Slashdot Mirror


The Sopranos Meet H-1B In New Jersey

theodp writes "We smack this IT geek around a little, take him for a nice car ride, threaten to 'take care of him' if he doesn't recant his story, give him 5 G's for his trouble, and badda boom, badda bing, case dismissed. Federal prosecutors allege that an H-1B visa-holding IT employee who was owed some $53,000 in back wages was threatened in meetings at restaurants and in his home if he didn't change his story. However, the victim captured some of what happened on tape, and two employees of an Illinois-based IT staffing company — not named in the indictment but identified by the NJ Star-Ledger as ComData Consulting Inc. of Rolling Meadows, IL — are now facing extortion-related charges and a possible 20 years in prison."

324 comments

  1. Re:+1 FP by MrNaz · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    If you don't stop that then the Slashbot will be sent to take care of you. Oh, and here's 5gb for your trouble.

    --
    I hate printers.
  2. Unacceptable by Renraku · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This behavior is unacceptable from companies that have offices in America. That might be how people do business in other places, but they need to leave that shit at the door. Perhaps someday we'll realize this has been going on in Chinese restaurants and massage parlors for 50 years and do something about those too?

    --
    Job? I don't have time to get a job! Who will sit around and bitch about being broke and unemployed then?
    1. Re:Unacceptable by sznupi · · Score: 2, Informative

      You noticed that the story is about US locals doing those thing to alien working for them, right?

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    2. Re:Unacceptable by TheRecklessWanderer · · Score: 1

      Um ya cause there's no corruption in the US.

      --
      Mean what you say...say what you mean.
    3. Re:Unacceptable by Sir_Lewk · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This behavior is unacceptable from companies that have offices in America. That might be how people do business in other places, but they need to leave that shit at the door.

      Absolutely. And really, this might be how things are done elsewhere, but it is never acceptable. I'm unfamiliar with the Chinese restaurant/massage parlor comment, but these practices need to be stamped out wherever they are. Cultural relativism is criminal when it is used to excuse crimes like this.

      --
      "linux is just DOS with a UNIX like syntax" -- Galactic Dominator (944134)
    4. Re:Unacceptable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      You noticed that the story is about US locals doing those thing to alien working for them, right?

      Yes, the US locals Trinath Chigurupati and Sateesh Yalamanchili were the ones who did this. If the guy you replied to had bothered to read the article he would have known that!

    5. Re:Unacceptable by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      This is about crime. Did someone claim that there is no crime in the USA? Note that the accused perpetrators are being prosecuted and will, if found guilty, go to prison.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    6. Re:Unacceptable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      Because indigenous US locals would have had different sounding names?

    7. Re:Unacceptable by wayward_bruce · · Score: 1

      Those things happen in other places, perpetrated by similarly shady characters, but people like you only bother to note the name of the country. Whereas things happening in the U.S. are

    8. Re:Unacceptable by wayward_bruce · · Score: 1

      (borked the preview) ...attributed to individuals, or in the worst case, companies. You may rest now knowing that people like you elsewhere will now think of the U.S. business in general doing this sort of thing.

    9. Re:Unacceptable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you even read the article? It was clearly stated that one of the two dudes arrested was an Indian citizen. The citizenship of the other dude was not stated.

    10. Re:Unacceptable by kabloom · · Score: 4, Funny

      Trinath Chigurupati, a 36-year-old Indian citizen living in Monmouth Junction, was arrested at his home Wednesday and released on $150,000 bail.

      I think that's a pretty good statement that a foreign citizen was involved.

    11. Re:Unacceptable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Chicago way.

    12. Re:Unacceptable by jbssm · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This behavior is unacceptable from companies that have offices in America. That might be how people do business in other places, but they need to leave that shit at the door.

      How is the parent comment rated insightful? It was US company and at least one of the crime perpetrators was a US citizen from New Jersey. It was the victim that was foreign.

      Seems to me the shit was in the US to begin with and was the people from outside US that were used to good business practices that stand up against it from the story !

      Man, then you ask why we Europeans think that Americans are full of crap ! At least in such obvious cases at least give the trouble to actually read the article before coming to advertise your country is the greatest thing this planet ever saw in all recorded history.

    13. Re:Unacceptable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hey hey hey now, let's not bring massage parlors into this. no need to get crazy.

      besides, they pass the savings onto us, the customer.

    14. Re:Unacceptable by Required+Snark · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Your are so wrong when you imply that this is not an intrinsic problem in the US. It is, in fact, the corporate standard behavior for US business. Workers, clients, and investors are all disposable, and exists only to fill the bank accounts of the corrupt executive class.

      Here are some examples from today's headlines. And by today I mean this week!

      http://thinkprogress.org/2010/04/17/alec-massey-mine/

      Yesterday, the AP reported that Marlene Griffith, a widow of William Griffith, one of the 29 men killed in last week’s explosion at a coal mine in West Virginia, is suing Massey Energy, the owner of the mine. Griffith filed a wrongful death lawsuit in Raleigh County Circuit Court, arguing that Massey’s handling of work conditions at the mine plus its history of safety violations amounted to aggravated conduct that rises above the level of ordinary negligence.

      ...

      Responding to the lawsuit, Nathan Coffey, the Public Affairs Coordinator of the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC), took to Twitter yesterday to mock Marlene Griffith. Coffey posted a link to the AP story about Marlene Griffith, sarcastically commenting that “Everyone wants free money!”

      http://www.businessweek.com/news/2010-04-18/goldman-s-staged-explosion-deserves-apology-roger-lowenstein.html

      As only someone from Mars doesn’t know by now, Goldman allegedly sold collateralized debt obligation, or bonds backed by mortgage securities, to institutional investors without disclosing that the specific securities were handpicked by hedge-fund manager John Paulson. Paulson was betting on the securities to fall and, for that reason, structured the securities to include losers -- not winners.

      http://www.zerohedge.com/article/yesterday-germany-today-uk-tomorrow-world-goldmans-response-lawsuits-everyone-q1-stub-bonuse

      As expected, the line of people preparing to sue Goldman is now longer than the posers who bought the iPad on launch day. Reuters reports that British Prime Minister Gordon Brown, who himself has been in hot water over his much lamented decision to sell UK's gold despite protests from the BOE and likely under the guidance of Goldman and JPM, wants an investigation into the Goldman affair by the FSA, and is saying that impacted UK banks will be considering legal action. Furthermore, GB slammed Goldman after the TimesOnline reported that Goldman will pay $5.6 billion in bonuses for just three months work, including 600 million pounds for London-based staff.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetar_Capital

      According to reports by ProPublica/National Public Radio/This American Life that came out in early April 2010, Magnetar "sponsored" mortgage-backed collateralized debt obligations by agreeing to buy the worst tranche (portion) of the CDO, the "equity tranche". The reports claim that Magnetar then shorted (bet against) those CDOs by buying credit default swaps that insured the CDOs. If the CDOs failed, Magnetar would get back many times its initial investment in the equity tranche by receiving the insurance payoff.[2][4]

      --
      Why is Snark Required?
    15. Re:Unacceptable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually I know a girl who works at a "massage parlor" (no, I didn't meet her there). The's Korean, not Chinese, but I don't think that changes anything. She isn't trapped there, beaten, or anything like that. For whatever reason, she wanted to come to the US. She couldn't find a legal route, so she chose the illegal one. She had to pay something like $10k, and came in under a student visa or something. She paid it back relatively soon, and is free to leave if she wants.

      She is trapped in the sense that if she quits, she will have to find another way to pay the rent without needing a clean ID or resident status. But she can change shops, work at a restaurant or any place she can find instead, marry a citizen, or go back to Korea any time she wants. I've met a bunch of her friends, and the situation is the same.

      They are all nice people, and don't particularly love their job, but it's an easy and mostly safe way to make money without needing a proper visa. (I say "mostly" safe, because there are times when the shops have been robbed by scary people).

    16. Re:Unacceptable by hedwards · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The irony is that while the US does a better job of dealing with corruption involving foreign officials we have 11 million undocumented workers a significant portion of which are at best indentured and at worst actual slaves. There's an embarrassing number of actual slaves living and working in the US as we speak and for whatever reason they aren't freed. The authorities do look for them, but unless people happen upon them and report it there isn't a lot that can be done by law enforcement.

    17. Re:Unacceptable by ErikZ · · Score: 1

      No one is stopping you.

      The question you should be asking yourself is "Why haven't I don't anything about the Chinese Restaurants and Massage parlors?"

      --
      Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
    18. Re:Unacceptable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nowhere in the OP do I see him saying "advertising" that America "is the greatest thing this planet ever saw in all recorded history."

      Seems to me that you're an obnoxious prick on a high horse.

    19. Re:Unacceptable by silentcoder · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry - no, this behavior is unacceptable no matter WHERE you are. It may be easier to get AWAY with elsewhere, that doesn't make it OKAY there, or anywhere.

      --
      Unicode killed the ASCII-art *
    20. Re:Unacceptable by TheLink · · Score: 1

      Maybe that bit was outsourced too ;).

      A: "I don't care how you meet your SLAs and I don't want to know".

      B: "OK. Don't worry, we're just going to smack him a bit, no permanent damage that sort of thing."

      A: "SHUT-UP! Lalala, I didn't hear you...".

      --
    21. Re:Unacceptable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everywhere in the world where there is the possibility of "making a lot of money fast" it will attract people with a "criminal mind".

      You see it in construction work, waste (like dumping radioactive waste in sea, http://trendsupdates.com/radioactive-waste-dumping-in-mediterranean-by-the-ecomafia/ ), weapon production etc.

      And in IT, some agency's ask high rates for consultants (e.g. 150 euros/hour) with employees who have to "pay back their education costs" when they would like to leave (with their own employees doing the education...), and the worst of it is, that the intelligent "criminal minds" work on the edge of what is legal. And it works, greed works, it makes them rich and powerful.

      just follow "big money" and you will see criminals, everywhere in the world, no difference between US and any other country.

      And whenever a criminal mind feel threatened it will switch to it basic primitive reaction: agression, they even put it on their own website ( http://www.comdataus.com/aboutus.html ):

      About US:

      Successful
      Aggressive ---
      Productive
      Dynamic

      Just some of the ways professionals describe ComData Consulting.......

    22. Re:Unacceptable by MartinSchou · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You think that's bad? Here's something to think about. It is illegal to import goods into the USA that have been manufactured by prison labour. Not just for sale, but also things that you might have on you during your vacation. Oh, and this goes for interstate as well.

      But the US uses prison labour to manufacture various things. Are license plates still made in prisons? If so, that does seem to go against this particular law every single time you cross a state border. How about all the circuit boards that IBM and Compaq have or used to have made by prison labour?

    23. Re:Unacceptable by dkf · · Score: 1

      This behavior is unacceptable from companies that have offices in America.

      No, that behavior is unacceptable, anywhere. Using strong-arm tactics to stop people from claiming their rightful pay is tantamount to slavery (or at least indentured servitude, which is slavery's close cousin) and it is always wrong.

      One of the few ways in which western civilization can claim to really be morally superior is that we stop this shit. OK, imperfectly sometimes, but even so we try our best. If we as a civilization can't do something without slavery, it's simply not worth doing; it's that important a core value.

      (Yes, I feel strongly about it!)

      --
      "Little does he know, but there is no 'I' in 'Idiot'!"
    24. Re:Unacceptable by Chrisje · · Score: 1

      While the people mentioned in the article were surely of Indian descent, they *are* indeed U.S. Locals just like the Li Pings, Pedro Gonzales', Jacob Weinblatts, Umfufus, Herman Meyers, Jean Grosjeans and Patrick O'Donnells of the United States. And for what it's worth they seem to have adapted well to the view most of the world has about New Jersey. Not because of the Sopranos, but because of stories of rings of dirty Rabbis getting arrested, the general reputation of New Jersey and some of the jokes Jon Stewart makes.

      Having said that, I do mind the

      That might be how people do business in other places,

      statement. Quite frankly, I think this is much more how you do business in the US than, say, Holland, Sweden, France or many other countries in Europe. So when you talk about leaving that shit at the door, the shoe fits but not on my foot, if you know what I'm saying.

    25. Re:Unacceptable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is a lot of this kind of thing going on right here in Europe, and there are bucketloads of arrogant euro twats just like the American one(s) above who are just as full of crap. I'd hate to be judged based on a lot of people I know around here.

      As far as the story goes, these people should be hit with the full power of the law regardless of what country they grew up in.

    26. Re:Unacceptable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dude, those were other Indians...

    27. Re:Unacceptable by Chrisq · · Score: 1

      No one is stopping you.

      The question you should be asking yourself is "Why haven't I don't anything about the Chinese Restaurants and Massage parlors?"

      If the US is anything like the UK, in the first case they are mostly family and would all happily deny that anything went wrong. In the second case they are often run by the Russian mob and any action is likely to get you a concrete overcoat.

    28. Re:Unacceptable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For all your US prison labour made shopping needs:
      http://www.unicor.gov/

      More than just license plates indeed.
      It's actually scary to think what "made in USA" means, seeing this.

    29. Re:Unacceptable by Civil_Disobedient · · Score: 1

      that does seem to go against this particular law every single time you cross a state border.

      Ah yes, well that's because other countries' prisons are awful, terrible places where people are regularly beaten and raped and murdered. So we can't import any of their prison-goods because we'd just be supporting criminal regimes and the inhumane treatment of prisoners.

      Nothing at all like our prisons, where inmates regularly get massages and pedicures and watch soap operas all day in perfectly safe, almost resort-like cells. Cells!... what am I saying? I meant luxury suites!

    30. Re:Unacceptable by Fred_A · · Score: 1

      You think that's bad? Here's something to think about. It is illegal to import goods into the USA that have been manufactured by prison labour.

      Everybody knows the US has always functioned on the basis of "Do as I say, not as I do".

      Why do you hate America ? ;)

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    31. Re:Unacceptable by Ltap · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, with cases like these, the people arrested will be the footmen - the guys who did the dirty work rather than the ones that made the decision.

      --
      Yet Another Tech Blog
      (but so much more, including game and movie reviews)
      http://yanteb.peasantoid.org
    32. Re:Unacceptable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yep, they don't sound sioux nor apache nor cheyenne

    33. Re:Unacceptable by operagost · · Score: 1

      Yes, because one American on Slashdot didn't read an article, it is indicative of all Americans. You're the one who has a problem, Captain Generalization. By the way, the article mentions that one of the perps is an Indian citizen, so how does he get a pass?

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    34. Re:Unacceptable by jbssm · · Score: 1

      No, sorry, at least 6 Americans didn't read the article, because beside the idiot that posted the parent comment, you have 5 other marking it as insightful. Did you chose to forget that part or you simply didn't think about it?

    35. Re:Unacceptable by MartinSchou · · Score: 1

      Well, since I live in a socialist country, I obviously hate you for your freedoms, but don't you worry! Your politicians are hard at work at solving that by removing all your freedoms.

    36. Re:Unacceptable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it's hilarious. The guy should have just told them to "waste him". I'd love to see a couple of nerdy little Indian fucks just try to do something.

      If it had been me, I'd have shot them both in the head when they came to my house and told the police that it was an attempted home invasion. Problem solved.

    37. Re:Unacceptable by triffid_98 · · Score: 1
      1. U.S. Local implies (at least to me) that they were born here. There are huge cultural differences between our country and well, lots of other places that happen to include India. Handing someone a green card does not make them suddenly have the same world-view as someone born into it. I am by no means saying the the United States is free of corruption, merely that it is frowned upon, illegal and not the norm as it is in some other countries.

      2. France is probably not something you should tout as an example. The disenfranchised minorities living in their slums are none to happy, as evidenced by the large riots in 2005, again in 2007, and most recently in 2009. This is bound to intensify as more and more of their workforce is replaced by immigrant labor. Currently this sits at around 10%, but with E.U birthrates at roughly 1.5 per woman, the percentage of immigrant labor is bound to increase sharply in the coming years.

      While the people mentioned in the article were surely of Indian descent, they *are* indeed U.S. Locals just like the Li Pings, Pedro Gonzales', Jacob Weinblatts, Umfufus, Herman Meyers, Jean Grosjeans and Patrick O'Donnells of the United States.....statement. Quite frankly, I think this is much more how you do business in the US than, say, Holland, Sweden, France or many other countries in Europe. So when you talk about leaving that shit at the door, the shoe fits but not on my foot, if you know what I'm saying.

  3. Note To "Goombahs" and Other Wannabes by IonOtter · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Geeks live for this sort of crap, so don't try it.

    You will lose.

    --
    [End Of Line]
  4. Free Market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Why shouldn't a company be allowed to do this in a free market? The Market is self-correcting, so if they do this then no one will work for them and they will go bankrupt. So let them do it, that is the American Way!

    1. Re:Free Market by Speare · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If they do this, then no one will work for them and they will change names and thrive. See Blackwater (nee Xe), Anderson Consulting (nee Accenture), AirTran Airways (nee ValueJet), Philip Morris (nee Altria), and perhaps as a zombie counterpoint, Caldera International (nee SCO Group).

      --
      [ .sig file not found ]
    2. Re:Free Market by russotto · · Score: 1

      If they do this, then no one will work for them and they will change names and thrive. See Blackwater (nee Xe), Anderson Consulting (nee Accenture)

      Andersen Consulting changed its name as a result of a dispute with their parent company Arthur Andersen which also resulted in Andersen Consulting becoming independent of Arthur Andersen. Further, they did so prior to the discovery of Arthur Andersen's crookedness in the Enron mess. They did not change their name to attempt to cover over any wrongdoing on their part.

    3. Re:Free Market by SteveFoerster · · Score: 5, Informative

      Good examples, but FYI the word "née" works the other way around.

      --
      Space game using normal deck of cards: http://BattleCards.org
    4. Re:Free Market by colinrichardday · · Score: 1

      Shouldn't that be Altria, nee Philip Morris?

    5. Re:Free Market by Speare · · Score: 1

      Cool, thanks for the correction. I thought it was direction-neutral. Looked up the etymology.

      --
      [ .sig file not found ]
    6. Re:Free Market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      They did not change their name to attempt to cover over any wrongdoing on their part.

      You say "tomato", I say their fucking thieves. It's all good.

    7. Re:Free Market by Gorbag · · Score: 3, Informative

      Even staunch libertarians don't condone fraud.

      --
      -- I speak only for myself
    8. Re:Free Market by Ogre332 · · Score: 1

      You forgot Xfinity (nee Comcast)

      --
      Shut up brain or I'll stab you with a Q-Tip. - Homer Simpson
    9. Re:Free Market by timmarhy · · Score: 1
      it would be if the workers were free to leave. hint free market has 2 sides to it.

      your a perfect example of a penis attached to a forehead.

      --
      If you mod me down, I will become more powerful than you can imagine....
    10. Re:Free Market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Thanks, as a Frenchman I was really confused by this unknown English abbreviation.

    11. Re:Free Market by Sir_Lewk · · Score: 1

      Slightly different. Comcast didn' change their company name, just the brand name of their main service package. Same reason though.

      --
      "linux is just DOS with a UNIX like syntax" -- Galactic Dominator (944134)
    12. Re:Free Market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That comment goes very well with your sig..

    13. Re:Free Market by Rasperin · · Score: 0, Troll

      Not true, Accenture was created in 2000 2 years after Enron. They used to be known as Andersen Consulting (yes a subsidary). And they only broke off to there own branch because it was melting and a lot of the executives thought that would be an easy way to hide. Source: I worked for them, I have the entire company history as a booklet and the seminar they take you through explain that you may have a bad rap because of it. They may be trying to change there history now, they were then. Such as, Enron also employed there IT workforce. Some food for thought.

      --
      WTF Slashdot, why do I have to login 50 times to post?
    14. Re:Free Market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Whatever the reason was for the name change, Andersen Consulting was indeed a *former* subsidiary (a spin off) of Arthur Andersen. In fact long before 2000, Arthur Andersen was suing Andersen Consulting because Andersen Consulting (originally, the original IT consulting arm of Arthur Andersen) had gone into Management Consulting (the original province of its former parent company) and Andersen Consulting was using the name confusion between the two to its own advantage.

    15. Re:Free Market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I think he was refering to the knighs who say Nee? Though for the life of me I can see no connection to the story...

    16. Re:Free Market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      née is used to indicate a women's family name, are you sure it may be used in this context? Did those companies get married?

    17. Re:Free Market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > your a perfect example

      His what? And shouldn't there a verb?

    18. Re:Free Market by Undead+Waffle · · Score: 1

      Probably not the best example. Altria (symbol MO) owns Philip Morris USA (according to the description at http://www.google.com/finance?q=NYSE:MO) and Philip Morris International (PM) operates outside of the U.S. So they really only changed their name in the U.S.

    19. Re:Free Market by Aceticon · · Score: 1

      "Née" means "born" in French.

      The word "née" is often used in official documents when refering to a married woman who took her husband's family name when she got married but before had a different name, for example Mrs. Smith née (born) Brown.

      So it should be Accenture (nee Anderson Consulting) not the other way around.

    20. Re:Free Market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The... American Way... the way that brought depression to the world... Yeah let's do it this way!

    21. Re:Free Market by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      "Née" means "born" in French."

      Ichi Ni?

      Scratch'em den.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    22. Re:Free Market by ultranova · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Even staunch libertarians don't condone fraud.

      True, they just oppose a government powerful enough to do something about it.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    23. Re:Free Market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let the strong enslave the weak, and there will be liberty and justice for all!

    24. Re:Free Market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      'Née' means 'born as'. So you need to turn your examples around.

    25. Re:Free Market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh. You really comfused me there until I worked out what you'd done.

      Just to let you know, "Nee" is used to denote the original name, not the current name.

    26. Re:Free Market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      For the record, Anderson Consulting was legally obligated to change its name. Also, this happened before the Enron scandal and was not the entity involved in said scandal -- that was Arthur Anderson.

    27. Re:Free Market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Enron was exposed after 2000.

    28. Re:Free Market by cloudscout · · Score: 1

      I suggest you go reread that booklet. Andersen Consulting completed its spin-off from Arthur Andersen in mid-2000 after a two-year legal battle. The Accenture name became official later that year (I happen to have a copy of both their original Indian Certificate of Incorporation and their "Fresh Certificate of Incorporation Consequent on Change of Name" which is dated December 5th, 2000). The Enron scandal surfaced in October 2001, 3 years after Accenture began its separation from Arthur Andersen.

    29. Re:Free Market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, they oppose a government that doesn't allow honest companies to go about their business.

    30. Re:Free Market by colinrichardday · · Score: 1

      That applies to the others as well, "nee" goes with the original (born) name.

    31. Re:Free Market by sjames · · Score: 1

      Even more amazingly, if actually busted for criminal activities, they get to spin the money making parts into "independent" entities that go on, leaving just a shell as a fall guy. The actual person equivalent would be to be caught dead to rights for murder so you clip your fingernails and the clippings are prosecuted and jailed while you go on your merry way with a new name.

    32. Re:Free Market by BoberFett · · Score: 1

      Powerful government frequently encourages such behavior.

    33. Re:Free Market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even staunch libertarians don't condone fraud.

      True, they just oppose a government powerful enough to do something about it.

      They oppose a monopoly in the provision of legal services. I see no reason to assume competing services wouldn't be effective. I see many reasons to assume competition would make them more effective.

    34. Re:Free Market by sac13 · · Score: 1

      Even staunch libertarians don't condone fraud.

      True, they just oppose a government powerful enough to do something to participate in it.

      There, fixed that for you...

      Libertarians don't believe in NO government... We simply believe that the purpose of government is to protect people's rights to life, liberty and property. Fraud is a violation of those rights.

      Keep in mind, monopolies (the real kind, not the x company controls 60+% of y market that people like to whine about even though real alternatives exist) don't exist, but for government intervention. Without ridiculous government immigration policy, you don't have the sorts of things going on that the article describes.

      Libertarians are completely against H-1B's. We're for opening the borders to any that wish to come and end these insane policies that perpetuate all of the abuses of human rights.

  5. Abuse of Restaurant Workers by linzeal · · Score: 5, Interesting

    When I was an undergrad I used to eat across the street from the Engineering building at a small Vietnamese restaurant, it was cheap and hot.

    One particular late night I came there with a few hours of Hydro HW, sat down and ordered some Pho and started taking my stuff out of my backpack when I heard this inhuman scream and a slap. I thought they were being robbed or something and froze there in terror until I started hearing the crying and "shhhhhh" sounds I remember all too well from a Catholic school upbringing, someone was being beaten in the back and whoever was doing it was trying to stop other people from finding out. I am ashamed to say it but I went outside and smoked a cigarette, ate the Pho and left as quickly as possible. I think I even left a tip. The next week I came in during the day to get something and the woman behind the counter had a fading welt in the shape of a belt across her face and she was smiling.

    So, after that shameful moment of realization I went to the Women's Resource Center on campus and told them. Never found out what happened though, that woman's face behind the counter haunts me to this day. Too many of just do nothing when we know the shitty situation those workers find themselves in.

    1. Re:Abuse of Restaurant Workers by Anpheus · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Don't. Do. Nothing.

    2. Re:Abuse of Restaurant Workers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you mean:
      Don't, do nothing.
      or Do something?

    3. Re:Abuse of Restaurant Workers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Viet, eh? That's actually a cultural thing. Women are regularly beaten if they dont work "properly."

      I'm not excusing it... just saying that it doesn't have much to do with the "restaurant" part of it... more to do with the Vietnamese part...

    4. Re:Abuse of Restaurant Workers by The+Wild+Norseman · · Score: 3, Funny

      Do you mean: Don't, do nothing. or Do something?

      The latter. Of course, I don't know why anyone has to explain it; it was really quite not unclear.

      --
      "A government is a body of people usually -- notably -- ungoverned." -Shepherd Book
    5. Re:Abuse of Restaurant Workers by shentino · · Score: 5, Insightful

      When leaving only gets you dragged back and beaten twice as hard for escaping, it's not really an option.

      Escape is a gutsy move, sure to piss off the captors and it may even cost you your life.

      The lion's share of the burden rightly falls on outsiders who are not as easy to catch, and are in a much better position to summon the cavalry.

    6. Re:Abuse of Restaurant Workers by WrongSizeGlass · · Score: 4, Funny

      Will you guys please stop channeling Yoda when giving advice?

    7. Re:Abuse of Restaurant Workers by WrongSizeGlass · · Score: 1

      "My name is Luka, I work at your restaurant ... "

    8. Re:Abuse of Restaurant Workers by v1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Contrary to what you might think, she could leave if she wanted to.

      VERY common misconception where domestic and foreign worker violence is involved. No, a lot of the time these people don't believe they have a choice. By the time things have progressed to this point, most of them have it pretty thoroughly engrained in their minds that offering any form of resistance, to say nothing of reporting the problem, will only lead to intensified beatings, to the point of severe injury or death. These people are controlled by fear. Fear of worse beatings. Fear of death.

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    9. Re:Abuse of Restaurant Workers by fm6 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      would you turn off Rush for a few minutes and do some actual reading? Try Googling "human trafficking". I think you'll find that many undocumented immigrants live under conditions little better than slavery.

    10. Re:Abuse of Restaurant Workers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      in soviet Russia, Yoda channels you!

    11. Re:Abuse of Restaurant Workers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      For a very graphic, but eye-opening look at what domestic abuse can be like, take a read though this book. Disclaimer: I am a friend of the author, but I had no idea it could be as bad as this book makes it out to be. It's written by someone who deals with domestic abuse situations every day, and says that the book is toned down compared to what really goes on.

    12. Re:Abuse of Restaurant Workers by carlzum · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Excellent point, I wish I had mod points. I don't think people understand that foreign workers are often more vulnerable than they were at home. They're isolated from family, financially dependent on their employer, and trapped in a society that's alien and frightening to them.

      And what if they do leave? Assuming their immigration status allows them to quit and seek assistance, they could take refuge in a shelter for a while and possibly scrap together food and rent if they're lucky enough to find a minimum wage job. Sadly, dealing with the abuse and staying put may be their best option.

    13. Re:Abuse of Restaurant Workers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I rather think he was channeling the Sopranos...

    14. Re:Abuse of Restaurant Workers by saturndude · · Score: 1

      Number 5 is "a beowulf cluster of these" if I remember correctly. Or number 7.

    15. Re:Abuse of Restaurant Workers by Aceticon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      VERY common misconception where domestic and foreign worker violence is involved. No, a lot of the time these people don't believe they have a choice. By the time things have progressed to this point, most of them have it pretty thoroughly engrained in their minds that offering any form of resistance, to say nothing of reporting the problem, will only lead to intensified beatings, to the point of severe injury or death. These people are controlled by fear. Fear of worse beatings. Fear of death.

      It works like bullying: eventually the victim's own fear means instant compliance with the bully's wishes.

    16. Re:Abuse of Restaurant Workers by AGMW · · Score: 4, Funny

      in soviet Russia, Yoda channels you!

      in soviet Russia, Yoda you channels!

      There ya go ... for you fixed it is.

      --
      Eclectic beats from Leeds, UK
      handmadehands.co.uk
    17. Re:Abuse of Restaurant Workers by ultranova · · Score: 1

      It works like bullying: eventually the victim's own fear means instant compliance with the bully's wishes.

      You're thinking of a thug. A thug bullies people to get them to obey him. A bully, on the other hand, is in it for the pain. He bullies people because he enjoys that, not because there's any other reward for it. A sadist, in other words.

      It is important to make the difference between selfish and malicious evil. Selfish evil is rational, at least to some extent, but malicious evil is insane.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    18. Re:Abuse of Restaurant Workers by Nathrael · · Score: 2, Informative

      You should stop worrying about other peoples plights so much, you'll live longer.

      I hope you are aware that it were the people who *did* care are also the ones responsible for your right to actually spout that garbage of yours.

      --
      A good education is a bit like a STD - it makes you unsuitable for a lot of jobs and gives you a desire to spread it.
    19. Re:Abuse of Restaurant Workers by Venik · · Score: 1

      I find this American concern for the well-being of Vietnamese women rather touching.

    20. Re:Abuse of Restaurant Workers by martyros · · Score: 4, Insightful

      They're isolated from family, financially dependent on their employer, and trapped in a society that's alien and frightening to them.

      And whose legal and cultural system they don't understand. There's a quote from movie, where a factory owner in London is trying to get one of his workers, a woman illegally immigrated from Turkey, for a sexual favor. He basically says, if you don't do it, I'll report you to the government, and they'll throw you in jail. "And British jail is not like your Turkish jail, where the men and women are kept separate. If you go to jail you will be raped every night, over and over again." 100% bullshit, but 100% effective.

      --

      TCP: Why the Internet is full of SYN.

    21. Re:Abuse of Restaurant Workers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I take a different viewpoint to this.

      I let people get violent with me; basically it's like being angry at a brick wall. I've dealt with a lot of abuse, I know how their minds work.

      I don't move, they try everything and get tired, then I suggest the best way to resolve the situation and they go with it because there is no other choice.

      I allow them to believe they are in control, sometimes I jive them, sometimes I entertain them, let them try it their way, and let them frustrate themselves.

      If, however, the situation is there and if they force me to be desperate and begin threatening me trying to force control; Once that line is crossed, there is one warning.

      "Do not make people desperate; that will only motivate them to kill the source of their desperation".

      If this does not stop them, then I kill them.

      It is amazing what you can do with a knife, a large trunk, a few extra-large trash bags and a few bottles of febreeze.

    22. Re:Abuse of Restaurant Workers by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Contrary to what you might think, she could leave if she wanted to. You should stop worrying about other peoples plights so much, you'll live longer.

      People of all nationalities commonly hire family to work in restaurants in the USA because you don't have to pay benefits, or in some cases even minimum wage. She was probably related to whoever she's working for, probably lives with them, and if she quits the job she's going to have to run away from home. You want her to throw everything she has and knows away to be homeless and existing on the sufferance of social services (at least for a time) in order to avoid abuse that's probably less serious than what it's like where she came from... and where she's going back to without a green card. Sounds like slavery to me. And it's not necessarily something that's easy to do. Perhaps you could tell us about the time you were being beaten by your father while working in a restaurant in China.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    23. Re:Abuse of Restaurant Workers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      These people are controlled by fear. Fear of worse beatings. Fear of death.

      Not so much. It may surprise you the majority of fear stems from deportation, not death. Many locals are illegals, or have family members abroad held hostage from being smuggled into America as ransom for any disobedience. Whether Mexican or Asian, local ethnic communities even in your city have gangs and organized ethnic mafioso which prey upon their own. So, what does it say about a person, and the country they are from, that will gladly weigh the cost of a beating against their own, or a friends, to at least reside in America.

    24. Re:Abuse of Restaurant Workers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they are illegal immigrants, they are not allowed to work in the US, so "find a minimum wage job" is not an option. Also, their family back home is held liable for the exorbitant fees for smuggling them into the country, so just letting themselves be deported is not an option -- they need to pay back the money somehow.

    25. Re:Abuse of Restaurant Workers by Phoobarnvaz · · Score: 1

      Worked at a major fast food restaurant in the late 80's. My bosses boss was in the store. I was detained for about 2 hours to do some cleaning & such so he wouldn't have to call in someone else for someone who had called in sick. I was not happy & squealed my tires on the way out of the parking lot. The next day...my boss called me into his office...slammed me against the wall & told me...while holding me to the wall...that if I ever pulled that sh!t again to make him look bad...he would make sure I would never forget this & that talk. Heard that his boss & him were indicted for fraud in another state. Never heard if they went to jail...but if so...hope they enjoyed being held against their will as some guy about 4 times their size discussed the situation with them.

      --
      Don't worry about the world coming to an end today. It's already tomorrow in Australia. - Charles M. Schulz
    26. Re:Abuse of Restaurant Workers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Americans don't care about brown (or yellow) people.

    27. Re:Abuse of Restaurant Workers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Contrary to what you might think, she could leave if she wanted to.

      Yeah. And if you don't like your shitty, abusive job, you can just quit and find another one. Or start your own business and become independently wealthy. If the gubmint doesn't steal it all from you, on account of we're Taxed Enough Already..

      Yeah. And the Prince married the beautiful young orphan girl and she became a Princess and they lived Happily Ever After.

    28. Re:Abuse of Restaurant Workers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Contrary to what you might think, she could leave if she wanted to. You should stop worrying about other peoples plights so much, you'll live longer.

      Contrary to what you think, it's readily apparent that you are subhuman.

      At age 7 my old man forced me to shit my pants by denying me access to a bathroom, and then forced to go out in public with kids I went to school with, after screaming at me for doing it deliberately even though I'd been begging him to let me use the bathroom, as punishment for shitting my pants.

      At the same age I was whipped with a 1/2" wide leather strap and forced to sleep outside for being right in an argument with my old man. At 10 I was whipped and grounded for 3 months for defending myself when a bully decided to screw with me, even when the bully's parents told my parents their kid got what he deserved, and my parents had listened to the entire situation. My old man used to laugh when my older brother would bully me in front of him, and then punish me when I would finally fight back. He got a great kick out of it, and thought it was great fun. That was a regular occurrence in my life.

      At the same age I was whipped because I gave a girl I liked a note telling her how much I liked her and my brother found out about it. He got me whipped for that "major infraction", and many other times too. He was a manipulator who could convince my parents that I was evil. They would punish me on nothing more than his say so. It didn't matter if he did the same thing I had done either. I'd just be told that they didn't care what he did, but that I was the problem and I was the one to get punished.

      By the time I reached the 7th grade my older brother was sexually abusing me. After I got married he'd get off on telling me how I was everything that was wrong with America. The toxic attitude towards me in my family was so pervasive that even my little brother told me I wasn't worth knowing and that we could never be more than casual acquaintances.

      I can tell you that I wished many a time that some outsider would have stood up for me. There were people who knew I was being abused, but no one did a damn thing. By doing so they condemned me to a life of hell as I had no where to go, and was too afraid to tell anyone as I didn't think any one would believe me.

      You assholes that don't know what it's like to be abused are always willing to tell someone else what they should or shouldn't do. To tell the truth, I have no doubt that you are an abuser yourself. They always like to defend abuse and say how being abused is the victim's fault so no one should worry about it.

      When a person knows what they're looking for, abusers stand out like a sore thumb. They publicly broadcast their presence by what they say. So, you can be sure there are people who know just what you are by talking to you in every day life, and by reading your posts here. You can't really hide, even though you might think you can hide your dirty deeds. Your very words betray you, asshole.

      So, go fuck yourself asshole.

      BTW, is that you, Bill? It sounds just like you.

    29. Re:Abuse of Restaurant Workers by operagost · · Score: 1

      would you turn off Rush for a few minutes and do some actual reading?

      I don't know what your problem is. I'm perfectly capable of listening to Geddy Lee shred atrocious bass lines while taking in a good novel.

      By the way-- you're a douche.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    30. Re:Abuse of Restaurant Workers by sjames · · Score: 1

      Sure, all she has to do is steal all of her documentation back (ID, green card if any, etc), find a new job, rent an apartment all in one quick action and nowhere near where she lives now. OH, and overcome the psychological damage being in such a situation creates in the first place, possibly overcoming a lifetime of negative cultural conditioning in the process.

      So I guess you're right for sufficiently small definitions of could.

    31. Re:Abuse of Restaurant Workers by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 1

      And be prepared for the shit storm that is sure to follow.

    32. Re:Abuse of Restaurant Workers by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      In all fairness, we don't care for most other Europeans either.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    33. Re:Abuse of Restaurant Workers by fm6 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it's so inconsiderate of me to point out your ignorance.

    34. Re:Abuse of Restaurant Workers by Vertigo+Acid · · Score: 1

      Pho Thanh still treats their workers like shit, but I don't think Mr. Long beats people these days. I know a girl who worked there for a few months; they treated her better than the other women because she's white.
      Mediocre pho, cheap prices, and indeed very convenient.

      --
      Beta is bad enough to make me go edit settings like this sig that haven't been touched since I joined
    35. Re:Abuse of Restaurant Workers by Ajaxamander · · Score: 1

      "Dirty Pretty Things" is the film you're referencing starring the lead actress from Amelie, if I'm remembering correctly.

    36. Re:Abuse of Restaurant Workers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Many times they are also illegal immigrants paid a measly wage under the table and told that they will be arrested and possibly arrested, imprisoned, tortured, and/or deported if found out. Room and board is provided at a rate that leaves the person indefinitely indebted to whoever paid to ship this person across the ocean. Basically, they are wage slaves.

    37. Re:Abuse of Restaurant Workers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, after that shameful moment of realization I went to the Women's Resource Center on campus and told them. Never found out what happened though, that woman's face behind the counter haunts me to this day.

      Good job, she'd probably been deported thanks to you

    38. Re:Abuse of Restaurant Workers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, don't be too hard on yourself. You DID something, and that's much more than most people can say about themselves.

      Would it have been better if you had done something right away? Perhaps, perhaps not, but it doesn't matter. You were too shocked, so it's entirely understandable you didn't do anything right away, but you DID get back to it the next day and report the whole thing.

      And in fact, that's even less common. Even people who would act in the heat of the moment might just shrug it off the next day and say and do nothing, but you did.

      So while it may not mean much coming from a random AC on Slashdot - kudos to you. You did the right thing. Who knows, maybe you were the one who changed this woman's life for the better.

  6. Mistakes Were Made by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not that I advocate that sort of thing, but when I worked for local uhmm...businessman as a young hoodl..er...turk, we did more than talk. We made the sale with a sample of the wares. We also offered to send samples to his fam...uh associates. We were always 100% successful and no outside competitors were needed to uh... close the sale. When you mean business, you show it, you don't say it. It's a tough world out there and you gotta get your pound of flesh, uh so to speak. I think the guys in the old ...union...would get a chuckle out of these amateurs.
                I've aged gracefully and the old "union" sort of fell apart due to dea..chronic illness and incarcer..early retirement. I've got a Joe Shmoe job now that is far less hazardous and I never had to suffer any of the usual "illnesses" associated with the job. Too old for that crap now.

    1. Re:Mistakes Were Made by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cut the crap and answer the quetion: vi or emacs?

  7. Re:Let it begin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    try talking about changing the h1b visa laws so that h1b visa holders can change companies when they want to and get paid real us wages for work in the us..

  8. Re:Let it begin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You just couldn't wait to play the race card, could you?

  9. From the ComData Web Site by fm6 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Our Talent Engagement and Management Teams strongly believe in

    • Relationships built on openness and trust
    • People centric atmosphere
    • Team building culture with 360o feedback between management and employees
    • Achievement of a qualitative work life
    • Flexible work culture with family first attitude

    The capacity of recruiters for absolute BS is amazing. Mind you there are smart ethical headhunters out there, but they're few and far between.

    1. Re:From the ComData Web Site by deniable · · Score: 1

      Talent Engagement And Management TEAMs. That's officially double-speak.

      Family first attitude. Yes, that family.

    2. Re:From the ComData Web Site by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      360 feedback = We spin you around until you agree

    3. Re:From the ComData Web Site by sunderland56 · · Score: 1

      The web site also has a "Carreers" section that lists their job "opporttunities".

      Pro tip: you may not want to work for a technology-based company that can't spell check their own web site.

    4. Re:From the ComData Web Site by turbotroll · · Score: 1

      The capacity of recruiters for absolute BS is amazing. Mind you there are smart ethical headhunters out there, but they're few and far between.

      Having enough of experience with recruiters to write a book, I can only confirm this. While there are always honest exceptions, you simply have to treat a recruiter like shit unless you want them to do the same to you.

    5. Re:From the ComData Web Site by fm6 · · Score: 1

      Another tip: don't bother with a recruiter who tells you a listing is "urgent". A sure sign they're screwing with you. Also a waste of time to let them submit you below the going rate.

    6. Re:From the ComData Web Site by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Team building culture with 360o feedback between management and employees

      Translation: we promise to not hit you *just* in the face with the bat. Wouldn't want you to get bored, amirite?

      Flexible work culture with family first attitude

      Translation: Our family, not yours. *Your* family can starve to death for all we care.

  10. Re:Let it begin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The H1B program deserves to be bashed, mindless or not. It artificially depresses the IT job market by flooding it with workers who are easy for companies to bully or take advantage of. These workers allow themselves to be treated like crap because they cannot leave their jobs without risking getting sent back to India. Most of them are afraid to speak up when they are treated unfairly because #1, they feel like they have it better than they did in India and #2, they don't know their rights in our country.

  11. Let Com Data hear from you by shis-ka-bob · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Email to info@comdataus.com. If you have hiring authority, promise never to use them. If you don't have hiring authority, just remember the name and badmouth them to anyone who does.

    --
    Think global, act loco
    1. Re:Let Com Data hear from you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because a company can't change their name?

    2. Re:Let Com Data hear from you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Anyone notice how "careers" is misspelled on their website? That alone would cause me to NEVER use their services, because if you can't proofread your own damn website, what guarantees are there that you pay attention to detail in whatever work you provide?

    3. Re:Let Com Data hear from you by QRDeNameland · · Score: 2, Informative

      I heard they're going to change their name to Webistics.

      --
      Momentarily, the need for the construction of new light will no longer exist.
    4. Re:Let Com Data hear from you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      YOu will never hire directly from them. The contracting companies and recruiters you use will hire from them. And those middlemen would not care, not one bit.

    5. Re:Let Com Data hear from you by cffrost · · Score: 1

      Anyone notice how "careers" is misspelled on their website? [...]

      Send your resume and an email; point that shit out to them. You've got a sharp eye for details; maybe they'll offer you a job!

      [I]f you can't proofread your own damn website, what guarantees are there that you pay attention to detail in whatever work you provide?

      Clearly they've got a lot of work that needs to be done, so they're probably too busy to babysit while you're working. And should you fall behind, hey... Forget about it!

      --
      Thank you, Edward Snowden.

      "Arguments from authority are worthless." —Carl Sagan
  12. um, let the restaurant wokers document/report by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    their abuse, there are no psychic cops; report crime, document crime, be free

  13. Re:Let it begin by clarkkent09 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    try talking about changing the h1b visa laws so that h1b visa holders can change companies when they want to

    Umm, they can.

    and get paid real us wages for work in the us

    The law already requires that. The abuses arise from the difficulty in defining the "real us wages for work in the us".

    --
    Negative moral value of force outweighs the positive value of good intentions.
  14. Re:Let it begin by Sir_Lewk · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Here is an even better idea: Lets change the immigration laws so that if someone wants to work in the US, they can quickly and easily acquire citizenship. I assert that anyone who wants to be an American citizen enough to ask to be, deserves to be. All of this isolationist shit should have died along with the 20th century.

    If we just grant these people citizenships, then we won't have to worry about the ethical ramifications of having multiple legal classes of workers in the country.

    --
    "linux is just DOS with a UNIX like syntax" -- Galactic Dominator (944134)
  15. How many years? by tompaulco · · Score: 5, Interesting

    20 years for extortion, and how many years for falsifying the need for entry level IT workers? I can name several unemployed people who could easily fit the task of "web development, information technology and software development" mentioned in the article. Specialized skill, yeah right.
    Judging by the content of recruiters e-mails that I get, it is not possible to get an IT related job in the United States right now unless you are an H1-B visa holder.

    --
    If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    1. Re:How many years? by John+Hasler · · Score: 3, Insightful

      > Judging by the content of recruiters e-mails that I get...

      And, as we all know, there is no more reliable source of information than recruiters.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    2. Re:How many years? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've worked in IT for 20+ years.. I've worked with a lot of decent QA and developers who were on H1B, but none of them had any specialized skills that every QA / dev I've known didn't have. There might be some legitimate need for H1B, but it's most definitely abused most of the time.

    3. Re:How many years? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Get some perspective you arrogant self entitled fuck."

      Stay classy BitZtream, an insult always makes a sound argument more convincing - or is that just the bad crank talking?

      "The Internet has put a lot of people in the world on equal footing ..."

      Did you read the story? It was about a guest worker in the United States, who was owed prevailing wages, which are not anywhere close to the levels you're talking about.

      No offense there buddy, but I sense a bit of anger, resentment, hostility and maybe a bit more here. Perhaps it would be best for all if you just stayed right where you are.
      Given your post, if you're earning at the level you indicate (about 52 times less than a US-based Engineer), I would judge that's probably about what you're worth.

    4. Re:How many years? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or maybe the system is stupid, and "abusing" it is the only way to get something approaching sensible. Demanding that foreign workers posses special skills that no US worker possesses is silly. I don't think most people in the US realize how hostile their requirements for work visas are compared to most countries in the world.

    5. Re:How many years? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uhm I didn't have any problem getting an IT job and staying in it for 10 years, with no Visa. (Now I left the US and went to another country and needed a working Visa...).
      Why do Americans assume immigration only works one way. There are a lot of countries with different supply and demand levels. If you are really good you can get a job anywhere, visa or not. On the other hand, for the really low level jobs that anyone can do (like cutting and pasting Java), it's going to come down to who can do it the cheapest. That should be obvious.

    6. Re:How many years? by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1, Interesting

      "For people who are supposed to be intelligent, it never ceases to amaze me that developers are amazingly ignorant of the way the economy really works."

      It ceases to amaze me that an intelligent person like yourself is not aware of tax law and fixed costs such as a head tax on hiring American workers.

      A few years ago, I read that it costs about $14,000 a head in taxes for most fortunate 500 companies. With an H1B1 its about $0.

      So if they can hire an entry level system administrator for $15,000 a year (about the going price for a fresh student in India) then I would have to work for $1,000 to match it. Can I do that under minimum wage laws?

      Either get rid of head tax or apply it for foreign hires. Then we have fairer capitalism.

    7. Re:How many years? by DavidTC · · Score: 1

      There is a supply of workers that are as qualified as they need to be that will work for far less.

      Yes, if by 'will work', you mean 'can be threatened into working'.

      Did you even read the fucking summary?

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    8. Re:How many years? by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Indentured workers are easier to manipulate than normal employees so that's what they want. There is a certain type of US manager than didn't get the point that slavery is bad and they want to get as close to it as the law will allow. When you export them to places like Australia they almost need a lawyer following them 24/7 to whisper common sense in their ears and keep them out of jail.

    9. Re:How many years? by ClosedSource · · Score: 1

      "Demanding that foreign workers posses special skills that no US worker possesses is silly."

      Well, that's the fundamental justification for the existence of the program. Without that, there's no reason why a certain class of businesses should receive special treatment.

    10. Re:How many years? by ClosedSource · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "If you are really good you can get a job anywhere, visa or not."

      Sure, as long as you have money to bribe people and you keep your head down in the boat.

    11. Re:How many years? by ultranova · · Score: 1

      Indentured workers are easier to manipulate than normal employees so that's what they want. There is a certain type of US manager than didn't get the point that slavery is bad and they want to get as close to it as the law will allow.

      Unregulated capitalism leads to slavery, because reducing your employees to that helps drive down costs, thus increasing profits. This is something many people at all levels of society seem to fail to understand, despite the rather dramatic demonstration during the Industrial Revolution.

      And no, slavery is not bad... for the slave owner.

      When you export them to places like Australia they almost need a lawyer following them 24/7 to whisper common sense in their ears and keep them out of jail.

      Most other places haven't been cursed by leaders who stick to an ideology even as it's proven wrong by reality since the Soviet Union fell.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    12. Re:How many years? by Ogive17 · · Score: 1

      My girlfriend works as an interpreter (she is Japanese but got BS and MBA in US). Last year around this time her work visa was revoked, her employer spent 5 months and thousands of dollars to get it re-instated. It was an incredibly long and stressful process for her, the company had to jump through hoops proving that this was a job that could not be readily filled by US citizens. Being able to translate verbally is one thing, being able to translate documents is completely different and a very unique skill in the US.

      Experiencing what she had to go through was horrible (not to mention my personal fear that she'd get shipped back to Japan with no prospect of coming back). It seems so rediculous how easy it is for foreigners to get a visa in the IT field when the skills are universal... meaning so many Americans have them.

      --
      "Action without philosophy is a lethal weapon; philosophy without action is worthless."
  16. Re:Let it begin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What, exactly, is mindless about citing this heinous shit as a fine reason for not supporting H1B corporate slavery?

  17. New Career Choices in IT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why didn't anyone tell me this earlier? I didn't know I could use my computer science degree to intimidate people. So here is my resume future iron fisted IT companies.

    I'm 6'6", 220 lbs and I have a black belt in mixed martial arts. Also I have a degree in computer science, and some other degrees...wait ignore that part the first part is more important for what you need me to do.

    Get back to me as soon as possible

    1. Re:New Career Choices in IT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would you consider yourself morally flexible?

    2. Re:New Career Choices in IT by Sulphur · · Score: 1

      black belt in mixed martial arts

      Feedback. Everything is a communication problem.

  18. Is the recording admissible? by Lord+Byron+II · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Under Illinois law, you can only audio record if all parties are made aware of the recording. If this guy was recording surreptitiously, then he might be in for some legal trouble of his own, not to mention that the recording may or may not be admissible (IANAL).

    1. Re:Is the recording admissible? by Rick+Zeman · · Score: 4, Informative

      Under Illinois law, you can only audio record if all parties are made aware of the recording. If this guy was recording surreptitiously, then he might be in for some legal trouble of his own, not to mention that the recording may or may not be admissible (IANAL).

      If you RTFA you'd see a) it was NJ, not Illinois and b) On Feb. 4, the two men met him again at a restaurant and offered to pay $5,000 for him to recant his story, authorities said, adding the consultant had gone to federal authorities by then and was outfitted with a hidden recorder that captured every threat.

    2. Re:Is the recording admissible? by machine321 · · Score: 1

      FTFA:

      On Feb. 4, the two men met him again at a restaurant and offered to pay $5,000 for him to recant his story, authorities said, adding the consultant had gone to federal authorities by then and was outfitted with a hidden recorder that captured every threat.

    3. Re:Is the recording admissible? by Fishbulb · · Score: 1

      FTA, the employee had gone to the authorities, who were apparently already investigating them. Likely, they wired him. Which would be fully admissible.

    4. Re:Is the recording admissible? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      There are two aspects of law that apply to audio recordings.

      First, you can't use it as evidence (without having a warrant that says that a specific recording can be made). So, while you couldn't take it into court, you certainly could use it to go to the police and convince them very effectively to investigate further. And if the criminals are using such amateurish standover tactics, then odds are pretty good that basic police investigating will be enough to charge them soon afterwards.

      Secondly, it's an invasion of privacy. Even - for some funny reason - in a public place (hey, I didn't write the law). But, odds are extremely low that you'll be charged criminally, since the DA has better things to do than charge victims, and criminals aren't usually going to go to a civil court to say that they've been recorded illegally when the illegal recording in question identifies their own much more illegal activities.

      I'm not saying I advocate means-to-an-end/fight-evil-with-evil solutions; I'm just saying that, pragmatically, someone who makes an audio recording of a crime doesn't have much to worry about on account of the recording itself. So you're completely correct, but none of what you're correct about matters very much in practice.

      Also; that's not what happened anyway. It was a recording with a warrant (and not in Illinois), so none of what either of us said applies.

    5. Re:Is the recording admissible? by PieSquared · · Score: 1

      Yes, that wouldn't be admissible under Illinois law (to the best of my understanding, IANAL). Or the law of 11 other states. In New Jersey (where this took place) and most other states in the union, you only need one party's consent.

      --
      Does a line appended to your comment give your post meaning in and of itself, or only in relation to those without?
    6. Re:Is the recording admissible? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know, most people just say IANAL. You don't have to demonstrate it. Really.

    7. Re:Is the recording admissible? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WHAAAAAAATTTT???????????

      So, someone threatens your life, you record it and use it as evidence so it is more than your word vs. theirs and then you get in shit for providing proof?? You must be crazy or the law is crazy.

    8. Re:Is the recording admissible? by PjotrP · · Score: 1

      What is the IT coming to when your own soldiers start wearing wires? In the old days whatever happened in the IT, stayed in the IT. You didn't talk to outsiders, and if there was a problem you went to a Capo. Now, with all these immigrants it's hard to run a proper IT family... IT is quickly becoming like waste management, it's a dying way of doing business.

      --
      PjotrP
    9. Re:Is the recording admissible? by BrentRJones · · Score: 1

      Rick, If I had a recording of me talking with 3 terrorists planning to blow up some federal building, would I not be able to use it? Would I be liable to arrest for hidden recording?

      As a public high school teacher I have often thought of hiding a video camera doing constant recording of class. I have been assaulted several times and kids often curse me out. Yet, because I am in Illinois I can't legally do this??

      Brent Jones [at] brentjones . org

      --
      Help end the use of Sigs. Tomorrow
  19. Revolting by MarkvW · · Score: 1

    This is exactly why we have criminal law. There is a special place in hell for people who take advantage of vulnerable people, but while they are here on earth we have another place for them--prison.

    I'm outraged.

    1. Re:Revolting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      There is no hell or god you idiot, this world is so screwed up exactly because of pathetic feeble minded religious tards like you.

    2. Re:Revolting by carlzum · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I lived in a small town on the Jersey shore and the tourist industry was controlled by organized crime. There were things like pizza shops that stayed in business without customers, suspicious fires, business owners being "encouraged" to sell, etc. Each summer an army of Mexican workers would appear out of thin air to staff the restaurants, hotels, and beaches. I figured it made sense with New York City near and the promise of work.

      A few years ago, it came to light that the local mob was working with Mexican mobs to traffic in seasonal workers across the state. They were working for next to nothing, usually tricked or coerced into service by Mexican criminals.

      Like you said, it was revolting. A lot of them were teenagers or young families with kids. It was a very small town, but we never saw them in school or playing outside. Police found homes with 70+ people crammed in every room. They were apparently told to stay out of sight and spent months with young children shut inside day and night.

    3. Re:Revolting by Rasperin · · Score: 1

      Same place in hell that people who talk in movie theaters go?

      --
      WTF Slashdot, why do I have to login 50 times to post?
    4. Re:Revolting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is one other places where a lot of these people reside.

      GIANT MANSIONS! and Other bit important buildings.

      The White house is one of said buildings...

    5. Re:Revolting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SHHHHHH we are supposed to be against ICE raids remember?

  20. Problems - since 2008 - some listed listed here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative
  21. Re:Let it begin by happyemoticon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They should be able to quickly and easily get a citizen-track visa or green card, but if we just grant citizenship to everybody who wants it, people will just be citizens for as long as it is convenient - say, as long as it takes to acquire the knowledge to offshore a process or function. There is every reason to give green cards to hardworking people who want to live and die in America, but I can't fathom why we want guest workers - except to hold down domestic wages.

  22. Recruiters lie, get everything in writing by onyxruby · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I remember years back being lured to a new job with one of the incentives being that the job included health insurance. Turned out that they 'had' it terms of it was offered, not included. It was an awful plan with no employer cost coverage. The cost for my family would have been a grand a month if I had paid for it.

    I explained that I was one phone call from going back to where I came from and that the recruiters deceptive words were going to have a cost. In the end they ate the cost of the insurance, and I stayed where I was. Some people will bully you unless you stand up for yourself. All that being said, in today's economy I don't know if that is still good advice.

    How about accountability in H1B with public records? That would solve this kind of problem for the poor guy who was owed so many back wages. Those in the states who are losing out to H1B's would better be able to make the case that their are Americans who can do the job. Those that do come over could avoid being turned into virtual slaves, I have met far too many H1B's who were worked 80 hours a week for wages less than half what an American would take. They would do it too, whether it was because their passport was confiscated or because such wages were still that much better than what they made at home.

    1. Re:Recruiters lie, get everything in writing by DavidTC · · Score: 1

      The problem is that 90% of the workers have no idea of their rights under the law.

      For example, confiscating someone's passport is illegal.

      People cannot legally transfer the ownership of their passport to someone else. No country allows this, with their own or anyone else's passport. It is not possible to legally own a passport issued to someone else, with possibly the exception of a minor or getting one from a deceased person's estate. People can, of course, let some else possess it, but they still own it. (Technically, their issuing country may own it, but they are in charge of it.)

      And, hence, the temporary possessor must give it back when asked, just like they have to give back a car they've been loaned. (Which applies despite who the legal owner is...the employee at the car rental place doesn't own the car, but he can lend it to you, and he can demand you give it back.)

      If they do not, they have committed theft by misappropriation. If someone loans you something of theirs (or someone else's they are in charge of), and then wants you to give it back, you, duh, have to give it back. It's not even debatable.

      And that's just the common sense law.

      On top of that, there are plenty of laws in general about:

      a) What employers can do. Namely, they cannot demand you loan them your property, even if they give it back. That's a wrongful termination suit just waiting to happen.

      b) Passports. I suspect it's not legal to ask to see someone's passport at all. Employees should be asking to see US work permits, aka, a green card or a work visa or whatever, not documents issued by some other country that have no bearing on whether or not someone can be employed in the US. In fact, it's illegal to base hiring decisions on someone's country of origin.

      We really need to stop letting companies abuse people. It's bad for the abused, it's bad for everyone else who now has to put up with depressed wages, it's bad for the economy in general. But it's very very good for companies, and it's very very good for any Congressentities they own.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    2. Re:Recruiters lie, get everything in writing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some people will bully you unless you stand up for yourself. All that being said, in today's economy I don't know if that is still good advice.

      Of course it is still good advice, what are you thinking? Hard times might make you more likely to accept less money or benefits, that's just reality in times when there is less to go around. Never accept reneging on promises or contracts to be acceptable though, if these are not honoured you have no basis with which to rebuild prosperity. Honouring commitments is crucial to civilisation, it is a concept central to our society. Insist on it.

  23. Professional Coyotes? by beadfulthings · · Score: 4, Informative

    This is fascinating in light of the recent lawsuit filed and won in Louisiana on behalf of a group of teachers from the Philippines who were brought here to teach and virtually held hostage by the agency that recruited them. (They won their lawsuit a few days ago--can't recall the more recent source.) Their visas were held by the recruiter as they were squeezed for ever-increasing fees, forced to rent substandard housing at exorbitant rates, and otherwise abused.

    It's especially fascinating to me that in these recessionary times when recent American college graduates can't find work, we have to import elementary and high school teachers and people with the most basic IT skills so that they can be held in indentured servitude and squeezed for more and more money. I guess human trafficking is no longer limited to unskilled workers.

    --
    "Here's what's happening. You're starting to drive like your Dad..." - Red Green
    1. Re:Professional Coyotes? by Renraku · · Score: 1

      Let's just say that they aren't being imported because there's a high demand for foreign work. They don't have skills that American workers don't have.

      Why are we importing them, then?

      Because we can treat them like slaves because most of them are ignorant to the laws in the USA. They see it as a land of opportunity and are willing to work for less than decent wages to get their feet in the proverbial door. No one usually tells them that they'll have ever-increasing debt the likes of which we haven't seen since corporate script in miner towns was common, though.

      We're importing them because someone's making money off it. The recruiting agencies, head hunters, human trafficking rings, etc. All of them get a cut of the already-low wages of the immigrant worker.

      --
      Job? I don't have time to get a job! Who will sit around and bitch about being broke and unemployed then?
    2. Re:Professional Coyotes? by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      This makes me sick.

      (disclaimer: my wife is a teacher)

      I was listening to the radio a month ago where an activist mentioned the ultra conservative economist Milton Friedman. He had a hand in using Katrina as an excuse to ban the teachers unions in Louisiana and force privatiziation ... you know because no qualified teachers were left after the hurricane. He mentioned that good teachers were finally going to get paid for what they are worth and privatization would scare enough teachers and give the tax payers a break and would be a utopia.

      Turns out the fired teachers were replaced by slaves. Wow ... and privatization is always better? I hate unions but I think having a teachers union is nice if you are a teacher. I find this totally unacceptable when it takes 6 years of school to become a teacher and slave laborers run to come in.

      I wonder if these economists and market purists every hear stories like this? Do they think its better as non-teachers will be richer? Or do they think people can all still be happy at$15k a year because that was good back in 1935 ... bla bla.

    3. Re:Professional Coyotes? by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      Your article is a great reason why big government is not that bad.

      Neo-conservatives cheered when Katrina hit Louisiana as they could finally fire the teachers and privitize schools with non union teachers. I never would have thought they would go this far. I would be upset as a parent if a slave with limited English were in charge of teaching my children phonics.

    4. Re:Professional Coyotes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The answer is quite simple: Friedman, Hayek and the others of their kind are criminals who take away the wealth for which "ordinary" people have worked very hard only to line their own pockets and those of their friends in big business.

    5. Re:Professional Coyotes? by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      The funny thing is that a lot of foreigners don't realize that the American lifestyle that they see is based on a heavily indebted society in general. I recently read a story about Ukrainian "mail order brides" who were coming over to the U.S. to marry husbands who they believed to be wealthy, only to be shocked to find out that their new husband's house was heavily mortgaged and that his fancy car was also largely owned by the bank. Apparently mortgages and credit purchases in general are a lot less common in the Ukraine, and these women didn't understand that most U.S. home "owners" don't actually *own* their houses (we only own a share in conjunction with a bank, sometimes a very small share).

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  24. Can I go undercover? by pspahn · · Score: 2, Funny

    It would not only be a fun and refreshing change from "normal" work, it would create so many new networking opportunities. Think of all the great and influential people you would meet!

    --
    Someone flopped a steamer in the gene pool.
  25. Re:Let it begin by BitZtream · · Score: 0, Troll

    All of this isolationist shit should have died along with the 20th century.

    You are utterly ignorant.

    I suggest before you start talking about how 'isolationist' America is, you get a few facts about how many people legally immigrate to America every year.

    If we just grant everyone in the entire world who asks for it citizen ship then we'll effectively turn America into the worst of 3rd world nations over night.

    We can help other people, no argument there, but we can't be fucking retarded like you suggest or we won't do anything but hurt EVERYONE, them AND us.

    If we just grant these people citizenships, then we won't have to worry about the ethical ramifications of having multiple legal classes of workers in the country.

    What? Why? What logic did you use to establish that? If we make them 'legal' they'll still be the exact same workers as before doing the exact same jobs.

    If they want to work, they'll still work under the table. You can report people for paying under the table but a lot of times the company that 'pays' you will just disappear and you'll be unemployed.

    In whatever Utopina fantasy universe you imagine it may be possible for America to support the entire world, but in case you haven't noticed, supporting our own internal population growth isn't sustainable, let alone taking in others.

    Here is an even better idea:

    No, thats a thoughtless idiotic idea spit out by some idealist with no actual connection to reality what so ever.

    We are not all equal. We never will be. We never have been. There will always be members of our species that do better in some situations than in others. If you want to live in a world with no classes you'll find the only thing you accomplish is getting run over by someone with far fewer delusions.

    --
    Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
  26. Re:Let it begin by bluej100 · · Score: 1

    Allowing everyone to obtain citizenship also means it's a fiscal impossibility to guarantee any level of income or health care. Having a limitless green card program is politically intractable enough; a limitless citizenship program is hard to imagine this century.

  27. Re:Let it begin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Sheesh, where did your entitlement come from? Unless you're a fucking Native American, you'd best STFO and be happy that your ancestors illegally immigrated here lest you be born into some "awful non-US country."

  28. Be careful what you wish for. by AnonymousClown · · Score: 2, Interesting
    If what you wanted were to happen, all of those smart people - the millions of them - would emigrate to the US and drive wages down so far, that unless you had some sort of protection like the AMA or BAR, you'd be making minimum wage and I'm sure a black market would open up for others to work less.

    As it is, having a h1-b or having to physically move overseas or creating some sort of relationship over there, has kept us from sinking that low - but it will happen eventually. I don't see the World's economy growing fast enough to account for all the labor being added as more and more countries start trading with the rest of the World.

    --
    RIP America

    July 4, 1776 - September 11, 2001

  29. Re:Let it begin by SirWinston · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You can't say it's always "mindless" to "bash the whole H1B program, all Indian techies and Indian call centers"--there are a few who do it out of prejudice, but most Americans complain about these things for perfectly rational reasons.

    "Buy American and Americans work." That was the well-advertised slogan of the 80s, and yet NAFTA and outsourcing empowered a transnational corporate world in opposition to the very values of localism and national pride which most Americans grew up embracing. Importing foreign workers and exporting American jobs are some of the most visible violations of these values.

    The oft-repeated mantra is, "We don't have enough skilled workers, so we need H1B!" Then why does almost anyone in the tech sector know many skilled but unemployed Americans? And if there were a real shortage, introductory salaries and incentives would let the "free market" attract more Americans to become qualified for tech jobs in the near future--but instead, H1B keeps introductory salaries and incentives artificially low and _creates_ the very shortage tech employers complain about!

    "Call center work (or 7-11 clerking, or construction, or industrial farm work, or any 'unskilled labor') is drudgery no Americans are willing to do!" Bullshit. Maybe they won't do it for minimum-wage-or-less like immigrants or outsourced labor, but if not unfairly undercut by immigrants or outsourcing there are millions of Americans who would gladly work any and every job. Just look at the damned unemployment rate, especially among minorities--it is patently unjust and unreasonable to support immigration and job outsourcing when so many Americans are left jobless. If a job is vital and needs to get done, employer and employee will find the right pay each is willing to live with--the market will set fair pay in a fair, largely closed system. But in an open system filled with endless hordes of immigrants and outsourced labor willing to work for wages no American can live on--unless he's willing to live in a closet and eat the cheapest processed foodcrap imaginable and never even dream of supporting a family and kids--employees become a disposable commodity and employers will exploit the unjust and unnatural imbalance.

    So, while what happened to this H1B guy is inherently unfair, criminal, and wrong--it is the foreseeable result of the H1B program, which along with outsourcing and uncontrolled immigration is creating an imbalanced market where workers both skilled and unskilled are disposable commodities instead of people.

    And that doesn't even begin to touch on the cultural issues. The Western world, and especially the U.S., is currently committing cultural suicide by not limiting immigration to rational levels. We are a nation built on immigration, that's true--but it has never neared this uncontrolled torrent before: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=5871651411393887069#

    --
    "It's a damn poor mind that can only think of one way to spell a word."--Andrew Jackson
  30. Re:Let it begin by tehdaemon · · Score: 2, Insightful
    "but in case you haven't noticed, supporting our own internal population growth isn't sustainable, let alone taking in others."

    Your numbers are at least 50 years out of date. The only reason our (US) population growth is even positive is due to immigration. (direct immigration and children of first time immigrants) If zero population growth isn't sustainable, we have bigger problems than immigration to worry about.

    The fact that your facts are so off makes me doubt the rest of your argument.

    T

    --
    Laws are horrible moral guides, moral guides make even worse laws.
  31. Re:Excuse me? All criticism has been well earned. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Really? Let's see, I'm a newly minted H1B. My wages here are $15k above the wages that the role was offering (so I'm nicely into six figures before bonuses and stock). I've been coding for 20+ years, I've been brought in to upskill the team and bring those 20 years of experience to bear, I'm leading the development of a small product, pushing code quality, dealing with other teams, users and the wider open source community.

    But then I'm British. So why don't you just say what you mean? That you don't rate Indian developers. Don't try to hide behind the H1B programme - you have a problem with a sub-continent, and you're tarring everyone from there with the same brush.

  32. Close; also 100K+ American teens at high risk. by Oxford_Comma_Lover · · Score: 5, Informative

    > Try Googling "human trafficking". I think you'll find that many undocumented immigrants live under conditions little better than slavery.

    Close. Actually, I think you'll find that many undocumented immigrants live in conditions of slavery. To the extent where the only real distinction is that the law--which they don't know anyway--says that it's illegal.

    You'll also find that hundreds of thousands of American teens are at high risk for being kidnapped or tricked into a life of slavery. Sources: The Polaris Project, Terry Lee Wright's River of Innocents, Victor Malarek's The Natashas.

    Not that we should care whether it's an immigrant or not. And the difference in the cultures of different immigrant groups make different techniques useful in finding and prosecuting human traffickers. But it's not really an immigrant problem, so much as a human one.

    --
    -- IANAL, this isn't legal advice, and definitely isn't legal advice for you. Also, Squee!
    1. Re:Close; also 100K+ American teens at high risk. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One more source that would be worth a look: love146.org

      They work specifically with child sex slavery and human trafficking both in American and abroad. There's nothing quite like a parent who sells their child off as a prostitute at age 5

  33. Extortion is common by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Extortion was very common at BellSouth a few years ago when I worked there as a contractor. The majority of contractors were H1Bs from India. They were working 50-60 hour weeks but were told to only charge 40 if they wanted to keep their jobs. It wasn't the contracting firms putting the squeeze on them; it was Bellsouth management putting pressure on them to meet deadlines without charging overtime. Their rates were undercutting local contractors and with them only charging 40 hours for 60 hours of work, there was no way to compete, so I bailed.

  34. Yes and no. by Oxford_Comma_Lover · · Score: 4, Informative

    > This behavior is unacceptable from companies that have offices in America. That might be how people do business in other places, but they need to leave that shit at the door.

    I agree. We have to change it. But it's not just a foreign problem.

    This is New Jersey. If you haven't heard a story about something like this happening in New Jersey, you haven't been listening. It's like not hearing a story about questionable behavior by waste contractors in several of the nation's major cities, or not hearing about racism on the part of law enforcement in some towns in the South. Sure, there are lots of legitimate businesspeople, and waste contractors, and helpful law enforcement officers. But the other kinds also exists and even thrives. Sure, sometimes its people bringing in their problems, but we have a lot of our own.

    --
    -- IANAL, this isn't legal advice, and definitely isn't legal advice for you. Also, Squee!
    1. Re:Yes and no. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I can assure you that it is not just happening in New Jersey.
      I'm sure that if presented with this and 3 others to congress they would say that "These are isolated incidents and have no bearing on the overall benefit of H1-B's and possible abuse of H1-B's".
      I tend to believe that where there is smoke there is fire. People have been reporting smoke for a long time and I have actually seen fire.
      It's rather frustrating that given the economic situation congress goes along and does what it's monetary supporters demand, I mean request.

      I think I hear more and more talk of US being closer to a third world country and am beginning to wonder if we haven't already slipped farther in that direction than we think. You know where there's smoke there may be fire. It's already given that the US dollar is going to be dropped as a major trading commodity, after that maybe Glen Beck will really have something to cry about. Well at least he won't have to go to China to get his skirts, he can get them made with the US label.

    2. Re:Yes and no. by operagost · · Score: 1

      It's already given that the US dollar is going to be dropped as a major trading commodity, after that maybe Glen Beck will really have something to cry about.

      He's been warning people about this for a long time, so your criticism of him is a bit ironic. Maybe if you actually watched a show or read a transcript instead of getting your information from the Daily Kos, you would know that.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    3. Re:Yes and no. by RalphTheWonderLlama · · Score: 1

      Here's something he said:

      With a deadpan, Beck insists that he is not political: "I could give a flying crap about the political process." Making money, on the other hand, is to be taken very seriously, and controversy is its own coinage. "We're an entertainment company," Beck says. He has managed to monetize virtually everything that comes out of his mouth. He gets $13 million a year from print (books plus the ten-issue-a-year magazine Fusion). Radio brings in $10 million. Digital (including a newsletter, the ad-supported Glennbeck.com and merchandise) pulls in $4 million. Speaking and events are good for $3 million and television for $2 million. Over several days in mid-March Beck allowed a reporter to follow him through his multimedia incarnations, with one exception, his 5 p.m. daily show on Fox News, which attracts just under 3 million viewers.

      --
      simple, fast homepage with your links: http://www.ngumbi.com/
  35. People unclear on the concept by swm · · Score: 1, Interesting
    Extortion only works in two cases
    • the extortionist is the government (see also: taxes)
    • the government has abdicated sovereignty over the victim (e.g. drug dealers, prostitutes, bookies, loan sharks)

    IT staffing firms don't fall into the first category, and web developers don't fall into the second.

    1. Re:People unclear on the concept by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      duh, what the fuck are you talking about.

      How about... everything else that's been talked about all thread? or the article itself?

      I'm pretty sure extortion is when you extort a lower price out of someone than they would ordinarily be willing to provide...

  36. Re:Let it begin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Thanks for the link - the video makes sense when you consider the illegal aliens. But I sincerely doubt H1B program is causing any significant amount of population growth in the United States. The 6yr cap, the dismally low Green card numbers leading to decades of wait periods, the very volatile IT job market, the fact that most h1-b workers are brought by outsourcing companies which by definition means that they are temporary (2-3 year average stay in my experience) - this all means that H1-B people are may be not even be significant to cultural, environmental and all the other issues pointed out in that presentation.

  37. Re:Let it begin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Wow, another mindless rant full of misconceptions, Where should I start?

    The H1B's (as opposed to "outsourced jobs") are paid the same as an American worker would. So, please learn the difference and understand to place your indignation in the right place. The H1-B Program is a legitimate way for companies to be competitive. You should be holding your representatives and senators accountable for updating the rules and enforcement to root out these types of fraud. But it is easier to "bash the whole H1B program, all Indian techies and Indian call centers". In this case, the angst is misplaced and done out of ignorance or malice. People who engage in this are, quite frankly, ignorant and will willfully throw the baby out with the bathwater. Call your senator and congressman and tell them to fix the H1 Visa program.

    Anecdoatlly, I feel that the mantra "We don't have enough skilled workers, so we need H1B!" is actually accurate when taken in context - and for two completely different reasons. One is that you're lumping all "skills" together: a Web Developer is NOT a good systems administrator or a DBA. So, you do get spot shortages of specific skillsets in places. The second is that the Indian software industry focuses on developing niches more effectively than in the US. Our kids are well rounded - they're not as good at being specialists in a given field. So, I can locally find a guy who can figure out his way in a given system (makes for a great supervisor of contract resources, BTW). But if I need someone who understands the intricacies of the SAP-HR module, it is more efficient to get a contract specialist. This is where companies that staff using H1-B's excel because I (a) can't keep this specialist busy and productive 40/hr a week month-after-month and (b) he won't ever be remotely interested (even if he does have the skills) in taking on a more flexible role.

    In short, the above has been my experience.in the past 15 years of being in IT and then in SW Development. I have found that many Americans workers detest working with Indian colleagues (regardless of whether they're H1-B or not). I find this racist and stupid in the extreme and this attitude really hurts them and gives American workers a bad name. I know that some managers will prefer to not mix US sourced folks with employees or contractors of Indian origin.

    I actually had a US Citizen turn down a 6month contract at $105/hr because he felt that the working conditions were not appropriate. His complaint: no assigned cube with window view and he reported to an "unqualified" supervisor ... which was code for someone of Indian background.

    So, I have a hard time finding sympathy with your post. Perhaps if it was a little more informed and researched, I might be willing to engage constructively.

  38. More! by b4upoo · · Score: 1

    Twenty years is not enough and I hope they sweep up the entire company!

  39. Re:Parent is NOT a troll by Score+Whore · · Score: 1, Funny

    Parent is NOT a troll.

    Oh yeah? How do we explain YOU then?

  40. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  41. Stock Options by DaveAtFraud · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The idiots from the IT outsourcing firm should have done it the "dot com" way. Under pay him by the same amount but promise him lots of stock options with absurd vesting requirements. Too bad if the the stock options go under water and then disappear through a corporate buyout.

    You may have better odds striking it rich in Vegas or by playing the lottery but stock options in lieu of salary are legal.

    Cheers,
    Dave

    --
    They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither safety nor liberty.
    Ben
    1. Re:Stock Options by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      The idiots from the IT outsourcing firm should have done it the "dot com" way. Under pay him by the same amount but promise him lots of stock options with absurd vesting requirements. Too bad if the the stock options go under water and then disappear through a corporate buyout.

      They can't do this anymore because of changes in accounting laws. Stock options used to be classified as an expense and were used as a tax write off. Today they are counted as owners equity.

      My cynicism tells me the changes were made by lobbying efforts from wall street to reduce the amount of shares in order to raise stock prices.

  42. Fear Re:Abuse of Restaurant Workers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    And fear of the unknown. Even being beat or dying doesn't hold a candle to the fear of the unknown. When people are in an abusive relationsihp, they often stay because the abuse and beatings they get here are at least known. Comparatively, they don't know if they leave _what_ will happen.

    Fear of the unknown stops people from many things: from leaving abusive relationships, to success in business and life. It's also a huge problem for guys wanting to ask a girl out.

  43. If this was me. by stimpleton · · Score: 2, Funny

    "We smack this IT geek around a little, take him for a nice car ride, threaten to 'take care of him' if he doesn't recant his story, give him 5 G's for his trouble, and badda boom, badda bing, case dismissed."

    We offered him a rig with DUAL SLI ATI Radeon 5970s and an i7 Extreme CPU with liquid cooling. Badda boom, badda bing, case dismissed

    --

    In post Patriot Act America, the library books scan you.
    1. Re:If this was me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We offered him a rig with DUAL SLI ATI Radeon 5970s and an i7 Extreme CPU with liquid cooling. Badda boom, badda bing, case dismissed

      That's how he knew you were lying, and why he brought in the feds. You can't SLI ATI cards, dumbass!

    2. Re:If this was me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We offered him a rig with DUAL SLI ATI Radeon 5970s and an i7 Extreme CPU with liquid cooling. Badda boom, badda bing, case dismissed

      You cant SLI ATI cards... Its called "Crossfire".

  44. Re:Let it begin by Jhon · · Score: 1

    "Call center work (or 7-11 clerking, or construction, or industrial farm work, or any 'unskilled labor') is drudgery no Americans are willing to do!" Bullshit.

    I'll agree with you, but for different reasons. Americans *ARE* willing to do these jobs. Hell, I did such work -- when I was 16 -- and for a couple of years after that. These are jobs (not necessarily construction or farm anyway) that have been traditionally done by high-school or college students trying to make some spending money. I honestly don't think a full time job serving burgers was EVER meant to support one person in economic luxary, never mind a family of four.

    When I was at age to work, the ethic in my house (and many other houses judging by my co-wokers) was "if you want money to spend, get a job". I think it's a good ethic. It teaches us a few lessons -- at an IMPORTANT time in our development -- independence, that "stuff has a price" and if we want more "stuff", we have to work harder or find a way to do without.

  45. How about the enabling law firms too? by sethstorm · · Score: 1

    Have that apply to firms like Grigsby & Cohen(known for their hostility to citizens in hiring practices) that as well.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  46. The reason why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    > Good examples, but FYI the word "née" works the other way around.

    You are correct, but you didn't explain it, and I think people will have a hard time remembering how it works if they don't know. The word née means "born" so it's like you're giving the birth name of a person. That's why you list their original name after the word née, e.g. Xe (née Blackwater).

  47. Re:Let it begin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    > but most Americans complain about these things for perfectly rational reasons.
    ha haha do you really believe that? No they don't, they do it for one of two reasons:
    1. They are racist, even if they don't want to admit it (though to be fair, it's usually more ignorance than racism)
    2. They are scared that they are going to lose their job to someone else.

    I remember when we had a lot of upgrade related tedium that nobody at my company wanted to do, so we hired an Indian company do do it. The white trash people in my company (who, remember, didn't want to do the work), started making silly complaints:
    "Doesn't India have like a 24 hour time difference?" No, and if they did, 24 hours would mean 0 hours. They don't mind working different hours to humor us, and it's better if they work off hours anyway, so they can get stuff done when we're sleeping.
    "But do they speak English? Probably only Indian" - yeah, there's no language called Indian, brianiac. I guess they didn't know that the official language of instruction at many many places in India is English.

    Also, the whole "Our Jobs" concept is bogus. There is work to be done. There is no place where god or satan defined which work is "our work". There's work to be done, and people willing to do it. If I live in New York, does that mean I should say people can't come from New Jersey to do it "My" New York work? I mean, get real. Bitching about people coming to the US to work will only result in the work being moved overseas instead, and the US will decrease in relevance.

    Oh yeah, Americans love a free market, when it works to their advantage. As soon as it goes against your advantage, then you don't like it. Part of capitalism is that you will earn the market price. With the world shrinking, and a lot of people overseas willing to work harder than americans for less pay, that market value is falling for many basic jobs. That's the way it is, get used to it - or you could just bitch about it some more instead. There are ways to insulate yourself from it and prepare, though. I suggest you read "the world is flat" for more about that.

    Anyway, as an American who had to go through a lot of hurdles to get a Visa somewhere else, I agree that the H1, and similar programs are not great - but in the opposite way. There should be no such requirement to get a Visa. That's just a hurdle to free market dynamics. I would vote that people should be able to move between countries in the future like they do states now, as the world shrinks. All the visa processing mainly just creates headaches for everyone. If anyone could simply move to the US or any other country they wanted (so long as they pay taxes, etc.), then a lot of people would come to the US, and realize that working at McDonalds there isn't any better than working at McDonalds in China or India, and go back. People with true skills would be able to get employed with less hassle, and if you ever got tired of bitching about how immigrants stole "your" jobs, you could go somewhere else and steal theirs. Some countries have taken a step in this direction (The Working Holiday program, which includes Canada, Autrailia, Japan, New Zealand, and a few others) - and it's been good for them in general. It hasn't lead to an explosion of illegal immigrants and the fall of society.

  48. Re:Let it begin by Rasperin · · Score: 2, Informative

    try talking about changing the h1b visa laws so that h1b visa holders can change companies when they want to Umm, they can.

    If the next company sponsors them, if they don't (it costs quite a bit) they can't. The worker also can't just up and quit his job like you and me either as they're isn't a grace period. Complaints usually end in a quick termination and then the person has a short period to be on the next flight back to home. Try filing a lawsuit while in a different country and not even being a citizen. It's a difficult situation. On the same note, I agree with making h1b's harder to get and more lax once you get them (aka a grace period of atleast 90days, higher wages based on average salary for similar positions, etc).

    --
    WTF Slashdot, why do I have to login 50 times to post?
  49. Re:Let it begin by aiosx · · Score: 1

    But in an open system filled with endless hordes of immigrants and outsourced labor willing to work for wages no American can live on

    Companies sponsoring H-1B employees are required to offer them a fair salary, which is meant to prevent cheap labor importation. From wikipedia's H-1B article:

    Employers must attest that wages offered are at least equal to the actual wage paid by the employer to other workers with similar experience and qualifications for the job in question

  50. Given unemployment, cancel these programs. by sethstorm · · Score: 3, Interesting

    There is no shortage of citizens that are capable of doing the job - they just have the problem of being a US citizen.

    Cancel the program and make it impossible to ignore the citizen until there is a real problem (long-term & short-term unemployment under 2%). Make it so that permatemping/temporary work does not count towards that 2%. Then reinstate with a sufficient amount of people(whom are paid a wage that discourages bribery) to enforce that law.

    When you hear "shortage" used to describe the amount of citizens in a needed part of the private sector(whether it is IT or most non-temporary forms of employment in the US), the source is lying through their teeth.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
    1. Re:Given unemployment, cancel these programs. by sjames · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Funny thing too, at one time a "shortage" of qualified people was a reason for businesses to contribute back to society by providing training and scholarship programs to get the people they needed. This, in turn, encouraged loyalty in both directions and so, long term employment. IF the H1B program is permitted to continue at all, the constraints should be expanded so that not only must the employer show that there are no qualified citizens or green card employees available but that there are none who could be qualified within a year (or two) with a training/educational program.

    2. Re:Given unemployment, cancel these programs. by pablodiazgutierrez · · Score: 1

      I haven't RTFA, but I work at the software division of a major hardware company, and we're struggling to find suitable candidates for 2 openings in my group. The 2-3 good enough candidates that we met went to other "cooler" companies. This is considering H1b candidates, so I can't imagine how hard it would be to get by doing business without them. The problem is not the idea, it's the implementation of the visa program, which should really be oriented to specialists, not code monkeys for consulting companies.

    3. Re:Given unemployment, cancel these programs. by sethstorm · · Score: 1

      The problem with that is it still gives them the opening to throw impossible requirements for US citizens.

      --
      Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
    4. Re:Given unemployment, cancel these programs. by sjames · · Score: 1

      They would have to enforce both the existing and new requirements a lot better as well, including making sure the H1B hired actually meets the requirements for the job as advertised.

    5. Re:Given unemployment, cancel these programs. by sac13 · · Score: 1

      There is no shortage of citizens that are capable of doing the job - they just have the problem of being a US citizen.

      Cancel the program and make it impossible to ignore the citizen until there is a real problem (long-term & short-term unemployment under 2%). Make it so that permatemping/temporary work does not count towards that 2%. Then reinstate with a sufficient amount of people(whom are paid a wage that discourages bribery) to enforce that law.

      When you hear "shortage" used to describe the amount of citizens in a needed part of the private sector(whether it is IT or most non-temporary forms of employment in the US), the source is lying through their teeth.

      I've seen that argument a lot in this thread. "There are so many qualified Americans available for the jobs." I must be missing something that everyone else is aware of.

      Everyone that I know that is worth employing, has had a job and no problems finding a new one in the past several years despite the economy. And, I'm fully aware of many that would be better suited to food service than IT that have had jobs the whole time. Maybe it's different elsewhere in the US, but as far as I can tell, there is a significant shortage of people capable of doing the job.

      Just because someone has had a job for however many years doing some sort of development, it doesn't mean they're worth a damn at doing their job. American IT people are the worst at feeling entitled to special treatment despite consistent failures and sub-par work. I'm not saying the H-1B's are any better, but if I'm paying for garbage, I want to spend the least for it.

      American's better learn that it's a global competition now, whether they like it or not. If you want top-dollar salaries, you better be prepared to put in top-dollar effort at being the best at your craft. You better keep learning. You better keep growing the value you add.

      I'm sorry if people are unemployed. I was there myself a dozen or so years ago. It was the best thing that could have happened to me. I learned that if you want to stay employed, you better bring value like no one else. And, I've done my best to do that ever since, which has resulted in no involuntary unemployed time since.

      It may sound callous, but you have to put up or shut up. It's a global economy now. Quit whining about international competition. It's only going to grow.

  51. Re:Let it begin by Rasperin · · Score: 1, Informative

    No, you are quite wrong. While the average birthrate for white citizens is below average population growth, the blacks are reproducing on average at 4.5 children per male and female adults (meaning twice the population growth). Ignoring latina's is like 3.something. We have a growing population count without immigration.http://flagcounter.com/factbook/us

    --
    WTF Slashdot, why do I have to login 50 times to post?
  52. Typical Recruiters by webbiedave · · Score: 1

    When will recruiting companies learn about the basic technologies that we consultants use on a daily basis such as "tape recorders" and "video cameras"?

  53. Re:Excuse me? All criticism has been well earned. by Rasperin · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Your point is valid to an extent, there are a few diamonds among the ruff and there are some piss poor american programmers. But (in my experiences and most anecdotal experience I've heard) most native India indian programmers cannot program the simplest stuff. I've come to the belief that it is a culture thing, the ways we think and process stuff has got to be completely different here compared to there. I don't know what's so hard about thinking logically but trying to explain something (with pictures and everything, I spent 6 months in Hydrabad training a team) always seems to fail. Honestly I don't know why that entire country is mostly full of fails.

    --
    WTF Slashdot, why do I have to login 50 times to post?
  54. Re:Let it begin by alexmin · · Score: 1

    "...system filled with endless hordes of immigrants and outsourced labor willing to work for wages no American can live on..." - as someone who went through H1B program myself, I can attest your view of the program is utterly wrong. Sure, there are plenty of scambags (namely four big Indian consultancies) that game the system, but there is no "endless hordes" of immigrants (just about 50K in recent years if you exclude graduates from US universities.) And surely offshoring (I take that's what you really mean by outsorcing) does not have anything to do with H1B which is about 'onshoring' labor, not shipping out work.
    As for wages, all my colleagues ( and I mean dozens ) from H1B days in couple of years were paid way "more" than run off the mill IT drone. And do not even get me started about how many welfare queens and public service "workers" live off theirs and mine taxes. We'd be very lucky to collect one-tenth of that when retired.

  55. Just being competitive in the global marketplace by NicknamesAreStupid · · Score: 2, Insightful

    That is what we said about slavery for over 100 years.

  56. Re:Let it begin by blahplusplus · · Score: 1

    Your post illustrates why capitalism and free market rhetoric is so bankrupt, it's not that we can't employ these people it's that there is no will to change the system.

  57. You guys have no f**ing idea. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Really. Most Americans are clueless regarding H1b and its variants.

    Big Indian company: own clients, 95% employees, including PMs and business analysts working in USA imported from India on H1B (less) L1 (more). Pay would be much less compared to America/Americans. They are rotated and sent back to India after some time. Once such a co gets a contract, expect to see only Indians in their payroll. Discrimination, as they have a US office? oh yeah. Does anyone care? guess not.

    Small Indian company: 100% employees on H1, (some on L1 if the company is Indian and have a token India office as well), save for Suzi secretary answering phones and occasionally checking boss's 'hardware'. Two-room office in some city. Great links with recruiters, esp ones in the favored contracting links of US companies. No direct clients. no hiring manger ever talks to them.

    Consultants: often the cheapest India can offer (Good ones work for multi-nationals with India offices, or the very big consulting cos) are the only ones working with small cos. Live in a small apartment with roomies. dream of transferring to another company for a permanent offer and eventual green card.

    Client: Wants only people with 10 years experience in every technology even ones invented last year.

    Modus operandi: consulting co takes the techie, gives him a one week buzzword course, asks him to rewrite the resume using several sample ones, making a 3-year experience 15 year one (every consultant from India has been working on projects with brokerage firms on their stock trading app for the last 25 years, if you read sample NYC bank-consultant resume), arrange friends as old-boss references, and pass on to a middleman. Middleman, usually white American, will arrange an 'interview' with the client company whose pockets he has already padded. Result the consultant gets hired.

    If its a big co with a direct project to the client, no worries, everyone goes into the project. Everyone from PM to development to test to meeting minutes shall be taken by employees from India/Brazil/Philippines (whichever is cheaper). Those jobs are GONE at that point.Those jobs are never openly hired, but filled only using offshore cadres.

    So there. Sometimes smaller (est) cos try to increase their margins by not paying consultants while on bench, or 'unpaid leave'. Sometimes they will be paid subsistence wages. Sometimes some smart guy will read up on labor laws and complain to DOL. Then stuff like this happens.

  58. Re:Let it begin by b4dc0d3r · · Score: 1

    Part of the problem is geographical location. Call center work at $20/hour moves to Appalachia at under $10/hour, and you get to choose between moving and being unemployed. Most choose the layoff, but a few take the incentive to go train the n00bs. Often they return back where they were, because going from a $20/hr environment to $10/hr is a big culture shock, even if your wage stays the same.

    Programming and other jobs can be virtual - I haven't worked with a team mate for 6 years now, barely meeting the ones I did work with. But I reorganized a few times and now I haven't met 16 out of the 20 people I work directly with now.

    Where are the jobs, and are the skilled people there, and if not are they willing to move? Or even apply?

  59. It's fascinating that Americans by Kream · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Who supposedly support the free and lubricated market when it comes to the free movement of capital across the globe can be so protectionist when it comes to labour. By the tenets of capitalism, a Bangladeshi man should be able to move to New Jersey without let or hindrance and put X plumbers and handymen out of business. How come the proponents of capitalism can consider with glee another country's protected industries and financial markets falling to the inexorable march while at the same time, oddly, not sharing the glee of, say, a Sri Lankan chicken farmer at the thought of selling Americans chicken for 0.50$ / lb, retail?

    Capitalist? Ha

    1. Re:It's fascinating that Americans by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      We don't support it.

      Our bought out politicians do. This is why the Tea party is becoming so popular. Coffee party is another group forming. Republican or democrat it wont matter as campaign dollars come from those who either bet against our own country like Goldman Sacks (ties to whitehouse) or those who want really cheap labor to boast their shareprice to benefit Godman Sacks and other banks expecting 25% returns year after year.

      In my opinion this makes capitalists socialists for themselves as they want the government to adversely ruin everyone for their own beneft and capitalism for the poor with limited bargaining power. They are hypocrites.

    2. Re:It's fascinating that Americans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By the tenets of capitalism, a Bangladeshi man should be able to move to New Jersey without let or hindrance and put X plumbers and handymen out of business.

      Sure, when I can move there and put X programmers out of business.

    3. Re:It's fascinating that Americans by Civil_Disobedient · · Score: 1

      Who supposedly support the free and lubricated market when it comes to the free movement of capital across the globe can be so protectionist when it comes to labour.

      Capital != Labor. Unless you're a slave owner.

    4. Re:It's fascinating that Americans by Kream · · Score: 1

      If you ever read Wealth of Nations by that Marxist radical Adam Smith, you'd find that one of the basic tenets of capitalism is that in order for the market to find equilibrium, just as capital should be free to move to the most profitable area (which it is doing right now), labour should be, too.

  60. man!.. by tanveer1979 · · Score: 5, Informative

    you actually have no idea about the level of corruption in "developing countries". There may be lot of sh!t going at top level, but at grassroots level the level of corruption in US is not even a small % of what goes on in countries like India. I live there, so I know.
    Heck, to repair my phone line I was asked for a bribe directly, ad if you want a new electricity connection, be prepared to pay big.
    And guess what, in the west you have to bribe to get something "Wrong" done, in India you have to bribe for the right thing too!

    --
    My Aurora : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o91ZsGwJYyg
    FB : https://www.facebook.com/TanveersPhotography
    1. Re:man!.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      My mum is from India and when I visited last year, I heard about the bribes she had to pay for an electric connection for the new house we build in her ancestral village.

      We are still waiting for a link to the water mains (bribes included) and have not bothered with a land phone line as that includes more bribes and we mostly used mobile phones anyway.

      My parents were willing to pay market rates for a couple of people to come and cut the grass in the garden there. The local workers refused, giving excuses while hoping for more pay.

      My dad got pissed off enough to buy a grass cutting machine from Singapore and used it himself when he was in India with my mum for a holiday.

      The very next day the labourers were willing to start cutting grass - for market rates.

      The house they build is currently almost 5 years old, and yet there are still some minor carpentry work outstanding with contractors still giving excuses. This just made my dad do most of the stuff himself (him being a handy man by nature).

      In the end, right now, my dad has better gear there then most of the local contractors / workers because of the shennigans they try to pull. And whenever my dad gets pissed off, guess they ain't getting work and he does it all himself.

      The whole society there is corrupt - and they almost always try to squeeze out as much as they can, and as long as they think they can get away with it / are in a position of (no matter how minor) power.

    2. Re:man!.. by WillDraven · · Score: 5, Interesting

      my dad has better gear there then most of the local contractors / workers

      Maybe he should hire a couple of impressionable young people, teach them honest business practices (and how to do the actual work of course) and start his own contracting company.

      --
      This is my sig. There are many like it but this one is mine.
    3. Re:man!.. by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      Had a friend from India who told me once that his house had caught on fire when he was a kid and his dad had to bribe the firefighters to fight the fire.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    4. Re:man!.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tell your Dad, I also learnt this after being in US for a decade to do stuff on your own and dont give in to the extortion.Carpentry is one skill I learnt in US and I have been able to build something nice.

    5. Re:man!.. by Geminii · · Score: 1

      The US has absolutely no bribing to get things done well.

      It's called "tipping". Gotta get the terminology right.

    6. Re:man!.. by Ihmhi · · Score: 1

      Just so long as he doesn't follow the standard Hyrule/India hybrid accounting practices of stashing your rupees in a clay pot.

      Thank you, I'll be here all night! Try the veal, bribe your waitress!

    7. Re:man!.. by TheRecklessWanderer · · Score: 1

      I didn't say there was no corruption in developing countries. I was sarcastically implying that there is corruption in the US.

      --
      Mean what you say...say what you mean.
    8. Re:man!.. by Phoghat · · Score: 1
      India isn't the only place this happens. I have a friend who lives in a city in central Mexico and despite the average annual income of US$ 500/month you just can't find someone to work and if you do you're charged an exorbitant rate because you're a Gringo, and before they start they ask for bribes up front.

      She rides a scooter around town and it kept getting knocked over/vandalized because she parks in the street by her home. When she heard a parking space was available(behind locked doors) she sent a Mexican friend to inquire about it because when she did the rent was triple what was normal.

      --
      Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
  61. ARE YOU LIEING in court? ATI cards don't do SLI 20 by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    ARE YOU LIEING in court? ATI cards don't do SLI. That will be 20 years bailiffs take him away.

  62. Re:Excuse me? All criticism has been well earned. by HungWeiLo · · Score: 1, Redundant

    All the smart people in India have already moved to the States with their families for a better living environment and better pay.

    All the rest stay in India, where they job-hop every 3 months for a raise until all the remaining smart ones end up being in management, which really doesn't do their technical productivity any favors.

    We're seeing the same sort of thing (with the job-hopping) in Eastern Europe now, but albeit at a much slower pace.

    --
    There are a huge number of yeast infections in this county. Probably because we're downriver from the bread factory.
  63. What has happened? by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

    10 years ago if you had a degree and an MCSE you could start at 5k a month and if you had 5 years experience demand 8k a month or walk out the door! Houses were only $170k with 5% down. As long as you could show up you could work anywhere.

    Could any of you imagine reading such a story 10 years ago? Shaking head ...

    I keep hearing how bankers such as Goldman Sachs are betting agaisn't America and Greece are doing everything in their power to have total destruction in order to reduce bargaining power and enslave the world in debt.

    I have nothing really to say other than disbelief on how this could happen in such a short short time. I do not think I should peruse I.T. anymore but this globalization is likely going to adversely effect all jobs.

  64. Department of Labor enforcement going again by Animats · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It's good to see the Department of Labor putting some teeth into labor law again. During the Bush years, too many regulatory agencies were out to lunch. The SEC, of course, we know about. Less well known was the attitude at the Labor Department. Now they're catching crooks again.

    Also, Obama just made two recess appointments to the National Labor Relations Board. The NLRB was down to two members, and couldn't do anything. Now the NLRB is back in business. It's going to be easier to unionize.

    US wage and hour law, as enacted by Congress decades ago, is quite pro-labor. It's the enforcement that's been weak. Looks like that's changing.

    1. Re:Department of Labor enforcement going again by Billly+Gates · · Score: 1

      I believe it when I see it.

      Obama listens to lobbyists before making key decisions and you bet they will fight to keep their cheap labor. Maybe throw in some dollars for some key democrats this November if Obama looks the other way and increases h1b1 visas to make them happy.

      Abuse or not wages are going way way down because we like bargaining power due to large large amounts of cheap labor. We white collar jobs go to minimum wage? going after a few bosses is not going to help everyone out.

    2. Re:Department of Labor enforcement going again by tomhath · · Score: 1

      It's good to see the Department of Labor putting some teeth into labor law again. During the Bush years, too many regulatory agencies were out to lunch.

      Really? Is that what the blogosphere told you? Here are the actual numbers, from a GAO presentation to Congress. As you can see on page 8, the number of Fair Labor Standards Act enforcement actions dropped precipitously from 33,000 in 2001 to 35,000 in 2003. Oh wait, that's an increase. The number did decline slowly over the next four years to 29,500 in 2007. But "out to lunch"? Hardly.

  65. Re:Let it begin by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Here is an even better idea: Lets change the immigration laws so that if someone wants to work in the US, they can quickly and easily acquire citizenship. I assert that anyone who wants to be an American citizen enough to ask to be, deserves to be. All of this isolationist shit should have died along with the 20th century.

    Let me tell this to you as a foreigner.

    You can't give citizenship out left and right. What makes your country is your culture (and I don't mean things like country music or apple pie here...), and if you just open your borders, you will be immediately swamped by third-worlders (like me) who want their piece of the quality-of-life pie. They don't care in the slightest how the pie came to be there in the first place, or what they have to do, long-term, to keep it - well, some will, but they are the minority. Most just want to have it.

    Therefore, for immgiration to be productive, rather than detrimental, to your society, you need to make sure that, however many people you take in, they are assimilated into your culture - and that's your upper limit. And the relatively straightforward way to see how good the immigrant is assimilating is observing how they do when they're still on worker's visa. It also gives them time to learn the language, as well as basics of living in a new place (you'd be surprised to know how many things that are mundane to you are strange and alien to a newcomer), and see what the society there is really like, and decide whether they're really sure they can be a proper part of it.

    To that extent, the process of acquiring permanent resident status (and eventually citizenship) from worker visa shouldn't be too simple - you need some gates there to control it. The biggest problem with your program as is is twofold. First, there are no established terms or guarantees. In most other countries that have similar programs in place, you are eligible to apply after working in the country for a certain specific period of time, and the process is straightforward in a sense that there are usually point-based systems with published evaluation criteria, so, for the most part, you know in advance whether you will be approved or not (unless you don't pass a security background check - but that isn't typical, though chances of a "false positive" are higher in today's terrorism-crazy world). The amount of time that processing of the application takes from the moment you submit it is also generally known fairly well.

    In contrast, applying for a green card from H1-B is very much a gamble - you never know if they approve you or not, nor how long it takes - and it can take really, really long. I know of people waiting for 7+ years to get there; for comparison, in Canada, the whole process almost universally takes less than 3 years from the moment you first set foot in the country (including 1 year on worker visa so that you're eligible for fast-track permanent residence).

    The second problem is just the one GP noted - that H1-Bs are severely disadvantaged, because they're tied to their employer, and, should he kick them out for any reason, they have to start packing right away - no chance to find another job (in practice, quite a few people actually break the law and overstay to do so - but this is also very much a gamble). Yeah, in theory, employers have to prove that the wage they offer to employee is above market average for this position - but there are many well-known tricks on how to legally do this for practically any number. And, once hired, the employer has both the carrot - raises - as well as the stick - termination of employment - at his full disposal.

    If a citizen is denied a raise that he believes is rightly his, he can just quit and go look for a better job - and, if his assessment of his worth was correct, he'll find one. An H1-B just has to suck it up, because however bad he has it, it's usually still way better than what he'd get back home. Ditto for overtime.

    And, of course, it screws both H1-Bs them

  66. Recco! by csb · · Score: 1

    Even worse, all of his code was for Webistics.

    --
    We reserve the right to serve refuse to anyone. -management
  67. Re:Excuse me? All criticism has been well earned. by Dionysus · · Score: 1

    All the smart people in India have already moved to the States with their families for a better living environment and better pay.

    That used to be true. I know lots of smart Indians decided to go back to India after the first downturn after 2001 and especially now.

    --
    Je ne parle pas francais.
  68. Re:Excuse me? All criticism has been well earned. by tnk1 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    As much as you have a point, I've been working in IT for years as well and I've only met one British worker in the US, and I think he's got at least a green card because he married an American girl. Just about everyone else I have ever seen working H1-B is Indian and boy do they fuck them over. As a white man who actually speaks a dialect of English that is considered civilized in the US, you are going to have a decent time of it. The only thing you need to worry about is idiots making too many Limey jokes and telling you that your spelling is funny.

    The Indians generally have to worry about unscrupulous companies that bring them in, keep them in the dark and then make sure that they work under conditions that you could consider appalling. I can't tell you the number of H1-B colleagues that I know who have at one time or another had to worry about losing their job and then having to deal with being packed off back to India 5 days later because they are a guest worker.

    The problem with H1-B is that it allows more bad than good. Clearly we want to have some guest workers like you over here to provide actual technical expertise, but most of these guest workers are doing jobs that Americans could definitely do and not even getting paid decently for it. That may be because we don't have enough IT people available to work over here, but I suspect that the supposed lack of IT workers is more of a situation where those said workers actually want to be paid US wages and treated like professionals.

    Of course, the H1-B problem is one where many of us feel we are being unemployed in favor of cheap labor, but it doesn't change the fact that the program is allowing the guest workers to get screwed too, if they happen to be from somewhere sufficiently backward. That's just bad all around, and I see no reason that it should be allowed to continue as it has been.

  69. Re:Let it begin by Nadaka · · Score: 3, Informative

    In my grandfathers day, a bagboy's salary+tips was enough to support support an adult frugally. A clerk at a corner store could expect to support a small family (essentially the same as working at a 7/11).

    Now? A typical wal-mart employee working full time at minimum wage +$0.25 to $2 can pay rent on a 1 bedroom apartment, pay the electric bill and if lucky some food with nothing left for other necessities. Unless you already own a home outright or want to rent space in a crack house, you can not live on that without help. Realistically, it would take about 3 such incomes to support a family with children and that does not count the cost of child care or saving for college/retirement.

  70. Re:Let it begin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In my company, I've seen American workers let go and their positions filled with H1B's. It's illegal, and yet nothing is done. So kindly go fuck yourself.

  71. Re:Let it begin by tehdaemon · · Score: 1

    Did you strip out births to first generation immigrants like I said to? No? There is where you are wrong. If you count births of only second-generation and older immigrants, we are negative. We actually need some of the immigrants just to be stable. (granted we overdid it a bit)

    Plus ~1%/year for a place as sparsely populated as the US, is fine for now. Go work on places with 4x or more people/useable area and growth rates 3+%. Those are the places to worry about population growth. The US is fine for now, and self-correcting. (so far anyway)

    T

    --
    Laws are horrible moral guides, moral guides make even worse laws.
  72. Not Surprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is not surprising. Some so called "consulting company" which has a non existent office, brings people from abroad (India?). They pay for air fares and even provide accommodation till they get projects to work on. Once they get into projects, they are billed individually for say 100 bucks per hour, the consultants take out 70 bucks and pay the rest 30 to these fellows. And all the while, they are under constant threat by their consulting firms as they cannot move to a different company (Once you arrive on H1B you can shift to working as employees of US companies on an yearly salary). If they come to know about secret negotiations with the new company then God help you.

    Prostitution, that's the work the people on H1-B do....

  73. Re:Let it begin by Kaboom13 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "The H1B's (as opposed to "outsourced jobs") are paid the same as an American worker would." That's bullshit. The job market is just that, a market. Supply and demand. Restrict supply wages go up, increase supply wages go down. Any increase in the supply automatically reduces wages. If there really is a shortage of skilled IT workers, how about investing in education? If people see wages on the rise, you can guarantee more will seek education in the field. If we aren't turning out qualified candidates, look for the reason why. Our math and science education sucks. Importing the products of other, more successful education systems merely hides the fact and covers it up for a little while, until eventual wages between us and them normalize to the point they have no interest in coming here. I for one am not interested in turning America into a 3rd world shit hole so you can find the cheap programmers you want to make some extra profit right now. If there is a real lack of talent, we need a long term solution, and that means improving education, improving access to the education, and letting the market set wages that actually makes the time, effort, and money spent on that education a sound investment.

    Furthermore, if we are going to allow immigration (and I think we definitely should) there are much, much better ways then the H1-B program. Ways that lead to citizenship, and a real investment in the future of our country. Ways that enable them to bring their families here, to be represented fairly in our government, and to quit their job if their boss is being abusive or paying them an unfair wage without fear of being deported. H1-B is and always has been a shortcut to cheap labor in the immigration system. If the regular system is to slow and corrupt, FIX THAT, don't make shortcuts.

  74. Re:Let it begin by ClosedSource · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Right. Just imagine what a mess we'd be in if 100 years ago anyone could become an American citizen just by showing up .. oh wait.

  75. Re:Let it begin by ClosedSource · · Score: 1

    "Allowing everyone to obtain citizenship also means it's a fiscal impossibility to guarantee any level of income or health care."

    Hey, I didn't know there was a guarantee of a certain level of income or health care in the US. Where do I go to get my money?

  76. Re:Let it begin by ClosedSource · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "What makes your country is your culture (and I don't mean things like country music or apple pie here...), and if you just open your borders, you will be immediately swamped by third-worlders (like me) who want their piece of the quality-of-life pie."

    This, of course, is already the story of America. Anyone who isn't a Native American is the descendant of people who wanted a better life. Those of us with families that have been here for centuries have no more right to be here than you do.

  77. Re:Let it begin by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This, of course, is already the story of America. Anyone who isn't a Native American is the descendant of people who wanted a better life.

    It's not that simple - there's also this whole "freedom, liberty, and pursuit of happiness" thing. Everyone wants a better life, but different people understand that differently, and U.S. has its own definition (that is rather unique in some ways).

  78. Re:Let it begin by atomic777 · · Score: 1

    Right on the money. The result is that the H1-B is only desirable for people who have it "bad" back in their home countries. As a Canadian working in the US for a few years on the comparatively free (but temporary) TN-1 visa, I quite rightly told my employer thanks but no thanks to the second-class status of an H1-B. I've since left, and the US has lost an immigrant who was fluent in the language and assimilated into the culture.

    I don't think anyone writing immigration policy in Washington, or the string-pullers in Silicon Valley, Seattle, etc. are shedding a tear, however -- a person integrated into American society with choices and relative freedom of movement is not the type of person they want.

  79. Re:Excuse me? All criticism has been well earned. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Well, as with most things, there is a hint of truth to all of the above. I work at an Indian owned company, so so I know these things first-hand.

    However, outsourcing companies are often hired for tedious jobs that anyone with talent would quit. You have to realize that when judging the quality of those guys you have seen. The companies are getting what they want then.

    Do the math: 60% the productivity at 30% of the price works out in the favor of the company paying. you can hire 3 less skilled people for the budget of one skilled local, and get almost two people worth of productivity. This only works on simple tasks that require more grunt and less management though. But.. this is exactly the type of task most places want to have someone else do.

    There are genius programmers in India, but they don't usually get stuck working in random projects, but can have their pick of any project they want.

    Also, as the IT profession is more common in India compared with the US and Europe, you have to realize that people with no actual interest in what they are doing end up in the field more often - that eventually affects quality.

  80. How about ... stay in your own country by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I am sure that people are going to clam me for this, but with so many unemployed IT people in the US, why are people being imported from other countries? I can see the reason when someone has extremely rare, exceptional, and valuable skills and the US labor pool is unable to fill the demand, but that's not the case with most of these H1-B people. I've seen DBAs, MSCEs, etc from India, Dominican Republic, and Egypt being overworked for $40k in jobs that should be paying a lot more than that, and to workers who are treated well. (OK, well not physically abused or asked to break the law in order to keep their jobs). Where are the unions when this happens? nowhere to be found.

    I had been thinking that the US should trade only with countries who have adequate labor and environmental laws, so all businesses have a fair playing field. But then, I realize that in many countries,it's easier to pay someone off to skirt the law than it is to follow the law. To a certain extent this is true here in the US as well, which is why we need to find bastards like ComData and squish them out of existance.

    All this talk about making the US a "competitive business climate" is just a race to the bottom in worker's rights. It's time to create standards of behaviour for labor and to see that they are adequately enforced. I would hope that other countries can do the same, and a healthy and viable trading economy between the best countries would be the result. I don't care so much that a salt&pepper shaker set made in the US costs $2.49 while one made in China costs $1, if the quality of the product and the treatment of the workers who produced it is adequate. This doesn't mean that I believe in this whole "Buy American!" crap, because there are so few products which have a certain and comprehensive national origin, and that there are plenty of employers in the US who treat their employees poorly. Being treated well doesn't mean that you have a guarantted 5 weeks of vacation per year, it means that the working environment is decent, there is no deception in wages and benefits, that number of hours per day and days per week are reasonable, and there is no personal abuse by supervisors or co-workers permitted.

    I don't, myself, put up with crap at the workplace. I had a boss threaten me with physical violence, in a serious manner and he had the ability to do it and a reputation of a very bad temper. I simply got up and left. I probably could have sued him, but I didn't know that at the time.

  81. Re:Let it begin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The parents comments are amongst the most absurd remarks ive read on /. in a long long time.
    America as a country was formed by immigrants from various countries. The sort of cultural brainwashing you wish to perform is crazy. Americas' culture is rich BECAUSE of the variety of immigrants from various nationalities not despite it.

    The simplest solution is to remove any hurdle to migrating across nations. The world started with a "my village your village"/ "my tribe your tribe mentality". As society has matured we have evolved into a "my country your country" mindset. How does your parents living in one part of the world cause you to feel more entitled than anyone else? People such as the parent feel threatened in a world of complete borderlessness because perhaps deep down in their psyche they know that there are 100 people who could take away their jobs. Its a classical immigrant mentality of getting into a secure way of life and then immediately expressing a need to let everyone else on earth rot in their misery.

    I pity a person which that sort of petty isolationist (all the more because s/he claims to be a foreigner).

  82. Re:Let it begin by Chrisje · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Well, the "one nation under God" was added in the fifties by Americans. So apparently the current population of US citizens seems to have a severely different grasp of what a "better life" is than the renaissance men who founded the country in the first place.

    I look at my own constitution and the state of my nation, and we're facing a very similar issue with Moroccan and Turkish immigrants who are Islamic. Some people want to put caps on immigration, some people want to outlaw Islam because they're clueless and scared.

    In the mean time The Netherlands have, since the Unie van Utrecht was drafted and signed in 1579, a ~450 year old tradition of guaranteeing Freedom of Religion and Freedom of a man's Faculty which was continued in our constitutions until this day.

    Culture is what you make of it. There's no such thing as a culture that is still alive *and* unchanging at the same time. In the mean time it is important we stay true to the Constitutional values that are the cornerstone of our respective nations.

  83. Re:Let it begin by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

    America as a country was formed by immigrants from various countries.

    Vast majority of them European.

    Americas' culture is rich BECAUSE of the variety of immigrants from various nationalities not despite it.

    You go tell that to the guy down the street who's going to do female circumcision on his daughter - that this part of his culture also enriches the American one.

    How does your parents living in one part of the world cause you to feel more entitled than anyone else?

    By itself, it doesn't do that. It just results in a higher probability of a person being more compatible with the society in question (since they were raised in it, taught its cultural norms from birth, etc).

    Its a classical immigrant mentality of getting into a secure way of life and then immediately expressing a need to let everyone else on earth rot in their misery.

    1) I do not reside in U.S., but in Canada.

    2) I'm not an immigrant who "got into a secure way". I don't even have PR, much less citizenship.

  84. Re:Let it begin by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Cultures change, absolutely. But such changes are evolutionary in nature, and generally happen at the pace with which most members can keep up, or at least tolerate. What I was talking about is a rapid change which discards most, if not all, of the fundamentals, all at once, in a very brief period of time.

    And, yes, naturally, any protective measures have to be respectful of the culture they're trying to protect, otherwise what's the point? If part of it is freedom of speech and freedom of religion, then that's what you stick to. It's very unfortunate that some people in the West have recently started to subscribe to the concept that human rights and freedoms - the concept which their civilization is largely responsible for establishing, promoting, and spreading - are not for everyone, and especially not for "foreign-looking" (i.e. not white, Muslim, etc) immigrants.

    Last I checked, however, even the most liberal countries still control immigration to some extent or another.

  85. Re:Let it begin by dangitman · · Score: 1

    In my grandfathers day, a bagboy's salary+tips was enough to support support an adult frugally. A clerk at a corner store could expect to support a small family (essentially the same as working at a 7/11). Now? A typical wal-mart employee working full time at minimum wage +$0.25 to $2 can pay rent on a 1 bedroom apartment, pay the electric bill and if lucky some food with nothing left for other necessities.

    Right, but that's simply the natural effect of population growth, technology, the free market, and capitalism. What do you blame, or think should be done about it? It's not like we can turn the clock back 100 years.

    --
    ... and then they built the supercollider.
  86. Re:Let it begin by sodul · · Score: 1

    That might be anecdotal evidence but I used to be a H1-B holder and have friends that are or have been in this situation. While on a H1-B I have changed jobs twice, and while it is a little bit more troublesome than while on a green card it is perfectly possible and is much easier than some think.
    Transferring a H1-B can be expedited to 2 weeks at extra cost. I don't know the latest fees but the whole process should cost less than $5k. Not that much when you consider how much companies are spending hunting for talent.

    Regarding salaries, if they are not competitive then this is not in compliance with the law. Back in 2002 my salary was $60k/year because that how little the company was allowed to pay me. I still managed to get raises, especially
    each time I changed jobs.

    Also for the grace period, there is some 'reasonable' time allowed. A friend of mine was laid off last year and the lawyers told him 6 months (I kid you not). He had to leave eventually because the economy was so bad but now he is back and has re-activated his H1-B with an other company.

    So, yes it is more difficult when you are on a H1-B, but if you are above average talent (which is what H1-B should be for) it is not like you are locked in with your current company.

    The only case I can think of is if you had your H1-B for 6+ years are waiting to get a green card. The H1-B get extended by the green card application which is linked to you current employer. This situation sucks, and I don't have much advice knowing the waiting list for some countries is longer than the 6y you can accrue on H1-B. The only thing is that if you are actually talented pressure you manager to get the green card application started ASAP if you plan on staying. Bigger companies tend to have better immigration lawyers and also more willing to eat the cost (which they're supposed to by law).

  87. Re:Let it begin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...unfairly undercut...

    What's unfair about it? If an immigrant and a local are both offering to do a job, and one is offering to do it for a lower salary than the other ... that seems perfectly fair to me.

  88. Re:Let it begin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A: How many H1B's go back home when their work permit is up?
    Or do they just stay here illegally, and the recruiters commit fraud when filling out W4/W9 forms? Do they pay taxes?
    They have no right to complain, no right to go to federal authorities, no right to bargain on wages...no right to go to another employer..

    Do they get their green cards and become US Citizens?

    They aren't paid the same as an American; if you're so sure, publish your payroll and we'll compare it to the US Bureau of Labor Statistics results on average.

    B: Racist? You come here, don't take the time to learn about MY society, about the blood, sweat and tears my forefathers spent to EARN this democracy. You wear those silly dresses and hats, and don't want to participate in American Society in the slightest by wearing our clothing or maybe dropping that confusing accent and trying to talk like us; you complain about shit you have not earned the right to complain about. To boot you smell weird, you do not make an effort to learn our laws or our way of life, and you expect us to accommodate you. You preach, eat, and say scary things in my environment while around me and you smell bad. Finally, I feel like I have to compete with you; that for all the time I have to spend explaining your job to you I am undermining my own career.

    A Black man is not a nigger, but a nigger may be a black man. That's not racism; that's how it works.

    C: HR managers look for a "person specification"; they want someone to do job X as though they are a cog in a machine. How do you know the Indian guy isn't saying he has SAP-HR module experience, doesn't know anything and as soon as he's got the foot int he door he's spending every waking hour learning that module in and out like any programmer would? I don't think you speak Indian nor know the phone number to his last employer.

    Go get yourself some useful skills; you're going to be needing them where this country is going.

  89. Re:Let it begin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Very good comment,
    US minimum wage has halved over the past 30 years (Because of ~400% inflation, see wiki) and is now on its way back up.
    Kids can expect to earn less than their parents despite being higher educated.
    The inflation also causes all life savings to be halved over time leaving no wealth in the population only debt.

    Your statement is spot on so blame the FED not H1-B for falling wealth standards.

  90. Re:Let it begin by TBoon · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Population growth? How does that affect it much? More people, more people need to provide services to a larger population.

    Technology? To a certain extent I guess. As more fewer people can care for more other people. On the other hand, technology has provided new avenues for services. Instead of 2 small grocery shops there is now 1 large and efficient one, but next to it is a cell-phone dealer...

    Free market and capitalism? yes. most certainly. here in norway the minimum wage, while absent in law, in reality is over $15/hr for unskilled labour. Even with a much higher tax-rate than the US that still leave plenty of money for a single person to support themselves frugaly... Yes, eating at a restaurant or even fast food frequently is prohibitly expensive here, but that's because even those people working there makea decent salary.

    The low cost of many products and services in the US is based on those providing them being payed really low wages./P

  91. Re:Excuse me? All criticism has been well earned. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Glad to see someone representative of the typical H1B worker decided to step forward!

  92. NJ is the Mecca of H1B Fraud by walterbyrd · · Score: 2, Informative

    Another examle:

    Vision Systems Group Indicted for H1B Visa Fraud

    http://www.huliq.com/3257/77441/vision-systems-group-indicted-h1b-visa-fraud

  93. Re:Let it begin by Nadaka · · Score: 1

    You are right, H1B has absolutely no effect on low end subsistence wages. But it does affect mid level wages in IT.

    Inflation would not matter much for people still working for a living if the real wages of the average person went up proportionally, though the retired would indeed see their savings dwindle. But it hasn't, no that difference has gone into the growth of the wealth of major corporations and the very wealthy people who own them.

  94. Not amused but not surprised too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    H1-B visa specifically encourages this kind of practices. Low wages and exploitation of immigrants are results, not causes, of this program.

    USA is currently the most inaccessible developed country for skilled immigrants. Many other countries either have sane work permit systems or have introduced point systems for skilled immigrants, which basically mean that a skilled immigrant can come there, search for a job, if he/she hasn't found one before, settle and live his/her life contributing to the host country's economy and integrating with it.

    In contrast, people coming to the US under H1-B visa are almost exclusively those recruited by companies specializing in trafficking low-wage workers and enslaving them for a limited period of time before dumping them. For a normal company or applicant it's typically way too much hassle and too little benefit to even consider going through this procedure. Both are much better off moving somewhere else.

  95. Re:Let it begin by Joe+U · · Score: 1

    How about we require outsourced employees hired by US firms to be subject to US minimum wage and labor laws?

  96. Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hate Illinois Nazis.

  97. Re:Let it begin by silas_moeckel · · Score: 1

    Yes we do via the welfare programs. More importantly allowing unchecked immigration allows for a huge surplus in low end labor. That would push down wages to the minimum levels and push down working conditions as well. The h1b program was a bad idea from the start. Skilled labor does not have a problem getting green cards and unto a citizenship track if they want it. Companies are willing to do what they need to to get these people. In the 80's h1b's did well as the huge difference in wages allowed them to save up enough money in five years to live off the investment income in there home country. I am not sure how well this worked out as many of the home countries have seen drastic changes since then.

    --
    No sir I dont like it.
  98. Re:Let it begin by sheph · · Score: 1

    It would be fine to allow everyone in if we had unlimited real estate and resources. It wouldn't be just the H1-Bs coming in though. The problem is that even if you're illegal you qualify for government services. Once they are here they don't have to work. Pregnant? No problem, government subsidized care at your service. Female, can't speak english, have kids, and no income? No problem, the government will pay your rent, give you food stamps, pay for your education, and help you to obtain citizenship. I'm not saying we shouldn't help the poor, and downtrodden, but shouldn't they have some of the responsibility? Look at California. Anyone wonder why they're going broke? This is at least a large part of it. I know this is about H1-Bs, but the prospect of opening the borders would have devistating consequences to our economy.

    When this country was founded and had open borders you could come here with nothing but the shirt on your back and a dream. The difference was if you didn't succeed there was no one there to bail you out. Now days it's laughable. There's no risk, and therefore no incentive to succeed. What this kindness has created is a whole culture of people who come here, have children, don't work, and game the system. I've seen plenty of it. The parents are apathetic, the children take everything for granted, and many wind up in jail. In general, they are rude, thoughtless, and lazy. Some would argue that this is because of some form of discrimination, but from what I've seen I think it has more to do with attitude. If you have no respect for the law, and your whole life you are taught that if you want something you just take it, it's not too hard to see the natural progression there.

    I don't know if you've noticed or not, but even among American citizens there are different classes of workers. The only reason companies want H1-Bs is because they can pay them less, and milk them for more productivity. We hear how there aren't enough qualified technical people here, but really that's not the issue. There are plenty of highly educated technical people here, it's just that they actually want to get paid for what has taken years of hard work to aquire.

    --
    I don't believe in karma, I just call it like I see it.
  99. Re:Let it begin by Civil_Disobedient · · Score: 1

    1. They are racist, even if they don't want to admit it (though to be fair, it's usually more ignorance than racism) [...] The white trash people in my company...

    People are not trash. No, not even the poor, white ones. You fucking hypocrite.

    2. They are scared that they are going to lose their job to someone else.

    Hammer -> nail.

  100. Laws and the Black Economy by Punctuated_Equilibri · · Score: 1
    The problem with passing a bunch of laws that go against people's economic self-interest is that they will find ways to evade them. There is an assumption in a bunch of these comments that more laws and regulations will make these problems go away. Experience suggests the opposite: the more unreasonable the laws, the bigger the black economy gets, with the exact result that there are more illegal workers who get no protection from the legal system.

    It is not some kind of absolute free-market concept that if you make it easier to get legal guest worker status, that would improve the conditions for these workers because they would then have basic legal protections.

    --
    In group behavior: 'because they're evil/morons/sheep/crazy' is not 'insightful' it's 'oversimplified'
  101. Abuser's mind by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    In the abuser's mind, THEY OWN their victims. So if they have to hunt down the victim that has left them, it is the worst insolence and to be punished as harshly as possible. It is also their biggest fear, that they DON'T have absolute control, and that their life-lie can be found out. Though they are unaware of this, it is just the overwhelming and unrecognized emotions that dictate their inhumane actions.

    A perpetrator might very well kill a victim that has fled from them, feeling justified in doing so, or just losing all control because of their own fears and shattering of their illusion that they have absolute control. It's predatory action, without awareness of consequences. Like an automaton. All this, while towards other people, such people may show signs of empathy and friendship, there is this black hole inside that yearns to live out their darkest wounds (a perpetrator has always been a victim at some point of time).

    When you don't even speak the language, it's hard to escape, almost impossible. Like in Dubai, people are being held there in the millions as labour slaves. They can't just flee, because they don't speak the language, the slave-culture is ingrained in Dubai and they may risk death and injury even to think about fleeing. Often, they have been promised great wages, great work-conditions, left their families, borrowed money to travel and is now stuck in a quagmire of economic and social oppression inside Dubai while basically being held as slaves:

    The Dark Side of Dubai
    http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/commentators/johann-hari/the-dark-side-of-dubai-1664368.html

    Although this is more a socially-accepted slavery, the underlying problems are similar, just in a different flavour. It's not sustainable in the long run. Dubai is like a big fat lie, that eventually will fall back into the desert and the natural environment, sooner or later.

  102. Re: Wow... by rnturn · · Score: 1

    I would never have thought a Suzanne Vega reference would show up show up in this thread.

    --
    CUR ALLOC 20195.....5804M
  103. Re:Let it begin by cloudscout · · Score: 1

    The only point of your post that I take issue with is the first part. H1B resources are SUPPOSED to be paid the same as an American worker would be paid and this is certainly the case for many of them. I'm an American currently working in India and India has a similar rule for granting employment visas.

    Since I've been here, however, I've heard many stories about people who have been "hired" by contract firms who sponsor them for an H1B visa. I put "hired" in quotation marks because the employees actually pay the contract firm for the privilege. They are told that it's much easier for them to seek citizenship or, at least, another employer who will take over their H1B visa sponsorship once they're in the US.

  104. Re:Let it begin by KGBear · · Score: 1
    I agree with you in principle. However there is something to be said for the "cultural integration" process. As an immigrant myself I can tell you there are many many reasons why someone would want to live in a different country. Money may be the most common, but I'm not even sure of that.

    In my case, there is very little difference in quality of life. I used to own a consultancy business in the "old country" and I was making a lot more money than I do now in the U.S. The fact that cost of life is cheaper here makes up for the difference, somewhat.

    My reason to come here was an affinity and an appreciation for basic principles. Call my corny but my reasons to want to stay here are two: the U.S. Constitution and the willingness of its people to take that seriously.

    People, including my compatriots, who come here for the big house and the big car; and then bring with them an attitude of "legal relativism," of "it's OK so long as you don't get caught," of "everybody's doing it so I'd be a fool for not doing it", offend me. They are the reason why I left my country in the first place. It's not "immigrant mentality." It's admiring a culture, wanting to be part of it and putting in the effort to make that happen. It makes me protective of that culture.

    If a culture is worth abandoning your country for, it's worth defending. Even from your former countrymen.

  105. Re:Let it begin by dkleinsc · · Score: 1

    You can't give citizenship out left and right.

    The United States has a long history of doing exactly that, actually. In the late 1840's and 1850's, that allowed German immigrants in who were escaping from the Revolutions of 1848. In the 1850's and 1860's, that allowed the Irish in who were escaping the Potato Famine. Around the turn of the 20th century, it allowed in millions of Eastern and Southern European immigrants in to work in industries such as meatpacking and textiles. In the 1930's and 1940's, it allowed the US to become a long-term refuge for European Jews. I could go on.

    Heck, one of the major innovations of government in ancient Rome was that provincials who served in the Roman army were granted citizenship.

    --
    I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
  106. Freedoms and rights VS laws by phorm · · Score: 1

    Indeed. Canada suffers from similar issues, to the point where glorifying terrorists in public floats seems acceptable. Freedom of religion is one thing, but it seems that when it comes to conflicts with law or good sense, we err on the side of not offending said religions/beliefs. Sorry, but if your beliefs involve blowing up a plane (or marketplace, bus, subway, whatever) full of civilians, then you they don't belong here!

    IMHO, feel free to wear what you want (except weapons). Read whatever book you want. Attend whatever ceremonies you want. But when it comes to violence or encroaching upon the peace/safety of others... law should trump religion.

    1. Re:Freedoms and rights VS laws by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      I find this piece of wisdom very apt these days:

      "The so-called paradox of freedom is the argument that freedom in the sense of absence of any constraining control must lead to very great restraint, since it makes the bully free to enslave the meek. The idea is, in a slightly different form, and with very different tendency, clearly expressed in Plato.

      Less well known is the paradox of tolerance: Unlimited tolerance must lead to the disappearance of tolerance. If we extend unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not prepared to defend a tolerant society against the onslaught of the intolerant, then the tolerant will be destroyed, and tolerance with them. — In this formulation, I do not imply, for instance, that we should always suppress the utterance of intolerant philosophies; as long as we can counter them by rational argument and keep them in check by public opinion, suppression would certainly be unwise. But we should claim the right to suppress them if necessary even by force; for it may easily turn out that they are not prepared to meet us on the level of rational argument, but begin by denouncing all argument; they may forbid their followers to listen to rational argument, because it is deceptive, and teach them to answer arguments by the use of their fists or pistols. We should therefore claim, in the name of tolerance, the right not to tolerate the intolerant. We should claim that any movement preaching intolerance places itself outside the law, and we should consider incitement to intolerance and persecution as criminal, in the same way as we should consider incitement to murder, or to kidnapping, or to the revival of the slave trade, as criminal."

      - Karl Popper, "The Open Society and Its Enemies" (1945)

  107. With unemployment so high in the US.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...do we really need the H-1B program?

    1. Re:With unemployment so high in the US.... by walterbyrd · · Score: 1

      We certainly do not the H1B program. We already have the O-1 for the truly "best and brightest."

      Of course, there are sooo many work visas, I don't know if eliminating the H1B would help, there is also the L-1, O-1, J-1, OPT, and many others. I think there are over two dozen such visas.

  108. Re:Let it begin by Pinky's+Brain · · Score: 1

    If the wages had not fallen due to inflation they would have simply been reduced out right. Supply and demand work regardless of inflation. In the long term inflation is a zero sum game unless you are in debt (inflation is good) or have a lot of money in the bank (inflation is bad).

    What has changed is automation ... labour is just not as valuable as it used to be.

  109. Re:Let it begin by Rasperin · · Score: 1

    Really about the 6months? I've worked with _a lot_ of h1-b's at Accenture and I was basically told by them they're was no grace period. Even then 60k (even in 2002) with more then 5+ years experience (which I'm assuming) was not competitive. In 2002 entry level was still around 50k (though location does make a difference) and (depending on skill) for a native developer the pay for 5-10years was between 85k-120k.

    --
    WTF Slashdot, why do I have to login 50 times to post?
  110. It kinda makes sense the other way by shis-ka-bob · · Score: 1

    A few months after the company name is fucked, you have a new company name. Sounds like the birth of a new name to me.

    --
    Think global, act loco
  111. But there is a 'shortage' by shis-ka-bob · · Score: 3, Insightful

    They are not lying so much as using the word in a new way. There really is a shortage of programmers willing to work at WalMart salaries.

    --
    Think global, act loco
  112. Re:Excuse me? All criticism has been well earned. by KGBear · · Score: 1

    That's just bad all around, and I see no reason that it should be allowed to continue as it has been.

    That might be true, but as an H1B worker myself, and I realize I can only speak for myself, I can say a) I am not from India; b) I make exactly as much as my American coworkers; c) I don't feel my employer treats me unfairly in any way.

    I do agree with the basic unfairness of some features of the program. I really don't like living with the constant possibility that I might have to leave the country on short notice. I am not "afraid to be sent back"; it just makes basic things like planning my future, thinking about retirement, even finding a good school for my child (who happens to be an American citizen by the way) that much harder. I also don't like it that I really don't have a lot of leverage when it comes to discussing promotions and raises, although so far my employer has treated me no different than any of my colleagues.

    It must be said though that I knew what the rules were when I got into it. If I don't like the rules I am free to leave at any moment. I don't care much what people's preconceived notions about "not knowing their rights in our country" are, to quote someone up the thread. The fact is that I, and I suspect most of my fellow H1B holders, are sophisticated enough to be able to learn how to live in a foreign country. If any of us chooses not to invest the time to understand the country, its laws and its culture, that's their problem. So say what you will about reforming the system but please be aware that I knew exactly what I was getting into; I am free to leave at any time; I am upholding my side of the bargain; and I expect the U.S. government to uphold their side. Please do not speak on my behalf. I don't want the rules of the game to change before the game is over. Or I want a say in how those rules get changed. Anything less would be extremely unfair.

    Now, you are certainly free to complain on your own behalf. If you feel strongly about the H1B program, by all means go learn all you can about it and do everything the law allows you to do to change what you don't like. Just don't say you have *my* interests in mind when you do it.

  113. There are many like these crooks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am happy to see these 2 crooks nailed by the Govt. and I say being an Indian, once H1-B slave worker who earned freedom to see the american dream unachievable. When I first started I earned 42K/year which was a whole lot compared to what I earned in India(5K/year).I thought of saving and get some economic freedom.Little did I realize it was very little compared to what an american citizen would get for the same job,I was subcontracted to IBM(big -blue). I am sure the middle level contracting companies took most of the money while I was chained into bondage with a hope to get a green card.I slogged my precious years in which I would have given my energy to do something big not only in monetary terms also in creative aspects.I am in this profession not by my education , but by my will to be what I was denied in India. As the years took toll on my psyche where I learnt that most of this consulting industry is built on leaches who have little concern for real customer but on their bottom line. I finally reached the mecca of IT(Sillicon Valley) where I am able to relive some of the dreams only to see the whole economy tanking no matter what hard work you put,you can never have an american dream. I tell most of my folks back in India, if you can make it successful back home , you better do it there, other wise spend a lifetime chasing a mirage.I get to hear that you made a lot of money and you dont want anyone else to have the same opportunity, so I say,it comes with a price,are you ready to pay.

  114. Re:Let it begin by sjames · · Score: 1

    H1Bs are SUPPOSED to be paid as much as an American worker would, but aren't always. In other cases, they ARE, but the difference is extracted by forcing them to work many more hours a week or be deported. In other cases, it's extracted by forcing them to put up with substandard working conditions.

    Historically, the response to needing a niche skill was to find a generalist who was close and then send them for training to get up to speed. Wise employers were somewhat free with the training since they never knew exactly when someone might be needed right away. This encouraged loyalty in both directions and long term employment, both good for our society.

    You might have run into some racism from time to time, unfortunately it's everywhere. But it also sounds like you're writing off every complaint as racism, perhaps to avoid facing up to the real issues. If one or two applicants won't work with your current management, it MIGHT be racism on their parts. Fine, 10% of Americans are out of work, so hire another. If NO applicant will work with your current management, you have bad management or aren't paying enough for what you want done.

    Of course, it sounds like you also want people to work in a dank cave and are too cheap to buy enough furniture. No wonder you have a hiring problem. You're willing to pay someone 200K/year but you're too damned cheap to throw in a cubicle and a chair? Something's screwy there.

  115. Re:Let it begin by g8oz · · Score: 1

    The low cost of many products and services in the US is based on those providing them being payed really low wages.

    You're discounting the contribution of productivity growth. But I don't disagree over all.

    The benefits of productivity growth accrue to the owners of capital, not workers.

  116. Re:Let it begin by sodul · · Score: 1

    60k was my salary out of 'internship' with a Masters. No previous experience other than 1y internship at that same company. I did get raises over time but moved to a different company to get the bigger raise. After 5y I was well within your range, still on a H1-B, higher if you include bonuses.
    The biggest hurdle to get hired somewhere else: the 3y experience mark. Before that companies would not even reply to my resumes, nowadays I turn down head hunters.

  117. Re:Let it begin by sjames · · Score: 1

    So your solution is that we should all become nomads?

    Honestly, your entire post could be summarized as "shut up and eat your gruel!"

  118. Re:Let it begin by sjames · · Score: 1

    No, they can't. Not really. The bureaucratic barriers to that process are quite high compared to those for a Citizen or someone on a green card.

  119. Re:Let it begin by atomic777 · · Score: 1

    Just based on this post, it is clear that the US is lucky to have you as an immigrant. Immigration policy should encourage you and make your life as easy as possible, since you are the "right" type of immigrant, but that does not seem to be the result of the current policies.

    I believe that most Americans would agree with this, regardless of their stance on the H1-B program.

  120. Re:Let it begin by KGBear · · Score: 1

    Thank you.

  121. In Jersey... by hazydave · · Score: 1

    ... anything's legal, as long as you don't get caught. - Travelling Wilburys.

    --
    -Dave Haynie
  122. Re:Let it begin by billybacs · · Score: 0

    That could work, except you could then prompt many companies to just move their HQ overseas and do everything in their power to minimize their US presence while maintaining a market in the US.

  123. Re:Let it begin by Rasperin · · Score: 1

    Interesting, are you an India Indian or of another race? (Maybe a citizen of the EU working in the US)

    --
    WTF Slashdot, why do I have to login 50 times to post?
  124. Re:Let it begin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I desperately want to agree with you - but can't because what you written is not factually correct (even if what you INTENDED to write was).

    Legitimate use of H1B's, by definition, are for foreign workers who are brought to the US from outside to fill a gap in skills/staff-availability. They are required to be paid the prevailing wage. So, if an employer hires a foreign worker under H1-B, they aren't saving any money.

    You point that H1-B will depress wages etc. due to the laws of supply-and-demand is somewhat on-point - but by limiting it to 65K/year, the impact to the overall worker pool (of millions of theoretically available workers) is hugely mitigated. More importantly, when the "onshore" cost gets too high, companies look for ways to "off-shore" these positions. So a balance needs to be reached and H1-B is a way to address that.

    As for the education system - you're tilting at windmills. You can rant all you want, but until you hold your congressman and senator accountable to drive greater investment in education at the federal/state level (and as a community stop voting down measures to improve education in your local schools), you're not going to change anything. The US education system has the most potential - but we self-castrate when we spend more time deciding if Creationism will be taught in schools at the expense of Darwinism ... rather than spending that time with our kids encouraging them to do well in school and being engaged (if you watched CNN last night, there was a documentary on what contributes to a successful school system).

    The current immigration structure is one that has been created by the American people - if you are frustrated with it, don't shoot the Mexicans or the Indians. Castigate your representatives who've sold themselves out to companies that want to turn "America into a 3rd world shit hole so you can find the cheap programmers you want to make some extra profit right now". If you don't do that, you'll be repeating the mistakes of your parents (who also didn't hold their representatives accountable).

    This is a good mantra "If the regular system is to slow and corrupt, FIX THAT, don't make shortcuts." --- but you should camp out in front of your congressman and senator if you want it taken seriously. Otherwise, you're largely preaching to the choir.

  125. Re:Let it begin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    U.S. has its own definition

    Yeah, but guess where that came from? It's not god-given; rather, it's derived from what the people who already came earlier believed in.

    Why should the old guard be allowed to dictate what the new guard should do, simply by virtue of their ancestors (not even themselves, just their ancestors!) having arrived earlier?

  126. Re:Let it begin by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

    Why should the old guard be allowed to dictate what the new guard should do, simply by virtue of their ancestors (not even themselves, just their ancestors!) having arrived earlier?

    Because the original definition is objectively better.

  127. Re:Let it begin by sodul · · Score: 1

    EU citizen working in the Silicon Valley. If you really want more details, it's all on my homepage (resume, vacation pictures and all).

  128. Solution - Make it easy for skilled immigrants by sgoguen · · Score: 1

    The problem is the H1B system. Because it costs so much money in legal fees to hire an immigrant, you end up with corrupt organizations who exploit this "debt". If a skilled immigrant can get a job that that meets a minimum salary, they should be easy to hire. Simple as that. The way I look at it: I can compete with an immigrant who is able to demand top dollar for his skills here. I can't compete with an immigrant who's locked out of the job market and being paid like an indentured servant. We should be importing the best and brightest into this country so they can earn top dollar here, pay taxes here, start businesses here, etc.

  129. MIDDLESEX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not one joke about Middlesex? Apparently no one RTFA...