Slashdot Mirror


Control Your Apps Without Your Finger

VincenzoRomano writes "You won't need to swipe your fingers over smallish touch screens. You'll move your arms, hands and fingers (or whatever else applies) in the air or shake the handset. The phone camera(s), the G-sensor, the compass and so on will be used by a software to understand the gestures and to translate them into control commands. This breakthrough comes from a company called GestureTek, a non-startup company in this field." I love the idea of my screen no longer being smudged. I hate the idea of people doing this on a bus.

119 comments

  1. *yawn* by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I love the idea of my screen no longer being smudged.

    Oh no! You have to spend all of 3 seconds to wipe off your screen occasionally.

    1. Re:*yawn* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, or if you weren't such a greasy dirtbag, your screen would stay clean...

    2. Re:*yawn* by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      Hmm...I can see it now.

      In the new Star Treck movies series, when Kirk wants to start the destruction sequence for the Enterprise, rather than starting out with "Computer, this is Captain James Kirk of the USS Enterprise. Destruct sequence one, code: 1-1-A."

      He'll just do the Hokey-Pokey...

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  2. I'm loving it. by ColdWetDog · · Score: 3, Funny

    (Gets bag of popcorn, sits on park bench)

    This ought to be amusing.

    --
    Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    1. Re:I'm loving it. by DJRumpy · · Score: 1

      Imagine what you could accomplish doing the 'funky chicken' in front of your phone...

    2. Re:I'm loving it. by natehoy · · Score: 5, Funny

      Back when Bluetooth first came out, we used to play the game "Wireless Headset or Missed His Meds", where we'd watch someone walk down the street talking to himself and try to figure out if he was using a headset or just talking to himself.

      This adds a whole new dimension to the game.

      "He's not shaking his phone up and down, he's masturbating on a porn page"

      I can see the marketing song for this, to the Village People's "YMCA":

      "Young man! Want to open that app?
      I say.
      Touch Screen! covers your screen with crap,
      so now,
      Gestures!, keep your hands off your screen,
      and then,
      your...
      phone...
      will...
      stay...
      so...
      clean...

      Open your apps to the Y! M! C! A!
      Dance, tap, and shake your phone the touchless way.

      You can open an app,
      your phone stays free of crap,
      you can stay in great shape
      and then you, can, wave, like an ape...

      --
      "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
    3. Re:I'm loving it. by natehoy · · Score: 3, Funny

      ** Order confirmed. Your 4,000 chicken pot pies will be delivered tomorrow. Your mobile account has been charged. Thanks for ordering from Kentucky Funky Chicken **

      --
      "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
    4. Re:I'm loving it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you in internet marketing?

    5. Re:I'm loving it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Absolutely! It'll be more fun than watching people "talk to themselves" as they walk down the street or down the grocery store aisle!

    6. Re:I'm loving it. by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      Back when Bluetooth first came out, we used to play the game "Wireless Headset or Missed His Meds", where we'd watch someone walk down the street talking to himself and try to figure out if he was using a headset or just talking to himself.

      There's was actually a fairly brilliant ad here in Canada for Rogers -- a cable and cell phone company.

      They show this little old lady with a walker going down the road, apparently talking to herself, and saying all sorts of strange things and getting the corresponding strange looks. (For example, as she passes by the mailman she's saying "Oh, you look pretty in that dress".)

      At the end of the commercial they flip around to show a different view than we've seen of her, and she's wearing a blue-tooth headset and talking to her grand daughter.

      A damned funny commercial, and definitely ties into the "Wireless Headset or Missed His Meds" you referenced. I've only recently stopped assuming people are slightly mad when I see them talking to themselves -- unless, I'm right downtown that is. Then you need some other visual clues to try to sort out if you need to cross the street or not. :-P

      Cheers

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    7. Re:I'm loving it. by aztracker1 · · Score: 1

      I have to agree, it's like Earth: Final Conflict's interfaces for the shuttles.

      --
      Michael J. Ryan - tracker1.info
    8. Re:I'm loving it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Link? Couldn't find it on youtube :D

    9. Re:I'm loving it. by cerberusss · · Score: 1

      Genius.

      --
      8 of 13 people found this answer helpful. Did you?
    10. Re:I'm loving it. by puppet10 · · Score: 1

      Exactly...

      Passer-by walks by someone making wild gyrations and jerking their arms and legs around.

      "Hello are you ok??"

      "Yes, (arm whistles past passer-by's face) I'm fine. (leg swings up and starts a pirouette) I'm just trying to see what the weather will be this week (goes back to jerking arms and legs all over the place looking like a seizure is in progress).

      --
      -------- This space intentionally left blank --------
  3. Sounds tiring by Hatta · · Score: 1

    Why would anyone think it would be easier to control a device with big unwieldy arms instead of small light dexterous fingers? Also, I have 2 arms and 10 fingers, seems like I could get a lot more done with the fingers.

    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    1. Re:Sounds tiring by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You'll notice they mention arms, hands AND fingers in the full summary.

      Meaning it will also read the gestures of your fingers.

      Making it essentially a non-touch touch screen.

    2. Re:Sounds tiring by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Making it essentially a non-touch touch screen.

      So thus negating the whole point of having a touchscreen in the first place?

    3. Re:Sounds tiring by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 1

      You won't need to swipe your fingers over smallish touch screens

      Thats what the first sentence seems to implicate.

    4. Re:Sounds tiring by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1, Interesting

      No, certainly not. This is just the next logical progression of mouse/pointer -> touch screen -> gestures above the screen. Too many people here are thinking "Wii," but that's not it: think "iPhone" without having to touch the screen. I'm no Apple fanboy, but I think Apple has already foreseen this by adding the G-force sensor in the iPhone/iPod Touch; I think they just haven't moved on it yet because they're waiting to see what other vendors are coming up with. I predict the next iteration of the iPhone will include technology along these lines.

    5. Re:Sounds tiring by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 1

      No, certainly not...think "iPhone" without having to touch the screen.

      So what's the point of having a touchscreen if you never touch it?

    6. Re:Sounds tiring by dkleinsc · · Score: 1

      This sounds a lot like the control mechanism for radios on the Heart of Gold, where you wave your fingers in the general direction of the device and hope you get something good.

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    7. Re:Sounds tiring by multisync · · Score: 1

      This is just the next logical progression of mouse/pointer -> touch screen -> gestures above the screen.

      Great.

      Let me know when I can plug a keyboard in to it.

      --
      I don't care why you're posting AC
    8. Re:Sounds tiring by kkwst2 · · Score: 1

      Well if you never touch it, then you wouldn't need it, cutting down on cost. However, I'm betting it couldn't completely replace it, but supplement. It would be nicer, for instance, to scroll without your tubby fingers obstructing the screen. But selecting icons or text would still probably need touch. I remember some videos a few months back of a prototype device in which you controlled it from the back and it projected shadows of your fingers onto the screen. That seemed pretty clever and might work for selecting.

    9. Re:Sounds tiring by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 1

      EXACTLY

    10. Re:Sounds tiring by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 1

      Did you read what I responded to? morgan greywolf was telling me that this didn't negate having a touchscreen but then went on to say that it means you never touch the touchscreen. I was just trying to get clarification on this obvious discrepancy.

    11. Re:Sounds tiring by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

      You can already plug a keyboard into the iPhone, but you need a jailbroken iPhone before you can use it.

      (Note: I don't own an iPhone, only reporting what I've heard)

    12. Re:Sounds tiring by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

      You'll notice they mention arms, hands AND fingers in the full summary.

      More correctly: One finger, one thumb, one hand, keep moving.

      Here's leaked documentation for the device: http://www.scoutsongs.com/lyrics/onefinger.html

      The next release will include support for legs: http://bussongs.com/songs/hokey_pokey.php

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    13. Re:Sounds tiring by steelfood · · Score: 1

      These aren't the droids you're looking for.

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
    14. Re:Sounds tiring by Garble+Snarky · · Score: 1

      I get complaints about being overly pedantic all the time, but this is really something. It's like asking "whats the point of having a pointing/clicking touchscreen interface similar to a mouse interface, but without having the mouse?".

      The point is that you have an interface similar to the iphone touchscreen interface (hopefully better in some way), with a different type of hardware. Just as there are situations where a touchscreen is better than a mouse, or vice versa, there also MIGHT be situations where a touch-less gesture interface might be the best. Let's let them sell this product and we'll find out.

    15. Re:Sounds tiring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I have 2 arms and 10 fingers, seems like I could get a lot more done with the fingers.

      I'm sure there is a 'your mom' joke in there somewhere!

    16. Re:Sounds tiring by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 1

      I get complaints about being overly pedantic all the time, but this is really something. It's like asking "whats the point of having a pointing/clicking touchscreen interface similar to a mouse interface, but without having the mouse?".

      Except that morgan greywolf said both that this wouldn't negate the need for a touchscreen but then went on to talk about having an iPhone where you didn't touch the screen.

    17. Re:Sounds tiring by shadowrat · · Score: 1

      i already have a device that reads the gestures of my fingers. It's called a keyboard.

  4. Wait, I still have to move? by gimmebeer · · Score: 1

    I thought this was 2010. Where's my mind control? Fail.

    1. Re:Wait, I still have to move? by Spad · · Score: 5, Funny

      Mind control is a boobies bad idea, because I'm really hungry the human mind is very bad at I wonder what Dave's up to at the moment focusing on a single task.

    2. Re:Wait, I still have to move? by quantumplacet · · Score: 4, Funny

      despite what most psychologists these days seem to claim, not everyone has ADD. some of can focus on thing at a titties.

    3. Re:Wait, I still have to move? by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

      I thought this was 2010. Where's my mind control? Fail.

      Not to worry. We have that.

      Thanks,
      The CIA

    4. Re:Wait, I still have to move? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://xkcd.com/604/

      This one says it all.

  5. So everyone will soon look like by Cornwallis · · Score: 5, Funny

    Elaine dancing?

    1. Re:So everyone will soon look like by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or an italian

    2. Re:So everyone will soon look like by Max(10) · · Score: 0, Troll

      Elaine dancing?

      Only when rearranging the desktop icons. Here's a list of the most common gestures:
      - raise arm and perform air-wipe over icon = launch application
      - raise arm all the way up and perform slam-dunk motion = close application in active window
      - perform one finger salute motion = shutdown -p now
      - raise both arms, look up as if asking "Why, God, why?", drop arms and shake head = restart Microsoft Windows after a hard reset

    3. Re:So everyone will soon look like by interploy · · Score: 1

      Got a point... People who talk on the phone with those earbud headsets already look crazy if you can't see the headset. What are we supposed to think of people waving their arms about for no apparent reason or waggling their fingers at their phones like they're a magician? "Abra-cadabra! Call my mom."

    4. Re:So everyone will soon look like by Cornwallis · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Remember not too many years ago people acting like this on the street were institutionalized. Now it is acceptable behavior in some eyes.

    5. Re:So everyone will soon look like by Keeper+Of+Keys · · Score: 1

      Actually it's great. I have always talked to myself when I'm trying to get my thoughts straight, but it can be kind of awkward when I'm out and about. Now all I have to do is put in an earbud and I look like a sane person.

      (As long as nobody listens in to what I'm actually saying: "Ah, I don't need to wrap the main text block in the relatively positioned DIV! I can use a negative margin to break it out of its bounding box, and use a background PNG for the drop shadow...")

  6. gesture by CSHARP123 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Showing middle finger to open an app on iPhone (There should be already one) on the bus and suddenly I am arrested for obscene gesture. Stop this nonsense now

    1. Re:gesture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What if you link your penis to opening your email inbox?

      "Honestly, officer, I was just trying to check my email. I wasn't flashing my penis at old grannies. Here, see for yourself. It's the latest in technology from Apple! It puts the whole Information Superhighway at the tip of your penis!"

    2. Re:gesture by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      In what dark age country are you arrested for “obscene gestures”?? Not even in the USA can it be that bad, can it?

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    3. Re:gesture by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      Well if you do it to a Cop you might.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    4. Re:gesture by noidentity · · Score: 1

      Hand gesture recognition? I seem to remember an early prototype of this a while back.

    5. Re:gesture by natehoy · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'd say urine big trouble, mister!

      --
      "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
    6. Re:gesture by natehoy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Unfortunately, there are places in the US that still have obscenity laws, which cover naughty words and obscene gestures. People can be, and have been, arrested for violating such laws.

      --
      "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
    7. Re:gesture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Arrests, perhaps. But such laws would never hold up to a Constitutional challenge.

      The situation is quite different in other countries; Beleidigung is a real offense in Germany.

    8. Re:gesture by splatter · · Score: 1

      Not in the states. Free speech as per our SC.

      --
      "(I) have this unfortunate condition that causes me not to believe a single thing any politician says when a mic's on.
  7. More effort required by ickleberry · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm willing to bet that using such a device will require more effort to use than say a trackball or mouse.

    Trackball - move your fingers
    Mouse - move your hand
    Touch screen / gesture thing - move your arm
    Motion based gaming thing - move everything

    Sure all these gesture things are great for games and helping fatties lose weight but for ordinary folk who actually need to use it for a large part of their day it will just cause gorilla arm http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gorilla_arm#Gorilla_Arm

    1. Re:More effort required by ByteSlicer · · Score: 1

      Now the phone also has to guess when you're gesturing to control it, or just gesturing while you're talking (or just moving in general).

    2. Re:More effort required by spidkit · · Score: 1

      But if you could master it, you might look like your playing a Theremin. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pSzTPGlNa5U

    3. Re:More effort required by hack++slash · · Score: 1

      That's not how you play a Theremin, this is how you play a Theremin! (NSFW)

      --
      To do something right, you often have to roll up your sleeves and get busy.
  8. Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "You won't need to swipe your fingers over smallish touch (areas). You'll move your arms, hands and fingers (or whatever else applies) in the air or will shake the handset. The phone camera(s), the G-sensor, the compass and so on will be used by a software to understand the gestures and to translate them into control commands. This breakthrough comes from a company called GestureTek, a non-startup company in this field."

    I thought you only needed a finger to activate the G-sensor. I wonder if this new technology will worth with other body parts, such as tongues. I think it's wonderful that by interfacing with the G-Sensor, you can get your entire phone to vibrate wildly.

  9. Control apps with your ass! by FlyingBishop · · Score: 3, Funny

    I've got a brand new, incredibly innovative input method for your touchphone! Simply put the phone in your back pocket, and sit on it. Then my revolutionary new AssSwiper (TM) will translate certain butt movements into commands on your phone. Want to skip that song? Just shift your weight back and forth a few times. You'll never use your phone the same way again!

    1. Re:Control apps with your ass! by natehoy · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but then you have to fart and end up skipping to a new album. No, thanks.

      --
      "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
    2. Re:Control apps with your ass! by hack++slash · · Score: 1

      There's already a female version on the market: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7qsWy9r_EuA

      --
      To do something right, you often have to roll up your sleeves and get busy.
  10. Frustration by domatic · · Score: 1

    And when I commit the crime of the millenium and want to hear news reports about myself I'll be waving my hands frantically around it.....at least until my girlfriend gets sick of it and chucks a pencil through the on/off space.

  11. "Non-startup"? by Sockatume · · Score: 1

    What, pray tell, does that mean? They had to start up at some point. Or do they just mean "we're on the up and up, honest, guvnor, we're not some fly by night outfit, nosiree, we've been around ages"? In which case calling attention to it has a shade of "the lady doth protest too much".

    --
    No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    1. Re:"Non-startup"? by nedlohs · · Score: 1

      Obviously it means they aren't a "startup company", so they have existed for a long enough to not be considered a startup anymore.

      Since the company isn't the one using the term "non-startup" it seems just a tad excessive to look down on them because some random internet poster used a couple of words when talking about them.

    2. Re:"Non-startup"? by Sockatume · · Score: 1

      My bad, I had assumed that a term like "non-startup" could only have dropped in from someone's PR department. For that kind of lingo to spawn by itself in the wild terrifies me.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
  12. Uh... Bad idea. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Once the software is enabled, users can shake, rock or roll their phone to play games, answer calls, shuffle playlists, navigate maps, scroll, pan, zoom, turn pages and even browse the web – all without pressing a button or touching the screen.

    Wow, that is possibly the most idiotic idea for interface design I have ever read. It looks like this makes it incredibly easy to roll your phone and accidentally call your boss.

    Also, if I am reading something I don't want to take my eyes off it while my device "rocks and rolls" to turn the page.

    All in all, this is definitely not well thought out. Gesture technology was cool when touchscreens sucked, but now that touchscreens are good, gestures are good addons (Such as the rotate on the iphone, still even that is sometimes annoying).

  13. The bird by kaoshin · · Score: 1

    I hope this is integrated into many other applications, because there are several that I would like to flip a certain gesture.

  14. This could be bad by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

    Imagine a group of people watching a soccer(football) match at your place:
    [Announcer]: And Barcelona scores a GOOOOAL!
    [You]: WTF? *Gives middle finger*
    [Computer]: Loading favorites. *Goatse.cx appears*
    [Everyone looks at you and starts to leave]

    --
    Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    1. Re:This could be bad by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 1

      I think the problem isn't the failed gesture recognition but rather your peculiar list of favourites.

      Then again, to each his own.

  15. dialing wand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ultimate input device for tubby fingers - a dialing wand.

    Where is the consideration for people with a few extra pounds?

    1. Re:dialing wand by Freetardo+Jones · · Score: 1

      I wash myself with a rag on a stick!

    2. Re:dialing wand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      learn2stylus

  16. Prior Art by Maximum+Prophet · · Score: 1

    Doesn't Nintendo have prior art in the Wiimote?

    --
    All ideas^H^H^H^H^Hprocesses in this post are Patent Pending. (as well as the process of patenting all postings)
    1. Re:Prior Art by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 1

      Since their patents predate the Wii, no.

  17. Etch-a-Sketch? by FrozenGeek · · Score: 1

    From the article: "...shake the handset..." So we really have gone back to the etch-a-sketch? (FWIW, about 10 years ago, when a friend of mine was promoted [demoted?] to a management position, I bought him a new "management laptop" aka an Etch-a-Sketch.)

    --
    linquendum tondere
  18. The ancients knew it all along. by abhishekupadhya · · Score: 1

    And the YMCA dance will be used to control apps now. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Y.M.C.A._(song)#Origin_of_hand_movement_and_dance

  19. Bluetooth by Flozzin · · Score: 1

    Great. Now on top of blue tooth making people looking they they talk to themselves. We will have people having seizures. This seems like too much effort all around. I can only imagine my phone calling grandma at 2 am since I left the phone on the table and wanted to get a snack to eat. How about track my eye movements? But even then if I look away it would have problems.

    --
    "Cowardice in a race, as in an individual, is the unpardonable sin." --Teddy Roosevelt
  20. Obligatory Back to the Future 2... by ground.zero.612 · · Score: 1

    You mean you have to use your hands? That's like a baby's toy!

    --
    "Be prepared, son. That's my motto. Be prepared." --Joe Hallenbeck
  21. Buttons are best! by MaWeiTao · · Score: 1

    Properly placed physical buttons and dials are, by far, the best control scheme for digital cameras. You need that physical feedback in order to know what you're pressing when you're taking photos. I'd rather keep my eyes on the subject instead of having to look down at the camera constantly to see what I'm doing. In cars it's even more important that your eyes stay focus on the road and aren't distracted by touch screens and whatnot.

    Tablet PCs are far more logical. And for desktops, I'm not sure why no one has developed a PC where the display sits closer to the user, inclined like a drafting table. You look down on it like reading a book, and it's far more comfortable to interact with the touch screen since it's no different than moving around stuff on the desk.

    The only viable use for gesture controls is computers and gaming consoles. And even then the value is dubious outside of games. It's impractical and exhausting. Imagine trying to keep your arms elevated for any length of time and manipulating items on screen with precision. This is all a stupid fad derived from recent sci fi movies. Technology may reach a point when we we'll get tactile feedback in mid-air making this sort of thing viable, but we're not there yet. And by the time we get to that point we will probably be able to effectively interact with computers using thought.

  22. MIME -- it's not just for file types now by erroneus · · Score: 1

    I'm waiting for the "Mime" HID driver. You pretend to open a file and guess what happens to the file? Pretend to crumple up some paper and guess what happens to the file? I leave other gestures to the imagination.

    1. Re:MIME -- it's not just for file types now by Target+Practice · · Score: 1

      Pretend to be stuck behind a glass wall to initiate an nmap scan...

      --
      There's a 68.71% chance you're right.
  23. Re:Prior Art - for decades by rubycodez · · Score: 2, Interesting

    prior art indeed, funny to see the same things reinvented again and again over the decades. Having worked in CADD/CAM since 70s, seen at trade shows all manner of gesture sensors, 3D viewing systems, gloves and other body position transducers...

  24. next killer app -- oil-repelling screen coating by jollyreaper · · Score: 1

    touchscreens get absolutely disgusting after a day's use. Looks like I rubbed a pepperoni pizza all over it and this is with clean hands. Humans are oily, disgusting meat sacks. Developing a smudge-phobia where once I had none.

    --
    Kwisatz Haderach
    Sell the spice to CHOAM
    This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
  25. Re:Prior Art - for decades by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 1

    prior art indeed, funny to see the same things reinvented again and again over the decades.

    How can the Wii be prior art to patents that were filed before it existed?

  26. Pull my finger... by scorpivs · · Score: 1

    fixed that.

    What's this on your shirt...

    Hey, look over there...


    The technology may mean the end to rude people, if it's not impolitic of a person to point that out.

    --
    There is nothing to FEAR but NOTHING itself; and I fear there is a whole lot of nothing going on. --scorpivs
  27. Oh, uses the camera to help? by billsayswow · · Score: 0

    Raise your hand if you have ever had a hair or bit of dust get stuck to your optical mouse's sensor...

    1. Re:Oh, uses the camera to help? by bakawolf · · Score: 1

      if i do that it opens the help file.

  28. And look like a fool while at it... by georgemoot · · Score: 1

    I've seen some people furiously shake their iPhone, on purpose. When asked what they're doing, they say that shaking makes the App do a "refresh", only it doesn't always register the command, so they have to do it again. You know what I do to make an app refresh it's content? I hit the refresh button with my finger, which has benefits including, but not limited to: not looking like a fool, not accidentally launching my phone across the room, not requiring an order of magnitude more energy to perform, and oh, did I mention not looking like a fool?

    1. Re:And look like a fool while at it... by k3vlar · · Score: 1

      I know someone who would always shake their iPhone immediately after rotating between landscape and portrait, just so "it knows I rotated".

      I never had a problem with the accelerometer recognizing I've done something. Except when I use Rotation Inhibitor.

      --
      Unlike porn, which yada yada rimshot hey-ooh!
  29. Other analogies by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

    Kinda like a theramin. Or one of those games where you maneuver a marble around on a board and try to keep it out of the holes.

    Please, people, the idea is to make better interfaces.

    --
    Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
  30. New control device by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A new control device will be unveiled...called a STYLUS!

  31. saroman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I picture someone perched over their iphone like saroman with his fingers all contorted gesturing the palatir in his tower.

  32. G-sensor? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought newest research shows it doesn't exist? Oh, wait...

  33. re by S-4'N3 · · Score: 1

    *waves hand* These aren't the droids your looking for.

  34. Back in the Day... by JoeD · · Score: 1

    If someone walked down the street talking to themselves and waving their arms around, everyone else would give them a wide berth and think they had something wrong with them...

  35. Fuck This Shit by sexconker · · Score: 0, Troll

    I like buttons.
    I like direct control.

    I don't want to have to perform a fucking rain dance to appease the Apple gods (and let's face it - this is all because of Apple) to try and get my device to do a simple task.

    I might as well try to arrange marshmallows while wearing boxing gloves.

    Fuck this shit.

    Touch screen, multitouch, gestures, accelerometers!
    Shitty keyboard, no keyboard, fewer buttons, gimmicky unreliable shit!

    You ever have a friend around while you're writing on physical paper? He invariably knocks your hand or grabs the paper in order to mess you up (as he SHOULD).
    You ever have a friend around while you're typing or mousing? He invariably mashes the keys, grabs the mouse and starts clicking, etc. in order to mess you up (as he SHOULD).
    You ever have a friend around while you're ordering from a touch screen at Jack in the Box or something? He invariably taps the screen frantically in an attempt to mess up your order and make you buy 30 "tacos" (as he SHOULD).
    You ever have a friend around while you've got arms? He invariably grabs them and uses them to hit you while asking why you're hitting yourself (as he SHOULD).
    You ever have a friend around while you're trying to do something delicate, like build a house of cards? He invariably stomps and tromps until it all comes tumbling down (as he SHOULD).
    You ever have a friend around while you're on the phone? He invariably dances around to distract you, makes loud sexual noises or silly voices, and if it's a land line picks up another handset to mash the keypad, listen in, or breathe heavily (as he SHOULD).

    I just don't like the idea of a new tech device that enables more ass hattery. Now all you'll have to do is wave your hands about, make some noise, or give a little shake. Will this shit erase everything after a few good shakes like an etch-a-sketch? Knowing the shitty gimmicky features they tack on, it'll be an option on several devices.

    Oh well. Plebes, buy your retarded devices with shitty interfaces. I will make your life hell. Me? You'll at least have to pry my devices from my hands before you can interrupt me.

  36. Works for me by hwyhobo · · Score: 1

    or shake the handset

    Works on my Blackberry like a charm, every time I throw it against the wall.

    --
    End anonymous moderation and posting on /.
  37. i don't buy it. by AP31R0N · · Score: 1

    The g-sensor is a myth.

    --
    Utilizing the synergization of benchmark e-solutions to pre-workaround action items!
  38. Why not for laptops with integrated webcams? by cerberusss · · Score: 1

    I never understood why this hasn't been implemented on laptops with integrated webcams. More than three years ago, one guy used the Sudden Movement Sensor in his Apple MacBook to create a SmackBook. He'd slap the MacBook on the keyboard to undo, go back etc. Later he implemented a less violent version using the integrated webcam. Check out this video on YouTube where he waves his left hand (at 0:27 in the movie) to go to another desktop.

    I love it, but have not seen it implemented yet.

    --
    8 of 13 people found this answer helpful. Did you?
  39. I'd rather have... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... Face Gestures.

    Opera Face Gestures

    1. Re:I'd rather have... by sexconker · · Score: 0, Troll

      Needs crotch gestures.

      Point webcam at exposed crotch.
      If genitals become engorged, MOAR.
      If genitals disgorge, SOMETHING ELSE.
      If genitals retract further than baseline, turn up the thermostat.
      If genitals quiver then glisten, dispense wet nap.

  40. making Facebook easier! by cashman73 · · Score: 1

    So, to de-friend someone on Facebook or Twitter, all you'll have to do is to flip the bird to your cell phone or computer? Sounds like a WIN to me! ;-)

  41. Don't move! by oren · · Score: 4, Funny

    The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy:

    "For years radios had been operated by means of pressing buttons and turning dials; then as the technology became more sophisticated the controls were made touch-sensitive -- you merely had to brush the panels with your fingers; now all you had to do was wave your hand in the general direction of the components and hope. It saved a lot of muscular expenditure, of course, but meant that you had to sit infuriatingly still if you wanted to keep listening to the same program."

    1. Re:Don't move! by BeerCat · · Score: 1

      Brilliant!

      When I was trying to find that quote to respond to a similar "control it by gesture" comment a few days ago, I couldn't find it. All I kept getting was things like "Mostly Harmless", and "Space is big...."

      --
      "She's furniture with a pulse"
  42. Ok, are we done yet? by LarrySDonald · · Score: 1

    They said one day we'd be so high level we'd communicate our requests in interpretive dance. I figured saying "No way you'll get people to do that" was as safe as "640k will be enough for anyone". Ok, so you got me. Point an laugh. It's for sure what I'll do. I was thinking by now the backlash would have started. Sure, grind away the last few nanometers of the learning curve by shoving usefulness into the dirt and stepping on it. At some point, people will realize learning touch type wasn't such a bad idea because while it didn't work crazy good out of the box, it's way fast. Morse code with two switches beats T9. It's going to be a while until we beat the human brain for processing, so how about we use what we have?

  43. I did something similar a year ago by S3D · · Score: 1

    Phone as 3d pointing device
    This one recognize some simple gestures with phone
    And both could be downloaded for Symbian OS 9.*. It seems I did mistake with choice of platform - Symbian OS is in decline now. But if you still keep old Symbian S60 3rd ed around you can download and try. Those demos use markers, but markerless approach also viable.

  44. What, you kidding? This would be great! by zullnero · · Score: 1

    This will be so much more entertaining to watch than all the sad, tired commuters on the bus I see every day. It will be like weird interpretive hand dances going on all the time, with people occasionally getting frustrated and swinging their fingers faster and faster. Someone will be touching their screen, and the person next to them will develop a smug look on their face, and you know they're thinking "Freakin newbies".

  45. G-sensor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some women have a very sensitive G-sensor, the G-spot. Although some argue that it does not exist.......

  46. Control Your Apps Without Your Finger.. by geekoid · · Score: 1

    I can do that now, it's called a penis.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  47. Re:Prior Art - for decades by Maximum+Prophet · · Score: 1

    Because Nintendo invented the tech *before* installing it in the Wii? For example: US Patent 6213872 - Pedometer with game mode, filed in '98

    Anyway, looks like these guys might have the scoop on using a camera to do what other people are using accelerometers to do. However, optical mice do the same thing in 2D. 3D is a neat trick if it really works on affordable hardware.

    --
    All ideas^H^H^H^H^Hprocesses in this post are Patent Pending. (as well as the process of patenting all postings)
  48. Smudged phone screens not going away by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unless you somehow have no natural oils in the skin/hair of your face/ears, you're going to have to wipe your screen occasionally; if you're female in a culture where cell phones are common, there's a good chance makeup causes similar problems. This happens to the tiny screen on my (effectively) antique brick phone, so there's no way it won't happen to the much larger screens on touch phones. This gesture technology might be interesting, but not because of smudges.

    - T

  49. G-sensor by HyperQuantum · · Score: 1

    makes me wonder what happens if you move it too close to a G-spot...

    --
    I am not really here right now.
  50. Re:gesture nope not illegal in the us by splatter · · Score: 1

    Sorry but mods are wrong.

    Arrested yes, charged no... PAID well yes.. matter of fact he was $50,000 thank you very much.

    http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1923125,00.html

    --
    "(I) have this unfortunate condition that causes me not to believe a single thing any politician says when a mic's on.
  51. Re:gesture nope not illegal in the us by natehoy · · Score: 1

    Not all of the laws have been struck down yet. So, yes, you can be arrested. Which can be terribly inconvenient, even if the law will probably be overturned and along with it any charges.

    Boss: "Why were you late to work, Bob?"
    Bob: "I was arrested for swearing at a cop."
    Boss: "Here, let me help you pack."

    --
    "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
  52. Ironically, no arm waving in the article by TomRC · · Score: 1

    Ironically, the technology being announced has absolutely nothing to do with waving arms or using hands or even fingers to make gestures.

    The "eyemo" technology enabled for Android uses the camera to detect movement of the phone. Yes, to move your phone you'll probably hold it in your hand and move it around a little, for those who love to nit-pick.

    The arm waving apparently originated wholly in the mind of the original poster.

  53. already thought of.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This was the device input method of choice in Tad William's Otherland series.

  54. What could go wrong? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't get a mouse or touchpad to work reliably. This should be far:
            * Better
            * Worse
            * Input not understood. Please turn off device and restart.

  55. Prior use? by Gaffod · · Score: 1

    Phones already control software through the accelerometer data- namely switching between portrait and landscape when you turn the phone sideways.

    Besides, I like the idea, but the reason you want it is finger smudging? Wash your hands and stop picking your nose.