Slashdot Mirror


After 27 Years, a New High Score For Asteroids

blair1q writes "In a marathon 3-1/2 day session, John McAllister, of Portland, Oregon, has broken the 27-year-old high score for Asteroids, set in 1982 by Scott Safran. The attempt was broadcast via webcam."

193 comments

  1. Sudden persepective. by Arancaytar · · Score: 5, Funny

    I have a whole new appreciation for the awesome, interesting things I do with my life.

    Thanks.

    1. Re:Sudden persepective. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
      Code on drupal? What can you do in Drupal in 3,5 days which helps your name go into geek history?

      from the article:

      Once you master the basics, Asteroids is simply a game of endurance: Can you keep from falling asleep? And if you can, will the arcade cabinet you're playing on stay glitch-free and powered up for three days straight?

      which adds value to it. Human nature drives us (or more so men) to excell and try to push the limits. You wont achieve the same. Sometimes, achieving a thing that seems very unlikely (high continued concentration) makes some go out and try to do it, just because they can or want to push themselves. That in itself is admirable, wheverever you cannot see value in that.

      It translates to 84 hours of persisted activity. If the average person watches 8 hours of TV a day, he just did something more useful and challenging for 10 days where the median average just is vegetating in front of a light box on a dialy base over an average 71, that's 598 hours of tv which do not amount to anything. Over a population of 309,018,640 in the us. How does that put things into perspective for you?

    2. Re:Sudden persepective. by addie · · Score: 4, Informative

      For anyone who hasn't seen The King of Kong, a documentary about shooting for the world record in Donkey Kong, I highly recommend it. It's a bit disturbing to see what goes on in the minds of these types of gamers, and at some points it's hard to believe it's a documentary. However it's an excellent movie, and a lot of fun.

      That said, it's easy to criticize someone like this. But hey, we all have our hobbies and talents right?

    3. Re:Sudden persepective. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look, I'm all for being impressed at somebody's achievements rather than just denigrating it because you feel like the reason you can't do better is that you have better things to do. But I don't really see it as more useful (challenging, yes, but not more useful) than watching TV -- in fact, depending on what you watch, there's a fair chance you can learn something even from bad TV. I also don't see it as admirable. That's a different thing from impressive.

      I don't think he's a bad person for doing this, don't get me wrong. But I do not at all admire him for playing Asteroids for 84 hours.

      I have, in fact, done persistent activity for a similarly long time, a few times. I don't think staying up 84 hours to do something is *particularly* rare, though breaking a record doing it is (think of all the people who failed to break a record doing this!). It's not a common thing and not one people generally care to repeat, and even as young as 27 that gets much harder -- I'm 25 now and already know that I just don't have the same ability to stay awake for long periods of time as I did at 21.

    4. Re:Sudden persepective. by beh · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That said, it's easy to criticize someone like this. But hey, we all have our hobbies and talents right?

      As my sister puts it about me (though - luckily (for me), not about old arcade games; and not meant in a creepy fashion (I hope)):

      My brother does not have hobbies. He has obsessions!

      And somehow I feel, here on slashdot, I am not the only one for whom this statement is true...

    5. Re:Sudden persepective. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have, in fact, done persistent activity for a similarly long time, a few times. I don't think staying up 84 hours to do something is *particularly* rare, though breaking a record doing it is (think of all the people who failed to break a record doing this!). It's not a common thing and not one people generally care to repeat, and even as young as 27 that gets much harder -- I'm 25 now and already know that I just don't have the same ability to stay awake for long periods of time as I did at 21.

      Dude 84 hours is a long time. Half a freaking week to be precise. That's a long time. Staying up that long to do something is fairly rare in my book unless the something you're staying up to do happens to be amphetamine.

      I'll be 42 this year. When I hit the 18 hour mark I'm pretty much ready for bedtime. When I hit 24 hours I'm more than ready for bed and I'm damn grumpy to boot. If I get much past 24 then I'm basically on autopilot and craving braaaaaains.

    6. Re:Sudden persepective. by xonar · · Score: 2, Funny

      I just got 3 hours of sleep, braaaaaaaaaaaaains

    7. Re:Sudden persepective. by erayd · · Score: 1

      ...unless the something you're staying up to do happens to be amphetamine.

      Or polyphasic sleep, although admittedly polyphasic sleep does involve short naps, so it's not continuous waking-time, but it's pretty close.

      --
      Forget world peace, bring on -1 pointless
    8. Re:Sudden persepective. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bloody hell. My partner, who is 30, can't stay up longer than 12 hours without sleep.

    9. Re:Sudden persepective. by Island+Admin · · Score: 1

      And somehow I feel, here on slashdot, I am not the only one for whom this statement is true...

      I am not obsessed .... I merely like certain things so much, that I spend every waking moment either thinking of them or doing them.

    10. Re:Sudden persepective. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In this are of high speed internet, when referencing to a movie, dont point to the imdb link. But to some place where you can make your own opinion instead of been feed some 'internet' critic one.

      http://thepiratebay.org/torrent/4670384/The.King.of.Kong.2007.LIMITED.Documentary.DVDRip.XviD-SeRbOvItCh

      Also, please seed.

    11. Re:Sudden persepective. by Pharmboy · · Score: 3, Funny

      The question is, is his "a life well spent" or "a life, well, spent".

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    12. Re:Sudden persepective. by TheLink · · Score: 4, Insightful

      She's a female after all...

      If women have a compulsion to wash their hands often, they'd:
      a) Be ashamed of it and try to keep it a secret.
      b) Go seek help from therapists.
      c) Just wash their hands often.

      If men have a compulsion to wash their hands often, they'd:
      a) Try to find the best soap, water, time and method to do it.
      b) See how many times they can do it per minute/hour/day, or how few times they can do it.
      c) Brag about it and have long arguments with fellow "hobbyists" about a), b) and other related matters. :)

      --
    13. Re:Sudden persepective. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      (Don't (use so many) parentheses) you moron.

    14. Re:Sudden persepective. by Thaelon · · Score: 1

      According to the guys at twin galaxies, most of that movie is carefully edited to be sensational and is factually wrong on a number of important points.

      --

      Question everything

    15. Re:Sudden persepective. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      That King of Kong "documentary" was very loose with the facts to make the story more fun and the "villain" in the movie more evil: http://ascii.textfiles.com/archives/1303

    16. Re:Sudden persepective. by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Might want to consult a doctor. Your partner probably has something like sleep apnea or something even more serious.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    17. Re:Sudden persepective. by Abstrackt · · Score: 2

      (Don't (use so many) parentheses) you moron.

      At least his are nested properly. ;)

      --
      They say a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, but it's not one half so bad as a lot of ignorance. - Terry Pratchett
    18. Re:Sudden persepective. by lyinhart · · Score: 1

      For anyone who hasn't seen The King of Kong, a documentary about shooting for the world record in Donkey Kong, I highly recommend it. It's a bit disturbing to see what goes on in the minds of these types of gamers, and at some points it's hard to believe it's a documentary.

      Actually, like many other so-called "documentaries" The King of Kong was apparently full of all kinds of inaccuracies. E.g. Billy Mitchell wasn't really trying to avoid Steve Wiebe, and Wiebe actually held the high score title for a while. It was still a cool film though.

      --
      Freedom is drinking a beer in the park when you're supposed to be at work.
    19. Re:Sudden persepective. by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      Until she sets the restraining order. Then it's just thinking of them.

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    20. Re:Sudden persepective. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Word to the wise; I'd leave this talent off of one's resume.

    21. Re:Sudden persepective. by Pharmboy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Now, you say that, but us guys in our 40s have gained one thing: persistence. If needed, I can do whatever it takes, including super long hours, not because my body is better prepared for it than a 25 year old (it isn't) but because my mind is. Older guys tend to be more persistent and willing to get the job done, regardless of the body damage it causes.

      Call it "intestinal fortitude" or just hard headedness, but while I don't have the physical stamina I might have had 20 years ago, I can more than make up for it by having a more determined mindset.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    22. Re:Sudden persepective. by Idiomatick · · Score: 1

      http://fora.tv/2008/12/12/MythBusters_Co-Host_Adam_Savage_on_Obsession

      Adam Savage of Mythbusters gives a talk on the value of obsession, detailing one of his own.

    23. Re:Sudden persepective. by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 1

      Which would of course have nothing to do with the fact that the documentary revealed them to be something of an insider's clique not above a bit of favoritism to their own, disdain, suspicion and skepticism of others and their claims?

    24. Re:Sudden persepective. by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

      He makes playing WoW feel like being an overachiever.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    25. Re:Sudden persepective. by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

      It is like reading Lisp

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    26. Re:Sudden persepective. by UninformedCoward · · Score: 1

      --> (At least his are nested properly. ;)

      At least his are closed! = P

    27. Re:Sudden persepective. by slyrat · · Score: 1

      (Don't (use so many) parentheses)

      It is like reading Lisp

      so we use(so, many) with the result going to Don't along with parentheses. Not sure what that would output... Don't(somany, parentheses)...

    28. Re:Sudden persepective. by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      I once did a debugging session that long...from Thursday morning in the 'til Monday morning when CeBIT opened its doors. Most of the time was in the CeBIT exhibition hall living on scavenged canapes from Sun's stand (next door to ours).

      Everybody said I looked a mess but I don't remember feeling too bad.

      --
      No sig today...
    29. Re:Sudden persepective. by Arccot · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The question is, is his "a life well spent" or "a life, well, spent".

      I absolutely hate quotes like this. It stinks of elitism and moral authority. No one knows the purpose of life, so by what right does one person judge another's success or failure in life? If a person led a life they personally are happy with, how can anyone say it was wasted?

      I'm not aiming this at you personally, but people that watch/listen to these type of stories and then spend any time to comment that it's a waste of time makes me run in the other direction. Just in case a black hole of hypocrisy swallows them up.

    30. Re:Sudden persepective. by Fallingcow · · Score: 1

      at some points it's hard to believe it's a documentary

      Another documentary that had a similar effect for me was Murderball. It started out as an interesting but typical look in to a sport that few people are familiar with, but by the end it had become the best sports movie I'd ever seen, period.

      Try not to read too much about it if you plan to watch it, as spoilers could really ruin the experience.

    31. Re:Sudden persepective. by bckrispi · · Score: 1

      Ya... Suddenly I don't feel so bad spending the past two evenings running around searching for eggs...

      --
      Xenon, where's my money? -Borno
    32. Re:Sudden persepective. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The King of Kong is a fake documentary. A lot of the equipment in the background was mine, especially the home made stuff. I refused to appear in the movie due to mistrust of the clown (Seth Gorden) that made it. The 'Hero' (Steve Weibe) of the movie is a friend of the clown.

      I personally know Billy Mitchell and while he is a bit pompous, he is nothing like he was portrayed in the movie. There was a second movie planned and Billy was offered a million bux to be part of it, he turned them down.

      King of Kong = major farce.

    33. Re:Sudden persepective. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This has got to be one of the most insight comments I've ever read!

    34. Re:Sudden persepective. by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      No one knows the purpose of life

      Biologically, the purpose of life is to get your DNA into the next generation of humans.

    35. Re:Sudden persepective. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >I absolutely hate quotes like this. It stinks of elitism and moral authority. No one knows the purpose of life, so by what right does one person judge another's success or failure in life? If a person led a life they personally are happy with, how can anyone say it was wasted?

      I enjoy raping and murdering children. I agree.

    36. Re:Sudden persepective. by Pharmboy · · Score: 1

      I don't remember making a moral judgement about the guy. I do remember saying that it would likely be viewed in one of two ways, and both sides are arguable. As for elitism and moral authority, I'm an American, and we tend to think that we *do* have just as much of a right to have an opinion as that guy had to spend 84 hours playing a video game. In this instance, I don't really have a strong opinion either way, but I fail to see why having one smacks of elitism.

      I sell luxury goods for a living. You are welcome to view that as wasteful or beneficial, as you see fit. It doesn't change anything, but you are welcome to your own opinion. I won't even consider it elitist.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    37. Re:Sudden persepective. by Krakhan · · Score: 1

      I personally know Billy Mitchell and while he is a bit pompous, he is nothing like he was portrayed in the movie.

      You're right, he's even more of a dick in real life, since Seth Gordon had to cut out the darker stuff while he filmed it. From this interview with him:

      ...The way we painted Billy and his actions is so much gentler that we could have, that it makes it hard for me to stomach the tiny little details that they are choosing to fight about, because his true actions were so ugly that we couldn’t use the complete truth, meaning we didn’t show him as dark as he really is.

      But hey Mr. Coward, believe what you want.

    38. Re:Sudden persepective. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, get a life!

    39. Re:Sudden persepective. by Mike+Buddha · · Score: 1

      Yeah, you keep telling yourself that, but I don't see any WORLD WIDE web site keeping track of who's searched for the most eggs anywhere.

      --
      by Mike Buddha -- Someday the mountain might get him, but the law never will.
  2. Score by kickme_hax0r · · Score: 5, Informative

    For those too lazy to read the article, he scored 41,338,740, with the previous high score being 41,336,440

    1. Re:Score by Arancaytar · · Score: 3, Funny

      Maybe in 2039, someone can score 41,339,486.

    2. Re:Score by gzipped_tar · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I wonder what the theoretically possible highest score could be. LONG_MAX? ULONG_MAX? Or something entirely different?

      --
      Colorless green Cthulhu waits dreaming furiously.
    3. Re:Score by shippo · · Score: 1

      There's no maximum as the score counter rolls over at 100,000. You need to have someone to manually keep track of the number of roll overs.

      I remember being in an amusement arcade in Redcar, UK in the early 1980s, when someone was attempting an Asteroids record. He had an assistant with a clipboard to verify the roll-over count.

    4. Re:Score by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No sorry, the timestamp for the highscore will overflow the year before. Your highscore would be saved as 1901.

    5. Re:Score by Jurily · · Score: 4, Funny

      Making it the new longest gaming record in history. Win-win.

    6. Re:Score by orkysoft · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Why doesn't the game include a roll-over counter?

      --

      I suffer from attention surplus disorder.
    7. Re:Score by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      There's a save score memory and score board patch daughter board you can buy for the Asteroids PCB so you don't have to do that anymore.

    8. Re:Score by ijakings · · Score: 1

      Im pretty sure thats over 9000

    9. Re:Score by realityimpaired · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Because the game was programmed more than 30 years ago, and its designers probably didn't think anybody would be insane enough to try to rack up a score in the hundred million range?

    10. Re:Score by gandhi_2 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      also called an extra digit?

      the 10's place is really a rollover counter for how many times the 1's overflowed.

    11. Re:Score by orkysoft · · Score: 1

      Exactly :-)

      --

      I suffer from attention surplus disorder.
  3. NOT THREE DAYS by Khyber · · Score: 4, Informative

    It took approximately 58 hours, not over 72.

    LESS THAN TWO AND A HALF.

    When you repeat old news, it might help to GET IT RIGHT.

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    1. Re:NOT THREE DAYS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      If you read the summary properly, it said 3-1/2 days, i.e. 3 minus a half day.

    2. Re:NOT THREE DAYS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's what TFS said. A three minus one-half day session.

    3. Re:NOT THREE DAYS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

      *Woosh*

    4. Re:NOT THREE DAYS by linzeal · · Score: 4, Funny

      Movie night must be fun at your place. Should I bring over some Soviet WWII films for next week?

    5. Re:NOT THREE DAYS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn son, calm down. What are you, like 16 years old or something?

    6. Re:NOT THREE DAYS by NickFortune · · Score: 4, Funny

      I hereby propose a new moderation option: "-1 Shouts Too Much".

      --
      Don't let THEM immanentize the Eschaton!
    7. Re:NOT THREE DAYS by JackieBrown · · Score: 1

      I think you are missing the joke. The summary states 72 hours (3 days) minus half a day (12 hours.)

      So the punch line is the summary states 60 hours which is close enough to 58 for you to just let it go.

    8. Re:NOT THREE DAYS by sourcerror · · Score: 2

      That's for pussies. Eat this. Hungarian post-soviet socio-drama in 435 minutes!

    9. Re:NOT THREE DAYS by sourcerror · · Score: 1

      Comes on 4 DVDs, but it's intended to be watched in one session. 435 minutes is roughly 7.5 hours, so the target audience is those, who watch movies for a living. It's one shift + lunch break.

    10. Re:NOT THREE DAYS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Christ. Stop being such a dick.

      -The Internet.

    11. Re:NOT THREE DAYS by sourcerror · · Score: 1

      "The film was briefly out on VHS and DVD in the 1990s, but went out of print very quickly, but is now available on DVD. It is infrequently shown due to its lengthy running time. It is sometimes shown in two parts, or in its entirety with two intermissions. Tarr has said the film should be shown without any interruption, but this is usually difficult to do given the restrictions of both film and video projection."

      So the DVD is a big compromise, having to change discs. I hope there will be a blue-ray version, so that we can enjoy it the way it's meant.

    12. Re:NOT THREE DAYS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No way, I totally forgot about order of operations. Here I was thinking it was (3-1)/2 = 1 day. Then I was thinking about whether the article writer believes a day is 12 hours or 24 hour hours.

      Eventually I settled on it taking 12 hours, and everyone else, the writer, the submitter, the gamer, and all of /. being incorrect.

    13. Re:NOT THREE DAYS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *Metawoosh*

    14. Re:NOT THREE DAYS by TheVelvetFlamebait · · Score: 1

      Exactly. And don't be a pussy either. They're both already in great abundance on the internet.

      --
      You know, there is a difference between trolling and pointing out the flaws in your reasoning. Just saying.
    15. Re:NOT THREE DAYS by Abstrackt · · Score: 1

      I hereby propose a new moderation option: "-1 Shouts Too Much".

      Everyone knows that caps lock is cruise control for cool.

      --
      They say a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, but it's not one half so bad as a lot of ignorance. - Terry Pratchett
    16. Re:NOT THREE DAYS by wykell · · Score: 1

      OMG YOU ARE SO RIGHT! Sorry, my caffeine levels spiked right as I read that. I do kinda want to go over to Khyber's now and watch the entire 3 minus one half day's worth of video taken for this, on the condition that his DAMNED NEIGHBORS STAY OFF THE LAWN! while we watch.

      --
      --- He advocated thrift and hard work and disapproved of loose women who turned him down. ---
    17. Re:NOT THREE DAYS by lab16 · · Score: 1

      Makes you wonder how many times he was thwarted by /.s anti shouting spam filter by trying to post over and over again until he found just the right ratio of words that he was allowed to have capitalized.

  4. This reminds me of... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Once you master the basics, Asteroids is simply a game of endurance: Can you keep from falling asleep?

    Anyone remember those dance marathons from the 1950s where people would dance for days to beat the world record?

    Okay, neither do I. But I *did* see it in an episode of Happy Days. So that still makes me old.

    1. Re:This reminds me of... by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      You should see "They Shoot Horses Don't They" for the un-funny side to those events.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    2. Re:This reminds me of... by tompaulco · · Score: 1

      Once you master the basics, Asteroids is simply a game of endurance: Can you keep from falling asleep?
      I agree with this statement. I got good enough at Asteroids where I could keep a game going indefinitely, but my thumbs got tired and nature called and whatnot. I would get it up the maximum number of lives (I think it was 99, but this was long ago, so I may be wrong), and then let someone else play for awhile until they started to get low on lives, and then I would run it back up again. But to beat the record, it has to be all the same player, which really does make it a "who can stay awake the longest" game.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
  5. where's the virgin tag? by timmarhy · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    i bet this guy is powered by hot pockets and mountain dew.

    --
    If you mod me down, I will become more powerful than you can imagine....
    1. Re:where's the virgin tag? by AndGodSed · · Score: 4, Funny

      Duly tagged.

    2. Re:where's the virgin tag? by Khyber · · Score: 1

      Should've been 'neverbeenlaid'

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    3. Re:where's the virgin tag? by Luke+Wilson · · Score: 1

      The previous record holder was 15 when he set the record. This guy is 27. And I don't think Scott had an arcade cabinet in his house in 1982.

    4. Re:where's the virgin tag? by OrangeCatholic · · Score: 1

      Is he 27? Where does it say his age in the article?

    5. Re:where's the virgin tag? by warGod3 · · Score: 1

      I vote for a "neverbeenlaid" tag.

      --
      "Be polite, be professional, but have a plan to kill everybody you meet." General James Mattis
    6. Re:where's the virgin tag? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      when in fact, now he's getting all sorts of girlgeek poontang.

      nerd girls in skirts & glasses.... Drool

    7. Re:where's the virgin tag? by Luke+Wilson · · Score: 1

      are you kidding? it says 27 all over the place... but it's not his age. He's actually 41

  6. Aw, no rematch. by Rogerborg · · Score: 4, Funny
    [Previous record holder Scott Safran] died in 1989, due to injuries sustained when he fell from the roof of his Los Angeles apartment.

    Perhaps he has a son to avenge him.

    Hmm. Or given his geek credentials, more likely not.

    --
    If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    1. Re:Aw, no rematch. by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      fell from the roof of his Los Angeles apartment.

      Just like a falling asteroid no less.

    2. Re:Aw, no rematch. by SpzToid · · Score: 1

      Negative gravitational force-fields are a real bitch, man. They can really ruin your day.

      --
      You can't be ahead of the curve, if you're stuck in a loop.
    3. Re:Aw, no rematch. by bipbop · · Score: 1

      It's the positive ones that always catch me by surprise.

    4. Re:Aw, no rematch. by shadowbearer · · Score: 4, Funny

      [Previous record holder Scott Safran] died in 1989, due to injuries sustained when he fell from the roof of his Los Angeles apartment.

        That's what Centauri wanted everyone to think. Good cover story!

      SB

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
    5. Re:Aw, no rematch. by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 4, Funny

      Sadly he was on his last life when it happened.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    6. Re:Aw, no rematch. by geekoid · · Score: 1

      To be fair, it was the 7 shots from the space hip on the way down that did him in~

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  7. I can beat that ... by Qbertino · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Just had the idea: Wouldn't it be a sort of cool project to build a robot that plays Astroids? I mean the actual arcade version? Shouldn't be that difficult. Such a device could beat the world record, no? ... In fact, it could probably play endlessly.

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
    1. Re:I can beat that ... by MichaelSmith · · Score: 4, Funny

      I spent 75 aud on a robot arm kit from Jaycar. 20 aud on an atmel atmega8 and about 20 aud on transistors, etc. That and about a weeks work got me a robot which can feed my fish when I am away from home.

      Staying with the atmel idea I could build an eye to detect spots of light with a mechanically scanning photodiode. Then the robot arm just has to push a lever left and right.

      The main limitation is that the plastic gears in the robot arm are not good for continuous operation. I have considered squirting lubricant into them but I expect their life is limited.

      Maybe this could be an offshoot of my sexbot construction project.

    2. Re:I can beat that ... by Yvanhoe · · Score: 1

      This one ?
      http://www.jaycar.com.au/productView.asp?ID=KJ8916
      I have seen a few of these kits and they look all too slow and imprecise for doing even a simple thing like playing an arcade game. I don't know this one, is it different ? Do you think it could change a joystick position 2 times per second during 10+ hours ? If so, I think I have to make a participation to Australia GNP...

      --
      The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
    3. Re:I can beat that ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      different game, but you might be interested in a computer playing Super Mario World

    4. Re:I can beat that ... by mhajicek · · Score: 1

      Instead of using a motorized arm, mount solenoids to push the stick from the four directions. You should achieve a fast response time and long cycle-life.

    5. Re:I can beat that ... by Arancaytar · · Score: 1

      The German computer magazine c't held a contest (German link) for the best Asteroids-playing artificial intelligence - it wasn't mechanical, but merely transmitted virtual keystrokes to a server that was running the game.

      I suppose adding a robotic element would add additional complications such as the reaction time of the limbs, and recognizing the playing field via optical sensors.

    6. Re:I can beat that ... by JackieBrown · · Score: 1

      Looks like people won against the computer

    7. Re:I can beat that ... by SuperMonkeyCube · · Score: 1

      It's 5 buttons, no joystick. Rotate Left, Rotate Right, Hyperspace, Thrust, and Fire. Your left hand gets the two rotate buttons, your right gets thrust & fire. The Hyperspace button is in the middle but away from normal hand reach - you have to abandon something else to press it.

    8. Re:I can beat that ... by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      I spent $13.25US on a robot to feed my fish when I was gone AND when I was home. Slit in the fish food can, Hobby servo, Pic and some junk from the trash.

      It spins twice a day and with the huge can of food on the thing, I'll refill the food in about a year. Fishies are happy, Nest up, automatic water changes! I already have a automatic water make up with a float valve from a toilet.... and I dont need to clean the glass, I found that snails are far easier to get than making little robots to clean the glass....

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    9. Re:I can beat that ... by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      then just tap in and put relays on all the button contacts. one HD camera and it should be trivial to write the auto player for it.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    10. Re:I can beat that ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, dont buy avrs from Jaycar - the markup is insane. Farnell & Rs australia now has free shipping and no minimum order, buy your chips from them.

    11. Re:I can beat that ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Here's some more information about that contest, in case anyone's wondering how a human can get to a 41 million score while the best of algorithms can only achieve 140000-ish scores: The contest games were limited to 5 minutes!

      Some of the coders reverse-engineered the random number generation in the Asteroids game, so their algorithmic players could deduce the initial values from events happening on the screen and have full information about the internal game state after a few frames. Consequently they could even use the hyperspace function without risk. When you look at the recordings, you'll notice that they fire before the asteroids appear and still every shot is a hit.

    12. Re:I can beat that ... by Aceticon · · Score: 1

      Nah, the true hacker way would be to byte-change the binary of the game so that it plays itself.

    13. Re:I can beat that ... by twistedsymphony · · Score: 1

      Just had the idea: Wouldn't it be a sort of cool project to build a robot that plays Astroids? I mean the actual arcade version? Shouldn't be that difficult. Such a device could beat the world record, no? ... In fact, it could probably play endlessly.

      If they can built Auto Guitar Hero then Asteroids should be a breeze

    14. Re:I can beat that ... by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      The main limitation is that the plastic gears in the robot arm are not good for continuous operation. I have considered squirting lubricant into them but I expect their life is limited.

      Maybe this could be an offshoot of my sexbot construction project.

      Way too much information.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    15. Re:I can beat that ... by TheCyberShadow · · Score: 1

      I participated in that contest, and was one of the people who disassembled the ROM and emulated the RNG. One of the biggest hurdles was that they decided to use UDP for the network protocol, which means you had to account for lost packets. In the end, partly due to poor time management on my behalf, I had only half a day left to implement the actual logic :(

      You can find magazine scans (in German) at the above link as well.

    16. Re:I can beat that ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Asteroids doesn't use a joystick. Which makes things simpler I think.

    17. Re:I can beat that ... by MobyDisk · · Score: 1

      I've always wanted to do that, but with Pac Man. I actually am now inheriting an industrial robot and I am trying to decide what to do with it. I'll count your vote in with this. If I succeed, I'll let you know.

    18. Re:I can beat that ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That and about a weeks work got me a robot which can feed my fish when I am away from home.... Maybe this could be an offshoot of my sexbot construction project.

      Don't you think you've pampered those fish enough?

    19. Re:I can beat that ... by Dr+Herbert+West · · Score: 1

      No lever in the original asteroids that I played in the mid-eighties, as I recall-- only buttons. Left/right, fire, thrust, and hyperspace. You would have to have a button-pushing robot arm, which would make the programming challenge all about finding the "sweet spot" of how long to hold = how many degrees (pixels?) rotation, how much acceleration given, etc. Also, I remember the way to rack up the points was to leave the last tiny asteroid on the screen and wait for the UFOs to come by, and shoot them. Minimize danger + maximize easy points. Would have to program that strategy in as well. Others have mentioned levers, tho, so I could be wrong.

    20. Re:I can beat that ... by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      Yeah that kit is not very precise. But fun to experiment with all the same.

  8. It's infinate by Chuck+Chunder · · Score: 5, Informative

    In the game the score wraps around to zero again so the "score" in this case is calculated by taking note of the number of times the score wraps.

    --
    Boffoonery - downloadable Comedy Benefit for Bletchley Park
  9. or even infinite by Chuck+Chunder · · Score: 1

    oops.

    --
    Boffoonery - downloadable Comedy Benefit for Bletchley Park
  10. So... by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...when is he expected to be visited by Centauri?

    --
    Ezekiel 23:20
    1. Re:So... by tgd · · Score: 5, Funny

      Only on Slashdot would that be moderated "interesting" and not "funny".

    2. Re:So... by blueZ3 · · Score: 1

      Greeting Asteroids player. You have been recruited by the Star League to fight against Zur and the Kodan UFOs.

      --
      Interested in a Flash-based MAME front end? Visit mame.danzbb.com
    3. Re:So... by JTsyo · · Score: 1

      Movie with similar plot
      http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0087597/

    4. Re:So... by Rysc · · Score: 1

      That's not a "similar" plot that's what we call an "identical" plot, since that is the movie the OP was referencing.

      --
      I want my Cowboyneal
  11. 2 Things have to be said by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    First, props to the quality of old time hardware. Do you think you could still play games on contemporary machines, almots 3 decades in the future?

    And second, bathroom break almost costing him the title? There's a REASON these machines were found near the bathrooms in the bars where they have been propped up back in the days! Not to mention that there are other ways to make sure you don't waste a life just because your waste ... well, throws an interrupt. Fffft, amateur! :)

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:2 Things have to be said by mccalli · · Score: 5, Interesting

      First, props to the quality of old time hardware. Do you think you could still play games on contemporary machines, almots 3 decades in the future?

      Another detail about Asteroids - it's a game you really can't emulate without specialist hardware. Yeah you can load up the ROM in MAME and it plays nicely enough, but the true Asteroids machine had vector monitor hardware. This really makes a difference to the feel of the thing and those beautifully glowing intense bullets look vastly better on the real thing than when played on standard raster hardware.

      I have a MAME cab and an ArcadeVGA adapter to power a Hanterax 20" screen - it makes even 320x128 look fantastic. But Asteroids is something it simply can't get right - without a vector monitor, you're stuffed.

      Cheers,
      Ian

    2. Re:2 Things have to be said by Alioth · · Score: 3, Informative

      If you want to get vector hardware for the home, there's always the Vectrex. A Vectrex in decent condition can be had for less than $100. The built-in game is Mine Storm, an Asteroids-like game, plus with some flash memory you can build a multicart with lots of games.

    3. Re:2 Things have to be said by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      It's not hard to make a regular TV tube a vector one anyways, it's just the phosphor mask that makes it a PITA to get crisp lines. I screwed with that back in college, I had a couple of sweep generators powering the X and Y fields on a color TV tube making some really cool designs before I fired some of the TV electronics.

      Oh and scanning OUTSIDE the mask was bad, with enough voltage you can bend the beam too far. What I loved was finding cracked flybacks that had a visible blue aura around them..... those rocked!

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    4. Re:2 Things have to be said by KlaymenDK · · Score: 4, Insightful

      First, props to the quality of old time hardware. Do you think you could still play games on contemporary machines, almots 3 decades in the future?

      Nope, because the DRM servers will have been shut down 29.5 years earlier...

    5. Re:2 Things have to be said by lowrydr310 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      My uncle had an Asteroids cabinet complete with a vector monitor and all I remember is WOW those lines were bright! I couldn't imagine playing that thing for one hour straight, let alone for 58 hours.

    6. Re:2 Things have to be said by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Brightness is tunable via a pot/rheostat inside the case.

    7. Re:2 Things have to be said by Hatta · · Score: 1

      There's even a card that will allow you to interface your Vectrex with a computer running MAME.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    8. Re:2 Things have to be said by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      It's a neat thing about vector displays. Specifically with Asteroids, it's a truly impressive thing when your ship's bullets are actually, literally, physically brighter than other elements on the screen. Not "whiter pixels", not "has a gradient glow rendered around it", not "ooo, look at the awesome 3D light effects this video card can do zomg". No, the shots actually emit more light in the physical, real world than everything else. Just impressive.

    9. Re:2 Things have to be said by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      Atari Star Wars was colored vectors, how did that work?

      --
      No sig today...
    10. Re:2 Things have to be said by GWBasic · · Score: 1

      Can't you emulate high quality vector graphics on a super-high resolution like 1080p?

    11. Re:2 Things have to be said by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      I may be wrong, but I think it's not just the crispness (no jaggies) that distinguishes vector graphics (since they truly are 'straight lines' and not made out of horizontal scanlines), but also that vector monitors can get (or at least typically _do get_) brighter than standard raster displays.

    12. Re:2 Things have to be said by GWBasic · · Score: 1

      But my point is that once you get to a high enough resolution, you won't see the jaggies.

    13. Re:2 Things have to be said by Dwedit · · Score: 1

      Separate electron guns for each color. They excite different phosphors on the screen. Just like a color TV.

  12. Gotta be that guy from the Buy More by Snaller · · Score: 1

    After all who but the Buy More crew has the best nerds ;)

    ("Chuck" reference :)

    --
    If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
    1. Re:Gotta be that guy from the Buy More by JackieBrown · · Score: 1

      The funny thing is the post under yours refers to "flash" which is what Chuck does as a spy.

    2. Re:Gotta be that guy from the Buy More by tangent3 · · Score: 1

      Actually the arcade game Chuck beat to reach the killscreen was Missile Command
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chuck_Versus_Tom_Sawyer#ep18

  13. Flash version by trACE666 · · Score: 2, Informative

    For those too young or too old to remember, there is an almost authentic Flash version of the game available over at Atari. http://www.atari.com/arcade/arcade.php?game=asteroids

    1. Re:Flash version by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I reached an awesome 730 points before I got bored...

      Damn you interwebs! My ability to concentrate has been ruined!

    2. Re:Flash version by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm on an iPad, you insensitive clod! where's the HTML5 version?

  14. fight the chicks off by Hognoxious · · Score: 4, Funny

    I bet he has to fight the chicks off with a shitty stick.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    1. Re:fight the chicks off by s-whs · · Score: 1

      I bet he has to fight the chicks off with a shitty stick.

      Of course: all the chicks want to play with his joystick.

      Note: The bigger your joystick, the better you can play...

    2. Re:fight the chicks off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No stick, just four missiles at a time. But whenever one hits or goes too far, he gets another one.

    3. Re:fight the chicks off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bet he has to fight the chicks off with a shitty stick.
      How do you know he likes anal?

  15. YouTube it or GTFO by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    TFS and TFA are full of shit considering every other outlet reports 58 hours and that's how long the gameplay footage I have is.

    Will there be a directors' cut? A special edition boxed set including "the making of..."?

    [insert obligatory dig at George Lucas here]

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    1. Re:YouTube it or GTFO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Will there be a directors' cut?
       
      Yes, in the director's cut, the asteroid shoots first.

  16. And the failed attempt by __aayejd672 · · Score: 3, Informative

    An Oregon man named Bill Carlton settled in for a marathon session in 2004, which ended in failure when his machine broke down after 27 hours of play. He had scored more than 15 million points, placing him 15th in the record books.

    Oh dear lord - and I thought it was bad when my mouse packed in half way through a CS match!

    1. Re:And the failed attempt by __aayejd672 · · Score: 1

      Oh and yes, mouse packed in due to a number of sudden impacts with a table......we lost that game

    2. Re:And the failed attempt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice thing about USB mice is that you have have more than one plugged in at a time. Just switch if one goes out.

    3. Re:And the failed attempt by vitaflo · · Score: 1

      John almost bit it at the end as well, though not because of power. I watched it live on this web stream. With about 500k left he took a bathroom break. He had racked up a ton of free ships, so it wasn't a big deal. Or, it didn't *seem* like a big deal. Having sacrificed maybe 10 ships on the bathroom break, he came back and was not on his game. He kept dying to little errors. When he was 300k from the record, about 58 hours into his play session, he was down to only two ships left. It was fairly tense in the chat room as the speed at which he was losing ships was faster than him getting free ones (you get a free ship every 10k). It looked very possible that he may end up losing this game right at the end and not reaching the record.

      Thankfully at that point he went on a tear, racked up another 5 or 6 ships and kept it at about that for the rest of the game. As soon as he passed the mark he was done. Killed a few asteroids but basically just let it kill him until game over.

    4. Re:And the failed attempt by garcia · · Score: 1

      I recently watched a "documentary" on Hulu about a dude (possibly this guy, I'm too lazy to look at the video) who set out to break the Missile Command record. He set aside several three day weekends over the course of a year and each time the machine was the culprit--breaking down 10s of hours into the attempt. The documentary ended with him not breaking the record.

      I have an original 1982 Ms. Pacman cocktail. The video reminded me that I need to get a new monitor for it, something which is becoming rare apparently. The price has gone up more than $100 in the last 5 years due to their scarcity.

    5. Re:And the failed attempt by d474 · · Score: 1

      Bill Carlton was actually in a documentary called "High Score" which covers his attempts to beat the 80 million point high score of Missile Command (arcade version). Bill Carlton has a lot of bad luck with his machines resetting during marathon attempts. He never loses his cool though, the man is a machine.

      --
      Authority questions you. Return the favor.
  17. Strategy. by shippo · · Score: 5, Informative

    The strategy behind the game is to clear the playfield of all bar a handful of small asteroids, and then wait for the flying saucers to appear. If you're moving fairly quickly up or down the screen you can avoid the saucers with practice. As the game awards 1000 for the small saucers and a bonus life every 10,000 points it's a somewhat easy task to rack up many extra lives. Once the last asteroid was eliminated, the game would restart, increasing the number of large asteroids at the start up to a limit of around 12.

    Early versions of the game were even easier as broken game logic resulted in an area of the screen that rendered the player immune to attacks. There wasn't even any means for making the game harder by setting the game's dip-switches - these only controlled the initial number of lives and other sundry settings such as language and coin count. Suffice to say experienced players could easily play the games for hours at a time.

    Atari later released Asteroids Deluxe which was somewhat harder. This included a second type of saucer that split into components which homed in on the player, as well as amendments to other parts of the game logic.

    1. Re:Strategy. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Asteroids Deluxe is a lot harder, mostly because it limits you to 9 extra ships in reserve. John has the record on that one too, intentionally stopping his game at 3,333,360 (in a nod to the "perfect Pac-Man" players).

  18. Defendor* of the planet! by wisebabo · · Score: 1

    So who would you rather have defending us when an asteroid with our name comes around, him or Bruce Willis?

    I think he's probably got better eye-hand coordination and his stamina... did he get bathroom breaks?

    * deliberately misspelled like the movie which I haven't seen yet, is it any good?

    1. Re:Defendor* of the planet! by Theoboley · · Score: 1

      Yes, He would farm lives and then take breaks as needed.

      --
      Stupidity only gets you so far, then you've gotta try
    2. Re:Defendor* of the planet! by wisebabo · · Score: 1

      Thanks, don't know the rules of video game competition!

    3. Re:Defendor* of the planet! by Theoboley · · Score: 1

      Yea, i was on the Justin.tv chatroom a couple hours before he broke/set the record and had asked the same thing... I mean 58 straight hours of gaming... you're gonna need at LEAST one pee break.

      Hook up the colostomy bag, this is gonna burn.

      --
      Stupidity only gets you so far, then you've gotta try
  19. yeah, a real shame.... by CFD339 · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately for him, the never before tried personal hyperspace button on his wristwatch actually worked, though he hadn't counted on the potential issues of a having an x, y, and z axis to worry about in a gravity well.

    Doh!

    --
    The problem with quotes on the internet, is that nobody bothers to check their veracity. -- Abraham Lincoln
  20. Uh... what? by mister_playboy · · Score: 1

    I don't think staying up 84 hours to do something is *particularly* rare

    Do you smoke crack or something? I don't think I've ever been awake for 48 hours straight, let alone 84.

    --
    Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law ::: Love is the law, love under will
    1. Re:Uh... what? by Jazz-Masta · · Score: 1

      I don't think staying up 84 hours to do something is *particularly* rare

      Do you smoke crack or something? I don't think I've ever been awake for 48 hours straight, let alone 84.

      You've never had a full time job as an IT or System Administrator then!

    2. Re:Uh... what? by Pharmboy · · Score: 1

      I don't think staying up 84 hours to do something is *particularly* rare

      Do you smoke crack or something? I don't think I've ever been awake for 48 hours straight, let alone 84.

      You've never had a full time job as an IT or System Administrator then!

      Are you trying to say that ALL SysAdmins smoke crack? I know the job has a lot of pressure, but still.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    3. Re:Uh... what? by eharvill · · Score: 1

      I don't think staying up 84 hours to do something is *particularly* rare

      Do you smoke crack or something? I don't think I've ever been awake for 48 hours straight, let alone 84.

      You've never had a full time job as an IT or System Administrator then!

      I think that statement is very telling of your skills as a sysadmin. I'm glad I've never had to work in your environment!

      --
      At night I drink myself to sleep and pretend I don't care that you're not here with me
    4. Re:Uh... what? by GNUALMAFUERTE · · Score: 2, Funny

      Not all Sysadmins. But many for sure. But Crack smoking is for the weekend,since you'll be really tripping balls. The week is coke time!

      My record of coke-induced unix-fixing rampage was 3 years ago, when a 12-machine asterisk system failed spectacularly after some douchebag that was administrating that system screwed up the mysql circular replication and ended up with 12 corrupt copies of a 2TB database, and a backup that didn't work (They had hired me a year and a half prior to that incident to setup that system as an external contractor, and they were going to administrate the system themselves). 106 Hours and 25 grams later, they had a working system again :)

      --
      WTF am I doing replying to an AC at 5 A.M on a Friday night?
    5. Re:Uh... what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope you expensed that

    6. Re:Uh... what? by ZosX · · Score: 1

      This has got to be the best sysadmin story I've ever read on slashdot. Well, one of the best! Thank you.

    7. Re:Uh... what? by GNUALMAFUERTE · · Score: 1

      Hehe. Those were fun times. I'm clean now (I didn't become a 12stepper or anything like that, I just eventually got bored of cocaine. But I say I miss the fun times of working totally high. I must say, every once in a while I find some script I wrote years ago at the wee hours of some Sunday, and let me tell you, that's what I call creative Perl ;)

      --
      WTF am I doing replying to an AC at 5 A.M on a Friday night?
  21. Obligatory by hellfire · · Score: 1

    THERE... ARE... FOUR... DAYS!

    --

    "All great wisdom is contained in .signature files"

  22. Is that impressive? by hellfire · · Score: 1

    Once you master the basics, Asteroids is simply a game of endurance: Can you keep from falling asleep? And if you can, will the arcade cabinet you're playing on stay glitch-free and powered up for three days straight?

    So it's incredibly easy to master the basics, and all you need to then do is keep from falling asleep and hope your lucky enough that the machine doesn't crash.

    So you are saying this isn't a very impressive feat huh? It's definitely not a very interesting one.

    --

    "All great wisdom is contained in .signature files"

    1. Re:Is that impressive? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...hope your lucky enough that the machine doesn't crash.

      You've been working in Windows for too long - I can't say the old stand-up console machines crashed very often, if ever. Maybe a transient voltage spike or something.

      Oh, and Slashdot editors? The submitter isn't the first to submit this story, so why does he get the credit? Just wondering.

  23. Spheres of Chaos by xaxa · · Score: 1

    Spheres of Chaos is the Asteroids clone I grew up with. There's now a freeware release for Windows and Linux.

    This is no usual Asteriods family member, SoC is the difficult nephew. The one with all the good albums who stayed out late and got that girl into trouble back in school. Those particle effects? You can recognise the family traits as being present and correct, but somewhere in the past you can see some Minter has entered the bloodline.

    For those unable to afford even the smallest portion of crack, Spheres of Chaos will dilate the pupil of your third eye and give you change from a fiver.

  24. the life wraparound was the real problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The real killer on Asteroids is the 8 bit life counter, meaning every couple of hours you'd suddenly find yourself with no spare ships. The rules we played forbade suicide to keep the ship count down, otherwise we could just have kept the lives at around 200 and stopped worrying.

    On casual days, we'd rack up 240 lives or so, hand the game over to any passing stranger then take 50min off for lunch. The same game was always still going when we came back!

    It really is a trivially easy game, so easy we had to invent rules to make it more challenging!

  25. This might be newsworthy by WormholeFiend · · Score: 2, Insightful

    if he beat the record set for the Tron arcade game...

    1. Re:This might be newsworthy by sh00z · · Score: 1

      Huh? Tron actually has a win state. Score didn't matter--it was all about being the victor.

  26. National Lampoons Vacation by RemoWilliams84 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Cousin Dale: "Ya' got Asteroids?"
    Rusty: "Naw, but my Dad does."

    --
    "I don't have to think. I only have to do it. The results are always perfect, but that's old news." - Meat Puppets
  27. records by jollyreaper · · Score: 1

    Sometimes a record stands the test of time because none can approach it, other times it stands because nobody feels like bothering to try.

    --
    Kwisatz Haderach
    Sell the spice to CHOAM
    This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
  28. "High Score" Documentary which is about this by SirStanley · · Score: 1

    There is a documentary called "High Score" it is about a guy named "Bill" who tried to get the high score on Missile Command and attempted Asteroids.

    It's pretty interesting.

    http://www.hulu.com/watch/135697/high-score

    --
    --------========+++Dont Feed The Lab Techs+++========--------
  29. Re:first by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The posters above me are ball-gargling faggots.

    That said, Asteroids is the shit.

  30. Hyperspace by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 1
    I wonder if he listened to the old Buckner & Garcia classic the entire time.

    Asteroids all over me, don't know where to run,
    I'm somewhere between the moon and the sun
    I'm in the three ships and there's more on the way
    I'll be faced again, I can really play!

    Hyperspace, Push on the button and I'm back in the race,
    Hyperspace, Shootin' my rockets all over the place,
    I'm invisible now, but I'll be back again,
    Kickin' the thrust, 'cause I just gotta win, I just gotta win,

    There's a ship on the rise and he's shootin' at me,
    I rotate my ship on the count of three
    I fire and shoot and blow him out of the sky
    Push on the buttons and wave bye-bye

    Hyperspace, Push on the button and I'm back in the race,
    Hyperspace, Shootin' my rockets all over the place,

    I'm invisible now, but I'll be back again,
    Gonna kick in the thrust, 'cause I just gotta win, I just gotta win,

    Hyperspace, Push on the button and I'm back in the race,
    Hyperspace, Shootin' my rockets all over the place,

    I'm invisible now, but I'll be back again,
    Kickin' the thrust, 'cause I just gotta win, I just gotta win,

    Hyperspace, Push on the button and I'm back in the race,
    Hyperspace, Shootin' my rockets all over the place,

    I'm invisible now, but I'll be back again,
    Gonna kick in the thrust, 'cause I just gotta win, I just gotta win,

    Asteroids all over me, don't know where to run,
    I'm somewhere between the moon and the sun
    I'm in the three ships and there's more on the way
    I'm a space cadet, I really know how to play!

    Hyperspace, Push on the button and I'm back in the race,
    Hyperspace, Shootin' my rockets all over the place,

    I'm invisible now, but I'll be back again,
    Gonna kick in the thrust, I just gotta win, I just gotta win,

    Hyperspace, Push on the button, push on the button
    Hyperspace, Shootin', shootin' all over the place,

    I'm invisible now, but I'll be back again,
    Gonna kick in the thrust, I just gotta win!

    Hyperspace, Shootin', shootin', shootin', shootin'

    Hyperspace! I don't know where to run
    Hyperspace! Gonna kick in the thrust, I just gotta win!

    Hyperspace!

    --
    Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
    1. Re:Hyperspace by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 1

      I am delighted to discover that the album this song is on is available on iTunes! If you're feeling nostalgic, or just wondering what the song above sounds like check it out! Warning: link launches iTunes

      --
      Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
    2. Re:Hyperspace by D'Arque+Bishop · · Score: 1

      Just keep in mind that it's not the original recording. Buckner & Garcia weren't allowed access to the master recordings so they re-recorded it. It's not any worse than the original... just slightly different in parts. The song "Mousetrap" is the most glaring example, as they didn't have access to a Mousetrap machine so they used stock sounds of a dog, cat, and bird...

      Hope this helps...

    3. Re:Hyperspace by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 1

      Oh, that's a little disappointing. I can still hear the sounds from Mousetrap in my head, so that would be immediately noticeable. I used to listen to this on my mono tape player/recorder repeatedly back in the day!

      --
      Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
    4. Re:Hyperspace by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      Warning: link launches iTunes

      That's one helluva nasty exploit.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    5. Re:Hyperspace by JedaFlain · · Score: 1

      Warning: link launches iTunes

      Further reinforcing my decision to never click on a bit.ly link.

  31. Comments on this great achievement by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

    My initial reaction: Wouldn't it have been a lot easier to use a team of people, each trading off joystick duty while the other(s) take a break?

    My later reaction: yeah, like that's really gonna help him get laid!

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  32. His next challenge? by Locke2005 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Setting the high score for desert bus.

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  33. Make it count by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can get the high score in asteroids and win cash on Android, in Vacuum: http://blog.door-6.com/

  34. No one's played the game for 27 years by AthleteMusicianNerd · · Score: 1

    That's why the record stood for so long.

  35. Greetings, Starfighter. by geekoid · · Score: 0, Redundant

    You have been recruited by the Star League to defend the Frontier against Xur and the Ko-dan armada.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  36. OT: Asteroids Cabs are HEAVY! by cyclomedia · · Score: 1

    About 6 years ago we had an Asteroids machine at my brother's arcade/amusement trading/repair business. The board was knackered and rather than take the time to rebuild it we sold it to someone who would, and the day before he was due to collect it I was moving it from out back towards the front of the workshop when i somehow slipped or tripped, dropped the barrow and essentially caught the entire thing on the back of my head. I then found myself in a somewhat Atlas-like pose but with the Asteroids cab atop myself instead of the Earth, although if you've ever handled one you'd find they weigh about the same as a planet. We always put the machines first, usually simple things like placing your hand between them and sharp parts of buildings you are manouvering them through so that you'll crush your hand rather than scratch the machine... This time I elected to crush my entire body to save the ancient beast, pulled about twelve muscles in the process of breaking its fall and returning it to vertical, I knew my body would heal but the machine would not.

    --
    If you don't risk failure you don't risk success.