Slashdot Mirror


The DIY $10 Prepaid Cellphone Remote Car Starter

An anonymous reader writes "Wish you could start your car via your cell phone, but don't feel like ponying up the $40k for a Chevrolet Volt or $499 (plus $29 a year) for an aftermarket system from Viper? This hack relies on a cheap prepaid cellphone that has had its vibration motor surgically removed, replaced by a couple of leads triggering the car's starter. Whenever the phone receives a call it starts up the car — a somewhat dodgy proposition if a telemarketer ever gets hold of your number, but an interesting solution nonetheless. Total cost of the project: $71.03."

454 comments

  1. Telemarketer solution by janek78 · · Score: 3, Informative

    On many phones you can group contacts and assign different ringing profiles. You could just program in allowed numbers and set all other calls to "silent".

    I personally leave my car in gear (with the reverse locked in if I leave it for extended periods of time), so this would not be very practical. :)

    1. Re:Telemarketer solution by mother_reincarnated · · Score: 1

      Remote starters are generally limited to automatic style transmissions...

    2. Re:Telemarketer solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've had telemarketer calls spoofed from same number (though if anything the telco should autoblock something as obviously false

    3. Re:Telemarketer solution by zoloto · · Score: 1

      I did this with my first gen iPhone jailbroken and unlocked using t-mobile and using iBlacklist, essentially allowing only my number to dial in and make a noise/vibration. It's an amazing little hack.

    4. Re:Telemarketer solution by dov_0 · · Score: 1

      I grew up on a mountain, so parking in gear against the slope is 2nd nature.

      Surely this isn't a new hack. Someone must have done this a long time ago. When I can ring my car to come and pick me up from the front door, THEN I'll seriously be impressed...

      --
      sudo mount --milk --sugar /cup/tea /mouth /etc/init.d/relax start
    5. Re:Telemarketer solution by xaxa · · Score: 1

      Why would you want this?

      I don't own a car, am I missing something obvious?

    6. Re:Telemarketer solution by bmo · · Score: 1

      Because in any place that has a winter, it's a lot nicer to get into a warm car that's ready to drive instead of waiting for the engine, and you, to warm up. And no, it doesn't contribute to global warming/wasteful, because the car is going to idle the same amount of time regardless of you being there or not.

      Either you live where the sun shines all the time and it never gets below freezing, or you're a snow bunny.

      --
      BMO

    7. Re:Telemarketer solution by MorderVonAllem · · Score: 1

      In colder climates you could start the car to warm it up before you venture outside or you could possibly have the AC running in hotter climates.

    8. Re:Telemarketer solution by Minwee · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Why would you want this?

      I've never understood it, but it seems that the majority of North American car owners do seem to prefer automatic transmissions.

      In fact many of them are willing to pay _extra_ for the joy of replacing the far more efficient manual transmission which the rest of the world enjoys.

      Maybe they're just all nuts.

    9. Re:Telemarketer solution by ottothecow · · Score: 1
      People who live in cold climates (especially those with a car with a few miles on it) who frequently park outside like them.

      You really shouldn't drive away until your car has had some time to warm up and reach a stable idle. Your car is also really cold so you don't want to sit in it for a couple of minutes while the engine warms up when the heater core also has to warm up. Hit the remote start button while you are putting your coat on and your car is ready to go when you get there. Also a lot of people used to install remote start systems in cars because it went hand in hand with remote locks on cars that were too old to have them originally.

      You can do it in a manual car as well, it just won't work if you park in gear...so you probably wouldn't want to use it on a hill. Some of the systems also have more advanced features like a turbo timer that works on shutoff--something to do with it being better for a high boost turbocharger to run at idle for a bit before stopping completely so the car runs for 60 seconds after you actually take the key out and leave.

      --
      Bottles.
    10. Re:Telemarketer solution by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 3, Interesting

      There is this strange theory, widely accepted in certain circles, that using machines to handle mundane, tedious, or otherwise undesirable tasks is a good thing. Having a machine handle transmission shifting seems to fall into the same vein as having a machine handle most of my floating point math.

      If you happen to enjoy twiddling a transmission, more power to you, we all need hobbies to fill the void between birth and death; but for those of us who don't care, labor saving devices are progress.

    11. Re:Telemarketer solution by Anonymusing · · Score: 1

      Manual transmissions are a pain in the rear -- or the ankle and foot, actually -- when you have to drive in bumper-to-bumper city traffic. Automatic transmission is much nicer in those cases.

      --
      Liberal? Conservative? Compare perspectives at Left-Right
    12. Re:Telemarketer solution by barzok · · Score: 4, Insightful

      CVTs (which are automatic) are more efficient than manual transmissions. I recently bought a 2010 Subaru Outback and the mileage numbers are a couple MPG better w/ the CVT than the 6-speed manual.

      North American car owners prefer automatics because you can't eat a cheeseburger and talk on the phone while applying makeup & reading the newspaper if you're driving stick.

    13. Re:Telemarketer solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I live in a cold climate and I use a block heater that is connected to an interior heater. On a typical winter day of -20 degrees Celsius, it's good practice to put the block heater on at least an hour before the trip. I suppose a remote control could be useful, but for a typical morning commute all you need is a cheap timer for the electrical connection.

    14. Re:Telemarketer solution by andymadigan · · Score: 1

      Automatic transmissions (even the non-CVTs) have gotten a lot better recently. If you look at the numbers the difference in MPG is very small.

      --
      The right to protest the State is more sacred than the State.
    15. Re:Telemarketer solution by sunderland56 · · Score: 3, Informative

      There are some tasks that machines are bad at; gear selection in an automobile is one of them. Automatic transmissions cannot predict when you are approaching a curve, or a hill, or other vehicles. Gear selection needs to be based on what you are about to do, not what you just did.

      Note that all race cars use manual transmissions, as does any decent sports car, for just these reasons.

      Automatic transmissions are also mechanically inefficient. Cars with a manual gearbox generally get 1 or 2 more miles per gallon; it is strange how many people want an efficient car, yet they elect to pay extra for the automatic option.

    16. Re:Telemarketer solution by vvaduva · · Score: 1

      When it's 0 degrees outside and you want to get in a warm car, it comes in handy...

    17. Re:Telemarketer solution by Wrath0fb0b · · Score: 1

      I was going to do this but realized it solved exactly half my problem. What do you do about the evening commute back home?

    18. Re:Telemarketer solution by gparent · · Score: 1

      They want an efficient car, but they still don't want to waste their time shifting. They give up on efficiency so that they can skip on a boring task.

    19. Re:Telemarketer solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes you can. you're just uncoordinated.

    20. Re:Telemarketer solution by jridley · · Score: 1

      I live where it gets plenty cold, and I have one thing to say:

      People are just wussies.

      No, it's NOT going to sit and idle the same amount of time. When I start my car up, it idles for about 10 seconds; that's how much time it takes to circulate the oil. By then I've scraped the car already on the outside. The inside won't fog up if you put the defroster on medium or high to keep moist air away from it, and crack the rear windows a bit.

      I actually ride a bike to work most days (regardless of temp, I've ridden at -25*F so far) but when I drive, I scrape the ice and snow off, get in, start it up, and I'm rolling in 15 seconds.

    21. Re:Telemarketer solution by BattleApple · · Score: 2, Funny

      North American car owners prefer automatics because you can't eat a cheeseburger and talk on the phone while applying makeup & reading the newspaper if you're driving stick.

      pffff.. I'm doing all that *and* posting on slashdot while driving a stick

    22. Re:Telemarketer solution by jridley · · Score: 3, Informative

      I prefer manual transmissions myself, but automatic transmissions these days are not all that bad. You give up maybe 1 MPG usually, and even then it depends on if your A/C is on. With the A/C on a car with automatic may actually be a little more efficient, because it's programmed to cut the A/C off during heavy acceleration. This is especially helpful in city driving.

    23. Re:Telemarketer solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Telemarketers or not, I get on average at least one call per moth from somebody who dialed my number by mistake. It would be very annoying, to say the least, to come my car after work and discover that it has been idling for eight hours, and possibly ran out of fuel. Especially if it is parked in a small garage.

      That is to say, just letting the car start on any call is stupid and dangerous, at the very least the silent profile trick should be used. Some more advanced phones, like my WM device, let you blacklist or whitelist the numbers as you choose, which is probably a good idea as well.

      My (used) car came with a Webasto remote heater which is pretty neat as it means the engine doesn't have to idle pointlessly, but if were'e looking at some serious ghetto solutions, this isn't such a bad one.
      -mobby_6kl

    24. Re:Telemarketer solution by jridley · · Score: 1

      I hate scraping cars off. If it's that cold out I ride my bike instead (yes, I'm serious).

    25. Re:Telemarketer solution by morgauxo · · Score: 1

      Generally block heaters are used on Diesel engines which aren't that popular in the US. I don't see a switch to Diesel happening here any time soon either as Diesel fuel here more than expensive enough here to offset it's efficiency gain over gasoline. Maybe block heaters could be used on Gasoline engines? I'm not sure if the blocks have the necessary holes for adding the heater. It's an interesting idea. House owners could do this before work. Most apartment complexes don't have power outlets near where the cars are parked though. Even if they do it's probably meant to be used for grounds maintenance tools, not for warming resident's cars. This still leaves the drive home. Where Diesel engines are more popular do employers provide power outlets in the parking lots for employees to warm their engine blocks? This is definitely not the norm here.

    26. Re:Telemarketer solution by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Lots of the inefficient automatics are fairly good at efficiency. even my old th125 transmission in my 1986 Fiero will do a TCC lockup after 35mph to eliminate the losses in the transmission.

      efficiency is low when it's not locked, but 90% of the time when the car is moving it is. newer 6 speed automatics are even more efficient. I saw one that was getting better fuel economy than a 5 speed stick. the car can decide shift points better than a person can.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    27. Re:Telemarketer solution by Lumpy · · Score: 4, Informative

      Um no, not unless you are looking at racing from 10 years ago or longer. Automatic transmissions DOMINATE drag racing right now. you get spooky consistant ET's running an Auto, plus you can get Auto transmission that handle far more HP than manuals.

      Also some of the more recent rallies in europe are being won with automatics in the car.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    28. Re:Telemarketer solution by karnal · · Score: 3, Informative

      Manuals will cut the AC off under heavy load as well. Had two Chevy vehicles that you could tell would kick the AC off under load or high RPMs and they were both stick.

      --
      Karnal
    29. Re:Telemarketer solution by Brooklynoid · · Score: 1

      "Note that all race cars use manual transmissions, as does any decent sports car, for just these reasons. " (My emphasis)

      Not true. Many drag racers are equipped with automatic transmissions. The slip inherent in having a torque converter allows the driver to keep the engine at a higher speed prior to launch, resulting in better quarter-mile times.

    30. Re:Telemarketer solution by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      Sounds like a problem that'll be fixed in the fairly near future(presumably starting with the nice stuff, and working its way down) by the plummeting cost of imaging hardware and DSP.

      I suspect that the autonomous vehicle guys would love to have this application as an incremental testbed.

    31. Re:Telemarketer solution by QuantumRiff · · Score: 1

      Mine is in a manual, cost probably around $200 installed. It has two sensors.. If the hood is up, the engine will not start (for if you're leaning into the engine bay, and bump your keys), and the other is on the E-brake. If my ebrake is not set, it will not start. I had to sign some disclaimers, promising not to sue if I left it in gear, with the ebrake on.

      --

      What are we going to do tonight Brain?
    32. Re:Telemarketer solution by Sir_Lewk · · Score: 1

      I'll gladly get 22MPG instead of 23MPG if it means I don't have to bother with a manual.

      I use my car to commute, not dragrace in the Andies...

      --
      "linux is just DOS with a UNIX like syntax" -- Galactic Dominator (944134)
    33. Re:Telemarketer solution by NeuroKoan · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Drag racing is probably the one exception to the rule, as its just a straight line and you don't have elevation changes, curves or other vehicles to worry about.

      To me, drag racing is barely racing. Its more like an engineering display. Besides the launch, there isn't much for the driver to do but keep the wheel straight for 10 seconds or so.

      --

      "However," replied the universe, "The fact has not created in me A sense of obligation."
    34. Re:Telemarketer solution by tie_guy_matt · · Score: 1

      I prefer manual transmission. All of my previous cars were stick shifts but my new (to me) car is an automatic. I decided to give it up and go automatic because it is much more cost effective to by a used car and in North America it is difficult to find a used stick shift (you may end up paying more.) In fact the car I bought doesn't even come in NA with a stick shift option. My car does have flappy paddle shifters that allow me to pick the gear if I want (a lot of new automatics have some type of option like that.)

      I also decided that automatic is the way of the future. It is fun to pick your gear if you only have 4-6 gears. More and more automatics these days have 6-8 or more gears with some being CVT. When you have more gears then shifting does become tedious, and what do you get with a stick shift CVT? Some type of gear knob? And as you add more and more gears the automatics become MORE efficient. I personally think that in the future all cars will be CVT automatics (assuming they have transmissions at all since electric cars don't really need them.)

    35. Re:Telemarketer solution by Montezumaa · · Score: 0

      You are incorrect. There are a large number of remote starters for manual-shifting automobiles.

    36. Re:Telemarketer solution by GSMacLean · · Score: 2, Informative

      You have no idea what you're talking about. Pretty well every gasoline engine has the capability (and the provision) for the addition of a block heater. Go up north where -40 is a normal winter temperature, you'll see everyone has block heaters. Even store parking lots have lines of plugs for you to plug your car in while you go inside. By the way, the only reason Diesel is more expensive here (unlike the rest of the world, where it is cheaper - which make sense, because it is far less refined and less costly to manufacture than gasoline) is because the government heaps taxes on it.

    37. Re:Telemarketer solution by GigG · · Score: 1

      A manual transmission is more efficient if the driver knows what they are doing. The vast majority don't. In the hands of the average driver an automatic is just if not more efficient than a manual with less chance of additional non-fuel costs.

      --
      Is buying a Harley Davidson as your first motorcycle since you were 16 at age 49 a midlife crisis issue?
    38. Re:Telemarketer solution by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

      "Drag racing" isn't really racing, though. It's just accelerating hard in a straight line, then stopping. You couldn't make a racing car with an automatic gearbox, and expect it to stay on the track beyond the first couple of corners. Heaven help you if turn 1 leads into a chicane...

    39. Re:Telemarketer solution by tom17 · · Score: 1

      How does the car know that I am about to overtake someone better than I know. Do they have brain implants now so that they can predict what you want before you are consciously aware of it? Clever...

      Tom...

    40. Re:Telemarketer solution by Ogive17 · · Score: 1

      Your CVT probably gets better mileage than the 6-speed MT due to how the car is tuned. I'm willing to bet the 6-speed MT is more geared towards "sporty" handling than just practical driving. I don't have any experience with Subaru's, but I know getting a 6 speed MT Honda means it's the sporty model and it will get lower MPG than the 5 speed MT (which will have less hp). The V6 automatic Accord gets better mileage than the V6 manual Accord (coupe).

      --
      "Action without philosophy is a lethal weapon; philosophy without action is worthless."
    41. Re:Telemarketer solution by holmstar · · Score: 1

      Yes, you can install block heaters on gasoline engine cars. It isn't all that necessary if you have a newer car and temps don't go below -20, but if you live farther north, then a block heater becomes almost mandatory if you have to park outside.

    42. Re:Telemarketer solution by aclarke · · Score: 1

      Either you live where the sun shines all the time and it never gets below freezing, or you're a snow bunny.

      Or, your car's engine is so efficient that it doesn't generate enough heat while idling to warm your cabin.

      Neither my '05 Volvo XC90 (2.5t petrol) or my '86 Land Rover 110 (2.5t diesel) generate enough heat under idle to noticeably lift the engine temperature, let alone the temperature coming into the cab. On my Land Rover I fitted a recirculating oil heater to help this out somewhat. I can idle my Volvo all I want but it's not going to help the interior temperature much. The best it will do is start to defrost the windows.

    43. Re:Telemarketer solution by MachDelta · · Score: 1

      Where I live in Canada, everything you just said IS the norm. Almost everyone's gasoline powered car has either a block heater or a frost plug (same idea, different application) and lots of midrange apartments and condos have electrified stalls. My condo has them anyways. Oh and yes we have diesels too. :)

    44. Re:Telemarketer solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They want an efficient car, but they still don't want to waste their time shifting. They give up on efficiency so that they can skip on a boring task.

      I'm unsure how this is "wasting time" since you're sitting in the car waiting to get somewhere anyway.

    45. Re:Telemarketer solution by NeutronCowboy · · Score: 1

      You realize that drag racing is a 100% predictable event, with no curves and a requirement for maximal acceleration during the entire race? Of course automatics should dominate the race. I'm waiting for the car with an optical starting light recognition system, where the computer has the engined dialed in to the perfect RPM the instant the light is about to go green. Drag Racing is designed to be run by computers today.

      As for WRC cars using automatics , I'd like to see a citation for that. A quick browse of the WRC site shows nothing but manuals - even if the manuals are all paddle shifters, it's still a manual.

      --
      Those who can, do. Those who can't, sue.
    46. Re:Telemarketer solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Strangely enough, current electronics and mechanical engineering are actually to the point where automatic transmissions offer the same if not more efficiency than manual. So if you're driving a car that's newer than a 2000 model, factor in that not everybody times shifts or switches gears perfectly, the real-world economy difference is quite negligable. If you want economy, you don't worry about the transmission - it's more practical to simply get a smaller vehicle.

      Now if you factor in the overuse of stopsigns, badly programmed stoplights, over capacity highways, and the traffic and huge clusterfuck that typically ensues during rush hours, you'd also figure out that there are plenty valid reasons why having an automatic transmission is the better choice here in the U.S. (But if you live far away from the city out in the sticks, or only have your car for weekend road trips, then sure going through gears in a manual might be fun.)

    47. Re:Telemarketer solution by holmstar · · Score: 1

      Everyone always says this, but I've driven a manual in traffic, and the only time that it is a pain is when traffic is moving at less than an idling pace. Moving at slower than an idle means constantly using the clutch, which gets tiring.

    48. Re:Telemarketer solution by sunderland56 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Top fuel and funny car classes don't have a transmission at all - they're one speed. There is a clutch pack that slowly engages - automatically, the timing is programmed by the mechanics before the run. That hardly qualifies as either manual or automatic.

      Rally cars have a manual transmission, shifted by a paddle to the right of the steering wheel. Watch any of the TV coverage, you'll see them shifting with the right hand without having to remove it from the wheel. Rallying is, in fact, an example of why manual transmissions are better for racing - when broadsliding around a dirt road corner at 120 MPH, you really don't want the car to suddenly shift gears.

    49. Re:Telemarketer solution by Reece400 · · Score: 1

      Block heaters are an option on most gas vehicles, both of mine have them although I rarely use them (only on VERY cold days).

    50. Re:Telemarketer solution by Brooklynoid · · Score: 1

      Bear in mind also, that a car with a manual transmission must be tuned to provide power over a (relatively) broad band of rpm's. When you have a CVT, you can run the engine at or very near its torque peak pretty much all the time. This allows you to tune for a very narrow power band, and would (I think; I Am Not An Automotive Engineer) make the engine more efficient when run within that narrow band.

    51. Re:Telemarketer solution by tangelogee · · Score: 0

      Also remember that in some states it is illegal to use the remote starter outside of your property. http://blog.timesunion.com/readandreact/108/leaving-a-car-unattended-gets-you-a-ticket/

    52. Re:Telemarketer solution by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      Automatic transmissions cannot predict when you are approaching a curve, or a hill, or other vehicles.

      Yet.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    53. Re:Telemarketer solution by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 1

      Several of the higher end remote starts (Viper, for example) will work with manual transmissions. They detect if the vehicle in gear (transmission sensor), and refuse to start if this is detected.

    54. Re:Telemarketer solution by Anonymusing · · Score: 1

      Exactly so -- like, perhaps, rush hour into Manhattan. Or Boston. I've done those, and it was literally painful. It gave me two things to curse: the fricking traffic, AND the pain in my foot.

      --
      Liberal? Conservative? Compare perspectives at Left-Right
    55. Re:Telemarketer solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's also important to note that for most drivers manuals are NOT more efficient than an automatic [citation needed]. For a manual transmission to be efficient it requires that the driver be well aware of the operations involved in a combustion engine. Learning to drive one is fairly easy, but mastering one takes time and will almost certainly cause LOSS in efficiency in the short run.

    56. Re:Telemarketer solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In cold countries now they use Webastos and other similar solutions, as a previous poster here as stated: warming an engine while in idle is not healthy for said engine, that's why they use separate, purpose built small displacement diesel engines to warm up the radiator water and other parts of the car and main engine. Those small engines can be remote activated and or programmed for a specific time.

    57. Re:Telemarketer solution by PhotoJim · · Score: 1

      The only time a manual transmission is boring or annoying is in gridlock. In traffic that is moving, or even better, on empty roads, manual transmissions change mindless, boring driving to a fun experience - at least for me.

    58. Re:Telemarketer solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Um.. No.

      Actually, a person with a brain would think something like this:

      It's really cold outside, and there is ice on my car. I can either go out there in the cold, scrape the ice off, and get in the cold car and drive, or I could start the car, let it warm itself up and melt the ice off of itself, and I could be comfortable for my drive.

      It will burn a bit of gas to do that, but it's worth it for me not to have to freeze my ass off like an idiot. I think I'll do that.

    59. Re:Telemarketer solution by pbhj · · Score: 1

      How are you wasting your time? You're still sitting there in the car whichever way you do gear changes. For me I think it's more about being engaged in the driving process.

    60. Re:Telemarketer solution by wwfarch · · Score: 1

      Me too.. but that's mainly because there's no way to get to my front door without going over some steps.

    61. Re:Telemarketer solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From what I gather it is illegal in the UK at least to leave a running car unattended:

      Regulation 107(2)(a). This states that no person shall cause or permit to be on any road any motor vehicle which is not attended by a person duly licensed to drive it unless the engine is stopped and the parking brake is effectively set. Exemptions to the requirements of this Regulation as to the stopping of the engine include a fire brigade vehicle, the engine of which is being used for any fire brigade purpose.

      Plus if your car gets stolen while you are not in attendance and you left it running [with keys in the ignition or otherwise] the insurance companies will not pay.

      Thanks

    62. Re:Telemarketer solution by icebraining · · Score: 1

      And my six years old Nokia with a monochrome screen can do that without jailbreaking.

    63. Re:Telemarketer solution by natehoy · · Score: 1

      I've never felt the need for an engine block heater for my Diesel car. Of course, it has glow plugs that run off the internal battery, so it starts just fine even in the cold (assuming you remember to wait for the glow plugs). It also has a small electric heater for the defroster, heat for both side-view mirrors, and heated seats. Most of this is to make up for the simple fact that a Diesel is too efficient to warm up quickly when it's very cold out. Generally it takes about 10 minutes of driving for the temp gauge to nudge off minimum when it's below about 0F.

      The coldest I've ever started my car is about -20F (~-29C), and it started up pretty easily, though I did have to wait about a minute for the glow plugs to do their warming thing. I expect I'd have trouble at much below that, but if the temps get much below -20F, I'd expect to have trouble with some of the other systems in the car, not just the fuel delivery and burn.

      --
      "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
    64. Re:Telemarketer solution by burisch_research · · Score: 1

      CVT consumes less engine power power to operate than the insanely outdated standard Automatic transmission!

      The reason CVTs are so much more efficient is that in conjunction with the engine controller they keep the engine at the precise RPM required to deliver the requested power at which the engine is most efficient. With conventional manual *and* auto transmissions, there are a few pre-set fixed ratios. So, for even the most experienced manual driver, or the most intelligent auto box, the revs are almost always lower or higher than they should be. Only for a brief moment is the rpm exactly correct to minimize consumption.

      Yes, it could be that the 6-speed MT is tuned differently from the CVT product, but there's no getting away from the fact that the CVT's engine will always be turning over at the most efficient speed.

      --
      char*f="char*f=%c%s%c;main(){printf(f,34,f,34);}";main(){printf(f,34,f,34);}
    65. Re:Telemarketer solution by natehoy · · Score: 1

      I generally fire up the car, turn defrost on medium, and let it idle while I scrape the windows off. Depending on how much I have to scrape and wipe off, the car will usually be safe to drive about the time I finish (if I have to wipe 10 inches of snow off it, it can take a couple of minutes - grin).

      --
      "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
    66. Re:Telemarketer solution by nedlohs · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Convenience wins over efficiency. It's hardly strange or surprising.

      Most people who want an efficient car choose a car over a motorcycle too. Same reason.

      You might enjoy driving or getting better performance or whatever. Lots of other people prefer not to have to push the clutch in and out constantly for the hour of stop-and-go bumper to bumper commuting that do each day (and don't try telling them to just stay in second, that's just more details they don't care about...)

    67. Re:Telemarketer solution by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 1

      The only people who seem to think Manual transmissions require thinking and or labor are people that have never driven manual transmissions. It becomes a second nature after 6 or so months and 2 or so days in a new vehicle.

      It's like typing vs speech to text. Speech to text people who have never typed (Rare now, but maybe in the future) will quickly point out "Why would I ever want to physically manipulate keys? I mean. It's a mundane task. I'll let the computer do it for me."

      I don't need to 'think' how to type or where the keys are. I just decide that I need to write this and my fingers just move to the positions they need to be in. The last 2 times I've had to 'think' about are when I learned QWERTY and when I learned DVORAK. After the first month. I just knew where the keys were. It's the exact same with a manual transmission. I know what 4000 RPM sounds like, I know what lugging sounds/feels like. I know what gear I'm in. I put no more consideration into shifting than I do walking. (Then again we can't all have Randy Newman coaching us through, "Left foot right foot foot right foot left foot right foot".

      Funny thing is people cite "city" driving as worst case scenario, but when I went to India EVERYONE had a manual transmission. Even the autorickshaws are manual.

    68. Re:Telemarketer solution by gparent · · Score: 1

      Well, I usually drive with friends, and have music on, so there's no contest for me. I've drove stick during driving classes but that was pretty much it.

    69. Re:Telemarketer solution by gparent · · Score: 1

      Perhaps wasting time wasn't the right term to use. Getting rid of an annoyance would be more appropriate.

    70. Re:Telemarketer solution by Knuckles · · Score: 1

      The solution to this is a parking heater in the car, not remote-starting the car to let it idle. E.g., the heaters by Webasto (http://www.webasto.co.uk/am/en/am_automobile_3177.html). Such heaters have been available for ages and can be controlled by timer, dedicated remotes, or texting from the mobile phone. They are pretty common over here and the German Wikipedia page is extensive (http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standheizung), but I could not find a similar page on the English Wikipedia (searching for "parking heater", the English term used by Webasto). Dunno if the term is incorrect or for some reason devices like this are rare in the US.

      --
      "When I first heard Daydream Nation it quite frankly scared the living shit out of me." -- Matthew Stearns
    71. Re:Telemarketer solution by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      If maximizing your passing speed is a concern, I doubt we're still talking about efficiency.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    72. Re:Telemarketer solution by natehoy · · Score: 1

      The last new car my wife and I purchased was a Pontiac Vibe. My wife wanted a manual because she and I both prefer them, but we were surprised to discover that the EPA rated mileage on the manual was 1MPG lower than the automatic. However, the purchase price on the manual was about $1600 less, so we figure we saved enough to pay for a couple of percentage point drop in efficiency, not to mention maintenance costs. :)

      Plus, we live in an area that gets lots of snow and ice, and we didn't want to drop a lot of dough on expensive traction control gimcrackery. A manual transmission is very handy under less-than-ideal driving conditions. It does, however, demand a little extra attention.

      I also find that having a manual makes me more aware of things. I feel more engaged in the driving experience, and am less easily distracted by other things. But that's a psychological improvement in driving, not a technical one, and probably doesn't apply to everyone.

      I will say that if I drove a stop-and-go commute every day, I'd switch out for something with an automatic. Manuals aren't for everyone, and they are certainly less than ideal under a lot of circumstances.

      --
      "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
    73. Re:Telemarketer solution by knarf · · Score: 1

      Simple, you plug it in the outlet at your parking spot. Most company parking lots here in Sweden have them. If these are not available at your work and you live in a cold climate you should tell them to install some as it is the 'green' thing to do and will be of use when cars go electric as well...

      Another option is a blowtorch... if you happen to drive a tractor. I use one to get my tractor to start if I leave it in the forest overnight. I have used it on my motorbike as well... I'm thinking about a way to get the thing to warm up without such dangerous tricks like a heating element in the oil pan. Carburetors and blowtorches do not make good company...

      --
      --frank[at]unternet.org
    74. Re:Telemarketer solution by delinear · · Score: 1

      Hmm, when I learned to drive I was taught to always ensure a comfortable driving position before driving away as you're less likely to become distracted - this includes things like checking mirror positions and seat position (which I have to do regularly as my other half uses my car not infrequently and she's a good deal shorter than I am) and to me "comfort" includes not being freezing cold :)

      Disclaimer: having said that, I live where it's rare to be cold enough to matter (UK) - although the fact that it's so rare tends to mean when it does happen, like this winter, it's even more important to be safe, warm and careful because we're not used to handling such conditions and that's the worst time to be distracted by something as silly as the cold - rather a live wuss than a dead hothead!

    75. Re:Telemarketer solution by delinear · · Score: 1

      In colder climates you could start the car to warm it up before you venture outside or you could possibly have the AC running in hotter climates.

      Honestly had to think for a second why the Anonymous Coward would be running...

      The problem I've had this winter (which has been the worst we've had in a century or something ridiculous) is that my daily commute is so short, the car doesn't get chance to properly warm up and run for any amount of time before it's cooling down again, so unless I idle it so that it's running warm for the majority of my journey, I'm sure I'll hurt the engine more.

    76. Re:Telemarketer solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Remote starters are generally limited to automatic style transmissions...

      Um, No actually they're not. Remote starters on a vehicle with a standard transmission just need to be more complex so that they only start if the car was turned off while the transmission was in neutral or has a detection mechanism to ensure the vehicle is still in neutral.

    77. Re:Telemarketer solution by delinear · · Score: 1

      I guess it's a side effect of living somewhere with good (relatively) city planning - you have lots of straight roads meaning you don't really need to gear shift so much. I live in the UK and we have enough fiddly little winding roads that I'd rather handle the gears than have it done automatically (although an auto is a godsend for long motorway journeys for the same reason). I also find it's quite a bit more fun driving a manual on such roads, as well as being a lot less expensive.

    78. Re:Telemarketer solution by fprintf · · Score: 1

      Automatic transmissions are heavier, much larger and more complex than manual transmissions. For most small vehicles this means they are unsuitable... if you take the form factor far enough, where weight is a serious penalty then automatic transmissions make no sense at all - motorcycles and racing cars.

      I drive a stick because I enjoy it. I also use it to exercise my sense of superiority over the cavemen driving automatic vehicles. :-)

      --
      This post brought to you by your friendly neighborhood MBA.
    79. Re:Telemarketer solution by delinear · · Score: 1

      I guess it's horses for courses - for me it's an automatic (no pun intended) response to change gears manually I've been doing it so long, and I enjoy the extra control it gives me when I really need it, on top of that, it's a seamless experience for me to drive an automatic (on the very rare occasion that I do have to, rental car, etc) while I imagine it would be more jarring for someone who has only ever driven an automatic to have to drive a manual. For me that's worth the extra step of manually switching, though some days when stuck in gridlock I really wish I did drive a manual as I hate stop-start driving in heavy traffic with a passion.

    80. Re:Telemarketer solution by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 1

      And no, it doesn't contribute to global warming/wasteful, because the car is going to idle the same amount of time regardless of you being there or not.

      It's pretty wasteful regardless actually, at least for any fuel-injected vehicle*. The time required for the vehicle to be "warm" to drive is about 10 seconds. This is quite a bit less time than is required for "warm" to human comfort...

      I regularly go out to start my car in the mornings, but there's no question that it's wasteful - I get about 1mpg worse on average when I'm doing this consistently. I'm just OK with that ;)

      * Carburetor-based vehicles are a different story, as are vehicles in cold climates which require actual pre-heating. (Though for the latter, the necessary warm-up occurs before starting the car, not after.)

    81. Re:Telemarketer solution by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      People who live in cold climates (especially those with a car with a few miles on it) who frequently park outside like them.

      You really shouldn't drive away until your car has had some time to warm up and reach a stable idle. Your car is also really cold so you don't want to sit in it for a couple of minutes while the engine warms up when the heater core also has to warm up. Hit the remote start button while you are putting your coat on and your car is ready to go when you get there. Also a lot of people used to install remote start systems in cars because it went hand in hand with remote locks on cars that were too old to have them originally.

      That's old advice. Modern engines warm up perfectly well (and faster) as long as you don't drive it hard when it's cold. A minute or two at most is all that is ever needed: http://ca.autos.yahoo.com/p/1663/do-you-need-to-warm-up-your-car

    82. Re:Telemarketer solution by MonsterTrimble · · Score: 1

      Top Fuel dragsters do a direct drive and most dragsters (other than Top Fuel) use an automatic. Too much momentum is lost doing a shift with a manual transmission and manuals are slower to shift then automatics.

      Most, if not all, of the F1, Indy & NASCAR vehicles use stick shifts, and the facts about Manuals vs Automatics is bang on (+1 Informative if I had mod points) but not *ALL* race cars use manuals.

      --
      I call it 'The Aristocrats'
    83. Re:Telemarketer solution by dfenstrate · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I purposely bought a stick shift in my Ranger, because I enjoyed using them at the time.
      After seven years, I've come to the conclusion that it's merely a distracting chore, as trucks aren't that fun to drive anyway.

      Anyway, what I'm trying to say is, you can shove your elitist anti-American (and/or canadian) attitude. Yes, we all get how cool you are for being able to operate a clutch AND a shift.

      Straight manual transmissions are on their way out anyway, being replaced by computer operated 'manual' transmissions. Cuts down on a warranty calls on sports cars, you see.

      Soon you won't find them in anything but sub-$11k econoboxes.

      --
      Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms should be the name of a store, not a government agency.
    84. Re:Telemarketer solution by Capt.DrumkenBum · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Here is a thought. Build a dragster without a driver.
      A light sensor to detect the "Go" light. (Yeah I know tons about racing.)
      A little computer power to keep it running straight, and to tell it when to start and stop.

      I wonder how it would do against a living driver.

      --
      If I were God, wouldn't I protect my churches from acts of me?
    85. Re:Telemarketer solution by ottothecow · · Score: 1
      Oh, I wasn't suggesting more than a couple of minutes. I meant it literally when I said start the car before you put on your coat.

      I don't personally have one (well, I've gone carless...but if I did have a car, it would not remote start) but this is the suggested use. Anything beyond that is just wasteful

      --
      Bottles.
    86. Re:Telemarketer solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, rally cars use Sequential Manual Transmission
      Just like you don't want the car to be choosing your gears at 120MPH while cornering, you also don't want to worry about clutching every two seconds on those twisty roads

    87. Re:Telemarketer solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Bugatti Veyron uses an automatic tranny. I personally perfer a manual myself.

      It usually boils down to this:
      Driver enjoys driving = Manual
      Driver couldn't care less about driving = Automatic

    88. Re:Telemarketer solution by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      Idling or reving to 3000 with no load blows heat out my exhaust. My car only warms up when it's in gear. For the most part, I keep it under 3000RPM by staying in higher gears; shift to second at 2000 and third when I pass 2250 or so. Once the temp needle moves I drive normal; entering the highway in second gear above 4000RPM is a quick way to get heat.

    89. Re:Telemarketer solution by ElSupreme · · Score: 1

      And how are you 'wasting' time shifting? You are in the car. You are driving. Your left foot is doing NOTHING if you have an auto.

      Unless you are fiddeling with the GPS, while talking on the phone, and tuning the radio, in between dipping your fries in ketchup, and shaving on the way to work. Oh and reading the paper.
      And still your left foot does nothing.

      --
      My addiction: Arguing with idiots. AKA Slashdot!
    90. Re:Telemarketer solution by triffid_98 · · Score: 1
      You can have an equally high speed launch with a clutch or an automatic. The key (for drag racing) is that an automatic transmission gives totally consistent results and a high rpm clutch engagement is dependant on how well the driver modulates the clutch at each launch. Also, good luck finding a consumer car with a built 2-speed Powerglide in it, they don't exist.

      Unfortunately (in the United States at least) it's impossible to buy some cars with manual transmissions and sometimes they're pretty awful units besides. I personally prefer a manual but I have to buy what the dealers will sell me.

      "Note that all race cars use manual transmissions, as does any decent sports car, for just these reasons. " (My emphasis)

      Not true. Many drag racers are equipped with automatic transmissions. The slip inherent in having a torque converter allows the driver to keep the engine at a higher speed prior to launch, resulting in better quarter-mile times.

    91. Re:Telemarketer solution by ElSupreme · · Score: 1

      Yeah and they are way more fun and the urge to burn tires is uncrontrollable!

      And it isn't that hard to learn te crusie in a good RPM range, and not over rev the engeine without the clutch engaged. If you learn those 2 things, and do them 80% of the time you will beat the horrible inefficent wastes that are torque converters.

      --
      My addiction: Arguing with idiots. AKA Slashdot!
    92. Re:Telemarketer solution by ElSupreme · · Score: 1

      And how does moving your left foot impeede on anything you just mentioned?

      --
      My addiction: Arguing with idiots. AKA Slashdot!
    93. Re:Telemarketer solution by barzok · · Score: 1

      It's not so much that you can go for a very narrow power band, it's that you can keep the engine RPMs in exactly the right spot for the conditions. The first time I accelerated uphill with the engine RPMs remaining constant, it was really weird.

      My other Subaru has a 4-speed automatic. There are times where it'll have to hold the revs in the ~4K range, and I'll have to feather the throttle to keep the car at a steady speed, or it'll try to keep the revs low and as a result I'll bog way down (it won't kick down right away). The engine and the transmission actually work against each other.

      Under the same conditions, the CVT & engine work together and everything remains "just right."

    94. Re:Telemarketer solution by almondo · · Score: 1

      >North American car owners prefer automatics because you can't eat a cheeseburger and talk on the >phone while applying makeup & reading the newspaper if you're driving stick.

      Sure I can, and with Verizon I can use my second phone to send text messages and read Slashdot.

      Coordination dude, git some ;)

    95. Re:Telemarketer solution by tom17 · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I took "the car can decide shift points better than a person can." at face value.

      I guess you meant "the car can decide the most economical shift points better than a person can."

      It's just a shame it can't be in the right gear when exiting a corner.

    96. Re:Telemarketer solution by skiflyer · · Score: 1

      I also prefer driving manuals, but that's a preference.

      All of the information in your post is just out of date. Plenty of race cars have gone automatic, especially double clutch autos. Same with decent sports cars. Some cars are getting better MPG and 0-60 times with their automatic equivalents in ideal conditions. And many more are getting better MPG and 0-60 times with their automatic equivalents when compared to a normal driver rather than one who shifts at all the optimal times.

      So, in short, you need to update your information.

    97. Re:Telemarketer solution by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "There is this strange theory, widely accepted in certain circles, that using machines to handle mundane, tedious, or otherwise undesirable tasks is a good thing. Having a machine handle transmission shifting seems to fall into the same vein as having a machine handle most of my floating point math."

      I suppose that would be true if you never owned anything but "mundane" and "tedious" cars.

      I've only owned 2-seater sports cars (ok, technically the 911 Turbo was a 4 seater, but, you couldn't really fit one whole person back there)...and it would be a shame to have gotten any performance car in an 'auto'. Heck, if nothing else, it generally kills resale value too.

      Yeah, if you drive nothing but boring cars sure, get an automatic. But if you enjoy driving something that is a pleasure to take out on the road every time you fire it up...go manual transmission.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    98. Re:Telemarketer solution by rolfwind · · Score: 1

      North American car owners prefer automatics because you can't eat a cheeseburger and talk on the phone while applying makeup & reading the newspaper if you're driving stick.

      I think most of those who prefer manual is only due the macho perception, of racing and the like - that's what it boils down too.

      Automatics are still the exception in Germany, but my uncle tried an automatic out 15 years ago (he never drove an automatic until he was 40) and he loves the convenience of it. He knows stick perfectly well, but the other upside to driving automatics is that the used cars can be slightly cheaper if they are auto, as every one there wants a stick.

      I drove both extensively. If you're drive a lot in the metro areas, the coolness of stick gets old fast.

    99. Re:Telemarketer solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      CVTs (which are automatic) are more efficient than manual transmissions. I recently bought a 2010 Subaru Outback and the mileage numbers are a couple MPG better w/ the CVT than the 6-speed manual.

      North American car owners prefer automatics because you can't eat a cheeseburger and talk on the phone while applying makeup & reading the newspaper if you're driving stick.

      Yes you can,

    100. Re:Telemarketer solution by MyGirlFriendsBroken · · Score: 1

      >

      You might enjoy driving or getting better performance or whatever. Lots of other people prefer not to have to push the clutch in and out constantly for the hour of stop-and-go bumper to bumper commuting that do each day (and don't try telling them to just stay in second, that's just more details they don't care about...)

      Agreed, my last car had a manual transmission, and was fantastic taking for a nice Sunday drive round some of the country road where I live (making sure I can stop in the distance I an see, etc. etc. etc.) But I got an auto next, I just thought its a bit dumb to choose a transmission, suspension and the rest based on 5% of my driving. Sure I have lost the fun when I want it, some handling compared to picking up an equivalent sport model and the performance/mpg loss of an auto, but it works for the 95% of the time I just need to get from A to B.

      This might disqualify my from being a petrol head, but I do plan to buy an Alfa at some point, also once I have a house with a garage I will be getting a kit car to build and have fun in. Yes, there is a long list of motoring ambitions waiting on having bought/paid for the actual important things in life

      --
      If you read a speed reading book, does it take you less time to read the second half?
    101. Re:Telemarketer solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Zero degrees? I wouldn't bother with a remote starter for that, Farenheit OR Celcius. -20 to -40... again, either unit of measure gives a close enough ballpark... but like virtually all countries on earth not the USA, I use Celcius... THAT's when I would kill to have a remote starter.

    102. Re:Telemarketer solution by lowrydr310 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Automatic transmissions cannot predict when you are approaching a curve, or a hill, or other vehicles. Gear selection needs to be based on what you are about to do, not what you just did.

      Have you driven any modern automatics recently? They've come a long way since the 80s and 90s. They have all sorts of sensors that measure engine load, accelerator position, and vehicle grade and they're much more effective at keeping or putting the vehicle in the proper gear for the task.

      I'll have to admit it's not as 'perfect' as I would be controlling a manual gearbox, however 99% of the time it's very effective, and a minor sacrifice for the convenience of not having to shift.

      Also the fuel economy isn't always worse on the automatics. Some autos actually do better than their manual brothers.

      In the case of the BMW 335d, there is no manual transmission available because they don't make one that can handle the massive amount of torque produced by that engine.

      Now despite all the defense I just made for the automatic, my personal preference is for a manual transmission. Unfortunately my vehicles are shared with someone else, and she doesn't like shifting.

    103. Re:Telemarketer solution by gparent · · Score: 1

      Just read my other reply, durr.

    104. Re:Telemarketer solution by gparent · · Score: 1

      It doesn't, perhaps you could read what I was replying to?

    105. Re:Telemarketer solution by jcrousedotcom · · Score: 1

      I had a 3 series BMW with an aftermarket starter / door locks. It was a 5 speed stick. They disabled (prior to my purchase) the clutch safety so I just had to make sure to never leave it in gear. A simple pull of the e-brake and neutral did the trick.

      That think worked from like a quarter mile away too, it was great!

      --
      Illiterate? Write for free help!
    106. Re:Telemarketer solution by afidel · · Score: 1

      Actually most racecars and high end p*n*s replacements (including the Veyron) use a sequential manual transmission, not automatics, though often as in the case of the Veyron the shifting can be completely computer controlled.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    107. Re:Telemarketer solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      North American car owners prefer automatics because you can't eat a cheeseburger and talk on the phone while applying makeup & reading the newspaper if you're driving stick.

      Sure you can! they're just not trying hard enough.

    108. Re:Telemarketer solution by drtsystems · · Score: 1

      You say you have driven a manual in traffic... have you done it every single day? My car is a stick and I would never trade it for an auto (at least of the same year, some of the new auto's, especially the dual-clutch automated manuals are looking pretty nice, but way out of my price range), but driving in stop and go traffic is not fun, no question about it. For me its worth it, but if I was the average joe who only wanted a grandpa-mobile car to get from A to B, and didn't care about the fun of driving, why would I want a stick?

    109. Re:Telemarketer solution by Stewie241 · · Score: 1

      From what I gather it is illegal in the UK at least to leave a running car unattended:

      Regulation 107(2)(a). This states that no person shall cause or permit to be on any road any motor vehicle which is not attended by a person duly licensed to drive it unless the engine is stopped and the parking brake is effectively set. Exemptions to the requirements of this Regulation as to the stopping of the engine include a fire brigade vehicle, the engine of which is being used for any fire brigade purpose.

      Plus if your car gets stolen while you are not in attendance and you left it running [with keys in the ignition or otherwise] the insurance companies will not pay.

      Thanks

      I wonder what would classify as a road? Generally, I would not consider a drive way or a parking lot to be a road.

      As for your other point, do you have a citation? I mean, sure if you left the car open, but generally with car starters, the car doors are locked, and there are no keys in the ignition, which means that the steering column is locked (making it very difficult to drive). Would seem to me there is no difference in terms of being easier or harder to steal (correct me if I'm wrong).

      All that being said, I have no plans to install a car starter in my vehicle because I think it is unnecessary and wasteful (and I do live in a climate where the weather gets cold in the winter and I do have small children).

    110. Re:Telemarketer solution by Stewie241 · · Score: 1

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Block_heater

      Probably somewhat rare in the US. Not common where I live in Canada, but frequently used in areas further north.

    111. Re:Telemarketer solution by Stewie241 · · Score: 1

      I think the implication was that his drive wasn't mindless or boring because he had company and music. *Shrug*

    112. Re:Telemarketer solution by Knuckles · · Score: 1

      Thanks, but not the same thing. A block heater heats the motor block, but those parking heaters I am talking about also heat the inside of the car to a certain degree (enough to make de-icing of the windows not required or at least much easier).

      --
      "When I first heard Daydream Nation it quite frankly scared the living shit out of me." -- Matthew Stearns
    113. Re:Telemarketer solution by Stewie241 · · Score: 1

      Ahhh... interesting. Had not heard of such a thing (so maybe that answers your question?)

    114. Re:Telemarketer solution by james_shoemaker · · Score: 1

      Used to pour a kettle full of boiling water on the carb on our old 9N ford tractor to get it to start on cold winter mornings to plow snow. Learned the trick from my grandfather who used the trick on early tractors and cars.

      James

    115. Re:Telemarketer solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sort of manual transmission. They only use the clutch when starting/stopping.

    116. Re:Telemarketer solution by Jesse_vd · · Score: 1

      there is absolutely no reason why gasoline engines couldn't have a block heater... my 4.3L and 5.0L chevys both came with one from the factory. then again i'm canadian

    117. Re:Telemarketer solution by Knuckles · · Score: 1
      --
      "When I first heard Daydream Nation it quite frankly scared the living shit out of me." -- Matthew Stearns
    118. Re:Telemarketer solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've been to jail over doing burnouts, so yes, a manual definitely helps to get some aggression out.

      300hp to the rear wheels creates a lot of smoke, given the right conditions.

    119. Re:Telemarketer solution by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      It's just a shame it can't be in the right gear when exiting a corner.

      Yeah, automatics will always feel clumsy to me, no matter how well executed. I used to have one, and I liked it - even with the pain that comes with working the clutch in traffic. In my case it made an almost intolerable little car very tolerable: a Saturn SC-1. It only had 99 horsepower, which was sufficient in the manual if you were driving alone - but completely unacceptable in the automatic version of the car. It also got fantastic mileage - almost 40MPG highway.

      I have two automatics now - my wife just can't get the hang of the manual.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    120. Re:Telemarketer solution by FragHARD · · Score: 1

      Hey, I can drive a stick all day long while I eat,talk on the phone and browse the web on my laptop...you just have to be very good with your legs and attention switching capabilities. Works for me ;)

      --
      FragHARD or don't frag at all
    121. Re:Telemarketer solution by toddestan · · Score: 1

      That's a big one. It seems that the overdrive gear in most automatics is geared lower than the highest gear in the manual version of the same car. Which means that on the highway, the automatic will be turning less RPMs when moving at the same speed as the manual transmission version of the same car. Naturally, this lowers fuel economy, not to mention increasing engine noise and possibly reducing engine life for the manual. I'm not sure why they do this - do people not like to downshift when they pass on the freeway?

    122. Re:Telemarketer solution by corychristison · · Score: 1

      Canadian here as well... I honestly don't think I've seen a car that doesn't come with it standard. Mind you I've only purchased 2 cars in my life and none of them brand new (2-3 years old).

    123. Re:Telemarketer solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A quick Google brought me this page on the UK highway code:
      http://www.direct.gov.uk/en/TravelAndTransport/Highwaycode/DG_070304

      and this article of a guy getting fined for leaving his car unattended:
      http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1573902/Driver-fined-for-de-icing-his-car.html

    124. Re:Telemarketer solution by addsalt · · Score: 1

      Also the fuel economy isn't always worse on the automatics. Some autos actually do better than their manual brothers.

      Can you explain that? The reason the manual transmission cars get better gas mileage is because it avoids the extra losses of the torque converter. There should not be significant efficiency gains between a planetary and countershaft transmissions. I have a tough time coming up with any circumstances where an automatic can ever get better gas mileage

      In the case of the BMW 335d, there is no manual transmission available because they don't make one that can handle the massive amount of torque produced by that engine.

      You mean they chose not to make one. Trust me, transmissions exist that can handle much more torque than a BMW will ever put out

    125. Re:Telemarketer solution by addsalt · · Score: 1

      CVTs (which are automatic)

      CVTs (continuously variable transmissions). Don't have clutches and don't shift. How exactly does that make them an automatically shifting vehicle? Might as well say a horse is an automatic and gets better gas mileage than an manual transmission.

    126. Re:Telemarketer solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Given its only DRAG racing, you could probably run evel 11's with you maker-level electronics kit.

      Run an auto, hi stall converter, direct brake & throttle activation... steering is the only real problem to solve, though I'm sure than running more castor will help.

      Given that steering is only keeping the car straight, its not insoluble (but possibly expensive).

      Sounds like a good PR stunt, really.

      Now a car that can race on a circuit... THAT would be cool.

    127. Re:Telemarketer solution by lowrydr310 · · Score: 1

      Can you explain that? The reason the manual transmission cars get better gas mileage is because it avoids the extra losses of the torque converter.

      No I can't explain it, however I'm really interested in learning the reasons why. I understand the inefficiencies of torque converters, but Toyota's RAV4 and FJ Cruiser are two examples where the auto does better than the manual transmission.

      It's always been the case that manuals get better mileage than the autos, however modern automatics seem to be making some great progress. One part of the equation may be the way the EPA testing is done; if you're not shifting a manual gearbox at the right point you could be wasting fuel. A computer-controlled automatic transmission could possibly be shifting at optimal points to maximize efficiency. I'm sure it would be possible to replicate that with a manual transmission, but as a driver you can't prescisely locate the point at which the engine is delivering maximum efficiency for a given load.

      While not a traditional automatic, CVTs generally do better than a manual transmission (but that's not really relevant to my original comparison).

      You mean they chose not to make one. Trust me, transmissions exist that can handle much more torque than a BMW will ever put out

      True; but my original statement that "they (BMW) don't make one that can handle the massive amount of torque" is correct. For whatever reason they decided not to offer a manual - it was probably cheaper to use an existing design than design a new one for a single specific model. The 335d is having enough difficulty selling the USA, regardless of what transmission it uses. I'd love to have a diesel sedan myself, but not for $40,000.

    128. Re:Telemarketer solution by barzok · · Score: 1

      If you aren't manually changing the gear ratio, it's automatic.

    129. Re:Telemarketer solution by tom17 · · Score: 1

      Much as I detest auto, I too, begrudgingly, have 2, for the same reason.
      My next car won't be though.

      Tom...

    130. Re:Telemarketer solution by holmstar · · Score: 1

      Yep, every day in traffic, about 45min-1hr each way. I too love driving a stick, but currently drive an auto so that the wife can drive it if necessary. But after having the auto for less than a year I've already told my wife that the next car I buy is going to me a manual and she'll just have to learn if she wants to drive it. :-)

    131. Re:Telemarketer solution by chelberg · · Score: 1

      What about hybrid cars, and electric vehicles? They have automatic transmission and achieve among the top fuel efficiencies. Would it even make sense for a prius to have a manual transmission?

  2. Doomed from the start by Quietust · · Score: 1

    a somewhat dodgy proposition if a telemarketer ever gets hold of your number

    That alone is enough to doom this project from the start - telemarketers are relentless, and they will get your phone number even if you haven't given it to anyone. Hell, you could also get trouble from people dialing wrong numbers, or from people miswriting/mistyping their phone number when giving it to somebody else (I get a phone call in Spanish every so often, and at one point they confirmed that they had indeed dialed my number correctly).

    --
    * Q
    P.S. If you don't get this note, let me know and I'll write you another.
    1. Re:Doomed from the start by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      telemarketers are relentless, and they will get your phone number

      I've never seen a phone (at least since the analog cell phone era) that you coudn't program to ring differently with different numbers. Set it to "vibrate only" from your other cell phone and you're good to go; telemarketers can call all they want, and all that will happen is they waste their time. The call won't even cost you minutes, since it won't be answered.

    2. Re:Doomed from the start by Quietust · · Score: 1

      Naturally, I realized that immediately after I posted my comment and saw janek78's comment right above my own.

      --
      * Q
      P.S. If you don't get this note, let me know and I'll write you another.
    3. Re:Doomed from the start by Amouth · · Score: 1

      Or - they fact that cell companies like to reuse numbers quickly - it used to be that the phone company would wait 1 year before reissuing a number after it is disconnected. i want to say the cell phone companies wait 30 days? if that it seems.

      --
      '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
    4. Re:Doomed from the start by icebraining · · Score: 1

      Or if you live in Europe, where you don't pay for answering calls (in some prepaid packages you even receive "money" from answering calls!)

  3. Better not park it where I live... by ResistanceIsIrritati · · Score: 1

    ...or you'll need a tow into a reception area to get going again.

    1. Re:Better not park it where I live... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      It's a REMOTE car starter, dufus. You can still start your car with a key.

  4. But can it make me a sammich? by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 5, Funny

    Wish you could start your car via your cell phone

    No, not even remotely.

    Heh heh... remotely...

    1. Re:But can it make me a sammich? by Like2Byte · · Score: 1

      Shutup, Beavis!!

    2. Re:But can it make me a sammich? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would hate to be the starter when your tooling down the highway at 70mph and someone misdials your car and your starter kicks in..
      GRIND TIME!!!!!! Very stupid idea without some additional controls to stop random and midirected calls.

  5. Simpler solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Presumably, you would only want to remote-start your car if you were near it. A microcontroller and a short-range control solution (say, the transmitter and receiver from a cheap mini RC car) would do the trick. For security, you could add a microcontroller on each side to send and receive a specific pulse sequence that changed in a pseudorandom manner. The total cost would be about the same, or less.

    For true remote control using the phone, connect the phone's speaker to an ADC on the microcontroller, and have it listen for specific tones.

    1. Re:Simpler solution by rickb928 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I bought one of those a few years ago. Came in a nice box, with instructions and everything.

      Actually, about 8 years before I could buy an Arduino. They still sell them, like the Viper thing.

      Mine worked over a 1/4 mile or a little more, almost line-of-sight from a second story office. Most of the cost was for installation. At the time, I didn't have decent schematics for my car.

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
  6. A thought occurrs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What if the car is running and someone calls?

    Goodbye starter motor?

    1. Re:A thought occurrs by natehoy · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not if they used the remote start circuitry in the car, which it looks like this author did. The remote start circuit already has all the safety features built into the regular ignition key starter, plus probably a few extras.

      --
      "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
  7. So long as it only turns the car on... by Drethon · · Score: 1

    I can just see the first time you bump the speed dial on your cellphone while going down the freeway if this thing turns the car off as well as on...

  8. Phone cost by russotto · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Unfortunately, an AT&T Go Phone costs minimum $100/year. Net10 appears to cost $200/year. Virgin Mobile costs $80, and TracFone costs $100. So it isn't cheaper per year.

    1. Re:Phone cost by yincrash · · Score: 1

      i don't think tmobile has a minimum

    2. Re:Phone cost by mcgrew · · Score: 2, Informative

      Your numbers are WAY off for Net10 and TracFone. TracFone's minutes are three times what Net10's are; I've used both. Net10 would be a good bet; you would only need to buy minutes if your card ran out, which iirc is about once a year. So you're talking thirty bucks a year -- you don't spend minutes if the phone isn't answered, and it wouldn't need to answer to start the car.

    3. Re:Phone cost by Pretzalzz · · Score: 2, Informative

      T-mobile's minimum is $40 a year[$10 every 90 days], or $100 for the first year and then $10 for subsequent years.

    4. Re:Phone cost by ducomputergeek · · Score: 1

      I can get remote start installed for $129. So $70 for a phone and $100 for the first year is still more....

      --
      "The problem with socialism is eventually you run out of other people's money" - Thatcher.
    5. Re:Phone cost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've got the Sprint family plan where second and third phones are $9/mo. My son got his own account a few months ago so I now have a spare phone with a cheap account that isn't being used. Might work.

    6. Re:Phone cost by houghi · · Score: 1

      Number recognition. If it sees the dedicated number, it starts the car. If not, it doesn't. That way you don't even need to make a connection. Just let it ring once.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    7. Re:Phone cost by CKW · · Score: 1

      7-11 speakout baby. Pre-paid that don't expire for one year. If you top up, all minutes roll over to one more year. I can't recall what the minimum purchase is, probably $25, and there's a minimum $1/mo 911 charge, so that's the base.

    8. Re:Phone cost by skine · · Score: 1

      Yes, but if you use a prepaid phone that doesn't charge you for receiving text messages, then you don't have to worry.

    9. Re:Phone cost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Net10 airtime expires - the cheapest you can get by with them is $15/month

    10. Re:Phone cost by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Yes, but it doesn't expire monthly. When I had them the year before last, I'd bought minutes twice a month, by the time I dumped them I was good until 2012. And you used to be able to buy $15 worth of minutes, by the time I got rid of them the minimum was $30.

    11. Re:Phone cost by joeme1 · · Score: 1

      TracFone charges if the phone rings for more than thirty seconds, even if it isn't answered. Kinda lame, but still pretty cheap.

    12. Re:Phone cost by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Their minutes cost a fortune, too.

    13. Re:Phone cost by VeNoM0619 · · Score: 1

      You won't need remote start all year anyways. Only in the cold winter months.

      --
      Disclaimer: I am not god.
      We may not be created equal
      But we can be treated equal.
  9. Re:Are Americans really this lazy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So what you're saying is that aside from where about 40% of Americans live, winters are never bad enough to need to run your vehicle before driving. Sorry bud, for those of us stuck in the cold shite in the northeast, remote start is a nice feature.

  10. More than that... by OpenSourced · · Score: 1

    I'd prefer my phone to be able to open my garage door. It should be a cinch, as it's all radio signals (I know, different frequencies, but hey! what about the universal radio chips that were supposed to be controlled by software?), but nope, if I forget my remote, I cannot use my phone.

    --
    Rome taught me patience and assiduous application to detail. Virtues which temper the boldness of great, general views.
    1. Re:More than that... by laederkeps · · Score: 1

      You could perform this exact hack for your purposes by coupling your usual remote with a cheap cellphone and then leaving the bundle in the garage. Call the cell phone, it "pushes" your garage door opener's button and opens the door.
      It can also be done with/to a computer, TV, bath tub, golf ball washer, etc.

    2. Re:More than that... by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      How old is your car? Mine's an '02 and it has not one but three door openers built in. If yours doesn't it would be far easier to rig a phone to open your garage; just hook a relay to the button inside the garage and to the opening phone's vibrator (you'd probably need a diode or four too). It would be far cheaper than a remote car starter, maybe five bucks worth of parts, plus the phone and minutes.

    3. Re:More than that... by treeves · · Score: 1

      Why do you not just leave it in the car? I never take mine out of the car. (I also have a numeric keypad on the outside of the garage to open the door).

      --
      ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
    4. Re:More than that... by greenzrx · · Score: 1

      Just hard-wire the garage door opener remote into your car. Most of the remotes use a 12 volt battery anyway. I bought a $2.00 switch from radio shack, hid the donor remote in the overhead console and installed the switch there too.

  11. Re:Are Americans really this lazy? by haderytn · · Score: 1

    It is frugality stupid.

  12. As a starting point... by berryjw · · Score: 1

    This could get far more interesting if you coupled the phone to, say, a laptop, or a headless mini, and integrated that into the auto systems. Then, you could call in, use a username/password, and have remarkable control over the vehicle - disable as well as start, for one. Interesting possibilities...

    1. Re:As a starting point... by BobMcD · · Score: 1

      This increases data channel costs, though. The original plan is for a binary system, while you're going digital.

  13. "I just want my phone call..." by starglider29a · · Score: 1

    In Dark Knight, The Joker made good use of some variants of this idea. I'm sure the DHS will be very excited about a bunch of people buying pre-pad phones just to 'wire up yer car.'&sarc;

    1. Re:"I just want my phone call..." by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      Given that cheap cell phones are already established as the IED remote control of choice, I suspect that they already are.

      Use of cell jammers in combat situations is already commonplace.

  14. Meh. This is basically an adaptation by hey! · · Score: 3, Funny

    of your standard cell phone triggered terrorist bomb. Nothing new here.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  15. Security? by MacroSlopp · · Score: 1

    What happen's if someone finds out your phone number? Can they steal your car?

    1. Re:Security? by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      What happens if someone finds your car key? Can they steal your car?

      Interestingly, my car was stolen once; the thief stole the spare key, and the police wouldn't prosecute because posessing the key is deemed permission. If they stole your car by remote starter, the cops could prosecute if they found it.

      The thief who stole my car traded the car for drugs, and the girl who traded drugs to the thief tried to kill her parents with it (broke both her mother's legs), and she was the one to be prosecuted for car thief, attempted murder, and several other charges. She wound up in a mental institution rather than prison.

      I journaled about it somewhere but there are too many journals to search through to find it.

    2. Re:Security? by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      the thief stole the spare key, and the police wouldn't prosecute because posessing the key is deemed permission

      What the hell?

      Fine, in that case, stealing the key is equivalent to stealing the car, so treat it as an equal crime.

      the girl who traded drugs to the thief tried to kill her parents with it (broke both her mother's legs), and she was the one to be prosecuted for car thief

      Didn’t she have the key as well? So how does that work?

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    3. Re:Security? by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      It was confusing to me as well. I think they were far more concerned with the attempted murder than the car theirft, but I think the fact that the original thief had been in my house while I never met the girl who tried to kill her parents with it had something to do with it. There was no way she could have claimed to have had permission, while the original thief could have claimed I loaned her the car and it would have been my word against hers. But I know about as much about law as a lawyer knows about computers, so I'm just speculating here. Plus, she never went to court on any of the charges, winding up at McFarland's Mental Health Center. This was over 3 years ago, I'd not even made the first payment and the car will be paid for this November.

      Adding insult to injury, the drug addicted murderer's parents' insurance company tried to collect from my insurance company for damages to their car, which their daughter pinned her mother between! Thankfully, after talking to me, they didn't pay.

      And I had to pay for the window in my car her dad broke out because it was less than my deductable (it cost me $200 to get the window replaced, iinm my deductable is $500).

    4. Re:Security? by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      I think the fact that the original thief had been in my house while I never met the girl who tried to kill her parents with it had something to do with it. There was no way she could have claimed to have had permission, while the original thief could have claimed I loaned her the car and it would have been my word against hers.

      Okay, that makes a bit more sense.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
  16. amateur hour by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow. An old technique for IED detonation re-hashed for car starting. A hack in the worst way.

    1. Re:amateur hour by JBaustian · · Score: 1

      Indeed. Someone who has tried to build an improvised explosive device (IED) but failed, now has a new and improved how-to guide.

  17. Re:Are Americans really this lazy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The reason Americans like remote starters is to get the car's heating or air conditioning to start working before they actually get in the car, due to the fact that most "tough" Americans are actually f**king hothouse flowers with one-degree comfort zones.

  18. Too cheap of a hack by maxrate · · Score: 4, Interesting

    In my opinion this is far too cheap of a hack. You need more control. I've personally built a very elaborate text message based system that incorporates anti-theft features/GPS/door lock/un-lock and other features. Costs $11/month in a prepaid sim card. Was great fun to construct using a microcontroller and various other parts. I was planning on building a website documenting it - but I'm horrible at putting webpages together. Other than the GPS, the cost wasn't that much more - but the unit does far more for me. Working out the bugs however took a long time, so if you're in a hurry to get remote cell based car warm-up, this project is a start.

    1. Re:Too cheap of a hack by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      use a PIC and a phone that is not crappy (I.E. it has HAYES modem set serial out the connector). and you can do this for $25.00

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    2. Re:Too cheap of a hack by horza · · Score: 1

      This is a great idea. If you know you have to leave for work at a certain hour, you can use an online calendar program that has the option to send you an alarm by sms. It sounds a really interesting project that many of us would like to read about. If you aren't good at putting together web pages, then get a free blog account such as Blogger or Livejournal. Make each aspect of the project into an article you post online.

      Phillip.

    3. Re:Too cheap of a hack by Rufty · · Score: 1

      I've been playing with one of these. Nice bit of kit, and can limit what's done by incoming number. Mine's currently (kinda) wired to a cat feeder...

      --
      Red to red, black to black. Switch it on, but stand well back.
    4. Re:Too cheap of a hack by pwnies · · Score: 1

      I was planning on building a website documenting it - but I'm horrible at putting webpages together.

      This is too good not to have online. If you send me pictures and instructions, I'll help you build a site.

    5. Re:Too cheap of a hack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't worry about putting together a web site. Just get Xara (about $30)and you don't have to know anything about webpages. You can just start typing and adding pics and docs, then move them around where ever you want. It will save you hours of time. Get the info out while you still have it fresh. Disclaimer: I don't work for them, but I was amazed at what their little web design program can do. Even my grandma could figure it out.

    6. Re:Too cheap of a hack by dualsportr · · Score: 1

      Maxrate - - This system you created has huge potential for car-sharing applications. I am extremely interested and would love to help you build a website or documentation. Please contact me!! :)

  19. DTMF by Dan+East · · Score: 2, Insightful

    A DTMF decoder, PIC microcontroller, and a couple dozen lines of assembly code and you could secure the system by requiring a code be entered on the calling phone.

    --
    Better known as 318230.
    1. Re:DTMF by Wingsy · · Score: 1

      I doubt that. Sending DTMF over CDMA or GSM distorts the living daylights out of it. You'd be lucky if your decoder can detect with 80% reliability. Been there, done that... or tried to.

      --
      If I didn't have absolutely NOTHING to do, I wouldn't be here.
    2. Re:DTMF by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      I’ve used plenty of touch-tone systems with my cellphone... so what the heck are you talking about?

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    3. Re:DTMF by Agronomist+Cowherd · · Score: 1

      Sending DTMF over a cell phone doesn't actually send the DTMF. You hear it locally, but it really works like VOIP: special packets are sent with the digits pressed (and lengths of time) rather than encoding the sound. The cell system turns it back into audio once it hits the regular phone network.

      Most voice codecs do a lousy job on non-voice signals, like DTMF tones, so the phone skips the encoding on button presses so that DTMF controlled devices still work from a cell phone.

      Try holding a DTMF encoder up to the earpiece of a cell phone (bypassing the local dialling buttons) and see how the tones sound on the other end; they usually sound pretty distorted, such that a DTMF recognizer won't.

      --
      -DwS
    4. Re:DTMF by Wingsy · · Score: 1

      Yeah, what he said. :)

      --
      If I didn't have absolutely NOTHING to do, I wouldn't be here.
    5. Re:DTMF by jeff4747 · · Score: 1

      You do realize you're not actually sending the DTMF over CDMA or GSM, right?

      The tones are generated locally and only play locally. You're sending (or receiving) a "button down" message to (from) the tower.

    6. Re:DTMF by Wingsy · · Score: 1

      No, I'm really talking about sending DTMF over CDMA & GSM. That's what we're talking about here, sending DTMF TO a cellphone, not FROM a cellphone. To send DTMF to a phone, it's CDMA or GSM audio from the tower to the phone and is carried over the voice channel (really bad quality for decoding DTMF). When you're sending DTMF FROM a phone, then yes, it's a digital button-down signal from the phone to the tower, and then DTMF audio the rest of the way.

      --
      If I didn't have absolutely NOTHING to do, I wouldn't be here.
    7. Re:DTMF by vonux · · Score: 1

      So the calling phone needs to be GSM too, and then it should work, right? :)

  20. CD tray opener by Errol+backfiring · · Score: 1

    It is as useful as the CD tray opener on your CD remote control. You still have to go to the device to put a CD in. In the car analogy, you will still have to go to the car to drive it.

    --
    Nae king! Nae laird! Nae yurrupiean pressedent! We willna be fooled again!
    1. Re:CD tray opener by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except when you load the CD, you can use it right away, you dont have to wait 10 mins for the drive to become ready....

      "You can do it in a manual car as well, it just won't work if you park in gear..."

      You should never park in gear anyway, it is really bad to rest the weight of your car on the gears. Gears in neutral, handbrake on, thats the way to park.

      In fact, when I learned on an automatic they always told me to put the handbrake on before putting it in park, so it wont rest on the gears. (I took my first test in the US on an auto car..boring. The UK test was much more comprehensive.)

    2. Re:CD tray opener by wwfarch · · Score: 1

      True, but if you leave the key in the car then you have to leave the door unlocked to get back in (or use a spare). With a remote start you can start the car, let it warm up, and not worry about it getting stolen because the door is unlocked.

  21. Use a tone decoder by argee · · Score: 0

    I would have used a tone decoder. They run in the $30 - $40 range, and typically require 4 DTMF tones. Set the phone to auto-answer on ring, a typical mobile setup. Plug the decoder into the phone jack. Dial the phone, and it auto answers. When you see "connected" in your own cell, just press the 4-digit sequence. The decoder starts the car. No more worry about telemarketers. And no taking the cheap cell phone apart.

  22. Re: Idling is bad for the engine by newdsfornerds · · Score: 3, Insightful

    According to Consumer Reports AND The Tappet Brothers (Tom and Ray Magliozzi) it's bad for the engine to "warm up" your car by letting it run idle in park. It's also a waste of time and gasoline.

    --
    Damping absorbs vibrations. Dampening is caused by moisture.
  23. Wooo! by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The DIY $10 Prepaid Cellphone Remote Car Starter
    The DIY $10 Prepaid Cellphone Remote Toaster
    The DIY $10 Prepaid Cellphone Remote Coffee Machine
    The DIY $10 Prepaid Cellphone Remote Front Door Lock
    The DIY $10 Prepaid Cellphone Remote Laser-enhanced Shark Cage Opening Mechanism

    The possibilities are endless!

    --
    Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
  24. Re:Are Americans really this lazy? by Anonymusing · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Can't speak for other people, but I warm up my car so that the engine is running smoothly before I head out into the 10-degree winter weather up here in the northern U.S. It's for the engine's sake, not mine.

    --
    Liberal? Conservative? Compare perspectives at Left-Right
  25. The joy of Los Angeles "driving" by spineboy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    You should come and experience the stop and go "driving", that constitutes Los Angeles. I dearly love manuals, and have often thought of switching to automatic. I have a performance type car, and replacing a worn clutch disc after 35k miles was not pleasant. And Yes I do know how to drive, and have taken two other manuals over 100k w/o wearing the clutch, until I came to LA. The dealer said I was doing averag in clutch wear for these cars, here in LA.
    So an automatic would be cheaper in heavy stop and go commutes

    --
    ..........FULL STOP.
    1. Re:The joy of Los Angeles "driving" by digitalPhant0m · · Score: 1

      I also live in Los Angeles, and drive a manual. I think you're lucky, try doing that with a 1950's era 3-on-the tree non syncro low. You can't downshift into first, you have to make a complete (or close to complete) stop, and usually, after stop, put it in 2'nd to sync 1'st, then back to first to get going. And yeah, I get about 35-40k on the clutch.

    2. Re:The joy of Los Angeles "driving" by Scooby+Snacks · · Score: 1

      Holy hell, that sounds unpleasant. You had me at "non syncro", and the rest was just icing on the cake.

      --

      --
      Runnin' around, robbin' banks all whacked on the Scooby Snacks...
  26. So many reasons NOT to do this by petes_PoV · · Score: 1
    OK, we've had the telemarketer accidentally starting the car. What about if you leave it in gear when someone accidentally starts it? I didn't see any safety interlocks or checks on this guy's lash-up. What about when the mobile phone company sends you a "helpful" (read: marketing) message to tell you about their wonderful new ways of getting your money .... on the day after you go on holiday for a couple of weeks? And that's leaving out ALL the reasons why you'd have to inform your insurance company so your policy wasn't invalidated for unapproved modifications, or to give them an excuse for not paying up if/when the car gets nicked.

    And what actual benefits do you get? The knowledge that occasionally your vehicle will have burned a bit of fuel just so you can get intoa nice warm car. Why not just put on a coat?

    --
    politicians are like babies' nappies: they should both be changed regularly and for the same reasons
    1. Re:So many reasons NOT to do this by emerrill · · Score: 1

      You safety concerns make no sense. It uses the standard remote starter. And even so, any modern automatic won't start in gear (most won't even let you take the key out of the ignition if it is in gear).

    2. Re:So many reasons NOT to do this by petes_PoV · · Score: 1

      any modern automatic

      Not all cars are automatics even in america, and definitely not in the other 95% of the world

      --
      politicians are like babies' nappies: they should both be changed regularly and for the same reasons
    3. Re:So many reasons NOT to do this by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Why not just put on a coat?

      Well, a remote car starter it wouldn't help me much in the winter since my car seemingly takes forever to warm up when it's not actually moving, but would be great in the summer when temperatures inside the car get high enough that you can get heat stroke before the AC starts kicking in, plus the seats are too hot to sit on.

      Parking in the shade is the best I can do. I wish they'd plant trees in parking lots.

    4. Re:So many reasons NOT to do this by icebraining · · Score: 1

      What about configuring your cellphone to only ring if the call is from your number?

    5. Re:So many reasons NOT to do this by horza · · Score: 1

      I wish they'd plant trees in parking lots.

      Car wash operators have been wishing for exactly the same thing...

      Phillip.

    6. Re:So many reasons NOT to do this by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      I'm sure they do, but I'd rather have to wash my car than sit in 150 degree heat.

  27. Not true: T-mo is $10/year by moosehooey · · Score: 1

    With T-mobile, you have to put on $100 at the start, but as long as you add some time once per year (minimum of $10) you keep all your minutes.

  28. Spend the extra money and do it right by fluffy99 · · Score: 1

    Seriously, this is a hack and a half. That's one of the worst soldering and assembly jobs I've ever seen (cat5 for hookup wire?) I don't even see enough parts to make it work at all. You'd need one relay to provide ignition power, then a second to hit the starter. Plus there are no other features here like a neutral/park detect (so the vehicle doesn't start moving), an auto shutdown so the vehicle won't run for days if you accidentally start it and forget, etc.

    A cheap remote start kit like the Bulldog Security Deluxe 500 is $105 anyway.

    1. Re:Spend the extra money and do it right by bcmm · · Score: 1

      I don't even see enough parts to make it work at all. You'd need one relay to provide ignition power, then a second to hit the starter

      You missed the bit where he's using a cheap remote-start thing (presumably works like a remote-unlock, and over similar range) and modifying it to work with a mobile phone.

      --
      # cat /dev/mem | strings | grep -i llama
      Damn, my RAM is full of llamas.
    2. Re:Spend the extra money and do it right by karnal · · Score: 1

      You obviously didn't read the article. He's plugged this into the aux on a remote starter that already exists, therefore not having to worry about all of the scenarios you just described.

      One of the limitations of remote starter systems is getting the signal to the car to tell it to start. I know Viper (and others) have a two-way system that greatly improves on the cheaper systems from a range perspective - and they even have an application for the iphone to start the car as well (note: car must get signal, same as this project.)

      I must say, it really grates on me when someone goes and shits all over an idea or an implementation here. Let's face it - if some of us do things as a hobby and it's not to your expectations, well.... I'm sure he really really cares.

      --
      Karnal
    3. Re:Spend the extra money and do it right by pz · · Score: 1

      Seriously, this is a hack and a half. That's one of the worst soldering and assembly jobs I've ever seen (cat5 for hookup wire?) I don't even see enough parts to make it work at all. You'd need one relay to provide ignition power, then a second to hit the starter. Plus there are no other features here like a neutral/park detect (so the vehicle doesn't start moving), an auto shutdown so the vehicle won't run for days if you accidentally start it and forget, etc.

      A cheap remote start kit like the Bulldog Security Deluxe 500 is $105 anyway.

      Wow, were we looking at the same page? It seemed pretty cleanly done to me: he used a perf board to hold the wire, did a reasonable job with soldering, nice neat assembly. Were you expecting a professionally designed PCB? CAT5 is perfectly good hookup wire, as long as you need solid core. Really, when you're using short lengths of solid core hookup wire, pretty much all 24 gauge is the same, as long as you don't need super high speed signalling (not here), high temp (nope), extremely low crosstalk (no), high voltage (definitely not). And CAT5 is cheap. Using it from the box to the cell phone is probably not going to work very well long-term, since the wire will fatigue from vibrations, but this fellow is open about learning from his mistakes. Furthermore, he used a terminal connector for the wires to the relay with heavier, stranded wire (a must for unsupported wire in an automotive environment), and he used crimp connectors and shrink tubing. Bonus for both.

      Seriously, speaking as an EE and automotive enthusiast, it's a pretty good job. Granted, the Bulldog device sounds much better on paper (wow, their website is not only broken with missing images and pages, but also a PIA to navigate), but there's no fun in having designed it yourself. This sort of hacking SHOULD BE ENCOURAGED. Or did you forget that that's where Linux comes from?

      --

      Put my fist through my alarm clock with its ding-dong death inside my ear. - The Blackjacks.
    4. Re:Spend the extra money and do it right by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Plus there are no other features here like a neutral/park detect (so the vehicle doesn't start moving)

      It's obviously not meant for a standard transmission, an automatic won't start if it's not in park or neutral. An auto-shutdown woudn't be too hard to impliment, just add a cheap timer that cuts power to the car's ignition.

      As to the cheap hack, I didn't RTFM. I really didn't see any need to, the idea alone is enough for anybody with a rudimentary knowlege of electronics. No real engineering is needed for something like this.

    5. Re:Spend the extra money and do it right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, were we looking at the same page? It seemed pretty cleanly done to me: he used a perf board to hold the wire, did a reasonable job with soldering, nice neat assembly. Were you expecting a professionally designed PCB? CAT5 is perfectly good hookup wire, as long as you need solid core.

      I dunno, I kinda agree that it was a crappy, very amateurish hack job. Yeah it might work, but it certainly wasn't high quality. Pretty crappy soldering on that perf board. Cat5 is lousy for hookup wire, as the insulation melts when you try to solder it. Using solid core wire runs in anything with vibrations like a vehicle is a bad idea as well. If you were impressed by the work as a EE, that just reinforces my opinion that most EEs are incapable of putting together the stuff they design. Just like all the auto design guys I know that can't work on their own vehicles.

      Or did you forget that that's where Linux comes from?

      Actually that explains a lot about Firefox plugs-ins!

  29. Oh, joy! by captainpanic · · Score: 1

    I bet that one day we'll even be able to communicate with each other through this new invention.

    1. Re:Oh, joy! by natehoy · · Score: 1

      You can already. It works similar to that modern thingamabobboe, the Telegraph. What you do is each carry two of these cell phones, and you mutually agree to designate one as "dot" and the other as "dash". Then, when you want to send a message, you do so in morse code.

      So, to send an SOS, you dial the other person's "dot" phone three times, then their "dash" phone three times, then their "dot" phone three times. Since the recipient never actually answers the phone, it'll pay for itself as compared to SMS charges the first few times you use it.

      Admittedly it's not terribly efficient, but people go to great lengths to avoid actually talking to each other on the phone, or even yelling loud enough to be heard upstairs.

      --
      "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
  30. How? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All of the cars I've seen in the past five years have anti-theft mechanisms like chipped keys. These prevent the engine from starting by disabling the starter or ignition or fuel pump unless the properly chipped key is within range of its reader, in the car.

    How would such a remote starter work on such cars? How old is this guy's car?

    None the less, this is an old technique for remote activation that has been used for other purposes, both good and evil.

  31. Re:Are Americans really this lazy? by newdsfornerds · · Score: 1

    Right on. Yes, they really are that lazy and ignorant.
    http://action.publicbroadcasting.net/cartalk/posts/list/669811.page Also, you gunk up your catalytic converter while idling which creates back pressure on the exhaust system. Cat converters are not cheap to replace.

    --
    Damping absorbs vibrations. Dampening is caused by moisture.
  32. Title? by HeckRuler · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Ok, so they did this for $71, not $10. Why even put that $10 price tag in the title? Because one component costs $10?
    That makes about as much sense as quoting the price of a whole car that can remote start out of the box.

    1. Re:Title? by Wanado · · Score: 0

      Mod up parent. A title with DIY and $10 is annoying and a waste of my time if the thing really costs upwards of $100. Author probably knew DIY $100 remote car starter just isn't very noteworthy.

      --
      Somehow along the way I made a bad choice in life and now must live with 0 Karma.
    2. Re:Title? by Brianwa · · Score: 0

      Probably because the phone itself cost $10 and the rest of the parts can generally be found lying on the floor of your average slashdotter's house.

  33. Re:Are Americans really this lazy? by rnelsonee · · Score: 4, Informative

    In modern cars, I keep hearing that warming up your car isn't needed, and can actually be bad for it. Note it still recommends 30-60s to let the fluids warm up, which makes sense.

  34. Vaguely related annecdote... by piemcfly · · Score: 1

    My grandmother, who was going slightly deaf, recently had a very loud radio triggered beeper installed that went off everytime somebody rang the doorbell.
    Turned out it worked on the same frequency as the neighbors DIY garage door system:

    If he opened his garage, her alarm started ringing.
    If somebody rang her doorbell, the neighbors garage door opened.

    I changed the frequency for her, but I think I should have explored the pranking possibilities of that set up a bit more.

  35. Re:Are Americans really this lazy? by Richard+Steiner · · Score: 1

    The only time I would have seen a use for it was when the temp got under -20 degrees F back home. It is nice to warm up the car when the wife is riding along. :-)

    (That's roughly -28C or lower for the Celsius users out there...)

    --
    Mainframe/UNIX Bit Twiddler and long time Windows/Linux Hobbyist.
    The Theorem Theorem: If If, Then Then.
  36. I had thought of doing this some time back by codepunk · · Score: 1

    I had thought of doing this some time back, what stopped me and apparently the author
    as well is the price of maintaining minutes on the phone just to run a remote starter.

    --


    Got Code?
  37. It still incorporates the remote start's safeties by name_already_taken · · Score: 4, Informative

    What happen's if someone finds out your phone number? Can they steal your car?

    No.

    This is just using a cell phone to trigger the auxiliary trigger input on a remote starter system installed in the car. Basically this input just simulates pressing the Start button on the remote starter's remote.

    Installed correctly, most remote starter systems will stop the engine if the brake pedal is pressed. Additionally, since the ignition key is not in, the steering is locked. Also, if the engine speed goes over a certain limit, the remote starter will stop the engine. Most cars with automatic transmissions require you to press the brake pedal to shift out of Park these days, so there's no chance of stealing the car that way.

    I suppose if the car had a manual transmission, it would be possible to make it move forwards or backwards in whatever direction the steering wheel is pointed, but only at slightly over idle speed. You might be able to drive it up onto a trailer.

    The problem that might come up is that most of these systems come with a pin switch that disables the system if the car's hood is opened (so you don't get your hands torn off when the engine starts unexpectedly, while changing a belt for example). Many people do not bother to install the hood pin switch. You would want to make sure it is in place and working, because a telemarketer's call could be deadly.

    If the phone rings while you're driving or the car is already running, nothing happens other than the remote start will keep the engine running after you remove the key (if you don't touch the brake pedal.

    --
    Putting moderation advice in your .sig lowers your karma!
  38. The decline of slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    back in the day this would have been up here first. Now it shows up weeks after appearances on other 'tech blogs/sites. Do the editors not read any other blogs to have a clue which 'stories' are kinda old news?

  39. Re:Are Americans really this lazy? by Anonymusing · · Score: 1

    Thanks for the link. I had always heard five minutes (which is what I do).

    --
    Liberal? Conservative? Compare perspectives at Left-Right
  40. More like by kaizendojo · · Score: 2, Funny

    the do it yourself Homeland Security visit kit.

  41. Re: Foggy windshields are bad for the driver by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    According to me it is bad to drive with near zero visibility due to condensation or frost on the interior of the windshield. My life trumps the life of the engine.

    Anyways a bock heater or garage is the way to go, at least if parked at home.

  42. Why? by radish · · Score: 1

    I've only been in the US a few years and I see people with these remote start setups quite a bit. The only thing is I have no idea why they're useful? I've never had any real desire to start my car when I'm walking towards it (which is what most people seem to do with them) and in fact it would be illegal in my home country. If anyone could explain what they're for I'd appreciate it :)

    --

    ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    1. Re:Why? by codepunk · · Score: 2, Informative

      Outside temperature 20 below zero, think about it. Some areas of the US have very harsh winters, remotely starting
      a car 10 minutes early remotely allows time to warm the interior to something more comfortable say 40 deg. Not
      to mention it is better for the engine to be at least slightly warmed up before placing it under a load.

      --


      Got Code?
    2. Re:Why? by codepunk · · Score: 1

      Obviously you have never gotten in a car at -20 outside temp or you would very much understand.

      --


      Got Code?
    3. Re:Why? by Pretzalzz · · Score: 1

      I've never actually seen one, but I've always assumed its for starting it from your house and letting it warm up in the winter.

    4. Re:Why? by TBoon · · Score: 1

      Looking at his signature, I guess he's from Norway, which also has plenty of cold weather in winter. But instead of starting the car early/remotely (which wouldn't work with manual gearboxes unless you left it in neutral), people install electric heating elements in the engine. A timer turns it on at such a time that it's warm and ready for when you're leaving for work. Granted, you have to remember to plug it in at night, and unplug it before you drive, but it's avoid the engine warming up on idle, or getting full throttle on cold.

    5. Re:Why? by radish · · Score: 1

      Makes sense for those areas I guess. I'm in NJ which gets cold, but not that cold! - they still seem popular. I see people walking towards their car in the parking lot and starting it a few seconds before they get in - that's what I never understood. Maybe just too lazy to turn the key!

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    6. Re:Why? by aclarke · · Score: 1

      Because we North Americans (I'll include Canada so the Americans just write my comment off as racist) have a high percentage of lazy fat people who hate the outdoors.

      OK I'll temper that a bit. We have winter, and many people dislike winter. They wish to experience it as little as possible. Therefore they start their cars before they get in, so they don't have to scrape as much ice off their windscreens (or at least so it comes off easier). Their car is also toasty warm quicker.

      In northern Europe, engine pre-heaters are more common. I believe you can buy Volvos with petrol- or diesel-fired heaters from the factory. That way your engine is truly warm and so is your interior, without wasting fuel pointlessly running your engine. Those aren't factory options here and basically nobody does that because a) they've never heard of the option, and b) it would cost a couple thousand dollars. I'd love to have one in my diesel Land Rover but I cheaped out and put in an electric recirculating coolant heater instead for a couple hundred dollars.

      You will note that both Webasto and Eberspacher are German companies. Their presence in North America is mostly limited to transport trucks and other commercial vehicles.

    7. Re:Why? by radish · · Score: 1

      Actually I'm British. My sig is simply an indication of my childish fascination with languages I can't hope to understand :) I think the manual gearbox point is a good one, most cars in europe are manual so you could cause a lot of trouble with a remote starter!

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    8. Re:Why? by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Like the other poster, you obviously have not owned a car where the temperatures drop REALLY low.

      Where I live, when it reaches minus 40, it will take 15 minutes of my car sitting in Idle for it to become DRIVEABLE - let alone the 20 to 30 before it would actually become a comfortable temperature. If I don't let it idle for that amount of time, it will stall about as soon as I try to put it into any gear. The gas line needs time to get the gasline antifreeze flowing - the oil needs time to warm up and get inside the cylinders (this is were plugging in your car is helpful).

      You run the risk of harming your engine by driving before the oil has time to warm up and flow around. Nothing like a Seized engine because you didn't let your car warm up 10 minutes every morning.

      Here in Canada - and some Northern States, a lot of countries in Europe, and probably Russia - Remote Car starters are a BIG thing.

      However, its only like $120 dollars to get one done here for an automatic, and about $150 for a standard.

    9. Re:Why? by Nos. · · Score: 2, Informative

      Might want to get your car looked at, tuned up, or replaced.

      This winter, I've driven three different vehicles several times in -30C and below. All of them required a minute tops to be driveable. During that time I'm generally clearing snow off the vehicles (including the roof and hood). In 20 years of driving in Saskatchewan, I've had very few cars that acted any differently. The ones that did were old beaters that probably shouldn't have been on the road.

      If you feel the need to wait until your interior is toasty before driving, then by a timer and an interior car warmer. Way more efficient and easier on your car. That or learn to dress for the season. I can get in a cold (-30C) vehicle with my jacket, insulated shoes, toque and gloves and be very comfortable in the car. In about minutes of driving the car is pumping out enough heat that I have to turn it down.

      If you're gas line is freezing up, keep more gas in the tank, more gas = less room for humid air.

      Use a proper viscosity oil for the season. No reason the oil shouldn't be at a reasonably temperature within a minute, even if the ambient temperature is -35C.

    10. Re:Why? by gizmonic · · Score: 1

      More likely it was a default or free add on when they bought it and they're just playing with it.

      My car was in the shop a couple years back, and the loaner had a remote starter on it. I did the exact same thing, starting it as I walked up to it. Not cause I had to, but merely because I could, and it was kinda fun.

      I'm a geek, I had a gadget, of course I was gonna play with it. I don't miss it on my car, and probably wouldn't pay to add it to my next one, but, if it came for free, I'd be doing the same thing. :)

      --
      WWJD?
      JWRTFM!
    11. Re:Why? by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 1

      All of the cars I've driven have been around since before I was born. If I was in something from this Decade I'd completely understand being able to drive them soon after starting. But that old Reliant K-Car doesn't do so well after 300k.

    12. Re:Why? by rrossman2 · · Score: 1

      My father had the same attitude, until I installed one for him. After you have one, you'll regret ever having a car without one. It's also good for parents of young kids. It allows you to warm the car up (in a safer fashion than leaving the keys in it running) or cool the car down before putting an infant inside

  43. Re: Idling is bad for the engine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Ever start your car in temperatures below -40? And that's not counting wind chill. Your engine will not like it if you jump in, start and go with zero warm up time. That being said, 30 seconds to 2 minutes is all the time needed to get the juices flowing.

  44. Re: Idling is bad for the engine by Rogerborg · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I agree. I just scrape the ice off and drive off right away. Of course, then my windscreen fogs up on the inside due to chilling from the airflow over it, but fuck you or your kids if you happen to walk in front of me: better you die than I "waste time or gasoline", right?

    --
    If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
  45. Prepaid phone = recycled phone numbers by waveformwafflehouse · · Score: 1

    You should be able to set a custom ring/vibrate for numbers in your address book, eliminating the false starts from everyone calling the last person who had your phone's number.

    1. Re:Prepaid phone = recycled phone numbers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or you could use a google voice number and set it to only ring from certain numbers.

  46. Re:Are Americans really this lazy? by navygeek · · Score: 1

    Yeah it couldn't possibly have anything to do with the fact that it's better for the car itself to warm up before driving, right?

  47. Re:Are Americans really this lazy? by marc_gerges · · Score: 1

    It ain't really necessary unless you go to seriously deep temperature. If your usage profile includes -12 C (conversion for those of us having no clue about Fahrenheits), proper oil with the right viscosity will be 'there' within half a minute, tops. From then on, light load is way better to heat up the engine than letting it idle for an eternity. It's quite some air pollution, too.

    Now, if you're going -30 or so on a semi-regular basis, I'd suggest a block heater or a propper fuel based heating system. Those will actually prewarm the engine.

  48. Re:Are Americans really this lazy? by Drethon · · Score: 1

    Yeah, I always wait just long enough for the RPMs to settle to normal during cold (less than 20 degress F) before I go. I figure that means everything is warmed up enough to circulate normally...

  49. Re:Are Americans really this lazy? by Richard+Steiner · · Score: 1

    I should also add that starting the car early helps to heat up the windshield and other windows, making it quite a bit easier to scrape the car after an ice storm by partially melting the ice on the windows.

    In other words, there are sometimes practical occasions to prestart the car, not just reasons based on comfort.

    --
    Mainframe/UNIX Bit Twiddler and long time Windows/Linux Hobbyist.
    The Theorem Theorem: If If, Then Then.
  50. Re: Idling is bad for the engine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Then your car is a piece of shit.

    I live in an area that people like you would curl up and die after seeing the snowfall we get overnight in a typical storm (3 feet overnight is not uncommon) I brush it off, get in and in the 2 minutes it takes me to get my ipod docked and playing what I want the windshield is clear (no hot air yet but warm enough to keep it fog free)

    Why do you people buy shit-tastic cars in colder climates? buy a fricking car that can handle cold weather. like a Dodge caravan, Chevy Aveo, or other car with a real heater and defroster system. my wifes Outback clears it even faster.

  51. Is it legal to leave an unattended car running? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    According to an article in the Longmont Times (Colorado?) Jan 12 2010

    On cold mornings, it may be tempting to start the car and wait inside the house while the engine warms up, but police warn that the practice is against the law and attracts thieves.

    In fact, the practice is such a problem that law enforcement has dubbed it “puffing.” Colorado Auto Theft Investigators, an association of law enforcement and insurance company investigators, designated this week as “Puffer Week.”

    NB this is applicable to cars on public property or highways, not in your driveway or garage!

    1. Re:Is it legal to leave an unattended car running? by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      I was under the impression that it was only illegal to leave an unlocked car running, but I’m sure the law varies from jurisdiction to jurisdiction.

      The remote start system on modern automobiles has safety features built-in anyway, so it isn’t (shouldn’t be) possible for someone to just hop in your car and drive it away... it will just turn the engine off again if you don’t insert the key into the ignition before trying to drive it.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
  52. Re: Idling is bad for the engine by Daley_G · · Score: 1

    ...it's bad for the engine to "warm up" your car by letting it run idle in park. It's also a waste of time and gasoline.

    Agreed, but it's the lesser of all evils. A *cold* car (and I'm referring to anything north of the Mason-Dixon) is better off getting a chance to circulate oil and "warm up" vs. getting in and putting the strain of moving the vehicle on cold, non-circulated oil. It's even worse if you get in and rev the engine to warm it up. Sure, there's an ecological argument here, but there again, studies have shown that the vehicle emits less pollution if allowed to gradually warm up before a load is applied vs. applying that same load to a cold (again, *cold*) engine. Do I have statistics, articles and data? Nope - I grew up where it gets above 90* for about three weeks out of the year

  53. Re: Idling is bad for the engine by Chirs · · Score: 1

    It's definitely a waste to let it sit there for long periods of time. At -40 my experience is that it can be useful for the engine itself to give it a couple minutes...with many vehicles you can hear when it's ready to drive--the note of the engine changes slightly.

    I then warm up the rest of the car by driving very sedately for quite a while until the transmission and suspension stop feeling so stiff.

  54. Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Why would you want to do this? I still don't get it. Unless you're James Bond, and can also remotely drive the car, I don't see a need for this.
    The whole hot/cold climate thing, can't you just wait a minute for it to cool/warm?
    Sure you can brag about turning your car with your cellphone, but what next? Waste of gas, time and money, I just don't get it.

  55. Re: Idling is bad for the engine by EatHam · · Score: 4, Insightful

    According to Consumer Reports AND The Tappet Brothers (Tom and Ray Magliozzi) it's bad for the engine to "warm up" your car by letting it run idle in park. It's also a waste of time and gasoline.

    Those guys can eat my ass if they think I'm driving around in a cold car I can't see out of. They are also welcome to scrape my windshield for me.

  56. Re: Idling is bad for the engine by aitikin · · Score: 2, Insightful

    See how your Aveo, Caravan, and Outback handle it when it's a 17 year old car. I know my heater doesn't warm up that quickly.

    --
    "Don't meddle in the affairs of a patent dragon, for thou art tasty and good with ketchup." ~ohcrapitssteve
  57. Re: Idling is bad for the engine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Which is why, in cold climates, you connect the remote to your parking heater instead of your engine. That's even recommended by ADAC.

  58. Too bad this is illegal. by theJML · · Score: 1

    In most states letting your car start or run without you present is illegal. (yes, this includes starting your car and running back inside while the ice melts or the air cools). Also, it's not exactly the safest idea if you live in an area with high theft. I read a story a while back about some thieves that would cruise a nearby rich neighborhood and pop a door on a car 'warming up in the drive way' drive off and surprise the owner when there was no car there anymore. This made even easier by people who leave their car UNLOCKED AND RUNNING in the driveway.

    So you freeze your butt off for like 5 min, oh darn. If it's that big of a deal, get a garage or heated seats, or an engine block heater.

    --
    -=JML=-
    1. Re:Too bad this is illegal. by codepunk · · Score: 1

      Commercially installed systems either require that the car is locked prior to starting or automatically lock the car during the start. Any attempt
      to then drive the car such as placing it into gear will kill the engine if the key is not inserted.

      --


      Got Code?
    2. Re:Too bad this is illegal. by GeckoAddict · · Score: 1

      Remote Start (such as this case) means the keys aren't in it. I know in my car, if it's remote started, it'll die as soon as you touch the brake. My new car requires that I lock the doors before remote starting as well.

    3. Re:Too bad this is illegal. by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 1

      In most states letting your car start or run without you present is illegal. (yes, this includes starting your car and running back inside while the ice melts or the air cools). Also, it's not exactly the safest idea if you live in an area with high theft. I read a story a while back about some thieves that would cruise a nearby rich neighborhood and pop a door on a car 'warming up in the drive way' drive off and surprise the owner when there was no car there anymore. This made even easier by people who leave their car UNLOCKED AND RUNNING in the driveway.

      So you freeze your butt off for like 5 min, oh darn. If it's that big of a deal, get a garage or heated seats, or an engine block heater.

      All the places in the US I've lived, it's a municipal ordinance that outlaws leaving an unattended vehicle running -- where such a law existed at all.

      --
      I am not a crackpot.
  59. Terrible Idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is a perfect example of when DIY is not appropriate. Imagine a telemarketer calling you and starting your car while it's in the garage (door closed). You literally could kill yourself.

  60. Re:Are Americans really this lazy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I start the car 20 minutes before I leave because it is 2 Degree F. outside and I want a cozy car...

    Who cars about the car...?

  61. Re:Are Americans really this lazy? by Groggnrath · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    In modern cars, I keep hearing that warming up your car isn't needed, and can actually be bad for it.

    I really don't care if it's bad for the environment. At -10F I'll be warming up my car rather than freezing my nuts.

  62. Re: Idling is bad for the engine by Sigmon · · Score: 3, Informative

    SNOW is not generally a problem when it comes to defrosting windows... it's ICE. Keep in mind, some of us live where much of the frozen perciptiation we get is not like the nice fluffy and powdery snow you may get. It's a totally different ball-game when there's a layer of ice on your windshield twice as thick as the glass itself. Sometimes you have to let the engine warm up enough to melt the undersurface before it can be scraped off.

  63. Do Not Disturb feature by PetiePooo · · Score: 1

    You could use the standard Do Not Disturb (DND) feature. Callers are greeted with an announcement instead of ringback, and only callers knowing the correct PIN are allowed through.

    Its a standard LSSGR and PacketCable feature, MSOs should have it too...

  64. Re: Idling is bad for the engine by Gordonjcp · · Score: 2, Interesting

    My 22-year-old Citroen CX usually cleared the windows within 30 seconds or so, even in the -20C mornings we had over our fairly brief winter just there. In the cold weather it took longer for hydraulic system to bring the thick, cold, gooey oil up to pressure.

  65. Re: Idling is bad for the engine by newdsfornerds · · Score: 1

    Hey. I wait for the idle to come down and if the windscreen is fogged, I wait for it to clear. Clear?
    I've been driving in the Northeast for 30 years with no serious accidents. Oh, I was rear ended by some yuppie fuck in his Volvo once. He was talking on his cell.

    --
    Damping absorbs vibrations. Dampening is caused by moisture.
  66. anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've been doing this for years, to start my computer remotely. Parallel attach the phone's motor connectors to your PC's on switch. Don't tell me I'm the only one who did this.
      (wakeonlan doesn't work over internet, or you'd need a relay machine like a dd-wrt router which has a WOL tool in it's webbased manager).

  67. Re: Idling is bad for the engine by newdsfornerds · · Score: 1

    My car is a Camry with 50K on it. Barely broken in. It handles Boston winters just fine, ya twat.

    --
    Damping absorbs vibrations. Dampening is caused by moisture.
  68. Re: Idling is bad for the engine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You've never heard my car scream and moan when its -20F out and I try to drive off- it has no power and feels like its going to stall. You -have- to warm it up. And this is a 2003 car, not some 1983 Dodge POS.

  69. Starting is bad for the engine by celtic_hackr · · Score: 1

    According to every automotive expert I've ever read or talked to, starting you car in cold temperatures is bad for you engine, and taking off in a car that hasn't warmed up properly is even worse. Apparently you've never lived anyplace with sub-zero temperatures, and neither has Consumer reports or the Tappet Brothers.

    That said, this device seems a bit overkill. Especially for a hacker. How about a simple relay switch powered by PIC or Atmel chip and a garage door opener. The PIC or Atmel chip being the brains of the circuit to test for, among other things: "is the car already running", "is this an authorized signal", "is the car in park", etc. Now of course handling those cases would require interaction with the existing onboard system. Which is why they sell kits that already implement these functions. Or you can hack your own together as I've stated, or do really stupid dangerous things like the article states. One possible consequence of the cell phone approach is, having your car started by some stranger who fat-fingered their friend's phone number, and sends 50 text messages in rapid fire order. Hoo haa.

    1. Re:Starting is bad for the engine by celtic_hackr · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah, and another side affect of having a cell phone start your car is posting an article about your car phone starter, which then invites nefarious /.ers to find your cell pone number and then having your car /.ed. Hope he's got a few spare starters. A good way to burn up a starter is to keep starting the car once it's already running.

    2. Re:Starting is bad for the engine by newdsfornerds · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm from Boston, and so are Tom and Ray. I have lived in Boston most of my life.
      Tom and Ray are automotive mechanics and have been working on cars since the NINETEEN SEVENTIES. Tom has an engineering degree from MIT. I trust them not to spew disinformation.

      --
      Damping absorbs vibrations. Dampening is caused by moisture.
    3. Re:Starting is bad for the engine by Rich0 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yup - I have a remote starter on my car - aftermarket.

      These sorts of devices aren't all that expensive. I'd have no issues with hacking an alternative receiver (phone or whatever) into the INPUT on the unit, but not directly into the starter.

      A typical remote starter does stuff like:

      1. Have a sensor on the spark plug wires so that it can detect the engine RPM and figure out when the engine has turned over. It runs the starter "just enough."
      2. Refuses to start the engine if it is already running.
      3. Has a timer so that it won't run the starter all day if something goes wrong.
      4. Has a safety interlock on the hood, so that your mechanic doesn't lose his hands when the engine cranks without warning (granted, whoever installs it might not bother to wire this up).
      5. Have some kind of mechanism built in so that somebody can't just drive off with your car.
      6. Has some kind of way to transition to normal operation when you insert the keys.
      7. Often they have extra features like a mode that will periodically run the car for 15 minutes to keep the engine warm - for cold climates I guess (though I suspect an electrical heater would be safer).

      I would never wire something like this to my car without some basic safety/control functionality. By the time you do all that you could have just bought one - they aren't actually that expensive if you install them yourself.

    4. Re:Starting is bad for the engine by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 1

      They absolutely hate Diesel engines and spew a ton of disinformation about them.

    5. Re:Starting is bad for the engine by newdsfornerds · · Score: 1

      Oh, you meant "sub zero F", probably. It gets down to -10F here in Boston once a year if we are unlucky. You want a block heater if you live where it's -20F at night for months on end. No?

      --
      Damping absorbs vibrations. Dampening is caused by moisture.
    6. Re:Starting is bad for the engine by fprintf · · Score: 2, Informative

      How about a citation? "Every" automotive expert? I have lived in a cold climate several times in my life, and currently live in a moderate climate where temps are usually below freezing all winter but not below 0 degrees F. In addition to that, several family members are certified mechanics or mechanical (automotive) engineers. With a properly chosen motor oil, there is no reason that a modern automobile cannot be started and driven away within seconds of turning the engine on. In addition, I have experience with the 2-cycle and 4-cycle snowmobile industry and the factory recommendations on those high performance motors is that they can be driven away immediately upon starting a cold engine.

      Tappet Bros. and Consumer Reports are correct.

      You are correct that startup from cold is the most damaging time for a motor. However it is not less damaging to let it warm up before driving it, as long as a) the oil is the correct viscosity for the temperatures and b) the driver does not accelerate too rapidly.

      --
      This post brought to you by your friendly neighborhood MBA.
    7. Re:Starting is bad for the engine by newdsfornerds · · Score: 1

      I believe the manufacturers of the automobiles will corroborate this.

      --
      Damping absorbs vibrations. Dampening is caused by moisture.
    8. Re:Starting is bad for the engine by newdsfornerds · · Score: 1

      Can you give me an example? I can't recall them talking about Diesel engines.

      --
      Damping absorbs vibrations. Dampening is caused by moisture.
    9. Re:Starting is bad for the engine by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 3, Informative

      http://forums.tdiclub.com/showthread.php?t=41668
      http://forums.tdiclub.com/showthread.php?t=8795
      http://forums.tdiclub.com/showthread.php?t=46193
      http://forums.tdiclub.com/showthread.php?t=131289
      http://forums.tdiclub.com/showthread.php?t=203750
      http://forums.tdiclub.com/showthread.php?t=100750

      I've heard them a few times give quite a bit of misinformation. They haven't the slightest clue about the differences between WVO, SVO, BioDiesel. Say that 10,000 mile oil changes are 'stupid' (It's VW recommended, they go up to 30,000 km in Europe).

    10. Re:Starting is bad for the engine by afidel · · Score: 1

      Actually you can buy nice premade starters with relays designed to do this for less than they spent on this project (about $45 last time I bought one). Installation is easy if you don't have a car with all sorts of built-in antitheft stuff, and then this trick won't work and are commercial models for under $100.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    11. Re:Starting is bad for the engine by element-o.p. · · Score: 1

      You do realize that 2-cycle engines have absolutely no bearing on this conversation, because in a 2-cycle engine, the oil is mixed directly into the fuel, right?

      --
      MCSE? No, sir...I don't do Windows. Yes, I am an idealist. What's your point?
    12. Re:Starting is bad for the engine by element-o.p. · · Score: 1

      I suspect neither the Tappet Bros. nor Consumer Reports have ever gotten into a car when it was so cold that you can't hardly push the clutch pedal to the floor because the fluid is as thick as molasses. I have, and when it's that cold where I live, I let the car run for a little while until it warms up.

      Their advice may be good in some parts of the country, but there will always be exceptions.

      --
      MCSE? No, sir...I don't do Windows. Yes, I am an idealist. What's your point?
    13. Re:Starting is bad for the engine by rrossman2 · · Score: 1

      I read an interesting article in Alaska Magazine about a town up there where the temperature can hit -50 to -60 without wind, and any moisture instantly turns to little ice "cubes" (for lack of better terms). It basically looks like fog, but you can literally scoop it with a shovel. The article mentioned if you don't have a heated garage, you're pretty much stuck leaving your car running, because if you turn it off after a few hours you won't be able to get it started again it's that cold.

    14. Re:Starting is bad for the engine by celtic_hackr · · Score: 1

      I didn't realize we were limiting the discussion to modern vehicles. Well if we're going to exclude all of those older carbureted cars from the list of cars then yes, there is no need to warm a car up much before traveling, although AAA still recommends warming up for at least a minute in cold conditions and then starting off easy. But carbureted cars really do need to warm up, or you could be in for some nasty surprises.

    15. Re:Starting is bad for the engine by azmodean+1 · · Score: 1

      That said, this device seems a bit overkill. Especially for a hacker. How about a simple relay switch powered by PIC or Atmel chip and a garage door opener.

      I think the main reason would be if you don't have good line of sight to your car. In my case for example I'd be lucky to have it running for a minute before I arrived if I used a garage door opener, whereas if I used a cellphone I could start it when I left the building I work in and it would have the 5 minutes or so it takes to make the walk to start warming up.

  70. Remote Bombs by SoTerrified · · Score: 1

    It's nice to finally see that technology developed to remotely set off terrorist bombs finally being used for something productive...

    1. Re:Remote Bombs by DutchUncle · · Score: 1

      Oddly enough, I thought this was an article on how to make remote terrorist bombs thinly veneered with respectability by claiming it was for something productive.

    2. Re:Remote Bombs by sjs132 · · Score: 1

      And the link posted on slashdot so that any idiot that didn't know how yet can now do it.... Great, just what the world needed...

      I think I'll make one to remote start my neighbors car and laugh when he thinks he left it running overnight. :)

      --
      --- Relax, that mass muderer is just trying to reduce our carbon footprint, one fetus at a time...
  71. I see a few minor problems.. by miataninja · · Score: 1

    this would perhaps try to start the car by routing power to the starter, but if the car is newer than ~10 years old, it would probably have a car alarm and an immobilizer. Since the immobilizer would still be in effect there would still not be any power to the fuel pump and the ignition so the engine wouldn't start anyway, and since the car alarm would also be active it would probably go off. Bummer, eh? And besides, if you have a stick-shift car (manual gearbox) you'd better make sure it's in NEUTRAL before placing the call (and that the parking brake is engaged). Oh, and you'd better hang up after the first signal because otherwise the starter would engage every ~5 seconds or so. Not very nice to the engine. I think commercial aftermarket systems are a little safer. There are car alarms with these functions built in.

    1. Re:I see a few minor problems.. by rrossman2 · · Score: 1

      seriously, guys... quit spouting this stuff out about something you obviously have no clue about. HE ALREADY HAS AN AFTER MARKET REMOTE START INSTALLED. All this is doing is sending the required NEGATIVE trigger to the remote start's neg activation input. THIS IS NO DIFFERENT THAN USING THE REMOTE STARTS REMOTE. The remote start is then activated, enabling whatever immobilizer bypass that was installed for the REMOTE START to work (Passkey III, PATS, VATS, MITS, etc). The car alarm WON'T go off as the remote start's factory alarm disarm output would pulse the car's DISARM wire, or some car's alarms disarm if you pulse the keysense wire, or when the correct IMMOB code is picked up, etc.

      Another thing, there are some remote starts designed for manual cars. You must put the ebrake on and release the foot brake while the car is running. Then you hit the remote start button on your remote, turn the key off, get out, close the door and press lock on the remote. The remote start then knows it's in neutral. If the door is open, key turned on, alarm trigger (if it's a unit with alarm + remote start features) etc the car WILL NOT REMOTE START. And again, this has nothing to do with what his guy did. He just found another way to activate the remote start. As for the starter engaging every 5 seconds.. there's obvious ways to stop this, and he EVEN TALKS about the way he did that in his blog thing.. which you apparently did not read before posting :)

  72. Re: Idling is bad for the engine by BassMan449 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Mod this up. I live in the US Midwest and snow is not a problem, but we tend to get ice at least once a year. Even if the ice is only a quarter inch thick, you can't scrape it off (at least not without breaking your scraper) until you warm up the car a little to loosen up the ice. Snow is very easy to deal with and my car has my window defogged in 30 seconds but getting rid of the ice takes time.

  73. Bluetooth or similar alternative? by nickruiz · · Score: 1

    Granted, bluetooth is limited in range, but would it be possible (and secure) to try designing a remote starter using bluetooth? Most devices are limited to a 10m range, which would be disappointing for a car starter, but it seems like an interesting idea, nevertheless.

  74. Re: Idling is bad for the engine by datapharmer · · Score: 1

    I think you are mixing up "warm up the engine" with "warm up the interior". If it is really cold most people don't want to try driving with frozen fingers and frosty windshields.

    --
    Get a web developer
  75. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  76. It's not laziness, but there is something better by name_already_taken · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Parts of this country get very, very cold in winter. It can take a long time for a car to warm up to the point that ice on the windows will melt. Weather conditions vary but I've personally given up on scraping very thick ice off of the windows a few times. Warming up the car can be the only way to get the windows clear.

    I have had remote start systems in the past, but this year I installed a parking heater, which is basically a tankless water heater with a circulating pump. It runs on gasoline and warms the car's coolant up before I get in and start it. It can be operated by a remote or by a timer on the dashboard. It seems pretty efficient, as what's coming out of its exhaust pipe is barely lukewarm. Once the coolant is warm it turns on the car's heater blower and will defrost the windows and warm the interior.

    It's a lot better than a remote start - uses less fuel, and there is never a cold start of the engine.

    Downsides - the cost. I bought mine on eBay, brand new for about $275 from a car dealer who was going out of business. Normally these heaters are not sold directly to end users, you have to get it installed (usually at a heavy truck parts supplier), and the cost for one including installation ranges up to $1800. It took me 9.5 hours to install (at no cost other than a full day's time). Supposedly the factory installers take about the same time to do it.

    Electric engine block heaters are a lot cheaper (can be under $50) - you just plug them into an extension cord, but most people can't do that in their work parking lot.

    With the remote I can start my heater from up to 450 feet away (and I have). The heater I have is German made and conforms to their stringent safety standards, plus it sounds like a tiny jet engine. Similar heaters are used on big diesel trucks to provide heat when parked, in areas that do not allow the trucks to idle their engines.

    --
    Putting moderation advice in your .sig lowers your karma!
  77. Re:Are Americans really this lazy? by NeutronCowboy · · Score: 1

    Do you like your car to last a long time? Then don't warm it up for 20 minutes.

    Funny how environmentally responsible actions are frequently the selfish actions.

    --
    Those who can, do. Those who can't, sue.
  78. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  79. Re: Idling is bad for the engine by newdsfornerds · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yeah, of course it depends on HOW cold. It never hits -40F where I live. If it did, I'd use a block heater. If your car stalls when you try to back up out of the driveway, it's still too cold. Otherwise, just drive it slow for a few miles. Of course for many Americans, slow drivers are just another kind of terrorist.

    --
    Damping absorbs vibrations. Dampening is caused by moisture.
  80. Re: Idling is bad for the engine by newdsfornerds · · Score: 1

    Tom and Ray are reasonable people. They would not ask you to drive blind. I find that heated seats make more difference than heated air. Heated floors would be even better.

    --
    Damping absorbs vibrations. Dampening is caused by moisture.
  81. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  82. Re: Idling is bad for the engine by Walter+White · · Score: 1

    Idling is bad for the engine, but I don't see how it wastes time.

    Anyway... WRT ice and frost on the windshield, a volunteer fireman's trick is to leave the windshield wipers part way up and use them to hold a large piece of cardboard on the windshield. It not only keeps the frost and ice off the surface, but it also keeps the temperature of the glass a little higher, preventing frost from reforming after it has been removed.

    That trick significantly reduces the time needed to get a clear windshield before you drive away.

  83. Re: Idling is bad for the engine by PhotoJim · · Score: 5, Informative

    The problem is that most people crank their defroster to maximum fan speed and that makes the engine take forever to warm up . The secret is to put the fan on a low speed (even 1) and don't be in the car for a minute or so (while you clear the windows), then ease it up to 2 and start going. Notch the fan up as you notice your temp gauge going up. Don't use maximum speed unless your engine is at full operating temperature. Even then, very small engines in very cold weather will lose heat at maximum fan speed unless they're actually driving (i.e. the engine is under load); idling at full fan speed may still result in the engine cooling off.

    I start my engine, leave the fan on low, turn on my seat warmer, clear the windows, and by the time the windows are scraped, I drive. Drive gently and easily until the engine is warmer. That way I get heat quickly and I am friendlier to the environment.

    If the interior of your car is really humid and you're getting frost inside on the windows, turn on the air conditioning. This will help to sublimate the ice faster. (Keep the heat turned to the warmest temperature, of course. It'll still warm up your car - but with air with less humidity in it, which helps to remove the frost and ice.)

  84. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  85. Re: Idling is bad for the engine by newdsfornerds · · Score: 1

    I'm not confusing anything. If your windshield is fogged, you have no choice but to unfog it. Do what ever it take to avoid running me over!

    --
    Damping absorbs vibrations. Dampening is caused by moisture.
  86. Theft solution? by lafflam · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I think I 'd rather use a cell phone like this to remotely STOP my car in the event of theft.

  87. No, you don't know how to drive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Washington, D.C. is only barely behind http://m.wusa9.com/news.jsp?key=196541) L.A. butI still commute here with my manual transmission. At 75K mi my clutch disc still grabs like an acrophobe on top of a bungy platform.

    Knowing how to operate a manual transmission mechanism is only one part of knowing how to drive. To properly drive a manual transmission vehicle in heavy stop-and-go traffic you cannot tailgate and you will spend a lot of time in Neutral. Yes, this means that more than once per-commute someone will cut in front of you because there was more than 5 feet between you and the vehicle in front of you even though your "performance type car" could have avoided that by hanging 6 inches off the rear bumper instead.

  88. Re: Idling is bad for the engine by pbhj · · Score: 1

    Do you have a reference there? I've read recently that allowing the car to warm up (for 30s I think they said) allows the engine to operate more efficiently as you're pulling away. This results in better protection of the engine, as the oil is warm, and sufficiently better fuel efficiency in the first little bit of driving that things are about even on use of petrol [gasoline].

  89. Re: Foggy windshields are bad for the driver by Philip+K+Dickhead · · Score: 1

    Hey! These guys turned your car into an IED!

    Get ready for your own, personal "False Flag"!

    --
    "Speaking the Truth in times of universal deceit is a revolutionary act." -- George Orwell
  90. Re:Are Americans really this lazy? by tyger_purr · · Score: 1

    so remote start via key fob is perfect. It takes me about 30-60 seconds to get from starting my car at max range to in the car with my seat belt on.

  91. Re:Are Americans really this lazy? by mcgrew · · Score: 1

    I won't waste gas warming the car up, but I do see why people do. It was -2F (-18C) a few days earlier this winter and I was sorely tempted to. And I'm not in Alaska, it's the middle of Illinois.

    Cooling it off in the summer is even more importanat; it get up to 150F (65C) inside a car in the summer. The best you can do is roll the windows down until the 150F air is replaced by the 95F (35C) air, at which point the AC is starting to work.

  92. Re: Idling is bad for the engine by MightyYar · · Score: 1

    it's bad for the engine to "warm up" your car by letting it run idle in park.

    It's also bad for my infant to get into a freezing car :) If it weren't for the little delicate one, I certainly wouldn't bother "warming up the car".

    My wife wishes for it if the windows are frosted/snowed over, especially on really cold days when the wiper fluid just freezes. I mean, you end up starting the car and letting it warm up while you scrape and dust anyway... why not just walk out to a frost-free windshield?

    --
    W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
  93. Re: Idling is bad for the engine by MightyYar · · Score: 1

    Of course for many Americans, slow drivers are just another kind of terrorist.

    I don't mind them if they pull over once in a while to let the normals pass them. And if they stay out of the passing lane.

    --
    W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
  94. Re:Are Americans really this lazy? by rossdee · · Score: 1

    If its been sitting out in sub-zero temperatures for a long time then it is a good idea to have it start and warm up for a few minutes before driving it away. Of course you can do that when you get to the car, and spend those few minutes scraping the snow and ice off it. For colder temperatures a sump heater is a good idea, some employers do make power available for their night shift staff for this reason.

  95. How does one "remote start" an electric car/volt? by naris · · Score: 0

    How does "ponying up $40K for a Volt" have anything even remotely to do with Remote starting your car?

  96. Re: Idling is bad for the engine by nospam007 · · Score: 1

    "It's also a waste of time and gasoline."

    And in some countries (like mine) it's illegal having a motor running in an empty car.

  97. The first phrase that came to my mind reading this by undecim · · Score: 1

    "Oops, sorry, wrong number."

    --
    The Internet has given stupid people the resources of intelligent people.
  98. Re: Idling is bad for the engine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would probably listen to that advice more if it were recommended by ACDC...

  99. Re: Idling is bad for the engine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When the temperature is very cold many cars will not drive well unless they are warmed up first. My car stutters and almost dies if I start it and drive it right away during the winter months, it must be warmed up for at least 1 minute first.

  100. Re: Idling is bad for the engine by Rogerborg · · Score: 3, Funny

    It never hits -40F where I live

    I'd just like to thank you for specifying your units there.

    --
    If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
  101. Re:Are Americans really this lazy? by FooAtWFU · · Score: 1
    The fancy new Prius models with the solar-panel roofs actually use said roof for climate control while the car is off. That helps with the summers, at least (though cold winter nights are another matter).

    Also: If your car regularly gets up to 150F in the summer... leave the windows open a crack.

    --
    The World Wide Web is dying. Soon, we shall have only the Internet.
  102. Re:Are Americans really this lazy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are both electrical and fuel powered solutions specifically made for heating up the engine and passenger compartment though, where the former is definately the best choice from an environmental perspective while also beeing much better for the engine itself.

    When an engine is cold it'll use more fuel, at the same time as the catalytic converter doesn't work well.

  103. With my luck... by hAckz0r · · Score: 1
    I'd go into work the day the political party solicitors discover my unpublished number, and I get to return back to it later having an empty gas tank in the middle of the night. Good thing there is a phone in the car! ...so I can use it to call AAA. I just hope there is some kind of timer on the phone that knows to turn off the car if its unoccupied (seat sensor not tripped).

    I have a lower cost solution. I own a Prius, and the keyfob acts as a remote in the sense that it just needs to be inside the car for the car to run. The door handle also knows if you have the keyfob is in your pocket so the car will automatically unlock. All I need to do is train my dog to carry the keyfob out to the car on his collar, open the door, hop inside and step on the starter button on the dash twice to get it started. A simple tug on a rope attached to the door and the inside will warm up nicely. Getting the dog to do all that could be very easy, as he very intelligent and always wants to go for a ride! The one downside is that I will have to tell him 'No' often, since most of the time I have to go to work. Maybe its not such a good idea. Its so hard to say 'No' to those big sad eyes...

  104. Re: Idling is bad for the engine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lazy, polluting SOB. The heat warms up faster driving than sitting there, too.

  105. Re:It's not laziness, but there is something bette by Sockatume · · Score: 1

    I think they're talking about warming up the car as preventative maintenance, not warming up the car so that it's comfortable to drive in and demisted.

    --
    No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
  106. Re: Idling is bad for the engine by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 1

    And that's not counting wind chill

    And you shouldn't... not as far as the car is concerned. Inanimate objects do not suffer from wind chill.

    --
    This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
  107. Re: Idling is bad for the engine by nabsltd · · Score: 1

    Ever start your car in temperatures below -40?

    Not without an engine block heater, which warms up the engine for you (at least enough so you can start it and start driving).

    The only reason to let a vehicle "warm up" on idle is to allow the passenger compartment to warm up (or cool down, for those 120F days), which is just a waste of gas (as others have said).

  108. Re: Idling is bad for the engine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I just scrape the ice off and drive off right away. Of course, then my windscreen fogs up on the inside due to chilling from the airflow over it, but fuck you or your kids if you happen to walk in front of me: better you die than I "waste time or gasoline", right?

    Keep your windows cracked and/or don't turn on the blower until you can actually get *heat* from the heater. I've not had this problem in my eastern Ontario winters.

  109. Re:Are Americans really this lazy? by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 1

    If your fuel-injected engine isn't running smoothly after a few seconds at temperatures above zero, then you should have it checked out.

  110. IED by jfroot · · Score: 1

    Also a good way to make an IED trigger. In that case, you reallly don't want a telemarketer to call when your doing the final arming stages.

  111. Re:Are Americans really this lazy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why would I sacrifice quality of life to make the car last longer? I can just buy another one when this one breaks down. Using the same logic I could walk everywhere and the car would last forever.

  112. Re: Idling is bad for the engine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    -40 is the same in C or F

  113. Re: Idling is bad for the engine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is much more wear on your motor to start it at -20F and hop on the Interstate then it is to allow it to warm up 2 minute before adding any "load"

  114. Re: Idling is bad for the engine by cawpin · · Score: 1

    Don't worry, both Consumer Reports and The Tappet Brothers are idiots most of the time. If your vehicle has regular maintenance it will be just fine warming up while idling.

  115. Re: Idling is bad for the engine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wot's a pahking heetr?

  116. Better design by Animats · · Score: 4, Informative

    Here's a better solution. This design connects to the cell phone audio output (so you don't have to open the phone) and has a DTMF decoder chip, so you send it tones to make things happen. That at least gives you some protection against random phone calls.

    1. Re:Better design by ambanmba · · Score: 1

      And here is another solution http://blog.ambor.com/2009/02/remote-control-by-sms-with-gsm-phone.html which gives a bit more granularity in your control.

  117. Re: Idling is bad for the engine by toastar · · Score: 1

    Whose Wise Idea was it to start putting salt on the Road, I bought a car from up north and bottom was rusted out, I've seen beach cars that were in better shape.

    Down here when it snows more then 1/2 inch the whole city shuts down.

  118. Re:warming up in winter by just+fiddling+around · · Score: 1

    Webasto sells this nifty gadget which is basically a miniature gas furnace which heats the coolant, starts the water pump to circulate it in the whole circuit and the cabin fan to "defrost". Much more efficient in fuel use, keeps your engine from idling wear, and bypasses the idle parking laws.
    Avaliable for big cars and trucks, where space is avaliable under the hood.

    --
    You're not old until regret takes the place of your dreams.
  119. Re:Are Americans really this lazy? by natehoy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I live in New England (Maine, specifically), and I personally see little use for a remote starter. But I purchased a car that was meant to be used in this climate (glow plugs for the Diesel engine, heated seats, heated side mirrors, and a small electric coil in the windshield defroster to clear the windows quickly). But a lot of cars simply aren't equipped that way. Volvo, Saab, VW, and maybe a handful of other brands really know what cold weather means, and give you the tools to compensate for it. With a lot of other cars, warmup is as much a safety issue as it is a comfort issue.

    Heaven help you if you get salt or something else on the windshield and try to wash it off, only to discover that your windshield is cold enough to frost up your wiper fluid when spread thinly enough. Instant, near-total blindness.

    It's unfortunate that more auto manufacturers don't offer cold weather packages, but even when they do they can get expensive (more so than a remote starter). It's probably cheaper to just run the thing for 10 minutes the 20-30 times a year you might need defrost. It's not like it consumes gallons and gallons of fuel.

    Having said all that, remote starters can and do get "abused". If you're remote starting your car when it's well above the freezing temperature of your washer fluid, you really need to rethink how much that is costing you (in my opinion). But, hey, it's great living in a free country where people can legally do things I consider stupid. :)

    --
    "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
  120. Re: Idling is bad for the engine by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 1

    Yes, it is. So Buy me a new car, or your kids die. I'm fine with either outcome really.

    --
    Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
  121. Re:How does one "remote start" an electric car/vol by natehoy · · Score: 3, Informative

    The Volt comes with an iPhone app that allows you to start it remotely over the mobile phone network.

    --
    "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
  122. Re: Idling is bad for the engine by almondo · · Score: 1

    This really depends on the ambient temperature and the vehicle type. The stress of engaging a drive train that is still at -30 degrees or colder well exceeds the stress of allowing it to idle and rise to a viable operating temperature. For a diesel powered vehicle the stress of operating in extreme cold without warming up is magnified significantly.

    There is threshold of what is reasonable, and waiting an hour or more to let the heater melt the ice for you is beyond that threshold but there is a reasonable amount of warming up that is prudent to decrease the stress on the vehicle.

    Tom and Ray need to spend a couple of winters in Duluth, MN or better yet, International Falls.

    My solution was to move to Florida, it works well and often my truck does not even ask me to wait for the glow plugs to warm up.
     

  123. Re: Foggy windshields are bad for the driver by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While your comment was intended to be hilarious, my two scrapers have saved me much time waiting for my car to warm up on those frosty days. Rather than waiting for the ice to melt by heat, I can just leave the engine running for the minute or two spent scraping and it'll be warm enough for the trip to the park and ride down the freeway.

  124. Re: Idling is bad for the engine by Jarik+C-Bol · · Score: 2, Funny

    el-Woosho!

    --
    I've decided to Diversify my Holdings. I've divided my cash between my left and right pockets, instead of all in one.
  125. Re: Idling is bad for the engine by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
    "Ever start your car in temperatures below -40? And that's not counting wind chill. Your engine will not like it if you jump in, start and go with zero warm up time. That being said, 30 seconds to 2 minutes is all the time needed to get the juices flowing."

    Damn...and I thought "I" had it bad this morning in the upper 40's, with slight fog, and heavy condensation on my windows.

    I said to myself, "Hell, this is just not gonna be a morning for putting the top down on the car and driving into work."

    :)

    --
    Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  126. Re: Idling is bad for the engine by sohare · · Score: 0, Troll

    My bicycle starts in all temperatures I can start in. Only sissies drive to work! :)

  127. terrorism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    sure, nice idea... but I'm afraid these instructions could easily be misused to make IEDs.

    not sure why this mediocre idea with minimal usability has gotten such coverage especially given the potential for misuse in any number of violent applications... sure it's basic and anyone with minimal electronic skills could probably figure out anyway, but thought I'd bring that up.

    There is a concept in Product Liability law called foreseeable misuse, where manufacturers must protect against obvious modifications that could change the function of the device or cause harm, etc...

  128. Angling for a funny mod? by sean.peters · · Score: 1

    Umm, they have these things called windshield scrapers. They're, you know, a lot cheaper than a new engine.

    1. Re:Angling for a funny mod? by Dunega · · Score: 1

      Ummm... The INSIDE of the windshield was what was mentionned. The part the fogs up and freezes due to you exhaling warm moist air inside the car. I have never seen someone scrape the inside of their windshield. The whole point of heating up the car in the first place is to prevent this.

    2. Re:Angling for a funny mod? by AmonTheMetalhead · · Score: 1

      Condensation tends to happen on the inside, when i scrape of the ice & get inside, the windshield tends to be covered with condensation (and when the air is very humid even ice), but that's nothing a scraper & cloth can't take care of

    3. Re:Angling for a funny mod? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have never seen someone scrape the inside of their windshield.

      I've done it. It's really only an issue when it's well below 0F.

    4. Re:Angling for a funny mod? by Mr.+Freeman · · Score: 1

      They make these nifty things called rags that can wipe that away. They also make AC which dries the air and works just as well, if not better than, heating the car up.

      --
      -1 disagree is not a modifier for a reason. -1 troll, flaimbait, redundant, overrated are NOT acceptable substitutes.
    5. Re:Angling for a funny mod? by Calinous · · Score: 1

      I've done it too. It isn't much of a problem in winter (inside air ventilation over windshield will protect it from the air exhaled by one person). However, this is much more a problem with four people in the car, of if it's cold and raining (the ventilation system pulls rain drops inside, then vaporizes them on the heater and sends them across the windshield).
            You need to scrape the interior windows when your car was left outside in the winter - internal humidity condenses everywhere, but mostly on the front wind shield)

  129. Oh, please by sean.peters · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I've owned and/or driven in a LOT of cars, and the problem of "the inside fogs over" clears up in about 30 seconds of running the defroster. So: hop in the car, start, turn on defroster. Put on seat belt. Turn on radio. Inside of the windshield is already defogged. Give me a freakin' break.

    1. Re:Oh, please by coolsnowmen · · Score: 1

      That is really going to be dependent on the area you live in though. I live in a pretty humid area, so it takes a little longer 2min maybe (then again, I have an old car, so that also might be a factor).

    2. Re:Oh, please by Stuarticus · · Score: 1

      In my experience internal fog on car windscreens is caused by dirty windows.

      If the windows are spotlessly clean then condensation doesn't start forming on them.

      Then again, it doesn't often get down to -40 in my neck of the woods very often (or in anyone's!).

      --
      If you think someone isn't free to have a different definition of "freedom" you may be a tyrant.
  130. Oh, jebus by sean.peters · · Score: 2, Informative

    Dude, it's not that hard. 1) start car, turn on defroster. 2) Scrape windshield. 3) by the time you're done, the inside of the windshield is already defogged, even if the defrost hasn't gotten up to temperature yet. It doesn't need to be warm to get the fog off the inside of the windshield, it just needs a few seconds of relatively dry air blowing over it... which you get from the first few seconds of defroster. It only needs to get warm at all to get the frost off the outside of the window, which, you know, you already scraped off.

    I can't even believe we're having this discussion. The idea that not preheating your windshield inevitably means that it's impossible to see is mind-boggling.

  131. They don't want to waste their time shifting? by sean.peters · · Score: 1

    Right, because with all that time wasted running the gearshift and clutch, they could be writing the Great American Novel... while they're driving their automatic. Seriously, dude, I understand that some people would rather not bother with shifting, but it's not like they're "wasting time" that they could spend doing something else. They're DRIVING at the time.

    1. Re:They don't want to waste their time shifting? by gparent · · Score: 1

      Just read my other reply.. people are so anal about things.

    2. Re:They don't want to waste their time shifting? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You said something stupid, don't get pissy because multiple people felt like pointing it out.

  132. Re: Idling is bad for the engine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Coincidentally that very issue was addressed yesterday by Tom and Ray Magliozzi:

    TOM: "In the old days of cars with carburators, you could hurt a vehicle by warming it up for too long. In warm-up mode, a carburetor would pour lots of gas into the cylinders, and the excess fuel could run down into the crankcase and dilute the oil. This rich mixture could ruin the car’s catalytic converter, too."

    RAY: "But modern cars use computers to meter their gas into the cylinders so precisely that they could idle for days without problems..."

  133. Re: Idling is bad for the engine by rolfwind · · Score: 1

    According to Consumer Reports AND The Tappet Brothers (Tom and Ray Magliozzi) it's bad for the engine to "warm up" your car by letting it run idle in park. It's also a waste of time and gasoline.

    I never let my car idle more than a minute if it's warmed up, and others mentioned the fogging up issue...

    But my mpg increased like 20% this winter if I let my car idle 5 minutes (vs the 30 seconds I did before). I usually only take short trips ( 45 minutes, usually 15 or less) but I have to wonder if it's all that bad for the engine...

  134. Re: Idling is bad for the engine by skine · · Score: 3, Funny

    But someone could have confused it with Kelvin or Rankine.

  135. Re: Idling is bad for the engine by gander666 · · Score: 1

    Or, you can live in Tucson, AZ and for the one day every 2 years that there is enough moisture to make ice, your AMX card will clear your windshield for you.

    --
    Suppose you were an idiot and suppose you were a member of Congress ... but I repeat myself. - Mark T
  136. Re: Idling is bad for the engine by skine · · Score: 2, Funny

    Sorry, I don't speak Spanish.

  137. Truth on extended car idling .. by Brigadier · · Score: 0

    This is actually true, but it depends on the car. Most newer cars allow a high start idle to reach the necessary oil pressure which is essential in preventing early bearing failure. If the car is properly broken in running it in park for long periods is ok. however most cars when started without a blip on the gas cannot sustain proper oil pressure for safe bearing operation. This will shorten the engine life dramatically

    http://www.mototuneusa.com/break_in_secrets.htm

  138. Re:Are Americans really this lazy? by mcgrew · · Score: 1

    Cracking the windows when it's that hot helps a little, but very little. In the spring when it's nice out the car still gets hot, it helps a lot in that case.

    Plus, you run the risk of it storming while you're inside at work, especially here in the early summer.

  139. Re: Idling is bad for the engine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Damn me for not clicking the link, el-Whoosho for sure.

  140. Speaking of disinformation... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...there are several states in the U.S. where it is illegal to leave a running car unattended - and a few that specifically cite remote starting in statute.

    If it weren't for that, I imagine that by now new cars would come with the feature built into the remote door-openers.

  141. Re: Idling is bad for the engine by TClevenger · · Score: 1

    And in some countries (like mine) it's illegal having a motor running in an empty car.

    And in some states and municipalities in the U.S. as well. In my hometown, idiots would go out on a 50 degree morning and start up their car, then let it idle for 10 minutes while they got ready for work. When it was determined that the majority of car thefts (and this town is nestled between the two highest car-theft cities in California) were of cars left to warm up, a law was passed that cites individuals for leaving a running car unattended.

  142. I beg -no yell- for enlightenment by SpaghettiPattern · · Score: 1

    First, why USD 71? I Bet I can get a phone for USD 20 where I live. If something is worth doing cheaply then it's worth going Scrooge.

    Second, what's this thing with starting the car remotely? I mean, suddenly we can't be arsed to get into a car with the engine shut off?

    Or is it because you want to run the air conditioning and cool the car down when it's hot? Well, open the fecking doors for 3 minutes and experience a temperature drop. It'll be quicker than running the air conditioning and -for what it's worth- save a bit on the environment.

    --

    I hadn't the slightest objection to his spending his time planning massacres for the bourgeoisie... (P.G. Wodehouse)
    1. Re:I beg -no yell- for enlightenment by ghjm · · Score: 1

      It's because you want to run the heater and warm the car up when it's cold. In very cold weather, many cars' owners handbooks recommend idling the car for 5 minutes before applying power. Also, it's a hell of a lot easier to scrape the ice and snow off the car once it's warmed up a bit. Not to mention that the locks often freeze and you can't get into the thing without applying heat somehow. Or that your frail human form might not desire to remain exposed to the cold any longer than necessary.

    2. Re:I beg -no yell- for enlightenment by SpaghettiPattern · · Score: 1

      Or that your frail human form might not desire to remain exposed to the cold any longer than necessary.

      Ah well, that explains everything. Many thanks for taking the trouble and inform us of the poor sods that do not own a garage for keeping one's car warm and sheltered. Yes, it can be a harsh world. Or so I'm told anyway by a very remote acquaintance.

      --

      I hadn't the slightest objection to his spending his time planning massacres for the bourgeoisie... (P.G. Wodehouse)
  143. waiting for the modded sonic screwdriver.. by Destoo · · Score: 1

    I want to include my remote car starter in a Sonic Screwdriver.
    Any suggestion?
    Maybe there is a "slim" version of universal remote car starters, or something with a smaller form factor?

    --
    Nouvelles de jeux et technologies en français. TC
  144. WHY?!!?? by uvajed_ekil · · Score: 1

    Why would you need to do this? For $70, a bunch of work, and to open yourself up to a hugely major security and safety risk? I'm not sure where the poster lives, but there are plenty of companies who do aftermarket work on cars here and advertise that they will install proper remote start systems for something like $100-$150. I don't have a need for this, but if I did, I would pay $30 more to know it would work and not be triggered by a wrong number. You can probably build your own refrigerator and sofa out of other objects too, but there are stores that sell pre-made ones, you know.

    --
    This is a hacked account, for which the owner can not be held responsible.
  145. Re: Foggy windshields are bad for the driver by AmonTheMetalhead · · Score: 1

    Or you could just wipe the windshield with a cloth & drive on, the car'll get warm fast enough, but i guess that requires some (how ever small) effort.

  146. Agreed. Also... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...all else being equal, automatic transmissions can tow more.

  147. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  148. Kill switch please by Zoxed · · Score: 1

    > Wish you could start your car via your cell phone ...

    No, but I often wish I could *stop* other peoples cars, as they 'drive' (sleep ?) their way near my daily cycle commute route.

  149. Re: Idling is bad for the engine by coolsnowmen · · Score: 1

    Wind chill has nothing to do with the object being animate or not, it has to do with the object having its own heat source. Wind chill is the difference between convective and conductive cooling. On the human body, an additional factor would be evaporation cooling from moisture.

  150. Why not BT it? by JDLazarus · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't it make sense to create a custom bluetooth setup to do the same thing? I'm sure it wouldn't be that difficult...

  151. Re: Idling is bad for the engine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Click and Clack—Bostonians themselves—recognize that it's quite necessary to warm up your car in cold weather, and recommend remote starters to people now and then. You don't need to warm up the engine every time your drive like they used to recommend on older cars, but having your windows defrosted and your heat working can be a great boon to safe driving.

  152. Re: Idling is bad for the engine by himself · · Score: 1

    My new solution: I now keep a dead Dunkin Donuts card [though any dead gift card should do] in a pocket of each jacket, and I can clear my windshield in under a minute.

    And yes, I *did* grow up in the windshield-scraping glory days when the Minnesota driver's license was built on a nice, thick piece of plastic.

  153. Hack-a-Day has blueprints... by sponga · · Score: 1

    I remember seeing an article on a DIY car starter with a cellphone, here it is.

    Cell phone based car starter, another take
    http://hackaday.com/2010/01/19/cell-phone-based-car-starter-another-take/

    GSM car starter
    http://hackaday.com/2010/01/15/gsm-car-starter/

    Start the car with a wave of your hand
    http://hackaday.com/2010/01/14/start-the-car-with-a-wave-of-your-hand/

    Better yet, you can signup for a Google Voice(Beta) account and route all the calls you want to where you want them to go.

    A lot of phones these days with GPS have software where if you send it a text message it will respond with its GPS coordinates or you can lock down the phone, I know some guy who did this with some of his expensive construction equiptment when he didn't want to buy a LoJack system. I use the Android app 'Mobile Defense' and have found my phone once when I left it at a restaurant.

    1. Re:Hack-a-Day has blueprints... by sponga · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah, I forgot to add the guy with the 'wave your hand' to start the car had an RFID chip implanted in his skin to do that.

  154. Re: Idling is bad for the engine by badboy_tw2002 · · Score: 1

    Interesting, do you also have laws against leaving the door open, or not owning a handgun, or dressing like "you want it"?

  155. phone activated... by kobiashi+maru · · Score: 1

    "sorry, wrong number, i was trying to call my car...no, I am not crazy...see, i have this special built-in cellphone to my car that starts it up when it rings...no, I am not insane."

  156. Re: Idling is bad for the engine by kobiashi+maru · · Score: 1

    temperatures below -40?

    Celsius or Fahrenheit? though at -40 it doesn't matter... :)

  157. Re: Idling is bad for the engine by kobiashi+maru · · Score: 1

    how the hell did this conversation get from cell-phone start-up to methods for clearing ice off of windshields and windows?!?!?!?

  158. Re: Idling is bad for the engine by Propaganda13 · · Score: 1

    Running your engine is bad for your engine - oh ok. I don't think your engine needs that much warm up time, but people idle their engines all the time.

  159. Re: Idling is bad for the engine by element-o.p. · · Score: 1

    It's a lot better for your car than driving down the road completely blind because your window fogged up as soon as your (presumably) warm body sat in the driver's seat. When it's -10F outside, it doesn't take much heat and moisture for the window to become completely opaque.

    Thanks for the advice, but I'll continue to warm my car before I drive off, thanks.

    --
    MCSE? No, sir...I don't do Windows. Yes, I am an idealist. What's your point?
  160. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  161. Re: Idling is bad for the engine by newdsfornerds · · Score: 1

    Engines are designed to operate "under load" i.e. pushing the car down the road. Engines lubricate themselves much better when you are actually driving the car, not sitting idle in a traffic jam or driveway.

    --
    Damping absorbs vibrations. Dampening is caused by moisture.
  162. Re: Idling is bad for the engine by element-o.p. · · Score: 1
    "Edge case" my shiny white backside.

    There's 415,000 "edge cases" where I live...that's about 1/10th of the population of the U.S.

    ...MORON. Good grief, what are you? 18? 19?

    Pot...kettle...black?

    --
    MCSE? No, sir...I don't do Windows. Yes, I am an idealist. What's your point?
  163. Re: Idling is bad for the engine by element-o.p. · · Score: 1

    Snowfall is not necessarily correlated to how likely a window is to fog. I've owned five cars (multiple makes and models) since I moved to Alaska; my wife has owned another three since I met her. In every one of these cars and under the right conditions, the windows fog up and make it difficult -- if not impossible -- to see outside, unless the car warms up for a few minutes.

    Anyway, you yourself are admitting you let the car warm up and the windows defrost before you drive off: "...I brush it off and in the 2 minutes it takes..."

    --
    MCSE? No, sir...I don't do Windows. Yes, I am an idealist. What's your point?
  164. Re: Idling is bad for the engine by flewp · · Score: 1

    ...because one of the primary reasons for remote start up is to warm up your car in cold conditions, thereby making it easier to scrape ice off one's windshield?

    --
    WWJD.... for a Klondike bar?
  165. Re: Idling is bad for the engine by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    Ah, that must be why aircooled engines don't have a fan.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  166. Re: Idling is bad for the engine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wait until you have heat, and you'll go through windshields much more often.

  167. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  168. Insurance still valid ???? by slincolne · · Score: 1
    This appears to be a dangerous hack.

    I wonder if the owner has disclosed this modification to his insurance company ?

    I'm sure they would like to be financially responsible for the consequences should the car start and cause an accident.

    1. Re:Insurance still valid ???? by rrossman2 · · Score: 1

      uh... you don't have a clue what you're talking about do you? If someone dialed the wrong number, his car would start. Big deal. It's no different than if he had pressed the button on the remote start's remote. It would run for 12-24 minutes (depending on what it's set to) and shut off. I love the people who jump on the "OMG WHAT IF?!?!" and really don't have a clue what they are talking about :)

  169. Re:It's not laziness, but there is something bette by dargaud · · Score: 1

    The most impressive cold engine start I've seen was on big Caterpilars and such in Antarctica, at the end of the winterover. With the truck having just spent 10 months unused at temps down to -80C, and a current temp of -60C. One guy gets inside and turns the key in the ignition while the other sprays some 'start pilot' (whatever that is) in the air intake. Broooom! There it goes. I've never been so impressed by hardcore mechanical engineering.

    --
    Non-Linux Penguins ?
  170. Re: Idling is bad for the engine by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 1

    Whose Wise Idea was it to start putting salt on the Road, I bought a car from up north and bottom was rusted out, I've seen beach cars that were in better shape.

    Down here when it snows more then 1/2 inch the whole city shuts down.

    Everything rusted from salt or everything smashed from sliding on ice. Take yer pick.

    --
    I am not a crackpot.
  171. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  172. consult a dictionary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    or even this

    All definitions have to do with subjective human observations on their own skin. Your conductive/convection/moisture theories are all about WHY there is wind chill, but not WHAT it is.

    Engines can not suffer from wind chill, as defined.

  173. Re: Idling is bad for the engine by newdsfornerds · · Score: 1

    Yes, I want people to crash into trees and run over chirren on the way to work. But be honest with me, you live in New Jersey where the mercury never drops to -10F.

    --
    Damping absorbs vibrations. Dampening is caused by moisture.
  174. Re: Idling is bad for the engine by Anachragnome · · Score: 1

    As an ex-Alaskan automotive mechanic, I will try to correct some of the misinformation I am seeing here.

    First off, unless the temperatures in your area REGULARLY drop below -10F. there is no reason to do this (or any sort of remote starting) other then for pure comfort of having a pre-warmed car interior. ONE minute of an engine running is plenty to get things seated properly(piston rings and valves are the most important here).

    That being said, in places like Alaska and northern Canada it perfectly reasonable to install some form of auto-start.

    The idea suggested is idiotic. Having to rely on so much other tech when a simple infrared keyfob (just like the one that locks/unlocks your car) works just as well. Just point it out the window, push a button and your car starts. Sure, you cannot start it from across town, but who the fuck would want to? Commercial auto-start systems are fully programmable with start times, so if your hiking in from the bush and want a warm car when you get to it, just program in your start time.

    For this circumstance, there is a better solution, a Webasto coolant pre-heater. It is a small furnace that essentially heats up the coolant (and turns on the interior heating fan, if you like) and only uses .5-.9 OUNCES of fuel an hour. You could keep your engine warm for a most of a day for less then a gallon of fuel (yes, they run on the fuel from your main tank).

    But, back to auto-start systems, I never used one myself. They are mostly for the lazy. It isn't that hard to go outside and start your car normally then go back inside for 20 mins. I usually started my car right before I hopped in the shower.

    The main reasons for pre-warming a car in severely cold climates are many.

    1. Seating of internal components.
    These components were designed to function properly at RUNNING temperatures. You would be surprised how much piston ring blow-by occurs until those rings seat. Running an engine under a load before this occurs is the biggest cause of engine oil dilution and engine wear as the crankcase is just being loaded up with raw fuel that escapes past the rings into the crankcase.

    2. Pre-warming of other under-hood components.
    Other components such as accessory drive belts do NOT like flexing when very cold. A warm engine raises the temperature of everything under the hood, but it takes some time for this to occur. Most of the heat is initially coming from the exhaust manifolds. People that just get in and drive were my best customers. They hop in, fire it up and drive off, causing cracks to form in seals, drive belts, CV boots etc. I had one customer (military, from Georgia, but stationed in Fairbanks) and I replaced the CV boots on her car 3 times before I finally asked her some questions. She was getting in her car, firing it up, then immediately backing up through a 90 degree turn unto the street, then driving away. The CV boots could not handle the stress of a full rotation of the steering wheel while frozen to -35F. After another inspection, it turns out she had lots of other associated problems.

    3. Plastic cars.
    Most of the interior of cars are plastic these days. Try hopping into a -40F car and start playing with dash buttons and knobs. Some will eventually break right off in your hand. Simply sitting in a vinyl seat at such temps will usually mean severely cracked seats. The plastic literally shatters if you sit on it at low temps. Buying leather seats solves this issue to some extent.

    In short, the discussed method is ridiculous. You can do the same thing, with far more safety, by simply using a commercial auto-start system and having it properly installed. Simply hooking into the starter circuit is downright foolish. You need to have system safety checks as well, such as the device making sure the vehicle is in Park/Neutral before starting, a crank signal needs to be checked to tell the device when to DISengage the starter, etc, etc. Some will even look at your fuel tank level to make sure the fucking th

  175. Re:How does one "remote start" an electric car/vol by SleazyRidr · · Score: 1

    That still doesn't make sense. Isn't half the point of an electric car that it doesn't need to be 'started'; that it's ready to go as soon as you get in?

  176. Re: Idling is bad for the engine by kitezh · · Score: 1

    A coolant flush will do wonders for how quickly your heater heats up. I had mine done after about 4 years according to the scheduled maintenance and I was getting heat in roughly half the time it took before the flush.

  177. Re: Idling is bad for the engine by element-o.p. · · Score: 1

    Anchorage, Alaska, where at least once a year, it hits -20F, and sometimes gets as low as -30F ;)

    --
    MCSE? No, sir...I don't do Windows. Yes, I am an idealist. What's your point?
  178. Re: Idling is bad for the engine by newdsfornerds · · Score: 1

    Yikes. So there is Unix or Linux work in Anchorage? I can't ever find *nix work except in medium to large cities. I would love to work in a small city like Anchorage.
    So I heard people just leave their cars and trucks running all night in winter in Alaska.

    --
    Damping absorbs vibrations. Dampening is caused by moisture.
  179. Re: Idling is bad for the engine by element-o.p. · · Score: 1

    They sometimes do in Fairbanks (where -40F is not uncommon) but not in Anchorage. I've managed to hold a couple of Unix/Linux jobs here, so they exist...but they aren't as common as Windows/Cisco jobs, unfortunately.

    --
    MCSE? No, sir...I don't do Windows. Yes, I am an idealist. What's your point?
  180. Re: Idling is bad for the engine by MaskedSlacker · · Score: 1

    Welcome to LA County. Leave before your soul evaporates.

  181. Re: Idling is bad for the engine by couchslug · · Score: 1

    When they are done with yours they can eat mine, which will be nice and warm courtesy of my effective heater.

    I'm an experienced mechanic and regard any potential wear from idling as a trifle. Set the idle properly if required, end of story.

    --
    "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
  182. Re:Are Americans really this lazy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I love people who say this... Just open any Helm's manual (they write a lot of shop manuals for actual dealership garages) and read some testing procedures. It will clearly list "run car until operating temperature is reached" which is "when the radiator fan comes cycles on and then off".

    Also, on most modern cars the tolerances, components, engine management, etc can handle running 10 to 15 minutes just fine to warm up a car. Your engine is under a lot more stress in stop and go traffic in the city from the constant acceleration and deceleration.

  183. Re:How does one "remote start" an electric car/vol by natehoy · · Score: 1

    I assume that would be to turn on the defroster and other functions, but yeah, remote start has far less utility in an electric. :)

    --
    "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
  184. Re:Are Americans really this lazy? by rrossman2 · · Score: 1

    that's funny, because Road and Track listed some of the cars in the US with the highest millage, and of those drivers (one was a Volvo with over a million miles, and one was an Accord with over 750,000).. the drivers never really turned their cars off. For example, the Accord was owned by a guy who worked as a Meter Reader, and would leave his car idle as he walked around the houses. He said it was only ever really turned off for routine maintenance or when he was sleeping. I know my parents Accord has over 350,000 and runs great.. and it has a remote start that gets used quite often.

  185. Automatic vs Stick vs Mileage by argee · · Score: 0

    Not true. For the average person, the Automatic gives better fuel mileage. Get stuck in mud or snow, and the Auto is easier to get unstuck. Put a woman behind the wheel; most don't grok stick shift. The stick car needs more maintenance, usually clutches, within its normal lifetime. Using a stick requires more brainpower. Brain power which is best used for listening to a CD or talking on the cell phone. Finally: Fuck you. I want a warm, toasty car. With automatic. I got lots of money, so I can indulge in my whim. The starving kids in africa can kiss my automatic transmission. LA can choke on my smokey exhaust. There, I said it!

  186. Re: Idling is bad for the engine by Montezumaa · · Score: 0

    My fucking reply is not flamebait JUST because I disagree with the previous poster. Fuck whoever modded my comment.

  187. Citation please by celtic_hackr · · Score: 1

    Really? What states are those?

    1. Re:Citation please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      here - let me...:

      http://lmgtfy.com/?q=anti-idling+laws ...or try the PDF:

      http://www.epa.gov/smartway/documents/statelaws.pdf

      good enough?

  188. Re: Idling is bad for the engine by nacturation · · Score: 1

    There's 415,000 "edge cases" where I live...that's about 1/10th of the population of the U.S.

    Did something wipe out several hundred million Americans when I wasn't watching?

    --
    Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
  189. Re: Idling is bad for the engine by poopdeville · · Score: 1

    Really? Four hundred thousand is a tenth of three hundred million?

    --
    After all, I am strangely colored.
  190. Re: Idling is bad for the engine by AG+the+other · · Score: 1

    Might be bad for the engine but driving with ice all over the windows is worse, crashing and such you know. I could put a cover over the car but occasional winds can blow them away.
    So on the days when there is frost on the windows I warm the car up until I can see.

    --
    Non bene pro toto libertas venditur auro
  191. Re: Idling is bad for the engine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Those guys can eat my ass"

    You have got some weird sexual fantasies of yours there, buddy.

  192. Re: Idling is bad for the engine by Calinous · · Score: 1

    Mod parent up:
      Most of the things discussed here have little importance in a "normal" winter, with -5 to -10 Celsius (15 Fahrenheit) and without freezing under the hood. However, ice can form over the many moving parts inside the car, so heating up is good for things other than the engine

  193. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  194. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  195. Re: Idling is bad for the engine by newdsfornerds · · Score: 1

    Yeah. I never suggested anyone should drive blind.
    My neighborhood seems to be full of people who think that they need to let their cars idle for 10 minutes before they can drive them, regardless of the temperature. Fifty years ago it may have been necessary to "warm up the engine" before driving on a cold day. With today's engine technology it's actually harmful to do so.

    --
    Damping absorbs vibrations. Dampening is caused by moisture.
  196. Re: Idling is bad for the engine by element-o.p. · · Score: 1

    Yeah, I was in a hurry and left out a zero...or two. Sigh.

    --
    MCSE? No, sir...I don't do Windows. Yes, I am an idealist. What's your point?
  197. don't assume anything chumpwad by spineboy · · Score: 1

    No I don't tailgate - Porsche parts are too expensive, and I have no need to tailgate anyone and often let people in front of me for that very reason. Because I don't want to get hit in my rear either i leave room for me to scoot up.
    Trust me, when I had a Saturn - I took it from 50k to 110k in LA, and still on the original clutch.
    Performance cars wear their "fun" parts out much more quickly.
    And yes I traded in my Saturn for a Porsche (and a bunch of $$) - the dealer never recalled doing that before.

    --
    ..........FULL STOP.
  198. Re: Idling is bad for the engine by newdsfornerds · · Score: 1

    Well, I have read it's not only bad for the engine but worse for the catalytic converter as well. Gas is not burned efficiently when the motor is idling and all that unburned gasoline is seWhen the cat converter gets gunked up, it creates backpressure so that the exhaust fumes can't efficiently escape. Also, the cat converter is not cheap to replace and contains significant amounts of rare metals.
    The engine is designed to work under load, i.e. pushing the car down the road. I remember Tom and Ray saying that an idling engine does not produce enough oil pressure to keep all it's parts fully lubricated.

    --
    Damping absorbs vibrations. Dampening is caused by moisture.
  199. Re: Idling is bad for the engine by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
    "Welcome to LA County. Leave before your soul evaporates."

    Err..I live in New Orleans

    --
    Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  200. Re: Idling is bad for the engine by MaskedSlacker · · Score: 1

    I thought that place was abandoned.

  201. Re: Idling is bad for the engine by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
    "I thought that place was abandoned."

    Nope, alive and well!! Looking forward to a great Mardi Gras season here in a couple of weeks...

    --
    Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  202. Re:It's not laziness, but there is something bette by name_already_taken · · Score: 1

    For the large diesel engines (everything from the Cummins B-series on up) you can install an ether system which basically automates the spraying of the starting fluid.

    --
    Putting moderation advice in your .sig lowers your karma!
  203. Re:It's not laziness, but there is something bette by PrepaidReviews · · Score: 1

    Some people don't have the option of not warming their cars up before driving. I used to live in the northern extremes in Canada and would have killed for an automatic car starter up there. We used to use block heaters and always had to remember to plug it in or else no one was getting to work or school the next morning. Nowadays I live in a slightly warmer climate but still see the advantage to starting your car ahead of time. These days it is all about convenience. I do however think the real point of this article is that you can do this by hacking a prepaid phone to do the dirty work.

  204. Re: Idling is bad for the engine by jc79 · · Score: 1

    There's 415,000 "edge cases" where I live...that's about 1/10th of the population of the U.S.

    So the US only has a population of 4,150,000 people? That's significantly less than I'd assumed.

  205. Re: Idling is bad for the engine by element-o.p. · · Score: 1

    That's significantly less than I'd assumed.

    Why yes, yes it is.

    That's the problem with having Gig-E wiring in the head, but only a 56K connection to the fingertips. Sometimes a zero or two gets dropped in the transmission, especially when you aren't paying complete attention to what you are typing because you are doing something else at the same time ;)

    In any case, I would stay say one in a thousand isn't exactly an edge case, particularly in light of the fact that there are plenty of other, more populous parts of the country that get as cold -- if not colder -- than much of Alaska (for example, Montana, North Dakota and Minnesota).

    --
    MCSE? No, sir...I don't do Windows. Yes, I am an idealist. What's your point?