Slashdot Mirror


Hands-On With Dell's Streak Android Device

adeelarshad82 writes "Dell Streak, the Android-based 5-inch tablet (which has also been called out as a smartphone) is set to ship starting in July, both from a US carrier and direct on Dell.com for $500. Even though Dell has not disclosed the name of the carrier, some experts believe that it will be AT&T because the Streak is a 3G GSM 850/1900 device and AT&T is the only major US carrier that supports those frequency bands. According to a hands-on, Streak is a sharp-looking device with a black front and candy-apple red back that unfortunately shows fingerprints easily. On the upside, Streak's curved body is comfortable to hold. Streak runs a customized version of Android 1.6, but Android aficionados will have to get used to the unusual button layout. Its 800x480-pixel screen makes images look tight, and web pages will benefit from the horizontal resolution. The 1 GHz Qualcomm Snapdragon processor, the same as in the HTC Incredible and Sprint EVO 4G, functions snappily. There's a 5-megapixel camera on the back, a VGA camera for video calling on the front, and a MicroSD memory card slot under the back cover."

167 comments

  1. This article is boss by negRo_slim · · Score: 4, Funny

    Can someone please quantify "sharp" for me?

    --
    On the Oregon Cost born and raised, On the beach is where I spent most of my days
    1. Re:This article is boss by goombah99 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Y'know sharp like the edges of a Archos MP3 brick when the ipod came out. Holding one of these huge things to your head to talk will have everyone laughing like it was an episode of Bean. This will get the brown Zune prize for 2010.

      --
      Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
    2. Re:This article is boss by icebike · · Score: 3, Informative

      Huge iPhone like device. Not something you want to hold up to your ear, bluetooth recommended just to hold down the Geek-factor.

      http://www.androidcentral.com/dell-streak-coming-att-later-summer

      Speculation about carrier based on the frequencies is at best guesswork, because new radios can be swapped into the design very easily. Most radio chipset manufacturers can give you a radio with the same pin-outs and die size for any flavor of cell system you want to talk to, and the programming interfaces are all standardized as well.

      It could be on sprint tomorrow if they wanted.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    3. Re:This article is boss by subspacemsg · · Score: 3, Funny

      Huge iPhone like device. Not something you want to hold up to your ear, bluetooth recommended just to hold down the Geek-factor.

      http://www.androidcentral.com/dell-streak-coming-att-later-summer

      Speculation about carrier based on the frequencies is at best guesswork, because new radios can be swapped into the design very easily. Most radio chipset manufacturers can give you a radio with the same pin-outs and die size for any flavor of cell system you want to talk to, and the programming interfaces are all standardized as well.

      It could be on sprint tomorrow if they wanted.

      Bluetooth is holding down the Geek factor? lol

    4. Re:This article is boss by WrongSizeGlass · · Score: 1

      Bluetooth is holding down the Geek factor? lol

      We can dream, can't we?

    5. Re:This article is boss by StikyPad · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well there's also this.

    6. Re:This article is boss by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please buy at least 2 of these, as I own Dell stock.

      Thank you.

    7. Re:This article is boss by iamhassi · · Score: 2, Funny

      Sure, it's as sharp as the images are tight

      I think Michael Bolton from Office Space wrote this review.

      --
      my karma will be here long after I'm gone
    8. Re:This article is boss by ksandom · · Score: 1

      Anyone else picturing this thing flying past with no cover on?

      --
      Funnyhacks - Wierd, unusual, and fun hacks
    9. Re:This article is boss by icebike · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Bluetooth is holding down the Geek factor? lol

      Sadly, bluetooth is becoming commonplace. Hands free driving laws pretty much mandate the technology. Maybe not in rural Iowa, but common enough everywhere else.

      Nobody is going to want to hold a slab the size of this phone to their head for very long.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    10. Re:This article is boss by segin · · Score: 1

      Yes, and Michael Dell is considering privatizing the company.

      So, Mr. Stockholder, you better hope he doesn't do it. That means the end of your stock.

    11. Re:This article is boss by segin · · Score: 1

      There's the AT&T confirmation. Look at the SIM card next to the 16GB microSD card. It's an AT&T SIM.

    12. Re:This article is boss by babyrat · · Score: 1

      If they were to privatize Dell, the stockholders would more than likely make out like bandits as the offer has to be accepted by the majority of shareholders which generally means the offer is very favourable to the shareholders.

    13. Re:This article is boss by jesset77 · · Score: 1
      From TFS:

      Streak is a 3G GSM 850/1900 device and AT&T is the only major US carrier that supports those frequency bands.

      Yeah.... except that tons of Android 3G GSM 850/900/1800/1900 devices built by HTC (desire, dream, hero, magic, passion) are on the market right now, and I don't believe any of them are sold via AT&T. I know the passion is designed to work on AT&T's network, but they don't sell it.

      So what carrier is it actually selling all of those? Damn, I can't remember their name, but I pay them $75/mo for unlimited minutes and unlimited data.

      Bah who cares. Whoever they are, they must not be a major US carrier, hell they only cover 48 of the 50 states. It's better to stick with AT&T, since they are a "major" network! ;D

      --
      People willing to trade their freedom of expression for temporary entertainment deserve neither and will lose both.
    14. Re:This article is boss by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      I don't get the joke, can someone explain it to me?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  2. Android 1.6? Is this a joke? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Come on - how can anyone sell an Android 1.6 device with a straight face in this day and age?

    No wonder it's going to AT&T. AT&T hates Android and so far has only carried the worst and most crippled Android devices on the market.

    1. Re:Android 1.6? Is this a joke? by LBt1st · · Score: 1

      It does seem strange it's only got 1.6 on it. Maybe it'll be upgraded later but the lack of a keyboard is a deal breaker for me.
      I really wish phone makers would think more about functionality rather then appearances.

    2. Re:Android 1.6? Is this a joke? by Ethanol-fueled · · Score: 1, Insightful

      AT&T hates Android

      You trollin' foo. ATT and Google, the two most infamous data-mining corporations, hate each other like Bush hates rich Arabs.

      Being in a relationship, after all, means never having to say you're Saudi.

    3. Re:Android 1.6? Is this a joke? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ATT and Google, the two most infamous data-mining corporations

      You know, I don't understand the FUD about Google just like I don't understand the way people have been so up in arms about Facebook lately. Maybe it's because I have sense enough to keep private stuff, you know, private. As in, don't post your dirty laundry on the 'net. I know, perish the thought, right? And as for the rest of it, I rather like having access to a search engine that seems to have as its goal to trawl every bit of available information in the world. Seems like a pretty cool resource to me. And all of the what if this and what if that is just fear mongering because the minute Google does something nefarious with people's data, people stop using them and they go bye bye. They'd be insane to abuse people with that loaded gun to their heads.

      I personally like Google, I like the things they do and I hope they keep doing them.

    4. Re:Android 1.6? Is this a joke? by Technomancer · · Score: 1

      Yeah, somehow I fail to be excited with it.
      But, if you look at all these Android tablet devices that begin to be available right now, they are Android 1.5 or 1.6.
      How pathetic.

    5. Re:Android 1.6? Is this a joke? by Urza9814 · · Score: 1

      Well, when you have 5 releases in less than a year, you can't really expect new devices to be using the latest version. The latest version of Android was released about two weeks ago. How many months did it take after Windows Vista was released before most new computers were shipping with it included? And that's a minor change. I mean it's big, but any PC they were making to run XP could run Vista too. Android's not so simple.

      While it is true that 2.0 was only released a month after 1.6, I would imagine they were developing for 1.5 and managed to shift to 1.6 fairly easily. But 2.0 is a much bigger update, and it'll probably take time to make it work on a new device. It'll get there, though they'll probably skip straight to 2.2 I would imagine.

    6. Re:Android 1.6? Is this a joke? by Talez · · Score: 5, Interesting

      This is the problem with trying to faux-innovate by creating an "experience".

      For starters, Dell is shit at it. Second of all, you spend so long tailoring it to the firmware version you started it on that it's now obsolete and the default experience is a million times better anyway.

      IMHO Dell needs to differentiate themselves in two ways:

      1) By a "build your own smartphone" model using a couple of different form factors (tablet, slider, flip) with commodity snap in parts that are user customizable (screen tech/screen size/flash space/CPU+GPU combo/camera) that would allow them to deliver any phone in any segment at any price point.
      2) Keeping up with the latest version of Android and providing the latest default Android experience as soon as possible. Make a generic firmware, stuff it with all the drivers you might need for all of the hardware used in the different combinations and release it quick. Sell on volume, sell on having the latest and greatest Android features available to customers a week after the general release and laugh at HTC promising firmware updates at some undetermined point in the future.

      If you give people what they want and quickly you won't have to differentiate yourself with all of this experience wank. You can just sell them whatever they want and sell them by the truckload because you're DELL. When people just want a laptop they jump on Dell's website, price one up, it's cheap as chips and they buy it. Just do the same damn thing with smartphones already.

    7. Re:Android 1.6? Is this a joke? by tftp · · Score: 1

      How many months did it take after Windows Vista was released before most new computers were shipping with it included?

      That is actually a negative number, at least -6 months if not less. MS created those infamous "Vista Ready" and "Vista Capable" classifications, and you could buy a PC with XP and with a free upgrade certificate. I got a couple of those myself, and redeemed them. MS may not know how to write good software, but they sure know how to sell what they write.

      Well, when you have 5 releases in less than a year, you can't really expect new devices to be using the latest version.

      I guess "Release early, release often" is not a proper strategy here. I suspect Google managers are simply not mature enough (too young, in other words) to understand the business needs and do what is right.

    8. Re:Android 1.6? Is this a joke? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heres the link to the dell blog page for it: http://en.community.dell.com/dell-blogs/b/direct2dell/archive/2010/05/25/dell-streak-the-versatile-5-inch-android-tablet.aspx

      They do go onto say that they will make the Android 2.2 available on the device as an OTA update later on in the year. Not sure how they are going to pull it off from Android 1.6

    9. Re:Android 1.6? Is this a joke? by Urza9814 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I guess "Release early, release often" is not a proper strategy here. I suspect Google managers are simply not mature enough (too young, in other words) to understand the business needs and do what is right.

      I disagree. I mean in a year or two I would imagine that development will naturally slow down a bit. But their options right now are to either release frequently and have some fragmentation, or release rarely and have people stuck on very old releases that don't have the features they want. Remember all the complaints about how long it took Apple to get MMS on the iPhone? Besides, as far as Google is concerned, implementing the latest version isn't really their problem.

    10. Re:Android 1.6? Is this a joke? by tftp · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Releasing a product in commercial space requires stability. Sure, you can't have everything in the release 1.0, but every release must be a solid product. If you look back, each DOS release was fine; most Windows releases were OK (as Windows goes,) and IIRC even OS/2 releases were reasonably mature.

      The major point here is to avoid the upgrade treadmill. I can understand frequent upgrades if they are seamless. But in Android they are not. Each OEM has to customize a base Android system to their hardware, and a handheld thing can have 10-20 different hardware items to worry about - the CPU itself, the display controller, the touch controller, the battery charge controller, WiFi, Ethernet, BT, compass, GPS... so it's a lot of work to the OEM to upgrade from 1.x to 1.(x+1). If you make them do it often they just say "stuff it, we won't be upgrading anything" and then you are stuck. In my work I occasionally have to upgrade frameworks. Qt offers a great example, especially when 3.x to 4.x transition changed *everything* and required rewrite of major pieces of code. Such an upgrade is often out of consideration even - the library pieces then get checked in along with your sources, and that's that.

      So IMO regardless of what Google wants to do, what they are doing is not working. Google people just don't understand what their releases are doing to the industry. Imagine yourself an OEM that plans a gizmo. If you pick Android you start development one day and never end, until the product is EOLed. That is hardly a winning strategy. If I were such an OEM I'd rather pick a no-name OS that at least allows me to build a product and let it be. If my product doesn't report its OS version I'm OK. If my product reports that it's Android x.y then it's already bad news - there is already a newer release by Google, and who will buy my gizmo then? Business-wise, Google is on a losing path here.

      Besides, as far as Google is concerned, implementing the latest version isn't really their problem.

      I'm afraid you are right and Googlers indeed harbor that foolish idea. But that very fact *is* their problem. They have enough cash to play ostrich for a few years, but the reality couldn't care less about what Google thinks. Reality deals with things that exist.

    11. Re:Android 1.6? Is this a joke? by beguyld · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Very good summary.

      Quite likely the issue is that Google is a web company, and in that world new software is almost continuously rolled out.

      So the decision makers don't have any person real-world experience with commercial devices containing firmware; which is very difficult to upgrade once it leaves the factory. (at least major version changes, for the reason you noted)

      This actually makes me wonder if Meego will be a sleeper. Nokia IS a phone company, so they understand that world. Trolltech has been playing with real world customers in the embedded world for a long time.

      Intel is in a different world, but I expect they are providing more funding than SW development. They will have decision making clout. But Intel is a hardware company, run by hardware engineers. And those guys think that once something goes out the door it's frozen forever. Very different then the Google web-based, "let's try this for a few hours in Ohio, and we can always roll it back if it doesn't work" way of thinking.

      It's not so much about "thinking" but about one's own decades of personal experience, which affects how we see the world and what decisions we'll tend to make.

      There are of course many factors which go into mass market acceptance, so I would not want to make any bets just yet about a dominant phone/tablet OS 5 years from now. But it will be interesting to watch.

    12. Re:Android 1.6? Is this a joke? by Wrath0fb0b · · Score: 4, Informative

      By a "build your own smartphone" model using a couple of different form factors (tablet, slider, flip) with commodity snap in parts that are user customizable (screen tech/screen size/flash space/CPU+GPU combo/camera) that would allow them to deliver any phone in any segment at any price point.

      Ever notice how phones and tablets tend to have SoC's from 6-12 months ago? Like the Snapdragon here when they've already got Snapdragon II running or the Droid/Pre/iPhone/Pod/Pad's A8 when the A9 has been out for a while and they are already flogging the A10 at Computex? A device that small has to be drawn out months in advance so all the components can be fabricated and any glitches in the assembly process ironed out. This isn't like plugging a PCI card into a motherboard -- almost every component is a custom part and every cubic millimeter of the device is taken.

      Make a generic firmware, stuff it with all the drivers you might need for all of the hardware used in the different combinations and release it quick.

      I don't know about the Android ecosystem but I used to be into WinMo hacking (before the birth of Android and the death of my free time )and this was straight impossible. Even the bootstrap sequence varied from phone to phone, as did vital kernel settings, radio settings and really just about everything. I would not be at all surprised if this was simply impossible.

      Also, in the official world, you have to get validation from the OEM, the carriers and the regulatory agencies (if you touched the baseband) before pushing firmware. That alone takes time, plus they might bump it back to you if they don't like it.

    13. Re:Android 1.6? Is this a joke? by theridersofrohan · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I wonder where's that article about android fragmentation now? I remember comments claiming that talk of fragmentation is FUD!. How can you come up with an android 1.6 device in June 2010?

    14. Re:Android 1.6? Is this a joke? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, but I completely disagree. Your remarks works for a dumbphone, but we are now speaking about smartphones and tablets, which are sold as a "computer in your pocket", or "computer in your couch". If I buy a device that is advertised as a computer, I expect that I control the software aspect of it, OS included. The current smartphone model where user is barely more that a renter and a cash-cow for network operators has lasted long enough, and I welcome android for at least attempting to shakes things a little (much too little in my view, especially with Google backpedalling on nexus one and the needed rooting for controlling fully your device). XDA-developers hacking of win 6.5 is how things should be imho, not the consumer model and walled garden of Apple, or worse, the network-centric view of subsidized feature phones (with their outrageous data plans and 2$ ringtones). Phone networks should be dumpipes, and phone OS and hardware should be able to compete independently from each other - just like the PC. The consumer has benefitted enormously from this PC model, and I hope it will return to smaller portable devices....

    15. Re:Android 1.6? Is this a joke? by viperblades · · Score: 1

      I'm afraid you are right and Googlers indeed harbor that foolish idea. But that very fact *is* their problem. They have enough cash to play ostrich for a few years, but the reality couldn't care less about what Google thinks. Reality deals with things that exist.

      I take it reality gets to ignore that android phones have overtaken iphones in sales in the last quarter?

    16. Re:Android 1.6? Is this a joke? by jo_ham · · Score: 1

      Yes, it's hardly surprising that "reality" shows Android overtook iPhone in the last quarter, when Verizon were running a 2 for 1 on Android handsets, and the iPhone sales slumped because the new iPhone is coming out in June/July 2010.

      I'm as excited as anyone else that Android is doing well, but you might want to check the reality that you are ignoring.

    17. Re:Android 1.6? Is this a joke? by tftp · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If I buy a device that is advertised as a computer, I expect that I control the software aspect of it, OS included.

      Sorry, a phone is not a general purpose computer. You can't control the software aspect of it without having access to the hardware aspect, and that is something you aren't going to get (from most OEMs, at least) - unless you want to buy a design from the OEM for some spare change like $100M or more. It's better to see the phone (or iPad) as a specialized device that also can run some simple and very limited software.

      This can change only after the phone undergoes the same standardization process as PCs did - and PCs did that only under MS's pressure to run DOS and Windows. There is no such pressure in the phone world; actually the opposite is happening - each OEM makes his phone in a slightly different way to carve a new niche in the market. This means that firmware of these devices is diverging fast.

    18. Re:Android 1.6? Is this a joke? by tftp · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I take it reality gets to ignore that android phones have overtaken iphones in sales in the last quarter?

      You need to consider that phones that were sold in last quarter started in design a year ago. I don't think OEMs were cognizant of the rapid pace of Android development at that time. Android offered them a good entry path into a high-end smartphone market. However once OEMs discover the pain of endless upgrades that may change. Another problem is that it's not trivial to even upgrade an OS on a handset over the air; there is always a risk of bricking, and then you need JTAG to fix that, which means RTM. Large OEMs manufacture hundreds of thousands of handsets and ship them overseas for sales, there is no way for them to upgrade those when they are sitting in boxes on shelves. There are no gnomes inside the boxes to keep upgrading the handsets even if the OEM is willing to continually rebuild the firmware image to match the latest Android release.

      So this Dell product pinpoints when its development started - at some point when 1.6 was the latest release, which was between Sep. 16, 2009 and Oct. 26, 2009 (yes, that's only 40 days!) And now that the product is done, it's already obsolete. How can you, as an OEM, live with that? It's not a disaster yet - the thing just needs the new firmware image, but it's a powerful reminder that the OS maker can at any time torpedo your product by releasing a new version, and then you are back to square one. It's much, much worse if you just finished a manufacturing run and are now stuck with thousands of obsolete units that nobody will buy. How much will it cost you to open each box and individually upgrade each unit? Probably more than it will cost to plow the whole run into a landfill and order a new one.

      It's not a problem that is unique to phone OEMs; PC makers (the same Dell, for example) are aware of that too. But MS releases new versions rarely and on schedule, and everyone knows years in advance what's coming. The new release of Android will be available who knows when, and it will have who knows what new functions. "Roadmap? We don't need any stinking roadmap! We release when it's ready!"

    19. Re:Android 1.6? Is this a joke? by Luscious868 · · Score: 1

      Which is why, if you want a real smart phone that you can actually upgrade without trouble, you do the smart thing and get an iPhone.

    20. Re:Android 1.6? Is this a joke? by IICV · · Score: 1

      How can you come up with an android 1.6 device in June 2010?

      Because you plan on selling the device to people who haven't got a clue? That seems to be Del^H^H^H everyone's target market these days.

    21. Re:Android 1.6? Is this a joke? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know about the Android ecosystem but I used to be into WinMo hacking (before the birth of Android and the death of my free time )and this was straight impossible. Even the bootstrap sequence varied from phone to phone, as did vital kernel settings, radio settings and really just about everything. I would not be at all surprised if this was simply impossible.

      Of course it is possible. All it requires is a bit of standardisation to make it work. Look at all the different hardware that goes into PCs, yet you can take a linux livecd and it will boot on practically any one, how well it will run tends to be down to the drivers it has available, but you can take care of those issue by being a little selective with the hardware, hell, you often can even move a generic linux distro install (say, something like Ubuntu) from one x86 computer to a completely different x86 computer just by moving/cloning the hard drive over, and it will work perfectly (subject to driver compatibility naturally).

      Of course you won't get all the manufacturers to agree to standards, but Dell could certainly make their devices sufficiently standardized to make a modular approach practical. So, from a hardware perspective, I'm sure it's possible to do, but Dell are in a sense just dipping their toe in the waters of the cell phone market, it's probably too early for them to consider the investment in tools to make this approach work at the moment.

      Now, the regulatory issues around producing mobile phones, I don't know what is involved, but yeah, I can see that as potentially being a significant barrier to a modular approach to making phones.

    22. Re:Android 1.6? Is this a joke? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      can u say Apple?

  3. some experts *believe* that it will be AT&T... by PaulBu · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ... while this "expert" have even seen a SIM card with AT&T logo on one of the photos in slideshow! :)

    Paul B.

  4. Bad Form Factor by HandleMyBidness · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The picture in that article makes me think this is the exact wrong size for every use it's designed for, especially as a phone.

    1. Re:Bad Form Factor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll reply to you since you made a reasonable-sounding assessment:

      What would people recommend for the current best option for either a smart phone or tablet that's not from Apple? It doesn't have to be Android, but it does have to have a strong processor and be available for development with a good set of dev tools. I've come to realize that I'm probably not going to replace my iPhone with another one; my tendency is to think that vertical integration gives more reliable support and integration, and so my first instinct is to go with a Nexus One. Any ideas on how long until they'll revise/upgrade the hardware?

      Also, the apps I write (originally for iPod Touch/iPhone, but iPad makes a much better GUI) are very resource-intensive soft real-time apps. I'm quite leery of Android because of this; are there people hacking Android phones to run C? Assembler? Any word on vector processing, without doing it in a hacky way using OpenGL? (I haven't heard of that for Android, but I've heard of people hacking it on iPhones.) If it wasn't for Java, I'd switch over in a second. It's a little unusual, because in almost every other circumstance I defend Java's performance, but in this one particular case it's just not a good fit.

    2. Re:Bad Form Factor by fm6 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Indeed. It reminds me of how I came to hate the Newton for its size (among other reason): too big to put in your pocket, too small to serve as a serious device for reading or writing.

      I own an HTC Hero (named "Dudley"; anybody get the joke?) with a 3.2" screen. For me, that's the perfect size — any bigger or smaller and it's a literal pain to use. (My left hand spasms if I even think about some of the other phones I've used.) If they're going to make a device bigger, it needs to be a lot bigger, so that there's enough screen real-estate for serious business.

      Unfortunately, you can't specify an arbitrary size for an LCD panel: you have to go with whatever the manufacturers find it worthwhile to set up production lines for. (That's why monitor makers switched to landscape layout at the same time as the switch to digital mandated it for TVs.) Maybe if thousands of people went to the window and yelled "I'm as mad as hell, and I want an 8x8 LCD!"

    3. Re:Bad Form Factor by lazyDog86 · · Score: 1

      Things are now drifting to the converse of the SNL bit from the mid-90s where they had cell phones the size of pencil erasers to the status symbol being ever bigger phones. Come to think of it, remember the boom boxes in the '80s? (yes, yes, I'm very old. I know.) Those things were huge!

      Maybe we'll get back to that and trendsetters will start carrying there MP3 player/cell phone/tabletbox-computer around on their shoulders for the world to see

      You heard it here first!

      --
      my insights may be modded Funny, but at least some of my jokes are modded Insightful
    4. Re:Bad Form Factor by Minwee · · Score: 4, Funny

      The obvious way to improve it would be to move the microphone and speaker to the side, and maybe change the shape to be more like a taco and less like a phone book.

      Side Talkin' never went out of style.

    5. Re:Bad Form Factor by FlyingBishop · · Score: 5, Informative

      You can run C code with the NDK.

      Of course, when people talk about Android fragmentation, they don't know it, but they're really talking about the NDK. If you stick to Java your program is fairly easy to keep working across versions. If you use the NDK, it's graphics programming in the late '90s again with a ton of different GPUs and odd CPU quirks to deal with.

    6. Re:Bad Form Factor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, very cool. Thanks. I'm just skimming over their page on it, but I'm not seeing event handling (e.g., touches) in there. Is it possible to write the entire app using the NDK? It sounds like they require you use Java to glue it all together, but with OpenGL for graphics and C for computation and file handling (that's possible?) there'd only be a little glue necessary.

      Also, would you happen to know if there's a lower-level -- but hopefully not driver-level -- access to audio than the Java SDK provides? I'm used to interacting with audio systems based on packets of frames, and being able to record into memory before writing it to disk, and that doesn't seem possible -- especially on the recording side of things -- in the Java SDK.

    7. Re:Bad Form Factor by MechaShiva · · Score: 2, Funny

      Be fair. It's less bulky than most tissue boxes so that's got to count for something, right?

      --
      After calming me down with some orange slices and some fetal spooning, E.T. revealed to me his singular purpose.
    8. Re:Bad Form Factor by beguyld · · Score: 2, Interesting

      So in other words, Android is a commercial success, but is poorly designed?

      I've been programming embedded devices (including Linux systems using OpenEmbedded, etc), desktop systems from PCI drivers to GUIs for 20 years, so I understand the issues, but I haven't studied the Android architecture yet.

      So I don't understand why this is such an issue. Sounds worse than a standard Linux distribution. Which again makes me wonder if Meego has a better chance long term because a lot of the KDE/Qt developers are involved. KDE just works on various size monitors, right?

      Just seems like Android is not so well designed, and rushed out by a server software company, assuming that Java is the answer to everything.

      I say that partially tongue in cheek, as I know Google uses a lot of other languages. Though they are fundamentally a server software company, not an embedded software company; which is bound to affect their gut instincts on architecture.

      Almost every developer I talk to says they would like to do Android development, as they are interested in the concept of programming for an open phone, but they aren't interested in using Java to do it. Pretty much the way I feel. I still might, but I'd rather just use Qt in C++, so I'm looking forward to seeing how Meego does in the future.

      Which partly asks the question: Can Intel get back market share in the phone/tablet market from the ARM hordes? I suspect the answer is that they have a chance for tablets, though phones will be more challenging. Maybe impossible with an x86 architecture, given the small batteries. But who knows...

    9. Re:Bad Form Factor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm with you on this: I have an htc diamond 2, 3.2'' screen, and it is a perfect sized device. I think they could go to 3.5'' while keeping the frame size identical just reducing bezel as much as possible and getting rid of their zoom bar...What I do not understand is the move to 4+ inches smartphones: Look like people do not care about putting their phone in their pockets anymore...Is this the rise of the man purse or what? ;-)

    10. Re:Bad Form Factor by kcitren · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      The HTC HD2 on t-Mobile has the 1Ghz snapdragon processor and run Windows Mobile 6.5. Development for it is pretty simple using .NET, but you can use lower level tools as well.

    11. Re:Bad Form Factor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Their SDK actually looks pretty good, though the docs so far don't seem quite as good as I've seen with the others (iPhone, and my skimming of Android). Is it true they're going to support OpenGL ES with Mobile 7? That'd make the transition much easier for me.

    12. Re:Bad Form Factor by BertieBaggio · · Score: 1

      Do you have to keep it away from newts?

      --
      If all you have is a grenade, pretty soon every problem looks like a foxhole -- MightyYar
    13. Re:Bad Form Factor by FlyingBishop · · Score: 1

      Actually, I think Android strikes an excellent middle ground between the iPhone (native only, a handful of models) and Windows Mobile 7 (Silverlight only, a plethora of models.)

      For most apps (even some games) the Java toolkit is more than adequate, and functions very well across devices with minimal tweaking. If you need performance, but still want your app to work on a variety of phones, you need to do more legwork.

      Apple doesn't actually have a solution to this problem, they're just protected because they only make a handful of devices.

    14. Re:Bad Form Factor by Invid72 · · Score: 1

      ...If you need performance, but still want your app to work on a variety of phones, you need to do more legwork.

      Apple doesn't actually have a solution to this problem, they're just protected because they only make a handful of devices.

      Limiting themselves to just a handful of devices IS their solution, along with abstracting away the minor hardware differences behind robust API calls.

    15. Re:Bad Form Factor by YourExperiment · · Score: 1

      (That's why monitor makers switched to landscape layout at the same time as the switch to digital mandated it for TVs.)

      Before that they were portrait?

    16. Re:Bad Form Factor by FlyingBishop · · Score: 1

      It's not a solution in that it doesn't create a wide market where app developers can target at least a third of majority of mobile phone users. People want too much variety for Apple to grab that much of the market with only a handful of models.

    17. Re:Bad Form Factor by Deosyne · · Score: 1

      My Droid is 3.7" and I have room to spare in the pocket of my jeans. I'm looking to get something closer to a 4" screen on my next one.

  5. Re:some experts *believe* that it will be AT&T by thrillseeker · · Score: 1

    No Verizon - no buy.

  6. Just what we need by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    A phone with a pathetic screen resolution on a pathetic carrier with a dog-old version of Android.

    I mean, I want an Android tablet, but I'm simply not settling for this.

    1. Re:Just what we need by TheKidWho · · Score: 3, Insightful

      There is no such thing as an Android Tablet. Google doesn't officially make an OS for tablets yet, they're holding off on ChromeOS for that. These are just hackjobs by manufacturers trying to get in on the iPad hype.

    2. Re:Just what we need by Threni · · Score: 5, Insightful

      > There is no such thing as an Android Tablet. Google doesn't officially make an OS for tablets yet,

      If someone puts Android on a tablet then at that point you can say that Google officially makes an OS for tablets. What Google intends to do, or where it expects an OS to run is neither here nor there.

    3. Re:Just what we need by darjen · · Score: 1

      I'm waiting for an android tablet, and this is just about the size I want. but you're right, it needs to be at least 2.1, preferably froyo. no way will I buy it with less.

    4. Re:Just what we need by Quarters · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You've got it completely backwards. Google has said on numerous occasions that ChromeOS is for netbooks. They are pushing Android as their tablet OS.

    5. Re:Just what we need by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's too large for a phone, but too small for a tablet. I don't know what niche it's supposed to take, because I don't see any I'd want to use it in.

      Given that there are much more compelling Android offerings both in phone and in tablet space, I don't see why anyone would bother.

    6. Re:Just what we need by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 1

      I heard it's going to get a 2.2 upgrade when that comes out. Which won't be long, so probably worth the wait rather than getting it with 1.6.

    7. Re:Just what we need by darjen · · Score: 2, Insightful

      yeah, I would definitely wait before it actually has 2.2 installed before actually pulling the trigger. promises alone aren't enough for me to spend $500 on any device.

    8. Re:Just what we need by Kitkoan · · Score: 3, Informative
      --
      Attention... all grammer nazi"s! Is they're anything; wrong with: my post,
    9. Re:Just what we need by Xtifr · · Score: 1

      It's too large for a phone, but too small for a tablet.

      Right, because the fact that there have been Internet Tablets with a similar size and form for as long as the iPhone has been on the market doesn't matter? If it doesn't have the Apple logo on it, it doesn't exist? Only Apple is allowed to define "Tablet"? I have no idea what you're basing your opinion on, but it doesn't seem to match the facts.

      On the other hand, I totally agree that this doesn't seem to stand out from the other Android and Maemo systems available, and I'm not sure why anyone would bother.

    10. Re:Just what we need by Blue+Stone · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What's the difference between a tablet and a netbook apart from a physical keyboard? Why do they need completely different operating systems?

      Never having used either of these OSs, my impression of Android is pretty favourable - it's like a open iPhone OS - whereas my impression of Chrome is that it's some ridiculous attempt to enable a vision of cloud computing (using Google's services) and pushing that service-as-a-platform idea down people's throats, than having a good operating system that is principally about doing what people want their device to do and doing it well.

      --
      Corporation, n. An ingenious device for obtaining individual profit without individual responsibility. - Ambrose Bierce
    11. Re:Just what we need by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      iPad sucks (and I always said that much). But its size is one of the few things that are right about it. Apple logo has nothing to do with it.

    12. Re:Just what we need by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      But you might be able to write your own code for it, play your own music on it, not have your literature deleted/banned/rejected ect.
      Dell might just give you something MS, Apple and Amazon never will, a really computer in a small form factor at a fair price.
      Buy an unlocked unit and sign up for any provider you like, if you have coverage.
      Make your own video clips, watch movies, read text, make calls, surf the web with expected functionality.
      Dell might just put the fun back into handheld computing again over time.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    13. Re:Just what we need by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Chrome is about always on tracking for the push of personalised advertising. You will always be leaking persistent, uniquely identifiable data back to google from cookies down to hardware.
      Unlike MS, your data might be safer over time, unlike Apple you can have more flexibility in what you code.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    14. Re:Just what we need by TheKidWho · · Score: 1

      Are they? I have yet to see any Tablets that aren't an oversized phone phone(AKA the Streak) which can access the Android market.

    15. Re:Just what we need by TheKidWho · · Score: 1

      No, because Google doesn't support it. Hence why the first wave of these devices are basically over sized phones, that's the only way Google will let them access the Android Market and the Google Apps.

    16. Re:Just what we need by Bysshe · · Score: 1

      It will fit nicely into my man-purse.

      --
      Read what I mean, not what I wrote.
    17. Re:Just what we need by wisdom_brewing · · Score: 1

      Make it 2 inches smaller so I can fit it into a jacket pocket and id be sold...

      Requiring a bag to carry it makes it redundant

    18. Re:Just what we need by Quarters · · Score: 1

      nVidia has a Tegra & Android based tablet coming out this fall that looks like it could be a very nice device.

    19. Re:Just what we need by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A tablet has a touchscreen and a netbook generally doesn't, that is the other main difference aside from the keyboard. Though, to be honest, I don't see the point in ChromeOS, it seems far too limited even for a netbook. The only use I see for is perhaps a quick-boot alternative to loading a full OS when you just want to check a webpage, but even there I'm not sure how much use it will be.

    20. Re:Just what we need by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The resolution for the screen is approaching the maximum that a human eye can resolve. Remember it's a five inch screen.

  7. Different ways to look at things by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What are the earmarks of a true tablet? Is it size? I think a 5-inch screen is too small to be called a tablet. It's large enough to watch movies and fill the Android interface with app icons, but you still have to type with your thumbs. In my opinion, tablets are supposed to fill in for laptops when you don't want the bulk of a screen and physical keyboard. The iPad fits that model.

    I look at it another way: The iPad is so big that it doesn't fit in my pocket, so I need to carry it in a case, so I may as well carry a laptop and get a proper keyboard and the myriad of missing iPad features that we've all been over. And I still have to carry a phone, too.

    I don't know about the Streak yet, but it does seem to me that it would still be pocket-sized and would give me a larger screen than my phone. For someone who needs a phone, but uses it more for texting and surfing, it could be very suitable.

    1. Re:Different ways to look at things by WrongSizeGlass · · Score: 2, Informative

      According to the video in this article Dell executive Ron Garriques says that fitting it into a pocket was "really the whole design point".

  8. Android 1.6? by Mark19960 · · Score: 1

    Come on Dell, Really?
    They are going to have to update that or few will be interested in it.

    1. Re:Android 1.6? by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 1

      I think it's going to get an upgrade when 2.2 comes out. Personally, I'd wait for that to happen before rushing out.

    2. Re:Android 1.6? by ktzqbp · · Score: 1

      Yep, stopped reading at Android 1.6. Get with the program, guys!

    3. Re:Android 1.6? by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      mmm Linux jailbreak

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    4. Re:Android 1.6? by wisdom_brewing · · Score: 1

      It's a phone with a larger and higher resolution screen than the Iphone. People will see it in a shop and go "ooooo, shiny!" and want it, most consumers have NO clue whatsoever about android versions...

  9. Does it come with... by dustin_0099 · · Score: 5, Funny

    a free Xbox 1 controller?

  10. Tablet or Phone? by migla · · Score: 1

    "The Dell Streak, however, represents the beginnings of a very slippery slope. Where does a phone end and a tablet begin?"

    What difference does it make?

    --
    Some of my favourite people are from th US; Vonnegut, Chomsky, Bill Hicks.
    1. Re:Tablet or Phone? by thoughtsatthemoment · · Score: 3, Interesting

      If there is a difference, people will have to buy both.

    2. Re:Tablet or Phone? by digitalchinky · · Score: 1

      I bought a Nokia N900 the other day, mostly the same specifications but probably a tad more open than Android. I don't think it's a slippery slope but you are right about the blurred distinction. It's not really a phone, not a laptop, not a tablet, not a PDA... I think maybe it's all of them, only a lot smaller.

    3. Re:Tablet or Phone? by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Will it fit in your average persons pocket :)
      If you need a vest, backpack or carry bag its a tablet and might just want to get a real netbook/laptop.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  11. May as well... by SuperKendall · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The iPad is so big that it doesn't fit in my pocket, so I need to carry it in a case, so I may as well carry a laptop

    That's where you lost me.

    Because a laptop doesn't need a case. It needs a bags, with accessories and so on.

    The iPad has long enough battery life you don't need to pack power cords "just in case", and really have nothing else to bring with it. It's still much more portable than a laptop and easier to drag around an office or into meetings.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:May as well... by Nerdfest · · Score: 2, Informative

      There are a few 10" netBooks with 10 hour battery life. I have a 9" Acer with an 8+ hour life. I carry it in a sleeve to meetings, etc, for notes.

    2. Re:May as well... by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Because a laptop doesn't need a case. It needs a bags, with accessories and so on. The iPad has long enough battery life you don't need to pack power cords "just in case", and really have nothing else to bring with it. It's still much more portable than a laptop and easier to drag around an office or into meetings.

      Bag, case, whatever. Let's abstract this down to what the problem is: The iPad means I still have to use a hand to carry it, whether holding it, having it under my arm, in a bag, case, whatever. It's the same problem in that sense as a laptop.

      The differences are then down to weight. I can carry my laptop just fine. In the bag. With a power charger. So weight isn't a problem.

    3. Re:May as well... by Ixokai · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Define "10 hour battery life" for me-- is that claimed, or based on "moderate usage", or? And how moderate is moderate, if that's it?

      Because I've never seen a laptop which got anywhere near the claimed battery life with what I consider "moderate" usage... and most die out from 2 to 4 hours of continual usage. Let alone if you're doing something intense, i.e. watching a video. I may be wrong: I've never used a netbook, and maybe these netbook makers finally managed (since I stopped using laptops a few years ago) to get battery life to actually useful levels.

      The iPad's 10 hour battery life is 10 full hours of real continual usage. Really, its like 11 hours of real work if you aren't on the 3G the whole time and aren't streaming over WIFI, but about 10 even if you are. And about 9 if you're on the 3G. Even if you're spending all that time doing intense stuff, like watching a video. Or playing games.

      It does make a difference in the usability of the device.

    4. Re:May as well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plus the laptop bag has a shoulder-strap, so I keep both hands free!

    5. Re:May as well... by dave562 · · Score: 2, Informative

      And further add to the discussion, as long as it requires having some sort of "bag" that bag probably has room for other common things that people carry around like writing implements, paper, books, etc. Making the statement that you don't need a case for an iPad is kind of like saying you don't need a briefcase for your papers. Sure, you could walk around with a couple of file folders tucked under your arm, but a briefcase is a lot more convenient. (If you're some sort of hipster who is morally opposed to the idea of a briefcase and the connotation it has with "the man", feel free to substitute messenger bag, or other metro-sexual approved fashion accessory.)

    6. Re:May as well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So before you leave your office to go to a meeting in the same building you put your laptop in a shoulder bag? Picking up an iPad is much easier.

    7. Re:May as well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've got a small laptop (eeePC 1005ha) that I use every day while commuting by bus, taking a break at a coffee shop etc. It's about the size of an iPad but has a usable keyboard (heck, I write actual code on it)! I haven't carried any accessories for it in months. It has 8+ hours of battery life, so I only need to charge it once every 2-3 days. The charger lives at my office, I don't even bother taking it home for the weekend. It's similar to having a cell phone in the sense that I don't even think about taking my phone charger with me everywhere I go.

    8. Re:May as well... by node+3 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Bag, case, whatever. Let's abstract this down to what the problem is: The iPad means I still have to use a hand to carry it, whether holding it, having it under my arm, in a bag, case, whatever. It's the same problem in that sense as a laptop.

      You are seriously stretching the similarity here. The iPad is significantly more portable than a notebook (even a thin 13" notebook, like a MacBook Pro). Even if you ignore the process of disconnecting the cords and putting it into a bag or sleeve as well as carrying any accessories (like power adapter), and just focus on transporting it, the experience is not even remotely comperable.

      The only notebooks I would consider anything close to similar to carrying an iPad is either a MacBook Air, or one of the thinner netbooks.

      The differences are then down to weight. I can carry my laptop just fine. In the bag. With a power charger. So weight isn't a problem.

      Except then you're now toting a bag around. Having commuted with notebooks, netbooks, iPads, and iPhones, I can tell you there's a very noticeable difference between each of them. The difference between an iPhone and an iPad is comparable in magnitude to the difference between an iPad and a small (13") notebook.

    9. Re:May as well... by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 1

      You are seriously stretching the similarity here. The iPad is significantly more portable than a notebook (even a thin 13" notebook, like a MacBook Pro). Even if you ignore the process of disconnecting the cords and putting it into a bag or sleeve as well as carrying any accessories (like power adapter), and just focus on transporting it, the experience is not even remotely comperable.

      Yes, an iPad is more portable. The question is whether it is more portable enough.

      To put it another way, when would I use an iPad that I couldn't use a laptop?

      To give you an example of the sort of thing I'm looking for: if I go into town with my family, I have a phone in my pocket. If we stop for coffee, I can look up cinema showtimes. I can go to the city, visit a museum and then look up the nearby restaurants. The phone works for such situations in a way that a laptop doesn't.

      So, what's the situations where an iPad does the things my laptop can't? I'm not talking about improvement in weight or size. I know it's lighter and smaller, but my laptop is small enough and light enough for me anyway so that's not going to get me to get an iPad.

    10. Re:May as well... by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 1

      Exactly. When I go to see clients, I carry some paper notebooks, a couple of biros, sometimes my razor too.

      I go and see people in places like London, and I'm hauling my Thinkpad up and down underground stations and on and off trains. It's not a problem. A woman might have problems with a 3kg laptop, but a man shouldn't, and to be honest, you can buy a lighter weight laptop for less than cheap laptop + iPad.

      But the main thing is that I know that a laptop is a better prepared computer than an iPad. Client wants to give me some video files on USB? I can do that. Open up a weird file format?

    11. Re:May as well... by SakuraDreams · · Score: 1

      NEC VersaPro UltraLite VS or the new VC - former is an Atom 1.86Ghz CPU, latter is an Intel i5 processor. The netbook is 735g in weight, notebook is under 1kg in weight, built with Mg Alloy - 150kg weight resistance and 75cm drop height resistance on both. Then there is the Panasonic Let's Note range - water resistant keyboard, Mg Alloy case, 100kg weight resistance, 10 hour+ battery, Core2Duo or i5 CPU and 76cm drop height - weight is about 1.3kg for a 14.1inch model
      which includes a built in DVD Writer (which the Macbook Air does not).

      In short you get a very large, sturdy and well made ultra portable and for not much more weight or form factor than an iPad
      with the power to run Adobe Acrobat, Lotus Notes, VPN software, Office, Photoshop etc.

      The iPad as said before still requires a whole hand or arm to hold it. You may as well carry something a little heavier - not much really - and you can burn/read CD/DVDs, use any Windows/Linux app and work with any file format.
      Of course the iPad is lighter, always on (Netbook takes 15sec to power up Windows with the built in Toshiba SSD) but
      iPad is instantaneous, but at the end of the day you still end up lugging them both around - and both have advantages and disadvantages - yet the advantages of the iPad in my mind don't overcome the disadvantages of having to occupy your whole hand with a bulky device. A smart phone can just fit in your pocket (and you can make calls on it too).

    12. Re:May as well... by Nerdfest · · Score: 1

      Here's a link showing some good options. Looks like the best option show (that this report looked at, in 2009) was an MSI Wind at 11 hours light use and 7ish hours stressful use. I would hope there's a few more better options these days. Still, I think you have much more potential with a netbook, while giving up little (and for less money).

    13. Re:May as well... by wisdom_brewing · · Score: 1

      I. Do. Not. Want. To. Carry. A. Bag.

      I WILL get drunk and I WILL lose it.

      Pockets solve that problem.

      All "papers" that I would need to carry around with me are non-existant. Either its a sheet or two of paper I can fold and fit in a pocket or it's work related and not allowed to leave the office (part of confidentiality agreement).

    14. Re:May as well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I wanted to take notes, I'd just load up some office application on my phone and bring a fold-up / small keyboard (don't have an Apple phone, so this is possible without voiding warranty). Seems so much more convenient that bringing anything 13" in size with a possibility to scratch up it's screen if you don't have it in a sleeve.

    15. Re:May as well... by node+3 · · Score: 1

      Yes, an iPad is more portable. The question is whether it is more portable enough.

      The first question is whether the iPad is more portable, and it is. Only then does the second question come into play. The first question is pretty much universally true. The second question is a matter of opinion. An opinion which I'm highly confident that you do not share with the majority of people. I'm not saying that invalidates your opinion. On the contrary, your opinion is quite valid for you. I'm just pointing out the alternate, more prevalent view.

      To put it another way, when would I use an iPad that I couldn't use a laptop?

      That is so not "putting it another way". Put another way would be "when would I prefer to bring an iPad instead of a notebook?" And the main answer to that is obvious, when you don't want to lug around a notebook.

      So, what's the situations where an iPad does the things my laptop can't?

      Again, the same nonsensical question. In fact, it's exactly reversed, because the notebook is the one that needs more justification to be lugged around. The question really is, "what are the situations where I need (or sufficiently desire) the things a notebook can do that an iPad can't?"

      For some people (you, I imagine), the set of situations where you need (or want) a notebook far exceed the number of situations where the iPad would suffice or be desirable.

      But for a lot of people. In fact, I'd say the overwhelming majority if people, the iPad is far more preferable in most circumstances than a notebook.

      I know it's lighter and smaller, but my laptop is small enough and light enough for me anyway so that's not going to get me to get an iPad.

      And I have no desire to convince you to buy an iPad, or to even want an iPad. I'm only trying to point out that portability does matter, and for most people, an iPad, as a portable device, is far superior to a notebook. There will always be people with different needs and preferences.

    16. Re:May as well... by node+3 · · Score: 1

      In short you get a very large, sturdy and well made ultra portable and for not much more weight or form factor than an iPad
      with the power to run Adobe Acrobat, Lotus Notes, VPN software, Office, Photoshop etc.

      Most people don't particularly care about the things that a notebook can do that an iPad can't. Your list, however, is fairly ignorant.

      1. Adobe Acrobat - iPad can read and create PDFs. The additional features that Acrobat can do are not important to the vast majority of people.
      2. Lotus Notes - is coming to iPad, but even so, the vast majority of people do not even know Lotus Notes exists, let alone need it.
      3. VPN software - iPad supports VPN connections, but yet again, most people don't need this.
      4. Office - The first thing that is even remotely useful to the average person. iPad is compatible with Word, Excel and PowerPoint, which covers the vast majority of the needs most people have for Office. Official support for Office on iPad is likely to be announced in two days.
      5. Photoshop - Most people do not have Photoshop, and if they did, they'd have no idea what to do with it. For photo editing, there are plenty of quality iPad apps.

      But sure, if you need a particular app or feature that is not available for iPad, then by all means a notebook is the way to go. No one ever said that an iPad can completely replace the notebook. But the case for needing a notebook is way overstated by most iPad detractors.

      The iPad as said before still requires a whole hand or arm to hold it. You may as well carry something a little heavier - not much really - and you can burn/read CD/DVDs, use any Windows/Linux app and work with any file format.

      Why? In terms of functionality, the iPad covers most people's needs, and does so in a form factor that is less of a burden than a notebook. Most notebooks are so bulky and heavy, and are often accompanied by peripherals, that carrying one around in one hand isn't even a reasonable option. On the other hand, an iPad will fit nicely into any bag a notebook can fit into, and do so with less bulk and less weight.

      The notion that the iPad is a similar amount of trouble to carry around as a notebook is not rational.

      A smart phone can just fit in your pocket (and you can make calls on it too).

      A smart phone is more convenient than an iPad, but it's even more convenient still than a notebook. This isn't make your point, it does the exact opposite. It points out that giving up functionality for portability is a trade off that millions of people make every day.

      The first question becomes, why would someone want to carry an iPad along with an iPhone? A significantly larger screen is something that most people can find an advantage in. The second question becomes, why would someone want to carry a notebook instead of an iPad? The additional power and functionality are nowhere near as compelling to most people as the larger screen of an iPad compared to an iPhone is. Neither the need, nor the desire is just not there for most people.

      And for those that do find those things compelling (like you presumably do)? They can buy (and lug around) a notebook. Problem solved, everyone's happy (except for those that seem intent on dismissing the iPad).

    17. Re:May as well... by Chuu · · Score: 1

      I think you need to take a closer look at the latest generation of CULV ultra-portables. I get 8 hours of battery life out of my Core2, which means most days I simply take the laptop and a bluetooth mouse in a neoprine bag. If you want a larger laptop (10"-12") you can stretch the battery life out to 10-12 hours.

      Longer battery life does indeed completely change usage, but this is not limited to the iPad.

    18. Re:May as well... by node+3 · · Score: 1

      I think you need to take a closer look at the latest generation of CULV ultra-portables. I get 8 hours of battery life out of my Core2, which means most days I simply take the laptop and a bluetooth mouse in a neoprine bag. If you want a larger laptop (10"-12") you can stretch the battery life out to 10-12 hours.

      Are you replying to me? I never said anything about notebooks and battery life. And "CULV ultra-portables" are not exactly your typical notebook.

      But since you brought it up, you're not being very honest. Long battery life isn't normal for PC notebooks, unless you opt for extra-large batteries. Even then, you generally have to run with things set to a notably lower setting, and avoid any heavy processing, and still fall far short of the iPad's battery life.

      On the iPad, however, 10+ hours is when you run it at full tilt. Games, video, web, the works.

      Longer battery life does indeed completely change usage, but this is not limited to the iPad.

      I never said it was. However, the battery life on the iPad is both remarkable, and fairly unique (even if not exclusive). Even more so when you consider not having to scale down activities or carry an extra capacity battery.

    19. Re:May as well... by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      The iPad has long enough battery life you don't need to pack power cords "just in case", and really have nothing else to bring with it. It's still much more portable than a laptop and easier to drag around an office or into meetings.

      A Rolex is even more portable, has just almaost as much snob appeal and is equally useful for taking notes etc.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    20. Re:May as well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you have to spend time "disconnecting the wires", you probably have been using apple laptops for way too long. Most business users nowadays have docking stations and really only press a single button to undock their notebooks. Having a spare power supply in your bag makes the whole process absolutely painless.

    21. Re:May as well... by Mr2001 · · Score: 1

      The iPad is significantly more portable than a notebook (even a thin 13" notebook, like a MacBook Pro).

      No, it isn't. You're confusing weight with portability. The iPad is lighter, but it isn't actually any more convenient to lug around: just like a notebook, you can either carry it in your hands or you can put it in a bag.

      A smartphone, on the other hand, really is more portable: you can carry it in situations where you couldn't carry a notebook.

      The difference between an iPhone and an iPad is comparable in magnitude to the difference between an iPad and a small (13") notebook.

      No, not at all. A smartphone offers a huge portability advantage over a notebook: it fits in your pocket, eliminating the need for a bag. A tablet just makes your bag a few ounces lighter.

      --
      Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
    22. Re:May as well... by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      You have pockets big enough to fit an iPad inside? You must wear some crayzeee pants.

      P.S. If you've never got drunk and woken up nekkid, you've never got properly drunk.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  12. Comparison with the EVO by pwnies · · Score: 4, Informative

    Just got the EVO today, and while it isn't as large as the Dell Streak, it is significantly larger than most smartphones in its class. One of the things I noticed was that although it's a joy to type on, it isn't so nice holding it up to your ear. It feels bulky holding it up against your head - however I can still use a headset and keep the device in my pocket. The significantly larger size of Dell means that a.) I wont be able to keep it up to my head without it feeling awkward, and b.) I wont be able to keep it in my pocket and use a headset. I can't see a reason to want a device of this size. It's at the perfectly wrong size, in fact.

    1. Re:Comparison with the EVO by darjen · · Score: 1

      It's a good size for me because I spend very little time talking on the phone. I don't mind feeling awkward for a couple minutes when I actually would have to call someone. most of the time I browse and text/IM, and this will allow me to do so while still able to fit in my pocket. unlike that sony netbook...

  13. 5 inch phone ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone tried to use the n800/n810 as a phone?

    If you like that, try using an iPad as giant phone.

  14. Re:some experts *believe* that it will be AT&T by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That and Engadget broke the news from the Dell CEO last month...

  15. What's the correct form factor for this niche? by Nemilar · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I've seen a few devices of this size (the Archos 7 comes to mind; and I've seen them on the internet, not in person, mind you) and I think it's interesting to watch the industry try to figure out the correct form factor for this new niche that is emerging. Obviously it is going to be something larger than a cellphone and smaller than a laptop -- but what, exactly?

    This Dell Streak, I think, is the exact wrong size. It's quite a bit larger than a phone, and it doesn't look like something that you want to carry around all day in your pant pocket. One of the reason cellphones have become so popular is because they are so small (and light-weight). Remember that for several years, the major thing about cellphones is that they were getting smaller and smaller? Compare a phone from, say, 2000, with a phone from today. Why would anyone want to reverse direction on that? It's too large for a phone.

    On the opposite end, it looks too small to do any actual work. A netbook-sized screen is good for emails and browsing, but it's not very useful for doing serious business. And this thing is much smaller than a netbook. I don't think that's the aim, of course -- I think it's more aimed to the niche that the iPod targets; gaming, "always-on" style internet access, etc.. But I have to wonder if the device is too small for these things, as well. I think it might very well be.

    But the overwhelming thing we seem to be seeing is that there are plethora of devices being released, each being in some significant way different from the next; companies are trying to find out what consumers want in a device like this. Maybe Apple has proven it with the iPad, given its popularity; they did that with the iPod, and now the market is full of MP3 players which are essentially iPod clones. But remember when MP3 players were first coming to market, there were many different form factors, many different storage devices (Sony had that thing with the mini CDs, for example), until it became clear what consumers want. The same thing should/will happen here; and I believe it's quite possible it's already happened with the iPad, and anyone making anything substantially different will wind up falling behind.

    --
    Nemilar http://www.techthrob.com - Visit Me!
    1. Re:What's the correct form factor for this niche? by 5pp000 · · Score: 1

      I like the N810 form factor a lot. I carry mine in a hip pouch -- not in a pocket, admittedly, but I've never liked to carry a phone in my pocket either. The Streak looks slightly too large to me -- it's significantly thinner, but that doesn't really make that much difference.

      Nokia obviously thought the N810 was too big since the N900 is smaller, but the smaller size forces compromises in the slide-out keyboard design, besides just making the screen a little harder to read.

      I like the slide-out keyboard myself, but the market is moving away from them. Given that, maybe the HTC Evo hits the form factor nail on the head. Will be interesting to see.

      --
      Your god may be dead, but mine aren't!
    2. Re:What's the correct form factor for this niche? by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      My phone in 2000 was smaller than my Droid. The droid is far better in every way.

      The iPad is going to be just one of many tablets much like the iPhone is just one of many smartphones. RIM sells more smartphones than iphone or android and it would not be surprising to see hp do something similar in the tablet segment.

    3. Re:What's the correct form factor for this niche? by Nemilar · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I completely agree about the slide out keyboard. I had a BB Curve a while ago, and I loved the hard keys. I moved to the BB storm because I desired a touch screen (I feel like a touch screen enables a smartphone to be anything, since it can turn the UI into anything), which was nice, but I greatly missed the hardkeys when typing out a necessarily long email while on the go. I moved to the Palm Pre Plus largely for this feature, and I absolutely love it.

      --
      Nemilar http://www.techthrob.com - Visit Me!
    4. Re:What's the correct form factor for this niche? by Totenglocke · · Score: 1

      My phone in 2000 was smaller than my Droid. The droid is far better in every way.

      Exactly. If it's just a flip phone, then yes, smaller is better. However, now that we have smartphones (which are really just pocket computers that also are capable of making phone calls) with touch screens, it's necessary and desirable to have a larger phone so that you have a larger screen to make it easier to select what you want through the touch interface and to make it easier to read on without excessive scrolling.

      --
      "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." ~Thomas Jefferson
    5. Re:What's the correct form factor for this niche? by wisdom_brewing · · Score: 1

      As long as the battery life doesn't suffer I'm all for larger phones, as long as theyre thinner... I never got the "lighter" thing though, I like being able to feel the weight of something ive paid decent money for...

      With the extra "niches" - take a look at the european car market to see that its happening in most sectors...

      Some people will find them appealing and, though it may not be a huge market, it might be profitable due to better margins AND higher prices...

    6. Re:What's the correct form factor for this niche? by sootman · · Score: 1

      I agree that it's big for a cell phone, but configure it for use as a house phone and I'd be all over it.

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
  16. One question before I run out and buy it by bedouin · · Score: 3, Funny

    Can I sync it with my Dell DJ?

    1. Re:One question before I run out and buy it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course you can! All it takes is a serial cable, and a floppy with drivers for it.

  17. Re:some experts *believe* that it will be AT&T by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Verizon - No Buy.

    fixed it for you.

  18. Why Android? by Weezul · · Score: 2, Interesting

    An N900 running Maemo is way more fun.. and MeeGo will be more fun in the future.

    In fact, I see tremendous value in pushing the screen real-estate for phones, sure some people won't buy the bigger phone, but you might hit that optimal size for many people.

    That said, you'll never break into a larger screen size using only a virtual keyboard. Anyone who'll buy the oversized phone will require the real keyboard for more computer like functionality, like writing emails.

    --
    The Christian religion has been and still is the principal enemy of moral progress in the world. -- Bertrand Russell
    1. Re:Why Android? by beguyld · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That said, you'll never break into a larger screen size using only a virtual keyboard. Anyone who'll buy the oversized phone will require the real keyboard for more computer like functionality, like writing emails.

      Yeah, the iPad hasn't sold at all...

      There seem to be two camps. One who is happy with the 95% of what the iPad can do. And the other who is all pissed off that it isn't a full laptop. Maybe this is a new device category? (and there are ways to use a keyboard with an iPad, when needed; and that should work for similar Android/otherOS tablets as well)

    2. Re:Why Android? by Weezul · · Score: 1

      Oh my comment obviously doesn't apply in the presence of the Steve Jobs reality distortion field. :) I was only criticizing this particular tablet.

      --
      The Christian religion has been and still is the principal enemy of moral progress in the world. -- Bertrand Russell
  19. Ok then by Boarder2 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Looks ugly.
    Old customized version of Android. (have to wait for Dell to update it)
    Too big to comfortably fit in your pocket.
    Too small to use for an extended period of time.

    And people wonder why Apple is doing well.

    1. Re:Ok then by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Looks ugly.
      Old customized version of Android. (have to wait for Dell to update it)
      Too big to comfortably fit in your pocket.
      Too small to use for an extended period of time.

      Thanks for your comment, Goldilocks.

  20. Streak? by The+Grim+Reefer2 · · Score: 1

    Streak is a sharp-looking device with a black front and candy-apple red back that unfortunately shows fingerprints easily.

    Well at least it's name is somewhat descriptive.

  21. no physical keyboard by Weezul · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If you want a device that size, chances are you'll also what the physical keyboard, well otherwise your probably writing kanji.

    I'm also curious why people are attracted to Android. I've found that my N900 definitely has limitations, especially no printing. Yeah, I could always install cups and ghostscript just like Linux, but I'd need to micromanage the ghostscript driver installation, well plus the apps don't offer print buttons. How does printing work on Android?

    I'm also not terribly happy with x11vnc on the N900. It'd rock if my phone's screen would just pop up on my desktop, but x11vnc is unbearably slow over wifi, making only usb networking pleasent for sharing screens. I'm obviously very happy the N900 has pdflatex svn, git, and rsync, but I've only actually used rsync. Android must have an rsync implementation, but what about svn and git?

    Afaik, the N900's email program also lacks gpg integration. :(

    --
    The Christian religion has been and still is the principal enemy of moral progress in the world. -- Bertrand Russell
    1. Re:no physical keyboard by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I'm also curious why people are attracted to Android.

      Apps.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    2. Re:no physical keyboard by KlaymenDK · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm also curious why people are attracted to Android.

      Free and cross-platform development environment. Everything else requires either a Windows license, a Mac, or a considerable sign-up fee.

    3. Re:no physical keyboard by LBt1st · · Score: 1

      I've never had a need to print anything from my phone but taking a look on the Market there appears to be a couple free apps that allow you to print via wifi.

      I'm not familiar with the nix apps you mentioned but I see some remote desktop apps on the market as well.

      Basically, there's an app for anything you could want. And if it doesn't exist, it can be made without any hassle by big brother. That's what makes Android great.

    4. Re:no physical keyboard by Weezul · · Score: 2, Informative

      You could install cups and ghostscript on an N900 too, or just use an ssh script, but you've got no integration with the native apps for email, web, etc. Android doesn't offer that either.

      x11vnc is for interacting with the phone from the computer, which lets you carry out more involved tasks more quickly. It sadly doesn't hardly work over wifi, only usb networking.

      Subversion (svn) and CVS are centralized version control programs, while Mercurial (hg) and Git are distributed ones.

      TeX is the only typesetting system in the world suitable for preparing professional quality documents with any significant amount of mathematics. You'd never actually write a (La)TeX document on an Android device of course, but you might modify one.

      All these programs are not exactly trivial to reimplement in Java, although you could port them to the Android NDK, which might cost you portability among Android devices. I'd imagine Android remote desktop apps all sacrifice portability by using the NDK for speed, btw.

      --
      The Christian religion has been and still is the principal enemy of moral progress in the world. -- Bertrand Russell
    5. Re:no physical keyboard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Afaik, the N900's email program also lacks gpg integration. :(

      Uh, nobody should use GPG/PGP for email. It's a stupid nonstandard hack. I hate those gpg signature attachments in messages that no one can actually view.

      Use S/MIME. It's standardized and supported by everything.

  22. Open Source fails again! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    epic fail. fill up my pockets you bitches.

    love,

    steve jobs

  23. The correct size by symbolset · · Score: 1

    The correct size is "all sizes". That way if you need one in a particular size, there is one for it. Your question is like asking the right number of blades for a razor, the ideal horsepower for a truck. This is wrong thinking entirely.

    --
    Help stamp out iliturcy.
  24. *customized android version* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All i need to know. Move along folks... nothing to see here.

  25. Re:BP GOATSE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Man, you must be a dickhead.

    Anyway, peeps complain that 1024x600 netbook screen is too small for web page. How can justify 800 by 480? Stop insanity now!

    Y

  26. Re:They called it the streak? by Daengbo · · Score: 1

    Thanks for the laugh. I had that on 8 track in the 70s.

  27. 4.8" screen is perfect for me by dara · · Score: 1

    I have an iPhone now (after bailing on my G1 after a month) and I'm thinking of this type of large display phone when my contract is up this December. After using a 3.5" 3x2 screen, I can appreciate wanting a much larger one. Some have said the Dell is too big - it's too small to do real work on, but yet too big to fit comfortably in your pocket (or up to your head if you don't have bluetooth handy). This may be true, but the larger form factor (say a screen at least 4.7" - the Dell Streak was often quoted to have 4.8", but O2's sheet (http://www.o2.co.uk/dellstreak/dellstreakspec) says 5", anybody know the real answer? also, a 800x480 screen is not 16x9 unless the pixels are not square - is that the case?) does have its advantages when using onscreen keyboards or viewing maps, photos, or web content. My eyes just can't focus much closer than 10" anymore, so I appreciate a good angle of view at that distance. In the future, I hope these size devices can pump up the resolution - by the time you get to 4.7 to 5", it really is meaningful to go all the way to 720p (1280x720). The video camera of these devices will capture at that resolution and of course a lot of youtube content at 720p is available.

    The things that disappointment me on this phone are a) there is too much margin from the screen to the edge,b) it's kind of heavy, and c) Android 1.6. Assuming it is a 5", square pixel, 800x480 screen with case dimensions 153x79 mm, that results in borders of 11.5 mm on the sides and 27 mm top and bottom. My iPhone has 6 and 21 mm and I want to see this dropped to 5 and 12-15 (depending on how much of a constraint the mic and speaker are). I want a big screen, but I still want to get a slim profile in my pocket. It's nice they got the thickness down to 10 mm, but I'd rather take a 1 or 2 mm hit on thickness to shrink the other two dimensions. I suppose the big device with Gorilla glass had to weigh that much, but holding 220 g in my pocket might take some getting used to. Finally, the choice of a modded 1.6 OS is ridiculous. Just give me the stock Android already. I wish Google would market the advantages of using a standard stock OS (like easier updating) and more of the manufacturers would offer stock models. I'm not interested in any of modifications (regardless of the success HTC has supposedly had), the whole point of Android for me was to have companies differentiate themselves on hardware (like a PC), not on software.

    I hope they are many 4.7"+ devices available by the end of the year.

    1. Re:4.8" screen is perfect for me by wish+bot · · Score: 1

      Brilliant!

      At least they'll sell 1 of them!

      --
      lemonade was a popular drink and it still is
    2. Re:4.8" screen is perfect for me by wisdom_brewing · · Score: 1

      I thought the average device was 6.5"...

  28. FAIL by uvajed_ekil · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Hate to do this, but:
    1. Too big to be a good phone, too small and slow to be anything else.
    2. Resolution is no good for a "tablet."
    3. AT&T blows.
    4. Many people still hate touch-screen keyboards.
    5. Android 1.6. Are you serious? No, really. You are serious? Oh. Wow. And it's a non-standard version. M'kay.

    Haven't seen one yet, don't need to. The Streak will be another big brown streak for AT&T and Dell. FAIL

    --
    This is a hacked account, for which the owner can not be held responsible.
  29. Cool. by Hadlock · · Score: 1

    AT&T junk tends to work on Tmobile, so here's hoping. I am a big fan of physical keyboards, but I can live with a shitty onscreen keyboard if it's on a 5" screen. The fact that it supports voice over traditional cellphone networks is a plus too, for when I absolutely have to make or receive a phone call. I'm guessing Skype service is in the cards for this one. I think a 5.5" screen would have been better but it's a great start. $500 might be a little steep though, Dell. Drop it down to $350 or $400 and now we're talking. LCDs are cheap as hell and it's just a traditional android phone inside, there's no reason to jack the price up to iPad prices without an iPad OS to go along with it.

    --
    moox. for a new generation.
  30. Not a tablet, what bozos by gig · · Score: 1

    If you can hold the whole thing in one hand and fit it in a shirt pocket and it has a speaker at top and mic at bottom that is a phone. Sheesh.

    The stupidest part of them calling it a tablet is at $500 it costs more than an iPad, which has a bigger screen, more storage, glass and aluminum instead of plastic, twice or more bettery life, and much more sophisticated software, including native C apps. Why invite that comparison? If you just call it a phone you see its reason for being is for those who want a big nerdy phone.

    Android v1.6 ... classic!

    1. Re:Not a tablet, what bozos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know. Given those complaints. I would really hope Motorola gets the idea to come out with a tablet (separate from their normal phones), starting at around this size and having versions more like the size of the iPad (this size for phone, iPad more for normal tablets), with Android 2.2+ (preferably the straight Google interface), proper storage and battery, and a good processor (the Snapdragon 1.5Ghz dual core chip sounds perfect). And do it like they did the Droid. Much bigger and the physical keyboard starts not making so much sense built-in, unless they did it Laptop/Tablet PC style (have I missed someone trying that with Android yet?). Though a version with and a version without the physical keyboard sounds best. But that would wipe out pretty much all of those complaints. Never mind that it is possible to code native apps on Android. It just creates problems. And the Java is only going to be getting faster, to the point that it's not going to matter (JIT compiling, etc.; in 2.2 there's already a significant increase in speed there).

  31. android by blimartini · · Score: 1

    Of course We can not do it, because the file type is different/not match each other. Xtreme No

  32. "Too large for a phone"? by jaffray · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "Too large for a phone" is a matter of opinion. This is exactly the size of phone I've been waiting for. I want as large a screen as possible, without making it impossible to hold it to my ear for my (very occasional) voice calls, or conveniently carry it in a holster or (less often) a pocket.

    For me, a phone being tiny is of little value. Give me vast amounts of screen space, a large physical keyboard with hard keys with spacing and some travel distance, and a huge battery that won't run out even if I spend all day using it heavily in areas with poor signal. The Dell Streak isn't what I want, having only the screen space but not the physical keyboard and an unknown battery (and an obsolete OS), but the size? Perfect.

    "Not useful for serious business"? Depends on your business. Much of my business is coordinating employees via email and text message, keeping records in spreadsheets and simple text documents, and occasionally consulting and searching through previous emails and web-based resources. A smartphone with a 5" screen, a reasonable array of apps, and a keyboard that lets me do 50wpm, is just fine for this.

    Even my T-Mobile Sidekick was adequate for most of my business needs, despite the dubious browser and poor screen, thanks to the ultra-quick app switching and utterly fabulous hard keyboard unmatched by any other device. If Microsoft hadn't bought the platform, stripped it of development resources, and left it to die, I might still be using it.

    Sure, this large a phone isn't for everyone. But that's one of the lovely things about an open OS - you have choices in hardware. I'd rather use iPhone OS, it's a far smoother user experience, but where am I going to find an iPhone with a 4-5" screen? or a physical keyboard? or running on a carrier other than AT&T?

    1. Re:"Too large for a phone"? by wisdom_brewing · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'd rather use iPhone OS, it's a far smoother user experience, but where am I going to find an iPhone with a 4-5" screen? or a physical keyboard? or running on a carrier other than AT&T?

      China.

  33. Android 1.6 customizing by krischik · · Score: 1

    Sony Ericsson did that as well for there Android smart-phone: create a customised experience on top Android 1.6. Probably to create a “unique selling point”. When they where finished with tweaking the Donut everybody already had a 2nd Eclair ;-) . Sony at least promised everybody to supply Eclairs later in September :ROFL:

    I hope they learn the hard way that the best “unique selling point” is the having the new version ready at max one month after release day. In the mean time I have some Froyo on my Nexus-One.

    Martin

  34. 1.6 Dell UI? /groan by MrDoh! · · Score: 1

    Bah, was looking forward to this. For me, that form factor is fantastic.
    But 1.6 and a Dell 'experience' UI? Oh dear Dell.
    I'm not a fan of the soft-touch buttons either, prefer to have solid buttons to press for home/back. They're very fiddly on the NexusOne, the HTC Desire's button configuration is alot better.
    And the power button on the top near the camera? Hmm... Odd choice. Should be more obvious (unless you can configure the Camera button to power up!)
    In the breakdowns of the hardware, not seen where the Notification light is, that's odd (don't mind no trackball, I can't recall where I've used it).
    To try and get it to fit the tablet mode, it seems to want to /really/ force you to use it's Landscape mode, not Portrait. It makes their UI look better I supposed, but seems odd you don't get the option when it's still more phonelike than tablet. That feels...artificial?

    I really did want one, but I'll wait and see how long it takes to get 2.2, if it's longer than 3 months, I think I'll pass for now and wait for other solutions as I don't want to be beholden to Dell for other vital upgrade

    Dell /really/ needed to deploy standard Android 2.2 with this.

    --
    Waiting for an amusing sig.
  35. There is a T-Mobile version by zoid.com · · Score: 1

    There is a T-Mobile version according to the FCC filing.

    http://www.gadgetell.com/tech/comment/5-inch-dell-streak-to-hit-t-mobile/

  36. wah wah wah by VoiceOfRaisin · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    bah, youre all a bunch of crabby old men. almost everyone thats tried this device has fallen in love with it. the resolution is not low. i remember using 800x600 on a 14 inch monitor. this is gonna be very small pixels on this device. also it comes out at the end of july in north america with an android 2.2 update in september. thats less than 2 months to wait, not a big deal. it fits in a pants pocket. they made it as big as they could while still being pocketable. thats the magic size for me. the htc hd2 and evo have 4.3 inch screens, this has a 4.8 inch screen, only 0.5 inches bigger.

  37. Binding to a carrier, so pre 2k by geirlk · · Score: 1

    It's horrible how you have to change carrier to get the devices you want. A really bad , consumer unfriendly system were the carriers can walk all over you.

    The shitty thing is that some manufacturers try to import that bullshit system to Europe too (England has had it for long). I won't name names, but _APPLE_ eg. is one of those companies. You had to initially choose binding to one carrier up here in Norway, and a little later, you had the choice between the two biggest carriers.

    Most Norwegian prefer the voluntary binding to carriers, but with the option of bying the device without.

  38. Slashdot is pro-Apple by CrashandDie · · Score: 2, Funny

    Streak is a sharp-looking device with a black front and candy-apple red back that unfortunately shows fingerprints easily.

    Man, you can't have a single article about a mobile device on Slashdot without Apple being mentioned these days.

  39. What is the obsession with fingerprints? by Perp+Atuitie · · Score: 1

    Damn -- it's first concern in half the mobile-hardware reviews these days. Do these people actually turn the phone on or just hang it around their necks as jewelry? Wipe the scary prints off on your overpriced shirt awready.

  40. A simple question: by dragonhunter21 · · Score: 1

    Why haven't we seen an Android device that doesn't require a cellular network? Seriously, a standard-sized Android device with WiFi capability would be very good competition for the iPod Touch.

    --
    Sent from my CR-48
    1. Re:A simple question: by PipsqueakOnAP133 · · Score: 1

      Well, aside from the really lame marketing (stemcell? seriously, who thought of that one? lemme guess, it's supposed to sound like a handheld version of the IBM Cell?)

      http://www.zii.com/Developer/Landing.aspx

      There you go. The device itself actually looks decent, and if they kick their current marketing team out and hire a new one, it might have a chance.