Slashdot Mirror


Google Reported Ready To Leave China April 10

A number of readers including tsj5j and bruleriestdenis wrote to alert us to this CNET story: "Google is expected to announce on Monday that it will withdraw from China on April 10, according to a report in a Beijing-based newspaper that cited an unidentified sales associate who works with the company. 'I have received information saying that Google will leave China on April 10, but this information has not at present been confirmed by Google,' the China Business News quoted the agent as saying. The report also said Google would reveal its plans for its China-based staff that day."

176 comments

  1. hmm... by Pojut · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ..it will be interesting to see what kind of repercussions google's employees living in China might have to face. This may sound weird, but I'm a bit worried for their workers over there...

    1. Re:hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, they're not so bad. I mean, c'mon! China's so damn generous with their transplantable organs, how bad could they possibly be?

    2. Re:hmm... by Ryvar · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm a bit worried about workers in China regardless of who they work for.

      --Ryvar

    3. Re:hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An actual legitimate use for H1-B Visa.

      Or they could open Google Taiwan. After all, they do speak the language.

    4. Re:hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Who wants to raise funds to send this guy there?

    5. Re:hmm... by tepples · · Score: 1

      Or they could open Google Taiwan. After all, they do speak the language.

      Dialects of spoken Chinese can be different from one another as Spanish is from French. Just because you can speak Mandarin doesn't mean you can speak Taiwanese.

    6. Re:hmm... by Sagelinka · · Score: 1, Troll

      With good right your worried. I am too. They are people too. Loosing a good job working for Google will have serious financial issues for the people in China.

    7. Re:hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Speaking as someone with ties to the Chinese government, I can confirm that they will be murdered.

    8. Re:hmm... by cyfer2000 · · Score: 3, Informative

      I heard their key employees have already been hired by Baidu, MS and Alibaba several weeks ago. Google.cn had to hire new people two weeks ago to keep the company running. And top three managers of google.cn decided to start their own search business.

      --
      There is a spark in every single flame bait point.
    9. Re:hmm... by Runaway1956 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      This makes me happy. Not that it's Google, specifically, but I'm happy to see any company pull out of China. Wake up, world. Globalization is not the way forward.
      Wait until Google is actually gone. See what happens to anything and everything that is either left behind, or has already been pilfered, copied, cracked, or whatever. China respects no "intellectual" property, whatsoever. All the property of Google in China is actually the property of China - intellectual, or otherwise.

      Expect Choogle to come online by the end of April, in direct competition with Google.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    10. Re:hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      The vast majority of people in Taiwan can speak Mandarin.

    11. Re:hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As an AC, I can confirm that the parent is me and that I don't know what I'm talking about.

    12. Re:hmm... by cyfer2000 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Official language at Taiwan is mandarin, and the language called Taiwanese is the same dialect used in south of Fujian province. So the most part of spoken language is ok. The writing system is the problem. Taiwan use traditional character set, and mainland China use simplified character set.

      --
      There is a spark in every single flame bait point.
    13. Re:hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      GP is justified in his concern. Over a tiff over Australian-Chinese ore trade, China arrested four employees from the Australian firm Rio. Australian officials are banned from the proceedings.

      See:
      http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE62I18V20100319

    14. Re:hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As an AC, I concur.

    15. Re:hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As the real AC, who really does have ties to the Chinese government, I am going to have you both murdered.

    16. Re:hmm... by LtGordon · · Score: 1

      Or they could open Google Taiwan. After all, they do speak the language.

      I think they were interested in China more for the marketplace than not wanting to learn Spanish instead.

    17. Re:hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      And as a real AC, I make air cooler.

    18. Re:hmm... by Yvan256 · · Score: 4, Funny

      If all of this was happening in Japan, the upcoming search engine would be called Moogle.

    19. Re:hmm... by homer_s · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Globalization is not the way forward.

      Are you also against inter-state trade? Why not? If trade between 2 ppl in different countries is bad (that is what globalization is), why is trade between 2 ppl in 2 different state here is ok?

      Wealth is created by division of labour aka trade - it doesn't matter if the 2 people trading are standing on either side of an imaginary line or not.

    20. Re:hmm... by chaodyn · · Score: 1

      And I'm so worried about the baggage retrieval system they've got at Heathrow.

    21. Re:hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I speak some Taiwanese and as the Wikipedia article you cited says, it's not mutually intelligible with the Southern Min spoken in Fujian and Hainan provinces. That said, most people speak Mandarin and Taiwanese Standard Mandarin is close to Beijing Standard Mandarin.

      The writing system is not a significant problem because most characters are either completely or nearly identical, and most of the simplified characters are used in Taiwan as handwritten shortcuts. That's all simplified characters are. The PRC chose to standardize printed characters to mostly match handwritten characters.

    22. Re:hmm... by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      Why? Did your SO put you in a crate or something?

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    23. Re:hmm... by CherniyVolk · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Are you also against inter-state trade? Why not? If trade between 2 ppl in different countries is bad (that is what globalization is), why is trade between 2 ppl in 2 different state here is ok?

      Did you not notice you used the word "trade"? Did you not actually "trade" with your friends as a child? Google opening shop in China is in no way "trade", not even similar concept no matter how you look at it.

      How weird it must be, instead of saying "Hey John, I'll trade you my apple for your fruit cup." with "Hey John, let me live with you in your room, under governance of your mom and dad so I can get a fruit cup too. Alice, Bob, Jack and I will form a committee to arbitrate a 'agreement' between us, so you have to let me live in your house with you. Oh, and btw, I don't agree with your posters on the wall, you have to change them from Porsche's to Lamborghini's and that super model chick you have has mutilated her body which is against my principles so we'll have to bring legal action against you and question your compliance to the way I think things should be."

    24. Re:hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +1 Final fantasy Reference

    25. Re:hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An American corporation showing concern for its employees? That's downright Un-American. The only concern for a publicly listed coporation is the bottom line.

    26. Re:hmm... by Bearhouse · · Score: 2, Informative

      Expect Choogle to come online by the end of April, in direct competition with Google.

      Well, it already exists; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baidu

      The only problem is, a lot of people in China find Google better for some purposes, (including party members, according to a report I heard).

      You'd better believe that if the Chinese Gov did not want Google to stay, they would have already thrown them out...

    27. Re:hmm... by Runaway1956 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      As already pointed out by sibling post - doing business in China is not "trade".

      Addressing globalization - that's not really "trade" either. Corporate America is sacking the United States, and Corporate Europe is raping Europe, moving manufacturing and other business to third world countries, where they can make goods more cheaply.

      Americans are getting nothing in "trade". Especially in the case of China, which regularly uncovers a new scandal involving deadly products being sold around the world.

      Let's sit and talk about this "globalization" thing. Here, I'll pour some coffee. Care for some melanin in your coffee? Or, I have powdered melanin, if you prefer. Fresh off the boat from China!

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    28. Re:hmm... by commodore64_love · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Mao Tse Tung's personally selected leaders will shoot these "intellectuals" in the head. Problem solved.

      And then Obama's Communications Director will give a speech about how Mao is her "favorite philosopher"

      No, no, I'm just joking.
      :-|

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    29. Re:hmm... by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I've been to Baidu a few times.

      Can you IMAGINE the arrogance of those people? That Chinese site is in Chinese!! Wait - wut did I just say?

      Alright, seriously - if I can switch languages, I don't know how, so it's useless to me. Is there a character on their page that says, "Click here for English, you foreign devil dog" ????

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    30. Re:hmm... by commodore64_love · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      >>>Baidu, MS and Alibaba

      Who?

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    31. Re:hmm... by blackraven14250 · · Score: 1

      Seems like he's getting the China treatment, then.

    32. Re:hmm... by blackraven14250 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What's funny is that in another post, they mention numbers of higher-ups from Google China already leaving, either to Baidu or to start their own search engines. You're shocked, right?

    33. Re:hmm... by mpfife · · Score: 1
      Alas - your assumption that the world will come crashing down in China is very ill-founded. Not much will happen to the search market because more than 50% of that market is already controlled by baidu. Google is a distant second. And espionage/pilfering/cracking/copying is not limited by borders. If they get behind - they'll simply launch remote raiding just as successful as local ones - it's the internet after all.

      Google's caught in a catch-22. If they stay - they might be able to influence the market towards more freedom and become a dominant enough player to turn the culture - but at the cost of their own security/image. If they leave - they give free reign to the Chinese government to do whatever it want, they'll lose out on the biggest new market in the world, and could potentially be the ones on the defense when baidu makes a killing as a monopoly in the chinese market.

      This is likely not over; I predict it'll awaken again in 5 years when Baidu or other engine is as big as Google and starts moving into OUR market.

    34. Re:hmm... by trapnest · · Score: 1

      What the crap is a "ppl"? Why is your post decently written except that?

    35. Re:hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      none of this "shareholder value" bullshit, either. if the board members are doing well screw everyone else.

    36. Re:hmm... by Random+BedHead+Ed · · Score: 1

      What exactly are u alluding 2?

    37. Re:hmm... by I'm+not+really+here · · Score: 2, Informative

      Baidu = China's #1 search site
      MS = Microsoft (I'm assuming that's who the GP was referring to)
      Alibaba = Wholesale manufacturer search site

      --
      Before commenting on the Bible, please read it first
    38. Re:hmm... by I'm+not+really+here · · Score: 1

      It's not meant for you. It's only a competitor to Google in the Chinese speaking/reading part of the world. Sorry, no Baidu for you.

      --
      Before commenting on the Bible, please read it first
    39. Re:hmm... by Vendetta · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Unfortunately, the Chinese government already has free reign to do what they want, which is exactly why Google is leaving. I don't see it as a catch-22. China isn't going to let Google offer the services in the way that they (Google) want them to be provided. China has already made it clear that Google needs to comply with China's laws, so Google isn't going to be able to offer unfiltered search results and such. So what's the point of them staying if they are forever forced by the government to play by China's rules, and by staying they make themselves look worse in the eyes of the Western world?

    40. Re:hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seems to me, Google's offering would be services... and they have a bunch.

    41. Re:hmm... by aussie_a · · Score: 1

      China respects no "intellectual" property, whatsoever.

      Sounds like the average slashdotter to me. After all, pirating is perfectly A-OK.

    42. Re:hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, no, I'm just joking.

      No, you're just trolling again.

    43. Re:hmm... by should_be_linear · · Score: 1

      Simplified? In China? Bloody hell, show me complicated one then.

      --
      839*929
    44. Re:hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a _REAL_(TM) AC, I go back and forth 100 or 120 times a second, depending on your locale.

    45. Re:hmm... by martin-boundary · · Score: 1

      Where's your classical education?

    46. Re:hmm... by schon · · Score: 1

      Why? Did your SO put you in a crate or something?
      --
      Now go away, or I shall taunt you a second time ...

      As you are someone who has a Monty Python quote in their sig, all I can say is EPIC FAIL.

    47. Re:hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From your sig:

      Before commenting on the Bible, please read it first [biblegateway.com]

      No, thanks. I prefer non-fiction.

    48. Re:hmm... by raju1kabir · · Score: 1

      Dialects of spoken Chinese can be different from one another as Spanish is from French. Just because you can speak Mandarin doesn't mean you can speak Taiwanese.

      Most of the search engines I've seen work with written rather than spoken language.

      A more salient point may have been that PRC uses the Simplified Chinese writing system while ROC uses Traditional.

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
    49. Re:hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for tagging your post outside of the signature Ryvar, also your homepage is mad cool in the 'i-discovered-ASCII-art-in-1998' sense. Tool.

    50. Re:hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who?

      Google's search engine is still available in most of the rest of the world. :-)

    51. Re:hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a nice and primitive "analogy" that isn't. If google.com is blocked in China, then China is blocking "trade."

      China, like many other countries, has memberships and agreements with numerous international trade organizations to allow fair business practices, whether from entities abroad or within its borders. Those same agreements allow Chinese companies to operate and sell their products in other countries similar to how Google and others operate in China.

      However, to nobody's surprise, people want to get more and give up less. In other words, nothing new.

    52. Re:hmm... by amRadioHed · · Score: 1

      The difference between simplified and traditional are not very significant. It's trivial to convert between the two, and if you're proficient in one, learning the other is not very difficult. Even without learning the other characters you can typically read it without much trouble.

      --
      We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
    53. Re:hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's Mao Zedong, not "Tse Tung". Get it right, whiteboy.

    54. Re:hmm... by Ihmhi · · Score: 1

      Now that makes me hope that Google will add a Moogle language version, just like they did with Bork.

      Kupo kupo kupo!

    55. Re:hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, snap! AC, you so funny!

    56. Re:hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I heard their key employees already worked for the government of China.

    57. Re:hmm... by AniVisual · · Score: 1

      Taiwanese on Wikipedia uses a romanised script. That is how much their language is different from Mandarin. Not to say that Taiwanese is like a language that has no distinctions of its own. In fact, Taiwanese resembles Middle Chinese, the prestigious language of antiquity, in a manner that Mandarin can only dream about. As Mandarin evolved, it took characters to be used as grammatical ones out of context. For example, shi4, originally meant straight, but was taken to mean yes. The reason why this can't work with Taiwanese is because no two people can agree on the Han character to be used. But of couse, with Mandarin the prestigious language, Taiwanese is sure to become just another dead "dialect".

    58. Re:hmm... by AniVisual · · Score: 1

      I'd say that with every company that decides to no longer do business with China, there are 2 who have decided not to start business with China, 3 who decide to do business with China, and 4 who are contemplating the possibility, and 5 who are happily doing business with China. So I think that's a fantasy of yours.

  2. It's time to chew bubble gum and kick ass... by eagee · · Score: 4, Funny

    And google is all out of bubble gum.

    1. Re:It's time to chew bubble gum and kick ass... by Em+Emalb · · Score: 1

      Google came to do two things, make money via search-based ads, and chew bubble gum. And they're out of bubble gum.

      --
      Sent from your iPad.
    2. Re:It's time to chew bubble gum and kick ass... by greenguy · · Score: 4, Funny

      Dude, do you know how much money Google has? They never run out of anything.

      --
      What if I do the same thing, and I do get different results?
    3. Re:It's time to chew bubble gum and kick ass... by Sir_Lewk · · Score: 2, Funny

      The chinese government stole all of their bubble gum. That's why google is so upset.

      --
      "linux is just DOS with a UNIX like syntax" -- Galactic Dominator (944134)
    4. Re:It's time to chew bubble gum and kick ass... by thijsh · · Score: 1

      The Chinese will be back wearing sunglasses...

    5. Re:It's time to chew bubble gum and kick ass... by hitchhacker · · Score: 4, Informative

      Way to fuck up the real quote dude.
      "I have come here to chew bubblegum and kick ass, and I'm all out of bubblegum" -- Roddy Piper
      The quote from 'They Live'

    6. Re:It's time to chew bubble gum and kick ass... by blackraven14250 · · Score: 1

      Good thing kicking ass is a decent method to get back stolen property.

    7. Re:It's time to chew bubble gum and kick ass... by dave562 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Too bad the Chinese have kung fu and a few millenia of practice in martial warfare. Google has... a bunch of nerds in Silicon Valley hyped up on caffeine.

    8. Re:It's time to chew bubble gum and kick ass... by dontbgay · · Score: 4, Funny

      Sooo what you're saying is China doesn't stand a chance?

      --
      Sig not found.
    9. Re:It's time to chew bubble gum and kick ass... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lies! It was Duke Nukem.

  3. The source is a salesperson by dracocat · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Why on earth would a salesperson at google be in the know on this one?

    My guess is a memo or something went out saying they would have a meeting on April 10th to discuss things, and the rumor mill starting going full speed inside the department about what it was about.

    I just find it hard to believe that Google's sales department would be let in on too much information.

    1. Re:The source is a salesperson by TSchut · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well, if the salesperson is working in China it would be nice for him/her to know he's losing his job on April 10th.

    2. Re:The source is a salesperson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The sales department sometimes need to know things before other departments. Pushing hard to secure a large deal with an influential customer, only for head office to announce the product is canceled the next day, tends to make your organisation look like a bit of a goose.

    3. Re:The source is a salesperson by SoopahMan · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This is at least somewhat irresponsible journalism. I mean, obviously Google needs time to consider first, how to deal with China, and second if it comes to it, how to handle it adequately. They should have the opportunity to plan and deliver the bad news themselves rather than some kneejerk reporter trying to make a name for themselves. Imagine how depressing this must be for Google China employees.

      Screw you, CNet.

    4. Re:The source is a salesperson by Loconut1389 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      intentional potentially deniable leak to test the waters?

    5. Re:The source is a salesperson by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 1

      Either way - doesn't it seem a little ridiculous to report that their will be an announcement a few days away regarding a plan to take place a week or two after?

      It's like - if Google had actually decided to pull out by now, don't you think they might have done so?

      Maybe they haven't yet settled on it, and they're either double checking their math, or waiting for a response by Monday for something.

      If the Chinese have any benefit from Google at all - wouldn't it put the heat on them to leak info that they might announce their departure a few days before the announcement?

    6. Re:The source is a salesperson by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 1

      Unless intended - what better way to Pressure China to change its ways then to threaten to leave. Made the news the world over for a week.

      Now, they've been given 3 days to change their mind.

    7. Re:The source is a salesperson by Dhalka226 · · Score: 1

      It might be bunk, of course, but I don't think that's much evidence. If I had already made the decision and just hadn't announced it yet I probably would have sent a memo out to the China sales staff telling them to, you know, stop selling things because effective April 10th you'd just have to give them their money back anyway.

      That said, I've also heard it on financial reports on television. Naturally that is not a great source either, but the consensus seems to be that Google is definitely leaving. Their stock even took a hit for it a few days ago. The fact that it's coming soon wouldn't surprise me.

    8. Re:The source is a salesperson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The sales department sometimes need to know things before other departments. "

      The date when the program will begin selling before the programmers will know it?

    9. Re:The source is a salesperson by yuhong · · Score: 1

      The next step would be to officially allow anyone at Google to speak to the press, allowing the source to be identified.

    10. Re:The source is a salesperson by blackraven14250 · · Score: 1

      No, whether the project is going to be canceled or not within the last approximate month of development.

    11. Re:The source is a salesperson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Screw you, CNet.

      FTFA:

      Google is expected to announce on Monday that it will withdraw from China on April 10, according to a report in a Beijing-based newspaper that cited an unidentified sales associate who works with the company.

      This was reported in a Beijing newspaper first. CNET is reporting on a report in that newspaper. If there was a kneejerk, it happened at the Beijing newspaper.

    12. Re:The source is a salesperson by Random+BedHead+Ed · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The sales department sometimes need to know things before other departments.

      I've seen this before. Management is obviously the first to know, and the first department that Management tells is Sales, followed by HR (since HR needs to plan the transition). Marketing finds out next because a guy from HR wants an excuse to talk to all the hot chicks at once, and this news provides that excuse. The information then gradually trickles down through the other departments in a largely uncontrolled way. Finally it occurs to someone to tell IT. "We need to fail over your servers to another country this afternoon because the office is closing. Sorry, should have mentioned it in January. That won't be a problem, will it?"

    13. Re:The source is a salesperson by dave562 · · Score: 1

      A lot of reliable sources (like the Wall Street Journal) seem to be under the belief that the Chinese aren't going to blink and that they will let Google go. The Journal had an article the other day about a couple Google businesses that will remain in China.

      Look at it this way. If a huge foreign company went to the United States government and said, "We don't like your imperialist policies in the Middle East. We're taking our toys and going home. When we do that, your people are going to see you for the imperalist dogs that you are!" Do you think the US government would really give two shits? Why should the Chinese behave any differently? They have one of the largest, untapped markets in the world. The Chinese have one of the highest saving rates in the world. The Chinese have control over their currency in a way that gives them unfair advantage in international trade. To say that they're holding most of the cards would be an understatement.

      The only card Google could play would be to pressure the US government to inact trade barriers on Chinese exports (US imports from China). That won't happen. Our country would suffer greatly without access to inexpensive Chinese goods, and the Chinese would suffer from a crash in their manufacturing. On a five year time line, I think the Chinese could foster domestic consumption faster than the United States could rebuild manufacturing in the US, or reallocate it to other markets (Mexico, Vietnam, etc)

    14. Re:The source is a salesperson by jadin · · Score: 1

      My tin foil hat suggested this was a deliberate leak by China to hurt Google. Although I'm not sure exactly what this would accomplish.

    15. Re:The source is a salesperson by danger42 · · Score: 1

      Salespeople are sometimes the most informed people in a company. They know lots of people, talk to lots of people, and get the inside scoop pretty often. This one might play squash with the VP of something, or golf with the IT guys. You just don't know, but it's very possible.

      --
      -nd
    16. Re:The source is a salesperson by unity100 · · Score: 1

      if they leave, they will be able to utilize and employ filter-circumventing schemes and run their bu siness from outside china without any restrictions.

    17. Re:The source is a salesperson by raju1kabir · · Score: 1

      On a five year time line, I think the Chinese could foster domestic consumption faster than the United States could rebuild manufacturing in the US, or reallocate it to other markets (Mexico, Vietnam, etc)

      I'm not so sure about that. Without the plastic garbage money coming in from the USA, China will have a hard time paying their own people to buy the crap.

      On the other hand, most of ASEAN would be desperate to get the business.

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
    18. Re:The source is a salesperson by wiredlogic · · Score: 1

      I just find it hard to believe that Google's sales department would be let in on too much information.

      This is what's known as a scripted leak. It allows Google to apply leverage to the Chinese without taking an official stance.

      A similar thing happened when Bush was "betrayed" by his friend discussing his use of cocaine (who talks about that shit over the phone?). It allowed him to admit the truth indirectly while currying sympathy and the press completely rolled over and dropped the issue after that. That was one of Rove's more brilliant maneuvers.

      --
      I am becoming gerund, destroyer of verbs.
  4. I'm with Google. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    I support Google in this. Censorship is BS and should never be tolerated.

    1. Re:I'm with Google. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Please mod down parent!

    2. Re:I'm with Google. by eln · · Score: 1

      Google has taken substantial hits to their goodwill lately with their stance on privacy and an ever-growing concern that they've become stewards of vast stores of personal data without any guarantees that it will never be misused. Of course, Google's entire business model depends on people handing over their personal data, so goodwill is a hugely important asset to them.

      Google is hoping to regain some of that goodwill with a highly public stance against Chinese censorship, at the cost of what is so far a relatively small market for them. I would imagine they're hoping they'll be able to sneak back into China quietly at some point in the future. Best case for them would be that China actually responds to the pressure and quietly dismantles their Great Firewall 5 years from now, but Google will likely be back there whether they do or not. China is a relatively small market for them now, but the potential is too big for a publicly traded company to ignore forever.

    3. Re:I'm with Google. by HisMother · · Score: 2, Funny

      +1 Funny

      --
      Cantankerous old coot since 1957.
    4. Re:I'm with Google. by waspleg · · Score: 1

      you say, both anonymously and with delicious irony, on a heavily moderated forum. el oh el.

    5. Re:I'm with Google. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Mod it down? Wimp. This is China. Admins, delete the message immediately.

    6. Re:I'm with Google. by dissy · · Score: 1

      Google has taken substantial hits to their goodwill lately with their stance on privacy and an ever-growing concern that they've become stewards of vast stores of personal data without any guarantees that it will never be misused.

      Google already gave us a legal guarantee that they won't misuse the data, which is the only kind of guarantee that really matters from a corporation in most peoples eyes.

      The 'privacy' link at the bottom of the main page links to their current policy and all archived copies.
        http://www.google.com/intl/en/privacypolicy.html

      These are legally binding, at least in the USA.
      What more would you prefer? Eric Schmidt to stop by with a personal word of honor? ;}

      Unfortunately, there are many other people whom also feel the only guarantee Google could make that would satisfy them, is to shut down business operations and have a massive hard drive burning and shredding party :{

  5. What does it mean to "leave"? by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    So they close up shop there. They are an INTERNET COMPANY!

    As long as they aren't blocked, they can still serve those users in China. And if they aren't blocked, they can still charge for advertising to non-Chinese customers.

    I asked this before, and everyone said something to the effect of "THERE ARE BILLIONS OF CHINESE" as a reason why Google should stay. But I'm still not seeing it. Google can operate from anywhere. A local presence provides them very little unless they intend to expand some China-specific business/technology, which they haven't done at all (for any country they are currently in for that matter).

    1. Re:What does it mean to "leave"? by WrongSizeGlass · · Score: 4, Insightful

      But they will be blocked in China. Remember the motto of the Chinese DNS servers: All your search are belong to us.

    2. Re:What does it mean to "leave"? by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 1

      I'll take your word for it, I suppose...

    3. Re:What does it mean to "leave"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As long as they aren't blocked, they can still serve those users in China

      Of course they'll be blocked: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Golden_Shield_Project

    4. Re:What does it mean to "leave"? by phantomfive · · Score: 4, Interesting

      My understanding is that they aren't planning on closing their offices in China, they are merely planning on closing down their chinese search engine. It is the requirement to censor that is really bothering them, and they are not going to do it anymore.

      They still will keep their advertising department open, and whatever other programming they do (it's such a pain to start an office in China that it's not a bad idea to keep a small office there, in case you ever do decide to start doing something there, it won't take six months of bribing people to get all the permits etc).

      --
      Qxe4
    5. Re:What does it mean to "leave"? by Sir_Lewk · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Being physically located in China or not has nothing to do with China blocking them. China could block them if they kept up shop in China, or they could not block them even though they no longer have employees in China.

      By removing themselves physically from China they might risk upsetting China (so that they are blocked) but that is not a certainty, and they ensure the physical safety of their employees.

      --
      "linux is just DOS with a UNIX like syntax" -- Galactic Dominator (944134)
    6. Re:What does it mean to "leave"? by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

      In China, all your word are belong to us, also. ;^)

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    7. Re:What does it mean to "leave"? by cyfer2000 · · Score: 1

      And they had been blocked. China had blocked google.com several years ago for several weeks and youtube is still blocked.

      --
      There is a spark in every single flame bait point.
    8. Re:What does it mean to "leave"? by Primitive+Pete · · Score: 1

      Leave = move assets to somewhere else. If was was Google, making what might possibly be a departure statement on April 10, I'd make sure that my critical assets were safe before, say, March 1. I don't want to donate my IP to the Chinese government (or any other, for that matter).

    9. Re:What does it mean to "leave"? by moosesocks · · Score: 1, Funny

      Pet peeve: Why is hyperbolic rhetoric like this increasingly being modded to +5 Insightful?

      You could have easily stated that China has a history of blocking non-vetted search engines without the sarcastic comment and nerdy in-joke. Rhetoric like this looks halfway-legitimate to somebody who is not intimately familiar with the topic being discussed, and helps spread misinformation. As far as I'm aware, there's no official known policy, and certainly no "motto"

      Slightly offtopic, but I bring this up, because I keep seeing throngs of protesters visibly upset because the healthcare bill will pay for abortions and death-panels, despite the fact that these two claims are bold-faced lies. Misinformation and sarcastic/hyperbolic rhetoric is having a *huge* adverse impact on the state of political discourse, and knowledge in general in our society. Remember: your words, no matter where you say them, or how insignificant they are, do have tangible consequences.

      I don't implicitly trust China, although you could certainly provide plenty of legitimate and verifiable evidence to support that claim. The only mod that this post could possibly deserve is +Funny. If this passes as "information" or "insight," then we have failed as a society.

      --
      -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
    10. Re:What does it mean to "leave"? by SecurityGuy · · Score: 1

      My understanding is that they aren't planning on closing their offices in China, they are merely planning on closing down their chinese search engine. It is the requirement to censor that is really bothering them, and they are not going to do it anymore.

      I congratulate Google and suggest that their new motto be:

      "Don't be evil...anymore" or maybe "Don't be evil...as much".

      I do genuinely applaud the move (if they make it), but it would have been far better to say no when asked to help oppress over a billion of their fellow humans.

    11. Re:What does it mean to "leave"? by Capt+James+McCarthy · · Score: 1

      Being physically located in China or not has nothing to do with China blocking them. China could block them if they kept up shop in China, or they could not block them even though they no longer have employees in China.

      By removing themselves physically from China they might risk upsetting China (so that they are blocked) but that is not a certainty, and they ensure the physical safety of their employees.

      I believe that their servers are located in China so that all requested searches go to those specific servers and the authorities then would have rights over said hardware should they deem it necessary to gain access to them. If all the data was/is housed anywhere else it would be very difficult for the Chinese government to gain _legal_ access to the data.

      --
      There are no loopholes. It's either legal or it's not.
    12. Re:What does it mean to "leave"? by xant · · Score: 1

      Sure. As soon as they do that, they'll be blocked. Google is "in" China because Google is physically in China, where:

      1. They are given special access to get through the Great Firewall, and
      2. China can prosecute Google employees if Google doesn't comply with local laws

      Google physically shutting down offices means China no longer has leverage over actual human beings working there. So they'll use the only other leverage they have: the Firewall. Expect google.cn to be accessible everywhere but in .cn.

      --
      It's rare that you're presented with a knob whose only two positions are Make History and Flee Your Glorious Destiny.
    13. Re:What does it mean to "leave"? by izomiac · · Score: 1

      I asked this before, and everyone said something to the effect of "THERE ARE BILLIONS OF CHINESE" as a reason why Google should stay. But I'm still not seeing it.

      China may have a lot of people but they aren't homogeneous. You have the wealthy coast and the rural interior (IIRC). According to Google (search) there are 111 million internet users in China. 70% apparently use Baidu, so Google's Chinese market is something like 33 million. A very large number still, but I suspect it's a minor part of Google's worldwide market.

    14. Re:What does it mean to "leave"? by mdielmann · · Score: 1

      If all the data was/is housed anywhere else it would be very difficult for the Chinese government to gain _legal_ access to the data.

      So, no problems, then.

      --
      Sure I'm paranoid, but am I paranoid enough?
    15. Re:What does it mean to "leave"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      these two claims are bold-faced lies.

      The common phrase is "bald-faced," as in unobscured from view.

    16. Re:What does it mean to "leave"? by speederaser · · Score: 1

      Expect google.cn to be accessible everywhere but in .cn.

      China owns the TLD .cn. Since country TLDs are controlled by the country I'm sure if Google leaves China they will lose the URL.

      Currently the main Google page outside of China appears to be www.google.com/intl/zh-CN/.

  6. The (more literal) China way of termination? by sethstorm · · Score: 1

    "The report also said Google would reveal its plans for its China-based staff that day."

    Literal termination of life, courtesy of the Chinese military & police?

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  7. Google by Krneki · · Score: 1

    Kudos to Google for showing the middle finger to the Chinese politicians.

    --
    Love many, trust a few, do harm to none.
    1. Re:Google by selven · · Score: 1

      Notice the repeated statements in TFS about how nothing is officially confirmed. I think we should hold our cries of celebration until we get some official word here.

  8. They won't leave by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Google is not going to leave China. They didn't even file a complaint with the Chinese government. The whole thing is just drama + propaganda.

    1. Re:They won't leave by Kissing+Crimson · · Score: 1

      [citation needed]

      --
      What's that smell? Ah, that's my karma burning...
    2. Re:They won't leave by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

      Just google.cn it!

      D'oh!

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
  9. Google's No Freedom Fighter by rutabagaman · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Google didn't come to this decision because they found their moral compass all of a sudden--otherwise they wouldn't have agreed to play censor for the government in the first place. Like any corporation they were attracted to China by the money and the audience, but after finding out the government was all too willing to help Baidu and hinder Google they re-evaluated their decision. The cyber attack may have been the breaking point, but it may just as well have been a convenient event for Google to justify their standoff with the government.

    --
    (insert witty/esoteric/dumb quote here)
    1. Re:Google's No Freedom Fighter by Abcd1234 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Google didn't come to this decision because they found their moral compass all of a sudden--otherwise they wouldn't have agreed to play censor for the government in the first place.

      Alternatively, like any individual or group, they may have felt, at the time, that they could do some good by operating in China, and then realized, in retrospect, that that simply wasn't the case.

      But you're right. It makes way more sense to ascribe sinister, greedy motivations to them. No company can possibly make a mistake...

    2. Re:Google's No Freedom Fighter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The US founding fathers weren't freedom fighters either? They didn't come to this decision because they found their moral compass all of a sudden--otherwise they wouldn't have been ok with paying taxes and lacking representation within the British government in the first place. Like any other colonists, they were attracted to the America by the money and the audience, but after finding out the government was all too willing to help the loyalists, they re-evaluated their decision. The 'intolerable acts' may have been the breaking point, but it may just as well have been a convenient event for the revolutionaries to justify their standoff with the government.

    3. Re:Google's No Freedom Fighter by nedlohs · · Score: 4, Insightful

      He was saying they made a mistake, they thought something would be profitable, but it turns out it wasn't worth the effort.

      There was no sinister greedy motivations ascribed. Just usual business decisions.

    4. Re:Google's No Freedom Fighter by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Who cares? In the end, it's the result that matters.

    5. Re:Google's No Freedom Fighter by rutabagaman · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's less about greed on Google's part and more about the usual cost-benefit analysis of doing business with China's repressive government. Google just stayed until the disadvantages outweighed the benefits.

      --
      (insert witty/esoteric/dumb quote here)
    6. Re:Google's No Freedom Fighter by 0xABADC0DA · · Score: 1

      An alternative theory is that Google originally thought it's value was in its employees, so even if somebody stole their technology and methods it wouldn't matter much. But now they realize that another company using their code and methods could easily out compete them with some help from the government or better cultural understanding. And the only way to protect your stuff from China is to not locate it in China.

      In other words, Google now believes its future rests on leveraging network effects from its properties and not from innovation. They will continue to innovate as there are some smart productive people working there, but strategically their future will rest on buying out new competitors and 'cutting off the air supply' of those it can't buy out. Of course, being a marketing company they will have some friendlier term for it, maybe something 'stealing their Buzz' or 'spamming their blog'.

    7. Re:Google's No Freedom Fighter by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      There was no sinister greedy motivations ascribed. Just usual business decisions.

      Remember that to the average Slashdotter, usual business decisions are sinister greedy motivations.

    8. Re:Google's No Freedom Fighter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    9. Re:Google's No Freedom Fighter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's less about greed on Google's part and more about the usual cost-benefit analysis of doing business with China's repressive government. Google just stayed until the disadvantages outweighed the benefits.

      There's one flaw with that argument. Bing has even worse market share than Google in China. And Microsoft has already stated repeatedly that they have no intention of leaving China.

      If the cost-benefit analysis didn't favor Google's being there, then it wouldn't favor Microsoft either. The only conclusion left is that ethical consideration were weighed on that cost-benefit analysis on Google's side (the hacking incident was clearly an ethical issue...they were trying to get emails from human-rights activists). This is one case where they are clearly just trying to not be evil.

    10. Re:Google's No Freedom Fighter by timepilot · · Score: 1

      You're assuming that Google and Microsoft share cost and benefit values, which is not a valid assumption.

      Cost and benefit are completely subjective, and are computed using company goals and values, which are very different for MS and GOOG.

    11. Re:Google's No Freedom Fighter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google is a for-profit corporation. Its whole reason to exist is to be greedy.

    12. Re:Google's No Freedom Fighter by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

      Google is a for-profit corporation. Its whole reason to exist is to be greedy.

      No, it's reason to exist is outlined in it's corporate charter. I'm sure "making money" is in there, but many (most?) charters also include a component that involves advancing the "public good" (which is why a lot of organizations donate to charities).

      But, you know, don't let me get in the way of your blind corporation-bashing.

    13. Re:Google's No Freedom Fighter by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      I don't think so. I've heard people say this, but I haven't seen anyone actually do an analysis suggesting why they think that. Google apparently makes around $300 million annually in China, which isn't a huge percentage of their income, but it's not chump change. Furthermore when you consider in the growth potential, it is hard to see why it wouldn't be a good financial bet to stay there. Certainly Microsoft thinks so, and with a much smaller share of the market.

      Especially when it seems they are just closing their website, not shutting down their China offices.

      --
      Qxe4
    14. Re:Google's No Freedom Fighter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you try to copy someone else's +5 post from a similar story posted to Slashdot a few weeks ago, do it better next time.

      http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1581834&cid=31466920

      Busted.

    15. Re:Google's No Freedom Fighter by yuhong · · Score: 1

      Yea, I tried to submit this to Slashdot and got rejected. Soon after, I submitted a similar article from The Huffington Post and got accepted.

  10. Apirl? by Rik+Sweeney · · Score: 1

    I really they'd had said April 1st instead. That would have foxed everyone :)

    1. Re:Apirl? by boarder8925 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I really that would be hilarious.

    2. Re:Apirl? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I really they'd had said April 1st instead. That would have foxed everyone :)

      if they have other stuff to announce on 1 april, then maybe better not to have this cluttering the newspapers' tech section on same day

  11. If this is true..... by tpstigers · · Score: 0

    If this is really going to occur, it's huge. Getting the Kiss Of Death from Google is tantamount to getting kicked off the information superhighway.

    1. Re:If this is true..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Moderate parent (-1, Uninformed). Google is a bit player in China - they're way behind king pin "Baidu" (a state-owned business). Besides which, China are quite insular - being divorced from the "western internet" probably wouldn't concern them too much (apart from anything, there's a large language barrier to overcome; compared to European languages, Chinese dialects are quite different and thus it's harder for a Chinese native speaker to learn English than say, a German native speaker).

  12. Old Quote by MrTripps · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Remember that old quote about how the Internet interprets censorship as damage and routs around it? That doesn't apply anymore.

    --
    "I'm not a quack, I'm a mad scientist! There's a difference." - Dr. Cockroach
  13. The joyful side of censorship by TiggertheMad · · Score: 3, Funny

    Imagine how depressing this must be for Google China employees.

    No worries, they can't see it. I'm sure it is filtered..

    --

    HA! I just wasted some of your bandwidth with a frivolous sig!
    1. Re:The joyful side of censorship by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think they'll get the hint though since all of google being IN china is censored as well.

      Never happened.

  14. Perspective of a Chinese-Canadian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I'm of two minds on this. On the one hand, I applaud Google for sticking to their guns, and keeping consistent with their Do No Evil policy. On the other hand, I also understand the patriarchal nature of Chinese society, and the need for a strong central authority to maintain order - its order - at any cost. The patriarchal perspective has its roots in the dynastic nature of China for almost the entirety of its 2000+ year existence, and that doesn't change in a mere century, especially not when the society is steeped in tradition.

    I'm guessing the Chinese government views Google in the same way a very conservative father might see a rebellious teenager, while Google sees the Chinese government as wanting to have things both ways with regards to playing by their rules and protection under their laws. The viewpoints of father-knows-best versus fairness are incompatible, and it was only a matter of time before the two split on ideological differences. Add to the fact that Google isn't making too much in China right now as a distant second in terms of marketshare compared to Baidu, and you can see how they might decide that they have more to gain from publicly splitting with China in order to improve their public perception with the western market (and possibly win points with the US government).

    (The CAPTCHA for this post is 'bypasses' - fitting, isn't it?)

  15. According to who? by Rhacman · · Score: 1

    "according to a report in a Beijing-based newspaper" Ahh I see, or rather, nothing to see here. Easy enough to just wait to hear from Google.

    --
    Account -> Discussions -> Disable Sigs
  16. Sure it is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Google didn't come to this decision because they found their moral compass all of a sudden--otherwise they wouldn't have agreed to play censor for the government in the first place. Like any corporation they were attracted to China by the money and the audience, but after finding out the government was all too willing to help Baidu and hinder Google they re-evaluated their decision. The cyber attack may have been the breaking point, but it may just as well have been a convenient event for Google to justify their standoff with the government.

    So Google's motives are not altruistic. So what? Lots of "freedom fighters" aren't motivated by an altruistic desire to oppose tyranny and promote liberty wherever they can. They're motivated because their toes were stepped on and they want to fight back.

    It's pretty rare that anyone deliberately goes and gets involved in a Freedom Fight that they have no stake in. That doesn't mean they're not justified in doing so.

  17. The great firewall by jwegy · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't it be great if all non-Chinese websites blocked all Chinese IP addresses? I know it would hurt the average Chinese citizen, but it sure would make a good point.

    1. Re:The great firewall by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, great for the Chinese government. No longer to need to maintain the fire wall.

  18. The salesman... by AugstWest · · Score: 1

    ...has since been sacked.

    Seriously, WTF is this person thinking?

  19. Why April 2nd? by NevarMore · · Score: 0, Troll

    Methinks this is an April Fools Joke.

    Mod me up or you are the other kind of person.

    1. Re:Why April 2nd? by c0d3g33k · · Score: 1

      Methinks you are a fool.

  20. To the editor by Galestar · · Score: 1

    Dear slashdot: Please stop posting rumors. I would like some facts, not an entire front page full of unverifiable rumors.

    --
    AccountKiller
  21. Like rain on your wedding day? by Tetsujin · · Score: 1

    ("Censorship is BS and should never be tolerated.")

    you say, both anonymously and with delicious irony, on a heavily moderated forum. el oh el.

    So... what's your point, again?

    Being anonymous isn't censorship. Being moderated down isn't censorship, particularly on a site where one can still read anything that's been moderated down. And, in fact, he hasn't been modded down. So it seems like he's neither in a situation where he'd likely be subject to censorship, nor is he, in fact, being censored. So where's the irony?

    --
    Bow-ties are cool.
    1. Re:Like rain on your wedding day? by blackraven14250 · · Score: 1

      Forcing people to reveal their identities is censorship, which China does require for forums and such.

    2. Re:Like rain on your wedding day? by yuhong · · Score: 1

      Except that it isn't either.

  22. Pity it wasn't six days earlier by overshoot · · Score: 1

    Somehow 4/04 seems appropriate.

    --
    Lacking <sarcasm> tags, /. substitutes moderation as "Troll."
  23. The term you're looking for by overshoot · · Score: 1

    Why on earth would a salesperson at google be in the know on this one?

    is "controlled leak." Politicians have been using it since before I started paying attention in the Johnson administration.

    --
    Lacking <sarcasm> tags, /. substitutes moderation as "Troll."
  24. Evil Scale by Wiarumas · · Score: 1

    Google had long considered leaving China. I forget where I read it, but I heard they did some sort of analysis where they determined it would less evil to be present in China and be censored than to not be in China and provide no search capability. It was some type of numbered rating scale of good and evil or something. It would be interesting to hear about how they came to this decision. Would be an interesting white paper.

    --
    I will bend like a reed in the wind.
    1. Re:Evil Scale by AtomicOrange · · Score: 0

      I too would be intrigued on how one quantifies evil...

      What would be the units?

      Hitlers? ie, "China just jailed four more protesters". (4 mHitlers - read mili-Hitlers)

      "This just in China has savagely beaten three puppies who were considered enemies of the state." (.5 Hitlers)

      --
      "What is there a tank on the boat? WHY IS THERE A TANK ON THE BOAT?!?" L4D2
  25. China will be fine with out Google by Voltas · · Score: 1

    Odds are China has backwards engineered what they needed from the search engine. They will "rehire" all the Google China staff when Google leave and make there own Google. Just like they do with John Deer lawnmowers and every new piece of equipment that lands on their shipping docks. reverse engineer it and start making it for themselves. China is know for having two whole manufacturing plants for the same product. One by the "owner" of the copyrights and one that makes the same product but for china only.

    China will have their Google and how they want it, big brother and all.

    --
    -- Disclaimer: I can't really back up anything I post on /. --
    1. Re:China will be fine with out Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I doubt it. Software is different from manufacturing. Otherwise China would already have had its Microsoft.

    2. Re:China will be fine with out Google by Voltas · · Score: 1

      if I recall correctly. The Chinese government pushed Microsoft to delivery to them the source code for Windows, stating that they "needed to check the code for what could be security issues for them". I believe Microsoft said "heulz no, you'll just bootleg it" (that was paraphrased)

      --
      -- Disclaimer: I can't really back up anything I post on /. --
  26. No, that doesn't make any sense. by mosb1000 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Internet search engines are a product, which Google was selling in China. It is trade, and it's nothing like what you've said here. Google has said they won't modify their product to meet China's requirements, China has said "fine, then we don't want 'em" so Google is leaving. Google hasn't done anything wrong, nor have they done anything like what you've described.

  27. Lithuanian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please do not bomb China afterwards, I like their food ;d

  28. Re:woosh.... by DarKnyht · · Score: 1

    Thanks to some really stupid legal rulings here in the US they are (legally that is).

    --
    Voting them all out of office, now that's change I can believe in.
  29. You know what I find funny? by AtomicOrange · · Score: 0

    That currently above post is marked funny and the post he's complaining about is the one that's insightful. There's not a damn thing that's funny about his actually insightful, albeit perturbed and scathing, commentary. That's what I call funny.

    --
    "What is there a tank on the boat? WHY IS THERE A TANK ON THE BOAT?!?" L4D2
  30. Think of the servers... by Stu101 · · Score: 1

    A thought just occurred to me. They probably have a LOT of servers there with a lot of info on them. I just hope they destroyed the disks in them because that information could be very useful to not only identify people searching for "bad" things but also the source code and such that resides on those databases. They are probably worth their weight in gold.

    --
    http://www.writeitfor.us - Writing IT for the IT generation.
  31. China is PURE EVIL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Screw them! Pay the former Google workers, promise them permanent work visa to leave the country and set up Freedom-China web sites from outside China and inform people how to overthrow their cruel government.

  32. Why bother shutting down at all? by VocationalZero · · Score: 1

    Why bother shutting down at all when they can remove all of the censorship filters on their Chinese site and let the local govt take care of the rest? Money saver!

  33. China to Google: by denelson83 · · Score: 1

    "Don't let the door hit you in the ass on the way out."