Slashdot Mirror


iPad Is Destroying Netbook Sales

Hugh Pickens writes "Fortune magazine reports that sales growth of low-cost, low-powered netbooks peaked last summer at an astonishing 641% year-over-year growth rate but netbook sales fell off a cliff in January and shrank again in April — collateral damage, according to Morgan Stanley's Katy Huberty, from the January introduction and April launch of the iPad. In support of Huberty's theory, she offers a Morgan Stanley/Alphawise survey conducted in March which found that 44% of US consumers who were planning to buy an iPad said they were buying it instead of a netbook or notebook computer. In related news, Apple announced that it sold its one millionth iPad last week, just 28 days after its introduction on April 3. 'One million iPads in 28 days — that's less than half of the 74 days it took to achieve this milestone with iPhone,' says Steve Jobs, Apple's CEO. 'Demand continues to exceed supply and we're working hard to get this magical product into the hands of even more customers.'"

141 of 911 comments (clear)

  1. Whatever it taks! by Locke2005 · · Score: 4, Funny

    says Steve Jobs, Apple's CEO. 'Demand continues to exceed supply and we're working hard to get this magical product into the hands of even more customers.' Steve -- have you tried using Pixie Dust?

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    1. Re:Whatever it taks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's really funny to me how when presented with technology they don't understand, people call it magic. I guess I like it though, it does wonders for my ego and self esteem to know that I'm not the most ignorant person in the world, by a longshot.

    2. Re:Whatever it taks! by Locke2005 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Most of the people on slashdot are not truly ignorant; instead they primarily fall into the "brilliant but really annoying" category.

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    3. Re:Whatever it taks! by PlusFiveTroll · · Score: 2, Informative

      Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.
              Arthur C. Clarke, "Profiles of The Future", 1961

      "Any sufficiently rigorously defined magic is indistinguishable from technology."
              Larry Niven

      "Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced."
              Gehm's Corollary to Clarke's Third Law

    4. Re:Whatever it taks! by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Exactly. Which is why you're never going to sell a million of anything you make in your life.

      Slashdot slams Apple every single chance they get.
      "Locked to no Apps, no one is going to buy that"
      "No way to change a battery! No one is going to buy that"
      "No flash, no one is going to buy that".

      Please, someone stand up and accept the fact that you have no idea what drives the general public and that as much as you rant and rave, stuff sells.

      Remember, Less Space than a Nomad. No Wireless. Has Lamely become synonymous with an MP3 player. Apple is the 400 lb gorilla when it comes to online audio sales.

      There are a few Apple threads that I remember being some of the largest slashdot has ever had. It's like being turned down for a first date, you hate something so much because you refuse to accept the fact that maybe you're not the target demographic that you rant and rave about it and STILL miss the point.

    5. Re:Whatever it taks! by Ltap · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You're missing a distinction. We're trying to make the point that Apple products are crap and Apple supremacy is wrong, we're not saying it's impossible or even improbable. We just wish people didn't fall for their bullshit.

      --
      Yet Another Tech Blog
      (but so much more, including game and movie reviews)
      http://yanteb.peasantoid.org
    6. Re:Whatever it taks! by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 3, Insightful

      bullshit

      No, you're wrong. Bullshit is companies like SCO, or Microsoft's blatant historical use of vaporware to instantly demolish other companies.

      The fact that you can't make that distinction is why you don't get it, and use exactly the same hyperbole you accuse Apple of, is why the Apple haters are just as fucking tedious as the fanbois.

      Being popular may not make it right, but it doesn't mean you couldn't STFU and go buy some Apple stock or something.

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    7. Re:Whatever it taks! by BlueStraggler · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Careful, you are in danger of making his point through use of unintended irony.

      It may be "crap," "wrong," and "bullshit" but according to the market, it's still head and shoulders above all the other crappy bullshit that is flogged by Apple's competitors. This is where the nerd cognitive dissonance tends to kick in: "If *I* think it's crap, but the marketplace thinks it's vastly superior, the only way to resolve this paradox is to assume that the marketplace is profoundly stupid and duped by Apple's svengali-like marketing. Because it couldn't possibly be that I don't have a freaking clue what people want."

    8. Re:Whatever it taks! by nabsltd · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "If *I* think it's crap, but the marketplace thinks it's vastly superior, the only way to resolve this paradox is to assume that the marketplace is profoundly stupid and duped by Apple's svengali-like marketing. Because it couldn't possibly be that I don't have a freaking clue what people want."

      I believe the US elections of the past few years show that as long as the average consumer is distracted by shiny toys, nothing else makes any impact on their brain. Apple products are the ultimate in shiny toys, thus, they are wildly successful.

      There are many other shiny toys that target people with more money than brains, and most are also wildly successful: almost every heavily advertised movie or video game (regardless of actual quality), "premium" automobiles that are just re-badged versions of cheaper makes, and, of course, casinos.

      I think anyone (including /. readers) should be proud if they are not one of the sheep, but rather a thinking human being. Even if you are an Apple fan (which means you likely aren't a big thinker...I kid) it's pretty easy to figure that an iPhone plus some other device (netbook, eReader, etc.) is a better bang for your buck than an iPad.

    9. Re:Whatever it taks! by c++0xFF · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No, the point we're trying to make is that technically-minded people see the shortcomings in Apple products compared to others.

      The problem is that people pay attention to their hip friends, not to the nerd with the broken glasses sitting at the front of the class. That nerd feels put-down because nobody listens to him.

      I don't think many people here seriously believe that "nobody will buy the iPad" -- on the contrary, it's easy to see that some people will buy any device that Apple makes and some will buy it because they don't care about the technical shortcomings ("it's good enough").

      That doesn't make Apple products "the best (computer|mp3 player|phone|tablet|etc) in the word" ... but it does make the product successful.

    10. Re:Whatever it taks! by Azureflare · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Eating spam is also a bigger bang for your buck. No one does it because it tastes like crap.

      Apple products may be derided as toys, but so what? Are you saying you don't like playing with shiny gadget toys? What kind of geek are you??

    11. Re:Whatever it taks! by BlueBoxSW.com · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yeah, I agree.

      Slashdoters may be smart folk, but as for predicting what technology will become established, we have a pretty bad track record. Especially concerning Apple.

      My two leading theories are:

      1) Slashdot is a very skewed sample of the general population, but like most skewed samples, thinks it is typical.

      2) Slashdotters secretly have a crush on Apple and want to take it behind the firehouse and get it pregnant.

      No idea which is the truth.

    12. Re:Whatever it taks! by abigor · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Funny thing - go to any Unix conference, filled with probably some of the nerdiest people ever, and check out the laptops people have. Hint: they aren't Dells running Linux.

    13. Re:Whatever it taks! by Kjella · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think most things would make more sense if geeks coupled it to the fact that most consider their users to suffer from id10-t or PEBCAK problems. While that's not really true either, most people don't want a "computer" the way us geeks look at a computer. They don't want to know about CPU and RAM and GPU and so on, it's kind of like asking them to assemble a car by what engine, transmission, brakes and exhaust system go together. They want a car that solves a transportation problem. => limited models

      Likewise with Apple's walled garden, honestly already people DO NOT know how to use their gizmos. Most of them will never ever see the fence, and if they do it'd feel tiny like the borders of North Korea. Geeks are like running full speed towards it and go like "See, there's a fence there" while others are like "Ok whatever, but what's everything else I haven't explored like? There *are* 200k apps here that do all sorts of cool shit." As many have said when they suggest a computer or internet driving licence, people don't know how to administrate their own systems. They depend on others whether it's their geeky kids, friends, family, computer shop or the support line or whatever. What the geeks are saying Apple takes away is something they already feel they have very little knowledge and control over. => don't care about lockdown

      Also, geeks have a blind spot for missing user interface disasters, but common users have a blind spot for missing back end disasters. We try something, realize it's crap and move on. They try it, struggle, struggle some more and think computers are really, really hard or that they are dense. They have huge learning costs and only understand function, not concept so each application is almost like new to them. Users like being put in front of one piece of good software, it does not have to be the ultimate software of all time but better than trying to figure out which of five open source clones are actually any good. This is why they always ask for "brand" products like Photoshop, they don't know good from bad but assume that with a famous product it's as easy as it'll get. => iEverything

      Apple makes products for the huge group who doesn't "really" want the complexities of those products, which turns out to be most of us. I have to admit that while I'm insanely geeky in some areas, for example my washing machine has more than a dozen programs and 95%+ of the time I use the basic 40 degree program. My photo camera has a bunch of manual settings but 95%+ of the time I just want to use the intelligent everything. Kinda like the Wii, I've managed to get even my parents to try it. They wouldn't touch PC or console games with a 10 foot pole. Any product you make that lets "everyone else" use something will be a huge hit. Just admit you're not in the "everybody else" category.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    14. Re:Whatever it taks! by Requiem18th · · Score: 3, Funny

      In other words Apple is not the way to go if you tend to Think Different.

      --
      But... the future refused to change.
    15. Re:Whatever it taks! by Risen888 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I don't buy that for a minute. So Apple's sold a million iPads. Whee. According to this article, there were 33.3 million netbooks sold last year.

      It cracks me up when reports like this come out and everyone starts screaming about how Apple's taking over. No they're not. They're not close. They've never been close. They'll never be close. It's not what "everyone wants." The million people who will buy any stupid goddamn thing Apple sells bought iPads. Those million people are by no means "the general public." So in short, who the hell cares? In consumer electronics, a million units hardly even registers on the scale.

      Let's play with the data a little bit. Let's assume for the sake of conversation that iPad sales continue at this rate. I don't think they will, but let's go with it. In three months, they've sold a million. By year's end, that makes four million. Four million units is roughly 12% of the netbooks sold last year. I don't know what your definition of "taking over" is, but in my book that doesn't cut it.

      --
      Hey, I finally got my first freak! Took you long enough!
    16. Re:Whatever it taks! by mjwx · · Score: 2, Informative

      Funny thing - go to any Unix conference, filled with probably some of the nerdiest people ever, and check out the laptops people have. Hint: they aren't Dells running Linux.

      Lenovo tends to be slightly more popular then Dell, mainly due to the fact that the hardware is rock solid, easily cooled for long periods of time and the keyboard/touchpad is far more comfortable to use for long periods of time. That and every model of Dell looks different.

      When I spend 6+ hours on a plane, I'm glad I have a Lenovo and a spare battery. The nipple mouse is far easier to use when in a confined seat and the vehicle is prone to shaking.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
  2. After a month of daily use... by crumbz · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ...I find the iPad to be a perfect web surfing device. Great for e-mail and watching video. I am actually considering selling my Macbook Pro, as it is starting to get dusty. That said, I wouldn't want to write a novel on it.

    1. Re:After a month of daily use... by Peach+Rings · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Why on earth would you want to use an iPad to browse the internet if you have a laptop? Tiny screen, no Flash support, no keyboard... when did it become hip to use crippled devices?

    2. Re:After a month of daily use... by Locke2005 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I find the iPad makes a great cutting board. Great for dicing tomatoes and, uh... apples! I am actually considering selling my Rock Maple cutting board, as it reeks of onions anyway. That said, I wouldn't want to do all my kitchen chores on it -- I tried chopping onions, and wound up accidentally downloading porn!

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    3. Re:After a month of daily use... by atarione · · Score: 4, Funny

      "That said, I wouldn't want to write a novel on it."

      so yeah it is perfect if you never have to do any actual work =p

      oh #$%* now i'm kinda jealous of your never having to work lifestyle..... DAMN IT....

      sigh...

      --
      actually I am happy to see you, however that is in fact a banana in my pocket.
    4. Re:After a month of daily use... by fruitbane · · Score: 4, Insightful

      When un-crippled devices proved to complex to use and maintain. The average person doesn't actually need a full-on PC for most tasks. The said, the iPad is damn expensive for a limited computing appliance.

    5. Re:After a month of daily use... by Man+On+Pink+Corner · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Why on earth would you want to use an iPad to browse the internet if you have a laptop? Tiny screen, no Flash support, no keyboard... when did it become hip to use crippled devices?

      Try it.

    6. Re:After a month of daily use... by shawn(at)fsu · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Hmmm a ~$250 netbook with an OS that allows the installation of arbitrary non approved applications and the ability to install other OSs... Or a $500+ for a closed OS with no ability to install unapproved arbitrary apps.

      Two comments
      1) Dear Apple please save me from your followers
      2) This is the same phenomenon as Ed Hardy popularity

      Typed on my netbook, while listening to Pandora and running an office app to type notes for a final

      --
      500 dollar reward for tip(s) leading to the arrest of the person(s) who stole my sig.
    7. Re:After a month of daily use... by Yamata+no+Orochi · · Score: 5, Funny

      Try it.

      Pay for it for me.

    8. Re:After a month of daily use... by Fnkmaster · · Score: 5, Funny

      That does sound awesome - sit around all day, surf the web, read email, and watch video. If you can figure out how I can support my lifestyle on that, I am totally down to replace my Macbook with an iPad too.

    9. Re:After a month of daily use... by Antiocheian · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's a great device for such computing requirements.

      I wish your Macbook Pro a more demanding owner.

    10. Re:After a month of daily use... by fredmosby · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I got an iPad earlier this week and I haven't used my laptop since. A laptop can do more, but the iPad does everything I need, and it's much easier to use. Actually the screen size isn't a problem because I tend to have the screen closer to my face than a laptop.

    11. Re:After a month of daily use... by insertwackynamehere · · Score: 5, Insightful

      So what you are saying is that the ipad is worthless in your opinion, which is more relevant than the fact the ipad is doing very well. Slashdot hated the ipad but all of their misguided and out of touch opinions couldn't change the fact that the ipad is a good product from the standpoint of the manufacturer and the consumers who purchase it.

    12. Re:After a month of daily use... by Man+On+Pink+Corner · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I think that's the problem. I understand the cool factor, but even a netbook is so much more functional than an iPad that I can't really see the justification of going with an iPad over a netbook, unless you're someone who absolutely, positively despises keyboards and knows you'll only use it for web browsing, iPhone-type games, and e-books.

      There are a few use cases that aren't immediately obvious for a large handheld device with a very high-grade touchscreen. For instance, it makes an unbelievably nice VNC client.

    13. Re:After a month of daily use... by thepike · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes!

      But only after you break it in half.

    14. Re:After a month of daily use... by rinoid · · Score: 3, Interesting

      > Tiny screen?
      Not. Smaller than a 15.6" laptop? Sure but bigger or equivalent to most netbooks.

      > no Flash support
      We are still fracking talking about this? Please.

      > no keyboard
      Really?! You point this out? Have you RTFM'd? On screen keyboard in landscape mode does fine for typing pretty long missives -- longer than this one. Bluetooth keyboards take you to the next level.

      It's really not "crippled" or "limited", not in the knee-jerk manner most consider. It's a nice productivity tool, and, it's a great device to have in the house or for travels. It does a ton of stuff.

      My favorite app? iSSH (with VNC tunneling support) ... now that's what I call crippled. Sigh.

    15. Re:After a month of daily use... by paiute · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Friend of mine bought an iPad. It's already collecting dust according to him.

      The actual worth of an iPad aside, your friend has a new piece of tech which people are lining up to buy at full retail and is still in limited supply? And he is letting it sit idle? He is either imaginary or an idiot or has never heard of eBay.

      --
      If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine
    16. Re:After a month of daily use... by jedidiah · · Score: 3, Interesting

      >> Why on earth would you want to use an iPad to browse the internet if you have a laptop? Tiny screen, no Flash support, no keyboard... when did it become hip to use crippled devices?
      >
      > Try it.

      I did. The trailer at Rotten Tomatoes wouldn't play.

      This is especially interesting because of the fact that Rotten Tomatoes was on the browser menu bar. It wasn't just something I picked off the top of my head with the intention of tripping the device.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    17. Re:After a month of daily use... by jo_ham · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Try it.

      Pay for it for me.

      Go to the Apple store and try it.

    18. Re:After a month of daily use... by jellomizer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Like most technology it is not for all people...

      I didn't buy an iPad because I don't need it, it doesn't fit what I want to do with a computer.

      However there are people out there that do things the iPad does well.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    19. Re:After a month of daily use... by Panaflex · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I don't think it's a sign of the end-times... it's a leisure device, it's instant-on and easy enough for kids to use without messing things up.

      These people already have a computer for the heavy stuff...
      Most people just want to google a term, play a quick game, or set the kids up in the backseat for a movie.

      --
      I said no... but I missed and it came out yes.
    20. Re:After a month of daily use... by Warhawke · · Score: 4, Funny

      They won't let me in. My jeans are not sufficiently tight enough to be deemed a "cool cat."

    21. Re:After a month of daily use... by NekSnappa · · Score: 3, Informative

      RealVNC, and Mocha both are easy to setup and work well. Although RealVNC wants you to use their server on your computer, I believe that both will work just fine with OS X built in Remote Desktop. I've used Mocha with both 10.4 and 10.6.

      Beyond that there are a number of handy remote control/trackpad keyboard apps as well. I've tried both Hippo Remote, and Mobile Air Mouse. Hippo is functional but is very basic. Mobile Air Mouse does all the basics, plus right click functionality. It also displays the shortcuts in the dock of the host machine allowing them to be launched with a tap on the iPad touchscreen.

      Apples Remote Control app is out there too. But all it does is provide and interface with Front Row.

      --
      I want to shoot the messenger!
    22. Re:After a month of daily use... by Yakasha · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Why on earth would you want to use an iPad to browse the internet if you have a laptop? Tiny screen, no Flash support, no keyboard

      When I wanted to sit on my comfy chair on my deck wrapped in a blanket with a coffee in one hand and /. in the other.
      Or when I want to browse while standing for an hour on the train twice a day.
      Or when I want to just not carry around a 5lb brick everywhere I go when not working.
      Or when I don't want unblockable popups.

      ... when did it become hip to use crippled devices?

      You mean like a motorcycle instead of a car?
      You mean like a regular cell phone instead of a smart phone?
      You mean like a laptop instead of a desktop?

      Many people like to use whatever is appropriate to the task.

    23. Re:After a month of daily use... by gstoddart · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Why on earth would you want to use an iPad to browse the internet if you have a laptop? Tiny screen, no Flash support, no keyboard... when did it become hip to use crippled devices?

      You know, if you're holding it at less than arms length, I suspect it's a pretty usable screen size since it' about the size of a book. I see people use their CrackBerry's for Google, and you'll notice they've got an even smaller screen.

      As to flash, I don't have it installed on most of my browsers, so it's not like you're missing anything. I can't view flash on my current machine because I've chosen to do without it -- it' hardly mandatory. In fact, it's a bloody nuisance.

      If you're truly browsing the internet, you mostly don't need a keyboard for the most part.

      With a form factor more like a book, I can see sitting in a comfy chair looking up stuff on the internet or reading an e-book or what have you. And, with a purported 10 hour battery life, that's pretty good.

      I'm not going to run out and buy one, but I'm keeping an eye on them -- might be something to ponder in a year or so if they come down in price.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    24. Re:After a month of daily use... by Haxzaw · · Score: 2

      My vote goes to imaginary friend. Actually, an idiotic imaginary friend.

    25. Re:After a month of daily use... by Eponymous+Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I have a netbook and an ipad and for me the ipad is a much, much better machine.

      For one, it's battery life is astounding.

      Secondly, the build quality is superb. It feels solid. The netbook in comparison is too flexible and feels very cheap.

      Third, I like tools that do what they are designed to do well. For some, no flash is deal breaker. For me, I don't miss flash one iota.

      I use the ipad for watching movies, email, surfing, reading, and games. In other words consuming content (ack - I hate that phrase). For these uses, it's hardly a crippled device. At least no more crippled than, say, a Nintendo DS or an XBox. Different devices, different uses. Personally, I'm a fan of simple tools that do a limited number of things well.

    26. Re:After a month of daily use... by nine-times · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Yeah, I don't agree that it's "the perfect web surfing device"-- but not for the reasons you're going to get flamed for. People are going to call you crazy because it's a little screen, no Flash, no physical keyboard, etc., but after using an iPad for a while, that's not the stuff that bothers me.

      The real problem with the iPad as a web browsing device is in how it handles tabbed browsing. I browse the web in a particular way, and it's not quite linear. When I'm reading through a page, if I come across a link that interests me, I open it in a new tab in the background. Then I continue on reading the page until there's nothing else I want, and I close the tab. That automatically brings me to the next tab, from which I do the same thing. It's a very easy and natural way of processing things, and I barely understand the point of having multiple web pages open at the same time if you're not managing things that way.

      On the iPad, however, you don't really have tabs. Instead you can back into some other screen where all your open pages appear as thumbnails. Not only is the transition of moving in and out a bit slow and aggravating, but there's no way to open a new page in the background. If you "Open in New Page", it automatically zooms you out, opens a new page, and zooms into that page. Worse yet, a lot of times if you have multiple pages open and you switch from one to another, the page you've just switched to will automatically reload itself. ??!! The whole reason I'd want to be able to keep pages open in the background is so that they'll be all loaded up and ready to go. If I have to wait for them to load each time, then I may as well just bookmark them and avoid the whole shrinky-zoomy animation.

      Apple needs to fix that experience. Along with everything else, they have these nice big touchscreens, and the best way they can come up with to change between web pages is to press a button that zooms you out to look at thumbnails? We can't get functionality to have a quick 3-finger swipe take you to "next tab"?

    27. Re:After a month of daily use... by Mr2001 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      >Tiny screen?
      Not. Smaller than a 15.6" laptop? Sure but bigger or equivalent to most netbooks.

      At that price, it'd better be.

      > no Flash support
      We are still fracking talking about this? Please.

      They still haven't fixed it, and they're clearly not going to. All the talk in the world about HTML 5 doesn't change the fact that many, many web sites use Flash, or that there's no HTML 5 equivalent of the Flash developer tools. Until either the iPad changes or the web changes, the iPad will be cut off from a big part of the web.

      On screen keyboard in landscape mode does fine for typing pretty long missives

      Having used an iPad myself, I beg to differ. I wouldn't recommend that screen for typing an SMS, much less a blog post.

      It's really not "crippled" or "limited", not in the knee-jerk manner most consider. It's a nice productivity tool,

      It's crippled in the sense that there are many applications you can't get, web sites you can't use, and tasks you can't perform with it, all because Steve has a chip on his shoulder. As for "productivity tool"... well, maybe with a Bluetooth keyboard hooked up. But at that point, you might ask yourself why you're trying to make it into something it doesn't want to be, and whether you might look a bit less silly using a device where the keyboard is attached to the screen.

      and, it's a great device to have in the house or for travels. It does a ton of stuff.

      Heh. You know what's an even greater device to have in the house or for travels, something that does even more stuff? A netbook. Comparable screen, lower price tag, actual keyboard, and uncrippled OS.

      --
      Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
    28. Re:After a month of daily use... by Eponymous+Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      There's an app for that:
      http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/rotten-tomatoes/id342598232?mt=8

      This is actually one of the things I'm a little bit worried about with the iPad. Rather than use the open, ubiquitous web, some are choosing to put up walls around their content by making it available through an app rather than the browser.

      More likely though, I think sites like Rotten Tomatoes are generally working to get away from Flash and Silverlight. This, I think, is a good thing. There are enough iPad's out there to make moving away from Flash worthwhile, but not enough to make locking up the content in an app a good idea. I'm happy about this.

    29. Re:After a month of daily use... by mikael_j · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Really? You must be new to the computing world, I could give you a long list of laptops I've used that couldn't go above 800x600, 640x480 or even lower resolutions. I've also been using computers long enough to remember why "everyone" hates Microsoft...

      --
      Greylisting is to SMTP as NAT is to IPv4
    30. Re:After a month of daily use... by mrchaotica · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think the people going out and getting these either have money to burn or don't realize that you can get a pretty decent and big laptop for the same kind of money.

      The people getting iPads DON'T WANT A BIG LAPTOP! They're getting the iPad specifically because it's NOT BIG. What part of that is so fucking hard to understand?!

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    31. Re:After a month of daily use... by raddan · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't hear many people complaining about not being able to write novels on their Playstations.

    32. Re:After a month of daily use... by Peteskiplayer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It has also had a lot more media coverage and been hyped greatly, and it's quite likely the marketing budget was larger too as Apple is touting it as the 'next big thing'.
      This may lead to more sales even if the product isn't any better.

    33. Re:After a month of daily use... by jo_ham · · Score: 4, Funny

      If you wear an outrageously silly beanie hat, it will compensate for the lack of tight trousers.

    34. Re:After a month of daily use... by Eponymous+Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Lots of people by televisions and game consoles. These cost considerably more than $500 and arguably do a lot less. What's your point again?

      $500 is an affordable price for a pretty large segment of the population. Couple that with the fact that there is so much software that you can get either for free or very inexpensively and you end up with a pretty cheap device that does quite a lot.

      Buy a PS3 or an XBox and check out the price of their popular titles. Lots of games are $50 or even more. When I buy a game for my iPad, I consider $5 to be expensive.

    35. Re:After a month of daily use... by mikael_j · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I never heard anyone say that about the Macbook Air (I assume that's the product you meant when you wrote "the Air"), I did hear (and agree with) plenty of people talk about it being overpriced or being too much of an "executive" laptop (meaning it's ultra-light and had enough power to do just about anything most people do in a normal workday but overall what you're getting just isn't worth it since the small edge it has over regular laptops is negated by the high price).

      Also, in case you didn't know, the Macbook Air was a full-fledged laptop where the focus was on making it lightweight and thin, unfortunately the price seemed to be too high for most people (I have met a couple of *nix geeks working as consultants who swore it was the best laptop they'd ever owned but they were an exception since they could afford it and it made sense for them to use a laptop with a decent-sized screen combined with a form factor that's as small as possible).

      --
      Greylisting is to SMTP as NAT is to IPv4
    36. Re:After a month of daily use... by darrylo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The iPad is easy-to-use, and has a decent battery life. Flash issues aside, it's the perfect device for non-technical users. Sure, it doesn't do a lot of things well, but it does them "good enough" -- good enough that the non-technical users don't care or can't tell the difference. And many (most?) don't care if there isn't a physical keyboard -- a lot of people can only type via hunt-and-peck, and most of them probably don't care if they're pecking on a real or virtual keyboard.

      Of course the iPad is disliked by a lot of people on slashdot, but advanced users aren't the target audience. Allow me to use a word that many people here might understand: it's for the "n00bs". Many consumers still have only little to modest computer expertise, and the iPad is a great, toaster-like device for them. (Apple will probably make a metric a**load more money selling to novices than advanced users.)

    37. Re:After a month of daily use... by NekSnappa · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If you are just a normal user, then the average consumer computer (i.e. one that runs OSX or Windows 7) is extremely simple.

      What you say is true. However for the "average user" (read not folks on /.) Install then uninstall a couple of programs on the Windows box, and the registry gets a little cranky. Or on Windows or OS X they read an article that changing this, that, or the other setting will make the machine do "something cool." And then suddenly it does work the same as it did before.

      The system isn't borked or anything. But the machine no longer behaves as it once did so it might as well be completely screwed as far as the user is concerned.

      Give the same group of people a device which does what they need to amuse themselves. With an OS designed for it. With very little flexibility to save them from themselves, and everybody's happy.

      Yes, even you. Because now you don't have to spend a weekend trying to figure out what Aunt Emma did to trash her registry.

      Have we as a culture really become that goddamn stupid? Do we really need our computers to function like digital picture books?

      Some people do just want digital picture books. Some just want to surf the web and stream Pandora. Just because someone doesn't want to use a computer for the same type. or breadth of things that you do doesn't mean they are stupid.

      If fact I'm very sure that there are a lot of people out there who are a lot smarter than you, or me, that just want that digital picture book.

      --
      I want to shoot the messenger!
    38. Re:After a month of daily use... by jDeepbeep · · Score: 3, Insightful

      when did it become hip to use crippled devices?

      Outside of /., it's called 'convenient', not 'crippled.'

      --
      Reply to That ||
    39. Re:After a month of daily use... by Nemyst · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If I get an iPad, I want it to be portable. Getting a Bluetooth keyboard on top of that defeats that purpose, since suddenly you're carrying around two things (at which point a netbook becomes a better investment).

      Compared to a netbook, it is crippled. I want to be able to install whatever I want, whenever I want, from whoever I want without Jobs policing me. If I want Flash, well I'm stuck on the iPad (like it or not, Flash is still very widespread and will continue to be so for the foreseeable future; yes it's still brought up and all the fanbois crying that Flash is so 2000s are obviously disconnected from reality). If I want to do anything serious, I won't use an onscreen keyboard. Do you touch type? I do, and I can tell you it's quite a bit more effective than going one-finger on a touchscreen. Even if you became used to it, you can never expect to be as fast as you would on a normal keyboard.

      Honestly, the number one reason it sells to well is that it is very simple to use and that Apple's sales and marketing teams are amongst the best in the industry. That's it.

    40. Re:After a month of daily use... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I call this the slashdot cycle.

      1) Criticize a new device/technology because it isn't open/free enough for your personal tastes, and talk about how NO ONE WILL BUY THIS CUZ IT AIN'T FREE, AND CUSTOMERS VALUE FREEDOM!
      2) Watch as people enjoy and buy/use the new device/technology
      3) Complain about how WELL IT ISN'T USEFUL AS THIS OTHER THING THAT IS VERY DIFFERENT WHY DON'T YOU USE THAT? YOU'RE STUPID BECAUSE I'M A GENIUS.
      4) Complain more and shoot down anyone who tries to explain the appeal, they're clearly a plant by corporations!
      5) Repeat with next technology that comes along

      There's not even a profit stage!

    41. Re:After a month of daily use... by Evtim · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think the large sale figures are because they are trying (and perhaps succeeding) to engage the completely non-technical crowd that still has to/would like to use at least the Web in their lives.

      Like my mom who has first seen PC at the age of 45 and never needed it, but now would want to Skype with me, being 2000km away. And no one around her can support (without payment) a PC. Add to that girlfriends/wives (some of them), posers, fan boys, uber consumers....I am damn sure the hype will not die out in a hurry.

      I would still not buy it for my mom because it will be some time (if ever) until the OS is translated into my language (mom does not speak English). I hope they do it for Russian though - that will solve it for her.

      I offered my wife to consider the iPad, but she disagrees with Apple about the pr0n thing and Steve's high moral horse (she reads /. sometimes).

      I would love to be able to browse while in the sofa though, so I hope there will be many more and suited to every taste devices like this. And I hope the whole DRM thing will not spoil the book reading, music listening and movie watching experiences on said devices.

    42. Re:After a month of daily use... by natehoy · · Score: 3, Interesting

      As a notebook user who knows several other notebook users, and is also a tablet (iPod Touch) user who knows other tablet users, not just "no" but "hell no". The devices may seem identical on the surface, but they are fundamentally different tools for fundamentally different uses.

      Don't get me wrong, I own an iPod Touch (won it in a contest) and I love the thing for what it does, and there have been many occasions where I've thought, "you know, something like this with about a 10 inch screen would be utterly brilliant!". So I understand the demographic and applications of the iPad fairly well.

      But when it came to a portable device, I chose a netbook. I use it for a lot more than iPhone-type games, web browsing, and e-books. Well, OK, most of my stuff technically qualifies as "web browsing" but a lot of it involves typing (case in point, what I'm doing right now). The difference between a tablet and a netbook is in the ability to interact. I can have a video conference on my netbook. I can type whole paragraphs on it. I can't sit comfortably on the couch and watch a movie on it, nor can I do a crossword puzzle easily on it. Reading books on it is frustrating - especially while sitting up in bed - it's too heavy and the damn keyboard gets in the way.

      I see the iPad as cutting into the Netbook demographic because Apple is the first to introduce a somewhat affordable and (within strict limits) very functional tablet that doesn't completely suck, and many of the tablet demographic have been going to Netbooks because they are close enough, not because they are what they actually want. Now that there's a completely-non-sucking tablet out there, the tablet-desiring demographic is discovering that they need not be encumbered by a keyboard and a form factor that doesn't quite suit them, and they can buy precisely what they do want. They just have to put up with the compromises of a closed ecosystem, but that isn't as much of a downside for a tablet as it is for a netbook anyway - you use a tablet more for passive consumption, not so much for interaction.

      So, netbook sales are not being "destroyed". They will drop, though. The demand is adjusting to account for the simple fact that not everyone who bought a netbook last year really wanted a netbook. Some of them really wanted a tablet, but they settled for a netbook because it was the closest thing that they could find. Now that the tablet niche has been competently filled with an affordable device, the netbook niche will see a loss of some of these crossover sales.

      Doesn't mean the market for netbooks is going away. It just means that there's a giant pent-up demand for non-sucking tablets, so Apple moved a lot of units based on that pent-up demand. Netbooks will still sell to people who want netbooks, but they won't sell to people who want tablets any more.

      --
      "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
    43. Re:After a month of daily use... by Altus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Everyone I know who owns an iPad is an engineer. Several of them write code for a living, all of them are very computer literate.

      Now I'm not saying that the iPad isn't good for non technical people, but your assumption about advanced users is incorrect. Admittedly they aren't replacing their primary computer with an iPad but they are using them far more than their primary machines for casual use cases. Just because someone is capable of being a power user does not mean that they wont enjoy sitting back on their couch and using an iPad.

      There might even come a day when I will stop buying laptops and actually move back to a desktop for my heavy duty computer and own an iPad for all my portable computing needs.

      I know a lot of people talk about an iPad being useless for "real" work. I don't know about you but most of the real work that most people do is at an office on a computer provided by the company that employs them. That might not be the case for you, but it is the case for the majority of the world (even the majority of technical professionals).

      --

      "In America, first you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women..." -H. Simpson

    44. Re:After a month of daily use... by feepness · · Score: 3, Informative

      The actual worth of an iPad aside, your friend has a new piece of tech which people are lining up to buy at full retail and is still in limited supply? And he is letting it sit idle? He is either imaginary or an idiot or has never heard of eBay.

      He's a app developer. He bought it to make his stuff work on it.

      According to him, it's just too heavy to be comfortable and he always grabs his iPhone instead.

    45. Re:After a month of daily use... by Amouth · · Score: 2, Interesting

      the air would have been nice.. if it had a REAL docking station.. and was changed so that it didn't have a drop down xicom style wired network connector..

      oh and a couple extra usb ports and an option for a cheaper rotating drive.

      --
      '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
    46. Re:After a month of daily use... by illumin8 · · Score: 2, Informative

      When I'm reading through a page, if I come across a link that interests me, I open it in a new tab in the background. Then I continue on reading the page until there's nothing else I want, and I close the tab. That automatically brings me to the next tab, from which I do the same thing. It's a very easy and natural way of processing things, and I barely understand the point of having multiple web pages open at the same time if you're not managing things that way.

      Do yourself a favor and buy Atomic Web browser for iPad. It's only $0.99 and it does all of the things you want to do. Tap and hold on a link and choose "open in a background tab". Supports ad-block, private browsing (porn mode), full screen browsing, user agent switching, etc.

      The number one feature I like is that I can switch tabs without having to reload the entire page. In Safari, for some reason when you switch pages to a page you loaded even a few minutes ago, it has to reload. This is probably for memory reasons, but it makes tabbed browsing damn inconvenient. Atomic Web does this and somehow keeps the pages in memory.

      --
      "When the president does it, that means it's not illegal." - Richard M. Nixon
    47. Re:After a month of daily use... by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 2, Insightful

      > no Flash support
      We are still fracking talking about this? Please.

      Which is HILARIOUS coming from /. crowd.

      Think about it for a minute. There is a huge contingent of diehard Flash haters here on /. and then you have this post, which decries the lack of Flash on the iPad.

      So, which is it? We hate flash, until it is not there, then we hate Apple for removing such a pig ?

      Silliness.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    48. Re:After a month of daily use... by fruitbane · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think they key is that most people buying netbooks don't want netbooks. They want something that's fancier than a smart phone but they don't really want another whole computer, and the netbook is simply the closest thing they can fine. These buyers likely DO want a computing appliance rather than a computer. My astonishment is with their willingness to accept the price tag, not the product itself.

    49. Re:After a month of daily use... by xtracto · · Score: 2, Insightful

      When I wanted to sit on my comfy chair on my deck wrapped in a blanket with a coffee in one hand and /. in the other.

      So, how long did it take to write this message on the iPad?
      I imagine you had to put down your coffee mug, put down the iPad in "notebook position... [d'oh!]" and write... or maybe you "touch typed" with your nose lol.

      Or when I want to just not carry around a 5lb brick everywhere I go when not working.

      netbooks weight at most 1.5 kg :)

      --
      Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
    50. Re:After a month of daily use... by dudpixel · · Score: 2, Insightful

      let me point out the amount of FAIL I can see here:

      Why on earth would you want to use an iPad to browse the internet if you have a laptop? Tiny screen, no Flash support, no keyboard

      When I wanted to sit on my comfy chair on my deck wrapped in a blanket with a coffee in one hand and /. in the other.

      Until you want to, you know, scroll down. Which do you put down, the iPad or the coffee?
      A netbook would sit comfortably in your lap. coffee in one hand, mouse in the other.

      Or when I want to browse while standing for an hour on the train twice a day.

      So if you're on a train, one hand is holding onto something for balance, and the other is holding a rather large device to do the same as what most other people are doing on their phones. And guess what, you cant scroll down without either putting your iPad on the floor or risking falling over.

      Or when I want to just not carry around a 5lb brick everywhere I go when not working.

      You must have big pockets. I wouldn't want to carry anything around that was bigger than my phone. If it doesn't fit in my jeans pocket - it's inconvenient.

      Or when I don't want unblockable popups.

      nice troll - most browsers block popups these days. You're promoting the lack of flash as a feature, but I'm pretty sure you can disable flash on your netbook if you wanted the same "experience".

      ... when did it become hip to use crippled devices?

      You mean like a motorcycle instead of a car?

      Meh, each to their own preference, they appeal to different markets, and most people prefer cars.

      You mean like a regular cell phone instead of a smart phone?

      The world is moving to smartphones - again, not the direction you were infering.

      You mean like a laptop instead of a desktop?

      There is nothing about a laptop that makes it inferior to a desktop, except for the keyboard maybe. But it actually gives you MORE than a desktop, in that it is portable. Unless you mean netbook, but then most people dont use those instead of their desktop. They use it when they are away from their desktop.

      Many people like to use whatever is appropriate to the task.

      This is true. However I suspect many iPad owners try to make the iPad appropriate to ANY task, rather than applying the above (in which case most of them wouldn't need one).

      I find a netbook much more appropriate for browsing the web from my couch, or whatever other computing task I might like to do. Unless I go out somewhere, in which case my (android) phone is just fine.

      Your examples were all poor. I can certainly see your argument, but I disagree and have provided the flip-side for your amusement :)

      --
      This seemed like a reasonable sig at the time.
    51. Re:After a month of daily use... by mikael_j · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Umm, yes. They've been attacking Google at every opportunity, backstabbing Adobe, one of Apple's biggest supporters (flashbacks to what MSFT did to IBM), Suing competitor over spurious software patents whist blatantly ignoring the hardware patents of other companies and threatening Open source codecs with law suits, very Microsoftian.

      They don't even have a majority market share when it comes to the various markets that they're operating in, so they're not so much abusing their position as they are doing what all large corporations do, bickering and backstabbing, something which is a problem but isn't nearly as bad as when someone with practically complete control of the market does it.

      Further more, the are attempting to circumvent web standards by forcing pages to be coded for the Iwhatever. Or did you honestly believe that they were trying to use an open standard, that isn't even a standard yet (strangely reminiscent of what MS did with IE).

      Are you talking about html5? You do realize that it's not some magic "Apple HTML" but rather the next version of the HTML standard, one which is hardly backed by just Apple, right?

      Like trying to force HTML 5 into H.264, or forcing flash sites switch to Apple's implementation of HTML 5. Perhaps the requirement for Iwhatever Application to be originally written in an Apple approved language also slipped your attention, deliberately making it difficult to make cross platform applications (DOS isn't done until Lotus wont run, do you see the resemblance). Maybe the banning of applications that mention Android also went unnoticed (banning something that even mentions a competitor is not anti-competitive, surely).

      They're not the only backers of H.264 as the HTML 5 default for video, and there are actually plenty of sound technical reasons for preferring H.264 over Theora.

      When you say "flash sites" do you by any chance mean video websites? Because yes, the iPhone, iPod Touch and iPad don't support Flash, a decision which isn't all good or all bad, while Flash support would've been nice my experience with mobile devices and Flash is that the current state of it is just horrible, combine that with the history of Flash performance problems on OS X and it sort of makes sense that Apple would rather bet on HTML 5 than trust Adobe to magically pull an efficient and stable Flash release for the iPhone/iPad OS...

      There's nothing illegal about being anti-competitive, in fact most companies are pretty anti-competitive, it's when you control a market that it becomes illegal. When it comes to morality it may be wrong but I don't see why we should hold Apple to a higher standard than other large corporations, they're not the ones who have the "Do no evil" mantra.

      --
      Greylisting is to SMTP as NAT is to IPv4
  3. hyperbole much? by thomasdz · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Geesh... "destroyed"? "fell off a cliff"?
    no bias in this article

    --
    Karma: Excellent. 15 moderator points expire sometime.
    1. Re:hyperbole much? by Locke2005 · · Score: 2, Funny

      My netbook fell off a cliff and really was destroyed, you insensitive clod!

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    2. Re:hyperbole much? by Chris+Burke · · Score: 3, Funny

      My netbook fell off a cliff and really was destroyed, you insensitive clod!

      And the iPad has no alibi, I notice. Hmmm...

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    3. Re:hyperbole much? by jeffmeden · · Score: 5, Insightful

      *We report* on how the awesome new Ipad is decimating the very existence of the Netbook, then defecating on its already stinking corpse. *You Decide* how long it will take you to open your eyes to the best computing device on earth, and then open your checkbook to the tune of 800 bucks!

      Fair.And.Balanced.

      Hey, look out! There's something behind you!

    4. Re:hyperbole much? by bhartman34 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Not only is it incredibly biased, but it offers nothing in the way of actual evidence that would persuade someone who'd advanced past third grade.

      Think about it for a second: Only 44% of the people who bought iPads who were surveyed said that they did so instead of buying a netbook. How many people bought iPads, as compared to those who bought netbooks?

      The other thing that's astonishing to me is that someone who writes a market research report could be so piss-poor at reading a graph. Sales of netbooks actually went down most in October/November 2009, well before the January announcement of the iPad. I'm kind of astonished that the author of the Fortune article could be that stupid.

    5. Re:hyperbole much? by clone53421 · · Score: 2, Informative

      We’re comparing growth in sales. Sales were 641% higher in July of ’09 than they were in July of ’08. Sales were still 5% higher in April of ’10 than they’d been in April of ’09.

      If you’d just look at the DOW it’s pretty easy to see why this isn’t really that spectacular. In July of ’08 the market was teetering at the brink of a precipitous fall. In April of ’09 things were just starting to recover.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    6. Re:hyperbole much? by maxume · · Score: 2

      I was more enjoying the irony than trying to defend the article.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
  4. Another explanation by Yossarian45793 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Or maybe netbook sales are cratering because instead of delivering quality models with high performance and low power packed into a lightweight enclosure, companies like Dell have axed all but the most profitable models, and replaced SSDs with magnetic disks and raised prices to the maximum they can squeeze out of customers. Netbook selection is terrible now compared to what it was a year ago. Last year there were many models and there was a price war, now there are a few models and they're just crappy low-end notebooks.

    1. Re:Another explanation by nine-times · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yeah, I've been questioning the whole "netbook" classification lately. What set netbooks apart form notebooks was that they sacrificed a lot of functionality to make the cheapest, lightest, smallest thing capable of browsing the Internet (on a screen big enough that you didn't have to zoom in/out the way cell phones do). Now they're generally cheap ultraportable laptops.

      Which is fine. Whatever. But "netbook" just seems like a marketing term now. They're small laptops made as cheaply as possible, but you can't call them tiny cheap laptops.

  5. welp. by hamburger+lady · · Score: 5, Funny

    the /. "it'll never sell, it's just a giant itouch' crowd really knocked this one outta the park.

    what can i say? when you're right 48 of the time, you're wrong 52 percent of the time.

    --

    ---
    Is this the MPAA? Is this the RIAA? Is this the DMCA? I thought it was the USA!
    1. Re:welp. by Yamata+no+Orochi · · Score: 4, Informative

      I think the /. crowd said something more along the lines of, "It's a piece of crap, but every yuppie retard will still buy one."

      Seems a little more in-line with reality.

    2. Re:welp. by DeadDecoy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Nah, most of the /. crowd is formed of IT admins, programmers, and engineers, whose environment is saturated with computers and probably do not need a device that has less functionality than the one they sit in front of all day long. For the basic end-user, it's a nifty device. You're just getting a biased opinion here.

    3. Re:welp. by Brett+Buck · · Score: 5, Funny

      "It's a piece of crap, but every yuppie retard will still buy one."

        In other news, Slashdot posters also declared with authority that "dating supermodels is a real pain in the ass, they are too high-maintenance" and "being rich doesn't make you happy!"

    4. Re:welp. by insertwackynamehere · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "it's worthless, mother, tell them it's worthless!" sulked Slashdot user Zironic. "There, there honey," his mother purred. "It's going to be alright. The iPad is worthless." In her heart, however, she knew that she was lying to him. As Zironic drifted off into sleep, she shed a tear of sadness for her sulking manchild. She knew that one day he would have to face the truth: he had no idea what he was talking about and everyone hated him.

    5. Re:welp. by insertwackynamehere · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What technical knowledge do they lack? They don't need any. That's why they like Apple. That's why they like the iPad. Do you think you can gallop into the Apple store on a brilliant white steed and declaritively compare spec sheets and the consumer will be blinded by your glory and understand the error of their ways?

    6. Re:welp. by jo_ham · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The slashdot crowd has been the vocal bunch that come out in every Apple article and moan and moan about how terrible all their products are, rather than simply skipping past.

      Bonus points for "not another apple article" comments. You think the scroll wheel or page down key had never been invented.

      Just look back over the early articles leading up to the launch - the overwhelming consensus was that it would tank, with some saying "it'll be great" some saying "who knows?" and some saying "only retards will buy one".

      Now that it's flying off the shelves faster than the iPhone those opinions have all gone, to be replaced with "what is it for?" and "only yuppies are buying them".

      I don't care one way or the other whether it succeeds, but a large portion of people here just can't leave it alone - it's not enough to just not buy one, it somehow must be killed with fire.

    7. Re:welp. by joh · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Nah, most of the /. crowd is formed of IT admins, programmers, and engineers, whose environment is saturated with computers and probably do not need a device that has less functionality than the one they sit in front of all day long. For the basic end-user, it's a nifty device. You're just getting a biased opinion here.

      No, the *real* IT admins, programmers and engineers whose environment is saturated with computers anyway love the iPad, because it is something they can just use for a change. No real IT admin wants to use a real computer for casual things if he can get away with something more simple instead. If you really can't get enough of computers even in your free time you must be fairly fresh to the job.

      Who's hating the iPad are all those people who pretend to be IT professionals and who just hate the thought of something people can just use, because they love to aimlessly tinker around with computers and pretend to be experts. That's the /. crowd today. At least it seems so.

    8. Re:welp. by pimpsoftcom · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You guys joke, but I have actually dated women that were known for winning modeling contests, and they always seemed more needy. The women who are used to getting attention all the time get worried and needy when they dont get the attention suddenly because you have to work or you have a personal project you want to finish, and it makes them worry and fear and as the wise Yoda once said, that leads to anger and general b*tch*ness in the end. Granted you can usually catch these sort of women on the way down into depression and get them in the emo "I will try anything to get my self esteem back" phase - its usually worth a week or two of good times until they start feeling better - but really on the other side of the coin I have found that women who don't get attention all the time are usually more happy and easier to spend time with for long amounts of time after the fun is over, and they are generally more appreciative of the time and effort you put into the relationship.

      --
      - d
  6. "Magical" product? by goldspider · · Score: 5, Funny

    Demand continues to exceed supply and we're working hard to get this magical product into the hands of even more customers.

    I can't imagine why some people regard Apple as a cult...

    --
    "Ask not what your country can do for you." --John F. Kennedy
  7. Sigh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I think it has to do more with market saturation than the iPad. All of the Soccer Moms and folks who wanted the small portable cheap computer picked them up over last year and the holidays. These aren't people on a 3 year HW replacement cycle and don't care about power so they're not going to go out and jump for another machine.

    Enough iPad sensationalism.

  8. One million by Zerth · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm going to feel just a little bit sad for the owners of those million iPads when they drop the price and kick out the next version in 6 months. They'll be outraged, but Jobs will just say "hey, at least it wasn't 2 months this time!"

    1. Re:One million by Ogive17 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm going to feel just a little bit sad for the owners of those million iPads when they drop the price and kick out the next version in 6 months. They'll be outraged, but Jobs will just say "hey, at least it wasn't 2 months this time!"

      Not only that, the next version will come with features that should have been included on the 1st one. Apple always fucks over the early adopters... yet they keep falling for the same trick every time. I know if I ever had the urge to buy an Apple product, I'd wait til the 2nd or 3rd generation. By then the price would have dropped and the list of features would be more in line with the price. This is why I told my gf to not buy an iPad yet... probably get a better one for half the price in another year.

      --
      "Action without philosophy is a lethal weapon; philosophy without action is worthless."
    2. Re:One million by s73v3r · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Care to name any other company that doesn't do this? Every company adds features to their products as the years go on.

    3. Re:One million by dangitman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not every company holds features out at the beginning and adds them in later...

      Spoken like somebody who knows nothing about software or hardware development. Do you think Apple just has a pile of these "features" sitting around and says "hey, let's exclude this feature so we can screw customers again in the future"?

      Software development takes time. Features that armchair pundits think are "trivial" actually take a lot of work and testing to implement. And features don't exist in isolation. They live within a system, where different parts are dependent on others. So, if you want good software it takes time and hard decisions to get it right. Of course, you could just add features in a rushed, half-assed manner, but then you don't end up with good software.

      Hardware is similar - you have to balance a whole range of factors - battery life, physical space and form factor, cost, heat, component availability, industrial design, manufacturing technology. A wafer-thin portable computer is not just something you hack together.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
  9. Why do people buy an iPad? by v(*_*)vvvv · · Score: 3, Insightful

    An iPad is a big iPod Touch. It's a toy. Fun for the whole family, and even geeks love them... but it is still a toy.

    A Netbook is another name for a cheap laptop. You can do real work on a netbook, and by work I mean Microsoft Office and Quickbooks work.

    So if people were buying netbooks just for fun, then maybe those who think they could have more fun with an iPad are opting for those instead, but it seems like the iPad is selling to a whole new audience that wouldn't have bought a Netbook to begin with like...

    Apple users who wanted a Netbook (Apple only has expensive laptops)

    1. Re:Why do people buy an iPad? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This may come as a shock to you but there are millions of people who don't need to do "real work" with an electronic device. Not everyone compiles Linux kernels, uses accounting software an needs to write the great American novel on a portable tablet. You want to do that shit, sit down on a chair in from a computer and go to it.

      Networks are garbage and that's why when given a choice, the iPad has a very large market it can tap into.

    2. Re:Why do people buy an iPad? by gstoddart · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You can do real work on a netbook, and by work I mean Microsoft Office and Quickbooks work.

      You know, I think you've basically just proved Apple's marketing campaign for the last several years.

      Usually the PC is saying they can do spreadsheets and other similar boring business type tasks. The Mac is more concerned about doing interesting things like managing photos and playing music and having a life.

      To a lot of people, Microsoft Office and Quickbooks aren't things they want to do. Apple seems to have made a market about selling people devices which do fun things. And, yes, that likely is a whole new audience.

      The fact they've sold a million in this timeframe means it's a big audience. I don't know what I'd do with one, but what I've seen of them makes me secretly want one -- I won't be buying one, but I do covet them.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  10. Not surprising by TheRaven64 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    NetBooks were always strange devices. Marginally more portable than a laptop (although not portable enough to fit in a pocket), and a lot less powerful. Their only real advantage was their cost. They were very cheap, but since the original EeeeeeeeeeeeeePC they've gradually crept up in price and now they're just too expensive for what they are.

    The iPad, in contrast, is not just a cheap laptop. It fills a distinctly different need to a laptop. I've not entirely worked out what that need is - it seems to target a market that doesn't contain me - but it's clearly not the same set of uses as a laptop.

    The iPad isn't killing Netbooks, they're doing that all by themselves. The iPad is just giving people who might have bought one and never used it after the first couple of months something different to waste their money on.

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    1. Re:Not surprising by LWATCDR · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The iPad has a better screen than most netbooks and a longer battery life.
      I am still waiting for a smartbook. I don't need windows on a mobile device. I have a notebook if I need windows.
      I can do everything I want on a mobile device just fine with Linux on an ARM.
      I would like Flash for it until Firefox decides to support H.264 but other than that I really could do everything on Ubuntu running on say a TegraII with a nice screen.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    2. Re:Not surprising by Animats · · Score: 4, Insightful

      They were very cheap, but since the original EeeeeeeeeeeeeePC they've gradually crept up in price and now they're just too expensive for what they are.

      I know. There should be vast numbers of $200 netbooks, and there aren't. The PC industry was terrified of that price drop, and with Microsoft's help, managed to fight it off.

      I have several of the original EeePC machines. Their Linux has a built-in self-destruct feature. Their "union file system" loses inodes over time. As a test, I have one plugged in and completely idle; it loses about 1% of its inodes per day. When all the inodes are gone, the machine stops working. There is a workaround for this, which must be applied every 90 days of power-on time, or sooner if you actually use the machine. The vendor-recommended procedure, though, is to reinitialize the machine to the factory-empty state, losing all user files.

      And people wonder why Linux hasn't succeeded on the desktop.

    3. Re:Not surprising by mrchaotica · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There are some situations where netbooks work well, usually they involve field workers in non-harsh environments who have to run full desktop apps but want a 2 pound laptop instead of a 5 pound one.

      What people really want -- and always wanted -- is an electronic substitute for a clipboard. They've been using netbooks (and Tablet PCs before that) because that's all that was available; now that the iPad exists there's no surprise that it's killing off those other devices! It still needs to lose another pound and get a better method of text/handwriting entry, though. (And be less proprietary...)

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    4. Re:Not surprising by domatic · · Score: 2, Informative

      I have Ubuntu Netbook Remix installed on a 4G 701. The camera, wireless, sd card and all the rest work with current software and no "self-destructing inode" misfeature bugs. It was all autodetected so I didn't have to do any system administration to get the hardware lit up. I like the interface better than what came on the Xandros as well.

  11. Not surprising by ErichTheRed · · Score: 4, Insightful

    For the vast majority of end users, especially those who don't care what's running their devices, the iPad is a good enough substitute for a full laptop PC. The screen is big enough to do serious browsing (unless you use Flash...) and it doubles as a book reader/media player. The major problems I've always had with netbooks is the desktop OS (Linux or Windows) crammed onto a too-small screen, the speed and the tiny keyboards. I've tried to like them - I really have. But that form factor really stinks if you have bad eyes and big fingers.

    (And no, I don't own an iPad. I'm the old fogey in the corner with a 14" laptop.)

    Even with the lack of Flash,a keyboard and a mainstream OS, the iPad as a netbook replacement is not totally out to lunch. There are some situations where netbooks work well, usually they involve field workers in non-harsh environments who have to run full desktop apps but want a 2 pound laptop instead of a 5 pound one.

  12. Inaccurate summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Growth in netbook sales is slowed down to "only" 6% YOY as of April. This means that they're just as strong as last year, just not going up at an insane exponential rate which is, by definition unsustainable for many generations. They are not *cratering* as the summary implies.

  13. iPad can't do everything my laptop can by rjamestaylor · · Score: 4, Insightful

    While it's true iPad cannot doesn't allow me to do everything my laptop does, I find that for most of the things I do with a laptop the iPad excels. Especially consuming content. Creating content is getting better (I'm more used to the keyboard and use an external BT keyboard for long writing sessions), iSSH makes it bearable to manage my servers remotely (the only servers I use anymore are "remote"), and when off work the iPad is a fantastic movie and gaming platform.

    So, I am finding myself using my iPad more and my laptop less. (Ironically, I'm writing this from my MacBookPro :)

    --
    -- @rjamestaylor on Ello
  14. That doesn't make any sense. by mosb1000 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    People buy toys. . .

  15. Sheer Madness by eldavojohn · · Score: 4, Insightful

    'One million iPads in 28 days -- that's less than half of the 74 days it took to achieve this milestone with iPhone,'

    Isn't it crazy how fast people will belly up to throw cash at you when you're not also forcing them into a two year cellphone plan with AT&T with high monthly payments? I know you need a service plan to use the iPad's 3G but there's also a model with no 3G. I wonder what the breakdown of that million sales looks like (yes, I know the 3G just came out). I'd wager the faster adoption of the iPad is mostly due to the consumer's ability to make their own choices. Consumer options are a good thing. I know that's not the way Jobs likes to do things but that's just my analysis.

    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:Sheer Madness by CrackedButter · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Hence the ipod touch?

    2. Re:Sheer Madness by dfghjk · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Apple's counting technique for 28 days is curious considering their presale period. The iPhone did not have a presale period nor did Apple produce sufficient stock to meet demand. iPhones remained out of stock for quite a while after launch while iPads can be seen in stores already. Had Apple executed with the iPhone like it has with the iPad it's not clear there would be a difference.

  16. Re:Idiot tax by insertwackynamehere · · Score: 3, Funny

    Ah, the "I was wrong but I'm actually still right" tactic. An interesting gambit.

  17. 641 by random+string+of+num · · Score: 5, Insightful

    641% wow man.. thats a lot of growth, if they could keep that up the number of netbooks in the market doubles roughly every month, it would only take just under 3 years for the entire population of the world to have a net-book (starting with 1 net-book at the 1st month) isn't it more likely that the net book market has saturated itself. I find it hard to understand how people can compare these two different product types, these tablets don't even have keyboards, and cost at least 2wice as much. enough already with this apple out to conquer the world hogwash don't believe the hype

  18. As someone WITH an iPad, I beg to differ... by nweaver · · Score: 5, Insightful

    An iPad is really a "new class" of device: a "content access" tool rather than a "content creation" tool. A notebook is really good for creating stuff. But for viewing stuff, its actually decidedly second-class.

    And netbooks are just small notebooks: with all the limitations that a notebook has.

    An iPad is different: it actually sucks for creating content for the most part: the keyboard just is a steaming pile of "not good" compared with even the keyboard on the XO laptop. But for data access it is brilliant: Light weight, long lived, easy to use.

    And with the app ecology, apps are just more "data to access", and its really good at that. I'd expect to see, eg, a lot of interesting industrial/business applications as well start to develop. Its not just a "for fun" device really, its just a reflection that there are different roles for devices, and apple built a specialist-in-a-different direction device.

    --
    Test your net with Netalyzr
    1. Re:As someone WITH an iPad, I beg to differ... by dfghjk · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "But for viewing stuff, its actually decidedly second-class."

      How so? In what ways is the iPad "first-class" in comparison?

      "...with all the limitations that a notebook has."

      None of which you have enumerated.

      "But for data access it is brilliant: Light weight, long lived, easy to use."

      Why is it brilliant for data access? In what ways does it help a user use "data" better than existing devices? Is it really easier to use than a notebook, say an Apple notebook? I don't agree. You are aware of the iPad's poor ergonomics for longer term use, right?

      "apps are just more "data to access"..."

      No they aren't, and apps are censored by Apple meaning there will be fewer than there otherwise would be. Sorry, that's another disadvantage.

      "I'd expect to see, eg, a lot of interesting industrial/business applications as well start to develop."

      Perhaps, but that doesn't make the iPad a "new class" of device. Tablets for vertical markets have been successful for more than a decade already.

      Sorry, but you are ignorant.

  19. Re:Not a fan of flashless tablets. by ciaohound · · Score: 2, Funny

    Decent? One-handed... in bed... with themselves? Adult film producer, you are just cramming too much innuendo into one slashdot post.

    --
    Oh, yeah, it's not easy to pad these out to 120 characters.
  20. Or people realize netbooks are retarded by BitZtream · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Its also entirely possible that people have begun to realize that netbooks are just annoying.

    Too small for long term use, too large for stuffing in your pocket or a small purse, battery life no better than my MBP for the same tasks and utterly incapable of doing the same things. Not useful as a phone.

    Netbooks were a cute fad but lets face it, they aren't really useful to most people and it took people a little bit to realize it.

    --
    Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
  21. Hype-Cycle by prefec2 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    First there was no such device as a netbook. Then the geeks saw the OLPC and then they ran around, screaming "I want one of these!!!!" After some screaming, Asus thought it might be nice to sell some of these devices to geeks. Hey its about money. And then more people saw that netbooks are nice devices so they bought one. As the demand for netbooks was high the sales jumped up (because the industry suddenly provided a portable product which was very much needed by many people). Now most of those people who want a netbook have a netbook and so the sales are going back. Also there was/is a financial crisis going on. And while the crisis more or less hit the public in the US very quickly it took some time to have an affect countries with "social backup systems".

    So in short: It is not a falling of a cliff it is just the end of a peak. And yes, as already mentioned, there are no really cheap netbooks anymore.

    1. Re:Hype-Cycle by joh · · Score: 2, Informative

      Netbooks came into existence BECAUSE they were inexpensive, there was no "AND". A "netbook" was an inexpensive, no-frills notebook and was not different in any other way.

      Except that they ran Linux instead of Windows and had small SSDs instead of HDs. Which was the reason they were called "netbooks" -- not enough HD space to store much data and just a handful of apps mainly to access the net. Appliances instead of computers. *That* was the original netbook. If you really think the original EeePC was just a small laptop you've never used one.

      I find it interesting that people have forgotten that already. Now the iPad comes along, does what netbooks tried to do and everyone is wondering why people buy such a thing... In fact the iPad is closer to the original netbook idea than any netbook you can buy today.

  22. Predicted last year by ThrowAwaySociety · · Score: 4, Informative

    Or maybe netbook sales are cratering because instead of delivering quality models with high performance and low power packed into a lightweight enclosure, companies like Dell have axed all but the most profitable models, and replaced SSDs with magnetic disks and raised prices to the maximum they can squeeze out of customers. Netbook selection is terrible now compared to what it was a year ago. Last year there were many models and there was a price war, now there are a few models and they're just crappy low-end notebooks.

    Indeed, at least one study in late 2009 predicted that Netbooks would fall off of their own accord
    http://www.internetnews.com/stats/article.php/3855261/Netbook-Sales-to-Cool-Off-in-2010.htm

    That was a month before the iPad was announced.

  23. That problem is hardly unique to Apple... by sean.peters · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Not particularly an iPad fan here, but still... every technology product has this issue. I think most people understand the tradeoff between having something now and having something slightly more whiz-bang later.

  24. Just bought a netbook by Geeky · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Well, I just bought a Samsung netbook.

    I needed a lightweight, long battery life device mainly for better browsing than a smartphone while travelling. I like to be able to type emails on a proper(ish) keyboard, same for web forums.

    I do a lot of photography and the 250GB harddrive is ideal to back up my compact flash cards and quick preview my shots - I used to use a dedicated Epson view for that.

    It has HyperSpace, which is a boot option that takes you into a cut down linux system - it boots faster, uses less battery and is therefore a handy option when all you want is to browse.

    Initial thoughts are that it's not that quick, but I also ordered a 1GB upgrade and when that arrives it should improve the Windows 7 performance (yes, Windows. Suits me. Sorry). Battery life seems good - I reckon the 11hrs quoted might be ambitious, but my experience so far says I should get 8 or 9 from normal use, including WiFi. Sticking a 3G USB dongle on will probably drain it quite a bit quicker...

    It was also under £300.

    Absolutely no reason I'd want an iPad.

    --
    Sigs are so 1990s. No way would I be seen dead with one.
  25. Americans have a lot of discretionary income by Flavio · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Desktop computers and laptops are designed to be workstations. The iPad was designed to be a toy, and that's how most people use it. That's how Apple markets it, and that's why people buy it.

    What Apple and Steve Jobs realised very early in the game is that Americans have a lot of money to spend on toys that look good. Even though most Americans spend their day using computers for work or entertainment, that doesn't make them geeks. They don't need significant computing power, create very little content and only use a very small set of hardware and software resources that are available to them.

    The remarkable thing is that most Americans are wealthy enough to spend $500 to buy an iPad. And even though most people could save that money and use it to buy something more useful later, they will spend it on discretionary purchases if the product is considered fashionable enough.

  26. No, it wasn't the iPad .. but Steve Jobs was right by Azureflare · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Netbooks just suck. That's why no one's buying them anymore. It's not because of the iPad.

    We have a hard time justifying buying an inferior tiny product that you can barely see, which can't really do that much, especially when almost everyone already has a laptop or desktop which works just fine.

    The iPad is successful with people because it provides a big huge screen which is great for lying in bed or sitting out on the patio relaxing with. While this is possible with a laptop, the iPad is much more conducive to a more relaxed environment (the ads for the thing were spot on in my opinion).

    Also it does have a longer battery life than a standard laptop. Laptops tend to chew through batteries way too fast these days.

  27. Netbooks did themselves in... by ISurfTooMuch · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ...with help from notebooks.

    When netbooks came on the scene, they were dirt cheap. Sure, they could do less than a notebook, but, again, they were dirt cheap, they were small, and battery life was good. Just what you needed for Web browsing and light productivity work. Oh yeah, and they were dirt cheap, easily several hundred less than most notebooks except that once-in-a-blue-moon sale you might run across.

    However, this didn't last. Companies started cramming more and more into these things, which drove the price up. In and of itself, that might have been OK, but notebook prices started coming down, and they offered more features. They were bigger, but you could do more with them, and I really believe that a significantly lower price is what drove netbook sales, not merely their size. So, people could spend maybe $250-$300 for a netbook, or, if they caught a sale, they could spend $350 for a basic notebook, which offered much more bang for the buck. That's what killed netbook sales, IMHO.

  28. Look and Feel by savanik · · Score: 4, Interesting

    A friend of mine has one that I got a chance to try out. It's an interesting little device - I'm not going to get one, but then, it's not meant for me.

    The iPad does notably excel in one simple thing that I have been missing for the past few years. It has no interface lag. My phone? When I'm switching screens, it lags for a couple seconds. My two year old laptop I got fed up with and threw out because the power jack kept breaking? Opening a directory took a noticable amount of time. Even my streamlined, power-user, performance gaming desktop has moments where its trying to access things and it chugs along before giving me any feedback.

    The iPad's interface is responsive. It does what you want it to, when you want it to. When you drag an icon around, it responds immediately. When you poke at a link, it responds instantly with feedback - the webpage might take a moment to load, but it lets you know it's heard you immediately. And everything else in the environment remains responsive. You access the dropdowns, they come right down. You hit the 'menu' button, and you don't get 'the application is waiting to close' hourglass or anything like that, you get MENU.

    I can see how that would appeal to many consumers in a world of stuttering, jerky computers.

    1. Re:Look and Feel by SpooForBrains · · Score: 2, Insightful

      and that UI responsiveness is exactly what would be lost if they opened up the software it can run to include non-approved apps, apps that can run in the background and FUCKING FLASH.

      --
      "The dew has clearly fallen with a particularly sickening thud this morning"
    2. Re:Look and Feel by Dirtside · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I agree; I love my Android phone (G1) but I really wish it prioritized user input response over everything else. I'll gladly sacrifice some processing power in order to ensure that it always responds to my UI actions immediately.

      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
    3. Re:Look and Feel by Reservoir+Penguin · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Thank you, great reply. It's sad (and funny) when geek trashs Ipod Touch and now the Ipad comparing it to for instance Nokia N900 which runs a full Linux ARM distro. You know, you are not gonna impress me by having a full distro on a N900 size device, I've seen full distros running on devices only slighly larger than a quarter and even that is not impressive anymore. Any second year student should be able to have Linux running on anything within a month given hardware specs. What is impressive is not cramming features into a device with laggy and unintuitive interface. but the opposite - carefully choosing a nice subset of features and polishing it to near perfection. And this is what Apple has done with the IPod Touch interface, it is more responsive than any Windows or Linux GUI I have tried, on a quad core with 4 gigs of RAM. Only BEOS could compare to it.

      This is actually a particular case of a more general problem with certain programmer's mindset. They believe that giving the users more features and more options is enabling the user, but actually it is quite the opposite - when there are tweny ways to do the same thing it is a sign of mental lazyness of the developer who could not pick the best way to do something and just shifted this responsibility to the user.

      --
      US-UK-Israel: The real Axis of Evil
  29. Re:Arrgh by JazzyJ · · Score: 2, Funny

    Apparently Apple's 'technology' has become sufficiently advanced to have become 'magic' to us mere mortals. :)

  30. Article is on crack by Enderandrew · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They show a chart that lists declines in Netbook YoY growth from July of 2009, and cite the iPad as being the reason why. The iPad wasn't even ANNOUNCED until January of 2010.

    The chart doesn't list netbook sales, but rather the rate of growth over the last year. You'll note that netbook sales still have positive growth.

    So despite the fact there was this sudden MASSIVE surge to buy netbooks in the past two years, netbook sales continue to grow. But the growth rate of that surge did not continue upward. And even though the decline started six months before anyone had heard of an iPad, clearly this is all about the iPad.

    Bull-fucking-shit. But nice try.

    That being said, I'd buy an iPad at $200. For $300 or more, I expect more PC-like functioanlity and would prefer a netbook. In fact, Asus makes a nice convertible netbook/tablet that is cheaper than the iPad, has 10 times the storage, a faster processer, a webcam, I can install whatever software I want, it runs Flash, has more RAM, has a full keyboard built-in when I want it, etc. etc. etc.

    If I can get that at $450, why would I want to spend so much more for far less functionality?

    Oh, the i-before the name!

    --
    http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
  31. It could be good for the netbook market by nick_davison · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Discussing this one in the office, the esteemed Kevin Thompson said,

    "It could be good for the netbook market when all of those people buy an iPad and realize they can't do [expletive] go and buy a netbook to replace it."

    Apple's training users to appreciate a convenience size... yet almost completely failing to provide for content production as well as content consumption.

    The quoted Morgan Stanley figures say 44% are buying an iPad instead of. That's 56% who aren't, who wouldn't be buying anything else. Many users will stay with Apple... but how many users have Apple converted to the size of ultra portables yet let down enough on content production that they'll move back in to, and enlarge, the general netbook market?

    1. Re:It could be good for the netbook market by alvinrod · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Your assumption only holds true if end users expect the same out of the iPad that they would out of a netbook or notebook. I believe that the different form factor may cause a large percentage of buyers to separate the two into different categories. If people don't expect to be able to use an iPad (Or any other similar tablet device for that matter.) in the same way that they would use a notebook, they won't buy the netbook.

      The majority of people in the world are consumers, not creators, and tablet devices provide a definite edge in terms of consumption. Tablet devices can handle the content creation in a pinch, but for any serious work I think most people would prefer a large notebook or a desktop over a netbook anyhow. Consumption ability on tablets is superior to netbooks and the creation ability on netbooks isn't honestly all that great compared to a notebook or a desktop. My own personal belief is that the iPad hasn't killed netbook sales so much as consumers have realized that netbooks aren't providing the experience that they were expecting. Any convenience factor they may have had has been largely eroded by tablet devices.

      The only argument that really exists is that the iPad limits the software that can be installed. This argument against tablet devices disappears once Android tablets start hitting the market later this year. They won't have the same restrictions and multiple manufacturers will be able to compete on price, providing more affordable alternatives to the iPad. The netbook is rapidly becoming irrelevant.

  32. pads in 28 days? by Gothmolly · · Score: 2, Funny

    My wife goes through some pads every 28 days, but never a million of them.

    --
    I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
  33. Or maybe the market is saturated? by fantomas · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Or maybe the vast majority of people who wanted a netbook now have one and that's why sales have slowed down. Were people expecting month on month rise in sales of 641% for ever? sounds like a new market plateauing to me.

    Early adopters might change their laptop eevery six months but most people will hang on to the same one for 2, 3 or more years. They've bought them and now the market has shrunk to a more mature marketplace shape?

  34. Re:Whatever it takes! by Ltap · · Score: 2, Funny

    Fox trying to report on science is just... too cute for words. Like watching a very stupid dog trying to bash its way through a glass sliding door.

    --
    Yet Another Tech Blog
    (but so much more, including game and movie reviews)
    http://yanteb.peasantoid.org
  35. 1 million iPads vs 20 million Netbooks by Hadlock · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is just a bad article in general. They're reporting year over year growth of Netbooks, which was going to plateau eventually. They're still on track to sell more than 20 million netbooks this year. 1 million iPads displacing 1 million units of netbooks isn't an enormous drop - it's about 5% of sales. Tops. I know a lot of engineers who weren't considering a netbook at all, but wanted a new shiny apple toy, so they bought the iPad.
     
    All the graph in the article does is illustrate a decline in growth of an established product. iPod sales growth has been declining too, but that's simply because literally everyone and their mother owns one now, and people are simply replacing them or buying their child their first iPod. Nobody's making splashy headlines about that. All products plateau eventually, and it happens sooner than later when their adoption rates skyrocket at launch.

    --
    moox. for a new generation.
    1. Re:1 million iPads vs 20 million Netbooks by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 3, Interesting

      1 million iPads in 30 days versus 20 million netbooks from dozens of nameless, faceless vendors in 365 days.

      iPad sales have plateaued, but I wouldn't be surprised that by the end of the year, that number starts to approach 2 million.

      Compared to any given Netbook product this year, the iPad will outsell it by a wide margin.

      --
      Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
    2. Re:1 million iPads vs 20 million Netbooks by Goaway · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You're comparing 1 million sold in 28 days with 20 million sold in a year, and you're accusing others of misrepresenting numbers?

    3. Re:1 million iPads vs 20 million Netbooks by node+3 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They're still on track to sell more than 20 million netbooks this year. 1 million iPads displacing 1 million units of netbooks isn't an enormous drop - it's about 5% of sales. Tops.

      1 million iPads displaced in one month. That's 12 million per year (perhaps less, as initial demand dies down, perhaps more, as production meets demand and international sales begin). That's greater than 50%, not "5% tops".

      All the graph in the article does is illustrate a decline in growth of an established product.

      It shows growth has flatlined (5% for April). One thing this graph shows for certain is that the iPad is undeniably having a negative impact on the netbook.

      iPod sales growth has been declining too, but that's simply because literally everyone and their mother owns one now, and people are simply replacing them or buying their child their first iPod.

      The iPod's decline in growth has been offset by the iPod Touch and iPhone. Apple keeps ahead of the game by being the ones who sell the product that replaces their old one.

      So the question for the netbook is, what product is going to replace it? Answer: iPad.

      Market saturation a la iPod not the reason for the netbook decline. Until the iPad, netbooks were pretty much the only game in town for ultraportable computing beyond a smartphone. Now the iPad fills that role, and it fills it far better than any netbook, because the iPad is designed from the ground up for that very purpose. The netbook is a parody of a real computer. It's an atavistic dead-end.

      As far as those numbers go, do you really think that somehow netbooks are approaching an asymptote of 0% YoY growth? Because that doesn't seem terribly likely. It's not like the market is going to fall off so quickly and just stop at "status quo from last year". In the course of less than a year, netbook growth went from over 600%, to just 5%.

      The writing is on the wall. Take off the nerd glasses and maybe you'll be able to read it.

    4. Re:1 million iPads vs 20 million Netbooks by Locke2005 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      iPad has less functionality than a netbook, and cost twice as much ("Less costs more" -- the same philosophy behind the Airbook!). When an iPad costs less than a netbook, then I might believe it threatens netbook sales. But currently, they are different market segments. iPads are designed purely for consuming content. Netbooks are also mostly for consuming content, but with occasional use of traditional PC apps, which the iPad simply does not support. This backwards compatibility with a desktop PC running Windows XP is the reason people buy netbooks instead of iPads. Not many netbooks running Linux have sold, have they?

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  36. Of course not. by BancBoy · · Score: 2, Informative

    He uses Pixar Dust, duh!

    --
    [UID-HeinzIntel]
  37. You have no point. by SuperKendall · · Score: 2, Informative

    I want to be able to install whatever I want, whenever I want, from whoever I want without Jobs policing me.

    Jailbreak it then.

    Or become a developer, I can compile and run anything I like for the device.

    Next lame argument please. Now serving number 348302389034859043850.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  38. Nokia Is Destroying Ipad Sales by mdwh2 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Incorrect - the Ipad was hyped and advertised for several months. The 30 days was simply the final shipping time.

    Not to mention that's been with vast amounts of coverage and advertising from the media, including Slashdot.

    Compared to any given Netbook product

    Can you tell me which specific netbook product gets three stories on Slashdot a day? Thanks. Hell, we don't even get that much for netbooks as a whole.

    Nokia ship hundreds of millions of mobile computing devices a year - do we get stories about them, or how they're "destroying netbook sales" (or indeed, how they're "destroying Ipad sales")?