Slashdot Mirror


Dying Man Shares Unseen Challenger Video

longacre writes "An amateur video of the 1986 Space Shuttle Challenger explosion has been made public for the first time. The Florida man who filmed it from his front yard on his new Betamax camcorder turned the tape over to an educational organization a week before he died this past December. The Space Exploration Archive has since published the video into the public domain in time for the 24th anniversary of the catastrophe. Despite being shot from about 70 miles from Cape Canaveral, the shuttle and the explosion can be seen quite clearly. It is unclear why he never shared the footage with NASA or the media. NASA officials say they were not aware of the video, but are interested in examining it now that it has been made available."

266 comments

  1. I'm sure NASA would have been dying to get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    if they'd known about it.

    Sorry.

    1. Re:I'm sure NASA would have been dying to get it by Kagura · · Score: 1

      What I want to see (or hear) are the last four minutes of the Challenger recordings. There is something interesting in such macabre things... for example this air show crash that killed dozens in the audience. There are body parts all over in the video of the crash and aftermath. The pilot and co-pilot both got years and years of jail time for it.

    2. Re:I'm sure NASA would have been dying to get it by Kagura · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Somehow the last four minutes of the recordings were incinerated, but all the other footage is intact.

    3. Re:I'm sure NASA would have been dying to get it by prisma · · Score: 1

      I suspect that the audio desynchronizes from the video. As the video clip progresses the slightly slower audio lags more and more behind. Perhaps the video transfer from Betamax tape to digital video was not properly done?

    4. Re:I'm sure NASA would have been dying to get it by EdZ · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure what they recorded to (I Am Not A Shuttle Flight Data Recorder Engineer), but if it was a magnetic tape of some sort, the latest recordings would also be the outermost recordings, and thus bear the brunt of any damage.

    5. Re:I'm sure NASA would have been dying to get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't that just a rumour since in reality power was cut when the accident occurred?

  2. Speculation... by quangdog · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Why would someone keep this private and/or secret for so long?

    1. Re:Speculation... by Tetsujin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why would someone keep this private and/or secret for so long?

      The launch and subsequent explosion were broadcast live on TV. I think if I'd shot it, I might have assumed that it was entirely redundant.

      --
      Bow-ties are cool.
    2. Re:Speculation... by IndustrialComplex · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Why would someone keep this private and/or secret for so long?

      Probably saw it on TV the next day and figured it nothing special. This was before the internet, and judging by the age of the guy, he probably never accessed much media beyond his neighbors and the local paper.

      I don't remember NASA ever asking for other videos, and from the footage, it seemed that they had much higher quality stuff to analyze.

      Then we get into the idea that this was a betamax camera, it is also possible that it sat in his things for years, and when his younger grandson or nephew realized what was on the tape, persuaded his granddad (great granddad?) to post it up to the internet/NASA.

      Lots of valid reasons why this never saw the light of day until now, and I'm most comfortable with the idea that he never thought about it or thought he had anything special. He probably thought there were thousands of such videos from other amateurs in Florida.

      --
      Out of modpoints but really liked a post? 1BDkF6TtmmeZ3yqXbz9yhdYVqRYnwFoXDj
    3. Re:Speculation... by LWATCDR · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Because it was his memory. It may have his comments on it while he watched. I was watching when it happened and my father found parts on the beach which we did turn in. Over all we just didn't talk about it much. It is kind of hard when you realize that you just saw seven people die in front of your eyes. It is some how different than when you see it on the news. Also that cloud just hung over us the entire day. It felt like it would never go away.
      Actually even trying to post about that day is hard. So I can see putting it on a shelf and not taking it down until I knew I was going to die.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    4. Re:Speculation... by ArsonSmith · · Score: 2, Funny

      yea why would you want to post something again when it has been already covered previously by others?

      Mod me redundant please otherwise the joke doesn't work.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    5. Re:Speculation... by christurkel · · Score: 5, Interesting

      My father covered the launch for AP and he never said a word about it after he wrote the article about it.

      --

      CDE open sourced! https://sourceforge.net/projects/cdesktopenv/
    6. Re:Speculation... by mcgrew · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Challenger was the first shuttle launch I didn't watch, having moved back to Illinois. I'd gone outside for all of the previous shuttle launches, and we even drove to the cape to see a few. That thing is LOUD!

      I was out looking for work when it happened, but it was traumatic for anyone, even just seeing it rebroadcast on TV (over and over) when I got home,so your point is well taken.

    7. Re:Speculation... by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 1

      Because a lot of people don't go through their crap until they know they're about to die soon.

    8. Re:Speculation... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Now mod him underrated, so we can get the first +5 Redundant.

    9. Re:Speculation... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Given that we know a communications disruption could only mean one thing (invasion), I conclude that someone holding on to their own video tape for so long instead of putting it on youtube immediately in 1986, can only mean one thing: a conspiracy to hide The Truth from the American people.

    10. Re:Speculation... by wrfelts · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The Challenger disaster was a personal tragedy for many of us. The shuttles represented the resurgence of hope that we were experiencing after 2 decades of societal insanity (60s and 70s). If you're too young to remember or not from the US, the whole nation mourned for quite a while. Having a video that you took of the incident would be akin to keeping a memento of a loved one that you just lost, a personal reminder of what was lost.

    11. Re:Speculation... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      It is kind of hard when you realize that you just saw seven people die in front of your eyes.

      You didn't see them die. They survived the explosion, and were killed by impact with the water. The proof is that they initiated emergency procedures after the explosion.

      Come to think of it, I don't suppose that makes you feel any better.

    12. Re:Speculation... by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      Yup, I saw it live from the west coast. Still remember exactly where I was standing. A very sad day.

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    13. Re:Speculation... by eldavojohn · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It is kind of hard when you realize that you just saw seven people die in front of your eyes.

      I would also like to point out that some people have more reverence for the dead than others. And that this individual could have decided out of respect of the families of those deceased to withhold the tape from the replay replay replay replay that major news networks would undoubtedly subject it to. Following the initial interest and showing of the footage, a release would simply be played again on the news, reminding those with lost loved ones and the nation of its failure.

      Some people don't believe in making a spectacle of something like another individual's passing. It's entirely possible that this amateur film maker felt that way.

      I can relate to it with a recent example. I was sitting in an airport over the holidays and a family was on TV grieving for their mother who was just killed in Haiti by a collapsed building. They chose to appear on that news network and they chose to open up all their emotions for the world to see. I was glad that the destruction and pain was effectively transmitted to me so I could understand their plight. I was not, however, glad to see the commercials for Jergan's Body Wash, the Latest Honda, Trojan Condoms, etc immediately following a young girl begging to have her mother's corpse returned to her.

      I was only four when the Challenger disaster happened. But I can relate to that kind of pain through disasters of my time and respect this man's wishes to withhold this footage even despite the benefit it might have provided NASA or expedited the investigation.

      --
      My work here is dung.
    14. Re:Speculation... by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      First +5 Redundant? You must be new here, the entire premise of /. is based on that score.

      Also I have seen those types of scores here many times over. +5 Troll? Please, how about -1 Insightful.

    15. Re:Speculation... by element-o.p. · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Still remember exactly where I was standing.

      I do, too. I was sitting in my high school history class, and the teacher rolled in a TV so we could watch the broadcast. Come to think of it, this was probably one of the most important lessons I learned in school: our technology is impressive, but not infallible.

      --
      MCSE? No, sir...I don't do Windows. Yes, I am an idealist. What's your point?
    16. Re:Speculation... by The+Archon+V2.0 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Why would someone keep this private and/or secret for so long?

      Conspiracy theorists obsess over things more the longer they were 'kept hidden'. Being handed over by a dying man? Well, that's even better. He's got nothing to lose anymore, so OBVIOUSLY releasing it before now would have brought the rage of the Illuminati down on him!

      So my theory is that it's a conspiracy against conspiracy theorists.

    17. Re:Speculation... by derGoldstein · · Score: 3, Insightful

      +5 Troll?

      Once a troll reaches +4, you need both fire *and* acid to kill it. Either that or magical fire / magical acid. If I remember correctly, +5 trolls regenerate all of their hp every round -- only a sadistic DM would throw that at his party.

      --
      Entomologically speaking, the spider is not a bug, it's a feature.
    18. Re:Speculation... by Tekfactory · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I worked with an Indian guy that had to give the eulogy when his father passed away.

      He talked about his father's life, and his father's position on Ghandi's staff when he was a younger man.

      After the funeral the guy's kids asked him why he never told them Grandpa worked with Ghandi, when they still could have asked their Grandpa questions about it.

      It just never came up.

    19. Re:Speculation... by prgrmr · · Score: 1

      So my theory is that it's a conspiracy against conspiracy theorists.

      As outlined in "The Protocols of the Elders of Zion"

    20. Re:Speculation... by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      It was low enough resolution and from far enough away that I doubt that it would have helped.
      I remember that some soulless creep of a news person actually shot the families while the explosion happened. That should have never made it to broadcast.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    21. Re:Speculation... by Civil_Disobedient · · Score: 1

      I remember as well. My father was an aeronautical engineer that worked on the main engines and related controls in the cabin (Honeywell was the contractor). I was in elementary school, and every launch he would get me a mission patch and autographs when he got to meet the crew. I was the king during show-and-tell.

      Mike Smith's (captain) was the last autograph I got. After that the whole atmosphere changed. I still get teary thinking about it.

    22. Re:Speculation... by Zen_Sorcere · · Score: 1

      Oooh, interesting idea. I might have to borrow that one...would force my party to work together. For once.

    23. Re:Speculation... by BobMcD · · Score: 1

      You'd also probably need to dust off those second edition books...

    24. Re:Speculation... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Conspiracy theorists obsess over things more the longer they were 'kept hidden'.

      Must be hell if any of them are closeted homosexuals.

    25. Re:Speculation... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I would also like to point out that some people have more reverence for the dead than others.

      Corollary: some people give up all their principles when they're about to die. If he released it before his death, he didn't really have that reverence, because any principles you give up in the face of death, you never really had.

      I'm not trying to badmouth the guy at this phase; we don't really know anything about it. But if you're assuming he didn't release it on principle, then I feel there's a flaw in your logic.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    26. Re:Speculation... by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Not really.
      He could have not turned it over when it happened because it would have have been played over and over so he put it on his shelf.
      Now after all these years he is going trough his stuff and giving it away to his friends and family since he is terminally ill and finds the tape. He has decided that it has been long enough and doesn't want this bit of history to die with him.
      I think an assumption that he has lost his principles is at best miss placed.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    27. Re:Speculation... by ServerIrv · · Score: 1

      My dad says that people should move every couple of years to knock loose the rust on our possessions; allowing us to make room for more needful things, give to the more needy or simply to rid ourselves of excess.

    28. Re:Speculation... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Honoring the dead of this tragedy.

    29. Re:Speculation... by the_last_rites · · Score: 1, Informative

      It probably never came up because "Ghandi" was a nobody, unlike "Gandhi".

      --
      Select SigText from Signatures where Len(SigText) > 120 Order By Len(SigText) desc
    30. Re:Speculation... by fotbr · · Score: 4, Informative

      It is kind of hard when you realize that you just saw seven people die in front of your eyes.

      Just being pedantic, but there's pretty good evidence that some, if not all, survived until impact with the ocean. Vehicle breakup was somewhere around 12Gs, which was survivable. On board oxygen was used, and switches that required pulling out against a spring had been changed to positions indicating an attempt to restore electrical power. Impact with the ocean was estimated to be somewhere around 200Gs. More here: http://history.nasa.gov/kerwin.html and here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_Shuttle_Challenger_disaster#Cause_and_time_of_death

      So unless you witnessed the remains of the cabin hitting the water, you didn't see (all) seven people die.

    31. Re:Speculation... by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Only his closest staffers called him Ghandi.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    32. Re:Speculation... by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Actually I was close enough to see some of the parts impact the water.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    33. Re:Speculation... by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      He didn't care about it but now that he's dying he wants to be immortalised and decides to make it public. So now future generations can hear a proper southern Goober analyse a shuttle explosion.

    34. Re:Speculation... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This was in 1986. way before youtube and digital format. they may not have even known who might have intrest in such a tape. it was on a 'new' betamax camcorder after all.

    35. Re:Speculation... by Chapter80 · · Score: 5, Funny

      I do, too. I was sitting in my high school history class, and the teacher rolled in a TV so we could watch the broadcast. Come to think of it, this was probably one of the most important lessons I learned in school: our technology is impressive, but not infallible.

      Why, didn't the TV work?

    36. Re:Speculation... by Chapter80 · · Score: 1
    37. Re:Speculation... by element-o.p. · · Score: 1

      Who modded this flamebait? I actually thought it was kind of funny...

      --
      MCSE? No, sir...I don't do Windows. Yes, I am an idealist. What's your point?
    38. Re:Speculation... by osu-neko · · Score: 1

      Indeed. For various reasons I've managed to move every 3-4 years for most of my life. Every time I move, I throw away half my shit rather than move it, and give away half of what I don't throw away. This habit started after the first time I moved (not counting when I first moved away from home). I loaded a bunch of shit into one of those storage places and paid something like $20/mo to keep it stored. Eventually I realized, after not even bothering to go to the storage place for a few months except to drop off a check, that I was wasting money storing shit I don't even have a use for. Those places are a waste. If you're thinking about renting one ("well, I'm moving someplace smaller but I'll want all this stuff next time I move someplace bigger"), don't. By the time you move to that bigger place, and presumably now making more money to cover it, you'll find that junk in the storage shed isn't so attractive after all. It seemed great when you were downsizing, but now that you're upsizing, you'll be going, "what on earth was I thinking? For the amount I spent storing it, I could have just bought a new (and better one)." Of course, obviously there are extremely high-value items for which this does not apply, but if you go look at what most people have in these storage units, very rarely is there anything that qualifies.

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
    39. Re:Speculation... by Mr.+Freeman · · Score: 1

      They passed out within seconds of the crash though. They really only had enough time to turn on the PEAPs, which wouldn't actually help them because they don't provide a pressurized air flow.

      --
      -1 disagree is not a modifier for a reason. -1 troll, flaimbait, redundant, overrated are NOT acceptable substitutes.
    40. Re:Speculation... by halcyon1234 · · Score: 1

      Being handed over by a dying man? Well, that's even better. He's got nothing to lose anymore, so OBVIOUSLY releasing it before now would have brought the rage of the Illuminati down on him!

      Underestimating the Illuminati's reach was the first mistake. Dying was the second.

      (Coming next summer from Fox...)

    41. Re:Speculation... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too soon

    42. Re:Speculation... by Kell+Bengal · · Score: 2, Insightful

      More likely, he was shooting pictures of the families for footage of them waving and cheering a successful launch, but the unexpected explosion captured something entirely different. It's just where his camera was pointing at the time - I guarantee it was someone further up the chain who pushed to have that footage shown. No cameraman worth his salt would have missed filming the explosion itself - it was the Hindenburg of a generation.

      --
      Scientists point out problems, engineers fix them
      altslashdot.org: The future of slashdot.
    43. Re:Speculation... by Larryish · · Score: 1

      Same here, except it was chemistry class.

      I remember all the jokes that came afterward, too.

      All about ashtrays and blue eyes.

    44. Re:Speculation... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OMG! It's your fault! If you're been watching 7 people would have lived!

      Captcha: Despised

    45. Re:Speculation... by fotbr · · Score: 1

      I stand corrected then -- I was assuming you were referring to just watching on TV like most of us.

    46. Re:Speculation... by __aaklbk2114 · · Score: 2, Informative

      They passed out within seconds of the crash though.

      Ummm no... Reality bites

    47. Re:Speculation... by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

      Or a group that had reached such a high level, that the only thing left for them to do, was kill all the +5 trolls, as well as the +6,+7,+8,+9 and +10 trolls, usually found frolicking together in much the same dungeon areas.

    48. Re:Speculation... by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      No I was there. As I said actually seeing it with your own eyes is some how different than seeing it on TV.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    49. Re:Speculation... by Skjellifetti · · Score: 1

      We all mourned, yes. But many of us, both at the time and today, regarded the shuttles as a hopeless waste of money that would have been better spent on far cheaper robotic planetary science missions.

  3. Houston... by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 3, Funny

    Houston, they've got trouble of some kind...

    1. Re:Houston... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Houston, they've got trouble of some kind...

      Houston, you've been slashdotted.

    2. Re:Houston... by WWWWolf · · Score: 1

      Houston, they've got trouble of some kind...

      "That’s trouble of some kind." - Jack Moss, a random guy with a video camera

      "Obviously, a major malfunction." - Steve Nesbitt, the NASA guy explaining what's going on

      Proof that, sadly, immediately after a big disaster, the experts are often no more knowledgeable than random bystanders.

  4. 70 miles away on Betamax? by elrous0 · · Score: 1

    I find it very hard to believe that a 25-year-old degraded video shot from 70 miles away on a consumer Betamax camcorder would be of any use to NASA in their actual analysis of the accident. There were probably a lot of people taping it or taking pictures that never bothered to turn them over to NASA, just because it never occurred to them that their crappy video would be of any real help in understanding what happened.

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    1. Re:70 miles away on Betamax? by harmonise · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's not that it would be useful for analysis, but it's useful as documentation of an historical event.

      --
      Cory Doctorow talking about cloud computing makes as much sense as George W Bush talking about electrical engineering.
    2. Re:70 miles away on Betamax? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Some very crappy images from a surveillance camera were quite useful when the crash of AA 587 was investigated. If you don't have the material, you don't know how much can be extracted by enhancing it and then combining it with sources - one tape might allow investigators to identify what pieces some grainy dots actually are on the tape that shows the timing when they fall off.

    3. Re:70 miles away on Betamax? by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      Well I'm sure there're dozens of home videos of the WTC collapsing that nobody's ever seen, and the owners never thought of making public because there is so damned much out there already.

      In 20 or 30 years, some grandson will find one, show it, and people will wonder why didn't they make this public at the time, golly!

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    4. Re:70 miles away on Betamax? by SEAL · · Score: 1, Funny

      Except that it was faked, just like the moon landings.

    5. Re:70 miles away on Betamax? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Flamebait? Hello, that was funny.

    6. Re:70 miles away on Betamax? by kegon · · Score: 1

      NASA have learnt pretty much all that is possible to learn from this event or all that they want to learn, anyhow. Do you really think that NASA needs this for archiving purposes ? Is that what they are now, a museum ?

    7. Re:70 miles away on Betamax? by AJWM · · Score: 1

      Actually the video might have been helpful in determining the trajectory of the debris, facilitating its recovery. Or not -- the launch was already covered from a number of angles.

      --
      -- Alastair
    8. Re:70 miles away on Betamax? by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      Hush! Do you want the aliens to know we're defenseless?

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  5. Mirror by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative
    1. Re:Mirror by c64cryptoboy · · Score: 5, Informative
      --
      I put the 'fun' in fundamentalism
    2. Re:Mirror by antgiant · · Score: 3, Informative
    3. Re:Mirror by onepoint · · Score: 1

      I just watch the video. I can understand why this guy did not publish it. listen well to the audio and you cna here him mention the word 'trouble'. listen to it and you can hear his voice change slowly.

      he choose just to put it away and not remember having this bad day. I would even think he might have been a person involved in korea or WW2 and was reliving something that might have been awful.

      --
      if you see me, smile and say hello.
  6. Why do NASA engineers drink Coke? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Because they can't get 7 up.

    1. Re:Why do NASA engineers drink Coke? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      How many astronauts can fit in a car? 12: 2 in the front seat 3 in the back seat and 7 in the glovebox.

    2. Re:Why do NASA engineers drink Coke? by xTEMPLARx · · Score: 1

      TOO SOON, MAN! TOO SOON!

    3. Re:Why do NASA engineers drink Coke? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What was the last thing Christa McAuliffe told her husband?
      You feed the kids, I'll feed the fish!

      What color were Christa McAuliffe's eyes?
      Blue! One blew this way, one blew that way.

    4. Re:Why do NASA engineers drink Coke? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      -1, poor taste.

      They much prefer Pepsi.

    5. Re:Why do NASA engineers drink Coke? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How did they know the astronauts had dandruff?

      They found their head and shoulders all over the beach.

      (yeah, I'm gonna check PA on that one)

    6. Re:Why do NASA engineers drink Coke? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Period joke...

      Q: What do NASA and Van Halen have in common
      A: They're both Hot For Teacher.

  7. Yessir by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 1

    That's trouble of some kind, George.

  8. 'nobody knows why ,...' by radioteeth · · Score: 1

    If I were lucky enough to film anything amazing, I wouldn't share it with any big entities either.. It's MINE !

  9. memories... by gandhi_2 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    they herded us into the library of my elementary school to watch the launch. I must have been in 3rd grade or so.

    The teachers hurriedly ushered us back into class when the "space ship" was "done". Most of us came away thinking a shuttle launch was supposed to look like that.

    1. Re:memories... by brainstem · · Score: 1

      I had the same experience... they herded all of us into the gym (2nd grade) to watch it live because of McAuliffe.... I don't remember exactly why, but our class was late for some reason and by the time we got there, it had already blown up. I had no idea what was going on at the time.

    2. Re:memories... by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I wasn't even born yet - but I had heard of Challenger and the failure, though I had never seen anything like it. It still strikes me as shocking even though I know whats going to happen. I feel the same sadness now as many must have felt over 20 years ago.

      Part of me feels like I've just missed one of the greatest eras of mankind. Space Exploration, Cold war ending, Berlin wall coming down and all that. There was a time when Astronauts were hailed as heros, now our generation views them as simple scientists in the ISS. They're lucky if their launches or arrivals get 15 minutes of airtime. Seems like nothing happens unless there is a disaster. I know this is not true, as there are people still doing missions in space (Hubbles maintenance is the first one that comes to mind). It just saddens me that it is no longer "Big News" sending people into space, only when its a disaster. RIP Challenger Crew. May it not only serve as an example of the dangers involved, but also as a reminder of the men and women who brave those dangers for the pursuit of knowledge.

    3. Re:memories... by dryueh · · Score: 1

      Same circumstances for me -- except I came away from the launch feeling completely terrified. In addition to the excitement that still welled up around shuttle launches back then, it was especially potent because there was a teacher on board. It's definitely one of those I-remember-exactly-where-I-was-when-it-happened moments.

    4. Re:memories... by neurovish · · Score: 1

      I wasn't even born yet - but I had heard of Challenger and the failure, though I had never seen anything like it. It still strikes me as shocking even though I know whats going to happen. I feel the same sadness now as many must have felt over 20 years ago.

      Part of me feels like I've just missed one of the greatest eras of mankind. Space Exploration, Cold war ending, Berlin wall coming down and all that. There was a time when Astronauts were hailed as heros, now our generation views them as simple scientists in the ISS. They're lucky if their launches or arrivals get 15 minutes of airtime. Seems like nothing happens unless there is a disaster. I know this is not true, as there are people still doing missions in space (Hubbles maintenance is the first one that comes to mind). It just saddens me that it is no longer "Big News" sending people into space, only when its a disaster. RIP Challenger Crew. May it not only serve as an example of the dangers involved, but also as a reminder of the men and women who brave those dangers for the pursuit of knowledge.

      That's actually one of the contributing factors to the Challenger explosion. By then, the shuttle launches had become routine, and not seen as quite as big a deal as a few years previous. This led to less scrutiny of the launch conditions and managers in control who saw "successful day's work" == "shuttle going into the air" instead of "shuttle not exploding".

    5. Re:memories... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm old: I was at home sick from high school on the couch and had fallen asleep during the actual launch. I woke up and the tv announcers were all slightly out of sorts and it was a few minutes before I saw a replay tape. Coincidentally, I was also home sick when Reagan was shot. I was only home sick twice; both on banner days.

    6. Re:memories... by nebaz · · Score: 1

      I hate to say this, but even then, generally astronauts were not viewed as heroes in the mid 80's. The Challenger flight was special though, as there was going to be a school teacher in space for the first time, broadcasting to classrooms live. It was an exciting time. That made the tragedy that much worse. I can understand wanting to have been alive at the time, but I feel the same way about my own circumstances. I was born after all of the Apollo landings. Then I think (at least for Apollo 11) the astronauts were truly considered heroes. Going from the moon to just a shuttle is a big let down in what astronauts do, as well.

      --
      Rhymes that keep their secrets will unfold behind the clouds.There upon the rainbow is the answer to a neverending story
    7. Re:memories... by DerekLyons · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Part of me feels like I've just missed one of the greatest eras of mankind.

      I thought that too when I was twenty and had just lived through the 70's.
       

      There was a time when Astronauts were hailed as heros, now our generation views them as simple scientists in the ISS. They're lucky if their launches or arrivals get 15 minutes of airtime.

      It just saddens me that it is no longer "Big News" sending people into space

      Are you sad when an oceanographic research vessel sets off on an expedition without even rating a mention on the local news? When a geological field team pitches it's tents and there isn't breathless 24/coverage on CNN? When a biologist checks into a local hotel before heading out into the woods, and the desk clerk just yawns and goes back to his book?
       
      It's kind of like exploring the interior of the US. Lewis and Clark got all the glory for crossing it the first time - but it wasn't until decades later that surveyors, cartographers, geologists, and biologists fanned out across the country. (The latter two categories are *still* out there exploring.) But they didn't make the history books and don't make the news, they're lucky if they get passing mention on a Discovery Channel special. Nobody will ever raise a statue to them, celebrate the 200th anniversary of their work, or stage a re enactment of their work. Only exploration geeks like myself know the names of some the most famous among them. But they're the ones that got the real work done.
       
      A great deal of the problems with out space program stem from the fact that for so long it's been heavily publicized and politicized, misleading people into believing that if it isn't worthy of news coverage then it isn't worthy of being done. It's past time we washed out hands of these romantic and sterile 'great leaps' and got on with hard, dirty, day in and day out work of engineering and exploration. It's going to be expensive, and slow*, and dangerous - and not at all romantic or glamorous, but we won't make progress until we do.

      *Far more expensive and far slower than the 'great leap' showpieces. Which is the main reason we don't do it.

    8. Re:memories... by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      First of all, I shouldn't feed the trolls, but I am having a slow day at work.

      Second of all, I understand that astronauts are not the only piece of the puzzle, in fact, we have many complex missions in space that involve no astronauts at all. Don't make the assumption that I don't.

      Thirdly, I never said anything about this being "For the Country". I am not even American, so to take pride in American Astronauts wouldn't make any sense. When I talk about their contributions I mean to mankind as a whole, as a species.

      Engineers and Scientists may work long hours, do harder work, and be rarer than astronauts. None of that changes the fact that they aren't the ones who die when things go wrong.

      I think those people who sacrafice their relationships for this are of the opinion that a parade in their honour would be pointless. They'd rather people acknowledge their contributions and support the pursuit of science.

    9. Re:memories... by zero_out · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Just because someone came up with a brilliant idea for making the machine work does not make them a hero. What DOES make someone a hero is their willingness to risk their very life for something greater than themself. I'll probably get modded down for quoting the Bible on /., but, "No one has greater love than this, that someone would lay down his life for his friends." (John 15:13, HCSB).

      Sure, there is something to be said for living a life of sacrifice, giving up something valuable every day for many years, but there is nothing greater than to die for someone else. That's the lesson of Apollo 1, Challenger, and Columbia. Those men and women were not only willing to die for the advancement of knowledge in our culture, they actually DID die.

      Every mission is a selfless death for those astronauts. That they are able to receive their lives back, after they touch down, is a return of the gift they gave to us.

    10. Re:memories... by gandhi_2 · · Score: 1

      Terrified... Because the teachers always told you if you did your homework, worked hard, payed attention, and followed the rules then someday YOU could fly to space too!

    11. Re:memories... by sconeu · · Score: 1

      I was at work, when someone told me. My response was, "You're shitting me, right?"

      We violated several security regulations that day by bringing a portable radio into our closed area and turning it on.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    12. Re:memories... by noidentity · · Score: 1

      I went to a private school and there wasn't even mention of the launch or disaster. I remember the teachers being a bit uptight that day, but otherwise nothing out of the ordinary until I got home.

    13. Re:memories... by dpilot · · Score: 1

      Me too, and for some illogical reason in the back of my mind, I've blamed him for the Challenger explosion ever since. I know it makes no sense - it's just an odd association.

      --
      The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
    14. Re:memories... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      reminds me of the joke: light a match, throw it up in the air, say "Teacher in space!"

    15. Re:memories... by Zen_Sorcere · · Score: 1

      I was in 6th grade, at lunch at the time. we came back in and our teacher had clearly been crying. There was a TV in the room, and she explained to us what had happened, and we watched the news about it for a while. Was an incredibly memorable day for a 12yo fascinated by astronauts and astronomy.

    16. Re:memories... by charlesj68 · · Score: 1

      Eleventh grade for me. I followed the Shuttle program ever since watching Enterprise "launching" from the back of the 747 in glide testing. I remember thinking (in my youthful arrogance) that it was silly and a PR stunt to include McAuliffe on the mission. Launches were becoming routine, but we still stopped everything in Colorado history class to watch the spectacle. Not much else happened in school that day as every class seemed to diminish into quiet speculation as to what could have happened. Lots of discussion too in math and science classes about the space program, the disasters that beset the Apollo and so forth. To this day I fight back chills when I hear Mission Control say "Go with throttle up" during a launch. And in September this year it will all end ...

    17. Re:memories... by BobMcD · · Score: 1

      Everybody dies. Everybody risks death every day. The risk of death in a space mission is more palpable, and a bit higher, but it is no more real than the risk everybody else takes on a daily basis.

      In a world where there is only one kind of death, the inevitable kind, life has no tangible meaning. We're all dead anyway, so what would be the big deal of shooting someone in the head? He or she was already dead, by this reckoning.

      Astronauts (and soldiers, rescue workers, etc) willingly enter situations which they believe will result in their own death. The rest of us are absolutely oblivious to the risk of death, such as when we commute, and want to hold people accountable when deaths do occur.

      There is a difference. Whether you support that their should be a difference is your opinion, and your right. But it does exist, and it is not a joke of any kind.

    18. Re:memories... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't worry, you'll be around for when the USA devolves into socialism and, hopefully, recovers from it quickly.

    19. Re:memories... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't worry about it. If you would've been around for that stuff, there is a greater chance you'd be a chest beating nationalist rather than being critical of our absolutely fucked government.

    20. Re:memories... by Skuld-Chan · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I was in high school when this happened - I didn't see the launch live, but I did see the replay on Channel 1 the next day (forced tv news for poor schools).

      Thing is - that launch carried the first American school teacher up, and her class was watching the event live on TV (which was of course also being covered) - I can still see that classroom of kids with shock and horror over their faces, and I think some were crying. I'll never forget that.

      Even today - watching that video its still leaves me feeling empty inside. Still - mistakes will happen, and its one of the risks of experimental flight.

    21. Re:memories... by raddan · · Score: 1

      I was the same age. We were all herded into the 2nd grade classroom to watch it on the new TVs they had installed in the corner of each room. Unlike you, though, the teachers did not hide their dismay from us. I think they were too shocked to "think of the children". I remember a lot of people crying, and the principal gathered the entire school in the lunchroom to explain what happened. As an fledgling space nut (I was building model rockets with my dad), this event had a profound effect on me. Columbia was not nearly as disturbing, but by then I was an adult, and I better understood the risks. I think the Challenger disaster was an end-of-innocence for a lot of people, me included.

    22. Re:memories... by steelfood · · Score: 1

      Are you sad when an oceanographic research vessel sets off on an expedition without even rating a mention on the local news? When a geological field team pitches it's tents and there isn't breathless 24/coverage on CNN?

      Yes. Because this would be far better as filler than the existing crap that's used in the 24-hour news cycle. Because it might just motivate people to learn about and do science.

      They don't have to show the nitty gritty, but the news can do short blurbs about these things.

      So yes, I do want to hear about these things. And occasionally, I do (usually in the form of: local man tries to break X record).

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
    23. Re:memories... by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      You really don't have any sort of valid point. Your trolls are denigrating. Just stop.

    24. Re:memories... by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      Because this would be far better as filler than the existing crap that's used in the 24-hour news cycle.

      So yes, I do want to hear about these things. And occasionally, I do (usually in the form of: local man tries to break X record).

      Fascinating. You don't realize the extent to which these statements are mutually exclusive, and you don't realize that stunts like breaking a record have absolutely nothing to do with science and exploration.

    25. Re:memories... by internewt · · Score: 0

      There was a time when Astronauts were hailed as heros, now our generation views them as simple scientists in the ISS.

      That was all propaganda.

      Just like how soldiers who are killed in occupied Iraq and Afghanistan now are hailed as heroes today.

      To prove my point, this post will probably get modded down by someone who can't see the propaganda for what it is.

      --
      Car analogies break down.
    26. Re:memories... by RWarrior(fobw) · · Score: 1

      I was in perhaps 6th grade, and the teacher came in and said the "satellite just ... exploded." She wasn't emotional at all.

      I thought she was talking about Voyager.

      --
      Remove the caps and hold to a mirror.
    27. Re:memories... by KlaymenDK · · Score: 1

      Annoying when that happens, isn't it? The *only* time I fell asleep in front of the telly was in 1986, during the broadcast of the Giotto space probe rendezvous with Halley's Comet. That's not something that'll be re-aired, though, and I doubt if I have my wits about me by the next time Halley comes around. :'-(

    28. Re:memories... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you ever bothered to look at the credentials and academic records of astronauts? They not only have to have top physical abilities but also top intelligence. Most could step in and do the job of any engineer working on the project. But do you think most engineers working on the project could step out of the centrifuge and immediately solve difficult math problems? If you fail that or any of the myriad of other tests, you don't become an astronaut. Only the best apply and to become one you must be the best of the best of the best in all regards.

      Society tends to make heroes out of people that have the best of abilities and are willing to do something with them - not to mention something dangerous. Is that your problem? It is understandable to envy them but why bash people for admiring them?

      And as an anecdote of both the attitude they have to their job and what it entails: In an interview, Aldrin revealed that during the parade, Armstrong had said to him "looks like we missed the whole show" since during the mission, they had been so focused on the job and just felt like tools of mission control that they didn't even think of the significance of what they were doing, let alone be "passengers" enjoying a ride.

    29. Re:memories... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sick huh. You would think that you and the Illuminati could come up with a better cover story.

    30. Re:memories... by glyneth · · Score: 1

      I was in college, and I found out about it on the way back from class. I skipped the rest of my classes that day, and just kept the TV on, watching in shock.

      My dad worked for IBM doing contract work for NASA through the Apollo missions and SkyLab (we have all the patches at home), but he wasn't involved in the shuttle at all. But I still wanted to go to space. Still do.

    31. Re:memories... by internewt · · Score: 1

      To prove my point, this post will probably get modded down by someone who can't see the propaganda for what it is.

      Starting Score: 1 point
      Moderation -1
          100% Overrated
      Karma-Bonus Modifier +1 (Edit)
      Total Score: 1

      QED.

      --
      Car analogies break down.
  10. "They got troubles" by syntap · · Score: 1

    A sad understatement in retrospect, RIP Challengers.

  11. Public domain? by houghi · · Score: 5, Funny

    How could they? They violated his copyright and took away any incentive for the man to make another movie.

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    1. Re:Public domain? by natehoy · · Score: 1

      Well, I would think death would have taken away that incentive, myself, but then again with current copyright laws maybe not.

      --
      "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
    2. Re:Public domain? by fprintf · · Score: 1

      Are you sure it isn't trademark? Where is KDawson when you need him?

      --
      This post brought to you by your friendly neighborhood MBA.
    3. Re:Public domain? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Death, or the rumored suspended animation) Didn't stop (Walt) Disney from making movies, but if the mouse was out of copyright by now he probably would have stopped.

    4. Re:Public domain? by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

      Not to ruin the joke, but you can sign away your copyrights to your works anytime you want. Just ask any artist under a RIAA label. He just would have to sign his copyright over to The Space Exploration Archive. They, in turn, would release it to the public domain.

      --
      My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    5. Re:Public domain? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True, BUT: under US law such an assignment can be terminated after 35 years by the assignor or his successors-in-interest. The first terminations under the 1978 Copyright Act are expected to be invoked within the next few years. It is still unanswered whether one can truly release something like this to the public domain: is that release an "assignment"? We won't really know until somebody sues over it.

    6. Re:Public domain? by sabt-pestnu · · Score: 1

      He just would have to sign his copyright over to The Space Exploration Archive. They, in turn, would release it to the public domain.

      That still a vastly better deal. He would earn just as much money (IE nada), but he could show a copy of his own movie to anyone he wanted without having to pay 'the label'.

    7. Re:Public domain? by DarrenBaker · · Score: 1

      Isn't there some sort of exclusion in the law for copyrighting materials that have major public importance? I'm probably just crazy.

    8. Re:Public domain? by osu-neko · · Score: 1

      Isn't there some sort of exclusion in the law for copyrighting materials that have major public importance? I'm probably just crazy.

      No, you're probably sane, which means you've have great difficulty understanding the thought processes of most people, and utterly perplexed by any kind of examination of laws. ;)

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
  12. Now we know... by nohumor · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ... that betamax did not just have great audio and video, *it can survive years in the attic* without losing much of the quality.

    1. Re:Now we know... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh please. Betamax trolling in 2010? You should try HD-DVD.

    2. Re:Now we know... by Grygus · · Score: 1

      Just another example showing that sometimes merely being the best is insufficient.

    3. Re:Now we know... by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      It depends on what is meant by "best". For some, "best" means "80% as good, only way cheaper". Lots of people include price in their "best" definition.

      For me, I'd have to say that Betamax being limited to only 60 minutes was a pretty darned big check in the "not best" column when going to the rental store. On the other hand, recording length was no big deal for camcorders, so the smaller size and higher quality of beta make it "best" in that application. Of course, Sony went and effed those up pretty royally - you couldn't play back from your camera!

      Now, my grandmother had one of those tiny little Video 8 cameras... THAT was a neat little format for it's time... fantastic sound.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    4. Re:Now we know... by moosesocks · · Score: 1

      I have plenty of 8mm videos from the same era that were shot with a consumer-grade camcorder.

      Last year, I picked up an old broadcast-grade Hi8 VCR from eBay for $100, and almost all of the tapes play just fine, with decent enough quality (in fact, I'd venture to guess that they look a bit better thanks to modern interpolating and deinterlacing algorithms)

      --
      -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
    5. Re:Now we know... by osu-neko · · Score: 1

      Just another example showing that sometimes merely being the best is insufficient.

      VHS tapes will survive just as well if you don't play them, thus preventing where and tear. And, contrary to the overused meme, the VHS/Betamax war was won by VHS because VHS was better than Betamax in most ways. The few things Betamax was better at weren't enough to overcome the many ways VHS was better. "Best" is subjective, but it takes an extremely selective presentation of the facts, carefully leaving out all the flaws, to make the idea that Betamax was better sound plausible...

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
  13. RTFS by Procasinator · · Score: 1

    How could they? They violated his copyright and took away any incentive for the man to make another movie.

    I would think the man being dead and all would have damped his enthusiasm anyway.

    1. Re:RTFS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      **woosh**

    2. Re:RTFS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would think the man being dead and all would have damped his enthusiasm anyway.

      How so? Everyone else gets Life+70 years...
      And the only reason for copyright is to promote the creation of additional creative works... so the only logical conclusion is that the dead can still contribute to our culture.

      The Copyright Term Extension Act (CTEA) of 1998 extended copyright terms in the United States by 20 years. Since the Copyright Act of 1976, copyright would last for the life of the author plus 50 years, or 75 years for a work of corporate authorship. The Act extended these terms to life of the author plus 70 years and for works of corporate authorship to 120 years after creation or 95 years after publication, whichever endpoint is earlier. Copyright protection for works published prior to January 1, 1978 was increased by 20 years to a total of 95 years from their publication date.

    3. Re:RTFS by troll8901 · · Score: 1

      ***whoosh*** !

    4. Re:RTFS by zippthorne · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Uh yeah, or that the living might want to sell the rights to their works and not have a corporation say, "look you're 70, so we'll give you $300 for it, but we're pretty comfortable just waiting for you to die."

      70 years after death might be excessive, but in order for the selling price of a work to be related to the value of the work, copy rights need to be somewhat protected from the author's death. I'd suggest a fixed term that is smaller than 21 years. One generation is more than enough of a monopoly on cultural items.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    5. Re:RTFS by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      but we're pretty comfortable just waiting for you to die.

      ...or killing him! :)

      I'd suggest a fixed term that is smaller than 21 years.

      Agreed. I'd also add that it is not at all clear to me why copyright needs to apply at all in the non-commercial sphere. I think there would be plenty of incentive to create if copyright were exclusively a commercial concept - and it would be more reflective of what happens in reality anyway.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
  14. Elementary School in the 80s by geoffrobinson · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It was weird that there were so many tasteless Challenger jokes. Anyone know if this was common all over the country or was it only my neck of the woods?

    --
    Except for ending slavery, the Nazis, communism, & securing American independence, war has never solved anything.
    1. Re:Elementary School in the 80s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's a basic fact of life that some people cope with disturbing things by making jokes about them.

    2. Re:Elementary School in the 80s by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 1

      They were common in South Dakota.

    3. Re:Elementary School in the 80s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      Need
      Another
      Seven
      Astronauts

    4. Re:Elementary School in the 80s by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1, Troll

      Like:

      NASA - Need Another Seven Astronauts?

      or

      What's this button do?

      I don't remember any others.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    5. Re:Elementary School in the 80s by phragle · · Score: 1

      yeah we even had that one in the UK at the time.

    6. Re:Elementary School in the 80s by nedlohs · · Score: 2, Funny

      What color were McAuliffe's eyes?

      Blue. One blew this way, the other blew that way.

      Where do astronauts spend their vacation?

      All over Florida.

    7. Re:Elementary School in the 80s by jcrousedotcom · · Score: 1

      Ohhh, I remember one that one now... (Need Another Seven Astronauts)... Ya, I think they were fairly common all over.

      --
      Illiterate? Write for free help!
    8. Re:Elementary School in the 80s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Did you know that Christa McAuliffe had dandruff?

      They found her Head and Shoulders washed up on the beach....

    9. Re:Elementary School in the 80s by idontgno · · Score: 1

      Last transmission: "No... a Bud Light!"

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    10. Re:Elementary School in the 80s by Sloppy · · Score: 1

      Tasteless jokes, on any topic, are normal almost everywhere. If you ever find a region where tasteless jokes aren't normal, that place isn't normal.

      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    11. Re:Elementary School in the 80s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      We had 'em, too. I was in 7th grade at the time, and they were irresistible.

      Know why NASA drinks Sprite? They couldn't get 7 up.

    12. Re:Elementary School in the 80s by kybur · · Score: 1

      I always thought the Need Another Seven Astronauts joke was pretty dumb. Airplanes don't need to sleep, so you always have multiple crews per aircraft. Commercial airlines usually have 4 to 7 complete crews per airplane. If you lose any aircraft, you don't need more crew, because you instantly have a surplus.

    13. Re:Elementary School in the 80s by thomst · · Score: 2, Funny
      What was the last thing Crista McAuliffe said to her husband?

      Honey, you feed the dogs - and I'll feed the fish.

      --
      Check out my novel.
    14. Re:Elementary School in the 80s by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      Just who did those jokes harm?

      Its one thing to make a joke in front of the families of those lost in the accident, but to make jokes around people with no direct connection really doesn't do any harm.

      To answer your question though, they were common in the schools all through central Florida.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    15. Re:Elementary School in the 80s by earthloop · · Score: 2, Funny

      One of the ones in the UK:
      "Go on then, let her have a go."

    16. Re:Elementary School in the 80s by AP31R0N · · Score: 1

      How did they know Christa McAuliffe had dandruff? They found her head and shoulders.

      --
      Utilizing the synergization of benchmark e-solutions to pre-workaround action items!
    17. Re:Elementary School in the 80s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You either were not in elementary school in the 80s, or everyone hated you.

    18. Re:Elementary School in the 80s by mcgrew · · Score: 2

      I heard quite a few of them. Many were funny as hell. But in situations where people are freaked out, sick humor is the cure for the freakout.

    19. Re:Elementary School in the 80s by u38cg · · Score: 1

      A friend of mine who was in high school in the UK, roughly 13/14, reckons he heard the first one within thirty minutes of the crash. The Michael Jackson jokes were quicker still.

      --
      [FUCK BETA]
    20. Re:Elementary School in the 80s by ktappe · · Score: 2, Funny
      Yeah, there were plenty of Challenger jokes. The one I recall:

      (PLEASE STOP READING NOW IF YOU DO NOT APPROVE OF OFFENSIVE JOKES)

      • Why was Christa McAuliffe's husband so angry?
      • Strange men were getting a piece of her all over the beach.

      (/OFFENSIVE)

      The interesting thing is I've not heard any Haiti jokes. I don't know if that's because I'm not in school now as I was during Challenger, or if there actually aren't as many jokes around.

      --
      "We can categorically state we have not released man-eating badgers into the area." - UK military spokesman, July 2007
    21. Re:Elementary School in the 80s by steak · · Score: 1

      i went to school in suburban houston, so not at all. i don't know if any nasa employees' kids went to my school but the teachers certainly acted like there were some. they told right before we went home for the day. until 9/11 i always thought the challenger was the pearl harbor jfk assassination where were you moment of our generation.

    22. Re:Elementary School in the 80s by LanMan04 · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure the operative words are "Elementary School".

      I'm sure the jokes there are just as tasteless as ever, just about different subjects.

      --
      With the first link, the chain is forged.
    23. Re:Elementary School in the 80s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      What was the last thing that went through Christa McAuliffe's mind?

      The control panel.

    24. Re:Elementary School in the 80s by Grygus · · Score: 1

      I was in high school in a suburb of Houston and the jokes were out the very next day. I do recall that they were whispered and considered tasteless, which in retrospect was a surprising amount of restraint from us at the time.

    25. Re:Elementary School in the 80s by BobMcD · · Score: 1

      The interesting thing is I've not heard any Haiti jokes. I don't know if that's because I'm not in school now as I was during Challenger, or if there actually aren't as many jokes around.

      "Too soon" would be my first guess.

      "Not very funny" would be my second. I'm trying to picture what one might be about, but I'm not really coming up with much.

    26. Re:Elementary School in the 80s by uncqual · · Score: 1

      As I recall, the tasteless jokes far outnumbered the tasteful jokes.

      (But, maybe the tasteful ones just weren't as memorable.)

      --
      Why is there an "insightful" mod and why isn't it "-1"? If I wanted insight, I wouldn't be reading /.
    27. Re:Elementary School in the 80s by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      The interesting thing is I've not heard any Haiti jokes. I don't know if that's because I'm not in school now as I was during Challenger, or if there actually aren't as many jokes around.

      Two other possibilities:

      • It's too soon (not likely).
      • School kids aren't paying much attention to Haiti.

      The latter is a trend in general in the US: try asking a random person what the biggest natural disaster in the last decade was, and I'll bet they'll say "Katrina" -- completely forgetting that the Indian Ocean tsunami the year before killed two orders of magnitude more people (~230,000 vs. ~2500).

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    28. Re:Elementary School in the 80s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The one I remember is:

      What did Christa McAuliffe say to her husband before leaving home that day?

      You feed the dog, I'll feed the fish.

    29. Re:Elementary School in the 80s by Torodung · · Score: 1

      Tasteless jokes, on any topic, are normal almost everywhere. If you ever find a region where tasteless jokes aren't normal, that place isn't normal.

      This is true. (Also true: Do not tell the "fish sticks" joke in Innsmouth. ;^) )

      Need Another Seven Astronauts. That brings back some memories. What a day that was. How amazing that we just picked up the pieces and kept on going. It would take years of red tape to kill the U.S. manned space program, not a disaster.

      --
      Toro

    30. Re:Elementary School in the 80s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Clearly it was only your neck of the woods.

      Most American elementary schools kids I know are very refined young people. They put other countries' children to shame.

    31. Re:Elementary School in the 80s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This made me think about me and a friend watching TV when the Columbia disaster happened. We weren't freaked out but we couldn't resist laughing a little when pictures of the shuttle pieces flying in the sky were shown with a banner: "Breaking news"

      Not that I think any TV channel would intentionally try to inject anything funny into their coverage of such an event so I think it was just some template they had used without thinking too much about it.

    32. Re:Elementary School in the 80s by moxley · · Score: 1

      Yes, I still remember them, those jokes were told incessantly. ..Almost all of them had to do with Christa MacAuliffe (Sp?) - I am thinking it's because she was a teacher and the highest profile member of the crew.

      How do you get rid of your favorite teacher?
      You "challenge 'er"

      And the one about her eyes.,

    33. Re:Elementary School in the 80s by Threni · · Score: 1

      I'm in London - we got them here. It's universal. If you don't know anyone involved it's just funny. 7 people died. 7 people probably died in car accidents as I type this message. You've gotta go sometimes - you might as well go out in style.

    34. Re:Elementary School in the 80s by raddan · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well, I can't speak for the rest of the country, but until just now, I never heard a single Challenger joke. To me, that kind of joke has an equivalent tastelessness as jokes about soldiers who die for their country. It makes light of a very great sacrifice.

    35. Re:Elementary School in the 80s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Onion had one: Massive Earthquake Reveals Entire Island Civilization Known as 'Haiti'

    36. Re:Elementary School in the 80s by ktappe · · Score: 1

      The Onion had one: Massive Earthquake Reveals Entire Island Civilization Known as 'Haiti'

      Cute. Perhaps this illustrates a change in our culture. "Back in the olden days" (read: 1980's) jokes were circulated by mouth. Now they're only available on the internet.

      --
      "We can categorically state we have not released man-eating badgers into the area." - UK military spokesman, July 2007
    37. Re:Elementary School in the 80s by bmecoli · · Score: 0

      The interesting thing is I've not heard any Haiti jokes.

      You can find plenty here.

    38. Re:Elementary School in the 80s by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      All the other jokes I've read were old hat, but this is new to me. Good job!

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    39. Re:Elementary School in the 80s by jeremyp · · Score: 1

      Needs Another Shuttle Aswell.

      --
      All I want is a secure system where it's easy to do anything I want. Is that too much to ask ~~ Randall Munroe
    40. Re:Elementary School in the 80s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't have to be in school, you just aren't browsing the internet enough.

  15. Video here... by crt · · Score: 4, Informative
    1. Re:Video here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On an unrelated note, how many f'ing ad sites does the courier-journal really need to link to? I've added 10 to the temporary list in noscript and it's STILL not showing the video on the side.

    2. Re:Video here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      he's from Corydon; most of my family is originally from the Santa Claus/Ferdinand area. I saw this on Digg either yesterday or the day before but it said Late Optometrist from Corydon captures Challenger explosion, so I was trying to figure out how he could see a Shuttle launch 1000 miles away.

    3. Re:Video here... by SharpNose · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Oh, man...the obliviousness and the repeating "that doe'n't look right..." over and over again is just heartbreaking.

    4. Re:Video here... by apoc.famine · · Score: 1

      Awesome. Except that I can't get to it. No, I'm not going to allow a hundred scripts from a hundred different websites to view it.
       
      I know, a typical /. bitch with noscript installed. Seriously - if you want to post a link, post a link to SOMETHING!!!! Not some shitty-ass website with a thousand tendrils mired in a thousand other websites.
       
      Where does this bullshit stop?

      --
      Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
  16. 70 miles away on Betamax ... might still be useful by oneiros27 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Even distant observations might still be useful if it was shot at a different angle than other observations of the event, and as it's in the sky, and you're 70 miles away, it's a different angle.

    The problem with video is that it's not as useful for judging the speed of things coming towards you, or away from you, unless it's of a fixed size, it's not tumbling, and you have sufficient resolution. If this had a different plane of the sky as the other 'official' footage, it could be used to test any 3d models that might've been made of the disaster, and if it disproves them, provide input for a new model to be made.

    Disclaimer -- I work at a NASA center as a contractor, but I have absolutely nothing to do with the shuttle program.

    --
    Build it, and they will come^Hplain.
  17. 25 year old Betamax tape still readable by Spy+Handler · · Score: 1

    can't say the same thing for your DVD/BluRay+-R discs in 25 years

    1. Re:25 year old Betamax tape still readable by nomadic · · Score: 1

      can't say the same thing for your DVD/BluRay+-R discs in 25 years

      I would put more faith in optical media outlasting magnetic media like betamax.

    2. Re:25 year old Betamax tape still readable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, yeah, we can,

    3. Re:25 year old Betamax tape still readable by sconeu · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but where are you going to find a player, especially with all the DRM?

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    4. Re:25 year old Betamax tape still readable by PPH · · Score: 1

      Perhaps it took them 25 years to find a Betamax deck to play it on.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    5. Re:25 year old Betamax tape still readable by toleshei · · Score: 1

      Well, I've had CD-R's fail after 8 or 9 years, but I can't speak to the quality of DVD or BluRay disks. Anyway, If you're really concerned about your data you should be transferring it to newer mediums as they come about and have multiple backups (including off-site).

    6. Re:25 year old Betamax tape still readable by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      Same place you find a betamax player probably.

      Just because they aren't the most popular type of device for that purpose doesn't mean they instantly disappear.

      People will collect all sorts of crap, and I'm betting you can find a Betamax player in a pawn shop in every large city.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    7. Re:25 year old Betamax tape still readable by Brett+Buck · · Score: 1

      I have plenty of production CDs that date back to their introduction and they all work just fine. I would expect DVDs and Blu-Rays to last just as long physically. CD-rs are much more prone to dying.

              Playing them on obsolescent players might be another story but I would be very surprised to find that every single blu-ray player in the world is going to disappear in the forseeable future. I have a 25-year-old VCR and people still sell/trade/make equipment for Edison wax cylinders.

              Brett

    8. Re:25 year old Betamax tape still readable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you not heard of disc rot? Look it up.

    9. Re:25 year old Betamax tape still readable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not if the optical substrate deteriorates so quickly like most CDs and DVDs. I had to throw away dozens of carefully stored DVDRs after no more than 2-5 years. So three years ago I stopped completely using any optical media to store stuff in favor of redundant hard disks, and rotate them after 2-3 years max. Didn't lose a single bit since then.

    10. Re:25 year old Betamax tape still readable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'd very likely be unpleasantly surprised. Recordable optical consumer media hasn't turned out to be so great after all. Heck, even trying to read a DVD+/-R after a year, stored properly, can become unreadable.

    11. Re:25 year old Betamax tape still readable by aibrahim · · Score: 1

      Clearly Spy Handler was referring to the DRM not the inherent quality of the media.

      I think that for any DRM to be protected by laws like DMCA or, for media that uses DRM, basic copyright, it must be handed over in its entirety to the Library of Congress and the NSA. This ensures that we can play that media back when its outlived its technological lifetime.

      --

      Don't post innacurate information
      If you do, I swear by my pretty floral bonnet I will end you.
    12. Re:25 year old Betamax tape still readable by arodland · · Score: 1

      Right where I put it. Also, there's no DRM on homemade recordings; that doesn't benefit major studios...

    13. Re:25 year old Betamax tape still readable by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      CD-rs are much more prone to dying.
      Indeed and while they are relatively new formats I'd expect the same to apply to DVD-R and BD-R.

      And unless you are very rich you aren't going to be getting all your backup discs/home videos proffesionally mastered so they are going to be on the recordable variant of the media.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
  18. Re:Florida retarded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    Florida isn't retarded... Alachua County, maybe.

    No, Florida is retarded. We voted for Bush twice and Obama once.

  19. Re:mod dowN by amicusNYCL · · Score: 1

    Does anyone know why people post things like this? Is there steganography involved here?

    --
    "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
  20. please mod redundant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This isn't speculation - it's an argument.

  21. I can't wait to get the Pentagon one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can't wait to get the next one: "dying man releases in public domain previously unseen footage of the plane crashing into the Pentagon".

    1. Re:I can't wait to get the Pentagon one... by BobMcD · · Score: 1

      Well that should all come out in the upcoming trials, right?

  22. Re:Florida retarded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    +5 fuck yes.

  23. Re:70 miles away on Betamax? No shit, Sherlock. by thomst · · Score: 2, Informative

    Seventy miles is not that great a distance for viewing space launches. I remember watching from Satellite Beach (about 40 miles from Cape Kennedy) as Apollo 11 lifted off for the Moon. We could easily see the Saturn booster, and the roar of the engines was LOUD, even that far away. My mother took Super 8 footage of the launch, and, even with the very modest zoom factor, the rocket and payload capsule are quite clearly visible for the first 40 seconds or so.

    --
    Check out my novel.
  24. Nobody understood me when it happened. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was at work, and I was the first one to make a comment.
    Still in a stunned state I said, "Oh no, not again... We're really screwed now..."

    My coworkers couldn't understand that statement, but then, they were neither very smart, nor were they well informed about NASA history.
    On the other hand, I've been trying to keep up with the space program since I was a toddler, the oldest memory I can recall is the the first moon landing.
    I was aware of the other disasters, even the ones from before I was born.
    Additionally, I had an understanding of the repercussions of the event.
    Short version, yep, we were seriously screwed by that.

    Something a lot of people don't understand.
        We go there because we haven't been there.
        We do it because it hasn't been done before.
        We don't know what new things we will learn.
        We are enriched by exploration in ways we can not predict.
        If we cease to explore an important part of us curls up and dies
        We have been greatly enriched by such exploration in ways we can barely comprehend
        Why do the ignorant or unthinking want to deny such wonders and enrichment to our children and grandchildren

    1. Re:Nobody understood me when it happened. by pottymouth · · Score: 1

      "Why do the ignorant or unthinking want to deny such wonders and enrichment to our children and grandchildren"

      I think the question contains the answer. The ignorant and unthinking don't value that type of enrichment. Having watched the moon landing as a kid and both shuttle disasters it sounds like we have similar feelings about the space program. The most shocking thing to me is that the shuttle, whose first landing was made with I was starting college, is still our only manned launch vehicle (to speak of...) almost 30 years later. That still boggles my mind...

      Considering Warner Von Braun was describing trips to Mars and moon bases in the 60's (with existing engineering technology) I'm amazed at our sad lack of progress in space exploration

    2. Re:Nobody understood me when it happened. by BobMcD · · Score: 1

      Considering Warner Von Braun was describing trips to Mars and moon bases in the 60's (with existing engineering technology) I'm amazed at our sad lack of progress in space exploration.

      Yes and no.

      On the one hand, there's nothing we need within reach. The moon and Mars are interesting, sure, but there's no payoff for reaching them. There's no Soviet program to compete against, for starters. Maybe if there was a use for the land once we got there, such as with the expansion to the North American continent, you'd see more of a 'rush'.

      The other side of it is - there are just as unique and hard-to-reach places right here on Earth. Antarctica, ocean trenches, the Amazon, and the odd pockets of biology that we hear about from time to time. Before we colonize Mars, perhaps we should colonize the rest of Earth?

      So while proving we could go to the moon was useful in the context of the Cold War, we have reached that 'been there, done that' point and need greater stimulation to go back.

    3. Re:Nobody understood me when it happened. by osu-neko · · Score: 1

      Considering Warner Von Braun was describing trips to Mars and moon bases in the 60's (with existing engineering technology) I'm amazed at our sad lack of progress in space exploration

      I'm saddened but not amazed. Politically speaking, space exploration is not sexy. Sending people into space is sexy. So we've wasted huge amounts of money on manned space missions, almost none of which involved any actual space exploration, leaving very little left over for actually exploring space. Gotta love Spirit, but Spirit should be one of dozens if not hundreds of little guys out there exploring every rock this side of Neptune, not one of a tiny handful...

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
    4. Re:Nobody understood me when it happened. by pottymouth · · Score: 1

      You need to read a few more of the proposals and projects that were put forth at that time. Utilization of the metals and water available in the asteroid belt (between Mars and Jupiter) could be hugely profitable. Having the opportunity to perfect the process of creating a totally closed environment as would be needed on a moon base would be incredibly useful. Perfecting/optimizing the technology to go to and from high orbit and get back and forth from the moon. These are things that would grow huge industries, provide 100's of thousands (if not millions) of GOOD jobs that require education and sophistication (rather than a shovel). It would change the people and the economy of the US and probably the world as Apollo did for decades. Apollo did for the peace time economy what post WWII did. The technology side effects were incalculable.

      The statement "there's nothing we need within reach" is almost laughable naive. There's plenty that we could use within easy reach if we were to devote more effort and money to opening up those horizons. This as opposed to say, paying for the lazy and stupid to continue to be so to provide votes for the criminally political. It's all a matter of priority. Do you want to support the lazy and stupid or contribute to the greater things man can achieve? The stupid and lazy will always be among us. The great and noble shine through only occasionally and the opportunity for them to do so is worth the investment. There are certainly places for exploration on earth. I'm talking about moving mankind forward, not just exploration.

    5. Re:Nobody understood me when it happened. by pottymouth · · Score: 1

      I agree with you. Sadly we lost interest before the industrial possibilities became viable.

      Considering how good we are at propagandising just about anything it kills me that NASA can make EXPLORING MARS(!!) about as interesting as watching paint peal. I grew up eating this stuff up and now, with technology that makes what I grew up with look like stone knives and bearskins, my kids have no interest whatsoever. Zero. Couldn't care less.

      My one hope is that the corporate crowd that's starting to take hold of this (Burt Rutan, Richard Branson) will carry it through. They both seem to have a real passion for making it happen (instead of just the profit motive) and they seem to have a real business plan to make it a self sustaining and growing concern. It's a better model than a government agency doing it with tax dollars. I just miss the old days when space exploration was treated with reverence rather than as a less worthy competition to "Planned Parenthood" (for heavens sake!!).

  25. I'm old as well by Weaselmancer · · Score: 1

    I was a senior in high school when it happened. I was the first person in my high school to know.

    Because I snuck out of shop class and went next door to the laundromat to play Pac Man. I was bored and I wanted a Coke and a game. And a TV was on. I remember thinking "Oh cool - a shuttle launch. That'll be fun to watch, should kill some time".

    I went back to school, told my shop teacher what I saw. And oddly enough didn't get in any trouble over it.

    I too always wind up in prime spots to watch disasters. I was writing software for a consumer IrDA controller (think universal remote) when 9/11 happened. I was the only person in the building with a TV, which I had for test purposes. We rigged it up with a coathanger and watched local broadcasts. I had to sit there and watch the whole ugly thing, all damn day long. Talk about lousy luck. I'm the only guy in the building with a TV on that day.

    --
    Weaselmancer
    rediculous.
  26. local eye doctor by kenosaga · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Dr. Jack Moss' son is my eye doctor. From what I understand, Dr. Moss thought that his recording of the catastrophe was only of any value to himself and possibly his family, as testimony that they had witness the event first hand. He believed, especially with all the media coverage, that he had nothing of scientific value to offer NASA. Like a lot of things, with time we often forget we have them ;)

  27. Ethics in action by woboyle · · Score: 1

    He probably could have made serious $$ with this tape, but didn't. Hopefully it was out of respect for the Challenger crew. If so, I applaud this person as a man of ethics.

    --
    Sometimes, real fast is almost as good as real-time.
  28. Mawkishness... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

    You Americans are rather melodramatic about this entire event...have you every tried to consider why?

    I mean, 7 people died after taking a risk in which they knew death was a possibility. 7. Only 7.

    And yet somehow this excites the same type of feverish outpouring of grief that is reserved for religious martyrs.

    And why are you so ready to label anyone who dies in the course of their normal daily work as 'heroes'?

    What did they accomplish that was so heroic?

    Not trolling BTW, just genuinely interested in your national mindset.

    1. Re:Mawkishness... by Grygus · · Score: 0

      Nothing national about it, humans create heroes all the time. Astronauts had been a traditional American hero for well over a decade by this point, and had honestly become commonplace; this particular shuttle launch had a civilian aboard, a schoolteacher, and so received some publicity for that. If the shuttle hadn't exploded, six of the seven would be completely forgotten. In fact, I bet many, perhaps even most people here know who Christa McAuliffe (the teacher) was, but can't name another one of the astronauts. I think talking about the heroes is actually missing the point.

      I think that the sense of loss isn't really about the people so much as about the surprising failure, a setback in a problem we (as a public) thought we'd solved. A lot of American pride was invested in the space program, too, so the cracks in that program made apparent by this disaster was a bit of a rude awakening. You're also dealing with American nerds, who probably feel that the space program hasn't lived up to the potential that it seemed to have in its first decade, and this event is often seen as a major contributing factor. In short, we're not mourning the loss of seven people, but the loss of a piece of American greatness.

    2. Re:Mawkishness... by BobMcD · · Score: 0

      It was the death of these seven, and the others, that make the danger to those that survived 'real'. If we don't revere their deaths as a loss, then we must not value the potential sacrifice of past and future astronauts.

      They're sort of like soldiers, firemen, rescue workers, etc.

    3. Re:Mawkishness... by Belial6 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You are absolutely correct. I don't get why people cried over this. Seven people died. That sucks for them and their families, but seven people die every day. Crying and feeling despondent over 7 people you do not personally know dieing doing something that they were fully aware was highly dangerous is bizarre. It is a little like crying and having real sadness over the injuries the guys on 'Jackass' incurred.

    4. Re:Mawkishness... by neiras · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'm Canadian and 29 years old. I don't remember the real event, but I still tear up a bit when I see the Challenger break apart on video. Part of me hopes it won't each time, of all things.

      They were carrying humanity's banner into space. They didn't make it. It's as if a top athlete were shot as they carried their nation's banner into an Olympic stadium.

      That either resonates with you, or it doesn't.

      Hero worship has nothing to do with it.

    5. Re:Mawkishness... by lefthome · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure this phenomenon is uniquely American, I'm a Canadian and I think I felt pretty much the same way. I'm not sure about equating to people's feelings about religious martyrs, but perhaps you are overstating to make a point.

      These people weren't garbage collectors, or bail bondsmen, or bus drivers. They were doing something that had the potential to further our knowledge of space and science in general. Some people aspired to be like them, most can at least admire the work they do and realize it's to the benefit of all. There is something altruistic about the type of work they do, because it doesn't seem to be motivated entirely by self interest.

      Their death did not make them heroes. They were already heroes when they accepted that risk in order to do the work they do. The many men and women who returned safely from space are also heroes, minus the tragedy of death to remind us how valuable they are.

    6. Re:Mawkishness... by jj00 · · Score: 1

      The big deal with this launch was that the space agency always represented the hopes and dreams for a lot of people, and during that time it seemed like we had made space travel safe.

      As far as the "national mindset" of Americans you mention; I'd say that the entire world tends to relate to certain events, and don't usually use the body count to determine if they should care.

      Ghandi was only one person, so was Jesus, Anne Frank...

      It's also kind of hard to consider you comment not trolling, considering you're posting Anonymously, and keep mentioning our "national mindset".

    7. Re:Mawkishness... by DarrenBaker · · Score: 1

      I think it's because they, like celebrities now and explorers of old, act as a sort of life proxy for people who can't get out of dead-end jobs, and bills up to the eyeballs. So when they go into space, or conquer that mountain, or, uh, win the Amazing Race, people feel like they've been there with them in a small way - it's the collective adventurer's spirit. When they died, especially in such a public manner, it blew apart people's expectations and took a bit of their hope with it.

      At least, that's my rationale.

    8. Re:Mawkishness... by msimm · · Score: 1

      Unlike many of the brutish or often self-serving things we do many Americans (and many non-Americans!) think the people who attempt to advance the science (and practice) of space exploration are real heroes.

      --
      Quack, quack.
    9. Re:Mawkishness... by ascari · · Score: 1

      That's nothing American per se: Close to 13,000 people were official "Heroes of the Soviet Union". Their number include all Soviet cosmonauts starting with Gagarin. Most of them just showed up for work, didn't even have to die to achieve hero status. Not sure what that says about the Soviet mindset.

    10. Re:Mawkishness... by RCC42 · · Score: 1

      These weren't people doing any old day-to-day job and they are regarded as heroes or at the very least special and worth getting upset over for the reason reason Americans would get upset over the death of their president. Ordinary men perhaps but doing extraordinary things not just for themselves but doing a job specifically detailed as one that benefits all of humanity (or in the case of the president, benefits the USA).

      I do understand that we don't lavish this same kind of attention on leading AIDS or Cancer researchers but admittedly their job doesn't have the same frequency of explosions sheer grandeur about them.

    11. Re:Mawkishness... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's how I see it:

      I was a kid at the time. This mission was important to me because one of the astronauts was a school teacher. As such, I had a connection to what was happening (not my teacher, but I'm sure you can follow this).

      Secondly, these 7 people knew it was a possibility they could die, but that was not the plan. They were not planning on being martyrs, they were planning on doing science in outer space, and returning safely. As such, I was deeply saddened when those hopes and dreams were snuffed out, and in fact, this is one of the few events that has happened in my life that I still feel sad about.

      So were their lives worth more than anyone else that has died? Probably not. But I knew the faces, I knew the story, I was connected and I cared about them doing well, and was deeply touched by the failure.

      I think anyone who is connected to someone who dies feels the loss much more personally than some distant statistic. Think about someone you kinda knew that died, and explore how you feel about that for an idea of what it might be like.

    12. Re:Mawkishness... by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Probably the same reason people went all crazy over Princess Diana's death.

      It doesn't make sense at all an outside observer. It's cultural.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    13. Re:Mawkishness... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There was less of a reaction whe Columbia broke up on '03. It isn't just an Astronaut hero thing.

      Shuttle launches were still a big enough deal in '86 that people tuned in on TV (a few years later nobody bothered). School children were gathered to watch on live TV during school, partly due to McAuliffe.

      School teacher McAuliffe was the first civilian (correct me if I'm wrong) on a NASA launch.

      While hundreds die every day from traffic accidents, etc., it is pretty rare that you and everybody else you know witnesses happen it live. You couldn't ignore it because there was always somebody around to talk about it.

      I think that is the difference.

    14. Re:Mawkishness... by Opyros · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm not sure I agree with your premise; the mourning was worldwide as I recall, and not just an American phenomenon. (Much as it was years earlier for the Soyuz 11 cosmonauts, or years later for Princess Diana.)

    15. Re:Mawkishness... by osu-neko · · Score: 1

      You Americans are rather melodramatic about this entire event...have you every tried to consider why?

      Not too deeply. It's the kind of question with answers that are immediately self-evident to anyone who's genuinely human. Someone with emotional problems, a sociopath or otherwise abnormal psychology might find it puzzling, but otherwise, no, it's not the kind of question that would even come up for most people. It's part of our species mindset, nationality has nothing to do with it.

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
    16. Re:Mawkishness... by asdf7890 · · Score: 1

      Even speaking as a non-America, I can appreciate why the even was so important in the minds of the people that where there, saw it on the news, or at least were alive, at the time - and it is not a purely American phenominon by any means. I was only 5 at the time so barely remember the actual event in a "first person" way (I'd have been more interested in dinosaurs at the time, rather than space exploration, and remeber more vivdly that we were snowed out of school due to an unusually cold winter that year) but for children a little older (or just more interested in space at that age) these people where what they wanted to be - they were their heros doing what they aspired to do. For the elder youngsters the "teacher in space" thing was something new, something that had never been done before, something that was therefore an acheivement of their era. For the adults of the audience this launch was special because someone more "normal" was going up, a teacher rather than a test pilot of scientist, bringing the age of space closer to the reach (or so it would have felt) of the common person, making her a hero (or at very least a significant figurehead) to joe public young and old alike.

      It isn't just that those seven people were special in some way that the even gets such treatment - it is that the mission, had it gone as planned, was destined to be special for other (obviously better) reasons and those seven people would still have gone down in history (no pun intended) particularly the teacher. The event punctured people's colletive confidence in our abilities and technology, "our" there being both the whole of those parts of the world that were watching and the American public more specifically. For those that get "mawkish" to use your word, the thoughts they have on the subject are usually (to my mind) as much about what the launch and subsequent mission could have been and could have represented in the long term as they are about what the event actually was (an expensive explosion that took out seven highly trained people and some of the world's dreams).

    17. Re:Mawkishness... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not the best comparison - the out-pouring of grief expressed by the thousands on TV was not shared by the hundreds of thousands sitting at home that were dying to watch something (literally anything) else. I didn't know anybody that shed a tear over it - we weren't happy about it, as she was a mother of young children, but we weren't moved much beyond our normal empathy for strangers.

      Its not even as though it was Scottish thing - even the English side of the family was less than moved by the whole thing.

  29. Re:70 miles away on Betamax ... might still be use by sabt-pestnu · · Score: 1

    To paraphrase xkcd:

    Movies: "Look, you can clearly see the O-ring giving way there!"

    Reality: "We can continue blowing this up and interpolating pixels, but anything we saw would be just our imagination."

  30. Re:70 miles away on Betamax ... might still be use by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Correct. And on the video, you can see an abnormal plume, even from 70 miles away, and the moment of tank explosion. The forensics guys will look at it with interest. It may not tell them much they don't already know, but they'll look.

    Disclaimer -- I used to work at a NASA center as a contractor, on Shuttle and Station programs.

  31. Because space exploration is fucking awesome. by maillemaker · · Score: 4, Insightful

    >You Americans are rather melodramatic about this entire event...have you every tried to consider why?

    Because space exploration is fucking awesome, represents the height of human achievement, and the timeless urge of mankind to explore.

    These people died doing something amazing, and thus they too were amazing.

    --
    A work that expires before its copyright never enters the public domain and thus enjoys eternal copyright protection.
    1. Re:Because space exploration is fucking awesome. by laddiebuck · · Score: 1

      These people died doing something amazing, and thus they too were amazing.
      No.

  32. Clearance by BlindSpot · · Score: 1

    Sharing stuff with news organizations in 1986 wasn't like it is today. Noawadays you can send stuff to news agencies via the web, email, Twitter, etc. and the network's usage rights are implied to be given by the mere use of their submission mechanism. However, back then they would have had to specially negotiate usage rights, exclusivity, compensation (yes you typically would actually get paid for submitting stuff), etc. They might even want the guy to prove he actually shot the thing. He'd definitely have forms to sign and would have to bring in the tape, and it would all have be done without the benefit of email or fax, too.

    So perhaps it was simply too difficult to work all this out logistically, or maybe the guy wanted more money, or just simply didn't want to go through with all the rigamarole... I wouldn't blame him if it were any of these.

  33. What's the last last thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...that went through Christa McAuliffe's mind?

    A chunk of metal *this* big.

  34. Because it was a Betamax by mangu · · Score: 1

    Why would someone keep this private and/or secret for so long?

    Would you admit publicly that you spent your money on the losing format in the video war? It would have been bad enough if it were a VCR, but no, it was a camcorder, which cost much more.

  35. Re:mod dowN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, I just decoded it:

    "All your Shuttles are belong to us"

    But what does it mean?

  36. SOME KIND by paxcoder · · Score: 1

    Are you deaf George?

  37. Idiot, here's why. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They died in the pursuit of bettering mankind, UNLIKE religious martyrs, who die in the name of a belief system that celebrates fictional beings.

    If anything, you should be questioning why ANYONE who get's martyred religiously should be celebrated, considering how belief in some mythical being is absurd.

  38. AC for a reason... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    McAuliffe's last words to her husband before launch:

    You feed the dog, I'll feed the fish

  39. Episode V - Sony Strikes Back by zill · · Score: 1

    After winning the latest format war, Sony thinks it wields enough powers now to rewrite history and attempts to retroactively win the last one.

    "Betamax offers crystal clear video quality even after 24 years!"

  40. Peacefulness by JimBobJoe · · Score: 1

    There is something peculiarly peaceful about this footage. The TV broadcast footage is somehow a bit too intimate in regards to their deaths, too mechanical and focusing on the gruesomeness.

    This video shows a quiet, sad failure, with smoke clouds peacefully crossing a couple of times. It's zen like.

  41. Where were you by Camel+Pilot · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I was working at Rocketdyne on the Shuttle Main Engines at the time.

    When the Challenger exploded we were told over the intercom that a "System Malfunction" happened on flight 51 and the phones went down. It was not until people went out for lunch that they found out really what happened. In the mean time guards came in and confiscated all the engine build log books to prevent someone from going in and "fixing" some data with the sudden realization of a serious error.

    Spent the next year helping to prepare a giant report at the request of Richard Feynman.

    1. Re:Where were you by apoc.famine · · Score: 1

      I was in elementary school. The entire school gathered around to watch the launch....
       
      Two decades later, when I became a teacher, I really appreciated how fucking awkward a moment that must have been...

      --
      Velociraptor = Distiraptor / Timeraptor
  42. Re:Mawkishness... It was even worse than that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "They were carrying humanity's banner into space."

    True, nicely said. But it was even worse than that. This one was special.

    It was the first time a truly lay person was going up in the shuttle, a very happy-go-lucky normal seeming teacher, Christine McAuliffe, so the media was particularly focused on it, as were most Americans. There were TV specials all about how her class of 3rd graders or whatever they were were going to join up in the school auditorium and watch it on TV. The human interest angle on all this was very high.

    I used to work the overnight shift at my job, and I remember purposely going straight home from work and turning on the TV immediately to watch the launch. Bleaty-eyed from overnight work on a bright sunny morning both where I lived and where the shuttle was rising, I watched with the usual fascination, and when I saw it explode right in front of my eyes...

    It still shakes me. It sucked, it was terrible. A nation's hopes rose with that shuttle, and were temporarily slammed back to earth.

    That shuttle launch was special. That's why people still get mawkish about it.

  43. Arguments, Room 12A by smitty97 · · Score: 1

    No it isn't.

    --
    mod me funny
  44. Well... by maillemaker · · Score: 1

    Well, they were more amazing than you.

    --
    A work that expires before its copyright never enters the public domain and thus enjoys eternal copyright protection.
    1. Re:Well... by laddiebuck · · Score: 1

      Neither of us were amazing. They were just doing their job. Kennedy was perhaps amazing for launching the project, but beyond that everyone was just doing their job. I think people who start novel projects and do new things with them are amazing, but in Apollo, you could only apply that with any justice to Kennedy.

  45. They did an amazing job amazingly well. by maillemaker · · Score: 1

    To say, "they were just doing a job" puts walking on the moon on the same relative plane as digging a ditch.

    How does one become so jaded? Does it take a long time?

    --
    A work that expires before its copyright never enters the public domain and thus enjoys eternal copyright protection.
    1. Re:They did an amazing job amazingly well. by laddiebuck · · Score: 1

      It isn't much above it. They volunteered for danger, which is something, certainly. But just because decades of training were invested in the Apollo astronauts doesn't mean they did anything original that was remembered. I haven't much admiration for them.

      It isn't jadedness. I have the deepest admiration for people who did do original things. Some shook the world with what they did, like Winston Churchill, Lawrence of Arabia, The Beatles, Charles Dickens, George Patton, Dennis Ritchie and Ken Thompson, Alan Turing... Some didn't, but they did break out of the average and turn things for the better, and I admire them just as much. This last group (the "minor heroes", though I admire them just as much) has many names, less remembered by history: Douglas Bader, Ernest Shackleton and RV Jones are a few that come to mind immediately, though I'd have to think a bit to remember more people in this group.

      I also admire extraordinary spirit or courage in non-original duties, from people like Kathleen Ferrier to soldiers like Michael Torrens-Spence, whom I was reading about a few days ago.

      But anyway, I really can't see what claim to admiration or amazement or whatnot the Apollo or Columbia astronauts have. For being in the right place at the right time? Notice I did not mention some pretty famous people who were merely in the right place at the right time: Captain Cook comes to mind immediately, especially that one of the shuttles was named after his ship, as I recall.