Slashdot Mirror


"Moot" Working On Reboot of 4chan Platform

Hugh Pickens writes "Nick Bilton has an interesting interview with Christopher Poole, known online as 'Moot,' founder 4chan, a jumble of content, hosting anything from pictures of cute kittens to wildly disturbing images and language. Poole, now 22, started 4chan when he was 15 after he discovered a Japanese image-board Web forum called 2chan dedicated to anime. 'The code for 2chan was publicly available and I took it and translated it from Japanese to English using tools online and I threw it up on the Web and sent it out to 20 people,' says Poole. 'I wanted to keep with the 2chan naming and the URL for 3chan was taken at the time so I just jumped to the next number.' Although 4chan gets 8.2 million unique visitors every month, 600 million page loads per month, and 800,000 new posts a day, Poole is working on a new project to reimagine what an image board should be today using the current technologies available."

128 of 205 comments (clear)

  1. Three sentences turned by lilmunkysguy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Three sentences turned into a frontpage story..

    1. Re:Three sentences turned by j_presper_eckert · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Could that article possibly be any more lame??? So...Moot ponders some nebulous concepts about 4Chan: The Next Generation for about five seconds. Some other dude then bloats it into a puff piece in hopes of warping reality by placing the concepts of "New York Times" and "hip blogger" in the same sentence, with his own name on top. Riiiight. Journalism, we hardly knew ye.

      Call me when a *real* article on the subject appears. Until then, forward my calls to /s/. :P

      --
      Can't stop the Beta? Time to evacuate to ##altslashdot at webchat.freenode.net - Slashcott in effect.
    2. Re:Three sentences turned by lilmunkysguy · · Score: 4, Informative

      Here's a real article about Moot and Times. http://musicmachinery.com/2009/04/27/moot-wins-time-inc-loses/

    3. Re:Three sentences turned by Brian+Gordon · · Score: 1

      And I wince every time I see a story seriously using the name "Christopher Poole."

    4. Re:Three sentences turned by noidentity · · Score: 1

      and turned, and finally realized they had been chopped from the whole, shoved into the subject line for some cheap suspense.

  2. Live from Slashdot, it's Friday Night! by LostCluster · · Score: 5, Funny

    Website creator promises to redesign his website. We'll be monitoring this story overnight and have a full report to you on the Saturday Really Early News. We start when normal people wake up.

    1. Re:Live from Slashdot, it's Friday Night! by e-Flex · · Score: 1

      I love you.

    2. Re:Live from Slashdot, it's Friday Night! by rolfwind · · Score: 1

      Not everyone here is from the same timezone... or even America.

  3. I can't wait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    For the web2.0 tubgirl experience.

    1. Re:I can't wait by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      IN THREE DEEE!

      What? Meme meets hype, it ain't like it's something new...

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    2. Re:I can't wait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Now with added corn!

    3. Re:I can't wait by lennier1 · · Score: 1

      I don't even want to think about what a revamped /b/ would look like.

  4. Lame joke... by LostCluster · · Score: 2, Funny

    We could discuss this further, but I'm afraid it'd be a Moot point.

    1. Re:Lame joke... by lilmunkysguy · · Score: 1

      womp womp

    2. Re:Lame joke... by julesh · · Score: 2, Funny

      We could discuss this further, but I'm afraid it'd be a Moot point.

      Headline should've read: 4chan Redesign Mooted.

  5. I call Vaporware! by LostCluster · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Doesn't Moot know that it's bad luck for geeks to discuss software they're going to write before it's written? It's the Vaporware curse that has been dogging classics like Duke Nukem Forever.

    1. Re:I call Vaporware! by lilmunkysguy · · Score: 3, Informative

      Moot didn't discuss it at all.

  6. Re:Hmmm by RLiegh · · Score: 1

    Maybe because not everybody does....?

  7. Anonymous post-it notes by j-stroy · · Score: 3, Funny

    That site is kind of like living with strange and often helpful people who leave you cryptic notes on your fridge, with pictures of your mom from some party you swear you don't remember being at. And yet all that is somehow comforting. A sort of magic 8 ball that both answers and re-enforces some of the lunacy and hivemindedness I remember from lambda moo. Also be sure to go there and ask people about the secret board where you can play "the game."

    1. Re:Anonymous post-it notes by lilmunkysguy · · Score: 2, Funny

      The Game

      Well played, Sir.

    2. Re:Anonymous post-it notes by Ethanol-fueled · · Score: 1

      "The only winning move is not to play."

      (from War Games)

    3. Re:Anonymous post-it notes by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      "the game."

      I officially hate you now.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    4. Re:Anonymous post-it notes by strack · · Score: 1

      you, sir, just lost.

    5. Re:Anonymous post-it notes by PopeRatzo · · Score: 1

      That site is kind of like living with strange

      You know, that's a really insightful post.

      I've also noticed something rather interesting about the Internet. If you just start googling something and randomly follow your casual interests and highlight interesting words or names and google those and just keep doing this over and over, say for 500-700 iterations, you will eventually and inevitably land on either 4chan or Encyclopedia Dramatica. I know, weird, right?

      It's like one of those dumb algebra tricks where you "add 2, divide by 6, take the square root of..." and then you end up after doing 20 minutes of punching numbers into a calculator (or if you're like me, you use a slide rule) with the same number. Well, it's not really like that, but sort of.

      Except for one time, I was doing random googling and ended up at The Urban Dictionary looking at the definition of Pittsburgh Platter. But I think that was just an outlier.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    6. Re:Anonymous post-it notes by lilmunkysguy · · Score: 1

      You may find the Collatz conjecture interesting. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Collatz_conjecture

  8. lol by Xaemyl · · Score: 1

    Needs moar pooper.

  9. "Close the world... by Securityemo · · Score: 1

    ...Open the nExt."
    Although if that where to happen, I'd probably wind up more like poor Mika-chan than Lain. ...Just keep the plumbing going during the transition Moot, we don't want a spillage.
    "The other side is overcrowded. The dead will have nowhere to go.", indeed.

    --
    Emotions! In your brain!
  10. Re:The sad truth about 4chan by satoshi1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "Chantards"? Man, aren't you cool. I bet you lurk there anyway.

  11. Re:I await they day that the feds by lilmunkysguy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    /b/ may be the cesspool of the internet, but even sewage needs somewhere to go. I suppose you rather all that filth pool up in your backyard?

  12. et tu, 4chan? by Punto · · Score: 5, Insightful

    first slashdot goes web2.0, and now 4chan? there'll come a day when you won't be able to look up man pages on the internet without a web browser with javascript and java enabled. mark my words.

    --

    --
    Stay tuned for some shock and awe coming right up after this messages!

    1. Re:et tu, 4chan? by Tumbleweed · · Score: 1

      first slashdot goes web2.0, and now 4chan? there'll come a day when you won't be able to look up man pages on the internet without a web browser with javascript and java enabled. mark my words.

      Don't forget Flash! :)

    2. Re:et tu, 4chan? by rhyder128k · · Score: 1

      Does this mean that 4chan will go through a phase with randomly distributed resize widgets spread about the screen? THEY'LL COVER THE BOOBIES!

      --
      Michael Reed, freelance tech writer.
    3. Re:et tu, 4chan? by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

      there'll come a day when you won't be able to look up man pages on the internet without a web browser with javascript and java enabled.

      Meh. I'm only interested in the WOman pages. Not saying it's wrong though. I mean, I don't see the attraction, especially to guys on 4chan or slashdot, but I guess you have a type...

    4. Re:et tu, 4chan? by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Don't forget Flash!

      How could I? I endearingly call it "job security for the forseeable time".

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    5. Re:et tu, 4chan? by Ma8thew · · Score: 1

      Java enabled? When was the last time you used a Java applet? Certainly it has nothing to do with 'web 2.0'.

    6. Re:et tu, 4chan? by ultranova · · Score: 1

      Does this mean that 4chan will go through a phase with randomly distributed resize widgets spread about the screen?

      No, it means that 4chan will copy the "enlarge all images" scriplet from 7chan. This is cue for 7channers to complain about 4chan and "party hard", that is, make the background change colors in rabid strobo effect to supposedly drive "niggertitters" out. Expect lots of epic drama as two sets of losers badmouth each other over nothing; in other words, information age entertainment at its best :).

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    7. Re:et tu, 4chan? by Punto · · Score: 1

      I was actually thinking "flash" but typed "java" accidentally. something to be interpreted about my subconscious I'm sure.

      --

      --
      Stay tuned for some shock and awe coming right up after this messages!

  13. /b/ by Darth+Cider · · Score: 4, Insightful

    this is your id and this is your id on drugs /b/
    see? same thing
    and that's even if you don't know anything about drugs

    it's not as if /b/ tries to be the wild wild west
    it just is
    what else is left that's like the old usenet?
    or like a place without rules?
    it's there.. not that one can continue to feel well
    if one looks into /b/ too deeply
    so it's funny to think that net freedom is healthy coz /b/ is there
    yet.. there you have it

    1. Re:/b/ by broken_chaos · · Score: 1

      what else is left that's like the old usenet?

      I always thought the point of being nostalgic about the 'old usenet' was that the conversations could actually be worth having. The 'new usenet' strikes me as far more similar to 4chan and other sites of that ilk, particularly considering the often-similar content of those sites and alt.binaries.*.

  14. The name of the new project...? by nebaz · · Score: 1

    5chan

    --
    Rhymes that keep their secrets will unfold behind the clouds.There upon the rainbow is the answer to a neverending story
  15. Re:The sad truth about 4chan by simoncpu+was+here · · Score: 5, Funny

    He's ranting because he can't do a Triforce.

  16. Re:I await they day that the feds by sopssa · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So feds should shut them down because they create and contribute nothing? What law are you referring to?

  17. We are all /b/tards. Not all of us accept that. by GNUALMAFUERTE · · Score: 5, Interesting

    /. and /b/ share a common history. /. is sort of a grandparent for /b/. And, read how I say /b/ and not 4chan. /b/ and the rest of 4chan are completely different places, with wholly different people. The difference is interests. Actually, people in other boards have interests, common interests. People in /b/ ... they are just /b/tards.

    but ALL of you go to /b/, some more often than others. You all troll Omegle, and you all have vandalized wikipedia at least once. Every single one of you have gone into chatroulette to flash your dick, and engaged in a flame war with the retards that post on youtube, or spent hours looking at gross things at rotten.

    This are the dark corners of the web. We all go there. Not all of us admit it.

    All of this sites exist for a simple reason: Because they can. It's part of what we all are, and we have to eventually vent and let the daemons run loose.

    So, don't be so critic of 4chan and accept it for what it is: A crappy board filled with self-righteous, ignorant, malicious and violent hypocrites. A quick hack that excretes nonstandard html code where lots of cruel and selfish uncaring monsters vent their frustration and anger. And we are those monsters.

    --
    WTF am I doing replying to an AC at 5 A.M on a Friday night?
    1. Re:We are all /b/tards. Not all of us accept that. by satoshi1 · · Score: 1

      but ALL of you go to /b/, some more often than others. You all troll Omegle, and you all have vandalized wikipedia at least once. Every single one of you have gone into chatroulette to flash your dick, and engaged in a flame war with the retards that post on youtube, or spent hours looking at gross things at rotten. Right. Wrong. Wrong. Wrong. Wrong. Wrong.

    2. Re:We are all /b/tards. Not all of us accept that. by Khyber · · Score: 1

      If you've never gone to rotten.com you need to be handing in your geek card, not to mention toss your geek cred out of the window and listen to it scream as it plummets to an asphalt-laden death.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    3. Re:We are all /b/tards. Not all of us accept that. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      /. and /b/ share a common history. /. is sort of a grandparent for /b/. And, read how I say /b/ and not 4chan. /b/ and the rest of 4chan are completely different places, with wholly different people.

      There used to be a /prog/ board in one of the chans (strangely, fchan.us.) Then 2 years ago, it was pulled without an explanation. It was still filled with immature teens who were taking intro C++ courses and asking for homework help, but 70% of the threads were memes about "EXPERT PROGRAMMER" and python's sucking due to "the forced indentation of code."

      And then, a couple times a week, a golden nugget would come out in the form of some interesting programming problem to be looked at, and giving or getting help on some legit non-compiling code, or a particular book to read. I miss that. Anyone care to inform where the board went, or whether there are similar boards? It was the closest that you could get to a /. system, with the benefit of flat threads, lack of censhorship (negative moderation will kill initiative, and I don't mid sifting through crap if the total threads are expunged slowly and aren't more than 30 or so.) There were no "news for nerds," but that meant everything was code-related, and complete noobs were somehow filtered out.

      Thanks.

    4. Re:We are all /b/tards. Not all of us accept that. by fyoder · · Score: 1

      "I mean, how many of us can honestly say that at one time or another he hasn't felt sexually attracted to mice. I know I have. I mean, most normal adolescents go through a stage of squeaking two or three times a day. Some youngsters on the other hand, are attracted to it by its very illegality. It's like murder - make a thing illegal and it acquires a mystique. Look at arson - I mean, how many of us can honestly say that at one time or another he hasn't set fire to some great public building. I know I have. The only way to bring the crime figures down is to reduce the number of offenses - get it out in the open - I know I have."

      (from Monty Python's The Mouse Problem sketch)

      --
      Loose lips lose spit.
    5. Re:We are all /b/tards. Not all of us accept that. by Ethanol-fueled · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The /b/-tard is but one aspect of us. Most of us are caring, empathetic, logical, intelligent and/or educated, and function in real-life. Embracing, expressing, and living in harmony with one's dark side is a sign of balance and health. Having masturbated in private to depections of questionable situations or posting insanely clever racist jokes based on reality are not abnormal.

      Problems arise when the dark side is swept under the rug instead of acknowledged and understood. The repression and cognitive dissonance has a way of catastrophically exploding in peoples' faces -- just ask Larry Craig, Mick Foley, or the Catholic priests. The assholes who dedicate their lives to fighting and speaking out against what they fear most about themselves.

    6. Re:We are all /b/tards. Not all of us accept that. by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Your point being?

      I'm a selfish bastard who relishes in the misery of others. I work in IT security and before that, I was in tech support. I have a LOT of karma to burn.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    7. Re:We are all /b/tards. Not all of us accept that. by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      I was expecting something along the lines of "what Rotten? Gee, there's a billion worse sites out there".

      True. And, just as you point out, Rotten is to shock sites what Playboy (or was it Penthouse? Sorry, too young here myself) is for ... inspiration material. When you compare it to the stuff you can get today, it's not even tame. Hell, I can see more tits in afternoon talkshows. But back when it was created, it sure was about the only halfway easily accessible ... inspiration material you could get your sticky fingers on.

      I'm pretty sure we'll soon get to see pages where you can watch high-res vivisection of living people (well, living at the beginning of the movie...). And no, I do explicitely NOT want to know whether such a site already exists. And even less whether Rule34 applies!

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    8. Re:We are all /b/tards. Not all of us accept that. by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      Hey then there is a video just for you! Enjoy!

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    9. Re:We are all /b/tards. Not all of us accept that. by Puff_Of_Hot_Air · · Score: 1

      What? What is /b/ ? What is Omegle? I have heard of chat roulette, but who in the hell would actually use it? I have never vandalised a wiki page, who over the age of 12 would bother to do such a thing? I can't criticize 4chan; because I don't know what it is! I have never browsed rotten.com; and frankly the kind of person that would scares me a little bit. If this typifies the slashdot community, I had no idea. News for nerds wasn't it? I browse slashdot, physorg, news sites, the old new thing, back to slashdot, few more software dev blogs. Aren't nerds into nerdy things? Who are you people???

    10. Re:We are all /b/tards. Not all of us accept that. by YouDoNotWantToKnow · · Score: 1

      stackoverflow.com is a good place to start

    11. Re:We are all /b/tards. Not all of us accept that. by Puff_Of_Hot_Air · · Score: 1

      Oh, and penny-arcade and xkcd of course.

    12. Re:We are all /b/tards. Not all of us accept that. by Securityemo · · Score: 1

      Not all people are prone to aggressive negativity, but I assure you (as such a person), there's no need to withdraw from such people unless they either lack self-insight/control, or also lack morals. Besides adrenaline rushes making it difficult to think clearly, and the slight strain and distraction from not showing violent/destructive impulses on the outside, there's not much impact on my "nerdiness".

      --
      Emotions! In your brain!
    13. Re:We are all /b/tards. Not all of us accept that. by Peganthyrus · · Score: 1

      Maybe everyone does bad things on the Internet; I won't argue with that, though I've never done any of the particular things on your list. Hell, I had to ask Google what Omegle was.

      But some people wallow in it, some people make that a large part of their identity. Some people choose to spend a large part of their time on the internet anonymously annoying and pissing off other folks.

      And, well, I think I'd prefer it if there wasn't a huge pool for these people to swim in, where they can reassure each other that this is the right and proper thing to do. Better in the long run to have them reprimanded and kicked out of one community after another until they finally get the message that being an asshole on the internet isn't cool.

      --
      egypt urnash minimal art.
    14. Re:We are all /b/tards. Not all of us accept that. by Theoxenmooving · · Score: 1

      I thought I was a good troll. You, GNUALMAFUERTE, have set the bar. I only hope that, one day, I can be as good of an troll as you.

    15. Re:We are all /b/tards. Not all of us accept that. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      It's simple.

      Many Slashdotters were losers who got bullied and had no luck with girls in high school, and this turned some of them into angsty misanthropes stuck in a kind of permanent adolescence. I would feel sorry for them if they weren't so obnoxious.

    16. Re:We are all /b/tards. Not all of us accept that. by ultranova · · Score: 1

      I'm a selfish bastard who relishes in the misery of others. I work in IT security and before that, I was in tech support.

      It's always nice when people find positions that fit their personality.

      I have a LOT of karma to burn.

      Real Life alignment system is closer to Mass Effect than D&D: good and evil don't cancel each other, they're counted separately, and the accumulated total of either can never go down. Oh, and only bad karma counts.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    17. Re:We are all /b/tards. Not all of us accept that. by CharlyFoxtrot · · Score: 1

      Easy, because rotten.com is one of the original good shock sites that any geek would've encountered long ago, you premature pre-pubescent prick.

      Yeah, I remember a time when the first site you would tell people to visit was rotten.com, the second was persiankitty.com.

      --
      If all else fails, immortality can always be assured by spectacular error.
    18. Re:We are all /b/tards. Not all of us accept that. by Azundris · · Score: 1

      Dude,
      a) speak for yourself.
      b) "either you agree with me, or I'll call you a liar" may be an acceptable line "over there", but I hope /. is better than that.

    19. Re:We are all /b/tards. Not all of us accept that. by Khyber · · Score: 1

      LMFAO Persiankitty. Now that was a staple porn site of the early-mid 90s!

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    20. Re:We are all /b/tards. Not all of us accept that. by GNUALMAFUERTE · · Score: 1

      All I can say, good sir, is: Lurk Moar!

      --
      WTF am I doing replying to an AC at 5 A.M on a Friday night?
    21. Re:We are all /b/tards. Not all of us accept that. by GNUALMAFUERTE · · Score: 1

      It's the same as /g/, except:

      s/gentoo/Ruby/g
      s/Battle\ Stations/Best\ IDE/g

      --
      WTF am I doing replying to an AC at 5 A.M on a Friday night?
    22. Re:We are all /b/tards. Not all of us accept that. by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Oh, and only bad karma counts.

      Then why bother being good?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    23. Re:We are all /b/tards. Not all of us accept that. by Neoprofin · · Score: 1

      Except the ones who value Wikipedia as a resource.

      I bet you shit where you eat too.

    24. Re:We are all /b/tards. Not all of us accept that. by slimjim8094 · · Score: 1

      I think that was GP's point. /b/ *IS* about getting it out into the open. Sort of like the gloryhole of the internet - all you see of everybody else is the most shameful, worst, most embarrassing parts of them - but you don't know them, and never will, so it's OK. And the same is true of you.

      So on /b/ you can be an asshole, venting your (perfectly natural) hate of everybody else *at* everybody else. And then not be like that in the real world.

      I know I do, sometimes. Less so than I once did.

      --
      I have developed a truly marvelous proof of this comment, which this signature is too narrow to contain.
    25. Re:We are all /b/tards. Not all of us accept that. by ultranova · · Score: 1

      Then why bother being good?

      Well, I can't speak for anyone else, but I have simply decided that there are some things I won't do; you know, the whole Nietzschean self-actualization thing: I might be a pathetic failure as a human being in many ways, but I'm still not sinking to certain depths. It's not so much about good or bad as it is about not being an invertebrate (such as a CEO, politician or a lawyer).

      People always complain that the world is nasty. It isn't; it's completely neutral, on account of being not self-aware. It's human beings who are nasty, but there's no reason why that needs to be the case. A lot more can be accomplished by cooperation than selfish profit-seeking, so why not band together and conquer the stars and our own limits?

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

  18. Re:I await they day that the feds by satoshi1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Pretty sure the feds have already caught wind of them. Notice how nothing has happened yet.

  19. Re:I await they day that the feds by rts008 · · Score: 1

    /b/ and a /xyz/ back to ya!

    I don't get the internet or sewage in my backyard, and never have.

    4chan can back up their own sewage servers to their own backyard, thank you.

    --
    Down With Slashdot BETA!!! I've been around the corner and seen the oliphant; you can only abuse me from your perspecti
  20. Re:I await they day that the feds by lilmunkysguy · · Score: 1

    /b/ and a /xyz/ back to ya! I don't get the internet or sewage in my backyard, and never have. 4chan can back up their own sewage servers to their own backyard, thank you.

    Thank you for elaborating my point, Sir.

  21. Re:Irony by lilmunkysguy · · Score: 1

    AnT is the first spammer I've seen Moot rage on. Would you mind elaborating?

  22. Re:The sad truth about 4chan by OrwellianLurker · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Anonymous Coward, do not be angry at Anonymous, for he is your kin.

    --
    'Political power grows out of the barrel of a gun.' - Mao Tse-tung
  23. Re:The sad truth about 4chan by trapnest · · Score: 1

    If newfags can't triforce, and oldfags don't triforce, then who was triforce?

  24. Re:I await they day that the feds by trapnest · · Score: 1

    moot is like 100k in debt.

  25. Re:Irony by trapnest · · Score: 1

    And I assume by "turns a blind eye" the GP means banning and deleting posts.

  26. Re:The sad truth about 4chan by haruharaharu · · Score: 1

    yeah, everybody knows they call themselves /b/tards

    --
    Reboot macht Frei.
  27. Re:The sad truth about 4chan by deniable · · Score: 1

    The guy buried in Grant's tomb?

  28. Re:I await they day that the feds by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

    You would think he could correct that by taking on a little bit more advertising. Not all his content is advertiser phobic.

  29. Re:The sad truth about 4chan by Eddi3 · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... i c wat u did thar

  30. Re:I await they day that the feds by tsotha · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That's the problem with free speech. About half the people wasted theirs trying to get someone else's curtailed.

  31. Re:I await they day that the feds by assemblerex · · Score: 1

    How is this trolling? It's simply the truth.

  32. Re:Hmmm by colonelquesadilla · · Score: 5, Funny

    That's a moot point.

    --
    It's either false dichotomies, or the terrorists win, you decide.
  33. Re:I await they day that the feds by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    I do not want to see what it looks like if /b backs up. It sure ain't pleasant...

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  34. Re:I await they day that the feds by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    If that's grounds to shut something down, a DAMN lot of TV licenses would be on the market for grabs! And domain names. Hell, half the internet would be dead and gone!

    Not to mention we'd sure have less of an overpopulation problem... I think I stop before I give 'em ideas...

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  35. Reboot? by reverendbeer · · Score: 1

    The stories and information posted here are artistic works of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact.

  36. Re:The sad truth about 4chan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    He's my younger, stupider, brother...

  37. Re:I await they day that the feds by FiveDozenWhales · · Score: 1

    /b/ has "backed up" (read: been unavailable) plenty of times. All that happens is the /b/tards swarm other parts of 4chan, or other chans.

  38. Re:Hmmm by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 1

    That is true the first time you learn about ANYTHING. But now you know about 4chan and moot, so why are you bitching? The article should make sense now.

    --
    Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
  39. Lol 4chan by Alex+Belits · · Score: 2, Informative

    Goatse is red,
    Mudkips are blue. /b/ has three posters --
    moot, Chris-chan and you.

    --
    Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
  40. Unnecessary. by jonadab · · Score: 1

    I already builded teh next-generation 4chan, but it sucked almost as bad as the current one, so I eated it. Now go to YouTube and watch a video you hate.

    --
    Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
  41. What I want to know is, by jonadab · · Score: 1

    When and how did 4chan start breaking even?

    This concerns me somewhat, because I had been expecting that the kid would eventually run out his line of credit and 4chan would finally die its much-deserved death. If the site is breaking even now, there's a chance he will be able to keep it going for decades yet, and maybe even pass it along to someone who will keep it going thereafter.

    That leaves me with the scant hope that eventually everyone will spontaneously realize stupidity isn't great, and then they'll stop propagating stupid 4chan memes. I'm not holding my breath on that one.

    --
    Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    1. Re:What I want to know is, by SharpFang · · Score: 2, Funny

      no, they will spill and bring the stupidity all over the net.

      --
      45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    2. Re:What I want to know is, by Rysc · · Score: 1

      Probably about the same time all those advertisements started popping up.

      --
      I want my Cowboyneal
  42. Re:I await they day that the feds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    well actually alot of people have been partyvanned from 4chan (for those not up with the chan's lit.; partyvanned is when the FBI task force trailer, the 'party van' shows up in your driveway.) They dont do much about raids and whatnot, although most of the people behind those raids are from 711chan and others like it. 4chan in a raid is usually just the fodder to get the job done. all the great hackers today are also great social engineers, and they make full use of the mob.

  43. No, we don't by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1

    I know what 4chan is, and having seen its like many times before over the years have no intrest in visiting /b/

    I didn't feel the need to behave like a 12yr old when I was 12, and still don't decades later. That you do is your problem. Don't try to make everyone else the same as you. That is another 12yr old boy thing. Everything must be exactly the same. Difference is evil. No thanks. No nerds visit /b/, they can't stand the rigid conformity of its visitors.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:No, we don't by Rysc · · Score: 1

      Rigid conformity? Yes, it's clear you've never been to /b/

      --
      I want my Cowboyneal
    2. Re:No, we don't by ultranova · · Score: 1

      I know what 4chan is, and having seen its like many times before over the years have no intrest in visiting /b/

      I'm impressed by your clairvoyant ability to judge a site you imply to not have visited. But why are you posting in a discussion about the future of a website you don't care about?

      I didn't feel the need to behave like a 12yr old when I was 12, and still don't decades later.

      It is interesting that you would associate vandalism and other negative behaviour with being 12 years old. It's also interesting that you associate "rigid conformity" with it, despite claiming that you were different and thus didn't conform.

      I wonder if you were ostracized by your peers at around that age, and developed these fantasies of being better in order to cope? That would also explain why you felt the need to beat your chest about that supposed superiority to total strangers.

      No nerds visit /b/, they can't stand the rigid conformity of its visitors.

      Indeed, no true Scotsman would conform!

      Are you a troll, a poor abuse victim, or just bad at logic?

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    3. Re:No, we don't by GNUALMAFUERTE · · Score: 1

      I am 12 and what is this?

      --
      WTF am I doing replying to an AC at 5 A.M on a Friday night?
    4. Re:No, we don't by Omestes · · Score: 2, Insightful

      /b/ is pretty damn conformist. Go an objectively read the posts there, notice the common form of all the posts, the common language and use of symbols. /b/ is just another cliche, it follows all the sociological rules defining such a group. /B/ is an in group, just like any other, with a common culture, common rituals, common symbolism, etc... They are as rigidly conformist (to their own mores) as any other group or subculture.

      Notice that you can always tell when confronted with any random b-tard that they are, in fact, a b-tard. If in doubt, wait for the "I see what you did there", or "am I doing it right", or some stupid reference to Pokemon. These are nothing but banal badges of identity. Like punk rockers in the late 70's wearing safety pins and anarchy signs, or people in the grunge subculture wearing ripped jeans and flannels, or metal heads in boots. There is a level of conformity in ALL groups.

      Don't fool yourself into thinking that /b/ is some super special group that you are a member of. All groups are the same, and generally have the same "insider vs. outsider" philosophy that this line of reasoning exhibits.

      Another line of proof, go scan /b/ once a day, reading it as an non-impassioned, objective, observer, and notice that the style, quality, and content really doesn't vary all that much from day to day. I tried to scan /b/, and got quickly bored since it really doesn't vary that much. If you scan /b/ once, you never really have to again, so rigid is the culture there.

      --
      A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government. -edward abbey
    5. Re:No, we don't by lennier1 · · Score: 1

      Smells like partyvan.

  44. Re:The sad truth about 4chan by pitchaxistheory · · Score: 2, Informative

    * Windows: [alt-255] [alt-255] [alt-30] [enter] [alt 30] [alt 255] [alt 30]
    * Mac: [option-space] + [option-space] + [option-J] + [enter] + [option-J] + [option-space] + [option-J]
    * Linux : [Ctrl+Shift+U + a0] [Ctrl+Shift+U + a0] [Ctrl+Shift+U + 25b2] [Enter] [Ctrl+Shift+U + 25b2] [Ctrl+Shift+U + a0] [Ctrl+Shift+U + 25b2]

    Anon Delivars!

  45. Re:The sad truth about 4chan by Macthorpe · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Doesn't the second space [alt-255] in the first line completely screw the alignment? Surely you'd want: * Windows: [alt-255] [alt-30] [enter] [alt 30] [alt 255] [alt 30] * Mac: [option-space] + [option-J] + [enter] + [option-J] + [option-space] + [option-J] * Linux : [Ctrl+Shift+U + a0] [Ctrl+Shift+U + 25b2] [Enter] [Ctrl+Shift+U + 25b2] [Ctrl+Shift+U + a0] [Ctrl+Shift+U + 25b2]

    --
    "It does not do to leave a live dragon out of your calculations, if you live near him." - Tolkien
  46. Re:The sad truth about 4chan by Macthorpe · · Score: 1

    Also you'd want some actual linespacing there.

    Why the fuck am I back to HTML Formatted without me knowing?

    --
    "It does not do to leave a live dragon out of your calculations, if you live near him." - Tolkien
  47. One idea: by drsquare · · Score: 1

    How about a tool that automatically melts your hard disk after visiting /b before the FBI turns up?

    1. Re:One idea: by baka_toroi · · Score: 1

      You mean DBAN?

  48. Re:The sad truth about 4chan by gpeuhqt · · Score: 1

    obvious troll is obvious /thread

  49. Re:Hmmm by Jurily · · Score: 1

    Actually, watching the arms race between 4chan and the people trying to flood 4chan is really interesting. For example, after their last attempt was blocked, they resumed the flood by alternating the language of the posts.

  50. New York Times != Time by tepples · · Score: 1

    DC Comics and Time magazine are published by Warner Bros. and The New York Times (note the S) is by a different company entirely.

    1. Re:New York Times != Time by lilmunkysguy · · Score: 1

      New York Times != Time

      Ah, thanks for pointing that out.

  51. [Slashdot platinum content] by Stavr0 · · Score: 1
    This post is accessible to Slashdot Platinum subscribers only.

    Click here to subscribe.

  52. Re:The sad truth about 4chan by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

    Depends on the current font.

    The alignment looks correct pitchaxistheory's way on my display.

  53. Re:Hmmm by Brian+Gordon · · Score: 2, Informative

    If by last attempt you mean almost every hour of every day for over two years...

  54. Re:I await they day that the feds by baka_toroi · · Score: 1

    No, you retard. It's not the true. Now STFU and GTFO.

  55. Second SO by BitterAndDrunk · · Score: 1

    Anyone care to inform where the board went, or whether there are similar boards? It was the closest that you could get to a /. system, with the benefit of flat threads, lack of censhorship (negative moderation will kill initiative, and I don't mid sifting through crap if the total threads are expunged slowly and aren't more than 30 or so.) There were no "news for nerds," but that meant everything was code-related, and complete noobs were somehow filtered out.

    Thanks.

    I'll second the Stack Overflow suggestion.

    --
    You better watch out, there may be dogs about . . .
  56. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  57. Moderation System? by kitsunewarlock · · Score: 1

    So were gonna see a Moderation system like Slashdot in which you can browse at >2 or >3 scores?
    Who am I kidding; people would just all browse with "view all messages" and call people "modfags" if they mod anything up OR down.
    Then again, they already have the "sage" system...

    --
    Ginga no Rekshiya Mata Each page.
  58. Re:I await they day that the feds by CharlyFoxtrot · · Score: 1

    /b/ has "backed up" (read: been unavailable) plenty of times. All that happens is the /b/tards swarm other parts of 4chan, or other chans.

    Seeing the horrified posts on other boards as people realize they're about to be swamped by /b/tards almost makes /b/ being down worth it.

    --
    If all else fails, immortality can always be assured by spectacular error.
  59. Re:I await they day that the feds by PenisLands · · Score: 1

    Moot's pockets are thoroughly empty. 4chan runs at a loss.

  60. Re:The sad truth about 4chan by tapo · · Score: 1

    For as much bullshit as they generate, 4chan's boards provide a damn neat culture. Much like Slashdot, its pretty easy to attack if you don't go there or recognize the jokes.

    --
    "Joy is contagious," he said, peering into the microscope.
  61. DT is way ahead of you by The+Clockwork+Troll · · Score: 1
    --

    There are no karma whores, only moderation johns
  62. Re:Irony by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

    kimmo, he does not spamming and attacks, you will get banned from 4chan for planning and or encouraging raids, except probably against AT because AT deserves it.

    --
    Snowden and Manning are heroes.
  63. Re:I await they day that the feds by osgeek · · Score: 1

    It's the truth that the feds should shut down sites that create nothing, contribute nothing, and make someone money?

    Are you on crack?

  64. Re:The sad truth about 4chan by Neoprofin · · Score: 1

    It's even easier to attack if you do occasionally go there, know all the jokes, and die a little inside every time you hear them screamed by 14 year olds in stores.

  65. Re:The sad truth about 4chan by pitchaxistheory · · Score: 1

    Yeah try it with Arial Unicode MS (via character map) if you're having problems.

    Displays correctly on youtube (though you oddly have to precede it with some text) and *cough* /b/ *cough* itself.

  66. Re:I await they day that the feds by macshit · · Score: 1

    How is this trolling? It's simply the truth.

    It hardly seems to be true that they "create/contribute nothing", since half the memes on the internet (and usually the funniest half) apparently come from 4chan...

    --
    We live, as we dream -- alone....
  67. You mean like this? by phantomcircuit · · Score: 1

    Web 2.0 image board http://wtfchan.org/themes/simpler/ (absolutely NSFW)

  68. Re:The sad truth about 4chan by Neoprofin · · Score: 1

    STFU FGT