Slashdot Mirror


Indian Military Hopes to Weaponize the Searing "Ghost Pepper"

coondoggie writes "The military in India is looking to weaponize the world's hottest chili, the bhut jolokia or 'ghost pepper,' according to a number of news outlets. The Bhut Jolokia chili pepper from Assam, India is no ordinary pepper. In tests first conducted by the New Mexico State University in 2008 and subsequently confirmed by Guinness World records and others, the Bhut Jolokia reached over one million Scoville heat units, while the next hottest, the Red Savina Habenero, clocks in at a mere 577,000. Scoville units are a universally accepted measure of chili hotness."

57 of 267 comments (clear)

  1. OK ... by WrongSizeGlass · · Score: 5, Funny
    ... but how does this compare to the Merciless Pepper of Quetzalacatenango, also known as the Guatemalan Insanity Pepper?

    Scoville units are a universally accepted measure of chili hotness

    I thought SCOville was universally accepted to be a litigious outhouse?

    1. Re:OK ... by Terminal+Saint · · Score: 3, Informative

      The problem with Scoville units(and the reason they're NOT a universally accepted measure of chili hotness) is that it's a subjective measure. It's based on taste testing. American Spice Trade Association pungency units are a better measure, as they're determined using high performance liquid chromatography.

      --
      It's sad when choosing an installation directory on your own qualifies you as an "advanced user."
  2. Military Application by Ironhandx · · Score: 2, Funny

    Screw invading Iraq, next time do India. Don't forget the nachos though!

  3. Re:Tastes great by DMUTPeregrine · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It does taste good. Has an excellent, complex and slightly smoky flavour. Also about as spicy as most pepper spray.
    I am American, not Indian, BTW. Just a pepperhead.

    --
    Not a sentence!
  4. Not needed? by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 5, Funny

    From past experience I can recommened the development of a chicken Vindaloo bomb. It will cause injuries when dropped then again about 24 hours later.

    --
    It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    1. Re:Not needed? by Chris+Burke · · Score: 4, Funny

      And here I was thinking more like 15 minutes.

      But seriously, weaponized Indian food, aside from being redundant, has got to be banned by some kind of international treaty.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
  5. Not the Next Hottest by hardburn · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The next hottest down would be the closely-related Dorset Naga, which is around 900k - 1M scovilles.

    But that's if you believe the Scoville scale, which is a subjective measurement of capsaicin content. I've had sauces that advertise a 250k rating that don't seem as hot as some 50k stuff. Makers seem to artifically inflate their ratings all the time, and how the heat hits you can change a lot, too. I've never had the oppertunity to try a Dorset Naga myself, but I've heard they don't have much heat until about 20 minutes later (at which time you might have already had quite a few, popping them like candy).

    --
    Not a typewriter
    1. Re:Not the Next Hottest by Thyamine · · Score: 4, Informative

      Actually, the Scoville scale measures the actual amount of capsaicin in a pepper. The test that Scoville himself invented was subjective. But because of the work he did on it, they named the quantitative units after him.

      --
      I will shred my adversaries. Pull their eyes out just enough to turn them towards their mewing, mutilated faces. Illyria
  6. Four Horsemen burger of San Antonio, TX by logicassasin · · Score: 4, Informative

    www.youtube.com/watch?v=3kO7MlHgJLA

    Hopefully that's the right link.

    There's a burger in TX that uses this pepper called the Four Horsemen Burger. As of the taping of this episode of Man Vs Food, only three people had managed to finish one in 25 minutes, with an additional 5 minutes of waiting without liquids. The host of the show became number 4, though it looked like he wasn't going to get past even the first bite.

    Isn't that illegal (internationally) if a weapon causes this much pain and suffering?

    --
    Fifty watts per channel, baby cakes.
    1. Re:Four Horsemen burger of San Antonio, TX by Cocoronixx · · Score: 3, Informative

      Considering that Pepper spray is considered a chemical weapon and is banned under the Chemical Weapons Convention (which India signed & ratified). I'd assume that this would fall under the same ban.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pepper_spray
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chemical_Weapons_Convention

      --
      "Obscenity is the crutch of the inarticulate motherfucker." - cloak42
    2. Re:Four Horsemen burger of San Antonio, TX by DMUTPeregrine · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It depends on the person.

      I make Naga Burgers using these peppers:

      Ground beef (120g (1/4 pound) is normal.)
      Mustard ("stone ground" with seeds): about 1.5 oz (3 tablespoons).
      10-12 drops Blair's Ultra Death. Other hot sauce may be used, but it should contain Naga Jolokia peppers. Otherwise it's not a Naga Burger, is it?
      1-3 Naga Jolokia (AKA Bhut Jolokia) peppers, minced finely.
      Crushed black peppercorns.

      Mix beef, mustard, and hot sauce together. Once consistently mixed, form into a patty. Press the crushed black pepper into the patty to coat the surface (like for steak a poivre). Grill or pan-broil quickly at high temperature to sear the outside & cook the inside to medium-rare. Resulting burger should be quite hot.

      That burger they just put the peppers on top, not sure how much it would affect the flavour.

      --
      Not a sentence!
    3. Re:Four Horsemen burger of San Antonio, TX by a+whoabot · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I was under the impression that ground beef had to be thoroughly cooked. Is this only true for certain cases then?

    4. Re:Four Horsemen burger of San Antonio, TX by corbettw · · Score: 4, Funny

      In India it's a weapon, in Texas it's a condiment. Yeah, that sounds about right. ;)

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
    5. Re:Four Horsemen burger of San Antonio, TX by Bigjeff5 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Article 1.5 prohibits the use of riot control agents in warfare, of which pepper spray is one. It's the catchall. Article 2.9 permits riot control agents for law enforcement.

      In other words, in war they have to shoot you dead or blow you up, none of these more humane methods to bring you under control. Way to go international treaty!! ;)

      --
      Security is mostly a superstition... Avoiding danger is no safer in the long run than outright exposure. - Helen Keller
    6. Re:Four Horsemen burger of San Antonio, TX by Bigjeff5 · · Score: 2

      "Steak" is, by definition, the opposite of "ground meat".

      A sustained internal temperature of about 145F makes for medium rare steaks, but it's likely that they hit 155 for at least 15 seconds towards the end.

      That's false. If the internal temperature rises to 155, the steak is no longer rare. That's why reading the internal temperature gives you an accurate measure of doneness in the first place. The temperature alters the proteins, and it happens gradually as the temperature rises (this is why the color changes, as well as the texture). With beef steaks the internal contamination risk is extremely low, making rare steaks perfectly fine. With ground beef, the contamination risk is much higher, which is why the USDA recommends (and requires for restaurants) a 155 degree sustained temperature for ground beef. There is no such requirement/recommendation for beef steaks.

      Rare steaks are safe because it is the outside of the steak that can be contaminated by bacteria, and a quick searing is all that is necessary to kill them. Ground beef is less safe because the contaminated outside of the steak is mixed together with the uncontaminated inside, contaminating all of it. Raw chicken meat (non-ground) is unsafe because salmonella is something the chicken picks up while it is still alive, which contaminates all of it. Same with pork, except the risk is tapeworms and other parasites, not salmonella.

      --
      Security is mostly a superstition... Avoiding danger is no safer in the long run than outright exposure. - Helen Keller
  7. Cross-culinary comparison by chronosan · · Score: 2, Insightful

    From TFA "When deployed, the grenade showers the targets with a dust so spicy that in trials subjects were blinded for hours and left with breathing problems." Still pretty mild compared to weaponized mustard.

    1. Re:Cross-culinary comparison by holmstar · · Score: 2, Informative

      Mustard gas only smells like mustard. It's actually a sulfur compound.

  8. Logical progression by oldhack · · Score: 2, Funny

    India had weaponized chili peppers long ago - it's called Andhra cuisine.

    --
    Fuck systemd. Fuck Redhat. Fuck Soylent, too. Wait, scratch the last one.
  9. Funny videos by TopSpin · · Score: 3, Informative

    Eating raw Jolokia is a source of some mildly entertaining videos.

    --
    Lurking at the bottom of the gravity well, getting old
  10. Re:Tastes great by DarkKnightRadick · · Score: 2, Informative

    That might work for preventing the spread, but the way that capsascin(sp) works is by activating all the receptors on the nerve. That's where the "heat" comes from, sensory overload.

    --
    "There is a way that seems right to a man, but its end is the way of death." Proverbs 16:25 (NKJV)
  11. Crisis by NEDHead · · Score: 3, Funny

    A pepper gap such as this cannot be tolerated. The security of our nation depends on meeting or exceeding these advances! At the very least, a space based pepper shield should be a highest priority. Pepper is Not A Game! Oh, wait, it is. My bad.

  12. Re:Tastes great by Raul654 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Back when I was working in New Mexico, there was a fair in Taos. One of the guys there was selling Dave's hot sauces, including their new ghost pepper variety. I bought the "temporary insanity" (57,000 scoville units according to this), and it's too hot for me except small doses. About a year later, the bottle is still mostly full.

    My roommate, who has a much higher threshold for spicy food than anyone I've ever met, brought the newly unveiled ghost pepper brand (2.5 million scoville units, according to the bottle, if memory serves).

    The dealer gave us a taste of it (a tiny drop on the tip of a toothpick) and my god did it burn.

    The guy who sold it to us told us a few interesting things about it: (1) It instantly blisters skin on contact (2) it's very expensive to buy over the internet because it has to be shipped as a hazardous materiel. (3) Not only is it good for eating, but it works great as a caustic agent for degreasing driveways, engines, etc.

    In short - ghost peppers are not something you play around with.

    --


    To make laws that man cannot, and will not obey, serves to bring all law into contempt.
    --E.C. Stanton
  13. Re:Tastes great by MBGMorden · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Yes but capsaicin is a fat-soluble compound. Water won't dissolve it (which is why drinking water or most liquids do nothing to stop a burning tongue), but milk, yogurt, or any other fat-containing liquid will dissolve it and wash it down the throat, nearly neutralizing the effect.

    --
    "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
  14. Is this needed? by joeflies · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The article implies that 1,000,000 scoville's is nasty stuff compared to the habenero. Yet when looking at wikipedia's entry on the scoville scale, it says law enforcement pepper spray is rated at 5,000,000 to 5,300,00 million scovilles. In other words, the pepper spray currently on the market is already stronger than the bhut jolokia. So what's the news then, if they are developing a weapon with significantly less strength than what's currently on the market?

    1. Re:Is this needed? by WillyMF1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That was my first thought too... also, according to Wikipedia they synthesized pure capsicum back in the 1930's. Is this just a some way to produce it cheaper by somehow distilling it out?

    2. Re:Is this needed? by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Cheaper, possibly less infrastructure needed (in terms of refining capacity, etc)

      Also sends some wealth out to the farming areas where these are grown.

      --
      If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
    3. Re:Is this needed? by mister_playboy · · Score: 2, Informative

      (which I had to sign a waiver to purchase)

      That's just for marketing purposes, not to satisfy any legal requirement.

      --
      Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law ::: Love is the law, love under will
  15. Not military grade... by dclozier · · Score: 2, Informative

    So it should be safe to use on your food. http://www.madeinnewmexico.com/647293003150.html

    I can't wait to taste this in a batch of chili.

  16. WTF, pure Capsaicin not good enough? by meerling · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The active ingredient that makes that pepper so hot is Capsaicin, the same stuff in pepper spray.

    Is it actually cheaper for them to use the local grown pepper with a variable yield than just using the pure substance with a controlled yield?

    The article says they want to use it for troops in cold areas. This scares me. It heavily implies that some moron in charge has no understanding of science. Just because it tastes hot doesn't mean it'll help avoid hypothermia in the slightest. (In fact, they are more likely to succumb to hypothermia if they try to 'reduce' the 'heat' from those peppers by taking off clothes or drinking cold liquids or sucking snow.)

    I'm going to throw out a guess that this isn't about the effectiveness of the pepper, but rather a homegrown movement to use a local product (in an inferior form) rather than a possibly foreign product. Sometimes the politicians in India are know to do stupid things like that.
    Come to think of it, sometimes US politicians do the same thing...
    (Buy American! Even if it's a piece of crap that costs three times as much as the one made in Canada, or where-ever.)

    One last thing, don't forget that exposure to high doses of Capsaicin can seriously mess you up, and in some extreme cases, kill.
    (For example, gassing someone who has asthma.)

  17. Sorry, but why? by mother_reincarnated · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I must be missing something here:

    1) I'm pretty sure it's a banned weapon militarily speaking.

    2)Who cares which pepper the capsaicin came from!? How would this be any different than any of the current commercial pepper sprays/balls/bombs?

    1. Re:Sorry, but why? by blind+biker · · Score: 3, Interesting

      2)Who cares which pepper the capsaicin came from!? How would this be any different than any of the current commercial pepper sprays/balls/bombs?

      You don't have to be a chemical engineer to understand that the process of extracting the capsaicin costs money. In theory, you are right, it doesn't matter where it comes from. But if you can get it at high concentrations without much processing, apart from simple drying and grinding (which would be necessary preparatory steps also for the extraction of capsaicin by pentane or some such solvent), then there is no reason why not use it in that form. Besides, pure capsaicin would be too strong and too expensive to be used directly, and would have to be diluted and perhaps mixed into a support material, such as calcium carbonate or such.

      --
      "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
  18. Pepper spray is torturous. by Securityemo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...Isn't this going to be a war crime, even if it's very good at neutralizing personell for a while without killing them? Granted I've never been hit with pepper spray or similar, but from the descriptions given by police cadettes (having to have a dose used on themselves before being allowed to use it) I would probably (besides the self-defense trial issues) batter someone quite severely rather than spray them with that stuff. And that's *normal* pepper spray. It would probably be used for temporary area denial (or whatever the proper military term is), sure, but when I saw this I got quite vivid flashes of screaming women and children.

    --
    Emotions! In your brain!
    1. Re:Pepper spray is torturous. by Khashishi · · Score: 3, Funny

      quit being such a wuss

    2. Re:Pepper spray is torturous. by Drethon · · Score: 3, Insightful

      So should that tool be a pistol instead? Not saying that instance is good but I'd rather be pepper sprayed than shot if given the choice...

    3. Re:Pepper spray is torturous. by bmk67 · · Score: 2, Informative

      If used in war, it is actually a war crime, since it's a chemical weapon banned under the chemical weapon convention.

      Is it? I'm reading the Chemical Weapons Convention right now, and I don't see any capsaicin-based compounds listed in Schedule I, II, or III.

      There are Chemical Weapons, and then there are chemicals used as weapons, and these two things are not synonymous with each other.

  19. Re:Tastes great by natehoy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Then the spray has had its intended effect.

    It's supposed to stop you from doing something by incapacitating you with pain and temporarily blinding you.

    Whether you are rolling on the floor screaming and ripping your eyeballs out by their bloody stalks, or rolling on the ground screaming and blindly smearing mango Lassi on your eyes is really irrelevant - your hands are otherwise occupied and cannot go for your gun, and you are temporarily blind.

    Plus I have to imagine something this high on the Scoville scale would actually do some burn damage before you can wash the capsacin away with your oh-so-handy dairy product. This stuff is ten times as potent as pepper spray, and by all accounts pepper spray REALLY HURTS. Something ten times as potent would probably look at your yogurt and laugh derisively as it sets in enough tissue damage to make you feel pain for a significant period of time.

    --
    "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
  20. Re:Tastes great by DMUTPeregrine · · Score: 2, Informative

    Sort of a slightly sweet/smoky mix, not really bitter at all. Very mild sourness, then spice. Aftertaste lasts for a while.

    --
    Not a sentence!
  21. Pepper Spray by TheLostSamurai · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So... they're trying to make pepper spray?

    --
    I am Jack's complete lack of surprise.
    1. Re:Pepper Spray by Lumpy · · Score: 3, Funny

      No,

      They are attaching blenders to the backs of troops and hooking up pumps to spray it at the enemy.

      Wind changes are a bitch with this weapon.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    2. Re:Pepper Spray by MaskedSlacker · · Score: 3, Funny

      To summ up your post:

      It's not pepper spray, it's sprayed pepper.

      Really?

    3. Re:Pepper Spray by Bigjeff5 · · Score: 2, Informative

      They should be using Resiniferatoxin, it's significantly more potent than capsaicin. Of course, that isn't found in peppers...

      The only down-side I see is it actually doesn't cause any physical damage except to pain receptors. so anybody who has been hit with RTX poison gas recovers and comes back the next day feeling absolutely no pain. If you use it on someone, you'd better kill them or you've just created a super soldier!

      --
      Security is mostly a superstition... Avoiding danger is no safer in the long run than outright exposure. - Helen Keller
  22. Re:Tastes great by DMUTPeregrine · · Score: 4, Informative

    It's not actually caustic. Capsicum just lowers your threshold of heat, so the nerves feel like they are in a hot area. Thus, it "burns" you. Blistering is a reaction to this. If you can use it as a caustic agent it probably has a lot of vinegar added.

    --
    Not a sentence!
  23. Technically correct, but... by Rene+S.+Hollan · · Score: 5, Informative

    Modern expressions of pungency in terms of Scoville units set pure capsaicin at either 15,000,000 or 16,000,000, and use HPLC to establish concentration of same (and related compounds). A Scoville rating is then set based on the concentration(s) measured.

    So, knowing the reference standard, the measurements are actually quite objective.

    Nobody, as far as I know, uses taste testers anymore.

    --
    In Liberty, Rene
    1. Re:Technically correct, but... by Rei · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What I don't get is why they're focusing on capsaicin. Just because it's well known? Resiniferatoxin activates the same receptor (TRPV1), but 3-4 orders of magnitude more.

      --
      "... Sean Hannity, whose surgery to remove those bolts from his neck was apparently successful, ..."
    2. Re:Technically correct, but... by Bigjeff5 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm no expert on these things (I like my food bland), but it seems to me that the fraction of capsicum is at best a rough measure of hotness.

      It varies from plant to plant, but you can get an average that is pretty accurate.

      It would make more sense just to give the fraction rather than copying the terminology of an obsolete subjective test, but I guess saying a pepper is 7% capsicum just doesn't sound as kewl as "one million scovilles!"

      That would actually be a hell of a lot less useful. For one thing, nobody knows how to equate 1% capsaicin to a relative hotness. What does that mean? It's like temperature - our local temperature is a fraction of sunlight absorbed by the earth, along with a boost caused by atmospheric retention factors (greenhouse effect and clouds). So why don't we say "it's nice out, 85% today"? Or "Man it was hot yesterday, must have been 88%!!" Do you see the problem? That figure is useless, to get the same granularity we have with fahrenheit or celcius we'd be using four decimal places in our percentages - that's not natural. Same thing with peppers. I don't know what "1% capsaicin" means, but I do know how hot a jalepeno is, and I do know that if a jalepeno tops out at 15,000 SHUs, and a habanero tops out at 500,000 SHUs, that a habanero is thus about 30 times hotter than a jalepeno and I definitely don't want to eat one raw.

      Also, the test is obsolete, but the unit is not. The test worked to provide a base scale of heat, and it actually gave a pretty good way of differentiating exactly how hot the peppers are compared to each other. It is subjective though, so you can't go back and repeat the test with someone new and expect even similar results.

      However, since they had a baseline from the original test, they could quantify the original unit size based on pure capsaicin - all you need is a pepper's SHU base number, and an average figure for the amount of capsaicin in the pepper, and scale the unit accordingly. Thus you get about 15,000,000 SHUs as a maxium with pure capsaicin.

      The SHU scale also tells me that this Ghost Pepper is one hell of a hot pepper - % of capsaicin doesn't convey that to me the same way.

      Sounds like Scovilles are "universally accepted" only by marketeers and culinary masochists.

      I don't exactly see a massive push to market hot peppers - the people who like them search them out, and the SHU is perfect for that. Those who don't wouldn't be swayed by a marketing add.

      Besides, hot foods are a rush, a bit masochistic, sure, but a hell of a lot of fun. How else can you have fun while just eating? I said JUST eating, not eating and other activities. I already know how to have that kind of fun. ;)

      --
      Security is mostly a superstition... Avoiding danger is no safer in the long run than outright exposure. - Helen Keller
    3. Re:Technically correct, but... by Bigjeff5 · · Score: 3, Informative

      My slightly more informed guess is perhaps because RTX isn't found in peppers.

      Just a wild guess though, but I would assume that since there is no RTX in peppers it would prevent them from measuring RTX in peppers.

      RTX comes from a leafy Moroccan plant similar to poison-ivy. Capsaicin is the primary TRPV1 antagonist found in peppers (the others found in peppers are nowhere near as potent or plentiful), thus capsaicin is the chemical to measure. Can't use it as a measure if it isn't there. Duh.

      --
      Security is mostly a superstition... Avoiding danger is no safer in the long run than outright exposure. - Helen Keller
    4. Re:Technically correct, but... by reverseengineer · · Score: 4, Informative

      A few things are going on chemically with hot peppers. Capsaicin is an alkaloid, which is just a term for a nitrogen-containing naturally produced base (caffeine would be another example; something like sodium hydroxide would be a non-alkaloid base). Capsaicin is not a particularly strong base, and is not very water soluble, behaving more like a wax. This is why pure water is not regarded as particularly effective in relieving the pain sensation produced by capsaicin. Peppers as a whole are generally very mildly acidic, with notable quanitities of weak acids like ascorbic acid (vitamin C). However, they are generally not acidic enough to resist spoilage, so preserved forms of chiles usually involve vinegar, which might be the acidity you taste in a hot sauce or canned chile.

      --
      "FDA staff reviewers expressed concern about the number of patients who were left out of the study because they died."
  24. Pakistan and China by jamrock · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Why does India need all these weapons?

    Three words: Pakistan and China. They've been to war several times with the former, and have had bloody border clashes with the latter. India has also blamed Pakistan for terrorist violence over Kashmir, among other things, including the bloody attack on the Grand Taj Mahal Hotel in Mumbai.

    It's worse now that Pakistan has nukes, but realistically Pakistan is not a viable military rival for her much larger and far more populous neighbor. The scenario that keeps me up at night is the growing rivalry between the world's two most populous countries, India and China. As China's economy booms and she becomes more assertive on the global stage, both nations will find themselves on a collision course in a competition for resources, and it's interesting to see how it will play out in the coming decades, particularly from a political standpoint, considering that it's a contest between the world's largest democracy and an authoritarian giant (my money is on India).

    I'm not Indian, by the way, and I'd be very interested in hearing the viewpoints of any Indian and Chinese Slashdot readers. In your opinions, will the 21st Century see the development of a bi-polar world all over again, with competition and rivalry between two economic powerhouses who espouse radically different political philosophies?

    1. Re:Pakistan and China by blackgod · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yes, you are right! India's both strength and weakness lies in Democracy. That is the reason behind India's moderate growth compared to China's aggressive.

      In the backdrop of Google vs China, we can't even imagine Google vs India. Here in India, you have freedom to express what you think. Here the limitation is you can't do as you wish freely due to practical issues like massive population, corrupted politicians (not political system) and bureaucrats and last but not least people's expectation that some one will/should come and solve our problem like a super man. China tackles all the above issues with one single weapon called Dictatorship in the name of Communism. So their pace may be better than India **as of now**.

      But it is true that growth of a nation is **not** 100m race, it is marathon - you need consistent performance and more resilience. After all Country is nothing but the people. What the govt. is going to achieve by isolating its people from the main stream of world? In Tamil, there is a saying - "What you are going to achieve by buying painting at the cost of your eyes?"

      I am afraid that I may be biased towards India, since I am an Indian. But I take US as dream role model for our country's political system. The democracy in US is the one which has driven it so far. We are lucky to have such a democracy in India. In US, the people's real patriotism lies in being true to the social setup (basically adhering to the rules and regulation of the society). But it is unfortunate that here in India patriotism is judged on your emotional show case than how sincere you are towards country's growth.

      --
      bits and bytes of life should serve the needy - My bits and bytes
    2. Re:Pakistan and China by jamrock · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Thank you for your reply, and in fact I agree 100% that India will prevail because of democracy. As Winston Churchill said, "Democracy is the worst form of government, except of course for all the others." In my opinion, the most basic political right is freedom of expression, and so long as India allows it and China does not, the full potential of the Chinese people will not be met. The Right To Information Act of 2005 is another great step forward by India, and I believe it to be an example to most other nations.

      It is a remarkable coincidence that when I first read this Slashdot thread, the quote at the bottom of the page was by Harry Truman: "If you have a government that is truly efficient, you have a dictatorship." Pure efficiency is not possible without trampling on the freedom of citizens. What I find interesting about China is the fact that their long history has been so tainted by chaos, disorder, foreign interference and exploitation, and unimaginable human suffering, that it is not a mystery why there is such a hunger for order, which is what the Communist Party purports to provide, and how they came to power in the first instance. It is my opinion that preserving social order is the foremost concern of the Chinese Communist Party, human rights be damned. But as Benjamin Franklin famously said, "Those who would trade security for liberty deserve neither".

      Chinese society has historically changed so incredibly slowly that the Information Age must seem like a nightmare to the Communists. The sense I get is that the Communists feel that the forces of history are against them, and that inevitably they will fade into memory. Since the passing of Mao Zedong, they have seemed to be searching for a way to preserve order within Chinese society while at the same time positioning China to step onto the global stage, while still remaining Chinese. Their booming economy and reputation as "factory to the world" may be taken for granted now, but I am old enough to remember when their fledgling experiments with capitalism seemed so out of character that the world was stunned by it.

      The world was rightfully horrified by the atrocities in Tienanmen Square, but what struck me at the time was that people were surprised by the brutal reaction of the authorities. I was most surprised by the fact that the demonstrators were allowed to gather in the first place, and remain there for three days. I remember talking with friends as the demonstrations entered the second day, and they were all gleeful that change was coming to China. I was almost in tears and practically pleading with the TV for them to leave: "You've made your point, and the authorities are signalling that they've heard you by allowing this gathering, now go, for the love of God!" My friends thought I was crazy because I predicted that it would end in tragedy and bloodshed.

      China has undergone what is for them dramatic change in the last thirty years, and continues to change. It's just that the rate of change isn't enough by the standards of the rest of the planet in this day and age. One thing that people ignorant of Chinese history should keep in mind is that China will change at her own pace, and to hell with what everyone else thinks. But like evolution, political change in China comes so slowly that it seems unnoticeable until it is put into context. I personally believe that China will transition to democracy sometime in this century, but by the time they do India will be a superpower.

  25. Re:Tastes great by phoenixwade · · Score: 3, Informative

    (1) It instantly blisters skin on contact
    (3) Not only is it good for eating...

    I'm having a hard time reconciling the first clause of fact #3 with fact #1.

    That's because "Fact" 1 isn't.
    I've been handling all sorts of hot peppers for many years, and the particularly hot ones are very capable of producing a burning sensation on the skin just like in your mouth. And Rubbing your eyes inadvertently will ruin your evening, there is no doubt. But blistering? I sup[pose it could happen if you had an allergic reaction, but that's not even remotely going to be a common thing.

    It's been my experience that dealers and vendors are really in to hyping the dangers of the sauces that are typically named "Loco", Death" and "Devil" based scary named variations.. And well they should, it's really good for business, and selling product is what they do.

    --
    A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it will annoy enough people to make it worth the effort.
  26. Re:Tastes great by Lumpy · · Score: 4, Informative

    The guy who sold it to us told us a few interesting things about it: (1) It instantly blisters skin on contact (2) it's very expensive to buy over the internet because it has to be shipped as a hazardous materiel. (3) Not only is it good for eating, but it works great as a caustic agent for degreasing driveways, engines, etc.

    the guy who sold it was ragingly full of shit.

    I have let it sit on my skin for 20 minutes to prove it's a fake claim... Won $100.00 in the office after that and eating a taco with it on it. (they dont understand that sour cream really kills it's burn)

    It's not acid, it dont burn the skin and is worthless for degreasing driveways.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  27. Call me juvenile ... by winomonkey · · Score: 5, Funny
    FTFA:

    In fact, Indian farmers say Bhut paste can be used for everything from sauces to tear gas. And there in lies the military's interest.

    The Indian military is interested in the many uses of Bhut paste? I ... I don't know how to respond to this in a mature manner.

  28. Re:Tastes great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    If your apt doesn't get enough sun, you need to use "apt -get more-sunshine". (You might have to change your sources to the beta-global-warming source repository first).

  29. Re:Pepper Abuse by Jesus_666 · · Score: 4, Funny

    That fetish might be less popular than you think it is.

    --
    USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
  30. Re:Tastes great by Bigjeff5 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    TRPV1 antagonists (of which capsaicin is one) can cause rashes and inflamation on the skin, but it takes a very high concentration. The only way I could see getting a blister is from a serious allergic reaction.

    --
    Security is mostly a superstition... Avoiding danger is no safer in the long run than outright exposure. - Helen Keller
  31. Re:Tastes great by DMUTPeregrine · · Score: 3, Informative

    That's contrary to what I know: Capsaicin binds to the TRPV1 receptor, which has a primary function of activating due to heat (>43C according to Wikipedia). The same receptor is present on some (but not all) pain nerves. The "second pepper isn't as hot" desensitization effect is due not to damage but to depletion of calcium used to transmit the signals from the affected nerves. You haven't killed anything off, just used up the fuel they use to signal the brain.
    It's also not a permanent pain reliever, it is temporary. It can last longer than other methods though. AFAICT it can last for a few weeks.

    --
    Not a sentence!