Slashdot Mirror


Japanese Spacecraft Bringing Back Space Rock

phaic tan writes "Bridie Smith from the Sydney Morning Herald reports on the Hayabusa spacecraft returning to earth in June with samples from the Itokawa Asteroid: 'A Japanese spacecraft will land in Australia in June, bringing with it samples from an asteroid found 300 million kilometres from Earth. The unmanned Hayabusa spacecraft, launched in May 2003, will become the first spacecraft to bring asteroid material to Earth when it lands in Woomera, South Australia, later this year.'"

116 comments

  1. Now that.... by vikingpower · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...rocks !

    --
    Religous speak to God. Insane are spoken to by God. When all shut up, one can finally hear Shostakovich in peace
    1. Re:Now that.... by houstonbofh · · Score: 1

      ...rocks !

      No doubt! I mean I though those Hayabusa Smart cars were cool, but this is Awesome!

    2. Re:Now that.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      No, it locks.

    3. Re:Now that.... by couchslug · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The more we can do without sending humans to do it in person, the faster exploration will progress.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    4. Re:Now that.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The more we can do without sending humans to do it in person, the longer it will take before we colonize other planets.

      In my opinion eploration by itself has very little value unless we use the knowledge we gain. If we don't intend to put more humans in space I don't really see any big reason to put more robots in space.

    5. Re:Now that.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All we found out there was a bunch of smeggin rocks.

    6. Re:Now that.... by rwa2 · · Score: 1

      Sounds cool... how long before we can start mining the stuff?

      It would be neat to be able to start hijacking mineral and ice asteroids into LEO and start figuring out how to process the material from them so we don't have to spend so much resources launching mass up from the Earth. I'd say this is probably a pretty important first step in commercializing the space industry, beyond simply ferrying satellites or creating space hotels. Plus it's compartively low risk (other than getting attacked by astrologers)... just build some thrusters to harvest small asteroids and park them in Earth orbit; once they're there you can do some science and analysis on them and start auctioning off material for projects.

      Yeah, been playing EVE and Vendetta Online a bit too much.

    7. Re:Now that.... by blair1q · · Score: 2, Insightful

      We need to know more before sending humans because if a colony of humans dies determining the hundred reasons that colonizing that spot is impossible then it's as though you were simply gambling lives for your own amusement.

      Really, unless the exploring humans luck into somewhere they can take off their helmets and gloves and physically interact with the environment, they might as well be here watching it on TV.

    8. Re:Now that.... by camperdave · · Score: 1

      ...just build some thrusters to harvest small asteroids and park them in Earth orbit;

      Right idea, wrong implementation. You send the harvesters to the asteroids, and then ship the water/ice to the various fuel depots. Why move the entire asteroid around when all you need is the ice?

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    9. Re:Now that.... by mbone · · Score: 1

      History is against you. The 10 years (1962-1972) of manned space exploration has never been matched by unmanned probes. Partly this is capabilities, partly this is politics, but the experiment has been tried and the results are against you.

    10. Re:Now that.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In other news, the Space Music Industry Association of Aliens has announced they are suing the Japanese astronauts for piracy, claiming theft of copyrighted materials. "We have the rights to all Space Rock" claimed SMIAA spokesalien Marvin Martian, "and we intend to enforce our claims".

    11. Re:Now that.... by element-o.p. · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Really, unless the exploring humans luck into somewhere they can take off their helmets and gloves and physically interact with the environment, they might as well be here watching it on TV.

      Gotta disagree with you there. Given the choice of walking on the moon in helmet and gloves or watching a robot crawl across the moon on T.V., I'd much rather be in the helmet and gloves actually on the moon. Even HD and 5.1 surround sound can't capture all the experience of actually being there.

      --
      MCSE? No, sir...I don't do Windows. Yes, I am an idealist. What's your point?
    12. Re:Now that.... by couchslug · · Score: 2, Insightful

      People tend to confuse "using the knowledge we gain" with "sending humans quickly".

      That was fine in terrestrial exploration when men and ships were throwaways. There is a silly emotional need to lead with flesh when the technology we (absolutely) require (anyway) for humans to exploit their environment is not mature. Remote-manned tech, be it distant-manned on Earth or closely-manned onsite, is still remote-manned.

      We are sending humans for their own amusement, not because they are useful to the process. At the moment they are a waste of resources. We have eons to send tourists, but actual exploration no longer has anything to do with putting meat on the spot.

      Those who want adventure should pay a commercial outfit to give it to them. Knowledge and power are more useful.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    13. Re:Now that.... by vtcodger · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ***History is against you. The 10 years (1962-1972) of manned space exploration has never been matched by unmanned probes.***

      With the notable exception of the return of lunar material during the Apollo program, most important research has been done with unmanned devices -- Viking, Spirit, Hubble etc. In a sane environment, what Skylab 1973-1974 would have established was that there was very little need or use for humans in space -- at least in the 20th Century and probably well into the 21st as well. Instead we ended up with the monster, money sucking black hole of the space shuttle/ISS whose very high cost, and inability to meet schedule objectives probably set space science overall back at least a decade.

      --
      You can't see ANYTHING from a car, You've got to get out of the goddamned contraption and walk...Edward Abbey
    14. Re:Now that.... by izomiac · · Score: 1

      It depends on what you view as exploration. If you care about mapping the universe, finding out relative concentrations of various elements, and building better probes, then unmanned exploration is the best choice. If you care more about more literally "traveling somewhere in search of discovery", developing human-oriented technology, or learning more about biology then manned exploration is better. Plus, of things that are intrinsically useless, which stimulates the human mind more, knowing the mineral composition of Neptune's moons, or being able to scale Olympus Mons?

    15. Re:Now that.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      lacist

    16. Re:Now that.... by lwsimon · · Score: 1

      With the exception of colonization, which is (in my estimation) 50 years of dedicated research away, you're right.

      --
      Learn about Photography Basics.
    17. Re:Now that.... by Laser+Dan · · Score: 1

      Given the choice of walking on the moon in helmet and gloves or watching a robot crawl across the moon on T.V., I'd much rather be in the helmet and gloves actually on the moon. Even HD and 5.1 surround sound can't capture all the experience of actually being there.

      True, but you aren't going there unless you are an astronaut. The choice is between one manned mission, where you get to watch a couple of people walk around and do some experiments, or 5-10 unmanned missions which achieve a lot more.

      If the unmanned missions can analyse potential colony sites and deploy some infrastructure, manned missions can follow and you may eventually have a chance to live in an offworld site.

    18. Re:Now that.... by phaic+tan · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Completely agree. There are many advantages to exploring in person.You can't make split second decisions with a remote probe when communication lags are in the spans of minutes. The success or faliure of a mission can be totally dependent on being able to make the right move at the right time.

      --
      Who knows what evil lurks in the hearts of men? - the Shadow knows.
    19. Re:Now that.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I ror'd.

    20. Re:Now that.... by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      ... here the only thing I could think of is the Hayabusa sportbike hah

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
    21. Re:Now that.... by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      Yes, we know not to use automated machines in our wars on other planets now.

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
  2. Smart enough not to land it on their own soil. by Orga · · Score: 4, Funny

    Picked another big island at least.. you know, in case the blob needs to be isolated. Al though I'd think if they landed in Japan at least Godzilla could melt it if it got too large. Oh well.

    1. Re:Smart enough not to land it on their own soil. by DamageLabs · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Australia IS a bigger target. Probably easier to hit.

    2. Re:Smart enough not to land it on their own soil. by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 2, Funny

      They also have extensive experience with rocks.

    3. Re:Smart enough not to land it on their own soil. by Ruvim · · Score: 1

      There are much more deserted areas in Australia than in Japan

    4. Re:Smart enough not to land it on their own soil. by snarfies · · Score: 1

      Indeed. The Zeon forces in the One Year War managed to drop an entire space colony on Sydney during Operation British. It wasn't their actual target, but as you say, it was so much easier to hit...

    5. Re:Smart enough not to land it on their own soil. by networkconsultant · · Score: 1

      It's all part of the plan to overtake Australia, they've wanted it ever since WWII, now they can let their alien minions do the dirty work and come in like heroes after the years of devastation. I for one welcome our new rocky asteroid based alien overlords.

    6. Re:Smart enough not to land it on their own soil. by SnarfQuest · · Score: 1

      Does this mean no Taco Bell target? I want a chance at free food!

      --
      Who would win this election: Andrew Weiner vs Andrew Weiner's weiner.
    7. Re:Smart enough not to land it on their own soil. by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but most of it you wouldn't want to hit.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    8. Re:Smart enough not to land it on their own soil. by blair1q · · Score: 3, Informative
    9. Re:Smart enough not to land it on their own soil. by arthur01 · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you should do some investigation as to what is actually at Wommera. Then you might realize why that site was chosen.

  3. yay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    space cooties, joy

    1. Re:yay by singingjim1 · · Score: 1

      Not that I really believe something catastrophic will come of it, but I was thinking the same thing. :)

    2. Re:yay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wormwood... look at the shape of the asteroid.

  4. What rocks even more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Is that Meatloaf has significant input into some of the software that went into that space craft. Say what you want about his music (its shit) but the guy has made many important contributions to both the Linux kernel and also more academic code as this. The guy deserves more credit!

    1. Re:What rocks even more by lxs · · Score: 2, Funny

      First Brian May, now Meatloaf?
      Is astrophysics mandatory for classic rock legends? What's next? Will Robert Plant drop his Aleister Crowley obsession in favor of studying the Pioneer anomaly?

    2. Re:What rocks even more by hcpxvi · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Would someone care to explain this Meatloaf/Linux Kernel slashmeme for the benefit of an old codger who is entirely missing the cultural reference? Oh, and yes, I did google it before posting this.

    3. Re:What rocks even more by ushering05401 · · Score: 1

      Will Robert Plant drop his Aleister Crowley obsession in favor of studying the Pioneer anomaly?

      That would be quite the unexplained deviation of trajectory for Mr. Plant. Whether he is unmanned or not is up for debate. Has he been doing any ED ads yet?

    4. Re:What rocks even more by lxs · · Score: 1

      Crowley did write:
      We place no reliance
      on Virgin or pigeon,
      our method is science
      our aim is religion

      Is Meat Loaf really a kernel hacker?

    5. Re:What rocks even more by insnprsn · · Score: 1

      +1 for this, explanation please?

    6. Re:What rocks even more by ShadowRangerRIT · · Score: 1

      It's a meme? That's the first I've heard of it. Maybe because this is the first time someone modded it interesting (I bump up Interesting and Informative by a point for the filter). I suppose people do it for the same reason the like inserting false facts into Wikipedia, trolling for giggles, but I'll admit this is an unusually odd manifestation. Choosing Meatloaf (over any other public figure) has the advantage of getting Google really confused; it doesn't know the difference between the person and the food, since Linux has nothing to do with either. I'd be curious to know the origin myself.

      --
      $_ = "wftedskaebjgdpjgidbsmnjgcdwatb"; tr/a-z/oh, turtleneck Phrase Jar!/; print
    7. Re:What rocks even more by dotancohen · · Score: 1

      Would someone care to explain this Meatloaf/Linux Kernel slashmeme for the benefit of an old codger who is entirely missing the cultural reference? Oh, and yes, I did google it before posting this.

      Meatloaf has contributed some driver code, I think it was the winmodems, under at least two different pseudonyms. Of course, "Meatloaf" is itself a pseudonym!

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
    8. Re:What rocks even more by BranMan · · Score: 1

      Would someone care to explain this Meatloaf/Linux Kernel slashmeme for the benefit of an old codger who is entirely missing the cultural reference? Oh, and yes, I did google it before posting this.

      Meatloaf has contributed some driver code, I think it was the winmodems, under at least two different pseudonyms. Of course, "Meatloaf" is itself a pseudonym!

      Care to elaborate with more details? It's very cool if true (not that I'm all that doubting. Stranger things have been true. Actress and pinup LeMar worked on developing acoustically guided torpedoes in WWII).

    9. Re:What rocks even more by dotancohen · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Being a high-tech field and competitive field, musicians are always in the need of the cutting edge. Quite a few musicians have either directly or indirectly contributed to kernel or application code, either through paying for development or getting right down and coding it themselves. The Meatloaf code may or may not have been actually coded by him, though that is how people like to say it.

      The other high-tech artist's field is movie production, and they contribute code as well.

      --
      It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
  5. Best story title ever. by verbalcontract · · Score: 1, Troll

    They used the fly-fly machine to bring sky hard-things to the big blue room's floor!

  6. Meh by 0racle · · Score: 0

    It's been done.

    --
    "I use a Mac because I'm just better than you are."
  7. This can only end,... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    with the destruction of Tokyo by a giant lizard or mecha.

    1. Re:This can only end,... by vikingpower · · Score: 1

      ...by a giant lizard or mecha.

      Nope. By the Shrike.

      --
      Religous speak to God. Insane are spoken to by God. When all shut up, one can finally hear Shostakovich in peace
    2. Re:This can only end,... by Mindcontrolled · · Score: 1

      Since when does the Shrike need means of transport to get to where it wants to be?

      --
      Ubi solitudinem faciunt, pacem appellant.
    3. Re:This can only end,... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or the worst case scenario: a giant moth.

  8. Maybe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Space_rock Maybe this will put an end to the pop music craze.

  9. Earth on crash course? by adosch · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Anyone catch the doomsday paragraph at the end FTFA:

    ''If we're on a collision course with an asteroid we need to know if they are rock-solid or if they are piles of rubble,'' he said. ''That will help us predict how best to deal with them.''

    ...how many sinister space asteroid scares have we had in the past decade claiming utter calamity on the earth? I''m not claiming conspiracy theory on this one (so stay in your caves, trolls!) but it'll be cool to see what kind of composition and materials are uncovered on that thing; because it would be good to know. It's nice to get good, "rock" solid evidence to back up a lot of theories and guessed accuracies of our solar system that are mostly data interpreted facts and not visual or tangible.

    1. Re:Earth on crash course? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is /., you expected people to actually RTFA?

    2. Re:Earth on crash course? by MoeDrippins · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Was that quote in reference to THIS asteroid? If you'll pardon the paraphrasing, i.e., "If we're on a collision course with this asteroid...", vs. "This experiment is a valuable technology and skillset to have, so if we find some as-yet unfound asteroid in the future with which we are on a collision course, we may repeat this process to find out its composition..." ? I read it as the latter, but I'm hardly a yardstick for understanding.

      --
      Before you design for reuse, make sure to design it for use.
    3. Re:Earth on crash course? by durrr · · Score: 2, Funny

      The quote doesn't say anything about calamity.
      If you read between the lines you'd also realize we are on collision course with an asteroid fragment thanks to this mission, it will hit Woomera, South Australia, later this year if nothing is done to prevent it. I suggest we hit it with all our nukes after touchdown, that saves us the trouble of hitting a moving target.

  10. Space rock? by Delusion_ · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Oh, physical rocks. I thought at first this was about Acid Mothers Temple, the other Japanese Space Rock.

    1. Re:Space rock? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, physical rocks. I thought at first this was about Acid Mothers Temple, the other Japanese Space Rock.

      Bartkid sez,
      That was my first thought, too, but I had Hawkwind in mind rather than the just-as-fine AMT.

    2. Re:Space rock? by BJ_Covert_Action · · Score: 1

      Japanese Space Rock? That genre exists? Great, there goes another day of productivity in the name of researching something totally badass sounding. This better not disappoint.

  11. Andromeda Strain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Do they have a 'Wildfire' installation in Australia to study any space microbes that might be on the rock?

    1. Re:Andromeda Strain by snspdaarf · · Score: 1

      Well, it got me through college...

      --
      Why, without your clothes, you're naked, Miss Dudley!
    2. Re:Andromeda Strain by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Unless there beer is sterno, then no.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    3. Re:Andromeda Strain by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      Bah, no alien virus is a match for Russell Crowe, mate!

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  12. What could go wrong? by motorhead · · Score: 0

    Slip a zombie on the barbie!

    --
    Employee Of the Month - Cyberdyne Systems Corporation - September 1997
  13. Australia, not Ueda! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here's hoping that it actually lands in Australia, and not Ueda.

    Though hot springs are cool, too. ^_^

  14. Dangerous by vvaduva · · Score: 2, Funny

    What if the asteroid contains a dangerous life form? Don't these people watch any sci-fi movies?

    1. Re:Dangerous by 2obvious4u · · Score: 1
    2. Re:Dangerous by rickb928 · · Score: 1

      People say WE are a dangerous life form. So far, so good. We could be doing a LOT worse.

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    3. Re:Dangerous by jpmorgan · · Score: 1

      That's fine, it's welcome to have a go on a planet covered by dangerous life forms.

    4. Re:Dangerous by rah1420 · · Score: 1

      First thing I thought of was Scoop. And not that icky new version either. Saw that and cringed. Give me my frickin' lasers in the central core.

      --
      Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens.
    5. Re:Dangerous by mercurywoodrose · · Score: 1

      Me too. i met paula kelly backstage after her LA performance in "dont bother me i cant cope" when the director of andromeda strain visited her to discuss her upcoming role. the director and producer took me and my dad out for drinks (i was 11), and the producer ordered me a horses neck. saw robert wises oscar, and watched a bad movie at his malibu beach mansion movie theatre ("public eye", from the 70's). andromeda strain rocks, and not just cause im a frickin insider.

      --
      You hear about the person who didn't rely on anecdotal evidence to support his belief system?
  15. Thank You, Japan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    for infecting Earth.

    Yours In Akademgorodok,
    N. Haflinger

  16. WooHoo AUSTRALIA! by notommy · · Score: 1

    You have just doubled your achievements! Your list now read:
    1. Rotary Washing Line
    2. First spacecraft to bring asteroid material to Earth

    Wait.. It was Japanese. Sorry. I guess it's still the rotary washing line for now :(

    1. Re:WooHoo AUSTRALIA! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Don't they also hold the record of most different horrible ways to die by nature?

    2. Re:WooHoo AUSTRALIA! by M-RES · · Score: 1

      You forgot the Ute (pronounced 'yoot')... aka pickup. ;)

    3. Re:WooHoo AUSTRALIA! by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Louis Pasteur invented Aussie beer but we at least invented the fridge to keep it in :)

    4. Re:WooHoo AUSTRALIA! by In+hydraulis · · Score: 1

      rsync
      Samba
      and of course this little gem

      I expect at least one follow-up WOOOSH! post but I derive pleasure from putting smartarses in their place.

  17. Andromeda Strain by soupforare · · Score: 1

    Will massive beer consumption save the Aussie populace!?

    --
    --- Do you believe in the day?
  18. Space is the future. by bobs666 · · Score: 0, Troll

    Being able to acquire materials from space will be required. You can't explore space in a vacuum. LoL. Obama... to little to late.

  19. Lovecraft. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Soon we will know if H.P. Lovecraft was right.

  20. Woomera is the perfect place. by atheistmonk · · Score: 1

    Any illegal aliens that come along with the spacerocks will be placed in Woomera Detention Centre for at least six months and then blasted back into outer space while the whales cry for them.

    1. Re:Woomera is the perfect place. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Surely you jest. It's Australia, they'll get put in Woomera for 30 days then granted Permanent Residency like every other illegal alien.

  21. Watch out for Aviads! by Mantrid · · Score: 1

    They've been wandering around there lately.

  22. Am I missing something? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Last time I heard, the japanese had lost contact with the spacecraft when it was near the asteroid after MAYBE taking samples. They had given up and declared the mission a failure. I must've missed something here.

    1. Re:Am I missing something? by mbone · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yes, you missed a lot. They recovered it and are getting back, after a real "Perils of Pauline" type adventure.

  23. Andromeda Strain II by Wormfoud · · Score: 1

    Let's hope some farmer doesn't find the spacecraft and crack it open...

    1. Re:Andromeda Strain II by Farmer+Tim · · Score: 1
      --
      Blank until /. makes another boneheaded UI decision.
    2. Re:Andromeda Strain II by M-RES · · Score: 1

      Yes, with the average Aussie farmer in the interior having about 10 million acres of land ;)

    3. Re:Andromeda Strain II by Farmer+Tim · · Score: 1

      The pair pictured aren't farmers, they're erosion enthusiasts.

      --
      Blank until /. makes another boneheaded UI decision.
  24. A plucky little space probe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    There have been *so* many technical problems with this mission, such as failure of reaction wheels, loss of the rover during deployment, damage to the solar cells by a flare, loss of attitude and communications due to a fuel leak, and so on. The mission timeline reads like "And then this broke, and we managed to fix it. And then this, and we fixed that. And ..." Yet they are getting close to pulling off the main goals of the mission (sample return). A failure of the sampling procedure probably means they've got a bit of dust rather than the larger pieces they were hoping for, but it's better than nothing! And the pictures and other data the probe has returned are very cool. The asteroid is a "rubble pile", which had been speculated for many asteroids, but not directly seen before.

    The engineers and scientists that are running the mission deserve a lot of credit for keeping this thing going despite the problems (the contractors that built it, not as much :-)).

  25. Might have Asteroid Samples on It by BJ_Covert_Action · · Score: 5, Interesting

    If I recall correctly, the Hayabusa spacecraft MIGHT have samples on it from the asteroid. Then again, it might not. The Hayabusa was originally designed to hover above the surface of the asteroid and fire a pellet into the surface, causing an ejection of material that the probe would then collect in a sample box. However, the probe has been having propulsion issues, amongst other things, and was required to land on the surface of the asteroid rather than hover above it. This, of course, was an achievement in itself. However, upon landing, the probe's pellet ejection system failed and no surface material was displaced forcibly. As I understand it, researchers are hoping that some dust or something settled into the sample collection bin. However, at this time, there is no certainty that it will contain anything.

    The most fascinating part about this mission, however, was the fact that it was using four plasma thrusters to steadily propel it to its destination. To my knowledge, this is the first time such technology has been used as the primary propulsion source for a mission. Even more fascinating is that three of the four thrusters failed and, as of now, one functioning thruster is a jury rigged hack job that they got working by using the control systems from one failed thruster and the thruster and propellant from a second. That said, Hayabusa has been an absolute testament to the tenacity and creativity in problem solving of JAXA. It has been an exciting mission, and I am very much looking forward to finding out just how lucky the unlucky probe has been in collecting dust bits from the asteroid.

    1. Re:Might have Asteroid Samples on It by mbone · · Score: 2, Informative

      You are correct. No one knows if there is anything to be returned. I myself would bet for at least a few micrograms, which would be enough to do some real science.

    2. Re:Might have Asteroid Samples on It by Sockatume · · Score: 3, Funny

      Tenacity is right. Space probe engineers are the sort of individuals who could coax a car into starting with no gasoline. Or engine.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
  26. You're all missing the point by smooth+wombat · · Score: 1

    The point of this endeavor was to determine if this a true asteroid or a planet-bomb sent by the Gamilons in their attempt to kill us.

    If it's just an asteroid, no harm, no foul. But if it's a planet bomb, then we need to get the Argo ready to take off and begin its long journey to Iscandar even though Queen Starsha sent us plans for the wave motion engine but couldn't send us plans for the Cosmo DNA device.

    Of course, maybe the LHC is really the first stage in the production of the wave motion gun and all of this is merely a ruse to keep the people from panicking.

    --
    We will bankrupt ourselves in the vain search for absolute security. -- Dwight D. Eisenhower
    1. Re:You're all missing the point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whoa... heavy!

  27. Let me get this straight.... by zerospeaks · · Score: 1

    So the Japanese sent a motorcycle in space to bring back an asteroid?

    --
    http://wwww.zerospeaks.com
    1. Re:Let me get this straight.... by element-o.p. · · Score: 1

      YES!!! And it's another Suzuki (albeit a *lot* faster than mine).

      --
      MCSE? No, sir...I don't do Windows. Yes, I am an idealist. What's your point?
  28. Crap by MickyTheIdiot · · Score: 1

    I thought this was going to be an article about J-Pop. I guess "Space Rock" isn't really coming back in Japan.

  29. Maybe by mbone · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There is no actual guarantee that there is a sample in the chamber (as the pellets misfired).

    It's a remarkable achievement to get it back; let's hope that there is something inside.

    1. Re:Maybe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And would it be called asteroid rock or meteorite rock when it gets here? It would have survived the descent through the earths atmosphere and landed

  30. Everybody is going ... by Rambo+Tribble · · Score: 1

    ... to look pretty stupid when the sample's mother shows up to claim revenge. Didn't these people watch the original "Star Trek" series?

    1. Re:Everybody is going ... by element-o.p. · · Score: 1

      "No kill I"?

      --
      MCSE? No, sir...I don't do Windows. Yes, I am an idealist. What's your point?
  31. Didn't they already try this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't think the resulting havoc was worth it:

    The Green Slime (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0064393/)

  32. Creepshow? by sharkey · · Score: 1

    Jordy Verill, you lunkhead!

    --

    --
    "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  33. And then a town dies by one2wonder · · Score: 1

    I have this feeling I can't shake that everyone near where this thing lands is going to die from some unknown infection except for the babies and drunks.

    --
    Never cease to wonder. If you do you have become compliant with the world around you, and that is a very dangerous thing
    1. Re:And then a town dies by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      Hot damn, that means I'm safe! Take *that* you self-righteous AA sponsor!

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  34. Yoshimi? by untorqued · · Score: 1

    Drat! From the headline, I thought this mission was kicking off a new wave of music in the spirit of the Flaming Lips.

  35. And to think I scrape space rock off my roof. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This stuff falls to earth all the time. I scraped a bunch of it off my roof and pulled it out with a magnet.

    Procedure.

    1. IF you have gutters put bucket under gutter
    2. If you do not have gutters find a place where the water channels and place a bucket under it
    3. Hose off your roof
    4. Collect dirty water and strain it through a very fine strainer (water only should get through)
    5. Stir debris with magnet

    The magnet should pick up iron debris from space. Rusty roof nails don't count.

    Cost .0008 cents of water and a few dollars worth of time , 5 dollar bucket, and 1 dollar magnet.

  36. Right band, wrong person by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Will Robert Plant drop his Aleister Crowley obsession

    I doubt it since it was Jimmy Page, not Robert Plant, who was obsessed with Crowley.

    Plant was obsessed with "oooh yeah, oooohhhh, yeah! Lemme get back lemme get back..." (And no, the Motörhead bass player and lead screacher was not lunging at him).

  37. Innovation minister FTW! by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

    The innovation minister, Kim Carr, said the spacecraft will land within the 130,000 square kilometre Woomera Prohibited Area,

    Man, we need an innovation minister too! Finally a minister role that I can sympathize with!

    --
    Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
  38. Japanese Spacecraft? by Anomalous+Cowbird · · Score: 1

    Is that a Hawkwind tribute band?

  39. Documentary? by mdm42 · · Score: 1
    It sounds like a hell of an achievement, given all the stuff that went wrong. I presume that much of this was recorded, so...

    Anyone know if there's (going to be) a documentary movie of some sort? I'd call it "The Little Engine that Could". Oh wait...

    --
    New mod option wanted: -1 DrunkenRambling
  40. enemy? WTF? by darkeye · · Score: 1

    it's quite sad and telling that the only use for research the Australian 'innovation minister' finds is how to destroy something.

    in this light, I wonder what they have against 'scientific whale hunting' by the Japanese...