Slashdot Mirror


Russian Company Buys ICQ

An anonymous reader writes "AOL has sold ICQ to Digital Sky Technologies (DST), Russia's largest Internet company, for US$187.5 million. DST's offer was apparently more attractive than those of Russia's ProfMedia and China's Tencent. ICQ, originally released in 1996 and bought by AOL in 1998 for US$407 million, was one of the world's first major instant messaging systems. Although largely forgotten in English-speaking countries, it remains widely popular in Central Europe, Russia, and Israel. Moscow News has additional coverage of the deal."

136 comments

  1. Very popular by etherlad · · Score: 1

    Also widely popular among spammers.

    I still have my ICQ account (seven-digit UIN starting with 1, woo) but pretty much the only traffic it gets anymore is spammers trying to add me and trying to send me IMs. Trillian fortunately blocks the latter for me.

    --
    Soylens viridis homines es
    1. Re:Very popular by MortimerV · · Score: 1

      I've had the same experience. The only people I used to talk to on it have moved to other IM services, and now it's just the occasional spammer. I don't really know why I keep it logged in.

      My account's a 7-digit UIN starting with 9, haha. I must've had this account for around 10 years.

    2. Re:Very popular by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      I still have my ICQ account (seven-digit UIN starting with 1, woo)

      *yawn*, I have a six digit one starting with '2' I don't think it has received a valid non-spam message in three years ago.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    3. Re:Very popular by Arancaytar · · Score: 1

      Same here; it's pretty much a spam wasteland. I still have the account credentials in Pidgin, but disabled the account for the past 3 years because only spammers used it.

      I'll have to say this for ICQ though - their feature to store offline messages server-side was a feature far beyond what AIM had or even has now.

      My UID was 282026638. Funny how some numbers just stick in memory.

    4. Re:Very popular by Scaba · · Score: 5, Funny

      *yawn*, I have a six digit one starting with '2' I don't think it has received a valid non-spam message in three years ago.

      double *yawn* I have a negative account number that's also an irrational number. I receive messages from the future.

    5. Re:Very popular by sentientbeing · · Score: 1, Funny

      Mine ends in an i, its an imaginary number in the complex plane and I receive messages from another dimension.

      --

      ------
      beware he who would deny you access to information, for in his mind he dreams himself your master
    6. Re:Very popular by davester666 · · Score: 1

      Interesting. How do you like communicating with us humans?

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    7. Re:Very popular by Kozar_The_Malignant · · Score: 1

      Mine is a 9-digit prime number. Do solicitations from Russian hookers count as spam or porn?

      --
      Some mornings it's hardly worth chewing through the restraints to get out of bed.
    8. Re:Very popular by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ICQ now is largely used by russian spammers as contact point.
      Since in 21st century it is hard to force user call +7-495-xxxyyzz.
      Yet another reason to stop using it.

    9. Re:Very popular by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mine is a quaternion, and I receive messages from distorted universes.

    10. Re:Very popular by xtracto · · Score: 1

      Haha, I think I have a 6 digit ICQ account as well... the bad thing is I do not remember my password.

      And now that we are talking about web-dong waving, My hotmail account was registered at:
        28 august 1997

      --
      Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
    11. Re:Very popular by DrugCheese · · Score: 1

      Yeah 6 digit ... but starting with 3 :(

      --
      *DrugCheese rants*
    12. Re:Very popular by yotto · · Score: 1

      Not only do I not remember my password, I don't remember my user name, email, or any other identifying characteristics from my account. And I think it's a pretty low number because I remember signing up as soon as I heard about the service which easily could have been in 1996.

      Oh well, I guess I'm better off living the past dozen years or so without all that spam.

    13. Re:Very popular by Bert64 · · Score: 1

      I have 2 accounts, one with a 6 digit uin and another with 8 digits - only the shorter one seems to get spammed...
      Using numbers its trivially easy to spam, simply increment then number to work out addresses... Perhaps they don't bother going all that high.

      --
      http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    14. Re:Very popular by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 1

      I have my own enumeration constant so they can handle my account as a special case- with that 90% of the code that runs only 10% of the time.

    15. Re:Very popular by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 1

      I have very limited memories... after so many years in a coma, upon regaining consciousness they had to teach me once again to speak, to walk, to eat, to log into my ICQ account.... unfortunately I never made a full recovery.

    16. Re:Very popular by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *yawn*, I have a six digit one starting with '2' I don't think it has received a valid non-spam message in three years ago.

      double *yawn* I have a negative account number that's also an irrational number. I receive messages from the future.

      Your message would have to come from the future since it would take people forever (literally) to type your account number.

    17. Re:Very popular by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah 6 digit ... but starting with 3 :(

      Pfft, mine started with a 1. And 6 digits. You young whippersnappers and your slow adoption of technolomogies.

    18. Re:Very popular by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 1

      I haven't used ICQ in ages. It was the most important part of my life about 10-8 years ago but now not so much. I still remember my pw and UID which is 5600178. Not quite as low as your but it's my second one. That said I am certain my first UID was above 1,000,000. I, unfortunately, was not able to have net access as early as some and certainty not as early as when they were dialling into BBSes (I assume) on the "The facts of life" sitcom. Yes I am aware it is sad when you can remember early sitcom nerdiness but I did have a thing for Blair despite her real life religious life.

    19. Re:Very popular by sr8outtalotech · · Score: 1

      I had a 6 digit UIN starting with 2 but I haven't used it in a few years. The guy that hacked my account is apparently still making use of it though. AOL absolutely refused to lock him out. Even though they had years of activity of me logging on from the same IP addresses in the US and having access to the old email account linked to the UIN they wouldn't reset the password and lock that clown out.

    20. Re:Very popular by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Offering 50 quatloos if you include the slave girl

    21. Re:Very popular by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sorry about that. I needed the money and realized my upstream connection defined spam as email and usenet, and didn't mention instant messaging. Hacked perl to make ICQ work like I need it to and I was soon able to send 20 million+ personalized ICQ messages. With a few hundred IPs and ICQ bound to aliased addresses, you can send a lot of messages with very few boxes. It was so nice that the demographic data was available and usually provided by the users so the spam changed based on age, gender, location, hobbies, etc. Sadly a few months later everyone and their brother was doing plain old spam and ICQ was basically dead. But I made some money and didn't get into trouble by my upstream (Although they did change their AUP after that). Actually I'm still rather proud of the code, but anyways sorry!

    22. Re:Very popular by Curtman · · Score: 1

      At least I still have my vendetta against the asshole who stole UIN 125359 from me, and my backup 492110.

      I don't remember my previous phone number though... Funny how that works.

      Seriously though, good riddance to you ICQ. The maximum password length for a long time was 6 alphanumeric characters. I hate you for stealing my contacts twice with a poorly designed authentication system, and no way to recover without access to a long since dead email account.

    23. Re:Very popular by WatcherXP · · Score: 1

      Yawn, 6 digit starting with "1'

      --
      09-f9-11-02-9* (G^GCA_++{>. RV>>>>+++ NO CARRIER
    24. Re:Very popular by Kalriath · · Score: 1

      I thought the special case on ICQ was "legitimate messages"?

      --
      For a site about things like basic rights, Slashdot users sure do like to censor "dissent".
    25. Re:Very popular by oiron · · Score: 1

      He takes the magnitude and phase values, of course! Simple mathematics... :P

      It's like the sphere visiting Flatland...

    26. Re:Very popular by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yawn yawn
      I have a six digit UIN starting with 1 and still stay in touch with a few old inet buddies who's uin's are five digits long.

  2. Well, given the tons spam from that region by sethstorm · · Score: 1, Redundant

    I am not surprised by who would buy it.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
    1. Re:Well, given the tons spam from that region by MrNaz · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Just so you know, the US is still the number 1 spam source, both by number of spam relays and origin of spammers. There was a recent Slashdot article on this, and you can also check the ROKSO list if you're interested. Don't be spewing that "but our poor PCs are controlled by evil Chinese/Russians/Europeans/Eritreans who use our unwilling innocent users' PCs in their botnets" crap either. Most of the top 100 on the ROKSO list are American citizens.

      Clean up your own backyard before you decide to make snarky comments about the Russians and Chinese. Yes, we know, they hate your freedom and they want to eat your babies, but nonetheless, try to stay factual.

      --
      I hate printers.
    2. Re:Well, given the tons spam from that region by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 4, Funny

      Absurd, good sir.

      America's culture of freedom and individual responsibility has made it a hotbed of unconventional electronic marketing entrepreneurs.

      Godless elsewhereistan's degenerate criminality makes it a hive of spammer scum.

      Get the Facts(tm)!

    3. Re:Well, given the tons spam from that region by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This got modded informative because...?

    4. Re:Well, given the tons spam from that region by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That article was just about botnets, not origination of messages.

      And it's not that rightist "they hate our freedom" nonsense; it's just that Russians in general have poor ethics. They'd skin you alive if it'd make them a buck. You can't even park your car on the street there without it being stripped down in a couple hours.

    5. Re:Well, given the tons spam from that region by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      sorry, have you ever visited Russia? Russian people are some of the warmest, friendliest people, who would bend over backwards to help you. just because you visited some shitty suburb of Moscow doesn't mean that the rest of the country is like that (and of course, you would experience the exact same thing visiting some awful area of St. Louis).

      here you are: http://www.spamhaus.org/statistics/countries.lasso . it's spam, not botnets (which are just as bad--why dismiss them?), and the US has nearly 5 times more active issues than Russia (which is absurd, even AFTER you correct for differences in population).

    6. Re:Well, given the tons spam from that region by ScrewMaster · · Score: 0

      and the US has nearly 5 times more active issues than Russia

      Presumably because we have more connectivity. As soon as other countries start building out more fiber, you're gonna see their stats rise. Spam is, unfortunately, profitable.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    7. Re:Well, given the tons spam from that region by mrmeval · · Score: 1

      Now that a company there owns it the quality of the spam may actually improve and the volume decrease. It seems that way with LJ. Hell I'd pay them for my ICQ account if A) I got no spam B) I got preferential treatment when they have to clobber people off their servers.

      --
      I'd go on a Vegan diet but the delivery time from Vega is too long. --brownkitty
    8. Re:Well, given the tons spam from that region by eugene2k · · Score: 1

      >they want to eat your babies
      Nah, the days of holodomor are long gone

      --
      Apple has "Mac vs PC", Microsoft has "Laptop Hunters", Linux has recession
    9. Re:Well, given the tons spam from that region by Trogre · · Score: 1

      That may be so, but nearly all ICQ spam I receive contains links to websites ending with .ru

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    10. Re:Well, given the tons spam from that region by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      He's talking about spam on ICQ, not email spam. I was thinking about killing my ICQ transport soon. I only know two people who still use ICQ / AIM, but I get a spam message Russian containing a .ru domain name every few hours via it.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    11. Re:Well, given the tons spam from that region by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Russian people are some of the warmest, friendliest people, who would bend over backwards to help you.

      This isn't true, sorry. While GP was obviously wrong, so are you. Given the state of affairs in modern Russian society, you see people stepping over a dying man lying on a sidewalk without blinking an eye. Yes, those same people can be very friendly - to someone they know, not to strangers.

      In any case, I find that the whole business of ethnic stereotypes, both positive and negative, is largely mythological. I've been in a few places now, and while I did note the difference in overall politeness in public (on which scale the only two country I've seen ranking below Russia are Egypt and China, by the way), it seems to be coming more from quality of life and availability of education, rather than from cultural roots, and ethnicity doesn't matter at all - e.g. Canadians of black or asian ancestry are just as polite as their fellow white citizens.

    12. Re:Well, given the tons spam from that region by DavidShor · · Score: 1
      Can I ask what you're there for? I'm studying abroad in Moscow right now and am curious.

      As for the content of your post: I think you under-estimate the kindness of others. I've been all over the place, and have had essentially the same experience as I've had in Russia. Most people are good, a couple of people are bad, and for the most part, people are as nice as they can afford to be. Your experience with the cashier could happen in pretty much every city in the world. (Except for India. Then they'll just try really hard to rip you off...)

      Also, keep in mind: You can't actually understand what the people around you are saying. It's not surprising that you think everyone is nice. p? To give you an example: My neighbor was walking down Arbat with her American boyfriend, when a group of Russian guys came by and started yelling in Russian "What are you doing with a Russian girl?! Go back to your country!!". She told the American that they were singing a soccer song, and he knew none the better. It's also hard to paper over the Racism. Russia is a bit special in that it has racist skin-head gangs roving around looking for dark people. This isn't a theoretical issue, two of the students in my program, out of twenty, have been attacked this year.

    13. Re:Well, given the tons spam from that region by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      I think you are wrong too. Your opinion is based on what western newspapers write.

      It's not - I'm Russian. My opinion is based on growing up in Russia, and living there for over 20 years.

      That wouldn't happen in Sweden - everyone is way too racist towards foreign people

      Ha, you should be thankful that you aren't dark-skinned or look Asian. Then you'd know what "racism" is.

      About your story, I have to ask: was it Moscow (very doubtful from your description), or elsewhere?

    14. Re:Well, given the tons spam from that region by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe he just looks charismatic.

  3. Not good by masterwit · · Score: 0, Funny

    "The company was forgetting what the "A" in AOL stands for (America, in case you forgot), losing its identity in a quick, worrisome desire to sprawl out in uncontrolled growth."----- Great there goes my ISP...and to think AOL was so fast. Insert "In Mother Russia" joke...

    --
    We should start a new Slashdot and return control to the geeks. It actually wouldn't be that hard to get some users to
    1. Re:Not good by DarkKnightRadick · · Score: 1

      What are you talking about? They only sold ICQ, an instant messenger client. They haven't gone out of business.

      --
      "There is a way that seems right to a man, but its end is the way of death." Proverbs 16:25 (NKJV)
    2. Re:Not good by masterwit · · Score: 0

      What are you talking about? They only sold ICQ, an instant messenger client. They haven't gone out of business.

      Meant more as a (bad) joke to the light of that I haven't seen much of anyone use AOL in years. AOL, as the article put it, is not doing so well as a company...your are correct however as this is dealing with the IM client, not the company being bought out.

      --
      We should start a new Slashdot and return control to the geeks. It actually wouldn't be that hard to get some users to
    3. Re:Not good by DarkKnightRadick · · Score: 1

      ah, sorry.

      I know a few people who still use it. I'm trying to convince them otherwise.

      --
      "There is a way that seems right to a man, but its end is the way of death." Proverbs 16:25 (NKJV)
  4. I still use ICQ by Ark42 · · Score: 1, Redundant

    I still use some OLD version of ICQ on Windows 7, because I never found another client that behaves as nicely. All the 3rd party stuff I've tried either failed to connect to the ICQ servers or failed basic features like file transfer or the ability to communicate with AIM screen-names from an ICQ account. Also, this ICQ client still has no ads and never pops up a chat screen overtop of anything else I'm doing. I frickin hate it when those other clients steal window focus even when you're typing in an unrelated program. All IM programs should blink patiently in the tray!

    1. Re:I still use ICQ by DarkKnightRadick · · Score: 1

      Have you checked out Pidgin? Also, think you could email a copy of the installer to me? I absolutely loved the customization features on the Mirabillis clients.

      --
      "There is a way that seems right to a man, but its end is the way of death." Proverbs 16:25 (NKJV)
    2. Re:I still use ICQ by etherlad · · Score: 1

      Trillian Astra: http://trillian.im/

      -Stays connected
      -Supports file transfer
      -Communicates with AIM from ICQ
      -No ads
      -Multiple options for what happens with new chat windows (show on desktop, show minimized, hide and notify via systray, with an additional "always show on top" toggle)

      All ICQ-specific features: http://www.trillian.im/learn/tour-features.html#ICQ

      --
      Soylens viridis homines es
    3. Re:I still use ICQ by iYk6 · · Score: 1

      Hey buddy. Check this out: http://www.oldversion.com/ICQ.html
      They've got versions for Windows 3.11

    4. Re:I still use ICQ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Which magical ICQ version are you using? I wish I could still use ICQ98 which didn't have ads, but I think the minimum that will even connect to the current servers is version 2003+

    5. Re:I still use ICQ by Feyr · · Score: 1

      pidgin is nice, but it has one of the worst notification system around. either it's focus-stealing or not notifying you at all of new messages

    6. Re:I still use ICQ by kyrio · · Score: 1

      When was the last time you used the program?

    7. Re:I still use ICQ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Miranda works GREAT with all the major protocols: AIM/ICQ, MSN, Yahoo!, Google Talk (Jabber), recently Facebook chat (Jabber); and the list goes on. No ads, just plain 'n simple, like ICQ used to be. There is a StopSpam module to prevent chat spam, as well. It's portable, so will run off of a USB drive if you wish.

    8. Re:I still use ICQ by toxickitty · · Score: 2, Informative

      I don't know when s/he last used it but I am using it right now (version 2.6.6) and it still does all of what Feyr said ~~

    9. Re:I still use ICQ by nurb432 · · Score: 1

      But does anyone else at this point?

      its day has come and gone.. partially due to the ads and unstable clients. But no, no one will learn from those mistakes.

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    10. Re:I still use ICQ by xtracto · · Score: 1

      Believe it or not, a couple (maybe 3) weeks ago I saw a *TV* ad for ICQ. This is a German TV channel. Now, I don't remember what they were advertizing but my reaction was "wow, are Germans still using ICQ in 2010!?". Granted, in this part of Germany (ex-eastern region still heavily depopulating) they still have some retrograd customs.

      --
      Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
    11. Re:I still use ICQ by DarkKnightRadick · · Score: 1

      That's a little far back. My favorite was from 96 or 97. (:

      --
      "There is a way that seems right to a man, but its end is the way of death." Proverbs 16:25 (NKJV)
    12. Re:I still use ICQ by Ambiguous+Puzuma · · Score: 1

      I always thought the main reason for its decline was the use of sequential numbers as public IDs, making it easy for spammers to find new targets by brute force. AIM and MSN had ads yet remained popular.

    13. Re:I still use ICQ by BradleyUffner · · Score: 1

      -No ads

      Except for when they constantly popup those little "toast" messages telling you to buy the iPhone version, or to ask you to vote for them in some "best of whatever" competitions.
      Don't get me wrong, I like Trillian enough that i paid for the pro version, but they still do some very annoying things.

      Also their xmpp support is very lacking. No bookmarks, and it leaves you disconnected from any chat rooms after it reconnects to the server when disconnected.

    14. Re:I still use ICQ by thePowerOfGrayskull · · Score: 1

      What OS? When I stopped using it on Windows (2.2 or so) it wasn't focus-stealing, and hadn't been since it was gaim. (I stopped because it's just too kludgy overall. I gave up on GUI IM clients and went with irssi+bitlbee. It does what I want it to - always connected , send and receive text messages, and irssi is second-to-none as an IRC client.)

    15. Re:I still use ICQ by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      The linux version, and presumably all versions, allow you to have it flash the tray icon on new messages. It will keep flashing until you focus the message.

      Also there is the "Hide new message windows" option. That will leave the a program list item flashing instead, at least on gnome. And updates don't take focus in the first place.

      Cracks me up when a problem not only doesn't exist, but you have multiple other choices.

    16. Re:I still use ICQ by kyrio · · Score: 1

      I've never experienced any of those problems with the latest version.

    17. Re:I still use ICQ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I still use ICQ. I get maybe two spam a week, and have an 8-digit UIN starting with 2.
      I use it to communicate with people on AOL IM, which surprisingly keeps the chatter down (probably because they're confused. they ask me for my screen name elseweb, and I spout a stream of digits). Once I get to know the person, I might give them the AIM screen name, explaining that this one lets them reach me when I'm on my phone, or what have ye.

    18. Re:I still use ICQ by alien9 · · Score: 1

      pidgin does it fine!

  5. A Russian company bought it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Welcome to identity rape, spam, theft, and the death of your credit rating when someone in Krzyrbzybiggistan siphons off your entire life savings and then emails your pictures of your dick to the entire world.

    1. Re:A Russian company bought it? by baka_toroi · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Right, because you can only find honest people and companies in the Glorious USA.

  6. Slashdot isn't the entirety of the world by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

    Largely forgotten by the Slashdot demographic maybe - but that tiny and self selected slice of the demographic pie is hardly representative.

    1. Re:Slashdot isn't the entirety of the world by DarkKnightRadick · · Score: 1

      Largely forgotten by the Slashdot demographic

      18115568

      --
      "There is a way that seems right to a man, but its end is the way of death." Proverbs 16:25 (NKJV)
    2. Re:Slashdot isn't the entirety of the world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ROFL, I almost forgot my old screen name too: 183650127356591!

    3. Re:Slashdot isn't the entirety of the world by e9th · · Score: 1

      And yet there's still a box for your ICQ UIN on your User Page.

    4. Re:Slashdot isn't the entirety of the world by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      11898585
      And that is my current one, after my first one (450????) got lost.

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    5. Re:Slashdot isn't the entirety of the world by DarkKnightRadick · · Score: 1

      I have another one, but it's higher up than even your current one IIRC (I don't remember the number, but I have the account set up on my other computer).

      --
      "There is a way that seems right to a man, but its end is the way of death." Proverbs 16:25 (NKJV)
  7. New incoming message! by Gavin+Rogers · · Score: 0, Redundant

    1995 called. They want their instant messaging back.

    1. Re:New incoming message! by DarkKnightRadick · · Score: 1

      Hey now, be nice (as the same could be said for AIM).

      --
      "There is a way that seems right to a man, but its end is the way of death." Proverbs 16:25 (NKJV)
    2. Re:New incoming message! by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      No it couldn't. Actually, it can't be said for ICQ either. ICQ was created in 1996, AIM didn't appear until 1997. My ICQ UIN is actually the oldest way of contacting me that still works, although my mobile phone number has been the same for only one year less. Email addresses, XMPP, and postal addresses have all changed in less time than that. For some reason, I can still remember my ICQ number, although I've not given it to anyone for about 7 years.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    3. Re:New incoming message! by DarkKnightRadick · · Score: 1

      touche. The point is, both AIM and ICQ are some of the oldest IM services still going. Too bad the Russians got a hold of ICQ. I actually dreamed of one day buying ICQ away from AOL. Back to dreaming, I guess.

      --
      "There is a way that seems right to a man, but its end is the way of death." Proverbs 16:25 (NKJV)
  8. Russia says by Mr.+Pibb · · Score: 1

    huh-oh

    (or however you would transliterate the sound of receiving a message)

    1. Re:Russia says by Luke+has+no+name · · Score: 1

      I nostalgia'd.

    2. Re:Russia says by VendettaMF · · Score: 1

      "Eh!Hoe" to my mind.

      --
      kartune85 : Incapable of reason, observation or learning. A kind of dim, drab, flightless parrot.
  9. Let me be the first to say by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    UhOh!

  10. Re:I still PREFER! ICQ by Marc_Hawke · · Score: 4, Interesting

    At least the ICQ style.

    ICQ assumes multi-line messages. (No "send-on-enter" crap.)
    ICQ has had offline-messages from the beginning.
    ICQ always kept message history.

    Those are the biggest two, but there are a bunch of other things that ICQ did right when the other IM companies did it wrong.

    AIM and MSN started out as 'super private IRC'. It behaves the same as the input line on an IRC channel.

    ICQ though is more like 'super fast email'. ICQ is a 'low overhead email', like Verizon's "Push To Talk" is a low overhead Cell Phone call.

    However, I admit that it's pretty much dead. The only people left that I still talk to are the same people I talked to back in 1998. All my family and 'new' friends are using a bunch of different networks. That's why I use a multi-network client (Miranda right now.).

    JABBER is the future though.

    --
    --Welcome to the Realm of the Hawke--
  11. Privacy concerns and disconnect from Papa Oscar? by LoadWB · · Score: 1

    IIRC, the only private information put into your ICQ account was your password. Anything else was public. If you are a dope and use the same passwords for everything, then you probably have concerns. Other than that, I cannot think of any. But it is in Russia, and there are plenty of stories about what happens once your information gets there.

    But more concerning is the potential disconnect from the Oscar protocol. In short, will ICQ and AIM be able to communicate together still, and will ICQ remain using the Oscar protocol? And to what server will we connect? (Probably in TFA, but who reads those?)

    I started using ICQ back in... 1995? I think, anyway around then with an 8 digit UIN starting with 12. I would have jumped on much sooner but I could not until StrICQ for the Amiga. I continued using ICQ after I started using Windows machines around 2000, but after AOL bought it the bloat became annoying: Xtraz or whatever, web search, ads, skins, and other crap. Fortunately, there are plenty of hacks to remove the annoying "features" in the full ICQ version after ICQLite was given the axe. And, no, I never bothered with any of the other chat clients on Windows so long as StrICQ and AmigAIM worked, Windows chat was just utility.

  12. Re:I still PREFER! ICQ by Hurricane78 · · Score: 2, Funny

    ICQ assumes multi-line messages. (No "send-on-enter" crap.)

    Most clients allow you to configure Ctrl-Enter as submit shortcut. Then enter does create new lines.
    Or if not possible, you can use Ctrl-Enter for multi-line messages, and Enter to submit. But it's hard and annoying.
    And obviously, MSN is the exception, as its users would not have the mental capacity to imagine wanting something like that in the first place.

    But unfortunately, this does not protect you from the retards
    who
    lol
    write
    their ;)))
    messages
    like
    this
    lol
    inlucidng
    no
    puntcuatin
    ro
    preppr spelng.

    Luckily, there still is per-user invisibility and ignore lists. :)

    --
    Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
  13. Whatever happened to PAL? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It was another early messaging system from around that time...

    Best eva was unix's "talk", (and before that, "write")

    1. Re:Whatever happened to PAL? by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      I'm not your pal, buddy!

    2. Re:Whatever happened to PAL? by daveime · · Score: 1

      I'm not your buddy, guy!

    3. Re:Whatever happened to PAL? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not your guy, friend!

    4. Re:Whatever happened to PAL? by Yvan256 · · Score: 2, Funny

      It got replaced by NTSC.

  14. Re:I still PREFER! ICQ by Hurricane78 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Oh, I forgot to mention:
    It’s wrong that ICQ is mostly dead. It’s mostly dead where you live. But luckily far from it everywhere else. :)
    I know children and teens who use ICQ. Some weren’t even alive when ICQ started.
    But it comes down to if their older friends and family used ICQ back then.

    Also: Jabber is now called XMPP, as far as I know. (I would have preferred it to be lightweight EBML instead of overhead monster XML.)

    --
    Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
  15. Technical details? by Phroggy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    How does this affect things like being able to sign into AIM using an ICQ number, and adding ICQ numbers to your AIM buddy list?

    --
    $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
    $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
  16. Re:ICQ is still my main protocol by trapnest · · Score: 1

    I believe AIM is the most popular protocol in the US. MSN is more popular in the UK and surrounding areas.

  17. Re:ICQ is still my main protocol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

    MSN is the most popular in Canada by far. AIM is for e-tards. ICQ is dead in NA. Yahoo Messenger was absorbed.

    yup, MSN is basically the only decent way to keep in touch via IM. That and Facebook Chat.

  18. In Soviet Russia... by Beelzebud · · Score: 5, Funny

    In Soviet Russia, Q seeks I.

    1. Re:In Soviet Russia... by MurphyZero · · Score: 1

      Actually, QCX (read the last as greek letter Chi - which I've always been told is the K sound followed by long I sound)

      --
      Our founding fathers removed the guys in charge. Be American. Vote incumbents out.
    2. Re:In Soviet Russia... by Motard · · Score: 1

      In Soviet Russia, the KGBCQ

  19. Am I missing something? by darkpixel2k · · Score: 5, Insightful

    AOL has sold ICQ to Digital Sky Technologies (DST), Russia's largest Internet company, for US$187.5 million.

    I connect to ICQ using Pidgin. I also connect to GTalk and a few XMPP servers using Pidgin. The XMPP server software is running on some version of Linux--probably Ubuntu or Debian. It was free to download, free to setup, and free to use. HOW THE #$*@# IS ICQ WORTH $187.5 MILLION?!?!.

    Is the Windows ICQ client really a direct pipe for advertisers to watch your web surfing habits or turn on and view your webcam at random or something? How in the hell can you buy an instant messaging company for $187.5 million now-a-days? IM clients and servers are free.

    --
    There's no place like ::1 (I've completed my transition to IPv6)
    1. Re:Am I missing something? by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 1

      Pedos use ICQ and Pedo buy a lot of stuff online?

    2. Re:Am I missing something? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      You're not buying the software, you're buying the customers who are locked into a proprietary system by network effects. Not sure how many people are on ICQ now. Statistics I read eight years ago were about 6 million active users. I wouldn't be surprised now if it's under $10/customer, which isn't bad for an advertising platform.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    3. Re:Am I missing something? by darkpixel2k · · Score: 1

      You're not buying the software, you're buying the customers who are locked into a proprietary system by network effects. Not sure how many people are on ICQ now. Statistics I read eight years ago were about 6 million active users. I wouldn't be surprised now if it's under $10/customer, which isn't bad for an advertising platform.

      Right--but those 6 million customers need to have some sort of value. That's why I asked if the Windows client was some sort of ad-ridden piece of garbage. Using Pidgin on Linux I've never seen an ad. I occasionally get some sort of russian spam, it's once or twice a month. How the hell do they get that multi-million dollar figure? How are those users actually worth that much? In other words, if this new russian company liquidated 'ICQ', where would that money come from?

      --
      There's no place like ::1 (I've completed my transition to IPv6)
    4. Re:Am I missing something? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      A lot of users put other information in their vcard, and the contact lists are now stored server-side (they were client-side in the early ICQ clients, which meant that I lost mine a couple of times when hard drives failed), so you can build up a lot of information about how users are connected. Messages are all sent through the server now, so you can data mine them too. All of this has a lot of value to advertisers.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  20. Might as well sell it to the russians... by night_flyer · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Their hackers have stolen most of the older ICQ numbers (mine included)

    --


    Thanks to file sharing, I purchase more CDs
    Thanks to the RIAA, I buy them used...
  21. Re:ICQ is still my main protocol by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

    Sadly, the post above isn't a troll. I don't know anyone who uses AIM, nobody uses ICQ anymore (was different 10 years ago), nobody uses Yahoo Messenger either.

    So it's either MSN, email or all that Facebook/twitter/etc crap.

  22. Alive and well in Germany by Neoprofin · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The Germans seem to love it as well. I was living with a number of masters students and I was absolutely shitting bricks to here them talk about a program that I thought was completely wiped from the face of the earth a decade ago by MSN and AIM/Google.

    It's moved on a lot from what it used to be, I think it might even support instant messaging now. Sad because the only thing I ever liked about it was that you leave people messages when they weren't online, sort of a hybrid email/chat.

    1. Re:Alive and well in Germany by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was the de facto standard IM network in Europe between approximately 1998 and 2004, a rather long time for a piece of software.

      Then people fled to MSN and later also to Facebook and Google.

  23. what about ICQ's IRC network and the mess there??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What will the new ownership do about the general degradation and op harassment by certain ops with ummmmm, certain religious affiliations harassing people who just don't happen to believe in God?

    Lets hope that the new ownership take a more proactive interest in what is really happening on their IRC network.

    After all, non-objective handling of users drive them into the hands of other networking such as MSN or Yahoo.

    Posting as an AC for certain obvious reasons.

  24. Re:I still PREFER! ICQ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    in at least a few clients, you can also hold shift as you press enter, and it will start a new line

  25. KGB goes commercial... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    so when is the KGB going to buy AT&T

  26. MS Messenger killed it by unity100 · · Score: 1

    ICQ was killed by microsoft's o/s monopoly just like netscape. since messenger started to be pushed in windows installations, icq users dwindled speedily. soon we were left to a group of 'elite' people, who were there before instant messengers first came out, while the masses were on messenger. due to business needs, we eventually had to migrate to messenger. most of us hated it, and we still hate it. thankfully googletalk came, but it is still relatively unknown.

    i very much think eu should slap ms with an anti monopoly fine and force them to offer instant messenger choice screen during installation.

    1. Re:MS Messenger killed it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How TRUE and insightful ! Pity, can't give you a point up.

    2. Re:MS Messenger killed it by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      I would rather much see the requirement for networks (all of them) to interoperate. There's no technical reason why an ICQ user shouldn't be able to send and receive messages to MSN or AOL users - the servers would need to federate, but there's nothing magical or even particularly hard about it. And, heck, it already worked for ICQ and AOL - now if we could just get Yahoo and Live to do that as well, and expose it all via XMPP...

    3. Re:MS Messenger killed it by unity100 · · Score: 1

      the only power that can mandate it is Eu as of now.

  27. Russian funny money by billcopc · · Score: 1

    What's 187.5 million for a dead IM network ? :P

    I was one of the early ICQ users in the 90s, 6-digit UID, yadda yadda. It was ground-breaking for the time, but that time has come and gone. Everyone I know moved to MSN Messenger, and ICQ pretty much died overnight.

    Me, I don't even bother with IM anymore. If I had a business use for it, I'd be fine, but for just keeping in touch with friends I'm quite content with Facebook and that century-old tech the telephone.

    --
    -Billco, Fnarg.com
  28. funny enough... by hitmark · · Score: 1

    i was reminded of ICQ when google first showed of wave. This largely because ICQ had two ways to show conversations. Either the now typical way with each line showing up in a common window. Or one where each character typed would be sent across so the other side could see you type in near real time. It also had keyboard sound effects, iirc.

    --
    comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
  29. Re:I still PREFER! ICQ by anton_kg · · Score: 1

    Absolutely agree - ICQ is a dead end, that's why the price is going down. Some big Russian companies like mail.ru has already switch to Jabber. Soon or later ICQ will be dead.

  30. Re:I still PREFER! ICQ by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure if I would call it super fast email. ICQ has multi-user chat which was awesome and the AIM, MSN, etc came about and they did not have functionality at first. TBH, I only moved away from MSN because of my frineds who went to MSN. If it weren't completely useless minus friends I would go to Google Talk / ICQ but no one really uses those.

  31. UO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since Ultima Online released when ICQ was big, it still remains the prominent method of communication between players (that still play a 12 year old game on life support).

  32. Re:Privacy concerns and disconnect from Papa Oscar by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

    I started using ICQ back in... 1995? I think, anyway around then with an 8 digit UIN starting with 12

    I joined in late 1997 with a 7-digit number starting with 6, so with an 8 digit number you can't have joined before 1998. You definitely didn't join in 1995 - the service wasn't launched until 1996.

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  33. In Soviet Messaging.... by Millennium · · Score: 1

    In Soviet Messaging, I seek YOU!

    Oh, wait...

  34. Re:ICQ is still my main protocol by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

    Exactly. I was not trolling. I’m just pretty angry at the people acting in monkey see, monkey do fashion... switching to MSN and FailBook because "everyone else does it". You know, having lived in Germany most of my life, this reminds me of this being the general excuse of people who did not fight the Nazis back then. They didn’t want “to have the stress” of fighting it. It seems it’s still a popular excuse. :(

    Sure, I can’t and won’t even try to compete with those who actually fought a dictatorship. Those guys are heroes.
    But I would hate myself for not at least withstanding what I think is wrong. Because otherwise I could just as well be a stupid cow following the herd.

    --
    Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
  35. Re:Privacy concerns and disconnect from Papa Oscar by LoadWB · · Score: 1

    Makes sense. The whole period between 1995 and 1998 is a mostly blur to me. I moved from BBSing on my 128D to the Amiga, then got hold of TermiteTCP and got online (aside from GEnie) via one of the local BBS's TCP/IP door. Once college offered dial-up Internet I was on-line thereafter pretty much 24/7. Then I discovered IRC, that was it for me. Not a quantum leap for me after having been in the ill-fated Q-Link rooms for years until the abrupt shutdown in 1994.

    Although, I would say it might have been late 1997 as well. At the time ICQ was growing exceptionally fast. I could do some archeology in my system to make the determination, but I am pretty sure it was just before 1998 based upon jobs and moves.

    Blah. Enough of that rambling.

  36. Re:I still PREFER! ICQ by CondeZer0 · · Score: 1

    > Also: Jabber is now called XMPP, as far as I know. (I would have preferred it to be lightweight EBML instead of overhead monster XML.)

    Jabber and XMPP are absolutely horrible, probably one of the most insanely byzantine protocols ever conceived, and they keep expanding it all the time (by now there are *hundreds* of extensions to the protocol).

    The inept use of XML is just the tip of the iceberg, and it is not even real XML, but *streamed* XML, which means parsers need to be even more complicated (as if parsing XML was not enough of a pain already).

    And all this for a functionality that after ten years still barely matches IRC (most jabber clients have trouble doing group chat and file transfer, or if they do they use different protocol extensions that are not compatible with other servers and clients).

    --
    "When in doubt, use brute force." Ken Thompson
  37. My little IM history, including ICQ by DollyTheSheep · · Score: 1

    I guess, I'm not very social, I kept my MySpace site for only some month. I'm in keeping my mostly inactive LinkedIn account alive strictly for business networking.

    But even I have to chat, when email is overhead or not possible! I knew instant messaging back at univeristy since 1994 by virtue of IRC and the chat facility of ICS (internet chess, does it still exist btw?). I think joined ICQ somewhere in 1998 or 1999 because "everyone did it", but had not much use for it. The ICQ client then was quite decent.

    In 2000 I found work at a software company as a consultant. Two years later, a colleague suggested using IM for fast communication within the company and our development partners. I installed IM again and was shocked that it had turned into an unusable mess of bloatware so quickly. It rivalled the Realplayer, which was quite a feat! My colleague said, I should install Miranda. I realized, that IM clients can be substituted as long as the protocol is implemented and the network allows it (AIM vs Trillian, anyone?).

    I later used Miranda to also connect to AIM, Yahoo!Messenger and - urgh! - MSN Messenger. Nowadays I use Skype to chat, never used GTalk despite being an early user of GMail, so no experience with XMPP protocol and clients.

  38. Re:I still PREFER! ICQ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually I recall when it came out in 1996, it lacked offline messaging. It always did the other two though.

    Unfortunately I find that my account suffers from all the same issues everyone else mentions. It's flooded with spammers and english speaking users have looooong since moved on from using it. However, seeing a Russian company buy it is not a surprise. I got a lot of add requests from legit Russians and Chinese for the past 5 years. Strangely enough, that's how I met my ex girlfriend... Chinese girl that just randomly added me and turned out to be pretty hot. Then she came to school in the US and we were together for a couple years. I guess that means I'll have relatively fond memories of ICQ, since we ended on rather amicable terms... ;-)

  39. Re:I still PREFER! ICQ by DrXym · · Score: 1
    ICQ may have done some things right, but it did the most fundamental and visible thing wrong - turned people into numbers. That shit might be acceptable for the 100+ year old telephone system, but not an IM system.

    The second thing it did wrong was allow itself to be bought by AOL. It may have been a lucrative move for Mirabilis but it consigned ICQ to playing second banana to AIM. Its surprising ICQ lasted so long since AOL bought and subsequently neglected Compuserve in similar circumstances but it didn't flourish either.

  40. We used to do things differently... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    *yawn*, I have a six digit one starting with '2' I don't think it has received a valid non-spam message in three years ago.

    double *yawn* I have a negative account number that's also an irrational number. I receive messages from the future.

    What is this new trend? In my time, one would brag about the enormousness of our manhood. Please advise this aging soul how less-digit manhoods are better than more-than-less digit manhoods. Not to mention irrational or negative ones...

    1. Re:We used to do things differently... by jimnorcal · · Score: 1

      Actually, an ICQ number was a bragging right even a half decade ago if the number was substantially low. When I started with ICQ, my UIN was (and still is although used once a year or so) 195XXX (where xxx is a number I don't care to advertise, of course, since it's spammed enough). When the internet really started to explode with new users in 98, UINs went from six digits to eight digits in a very short time and I remember people bragging to their friends online how their number was one of the first in the millions. About six years ago I remember telling someone online what my UIN was and they offered to buy it from me. I thought the whole thing had really gone too far then. But, by then I had already moved on to other things and the spamming of ICQ was starting to pick up. A few years later when I logged back in for the first time in a very long time, I had so many spam messages that I found the service to be nearly useless.

      I still have all the old, original ICQ sounds for nostalgic reasons. What's funny is that in a local gas station in the small town where I live, the cash register they have makes the ICQ sound "uh oh" whenever they do a transaction. I just grin as I think I'm probably the only one that realizes this when I'm in there buying something.

  41. Re:ICQ is still my main protocol by rtbyte · · Score: 1

    Sadly, the post above isn't a troll. I don't know anyone who uses AIM, nobody uses ICQ anymore (was different 10 years ago), nobody uses Yahoo Messenger either.

    So it's either MSN, email or all that Facebook/twitter/etc crap.

    Nobody uses MSN where I live. Most of the people never heard of it. Everybody uses Skype (kids, moms, grand moms), few use ICQ (mostly older guys - 30+ years old) and some google's chat (techie guys).

  42. Firewalls help by PReDiToR · · Score: 1

    One of the first things I would do on a Windows install was to put a rule in the firewall that C:\Program Files\ICQ\ICQ.exe couldn't access icq.com. Even before the program was installed.
    If it couldn't get to the ad server it couldn't even get the first set of ads. Just an awful looking white box at the bottom of every message window.
    Beat a flashing/changing ad by a mile though.

    --

    Do not meddle in the affairs of geeks for they are subtle and quick to anger
  43. Re:I still PREFER! ICQ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "TBH, I only moved away from MSN because of my frineds(sic) who went to MSN."

    Some friend you are. I bet you avoid them in clubs too.

  44. Of course....! by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

    Of course the russians would want to buy out the main staple of their spamware enterprise. seriously, if someone else had bought it, and sent out malicious updates that contained malware, imagine the botnet of botnets they cold have created, hey....wait a minute....

  45. DST has holdings in Zynga... by Orbijx · · Score: 1

    ... so the real reason behind the purchase is to incorporate ICQ into junk like Mafia Wars, and all the other FACEB00C games that they control, and use it as an off FACEB00C's record communications device to take over Mafia World. ... or something like that.

    Uh-oh!, indeed.

    Time to deactivate my UIN.

    --
    One of these days, I am going to flip out. When I flip out, I'll be back in five minutes.