Slashdot Mirror


First Impressions of the 11th Doctor Who

Mirk writes "The first episode of Doctor Who's new series 5 has just aired on BBC1 in the UK. This is an important episode for the show because so much has changed: Matt Smith plays the new Doctor, replacing David Tennant, and Karen Gillan portrays a new companion, Amy Pond. Maybe most important, Russell T. Davies is replaced as showrunner by Stephen Moffat, who is known for acclaimed Doctor Who scripts including The Empty Child and Blink. Here is an early review of the new Doctor, companion, showrunner, and series."

38 of 379 comments (clear)

  1. Watched it, impressed! by King+InuYasha · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The new Doctor is quite impressive! A little bit on the stranger side, but fans of Doctor Who are no strangers to strange Doctors!

    1. Re:Watched it, impressed! by Goffee71 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Love the humour, love the pace but still a bit too much random running around. Cast and chrs are just the change of pace needed, quirky but loveable and with decent chemistry. Wonder who was responsible for the cracks in the universe?

      --
      If he's the Walrus then can I be a penguin please?
    2. Re:Watched it, impressed! by Mindcontrolled · · Score: 3, Informative

      It's off to a good start, I agree. As for the cracks - the Doctor mentioned that the prisoner opened them, but I guess that might not be all behind it. Those cracks will be with us for a while, I suppose.

      --
      Ubi solitudinem faciunt, pacem appellant.
    3. Re:Watched it, impressed! by click2005 · · Score: 4, Informative

      The prisoner said it didn't create them. It teased the doctor because he didn't know who had.

      --
      I am a free slashdotter. I will not be modded, blogged, DRM'd, patented, podcasted or RFID'd. My life is my own.
    4. Re:Watched it, impressed! by NoobixCube · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I'm fairly certain the reason the multiform taunted the Doctor about it was because the Doctor, or at least the Timelords, are the root of the problem. I'm aware he's supposedly the last Timelord alive, but we've seen how thinking you're the last often turns out... Of course, they could pull the whole alternate reality thing again. The Doctor never was clear about how alternate realities come to be, just that they're meant to be sealed off. I'd say alternate realities are the convenient writers-block fixer: Out of enemies? Bring an ancient and long-since-defeated enemy back from another alternate reality! The damaged Cyberman in the preview says it's at least possible. What I'm most curious about is the English-flag-stamped Dalek; though it's probably just some military immitation, and not a true Dalek...

      --
      Admit it. You post strawman arguments as AC so you get modded Insightful for refuting them, rather than Troll
    5. Re:Watched it, impressed! by bigstrat2003 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Honestly, I don't care what deus ex machina is required to bring the Time Lords back. I really wanted to see them again, and was kind of irritated that Russell T Davies wrote them as "The Time War turned them all evil", and then sealed them away "forever". I'd like to see the Time Lords as an actual civilization again, not something remembered in whispers.

      It's not just the Time Lords, though. As much as I loved RTD's writing for the series, he had the idiotic tendency to keep committing genocide towards the recurring villains. You know you're not going to leave them "all dead", so please stop pretending like you killed them once and for all. The tricks that you need to use to bring them back get less believable every time. As a result, I accept that Stephen Moffat is going to have to do some epic hand-waving for basically every recurring villain he wants to bring back, but hopefully after that he'll have the sense to not "kill them off" every time, and we can get past it.

      --
      "16MB (fuck off, MiB fascists)" - The Mighty Buzzard
    6. Re:Watched it, impressed! by Eli+Gottlieb · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It certainly appears from the previews that the Weeping Angels have become recurring villains of a sort.

  2. The Companion by OverlordQ · · Score: 5, Informative

    is hot.

    --
    Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
    1. Re:The Companion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Uh, hello, The Doctor is a mega-genius, remember? This was all part of his plan to get her into the Kissogram business so he'd have excuses for her to wear different costumes while looking hot.

    2. Re:The Companion by isorox · · Score: 4, Informative

      is hot.

      Just a note to our cousins across the pond, British police officers *do not* look like that :(

    3. Re:The Companion by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 3, Funny

      British police officers *do not* look like that :(

      That's OK, US viewers certainly understand it, after all, the British police boxes likewise don't look on the inside like that (I hope).

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    4. Re:The Companion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Huh. I've always been under the impression that I enjoyed this show, but now that I know a random stranger on the Internet doesn't like it, I guess I'll have to reconsider.

    5. Re:The Companion by digitig · · Score: 3, Informative

      It's a very long time since they looked like that on the outside, either. Or like anything, actually, as we no longer have them as far as I am aware.

      --
      Quidnam Latine loqui modo coepi?
    6. Re:The Companion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative
  3. PICs by leuk_he · · Score: 4, Informative

    Pic 1
    She is not really a police officer or a nun nor a nurse. ;)

  4. The New Tardis by Yvan256 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    While Matt Smith seems capable of playing the Doctor, the new TARDIS on the other hand really was disappointing.

    I'm sorry but a pinball plunger, an old typewriter and a decor that looks ripped from a kid TV show just doesn't suit the supposedly alien look of the inside of the TARDIS. Too many earth parts, levers and buttons too obvious. The new TARDIS is a pale joke compared to the previous one.

    1. Re:The New Tardis by Josh04 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It crashed, damaged, into an old garden shed, and repaired itself with parts therein :)

    2. Re:The New Tardis by Jezza · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The Doctor and the Tardis influence each other, and the Doctor's fascination with Earth is well known, so a Tardis with lots of recognisably "Earth-tech" is hardly that much of a stretch. Anyway, the new Tardis is kinda SteamPunk, and I can't argue with that. Personally I like the new Tardis set, not sure about the "storm cloud tunnel" in the opening credits ... but I guess we'll get used to that.

      It all got a big thumbs up from me. Thanks Auntie Beeb, glad to see you spending my license fee on something I actually like!

    3. Re:The New Tardis by PCM2 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Plus the sonic screwdriver is no longer blue? Huh? Lore, people, lore?

      Lore? The sonic screwdriver only had a light on it for the new series. It wasn't any color at all in the originals.

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    4. Re:The New Tardis by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 3, Informative

      the new tardis appears to be a labout of love for a guy who posts on livejournal

      his name is douglas442 and he appears to have started work on the tardis around 18 months ago.

      "The steampunk console project"

      all kudos to him and it fucking shows how much hard dedicated work he has put in
      tremendous job :)

      http://douglas442.livejournal.com/

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    5. Re:The New Tardis by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Anyway, the new Tardis is kinda SteamPunk, and I can't argue with that.

      Eh, it's not that good compared to the control room that the 8th Doctor had.

      --
      -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
    6. Re:The New Tardis by jnaujok · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Unfortunately, in a rather odd true Hollywood story, that entire set was stolen from the lot. No one knows what happened to it. It is a shame as it rather grew on me during that movie. Shame they never did any more 8th doctor (video) stories.

      --
      Life, the Universe, and Everything... in my image.
  5. Re:post title by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    Always liked Christopher Eccleston more, he was much cooler. Tennant was also darn good though. Matt Smith got off to a decent start but as far as I'm concerned the jury is still out on him, after all we've only seen one episode so far. Didn't like the new intro music at all, a time vortex doesn't have smoke, for one, and the music was a lot worse - it didn't quite have that Doctor Who feel to it. The episode also seemed more low-budget than episodes from previous seasons, but that could be because it was the first time I've watched it in FullHD. My impression is that the acting performance was strong but almost everything else was a bit lacking, including the script. It was a still good, but I hope it gets better because I've come to expect a lot more from the show.

  6. Re:His acting grew on me in the first 10 minutes by BeerCat · · Score: 5, Funny

    Indeed - "Box falls to earth; man falls out of box; man eats fish custard"

    What's not to like?

    --
    "She's furniture with a pulse"
  7. Gawd by vague+disclaimer · · Score: 3, Informative
    It is surprisingly difficult to take seriously a review from someone who described The Girl in The Fireplace as 'whimsical'. That big a "whoosh" should be a warning to everyone.

    Here is a rather more intelligent take: http://iainjclark.livejournal.com/222121.html#cutid1

    (for me: someone shoot Murray Gold and put a call into to Christophe Beck to write decent music)

  8. Re:post title by PCM2 · · Score: 3, Informative

    The episode also seemed more low-budget than episodes from previous seasons, but that could be because it was the first time I've watched it in FullHD.

    No, my reaction also was that the effects in this one were a bit naff. I thought that of the very first episode, too, though. Remember Mickey wrestling with the Dumpster? And the Nestene Consciousness wasn't very impressive. I figure they're just saving their budget for the best bits to come.

    --
    Breakfast served all day!
  9. Lovely and Scottish! by Oxford_Comma_Lover · · Score: 4, Interesting

    "We saw some amazing actresses for this part. But when Karen came through the door, the game was up - she was funny, clever, gorgeous and sexy. Or Scottish, which is the quick way of saying it. A generation of little girls will want to be her. And a generation of little boys will want them to be her too." -- Steven Moffat

    --
    -- IANAL, this isn't legal advice, and definitely isn't legal advice for you. Also, Squee!
    1. Re:Lovely and Scottish! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      As a Scotsman, that must be difficult. Probably he had just seen an English woman up close recently and, after that, even a male goat looks funny, clever, sexy and gorgeous.

  10. And it will only take you a million years... by Oxford_Comma_Lover · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The Doctor is 900 years old. There are dozens of seasons.

    Start with 2005, work forward. THEN go back and watch some of the classics. I like Tom Baker, but an Unearthly child is also worth a look.

    Also, if you've seen even one episode, this is priceless.

    --
    -- IANAL, this isn't legal advice, and definitely isn't legal advice for you. Also, Squee!
  11. Re:Introduction to Dr. Who (Off-topic) by EdgeyEdgey · · Score: 4, Informative

    Blink
    That's the one that got the current writer promoted so is a good prelude to the current series.
    Unfortunately they aren't all as good as that.

    --
    [Intentionally left blank]
  12. Re:Introduction to Dr. Who (Off-topic) by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 3, Informative

    "The Girl in the Fireplace", which was also his, was so good, it was almost too good to be a Doctor Who episode.

    --
    No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
  13. Misidenttified by Gonoff · · Score: 3, Informative

    The Dalek was not showing an English flag. It was in fact the British flag. England is no more the whole of this country than Texas is the whole of the USA. I agree that there are many Texans and English who may not fully appreciate the differences but people on /. are generally less parochial...

    --
    I'll see your Constitution and raise you a Queen.
  14. Re:Seriously? by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 3, Informative

    The Doctor Who monsters from that era were priceless. My favorite was Alpha_Centauri from the Jon Pertwee "Peladon" episodes; a painted beach-ball head, a shower curtain for a costume, and six arms, the lower two sets hanging from strings below the actor's real arms. Cheesy defined!

    --
    No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
  15. Re:post title by aztektum · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...a time vortex doesn't have smoke...

    Traveled through a few time vortexes have ya?

    --
    :: aztek ::
    No sig for you!!
  16. Re:William Hartnell & Patrick Troughton by gbjbaanb · · Score: 4, Insightful

    not to mention the theme itself, go read up on how it was actually made in the days before synthesisers and music-editing computer software. It was practically made before electronics were commonplace.

    And you tell that they spliced individual notes together on analogue tape to the youth of today who expect to click the 'make music' button on your favourite music package and they won't believe you... (after saying "what's analogue tape")

  17. Re:William Hartnell & Patrick Troughton by Hurricane78 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Sorry, but your opinion is in my eyes bullshit.
    I think the current series is really great
    Sure, it’s not on the story complexity level of Revolver or the wow effect of Fight Club, or the thrills of Matrix...
    But I don’t expect that from a weekly TV show.

    And no, you don’t know more about good stories than I do, because I learned what makes a story good because of my job. (Of course I also don’t consider you bad. Because I don’t know you.)

    By the way: Wannabe experts always thump that the story is so important. But in reality, the story is only one aspect. It is really the whole experience. A rollercoaster ride has no story at all, but is still a lot of fun.
    So the aesthetics (including sound, behavior, everything that is styleable) are an important part.
    And the technique/technology too.
    In full games there also is gameplay as a fourth part.

    Those parts strengthen each other. So even the charm of a character can be an essential part of what makes a whole show great.
    Plus, it is very important to note, that every story has two parts: The part that Spok would enjoy. And the part that Troi would enjoy. A movie can have a complex emotional story, that us logic-loving male geeks would not even see as a story at all. Nonetheless it is just as important.

    Ok, maybe that helped you get some perspective. If not, please enjoy life anyway, OK? You only have one! ^^

    --
    Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
  18. Re:Introduction to Dr. Who (Off-topic) by Hast · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Moffat also did The empty child/The doctor dances in the first season and Silence in the library/Forest of the dead in season 4. Considering he consistently made awesome episodes in the past I was very pleased that he's now main producer of the show.

    Personally I consider both Blink and Girl in the fireplace to be extremely good. For me Blink wins out by a bit; but that's just me. What's fascinating is that Blink doesn't follow the normal Dr Who cast all that much, but he manages to introduce us to several new people and make us care more about them in 45 minutes than most shows manage for their standard cast in several seasons.

    For starting Doctor Who I'd recommend going with the 2005 reboot. Every season after that kind of builds on top of it, and while the episodes are largely separate there are a lot of continuing plots as well. If you want some of the backstory I recommend watching the "Doctor Who Confidential" episodes as well. There is one for every episode and it's as 1 hour per episode. These give a lot of information and flash backs into the vast Dr Who library as well as interviews with the cast and former cast of the show. It really is an impressive "behind the scenes" presentation.

  19. Why can't by azgard · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ..Hugh Laurie be a Doctor? That would be interesting.