Slashdot Mirror


Computex 2010 Tablet PC Round-Up With Video

MojoKid writes "At Computex 2010, devices like the Eee Pad and Eee Tablet were all the rage. Of course the bulk of these were Intel Atom-based systems, but there were a number of NVIDIA Tegra 2-based models in the mix as well. What is glaringly apparent on all of these tablets — and absent on the iPad — are the multitude of connectivity options built into them, like USB ports, flash card readers, and video output ports. Obviously, from a hardware perspective, the iPad is a sexy device; but Apple's true mastery is that of the user interface. The first big player that steps up with something competitive to Apple in that regard will have the pole position in 2010's race for the hot re-emergent tablet market." Reader Raikus adds an opinionated summary of winners and losers at "Tabletpalooza," i.e. Computex 2010.

174 comments

  1. Interesting quote from the summary by DJRumpy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I think it would be more accurate to say that Apple already has the pole position (no pun intended), and that any new competitors would be the runner up until proven otherwise.

    "The first big player that steps up with something competitive to Apple in that regard will have the pole position in 2010's race for the hot re-emergent tablet market."

    1. Re:Interesting quote from the summary by Mordok-DestroyerOfWo · · Score: 1

      I'd say the Android OS is on its way. The one thing I'd want to see is the manufactures not crippling the device. I'd prefer a vanilla version or one somewhat optimized for a tablet interface. I've been using the Ubuntu Netbook Remix on my netbook for a few months now and am fairly happy with it. Does anybody have an opinion on whether this option may be a little more prepared for "prime time" than Android?

      --
      "Never let your sense of morals prevent you from doing what is right" - Salvor Hardin
    2. Re:Interesting quote from the summary by FuckingNickName · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Is Windows purchased because it is technically the best, or because it has the best marketing team aimed at the target market?

      Ask yourself the same question about the iPad.

      All Apple's taught us is that it's possible to market something so well that even "I gotta be different, man!" geeks are taken in.

    3. Re:Interesting quote from the summary by Space+cowboy · · Score: 4, Informative

      Neither. It's mainly purchased due to a desire to conform to what the majority have, mainly for interoperability with others (work, gamers, ...). It's purchased because it has the majority of marketshare.

      It's tough to make the same claim when Apple went from zero phones in 2007 to what they have today, or the introduction of the iPad which again went from 0 to todays 2 million in a matter of weeks.

      Simon.

      --
      Physicists get Hadrons!
    4. Re:Interesting quote from the summary by MarkvW · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That's a ridiculously argumentative question based on a false dichotomy.

      I don't buy Windows because it's technically the best AND I don't buy it because it has the best marketing team. I buy Windows because it runs Adobe CS5 and Ableton, and because I am familiar with the Windows interface. Doubtless, other people buy Windows for different reasons.

      If your false dichotomy truly represented the only two reasons why people purchase Windows, open source systems would have no trouble displacing Windows.

      Fanboi is a modern synonym for eunuch.

    5. Re:Interesting quote from the summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm confused by the summary, myself. My iPad has a USB port -- albeit an unusual one -- and can do video output to an external display. Do those connectivity options not count because the USB port's shape is unusual, or because it doesn't have a flash card reader?

    6. Re:Interesting quote from the summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I think it would be more accurate to say that the competition doesn't have a chance in hell of catching the iPad - they don't have the infrastructure, the advertising budget (I estimate that the average person is now reminded to buy Apple products at least 10 times a day) or the customer base. But go ahead guys, knock yourself out. It'll give Apple a ton of new free publicity as review after review compares each pathetic new offering to the iPad.

    7. Re:Interesting quote from the summary by DJRumpy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes and no. In two years time, i'm sure some 'android' equivalent will establish itself as a real competitor, and it's fan's will claim that it is the best thing since sliced bread and that nothing Apple does is 'orignal' or 'new', all the while forgetting that their tablet probably has it's roots, and it's very existence based on an attempt to 'best the iPad'. The same is true for the iPhone and the current crop of Android devices.

      Simply creating a device is only half the challenge. You also have to do it well, which is where they tend to fall to the wayside.

    8. Re:Interesting quote from the summary by FuckingNickName · · Score: 3, Insightful

      or the introduction of the iPad which again went from 0 to todays 2 million in a matter of weeks.

      That's the best evidence of good marketing I've come across. It's an unproven device which few people had even seen, let alone had the chance to try out, yet preorders and early orders came in by the hundreds of thousands.

      People want to conform to a majority brand: the Apple brand offers social interoperability. No-one does real work on an Apple iDevice - they're for the guy in Starbucks always writing his first bestseller, taken mainstream. If you think you're the exception, you're on the spaceship with the management consultants (how I miss '70s and '80s Apple..).

    9. Re:Interesting quote from the summary by node+3 · · Score: 5, Funny

      That's the best evidence of good marketing I've come across. It's an unproven device which few people had even seen, let alone had the chance to try out, yet preorders and early orders came in by the hundreds of thousands.

      In stores, before you buy an iPad, you can try one. Even before the iPad was announced, you would have experience of the OS from the iPhone. And ultimately, you can return it, if it doesn't meet your expectations.

      There's absolutely no way whatsoever Apple's current success can have been achieved primarily by marketing. For marketing to work, long-term, you have to have a great product behind it.

      People want to conform to a majority brand: the Apple brand offers social interoperability.

      Apple had zero smartphones sold just three years ago. Now they have tens of millions. These people all bought iPhones because it was already a majority consumer brand?

      No-one does real work on an Apple iDevice - they're for the guy in Starbucks always writing his first bestseller, taken mainstream.

      I can guarantee you more "real work" is done on iOS than on Android OS. But it's a silly metric to use, unless you think that people should only own things that are used for "real work", or that the iPad is primarily targeted as a device for "real work".

      "Real work" (whatever that means) is still primarily the role of the PC (whether Windows or Mac). The iPad is useful to augment "real work", but isn't something that's yet set to replace the PC for that purpose. Which is why no one every says it should, outside of those that use it as a reason to put it down.

    10. Re:Interesting quote from the summary by node+3 · · Score: 1

      I'm confused by the summary, myself. My iPad has a USB port -- albeit an unusual one -- and can do video output to an external display. Do those connectivity options not count because the USB port's shape is unusual, or because it doesn't have a flash card reader?

      It does have a flash card reader. In fact, the iPad has all three things listed as omissions in the summary.

    11. Re:Interesting quote from the summary by Albanach · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I would imagine the vast majority of the 2 million were purchased by people who owned an iPhone or iPod Touch and therefore had a pretty good idea of what they were getting.

      It certainly wasn't as big an unknown as the first iPhone.

    12. Re:Interesting quote from the summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I just looked at the iPad specifications on apple.com and couldn't find any mention of an SD slot. Did I miss something?

      I'd really like to know if the iPad does indeed have an SD slot because that might make it worth having. I'm not talking about some kludgey dongle thing that will let me read SD cards, but an actual slot on the side.

    13. Re:Interesting quote from the summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The iPad is the new competitor here. Tablet PCs have existed for years. If anyone is the runner up, it's Apple.

    14. Re:Interesting quote from the summary by node+3 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I just looked at the iPad specifications on apple.com and couldn't find any mention of an SD slot. Did I miss something?

      Yes, but...

      I'd really like to know if the iPad does indeed have an SD slot because that might make it worth having. I'm not talking about some kludgey dongle thing that will let me read SD cards, but an actual slot on the side.

      It's an adaptor for the dock connector on the bottom of the iPad. It's very compact (much smaller than most USB SD readers). Being able to bring it with me on vacation to sync photos means I can leave my notebook at home, and to me that's *HUGE*.

      It's also very well integrated with the Photos app, including supporting RAW files, skipping already imported items, deleting from the card when you're done, syncing photos back to your PC, etc. Yes, these are all things one would expect from a properly done process, but on portables, "properly done process" isn't exactly something you can always count on being the case.

      But if you have an aversion to adapters, it's got that going against it. It seems a bit much to me to base the iPad's suitability on one very small adaptor, but to each his own.

    15. Re:Interesting quote from the summary by hitmark · · Score: 2, Insightful

      iphone piggy backed on itms and ipod, pretty much the same way windows piggy backed on dos and the invetment people had done there.

      --
      comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
    16. Re:Interesting quote from the summary by hitmark · · Score: 1

      and had a sizeable investment in itms and app store perhaps?

      --
      comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
    17. Re:Interesting quote from the summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apparently you hit a nerve. One would be hard pressed to argue that the inspiration for Android WASN'T the iPhone.

    18. Re:Interesting quote from the summary by Zerth · · Score: 1

      Apple had zero smartphones sold just three years ago. Now they have tens of millions. These people all bought iPhones because it was already a majority consumer brand?

      I won't say all of them did, but as a complete anecdote: the marketing head at my company recently requested an iPad to display documents and presentations to customers instead of paper or slides. It only has a 10" diagonal screen, so any real text will be marginally legible unless we reformat all our material to fit in nearly half the square inches and a fraction of the resolution.

      This is clearly not going to make his presentations more effective than a laptop, except for the "we're as awesome as those guys on the news who use an iPad instead of a written notes" factor

    19. Re:Interesting quote from the summary by Zerth · · Score: 1
    20. Re:Interesting quote from the summary by node+3 · · Score: 1

      That's just for MicroSD, which doesn't apply to most cameras. By going with SD and USB, they cover all the bases quite well. The SD adaptor is really quite small, google for "iPad camera connection kit" to get an idea. It's quite a bit smaller than a book of matches.

    21. Re:Interesting quote from the summary by greenguy · · Score: 2, Funny

      Apple already has the pole position (no pun intended)

      None taken.

      --
      What if I do the same thing, and I do get different results?
    22. Re:Interesting quote from the summary by node+3 · · Score: 1

      Apple had zero smartphones sold just three years ago. Now they have tens of millions. These people all bought iPhones because it was already a majority consumer brand?

      I won't say all of them did, but as a complete anecdote: the marketing head at my company recently requested an iPad to display documents and presentations to customers instead of paper or slides.

      So, you're saying this is indicative of the average (or even of a significant minority of) iPad buyer? If not, then it's not clear how this is relevant.

      It only has a 10" diagonal screen, so any real text will be marginally legible unless we reformat all our material to fit in nearly half the square inches and a fraction of the resolution.

      This is clearly not going to make his presentations more effective than a laptop, except for the "we're as awesome as those guys on the news who use an iPad instead of a written notes" factor

      Why would it be any less effective than a laptop? If it's a large meeting, he can connect it to the same projector he would connect the laptop to. If it's a small, more personal meeting, the iPad is likely to be quite a bit better suited than a laptop, since it's going to be easier to handle and even be passed around.

      I'm curious if you'd have promoted a netbook over an iPad for something like this, were it not for the blatant contradiction in that stance.

    23. Re:Interesting quote from the summary by dakameleon · · Score: 1

      Are you then going to say the iPod piggybacked on the iMac? How far back up the chain do you want to assign prime cause?

      --
      Man who leaps off cliff jumps to conclusion.
    24. Re:Interesting quote from the summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...It only has a 10" diagonal screen, so any real text will be marginally legible unless we reformat all our material to fit in nearly half the square inches and a fraction of the resolution.

      It's 1024 x 768, probably the most common slide projector resolution on the planet, and higher than many "full featured" netbook PCs.

      Oh, sorry, did I let technical details get in the way of your prejudice?

    25. Re:Interesting quote from the summary by node+3 · · Score: 1

      You do realize a device can have optional external components and adaptors, don't you?

    26. Re:Interesting quote from the summary by zmollusc · · Score: 1

      Can you connect an iPad to a projector? I didn't think it had much in the way of connectors.

      --
      They whose government reduces their essential liberties for temporary security, receive neither liberty nor security.
    27. Re:Interesting quote from the summary by UnxMully · · Score: 2, Informative

      Can you connect an iPad to a projector? I didn't think it had much in the way of connectors.

      There's an adaptor for an iPad to VGA connection - http://store.apple.com/uk/product/MC552ZM/A?fnode=MTc0MjU4NjE&mco=MTczMTA1MTE

    28. Re:Interesting quote from the summary by hairyfeet · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The iPod sold because the other PMPs at the time sucked ass or blew chunk, your choice. One thing I'll give old Steve credit for, he may be an asshole, but that man knows how to get a good UI designed. The players at the time had craploads of buttons, usually menus upon submenus, nothing at all was intuitive or was where you would expect it to be, frankly they all sucked.

      As for the other iDevices, never underestimate herd mentality. Sure they work great, nothing wrong with them that I know of, but when my 67 year old dad, who is about as clueless as they come and is about as "cutting edge" as a stone age hammer, says he is thinking about an iPhone cause some of his friends have them and they "look spiffy"? yeah, don't underestimate herd mentality or keeping up with the Joneses. On a positive note, I've been getting all his tech fad hand me downs since he got a Trash 80 when they were all over the TV, so if he wants to play with a new shiny, who am I to stop him? ;-)

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    29. Re:Interesting quote from the summary by PhilHibbs · · Score: 2, Insightful

      A combination of good marketing and a loyal fan base that know that they tend to like Apple products. One person's fanboi is another person's satisfied customer.

    30. Re:Interesting quote from the summary by LinuxAndLube · · Score: 1

      When rumours of the the Apple iPhone surfaced around the world, it was pre-selected as one of the biggest must-haves of 2007. When it became a reality, as soon as Apple set a release date, it was already sold-out. The first shipment of iPhones were gone before anyone had the chance to discern or decide whether it was worth the hundreds of dollars or not.

    31. Re:Interesting quote from the summary by capebretonsux · · Score: 1

      There's absolutely no way whatsoever Apple's current success can have been achieved primarily by marketing. For marketing to work, long-term, you have to have a great product behind it.

      Not necessarily. Apple has their 'loyal following', which would buy anything put out by Apple. Jobs et al could launch gold-plated dog turds emblazoned with apple logos and announce that it was a 'revolutionary, magical device that provides the best experience of holding down papers on our desks' and they'd still sell half a million units on launch day at a horribly inflated price. I'm not a die-hard apple hater, xbox 360 fandom suffers from the same problem. I personally know people who are on their third, fourth or fifth consoles, and while the failure rate has gone down, it's not what I would call a great product... unless I was the manufacturer I guess.

    32. Re:Interesting quote from the summary by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      I'd say it's not. 90% of all android tablets are "not upgradeable" or ship with a horribly out of date OS version. Android 1.5 or 1.6? Come on. No android app store..

      It might as well come with windows CE installed.

      Ship the dang thing with a current OS and get certification with Google to include the app store.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    33. Re:Interesting quote from the summary by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      at the time? I have tried 4 separate Android based tablets recently. They all STILL suck horribly. Battery life is good for the better ones, but they all STILL use a horribly out of date Android OS release with no plans to offer any upgrade.

      No thanks.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    34. Re:Interesting quote from the summary by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      It's an adaptor for the dock connector on the bottom of the iPad. It's very compact (much smaller than most USB SD readers). Being able to bring it with me on vacation to sync photos means I can leave my notebook at home, and to me that's *HUGE*.

      I dont understand that. I take 18 megapixel images, On "vacation" I take nearly 1000 photos. even the biggest flash sized ipad cant candle the photos I take. It's why I own a imagetank.

      Are you taking tiny 4 megapixel images, or only taking maybe a handful? then get a 8gig SDHC card and not worry about offloading.

      The ONLY use I can see a iPad for in photography is to look at the photos. and Honestly, I dont want to do that on vacation.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    35. Re:Interesting quote from the summary by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      I also use UNR on a netbook; but I don't think I'd use it on a tablet.

      Essentially, UNR is largely identical to desktop Ubuntu's take on Gnome(theme, default programs, etc.); but with a launcher and windowing defaults that make more sense on fairly low resolution screens. In my opinion, it does that reasonably well. However, the moment you actually hit any of the application buttons, you are right back in a (full screen) version of a standard desktop application.

      Experience has generally shown that desktop applications are fairly unpleasant for tablet use. Not impossible; but unpleasant. They tend to assume input at mouse-resolution, rather than capacitive-fingerpaint resolution, they tend to assume that keystrokes are highly efficient shortcuts, rather than necessary evils, and so forth. There are certain places where touch inputs make very useful adjuncts to the mouse and keyboard for desktop use. Most notably, your Wacom style touch devices, with their sensitivity to fine gradations in pressure, are quite good, even essential, for drawing. The low-end touchscreen stuff, often IR edge sensor based, available in a fair number of all-in-one desktops(HP seems to have started the fad, though others are doing it as well) isn't vital to much of anything; but you don't pay much extra for it, and being able to click on something by poking the screen isn't a bad thing, and can be useful for casual demoing purposes.

      For the purposes of smallish, keyboardless tablets, though, my money would be on Android, with its cellphone history, rather than UNR, which is basically a nice way of launching and window-managing desktop apps on small screens. For anything with a keyboard and a reasonably conventional pointing device, though, Android would seem more like a stunt than like a serious choice(with the possible exception of further development of the interesting demos that have been done of running Android applications as widgets on desktop Linux OSes).

    36. Re:Interesting quote from the summary by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Be aware, though, that(contrary to expectations developed in using PCs, including the OSX-running ones), iPad VGA out doesn't just automatically mirror the internal screen. Support is per-application, and at the application developer's sole discretion. Oh the sob stories from people planning to use the netflix app on a large screen...

    37. Re:Interesting quote from the summary by hitmark · · Score: 1

      no, ipod was a good product, tho it didnt really take of until itunes got ported to windows and the usb enabled model came about (the first model was firewire only, iirc).

      there had been HDD based mp3-players before, but i think they where all based on 2.5" drives, creatives being perhaps the best known. Small display, the size and shape of a CD player.

      thing is, with the ipod, nothing was really apple made except the outside design. the Firmware was third party, itunes was third party. To this day i am unsure what made it great tho, as it just seemed to show up on news pages and forums one day. Best guess, some star showed up with the white wires one day, and people wondered what it was all about.

      but heck, even microsoft got where they are thanks to a lucky break with IBM, and a contract that allowed them to sell their os to third parties (i suspect IBM never envisioned that compaq would get their clean room bios approved in court). End result, a market explosion as the IBM PC became a over night commodity, with MS-DOS providing compatibility with the whole range of software. Not really surprising that microsoft would bend over backwards to maintain compatibility and therefor market. Nor is it surprising that apple would leverage their ipod/itms market to get the iphone up and running, and later the ipad.

      --
      comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
    38. Re:Interesting quote from the summary by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      I think it would be more accurate to say that Apple already has the pole position (no pun intended),

      In your opinion. They have pole position of media hype - which came before the product was even announced. There are plenty of tablets, netbooks and other portable devices out there.

      On that note, I'm confused by TFS - it points out a flaw in the Ipad compared to all the other devices, yet then goes onto give an obligitary Slashvertisement praise about how the Ipad is allegedly the best (go on, give us an example of how the UI is much better than all other devices? Because that's not my experience when I use Quicktime, Itunes or an Ipod - e.g., the other day I tried playing video files on a computer from someone's Ipod, and I had no idea what was what, because the files were all scrambled. In the end I have up. On other devices, this sort of thing Just Works).

      and that any new competitors would be the runner up until proven otherwise.

      So it's Apple until proven otherwise? No, the burden is upon you to support your claim.

    39. Re:Interesting quote from the summary by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      Hear hear.

      And 10 years ago when the hype was on MS, Slashdot was a place to be sceptical of such market hype, and a place to discuss other (more open) systems.

      Now? It's Apple who are loved here, with people taken in by the marketing, far more so in the general public (e.g., the Iphone only has about 5% market share in general, similarly for Macs). It is funny to see people saying they "Think Different" whilst telling us that they're buying what they think everyone else is buying.

    40. Re:Interesting quote from the summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apple is selling millions of tablets every few weeks. Can any other tablet maker make that claim? What additional 'proof' do you require? You can't keep moving the goalpost due to your dislike of Apple. Love them or hate them, they have revived the 'Tablet'. The history of tablets over the last DECADE had them written off as a horrible failure and a dead technology, and it was also the opinion of most folks here on /.

      They indicated Apple would fail on this one simply because there was no need for a tablet (as history had already shown).

      The summary indicates the iPad is best because right now it outsells every other tablet on the market, and easily so since none of them were selling at all in any volume before the iPad and as far as I'm aware, none of them are selling anywhere near the iPad volume, even now.

    41. Re:Interesting quote from the summary by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      It's tough to make the same claim when Apple went from zero phones in 2007 to what they have today

      I don't see why the comment of "zero phones" is relevant. Three years is a long time in phone technology, and Apple were and are a billion dollar company, one of the largest technology companies around (bigger than Microsoft by value, by some measures).

      So the idea that Apple are some small startup who deserve a cookie for entering the phone market and getting to where they are (a whole 5% of the market, incidentally) is a myth.

      Microsoft started from zero too once.

      Anyhow, the claim was not about what people buy, but about the marketing. And the point you are missing is that Apple get that media coverage, even before it's what most people use (if that even ever happens). In the case of the Ipad, the large amounts of media coverage happened not only before it was released, but before it was even announced, for heaven's sake!

      or the introduction of the iPad which again went from 0 to todays 2 million in a matter of weeks.

      Another myth. I recall vast amounts of media hype and free advertising for a period of many months. It's simply that they only (finally, after years of hype - remember the Apple tablet news five years ago?) shipped the orders in the last few weeks.

    42. Re:Interesting quote from the summary by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      Simply look at the vendor-lock.

      When did it start?

      When you've got multimedia content that will only play on an Apple branded device, clearly there is frontloaded demand for another Apple device.

      It's much like MS-DOS. The moment you buy a single proprietary DOS/iTunes only product, you are forever locked into that platform unless you are willing to abandon that "investment".

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    43. Re:Interesting quote from the summary by FuckingNickName · · Score: 1

      There's such an obvious difference between a satisfied customer and a fanboy that it takes an Apple fanboy to blur it.

      I'm a satisfied customer of Microsoft as far as Windows 7 goes, but I am not "loyal" to Microsoft and I'm not a "fan"atic of the brand. If tomorrow they release another product, I'll wait and see and take advantage of any trials. Same applies to Apple. This simply doesn't fit in with pre-ordering or first month ordering frenzies.

    44. Re:Interesting quote from the summary by PhilHibbs · · Score: 1

      Well, I have an iPhone and I'm happy with it, but I don't think that makes me an Apple fanboy. Every time I use my brother's mac, I get annoyed with the user interface. I'm going to wait for the v2 iPad before deciding if I want one or not. I'm tempted by a v4 iPhone but I'll probably wait until next year, my 18-month-old 3G is enough for me.

    45. Re:Interesting quote from the summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's curious. Maybe the brits are just taciturn and/or stiff-upper-lipped; but the UK store link above has a tiny amount of feedback, all positive.

      Over at the US location the whiny Americans are letting Apple have it about this "feature"...

    46. Re:Interesting quote from the summary by Zerth · · Score: 1

      Perhaps s/he was being print-centric and meant a fraction of the resolution(dpi, not pixels) of paper. 600 dpi is a lot better than ~100 dpi.

      Somebody is a showing their bias.

    47. Re:Interesting quote from the summary by painandgreed · · Score: 1

      It's an unproven device which few people had even seen, let alone had the chance to try out,...

      What are you talking about? It is essentially a larger version of the iPod Touch or iPhone (without the phone part). It was generally accepted as what it was going to be as all indications and reviews showed that. While some people made fun of that, many of the people that preordered an iPad were probably like me and while browsing on their iPhone, thinking to themselves the entire time "Gee, I really wish I had a larger version of one of these."

    48. Re:Interesting quote from the summary by Zerth · · Score: 1

      So, you're saying this is indicative of the average (or even of a significant minority of) iPad buyer? If not, then it's not clear how this is relevant.

      I've heard similar gripes from people I know at other companies, but that isn't even 10 people so I wouldn't even claim there is a significant minority.

      Why would it be any less effective than a laptop? If it's a large meeting, he can connect it to the same projector he would connect the laptop to. If it's a small, more personal meeting, the iPad is likely to be quite a bit better suited than a laptop, since it's going to be easier to handle and even be passed around.

      The reviews of third party PDF apps I've generally complain that they are unresponsive and aren't 100% compatible. Perhaps the new PDF feature announced recently will work better. Passing it around would indeed be easier than a laptop, but I think having a paper copy that they can write on and take with them wins over anything.

      Unless everybody gets tablets, which would actually be kind of cool, but isn't likely to happen in my industry. Some of our clients still track multi-million unit inventories using index cards.

      I'm curious if you'd have promoted a netbook over an iPad for something like this, were it not for the blatant contradiction in that stance.

      I wouldn't have recommended a netbook, even one of those Asus convertibles, for much the same reasons. If he really wants something light, expensive and from Apple, I would honestly rather buy him a Macbook Air. It has a slightly better screen, although worse in terms of pixels per inch, but it is at least a functional computer. Mostly.

    49. Re:Interesting quote from the summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps s/he was being print-centric and meant a fraction of the resolution(dpi, not pixels) of paper. 600 dpi is a lot better than ~100 dpi.

      Somebody is a showing their bias.

      Yeah, I suppose that when the poster compared it to a laptop ("his is clearly not going to make his presentations more effective than a laptop...") I automatically assumed he or she meant a clamshell-folding type portable personal computer, not a stack of paper literally on top of the requestor's lap. And when he or she referred to "slides," I figured those to be an electronic slideshow presentation (eg. Microsoft PowerPoint, OpenOffice Impress) and not, you know, actual 35mm slides. (Not that those have much more detail than the electronic variety anyway.)

      Admittedly, my pro-technology geek bias seeping in, coupled with my expectation that everyone on Slashdot would be like-minded. Mea Culpa.

    50. Re:Interesting quote from the summary by vuffi_raa · · Score: 1

      The iPod sold because the other PMPs at the time sucked ass or blew chunk, your choice.

      I disagree- I loved the creative zen that I used far more than the ipod, archos had some nice options as well.

    51. Re:Interesting quote from the summary by RocketRabbit · · Score: 1

      Neither. At this point it is sheer momentum. Microsoft's marketing is inept and laughable, and technology wise it is far from the best solution.

      The ipad sells because in the past, tablets were thick, chunky, expensive, and have awful battery light. The ipad is thin, light, slick, and has excellent battery life. You can put a USB port on a pig but that doesn't mean you have accomplished anything useful.

      Intel tablets will fail, as the Atom sucks for low power applications. Windows tablets, therefore, will fail.

      Apple's marketing has nothing to do with their current uptake among the hardcore geek segment. That part is simply due to Apple having the best damn laptops, extremely powerful workstations, phones that aren't a joke, and a tablet that is literally the only thing on the market that isn't utter shit.

      Now the 14 year old girls who love apple, the soccer moms, they are victims of marketing. But your engineers and biologists and mathematicians use macs for totally different and very legitimate reasons.

    52. Re:Interesting quote from the summary by RocketRabbit · · Score: 1

      Who has multimedia content that will only play on apple devices?

      Are you talking about iTunes store? Because it's DRM free and has been for a while now.

      TV shows still have DRM but you can thank the media companies for that, not Apple.

      iTunes is a platform just like Netflix or any other media delivery platform. The only problem people have with Apple is that it's Apple.

    53. Re:Interesting quote from the summary by RocketRabbit · · Score: 1

      Android will be a competitor for sure, the same way they are now. Just as the Tata car is a competitor to Lexus.

      You walk into a store and they give you an incentive to buy the Android phone because they are cheap, a commodity now. A lot of people get it because it's cheap, not because it's any better.

      When Verizon starts giving out Android tablets "free" with their data plan, sure, people will snap them up. It'll be just as pathetic up against an iPad as the Android is against the iPhone, but subsidized purchasing from the cell networks by the shipload will ensure that there are quite a few of these devices out there.

    54. Re:Interesting quote from the summary by DJRumpy · · Score: 1

      I actually thing that Android has been great for the smartphone market and specifically on iPhone development. They are definitely having an impact on the iPhone, both in software features and possibly in hardware, although on the hardware front, it's arguable that these are pretty common advances and it would get those in any case.

      I do think that Android wouldn't exist today without iPhone, but folks would have to remember back a few years to recall just how horrible smart phones were in the first half of the decade. it was a game changer, and the interface and features on the first Droids were very close if not identical to Apple's (albeit not quite as polished). They did however improve on those features and have continued to do so. That and the fact that Android has a much larger hardware and vendor base will make them a strong competitor in the market and keep Apple on it's toes.

    55. Re:Interesting quote from the summary by RocketRabbit · · Score: 1

      "So it's Apple until proven otherwise? No, the burden is upon you to support your claim."

      An easy one for anybody to support.

      Apple tablet sales: huge, a million a month.

      All other tablets combined, maybe moving a few thousand per month.

      If you are somehow widening the competition for the iPad to "netbooks and other portable devices" you have missed the point. However, I doubt that a million netbooks of ANY other particular brand, make, or model were sold in April, whereas a million Apple branded iPads and about two million iPhones were sold.

      What you are saying is similar to this: "The Prius is not in the pole position for hybrids, because there are plenty of trucks, planes, and sailboats out there." "Oh and the only reason anybody drives a Prius is because of hype, not because it's superior to the competition in any way." Ignoring that the Prius is competing with other hybrids and small cars, not trucks and planes and boats, and ignoring the fact that yes, while the Prius is a hip car it's mainly successful because it actually offers good mileage too.

    56. Re:Interesting quote from the summary by RocketRabbit · · Score: 1

      "I actually thing that Android has been great for the smartphone market and specifically on iPhone development. They are definitely having an impact on the iPhone, both in software features and possibly in hardware, although on the hardware front, it's arguable that these are pretty common advances and it would get those in any case."

      I think the Android is certainly a smartphone of some description. However, I don't think it is really worthy of being called a true competitor. My neighbor's redneck buddy, who is totally computer stupid, just got an Android. I don't know if it was Verizon's fault or what, but despite the specs of the hardware which might lead you to believe it's somehow fast, it was slow as molasses. Half the time, if you rotate the phone, it will not tilt the display because it's gone modal and needs you to click a button or go back a screen. My neighbor himself works for an Apple reseller so of course has an iPhone, and we were using them side by side to do things like browse the web, make calls, add contacts, and etc. Apple was, in every instance, much easier to use and much prettier to look at.

      I wish the Android the best, if only to make Apple open up the iOS a bit more, but I think somehow as long as Google lets the networks fuck up their individual Android phones, neutering features and making it look and run like shit, they will be a poor second.

      "I do think that Android wouldn't exist today without iPhone, but folks would have to remember back a few years to recall just how horrible smart phones were in the first half of the decade. it was a game changer, and the interface and features on the first Droids were very close if not identical to Apple's (albeit not quite as polished). They did however improve on those features and have continued to do so. That and the fact that Android has a much larger hardware and vendor base will make them a strong competitor in the market and keep Apple on it's toes."

      Well I think you are right about this. Apple has changed the game a few times over the last 30 years, maybe more than anybody else in the business. When they do something, the whole herd also does it, or gets as close as legally possible. Apple does work to stay ahead of the herd, and sometimes looks a bit awkward doing it. I think that iOS is an answer to the Android's multitasking abilities, and also a wink and a nod admission from Steve Jobs that he does have to watch his ass.

      I have my beefs with Apple on several subjects, but I don't think I know anybody who has a Mac or an iPhone or an iPad who thought they spent too much money and felt ripped off. This is Apple's main power - customer satisfaction.

    57. Re:Interesting quote from the summary by hrimhari · · Score: 1

      Not to defend Apple or the iPad, but:

      If he really wants something light, expensive and from Apple, I would honestly rather buy him a Macbook Air.

      How does the expensive part apply to this thread? Last time I checked, the iPad compared to netbooks in price, that is, below the $ 500.

      --
      http://dilbert.com/2010-12-13
    58. Re:Interesting quote from the summary by node+3 · · Score: 1

      The situation is identical on Android. Apps can support it, but don't automatically support it.

      And Netflix does support external displays on iPad.

    59. Re:Interesting quote from the summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      eunuch? You got some sex problems and you'd like us to talk about it here?

    60. Re:Interesting quote from the summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      An iPad starts at $499. Considering an equally priced netbook would have twice the processor and a battery you can remove, that is "comparably" under $500 in the same sense that Bea Arthur and Jeri Ryan are both younger than Betty White.

      And Jeri Ryan is not the iPad in that comparison.

    61. Re:Interesting quote from the summary by jon3k · · Score: 1

      And then people will remember the iPhone was based on blackberry and microsofts windows mobile.

      You .. didn't forget ... did you?

    62. Re:Interesting quote from the summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think so since neither had a touch screen at the time.

  2. iPhad; hardware is sexy? by hhedeshian · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Obviously, from a shiny perspective, the iPad is a sexy device; but Apple's true mastery is that of the lack of a user interface.

    Fixed that for ya.

    1. There is nothing sexy about a crippled CPU with no connectivity.

    2. People can't handle choices. If you give them a device with only a few buttons, then it's like a microwave and they're happy.

    1. Re:iPhad; hardware is sexy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Obviously, from a shiny perspective, the iPad is a new device; but Apple's true mastery is that of the lack of a user interface.

      In what way is an inanimate piece of plastic sexy? It's only advantage is that it does a few tasks adequately.
      Everything it does, there is a device that does it better, just not all in one shiny white idiot-proof case.

      Anyone know if these have external moisture sensors on them too?

    2. Re:iPhad; hardware is sexy? by gyrogeerloose · · Score: 1

      There must be something sexy about the iPad hardware since all the tablet computers shown on the page linked to in the summary look pretty much identical to one.

      --
      This ain't rocket surgery.
    3. Re:iPhad; hardware is sexy? by TinBromide · · Score: 3, Interesting

      ditto, the average person wants something that he can poke at and make work. If it's as simple as the interface that biologists provide monkeys in research cells, all the better. He wants to poke at the red square and get a treat, or when he wants other treat, poke at the blue one. Uneducated users are afraid of the unknown, and software that they would have to test and use themselves to determine the quality of is well beyond their knowledge base (unknown = bad). Unless something has been vetted through nerds (us) who have the knowledge and expertise to know quality, OR everybody and their mother uses it, it's unknown and only potentially not ungood.

      Unfortunately, until some manufacturer comes out with something that is simple (red square = treat) and as good (face it, the iphone/ipad is quality-ish hardware and its interface does work), the apple products will continue. Just because it lacks a few features that 75% of the population doesn't use (only we wish that we could hook up a keyboard or mouse, everyone will continue to be happy jabbing at the screen instead of jabbing at a keyboard), doesn't mean that something that you can be more productive on will dethrone it.

      --
      Is it sad that I am more likely to recognize you and your posts by your sig than your name or UID?
    4. Re:iPhad; hardware is sexy? by click2005 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There are only so many things you can do with a tablet form factor.
      Other than a button or two and some ports, they're all going to look more or less the same.

      --
      I am a free slashdotter. I will not be modded, blogged, DRM'd, patented, podcasted or RFID'd. My life is my own.
    5. Re:iPhad; hardware is sexy? by hondo77 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      1. There is nothing sexy about a crippled CPU with no connectivity.

      Internet connectivity not enough for you? Are you holding out for wormhole connectivity?

      --
      I live ze unknown. I love ze unknown. I am ze unknown.
    6. Re:iPhad; hardware is sexy? by PIPBoy3000 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      For the majority of consumers, the biggest thing you can do with a tablet form factor is to drop the price.

    7. Re:iPhad; hardware is sexy? by gyrogeerloose · · Score: 1

      There are only so many things you can do with a tablet form factor.

      That is true to a certain extent but there is still room for innovation or, at least, variation. The iPad is a slick bit of industrial design, but that doesn't mean someone couldn't come up with a different design that would work as well or maybe even better. When you look at the photos of these hopeful competitors, however, it's pretty obvious that they're all pretty much iPad clones.

      --
      This ain't rocket surgery.
    8. Re:iPhad; hardware is sexy? by gyrogeerloose · · Score: 3, Informative

      only we wish that we could hook up a keyboard or mouse

      You can connect an iPod to a keyboard--either Apple's own unit or any standard Bluetooth keyboard will work. No joy on a mouse, though. The touch interface doesn't support one.

      --
      This ain't rocket surgery.
    9. Re:iPhad; hardware is sexy? by hondo77 · · Score: 1

      ...only we wish that we could hook up a keyboard or mouse...

      I don't think you're getting it. If you want a mouse AND a keyboard, get a laptop. The iPad isn't a laptop. It really is not meant to do everything a laptop can do. That doesn't make it bad, lame, or crippled. It's just not a laptop.

      --
      I live ze unknown. I love ze unknown. I am ze unknown.
    10. Re:iPhad; hardware is sexy? by darthdavid · · Score: 1

      I don't much like the iPad, but you do know that you can in fact hook it up to a keyboard, right?

    11. Re:iPhad; hardware is sexy? by westlake · · Score: 1

      Fixed that for ya.
      1. There is nothing sexy about a crippled CPU with no connectivity.
        2. People can't handle choices. If you give them a device with only a few buttons, then it's like a microwave and they're happy.


      These are - by definition - mobile devices.

      When you are on the road with your kids, what you want is a reliable cell phone, a GPS that delivers clear and accurate directions. The pocketable still or video camera, Perhaps a book to read, some music, movies or games to help pass the time.

      You are looking for an escape from the keyboard and cubicle.

       

    12. Re:iPhad; hardware is sexy? by Concerned+Onlooker · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No, people CAN handle choices. And they're choosing the iPad.

      --
      http://www.rootstrikers.org/
    13. Re:iPhad; hardware is sexy? by DinDaddy · · Score: 1

      I see this argument a lot in defense of other mfrs copying Apple designs. While it certainly has some validity, I wonder, can anyone find an example of a tablet released before the iPad that looks nearly as much like it as these do?

    14. Re:iPhad; hardware is sexy? by hitmark · · Score: 1

      lets not forget that the iphone ads are basically show and tell videos of how to do different things with the built in features.

      --
      comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
    15. Re:iPhad; hardware is sexy? by TinBromide · · Score: 1

      lets not forget that the iphone ads are basically show and tell videos of how to do different things with the built in features.

      Though you have to admit, those are the best ways to advertise. Granted the iphone isn't as fast as the commercials, but it's displaying real world features that are usable by everyone. I actually like those show-and-tell ads more than the ones that were outright lies (The whole internet, not the... etc. But they didn't tell you that flash didn't work, that you couldn't get 3g, a feature firmly established in previous generation smartphones, and that certain sites would pick up on the iphone and show you mobile sites that are different from desktop "internet") because they demonstrate the product. It's better than those snuggy commercials ("Are you too retarded to operate a phone when covered with a blanket?").

      --
      Is it sad that I am more likely to recognize you and your posts by your sig than your name or UID?
    16. Re:iPhad; hardware is sexy? by phorest · · Score: 1

      What I've been using for the last FIVE years. The form-factor can't really be much different.

      --
      God: When you do things right, people won't be sure you've done anything at all.
    17. Re:iPhad; hardware is sexy? by suomynonAyletamitlU · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Wow, a blatant troll at +3 insightful. Well, I suppose it only takes a handful of mods.

      1. There is nothing sexy about a crippled CPU with no connectivity.

      There is something intriguing, and perhaps sexy from the right viewpoint, about a device that responds instantly and smoothly to your input, and which has consumer-level (finished) applications that look gorgeous. A device that was nothing but "shiny" would have no, or few, practical applications, and any consumer level app is or can be considered a "practical application"--it's something you would pay money to do, use, or have. Or, well, not any, I guess, but I think the size of the market supposes pretty clearly, if only by sheer virtue of statistics, that there are in fact practical applications for it.

      2. People can't handle choices. If you give them a device with only a few buttons, then it's like a microwave and they're happy.

      I disagree with your oversimplification. A platform like Windows or Linux allows anyone who develops applications to say, "You need to be this geeky to install and use this application." This is by far one of the most straightforward, and yet it is somehow one of the most hotly debated, reversals of the iOS: they do not allow you to jump through hoops in order to get extra functionality, which means that the programmers either have to begrudgingly improve their GUI skills or limit functionality altogether.

      The reason is simple--the people they're marketing to will go cross-eyed if you talk to them about a topic they would need to study for months or years to understand at the same level you would, and believe it or not, computers and programming are such a topic. If your life is already computer-centric, understanding computers is no big deal. If your life is centered around construction work, business deals, hair salons, clothing design, or any of the other (completely fucking legitimate) career paths out there, saying "You have to spend months learning computers before this $500 tablet and this particular $2 application become useful to you" is going to lose you customers.

      If instead you tell those same customers, "We promise we won't let the programmers do anything that's going to confuse the crap out of you, for instance, try this $2 app that you can start using right away! And there are more that are just as easy!" you now have a customer, and probably more on the way

      I mean, in some ways I feel you. I've been a computer user literally longer than I can remember, and the idea of having a tablet that can also have cron jobs and shell scripts running in the background is delicious. But no, dude, don't yell at the Norms for being Normal. Give it a year or two and there will be some kind of really excellent Linux tablet that does everything a geek could ever want. You don't have to try to turn this one into that miracle product. Just let it be.

    18. Re:iPhad; hardware is sexy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Before the iPad came along there was no "tablet" that looked remotely like the iPad.
      Take a look at Microsoft's Courier or HP's Slate. Want to bet that they'll both mimic Apple's designs in their future products?
      Same thing happened with the iPod and the iPhone.

    19. Re:iPhad; hardware is sexy? by zmollusc · · Score: 1

      Just to pick up on your point of 'a device that responds instantly and smoothly to your input', I have seen video of iPads and iPhones and they don't seem to respond instantly, they have zooming and sliding and all the other crap that I switch off on desktop machines. Can this crap be disabled on iPhone/iPad?

      --
      They whose government reduces their essential liberties for temporary security, receive neither liberty nor security.
    20. Re:iPhad; hardware is sexy? by jo_ham · · Score: 2, Informative

      No, but it's not as obtrusive as you might think, but it may put some people off. The different pages of apps on your home screens slide sideways when you swipe your finger, but they move as fast as your finger does; so if you do a demo you can do it slowly. If you are using the phone day to day you swipe without thinking and it happens rapidly, but enough that you can see what it is doing (better feedback than just instantly blinking to the next page).

      The zoom happens when you start an app, and this is really there to cover the load time I think. On my 3G some of the bigger apps are still loading after the zoom finishes.

      From using it day to day there's no extra animation beyond UI feedback - for example, icons don't swirl around like some fancy vortex when you press them just to look pretty. Every animation is specific to give you feedback on your input. That's the smoothness - the rate at which a list scrolls is entirely down to you. A couple of quick flicks and it whizzes past but stops instantly if you touch your finger down again.

    21. Re:iPhad; hardware is sexy? by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      2. People can't handle choices. If you give them a device with only a few buttons, then it's like a microwave and they're happy.

      AMERICANS cant handle choices. Go to Japan, they have some great devices that let you do a lot. Those products don't come here because Japanese designers are certain that Americans are "dumb".

      I'm not trolling, this is a REAL perspective of Japanese manufacturers about american consumers.

      The BEST DVD recorder I ever bought was a JVC that was available in Japan only. IT even allowed me to adjust the menus and had a DV deck in it that transferred the video from DV to the DVD-R with an edit list, plus let me capture frames for backgrounds and enter text for menus.... It was NEVER available in the USA.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    22. Re:iPhad; hardware is sexy? by hitmark · · Score: 1

      yea, they make sense. It just irks me when people claim the iphone and so on are "discoverable" or whatever the word is, when apple keep running those ads.

      but then much of what we label as common sense is more accepted "truths" picked up by way of observing other humans in action than anything really "common". I guess we all remember what we want to remember.

      --
      comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
    23. Re:iPhad; hardware is sexy? by jedidiah · · Score: 3, Insightful

      > There must be something sexy about the iPad hardware since all the tablet computers shown on the page linked to in the summary look pretty much identical to one.

      There's plenty you could do to bring a tablet into the 21st century and still leave it looking pretty similar to an iPad.

      1) USB port
      2) SD card port
      3) HDMI port

      4) Decent CPU

      5) Respectable GPU

      6) Correct screen geometry for video

      7) Some means of accomodating an external hard drive.

      8) An internal hard drive.

      9) non-crippled OS

      10) Allow for multiple "app" vendors.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    24. Re:iPhad; hardware is sexy? by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      There's no good reason that a tablet couldn't start acting more like a desktop once a mouse and keyboard are plugged in.

      Walk around, use it as a tablet. Then sit it down and dock it and actually start touch typing with it like a real computer.

      There are lots of interesting possibilities if you aren't treating it as a pregnant ipod. This stuff doesn't even have to annoy the n00b in order for it to be available to the rest of us. If anything, the OpenStep version of MacOS readily demonstrates that.

      You simply don't have to create a garden of pure ideology in order to suit the n00bs. The idea that you have to is just self-serving rhetoric from the corporate overlords.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    25. Re:iPhad; hardware is sexy? by jedidiah · · Score: 2, Insightful

      >> 1. There is nothing sexy about a crippled CPU with no connectivity.
      >
      > Internet connectivity not enough for you? Are you holding out for wormhole connectivity?

      No it isn't. I would like to be able to connect to my own home network. I want to print without any stupid hacks. I want to be able to save stuff and to read stuff that I have stored on other computers. I don't want to be limited to Apple-only standards and incomplete 3rd party tools. I don't want to have to deal with some lame app that looks like it's still stuck in the 90s to manage my files.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    26. Re:iPhad; hardware is sexy? by gyrogeerloose · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      You missed my point entirely, and apparently willfully, in order to complain about things you don't like about the iPad.

      --
      This ain't rocket surgery.
    27. Re:iPhad; hardware is sexy? by jedidiah · · Score: 2, Insightful

      > I disagree with your oversimplification. A platform like Windows or Linux allows anyone who
      > develops applications to say, "You need to be this geeky to install and use this application."

      Nope. That's total, mindless, foaming at the mouth, cult following FUD.

      Windows installs have never been terribly complex.

      Linux uses an installation method that strangely resembles the App Store.

      The idea that installing new stuff on a general purpose machine must be hard even
      when that machine is a Unix machine with the training wheels sawed off is a fallacy
      from the last century.

      It's time to update the FUD.

      I install VLC on Macs not because it is "free software" but because it is the simpler
      option when compared to dealing with the prospect of augmenting the designated built-in
      OS level service. Apple has no "midas touch" by any stretch of the imagination.

      The iPad doesn't even "limit choice" really. It just limits certain choices that might
      be inconvenient for the platform vendor. This is more like Microsoft might have run amok
      in the 90s then some sort of improved user experience.

      The iPad is Microsoft's monopoly wet dream.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    28. Re:iPhad; hardware is sexy? by suomynonAyletamitlU · · Score: 1

      Again, I know you're trolling, but ffs. There are different levels of geekery needed at different levels of technical requirement, and sometimes, you may not even know you're moving up to the next bracket where things are going to get geekier.

      Not every program developed for windows comes with a fully packaged installer, and programs from previous versions have problems like missing dlls, compatibility requirements, or just out-of-the-box, unfixable failure.

      Linux takes this steps upon steps further when you come across programs that need to be built--and luckily most come with sane build scripts, but I've run across a "program" that was "distributed" as a flat source file before.

      In both cases these are supposed to be things you can do with your computer. You go looking for a program that does what you want, and if you come across this kind of trouble, you either get geeky or get frustrated. They tend to be niche things, but that's why I said, "programmers are allowed to require a certain level of geekiness to get increased functionality". Of course, and obviously, most standard functions will work, barring technical faults or viruses.

      And viruses do come up on Windows, and could easily come up more often on Linux. Knowing not to open install packages from shady sources is another "geeky" thing, as is knowing how to operate your antivirus, as are almost all other security concerns--including file backup. Trying to salvage files for someone who didn't know they needed to backup is the family geek's nightmare.

      But if something goes seriously wrong with your iOS device, such that it isn't working right anymore, you have pretty much three options: wipe the disk and restore from backup with iTunes (done during syncing every day), take it to the store and have them give you a brand new one under warranty (then restore your files automatically with iTunes), or just buy a new one (then restore your files automatically with iTunes). There is no, and will never be any, "call the local geek and feel like a complete moron while he says how simple the problem is and does a million complex things" option.

      Further, to your 'cult-following FUD' declaration: in my entire life I've owned one apple product, and it's neither an iPad nor an iPhone, but the iTouch, which has the lesser qualities of both--small screen and no phone or GPS. It's a decent device and I like it, but I'd need something substantially cooler before I was willing to join ANY tech cult. And, frankly, I'm hoping for that to be an Android device anyway; seems cooler to me.

      Unfortunately for you, that doesn't stop me from thinking, or from being able to clearly state what is wrong with stupid arguments like yours.

    29. Re:iPhad; hardware is sexy? by illumin8 · · Score: 1

      2. People can't handle choices. If you give them a device with only a few buttons, then it's like a microwave and they're happy.

      I can just imagine the design meeting for the iPad:

      Steve Jobs: You know how when we first introduced the Mac, we said we wanted a mouse with just one button?

      Jonnie Ives: Sure, we're still making them with one button...

      Jobs: Well, the PC guys came out with their 2 button, then 3 button, then 4 and 5 button mice, but we just stuck to our guns because we know that most computer users can't figure out how to use a mouse with more than one button.

      Ives: Yeah, and despite 25 years of GUI development, you're right, they still can't figure it out.

      Jobs: I've got a new project for you - We're going to build [cue dramatic music - duh! duh! duh!]

      A one button computer!

      --
      "When the president does it, that means it's not illegal." - Richard M. Nixon
    30. Re:iPhad; hardware is sexy? by illumin8 · · Score: 1

      No joy on a mouse, though. The touch interface doesn't support one.

      Check this out if you want to see an iPad controlled by a mouse.

      The mouse support code is there, it's just disabled by default. It is a little half-baked however, since drag scrolling is the opposite behavior of most mouse users (dragging up to scroll down). My guess is that Apple is working on it for a future release of iOS, but, just like copy and paste, doesn't want to release it until it works well.

      --
      "When the president does it, that means it's not illegal." - Richard M. Nixon
    31. Re:iPhad; hardware is sexy? by zmollusc · · Score: 1

      Ah, thank you. It sounds better than other touchscreens i have used.

      --
      They whose government reduces their essential liberties for temporary security, receive neither liberty nor security.
    32. Re:iPhad; hardware is sexy? by Geeky · · Score: 1

      I've been a computer user literally longer than I can remember, and the idea of having a tablet that can also have cron jobs and shell scripts running in the background is delicious. But no, dude, don't yell at the Norms for being Normal. Give it a year or two and there will be some kind of really excellent Linux tablet that does everything a geek could ever want. You don't have to try to turn this one into that miracle product. Just let it be.

      If HP do a WebOS tablet and leave it as open as the Pre phone, that'll be it. The Pre runs linux, you can get root on it with a really simple procedure and cron is available.

      --
      Sigs are so 1990s. No way would I be seen dead with one.
    33. Re:iPhad; hardware is sexy? by gyrogeerloose · · Score: 1

      Interesting, thanks, although I wonder if Apple is really working on it or if it's just legacy stuff they haven't removed.

      --
      This ain't rocket surgery.
    34. Re:iPhad; hardware is sexy? by RocketRabbit · · Score: 1

      Yes, but your Viewsonic is nothing like the ipad. The Viewsonic is a thick, chunky vnc client that gets maybe 6 hours of battery life at idle.

      The ipad gets 10 minimum, and that's watching HD video. I bought one and tested it out for my use case, which involves PDF reading, web browsing, a bit of ssh, and playing go, and I can get about 30 hours out of the ipad. Considering that this is all I do most of the time when I take my laptop with me, and that I can reach my desktop with vnc or ssh if I find I need to do some real computing, this is a boon.

      I can't seriously believe that you think that using Windows from a pen-based portable screen is somehow anything like using an ipad, which of course does everything the Viewsonic does, and a hell of a lot more, and does it a hell of a lot better. Could you stretch any farther? I mean, will you suggest that a television does everything a computer does?

    35. Re:iPhad; hardware is sexy? by RocketRabbit · · Score: 1

      As another poster has said, the GUI zooming and scrolling and sliding is actually there to inform you about what you are doing. If you put your finger down and swipe it on the home screen, you can see the one page of app icons slide off at the same speed. If, mid-swipe, you decide you really didn't want to go to the next screen, you don't need to stop, let the next screen load, and then hit another button or actuate the scroll bar.

      The swipe is much like a scroll bar, however the active size of the bar is the whole screen and the bar has the screen contents inside it.

      I think the ipad is nice for a lot of people who may not like computers in general because they are often quite obtuse about what is going on. Controls are placed on the screen on a computer, given cryptic icons, and the user who has little experience is fucked. The ipad shows the user what is happening when they do something, and lets them know their actions are having an effect. Without the cryptic icons and widgets that are basically learned ad-hoc in a sort of memetic fashion, things happen in a natural way that allows people to explore and use the computer with feedback showing them what their actions will do.

      Of course, hovering tooltips provide information these days, if the developer chooses to use the well, but I think more natural interaction is just progress of a good sort.

    36. Re:iPhad; hardware is sexy? by phorest · · Score: 1

      I'm glad someone has created an improvement. Your points are valid though I have been using a tablet for FIVE YEARS. The Ipad is neither new -or- magical, just different. The viewsonic has a consumer replaceable battery. TWO USB ports (Keyboard & Mouse), a speaker (lame-one at that) and separate mic & speaker outs. Sadly, no camera but I realize time marches on and I wondered what was taking so long for an actual tablet to get wide-market acceptance. It's still great for browsing the web while I chill and watch TV for the 2 hours a night. When I am done, I put it in the dock to recharge it. The battery life issue does not affect me. I simply cannot wait to replace the Viewsonic tablet with something else. Not necessarily Apple...Most likely not...

      --
      God: When you do things right, people won't be sure you've done anything at all.
    37. Re:iPhad; hardware is sexy? by RocketRabbit · · Score: 1

      The trick with the ipad is not just its physical form factor. It's the package, software and hardware. People would not be lining up to use Windows over RDP on the iPad if that were what it ran for its software component, even if it was half as thick and had twenty times the battery it has now.

      Windows over RDP may be a solution for you, but that totally negates any benefit of having a nice small touchscreen device as you need a stylus to poke at UI nubbins. Meanwhile on the ipad i'm tilting and rotating and using my hand to enlarge or shrink stuff.

    38. Re:iPhad; hardware is sexy? by Dog-Cow · · Score: 1

      That has nothing to do with network connectivity.

  3. Maybe so by osgeek · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The first big player that steps up with something competitive to Apple in that regard

    Haven't prognosticators been saying this exact same thing for years about the iPod and the iTunes store?

    The song goes something like this: "We've got hardware! It's got MIPS and ports and pixels and gigabytes! All we need now is easy to use software. See that word 'easy'? That must mean it's EASY to build."

    As a geek, I'm not interested in an iPad because it's missing hardware options, but to the regular consumer the shiny, easy, hip user experience is everything.

    1. Re:Maybe so by ducomputergeek · · Score: 1

      I like my iPad because it is missing hardware options. I spent too many years in the day job getting hardware A talking to hardware B with Software X on 2 - 3 different Operating systems. After a decade of that I'm to the point where lack of hardware options is kind of a feature. I got rid of my MacBook Pro and went to a iPad 3G as all I do these days is email, skype (chat mostly), and write proposals and do some web surfing. The only thing I wanted was the ability to attach a keyboard and the apple wireless keyboard I use with the Mac Mini attached to the TV works great. Even then I went ahead and got two docking stations, one for the office and one for the house. And if I want to take it to the coffee shop, it's just as portable even if I bring the bluetooth keyboard as the 12" PowerBook it originally was going to replace and ended up replacing my MacBook Pro as well.

      --
      "The problem with socialism is eventually you run out of other people's money" - Thatcher.
    2. Re:Maybe so by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      > I like my iPad because it is missing hardware options.

      Yes. Like printing.

      If you don't want to print, you can just limit yourself. You don't need to be led by the nose. You can create your own "walled garden". You don't need Apple to build it for you.

      OTOH, if you finally decide you want to print something on the self-limited device you won't end up with bad hacks and kludges just to do something that should be a basic part of any OS.

      Apple really has taken castration to a new level.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    3. Re:Maybe so by Dog-Cow · · Score: 1

      I'd say that one day you will realize that the iPad is not intended to be a general purpose computer, even if the included hardware is capable of being used as such. But then I remember that I'm on slashdot, the home of self-involved assholes who think that if a product doesn't match their desires that it is fundamentally flawed and that anyone who likes it must be mentally challenged.

      You can print from an iPad, or you can move the material to a PC and print from there. Apple starts with limited capabilities and adds new features as users make their desires clear and as usage patterns emerge that make sense to Apple. I am sure printing will debut as an iOS framework sometime in the next few versions.

  4. As to gui and inputs/outputs by AHuxley · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Seems to come back to a view of the world at this time.
    Apples sees it as a pure content delivery device with lock down and photo usb as an afterthought.
    Windows was the same with sound, video drm ect.
    Your just renting time and buying products on their devices.
    I hope other devices have real computer like support.
    Webcam to flash to a webpage in real time, tethering, telco options, real software and media options to fit your life, not just fill Apples coffers.
    Someone needs to do I am a "Ipad" and I am a Table pc" parody.
    Have some fun with how limited, expensive and locked down push-centric devices are.

    --
    Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  5. 2010 Roundup? by Bysshe · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Considering its only June, its hard to do a comprehensive 2010 roundup.

    --
    Read what I mean, not what I wrote.
    1. Re:2010 Roundup? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      What part of "Computex 2010" don't you get?

  6. So what makes a tablet? by BearRanger · · Score: 1, Interesting

    TFA talks about additional ports and card slots. Are those defining characteristics? Whether they are or not, what they symbolize is an extension of the PC-centric model of computing that the iPad does not. Many people have said, and I agree, that the iPad is a computing appliance and not a true computer. That's actually its greatest strength. In the sense that Apple has created a market for tablet devices these potential competitors are misreading that market if we see a slew of Windows 7 tablet computers come out of this. Android tablets may or may not be another story. If the market is for a simple computing appliance these vendors would do well to try to do as little as possible, not what it seems they're trying to do.

    Never forget that the market for these devices isn't the just technorati. It's Homer Simpson and friends.

    1. Re:So what makes a tablet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As I see it, the important thing about the ipad (and iphone, etc) is the 'ecosystem' that Apple has built up around it (itunes, iapps, and eventually ibooks) that make it easy for the users. None of the competitors has this. And what is worse, there are so many diverse entries that I don't think there ever will be a viable competing ecosystem.

    2. Re:So what makes a tablet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what is worse, there are so many diverse entries that I don't think there ever will be a viable competing ecosystem.

      With Google and hardware manufacturers working together to avoid fragmentation, I think android with be able to compete. Not only that you'll have stuff like this, this, this...etc. you will also have the rest of the marketplace in which Google encourages people to develop the way they want to.

    3. Re:So what makes a tablet? by MeNeXT · · Score: 1

      The iPad needs access to files, be they movies, music, letters, faxes, PDF's, pictures, contracts.... It also would be great if it could connect to multiple computers to share those files. Bluetooth transfer of files would be nice. Printing would be nice too. iTunes is just brain dead. This is coming from people who bought as a gadget who don't know about it's limitations.

      I personally hate the DRM, lockdown and Apples (Jobs) attitude.

      --
      DRM? No thanks, I'll just get it somewhere else...
    4. Re:So what makes a tablet? by jon3k · · Score: 1

      So if Microsoft builds a great version of WIndows for tablet devices, do you think there's a possibility of the same thing happening that happened in the 90s? Low cost tablets from numerous vendors all supporting Windows against Apple's single product offering?

  7. USB Ports on Tablets by billstewart · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You must have one of those special iPads, then - the ones Steve Jobs is selling have a Dock Connector Port, though you can hang a cable with a USB connector off of that, or plug into a dock. It's not part of the tablet itself, it's an external device, so it's annoying at best if you're trying to connect things to a tablet as opposed to a desktop-mounted thing. Also, I can't tell from the documentation how many of those things you can use simultaneously - obviously you can't use the Dock-to-VGA cable and the Dock-to-USB cable at the same time, but if you've got the Dock or Keyboard Dock, can you use both the VGA and the USB at once? It doesn't look like it.

    With USB, if the device only has one port (boring), you can hang a powered hub off it to support keyboard, mouse, Ethernet adapter, etc, but AFAIK there's no equivalent fanout for Dock ports. So your iPad battery had better be charged up before you use it with an external screen, and you'd better have a Bluetooth keyboard and mouse and Wifi.

    It's one thing for Apple to try to use proprietary connectors to keep you locked in to Apple's world. But it's another thing entirely to be Not User Friendly as a result, or to be Ugly and Klunky instead of Insanely Cool-Looking.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
    1. Re:USB Ports on Tablets by gumbi+west · · Score: 0, Redundant

      "you can hang a powered hub off it to support keyboard, mouse, Ethernet adapter,"

      Not sure if you are in the market for a tablet. Perhaps you should consider a portable computer. It is true that Apple cuts adapters and connectors much faster than other manufacturers.

      Remember when the iMac didn't have a floppy drive? My x86 computers continued to have them for about 5 years but I never used one after 2000 (others surely did, but I didn't). There was also firewire and gigabit Ethernet where they added these expensive high speed connectors way before others did.

    2. Re:USB Ports on Tablets by fredmosby · · Score: 1

      I agree that iPad should have at least one powered USB port. But I think that if you are plugging it into an external monitor, keyboard and mouse then you aren't using it correctly. Have you even tried using one? It's a multitouch interface. A mouse doesn't even make sense.

    3. Re:USB Ports on Tablets by dakameleon · · Score: 1

      In the case of Firewire 400, they're also dropping them before others have even picked them up. Apple is that far ahead of the curve.

      *ducks*

      --
      Man who leaps off cliff jumps to conclusion.
    4. Re:USB Ports on Tablets by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      I have several network Projectors that will display content over the network from the laptop. and Panasonic is currently working on a iPad app to display the presentation on the projector wireless.

      IT's simply that the projector manufacturers forgot to design their drivers/apps.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    5. Re:USB Ports on Tablets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, okay, so it is that the iPad can connect via USB and do video out, but the slashdot illuminati don't want to count it because of their anti-Apple bias. Thanks for clearing that up.

    6. Re:USB Ports on Tablets by jedidiah · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why should the hardware manufacturers have to make special accomodations for
      a particular system vendor when there are widely used open standards that are
      readily available?

      It's not like we're talking about a video card or a capture card here.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    7. Re:USB Ports on Tablets by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      No. We simply take the iPad's capabilities for what they are...

              An iPad is much like an Atari 800 or TI/99a in these matters.

      The dongle nonsense leaves a lot of questions open, just like various
      app based hacks that are meant to re-create basic OS level functionality
      do. The mere existence of some cobble-ware solution doesn't mean it isn't
      something that would embarrass a mid-90's era Linux user.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    8. Re:USB Ports on Tablets by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Because the projector makers are not using the "widely used open standards that are
      readily available"

      They typically make dumb executive decisions to create a closed protocol.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    9. Re:USB Ports on Tablets by RocketRabbit · · Score: 1

      Because this is what they do all the time. They go where the money is.

      If a new wonder connector comes out, and a lot of people buy the device with the wonder connector, you either have a stupid company that chooses not to participate in that market, or a smart company that does. Pretty soon a wonder connector becomes the industry standard, you know, in the same way that almost every other connector evolved from a proprietary technology to an IEEE or ISO standard.

  8. Network effects by sjbe · · Score: 1

    Is Windows purchased because it is technically the best, or because it has the best marketing team aimed at the target market?

    How about neither. Windows is purchased because the majority of other people/companies also purchased Windows. It's called network effects and there is a lot of value in using software that is maximally compatible with what everyone else uses.

    Of course one could make the heretical argument that for many people Windows might actually have been the best choice for their needs and budget at the time of purchase. I know, crazy world in which we live.

  9. Copying Documents On Ipad Is Insane by meehawl · · Score: 1

    TFA talks about additional ports and card slots. Are those defining characteristics? Whether they are or not, what they symbolize is an extension of the PC-centric model of computing that the iPad does not.

    Beyond symbolism, what they represent is an easy, simple, straightforward and tactile way for people to copy their shit from one device to another without being leashed to Itunes, or jumping through bizarre hoops. If you want to do anything other than CONsume the paid-for media that Apple has sold you, the Ipad's user itrface workflow borders on the obscene:

    Prisoner of iTunes - the iPad file transfer horror

    To import, you connect the iPad to your computer, go to the apps tab of your big iPhone iPad, and look down at the bottom to see which of your apps you want to open the file with. Then you click Add and get the file from your computer, then it trundles along the wire to the iPad. After all this you can open with the app you sent it to, but only with that app.

    Sending it in the other direction is possibly even more baroque. In the case of Apple's iWork applications, you go to My Documents, press the 'send' icon at the bottom of the page, and up come three options: send via email, share via iWork.com and export. Note that you can't save 'to' anywhere, you can't save at all because the iWork documents save themselves all the time, and as far as you're concerned there is no 'to'. The first options do what they say on the tin, while 'export' lets you export the file in a couple of different formats to... where?

    OK, back to iTunes, connect your iPad, go to the apps tab for your iPad, scroll to the bottom, click on the app you exported it from, highlight the file, then click on Save to, and save the file onto your computer. You can't do any of this while you're working on the document itself on the iPad; you need to switch over to the My Documents section.

    Nor can you name files on the iPad. Highlight a template and click on the plus sign underneath it, and you get an option to duplicate the document, in which case it'll open a file with 'copy' appended to the template's name. Edit directly from the template, and you'll find it creates a new file with '1' appended to the template's name. It gives itself two different ways to create non-relevant filenames, and won't let you have even one?

    You've got to be fucking kidding me. Homer Simpson and friends want their porn on their Ipads and they don't want to have to go through this shite to get it. Give them a tablet with memory card, and they'll just copy the files onto it and swap the memory card over. It's what hundreds of millions of grandmothers have learned to do with cameras and photoframes and printers.

    --

    Da Blog
  10. Good luck with that by mveloso · · Score: 1

    The only way a tablet will make it in the consumer market now is if it lets you watch flash-based porn on it. Soon even that will be gone, as the porn industry moves to HTML5/H264.

    Basically, the rest of the market is fucked. Nobody can put out a device with the screen and build quality at the price points that Apple has, because nobody else has the volume to do it cost-effectively.

    IPS screens are expensive...unless you buy them in bulk. The same goes with anything Apple is buying for their devices. Flash memory? Apple probably sells 2/5ths of the world production of flash. Crap, they must buy millions upon millions of molex connectors. How aboout glass? Yeah, it's not like anyone is opening new glass factories to make capacitive screens for these tablets. They're using what Apple doesn't want...or excess capacity run at off hours by the B team.

    That's not to say tablet manufacturers won't make money. Apple makes tons of money in the PC market with a puny marketshare, relatively speaking. However, they won't make as much margin as Apple does in its PC niche because, when you come down to it, everyone else (non-Apple customers) is too cheap to buy gadgets at a price point that's sustainable.

    That leaves two markets: government and verticals...the two areas where tablets actually exist in countable numbers. Verticals are soon going to be crushed by the iPad as well, unless they have odd physical requirements.

    So there you go...a Q&D analysis of the 'tablet' market. Summary: go vertical now, before the iPad gets there. Or sell to governments.

    1. Re:Good luck with that by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      Seriously, what? I can't tell if I've wildly missed some sarcasm...

      Basically, the rest of the market is fucked. Nobody can put out a device with the screen and build quality at the price points that Apple has, because nobody else has the volume to do it cost-effectively.

      Huh? People have been making tables for years. My personal all-time faveourite is/was teh HP-Compaq T1100. The screen is actually a wacom tablet. Anyway...

      IPS screens are expensive...unless you buy them in bulk.

      Er, what? IPS screens, like all others have been steadily dropping in price since their invention. And there are plenty of other useful screen technologies. Look, every small-form-factor laptop vendor has found a cost effective way to sopurce small sceens.

      Apple probably sells 2/5ths of the world production of flash.

      That is a very curious statement. Apple maybe sell about that many smartphones, which do come with flash. That ignores everything else (USB sticks, SD cards for just about everything, solid state disks, embedded devices, and do on and so on and so on). I expect you're overestimating by several orders of magnitude.

      Crap, they must buy millions upon millions of molex connectors.

      This must be sarcasm, right? They don't even use them anymore and you can buy them already for pennies at a time from RS and Farnell.

      That's not to say tablet manufacturers won't make money. Apple makes tons of money in the PC market with a puny marketshare, relatively speaking. However, they won't make as much margin as Apple does in its PC niche because, when you come down to it, everyone else (non-Apple customers) is too cheap to buy gadgets at a price point that's sustainable.

      That's more reasonable. Apple sell at a decent margin,other vendors o for volume. Still, I expect that Apple will regularly trade places with the other top vendors.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
  11. Really? by N0Man74 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'm probably going to get modded down by fan boys for my blasphemy, but...

    Lack of USB ports, card readers, and video outputs and the like are features? Seriously!?

    You do realize that the reason that there are compatibility issues that exist within the PC world is not simply because of hardware options, but because of the fact that every single piece of the system is customizable. Every piece of hardware, every piece of software, and even the OS can be picked by a user. The more variables there are, the more possibility that there can be unexpected interactions.

    However, if you have a locked down platform where you control the OS and the hardware that is present, then the chances of random compatibilities goes down incredibly. That's without even taking into account having control of the software too.

    My XBox 360 has more hardware features than my Wii does, and amazingly I haven't had a single compatibility problem with it. My friend has no issues with his DSi, even though it has more hardware features than his old DS. I'm going to take a stab in the dark and guess that if Apple had added additional hardware features to their iPad, then the chances are they'd work without compatibility issues.

    I think that one could argue legitimate reasons for exclusion of certain hardware exclusions. I might disagree, but reasonable arguments could be made. However this one just seems silly. I might have a lot of criticisms for Apple, but they seem to do well in quality control; I have faith that they could pull off hardware features that work.

    1. Re:Really? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Lack of USB ports, card readers, and video outputs and the like are features? Seriously!?

      Did you even finishing reading the post? His reasoning was completely explained.

    2. Re:Really? by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      >> Lack of USB ports, card readers, and video outputs and the like are features? Seriously!?
      >
      > Did you even finishing reading the post? His reasoning was completely explained.

      No not really. His alleged requirements really don't fit with his proposed solution.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  12. iPad has USB and video out in its iPod connector by gig · · Score: 2, Informative

    There is no lack of connectivity on iPad. It has a 30-pin iPod dock connector, which is multiple ports in one, for the same reason as an iPod: it's too thin for the other ports it replaces. There is USB, video out, and a number of other cables in an iPod dock connector, so there is no lack of connectivity. A device with a micro-USB port is no better off, you still need a cable with the right ends for whatever device. iPad supports USB audio, hubs, keyboards, and card readers. It supports VGA, component, and composite video out. iPad also works with many iPod accessories, such as credit card readers, which is something other tablets can't say. iPad connects directly to iTunes, which makes it easy to transfer music, movies, books, documents, podcasts onto and off of the device. And it supports Bonjour (zero configuration networking) so it appears as "iPad.local" on the network. Bluetooth keyboards, audio, and controls. It jumps on and off Wi-Fi networks very easily as you move around. There's no shortage of connectivity.

    When comparing iPad competitors, it's going to be way, way, way more instructive to compare software, which is 95% of this kind of device. Look at firmware, system, native C apps, HTML5 Web apps, and cloud services. The software that runs the touchscreen is very important to whether the device is practical. Also, usability is very important in consumer electronics.

    Maybe the summary means other tablets are vying for pole position in the race to compete with iPad, but if talking about the market as a whole, iPad is way out in front by any measure. They already outsold all other tablets from the past 25 years.

         

  13. NO NO NO! BAD TABLET, BAD! by dafing · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What is glaringly apparent on all of these tablets — and absent on the iPad — are the multitude of connectivity options built into them, like USB ports, flash card readers, and video output ports.

    Christ, whats wrong with these people? Make it *NICE TO USE*, and THEN worry about slowly trickling out new features!

    Are you really going to take X over Y because it has an IR transmitter? Maybe the Slashdot audience, but certainly not the majority of consumers, you know those people whos money is just as worthy as the tech elite?

    Make it nice! Make it lovely, a pleasure to use! I actually imported an iPad, without even seeing one in the metal, and ended up paying EXTRA. And yet, I am wildly happy with my iPad, cannot imagine living without it. Would I want "Tablet Y" even if it were cheaper and had a Serial port? NO! Because every other tablet SUCKS!

    I actually fear for the other manufacturers, who have clung to Android. I think its bad to build Google into this all important Super-Company in every market. It means we get locked down into Android...or nothing...because theres no third option.

    I hope HP does well with WebOS, the big thing with getting ANY portable computer essential is that its NICE to use! Not some hacked together lump of plastic and ports.

    A man with a Netbook came into my work today, he was measuring furniture and entering it onto the HP Netbook. He was pushing a pram, AND holding this open screened Netbook down each aisle, incredibly awkward looking! I couldnt help but imagine how much better using my iPad would be for the task. I could easily hold my iPad in one hand, and tap-type with the other, instead of walking about with this big (it looked huge and flimsy) Netbook with a crappy screen. For each entry, he had to place it on something, and crouch over to type a few numbers into the spreadsheet. I'm sure I can type many times faster on a physical keyboard than my iPads software keyboard, but not in that scenario! How fast are you when crouched over, pecking out keys in a public space? Holding with one hand, tap typing with the other, I would be much more efficient using my iPad in this situation. Of course, a smartphone would have been better yet.

    For the love of god Hardware Companies, make NICE products, dont just worry about what never to be used port you can slap on the ugly sides!

    What an appropriate Slashdot quote "The truth of a thing is the feel of it, not the think of it. -- Stanley Kubrick"

    --
    --- ...or a new slashdot signature. Dear aunt, let's set so double the killer delete select all
  14. Re:NO NO NO! BAD TABLET, BAD! by Totenglocke · · Score: 1

    So you buy products because they look pretty, not because they actually do anything worthwhile? That seems to be the gist of what you wrote there, but feel free to correct me if I'm wrong.

    --
    "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." ~Thomas Jefferson
  15. Re:iPad has USB and video out in its iPod connecto by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    "iPad also works with many iPod accessories, such as credit card readers, which is something other tablets can't say."
    Yeah, they're stuck with standard USB credit card readers, like you'd use with a PC or even *gasp* a Mac desk/laptop. I bet they cry at night because they can't use the cool proprietary bus.

    Anyone who wants bonjour can install it on Windows machines along with quicktimes/itunes/safari, courtesy of Apple's all-in-one installer. Anyone who wants zeroconf in Maemo, at least, just installs avahi. I don't have an Android or WebOS device, but no reason avahi shouldn't work there, too; if nobody's packaged it up, it's because nobody cares, more's the pity.

    "There's no shortage of connectivity." only because you spin every bit of missing connectivity as a MOTHERFRAKKING FEATURE! No, making your device too thin for standard ports is NOT a feature -- especially since that thinness does absolutely no good, you can't put it in your pants pocket or anything. And you brag about its "Bluetooth keyboards, audio, and controls.", blithely ignoring it doesn't do bluetooth file transfer? Oh, that's right, because we don't let users play with the filesystem from on the device; that would just confuse them. You have to use iTunes for that; it's a FEATURE!

    Forgive me if I find it a wee bit disingenuous to call it a "feature" every time you tell me I can't do something. If Steve Jobs thinks a shiny (or style, or ease-of-use, or whatever) vs. functionality tradeoff is the right thing to do, stand up and say it, but don't pretend that killing functionality is adding functionality. If it's really the right way, YOU DON'T NEED TO LIE ABOUT IT.

  16. Re:NO NO NO! BAD TABLET, BAD! by dafing · · Score: 1

    Oh no, you got me!

    Really, dont you want NICE looking, and NICE to use products? Have you tried say, a Windows Tablet? They are NEITHER. "five times" as thick, and buggy, unoptimised...

    For the average person, why get excited about plugging in SD cards? That then require your slick looking device having a permanent gash...

    I think its a simple fact, given the choice, people would rather have NICE to use devices, that look NICE, than additional features that, in my opinion, we will never use!

    Hey, I hardly think every other person in the world cares what I think, then again...the market is responding. iPads sold, 2 million plus, a MILLION a month....compare that to Kindles (not even on sale in NZ), Zune HD's (not even on sale in NZ), HP Slate (not on sale ANYWHERE), Microsoft Courier (not on sale ANYWHERE)....

    --
    --- ...or a new slashdot signature. Dear aunt, let's set so double the killer delete select all
  17. Re:NO NO NO! BAD TABLET, BAD! by Totenglocke · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'll take something useful over something pretty anyday. Useful AND pretty is a bonus. However, like the iPad, pretty and not useful is an epic fail.

    For the average person, why get excited about plugging in SD cards? That then require your slick looking device having a permanent gash...

    See, in the real world, there are people who have these things called "files". A great way to transfer these "files" from one device to another is either a USB drive or a SD card. It's infinitely better than having to take your iPad, plug it in, load iTunes, and then go through it's horrific sync system that only syncs files for programs Apple chooses to let you sync from (I have an iPod and an iPhone, I'm well aware of the horrible flaws in iTunes sync). It's much easier if you can keep extra songs / pictures / movies / books / whatever on an SD card and just pop it in and read it off the card - that way if you go on a trip, you don't have to lug a laptop with you just to get more files over to the tablet.

    iPads sold, 2 million plus, a MILLION a month

    Yes, but they have something that no one else has! A bright shiny apple on the back! That means that the average moron MUST have it or be a social outcast, despite the fact that there are other options (well, in the case of the iPad, there soon will be) that cost less and do more - but they don't have the shiny apple on the back, so they're inferior products.

    You seem to be confusing "I must have it because the TV tells me I have to have it in order to get attention and popularity" with "I really like device X and it does everything I want".

    That's why I'm trading in my iPhone 3GS for an Evo - not only will I save $23 / month with Sprint vs. AT&T, but I'll have better hardware, better software, and the ability to customize my phone however I want. I'll laugh at all the trendy idiots buying the iPhone 4 that isn't even as good as an Evo, despite coming out a month later. I'll especially laugh in 3 months when the next Awesome Android Phone comes out and really embarrasses the Apple fanboys.

    --
    "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." ~Thomas Jefferson
  18. Re:NO NO NO! BAD TABLET, BAD! by dafing · · Score: 1

    I'll take something useful over something pretty anyday.

    By chance, are you one of those people with a calculator watch? :) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Calculator_watch Oh yes! All that SEXY functionality! :)

    Oh, so you have a bandolier of SD cards strapped around you, and you change "mags" a dozen times a day with your phone/tablet device? Why not just get the storage space you require, INTERNALLY?

    If you want a file, why not email or otherwise FTP it to where you want? Rather than carrying things about on little bits of plastic? Or...do it all..."on the cloud"!

    Give me an example of an iPad competitor, thats in the market right now (pretty much worldwide too), that I could have bought instead of my iPad. Something thats as nice to use for media consumption, web browsing, games etc. I dont think theres anything really comparable. I hope the HP Slate will be the second in the same market.

    In New Zealand, we essentially get ZERO Apple ads...if you hate Apple, move here :) Perhaps when the new iPhone is released, we get a couple ads a day, for a week or two, but thats it. All our Apple ads, for a whole year!

    We also have no Apple Stores, those damn attractive, ultra profitable stores, damn them! *shakes fist*

    I would personally assume the iPhone 4 is far better than the EVO, but I have actually used neither. Whats the EVO got? Faster network...actual tethering (although the iPhone can be tethered in basically every OTHER country apart from yours....)....what else?

    The iPhone 4 will be about the same price (I buy unlocked and run on prepaid plans normally), is slimmer, I think it will have better build quality (my opinion) and definitely a better rear camera, from what we've seen. Maybe if you get your socks off over bandwidth speeds or have the absolute largest screen (with a lower resolution)...

    But really, if I choose the iPhone 4, and you choose the EVO, great! Its not like we have to engage in fisticuffs with each other! We share the same biology maaaaan :) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4rk78eCIx4E

    Listen, I know its all cool to hate "the establishment" and all, but judge tech on its own merits, not how your peers feel. I've never seen an ad for an iPad, or my iPhone on my TV, or a bus. I pick the devices I like.

    Have a great day (its 9PM Tuesday night here)

    --
    --- ...or a new slashdot signature. Dear aunt, let's set so double the killer delete select all
  19. Re:NO NO NO! BAD TABLET, BAD! by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

    A man with a Netbook came into my work today,

    This is, of course the classic scenario for a tablet, and has been for a long time. It's why tablets are so incredibly popular in certain industries. You may also note that many of the toughbook series can operate as tablets.

    --
    SJW n. One who posts facts.
  20. Correction... by Aeternitas827 · · Score: 0, Troll

    but Apple's true mastery is that of the user interface. The first big player that steps up with something competitive to Apple in that regard will have...

    ...an enormous lawsuit on their hands, because Apple have patented everything except your face. And Jobs is working on that, too.

    --
    I don't post AC. I like my -1, Flamebaits. Trump/Sheen 2012 on the Batshit Insane ticket!
  21. Re:NO NO NO! BAD TABLET, BAD! by dafing · · Score: 1

    Hi, yes I know and understand about professional use of tablets in rugged environments, its a bit like NASA space rockets being specialist, I dont expect the average GM car to fly to mars :)

    The man with the Netbook was just a regular guy, buying several sideboards, cabinets etc. There was no real reason for him to have the Netbook, he was essentially typing "cabinet A, 3 Metres, $500" into a spreadsheet. A couple years ago, we might have written on a 5 cent piece of paper, with a dollar pen :) I would have used a smartphone, or a tablet computer if possible. His netbook use was very difficult looking, needing to put it down every few metres, and bend down to it etc.

    I have no doubts that specific jobs have used tablets before. But, around the home, at school, at university, they have not been the whopping success Bill Gates predicted :)

    I think the iPad is a truly "magical" device, the first of its kind, of consumer media consumption "tablet".

    --
    --- ...or a new slashdot signature. Dear aunt, let's set so double the killer delete select all
  22. Re:NO NO NO! BAD TABLET, BAD! by Bongo · · Score: 1

    Exactly. Plus, "nice" doesn't just mean pretty. Those who don't get this, consider a girlfriend. She can be pretty, but a total bitch. She can treat you like a doormat and make you feel terrible. She could be neurotic and make your life hell. But still, she could be "pretty".

    In classical architecture, they talk about "commodity, firmness, and delight". You kinda need all three for any of them to be worth it. That's why Apple can seemingly make compromises but end up with a more popular product.

    I know people (educated, expert, professional people) to whom you point out and name all the different ports on the side of their laptop, and they are confused. I think the confusion is actually, "I'm a respected professional in my field, and I earn loads of money, I'm qualified, I'm published, I'm intelligent -- so why am I wasting my time with all these different computer ports?"

    Using the girlfriend analogy, she cooks you a nice dinner and she makes the effort to have a nice conversation with you over dinner. She is "nice". She can be good looking too. But she doesn't throw your dinner in the bin the moment you happen to make a remark that she misconstrues as being a subtle insult. That would be neurotic.

    Neurotic can be exciting and wild, and have all sorts of interesting surprises, but in a long term relationship (which is what you enter into with a computer gadget that you are trusting all your information and media to) you want nice, mature, attractive, balanced, good hearted stuff.

  23. Re:NO NO NO! BAD TABLET, BAD! by Totenglocke · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Oh, so you have a bandolier of SD cards strapped around you, and you change "mags" a dozen times a day with your phone/tablet device? Why not just get the storage space you require, INTERNALLY?

    Well, your beloved Apple limits the iPad to 64 GB (for way too much money) or a measly 16 GB which stores....well, not much. SD cards would fix that just fine - cell phones have been doing it for years.

    If you want a file, why not email or otherwise FTP it to where you want? Rather than carrying things about on little bits of plastic? Or...do it all..."on the cloud"!

    Once again, with your "email it" "solution", you're back to needing a second computer just to get a damn file. That's absurd and one of the major failings of the iPad. Secondly, if you want Google / MS / Apple / Other Big Company to have ALL of your personal files (pictures, home videos, word documents, everything) that not only they have access too but a mistake could mean you lose all of your files FOREVER, then to be blunt, you're a damn fool. A little extra convenience is NOT worth losing your privacy or potentially losing all of your files for.

    Give me an example of an iPad competitor, thats in the market right now (pretty much worldwide too), that I could have bought instead of my iPad.

    Well, you know, there's this thing called "impulse control" - you could start by learning some of that. Then you could wait a few weeks as the Android tablets flood the market. I know - researching before you buy something, it's a crazy idea!

    We also have no Apple Stores, those damn attractive, ultra profitable stores, damn them! *shakes fist*

    Please, go in one sometime when you're in the US. You'll never want to do business with Apple again. Everything about their stores (from the way the employees talk to customers to the giant displays they have with "tips") tells you blatantly that they think you are a complete moron. It's rather insulting, not to mention that Apple intentionally has about one store per 5 million potential customers, which ensures that you'll always have long waits.

    I would personally assume the iPhone 4 is far better than the EVO, but I have actually used neither.

    Making decisions about two products you've never used based purely off Lord Jobs' advertising. I can see now why you bought an iPad. I have an iPhone 3GS and I've used phones running Android 2.1. Android not only allows you to run whatever apps you want, to customize whatever apps you want, but it also adds new features at a pace that Apple can't even dream of.

    Whats the EVO got? Faster network...actual tethering (although the iPhone can be tethered in basically every OTHER country apart from yours....)....what else?

    More memory, expandable storage, higher res cameras (yes, BOTH cameras are higher rest), mini-HDMI port, FM tuner, a kickstand to watching movies / Sprint TV, Flash support, a much bigger screen, and other things I can't think of off the top of my head.

    The iPhone 4 will be about the same price (I buy unlocked and run on prepaid plans normally), is slimmer, I think it will have better build quality (my opinion) and definitely a better rear camera, from what we've seen.

    Being .1 inches slimmer is an unnoticeable difference. You're basing the "better camera" on what exactly? As for build quality, the Evo has gotten great reviews for build quality, as has just about every HTC phone.

    Listen, I know its all cool to hate "the establishment" and all, but judge tech on its own merits, not how your peers feel.

    I do buy based off the merits of the technology - that's what my whole disagreement with you has been about. You've been saying people should buy a device because "OMFG it looks cool!" instead of it actually DOING something useful.

    --
    "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." ~Thomas Jefferson
  24. Re:NO NO NO! BAD TABLET, BAD! by dafing · · Score: 1

    Ugh.

    Last post from me, I'm sure you also have better things to do.

    What size are the SD cards you are using? Oh wait, dont bother replying, better if we each end it here. 64 GB is quite a lot, especially for a removable storage card...its not like TB SD cards are a couple bucks each :) Hey, I am using most of my 64GB iPad, but if I had a 128GB iPad...I'd be using that...whatever space you have on device, it will practically NEVER be enough! So...you could...stream....to the device? Eh? Its a portable device you know! Its not meant to be connected to a massive RAID by a Fibre Channel :) You want a video? Stream it from YouTube! Or Hulu, or Netflix...or whatever you might use. I dont know your situation.

    Um, yes, normally when I give a file to someone else, I expect them to have a computer, or some way of using it :) You have not sold me on the idea of a stack of SD cards in each pocket. I have 200 DVDs staring back at me right now, I ripped them to my computer, and I never intend to insert a single disc again, unless to, *gasp* rip it to my HDD. Why would I want to swap in my "games" SD Card, then my "photos" SD Card...? "oh, hold on, its on my other SD Card, oh, I must have forgotten that one in my other jeans pocket..." Smooth move there :)

    Oh yes, I'm sure you are very angry that there are NOT ENOUGH Apple Stores! :) My friends (in many different countries) have visited, and all mention how much they enjoy their local Apple Store. Ohhhhhh, they must be whiny "fanbois" like me, eh? Whatever I say, you're going to argue about, if Apple are too aggressive in getting "in your face", if they dont have enough wonderful Stores....

    All I know is, when I visit a local "tech department store", it SUCKS compared to what it would be like at one of these Apple Stores I've heard so much about. I get "a long wait" here, where we have perhaps a couple iMacs and a MacBook on display, forget about a Mac Pro etc or service...

    I actually like Android, and WebOS...I hope they ALL do well, I dont want to live in a monopoly! Oooooh, "Lord Jobs", yes, because I've dedicated my life to Steve Jobs, because I have an iPad, right? Yeah, meanwhile, what, you're in an open relationship with who, Eric Schmidt? Freaking Ballmer?

    I probably read all the same websites as you do. I've never found myself wanting an Android App, perhaps Google Goggles, just to play about with, it might not work outside the US though? I'm not suffering from Apples "EVIL" plan to "tell me what Apps I can run"...

    About the EVO...if you like it, great for you! I have no problem with what "Totenglocke", someone presumably on the other side of the world chooses to use in his or her life :)

    The EVO cameras SUCK for quality though, who cares what resolution they claim to be. Based on the photos from the iPhone 4, it takes better footage too, and at a higher frame rate. Ohhhh, but there I go being a drooling fanboi, right? By judging from the end results, not memorising the manufacturers spec sheet! :)

    We will soon see, hands on, which we each like better. Thats if the EVO is even sold in my country, as far as I know, it WONT. And, I'd have to import one without ever using it first. Should I take a 20+ hour (each leg) plane flight to the US just to try out Android phones?

    FM tuner, boy, to listen to all those GREAT radio stations! Why would I ever want to listen to my own podcasts, or high quality music? Instead of, Leo Laporte, I can get my tech news from the local NZ "tech news guy"! "um, and theres this thing called Android, I think, and its not out here in New Zealand but..."

    Many Nokias also TRANSMIT on FM, I dont know if the EVO does? If not, does that make a Nokia a better device? Hardly.

    A kickstand is just hillarious to me, I imagine its like those fat people who use a mobility scoo

    --
    --- ...or a new slashdot signature. Dear aunt, let's set so double the killer delete select all
  25. Re:iPad has USB and video out in its iPod connecto by LinuxAndLube · · Score: 1

    30 pins should be enough for everybody.

  26. Re:NO NO NO! BAD TABLET, BAD! by LinuxAndLube · · Score: 1

    In New Zealand, we essentially get ZERO Apple ads...if you hate Apple, move here :) Perhaps when the new iPhone is released, we get a couple ads a day, for a week or two, but thats it. All our Apple ads, for a whole year!

    In New Zealand, 'essentially ZERO' is 28.

  27. Re:NO NO NO! BAD TABLET, BAD! by dafing · · Score: 1

    Oh, are you in New Zealand? Where are you seeing all these ads? C4? TV3? The New Zealand Herald? Or The Listener?

    Hell, bring on the Apple ads I say, better than the BS from Telecom, apologising for XT.

    --
    --- ...or a new slashdot signature. Dear aunt, let's set so double the killer delete select all
  28. Define "remotely like" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Define "remotely like" because there are plenty like the ipad. Another poster put forward one and how many ways can you fuck around with the look of a tablet: IT LOOKS LIKE A FRIGGING TABLET. You know, one of those things 10 commandments come on, THAT is how old that form factor is!

    Of course, if you're talking about the form factor AND marketing it as "an appliance" rather than "a computer", then Apple have "innovated" there, though I don't like the direction. It's back to the old Big Iron days of "you do what we want, when we want and how we want. So help you god.".

  29. "What size are the SD cards you are using?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "What size are the SD cards you are using?" Does it matter? Here's the thing with SC cards: you have SD cardS. Multiple. a lighter-sized box holds 12 of them, the internal pocket of your geek toys hold more. You know what else you can do? SWAP THEM WITH OTHER PEOPLE. You know, just like in the sneakernet days. You copied a meg or so and moved the floppy disk to another machine. Well, will you swap your iPad with someone else so they can get a copy of your stuff?

    You have completely swallowed the load that Jobs left.

    1. Re:"What size are the SD cards you are using?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ha ha ha! You want to "swap them with other people... just like in the sneakernet days"? That's progress?
      How is that better than email, FTP, Dropbox etc? Utterly Ridiculous.

  30. Android Tablet came out 2 months ago by jesseschulman · · Score: 1

    Has no one seen the WePad? It's an Android based tablet that gives the iPad a run for it's money. http://www.crunchgear.com/2010/04/12/the-wepad-gets-a-price-and-launch-date/

  31. Re:NO NO NO! BAD TABLET, BAD! by jmac_the_man · · Score: 1

    A man with a Netbook came into my work today, he was measuring furniture and entering it onto the HP Netbook. He was pushing a pram, AND holding this open screened Netbook down each aisle, incredibly awkward looking! I couldnt help but imagine how much better using my iPad would be for the task. I could easily hold my iPad in one hand, and tap-type with the other, instead of walking about with this big (it looked huge and flimsy) Netbook with a crappy screen. For each entry, he had to place it on something, and crouch over to type a few numbers into the spreadsheet. I'm sure I can type many times faster on a physical keyboard than my iPads software keyboard, but not in that scenario! How fast are you when crouched over, pecking out keys in a public space? Holding with one hand, tap typing with the other, I would be much more efficient using my iPad in this situation. Of course, a smartphone would have been better yet.

    Every netbook I've seen has an open hinge, where it's possible for a right handed user to stick their left hand under the computer and have their fingers come through the hole in the hinge. (The result looks a bit like holding an artist's palette.) Then the user types with their right hand. You're less likely to drop it, you get tactile keyboard feedback, and you can transfer the data the guy was typing to an inventory system or whatever out one of the "ugly ports."
    Plus, when you're not typing, you can push the pram with your right hand while still holding the netbook in your left hand. (Also, you can probably afford more furniture to measure if you're using a netbook rather than an iPad.)

  32. Re:NO NO NO! BAD TABLET, BAD! by dafing · · Score: 1

    hehe.

    This man was definitely having to pick his Netbook up, and put it down every few metres to tap out "1.5M $500" etc. Very uncomfortable.

    What "Ugly Port" would you use? Ethernet? USB? Firewire? Why not Bluetooth or Wifi? Or a 3G connection? You know, like those sleek and practical iPads. Much better than dragging a USB cable throughout every store you visit :) Our store is...basically the dimensions of a "Football" (as in the international Football) field.

    Frankly, using pen and paper would STILL have been easier. Unless he had a Newton :) God bless my little Messagepads :)

    --
    --- ...or a new slashdot signature. Dear aunt, let's set so double the killer delete select all
  33. Another Asus Eee table Demo video by DarrenE6 · · Score: 1

    You can also see a video of the Asus Eee Tablet here, apparently it will be available from September for around $199, not sure how much it will be in the UK (surely be more than £140?) http://www.theinquirer.net/inquirer/news/1651579/asus-eee-tablet-video

  34. Re:NO NO NO! BAD TABLET, BAD! by LinuxAndLube · · Score: 1

    a couple ads a day, for a week or two

    2 * 7 * 2 = 28

  35. It's better than email by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's better than email because the bandwidth of an SDHC card is vastly superior than you get with mobile internet or even WiFi. You also don't have to have wireless internet. Just exist in a physical dimension.

    I guess that dissing the idea of swapping SD cards is required because the iPad doesn't have it and it is needed, but you have to dodge and weave to avoid saying so else your i* device shows up its true colours: underperforming crap.

    1. Re:It's better than email by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Firstly, as has been stated over and over in this discussion, the iPad can read SD cards with a small peripheral.

      Secondly, the statement "the bandwidth of an SDHC card is vastly superior" is stretching the truth. From wikipedia: -
      The following are the ratings of some currently available cards:
      Class 2: 16 Mbit/s (2 MB/s)
      Class 4: 32 Mbit/s (4 MB/s)
      Class 6: 48 Mbit/s (6 MB/s)
      Class 10: 80 Mbit/s (10 MB/s)

      The first class 10s appeared in mid-2009 with a capacity of 32GB. I have 50Mbit/s cable, it has a capacity of oh, the entire internet. I don't have to walk/drive to the actual physical location if I want to swap.

      Are you actually seriously suggesting that SDHC is better, more convenient method of storage than the cloud? That's completely fucking retarded.

      Enjoy your third-rate, shitty "i* device" rip-off and your stupid fucking "lighter-sized box" of SD cards. Yeah, that's surely the way ahead. 'Tard.

    2. Re:It's better than email by Totenglocke · · Score: 1

      Firstly, as has been stated over and over in this discussion, the iPad can read SD cards with a small peripheral.

      Actually the iPad can read picture files from SD cards with a small peripheral. The other 99.99999% of files can NOT be read from an SD card by the iPad.

      Nice attempt at trolling though!

      --
      "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." ~Thomas Jefferson
  36. Re:NO NO NO! BAD TABLET, BAD! by jedidiah · · Score: 1

    > This man was definitely having to pick his Netbook up, and put it down every few metres to tap out "1.5M $500" etc. Very uncomfortable.

    This guy was clearly just resisting the urge to "hunt and peck" type. He putting the device down to touch type.

    If he wanted to do single finger typing iPad style he could have done so. Clearly he chose not to. He would probably put an iPad down to type on it too.

    --
    A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  37. Re:NO NO NO! BAD TABLET, BAD! by jedidiah · · Score: 1

    > Christ, whats wrong with these people? Make it *NICE TO USE*, and THEN worry about slowly trickling out new features!

    The problem with "nice to use" is you end up with bad kludges to fill in all the obvious gaps the device is shipped with.

    "nice to use" just the excuse du jour for the Apple fanboys. The problem with "nice to use" is tomorrow. All of these
    "apps" are being built with some very fundemental limitations. Much like old DOS and Windows programs, they will reflect
    these limitations far into the future.

    Not being able to save or print makes a device "not nice to use".

    --
    A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  38. It copies 16GB in ~2 seconds. I give them the card by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It copies 16GB in ~2 seconds. I give them the card.

    Remember too that both parties need mobile wireless bandwidth and a data plan that allows them to transfer.

    "Are you actually seriously suggesting that SDHC is better, more convenient method of storage than the cloud?"

    1) No, I didn't.
    2) I said it was a more effective and efficient way of transferring files than email FTP or any other pisstank excuse you use to avoid going "hey, maybe it does need a reader"
    3) Yes, it is a better place to store data. You have it even if the company goes titsup

    You truly are enjoying the assraping of jobs so that you can feel like you're superior, aren't you?

  39. Re:It copies 16GB in ~2 seconds. I give them the c by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "It copies 16GB in ~2 seconds". It doesn't. It really doesn't. You just blew any sense of credibility your prior posts had as hard as you blow on Eric Schmidt's stubby dick. Straight from the horses mouth : -
    http://www.sdcard.org/developers/tech/sdhc/

    You're the same contrarian asshole who I've met a million times. You'll grab on to whatever's second best so you can feel smug about not being one of those "dumb sheeples".
    In actual fact you're just subjecting your self to a second rate experience and you know what? Not one single iPad/iPhone/iPod Touch user actually gives a fuck what you're using they're just tired of listening to your ceaseless whining.

    Enjoy your physical media security blankie while it lasts son because, just as with the floppy in the original iMac, it's already dead. You just don't know it yet.

  40. Re:NO NO NO! BAD TABLET, BAD! by dafing · · Score: 1

    I feel like I'm bashing this poor anonymous New Zealander :)

    He was absolutely using ONE hand to type, bend over in a most excruciating fashion.

    Enough about this random guy :)

    --
    --- ...or a new slashdot signature. Dear aunt, let's set so double the killer delete select all
  41. Re:NO NO NO! BAD TABLET, BAD! by RocketRabbit · · Score: 1

    "I'll take something useful over something pretty anyday. Useful AND pretty is a bonus. However, like the iPad, pretty and not useful is an epic fail."

    I don't think anybody can hear you, over the millions of people who are sometimes physically duking it out over places in line to buy the iPad, yelling and screaming themselves hoarse trying to buy them.

    Seriously, epic fail? A million units a month, which is the kind of volume companies would probably kill for if it would help them, is an epic fail?

    Can you think of another gadget that is selling like that? I can only think of a few that ever have. None at this high of a price point though.

    The geekiest people I know all have iPads now, despite it being crippled. We just all paid our $99 tax to Apple and can compile and stick whatever we want on there. You get a buttload of certificates, so I can hook up people who didn't pay the tax as well.

    "See, in the real world, there are people who have these things called "files". A great way to transfer these "files" from one device to another is either a USB drive or a SD card. It's infinitely better than having to take your iPad, plug it in, load iTunes, and then go through it's horrific sync system that only syncs files for programs Apple chooses to let you sync from (I have an iPod and an iPhone, I'm well aware of the horrible flaws in iTunes sync). It's much easier if you can keep extra songs / pictures / movies / books / whatever on an SD card and just pop it in and read it off the card - that way if you go on a trip, you don't have to lug a laptop with you just to get more files over to the tablet."

    Too bad there is no convenient, globally addressable network that these files could travel across. Maybe someday they will invent one and then I could get files onto my ipad. I mean, there's no way somebody could email me a Pages document, and I click on the link, and the iPad automatically grabs the file, puts it in my little pages doc library, and opens it.

    Damn.

    See the iPad is a *networked* device and in this day and age there is really no reason to lug a whole bitchton of files with you say, when you go on a trip. And even the base model certainly has enough space to throw books and movies on there to entertain you for your trip, in lieu of a network connection.

    "Yes, but they have something that no one else has! A bright shiny apple on the back! That means that the average moron MUST have it or be a social outcast, despite the fact that there are other options (well, in the case of the iPad, there soon will be) that cost less and do more - but they don't have the shiny apple on the back, so they're inferior products."

    I think people are buying iPads because you can't get a well constructed, easy to use, nice to look at, tablet computer that is anywhere near as thin, that has anywhere close to the same kind of battery life, and that works nearly as well for $500 from anybody BUT Apple. My 80 year old aunt got one, and she's literally never ever used a PC in her life. She is now browsing the web, buying apps, and playing scrabble with me over the internet. She hates scrabble, by the way, but she is just tickled pink by the idea of playing scrabble over the internet with her nephew from 2500 miles away. Apple has created another product like the iPhone and the iPod, one that would literally sell itself if they stopped advertising. The reason is because it fucking works.

    "You seem to be confusing "I must have it because the TV tells me I have to have it in order to get attention and popularity" with "I really like device X and it does everything I want"."

    You are really being a prick. Snidely suggesting that everybody who bought an iPad is stupid and bought it solely because they were utterly beguiled isn't only rude, but you must know it's just a lie. Most folks out there use computers to do three things - read email, browse the web, and use it as a fancy electronic typewriter. We're probably talking about at least 2/3rds of the people

  42. Re:NO NO NO! BAD TABLET, BAD! by Totenglocke · · Score: 1

    So once more you spout off a bunch of nonsense based on Apple's advertising. By your own admission you've never even touched one of these phones, yet somehow you're an expert on both of them.

    Remember when the G1 was hot shit? Or the Droid? Or the Nexus One? They all have their month of fame. And then they drop away, to be replaced by the New Hotness. The EVO is having its fun now, lets just see how successful it is compared to the iPhone 4. I'd be highly surprised if it outsells this next iPhone, or the last iPhone, or the iPhone before that...

    And your limited intelligence is showing. It's not about a particular handset, it's about the Android OS. How those phones become outdated so fast? That's called "progress". Android and the handsets it runs on are constantly improving. Apple comes up with minor updates to both the hardware and the OS once a year. Android improves the OS much more frequently and the hardware is improved every 2-3 months. Also, the iPhone has been around for 4 years - Android has been around for a year and a half, plus Android lacks the shiny apple logo and the Steve Jobs Reality Distortion Field. That's pretty damn impressive.

    But hey, it's from Apple, so of course it's vastly superior and you just have to get one.

    --
    "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." ~Thomas Jefferson
  43. Re:NO NO NO! BAD TABLET, BAD! by RocketRabbit · · Score: 1

    In this day and age, printing is pointless especially if you have a nice tiny device that practically runs forever to read and edit documents on.

    If some other douchebag doesn't have an iPad yet you can email the document to them, and they can print it. Or you can drag n drop the document from its spot in itunes and then print it yourself if you want to carry around paper for some increasingly pointless reason.

    Or you can email your documents to your free gmail account and access them from anywhere that has a printer, and print them. Printers tend to actually be hooked to computers you know, where you find one the other is usually a meter or two away at the farthest.

    The point of this thing is to be a portable device, that you take by itself because you don't need anything fancier at the moment. You don't throw it into a gym bag along with a printer and a raid array all hooked to a big lead acid battery to run it all for all of 3 minutes. You grab the shit you need, and leave the rest on the network.

    Now that printing's out of the way, who said anything about not being able to save? I can save damn near anything I can find on the internet, to the ipad. I can then email it. Or heck, I can use my ipad to ssh into my computer here, and use wget to grab it.

    It's a fucking tiny little device, designed to be mobile and thin and run a long time. If you really have a problem with the app situation, pay your $99, get your certificate, compile whatever the hell you want, and put it on the ipad yourself. Steve Jobs doesn't care what you install on your machine in this case.

  44. Re:NO NO NO! BAD TABLET, BAD! by Totenglocke · · Score: 1

    I don't think anybody can hear you, over the millions of people who are sometimes physically duking it out over places in line to buy the iPad, yelling and screaming themselves hoarse trying to buy them. Seriously, epic fail? A million units a month, which is the kind of volume companies would probably kill for if it would help them, is an epic fail?

    You're unable to distinguish between "useful device" and "financially successful device". There are countless cases of utter crap selling incredibly well (American Idol is a great example). I never said that the iPad doesn't sell, I said it fails as a useful device, especially since it doesn't do a single thing that an iPod Touch / iPhone doesn't do.

    Too bad there is no convenient, globally addressable network that these files could travel across. Maybe someday they will invent one and then I could get files onto my ipad. I mean, there's no way somebody could email me a Pages document, and I click on the link, and the iPad automatically grabs the file, puts it in my little pages doc library, and opens it. Damn. See the iPad is a *networked* device and in this day and age there is really no reason to lug a whole bitchton of files with you say, when you go on a trip. And even the base model certainly has enough space to throw books and movies on there to entertain you for your trip, in lieu of a network connection.

    Too bad that there's these things called "attachment size limits", not to mention it still requires TWO computers to get that file. Then there's the fact that not everyone wants their files put on an email server where it can be read / viewed by others.

    Apple has created another product like the iPhone and the iPod, one that would literally sell itself if they stopped advertising. The reason is because it fucking works.

    No, the reason is that the majority of their customer base doesn't know any better. Apple has openly acknowledged for years that they intentionally target the people who are so incompetent that they can't even read an instruction manual or figure out what the difference between "left click" and "right click" is. They exploit people who know absolutely nothing about technology and are desperate for social status.

    ost folks out there use computers to do three things - read email, browse the web, and use it as a fancy electronic typewriter.

    Yes, and the iPad does - well, lets be nice and round up - 45% of those three things. It lets you read email no problem, I won't argue that at all. It lets you browse some of the internet. The absurd number of sites using Flash though are unable to be viewed, meaning that you can't access large parts of the internet. Then lets look at a touch screen - I love touch screen devices, but it's horrible for typing more than a few sentences, so it fails at typing documents in anything other than an emergency situation.

    I can tell you from experience that the Android phones I have used, despite their theoretically superior hardware, felt sluggish and often went all modal and would not allow you to turn the device and have the screen auto rotate.

    That may have been true on old Android phones, but not new ones. I know many people with them and I had far more trouble with getting my iPhone to rotate the screen than I ever have on an Android phone.

    If you are happy with the paucity of apps in the Android marketplace, then that's great but I doubt you could find many people on the street that would rather have the Droid's app selection over the App Store.

    I know - I'm picking useful apps over a large quantity of garbage. Stupid me. And yes, since I've had an iPhone for a year and spent plenty of time in the App Store, I'm well aware that maybe 1% of the apps on the iPhone are actually worthwhile.

    In three months, another Android phon

    --
    "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." ~Thomas Jefferson
  45. Re:iPad has USB and video out in its iPod connecto by Dog-Cow · · Score: 1

    The thinness is definitely a feature. You are just a bigot.

  46. Re:NO NO NO! BAD TABLET, BAD! by Dog-Cow · · Score: 1

    I truly hope you die a horrible painful death and take your whole family with you.

    You are filled with such hatred and contempt it's amazing you can even get out of bed in the morning.

    The iPad is extremely useful if you JUST USE IT AS IT WAS INTENDED TO BE USED. Just because it's not intended to be used the way YOU want does not make it useless. You are a self-absorbed piece of shit.

  47. Re:NO NO NO! BAD TABLET, BAD! by Dog-Cow · · Score: 1

    I have an 8GB iPod Touch that I've never filled. Some people just don't need a terabyte in a portable device. If you do, THE iPod/iPad WAS NOT DESIGNED FOR YOU. The fact that you hate its existence proves that you are a pure bigot who hates without cause.

  48. Re:NO NO NO! BAD TABLET, BAD! by Dog-Cow · · Score: 1

    And because your mental capacity cannot even be measured in Planck units, you have to hate it because it comes from Apple.

    Do the world a favor and leave.

  49. Ironic by LihTox · · Score: 1

    Given the fact that the article is all about OTHER tablet PCs, why are all the top-modded comments here about the iPad? Maybe this is why it's doing so well-- even its detractors can't seem to talk about anything else!

  50. Re:NO NO NO! BAD TABLET, BAD! by RocketRabbit · · Score: 1

    Flash is dead, man. It took most of the major sites about a week to convert completely away from it, once the ipad came out. Ebay used to be a mess of flash garbage flickering on the frontier of the screen, now it is nice and simple and fast. Google has even nodded to the ipad and enhanced several of their products for it.

    As far as what the ipad does, it does nearly everything I would wish it to. Sure, I could use a root shell, and it'd be nice to have background apps running all the time(which are coming in about a week or so with iOS 4).

    There's a lot of shit on the app store for sure, but there is a lot of good stuff as well. For anything else, that Steve Jobs doesn't like on the app store for example, I can compile and install it myself. I'm still mystified that you are under the impression that your Android phone can magically do stuff the ipad or iphone can't, aside from multitasking. What's most baffling is that a product comes along that is literally a game changer - nothing exists as competition to it - one that's clearly going to be a tough act to follow, and one that has set the competitors ascramble, spurring the possibility of newer and better devices, and you are disgusted with Apple for even having dreamed it up. What the hell man? Without the ipad your little android or webos tablet would never happen.