Slashdot Mirror


Gonorrhea As the Next Superbug

WrongSizeGlass writes "Reuters is reporting that Gonorrhea risks becoming a superbug: 'The sexually transmitted disease gonorrhea risks becoming a drug-resistant "superbug" if doctors do not devise new ways of treating it, a leading sexual health expert said.'"

456 comments

  1. I've got the cure by TheKidWho · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I've got the cure!

    It's called a condom and not screwing nasty hoes!

    1. Re:I've got the cure by McGiraf · · Score: 5, Funny

      You must live a dull life.

    2. Re:I've got the cure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      My cure is posting on slashdot.

    3. Re:I've got the cure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also don't use iPhones and/or have homosex.

    4. Re:I've got the cure by TheKidWho · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Maybe, but at least I don't have gonorrhea!

    5. Re:I've got the cure by t0qer · · Score: 4, Funny

      Where are these "Nasty Ho's" that you speak of? This dry spell has gone on so long that even knotholes in fences are starting to look good.

    6. Re:I've got the cure by Aranykai · · Score: 3, Funny

      You must be new here.

      --
      If sharing a song makes you a pirate, what do I have to share to be a ninja?
    7. Re:I've got the cure by jidai · · Score: 1

      I've got the cure!

      It's called a condom and not screwing nasty hoes!

      Ive got a cure: Humping you in the face.

    8. Re:I've got the cure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Your method has a track record of never wiping out a single venereal disease.

    9. Re:I've got the cure by RMS+Eats+Toejam · · Score: 0, Troll

      Using a condom is like eating a candy with the wrapper still on it.

      --
      Turning to a Linux advocate for thoughts on Microsoft is like asking Hitler how he felt about the Jews.
    10. Re:I've got the cure by mysidia · · Score: 1

      I don't know what they taught you in school sex ed, but NiMH rechargeable batteries are decidedly not a cure for Gonorrhea, or any known disease, no matter where you try to insert them.

      Good plain abstinence goes along way. A lot farther than sticking batteries or energizer bunnies up your partner's *****.

      If you want an exciting life, go skydiving with your prospective girlfriend instead of s3x0r. You will live a lot longer and have a lot more fun.

    11. Re:I've got the cure by MikeFM · · Score: 4, Funny

      So get married and go without. You get to take the wrapper off but you have to eat the same candy every day.

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
    12. Re:I've got the cure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Live longer? Says who?

      Sex makes you less stressed. Your alternative of skydiving is a hell of a lot riskier than having sex with a stable girlfriend.

      Or am I just feeding the troll?

    13. Re:I've got the cure by blackraven14250 · · Score: 5, Funny

      That's not a cure, it's a prevention mechanism.

    14. Re:I've got the cure by deniable · · Score: 1

      Prevention is better than cure.

    15. Re:I've got the cure by Jurily · · Score: 5, Funny

      a leading sexual health expert

      Translation: virgin.

    16. Re:I've got the cure by paeanblack · · Score: 2, Funny

      Just lay off the Salsa Cookies and you'll be fine.

      Oh yeah...Windmill Cookies too...

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bpAzvKt_8lk

    17. Re:I've got the cure by rubycodez · · Score: 4, Informative

      wrong, throat gonorrhea is quite common, and transmissible to your penis via oral sex.

    18. Re:I've got the cure by Alwin+Henseler · · Score: 1

      It's called a condom (..)

      Just one? That won't get you very far...

    19. Re:I've got the cure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      you get to eat candy every day?

    20. Re:I've got the cure by bertoelcon · · Score: 1

      NiMH rechargeable batteries are decidedly not a cure for Gonorrhea, or any known disease, no matter where you try to insert them.

      Wait a dead phone isn't a disease? Those bastards lied to me!

      --
      Anything can be found funny, from a certain point of view.
    21. Re:I've got the cure by wooferhound · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Using a condom is like taking a shower with your cloths on

      --
      We are Dead Stars looking back Up at the Sky
    22. Re:I've got the cure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't have a penis, you insensitive clod!

    23. Re:I've got the cure by Jedi+Alec · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Good plain abstinence goes along way.

      If you want an exciting life, go skydiving with your prospective girlfriend instead of s3x0r. You will live a lot longer and have a lot more fun.

      Uhuh...or just pop down to the local clinic, have some blood and urine samples taken and wait a few days. Tada! Either there's nothing wrong with either of you and hence no reason to avoid s3x0ring except choice, religion or fear of conception or the tests will show up positive for something and you're glad you found before stuff started to fall off/rot your brain/etc.

      The numbers don't lie. Trying to pretend teenagers will not have sex does not have sex. Teaching abstinence only and restricting access to birth control methods such as is often seen in fundamentally religious communities leads to more teenage pregnancies, abortions and STD's transmitted, not less.

      --

      People replying to my sig annoy me. That's why I change it all the time.
    24. Re:I've got the cure by itsthebin · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's called a condom (..)

      Just one? That won't get you very far...

      correct you need 2 - with some chilli paste between them.

      that way one of you will know if you develop a leak :D

      --
      ...I obey the laws of physics....
    25. Re:I've got the cure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just because you have a size 68 waist from the pizza and Mountain Dew, and haven't seen - or felt - your johnson in five years doesn't mean it no longer exists...

    26. Re:I've got the cure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Call me crazy, but that may be... a woman!

    27. Re:I've got the cure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you need sex to make your life interesting, perhaps you are the one with a dull life?

    28. Re:I've got the cure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, I agree with what I think you're trying to say, but you really need to start proof-reading your posts before you submit them.

    29. Re:I've got the cure by LBt1st · · Score: 1

      Totally agree. Find someone your happy with. Get checked out. If everything's clean, go at it like rabbits. Nothin wrong with that at all!

    30. Re:I've got the cure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      And that is relevant... how, exactly, unless she was going to pose for naughty pictures for us?

      If this were 4chan, this would be the obligatory tits or gtfo.

    31. Re:I've got the cure by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 5, Funny

      Go back to church dickhead.

      And you think priests don't have Gonorrhea?

    32. Re:I've got the cure by VanGarrett · · Score: 3, Informative

      Teaching practices need to promote the ideal circumstances, and count on the opposite. In the case of sexual education, promote abstinence, explain the array of potential consequences (which can occur despite the use of condoms), and make sure they know what their contraceptive options are, as well as how to go about getting them-- After all, even if they don't take this new found knowledge and immediately go out to copulate, this information will still be useful when they get married.

      Really, in a perfect world, the responsibility for teaching children about sex would fall squarely on the parents, but we just can't count on the parents doing that part of their job. Maybe it's because we have horrible parents who are so bad at their tasks because their own parents were no good at it, or maybe it's because our culture regards sex as a generally impolite subject which parents are generally content to ignore. One way or another, we've failed on the whole subject for a couple of generations now, and the consequence is that each successive generation is slightly more loose than the one that came before (on the other hand, I'm not certain that the current youth is quite as promiscuous as the "FREE LOVE" generation of the 60's, but then, I've only born distant witness to the younger of the two). One way or another, something needs to be fixed.

    33. Re:I've got the cure by MaskedSlacker · · Score: 2

      Which is a good idea if you've just spilled something hazardous on yourself--like that dirty hoebag.

    34. Re:I've got the cure by dudpixel · · Score: 2, Funny

      only in the literal sense

      --
      This seemed like a reasonable sig at the time.
    35. Re:I've got the cure by andreicio · · Score: 0

      Why is abstinence the ideal circumstance? I really don't understand this point of view. It's usually due to a religion of some sorts (the 3 monotheistic that came from the middle east share this thought), but even so I don't get it. Why did religion have to forbid sex for pleasure? I agree that self-control is easier to teach through banning basic pleasures, but sex? Banning a natural thing is NOT a good idea, and will generate a hell of a cognitive dissonance.

    36. Re:I've got the cure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's why I only post AC ;-)

    37. Re:I've got the cure by h4rm0ny · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If you want an exciting life, go skydiving with your prospective girlfriend instead of s3x0r. You will live a lot longer and have a lot more fun.

      Flaws with your post:
      1. You describe falling out of a plain strapped to another guy as more fun than sex.
      2. You neglect the possibility that one can have sex whilst sky-diving.
      3. Your logic presumes that it's an either / or. If you're doing so much sky-diving that you don't have time for sex, well...
      4. Sky-diving is massively more costly than having sex. If you think otherwise, then you need to meet a different sort of girl.
      5. People die during sky-diving and not many people do it. Few people die during sex and everybody does it. Statistically, your suggestion of living a lot longer through sky-diving is screwy. Have sex a few hundred times a year, or jump out of a plane a few hundred times a year.

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    38. Re:I've got the cure by h4rm0ny · · Score: 1


      Oh, I forget number 6. It's spelled 'sex' not 's3x0r'.

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    39. Re:I've got the cure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sex makes you less stressed if you're a moron who is constantly seeking sex, in the same way that finding a rock will make you less stressed if you were spending all week being stressed because you couldn't find a rock.

    40. Re:I've got the cure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Sex releases Dopamine and Serotonin and is why you love sex so much. Get some coke, meth or dmt and you can escape the dependency of vagina for those 'good feelings' and also avoid the inevitable headache from her bitching.

      AC? you betcha she might be reading!

    41. Re:I've got the cure by mick232 · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, my religion doesn't allow me to use them...

    42. Re:I've got the cure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So get married and go without. You get to take the wrapper off but you have to eat the same candy every day.

      Every day? I want to meet your wife...I'm lucky if I get to eat the candy once a week

    43. Re:I've got the cure by webagogue · · Score: 1

      There's worse things than a bit of ooze... like having never banged two slutty hos at the same time.

      --

      Knowledge is valuable. Ignorance is dangerous. Censorship is unacceptable. http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=10
    44. Re:I've got the cure by Schadrach · · Score: 1

      In terms of avoiding STD and pregnancy, it's pretty clear why abstinence is the ideal circumstance -- it's the only one where the risk is non-existent, rather than small.

      As for religion forbidding sex, it's simple -- it's easier for a religion to control people when "all have sinned". It's rather like the quote about how the government can't control innocent men, it can only crack down on criminals.

    45. Re:I've got the cure by demonlapin · · Score: 1

      Try Craigslist; I think they're still there.

    46. Re:I've got the cure by loufoque · · Score: 1

      That's not a cure, that's a vaccine.

    47. Re:I've got the cure by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 2, Funny

      ... Only if you're trying to wash your junk by having sex.

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    48. Re:I've got the cure by TheKidWho · · Score: 1

      Newsflash, this isn't 4chan and no one cares about what would happen on the cesspool known as 4chan.

    49. Re:I've got the cure by vegiVamp · · Score: 1

      Agreed with your general point, but getting tested is no 100% certainty. Take into account both incubation periods (for HIV currently 3 to 6 months), and the possibility that $other hasn't quite enough with you alone.

      --
      What a depressingly stupid machine.
    50. Re:I've got the cure by mapkinase · · Score: 1

      "Teaching abstinence only and restricting access to birth control methods such as is often seen in fundamentally religious communities leads to more teenage pregnancies, abortions and STD's transmitted"

      I'd love to see more or less comprehensive statistics on the part in bold.

      --
      I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
    51. Re:I've got the cure by ipquickly · · Score: 2, Insightful

      NO religion teaches abstinence as an ideal circumstance.
      Religions teach abstinence until the person meets another person, and then makes a permanent commitment to that person.
      Then religions say Go for it!

      Many people have major misconceptions about religion and sex, and then make strong statements rooted in ignorance.

      Sex is an addiction to anyone who has done it. Once you start, you don't stop.
      Religions know this, and that's why they say to wait until you found the right person, to not only have sex with, but to also have a family with.

      Last time I checked, most people do want to get married someday, and do want a family someday.

    52. Re:I've got the cure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go back to church dickhead.

      You do know that it's not your fault.

    53. Re:I've got the cure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dont worry about him Fleshlight for the win!

      http://www.fleshlight.com/

    54. Re:I've got the cure by CharlieG · · Score: 1

      Yes - there WAS a reason for blood tests before getting married and the traditional 'no sex before marrage' deal back in the days before antibiotics and the pill. We may just end up back there. May be dull having only one partner all your life, but a lot of us have done it anyway

      --
      -- 73 de KG2V For the Children - RKBA! "You are what you do when it counts" - the Masso
    55. Re:I've got the cure by Aceticon · · Score: 1

      The way certain Churches deal with sex outside the marriage and preach abstinence is a bit like the war on drugs:
      - You make it illegal/socially-shamefull
      - You tell teenagers they can't do it.
      - Teenagers dully proceed to do what you told them they can't do.
      - Some teenagers get problems because of it.
      - Because it's illegal/socially-shamefull the teenagers with with problems do not seek help.
      - The problems develop into life-ruining outcomes (uncontrolled addictions/children born to single mothers).

      Telling teenagers to go against their strongest impulses and then denying them help when they "fall to temptation" even if just once just creates more single-mothers and children of single-mothers: both belonging to social groups with the lowest likellyhood of future success.

    56. Re:I've got the cure by ipquickly · · Score: 1

      The numbers don't lie. Trying to pretend teenagers will not have sex does not have sex. Teaching abstinence only and restricting access to birth control methods such as is often seen in fundamentally religious communities leads to more teenage pregnancies, abortions and STD's transmitted, not less.

      Show me those numbers!
      Everything that I've seen contradicts your assumptions.

      But such statements are common amongst those who haven't done the research.
      Drawing from ones own life experience is not a substitute for statistics.

    57. Re:I've got the cure by TheKidWho · · Score: 1

      Been there, did them both, except only one was a slutty ho.

    58. Re:I've got the cure by jandersen · · Score: 1

      I've got the cure!

      It's called a condom and not screwing nasty hoes!

      No, this is a stark reminder of the importance of washing your hands! Remember, this is Slashdot, where people are use to manage these matters on their own. Another good tip: don't confuse the superglue with the lubricant.

    59. Re:I've got the cure by Thing+1 · · Score: 3, Funny

      You can also buy fences on Craigslist.

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    60. Re:I've got the cure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Erhm..I do! Tits or GTFO!

    61. Re:I've got the cure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Teaching abstinence only and restricting access to birth control methods such as is often seen in fundamentally religious communities leads to more teenage pregnancies, abortions and STD's transmitted, not less.

      Actually, this is debatable.

      If you compare teen pregnancy and abortion rates from more liberal and conservative states, no clear pattern exists.

      While restricting education and birth control is objectionable simply on humanitarian grounds, to discount the effect of social pressure (as commonly found in religious communities) on reducing STDs and pregnancy is equally misguided.

      Yes, teens have sex, but the permissiveness and tolerance of it can have a significant effect on outcomes.

    62. Re:I've got the cure by Andypcguy · · Score: 1

      From the girls point of view this is a bit unfair. Guys will lie and do anything to trick a girl into a quick F*%^. So don't mess around with skanky guys. Girls already try to do this.

    63. Re:I've got the cure by FlyMysticalDJ · · Score: 1

      I disagree. There is a lot more variety when married than to compare it to the exact same candy. It's more like rooting yourself to one brand of candy. You get all the variation that you can find within that brand. And yes, I already hear the obligatory "But how can you know that a brand of candy isn't total crap unless you taste it first?". As much as that theoretically is a problem, I think you'll find that if you know and understand the owners of the company, then you can attest to quality, and more importantly the dedication to improved quality, without even touching the candy. Personally, I made sure I had myself a Godiva before I took things anywhere.

    64. Re:I've got the cure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Teaching abstinence only...leads to more teenage pregnancies, abortions and STD's transmitted, not less

      Care to back up any of your nonsense with facts? http://www.ncfy.com/publications/abstats.htm

    65. Re:I've got the cure by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      If you want an exciting life, go skydiving with your prospective girlfriend instead of s3x0r.

      Yeah, like you're not getting laid after talking a chick skydiving. Come on!

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    66. Re:I've got the cure by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      These fences are not going around a herd of sheep by any chance, are they? ^^

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    67. Re:I've got the cure by fonske · · Score: 1

      This is teenage or unexperienced male talk.
      Either circumcised or not, a condom will not lower your pleasure. In fact even the male will experience more pleasure because of postponed ejaculation.
      If you can't take the time to put on a condom you are again unexperienced.
      And condoms are not the all protective measure because they can tear, even when properly put on.

    68. Re:I've got the cure by tibit · · Score: 1, Insightful

      What a strawman. An addiction is not something that once started, you don't stop. If you define things like that, then walking is an addiction too. So that argument is just stupid.

      Sex can be an addiction if it quacks like one. If it negatively affects your daily life, then yes it is an addiction. Never mind that married couples have *intramarital* sex addiction problems too, you don't automatically get excluded simply because you married. If you sneak out of work twice a day for sex, it doesn't matter if you do it with your secretary or with your wife/hubby.

      Anyway, all of the not-yet-married couples I know or knew, and there were quite a few, were rather definitely not addicted to sex, so I don't see it as a problem of *addiction*. Some of them would be addicted to other things, but not to sex.

      Your arguments don't pass the smell test, IOW. They are just one more in an endless stream of religious rhetoric that falls on its face if looked at from any angle other than blind acceptance.

      I don't think that people have "major misconceptions" about sex and religion like you insist. You're laying some smoke bombs, OTOH. Catholic Church does *not* allow *married* couples to have sex with contraceptives. That's hardly saying *go for it*, isn't it? There are more examples like this, hopefully you know them and just pretend to ignore them. If you didn't know, then perhaps it's time to get educated?

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    69. Re:I've got the cure by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      Uhuh...or just pop down to the local clinic, have some blood and urine samples taken and wait a few days.

      Unless of course your prospective partner picked it up too recently for it to show up on the tests. HIV, for example, takes 3-6 months to show up in blood tests, there are other STDs that take time to show up in tests as well.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    70. Re:I've got the cure by smooth+wombat · · Score: 1

      I'd love to see more or less comprehensive statistics on the part in bold.

      Let's start with this article which references several different studies over the years which have shown that abstinence-only programs fail at their message when compared to a comprehensive sex education program.

      The reports do not say that these were in fundamentally religious communities, but the results would probably be similar in those communities.

      However, there is this report (pdf) which discusses abstinence-only vs. a comprehensive sex education program.

      Finally, there is this report (pdf) from the Journal of Adolescent Health which reviews current (2005) U.S. policy of abstinence and abstinence-only programs.

      Here is the link (pdf) to the report mentioned from the Guttmacher Institute. They also produced this report (pdf) which does talk about a somewhat successful abstinence-only program for young African-Americans, but notes this was not the normal abstinence-only type program.

      Hope this helps.

      --
      We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    71. Re:I've got the cure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Talk about one place you need to wear a condom.

    72. Re:I've got the cure by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 2, Informative

      The numbers don't lie. Trying to pretend teenagers will not have sex does not have sex. Teaching abstinence only and restricting access to birth control methods such as is often seen in fundamentally religious communities leads to more teenage pregnancies, abortions and STD's transmitted, not less.

      Sorry to reply a second time right away, I missed this the first time. According to this study ( http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Education/2010/0202/Abstinence-only-study-could-alter-sex-education-landscape ) you are wrong. This study took kids and randomly assigned them to four groups, each of which received different types of sex education. The abstinence only kids had the lowest rate of beginning sexual activity. It is not in this article, but the study also found that the rate of condom use by those who had sex was statistically similar across all four groups.
      I would agree that restricting access to contraceptives is counterproductive. However, there is a difference between not restricting access to contraceptives and providing contraceptives.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    73. Re:I've got the cure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This would be the same Guttmacher associated with Planned Parenthood?

      Yeah, no conflict there.

    74. Re:I've got the cure by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      +5 insightful? Insightful, my ass. You're going to use a condom when you have sex with your wife? And the guy that's banging her is also banging this crackwhore [link possibly nsfw].

    75. Re:I've got the cure by mapkinase · · Score: 1

      "The reports do not say that these were in fundamentally religious communities"

      "Hope this helps"

      No, it does not.

      The effectiveness of abstinence-only program directly depends on how people follow it and it is obvious that in religious communities they follow it out of deeper broad universal wholesome conviction, not as abstract out-of-nowhere rule.

      --
      I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
    76. Re:I've got the cure by thasmudyan · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Religions teach abstinence until the person meets another person, and then makes a permanent commitment to that person.
      Then religions say Go for it!

      I sincerely hope you're being sarcastic. Religions perceive sex as a necessary evil, to be used for procreation only. Actually, most religions go even further and condone the concept of love (and by extension sex) only if it subject to some kind of religious regulation mechanism, because anything else gnaws away at the oppressive stranglehold religion has over everyday life. In order to exist, religion needs to have a monopoly on everything fulfilling and meaningful.

      Sex is an addiction to anyone who has done it. Once you start, you don't stop.

      Again, you're kidding, right? Sexuality, for most people, is a natural part of their existence, a part of themselves. Sex addiction is not a recognized medical condition, it's a catchphrase invented by tabloid media designed to appeal to stupid people.

      Religions know this, and that's why they say to wait until you found the right person, to not only have sex with, but to also have a family with.

      And until you found "the right person", you are required to act as if you're a sexless, joyless, dishonest zombie. You're not even allowed to find out if that person is actually sexually compatible, until ít's too late. Oh, I forget "the right person" has to meet certain requirements of gender and, in many cases, social status. Otherwise, they're obviously not the right person. And once you have declared one person to be "the right person", you can never change your mind, or an invisible sky tyrant will crush your immortal soul for all eternity. Sounds awesome.

    77. Re:I've got the cure by Jedi+Alec · · Score: 1

      Teaching practices need to promote the ideal circumstances, and count on the opposite. In the case of sexual education, promote abstinence, explain the array of potential consequences (which can occur despite the use of condoms), and make sure they know what their contraceptive options are, as well as how to go about getting them-- After all, even if they don't take this new found knowledge and immediately go out to copulate, this information will still be useful when they get married.

      I agree with you except except for the part on teaching abstinence. I thought this was Slashdot, home of the libertards? Schools should teach facts. You're 12/13/14, there's lots of funky stuff going on in your bodies and you've probably started to notice all sorts of interesting things about the opposite(usually) sex that weren't quite as interesting before. Here's the deal...these are the available methods for contraception, the methods for avoiding STD's and the associated risks and benefits of each of them. This is where you can go if you have more questions or if you need to get tested anonymously. Oh, and just for added flavor, this is a picture of what syphilis does to you after a few years...nothing but cold, hard, facts...

      After that you hand it off to the parents and they can wrap it in their local flavor of morality. In the case of my folks that was "think first, then ask questions and if you're still going to shoot you're bloody well going to do it in a piece of latex", accompanied by a pack of rubbers. If you want to tell your daughter that the first guy to lay a finger on her is going to get a shot of 12 gauge in the face, be my guest, but at least she'll have all the facts when she has to make a decision.

      Surely no true-blooded slashdotian would advocate actively withholding facts from other people? Information wants to be free right? Even if it might displease the great big invisible guy in the sky?

      --

      People replying to my sig annoy me. That's why I change it all the time.
    78. Re:I've got the cure by thasmudyan · · Score: 1

      http://americanaffairs.suite101.com/article.cfm/high_std_rates_abstinence_ed_link
      http://www.newsweek.com/id/74005
      http://gayteens.about.com/b/2009/11/17/rising-std-rates-linked-to-abstinence-only-education.htm
      http://www.avert.org/abstinence.htm

      Just a few links off the top google search results on the subject. While facts will certainly never really matter to people who feel so strongly in favor of religious indoctrination and against sex, it's certainly easy for the rest of us to see the obvious effects at work here. It's a lovely subject of discussion between fundamentalists and enlightened people, but for the sake of all adolescents who are just starting out on this whole sex thing, I'd rather see that relgious brainwashing stay out of sex education (or any form of education for that matter).

    79. Re:I've got the cure by sourcerror · · Score: 1

      I don't have sex. I use MakeHuman.

    80. Re:I've got the cure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dad?

    81. Re:I've got the cure by kyrio · · Score: 0

      A problem with your retarded post: it's plane not plain.

    82. Re:I've got the cure by LanMan04 · · Score: 1

      Awesome, now we just need to align our culture to the biological cues of our bodies.

      Will you be the first to write Congress saying it should be legal for an 11 year old girl to get married and have kids? Because until that happens, "kids" will have premarital sex.

      --
      With the first link, the chain is forged.
    83. Re:I've got the cure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also in the category of things people tend not to stop once starting: walking, breathing, driving an automobile, going to work, raising a family, paying taxes, gardening, and watching television. With the possible exception of the latter, I don't think I'd call any of them addictions.

      The fact that sex is enjoyable doesn't make it an "addiction". It becomes an addiction when you cease to have control over it, or it screws up your life.

      My wife and I have both slept with many people over our lives (with each other's approval, since marriage). No STIs, no unplanned pregnancies, and no drama. There's these newfangled inventions called "condoms", "STI testing", "birth control", and "not sleeping with self-destructive skanks". You should try them.

      Oh, and I also like skydiving.

    84. Re:I've got the cure by pauljlucas · · Score: 1

      [T]hroat gonorrhea is quite common, and transmissible to your penis via oral sex.

      Is throat gonorrhea transmittable to one's own throat via only kissing?

      --
      If you reply, do so only to what I explicitly wrote. If I didn't write it, don't assume or infer it.
    85. Re:I've got the cure by BlackSnake112 · · Score: 1

      I believe there are many people with advanced degrees and years of research who will say otherwise.

      People who have regular sex (i.e. a few time every week) are much less stressed then others. They are also healthier.

    86. Re:I've got the cure by Phoobarnvaz · · Score: 1

      Last time I checked, most people do want to get married someday, and do want a family someday.

      Let me count the ways why even this isn't a good reason:
      1. Genetics
      2. The movie "Deliverance" showing what genetics can do in real life
      3. Eating applesauce with a fork
      4. Constant nagging from the significant other...no matter what you do

      On the other hand...if you get yourself fixed & refuse to get it reversed no matter what...don't have to worry about becoming a story on "The Darwin Awards". Remember...it's always good to laugh at others...especially if they are taken out of the gene pool.

      --
      Don't worry about the world coming to an end today. It's already tomorrow in Australia. - Charles M. Schulz
    87. Re:I've got the cure by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      And you think priests don't have Gonorrhea?

      You're unlikely to get Gonorrhea from little boys.

    88. Re:I've got the cure by Jeian · · Score: 1

      Every day? Maybe at first...

    89. Re:I've got the cure by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      This dry spell has gone on so long that even knotholes in fences are starting to look good.

      A Nerd's Guide to Getting Laid

    90. Re:I've got the cure by Mashdar · · Score: 1

      Yeah. Eating is an addiction too. Some people get over it, but that doesn't make them awesome.

      Fact is we are wired for sex because otherwise we would not exist. Granted we can mind-fuck some people enough that they are damaged and overcome an eternity of environmental pressures, but we can't mind-fuck everyone. Some un-mind-fuckable people will continue being normal (healthy) humans and will therefore continue having sex. Making them feel guilty about it or not giving them the information they need to do it (no pun intended) in a safe and reasonable way is just stupid.

    91. Re:I've got the cure by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      The abstinence only kids had the lowest rate of beginning sexual activity.

      Except it wasn't really an abstinence program because it taught that the kids should delay sex "until they were ready" - not "until they were married." It kinda defeats the purpose of abstinence if the only requirement to breaking the chastity is feeling like.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    92. Re:I've got the cure by Mashdar · · Score: 1

      PS please don't tell me safe and reasonable == wait until some arbitrary religious ceremony.
      A) Many people don't get married for a myriad of reasons. Should they be celibate for life?
      B) We are hormonally compelled to make babies much earlier than the typical age at which people get married.

      Long term, committed, healthy sexual relationships with prior STD testing should not need the seal of some dude in a robe to be okay.

    93. Re:I've got the cure by bigpat · · Score: 1

      I think the sexual revolution has solved some problems. Making life easier on those that didn't follow the social norms. But the societal changes over the last century have also created new problems that once again put us at odds with our own biology.

      I think the "someday" part is what is screwed up now. Modern Society says to wait until you are economically independent and stable in order to start a family, which basically means 80% or 90% of the population would have to wait until their 30s to get married and have kids and thus under the traditional model that is when they would start having sex. Maybe under current conditions society would just tell most people that they shouldn't get married or have children at all.

      But our bodies are built to start having sex when we are teenagers. It is also a biological fact that we should be having children as teenagers and in our 20s.

      Having children in our late 30s and early 40s just doesn't make as much sense biologically. And socially you are running into the biological wall of old age when parents are as old as grandparents used to be and grandparents are too old to help raise the children. Instead we are being forced to rely more and more on complex economic and social arrangements to help care for our children. Arrangements which may or may not be economically sustainable or socially desirable. We are living through a patchwork of social experiments, some of which seemed based on the desire of an elite to further their own societal dominance.

      So, the tension we have now is a direct result of the social engineering that has gone on to promote getting married later in life versus the traditional family structure (admittedly also socially engineered) which only satisfies the sexual urges of young adults if they are allowed to get married at a younger age.

      Sure getting married young and having children causes its own social problems if those marriages fall apart. But so does having children outside of marriage and never getting married.

      I don't think there is an easy answer that will get everyone a life long spouse early in life and put everyone on the path to create strong families. But neither should their be an easy scapegoat either in modern or traditional values.

    94. Re:I've got the cure by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1

      Not if those boys have been to a different church before...

    95. Re:I've got the cure by Taibhsear · · Score: 1

      I've got the cure!
      It's called a condom and not screwing nasty hoes!

      I don't think that word means what you think it means...

    96. Re:I've got the cure by mapkinase · · Score: 1

      It looks like you did not get my request. I was asking specifically about statistics of STDs in fundamentally religious communities where abstinence outside of the marriage is practiced as part of religion, not as some externally imposed school "rule".

      --
      I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
    97. Re:I've got the cure by ArticulateArne · · Score: 1

      I sincerely hope you're being sarcastic. Religions perceive sex as a necessary evil, to be used for procreation only. Actually, most religions go even further and condone the concept of love (and by extension sex) only if it subject to some kind of religious regulation mechanism, because anything else gnaws away at the oppressive stranglehold religion has over everyday life. In order to exist, religion needs to have a monopoly on everything fulfilling and meaningful.

      Huh? Apparently you haven't read the biblical Song of Solomon. To quote from Chapter 7 (NIV translation):

      1 How beautiful your sandaled feet,
                    O prince's daughter!
                    Your graceful legs are like jewels,
                    the work of a craftsman's hands.

        2 Your navel is a rounded goblet
                    that never lacks blended wine.
                    Your waist is a mound of wheat
                    encircled by lilies.

        3 Your breasts are like two fawns,
                    twins of a gazelle.

        4 Your neck is like an ivory tower.
                    Your eyes are the pools of Heshbon
                    by the gate of Bath Rabbim.
                    Your nose is like the tower of Lebanon
                    looking toward Damascus.

        5 Your head crowns you like Mount Carmel.
                    Your hair is like royal tapestry;
                    the king is held captive by its tresses.

        6 How beautiful you are and how pleasing,
                    O love, with your delights!

        7 Your stature is like that of the palm,
                    and your breasts like clusters of fruit.

        8 I said, "I will climb the palm tree;
                    I will take hold of its fruit."
                    May your breasts be like the clusters of the vine,
                    the fragrance of your breath like apples,

        9 and your mouth like the best wine.

      That doesn't sound like "necessary evil" to me. I'd say it sounds rather enthusiastic. :)

    98. Re:I've got the cure by IICV · · Score: 1

      I would like to refer you to this alternative analysis of the study. Especially interesting is this quote from one of the study's authors on the design of the abstinence-only educational segments:

      The abstinence class included a number of interactive exercises, Jemmott said. For example, the students were asked to think about their hopes five and 10 years in the future. Then they had to consider the consequences of a pregnancy on their plans."It's designed to be fun," Jemmott said. "There are games where they can win points, and role-playing and other upbeat activities. There's no preaching, and it's not moralistic."

      That doesn't sound like the sort of abstinence-only classes you normally get, the ones that would have received funding under the Bush administration. Those programs required an emphasis on abstaining until marriage and generally tended to include material that denigrated the effectiveness of contraceptives; this program did neither of those things.

      Basically, the reason why this study showed such strong effects all around was because it compared well-done, effective, secular sex ed to well-done, effective, secular sex ed with an emphasis on abstinence. Then, people go and cite this study to demonstrate that sex ed should be poorly taught, based on religious preaching and known to be ineffective.

    99. Re:I've got the cure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Either circumcised or not, a condom will not lower your pleasure. In fact even the male will experience more pleasure because of postponed ejaculation.

      Sounds like the talk of an inexperienced male. After 20 years of unprotected monogamous sex, I can safely say there's lots of fun things you can do that don't work with a condom. Staying power isn't a big deal once you know what you're doing. That said, I'm single now and will be using condoms for a long time. Having unprotected sex outside of a strong long-term relationship is just plain stupid.

    100. Re:I've got the cure by infinite9 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I sincerely hope you're being sarcastic. Religions perceive sex as a necessary evil, to be used for procreation only. Actually, most religions go even further and condone the concept of love (and by extension sex) only if it subject to some kind of religious regulation mechanism, because anything else gnaws away at the oppressive stranglehold religion has over everyday life. In order to exist, religion needs to have a monopoly on everything fulfilling and meaningful.

      I can only speak as a Christian. And from my perspective, you have no idea what you're talking about. The list of activities that the vast majority of Christian woman won't do is very short. The main restriction is having to wait until marriage. After that, there are virtually no restrictions at all. Any restrictions there are have to to with respecting each other and making each other happy.

      Sex addiction is not a recognized medical condition, it's a catchphrase invented by tabloid media designed to appeal to stupid people.

      I disagree. There's a neurochemical hit humans get from sex. Some people get addicted to this. Most people don't. Just because you're not an alcoholic, it doesn't mean there aren't any alcoholics.

      And until you found "the right person", you are required to act as if you're a sexless, joyless, dishonest zombie. You're not even allowed to find out if that person is actually sexually compatible, until ít's too late. Oh, I forget "the right person" has to meet certain requirements of gender and, in many cases, social status. Otherwise, they're obviously not the right person. And once you have declared one person to be "the right person", you can never change your mind, or an invisible sky tyrant will crush your immortal soul for all eternity. Sounds awesome.

      There's two things wrong with this attitude. First, I believe it's unrealistic to expect people to wait until their 20s or 30s to get married. If people were getting married right out of high school, it would be far easier to wait until you were married. It was like this in the past and worked. Our present society is broken. And don't try to tell me that 18 year old kids haven't experienced enough to know who to get married to. It's not like the divorce rate is heavily skewed toward young people. I'd rather my kid get married at 18 and get divorced 6 years later than have a different girlfriend every 6 months for 6 years. Which one is far less likely to get an STD?

      And secondly, how difficult is it to have many explicit conversations about this before you get married? What do you like or not like? What's acceptable behavior and what isn't? How often is too much or not enough? The wedding night doesn't have to be a surprise if you don't want it to be.

      --
      Disconnect your television. Do your own research. Draw your own conclusions. They're probably lying. Don't be a sheep.
    101. Re:I've got the cure by Toze · · Score: 1

      Religions perceive sex as a necessary evil, to be used for procreation only.

      Which religions? Judaism and Christianity both use Song of Songs as a source, and it's pretty blatantly erotic. Even taking it purely as allegory, one can't escape that the author had a positive view of sex.

      --
      No OS on the planet can protect itself from a user with the admin password. - Yvan256
    102. Re:I've got the cure by infinite9 · · Score: 1

      It's called a condom (..)

      Just one? That won't get you very far...

      You can re-use them. Just flip it inside out and shake the fuck out of it.

      --
      Disconnect your television. Do your own research. Draw your own conclusions. They're probably lying. Don't be a sheep.
    103. Re:I've got the cure by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      NO religion teaches abstinence as an ideal circumstance.
      Religions teach abstinence until the person meets another person, and then makes a permanent commitment to that person.
      Then religions say Go for it!

      Wrong.

      You've obviously never read about Calvinism.

      According to Wikipedia, there's even a revival of Calvinism going on.

      Also, don't forget Roman Catholicism, which teaches that priests should be abstinent for life.

    104. Re:I've got the cure by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Somebody saying something like "Religions perceive...." is even funnier than somebody thinking Slashdot has a unified opinion.

      Religions differ.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    105. Re:I've got the cure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NO religion teaches abstinence as an ideal circumstance.

      Except for the Shakers. But they died out.

    106. Re:I've got the cure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Er.... Well, except for christianity, you're exactly right.

      In Paul's first letter to the Corinthians, he basically says "Marry if you have to to avoid sinning, but I'd rather have you be like me" (I.e. Unmarried and abstinent). Chapter 7, for the curious.

      So christianity, at least, DOES teach abstinence as the ideal.

    107. Re:I've got the cure by BlueParrot · · Score: 1

      Religions know this, and that's why they say to wait until you found the right person, to not only have sex with, but to also have a family with.

      At which point people basically figure that they really don't want the same thing in bed, and thus it either ends the same way anyway, or they get stuck in a marriage which shitty sex because of outdated ideas which stem from an age when effective contraceptives did not exist.

    108. Re:I've got the cure by h4rm0ny · · Score: 1


      Sex is also more fun than correcting stranger's spelling on Slashdot.

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    109. Re:I've got the cure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >NO religion teaches abstinence as an ideal circumstance.
      >Religions teach abstinence until the person meets another person, and then makes a permanent commitment to that person.

      Oooh, I'm so sorry. That's wrong, but thank you for playing. Aside from the religions that actually DO teach abstinence as an ideal circumstance for some or all members (note that even in the Christian religion, many members of the clergy in certain denominations are exhorted to be abstinent), you've totally missed that it's not about making a permanent commitment. It's about making a permanent commitment that the religion has deigned to recognize. And even then, that's ignoring the religions that allow for the impermanence of "marriage".

      Also, the last time you checked, you didn't check with MOST people about anything at all... and you certainly didn't ask most people what their idea of "marriage" was and which religions would be OK with that.

      So, pretty much, you're wrong about it in all possible ways. Nice try though!

    110. Re:I've got the cure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So get married and go without. You get to take the wrapper off but you have to eat the same candy every day.

      You must be single. No woman gives up the "candy" everyday once she's married you.

    111. Re:I've got the cure by pydev · · Score: 1

      Religions teach abstinence until the person meets another person, and then makes a permanent commitment to that person.

      Some religions teach that, others don't.

      Sex is an addiction to anyone who has done it. Once you start, you don't stop.

      Sex and the desire for it are not addictions, they are a normal part of human behavior.

      Last time I checked, most people do want to get married someday, and do want a family someday.

      Getting married and having a family does not require monogamy.

    112. Re:I've got the cure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Still it's only a recommendation. I for one feel responsible enough to tame my urges and don't need some hocus-pocus religion book telling me how to live my life.

    113. Re:I've got the cure by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      yes, but transmission rate is very low - so not likely.

    114. Re:I've got the cure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where did you check that info? I don't recall anything on the census about wanting to get married or have kids.

    115. Re:I've got the cure by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 1

      Normal ladies don't let you snort coke out of their ass crack. How am I supposed to maintain an erection without my favourite hobby?

    116. Re:I've got the cure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With the aggregate problem of using standard clothes that are always to small.

    117. Re:I've got the cure by VanGarrett · · Score: 1

      Let's go ahead and put all religion aside. Here's the simple fact: Sex comes with it, the possibility of resulting pregnancy. Once you've taken multiple people with multiple partners into the equation, you've increased the ante to include gonorrhea, AIDS, syphilis, chlamydia, hepatitis, herpes, crabs, and many other infections. Many of these diseases are easy to spread, and some of them can't be cured. Is a few minutes of carnal entertainment really worth these potential consequences? Some of them discourage ever doing it again, for the rest of your life.

      One of the best parts about being intelligent human beings, is that we can disregard what our hormones tell us to do, and choose a wiser course of action. We have the capacity to be thoroughly in control of ourselves, and that is also a natural thing. We should be exploiting this.

      I'm not saying that everyone should live like monks, but I am saying that promiscuous sex is a foolish pass-time, and that justifying it by claiming it to be a "natural" thing is foolish, as well. To pursue exclusively what is brainlessly natural, is to pursue a chaotic world, full of disease and fatherless children.

      Religions don't discourage this sort of behavior on accident. There are a lot of religions that really miss the point of things and abuse the power that they have over people, but you'll find, nevertheless, that rules pertaining to morality are generally rooted in good, cause-and-effect wisdom. The real tragedy is that those reasons aren't often explained to people.

    118. Re:I've got the cure by kyrio · · Score: 0

      Irrelevant, troll.

  2. What? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Gonorrhea? I thought we had that one licked.

    Thank god we all agree that teaching adolescent kids about condoms is a good idea, or this could get really become a big problem.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
    1. Re:What? by X0563511 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Unfortunately it seems it will take an outbreak of Gonorrhea 2.0 to get the lesson to stick.

      Thankfully, it will be a hell of a lot easier to prevent than the bugs roaming the hospitals now.

      As another poster put it: 'It's called a condom and not screwing nasty hoes!'

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    2. Re:What? by blankaBrew · · Score: 5, Funny

      I doubt that this would be an issue for the average slashdot reader.

    3. Re:What? by ZekoMal · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I smell sarcasm; in my school 90% of the kids firmly believed that abstinence was the best preventive measure, but decided that meant having boatloads of oral sex without condoms. 8% thought that they didn't need condoms, and the remaining 2% were split up by reasonable people and virginal nerds...

      Maybe we can get some well needed crowd thinning.

    4. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Gonorrhea? I thought we had that one licked.

      Well there is your problem: DONT LICK ANYONE WITH GONORRHEA.

    5. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Gonorrhea? I thought we had that one licked.

      Gross.

    6. Re:What? by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      Syphilis and chlamydia rates are also going up after being down in the 90s, and they also are curable diseases.

    7. Re:What? by LordLucless · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Abstinence is the best (well, most effective) preventative measure. It's just that, like the pill and condoms, it fails when people don't actually use it. What your anecdote shows is that there should probably be a greater emphasis placed on STDs and the possibility of infection via oral sex in current sex ed.

      --
      Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
    8. Re:What? by Therilith · · Score: 1

      split up by reasonable people and virginal nerds

      You callin' me unreasonable?

    9. Re:What? by Paul+Jakma · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Abstinence is less effective than condoms. Anyone who says abstinence is 100% perfect is an idiot, probably with an agenda. It's the equivalent of saying "condoms would be 100%, if they didn't tear, or get put on wrong, or ...".

      Let's say it again and again till it sticks: Abstinence is *less* effective than condoms, based on real-world data.

      --
      I use Friend/Foe + mod-point modifiers as a karma/reputation system.
    10. Re:What? by Vellmont · · Score: 1


      What your anecdote shows is that there should probably be a greater emphasis placed on STDs and the possibility of infection via oral sex in current sex ed.

      This is not news. The _only_ reason we're even seriously talking about abstinence is because the conservative Christians in this country want to put their heads in the sand and believe it can actually be effective, or if it's not it's some kind of moral failing. They'll fight your proposal tooth and nail because they seriously believe that talking about condoms and oral sex would harm society.

      --
      AccountKiller
    11. Re:What? by Nemyst · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Abstinence is like communism: in a perfect world, it'd work.

    12. Re:What? by LordLucless · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No. Abstinence is 100% effective. If you say you're using abstinence as a birth-control method, and then go have sex, then that's not abstinence.

      It's analagous to saying you use condoms, but then don't bother putting them on. That doesn't say anything about the efficacy of condoms, it just says your lying about your birth control method.

      What you (probably) mean to say is that abstinence is a hard method to keep to, and that most people fail. That while it might be an effective birth control method, it's not a suitable method for most people. Abstinence works fine, but horny people have trouble using it. Same way as how the pill works fairly well, but forgetful people would have trouble using it. Problem is, abstinence is being sold to teenagers, who are generally not inclined towards self-control.

      --
      Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
    13. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gonorrhea? I thought we had that one licked.

      That's disgusting.

    14. Re:What? by Decollete · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Saying abstinence is 100% effective is like saying window shopping is a 100% discount. Sure you avoided STDs/spending money but its considerably less enjoyable.

    15. Re:What? by Chaffar · · Score: 1

      Thank God we all agree that teaching adolescent kids about condoms is a good idea...

      What? But I thought God was against condoms!

    16. Re:What? by TerranFury · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You know, I wish that somehow "I didn't feel like using method X" weren't counted as failure or improper use in the contraceptive-effectiveness stats. If it weren't, then abstinence would of course be considered 100% effective, but the condom stats would also be a heck of a lot better. As it is, the commonly-cited condom effectiveness stats are all screwed up and seem pretty worthless because, since they don't differentiate between failure of the condom itself, actual improper use, and just not bothering occasionally to use one (which euphemistically gets called "improper use," but I say that's bullshit), I get the impression that they overstate the risk.

    17. Re:What? by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      Thats true, but unlike communism, abstinence also works as a preventative in the real world as well. Getting everyone to abstain may be a problem, but that doesnt diminish its effectiveness.

      Incidentally, could part of the problem be the attitude seen above, with one poster ridiculing another over the suggestion of abstinence? And people wonder why its such a problem getting the average kid to abstain?

    18. Re:What? by Nadaka · · Score: 2, Funny

      i would not recommend licking Gonorrhea.

    19. Re:What? by Nadaka · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Lesbianism and homosexuality are also 100% effective birth control.

    20. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      90% of the kids firmly believed that abstinence was the best preventive measure

      If the kids think it, that's great (provided they're not also doing the other thing you mentioned). The problem is when the parents think the kids think it. They say 'Little Billy would never do that' while Littler Billy is already on his way.

    21. Re:What? by MaskedSlacker · · Score: 1

      Abstinence...abstinence...Abstinence...

      You keep using that word. I don't think it means what you think it means.

    22. Re:What? by ppanon · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Actually the GPs post is right on, both fail because the practices are incompatible with human nature. Communism can work in small communities where there are significant advantages from altruistic cooperation and interpersonal bonds to discourage abuse (see most primitive hunter-gatherer cultures with communal child-raising and food production), but breaks down in larger environments where gaming the system for personal benefit becomes easier because there is a degree of anonymity which facilitates exploitation of others. Abstinence theoretically is the most effective method of birth control and STD prevention, but it ignores that the urge for sexual reproduction is one of the strongest and most basic drives of the human hormonal and neural systems.

      --
      Laissez lire, et laissez danser; ces deux amusements ne feront jamais de mal au monde. - Voltaire
    23. Re:What? by srothroc · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Lesbianism IS homosexuality.

      Beyond that, what about lesbian couples where both wives decide to go for artificial insemination?

    24. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gonorrhea doesn't care about that.

    25. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My gay friend thought that anal sex wouldn't put the penetrating partner at risk or some bullshit. He's smart, quite smart, but hell, why does he have to fit the gay stereotype of being a fucking idiot about safety? It's like his brain just turned off or something.

    26. Re:What? by lena_10326 · · Score: 1

      Sticking to abstinence may not be 100% effective due to lack of discipline but neither are condoms 100% effective. You don't throw out abstinence because it's less than 100% just as one wouldn't throw out condoms because they are also less than 100%. It should be a series of protections starting with abstinence. If that fails, then condoms, if that fails then there are third, fourth, and fifth options: no sex until several months after introduction, non-penetrative sex only, and finally staying monogamous. Monogamy won't reduce pregnancy but it would increase the chance the male would stick around due to the relationship having survived the introduction phase.

      --
      Camping on quad since 1996.
    27. Re:What? by laejoh · · Score: 1

      My dad said flu vacines are linked to autism, so to be save from swine flu I'm trying to lick an autistic kid. Now you tell me I have to check the kid for Gonorrhea first?

    28. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Lesbianism and homosexuality are also 100% effective birth control.

      Yeah, but neither one will protect you from STDs, which is what we're talking about here.

    29. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Abstinence is like communism: in a perfect world, it'd work.

      Worked pretty well for me until I got married. And for most of the couples I know, in fact...

      Abstinence as a teaching programme doesn't tend to work because it's teaching people things they already know (Hands up those that didn't know sexually transmitted diseases are, erm, sexually transmitted? Hands up those who didn't know that most major religions recommend waiting til your married?). Of course you're not going to have an effect by restating that. What kept STI rates lower in the past was the social pressure not to have sex before marriage, even among the irreligious -- but the abstinence programmes' message to youth is effectively "You can choose to be pressured not to have sex, but can then opt out at any time because this is a free society and its your body after all and nobody's allowed to discriminate against you regardless". That's so wishy washy as to be a complete waste of effort.

      Abstinence itself, however, works every time -- how many people do you know that caught a sexually transmitted diseease without having sex?

    30. Re:What? by Burz · · Score: 1

      How old is the 'kid' we are talking about?

      "Kids" typically get married after college. But biology says these people will have a substantial appetite for sex by the time they're 16.

      The abstinence model of education is based on ignorance and unrealistic expectations. It only partially works in societies where women are relegated away from higher education and career-seeking, and bars educators from teaching a large chunk of biology education.

      I think the "Just Say No" conservatives need to ask themselves why so many of these diseases are worst in the regions lacking sex education. And the USA's Bible Belt is often implied in different discussions and speeches as some kind of would-be role model for issues like teenage pregnancy (Godly abstinence) and worker productivity (Protestant work ethic). But I'm sorry, the numbers often tell an opposite story.

      Personally, I think the controversies have a lot to do with people determined to hold on to childlike myths and attitudes about humanity and the cosmos into adulthood. Its to the point where they end up at "spiritual war" with information in general and with most of the sciences.

    31. Re:What? by symes · · Score: 1

      Gonorrhea? I thought we had that one licked.

      Alas no - we are doomed to a sticky end!

    32. Re:What? by Ogi_UnixNut · · Score: 1

      Nope, just some fools in the Catholic Church (AFAIK in my denomination nobody ever told us not to use condoms). I guess they want more followers, even if they come into being accidentally.

    33. Re:What? by YourExperiment · · Score: 1

      Gonorrhea? I thought we had that one licked.

      Ewww. Speak for yourself.

    34. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Abstinence itself, however, works every time -- how many people do you know that caught a sexually transmitted diseease without having sex?

      You mean like herpes? Nobody! Except for 30% to 60% of all children below the age of 10.

    35. Re:What? by Ginger+Unicorn · · Score: 1

      Birth control doesn't mean you never get pregnant. It means you get pregnant only when you want to. So fertile women that never have sex with men have perfect birth control, including if they undergo artificial insemination.

      --
      (1.21 gigawatts) / (88 miles per hour) = 30 757 874 newtons
    36. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the "Just Say No" conservatives need to ask themselves why so many of these diseases are worst in the regions lacking sex education. And the USA's Bible Belt is often implied in different discussions and speeches as some kind of would-be role model for issues like teenage pregnancy (Godly abstinence) and worker productivity (Protestant work ethic). But I'm sorry, the numbers often tell an opposite story.

      You know their answer, right? Black people. Lots and lots of them. Present in huge numbers in the South, mostly irrelevant populations elsewhere. And while culturally very conservative, they're not squeamish about sex the way white conservatives are.

    37. Re:What? by DarkIye · · Score: 1

      I reckon if this phrase doesn't set extreme-right-wing America straight, then nothing will.

    38. Re:What? by Mjlner · · Score: 1

      Abstinence is like communism: in a perfect world, it'd work.

      Your idea of a perfect world is a world without sex???

      --
      Lemon curry???
    39. Re:What? by Velex · · Score: 1

      Abstinence is the best (well, most effective) preventative measure.

      In theory, that is. In practice, it's the least effective. Maybe I'll track down the evidence to support my claim later today, but I've noticed the more religious a family is, the more likely all their daughters are going to be baby-mammas, which become drains on society (no, I'm not being misogynist because I can).

      That being said, there was someone else here who said it best, but I don't remember off the top of my head. Basically, using abstinence to prevent pregnancy and STDs is like not driving a car to prevent car accidents. It's a great idea in theory, but good luck with that.

      Of course, hell, I'm posting to Slashdot. Abstinence has worked for me my whole life.

      --
      Join the Slashcott! Stay away entirely Feb 10 thru Feb 17! Close all tabs to prevent autorefresh!
    40. Re:What? by LordLucless · · Score: 1

      You could probably just read the other posts I responded to, which pretty much raise the same points. Abstinence is the most effective measure for birth control. It's just that people don't use it. Just like condoms - they're good, but if people don't wear them, you don't say condoms are ineffective.

      The problem's not with abstinence, it's with people who say they're using abstinence as birth control, and then have sex. If you're going to go abstinent to say safe, then do it. If you're going to have sex, use an alternative method. But don't say "abstinence doesn't work because I don't use it".

      --
      Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
    41. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perfect world? Abstinence means not having sex, right?

    42. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if that's your idea of a perfect world, I'd rather go to hell.

    43. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No-one with any sense wonders why its hard to get kids to abstain - its hard because you're asking them ignore every fiber of their very being. You're asking them to ignore the actual reason they were born to carry out - to procreate.

      You can pretend all you like about our higher purposes and all that crap, but when every neuron in your brain is screaming for gratification of the sexual variety, all your nobility won't mean shit and even you will be rutting like a pig.

    44. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Abstinence is like communism: in a perfect world, it'd work.

      I hear that a lot. However, in a perfect world, none would feel they needed communism.

      Communism is cure for corruption in capitalism. Capitalism is cure for corruption in communism. I guess there is no cure for corruption, except perhaps a large asteroid impact, or equivalent.

    45. Re:What? by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately it seems it will take an outbreak of Gonorrhea 2.0 to get the lesson to stick.

      Lessons do not stick on people who think enforced ignorance counts as education.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    46. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The pill may work fairly well (when taken regularly), but there are women who it wrecks havoc on their digestive system. (Think: nothing passing for 1.5 months after 3 months of taking a progesterone only pill at same time every day)

      Which is also an effective birth-control and anti-sex method, in that, if entire abdomen is in excruciating pain, the boyfriend will get shot down so much if he suggests anything related to trying to put something else in the already crowded-feels-like-death-space.

    47. Re:What? by miasmic · · Score: 1

      Truly insightful post - I've never seen what is wrong with communism explained like this before and it's so obvious it's like being hit with a plank in the face. I think there are a lot of people out there who completely miss this point too.

    48. Re:What? by sourcerror · · Score: 1

      What about Virgin Mary?

    49. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Abstinence is 99.99% effective says the VIRGIN Mary :)

    50. Re:What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. I think Paul was talking about sexual education. Teaching kids to use condoms works pretty well. Telling them not to have sex at all and expecting them to stick to it is foolish. This is a big deal in the US since so many of our religious folk insist that teaching kids to abstain until marriage is a reasonable policy.

    51. Re:What? by zstlaw · · Score: 1

      Most of the pregnant teens in my high school wore abstinence promise rings. It was a guarantee that prom sex was going to be unprotected. A bunch of girls in my gifted class got knocked up around homecoming.

      Saying abstinence works if you ignore people not using it properly is just wrong. Even if you ignore the fact that less than half of all teens using abstinence use it properly. Overall abstinence has a user-failure rate between 26 and 86 percent. (http://www.sexetc.org/story/2043) Abstinence is a technique 5 times more likely to fail than a condom after proper sexual education.

      What we need is REAL sex education with real discussion of complications diseases and how profoundly pregnancies can impact your life. The best pregnancy prevention tool in every nation has always been education. As women get more education the pregnancy rates decline as people decide to wait until it is appropriate to have kids.

      Bush saw pregnancy rates climb 3% under his abstinence-only leadership. (http://www.usatoday.com/news/health/2010-01-26-1Ateenpregnancy26_ST_N.htm) Pregnancy and abortion rated ended a decade long decline with the promotion of abstinence. Studies show abstinence is considerably worse than sex education in preventing sex and teenage pregnancy. (http://ari.ucsf.edu/science/reports/abstinence.pdf)

      There was a great report I can not find right now that showed how poorly the US fairs. We are right up there with India, Niger, and Indonesia in teenage pregnancy. Compared to Europe, the US promotes abstinence more heavily and yet sex starts earlier and is more likely to be unprotected than other countries. Pregnancy rates are 2 to 8 times higher than most of Western countries. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Teenage_pregnancy.)

    52. Re:What? by Nadaka · · Score: 1

      The word homosexual has ambiguous etymology.

      Homo-sexual (Male copulation)
      Homos-sexual (Same copulation)

    53. Re:What? by Toze · · Score: 1

      99.999% effective,* though!

      *Some exceptions for girls named Mary.

      --
      No OS on the planet can protect itself from a user with the admin password. - Yvan256
    54. Re:What? by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      Heck, in a perfect world I could screw like bunnies with dozens of women and not get an STD. (Of course, in a perfect world, I might not want to.)

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    55. Re:What? by ppanon · · Score: 1

      In fact most socio-economic systems suffer from the same effect when attempting to scale up, even capitalism, but communism is particularly vulnerable because it fundamentally assumes a degree of altruistic cooperation on behalf of its participants. When that assumption breaks down, various 'communist' movements attempt to enforce it through totalitarian hierarchies that just make the problem worse.

      --
      Laissez lire, et laissez danser; ces deux amusements ne feront jamais de mal au monde. - Voltaire
    56. Re:What? by Paul+Jakma · · Score: 1

      I really worry about the poor grasp of science many slashdot mods must have for you have to reached +5 insightful.

      a) If a method is hard to keep to, and if someone people fail, then this counts against the efficacy of the method.

      If you think that's the case, then you must also think that condoms are far more effective than the studies show.

      b) We have **DATA**, from real world *studies* across large populations, which show that, all else being equal, a group of teens who are told to use abstinence as a birth control mechanism will have higher pregnancy rates amongst their females than those who are told to use other forms of birth control. By implication, this means abstinence is also a much much worse form of STD control.

      So you have to simply be on crack, or endowed with an incredibly tiny mind, to think that abstinence is an effective birth or STD control method for populations of people.

      Now, you may want to argue abstinence is more effective at preventing kid having sex, and I suspect this is the real motivation with any espousing abstinence as a birth control method, but I'm not sure there's even any evidence for *that*.

      Anyway.. you're a prize idiot.

      --
      I use Friend/Foe + mod-point modifiers as a karma/reputation system.
    57. Re:What? by Paul+Jakma · · Score: 1

      correction: If you think's /not/ the case.

      --
      I use Friend/Foe + mod-point modifiers as a karma/reputation system.
    58. Re:What? by LordLucless · · Score: 1

      Every statistic I see for condom effectiveness (1 2 3) lists their prevention rate assuming correct and consistent useage. The default assumption when discussing every birth control method apart from abstinence seems to be, you measure it assuming it is used correctly.

      I'm not American. And I think the number of vociferous replies, including yours, I've gotten to these posts shows the tendancy of Americans to polarize on almost any issue, frequently down political/religious lines (which seems to be synonmous there).

      The right pushes abstinence as the best way to control pregnancy/STDs among teenagers (which I agree is stupid). The other side then can't see any reference to abstinence as birth control without immediately jumping on it as if it were an endorsement of the right's policies. That leads to people like you who take my post, which says "if you're abstinent, you won't get pregnant", and trying to argue that abstinence is a poor educational method (which I agree with, but which my post says nothing about).

      --
      Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
    59. Re:What? by Paul+Jakma · · Score: 1

      I'm not an american either, but am from a country that had a history of similarly religiously motivated "idiocy". I've had this discussion before, and experience has conditioned me to assume the other side will be deliberately ignorant.

      Here's what annoys me:

      - You can not separate the educational issues from the method. If some preventative method must be self-administered and if it requires public education to do so successfully, then the efficacy of the education *is part of the efficacy of the method*.

      - The theoretical and laboratory efficacy of some method are *NOT* the same as the *epidemiological* efficacy.

      - Theoretical and laboratory efficacy, informed by estimates of the efficacy of education, should be used as inputs to determine whether it is worth trialling a method - for real-world epidemiological study.

      - Public health, across the population, should be informed by *epidemiological* studies.

      E.g. if abstinence under "lab conditions" is 100% effective, but if 40% of the time people can't "use" abstinence correctly in the real-world despite education, then the epidemiological efficacy of abstinence is 60%. Similarly, if condoms are 98% effective under lab conditions, and 10% failure rate in the real-world, then their real effectiveness is 88%.

      The public health messages you're quoting are part of the public health *education* campaign to encourage people to use condoms. They're deliberately picking the higher, clinical conditions / perfect-use statistic for *educational* purposes. I.e. they're stressing how good condoms can be when used correctly to encourage people to use them, and to stress the need to use them correctly.

      If you were having an honest debate about the merits of one form of preventative health care versus another then, presuming the real-world, epidemiological studies are settled, you must use those - not the theoretical, peak lab efficacy! And anyone using the lab figures for, e.g., condoms, in a debate on pregnancy rates or STD rates would be as guilty of dishonesty as someone claiming abstinence to be 100%. Note that public education is different from public debate (e.g. latter occurs before you'd decide to roll out a campaign to do the former).

      Do you see the difference?

      If we want to try keep things objective and avoid making public health decisions on political whims, then we need to rely on apolitical, real-world data. We need to make sure our processes are data driven. I.e. we should try apply some kind of scientific method. We can't eliminate politics altogether, but we can at least agree to honour the best available factual data.

      Sorry if I mistook you for a religious nut incorrectly, but "abstinence is the best" kind of ill-informed thinking now just annoys me greatly.

      --
      I use Friend/Foe + mod-point modifiers as a karma/reputation system.
  3. On the bright side by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    No one on slashdot will ever be exposed.

    1. Re:On the bright side by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would be on the dark side. Gonorrhea can't reach basements.

    2. Re:On the bright side by blackraven14250 · · Score: 4, Funny

      More accurately, gonorrhea doesn't have the proper stats to beat the mommamonster on level 1.

    3. Re:On the bright side by DarkIye · · Score: 1

      Ho ho ho ho HO HO HO. Nobody's made THAT fucking joke before.

  4. Let us clap by Kitkoan · · Score: 4, Funny

    For the Claps big return

    --
    Attention... all grammer nazi"s! Is they're anything; wrong with: my post,
    1. Re:Let us clap by dkleinsc · · Score: 1

      Or even better, celebrate with a jaunty tune by the great Tom Lehrer.

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
  5. Darwin Or Nature's Reset Button? by IonOtter · · Score: 1

    I can't really decide, here.

    On the one hand, if you're playing around without wearing a condom, then you're a Darwin Award. On the other hand, this could be exceptionally nasty in third world nations, especially in places where condoms aren't available or expensive. Now it's Nature's Reset Button. And if the people are listening to a religious restriction, saying condom use is against their faith, now we're back to the Darwin angle.

    Either way, you're screwed.

    --
    [End Of Line]
    1. Re:Darwin Or Nature's Reset Button? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Name one religion that allows sex outside of marriage but insists that no condom be used.

    2. Re:Darwin Or Nature's Reset Button? by interkin3tic · · Score: 5, Insightful

      On the one hand, if you're playing around without wearing a condom, then you're a Darwin Award.

      You heard it here first on slashdot, folks: a claim that unprotected sex will lead to natural selection AGAINST you for that behavior.

      I have to agree that if we all don't use condoms, that will definitely cause the extinction of the human race.

    3. Re:Darwin Or Nature's Reset Button? by tsotha · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And if the people are listening to a religious restriction, saying condom use is against their faith, now we're back to the Darwin angle.

      I wish people would stop peddling this ignorant crap. The Catholic church is against condoms, yes, but it's also against extramarital sex. If you're really an observant Catholic the lack of condoms isn't going to increase your risk of contracting STDs.

      Catholics having extramarital sex aren't acting within the tenants of their faith, and if they don't wear condoms it's because nobody likes to wear condoms, not because of any church teaching.

    4. Re:Darwin Or Nature's Reset Button? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

      The problem lies with Catholics(and people of other faiths which follow the god of the desert) who insist against the benefits of condoms being taught to people who are going to engage in extramarital sex anyway.

    5. Re:Darwin Or Nature's Reset Button? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, you're right! Catholics are the only religious types who say prophelactics are against their religion. Thanks for clearing that up for us!

    6. Re:Darwin Or Nature's Reset Button? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wish people would stop peddling this ignorant crap. The Catholic church is against condoms, yes, but it's also against extramarital sex. If you're really an observant Catholic the lack of condoms isn't going to increase your risk of contracting STDs.

      Catholics having extramarital sex aren't acting within the tenants of their faith, and if they don't wear condoms it's because nobody likes to wear condoms, not because of any church teaching.

      But if you get remarried, your gained STD's can't get annulled...

    7. Re:Darwin Or Nature's Reset Button? by reverseengineer · · Score: 1

      Except when complications arise, gonorrhea generally does not get serious enough to actually kill people. It has historically been an aggressive nuisance, but not a great plague even before the discovery of penicillin. Of course, without proper courses of treatment, there would be more complications: there would be occasional cases of gonorrhea developing into heart and brain infections, cases of it causing pelvic inflammatory disease in women, but mostly we'd hear about newborns blinded a few days after birth. It's not just a disease of lust, you know. "Superbug" status aside, we do have plenty of drugs still in the pharmacy that will be able to treat resistant infections. Ceftriaxone and cefixime are third generation cephalosporins; the fourth generation have started seeing service.

      One issue is that many of the new and remaining drugs are IV only; from the discovery of penicillin on, gonorrhea has usually been something you filled a prescription and took a pill to treat (of course, in such places where medicine was available). Also, while drug resistance in Neisseria gonorrhoeae is certainly a problem, a concern on the horizon is having its relative Neisseria meningitidis, the causative agent of meningococcal meningitis, develop resistance to cephalosporin antibiotics.

      --
      "FDA staff reviewers expressed concern about the number of patients who were left out of the study because they died."
    8. Re:Darwin Or Nature's Reset Button? by drsmithy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Are Catholics forbidden from marrying non-Catholics ?

    9. Re:Darwin Or Nature's Reset Button? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But how can you marry a young boy ?

    10. Re:Darwin Or Nature's Reset Button? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In a word, no. They typically ask that your children be raised in the faith, but marrying outside of the church is generally accepted.

    11. Re:Darwin Or Nature's Reset Button? by elp · · Score: 1

      My Wife is a staunch catholic, I'm more FSM. It's never been an issue other than that the kids need to be raised catholic. On a side note we live in South Africa, and while no priest would publicly say "use condoms", they definitely do so privately.

    12. Re:Darwin Or Nature's Reset Button? by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Where's the ignorant crap? He said some religions are against condom use. You mentioned one: Catholicism.

      True, extramarital sex is also frowned upon by Catholicism, but I didn't see anything about that at all in his post. What happens in the real world is that it's awfully easy to be a "good Catholic" by not wearing a condom, but really hard to do it by not having sex. Hey, might as well not piss off God ALL the way, right? Again, in the real world the anti-condom stance means that kids may not be taught how to use condoms properly, not taught how important it is to use one if you're going to have sex, or a not-so-good Catholic might just not have them around.

    13. Re:Darwin Or Nature's Reset Button? by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      My grandmother was excommunicated for marrying an Anglican and refusing to leave him when her priest told her she was living in sin.

      Apparently the Catholic church has modernized a little since the middle of last century though.

    14. Re:Darwin Or Nature's Reset Button? by nacturation · · Score: 1

      Catholics having extramarital sex aren't acting within the tenants of their faith...

      Perhaps not tenet, but certainly you might be within a tenant.

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    15. Re:Darwin Or Nature's Reset Button? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But you see, most of us aren't so desperate to believe the catholic church's bs that we have the common sense to know--as do you--that it is more likely that telling someone to use a condom if they have sex is going to be more effective than telling them to just not have sex...I mean, COME ON...you aren't that sheltered, are you?

    16. Re:Darwin Or Nature's Reset Button? by ppanon · · Score: 1

      Yeah but the problem is that most people enjoy sex and ignore religious proscriptions against sex outside of marriage, but find using a condom a hassle and therefore pay attention to that religious proscription and avoid using condoms. Mayhem ensues.

      --
      Laissez lire, et laissez danser; ces deux amusements ne feront jamais de mal au monde. - Voltaire
    17. Re:Darwin Or Nature's Reset Button? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "tenets", sweetie. try not to look ignorant.

    18. Re:Darwin Or Nature's Reset Button? by ppanon · · Score: 1

      To elaborate on the above, religious figures that don't believe in evolution think the above is just fine because what will happen is the unfaithful will die (and go to hell!) and they'll get more faithful followers. In practice though, the reproductive urge is the strongest human drive as a result of eons of evolution and trumps the comparatively recent neural innovation of being good little religious followers. So you get plagues that devastate their communities.

      --
      Laissez lire, et laissez danser; ces deux amusements ne feront jamais de mal au monde. - Voltaire
    19. Re:Darwin Or Nature's Reset Button? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Catholics having extramarital sex aren't acting within the tenants of their faith

      Are they obeying the Lord or the landlord?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    20. Re:Darwin Or Nature's Reset Button? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Catholic church is against contraception because they know people will have sex anyway. It's a political/economic strategy: get your followers to reproduce more and you will have more followers, and hence more money, power, and young boys. The church tells people to practice abstinence, with a couple thousand years of experience telling them nobody actually will. You do the math.

      Oh, and by the way, all the other big religions are doing the same thing. It's how they got big.

    21. Re:Darwin Or Nature's Reset Button? by tsotha · · Score: 1

      True, extramarital sex is also frowned upon by Catholicism, but I didn't see anything about that at all in his post.

      Yes, and that was my point.

      What happens in the real world is that it's awfully easy to be a "good Catholic" by not wearing a condom, but really hard to do it by not having sex. Hey, might as well not piss off God ALL the way, right?

      No, that's not what happens at all in the real world. I was raised Catholic. I went to a Catholic high school. You know what they told us? "Don't have sex before you're married, but if you do, use a condom." People aren't as simple or stupid as you make them out to be.

      Again, in the real world the anti-condom stance means that kids may not be taught how to use condoms properly, not taught how important it is to use one if you're going to have sex, or a not-so-good Catholic might just not have them around.

      Again, in the real world people outside the church don't give a damn what the church teaches. People in the church teach their kids not to have sex before marriage, and to use condoms if they do.

    22. Re:Darwin Or Nature's Reset Button? by Foobar+of+Borg · · Score: 3, Funny

      Perhaps not tenet, but certainly you might be within a tenant.

      Well, depending on how the tenant pays the rent...

    23. Re:Darwin Or Nature's Reset Button? by nacturation · · Score: 1

      Well, depending on how the tenant pays the rent...

      Exactly... I knew there was a better way I should have played that typo.

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    24. Re:Darwin Or Nature's Reset Button? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Are Catholics forbidden from marrying non-Catholics ?

      What difference would that make?

      (FYI: there are condoms that women can wear, too. I shouldn't have to mention that, but this IS Slashdot...)

    25. Re:Darwin Or Nature's Reset Button? by williamhb · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, this could be exceptionally nasty in third world nations, especially in places where condoms aren't available or expensive.

      You might want to revisit the statistics. Up to 1 in 6 Americans has herpes. Meanwhile, chlamydia infection rates have doubled in the last 10 years. Young people (15-24) make up half of all new STI infections each year. This is not some third world problem.

      It won't be popular to say this on Slashdot, but it also turns out that your grandparents' solution (waiting until marriage) is very effective indeed: from the medical article "About 4 percent of those with one lifetime sex partner were found to have herpes, compared with about 27 percent of those who reported having 10 or more partners."

    26. Re:Darwin Or Nature's Reset Button? by boppacesagain08 · · Score: 0, Troll

      The priests use condoms? Are they really expecting 12 year olds to have STD's? South Africa must be in bad shape.

    27. Re:Darwin Or Nature's Reset Button? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's discouraged, but not outright forbidden.

    28. Re:Darwin Or Nature's Reset Button? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... or they could just go into the wooden box with the screen, and say a couple of hailmaries, and all would be right - right?

    29. Re:Darwin Or Nature's Reset Button? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only the Irish.

    30. Re:Darwin Or Nature's Reset Button? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know what they told us? "Don't have sex before you're married, but if you do, use a condom."

      So your school is the rare exception.

    31. Re:Darwin Or Nature's Reset Button? by Artifakt · · Score: 1

      To have sex with somebody, you have to find a partner, normally one person that agrees to have sex with you. Even people whose preferences are statistical outliers usually manage to find other people who share them. Even where some people try hard to stop other people having certain kinds of sex, the attempts to stop it are seldom even 50% effective.
            To use condoms regularly and actually get the benefits, you have to be able to get them from a reliable source, such as a pharmacy or planned parenthood. Attempts to stop these sources from distributing condoms can easily be 80 or 90% effective. Any reasonably repressive dictatorship can make condom use rare as chicken's lips if that becomes a goal, but probably can't do much at all to enforce abstenence instead.

      --
      Who is John Cabal?
    32. Re:Darwin Or Nature's Reset Button? by dkf · · Score: 1

      On a side note we live in South Africa, and while no priest would publicly say "use condoms", they definitely do so privately.

      On the bright side, at least those priests aren't using those condoms in public, but are saving it for when they're in somewhere where the congregation aren't watching.

      --
      "Little does he know, but there is no 'I' in 'Idiot'!"
    33. Re:Darwin Or Nature's Reset Button? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope, Catholics can marry outside the faith, but there are particular rules for the wedding in order for the Catholic Church to recognize the marriage. It gets a little dicey if the other faith is not a Christian faith and you don't want the marriage ceremony in the Catholic Church, but it is still possible.

    34. Re:Darwin Or Nature's Reset Button? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In a word YES

    35. Re:Darwin Or Nature's Reset Button? by tibit · · Score: 1

      It's all about what's acceptable risk to you. OTOH, according to your cited statistics, it may be enough to pass a law that forces one of the partners to be at least 25 y.o.

      Waiting until marriage is effective against the spread of STDs only if you're conservative enough not to do other things that can also spread STDs yet are not considered sex. Ask any teenager if they thing kissing is sex. Yet you can catch a whole bunch of STDs by kissing someone passionately enough.

      I fully believe in nothing-barred education. Kids need to learn about STDs in school, they need to know how relevant biological processes work, they need to be taught this stuff not quite unlike doctors are. They need to see pictures of it! It must be something that is *not* a taboo, that kids are expected to openly talk about -- the stigma of STDs is the real killer, and it's the sole doing of religious wingnuts. The kids need to be able to recognize a herpes or syphyllis sore. They need to understand that doing it literally in the dark is at best irresponsible -- look and examine each other before! And so on.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    36. Re:Darwin Or Nature's Reset Button? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But if a Catholic didn't want to act completely outside the tenants of their faith, they'd have oral sex (the compromise sex). And I bet you they wouldn't use a condom.

    37. Re:Darwin Or Nature's Reset Button? by danlip · · Score: 1

      They shouldn't assume they are the first priest to meet that child.

    38. Re:Darwin Or Nature's Reset Button? by misexistentialist · · Score: 1

      The reason extramarital sex was once considered immoral was because it often resulted in pregnancy. Since that is no longer true the Catholic Church doctrine is what should be described as "ignorant crap." We could talk about how the Popes' continued opposition is grounded in the lust for worldly power and how it results in the evil of increased abortions, but really Catholic leaders have absolutely no authority in sexual matters anymore. Maybe in 500 years if they have kept it in their pants they can talk again about chastity.

    39. Re:Darwin Or Nature's Reset Button? by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      The Catholic church has a long history of discouraging condom use, both official and actual. I know several catholic teachers who are told by their school and church administrations that they must not tell students to use condoms. They all do, quietly, but that doesn't excuse the official policy.

      Again, nobody said people are simple or stupid. You seem awfully defensive, to the point of imagining insults. Crisis of faith?

    40. Re:Darwin Or Nature's Reset Button? by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      On the one hand, if you're playing around without wearing a condom, then you're risking a Darwin Award. On the other hand, if you use a condom every time you have sex in your life, you are ensuring a Darwin Award. If your genes don't survive your death (and everyone dies), you lose the Darwin Game.

    41. Re:Darwin Or Nature's Reset Button? by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      WTF? If you wear a condom you can't reproduce! If everyone used condoms every time they ever had sex, that would cause the extinction of the human race. OTOH, ghonorrea has been around for thousands of years, likely as long as the human race has. Ghonorrea will NOT cause the human race to go extinct.

    42. Re:Darwin Or Nature's Reset Button? by SpaceCadets · · Score: 1

      I'd rather have David Tennant within me, but hey. :)

    43. Re:Darwin Or Nature's Reset Button? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He probably uses his sonic screwdriver at the local ATM.

    44. Re:Darwin Or Nature's Reset Button? by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

      WTF? If you wear a condom you can't reproduce!

      But would you be able to feel the whoosh?

      (Yes, I'm aware, and was mocking GP for suggesting that having unprotected sex could qualify one for the darwin awards

    45. Re:Darwin Or Nature's Reset Button? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's highly doubtful that an STD that kills fast enough to prevent the infected to crap out a kid first would hit 100% of the population. In fact an STD that killed that fast would be less likely to infect a lot of people (they die before passing it on) and a weaker STD just wouldn't stop reproduction. Don't forget that Gonorrhea might as well have been a superbug a few hundred years ago when there were no antibiotics.

  6. Socially Fucked by cosm · · Score: 5, Funny

    Perhaps in the eyes of the overlords, or perhaps evolution, STDs are a "feature not a bug" situation, a form population control. Reducing numbers through the attempt to increase numbers. I wonder if we should start including a Trojan constant in our population growth and decay models. Combined with the social network clusterfuck, perhaps we need a digital vaccine. Hope your not allergic to PCillin.

    While on this line of thought, I would liken using Norton to wearing 8 condoms, all which having been poked with a needle, and Spybot Search & Destroy being the "Pull-Out" contraceptive method, and disconnecting from the internet altogether being like a hysterectomy. Unfortunately, we can't forget Live OneCare, which is like wrapping it with toilet paper, drinking a fifth of tequila, taking two viagras, and then wandering around Mexico City.

    What was my point again?

    --
    'We are trying to prove ourselves wrong as quickly as possible, because only in that way can we find progress.' RPF
    1. Re:Socially Fucked by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

      STDs are a "feature not a bug" situation, a form population control.

      Diseases in general are a check on population. Not a "feature" though, at least in an evolutionary sense. Unless your population grows so big, it chokes it's own resources off and the whole population goes extinct, there's not much evolutionary advantage to limiting your numbers, at least not to the individual organism.

      On a cellular basis, something like population control has evolved, but that's because when one cell overpopulates (cancer) that dooms all the cells, your melanoma isn't going to hop ship and thrive if it kills you. With individual organisms in a population, there's not much of an advantage: you have fewer kids, your neighbor still has 40, if the whole town starves, they're more likely to survive and pass on their selfish genes, and in good times they still have the advantage. With the disease, if you have 400 animal lines who were susceptible to the disease when their population got too high, and one line that was resistant to the disease, selfish, the disease would itself select for resistance, and within one or two disease wipes (depending on how effective the disease was) the whole population would be resistant.

      Humans actually in many ways represent a foolish dead end direction in terms of evolution. We have maybe 4 kids on average? That's not much when compared to even other vertebrates, let alone invertebrates, who vastly outnumber us and have far more diversity, and in terms of evolutionary fitness, the whole multicellular thing was a bad idea. It would only take one measly nuclear apocalypse to wipe us humans out. Cockroaches would come back in a few years, and bacterial numbers would probably barely blip. So no, there's no reason to evolve to limit your own numbers via disease.

      Maybe you were talking more philosophically and less evolutionarily...

    2. Re:Socially Fucked by BlackSabbath · · Score: 1

      > Perhaps in the eyes of ... evolution, STDs are a ... form population control

      Dude, in the eyes of evolution, EVERYTHING is potentially a form of population control. Hell, Gentoo Linux is a form of population control.

    3. Re:Socially Fucked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your point was that windows security is doing just fine. :)

    4. Re:Socially Fucked by cosm · · Score: 1

      Ain't that the truth. Maybe thats why Linux doesn't spread like wildfire OS market, all its backers are more preoccupied with compiling than conceiving, and penguin gene is lost.

      --
      'We are trying to prove ourselves wrong as quickly as possible, because only in that way can we find progress.' RPF
    5. Re:Socially Fucked by noidentity · · Score: 1

      While on this line of thought, I would liken using Norton to wearing 8 condoms, all which having been poked with a needle, and Spybot Search & Destroy being the "Pull-Out" contraceptive method, and disconnecting from the internet altogether being like a hysterectomy. Unfortunately, we can't forget Live OneCare, which is like wrapping it with toilet paper, drinking a fifth of tequila, taking two viagras, and then wandering around Mexico City.

      Where does Slashdot fit into the above? Oh, right, Slashdot is like posting about these things, like I'm doing. Guaranteed safe.

  7. Exercise some self-discipline and keep... by Nutria · · Score: 1, Insightful

    your pecker in your pocket. No worries about broken or slipped condoms, or being overcome by the moment and not using one.

    Of course, mentioning this to young, self-righteous members of an incredibly hedonistic and narcissistic society is akin to pissing into the wind, so I fully expect to get modded into oblivion.

    --
    "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    1. Re:Exercise some self-discipline and keep... by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 4, Funny

      Speaking as one who regularly succumbs to propositions from strange attractive sexually promiscuous women, I would rather be gorgeous and infected than germ-free and ugly.

    2. Re:Exercise some self-discipline and keep... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I wholeheartedly agree.

      As a Slashdot reader, I feel I am uniquely situated to speak about abstinence, because unlike all those hypocritical politicians, I obviously practice what I preach. In my experience the best way to avoid getting gonorrhea is to live in your mother's basement and play World of Warcraft.

      There's only one thing you have to be careful about: you mustn't let your mother come down there. After a while you get pretty desperate.

    3. Re:Exercise some self-discipline and keep... by Alarindris · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Do you really think it's self-righteous, hedonistic, and narcissistic to have sex? It's how you got here.

      Live a little!

    4. Re:Exercise some self-discipline and keep... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Sorry, did you say something? I was too busy having sex, which I, being a youth, do constantly.

    5. Re:Exercise some self-discipline and keep... by eln · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Sure, and hormone-soaked teenagers whose brains are still trying to develop good impulse control always think rationally and choose abstinence when a member of their preferred sex is hot to trot for them. This is why abstinence-only education has been such a rousing success everywhere it's been tried.

    6. Re:Exercise some self-discipline and keep... by hargrand · · Score: 1

      Sure, and hormone-soaked teenagers whose brains are still trying to develop good impulse control always think rationally

      I think daddy coming along with a shot gun will have a very positive impact on "impulse control" and "think[ing] rationally".

    7. Re:Exercise some self-discipline and keep... by al.caughey · · Score: 1

      Sorry, did you say something? I was too busy having sex, which I, being a youth, do constantly.

      I guess you must be typing with one hand then...

    8. Re:Exercise some self-discipline and keep... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yet you are on slashdot saying this... Right. Pull the other one.

    9. Re:Exercise some self-discipline and keep... by LordLucless · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Hedonistic? Yes. Hedonism is the pursuit of pleasure as the goal of life. I'd say sex qualifies.
      Narcissistic? Not necessarily, but it you're having sex without thought of the consequences - especially unprotected sex - then yes, I'd say it does.
      Self-Righteous? No. But being self-righteous makes you less likely to accept any criticism of your lifestyle, which is what the GP was trying to say.

      All in all, those three qualities in a society makes it likely they will have lots of sex (hedonism), and in doing so spread disease (narcissism) , while being unlikely to change when someone tells them it might be a good idea (self-righteous).

      --
      Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
    10. Re:Exercise some self-discipline and keep... by LordLucless · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Hormone-soaked teenager brains already have all the physiological necessities for impulse control; what they don't have is any motivation to develop it, since excuses like the above are always made for them.

      --
      Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
    11. Re:Exercise some self-discipline and keep... by Animaether · · Score: 1

      Live a little! Spread herpes! ... wait, what?

      The 2nd comment I saw in here was from some guy suggesting that using a condom and not sleeping with 'just anyone' was living a dull life. They got +4 Insightful (at the time of this writing). I'm not sure what to make of that.

      Is it truly the case that in the U.S. (presumption based on the current time) condoms and/or not having sex with 'just anyone' is so disregarded as to deriding it being hailed with a "hear, hear!" ?

      I didn't think that potentially getting - or spreading - an STD was something that should be hailed as a virtue.. nevermind the basic statement suggesting that in order to 'live a little', the aforementioned is a totally acceptable risk.

      Of course prevention can be taken to an extreme as well - but to see the basic suggestion of using a condom and/or not sleeping around with random-persons-A-through-Z so belittled as it is, I'm going to have to say it's rather obvious why the vast majority of STDs aren't on a decline; and in fact on the rise. No wonder every time I'm staying in the U.S. and flick a hotel TV on I'm met with there-is-no-cure-for-herpes ads in practically every commercial break - it must be a booming business.

    12. Re:Exercise some self-discipline and keep... by Dave114 · · Score: 1

      Do you really think it's self-righteous, hedonistic, and narcissistic to have sex? It's how you got here.

      Live a little!

      I suspect that what the original poster was getting at was a lack of casual sex / promiscuity - which takes some level of self-discipline.

      Having at most one sexual partner to whom you're faithful negates the risk.

    13. Re:Exercise some self-discipline and keep... by ndogg · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, it's a good thing that you have such great discipline regarding your sexuality.

      Is there anything in yourlife that you consume even though you know it's bad for you? Smoking? Any particular food? Or are you just the model of perfection with no vices whatsoever? Or do instead lead the most boring life ever, and so never have to worry about these things?

      This isn't about what should or what could be. This is about the reality of things. Nobody advocating sex ed will deny that abstinence is the only 100% prevention for abstinence, but the reality is that some people will have sex in spite of the consequences, and so they are entitled to the most medically accurate info about it, and how things like condoms will mitigate the risks.

      --
      // file: mice.h
      #include "frickin_lasers.h"
    14. Re:Exercise some self-discipline and keep... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's pleasurable to have sex with your partner, it's hedonistic to have sex with everyone else. But then again, it's the nature of half of us, as shown by this chart

    15. Re:Exercise some self-discipline and keep... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...the pursuit of pleasure as the goal of life.

      What other possible goal could there be?

    16. Re:Exercise some self-discipline and keep... by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

      Exercise some self-discipline and keep your pecker in your pocket. No worries about broken or slipped condoms, or being overcome by the moment and not using one.

      I'm confused. If one is overcome by the moment and not using a condom, doesn't that imply that self-discipline, and keeping it in a pocket has failed at least once? Your advice seems a little like "Don't be flammable, so that way you won't catch on fire and burn to death."

    17. Re:Exercise some self-discipline and keep... by LordLucless · · Score: 1

      Pick a religion. Throw in concepts of honour, duty, continuation of the species, leaving one's mark on history, pleasing others, etc, etc.

      --
      Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
    18. Re:Exercise some self-discipline and keep... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dream again. Chains work. Fear doesn't. At some point you must admit you have no control over what happens.

    19. Re:Exercise some self-discipline and keep... by eln · · Score: 5, Insightful

      There have been several studies (third question in the interview, feel free to google for more information) showing that the areas of the brain linked to complex decision making and impulse control are still under development in the adolescent brain, and in fact continue to develop into the 20s. These findings may explain, in part, why teenagers are more prone to risky behavior (such as, say, unprotected sex) than older people. In short, studies indicate that hormone-soaked teenage brains do NOT have all the physiological necessities for impulse control.

    20. Re:Exercise some self-discipline and keep... by compro01 · · Score: 1

      All of which are used to attain pleasure, through a greater or lesser degree of indirection.

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    21. Re:Exercise some self-discipline and keep... by LordLucless · · Score: 1

      And as the researcher himself says, his research has been restricted to research on adolescent raised in the US, that there is a long-standing debate on the influence of culture on adolescent brain development, and that he wants to do more research on the subject.

      That is my contention entirely. We raise our children in an environment that does not foster the development of self-control, then use that as an excuse for them when they don't demonstrate any.

      --
      Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
    22. Re:Exercise some self-discipline and keep... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree with realistic treatment of these problems, but: I don't get the whole "your life must be boring" thing whenever someone talks about their abstinence of something. Are vices the most meaningful thing you have in life? Is it some kind of denial that life can be just as great without those things because you don't want to put in the effort to get over them? I'm not saying you should live like a monk, but it is naive to play the "you must be boring" card, especially when so many people I know indulge in their vices and still end up being bored with life. Tesla didn't seem to live a very boring life.

    23. Re:Exercise some self-discipline and keep... by timmarhy · · Score: 2, Insightful
      fail.

      hedonism is the pursuit of everything in EXCESS. having sex is just normal not in anyway an excess.

      narcissism is a far more extreme psyhcological condition then just being horny and acting on it. that'd be like calling someone narcissistic just because they took the last coke out of the fridge.

      This idea that we somehow have more sex now then in the past is the biggest load of bullcrap. guess what? people fuck, your grandma had he same urges in the 1920's as you have now. the biological drive is exactly the same, it's just socially we are less afraid to express it, so you hear about it more.

      the idea that teenagers won't fuck is laughable.

      --
      If you mod me down, I will become more powerful than you can imagine....
    24. Re:Exercise some self-discipline and keep... by slashgimp · · Score: 1

      Sure, and hormone-soaked teenagers whose brains are still trying to develop good impulse control always think rationally and choose abstinence when a member of their preferred sex is hot to trot for them. This is why abstinence-only education has been such a rousing success everywhere it's been tried.

      uhhh ..."such arousing success"? :p

      Whee!
      SG

    25. Re:Exercise some self-discipline and keep... by LordLucless · · Score: 1

      Yeah, yeah, psychological hedonism. Long differentiated from ethical hedonism, as the OP was clearly talking about. Interesting if you're a psychologist, a useless distinction for actually conducting an argument.

      --
      Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
    26. Re:Exercise some self-discipline and keep... by drsmithy · · Score: 1

      Hedonistic? Yes. Hedonism is the pursuit of pleasure as the goal of life. I'd say sex qualifies.

      So anyone having sex for purposes other than reproduction is hedonistic ?

    27. Re:Exercise some self-discipline and keep... by TerranFury · · Score: 1

      No wonder every time I'm staying in the U.S. and flick a hotel TV on I'm met with there-is-no-cure-for-herpes ads in practically every commercial break - it must be a booming business.

      AFAIK, herpes stats are pretty much the same for the US and European countries.

    28. Re:Exercise some self-discipline and keep... by LordLucless · · Score: 2, Informative

      Fail, fail, fail.

      Hedonism is the pursuit of pleasure. Where you got your definition from, I don't know.

      Fail, fail, fail.

      Narcissism is a personality trait. Narcissistic Personality Disorder is a psychological condition. The person who took the last coke out of the fridge would be narcissistic - to a degree. There is an element of narcissism in all of us. The OPs use of the term indicates he thought that there is an excess of narcissism in our society, not that he thought everyone was pathologically narcissistic.

      This idea that we somehow have more sex now then in the past is the biggest load of bullcrap. guess what? people fuck, your grandma had he same urges in the 1920's as you have now. the biological drive is exactly the same, it's just socially we are less afraid to express it, so you hear about it more.

      Yeah, it just used to be that people married early, and their impulses tended to be directed more towards a single person (not exclusively, of course, but more so than today). Monogomy tends to retard the spread of STD. It's no coincidence that the rapid spread of STDs coincided with the sexual revolution (and with rapid, affordable intercontinental travel).

      --
      Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
    29. Re:Exercise some self-discipline and keep... by dunkelfalke · · Score: 1

      Well, in the USSR the children were raised in an environment that fosters the development of self control. Only it failed nearly all the time (abortion was the most common pregnancy protection).

      --
      "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
    30. Re:Exercise some self-discipline and keep... by LordLucless · · Score: 1

      To a degree. Although you got that the wrong way around - the more hedonistic a person is, the more likely they are to have lots of sex.

      --
      Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
    31. Re:Exercise some self-discipline and keep... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nobody advocating sex ed will deny that abstinence is the only 100% prevention for abstinence, but the reality is that some people will have sex in spite of the consequences, and so they are entitled to the most medically accurate info about it, and how things like condoms will mitigate the risks.

      I assume because following abstinence, by definition, means that one will certainly not prevent abstinence?

    32. Re:Exercise some self-discipline and keep... by thatskinnyguy · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hehe... You said OVERCOME. Didn't know that was possible.

      --
      The game.
    33. Re:Exercise some self-discipline and keep... by timmarhy · · Score: 1
      "and their impulses tended to be directed more towards a single person"

      for a start, marriage used to be done for policial and wealth gains, and you kept a lover on the side (atleast one) for sexual gratification. this was the normal mode of operation during the victorian era of insane sexual repression, and i doubt it "improved" in the 20th century. the sexual revolution of the 60's was really all about bringing to the fore what everyone had been doing since forever. it was a revolt against the hear no evil speak no evil attitude of the 50's.

      do you know WHY we have monogomy and stupid virginity pledges? because back in the day before the pill, condoms and paternatiy tests, the only way you could be SURE your wife's offspring was actually your own was if she was a virgin when you met and that she slept with no one else. after all you want your own genetic code to multiply and recieve the benefits of your hardwork.

      all this crap about no sex before marriage and only having one sexual partner stems from this hangover from history.

      --
      If you mod me down, I will become more powerful than you can imagine....
    34. Re:Exercise some self-discipline and keep... by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Yeah right. When exactly in history do you think the young and self-righteous (or old and cynical for that matter) of any reasonably sizeable society have actually routinely abstained from sex?

    35. Re:Exercise some self-discipline and keep... by LordLucless · · Score: 1

      Firstly, that was generally only the fairly wealth (who could afford a mistress). Even then, it was still pretty much monogamy (just with your mistress rather than your wife), and what I said still holds true.

      The number of sexual partners a person is likely to have had has increased hugely in the last century or so, largely because of the sexual revolution, and the increasing average age of marriage, as well as the increased opportunity (more people living in urban centres and faster, easier travel). This has coincided with a rapid spread of STDs.

      --
      Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
    36. Re:Exercise some self-discipline and keep... by Nutria · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sure, and hormone-soaked teenagers ... always think rationally

      So, we let them run wild, and not even try to impart some self-discipline?

      No wonder this country is in it's current shit pile state of affairs, sinking even deeper.

      This is why abstinence-only education has been such a rousing success everywhere it's been tried.

      Re-read my post. Nowhere did I say "Only teach abstinence." It's why there are speed limits and safety belts.

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    37. Re:Exercise some self-discipline and keep... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You may be laughing now, but I guarantee that my victory will be much sweeter. At the point where your penis falls off from disease, and my two inch monster can still do the deed. I believe they refer to this as: Losing the battle, winning the war.

    38. Re:Exercise some self-discipline and keep... by ppanon · · Score: 1

      All in all, those three qualities in a society makes it likely they will have lots of sex (hedonism), and in doing so spread disease (narcissism) , while being unlikely to change when someone tells them it might be a good idea (self-righteous).

      Oh yeah? Who is being more self righteous? The person who has lots of sex (and potentially might have used prophylactics if they weren't deliberately kept ignorant by others), or the person who is trying to ignore millennia of evolutionary pressure and telling everyone else to stick to abstinence while ignoring solid research that indicates that a substantial portion of the population is unlikely to stick to a policy of abstinence regardless of how noble and dedicated their intentions are be celibate. In my book, the self-righteous twit is the one who insists on forcing their preference for abstinence on everyone else when it's a demonstrably faulty policy, instead of the poor gullible or ignorant fool who tries to follow that faulty policy and fails.

      --
      Laissez lire, et laissez danser; ces deux amusements ne feront jamais de mal au monde. - Voltaire
    39. Re:Exercise some self-discipline and keep... by ppanon · · Score: 1

      Actually since both types of hedonism come down to varying degrees of chemical rewards in the brain for certain behaviours, from a biomedical standpoint, the difference is only quantitative, not qualitative.

      --
      Laissez lire, et laissez danser; ces deux amusements ne feront jamais de mal au monde. - Voltaire
    40. Re:Exercise some self-discipline and keep... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you really think it's self-righteous, hedonistic, and narcissistic to have sex? It's how you got here.

      Wow, slow down.You are going to get dizzy spinning those words around like that. Having sex with strangers with no intention of reproducing *is* hedonistic. It's all a matter of what your intent is. Besides, STDs are a good way to control people who have no self-control.

    41. Re:Exercise some self-discipline and keep... by jacquems · · Score: 1

      My high school's sex education classes (in the mid-1990s) presented the potential risks and the level of risk associated with various forms of sexual activity, as well as the various options for mitigating the risks and the effectiveness of each option. It was emphasized that abstinence (including abstinence from oral and anal sex) was the only 100% effective method for preventing pregnancy and STDs. I determined what my acceptable level of risk was, and acted accordingly, but then again I can't claim to have been a typical teenager.

    42. Re:Exercise some self-discipline and keep... by LordLucless · · Score: 1

      Ahh, a determinist. How cute.

      --
      Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
    43. Re:Exercise some self-discipline and keep... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure, and hormone-soaked teenagers whose brains are still trying to develop good impulse control always think rationally and choose abstinence when a member of their preferred sex is hot to trot for them. This is why abstinence-only education has been such a rousing success everywhere it's been tried.

      It depends on the program. "You might catch a disease, so you should wait, but of course it's your body and up to you" hasn't been particularly effective, that's certainly true. But I'm told the "If I catch you mucking around with some girl, sonny jim, I'm going to thrash the bloody life out of you" program worked reasonably well for my grandparents.

    44. Re:Exercise some self-discipline and keep... by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      fail.

      hedonism is the pursuit of everything in EXCESS.

      FAIL! Hedonism is a school of ethics which argues that pleasure is the only intrinsic good.

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

    45. Re:Exercise some self-discipline and keep... by tibit · · Score: 1

      Sex is pleasurable, yet it doesn't have to be you goal in life, and merely having sex is not making you a hedonist.

      Doing stuff without thinking of the consequences is not narcissism. It's being stupid. Narcissism is something else, go read about it.

      As for self-righteousness, well, you define it quite well.

      But frankly, your posts make very little sense. On the surface they look good, but it's all bondo. Hopefully you'll get the car analogy.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    46. Re:Exercise some self-discipline and keep... by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      Except that in actual scientific tests it has been http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Education/2010/0202/Abstinence-only-study-could-alter-sex-education-landscape
      See another of my posts for more details.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    47. Re:Exercise some self-discipline and keep... by tibit · · Score: 1

      OK, so apart from spreading STDs, unwanted pregnancies, and potentially dangerous pleasure, sex is bad how? If the first three were not a problem, would it be OK with you? I don't think so, yet your whole argument is construed as if those three bad things were determining your stance.

      One can obviously rather easily deal with the first three rather simply. Heck, I think that many teens must be dealing with #3 for you on the female end for free, just by the fact that quite often it requires a wee bit longer relationship for the guy to be able to actually give pleasure to the girl.

      LOL.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    48. Re:Exercise some self-discipline and keep... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      --signed, Rock Hudson

    49. Re:Exercise some self-discipline and keep... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your perspective is what is laughable.

      I was a teenager. I had plenty of drive. I had plenty of opportunity. I didn't do it.

      As a result - no STI, no pregnancy, no drama.

      And now, later in life - the same self control that worked as a teenager still does the job.

      As a result - no STI, great children, happily married, no cheating, no affairs, no ex-wife, no stepchildren drama, no divorce drama.

      It's not that complicated. All these things run together because the attitudes involved are so similar. People can control themselves, and doing so usually leads to good results. Why should that be a shock, or something to be laughed at?

    50. Re:Exercise some self-discipline and keep... by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      You must be either

      1. Very young
      2. Happily married
      3. A feminist (always blaming men, "keep your pecker in your pocket"
      4. A religious nut or preacher
      5. Completely without a sex drive for some other reason (a freak of nature)

      Did I miss any possibilities?

      You obviously weren't an adult during the '70s when contraception was cheap and easy (there were IUDs back then, no need to have to remember to take a daily pill) and there were no uncurable STDs. That had never happened before in human history, and hasn't happened since. It was common for strange women to walk up to me in the supermarket and casually say "wanna fuck?" I kid you not. I always had to decline, as I was married (I no longer am, I hope they cure aids and bring back IUDs!).

      You obviously do NOT read any history, either, and never heard of the "free love" movement in the 1920s.

      To say that today's society is more hedonistic than any other time reeks of pure ignorance, which is why you WERE modded to oblivion; you're simply wrong, and insultingly and judgementally so. Speaking of which, if you're #4, leave a little extra in the collection plate and beg forgiveness; you know what Jesus said about being judgemental.

    51. Re:Exercise some self-discipline and keep... by Nutria · · Score: 1

      Very young

      Middle aged.

      Happily married

      Relatively happy.

      A feminist

      Hah!

      A religious nut or preacher

      Atheist.

      Completely without a sex drive for some other reason

      Nope...

      It was common for strange women to walk up to me in the supermarket and casually say "wanna fuck?"

      You must have lived in a big city. Probably coastal.

      never heard of the "free love" movement in the 1920s.

      How restricted was that to the upper classes (and their hangers-on)?

      To say that today's society is more hedonistic than any other time reeks of pure ignorance,

      Today's society "started" in the 60s, and it's gotten worse ever sense.

      you know what Jesus said about being judgemental.

      Yes, I do know. That quote refers to hypocrisy.

      Otherwise, Judeo-Christian societies wouldn't have laws, judges and police forces.

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    52. Re:Exercise some self-discipline and keep... by ppanon · · Score: 1

      Ahh, a dualist. How cute.

      --
      Laissez lire, et laissez danser; ces deux amusements ne feront jamais de mal au monde. - Voltaire
    53. Re:Exercise some self-discipline and keep... by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Middle aged.

      Then you weren't an adult in the 1960s and 1970s, so how can you determine when "today's society started"? From my perspective (born 1952) the '50s were little different from the '60s, While the '60s were radically different than the '70s. The cusp at about 1970 saw the ending of racial segregation, the beginning of the Vietnam War's end, the acceptance of marijuana, the signing of environmental legislation, and the rejection of materialism, which rapidly returned in the 1980s.

      Happily married
      Relatively happy.

      I thought it was one of the choices.

      You must have lived in a big city. Probably coastal.

      Cahokia, Illinois. Population at the time 18,000.

      you know what Jesus said about being judgemental.
      Yes, I do know. That quote refers to hypocrisy.

      "Judge not, lest ye be judged yourself." None of us are perfect ("None are good, save God"). The only perfect human was tortured to death. To think you are better than a hedonist or a homosexual or even a mass murderer is hypocracy in and of itself. We are all flawed, including you. Including me.

      Otherwise, Judeo-Christian societies wouldn't have laws, judges and police forces.

      The police arrested Jesus, who was betrayed by a snitch (today we would call Judas a narc), then judged and executed by his government. But I see you say you're an athiest, so it isn't so hypocritical of you to be so judgemental.

      There's nothing wrong with pleasure, so long as it doesn't harm anyone else. All things in moderation.

    54. Re:Exercise some self-discipline and keep... by jacquems · · Score: 1

      Being raised in a totalitarian environment is a sure way to grow up with absolutely no ability for self control. When someone is telling you what to do constantly, you don't have to think, you just have to obey. Sadly, the prevailing parenting style in the USA emphasizes obedience and discourages challenging authority. By the time children get to their teens, they have already been trained to obey. The problem is, they are now obeying their peers.

    55. Re:Exercise some self-discipline and keep... by LordLucless · · Score: 1

      You're putting it the wrong way around. Having sex doesn't make you a hedonist; being a hedonist makes you more likely to be having more sex.

      Doing stuff without thinking of the consequences for others is narcissistic, should have made that point clearer.

      --
      Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
    56. Re:Exercise some self-discipline and keep... by LordLucless · · Score: 1

      Quote one post of mine where I said sex is bad.

      --
      Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
    57. Re:Exercise some self-discipline and keep... by thatskinnyguy · · Score: 1

      Syphilis. That one's been around a while. And I do believe that there is no cure.

      --
      The game.
    58. Re:Exercise some self-discipline and keep... by markov_chain · · Score: 1

      It was common for strange women to walk up to me in the supermarket and casually say "wanna fuck?" I kid you not.

      This still happens to me even today. Trouble is I usually wake up right after :D

      --
      Tsunami -- You can't bring a good wave down!
    59. Re:Exercise some self-discipline and keep... by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      No, antibiotics will cure it, but like the clap once you have it long enough you can't cure it.

    60. Re:Exercise some self-discipline and keep... by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Well, it still happens to me, but these days it's just skin-and-bones thin ones, and they all want twenty bucks for it.

  8. Here's an idea by Vyse+of+Arcadia · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Howsabout people stop having unprotected sex with people with gonorrhea? I realize that people may lie about not having it or something similar, but one's policy should be use a rubber unless one is very, very certain it's safe.

    1. Re:Here's an idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good idea.
      I don't want the big deal is about wearing protection.

    2. Re:Here's an idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      A lot of people don't realize they have been sleeping with someone who has been sleeping with someone else.

      I can't even count the number of people I know that are cheating, or have been cheated on. And all these people will think they are all faithful and will not use a condom, but one of them will get something and pass it along to everyone else.

      My wife cheated on me once, but I was far more upset that she came back to me and didn't use a condom after god-knows-what the bitch did or didn't use with the other guy.

    3. Re:Here's an idea by Vyse+of+Arcadia · · Score: 1

      Running with scissors is fun too, and so is driving without a seatbelt.

    4. Re:Here's an idea by the_humeister · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That's a nice sentiment. Unfortunately there's a not too small contingent of people who believe that sex education = abstinence education leading to people who will have sex without proper protection.

    5. Re:Here's an idea by dmr001 · · Score: 1
      Oh hi. You don't have gonorrhea (again)? No? And we're using birth control pills? And we're married/together/have 3 children together/in high school so we don't think more than 3 hours into the future/are self-deluding evangelical Christians/don't really give a crap? And you would never sleep around on me? So it must be safe to have sex, then, right?

      Gonorrhea (and it's fellow-traveler) chlamydia deserve some credit here - they're good at what they do, and have been for thousands of years, and will probably continue to do so until we find something more new-fangled than current antibiotic therapy.

      Convincing people not to have risky sex is about equally challenging.

    6. Re:Here's an idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, that's the thing, neither of those two are actually fun. When it comes to physical pleasure, very few have the mental focus to stay rational.

    7. Re:Here's an idea by mogness · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Those things aren't actually fun. As opposed to sex, which is. Please try again.

      --
      that's teh shizzle bizzle
    8. Re:Here's an idea by jamesh · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Condoms take away a large amount of the pleasure of sex.

      So does a good case of <insert STD here>, which can also remove a bunch of other pleasures in life, temporarily or permanently (gonorrhea is associated with infertility, and a bunch of other STD's hurt from what i've heard)

      Seriously, if you are going to have unprotected sex with someone you don't know, just remember that you are going to have sex with someone who isn't adverse to having unprotected sex with someone they don't know. Proceed cautiously.

    9. Re:Here's an idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stop being a cheapskate and buying condoms in bulk at the bargain bins. Start paying a little more to buy the thin models, learn how to apply them properly, actually invest time in a little foreplay, and you'll find out you can still get most of the same pleasure from sex with minimal risk of pregnancy or STD. I guess the exception is if you're (biologically constrained or voluntarily) packing fudge as your main sexual activity, in which case I have heard that condoms do make a big difference. But that's really a relatively small fraction of the population.

    10. Re:Here's an idea by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      My wife cheated on me once, but I was far more upset that she came back to me and didn't use a condom after god-knows-what the bitch did or didn't use with the other guy.

      Rather than using a condom with your wife, you should have simply had het tested. Better, you should have just divorced the slut (as I should have divorced mine the first time. And the second time).

      A frien of mine confided to me that she caught the clap, but neither she nor her boyfriend knows who gave it to who. I'm glad I'm not porking her, I hate shots, and ghonorrea burns like hell when you piss and leaves green slime in your shorts.

  9. That's a bit of a generalization by ciaohound · · Score: 1

    People have been and, as long as there is goatse.cx, will continue to be exposed on slashdot.

    --
    Oh, yeah, it's not easy to pad these out to 120 characters.
  10. Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Not only are you dull, but you are an idiot too. It does not take doing a ho to get it. This is no different than HIV. IOW, it is not who you screw, but who the person 5 removed from you that had it and passed it on. And as to you knowing whether you have it or not, I seriously doubt that you have a clue.

    1. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is not who you screw, but who the person 5 removed from you that had it and passed it on.

      Textbook dirty hoebag to me.

    2. Re:Wow by Jeremy+Erwin · · Score: 1

      Put down that book and come to bed, darling.

    3. Re:Wow by TerranFury · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It does not take doing a ho to get it. [...] it is not who you screw, but who the person 5 removed from you that had it and passed it on

      True true.

      This is no different than HIV

      Except, on the plus side, it's currently curable, and on the minus side it's a hell of a lot more common.

    4. Re:Wow by TheKidWho · · Score: 1

      That's why you get tested and make sure the girl your screwing has been tested?

      Not very hard.

    5. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Not very hard.

      That's what she said

    6. Re:Wow by Mr.+Freeman · · Score: 1

      You're clearly a troll, but let me explain for anyone with similar thoughts. "Wearing a condom and not screwing a ho" is a fancy way of saying "don't have sex with people that you don't know are clean (i.e. STD test) and always practice safe sex". Furthermore, we can generalize this to apply to ALL STDs, curable and otherwise.

      --
      -1 disagree is not a modifier for a reason. -1 troll, flaimbait, redundant, overrated are NOT acceptable substitutes.
    7. Re:Wow by TheKidWho · · Score: 2, Funny

      Oh no she didn't!

      *snaps fingers*

    8. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah, he's right. All three times I got it was from screwing hookers without a condom :(

  11. An STD the next super-bug? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Clearly, the geeks shall inherit the Earth.

    1. Re:An STD the next super-bug? by linguizic · · Score: 1

      For about a generation, then the complete lack of sex will bring about the end of humanity.

      --
      Does this sig remind you of Agatha Christie?
    2. Re:An STD the next super-bug? by d1r3lnd · · Score: 1

      I don't see how that follows; if anything, the Greeks shall inherit the earth. Frat boys will be the first to develop an immunity, and let's face it - if you're contracting STDs, you're both having sex and avoiding birth control.

    3. Re:An STD the next super-bug? by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Clearly, the geeks shall inherit the Earth.

      Hold on, you haven't solved the reproduction part. (I'm still trying mitosis.)

    4. Re:An STD the next super-bug? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah and the place will be a bit like that Will Smith movie where there's no one around - the streets are empty.

      All the geeks will be home in their sub-basements playing world of warcraft or "wish i had a friend"

    5. Re:An STD the next super-bug? by Cyrano+de+Maniac · · Score: 1

      And then die off within a generation.

      --
      Cyrano de Maniac
    6. Re:An STD the next super-bug? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and have no heirs themselves.

  12. Cure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cure: Post on slashdot and never have contact with those pesky disease carrying ladies

  13. Mod Parent Up!!! by schmidt349 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Where were you when I had mod points? ... that's not such a good question, is it.

    1. Re:Mod Parent Up!!! by cosm · · Score: 4, Funny

      Mexico City.

      --
      'We are trying to prove ourselves wrong as quickly as possible, because only in that way can we find progress.' RPF
  14. Re:Needed crouwd thinning?? by ZekoMal · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Please; don't throw around Fox News memes. I mean, if I wanted to believe that the majority of the world was killing itself because of health care it's had, I'd go ahead and let Glenn Beck talk for me too.

    Stupid people should die. But if that were true, Fox News would be out of business, wouldn't it?

    Besides, it's not my job to demand people die. Are you saying that you want people to die just so you don't have to pay the same goddamn premiums you already pay for private healthcare?

  15. this story is about a month and a half late by slashgimp · · Score: 1

    ...I can't possibly be the only one who has wished people "Happy VD!" on Valentine's Day :D

    hehe

  16. Re:Needed crouwd thinning?? by Yosho-sama · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Here is a take on your intellect: You are a fucking retard. Here is the same situation, without health care.

    Some asshole sleeps around without a condom, and because they do not have health care, they do not get it treated and spread it to more people, one of whom is your mom.

    or

    Some asshole sleeps around without a condom, gets gonorrhea, and starts taking antibiotics without medical consultation and so on and so forth until the disease becomes drug-resistant AS THE ARTICLE IS DISCUSSING RIGHT NOW.

    or

    Some asshole gets a physical at the doctor, finds out about the consequences of having sex without a condom and sees some lovely pictures of herpes/chlamydia/gonorrhea and the asshole starts using a condom from then on and the spread of disease is stopped at a lower cost to society than having X amount of people needing treatment for STIs.

    Grow the fuck up, biology and disease prevention have nothing to do with politics.

    --
    My kingdom for a donkey!
  17. No one loves you when you have the... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    When I was a sexually active youth (back in the 60's and 70's) I managed to get the clap at least 3 times. The first time, I was in Mexico. I went to the pharmacy and got a lot of oral penicillin. Dosed myself with a couple of million units a day for a week or two. Bingo - cured. The next time, I was in the US and went to my family doctor. He prescribed some new "stronger" antibiotic for it. Guess what - it didn't work! I went back to the massive "beat it to death" penicillin doses and cured it post haste. The last time I got it, I went to the P-cure again. Two weeks, gone.

    Frankly, I don't think most doctors know what they are doing when it comes to dealing with this cruft. They are the reason why we are getting these "super bugs". It's a matter of "try a little of this, and if that doesn't work, try a little of that". As a result, both "this" and "that" make the little buggers stronger. My philosophy when it comes to infections - hit them hard and don't let up until they are dead, dead, dead!

    1. Re:No one loves you when you have the... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Unfortunately, the "beat it to death" method you use necessitates that stronger antibiotics be prescribed by doctors. It's the penicillin resistance that requires newer, stronger drugs.

    2. Re:No one loves you when you have the... by tokul · · Score: 1

      hit them hard and don't let up until they are dead, dead, dead!

      make sure that you don't die before they do. Lots of medicine can kill you too.

    3. Re:No one loves you when you have the... by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      Frankly, I don't think most doctors know what they are doing when it comes to dealing with this cruft. They are the reason why we are getting these "super bugs". It's a matter of "try a little of this, and if that doesn't work, try a little of that".

      Frankly as a doctor I can say you have no idea about the subject which you are attempting to speak. It saddens me to learn that in your ignorance you choose to blame the people who actually have researched and understand infectious disease and antibiotic resistance, when you have absolutely no idea even of how your own body works. You know. The one you've been living in all your life?

      Suggesting that any physician was "experimenting" with you is preposterous. Such a thing is both immoral AND illegal. We follow treatment guidelines that result from numerous published scientific studies that show that one drug is statistically superior to another. No one just picks a drug "at random" to treat you. Statistical superiority does not guarantee that the drug will work in your particular case - that's not what statistics do, however it is logically your "best chance" at a first time cure. The fact that your disease was resistant to the new drug only goes to show the severity of this problem.

      Also understand that there is nothing "magical" about penicillin. Different categories of antibiotics work in different ways. Penicillin affects the ability for bacteria to grow their cell walls. Other drugs (cipro for example) inhibit bacteria's ability to copy their DNA. Still others (macrolides like Azithromycin) inhibit protein synthesis at the ribosome level. Some of these drugs never work on some type of bacteria. All of these drugs can be rendered useless by some bacteria - and what's worse, these resistance genes can be passed across species of bacteria through plasmids.

      As to your philosophy regarding infections - perhaps keeping your penis in your pants and avoiding them would be wiser. Getting one STI is bad enough. Getting THREE means you were either paying for unprotected sex with prostitutes or are simply sleeping with everything in sight. I hope you have been checked recently for HIV, syphilis, hepatitis B and C and HPV, because most sexually transmitted infections come in groups - the person(s) who gave you gonorrhea probably gave you quite a few other things too. It also pains me to think how many other people you might have harmed or might harm in the future in your ignorance.

      Please educate yourself. And please masturbate from now on, you'll be doing the world a favor.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    4. Re:No one loves you when you have the... by Vegeta99 · · Score: 1

      Doc, don't try to defend your entire profession! Remember the joke, "What do they call the man at the bottom of his med school class?"... Well, he's still a doctor. Not all of them have their scruples. My family doctor gave me Accutane cream the first time I ever asked him what to do about zits when I was a kid (maybe 12), and when I turned into a teenage migraineur, he skipped suggesting Excedrin and a chiropractor, glossed right over Imitrex and plopped 10mg Percocet down on his prescription pad. That was probably 14 or so. He died that year of heart failure.

      My new doc? I remember going there in high school with colds and he'd just tell me to go home and take it easy, no antibiotics, nada. As a result, my adult immune system's pretty damn strong. This guy's the exact opposite of my first family doc.

    5. Re:No one loves you when you have the... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunately, the "beat it to death" method you use necessitates that stronger antibiotics be prescribed by doctors. It's the penicillin resistance that requires newer, stronger drugs.

      Not necessarily, but that's due to the fact even heavy regimens of antibiotics will never "beat and infection to death". On the other hand they don't really need to, as except in really specific cases (like being co-infected with AIDS or under immuno-suppression treatments) your body's immune system is still doing its part to kill harmful bacteria. Infections usually are a sign that your body's defenses are overwhelmed, not that they no longer function. Therefore, proper use of antibiotics kills the vast majority the infecting bacteria allowing a person's immune system to mop-up the remaining resistant bacteria (white blood cells engulfing and starving individual bacteria is very effective on the small scale, but can't cope well with the reproduction rates of a firmly established infection). However, when treatments are withdrawn before the infection is reduced sufficiently the immune system is still overwhelmed and a greater proportion the infection is drug resistant, increasing the likelihood infecting others with initially drug resistant bacteria.

    6. Re:No one loves you when you have the... by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      Not all of them have their scruples.

            Agreed. Like everything else there is a normal/bell/Gauss curve. Some very few of us excel. Some very few of us really shouldn't be there. But most of us are hopefully somewhere in the middle. I myself can only comment on what is/should be considered "normal", and I consider myself to be somewhere in the middle. But we're none of us perfect.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  18. How is this news for nerds? by psithurism · · Score: 2, Funny

    How is this news for nerds?

    Being nerd protects me quite well from such diseases. Is this some sort of appeal from non-nerds for our help?

  19. I for one welcome our sexual overlords by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    at least those our future kings gots their priority sorted

  20. Clearly the answer is..... by jameskojiro · · Score: 1

    Clearly the answer is to convert Humanity from a Sexual Species that reproduces via Sexual Mating, to one that is Asexual and reproduces via Asexual technology assisted Cloning.

    --
    Tsukasa: All I really want, is to be left alone...
    1. Re:Clearly the answer is..... by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

      Clearly the answer is to convert Humanity from a Sexual Species that reproduces via Sexual Mating, to one that is Asexual and reproduces via Asexual technology assisted Cloning.

      Yeah, like I'm gonna use that cloning machine after you've been in it. Ewww...

      --

      You can't take the sky from me...

  21. I carry a condom and never needed, until 1st beer. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It was the first condom given me. And the first beer I had was given me and I put it up on the wall next to my few trophies where it sat for 4 years: until one fateful day, I opened that keystone light and condom together.

    What resulted was a yeast infection, for which I blame that goddamn Ameri-can!

    And that condome was useless.

    Abstinate to the core, Semper Fi!

  22. 69 Comments by pongo000 · · Score: 1

    What I saw in this article summary when I refreshed the front page:

            * 69 comments

    I thought this might be a joke...then I remembered I was on /.

  23. Re:Needed crouwd thinning?? by Disstress · · Score: 1

    my fail in responding in time.... my response is meant for the asshole that supports socialism "" AS THE ARTICLE IS DISCUSSING RIGHT NOW."" --that

  24. Clap for the Wolfman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  25. Re:Needed crouwd thinning?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Besides, it's not my job to demand people die. Are you saying that you want people to die just so you don't have to pay the same goddamn premiums you already pay for private healthcare?

    nice fallacies there.

  26. Re:Needed crouwd thinning?? by Matt+Perry · · Score: 1, Informative

    some asshole sleeps around without a condom, and you are the one responsible for his health bill.

    That was true before the healthcare bill passed. Some asshole that sleeps around without a condom and without insurance could just go to the emergency room, get treated, and the taxpayers have to pay for it. Now that same asshole is required to pay their way or pay a fine. That sounds fair to me.

    --
    Slashdot: Failed Car Analogies. Amateur Lawyering. Anecdote Battles.
  27. stealing from the future by cats-paw · · Score: 1

    it's not good enough that we've trashed the planet and are taking it away from future generations, now we're going to take antibiotics (and soon anti-virals) away from them too.

    why do we hate our children ?

    --
    Absolute statements are never true
  28. Surgeon General recommendation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Surgeon General has recommended joining Slashdot as a preventative measure. Studies have shown it's more affective than condoms at preventing sexually transmitted diseases.

  29. Re:I carry a condom and never needed, until 1st be by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    1.
    wikipedia:
    break or slip due to latex degradation (typically from usage past the expiration date, improper storage, or exposure to oils)
    it was probably expired, too drunk to read it

    2. you were drunk, you probably did other stuff...

    3. you said you carried it, heat from your body can also degrade it, it not reccommend to have in like a wallet for extend periods

    4. it was 4 freaking years old

    you did basically everything wrong

  30. Re:Needed crouwd thinning?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some asshole sleeps around without a condom, gets gonorrhea, and starts taking antibiotics without medical consultation and so on and so forth until the disease becomes drug-resistant AS THE ARTICLE IS DISCUSSING RIGHT NOW.

    God people need to think. For everyone in the world professing that they believe in evolution, no one understands survival of the fittest.
    If a bacteria resists a drug, it was ALREADY resistant. Viruses and bacteria don't BECOME immune by you taking a drug that doesn't work. The mutation happens regardless of what drug you took, and all you're doing is killing off the rest of the bacteria. There will be immune strains regardless of how drugs are used. The objection to using anti biotics willy nilly has to do with killing the good bacteria in your system, allowing bacteria that are normally not an issue to over populate, causing them to become an issue.

  31. You're not far off, actually! by WheelDweller · · Score: 5, Interesting

    A few weeks back Slashdot ran a story about MRSA and other 'superbugs' being fought in (I believe it was) Finland.

    The cool thing about it is, for at least a decade they've been using the same level of sanitation as 50 years ago: steam-cleaning the floors and walls, not using HAND SANITIZER all the time, and letting the place remain a bit "dirtier" than our own hospitals. THEY HAVE THE LOWEST NUMBER OF SUCH CASES.

    It makes sense; let the lesser-bugs go, kill with dumber, more-trusted ways that kill ALL the bugs or none at all, and the superbugs have to mate with lesser-bugs. This bleeds out the specialty features.

    Meanwhile, everytime someone shakes hands in America, they hit it again with the sanitizer. It's just a never-ending "Germ Olympics" where only the strongest survive.

    We really need to consider 'alternative' means like this, and I think you've hit the penis on the head! :>

    --
    --- For a good time mail uce@ftc.gov
    1. Re:You're not far off, actually! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Bugs" as in bacteria don't mate. The strategy is to let benign bugs out compete virulent bugs for very limited resources.

    2. Re:You're not far off, actually! by Caue · · Score: 1

      bugs mating? you expect them to start doing unsafe microscopic sex and die from micro STDs?

    3. Re:You're not far off, actually! by eggnoglatte · · Score: 1

      It makes sense; let the lesser-bugs go, kill with dumber, more-trusted ways that kill ALL the bugs or none at all, and the superbugs have to mate with lesser-bugs.

      I agree with the general sentiment of you posting, but bacteria and viruses don't mate.

    4. Re:You're not far off, actually! by 517714 · · Score: 1

      ... and the superbugs have to mate with lesser-bugs. This bleeds out the specialty features.

      The bugs don't mate. The non-resistant bugs outcompete the resistant bugs because the genetic baggage attached to being resistant usually has a cost associated with metabolism.

      --
      The US government have made it clear that we have no inalienable rights; any we do not defend vigorously will be taken.
    5. Re:You're not far off, actually! by GargamelSpaceman · · Score: 1

      I don't understand how Gonhorrea (sp) can have evolved resistance when the treatment is a single dose of antibiotics. One dose has no compliance issues. I'd expect this if the treatment were two weeks of pills, then people might miss a dose. Unless the antibiotic is being used without direction by a physician, or used on a doctor's orders at a lesser dose over a longer time for other infections.. Maybe then if someone also had ghonoroeha (sp) then they might breed a superbug in themselves...

      Still what does hand sanitizer have to do with ghonhorheha (sp) ? They don't use the same antibiotic in those products do they?

      Bug killers that are not injested ought to be poisonous. Amoxicillin solution can't be a better germ killer than Listerine, or Bleach.

      --
      ...
    6. Re:You're not far off, actually! by kaffekaine · · Score: 1

      It makes sense; let the lesser-bugs go, kill with dumber, more-trusted ways that kill ALL the bugs or none at all, and the superbugs have to mate with lesser-bugs.This bleeds out the specialty features.

      So, what you're saying is we need to leave some cases of gonorrhea untreated, right?

  32. Re:Needed crouwd thinning?? by dunkelfalke · · Score: 4, Informative

    Wrong. Antibiotics are there to kill off all the non-resistant strains until the amount of bacteria low enough so the immune system can take care of the rest, this way preventing that the resistant strains survive.
    If an antibiotic treatment suddenly stops before all non-resistant strains were killed, the resistant strains survive and multiply and soon become dominant strains.

    --
    "It's such a fine line between stupid and clever" -- David St. Hubbins, Spinal Tap
  33. No worries! by metiscus · · Score: 1

    Noone on here has anything to worry about!! It is an STD.

    1. Re:No worries! by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Dude, Peter Noone is SO going to sue you for slander. "Lots of sex" is a musical trademark, to say a famous musician (even if aging) has no worries about an STD is worse than calling him a hack.

  34. Re:Needed crouwd thinning?? by Yosho-sama · · Score: 1

    I thought I clarified that I meant taking antibiotics incorrectly, but I was wrong.
    The number one cause of antibiotic resistant diseases is self-treatment, ending the antibiotic regimen when the symptoms disappear, as opposed to when the contagions have been eliminated. This is most prevalent in third-world countries where drugs are plentiful but medical professionals are scarce, like Russia, Africa and some South American countries.
    dunkelfalke basically explained the details of why this happens.

    --
    My kingdom for a donkey!
  35. Re:Needed crouwd thinning?? by Soporific · · Score: 1

    Like when some asshole starts a war and we get to pay for it?

    ~S

  36. Gonorrhea: Nature's Birth Control by Tony+Stark · · Score: 1

    If you have gonorrhea long enough it can cause sterility. I think if it becomes resistant to antibiotics, this is nature's way of telling us "hey, it's ok to have lots of sex because you can't get anyone pregnant now." You get it, they can't cure it for a while so you live with it till they come up with a new cure, in the meantime you became sterile. Thanks, mother nature!

  37. Re:Needed crouwd thinning?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are at least two ways of dealing with the problem at hand: the right way, and the wrong way.

    There's also the Navy way, and my way. They do things my way, we'll get along.

  38. Re:I carry a condom and never needed, until 1st be by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    you did basically everything wrong

    Not everything. She didn't explain the joke.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  39. Re:Needed crouwd thinning?? by Hognoxious · · Score: 3, Insightful

    1) You list China as a country with "ideal" healthcare?

    No, the *map* showed China as country with *universal* healthcare.

    A country where they inject formaldehyde into a baby if it's a second pregnancy?

    I suspect they aren't trying to cure it of anything, so that'd be a social/political problem rather than a problem with the medical system.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  40. Poor Gonorrhea by DynaSoar · · Score: 1

    "Reuters is reporting that Gonorrhea risks becoming a superbug"

    Why would gonorrhea risk doing that? It must be a very good reason for it to undertake such a risk. Now if it were 'at risk of', TFA would make sense.

    Yeah it's a cheap shot. But for fuck sake, Reuters?

    --
    "I may be synthetic, but I'm not stupid." -- Bishop 341-B
  41. Re:Needed crouwd thinning?? by Sulphur · · Score: 1

    A drug resistant germ can produce a hula hoop shaped thingy called a plasmid.

    For the purpose of this discussion, call it a floppy.

    The drug resistant germ passes the code to deal with the antibiotic to its peers which become drug resistant.

  42. Manila ?? by vikingpower · · Score: 1

    Of all places, the conference met in MANILA, for crying out loud. Wonder how many participants came home with their nice personal version of the claps. "Look, mommie, without hands !"

    --
    Religous speak to God. Insane are spoken to by God. When all shut up, one can finally hear Shostakovich in peace
  43. So kids you heard what the doctor said by CxDoo · · Score: 1

    Don't fuck with gonorrhea!

    --
    "Blah blah blah." - [citation needed]
  44. probiotics for the vagina by nido · · Score: 5, Interesting

    When I was at the Natural Food store the other day, I noticed a probiotic in the refridgerator display called femdophilus. This product has two strains of lactic acid-producing bacteria that are well suited to colonizing the vagina.

    Here's another one: http://www.gynophilus.ca/

    I have an anecdote about conventional medical thought on bacteria, fungi, and the vagina. I took a late trip home a few months back, and Loveline came on the radio. I listened fairly regularly a long time ago, so I 'tuned in' for old times' sake.

    One caller asked Dr. Drew what he could do about his new girlfriend's horrible vaginal odor. Dr. Drew & Crew were like, "what can you do? Bacterial Vaginosis is hard to treat. Don't say anything."

    A later caller wanted to know what she could do about recurrent yeast infections. She'd tried any number of pharmaceutical anti-fungal medications, but the yeast didn't give up.

    Knowing a bit about so-called "alternative" medical technology, I picked up the cell phone and called. While I was on hold, another caller came on to say that she had good luck with dealing with teh yeast by using only polyester underwear.

    I asked Dr. Drew if it was safe to use yogurt in the vagina. He was like, "sure, but why bother? It's not going to help. These people have tried the most powerful antifungals available, and still have problems. What can yogurt do that drugs cannot?" (this was his sentiment, if not the exact wording).

    While Yogurt is a sub-optimal probiotic solution, at least it's getting to the root of the problem. Yeast infections and bacterial vaginosis are caused when "bad" bacterial and fungi are able to establish themselves. No matter how many of these "bad" bacteria/fungi the antibiotic/antifungal is able to take out (99.9999% is not enough), the survivors will be able to quickly reestablish themselves once the pills are stopped.

    In alternative medical thinking, "good" bacteria are used to coat the digestive system / skin / vagina with a protective film. When "bad" bacteria come along, there's no room available, so they can't establish a colony.

    I don't know if there's been any research about probiotics & gonorrhea. But it'd be an interesting study...

    here's an article about probiotics & Urinary tract infections: Specific probiotic strains are effective for genitourinary infections, Townsend Letter for Doctors and Patients, Nov, 2006 by Alan R. Gaby

    --
    Learn the rules so you know how to break them properly.
    www.teslabox.com
    1. Re:probiotics for the vagina by benjfowler · · Score: 2, Insightful

      *Dons tin foil hat*

      In the meantime folks, please get your sex-ed and medical advice from a DOCTOR, and not your local crank. These people spend a decade in college for a reason.

    2. Re:probiotics for the vagina by Opportunist · · Score: 2, Funny

      To paraphrase my doc (who also happens to be a good friend of mine): I studied med, so I could get my hand at the more interesting drugs legally.

      There's your reason why they spend a decade in college.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    3. Re:probiotics for the vagina by demonlapin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The only interesting drugs we have access to are depressants and stimulants (and the stimulants are watched much more closely than the depressants). If you want psychedelics, you'd be far better served by getting a PhD in organic chemistry.

      BTW, is your friend an anesthesiologist? I've always contended that the relatively high rate of drug abuse among anesthesiologists is a result of high-functioning drug users making a rational choice to go into the specialty with the keys to the candy store, and some of them getting in over their head.

    4. Re:probiotics for the vagina by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think I have to avoid eating breakfast when reading slashdot now...

    5. Re:probiotics for the vagina by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah right. Once I had some "growths" on my pecker. I went to a physician who inspected them for about a second, said "Herpes" and wrote me a prescription. So, I anted up my $100 for a dozen or so pills, went home and delivered the news to the wife -- not a pleasant experience. I decided to get a second opinion from a urologist, who informed me that they were warts and could be removed. And THAT is why you get a SECOND OPINION from this group of college educated geniuses.

    6. Re:probiotics for the vagina by 517714 · · Score: 1

      You must be new here. Discussions of vaginas are strictly on a theoretical plane around here.

      --
      The US government have made it clear that we have no inalienable rights; any we do not defend vigorously will be taken.
    7. Re:probiotics for the vagina by iroll · · Score: 4, Informative

      This is not "alternative medical thinking." Alternative Medical Thinking would be making a homeopathic yogurt dilution and believing that the spirit of the yogurt was imprinted on the solvent. Doctors (like Dr. Drew) are professionals, just like programmers. They can be wrong, or behind the times, or attention-grabbing without actually being representative of the state of their field.

      Treating and encouraging your natural bacterial flora is mainstream medicine, and the yogurt trick for encouraging health "down there" is something a lot of doctors will pass along. I can't speak to your personal experience, but anecdotes =/= mainstream medicine. Your family physician will probably also tell you to eat some yogurt when they give you antibiotics to clear up some strep throat or another nasty bacteria, because it'll help replenish the good bacteria in your gut that you have been eliminating, and keep you from getting a monster case of the runs.

      And there are the studies on GM bacteria mouthwashes, to colonize your mouth with bacteria that out-compete your old, cavity-causing flora with something safer. And the studies that show that while we've generally eliminated the bacteria that cause stomach ulcers, we've also caused some downstream problems because those bacteria were part of a balancing act in the ecosystem in there. The bacterial flora are a hot areas of research.

      I'm not a doctor, but I have a degree in bioengineering, and I have stayed at a Holiday Inn Express.

      --
      Repetition does not transform a lie into the truth. - FDR
    8. Re:probiotics for the vagina by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      And THAT is why you get a SECOND OPINION from this group of college educated geniuses.

      I second that. My wife had massive headaches. The ER thought it must be an aneurysm - but when they did the spinal tap test, it came back negative. So she went to a specialist - he prescribed an anti-depressant, said that as a side-effect it "helps with headaches." We said WTF? and went to another specialist - he said it was a tiny leak of spinal fluid, that these things happen spontaneously once in a great while and that it will heal on its own in a week or so, plus the spinal tap exacerbated it. Sure enough, a week goes by and she is 100% recovered.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    9. Re:probiotics for the vagina by juan2074 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I recommend the book Good Germs, Bad Germs by Jessica Snyder Sachs. (I'm pretty sure someone else on Slashdot recommended it, which is why I read it.)

      In the past, doctors have given patients innocuous strains of staph or strep to prevent harmful strains (MRSA, etc.) from taking over.

      In our litigious society, a lot of doctors and hospitals in the US won't risk it though.

    10. Re:probiotics for the vagina by gknoy · · Score: 1

      Speaking of the GM bacterial spray which prevents tooth decay ... what happened to that? I see articles from eight years ago, but not much that's current. Where can I get some? :D

    11. Re:probiotics for the vagina by nido · · Score: 1

      I hadn't heard about the mouthwash, but I did notice a new product at the vegetable/bulk food superstore: Probiotic Smile

      One of my animal-loving friends has horses, chickens, dogs and cats at her house. Usually the dogs get all the horse manure they desire, but she recently had to separate one of her dogs from it's vegetable supply. She quickly noticed that the dog who wasn't getting his daily pre-digested vegetable ration had a lot of tartar on his teeth. She then mentioned some research that's been done about how the horse manure has a specific strain of bacteria that prevents tartar buildup...

      HTH, HAND.

      --
      Learn the rules so you know how to break them properly.
      www.teslabox.com
    12. Re:probiotics for the vagina by nido · · Score: 1

      Alternative medicine is trying natural remedies first, and only using synthetic remedies (antibiotics/etc) when all else fails, or for the immediate survival of the patient.

      The medical establishment turns to synthetic remedies first, and mention "tricks" that anyone can do without their permission as an aside.

      And the studies that show that while we've generally eliminated the bacteria that cause stomach ulcers, we've also caused some downstream problems because those bacteria were part of a balancing act in the ecosystem in there.

      Maybe the problem is that stomach ulcers are not directly caused by bacteria. About 50% of the population has the H. Pylori bacteria in their system, but only a fraction of those people have ulcers. And of the people who do have ulcers, only a small percentage are helped by antibiotics. Why is that? I know, but you probably wouldn't believe it if I told you.

      --
      Learn the rules so you know how to break them properly.
      www.teslabox.com
    13. Re:probiotics for the vagina by brianleb321 · · Score: 1
      Oh my goodness. This is one of those sorts of stories pharmacists trade at bars (e.g. the patient who chewed their suppository not knowing where it was supposed to go). Those yogurts, in the yogurt section? They're foods. They aren't for vaginal application. Yes, they may improve vaginal flora, as well as GI flora. Nowhere on the packaging does it say anything about inserting vaginally, because that is NOT what you are supposed to do. From the article you even linked, it clearly states:

      L. rhamnosus GR-1 and L. reuteri RC-14 have also been shown to be effective when taken orally. After oral administration, these organisms survive passage through the gastrointestinal tract and apparently migrate to and colonize the vaginal mucosa.

      PLEASE never recommend anyone apply yogurt to their vagina. That just seems... cruel and unusual. Also, your analysis of how 'bad' flora take over isn't terribly accurate. Our bodies are full of bacteria, we know that. An imbalance of the bacteria in any given area may cause problems, such as overgrowth of a particular species, which may cause problems on a macro scale ('signs and symptoms'). This may occur for any number of reasons, including diet, lifestyle choices, recent illnesses, etc. However, less than 5% of women experience recurrent vaginal candidiasis ('yeast infection'). It is notably inaccurate to say that once you stop taking the drugs, the bad bacteria come back, and that the drugs can never kill everything. One adequate course, taken correctly, will most certainly clear up candidiasis. In more than two thirds of women, they'll never experience another bout of vaginal candidiasis in their lifetime. So please stop telling people the things you tell them.

      --
      Please stop pluralizing words with an apostrophe. That is not what it is there for.
    14. Re:probiotics for the vagina by cavebison · · Score: 1

      The bacteria in yoghurt doesn't do anything for yeast infections or to improve "vaginal flora". It may, however, feel soothing, and is not harmful if you use *plain*, natural yoghurt.

      http://www.abc.net.au/health/talkinghealth/factbuster/stories/2008/10/14/2379507.htm

      We should get MythBusters onto this. Particularly Kari.

    15. Re:probiotics for the vagina by nido · · Score: 1

      Also, your analysis of how 'bad' flora take over isn't terribly accurate.

      Writing posts for slashdot is a fine art. Finding a balance between being concise, informative, interesting, inflammatory, etc isn't always easy. Especially when the poster can't come out and say openly that the commonly-accepted course of action is wrong.

      PLEASE never recommend anyone apply yogurt to their vagina. That just seems... cruel and unusual.

      Have you ever read any forum posts from women who suffer from Bacterial Vaginosis? Let me find one for you...

      Wrong Diagnosis has a thread with hundreds of posts on Bacterial Vaginosis. Some say that the antibiotics worked for them, others report success with using the probiotics, and other posters report that nothing works.

      Why start with an antibiotic when probiotics successfully treat for many BV sufferers?

      One adequate course, taken correctly, will most certainly clear up candidiasis. In more than two thirds of women, they'll never experience another bout of vaginal candidiasis in their lifetime.

      What about the other 1/3 - are they left out in the cold?

      Cruel and unusual is treating a lack of beneficial symbiotic bacteria with antibiotics (which can have potent side effects of their own), when a comprehensive treatment with the right kind of bacterial preparation is what they really need.

      --
      Learn the rules so you know how to break them properly.
      www.teslabox.com
    16. Re:probiotics for the vagina by iroll · · Score: 1

      I know, but you probably wouldn't believe it if I told you.

      I'm curious, but it doesn't really matter, because you missed the point entirely. I was pointing out that research into flora is a major part of medicine these days, regardless of what Dr. Drew spouted on LoveLine. If anything, I'm probably going to be on your side, as long as you can show me some resources--I didn't realize I was going to have to write a treatise on H. Pylori just to show you that bacteria are more than just the provenance of the Whole Foods probiotics counter.

      I mean, for Christs' sake, I was pointing out that there's research into problems that may be caused by NOT having H. Pylori. Wouldn't that be supporting evidence for your position?

      My point--and I'll try it again--is that doctors (e.g. Drew, and your family physician) can be wrong, can be behind the times, and can be attention-grabbing without knowing the state of their art. That doesn't mean that the "medical establishment" is teaching all doctors to use the napalm pills first, and damn the patient's diet.

      What you call "alternative medicine," I'd call "medicine," with the caveat that the natural remedies have to be REAL remedies. That means that they have a statistically significant effect on the problem, not just anecdotal evidence. Yogurt falls under that very nicely, as do a lot of other foods and botanicals. Homeopathy and overpriced herbal supplements do not.

      Good doctors don't want to over-prescribe antibiotics. Good doctors tell you the tricks, when the tricks are known to work. Bad doctors and overworked doctors will write you a script just to get you out of the office. That's an indictment of our health care delivery, not the state of the "medical establishment."

      But if it helps for you to have a "medical establishment" bogeyman out there to justify your choice not to vaccinate your kids, or to give them honey tea to get over the plague, that's your business. See? I can play straw-man argument, too ;-)

      --
      Repetition does not transform a lie into the truth. - FDR
    17. Re:probiotics for the vagina by nido · · Score: 1

      But if it helps for you to have a "medical establishment" bogeyman out there...

      I think this point (which was brought up several times in this post) is the core of the matter.

      Here is an article about how the Medical Establishment was formed: 100 years of Medical Robery

      The followup article is also very good: Real Medical Freedom

      Wikipedia's article on the Flexner Report is also helpful, particularly the section on the report's consequences. Note that almost all small medical schools that were not affiliated with a university closed in the early 20th century. From the article: *The Report is now remembered because it succeeded in creating a single model of medical education, characterized by a philosophy that has largely survived to the present day" (emphasis added).

      To summarize, the only way to become a Medical Doctor is to go to one of the Medical Cartel's medical schools. The Cartel teaches its doctors to think and act in a certain way - not because it's the most effective way to help patients, but because they need salesmen to push the use of their products (patent drugs, patented medical equipment, etc).

      A few doctors break out of the mold. For example, Andrew Weil, M.D., has some passages in Spontaneous Healing about the weakness of the training he received at Harvard Medical School. I'm not a big fan of Dr. Weil's books/etc, but he does have some good points.

      HTH, HAND.

      --
      Learn the rules so you know how to break them properly.
      www.teslabox.com
  45. Re:Needed crouwd thinning?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They won't be the same premiums. Taxes are going up to pay for it. Whether you deny it or not, taxes are still essentially a premium because they are going towards paying for the healtcare. Besides, healthcare isn't a right. It never was and should not be now. Nuff said.

  46. Cancer by komap · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why is this story tagged as "cancer"?

    1. Re:Cancer by DryGrian · · Score: 1

      I wondered this myself...

      --
      For optimal comment enjoyment, take red pill now.
  47. That's what happens by nixofortune · · Score: 1

    That's what happens when product released to the masses. It becomes the super product.

  48. Celibacy might suck in some respects... by petrus4 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    ...but it does have other fringe benefits.

    If this does turn out to be another pandemic, there's a very simple vaccine for it, kids. Keep your pants on. ;)

  49. Wait a few days? by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1, Insightful

    You don't know women very well. Your method only verifys she was clean several days ago, when she was all hot and bothered and you turned her down.

    This is like going to your bank, walk into the vault, check your money is there and then be happy your money is safe... lets see who is clever enough to spot the problem.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  50. Re:Needed crouwd thinning?? by bytesex · · Score: 1

    You're forgetting the part where insurance companies tend to be on the same side as you, at least theoretically: no person, however insured, /wants/ to be ill.

    --
    Religion is what happens when nature strikes and groupthink goes wrong.
  51. strange attractive sexually promiscuous women by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1

    Speaking as one who regularly succumbs to propositions from strange attractive sexually promiscuous women...

    Yes, they would have to be pretty strange, wouldn't they. ;)

    Come on, I couldn't let that one pass.

    And I apologize for calling your mom strange.

    Bam, two for one.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  52. uro biofon by McBooCZech · · Score: 1

    Check uro biofon. It works great for me: http://www.biofon.ru/eng/uro/simptoms.shtml

  53. So In Other Words... by pandrijeczko · · Score: 1, Insightful

    ...people who stay faithful to one partner, use proper contraception & have enough responsibility to not inflict more screaming brats on the social support system won't get it and therefore won't die of it.

    So where's the problem? Natural Selection in action, folks...

    --
    Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
    1. Re:So In Other Words... by cathyp · · Score: 1

      Really? 1. Many STD's can remain symptomless. So that indiscretion in college, you passed whatever you got from that to your partner. 2. Oral sex with no protection? STD's can pass that way too. 3. Condoms aren't always effective. I'm not saying we shouldn't use them - we definitely should, but condoms can break and they're not always effective... for example HPV (often symptomless) can be present at the base of the penis or the outskirts of the vagina. 4. Having two faithful partners or finding the right person in the first person you sleep with is not the norm, unfortunately. You have to be more realistic that sex happens. 5. Try to refrain from judgements on those who have "screaming brats on the social support system"/have std's/have abortions. You don't know their motivations or what they've been/are going through. Bottom line is - get tested for std's, get tested often. Think twice before you have sex, and use condoms. And make sure the meds (all of the meds) clean up your junk! ps. it's not natural selection if they have kids and they survive and also have kids comma.

  54. Don't care by celibate+for+life · · Score: 1

    I'll never get it. My username explains.

  55. Technically by DrYak · · Score: 0

    "don't have sex with people that you don't know are clean (i.e. STD test) and always practice safe sex"

    Well, technically if you wear a condom, you don't give a damn about what bugs might be on the other side of the latex barrier, as long as there's the latex barrier between you and them.

    The whole point of condoms (I mean, beside contraception) is to create a physical barrier to stop the spreading of disease.
    It's perfectly safe to have sex with a HIV or Gnorrhea (or Chlamydiae, or Syphilis, etc.) -infected person, as long as your wear proper protection. You won't catch them while properly wearing a condom.
    (well at least not during the screwing-while-wearing-condom. Now, if you do other stupid stuff, or don't wear the condom properly...)

    The better formulation would be :
    - always practice safe sex and wear proper protection
    - unless both partner a proven clean (with proper testing) and trust enough each other so one will admit a risk of contamination in case of cheating.

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
    1. Re:Technically by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      Condoms break and or slip off. Also, how about oral sex?

      Sucking cock through a condom must sound about as appetizing to a cocksucker (male or female) as using dental dams does to me. In fact, I have met exactly one person who even advocated for the use of barriers during oral sex, and while I did have sex with her, it wasn't oral, so, I can't say as I have experienced it from either side.

      Its not theoretical either, just ask the friend of mine who got herpes on her face from eating a girl out.

      Though hey, 80% of the population has an oral HSV1 infection, and now she does too.

      -Steve

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    2. Re:Technically by Custard+Horse · · Score: 4, Funny

      Does anyone want my other sandwich? I'm not hungry..

    3. Re:Technically by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but you are mistaken. I do not remember which ones they are, but there are several STD's that can be transmitted even if the male is wearing a condom and it works as designed. This does not factor in the risk of failure of the device.
      Simple rule, the more sexual partners you have, the greater your risk of catching something no matter what other actions you take. If you and your sexual partner are monogamous your chance of catching an STD approaches zero (however since many STDs have alternative transmission vectors--e.g. blood transfusion--that chance will always be greater than zero).

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    4. Re:Technically by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      her face from eating a girl out

      Sounds like a sexy story to me.. Can you leave the herpes part out and just tell us the rest?

    5. Re:Technically by ericlondaits · · Score: 1

      The San Francisco City Clinic has a very handy table that describes the risks of each type of unprotected sex:

      http://www.sfcityclinic.org/stdbasics/stdchart.asp

      I agree that protected oral sex sounds pointless, and you'll be pleased to know that young people all around us are mostly having the unprotected kind... and lots of it... which means that the chances of getting a STD from unprotected oral sex are not really that high.

      --
      As a Slashdot discussion grows longer, the probability of an analogy involving cars approaches one.
    6. Re:Technically by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      Really the chances of an STD aren't that high, in general.

      Even HIV, just look at the actual transmission rates and, unless you are an IV drug user who shares needles, there is a lot ess to worry about than some might have you believe. You can have a man with FBA (thats full blown aids) fuck you in the ass with no condom and you still have only a 1 in 200 chance of becoming infected! (thank you wikipedia)

      When you combine that with the actual odds that any given person that you may choose to sleep with has HIV in the first place and, well, lets just say that you probably have better things to worry about.

      Of course thats just HIV. Many of the others may be more transmissible, but are also more treatable. I think I would still take my chances with the clap vs HIV, even with its higher infection rate and now emerging superbug status.

      -Steve

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    7. Re:Technically by LandGator · · Score: 1

      80% ? Got a citation for that, or did you just pull it....

      --
      There is nothing wrong with yr Internet. Do not attempt to adjust the picture. We are controlling the transmission - NSA
    8. Re:Technically by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      I do not remember which ones they are, but there are several STD's that can be transmitted even if the male is wearing a condom and it works as designed.

      Crabs (pubic lice) for one. And I wouldn't like to come in contact with a primary syphilis sore ("chanker", IIRC) with any part of my body. Herpes simplex as someone else has pointed out, can be present on any part of the body, and so presumably can be spread by any bodily contact (e.g., handshake ; cue Michael Jackson jokes - he may have been mad, but that doesn't mean that the mask was irrational). I'm sure there are others.
      Also there are, as you point out, any number of diseases that can be spread by intimate and casual contact. Chickenpox, for example, is generally considered a disease of casual contact, but I'd be astonished if it had never been transmitted by sexual contact either. In that respect, the whole concept of an "STD" Sexually Transmitted Disease may be rather misleading - rather there are some diseases that have dominant transmission through sexual activity, some that have minor transmission through sexual activity, and some with many vectors. How, for example, would you classify DFTD, considering that "aggressive mating" is a major route of transmission?

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  56. Use a condom by DrYak · · Score: 1, Redundant

    or the tests will show up positive for something and you're glad you found before stuff started to fall off/rot your brain/etc.

    or : ...and you just keep using a condom properly just like before the result came.

    The reason sexual education is insisting on using condoms it that not only do they prevent unwanted pregnancies (like any other contraception method), but the latex will be a physical barrier between you and the (untested) bugs which might be on the other side of it. As long as the condom is properly used and no other stupid stuff is done aside, the risks tends toward zero.

    The golden rule is : do whatever both of you want (consensually) but : ALWAYS WEAR LATEX while doing it. Unless both partners are properly tested clean and trust enough each other so one will admit if a risk arise due to cheating.

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
  57. Married ?! by DrYak · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Sorry but what marriage has to do with it ?

    Marriage is not a 100% guarantee that the other person will never ever happen to cheat and be at risk at bringing some nasty bug home.
    You may make romantic promises of trust and fidelity on the "Big Day", but we're still animals with deeply rooted instincts and you can't guarantee that nothing will ever go wrong over the course of a whole life.

    Doing tests for both (non necessarily married/engaged) partners, trusting enough each other that a partner will openly admit cheating and potential risks of bringing bugs home, that is a slightly more efficient strategy.

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
  58. My Wife by ben2umbc · · Score: 1

    I told my Doctor that my wife gave me gonorrhea. He gave himself a shot!

  59. Grants ! Funds !! Stipends !!! by DrYak · · Score: 1

    One more reason to continue lobbying for more funds and grants into research on human cloning !

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
  60. Technically ... by DrYak · · Score: 3, Insightful

    My philosophy when it comes to infections - hit them hard and don't let up until they are dead, dead, dead!

    Technically, the proper medical procedure is, indeed :
    - to use the lowest powerful antibiotic (if penicillin works, use it, damn !) and only if needed (most cold are caused by viruses and don't need any)
    - make it really, really, really clear to the patient, that he/she had to take the antibiotics all the way until the end of the cure, until all the bacteria are clearly and definitely dead. And not stop abruptly as soon as he/she feels better.

    That slows down the evolution of super-bugs.

    (and in addition to what you said :
    - most antibiotics kill all bacteria indiscriminately, not only bugs, but the normal flora : which perturbs some normal function and leave the place free for bad yeast to rush in. So always explain to the patient which food contain good probiotics to compensate (like some yogurts) and prescribe some probiotics too (usually some good yeast) )

    That's what we're taught in our medical education.
    The only problems comes into getting the correct choice of the lowest denomination antibiotics.
    - On one hand, hospitals have proven and tested recommendation (based on tests against resistance, etc.) And might even have some quick tests to predict resistance (so even when super bugs become prevalent, you can still detect which don't need the super-drug).
    - On the other hand, pharmaceutical companies have an agenda to push for newer (and still patented) drugs.

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
    1. Re:Technically ... by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      - to use the lowest powerful antibiotic

      EXCEPT in the case of STI's, where the social implications of having an asymptomatic carrier spreading disease around the population far outweighs the standard procedure for treating, for instance, community acquired pneumonia. In the case of STI's you give the RIGHT antibiotic the first time (which is why it's useful to carry one of these in your pocket).

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  61. Superbug? by Jake+S+Griffin · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Well I for one welcome our new gonorrhean overlords...

  62. No one here needs to worry. by Philip+K+Dickhead · · Score: 0, Redundant

    It requires copulation, to be infected. /. is immune to this transmission vector.

    --
    "Speaking the Truth in times of universal deceit is a revolutionary act." -- George Orwell
  63. Yogurt... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    A guy catches a STD. He goes to MD and doc prescribes him "yogurt therapy" - he is to dip his dick into yogurt for 15 minutes twice a day and additionally, after every sexual intercourse. One day, he does a prostitute. After they are done, he sits on the edge of bed, pours a glass of yogurt and starts his procedure. She looks in disbelief and says: "You learn something new each day. I've been in the business for ten years and I find out just now that it's refilled like a fountain pen!"

  64. I thought we had that one licked. by Type44Q · · Score: 1
    "I thought we had that one licked."

    Hope not. :P

  65. Levels of quality: by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

    - Hard mathematical fact, checked and reviewed for decades.
    - Proven by several peer-reviewed experiments of competing teams.
    - Proven by one peer-reviewed experiment.
    - One experiment found that...
    - One study found that...
    - An expert committee agrees, that...
    - An “expert”* says, that... (* our definition of “expert”)
    - In a poll with 3% of the population (9.35 million people), 70% of the people think that...
    - 66% of the people we asked confirm that... (* We have asked about 80 people, and possibly paid them)
    - We/I think this is great!
    - It’s got electrolytes! It’s what plants crave!
    - This product does not contain any thermonuclear or biochemical weapons! (* No guarantees!)

    --
    Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
  66. easy cure: get a mac by knappe+duivel · · Score: 1

    The cure is easy: get a Mac. Girls will want to sleep with you and no virus can touch you. (It works for me)

  67. And so... by feldicus · · Score: 1

    Captain Trips becomes Captain Claps.

    feldicus

  68. I'm Safe. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sweet. I can just continue not getting laid.

  69. Re:Needed crouwd thinning?? by the+gnat · · Score: 1

    some asshole sleeps around without a condom, and you are the one responsible for his health bill.

    Ah yes. Or some asshole sleeps around without a condom, infects his unsuspecting wife, and then dies in a car crash, leaving his widow to choose between treating her illness or paying for her child's education. . . but hey, the slut had it coming, right?

  70. Re:Needed crouwd thinning?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think the poster was referring more to an infected person obtaining antibiotics without seeing a doctor. Some antibiotics work better than others with certain varieties, as well as the patient's medical history (i.e. "Allergic to penicillin? Okay, then nothing in that family...") Obtaining, as in, ordering off the net, or using someone else's prescription. Or for an unrelated condition.

    As well as infected persons obtaining probiotics to try to treat an infection that has moved from site of infection to further within the body. If the bacteria has infected further internal structures, then external application of probiotics is not going to make a positive difference in the progression, and will only lead to further delay in effective treatment being sought, in turn heightening the probability of affecting sexual reproduction and function down the road.

    Also, if you RTFA, you would realize that the current strategy for dealing with Gonorrhea is a single dose of an antibiotic. The bacteria is adapting to that, resulting in some prescriptions extending beyond the single dose, as well as finding that it is resisting treatment by multiple antibiotics. Treatment with the wrong antibiotic may lead to a cease in the growth of bacteria -- but once the course of antibiotics is up, it blooms up again more rampant - whereas correct antibiotic should kill it off completely...

  71. So what.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slashdot is supposed to be news FOR nerds. Like anyone here is at risk of getting Gonhorrhea...

  72. Re:Needed crouwd thinning?? by 517714 · · Score: 1
    Like a lot of posts here you had it right almost til the end - an accusation I fully expect to have leveled at me on this one.

    biology and disease prevention have nothing to do with politics.

    Until people politicize it - as happened with AIDS. Had AIDS been treated in a manner similar to leprosy, the cost in lives and resources would have been much lower, but we would have had to force people to do something against their will. The AIDS rights activists who demanded political action instead of allowing the medical community to act have blood on their hands.

    --
    The US government have made it clear that we have no inalienable rights; any we do not defend vigorously will be taken.
  73. Untrue. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    Viruses and bacteria are not magical being that can cross walls.

    If you use a condom and itis in one piece you will not get STIs Period really.

    You saying it is not so is frankly pointless since you are claiming something extraordinary and against common sense without citing a single shred of evidence.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  74. Why promote abstinence? by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    Proper education should be completely neutral about the matter.

    Proper education should present all the options available with pros and cons and then people will make their own choices.

    Education taking sides on social or moral debates is not education, is indoctrination, which is why religious educations should be segregated from public rational one.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  75. The point is that abstinence is a pipe dream by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    So one has to wonder why people keep giving it any credence.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  76. Even real abstinence isn't 100% by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

    Actually it's possible to get some STDs by skin contact (specifically, hepatitis somethingorother) or even contact with, say, a toilet seat (hopefully someone with medical knowledge can chime in with the details). I know this because a few years ago while discussing STDs during a routine checkup, my doctor decided to tell me this rather than discussing the dangers of acquiring STDs by conventional means. (FML?)

    But anyways, can you imagine how much it would suck to get an STD with little to no human contact, never mind actually getting laid? 8(

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    1. Re:Even real abstinence isn't 100% by LordLucless · · Score: 1

      Then it really wouldn't be a sexually transmitted disease then, would it?

      --
      Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
  77. Catholic Church says sex for procreation only by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    At the end, the Catholic Church no longer has any moral authority to lead in matters related to sexuality, the recent worldwide debacle regarding paedophile priests and the Church's attempt to brush this under the carpet is enough to allow them any moral authority.

    On top of that, any other priests without such sick proclivities have absolutely no experience about how human sexuality works (they are celibate), so again, they know nothing about human sexuality for the simple fact that they have foregone to practice it.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
    1. Re:Catholic Church says sex for procreation only by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your title is decades out of date... There has been a major change in the Catholic Church's theological understanding of the role of sex in marriage. The origins of this theological teaching date back to the 1950's when Karol Józef Wojtya (i.e. the pre-papal Pope John Paul II) writing and publishing on the topic. Later during the 1980's Pope John Paul II would devote a substantial number of weekly public audiences to this new theological understanding, and it became a central part of his papacy.

      Here are some of the highlights; pleasure (within the bounds of marriage) is not just a tolerable side effect of the sex act instead it can and should be an end in itself, the emotional and physical pleasure of both partners are of equal importance, and Natural Family Planning (i.e. intentionally limiting sex to times in the menstrual cycle when a woman is infertile) is a morally valid way to limit family size. I realize this may not be enough to harmonize the Catholic Church's beliefs sexuality with the that of the majority on Slashdot, but it's significantly different than what you wrote!

      On top of that, any other priests without such sick proclivities have absolutely no experience about how human sexuality works (they are celibate), so again, they know nothing about human sexuality for the simple fact that they have foregone to practice it.

      Are you insinuating the former Protestant clergy who've become Catholics or the non-monastic Eastern Rite Catholic priests are sexually perverted or just showing more ignorance of the realities of the Catholic Church?

  78. Blah blah blah by Aphoxema · · Score: 1

    Bah, just ignore this guy, it worked for all the other people talking about this "Superbug" nonsense.

    --
    "Most people, I think, don't even know what a rootkit is, so why should they care about it?"
  79. Excommunicated? By whom? by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    Many low time priests issued empty threats against people they didn't agree with.

    Excommunication can only be dished by people very high up in the Catholic hierarchy: bishops and up I think, and never without the consent of the Vatican I believe.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
    1. Re:Excommunicated? By whom? by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      I don't know the details, nor do I know if it's the same now as it was then, but she was excommunicated. Not threatened. Besides, bishop isn't really that high up. Your local priest could drop off the request at his office in person on his lunch break.

      Anyway, it looks like you're wrong. Wikipedia says a latae sententiae excommunication is automatic if you break certain rules. Currently you're automatically excommunicated if you get an abortion or swipe one of the holy crackers. Actually, it looks like you're probably latae sententiae excommunicated if you just drive someone else to the abortion clinic.

  80. Re:Needed crouwd thinning?? by mcgrew · · Score: 1

    Stupid people should die.

    They do, every single one of them.

    So do smart people.

  81. That's only part of the problem by gillbates · · Score: 1

    The reason abstinence is taught in schools is because it *reduces* the sexual activity of teenagers. Even the authors of such programs realize there will be those at the ends of the bell curve for which no amount of education will keep them out of trouble. Even if you teach kids to use condoms, there will inevitably be some who just don't get the message, or are too stupid (or incautious) to use one. The difference between teaching condom use and abstinence lies in what happens to the majority: with condoms, most end up having more sex; with abstinence, much less sex. Studies have shown (and I really wish I had a link now) that teaching condom use results in *more* unprotected sex than teaching abstinence, simply because of the proliferation of sexual activity and the frequency with which teenagers find themselves without a condom.

    --
    The society for a thought-free internet welcomes you.
  82. Nit picking by DrYak · · Score: 1

    Sorry, but you are mistaken. I do not remember which ones they are, but there are several STD's that can be transmitted even if the male is wearing a condom and it works as designed.

    This information tends to come from people who lump together "anything which might be catched during a sexual intercourse" into the STD category.

    Any "normal" disease, which doesn't transit through semen/vaginal secretion, but transit by other means, can be transmitted during a sexual intercourse with a condom, too.

    That includes lice, other parasites, infectious skin diseases, non sexually transmitted hepatitis, etc.
    (And could also include common cold and gastroenteritis as other bugs which could potentially jump between sexual partners although not strictly a STD. Strangely enough the people only complain about the previous disgusting disease and not about these ones)

    All of them could also be caught while successfully practising abstention during non sexual contact. And some like lice and other parasites, being small animals (or being able to survive in the water system for gastroenteritis), could even be transmitted without any contact.

    I wasn't referring to them, I was specifically referring to classic STD : bugs which ride the secretions of male and female genitalia to jump across partner during the sexual act.

    For the true STD diseases, what I said and what is said in the "Untrue" post remain true :
    bacteria and viruses cannot magically jump acros a physical wall.

    If no sperm nor menstrual blood or other vaginal secretion (depending of sex of the partner) reaches you, you're perfectly safe from HIV, Ghono, Chlam, Syph, and the bloodborne subtypes of Hepatitis.

    Of course you're not protected from a lice jumping to you, or catching a cold (even if you used a condom properly, even if you didn't have sex).

    But that's beyond the theme of TFA and this thread's subject (are "nasty ho" dangerous in term of STDs ?)

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
    1. Re:Nit picking by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      I wasn't referring to them, I was specifically referring to classic STD : bugs which ride the secretions of male and female genitalia to jump across partner during the sexual act.

      So, you don't consider anal warts to be an STD?
      Tricky things, definitions.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  83. Read my post again by DrYak · · Score: 1

    Condoms break and or slip off.

    Quoting my self :

    or don't wear the condom properly...

    A properly used condom doesn't fail.
    If the condom breaks or slips, it wasn't used propely.

    Condom should :
    - be of adequate size (just stop buying XXL condoms to pretend that you have a ginormous dick. The size doesn't even play a role, beyond discomfort)
    - be checked for expiry date on package
    - be checked for breakage of package
    - be kept in a proper container (solid, shields direct light)
    [And all of the above can be performed "off-line" in case you complain that it kills the romanticism of spontaneity]
    - package opened only with finger (no scissors or whatever)
    - be unrolled on an *fully erect* penis only (if the pee-pee isn't ready do more foreplay or switch to another method which doesn't require a condom).
    - DO NOT stack them (the joke "layering 2 condoms" is exactly that : a joke. Condom are designed to rub against wet mucous membranes. Not to rub latex-against-latex. That damages them)
    - DO USE ONLY a water lubricant. Or just do more foreplays. Do not use a fat one like vaseline (that make the latex porous).

    If used so a condom never fails. Never failed me for the hundreds of time I've used them so. Nor my friends.

    Also, how about oral sex?

    Quoting my self :

    well at least not during the screwing-while-wearing-condom. Now, if you do other stupid stuff

    The discussion was about putting your pee-pee into a "nasty ho'". And I still maintain that a correctly used condom protects in that case.
    Of course, if you still managed to get into contact of semen/menstrual blood by doing other games, the fact that you wore a condom specifically during the "screwing" part, won't protect you.

    Now notice by the way that, according to current knowledge, the risks are dramatically low, specially in case of receiving male or giver-to-female.

    Though hey, 80% of the population has an oral HSV1 infection, and now she does too.

    Sorry, but you did not do the research. To quote wikipedia :

    HSV-1 is usually acquired orally during childhood , but may also be sexually transmitted

    80% of the population doesn't get HSV-1 because it's an STD, 80% simply get it because it's transmitted through saliva and kids tend to lick anything.
    Only in a few border case it goes another route
    (- you need one non-infected person performing oral sex to someone with genital HSV-1 exactly at the moment it is active.
    - And that person in turn need to have it because she was uninfected and received oral sex from someone with an oral HSV-1 at the exact moment it was active).

    The herpes you where thinking about when trying to sound terrifying is the HSV-2. (Which is probably what she got). But the oral form of that one is much less common.

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
    1. Re:Read my post again by dferrantino · · Score: 1

      Probably way too late to bother replying to this, but I've had a "properly used" and "properly stored" condom break on me. Sometimes it just happens, they're not 100% effective and are never advertised as such.

  84. Damn right by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

    Yeah you might as well bring up an IE8 vulnerability at an Amish town hall meeting.

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  85. The Right drug by DrYak · · Score: 1

    In the case of STI's you give the RIGHT antibiotic the first time (which is why it's useful to carry one of these in your pocket).

    And usually in such hospital recommendation, the recommended drug is the one which (according to current research and statistics) is the least powerful, but still manages to kill all the bugs.

    You don't jump immediately to the latest glycopeptidic atb (well, unless a PCR test result told you so).

    That's what I was trying to refer to.

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]