Slashdot Mirror


Raleigh Councilman Offers Child Naming Rights To Google

Anonymous Meoward writes "In what may be the weirdest perk proposed by a municipal authority to entice business, city councilman Bonner Gaylord has offered to name his unborn children Sergey and Larry, after the founders of Google. All he wants in return is the search giant to build its proposed high-speed fiber-optic network in Raleigh."

121 comments

  1. Asshole by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So his kid may have to go through life with an arbitrarily bad name, because it will help this guy's career and/or home town?

    I wonder what other kinds of crap this guy is going to pull over the next 18 years. Poor kid.

    1. Re:Asshole by dingen · · Score: 5, Funny

      His kids will be Gaylords, no matter what he calls 'em.

      --
      Pretty good is actually pretty bad.
    2. Re:Asshole by Rhaban · · Score: 5, Funny

      Sergey or Gary Gaylord can't be worse names than Bonner Gaylord.

    3. Re:Asshole by Manfre · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Sergey and Larry are not really bad names considering his kids will already be teased for their last name. It's not like he's going to name the kids "Adolf Hitler Gaylord" or "Sarah Palin Gaylord", like those other parent of the year candidates. I would feel bad for a girl if she was named Sergey or Larry.

      I'm curious if Google would rip out all the fiber if/when Mr Gaylord fails to provide children.

    4. Re:Asshole by dingen · · Score: 4, Funny

      At least it's not Boner Gaylord.

      --
      Pretty good is actually pretty bad.
    5. Re:Asshole by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yea, well it'd have to be better than Boner Gaylord Jr, now wouldn't it?

      Seriously, what's he got to lose?

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
    6. Re:Asshole by dingen · · Score: 2, Funny

      Boner Gaylord Jr

      Are we still talking about his child?

      --
      Pretty good is actually pretty bad.
    7. Re:Asshole by Chrisq · · Score: 1

      Yea, well it'd have to be better than Boner Gaylord Jr, now wouldn't it?

      Seriously, what's he got to lose?

      His parents were involved in an attempt to attract business from a male-on-male porn magazine.

    8. Re:Asshole by dintech · · Score: 1

      Well, it's easy to promise to name your children Sergey and Gary if there aren't actually going to be any...

    9. Re:Asshole by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sergey Geylord would twist your tongue, so the concatenation would happen.
      I can just imagine... Ser. Geylord

    10. Re:Asshole by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So his kid may have to go through life with an arbitrarily bad name, because it will help this guy's career and/or home town?

      I wonder what other kinds of crap this guy is going to pull over the next 18 years. Poor kid.

      With a name like 'Bonner Gaylord' (for real? I had to look it up to be sure..) I am sure he can come up with much more horrifying names than Larry and Sergey. I'd say lucky kid actually.

    11. Re:Asshole by thijsh · · Score: 1

      Found in the phonebook: Gaylord, Junior Boner. Oh and yeah, he's probably talking about his child... the puppy being a priest of satan and all (oh no it was the other side that does the buggering).

    12. Re:Asshole by SpaghettiPattern · · Score: 0

      So his kid may have to go through life with an arbitrarily bad name, because it will help this guy's career and/or home town?

      I wonder what other kinds of crap this guy is going to pull over the next 18 years. Poor kid.

      Nah. I take he took into account that both names were pretty common. There are lots of Sergeis and Larries around. I take he wouldn't have come up with a similar idea concerning Mr. Obama. Simply because the name Barak is not heard very often -I never heard of it before Obama was in the news- and it will inevitably be directly associated with Mr. Obama.

      --

      I hadn't the slightest objection to his spending his time planning massacres for the bourgeoisie... (P.G. Wodehouse)
    13. Re:Asshole by krou · · Score: 4, Funny

      Sergey and Larry are not really bad names considering his kids will already be teased for their last name

      Not until the one kid gets the nickname Sir Gay Gaylord.

      --
      'If Christ had tweeted the sermon on the mount, it might have lasted until nightfall.' - John Perry Barlow
    14. Re:Asshole by jonadab · · Score: 1

      Sarah's a sufficiently common name that "Sarah Gaylord" wouldn't be a big deal. Nobody'd even know she was named after a modern famous person until they find out her middle name. Most kids are at least slightly embarrassed about their middle names, but they quickly discover that everyone else is too, so it's generally no big deal unless it's really extreme, and being named after a famous politician (well, apart from Hitler) isn't as extreme as all that.

      Adolf as a first name, of course, would be a terrible thing to saddle the poor child with, quite irrespective of the middle name.

      --
      Cut that out, or I will ship you to Norilsk in a box.
    15. Re:Asshole by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So his kid may have to go through life with an arbitrarily bad name, because it will help this guy's career and/or home town?

      While Sergey is an uncommon name in America, Larry isn't. Well, perhaps it is in this generation, but it's not unheard of. And I imagine the guy was talking about naming the kids first and middle name as either Larry or Sergey. Given naming kids is rather subjective, I'd say it's hardly a 'bad name' given I've seen a rather terrible name of "Kermit The" recently in my home town area. You can see it in the Google result summary but the page is no longer there. The family name is "Pfister" so the kids full name is Kermit the Pfister. One of my friends knows the guy. They were going to call their kid "Twisted" (to sound like Twisted Pfister, ie. Twisted Sister) but they thought that would be going too far.

      Of course, there's those families that name kids to sound like drugs, sex, or Nazi's. So, in comparison, calling someone "Sergey" or "Larry" isn't that bad at all.

    16. Re:Asshole by fafaforza · · Score: 1

      With the worsening comprehension of the language, I'm not sure that most people would recognize a difference.

    17. Re:Asshole by catd77 · · Score: 1

      Yep, well that guy must be really desperate. Typical politicians...

    18. Re:Asshole by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why Sergey and Larry, let his children be named Google Gaylord , Microsoft Gaylord and why not Walmart Gaylord

    19. Re:Asshole by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Their last name is Gaylord, and your complaint is that relatively common, normal first names are going to ruin their lives? Really?

    20. Re:Asshole by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tell that to his elementary school classmates.

    21. Re:Asshole by The+Ultimate+Fartkno · · Score: 1

      Well, that certainly Explains it All.

    22. Re:Asshole by ThiagoHP · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Sergey or Gary Gaylord can't be worse names than Bonner Gaylord.

      In Portuguese, "Sergey" is pronounced exactly like "ser gay", which means "to be gay". Sergey Gaylord would be quite amusing. :P

    23. Re:Asshole by Monchanger · · Score: 1

      My take on the "typical politician" angle: he's oblivious of the fact that for this to work Brin and Page would have to be just as vain and corrupt as his ilk.

    24. Re:Asshole by stonewallred · · Score: 1

      That is a win for my state! Not only did we have both John Edwards and Jessie Helms, we have this moron. At least we have UNC basketball and many of the ACC teams.

    25. Re:Asshole by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 1

      If I were his kids I'd pray to every god that he calls me Sergey or Larry rather than Bonner Gaylord Jr.

    26. Re:Asshole by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 2

      Really? Sarah Palin is now up with Adolf Hitler?

      Pol Pot, Iosif Stalin, Mao, Glenn Beck, now those are up with Hitler, but who did Sarah Palin kill?

      Sarah is a perfectly good name.

    27. Re:Asshole by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      Well, at least he's manning up and selling his own children...

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    28. Re:Asshole by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who knows, maybe he actually liked those names and thought "Why not get something out of it?". Maybe he would have called Microsoft if he wanted to call them Bill and Steve.

      Sergey and Larry aren't that bad. With a surname of Gaylord his kids pretty much already lost anyway and it's way better than lots of the crap celebrities give to their children for shits and giggles.

    29. Re:Asshole by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      As a resident of Raleigh, I'm all for it. No one gets the name they 'want' you just get some name. How names are picked is arbitrary, the kids could get something retarded anyway, or its actually even entirely possible the guy already decided on these names anyway and this is just a nice publicity stunt.

      Either way, if you think the names are going to define the kids destiny you are seriously disconnected from any sort of reality I'm involved in. Its simply not really that big of a deal and no one will know they were named to get some fiber in the ground.

      More importantly, the guy himself got shafted when it comes to naming, his kids will be in good company for the 'bad names' as you call them.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    30. Re:Asshole by H0p313ss · · Score: 1

      Larry could be short for Larissa, she would also have to be black and ghetto

      I must be missing something, Larissa is a Russian name.

      --
      XML is a known as a key material required to create SMD: Software of Mass Destruction
    31. Re:Asshole by SupremoMan · · Score: 1

      How will him advancing his career not help his kids? What planet do you live on where the parental income does not affect what advantages a kid is offered in life?

    32. Re:Asshole by Cramer · · Score: 1

      It's a fairly weak bluff. Google will not be wasting their efforts on Raleigh. There's thousands of miles of fibre around here already. It costs too much to use it -- that is, they will charge too much for you to want to use it. For example, a T1 pretty much anywhere in the county can be had for $300/month. But ethernet (i.e. a fibre drop) is $800/month -- and may take 2 months to install -- even when the node is in your parking lot.

      (Plus, they'd be picking a fight with about 9 other telcos. I have 5$ that says AT&T and TimeWarner already have their lawyers at the courthouse.)

    33. Re:Asshole by Manfre · · Score: 1

      Typo on my part. Should have been "McCain Palin Gaylord".

    34. Re:Asshole by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 1

      I would have gone Che Mugabe Gaylord.

    35. Re:Asshole by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      bonner, what's a bonner?

    36. Re:Asshole by cffrost · · Score: 1

      His kids will be Gaylords, no matter what he calls 'em.

      Not A. Gaylord?
      Imno Gaylord?

      --
      Thank you, Edward Snowden.

      "Arguments from authority are worthless." —Carl Sagan
    37. Re:Asshole by blitzcat · · Score: 1

      He was an asshole when he was my HS classmate. So he's already delivering more of the same.

    38. Re:Asshole by shnull · · Score: 1

      i wonder just how many of these kids will have their revenge 20 years from now, after the population has aged and it's those kids that have to take care. Think they will have forgotten all this nonsense ?

      --
      beware he who denies you access to information for in his mind, he already deems himself to be your master (SMAC-ish)
  2. gogo carolina! by blackraven14250 · · Score: 1

    Guh.....what? I'm dumbfounded by this.

  3. Leave the guy alone. by GNUALMAFUERTE · · Score: 5, Funny

    Maybe he's internet-starved. You would sell your mother and all your future generations for some sweet bandwidth ;)

    --
    WTF am I doing replying to an AC at 5 A.M on a Friday night?
    1. Re:Leave the guy alone. by Higaran · · Score: 1

      If your going to sell your future generations for bandwith, I gurantee your soo much of a nerd your never going to have any.

    2. Re:Leave the guy alone. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      And I can guarantee you are not so much of a geek because your spelling is that of a salesman.

    3. Re:Leave the guy alone. by skine · · Score: 1

      So you're saying that this is just Rumpelstiltskin?

    4. Re:Leave the guy alone. by cffrost · · Score: 1

      It's funny because it's true.

      --
      Thank you, Edward Snowden.

      "Arguments from authority are worthless." —Carl Sagan
  4. hehe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A little late in the game for this stunt. But Raleigh would be a good city for Google to test out their fiber.

  5. Bonner Gaylord... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Srsly??

    1. Re:Bonner Gaylord... by suso · · Score: 1

      Only slightly better than Gaylord Focker.

  6. I'll do better than that: clone army by cerberusss · · Score: 2, Funny

    city councilman Bonner Gaylord has offered to name his unborn children Sergey and Larry, after the founders of Google

    I'll do better than that. If Google builds a high-speed fiber-optic network to my apartment block, I will create an army of clones, each platoon named after either Sergey or Larry.

    --
    8 of 13 people found this answer helpful. Did you?
    1. Re:I'll do better than that: clone army by clone53421 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Am I supposed to register somewhere?

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    2. Re:I'll do better than that: clone army by Xeleema · · Score: 1

      Ah, so that's the mystery behind Vault 108's "Gary" clones!!! Thanks!

      --
      "When I am king, you will be first against the wall..."
    3. Re:I'll do better than that: clone army by __aasqbs9791 · · Score: 1

      What are doing out of formation soldier!

    4. Re:I'll do better than that: clone army by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      Sorry! My telepathy unit must be malfunctioning, I’ll have it checked immediately.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
  7. Name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is it still ok to laugh at his name?

  8. Bonner Gaylord was bullied. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Boner" Gaylford. Enough said.

  9. humanity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is this including its soul? This guy is a politician that would do anything to get himself advanced in politics and it seems as if he would sell his first born to the devil if he could.

    1. Re:humanity by SteveFoerster · · Score: 3, Funny

      This guy is a politician that would do anything to get himself advanced in politics and it seems as if he would sell his first born to the devil if he could.

      First and second born, actually, although on the other hand it's not like he's offering to name the kids William Gates Gaylord and Steven Ballmer Gaylord.

      --
      Space game using normal deck of cards: http://BattleCards.org
  10. Name makes me giggle... by StickInTheMud94 · · Score: 1

    I feel a little bad about myself right now...this person's name makes me giggle. (Also, is this a little too close to April 1st to be true?)

  11. Oh, It's a revenge! by GNUALMAFUERTE · · Score: 2, Funny

    FTFA:

    RALEIGH, N.C. — Raleigh City Councilman Bonner Gaylord

    Ok, please sit down and think about it. This guy's name is BONNER GAYLORD.

    He's just trying to get back at his parents, by giving his kids horrible names. Bonner Gaylord. //Goes to check The Onion, to make sure the story wasn't pulled from there

    --
    WTF am I doing replying to an AC at 5 A.M on a Friday night?
  12. Think of the children! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    If your father were named "Boner Gaylord" you would want someone outside the gene pool to name you too. Might as well be Google.

  13. eight years later by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey Fermat! Howja get yer name? Look at that kid, Fermat! Fermat! Fermat!

  14. Just one moment... by Redlemons · · Score: 2, Funny

    This story is 3 days early.

  15. I'll spin the straw into gold. by Culture20 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    But in return, you must give me your first born child.

    1. Re:I'll spin the straw into gold. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm azoospermic you insensitive clod.

    2. Re:I'll spin the straw into gold. by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      No, you're just trying too hard and you aren't funny.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    3. Re:I'll spin the straw into gold. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do aborted ones count?

  16. CREEPY CREEPY CREEPY by macbeth66 · · Score: 2, Funny

    If it were my company, and this guy proposed such a thing, the LAST thing I would do is consider his city. I would want to be at least several states away.

    Someone get the butterfly net...

    1. Re:CREEPY CREEPY CREEPY by BitZtream · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Too bad they have a data center a few hundred miles away. Raleigh and Google have a rather good relationship, Raleigh has given Google massive tax breaks to get them to move into Lenor. Being that those tax breaks come out of my wallet, the least they can do is put some fiber in my neighborhood for me.

      Sadly, I live in Cary, which is one of raleighs outlaying cities ... we probably won't get hooked up and will get left being raped by Time Warner when they raise the price to compensate.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
  17. who cares? by Weezul · · Score: 1

    Sergey and Larry are perfectly normal names. Google is the most ethical multi-national ever. If I cared about namesakes, I'd consider Sergey or Larry for free. I'd avoid John and Maynard regardless.

    That said, I hope google sends him a very nice letter respectfully thanking him for the deep complement, but explaining that they'll choose the cities based upon other various factors, like their potential influence upon other cities.

    --
    The Christian religion has been and still is the principal enemy of moral progress in the world. -- Bertrand Russell
    1. Re:who cares? by Improv · · Score: 1

      Please don't tell me you're one of those Libertarian/Randian types who inserts into every conversation a sly mention of discredited economist Hayek.

      --
      For every problem, there is at least one solution that is simple, neat, and wrong.
    2. Re:who cares? by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      >>>explaining that they'll choose the cities based upon other various factors

      In Houston they bribed Compaq by giving them a Houston address. It didn't matter that Compaq was nowhere near Houston (about 10 miles outside city limits). Must feel good to be a politician with so much power (libido dominandi).

      Back to topic:
      - I remember accessing the internet with only 1 k (1200 bps modem)
      - Today I access the web with either 50k or 750k, depending upon my location.
      - Do we really, honestly need 100,000k lines this desperately? That sounds more like a "luxury" than a "need" and this politician being on his knees to please Google seems pretty pathetic.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    3. Re:who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is Slashdot, what do you expect? Judging by your UID I'd expect you to be used to seeing the obsessed libertarians roaming this site.

    4. Re:who cares? by G00F · · Score: 1

      What we need is to break the market up, Most people have Cable or DSL, and even in those markets where you have both, they both suck.

      In my area, Salt lake City, UT. We have a wireless company that I am seriously considering(and I hate wireless!) and there where once employing fiber through utopia, but that was destroyed by cable/telco (that had many mom/pop DSL providers behind it) But they both are still bound by Qwest for backbone, not as bad because of different last mile, but there needs to be some serious beef to break of the dualopoly(is there such a thing?)

      --
      The spirit of resistance to government is so valuable on certain occasions that I wish it to be always kept alive
    5. Re:who cares? by Yamata+no+Orochi · · Score: 1

      "Accessing the web" is not the only thing these lines are used for. I parse that phrase as "surf websites," and while I could very easily make an argument explaining that flash and embedded media make many websites one may want to visit VERY much larger than they were when you were accessing at a thousand bits per second, it is easier simply to say that the biggest demand for additional bandwidth is for the many other functions of those same pipes that benefit from more throughput, such as large file downloads and P2P functions.

      That said, being on the upper end of current technologies may be viewed as something to improve the image of your city/county/state/whatever, and as such would make a politician look good for facilitating it.

    6. Re:who cares? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rand hated libertarians, you know; not sure why people act as though Objectivist "Randians" and libertarians are the same thing.

      Though if you think Hayek is "discredited", well, I guess it's just all-around ignorance.

    7. Re:who cares? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      I would have done the same thing if it meant brings jobs to the community.

      "- I remember accessing the internet with only 1 k (1200 bps modem)"
      And I remember 300 baud and needing to get permission from the university. Big deal.

      "- Today I access the web with either 50k or 750k, depending upon my location."
      So?

      "- Do we really, honestly need 100,000k lines this desperately? That sounds more like a "luxury" than a "need" and this politician being on his knees to please Google seems pretty pathetic."

      All communications and entertainment s moving to the internet, and homes have more then 1 device connected to the net. A family of 4 will have at least 4 connections, and probably more.

      Plus, if you want to have your community have even the lightest chance to bring in new startups, you needs to have very phat pipe. And bringin in startups means money and employment.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    8. Re:who cares? by WillDraven · · Score: 1

      I'd avoid John and Maynard regardless.

      Fuck that. Maynard is an awesome name.

      --
      This is my sig. There are many like it but this one is mine.
    9. Re:who cares? by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 1

      Google is the most ethical multi-national ever?

      From TFW on MNCs - "They have pointed out that multinationals create false needs in consumers and have had a long history of interference in the policies of sovereign nation states. Evidence supporting this belief includes invasive advertising (such as billboards, television ads, adware, spam, telemarketing, child-targeted advertising, guerilla marketing), massive corporate campaign contributions in democratic elections..."

      Google advertises, invades privacy donates to elections, so what makes them more ethical than Apple, IBM or Intel to name three? Also Google has only been around for 12 years so they've not had time to sell data gathering tools to genocides yet like IBM did.

      As for the "...but explaining that they'll choose the cities based upon other various factors, like their potential influence upon other cities." Raleigh is in the middle of the Research Triangle.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Research_Triangle

    10. Re:who cares? by Stormwatch · · Score: 1

      In a way, it makes sense: objectivism and libertarianism have many similar views in politics and economics. However, there are differences. Rand thought libertarians lacked the philosophy behind the politics. For example, you can be a libertarian and religious conservative, while she rejected religion completely.

    11. Re:who cares? by Weezul · · Score: 1

      No, I just picked the most well known economist that has contributed to our current economic problems.

      If I was being serious, I'd have looked up the asshole economist who initially put forward the theory that a corporation's sole duty is to it's stock holders.

      --
      The Christian religion has been and still is the principal enemy of moral progress in the world. -- Bertrand Russell
  18. Zen by Improv · · Score: 1

    And then, 30 years later, his children would both end up working at google and we will have come full circle.

    --
    For every problem, there is at least one solution that is simple, neat, and wrong.
  19. Officials are used to whoring by Morris+Thorpe · · Score: 1

    The stunts being done by these cities and their officials border on begging. I mean, sure it'd be cool to land the Google network, but c'mon man! Hold on to some dignity.

    This has been an interesting example of the mindset of the politicians as opposed to normal people, though. Some politicians are making fools of themselves to try and attract Google's gaze. Would normal people even consider doing something like this? Of course not. Why would having a mayor diving in icy waters or naming a child after the Google guys convince them to move to your town?

    For most politicians, begging and whoring themselves comes naturally. That's what's scary about this.

    1. Re:Officials are used to whoring by syntheticmemory · · Score: 1

      Well, if it works for Reality TV programs, it should work for politicians....

    2. Re:Officials are used to whoring by geekoid · · Score: 1

      " Would normal people even consider doing something like this? Of course no"
      Of course they would. Do you really need a list of stupid shit normal people do in the hopes of getting money?

      The Google contest is to see who will go the farthest in impress Google.

      Here is a clue" Politicians are pretty much normal people.

      For the record, I don't think this will do it. I think it would be better to change a street name to "Google Ave" and have it cross with "Internet Highway".

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  20. Who do we work for anymore? by The+Angry+Mick · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Ourselves or the fucking corporations? Have we sunk so low that we're offering our CHILDREN up to the gods of corporate benevolence?

    And how much do you want to bet that along with the offer of surrendering his offspring's identity, there's an additional offer of either a hefty tax break, or even a free pass?

    --

    I'm not tense. I'm just terribly, terribly, alert.

    1. Re:Who do we work for anymore? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Oh clam down. It's a name. Yeah, it's pretty weird, and I wouldn't do it. It's not like he is saying everyone in the town will get Google tattoos for their children,. It's not their identity.

      If it would mean enough jobs, then why not a tax break?

      It is better to have 1000 Jobs and a tax breaks to a corporation, then 0 jobs and no tax break.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:Who do we work for anymore? by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      Right, because there aren't hundreds of thousands of other Sergey and Larry boys running around the world.

      Stop being so angsty, its not you, its not your kids, its not your city, its not your name.

      You've got your panties in a bunch over something that will never effect you and will likely never even be known by the two potential children inless it comes up in a funny conversation 30 years from now.

      In short, it doesnt fucking matter if he names his kids after Google founders, their going to get names based on some random thing, why not something productive for him.

      There are far bigger issues in the world, and in Raleigh for that matter than what some guy names his kids.

      I really fail to see why it even matters to you. It won't effect anyone but maybe the lucky people who get fiber.

      The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few ... especially when the only change the 'few' are going to notice his how long it takes them to sign a check.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    3. Re:Who do we work for anymore? by The+Angry+Mick · · Score: 1

      You're right, it's not me. It is however, a reflection of our societal values.

      If we are willing to trade our children's identities for a handful of dollars or a faster internet connection (!), what's to stop us from going even further, say, handing the kids over for labor? Hell, it'll save Google loads of money, lower their tax burdens. and we could probably write the runts off. Joy and prosperity all around!

      Except for the kids that have to grow up realizing that mommy and daddy cared more about money than their own flesh and blood.

      --

      I'm not tense. I'm just terribly, terribly, alert.

  21. Touching by tarscher · · Score: 4, Funny

    Touching what men wants to do to download porn at high speed.

  22. Espn Real by tepples · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Have we sunk so low that we're offering our CHILDREN up to the gods of corporate benevolence?

    If so, it's nothing new. Case in port: Espn Real.

  23. koosh koosh by Essequemodeia · · Score: 1

    I propose we attempt to embarrass this man to the fullest extent... by naming his child... Bonner Gaylord. Surely a funnier name has yet to be found.

    1. Re:koosh koosh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Randy Bumgardner (white house official) begs to disagree :-)
      And of course the unfortunately named "Peter File".
      or "Paris Hilton" come to think of it.

    2. Re:koosh koosh by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      Runner-up list:

      Coco Crisp
      Albert Pujols (yes, as in “poo holes”) ... although someone could probably think of a worse first name than Albert.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
  24. Bribery? by Blindman · · Score: 1

    This isn't the classic example of a bribe, but technically he is offering something arguably of value to the founders of Google in return for them causing Google to give him something that he wants. I assume the names Sergey and Larry are more valuable to Google's founders than Google itself, and he isn't offering to name his children Google, Adwords, or some other Google trademark.

    --
    I don't practice what I preach because I'm not the kind of person that I'm preaching to.
    1. Re:Bribery? by 644bd346996 · · Score: 1

      When the government does it, it is called an incentive.

  25. Sounds like an April 1st joke by swatthatfly · · Score: 1

    An article where a dude named Bonner Gaylord will name his children after the Google founders is just an excuse for an April first warm-up. Some people just can't wait to get started with the pranks.

    --
    keyboard not found! press any key to continue...
  26. How does he guarantee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How does he guarantee that he will have any children ?

  27. Not the weirdest proposed by a municipal authority by homey+of+my+owney · · Score: 3, Funny

    Many years ago, the town of Radium Hot Springs, New Mexico, offered to change their name to "Truth or Consequences" to win a prize from the TV show of the same name. They thought it would bring in business, and notoriety. It's still a pretty quiet town, though it does have an amusing name... especially when the abbreviation (T or C) is pronounced as a word.

  28. Lessons not learned by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

    Turok Gaylord?

    --
    Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    1. Re:Lessons not learned by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      Could be worse, could be Peter Gaylord. It doesn't surprise me though, as I've met a few kids growing up where I thought "WTF were their parents thinking?". For example there was a girl in my class whose parents named her Sandy Bush and her brother's name was Harold (which of course got shortened to Harry).

      At least my GF and I have excuses for our names, my mom went into labor while watching Thunderball in the theater so I got named Sean, while my GF's mom went into labor in the middle of a Brenda Lee concert and so got named Brenda. Cool thing was she got a card every year until she was 18 from Brenda Lee.

      But considering the fact that we have become such money whores that girls sell their virginity to the highest bidder, why should we be even surprised that some douche is willing to sell his kid's names? At least he'll get reelected if he pulls it off, and maybe fiber to the home.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    2. Re:Lessons not learned by sarahbau · · Score: 1

      I'm in Raleigh, but would never vote to reelect him, even though I would really like Google to bring its network trials here. If he's willing to sell his kid's names to further his career, what other shady things would he be willing to do?

    3. Re:Lessons not learned by cswiii · · Score: 1

      Probably try to get himself named to the Wake County Board of Education.

    4. Re:Lessons not learned by Thiez · · Score: 1

      > But considering the fact that we have become such money whores that girls sell their virginity [foxnews.com] to the highest bidder, why should we be even surprised that some douche is willing to sell his kid's names? At least he'll get reelected if he pulls it off, and maybe fiber to the home.

      How is this worse than 'normal' prostitution? The 'girls' you speak of is a single person and is 22 years of age. The highest offer mentioned is about $3.7 million, I think she's getting a pretty good deal for giving up something worthless.

    5. Re:Lessons not learned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      still a lord of gay

  29. Isn't this just plain begging by bkmiictian · · Score: 1

    Every other day there is a story describing how yet another b/w starved city/town is 'begging' google in an innovative way. Is begging the defining characteristic of our generation? Maybe, if someone can highlight a story wherein a town/city highlights how they can stand up on their feet with the extra b/w (not a bplan!), instead of a crazy marketing gimmick, google might actually initiate some action and live upto their motto of 'do no evil'. (Note that it doesn't necessarily mean 'do good')

    --
    The pen is mightier than the sword. The keyboard is mightier than the pen.
  30. Lesser of three evils... by jwoah12 · · Score: 2, Funny

    If you look on the bright side, it prevents the kid from being called Bonner Junior (B.J. Gaylord).

  31. Epically bad decisionmaking by jeffmeden · · Score: 1

    Was I the only one who read "child naming rights" and then skimmed straight to "Sergey And Larry", thinking that he was in fact going to name his next kid "Sergey And Larry Gaylord"?

    What a prize. Anyway, I imagine the next article is going to read something like this:

    "Raleigh Councilman's Child Production Rights Revoked By Upset Wife"

  32. No, Not Sergey and Larry by Michael_Burton · · Score: 1

    I think this guy's counting on "don't be evil." Anyway, Sergey and Larry aren't bad names. I think he might withdraw the offer if Google counters with a demand for "Google" and "Froogle."

    --
    When all you have is an axe, everything looks like a grindstone.
  33. Scary. by NamShubCMX · · Score: 1

    I can't help but to think of the book Jennifer Governement by Max Berry (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jennifer_Government).

    Dystopian sci-fi should remain well... fiction.

    --
    We've always been at war with Eurasia.
  34. Amazing what people will do... by SimonSaysBleed · · Score: 1

    ...for something we should already have.

  35. If a man... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If a man can effectively sell the names of his children, names that the children will be basically forced to keep for their entire lives... Names which could impact their entire development...

    Why can't two consenting adults exchange currency, in a private transaction, for the purpose of engaging in anywhere between 5 and 30 minutes of consensual sex?

    Or how about for some baseball tickets?

  36. If I were Sergei or Larry by maroberts · · Score: 1

    I'd build the damn thing in Raleigh if he didn't name his children after me

    --

    Donte Alistair Anderson Roberts - hi son!
    Karma: Chameleon

  37. If I were Him... by darthdavid · · Score: 1

    I'd have taken my wife's last name. Hard to be worse that Gaylord...

  38. Lifetime Accomplishment by iperkins · · Score: 1

    Well, it got the guy a mention on /. What more could anyone want?? Next, he'll want to change his name to Frist Psot

  39. Right ... by PinkyGigglebrain · · Score: 1

    As if we needed any proof that politicians are willing to barter their family to advance their careers.

  40. MS Gaylord already taken by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why Sergey and Larry, let his children be named Google Gaylord , Microsoft Gaylord and why not Walmart Gaylord

    Well, I don't know about the other two, but Microsoft Gaylord is already taken - it was the little known optional foppish Southern animated guide character the user could choose in Microsoft Bob.

  41. Obvious reaction... by RichiH · · Score: 1

    ...is for Google to tell Mr. Boner Gaylord to go bone his gay lord.

    Seriously, even though his children will be teased anyway even offering this is wrong. Period.

  42. Note to Americans: by drsquare · · Score: 1

    Stop worshipping the rich. It will solve all of your problems.

  43. And the Jews said...... by dogzdik · · Score: 0
    And when the Sodomites wanted to fuck the angels arses, the Sodomi said, "Here fuck my daughters instead"......

    -

    The intelligence of parents is frequently overrated.

    --

    .

    Voting up, Voting down - If I really gave a fuck about your approval or not, I'd come and ask you.