Slashdot Mirror


LimeWire Likely To Shut Down Soon

suraj.sun quotes from a CNET story: "A federal court judge has likely dealt a death blow to LimeWire, one of the most popular and oldest file-sharing systems, according to legal experts. On Wednesday ... US District Judge Kimba Wood granted summary judgment in favor of the ... [RIAA], which filed a copyright lawsuit against LimeWire in 2006. In her decision, Wood ruled Lime Group, parent of LimeWire software maker Lime Wire, and founder Mark Gorton committed copyright infringement, induced copyright infringement, and engaged in unfair competition. 'It is obviously a fairly fatal decision for them,' said [an industry defense lawyer]. 'If they don't shut down, the other side will likely make a request for an injunction and there's nothing left but to go on to calculating damages.'" The article notes that LimeWire is used by nearly 60% of the people who download songs.

56 of 264 comments (clear)

  1. And nothing of value was lost by Prien715 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    And nothing of value was lost. Seriously, who uses an inefficient cruddy program like Limewire when you've got bit torrent?

    --
    -- Political fascism requires a Fuhrer.
    1. Re:And nothing of value was lost by eldavojohn · · Score: 5, Funny

      And nothing of value was lost. Seriously, who uses an inefficient cruddy program like Limewire when you've got bit torrent?

      But if they shutdown Limewire, where will my sister get all her Windows viruses from?

      --
      My work here is dung.
    2. Re:And nothing of value was lost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      It was as if a million viruses embedded in Britney Spear's singles cried out in terror, then were suddenly silenced.

      I fear something awesome has happened.

    3. Re:And nothing of value was lost by ScrewMaster · · Score: 4, Informative

      And nothing of value was lost. Seriously, who uses an inefficient cruddy program like Limewire when you've got bit torrent?

      You don't use a torrent to grab a three or four meg file: swarming protocols work best for sharing large files.

      The Gnutella network was, and is, very efficient at sharing small files (you know, the kind that keep media executives up at night.) That said, there are plenty of other ways to share such information, and all the RIAA has done is to (once again) continue the game of whack-a-mole. There are many other Gnutella clients available (personally, I like Phex: multi-platform, open-source, and does what I need. Pick it up on SourceForge) and people will quickly find them. Let the lawyers celebrate their "victory", for whatever it's worth.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    4. Re:And nothing of value was lost by ducomputergeek · · Score: 4, Interesting

      A lot of non-tech people who don't understand he difference between Bit Torrent let alone what Bit Torrent even is. Although, usually when I see Windows machines infected or doing strange things at the local coffee shop, the person has lime wire installed.

      My understanding was there were more virus and other malware infected stuff on limewire than just about any other source. Granted that was a few years ago.

      --
      "The problem with socialism is eventually you run out of other people's money" - Thatcher.
    5. Re:And nothing of value was lost by Endo13 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You don't use a torrent to grab a three or four meg file: swarming protocols work best for sharing large files.

      Most people these days who used to use limewire now use torrents to download albums and band collections, then use iTunes to pick up the odd track here and there that was too much trouble to get from a torrent.

      --
      There is no -1 Disagree mod. Slashdot.org/faq defines mod options. USE IT.
    6. Re:And nothing of value was lost by nomadic · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Seriously, who uses an inefficient cruddy program like Limewire when you've got bit torrent?

      Or itunes, or Amazon's MP3 store. Oops, wait, I forgot I shouldn't admit I actually feel a moral obligation to actually pay for the music I buy on slashdot.

    7. Re:And nothing of value was lost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      For MP3s, it's actually perfectly fine. I've never gotten anything troublesome from LimeWire. Search results are always crowded with garbage, but the spam is so crude that you'd have to be a moron to download it:

      Pretend Example Search: kate bush wuthering heights

      1. "kate bush wuthering heights.mp3"

      Do not download files whose names are identical to your search

      2. "Kate Bush - Wuthering Heights.wmv"

      Do not download WMVs

      3. "Kate Bush - Wuthering Heights.mp3 ~ 3kB"

      Sort by size and find something near 1MB-per-minute

      4. "Kate Bush - Wuthering Heights.mp3 (rare live recording)"

      Strangely, every song ever recorded has a "rare live recording" that you probably shouldn't download.
      5. "underage porn sex girl with horse and dog"

      Even if you WERE looking for filthy, illegal porn you'd have to be an idiot to download that. But man, there are a lot of files with names like that.

      So you search, sort by size, download something with a sane name of the right size, and probably never play it in WMP, just to be safe.

      But really? The "index of" Google search has largely replaced LimeWire for me anyway. It's fast, it's easy, you don't spew your hot, sticky IP all over the Gnutella network, you can use it from any smartphone with a web browser...it's gotten extremely polluted with fake spam index-of sites, but there are also sites that helper filter the spam sites.

      BitTorrent just seems like a waste of energy for music...but I don't really know why. I suppose it works as well for small files as large... it just feels like more work to search for something so small in the browser, open it in a new app, clutter uTorrent with a thousand tiny downloads...

      LimeWire still has a place in my heart.

    8. Re:And nothing of value was lost by Darkness404 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Good luck finding a decent torrent for small files. Yeah, BitTorrent is great for downloading a 700 MB Ubuntu ISO, yeah, its great for getting every song a band sang, ever. But, for downloading a single song or other small files? BitTorrent is pretty terrible.

      --
      Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    9. Re:And nothing of value was lost by Endo13 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      BitTorrent just seems like a waste of energy for music...but I don't really know why. I suppose it works as well for small files as large... it just feels like more work to search for something so small in the browser, open it in a new app, clutter uTorrent with a thousand tiny downloads...

      BitTorrent's role in music sharing is mainly for albums and artist collections. You know, like say if you wanted the complete works of the Beatles. When your typical MP3 player has room for tens of thousands of tracks, you're a lot more likely to look for those large collections to save time, if for no other reason. Got the space, may as well fill it up.

      --
      There is no -1 Disagree mod. Slashdot.org/faq defines mod options. USE IT.
    10. Re:And nothing of value was lost by larry+bagina · · Score: 2, Funny

      is "singles" slang for ass, mouth, or vag? I'm not quite sure from the context...

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    11. Re:And nothing of value was lost by black88 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      What I tend to do is, if there is a song on an album that I need, I will just download the torrent, open it in utorrent, and only choose to download that particular song.

    12. Re:And nothing of value was lost by linzeal · · Score: 2, Informative

      I know maybe 2 or 3 people who actually use iTunes to buy not organize music. Is it more popular in the under 30's or something, because everyone I know either buys CDs/LPs or pirates everything.

    13. Re:And nothing of value was lost by Doctor_Jest · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Sometimes its just nice to save a step between the LP you still have and your MP3 player. Now I know the studios want you to "buy it again", but I prefer either recording it myself via a USB turntable, or if I've no time for that, the disc is available via torrent.

      I don't feel it's infringing on copyright, since I own the album. (And that is also true for out-of-print CDs and LPs as well.) I mean, I could track them down used, but that doesn't "give money to the artist".... So their argument is moot. That said, I'm not a "collector" of music in that I get discogs of every band and scour the web for bootlegs. I like the album enough to buy it, and I like the album enough to want it on my iPod... shouldn't be too difficult. (I know we're treading on "legal gray areas", but sometimes we just have to use a little common sense...Something the RIAA hasn't had, well, ever.)

      --
      It's the Stay-Puft Marshmallow Man.
    14. Re:And nothing of value was lost by mikael_j · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Well, here in Sweden it seems almost no one uses iTunes to buy anything. The main reasons for this seem to be:

      1. Spotify - Lots of people who are "casual" music listeners just use Spotify, it's like listening to the radio except you get the songs you want.
      2. File sharing started early here in Sweden - Which means that for-pay services lagged behind regular file sharing even further than in a lot of other places.
      3. No TV shows on iTunes - I've heard a lot of people here say they'd be more inclined to use iTunes to buy stuff if they could also pay for TV shows, not possible here in Sweden though.
      4. Downloading music, TV shows and Movies used to be legal/semi-legal up until quite recently - It was basically made illegal because the content industry told our politicians that we'd be transformed into a Internet equivalent of a third world country otherwise.
      --
      Greylisting is to SMTP as NAT is to IPv4
    15. Re:And nothing of value was lost by zmollusc · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, like the music industry can afford expensive lawyers after losing trillions of dollars per day to teh pirates. Those lawyers will have been on less than minimum wage.

      --
      They whose government reduces their essential liberties for temporary security, receive neither liberty nor security.
    16. Re:And nothing of value was lost by pushing-robot · · Score: 2, Informative

      Most decent clients will let you download only specific files from a torrent.

      --
      How can I believe you when you tell me what I don't want to hear?
    17. Re:And nothing of value was lost by Larryish · · Score: 2, Informative

      Bittorrent is excellent for downloading individual files.

      Most torrent clients allow you to download individual files from a collection via some sort of Properties dialog.

      You get the .torrent for the entire album or collection. Then when you load it in your client you go to the Properties/Files dialog and uncheck every song or file except those that you wish to download.

      It is good for things like John Mayer albums, where most of the songs on the new album are repeats of songs from the previous album.

      A lazy bastard, he is.

    18. Re:And nothing of value was lost by Ash+Vince · · Score: 2, Interesting

      And nothing of value was lost. Seriously, who uses an inefficient cruddy program like Limewire when you've got bit torrent?

      I always wondered why everyone uses a centralised system like bittorrent to illegally download other peoples hard work when the gnutella network existed. It might be less efficient and slightly slower to find what you want, but at least they will never be able to shut it down completely. I know this may result in the death of Limewire, but that was not exactly the only Gnutella client in existence.

      The fact is the gnutella's inefficencies are also in many ways its benefits.

      --
      I dont read /. to RTFA, I read /. to offend people in ignorance.
    19. Re:And nothing of value was lost by oakgrove · · Score: 2, Informative

      Same here except for utorrent (I use transmission in Ubuntu). The only thing is, what if you want a certain cut of a particular song that isn't the album version. Also, it's a bit faster, for me, to just click on Frostwire and type in my search term vs finding the item on a torrent search engine, plucking the particular track out of the album, and downloading that way. Usually for a particular song, I guess I just find Frostwire to be a bit quicker on the draw.

      --
      The soylentnews experiment has been a dismal failure.
    20. Re:And nothing of value was lost by mcclungsr · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I buy music on Amazon, and once iTunes offered DRM-free tracks that became an option as well (since I mostly listen on linux boxes). I don't think of this as a moral issue, it's a convenience. The bitrates are good, and less work even than torrents. For $1/song, the money really doesn't seem like a big issue. I still buy CDs that I rip myself from time to time, but more and more I'm just using the online stores.

      I call it being practical.

    21. Re:And nothing of value was lost by kdemetter · · Score: 3, Insightful

      From other clients that use the gnutella network ?

      Really , limewire just uses the gnutella network . It's like banning edonkey2000 , which uses the edonkey network.
        Unless they ban the entire network , but that's not likely to happen , as it's a decentralized network.

      So , in other words , it sucks for limewire , but someone else will take over when they fall.

    22. Re:And nothing of value was lost by hairyfeet · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not to mention all us PC repairmen that have made millions of dollars cleaning Limewire crap from folks PCs. The RIAA is a bunch of socialists and costing us jobs!

      Of course the nice thing about decentralized P2P is that you can't really kill it, especially with there being FOSS implementations, so I'm sure we PC repairmen will still get plenty of work from the next Limewire style Gnutella app that becomes popular. God bless you FOSSies, and thanks for helping spread those viruses! Keep up the good work! Oh and if you could kind of increase the infection rate? My GF has a Bday coming up, kthnxbai.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    23. Re:And nothing of value was lost by spire3661 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Itunes on windows sucks, thats why. I dont need a massive, bloated piece of software to listen to music. Winamp 2.x was the pinnacle of software MP3 players IMHO.

      --
      Good-bye
  2. Alternative Limewire network coming online... by Aranykai · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...in 3, 2, 1

    --
    If sharing a song makes you a pirate, what do I have to share to be a ninja?
    1. Re:Alternative Limewire network coming online... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Its the gnutella network.

      There are already a half-a-dozen alternative clients.

      Its like the legal profession is completely naive of how software on the Internet works.

    2. Re:Alternative Limewire network coming online... by ScrewMaster · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ...in 3, 2, 1

      Limewire was nothing special: just a Gnutella client with extensions. The Gnutella "network" is alive and well, has been for years, and there are many clients out there for it. Limewire just suckered a lot of people into paying for software that was readily available for free. I don't care that Limewire is getting nailed, I just don't like the media companies winning cases like this. It's bad for everybody, including them, if they just had the wit to see it.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    3. Re:Alternative Limewire network coming online... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Its like the legal profession is completely naive of how software on the Internet works.

      Or they know exactly how it works and the lawyers like making gobs of cash playing whack-a-mole?

    4. Re:Alternative Limewire network coming online... by Aranykai · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Its like what I started doing when I was a teenager. My summer job was mowing lawns, so I started offering a bonus service to fertilize it in the spring for a small amount. Just about everyone that took that service switched from 10 day mowing to weekly mowing cause the grass grew faster.

      I made a good chunk of change that year.

      --
      If sharing a song makes you a pirate, what do I have to share to be a ninja?
  3. 60 percent? Really? by dexterr · · Score: 2, Insightful

    As the title says; 60 percent!? Really? Except for my girlfriend (wich by the way stopped using it when she met me because I recommended better protocols) I don't know anyone who's using it or have been using it.

    1. Re:60 percent? Really? by fewnorms · · Score: 2, Funny

      Lies! Just admit it, it was your little brother slurping up all the bandwidth. Right?
      Slashdot posters with a girlfriend, there ain't no such thing!

      --
      Veni, Vidi, Velcro!
  4. I switched to legal downloads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I stopped using Limewire years ago after downloading a few nasty viruses and hundreds of low quality and incomplete music. Free music was no longer worth my trouble. I switched to iTunes and legal music purchases and have never looked back.

    1. Re:I switched to legal downloads by Darkness404 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yeah, Limewire is generally crap because so many songs are incorrectly attributed, wrong titles, etc.

      The problem with iTunes and the like is it is impossible to get many artists, other times you can find early or later works by a band but can't find the ones you want, or in extreme cases iTunes wants you to pay $10+ for the album when you really want one song.

      Music distributors finally got their heads out of their rears recently and eliminated DRM for the most part, but there is still a lot of things they are doing wrong.

      --
      Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
  5. FrostWire by Meneth · · Score: 4, Informative

    It's not like the Gnutella network will shut down. Even if LimeWire stops distributing its client, there are plenty of others. For example, FrostWire.

    1. Re:FrostWire by sznupi · · Score: 2

      Heck, for all practical purposes, FrostWire is Limewire...just a fork done a bit more right.

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
  6. It's Taken The This Long? by segedunum · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Limewire has been around for years and they've only now just got around to trying to close the thing down?

  7. Limewire down? Oh, my! by Alien1024 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Next thing they will be turning down is WinMX. With audiogalaxy gone, things look all gloom and doom for P2P music downloads.

  8. Corporate Veil by phantomcircuit · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Yeah but will they be able to pierce the corporate veil and hold the CEO personally accountable? Otherwise his company becomes worthless and he keeps all the money that he's been paid in salary.

  9. 60%? by Arancaytar · · Score: 3, Interesting

    That number seems either misleading or bullshit. Earlier reports were saying that the vast majority of peer-to-peer filesharing goes through BitTorrent, and now a different network is supposed to have more than half of the traffic?

    Perhaps they mean 60% of the non-torrent traffic?

  10. Excellent by RichardJenkins · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The sooner we get these people off Limewire and onto Bittorrent, the sooner I can stop having to clean trojans off my friends PCs every few weeks.

  11. Good by devent · · Score: 4, Interesting

    That's a good thing. I wish they could stop all illegal downloads of music, videos and software. When people finally can't download any free content from the mafia (i.e. content industry) the people will finally see how expensive and restricted the legal alternative is and turn to free and independent sources.

    Imagen, if you can't download Windows, Photoshop or MS Office anymore. Maybe than people will see and embrace the free alternatives which are more than sufficient for at least 99% of the users. The same with music, that people can discover that there are plenty of independent music bands with music good as on MTV. And there is plenty of DRM free games, a few free to download, like the http://mashable.com/2009/10/20/world-of-goo-huge-success/

    --
    http://www.mueller-public.de - My site http://www.anr-institute.com/ - Advanced Natural Research Institute
    1. Re:Good by Shados · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This. seriously.

      Its true with most things: When people dodge the law, wether directly or by loopholes, there's no incensive to get the law changed, and things stay in an annoying gray area, and thats not good for anyone. Deal with the law, see how much it sucks, THEN there's a chance things will change.

    2. Re:Good by Animats · · Score: 2, Informative

      Imagine, if you can't download Windows, Photoshop or MS Office anymore.

      The problem is buying a machine without Windows or MS Office, not downloading it.

      Photoshop Elements ($79) is enough for most people. Really, the typical teenager in his parent's basement has no need for CYMK separation capability. Most printing plants prefer to do that themselves now; they know their own ink and press capabilities.

  12. Shareaza by enter+to+exit · · Score: 2, Informative

    For those of you who have a reason to avoid torrents. Shareaza is an excellent (clean and superior) alternative. ( http://shareaza.sourceforge.net/ ). It supports eDonkey2000, Gnutella, Gnutella2 and handles bitTorrent acceptably. It is free software (GPL).

    windows only (kinda works on wine)

  13. Google by whisper_jeff · · Score: 3, Interesting

    And what is Google doing during each of these cases. As the RIAA wages battle against these smaller search engines (because, really, that's what they are) and wins, they are building an ever-increasingly large portfolio of prior case law. Eventually the RIAA are going to decide that enough cases have gone their way that they can wage the real battle - to go after Google (and Bing and Yahoo). I am shocked that Google's legal department is just sitting and watching these cases unfold without offering assistance. Then again, I'm not a lawyer nor a multi-billion dollar corporation so what do I know?...

  14. Gnutella Web Cache? by tepples · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Its the gnutella network.

    There are already a half-a-dozen alternative clients.

    But do alternative clients provide their own set of Gnutella Web Cache servers? Without one, a client doesn't know of any active nodes accepting connections into the network.

  15. Re:UMG v. MP3.com by paeanblack · · Score: 5, Interesting

    There is a crucial difference between how lawyers and engineers view the issue:

    To an engineer, the content of a digital file is the primary attribute. Two files with identical contents are indistinguishable and interchangeable.

    To a lawyer, the pedigree of a digital file just as important as the content. Two identical files with different histories are different entities.

    What this means is that if you and your friend each own a copy of the same album, you may feel it is reasonable to copy data from his disk when convenient, since you legally own a copy with the exact same contents. In the eyes of the law, however, those song files are NOT the same, because they have different histories. The rights you have to your copy do not extend to all other instances of that file, even if they are indistinguishable or not.

    It's easy to say that the lawyer view is ridiculous, but (a) that is the view that defines the law, and (b) it seems far less ridiculous after one studies the history of copyright law beginning in the 1500s.

    There is a good article on this subject:
    http://ansuz.sooke.bc.ca/lawpoli/colour/2004061001.php

  16. They can and they have by westlake · · Score: 5, Informative

    From Reuters:

    First, the judge found Gorton, who is also LimeWire's sole director, personally liable for infringement, observing in her ruling that "an individual, including a corporate officer, who has the ability to supervise infringing activity and has a financial interest in that activity, or who personally participates in that activity is personally liable for infringement."

    That will likely strike fear in the hearts of would-be P2P moguls who may have been clinging to the belief that they could hide behind corporate shells, insulating their own assets if the law ever caught up with them.

    Ruling could have chilling effect on P2P services

  17. Most popular? It's just one client. by Hurricane78 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What the fuck is he talking about? LimeWire is just one client... just one client... for the Gnutella network.
    There are many many others! Hell, take a ready-made gnutella library and build your own one in no time!

    Gnutella is not going anywhere, as it, being completely decentral, can’t be killed.
    My bet is on TFA being MAFIAA FUD.

    --
    Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
  18. Re:UMG v. MP3.com by tepples · · Score: 2, Informative

    What defines the law is what the population will put up with. If no one will put up with the lawyer's bullshit view then it's unenforceable.

    What defines what the population will put up with is what the major publishers, through the news media, tell the population to put up with. For example, every major commercial TV news channel in the United States (CBS, ABC, NBC, Fox, and CNN) shares a parent company with one of the big six movie distributors (Paramount, Disney, Universal, Fox, and Warner).

  19. 320,000 Downloads Of The Client Each Week by westlake · · Score: 4, Informative

    As the title says; 60 percent!? Really?

    From Download.com.

    Total LimeWire client downloads: 206 million.
    Total last week: 320,000.

    Total uTorrent client downloads: 8 million.
    Total last week: 61,000.

    P2P & File-Sharing Software

  20. Re:A blast from the past by Voyager529 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Actually, NOD32 flagged that...

    5/16/2010 10:15:20 PM
    HTTP filter file
    http://cristgaming.com/pirate.swf BAT/ZEP.A virus
    connection terminated - quarantined
    Threat was detected upon access to web by the application:

  21. Prohibition Part 2: P2P by bedouin · · Score: 2, Interesting

    A 10+ year fight against something most people use and have no moral objection to -- except a pushy minority with special interests.

    History repeats itself. Ban P2P and 'elite' FTPs will reemerge with private memberships. High quality private torrent trackers already exist. Instead of joining a free P2P network you'll pay a guy in China a nominal fee for access to his file distribution network. Remember how much money pirates made in places like Thailand in the 90s just by selling things for a few dollars? All of the shady rackets will return, along with even more viruses since individual files will not be checked by large groups of people, or distributed via reliable release groups.

    Ban P2P and watch real crime and extortion take place. Eventually it will be a burden on authorities to chase after 15 year olds who want the new 50 Cent CD; the RIAA won't have money to toss to lawyers either, because their income will remain just as shitty as money goes to shad(ier) sources instead.

    For a decade now the biggest sites were targeted and shutdown, yet for some reason it gets easier each year to find what I need on-line. Hmm.

  22. 60%, really? by Fross · · Score: 2, Informative

    "The article notes that LimeWire is used by nearly 60 percent of the people who download songs."

    I take it the article was written before the suit was filed then, sometime around 2003?

  23. Gnutella is past, use eMule instead by Antiocheian · · Score: 2, Insightful

    When I left Gnutella about 7 years ago it wasn't fully decentralized. It required Hubs (or was that Ultrapeers ?). It was also prone to spam and fake attacks because it was forwarding the query itself so that any spammer could tell you that he had the file you asked for. I eventually chose eMule because:

    1) It was open source. While the eDonkey client (which eMule was initially based on) was providing better speeds and had a decentralized searchable network (Overnet) it was closed source. My decision proved wise when some years later eDonkey timebombed itself per RIAA's directive. I had a cold dish served by those eDonkey fanboys who were claiming bollocks on the open source argument.

    2) It was, and still is, under heavy development. The official client is somewhat stale but modders are working constantly to improve the client. See mods such as Neo, Xtreme, MorphXT and Shark. Mod development comes mainly from Germany, Italy and some from Israel.

    3) It developed its own fully decentralized network which is now standard in any installation. In fact I'm not using servers anymore.

    All that combined with an anonymous VPN gives me troublefree access to anything I want. The variety of the material is simply amazing. This is far beyond your plain old piratebay copyrighted stuff:

    * Old recordings that have gone out of copyright ? Of course
    * Fan made movies in their highest quality (without youtube compression) ? You bet
    * Service manuals ? Anytime
    * I have even found scanned medieval books there that were impossible to find anywhere else on the internet or a public library (apparently some guy has got hold of these somehow and got them public).

    The speeds are not great but the overall service is practically bulletproof. It's not by chance eMule has won Sourceforge awards twice in 2006 and 2007.

    But the average USA p2p user has always stuck with US-made oldies like WinMX and Gnutella. I've never figured out why.

  24. Re:UMG v. MP3.com by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Two identical files with different histories are different entities.

    So if I find a Beatles song somewhere in the Champernowne constant, am I free to keep it?

    --
    Ezekiel 23:20