Slashdot Mirror


Aussie Attorney General Says Gamers Are Scarier Than Biker Gangs

Sasayaki writes "South Australian Attorney-General Michael Atkinson claims, in an interview with Good Game, that gamers were more of a threat to his family than biker gangs. This is the man who has been the biggest opponent to Australia receiving an R18+ rating for video games and who has the power to veto any such law introducing it."

78 of 409 comments (clear)

  1. Well, i guess so... by gandhi_2 · · Score: 5, Funny

    if you are a bag of Doritos.

    1. Re:Well, i guess so... by interkin3tic · · Score: 5, Insightful

      To be fair, the context was that a gamer slipped a threatening note under his door. I think in general, zombies are scarier than my next door neighbor, but if my next door neighbor says he's going to burn down my house, and zombies remain fictional, temporarily my neighbor becomes scarier than zombies.

      It's not a statement that should have been made by a politician in public though, and since he's keeping censorship going, he deserves whatever he gets (quotes taken out of context AND the threats). Furthermore, for him to fairly make the comparison, he needs to try banning motorcycles and then telling us which is scarier. I don't know much about motorcycle gangs, but I think they probably wouldn't have slid a note under his door, I think they would have slid a note on the end of their boot up his ass.

    2. Re:Well, i guess so... by Bakkster · · Score: 4, Interesting

      To be fair to the guy, if he's worried about threats to his family, none of that matters.

      Of course, the fact that he uses ridiculous rhetoric (apparently he claimed bikers cooked a cat on a grill in his district; even though it wasn't a cat, wasn't in his district, and no bikers were involved) doesn't help matters. However, threatening the guy is the exact wrong way to go about fixing the Aussie rating system. Gamers making threats will just reinforce the stereotype that gamers are dangerous, giving him more reason to oppose adult classifications for games.

      So, to everyone in Australia, the guy who made that threat is fucking it up for the rest of you. Maybe you should beat him up, or something...

      --
      Write your representatives! Repeal the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics!
    3. Re:Well, i guess so... by ozbird · · Score: 5, Insightful

      To be fair, the context was that a gamer slipped a threatening note under his door.

      A gamer allegedly slipped a threatening note under his door.

    4. Re:Well, i guess so... by swedd · · Score: 2, Interesting

      for him to fairly make the comparison, he needs to try banning motorcycles and then telling us which is scarier
      To be fair, he did introduce "guilt by association" legislation to make bikie gangs illegal in South Australia. That is why he is making this particular comparison.

      --
      Deny everything, admit nothing, demand proof, and reject the proof.
    5. Re:Well, i guess so... by Shatteredstar · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think we need to see the actual 'note' for evidence. After all the drama surrounding the issue we have a very very high chance of this all being a stunt.

      Gamers as a whole are unlikely to approach someone's home and leave a PHYSICAL note. Most gamers have enough concept and paranoia of the real world law (just see what happens if one of their buddies mentions they got a 'cease and desist' type notice for pirating a game or movie) that they generally do not like doing things that might bring the real world authorities into play.

      Not to mention also a threatening note is easily a candidate for investigation/arrest material even simple fingerprinting is possible to apprehend a suspect for threats.

      If it was a gamer doing this we would be more likely to see something about a threatening email or website, NOT a physical letter under his door.
      Considering a large majority of /. are gamers, would you write a threatening letter to someone in a position of power and leave it at their door?

      The other fishy thing here is no vandalism, if someone was UPSET or bothered enough to actually travel to his home and leave a threatening letter then I don't see why vandalism was not an issue here. Someone young enough to do something as silly/stupid as leaving the note would certainly not be smart enough to avoid the temptation of vandalism at the same time.

      --
      I do what I must because of what I must do.
    6. Re:Well, i guess so... by jcr · · Score: 4, Insightful

      A gamer allegedly slipped a threatening note under his door.

      An alleged gamer allegedly slipped an allegedly threatening note under his door. Personally, I would need more than a politician's word on it.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    7. Re:Well, i guess so... by interkin3tic · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So, to everyone in Australia, the guy who made that threat is fucking it up for the rest of you.

      I'd argue that it's mostly the target that is fucking it up for everyone else. He was blocking it well before the claimed threat. Banning all adult games for sale to because one gamer threatened you is incredibly bad justification for an incredibly bad move.

    8. Re:Well, i guess so... by eltaco · · Score: 2, Informative

      funny vid. next time dont give away the punchline though, please.

      --
      It's not about fate, it's about character.
      there be no shelter here, the frontline is everywhere!
    9. Re:Well, i guess so... by mjwx · · Score: 2, Informative

      To be fair to the guy, if he's worried about threats to his family, none of that matters.

      Of course the matter isn't being investigated by the police. So I'm inclined to believe that this is another politician lying, which parliamentary privilege gives him the right to do (it also gives politicians the right to expose dangers and corruption without fear of retrobution, which is why it is unfortunately needed). No one in Australia is taking this guy seriously.

      This is just proof that Atkinson is scared of opposition like Gamers for Croydon.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    10. Re:Well, i guess so... by Demonoid-Penguin · · Score: 4, Informative
      No - to be fair you'd have to consider the guys history (and ask why he didn't report the alleged incident to police).

      And it's not just little lies about "bikers roasting cats".

      He has also brought in a law (since revoked) that required that people blogging about elections to publish their name and address, and to support that law claimed that a certain blogger was "not a real person" - an invention of the Liberal Party.

      Prejudiced the trial of people by claiming they were "pure evil - have no hope of rehabilitation".

      So he has a history of "discovering evidence" to support his extreme views

      He has a law degree - and spent a couple of years working for a newspaper (until he was "removed" for fabricating stories)

      So he should know about checking your facts, and, the existence of police.

      I believe the appropriate comment is "sucked in!".

    11. Re:Well, i guess so... by obeythefist · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Gamers as a whole are unlikely to approach someone's home and leave a PHYSICAL note. Most gamers have enough concept and paranoia of the real world law (just see what happens if one of their buddies mentions they got a 'cease and desist' type notice for pirating a game or movie) that they generally do not like doing things that might bring the real world authorities into play.

      Well, there are stupid gamers in this world, just like there are stupid attorneys-general.

      --
      I am government man, come from the government. The government has sent me. -- G.I.R.
  2. Hells Angels by e2d2 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I hear a challenge Hells Angels/Mongols/Pagans/Insert your club here. This guy just called you all a bunch of pussies!

    1. Re:Hells Angels by Deadplant · · Score: 4, Funny

      according to TFA their 'biker gags' are called 'bikies'.
      wtf?
      makes sense now... who would be afraid of a widdle bikie-wikee gang?

    2. Re:Hells Angels by rarel · · Score: 4, Funny
      Hell's Angles would be pretty tough for a nerd.

      "TANGENT ATTACK! CHEW ON MY SATANIC PI! ONE THOUSAND DEGREEEEES HYPOTENUSE!"
      "NOOO This value is... not... real.. not... possible!Gngngngnn.Must... Resist..." *faints*

      Hell's Angles declared winners.

    3. Re:Hells Angels by natehoy · · Score: 4, Funny

      No, that's SATA N DEATH 666. It's a SerialATA specifications group who is concerned that SATA will reach 666 MB/s, and that this would indicate the coming of the Apocalypse by bringing one of the Four Horsemen, Death.

      --
      "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
    4. Re:Hells Angels by Ninth+Marion · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'd be less scared of a biker as Attorney General than a puritan nutjob like Atkinson.

      That originally popped into my head as a joke, but I think it's actually true! See also his recent law banning anonymous speech.

    5. Re:Hells Angels by Gandalf_Greyhame · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, Aussie slang is pretty easy to get the hang of, merely cut the word in half and add "ie" at the end of it. That probably amounts to 95% of Aussie slang

      In the case that a citation is required, is it enough to say that I am Australian

      --
      I am not stubborn. I am right!
    6. Re:Hells Angels by The+Archon+V2.0 · · Score: 2, Funny

      This is the same idiot?? All is explained!

      Yep. If you see any news item these days that can be summed up as "retarded Australian legislation and/or ban", just assume it has the Michael Atkinson seal of approval.

      I like some previous post's suggestion that he try to ban or "rate" motorcycles according to how gang-like they are, and see how far that gets him, with the Hell's Angels or anyone else.

      Will his rating scheme be 1-4 grilled cats?

    7. Re:Hells Angels by Hognoxious · · Score: 2, Informative

      For the other 5% you cut the word in half and add "o": lebbo, abbo...

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    8. Re:Hells Angels by svunt · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yep, that's how we do it...ie. Not only is a bottle of beer a 'stubby' but a can is a 'tinnie' - which is also a small metal boat, like a dinghy. The nastier half of us even call Indians 'curries'.

    9. Re:Hells Angels by atomicstrawberry · · Score: 2, Funny

      Australian slang is all about making everything have two syllables. 'Bike' has one syllable, so we add '-ie' to make it two. Lebanese has three syllables, so we take the first syllable and add '-o' to make Lebbo.

      It gets a lot more surreal when we apply this kind of abbreviation slang to things that are already slang. The best example being 'seppo', which is abbreviated from 'septic tank' which is cockney rhyming slang for 'yank'.

  3. Bwahahaha! by MightyMartian · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Where does Australia find these whack jobs? I mean, either the guy is a paranoid schizophrenic or a mental retard.

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    1. Re:Bwahahaha! by guruevi · · Score: 4, Funny

      He's a politician. What do you expect - he's probably both?

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    2. Re:Bwahahaha! by Red+Flayer · · Score: 4, Informative

      I don't disagree that he's a whackjob. But if people bothered to RTFA (wishful thinking on my part)...

      Atkinson's got very vocal opposition among biker gangs and gamers.

      The reason he feels gamers are more of a threat to his family is because a gamer left a threatening note under his door one night. No biker has done that.

      Put yourself in the same situation. What would you consider a more present threat to your safety -- a set of organizations who is opposing you politically (the biker gangs are putting forward their own candidate to run against him), or a set of individuals, one of which has made a threat, in writing, at your home?

      Context is everything. The submitter, the editor, and all of the early posters like yourself should do yourselves a favor and (1) read the fucking quote before misattributing words to someone and (2) understand the context in which those words were said.

      I'm addicted to slashdot, obviously so if you see my post history. But I'm sick of it becoming the geek tab of fark.

      --
      "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
    3. Re:Bwahahaha! by MightyMartian · · Score: 5, Insightful

      As a politician and (assuming Rudd isn't running everything) a setter of policy, it's his job to look beyond personal anecdotes. If he's making policy based solely on the fact that some nutjob left a note on his door, and he can't get past that, then he has no business being in a position where he does form policy. I'm sorry someone made some sort of a threat, but if he's suffered that significant an emotional scarring from it, perhaps he should recuse himself.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    4. Re:Bwahahaha! by rale,+the · · Score: 5, Informative

      The article also mentions that in his scuffle with the bikers, he claimed they had BBQ'd and eaten a cat. Then was forced to admit he made it up. Why would you give him any credibility with regards to this supposed threat he received, when he has lied about his opposition in the past?

    5. Re:Bwahahaha! by elrous0 · · Score: 3, Informative

      At least in the U.S. we disbarred Jack Thompson. In Australia, they made him Attorney General!

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    6. Re:Bwahahaha! by MightyMartian · · Score: 4, Informative

      Australia must be a land of lolly pops and fluffy clouds, because I'd wager the Attorney General of any other reasonably large country on this planet probably receives a bag full of hate mail ever year. I can only imagine the kind of stuff the US Attorney General gets.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    7. Re:Bwahahaha! by godless+dave · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Because he's a public office holder. To the modern press, any elected official is automatically credible, even if he or she has been caught lying in the past. This is known as "balanced journalism". And no, it doesn't make any sense.

      --
      "If it's real, then it gets more interesting the closer you examine it. If it's not real, just the opposite is true." -
    8. Re:Bwahahaha! by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 2, Informative

      In Australia, they are called "prawns" and not "shrimps", and I have never heard and actual Aussie ever say "barbie". So for the record, "shrimps on the barbie" is something you would never actually hear in Australia. (At least from a real Australian.) They also think Fosters beer is piss, and Crocodile Dundee is crap.

      And saying something damaging about someone you have a political axe to grind, without any proof, is pretty much the definition of "slander". Thankfully he reduced it back down to "hearsay and bullshit rumors".

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    9. Re:Bwahahaha! by NFN_NLN · · Score: 4, Funny

      FWIW, the bikers did indeed barbecue and eat a cat.

      Which is in direct contradiction with the article that says:

      He was later forced to apologise. The animal was not a cat, the incident happened at another location and bikies weren't involved.

      So...what am I supposed to make of this?

      It was not a cat, it was a pig. Those weren't bikers, they were Hawaiians. It wasn't a biker gang rally, it was actually a Luau. He wasn't even in Australia at the time, he was on vacation in Hawaii. OK, it all makes sense now.

    10. Re:Bwahahaha! by tdelaney · · Score: 4, Informative

      Actually, I'm an Aussie who says "barbie", as does everyone I know. "Shrimp" OTOH is never used (and if I ever hear the term, I think of really tiny little prawns).

    11. Re:Bwahahaha! by Shagg · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I mean, either the guy is a paranoid schizophrenic or a mental retard.

      Why not both?

      --
      Unix is user friendly, it's just selective about who its friends are.
    12. Re:Bwahahaha! by ashridah · · Score: 3, Informative

      s/country/state/g. This is a state-level Attorney General, not for the entire country. (US has state-level AGs as well, fyi)

      Second, there's a difference between getting nastygrams sent to your office, where they can be filtered by functionaries, and a nastygram sent to your home.

      That said, this guy's holding an irrational position if he wants to avoid violence getting in the hands of teenagers, imho. Better off allowing R18+, and then pushing for more games to be rated R18+, so that fewer of them are given to children by parents. Of course, he prefers the 'head-in-sand' approach.

    13. Re:Bwahahaha! by ashridah · · Score: 2, Insightful

      plus fucking 1 on that score. How the hell did we end up with a religious nutjob for a prime minister?

    14. Re:Bwahahaha! by bloodhawk · · Score: 2, Informative

      I would probably stake all my money on the fact that "MOST" aussies use the word barbie. I know I have only ever lived in Canberra, Sydney and Melbourne and few country towns, but considering it is common practise in all those cities and towns and that is a large proportion of the countries population I feel my money would be pretty safe. I would also like to bet your not an aussie and have probably never been there if you think we don't use that term.

    15. Re:Bwahahaha! by TapeCutter · · Score: 2, Informative

      Another Aussie here, Victorian but at 50 I have seen most of the country several times over. Everyone I know calls it a barbie, including the polititians on TV who try to set the adgenda for "talking around the barbie".

      Shrimp = short person, or the tiny prawns in a "shrimp cocktail".

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
  4. I'm pretty sure... by SharpFang · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...it would be opposite if he was proposing a ban on motorcycles.

    --
    45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    1. Re:I'm pretty sure... by megamerican · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The article states that he indeed, did:

      Mr Atkinson was involved in introducing tough new laws to outlaw bikie gangs in South Australia several years ago.

      At the time he said politicians and public officials had to put themselves "on the line" to take the gangs on.

      How brave of him. Now he has to bravely face some teenager leaving a note at his door that most assuredly called him a "nigger faggot."

      --
      If you have something that you dont want anyone to know, maybe you shouldnt be doing it in the first place -Eric Schmidt
  5. Even scarier - both by davidwr · · Score: 5, Funny

    Biker gangs playing video games while driving - that's double scary.

    But what about Biker gangs playing video games about biker games playing video games while driving, while driving???

    Or what about ERR_STACK_OVERFLOW

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  6. Anecdotal Evidence Disagrees. by Oxford_Comma_Lover · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Gamers sometimes learn bad fictional behavior. (Consider the evil character paths in various D&D games.) Gamers frequently learn good fictional behavior. (Consider the hero character paths in many D&D games.)

    In contrast, a chapter of Hell's Angels in Hamburg ran multiple houses for the rape of teenage girls and women held as slaves. (Sources: Victor Malarek's The Natashas, Terry Lee Wright's River of Innocents.) They were responsible for enabling thousands of rapes in the real world.

    Yes, it's atypical for a biker gang. But all things considered, it's more rare for the gamer.

    --
    -- IANAL, this isn't legal advice, and definitely isn't legal advice for you. Also, Squee!
    1. Re:Anecdotal Evidence Disagrees. by hypergreatthing · · Score: 2, Insightful

      well.... a corpse can't give consent.

    2. Re:Anecdotal Evidence Disagrees. by ae1294 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Which is why we need another new law covering this....

  7. I hear that AG! by AioKits · · Score: 3, Funny

    I can't count the amount of times I've felt threatened on the highways here as a beat up, patchy painted Honda Civic pulls up with a triforce or horde sticker in one of the windows. If it's one car, you can usually outrun it as they're not really going to be paying attention, usually debating the merits of pixel shading with others in the car at this point. However, if it's more than one car, you can bet they have you in their sights. Especially after playing that brutal and vicious car game I saw in the arcades once.. Spy Hunter I think it was?

    Or if I actually make it to a gas station and am fueling up, one of em might come over, push his glasses up or adjust the tape holding them together, asking what if I'm gonna reserve the new StarCraft! The horror!

    I always feel much safer knowing that the guy next to me on that bike on the highway has a full body tattoo and a mustache, and so does his girlfriend on the bitch seat! I mean, at least they're not gamers, right?

    * PS - This is intended as a lame attempt at humor, don't hurt me, I play games too! >.>

    --
    "Quote me as saying I was mis-quoted." -Groucho Marx
    1. Re:I hear that AG! by Stregano · · Score: 3, Funny

      So you are going to reserve Starcraft 2, right? RIGHT?!?

      --
      The world is how you make it
  8. Soo.. by binarylarry · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What he's saying is, every person under 30 who lives in Australia is scarier than Biker Gangs?

    Does he ever leave the house?

    --
    Mod me down, my New Earth Global Warmingist friends!
  9. Veto? by afidel · · Score: 5, Informative

    Wow, the AG has the power of the veto in .AU? That's a pretty strange arrangement where the guy charged with enforcing the law gets to decide if something should be a law.

    --
    There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    1. Re:Veto? by Beezlebub33 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If there is a law, and the AG doesn't enforce it, it might as well not be a law. That's an (implicit) form of veto. Of course, the summary is hyperbole, but the key point (that the guy's a loon and in a position to affect how the law is applied) is correct.

      --
      The more people I meet, the better I like my dog.
    2. Re:Veto? by Falconhell · · Score: 3, Informative

      This is a STATE AG, and for the relevant changes the approval of all the states AG is required.

      Atkinson is the holdout.

      He is the darling of the Right faction of the Labor
      party, which confusingly used to be left wing before they sold out.

      Please note in au liberals are the conservative party!

  10. Of course! by geoffaus · · Score: 3, Funny

    Of course they are scarier - they get multiple lives!

    --
    As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a reference to Godwin's Law approaches 1
  11. Re:The guy's right by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Jesus, who are you, his wife? Hur dur, a random crazy threatened him, but no bikers have... why might that be? Let's see him support legislation outlawing biker gangs, see how many threats he gets.

    --
    I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
  12. ok... by kaoshin · · Score: 2, Funny

    "He was later forced to apologise. The animal was not a cat, the incident happened at another location and bikies weren't involved."

    This bloke is a dill mates.

    1. Re:ok... by Mathonwy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "He was later forced to apologise. The animal was not a cat, the incident happened at another location and bikies weren't involved."

      Wait, what?!

      "Oops, my bad, it was a cow, not a cat. And it wasn't at my house, it was at the local Burger King. And I guess it was just a family of 4, not bikers. But it looked so delicious that I was understandably confused!"

  13. What a tit by Attaturk · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm not sure whether my biker self or my gamer self is more offended by this arsehat. I've met and hung out with dozens of "biker gangs" at various rallies - yes including the patch clubs that people refer to here like they're comprised of mindless hooligans - and felt safer in their company than when taking a trip through a town centre on a Friday or Saturday night.

    In short, "biker gang" is not shorthand for dangerous thug. Nor is "gamer" shorthand for brainwashed serial killer. And while we're at it I'm pretty sure that "Australian politician" doesn't mean paranoid, misinformed and dangerously ignorant jerk"... but I could be wrong.

    Just a thought Mr Atkinson but perhaps your ill-considered bigotry is what causes people to take such a dim view of you. A single gamer harrassing you is more likely indicative that you've pissed someone off personally than that all gamers are out to get you and your family. Gah.

    1. Re:What a tit by mooingyak · · Score: 2, Informative

      And while we're at it I'm pretty sure that "Australian politician" doesn't mean paranoid, misinformed and dangerously ignorant jerk"... but I could be wrong.

      It does actually, though it means it if you drop 'Australian' from there too.

      --
      William of Ockham had no beard. The most likely explanation is that it was chewed off by squirrels every morning.
  14. This guy is going to piss him... by MindlessAutomata · · Score: 2, Funny

    This guy is going to piss himself if he meets a gamer that's in a biker gang.

  15. Re:The guy's right by Qzukk · · Score: 5, Insightful

    this guy thinks that gamers are generally more dangerous than bikers in order to discredit him.

    Quote:

    "I feel that my family and I are more at risk from gamers than we are from the outlaw motorcycle gangs who also hate me and are running a candidate against me"

    He didn't say "from a gamer" he said "from gamers", as in the whole group. As opposed to the outlaw motorcycle gangs, as in their whole group. He feels that gamers are more dangerous than bikers. If he's never received a death threat from anyone but a gamer, then perhaps he's justified in feeling that way, but I'm seriously surprised that this is the first death threat an AG would get.

    I do have to say that the motorcycle gangs have a better long term plan than the gamers do at this point. Someone should start a gamer party and run for election on the grounds that you actually know something about what you're trying to regulate.

    --
    If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
  16. Shh, don't tell him... by Mysticalfruit · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That a bunch of gamers got together and raised 1.7M dollars for charity last year to give to sick kids in the hospital, including two hospitals in Australia on the east coast...

    --
    Yes Francis, the world has gone crazy.
    1. Re:Shh, don't tell him... by Macrat · · Score: 2, Funny

      That a bunch of gamers got together and raised 1.7M dollars for charity...

      By smuggling drugs or weapons?

  17. Re:The guy's right by Red+Flayer · · Score: 2, Insightful
    He feels that gamers are more dangerous than bikers.

    No. That generalization of his quote is incorrect. You are correct in gernealizing from "a gamer" to "gamers" -- but you are incorrect in generalizing from his family being at risk to other families, or individuals, or all of society being at risk.

    Considering that he claims a credible threat was made against him by gamers, and none by bikers, you can see his rationale for believe that *his specific family* is more threatened by gamers.

    That does not mean that you can generalize his beliefs to include *gamers in general* are more dangerous than *bikers in general* regardless of the subject of the risk assessment.

    --
    "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
  18. Aussie Jack Thompson? by TiggertheMad · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Interesting to note, that he basses his views of the groups as a whole on the behavior of individuals.

    Were he to say, "I am more worried about black people* than Mexicans because a black person slipped a note under my door." he would get eaten alive by the public outcry. Apparently, it's ok to generalize based on traits that are chosen rather than inherited...

    --

    HA! I just wasted some of your bandwidth with a frivolous sig!
    1. Re:Aussie Jack Thompson? by Whalou · · Score: 2, Funny

      Kangaroo Jack Thompson.

      --
      English is not this .sig mother tongue...
  19. Its the truth!! by Xanator · · Score: 2, Funny

    If you ever wiped a raid in World of Warcraft, you'll believe this guy, those guys can get really scary, specially when they found out you did it on purpose just to see what the "fear button" did :P


    Believe me there is nothing more scary than 24 angry players with huge repair bills, and no epic loot.....

  20. b0ng clan for life by dadelbunts · · Score: 2, Funny

    I remember when me and my clan defeated the Hells Angels. They didnt even know how to plant the bomb properly. LOL NOOBS. One of them was using an aimbot and still lost! After going 30-4 (they got lucky a couple of times) we kicked them out. They packed up their alienware laptops and rode into the sunset broken and defeated.

  21. Re:is he right? by Lumpy · · Score: 2, Informative

    Most 1% er's people see are actually posers. I've been an official photographer for most of the BIG motorcycle events in the eastern half of the USA and real bikers that are real 1%er's are far and few between.. Most of the time you have a 1%er poser. someone that wants to look like a badass but in reality is a big pussy that wants attention. Problem is at Sturgis these posers get their asses kicked by the real 1%ers because they try and pull their bullshit in front of them.

    a Real 1%er when you find one will let you know. I've met a few of them, and I steer clear after I buy them a drink and they let me know of who to steer clear of.

    So that loser riding his shiny new 2010 harley all leathered up with harley jeans, harley shirt and skull print face mask... He is, in fact, a poser. 1%er's don't have new bikes and dress in all that branded crap at the hardly store.

    A real 1%er has a jacket that has road rash on it and looks like he at one time was ran over by a truck, because they typically lead incredibly hard lives. I have almost lost a camera to a 1%er. I gladly handed it over, saying "I'm sorry, here you go".. surprisingly he stopped, asked how to remove the card and threw me the camera back grunting, "NO PICTURES".

    You don't screw with a 1%er. In fact I don't even raise my camera in their general direction. After the 6 years of shooting at Sturgis and other big events I can spot them easily.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  22. Yu-Gi-Oh! Gang by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 2, Funny

    You don't wanna mess with the Yu-Gi-Oh! Card-Gaming Gang.

    --
    Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  23. Re:Article says he helped ban biker gangs by element-o.p. · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This begs the question, and I'm sincerely curious about the answer. In practical terms and under Australian law, what is the difference between a group of friends riding motorcycles together and a biker gang? He couldn't seriously have outlawed group rides, could he? Or is it only a gang if everyone (majority, perhaps?) are wearing black leather and riding Harleys?

    --
    MCSE? No, sir...I don't do Windows. Yes, I am an idealist. What's your point?
  24. Re:The guy's right by russotto · · Score: 3, Funny

    No. That generalization of his quote is incorrect.

    It's not a generalization. He said "I feel that my family and I are more at risk from gamers than we are from the outlaw motorcycle gangs who also hate me and are running a candidate against me".

    Of course, this "note" could easily be bogus, like the cat incident. Perhaps it will turn out that the note wasn't slipped under his door, it was placed on his refrigerator. It wasn't written by a gamer, it was by his daughter. And it wasn't a death threat, but a grocery list.

  25. Hey, we got some of them in Amsterdam by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 3, Funny

    Me and some gamer mates are going to beat up the Amsterdam chapter of the Hell's Angels. I mean, we are thougher then them right? What could possibly go wrong? They are wusses and I will make sure to tell them loudly and clearly, what are they going to do? None of them has scored as many kills in Counterstrike as I have.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  26. Re:I'd have to agree with him... by edraven · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yeah, it's always good to have a few fat slobs to cover your escape while you run out the back door.

  27. Oh, great; there's MORE of these wackos? by Millennium · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So basically, this guy is to Australia what Jack Thompson would be to the US if he ever got into a position of power. Guys like him would probably faint at the words I typically use to talk and think about them, not because of any actual obscenities, but because phrases like "enemies of freedom" would remind him too much of the way them thar turrists talk about the West.

    That said, I can't help but wonder if maybe JonKatz was onto something. Not even 15 years ago, gamers and geeks of all kinds tended to be seen as mostly harmless: bumbling and socially-inept, but generally well-meaning (albeit odd). We were condescended to, and even bullied from time to time, but we were more or less given the benefit of the doubt.

    That's changed, and it hasn't been for the better. The condescension and bullying haven't really gone anywhere, but now there's a palpable sense of fear mixed into it. We're seen as ticking time bombs, holding on by a thread that a pin drop in the wrong direction could snap. Some see us as pre-murderers, others as pre-rapists, yet others as pre-saboteurs, but the common thread is clear: we are sleeping monsters to be tiptoed around.

    The stereotype is of course false, or at least it's no more true than it's ever been for any group of people. But like the old stereotype, the new one wasn't born in a vacuum. Gaming and geekdom have always had a few Creepy People doing Creepy Things, but it's only recently that they've risen to the forefront. That's our image problem, and it would do us as a group a lot of good to think about why it happened and how to reverse it, before people like Thompson and Atkinson manage to do it for us.

    1. Re:Oh, great; there's MORE of these wackos? by darkmalice · · Score: 2, Interesting

      he's Jack Thompson on crack, its not only games he trying to control he also recently attempted to make anyone writing online about his political party to submit there name and postcode (zip code), thankfully this never came to fruition but it is extremely disturbing how much power this guy seems to have.

  28. Political Disenfranchisement by soporific16 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    When one guy can hold an entire country of gamers to ransom, it's not hard to understand the frustrated reactions of those who are effectively politically disenfranchised. Australians have very low levels of political consciousnesses compared to the rest of the world's population and part of this is reflected by the way the system was setup over here. It's not as if the convicts ever had much say in what went on and this top-down and top-heavy system of governance has developed as such, such that we have a nanny-state style of organising society. The wowsers are in control and don't you forget it! Sit down, shut up, or you won't EVER get your R18+ gaming classifications. I think it's fair to say it's never gonna come without a little pressure, but immature notes under the door probably isn't the sort of pressure that will work. Having said that, the dickhead deserves nasty things said to him. Very nasty things. I would say R rated things, but he's probably never heard any :(

  29. Re:The guy's right by Lunzo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think it's all a load of bullshit.

    1. The contents of the note haven't been made public, so we don't know how threatening it really was. My guess on the contents: "I want my left 4 dead 2 you fucking fucker"
    2. There is no indication that the police have been involved. If Atkinson was actually scared of the supposed death threats you'd think he would have called the cops.
    3. It is currently legal to leave a note under someone's door, even at 2am.
    4. He is more at risk from bikie gangs than gamers. SA has some nasty anti-bikie laws that he introduced recently. These laws are a horrible attack on freedom of association, and in theory could be used to rule other groups illegal in the future.

  30. Solution - Vote for the opposition on March 20. by harlequinn · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Michael Atkinson is a Labor Attorney-General.

    The incumbent South Australian Government is Labor.

    Vote for the opposition (Liberal, Independant, etc.) in the impending South Australian State Election on the 20th of March 2010 and the new government will invariably give us a new AG.

    If you are in the Croydon electorate - which is where Michael Atkinson's seat it - then you should rally all your friends and vote for the opposition - then he won't even have a seat, let alone be AG.

    Democracy at work people.

  31. Threatening?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Here is a copy of the note itself
    http://imgur.com/CeACw.png

    How does this constitute a threatening letter?
    "Dear Mick, I Can Has R18 Rating Pls? kthxbai"

    Screen shot Taken from http://www.abc.net.au/news/video/2010/02/16/2820930.htm (not by me)

    Talk about the media taking it and running with it and blowing out of proportion

  32. Everything is NOT bigger in Texas by TapeCutter · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "Throw a shrimp on the barbie" was a joke, it's saying "everything is NOT bigger in Texas", eg: Anna Creek cattle station is more than 10X the size of the largest US ranch. Americans failed to get the joke and thought the phrase was part of our lingo.

    BTW, Most Aussies including me enjoyed the first Crocodile Dundee but Hoag's lost his popularity with Aussies when he dumped his wife of 20yrs and ran off with the woman from the movie.

    --
    And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.