Slashdot Mirror
Police Called Over 11-Year-Old's Science Project
garg0yle writes "Police in San Diego were called to investigate an 11-year-old's science project, consisting of 'a motion detector made out of an empty Gatorade bottle and some electronics,' after the vice-principal came to the conclusion that it was a bomb. Charges aren't being laid against the youth, but it's being recommended that he and his family 'get counseling.' Apparently, the student violated school policies — I'm assuming these are policies against having any kind of independent thought?"
To an Idiocracy!
Public school administrators are leading the way!
What's the student supposed to get counseling for? The trauma the school put him through for no reason? More likely, so the school authorities can point to the fact that the kid got counseling to show something is wrong with him (and not them)
I'd like to recommend the authorities get some counseling. Either that, or a clue, but counseling is easier to come by.
This is what happens when the students are smarter than the teachers.
In the wild there are no dumb lions tigers or bears. Only humanity subsidizes the continued existence of the stupid.
Don't do anything to attract attention to yourself ever.
The school, which has about 440 students in grades 6 to 8 and emphasizes technology skills, was initially put on lockdown while authorities responded.
...Stu
The real question is why are we letting people this stupid in charge of educating our children?
"I don't blame the school...it's the continued pussification of America that is the real problem at hand". Wish I had said that. WTF is going on with these school admin? Dude is staff a magnet school, got to expect to come across situations like this and be able to deal with it. I think the school staff needs counseling not the kid and his family. Pussies.....
This is part of the "nervous Nellie" reactions that have developed over the past few years. We should be encouraging inquisitiveness, exploration and learning in our children or we will just produce more mediocre administrators. Kids do things at home, bring them to school and show their friends. As long as it was not clearly a weapon or some other prohibited device there should not be a problem with it.
We are applying the same "sterile area" rules that supposedly exist in our airports to our schools. Will TSA be staffing the schools to keep out prohibited items?
Unless the child lied about what the device was it appears that the principal overreacted and did not apply too much common sense. It sounds like a pretty cool idea to use a Gatoraide bottle as a focusing point for a sonic device. Smart kid to think that through and to try something with it.
How many people who read /. have tried out other things like this in their childhood? Most of us have.
Tisha Hayes
So, it wasn't enough that the device from the poor kid (who showed some practical skills) was perfectly harmless, his home also had to be checked just in case he was a terrorist?
That's fucked up beyond 1984.
>And we wonder why US is behind all other nations in educating our young.
The rest of the world knows though.
Open Source Drum Kit, LPLC deve board - mjhdesigns.com
Bomb and NotBomb are not equally likely possibilities.
So you propose that NoReaction is inferior because you're screwed if it was a bomb, while Reaction is inferior because its safe either way. I think you're wrong, NoReaction+Bomb is the worst outcome, yes, but its astonishingly unlikely. Getting hit by lightning in your office likely. OTOH, Reaction+NotBomb is still somewhat harmful to you (if nothing else the kids family and their friends think you are a monster) and NotBomb is very very likely.
On average having a the more tempered reaction is the best outcome. Sadly, people are stupid.
What a fuckwhit - the school principal should be fired.
So they told you that you had a great way to grow marijuana? Thats nice of them. I wonder what experience led them to that idea.
http://michaelsmith.id.au
It isn't necessarily ineptitude that causes school officials to make decisions like this. The basic reasoning boils down to the fact that the school officials will take little if any flack for over reacting in the name of safety, but they will lose their jobs and be raked through the mud if they fail to react to an "obvious" threat.
Part of the problem is that no one ever gets rewarded for the issues they chose to ignore. So there is no benefit to the principal to ignore what they think is a possible threat even if the probability of it being a threat is vanishingly small.
The end result is that school officials with a high self interest will put their self interest in front of everyone else (the authorities who are wasting their time, the students out of class, the student directly involved, the parents who have to come pick up all the students early, etc), since they are more worried about the ramifications to themselves than the trouble they may cause for others.
Everything you said makes sense ... if the moron did not suggest the kid seek counseling.
Once you realize that YOU over-reacted, the correct action is to accept the fact that YOU acted like a fool. It is not to shift blame to the kid.
excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
At least it isn't as dangerous as a #3 pencil.
it is stupidity. An intelligent principal could have ascertained the necessary information by sitting down with the student and asking questions calmly thereby by avoiding all the resulting mess.
That's why I think people shouldn't criticize the vice principal too much for calling authorities to look into this. He wouldn't have done so unless he thought there was a reasonable chance that this thing was a bomb. Maybe he should have known better, but he didn't, and I'm not going to fault him for erring on the side of caution. But, I am troubled that the school and authorities seem to be blaming the kid and parents for this, like they should have known better than to bring a geeky home project to a *technology magnet school*. I would consider this a non-story if the school, vice principal, and authorities showed a little embarrassment over this situation, but they really seem to think this family did something horribly wrong.
My younger brother used to get in trouble for telling his math and science teachers that they were fools and idiots when they asked him questions in class. Nothing was very challenging to him. He dropped out after the 10th grade.
He went to Community College, got straight A's. He got into an engineering program at a public university, got almost straight A's. Now he's finished his PhD at the top engineering school in the country, in his field, MIT.
American schools are there to train the rank and file. In fact everyone that I know that works in a scientific field had dangerous aspirations in their teenage years, and didn't think much of the education our systems were providing. It became clear to all of us that if we cared to actually learn anything, it would be on our own.
I actually read TFA, and it states, as the summary quotes, "Apparently, the student violated school policies", but the article doesn't state the policy in question. It is hard to know if this is a case of stupid overreaction or a real violation of the rules. Does anyone know the exact wording of this "policy"?
If I can be modded down for being a troll, can I be modded up for being an orc, or a balrog?
After talking to the student, it was decided about 1 p.m. to evacuate the school as a precaution while the item was examined.
So they get there, the kid tells them what's going on.... THEN they decide to evacuate and examine it with a bomb robot (which takes two more hours). If that was a bomb and the kid wanted to use it, they were now four hours too late. Other than that, nice to show some faith/confidence in the kids.
Now, the kid is "quite shaken"... and quite possibly will stop doing this kind of work on his own. Well done.
that vice-principal is a terrorist. ;)
It’s exactly what the dictionary says. (I don’t mean the 11th edition of the newspeak one, that you may think of.
He terrorizes an 11 year old child. (Think of the children!) He terrorizes the whole family. He causes fear, terror that requires police intervention.
I say, make an example and ship him to Gitmo, in exchange for a honest American who sits down there just because his parents immigrated from the wrong country. ;)
I’d call that the American spirit!
Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
The real problem is lawsuits. If the school officials get it wrong (and lets face it school kids HAVE attacked their school in the past) then they are sued, so nobody plays it safe anymore.
One of the reason the US medical bill is through the roof is that because if a patient demands X procedure while the doctor knows it is silly, he gets it, because else he might sue.
Say you are a station attendant and see a bag that seems to have been left behind. In the "real" world, you take a look, the changes of it being a bomb are remote and even if it is, bombs rarely explode just by looking. BUT what if you can be sued if you get it wrong? Loose not just your life (and nobody thinks they are going to die) but every thing you own? (Silly? Count the doctors that smoke or drink or drive without a seatbelt but do have malpractice insurance.)
If you are sued for millions if you don't follow the book, you follow the book. And if you don't you loose your insurance and the first court case could bankrupt you.
Calling the people involved stupid is the easy lazy answer. The real problem is the sue happy culture of the US, where any slightest mistake anyone not following the rule book to the letter can be sued for millions. If I saw an American have a heart attack, I would let them die. I could be sued for breaking a rib while saving their lives. No thanks.
MMO Quests are like orgasms:
You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.
School policies are usually pretty benign. Most of the time there's nothing wrong with the language of a policy per se, but they are often quite vague. And 99% of the time it's fine that a given policy is vague, since reasonable people are perfectly capable of looking at a situation and coming up with a reasonable response (and yes, school administrators are usually reasonable people).
But, when people get put on the defensive, they'll often try to justify their actions. Vaguely written policies are very easy to point to as justification. So, while I basically agree that school policies are generally reasonable, I'm far less inclined to say a student necessarily did something wrong just because he violated a policy. It's certainly possible that we're not getting the whole story here, but it seems like what we do know from the article points to authorities attempting to justify their actions. The article said the student was "very cooperative" with authorities, which to me suggests he didn't say anything like "It's a bomb!", or that he talked back to the vice principal or authorities.
And, for what it's worth, I don't think the response to the device was entirely unreasonable. I just think the vice principal and authorities should feel a little more embarrassed given what had actually happened.
No need to involve the student. This isn't a kid prodigy building an atomic reactor; the device sounds (and likely was) simple in composition and principle. Just turn to the science teacher and say "That's not a bomb, is it?" and the science teacher will respond with "Oh, no, it's a simple little device for detecting motion made out of a plastic bottle, quite ingenious really, especially at this kid's grade level, gave it an 'A'."
And that would be that.
This principal ought to be then stripped in public, beaten senseless with a cane, then tarred, then feathered, then made fun of by an entire class of pointing science fair students.
And then they ought to be fired.
STOP . AMERICA . NOW
Just a few days ago I read an article about DARPA complaining that not enough students were taking science degrees. Now we see why! Here is a principal at a tech magnet school, seriously unqualified, that cannot discriminate a simple electronic device from a bomb. The real question is exactly who hired this incompetent idiot to administer students that are obviously smarter them himself and the HR person. Instead of panicking and calling 911 he might have called one of the science teachers first. But no, he went into chicken little mode and assumed that Armageddon was at hand.
When I was about 15 (20 years ago), we used to make little (~1m x 1m x 1m) hot air balloons out of tissue paper and use methylated spirits as the fuel. On one occasion our bottle of fuel was leaking - the lid had cracked or something and didn't fit tightly - so we chucked a cloth under the lid to stop it spilling. We were just about to head out the door when my dad pointed out that the fuel bottle (which I was carrying in my hand) looked uncannily like a molotov cocktail, and that we might want to reconsider how we carried it. Back then, had someone noticed, we might have been confronted by a policeman wanting to make sure we weren't up to too much mischief... I wouldn't like to think about what would have happened if we tried the same sort of thing today.
It must suck a bit to be a kid in these times. There's no way I'm going to take my kids on an airplane... not because I fear for their safety, but because I just know that one of them will think it hilarious to make a joke about a bomb, and nobody else is going to find it funny.
I don't think you can frame this as game theory; the staff of the school are not reacting in this way in order to maximize their personal benefit (or minimize their personal loss). Whilst I concede that some people do think in this way, teaching selects out that characteristic by being an underpaid and overworked profession for the level of education and aptitude they have.
The problem is that the staff are not permitted to make any kind of decision themselves; they are completely servile to the institution and the institution cannot be expected to exhibit human rationality.
If we can put a man on the moon, why can't we shoot people for Apollo-related non-sequiturs?
Kid, keep up the good work, and move to a school with smarter officials.
Pain is merely failure leaving the body
that the article states the middle school "emphasizes technology skills".
And people wonder why science and technology are on the decline in the US.
then the students family would be sued to cover the cost of the false alarm, cause it was the students fault in the first place
School administrators are often failed teachers or P.E. instructors with a career in the classroom that can be measured in 5 years or less. They are truly inept and feel that a tasted of the education system of any kind makes them qualified to then lead entire schools in turn.
The man in this story is simply a moron who did not rationally discuss anything about the construction of the device with the child to draw intelligent conclusions. He had a knee-jerk reaction because that's what stupid people do when presented with things they don't - or refuse to - understand.
Sadly this is absolutely the norm in school districts all across America, and has been for a few decades. The education system isn't flawed, just that the standards for these types of positions are _incredibly_ low.
An excerpt from "The Underground History of American Education":
http://www.johntaylorgatto.com/chapters/16a.htm
"""
Solve this problem and school will heal itself: children know that schooling is not fair, not honest, not driven by integrity. They know they are devalued in classes and grades, that the institution is indifferent to them as individuals. The rhetoric of caring contradicts what school procedure and content say, that many children have no tolerable future and most have a sharply proscribed one. The problem is structural. School has been built to serve a society of associations: corporations, institutions, and agencies. Kids know this instinctively. How should they feel about it? How should we?
As soon as you break free of the orbit of received wisdom you have little trouble figuring out why, in the nature of things, government schools and those private schools which imitate the government model have to make most children dumb, allowing only a few to escape the trap. The problem stems from the structure of our economy and social organization. When you start with such pyramid-shaped givens and then ask yourself what kind of schooling they would require to maintain themselves, any mystery dissipates--these things are inhuman conspiracies all right, but not conspiracies of people against people, although circumstances make them appear so. School is a conflict pitting the needs of social machinery against the needs of the human spirit. It is a war of mechanism against flesh and blood, self-maintaining social mechanisms that only require human architects to get launched.
I'll bring this down to earth. Try to see that an intricately subordinated industrial/commercial system has only limited use for hundreds of millions of self-reliant, resourceful readers and critical thinkers. In an egalitarian, entrepreneurially based economy of confederated families like the one the Amish have or the Mondragon folk in the Basque region of Spain, any number of self-reliant people can be accommodated usefully, but not in a concentrated command-type economy like our own. Where on earth would they fit? In a great fanfare of moral fervor some years back, the Ford Motor Company opened the world's most productive auto engine plant in Chihuahua, Mexico. It insisted on hiring employees with 50 percent more school training than the Mexican norm of six years, but as time passed Ford removed its requirements and began to hire school dropouts, training them quite well in four to twelve weeks. The hype that education is essential to robot-like work was quietly abandoned. Our economy has no adequate outlet of expression for its artists, dancers, poets, painters, farmers, filmmakers, wildcat business people, handcraft workers, whiskey makers, intellectuals, or a thousand other useful human enterprises--no outlet except corporate work or fringe slots on the periphery of things. Unless you do "creative" work the company way, you run afoul of a host of laws and regulations put on the books to control the dangerous products of imagination which can never be safely tolerated by a centralized command system.
Before you can reach a point of effectiveness in defending your own children or your principles against the assault of blind social machinery, you have to stop conspiring against yourself by attempting to negotiate with a set of abstract principles and rules which, by its nature, cannot respond. Under all its disguises, that is what institutional schooling is, an abstraction which has escaped its handlers. Nobody can reform it. First you have to realize that human values are the stuff of madness to a system; in systems-logic the schools we have are already the schools the system needs; the only way they could be much improved is to have kids eat, sleep, live, and die there.
Schools got the way they were at the start of the twentieth century as part of a vast, intensely engineered social revolution in which all major institutions were overhauled to wo
A 21st century issue: the irony of technologies of abundance in the hands of those still thinking in terms of scarcity.
Now I understand! This is the 'socialization' that the home schooled kids are missing!
Counseling for being so stupid as to take some initiative and build something on his own. That's not what schools want to teach. Schools want to train the next generation of assembly line workers, Wal-Mart employees, and gas station attendants. Scratch that, they don't even want to do that, what they really want to do is make sure everyone meets the minimum requirements set by the state/federation so that they can continue to get funding.
Teachers, on the other hand, want so much more for the students than they themselves have the time or money to give.
Job? I don't have time to get a job! Who will sit around and bitch about being broke and unemployed then?
This article didn't make sense. It says the student broken no laws, but he was in violatino of school policy? What kind of policy prevents them from bringing in harmless science projects?
"The student will not be prosecuted, but authorities were recommending that he and his parents get counseling, the spokesman said. The student violated school policies, but there was no criminal intent, Luque said."
Why the hell would they recommend counseling for a non-violent and non-criminal act?
Is there a better link regarding this article?
"The principal doesn't know enough about electronics..." How could he not know? He's overseeing a *technical* school. Does he ever venture out into the halls or talk to the kids? He's a fucking absentee landlord and deserves to lose his job two weeks ago. And shame on the parents for letting the gestapo inspect their house and suggest counseling after "da bomb" was determined to be harmless.
Police and fire officials also will not seek to recover costs associated with responding to the incident, the spokesman said.
Translation: We realize we screwed up and don't want to be laughed at in court.
Opus: the Swiss army knife of audio codec
However, say the principal is sitting there with the student with a device with wires sticking out of it all over the place. The principal doesn't know enough about electronics to to be sure whether it is a safe device, or is indeed a bomb. Additionally, the principal doesn't trust the student since if it is a bomb the student probably wouldn't admit to it.
Someone who personally knows the student and could accurately assess the situation should have been there. The principle, and assistant principle or just a teacher. Was there no-one around who actually knew the kid ? Seems like a pretty bad school to me.
If all else fails, immortality can always be assured by spectacular error.
If they treated kids like this in the 70's, I would have been declared a threat to the free world. I taught myself how to solder when I was 10, and I was into building all kinds of electronics kits and projects. I was also into model rocketry and built multi-stage rockets capable of reaching altitudes of 2500 ft. I brought crap to school to show my class all the time. Luckily, I didn't grow up to be an international terrorist - I became an engineer. We are in deep trouble when our education system treats the kids that should be leading us to the next technology leap forward as criminals.
In most cases, "Don't make Admin look stupid, especially if they are." is implied policy #0.
This is in no way confined to schools, of course.
Until there are actual ramifications for raising a false alarm, issues like this are not only likely to continue, but inevitable.
If we try to solve this solution by punishing false alarms, it will make the problem worse as anyone with half a brain realizes that they will be punished no matter what happens. Would you want to stay in the kind of position where no matter what you do, you are penalized? If I have that kind of boss, I leave immediately. The only people who remain will be those who are too inept to find an alternative.
The solution is going to be that eventually kids will get used to the idea that they shouldn't bring things in that scare their administrators, and they'll adapt. May sound lame, but it's what's going to happen, unless we can somehow reduce the risk that people are going to come and shoot their classmates, or bring a bomb. No school administrator wants that to happen at their school. You may rightly say that the risk of that happening in a particular school is unlikely, and you would be right, but no administrator knows how to determine if it is likely to happen at their school or not. They may have students a lot like Dylan Klebold in their school, and don't know how to ensure that they don't go off the deep end, so they do the best they can.
Qxe4
he and his family need to move to a country that values science over superstition and is in general, more sanely run than the USA.
The principal and vice-principal of this allegedly "technical" high school should be fired and blacklisted, of course, but they'll probably get promoted instead.
Tech Public Policy stuff
The school's statement does make sense, I'm sure it was to calm parents.
"Don't worry, we have rules and guidelines, and a system in place that would have caught this had it been real. We're like all over that. He broke the rules, had it been a real thing we would have stopped him before he did anything"
It's lies obviously, since the kid did nothing wrong, but that's what the purpose of that was, to cover their own asses and make sure at the next PTA they don't get "They're NOT THINKING OF THE CHILDREN! This could have been a terrorist attack! This shouldn't happen!"
"Why the hell would they recommend counseling for a non-violent and non-criminal act?"
Being mind-raped by the State causes mental trauma.
Oh. Wait. That couldn't be it.
Maybe it was this bit, "The Millennial Tech experience will enhance educational opportunities, prepare students for the workplace and allow all individuals to feel comfortable and secure." Clearly he should have anticipated the paranoia of his vice principal and refrained from making anything he could mistake for something else and thus feel unsafe. *shakes head*
Conservation of angular momentum makes the world go round.
I live in an Australia city now, but when my kids get to the inquisitive age, I'll have to pack up and move back to the bush - I like north queensland ... barrier reef.
We used to combine all sorts of nasty chemicals together as kids to see what would give a good bang. After many experiments we worked out which ones generally reacted together. Dad made sure there were textbooks lying around so we could work out what the reactions were and why (we were left to do this on our own - not forced to do so). We also built lots of electronics and mechanical contraptions from supplies we found and collected from the farm dumps. All kinds of shit really; No such thing as boredom.
I now have three science degrees; Mathematics, Computer and Organic Chemistry. Brother is an orthopaedic surgeon.
There is no way we could do that in the current environment where we live now. Too many nannies would get their panties in a twist. I do feel sorry for kids today. Kids will be kids.
.
"The solution is going to be that eventually kids will get used to the idea that they shouldn't bring things in that scare their administrators"
*twitch*
" unless we can somehow reduce the risk that people are going to come and shoot their classmates,"
To negative numbers? The chances of a kid dying in a violent crime involving explosives at a school are so low that you need a scientific calculator to display them. Compare that to the mortality rate in high-school football: http://www.scienceagogo.com/news/19980610033631data_trunc_sys.shtml
The problem won't be solved until idiots that fail to understand basic statistics aren't allowed to graduate high school. Though jailing any idiot that ever excuses incidents like this with any permutation of the phrase "they['re] do[ing] the best they can".
There's a quote which I fear I cannot find in order to cite, but to paraphrase:
"If all the well-intentioned were killed at birth, the remaining evil-doers would be small potatoes by comparison."
This is one of those real life incidents that makes movies with an idiot plot all the more believable.
You and people like you are exactly why the situation in the USA gets ever worse.
...
You are constantly obsessed with un-real threats, fixing problems that don't exist, and simply a GENERAL denial of common sense, justified on stupid rules and panicky process. Eg TSA
This kid was VICTIMIZED, should sue the vice-principle, inter alia, for slander of reputation (in his trade of profession, as a school student) and for distress and the suit should enjoin the school Board, and the County. His parents should have at least one with balls.
He is entitles to an APOLOGY, DAMAGES, and full reparation of his REPUTATION, and equal publicity, if necessary paid for by the Board, and since the costs were vicarious should be sanctioned across the Board members by a levy.
It sounds like a Simpson's chalkboard gag: "I will not expose the ignorance of the faculty"
--
"Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
Maybe some instruction would be in order.
Rule one. Don't scare the sheep.
Rule two. Don't scare the sheep that thinks they are in charge.
I think that making this guy look like a fool might be a good thing. I would have been all with letting him keep his dignity up till the CYA part at the end.
See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
In most cases, "Don't make Admin look stupid, especially if they are." is implied policy #0. .
Of course, schools are designed to teach kids how the real world works.
Teaching may select out that characteristic, but management seems to select for that characteristic. The person in question was Vice Principal. If the theory holds true that bad engineers in companies are promoted to management to avoid causing actual damage, you can easily imagine what happens in schools. (And yes, like most stereotypes, even if it were generally true, it's almost certainly not absolutely true. But, what sort of person would spend years to get a degree to teach, just to take the position of Vice Principal and be stuck primarily discipling children? And if they're not a teacher at all, why, as a manager, would they want to work in a school?)
Eurohacker European paranoia, gun rights, and h
Counseling from the trauma of having the bomb squad called over your science project?
Reboot macht Frei.
>the institution cannot be expected to exhibit human rationality.:
there is no such measurable entity as "The Institution". There are only people looking for excuses to not take responsibility.
The terrorists do not have to win in order for us to lose.
We all know what to do, but we don't know how to get re-elected once we have done it
they shouldn't bring things in that scare their administrators
As a Finn I hope this happens. You know, stifling imagination and inventiveness is a sure way to ensure competitiveness will drop too.
Anything can, and will, scare other people. Teddy bears to geocaching to advertisements to ...
Nope. Those who can't play rock and roll become pop artists :P
Stopping them from graduating high school is not enough. We need to stop them from _running_ high schools, as well.
Well it's quite obvious. They couldn't find anything illegal or wrong whatsoever. So of course they're going to make up bullshit "the student needs counseling" and "he violated school policies" to make it sound like they aren't a bunch of incompetent shitheads.
This happens all the time with terror suspects, like that guy who was puking in the bathroom on the plane a few weeks ago. He was labeled a "terrorist" because of the color of his skin and yet the government and the racist airline employee managed to come out looking like heroes. How? They spew this bullshit about "have to be cautious" and "he was suspicious" and they imply there was actually danger "we were lucky it was a false alarm".
-1 disagree is not a modifier for a reason. -1 troll, flaimbait, redundant, overrated are NOT acceptable substitutes.
Why the hell would they recommend counseling for a non-violent and non-criminal act?
By recommending something vaguely punitive (and "magnanimously" forgoing billing the childs family for the expense), the authorities are attempting to prevent blame from shifting from the child and his family to the place that it actually belongs: the authorities
recommending counseling is an attempt to maintain the appearance that the child actually did something wrong.
"Cursed is he who rises early in the morning..." Isiah 5:11
>> Maybe he should have known better, but he didn't, and I'm not going to fault him for erring on the side of caution.
And therein lies the root of the problem: There is absolutely no consequence to acting, reacting, or over-reacting in an unreasonable, ignorant, or just plain stupid way.
All actions should have consequences, even those obviously foolish ones taken with the best of intentions. This is precisely the reason why people who constantly "abuse" the 911 emergency services for--what some officials deem--trivial reasons, get police warnings or have to pay penalties for wasting everybody's time.
-dZ.
Carol vs. Ghost
In most cases, "Don't make Admin look stupid, especially if they are." is implied policy #0..
Sounds like they can manage that by themselves.
The sad truth is nobody is thinking of the children. They are our future and it looks like a pretty bleak one right now. Where every kid who displays an ounce ingenuity, exceptional achievement, or even exceptional interest in a particular topic of field is labeled as a potential threat.
How likely is this kid after this experience to want to participate in a science fair again? How likely is he to share is projects with teachers who might be able to mentor him? Now even if teachers would be willing to put the extra time in the kid is going to be afraid to ask.
We are looking at a system that is effectively geared to NOT develop the talents of our best and brightest!
Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
I agree the parents acted shamefully. I don't have any kids yet myself but my parents always knew enough about what I was doing that this sort of thing would not have caused them worry about me and instead cased them to get extremely defensive. They would have stuck up for me.
I can hear mom now"
"You're and idiot I am taking my son and leaving now; and don't you come anywhere near our house or is father will make you wish you didn't"
Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
And, since they have NO evidence of ANYTHING, they will loose.
Sadly, they won't lose.
If the parents choose to make an issue out of this, the school division will line up solidly behind this guy, and it will sit in lawyer hell until after the kid's graduated. I know an example where the parent's lawyer told them it would cost $250,000 and ten years, and at the end the school will give them a very nice apology - basically, that it wasn't worth pursuing.
The best solution for the kid and parents is preferably to change schools - the place advertises itself as a tech-focused school, but freaks out when kids make science projects? Barring that, you're stuck playing passive-aggressive with the admins - send notes excusing your kid from homework because of "concerns that it may be mistaken for explosive devices"...
Perhaps it doesn't. I'm just making the point that you are not special because you are military.
Unfortunately, your point that may be valid 'in abstracto', has no relation to the actual facts we're discussing. As soon as the guards had established he had a right to carry a rifle onto the plane, any search for other guns (that was what they try to find with a metal detector) or even a knife was a useless waste of time.
Therefore, by the (faulty) logic you're using, you're just a cow with a keyboard - osu-neko (2604)
For the period January 1990 to February 28, 2002 the U.S. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) recorded 1,055 incidents of bombs being placed in school premises.
And apparently, there are 125,000 schools in the US
.
So, assuming an even spread (no two "bombs" in the same school), a school has a 0.84% (less than 1 in 100) chance of being involved in a single incident over the last 12 years. Now, IIRC, US schools run on the four-year system (grades 1-4 in one school, 5-8 in another, 9-12 in the third, right?), which means that over 12 years, that's three generations of kids going through the doors - two-thirds of the student population over the time listed, even if their school was "hit", weren't a student there when it happened anyway.
If my 8am math is working right, that gives your school a 0.281% chance of being involved in a "bomb incident" during your child's four year stay. And that's before you start removing the incidences where the bomb is an alarm clock with a few wires sticking out (the "I didn't do my homework" bomb) rather than an actual explosive of any kind.
No, I'm thinking that if you're going to let him carry a freakin' assault rifle on board the aircraft, the rest of the security inspection is rather pointless.
I think terrorists are now more likely to dress as a member of the US military, since instead of futzing with MacGyver-reject bombs, you can just.. oh.. shoot the passengers.
is that, even after finding out that the kid's project was harmless, they went to his house and inspected his garage. There was no rational suspicion of wrongdoing, no evidence to justify further investigation. I can only assume that this was the "We always have to be absolutely sure" excuse used far too often to go where they don't have a real right to.