2008 games, but as far as I can see, the only policies that really did make a difference in the weather was closing factories, and banning cars from the road to reduce the choking air pollution...

    1. Re:Does this EVER work? by Primitive+Pete · · Score: 1

      Yes. See "Cloud seeding" on wikipedia for some details.

    2. Re:Does this EVER work? by dtolman · · Score: 1

      Cloud seeding is one thing - this is an attempt to stop precipitation for a region altogether.

    3. Re:Does this EVER work? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      ... which still involves cloud seeding by causing premature precipitation. If you don't care to RTFA or RTFWP, at least read the fucking summary.

    4. Re:Does this EVER work? by dtolman · · Score: 1

      ...which does not prevent precipitation from forming after the seeding process is finished. And has dubious effectiveness. Try Reading the Fucking Wikipedia Entry next time.

  13. In soviet russia... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Snow geoengineer you..

    1. Re:In soviet russia... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol

  14. Damn Russians by Capt.DrumkenBum · · Score: 1

    Stealing all my snow. Bastards! I live further than anyone else from the office, if it snows I get a snow day. So far this winter it has snowed once on my way home from work, and it was all gone by morning.
    I can hear you asking where I live... I live in the best place in the world! Vancouver Canada.

    --
    If I were God, wouldn't I protect my churches from acts of me?
    1. Re:Damn Russians by hysma · · Score: 1
      It is the "best place on earth," but only if you don't count Campbell, BC Ferries, health care, minimum wage, homelessness, police brutality, and the divided opinion on the Olympics.

      But none of those matter much, it is The BEST Place on Earth afterall.

    2. Re:Damn Russians by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      I live in the best place in the world! Vancouver Canada.
      --
      There's an old robot saying that applies here:
      DOES NOT COMPUTE

      Wow, that's the perfect combination of post and sig. Congratulations.

    3. Re:Damn Russians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Vancouver? Come on, we all know Surrey has better weed and hookers so it wins!

      http://uncyclopedia.wikia.com/wiki/Surrey

    4. Re:Damn Russians by Bigjeff5 · · Score: 1

      That reminds me of the move "Elf", when he finds the coffee shop with a sign that said "World's Best Cup of Coffee". The coffee, of course, was shit.

      It's like calling a big guy "Tiny", or a midget "Mr. Big".

      It's an irony thing - The BEST place on earth *wink wink*.

      --
      Security is mostly a superstition... Avoiding danger is no safer in the long run than outright exposure. - Helen Keller
  15. The article says.... by Primitive+Pete · · Score: 2, Informative

    The article in Time says Moscow usually spends about $12M on removal, twice the $6M cost of seeding for this exercise.

    1. Re:The article says.... by Talderas · · Score: 3, Informative

      So this year they're spending about $18M on removal.

      --
      "Lack of speed can be overcome. In the worst case by patience." --Znork
    2. Re:The article says.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Somehow I think they would probably have gotten snow before now without this attempt.

    3. Re:The article says.... by Jay+Clay · · Score: 1

      And as long as they learn from their mistakes, about $6M a year in the future.

    4. Re:The article says.... by flydpnkrtn · · Score: 1

      That's an extremely pessimistic view though... if in the future they use this technique to reduce/remove the amount of snow, it could cost half as much year over year. Anyone can see how that could ROI pretty quickly...

    5. Re:The article says.... by nametaken · · Score: 1

      Not likely. The article also said it normally snows from November to March. It's nearly January and we're reading about how it has snowed in Moscow. Sounds like they're doing a good job, no?

  16. Re:Snow falls in Russia - Film at 11 by isama · · Score: 3, Funny

    In Kapitalist russia YOU control snow,
    In Communist Russia Snow controls YOU!

    yet again a failed promise made by a politician, does it ever CHANGE?

  17. What climate problem? by dontmakemethink · · Score: 1, Informative

    Lemme get this straight. We're in the middle of a climate crisis, and they're messing with the weather? There couldn't possibly be a connection between precipitation and temperature could there? It's not like water vapor is the most prominent greenhouse gas or anything...

    --

    War as we knew it was obsolete
    Nothing could beat complete denial
    - Emily Haines
    1. Re:What climate problem? by QuantumG · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      *facepalm* please go back to Fox News.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    2. Re:What climate problem? by dontmakemethink · · Score: 1

      You're kidding me. You don't see any potential political backlash from frivolous atmospheric geoengineering on the heels of the Copenhagen summit? I'm not being greenboi, just suggesting it's a rather inflammatory thing to do in this *political* climate.

      --

      War as we knew it was obsolete
      Nothing could beat complete denial
      - Emily Haines
  18. What the hell? by GhostGuy · · Score: 1

    Nobody should mess with nature on a large scale like that. Especially not russia, they're not exactly known for thinking things through properly. Who knows what sort of chain effect this sort of shit could set off? It's bad enough that we alter coastlines, pollute the air, alter tides, etc. Fucking with precipitation is just fucking irresponsible.

    1. Re:What the hell? by graft · · Score: 0

      Yeah, mod parent up. Given the unmitigated disaster we're experiencing right now with regards to large-scale ecological destruction from our PASSIVE tampering with various natural processes, why do we think we've got the brains to get it right when we mess around with things actively? Given the history of large-scale government-controlled projects to alter land use and agriculture patterns in Russia (and China, where they're also trying weather modification), I would think they'd be a bit more cautious about stuff like this. Hubris knows no bounds, apparently. And has no memory.

    2. Re:What the hell? by Bigjeff5 · · Score: 1

      As far as nature goes, that's really small scale. Now, if they were trying to do this for all of eastern Russia, that's different, but they were just trying for Moscow. Less snow in Moscow wouldn't do that much, though it would probably slow the spring recovery a bit - less insulation for the plants during winter means the ground freezes deeper, and no runoff from snow melt means plants get their first watering later.

      --
      Security is mostly a superstition... Avoiding danger is no safer in the long run than outright exposure. - Helen Keller
    3. Re:What the hell? by u38cg · · Score: 1

      Area of Moscow: ~1000 sq km. Area of Russia: ~17m sq km. Practical effects of moving precipitation in 0.006% of Russia's surface area: zero.

      --
      [FUCK BETA]
  19. Snow Removal In Moscow by twmcneil · · Score: 4, Interesting

    One morning with nothing better to do, I watched from my hotel window as a crew removed snow from the Moscow street below. Men with shovels scooped the snow into a truck, no other machines were used. The truck disappeared to dump the snow into the river. The snow has so much salt in it that nothing, absolutely nothing downstream survives. It's a huge source of pollution. It took the truck about two hours to dump the snow and return. During this time the men lean against their shovels and smoked. They did not employ a second truck which led me to assume that in Russia a truck is worth more than six men.

    So there is a good reason to stop snow accumulation in Moscow (reducing pollution) but unemployment would spike.

    --
    "The ferrets, they're every where I tell you!"
    1. Re:Snow Removal In Moscow by istartedi · · Score: 2, Informative

      Wow. That sounds like the Soviet Union never really ended. Is there so much snow that they can't use a plow and shove it up on the sidewalk?

      That would eliminate all the jobs except "snowplow driver", of course.

      As long as you are employing men with shovels, a 2nd truck doesn't really help. They need to rest anyway. The last thing they need is heavy smokers shoveling snow continuously without a break.

      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    2. Re:Snow Removal In Moscow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suppose a capitalist pig would say using one snow plow would let you use the men's wages to produce wallets for export or whatever, generating wealth and increasing the GDP.

    3. Re:Snow Removal In Moscow by Bigjeff5 · · Score: 1

      What we do in Alaska is plow the snow up on the sidewalk, and then use single-person driveable snowblowers (like those mini-backhoes you see) to clear the sidewalks. They are wide enough to get the whole sidewalk in one pass, and pedestrians are only inconvenienced a day or two. They would have been trapsing through a foot of snow anyway, so no big change.

      For really small streets a single plow will do the job, for medium sized streets two plows tag-team it, and for the major roads it is generally two to three plows plus giant snowblowers dumping snow into trucks for removal (since too much would accumulate on the side of the street).

      And of course, we aren't stupid enough to salt the roads here - coarse sand works just as well and won't rust your underbody or kill plant life.

      --
      Security is mostly a superstition... Avoiding danger is no safer in the long run than outright exposure. - Helen Keller
    4. Re:Snow Removal In Moscow by jrumney · · Score: 2, Informative

      This may be surprising to you, but outside of North America sidewalks are for walking on, not for storing surplus snow.

    5. Re:Snow Removal In Moscow by grapeshot · · Score: 1

      If you've ever lived in a city where an awful lot of snow falls in the winter, you would know that it's not enough to merely plow the snow. At some point the piles of plowed snow accumulates to the point where you can't plow any more snow onto the pile. In Michigan's Upper Peninsula, every so often during the winter months, GINORMOUS monster snow blowers are brought out which are used to blow the mini-mountains of accumulated plowed snow into dump trucks, which haul the snow out into the countryside. In Wisconsin, this sort of thing happens on a smaller scale in parking lots. There they use end loaders to put the snow into dump truck...which then haul the snow out into the countryside.

      Here's a video of one of these giant snowblower trucks in operation. (One manufacturer of these trucks is Oshkosh Trucks. I bet they'd be willing to sell a few to the city of Moscow.)

      It takes a serious investment of tax payer's money to buy and keep such equipment. It's not clear to me that municipal governments in Russia function as effectively as they do in Canada and the US. Are taxes collected? Do citizens actually pay their taxes? Or are the citizens too poor to pay taxes, and the wealthy oligarchs excused from paying them? If taxes are paid and collected, do they end up being used for public needs? Or do those funds end up in the pocket of some public official?

      In America a lot of people like to bash "government" as wasteful and inefficient, but most Americans have no idea of just how wasteful and inefficient a government can be.

    6. Re:Snow Removal In Moscow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That reminds me. I was in Rome a couple years ago and my friend who had lived there for most of his life would litter so much.

      I kept saying "dude, wtf? Don't litter" and he would say that he is doing his part and giving someone a job. Strange!

    7. Re:Snow Removal In Moscow by istartedi · · Score: 1

      This may be surprising to you, but in many US cities there is a planting strip between the sidewalk and the road. In urban areas the sidewalks may be quite wide and also have a planting strip. While the snowpiles may decrease the pedestrian capacity some, they won't decrease it to the point where the sidewalks are unusable, unless you have truly epic snowfalls (Buffalo, NY leaps to mind). That's why I prefaced my remark with, "is there so much snow that...". I'm not that familiar with Moscow. I know it's cold. I know it snows; but is there heavy snow all the time with no intervening melt? Are the sidewalks wide enough and/or bordered by planting zones?

      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    8. Re:Snow Removal In Moscow by jmv · · Score: 1

      Is there so much snow that they can't use a plow and shove it up on the sidewalk?

      If Russia is anything like Canada, that option is only possible in suburbs where there's a sufficiently large area in front of the houses. It just doesn't work in cities. I live in Montreal. We usually get anywhere between 2 and 4 meters of snow in the winter. If you somehow managed to push all of that on the sidewalks, you would end up with 10+ m walls.

    9. Re:Snow Removal In Moscow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am from Belarus and have been to Russia many times. There are many snowplows which go in the early morning to clear up roads, and then keep going in the afternoon. Probably he was on some private property and that was the administration's dealing with the snow.

    10. Re:Snow Removal In Moscow by istartedi · · Score: 1

      It turned out to be quite difficult to get hard data about snowfall in Moscow. I guess because snow can come in various densities, they prefer to quote liquid equivalents.

      According to one source: " mainly from November through March. During those months Moscow gets a liquid-equivalent of 7.30-8.98 inches of rain. If that all fell as snow, they would get more than 73-90 inches!"

      It sounds like it might the kind of situation you're talking about--epic snowfalls of the type Washington DC saw recently being common as opposed to rare. I don't know if they did it this time because I'm not there anymore; but when that happened in DC a number of years ago, they did indeed resort to dumping it in the Potomac.

      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    11. Re:Snow Removal In Moscow by khallow · · Score: 1

      I suppose a capitalist pig would say using one snow plow would let you use the men's wages to produce wallets for export or whatever, generating wealth and increasing the GDP.

      Sounds like it must stick in your craw that that the "capitalist pig" is right.

    12. Re:Snow Removal In Moscow by quacking+duck · · Score: 1

      I live in Ottawa, so our snowfall is very comparable to Montreal's. Here, ploughs do indeed shove everything onto downtown sidewalks initially, and the sidewalk ploughs clear a path afterwards. Then, after enough ploughed snow has accumulated they'll remove it using giant snowblowing trucks which go down street after street (overnight parking bans would be in effect) and transfer them to dump trucks to take it to designated snow fields. There's almost always one dump truck being loaded and one waiting to take over, it's a fairly efficient operation from what I've seen.

      How does Montreal do it?

    13. Re:Snow Removal In Moscow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bastard! What about the people who walk or ride bikes? Oh, those people, who gives a fuck, we'll just shovel all this snow where they walk/ride. Who's crazy to be out in this weather anyway?

      Well, lots of people would be if there was some where to fucking walk!

      Why don't you go to Sweden and see how they do it, roads and sidewalks are cleared of snow, and you have to be up pretty early to notice it being done.

      So, fuck you and your car culture.

    14. Re:Snow Removal In Moscow by blind+biker · · Score: 1

      Using salt is boneheaded. In Finland, that has just as much (if not more) snow and cold as Moscow, they don't use salt atall, just gravel, combined with an effective road and street cleaning schedule.

      --
      "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
    15. Re:Snow Removal In Moscow by Cyberax · · Score: 1

      "Wow. That sounds like the Soviet Union never really ended. Is there so much snow that they can't use a plow and shove it up on the sidewalk?"

      No, not possible. The snow will quickly accumulate.

    16. Re:Snow Removal In Moscow by Katchu · · Score: 1

      Really? That is odd. I was just watching a webcam on opentopia ( http://www.opentopia.com/ ) and watched a cam in Russia viewing a front loader scraping up snow with trucks arriving at interval to be loaded. It looked to be about as efficient as could be. Also, the person running the front loader was really good (my experience in a combat engineering battalion that used earth-moving equipment as a basis of judgment). OTOH, your description could well describe DOT workers anywhere.

      --
      Keep Doing Good.
    17. Re:Snow Removal In Moscow by twmcneil · · Score: 1

      In all fairness, it was a few years ago - maybe 7 years ago.

      --
      "The ferrets, they're every where I tell you!"
    18. Re:Snow Removal In Moscow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bastard! What about the people who walk or ride bikes? Oh, those people, who gives a fuck, we'll just shovel all this snow where they walk/ride. Who's crazy to be out in this weather anyway?

      Well, lots of people would be if there was some where to fucking walk!

      Why don't you go to Sweden and see how they do it, roads and sidewalks are cleared of snow, and you have to be up pretty early to notice it being done.

      So, fuck you and your car culture.

      And you, sir, can go suck a fat cock.

    19. Re:Snow Removal In Moscow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We use sidewalk medians for storing snow...
      Not that it makes any difference.

      Everybody still walks in the middle of the god damn street.

    20. Re:Snow Removal In Moscow by Nephrite · · Score: 1

      If you were looking from a hotel window I assumed that you lived close to Moscow center with narrow streets and heavy traffic jams. No need to add to that more heavy vehicles like snow harvesters.

    21. Re:Snow Removal In Moscow by jmv · · Score: 1

      Exactly the same in Montreal. I was just saying that if you never removed the snow, it just wouldn't work.

  20. Cup half empty if it worked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    And west of Moscow they get 12' of snow but east of Moscow they have a severe drought. There's no such thing as ideal weather for everyone even if it had worked. They talk about the butterfly effect, well this is the equivalent of dropping a nuke. Modifying weather there could reduce snow fall in the mountains leading to dry rivers in India or western China. There's simply no way to isolate weather and large scale engineering in Russia could affect weather worldwide. already it's hard to predict weather more than a couple of days ahead so it's impossible to judge regional and long term effects.

    1. Re:Cup half empty if it worked by Bigjeff5 · · Score: 1

      I don't know if you know this, but Moscow is not on a mountain. The most likely place for them to get the snow to dump would be over a mountain, so your scenario is completely backwards.

      Still, I'm a bit surprised that they would try this, completely eliminating the snow will slow the warm-up process in spring, and any vegetation will have a much harder time coming back. The snow prevents the ground from freezing as deeply - without it a lot of plant roots die during winter. Do they really have so few plants in Moscow that this is no big deal? No parks or anything?

      Sounds like a sad, dreary place if so.

      --
      Security is mostly a superstition... Avoiding danger is no safer in the long run than outright exposure. - Helen Keller
    2. Re:Cup half empty if it worked by Daniel+Boisvert · · Score: 1

      Still, I'm a bit surprised that they would try this, completely eliminating the snow will slow the warm-up process in spring, and any vegetation will have a much harder time coming back. The snow prevents the ground from freezing as deeply - without it a lot of plant roots die during winter. Do they really have so few plants in Moscow that this is no big deal? No parks or anything?

      I remember there being some small parks around Moscow, but I don't remember any being very large or particularly noteworthy. One of the things there seems to be no shortage of in Russia is labor--you'll find humans performing tasks there that seem either completely unnecessary or like they should've been automated away long ago. This extends to park maintenance, as well. I was amazed at how many people it seemed to take to water the flowers in the park outside the Kremlin the last time I was there. I'd be surprised if they worried about it taking a little more work to get the flowers to grow due to lack of insulating snowcover over the winter.

      From the perspective of a modern-day westerner, russians seem to have an interesting relationship with nature. When they build cities, they don't play around. They pile in the industry, and the cities are typically dirty and hazy from exhaust of various kinds, dirt, etc. The parts of Russia I've seen outside of Moscow & St Petersburg look a lot like the photos I've seen of Soviet-era cities, aside from the gradual infiltration of english words in signs over the past several years. In contrast, it seems many families--not just the rich--have summer cottages on the outskirts of the cities which are teeming with gardens and plants and anything green or edible, and are quite pretty (ignoring the smokestacks billowing in the background). It's like they have everything neatly compartmentalized.

      I can also see why they seem more willing than we are to screw around with the environment. They don't really have suburbs and sprawl in the same way we do in the US. As you ride the train through the countryside, you see a city with some villages clustered around it, then hours upon hours of solid trees and grasses, then another city with some villages around it, then more hours of trees and grasses. It's an enormous country, and it seems largely unpopulated by humans, aside from those small clusters around the cities you see every so often. It's easy to not worry much about nature when there's so much of it around.

      Sounds like a sad, dreary place if so.

      You think those famous russian authors all wrote depressing novels by coincidence? Personally, I loved St Petersburg in February, but I'm a little odd that way. I've spent an aggregate of about six weeks in Russia over the past couple years, and while I find the culture fascinating and the people wonderful, I'm not sure I could handle living in any of their cities for an extended period of time. There's a possible exception in St Petersburg, but that one's too european to really be russian, anyway. Russia is definitely a cool place to visit, though--I highly recommend it if you get the chance.

  21. Re:Does this EVER work? "not really" by Wodenedow · · Score: 2, Informative

    To save folks time, I will quote directly from the wikipedia article: "The amount of precipitation due to seeding is difficult to quantify. Cloud seeding may also suppress precipitation." The article contains plenty of examples of places where cloud seeding is used, but no data that would back up the "works" claim.

  22. At least read the summary before correcting others by rts008 · · Score: 1

    Go back and at least read the summary.

    (Hint: a quote from TFS)

    Carrying off the $6 million procedure required jets to spray silver iodide into coming clouds, ensuring that all precipitation fell before it reached the capital.

    Cloud seeding is EXACTLY what they are doing. And it's not for a region, just Moscow...the 'capital' quoted from TFS above.

    --
    Down With Slashdot BETA!!! I've been around the corner and seen the oliphant; you can only abuse me from your perspecti
  23. Poor Russian snow by damburger · · Score: 5, Funny

    It saved their asses from Napoleon and Hitler, and this is the thanks it gets!

    --
    If we can put a man on the moon, why can't we shoot people for Apollo-related non-sequiturs?
  24. Re:At least read the summary before correcting oth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe I'm being dumb, but how did they know it wasn't already going to be exhausted before it reached the capital?

  25. incompetence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A Russian failure? Inconceivable...

  26. Is this why the rain has increased lately ? by Fly+Swatter · · Score: 1

    The past year or so the North Eastern US has seen almost weekly rain, it's almost impossible now to go 5 days without rain.

    People please stop messing with the weather, you couldn't predict it then and you can't control it now (and you still can't predict it).

  27. Re:At least read the summary before correcting oth by PotatoFiend · · Score: 1

    Maybe I'm being dumb, but how did they know it wasn't already going to be exhausted before it reached the capital?

    The mayor consults an expert team of babushkas stationed on the front steps of tenement buildings across Moscow. If the babushkas begin complaining about their arthritic knees more than usual it means rain is imminent.

    --
    "Liberty may be endangered by the abuses of liberty as well as the abuses of power." -- James Madison
  28. Look out! by JaneTheIgnorantSlut · · Score: 1

    These are the same folks that want to "nudge" an asteroid! http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091230/ap_on_sc/eu_russia_asteroid_encounter

    1. Re:Look out! by DigitalSorceress · · Score: 1

      I came here to say THIS.

      Gods, it scares me.

      --

      The Digital Sorceress
  29. Re:At least read the summary before correcting oth by dtolman · · Score: 1

    A - I read the summary. Cloud seeding will result in precipitation forming prematurely - but it will not denude a cloud of all possible precipitation. I have never heard of anywhere close to 100% precipitation being prevented by cloud seeding... Thus my question. 2 - Moscow is over a 1000 km squared - I'd call that a region. This ain't a little burg somewhere.

  30. Chinese geoengineering: just spray on and let dry! by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 1

    Keep in mind, in China they use green spray paint on the grass in its parks and the sides of its strip-mined mountains.

  31. Silver Iodide is a carcinogen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Silver Iodide is a known carcinogen. Real smart putting that in the air so it can rain down on people. Of course, this is what governments do to the public. Slowly torture, rob and kill them. Carry on idiots...

    Oh, and cattle eat grass not PETROLEUM FEED. That's why they have a rumen idiot. And why they don't graze in corn fields.

  32. Fox 'News'... fixed it for you. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yowza.

  33. I'm so glad that failed by Nephrite · · Score: 1

    Luzhkov implemented a lot of crazy and unpopular projects. I'm glad he couldn't ruin our winter.

  34. Salt by aclarke · · Score: 1

    When I become dictator, I'm going to ban the use of road salt. Here in Ontario, Canada we dump it all over our roads, even when it looks like it MIGHT start freezing soon. I understand we're using less than before, but why not get rid of it altogether?

    Just drive a little slower. Buy a better car and keep it longer, which you'll be able to do as it won't rust to pieces in 8 years. Cessating road salting will also help bridges and roads last longer and will cause less environmental damage.

    The Swiss seem to manage mountain villages without road salt. Other than a communal laziness and a lack of interest in winter, I'm not sure why we need to continue dumping salt on our roads.

  35. actually it was also the 'oil for food' scandal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    wherein french companies/govt were subverting the sanctions so they could sell nice things to a rich dictator.

    this destroyed a lot of credibility for france (and europe's) case against the war.

    they thought america was being stupid and hasty, america thought they were just protecting their business deals with saddam.

    there were no grownups around who anyone would trust to actually have legitimate,

  36. we made cattle feed from uranium processing waste by decora · · Score: 1

    google Sequoyah Fuels Corporation, Kerr-McGee and Grove Oklahoma. they took raffinate from the process of converting yellowcake into uranium hexafluoride gas, and sprayed it on fields where cows were grazing.

  37. another efficiency expert poops on the working man by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    did it ever occur to you that 6 guys with shovels is probably cheaper than some machine they'd have to buy and ship from the US and maintain and buy fuel for it?

    did it also occur to you that perhaps they had some of those machines, but in a massive city like moscow, they were being used on higher priority areas than your street?

    and then what do you do with the machine all summer? it's just laying there taking up space in the maintenance department.

    and... did it ever occur to you that the human body might not be able to shovel thousands of pounds of snow, solid, no breaks, for 10 hours a day? what do you want those 6 guys to do, ride in the truck to the river so they can watch it get dumped?

    Here's a fun fact about how white collar IT people waste their time and taxpayers money: slashdot has tens of thousands of comments posted to it every day, all day, 9-5, whatever, and tens or hundreds of thousands of readers. how many of those people are getting payed to read slashdot?

    the difference is you dont have a crowd of people driving by saying 'jee what a waste' when all those white collar guys do it from behind a cubicle wall.