Slashdot Mirror


Khan Academy Delivers 100,000 Lectures Daily

eldavojohn writes "Working from the comfort of his home, Salman Khan has made available more than 1,500 mini-lectures to educate the world. Subjects range from math and physics to finance, biology, and current economics. Kahn Academy amounts to little more than a YouTube channel and one very devoted man. He is trying to provide education in the way he wished he had been taught. With more than 100,000 video views a day, the man is making a difference for many students. In his FAQ he explains how he knows he is being effective. What will probably ensure his popularity (and provide a legacy surpassing that of most highly paid educators) is that everything is licensed under Creative Commons 3.0. He only needs his time, a $200 Camtasia Recorder, an $80 Wacom Bamboo Tablet, and a free copy of SmoothDraw3. While the lecturing may not be quite up to the Feynman level, it's a great augmenter for advanced learners, and a lifeline for those without much access to learning resources."

213 comments

  1. can't resist by meekg · · Score: 5, Funny

    KAHHHHHHN !!!!!1!

    1. Re:can't resist by Twide · · Score: 0, Troll

      KAHHHHHHN !!!!!1!

      Resistance is futile.

    2. Re:can't resist by PatPending · · Score: 2, Funny
      --
      What one fool can do, another can. (Ancient Simian Proverb)
    3. Re:can't resist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I'm looking forward to khaaan.xxx

    4. Re:can't resist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Typo. It's Khan.

    5. Re:can't resist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Typo. It's Khan.

      Actually, if you listen very carefully to the intonation in Kirk's scream, you'll hear he puts the "a" before the silent "h" ... although some scholars argue this is merely due to an errant glob of spittle.

    6. Re:can't resist by iknowcss · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's the math of Kahn ;)

      --
      Life is rarely fair. Cherish the moments when there is a right answer.
    7. Re:can't resist by numbski · · Score: 1

      My kingdom for some mod points. Come *ON* people.

      --

      Karma: Chameleon (mostly due to the fact that you come and go).

  2. s/Kahn/Khan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    C'mon. The link is to KHANacademy.org, and it's still titled KAHN?

    1. Re:s/Kahn/Khan by fishexe · · Score: 3, Funny

      You forgot your trailing slash. And you want us to think you actually use sed. Come on.

      --
      "I don't care about the Constitution!" --Bill O'Reilly, November 17, 2009
    2. Re:s/Kahn/Khan by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      I wonder what sed would do in that situation.

      1) Nothing?
      2) You'd get an error message?
      3) Something really bad and unexpected (but that with hindsight makes sense, if you really think about it) would happen?

      I think 2 is unlikely, and I'm not going to risk it.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    3. Re:s/Kahn/Khan by martenjanderuiter · · Score: 1

      Nope. Gp forgot to include the starting colon. :s/Kahn/Khan has the desired effect in vi*.
      * YMMV. This post is not intended to ignite the flamefest known as the vi-emacs schism.

    4. Re:s/Kahn/Khan by fishexe · · Score: 1

      * YMMV. This post is not intended to ignite the flamefest known as the vi-emacs schism.

      Which is small comfort, as I think you and I both know the road to schismatic flamefests is paved with good intentions.

      --
      "I don't care about the Constitution!" --Bill O'Reilly, November 17, 2009
    5. Re:s/Kahn/Khan by Jurily · · Score: 1

      You forgot your trailing slash. And you want us to think you actually use sed. Come on.

      Congratulations, you just pointed out a syntax error in pseudocode.

    6. Re:s/Kahn/Khan by dylan_- · · Score: 1

      I wonder what sed would do in that situation....I'm not going to risk it.

      $ sed s/khan/kahn tmp.txt
      sed: -e expression #1, char 11: unterminated `s' command

      I'm not sure exactly what you expected could go horribly wrong just using sed! (Not that this should be a general rule for trying out different commands)

      --
      Igor Presnyakov stole my hat
    7. Re:s/Kahn/Khan by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      It would be number two. GNU sed will actually tell you that you didn't terminate your 's' command correctly. Older seds will just say something like "garbled command".

    8. Re:s/Kahn/Khan by Rysc · · Score: 1

      If one extra character changes it from pseudocode to real code, why not include that one extra character?

      --
      I want my Cowboyneal
    9. Re:s/Kahn/Khan by wealthychef · · Score: 1

      If one extra character changes it from pseudocode to real code, why not include that one extra character?

      Because he's not writing to a computer program? Clearly his communication was successful to its intended audience. I know some of us interact with computers all day, but there is no reason to start acting like one when talking to other humans. Except for the fun of it. :-)

      --
      Currently hooked on AMP
    10. Re:s/Kahn/Khan by dominious · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure exactly what you expected could go horribly wrong just using sed!

      My friend, you have no idea:)

      For example: script to replace bad words such as: s/gay/homosexual/

      Result: http://revealingerrors.com/tyson_homosexual

    11. Re:s/Kahn/Khan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because he's not writing to a computer program?

      Speak for yourself, meatbag.

  3. Hey I used him to learn partial derivatives by NotSoHeavyD3 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It was just personal curiosity since I had heard of it but boy, he was so straight forward about it I understood very quickly. The guy deserves his success.

    --
    Did you know 80 to 90% of the moderators on slashdot wouldn't recognize a troll even if one dragged them under a bridge.
    1. Re:Hey I used him to learn partial derivatives by MoeDumb · · Score: 0

      Re your sig: And if one DID drag them under the bridge a cry would immediately go up: "There goes the neighborhood!" (Pace, mods. I kid because I love.)

      --
      Mod Me Up. You'll make a grown man cry.
    2. Re:Hey I used him to learn partial derivatives by The+Hatchet · · Score: 1

      Agreed, I was having problems with a few small subjects in advanced calculus three, and not only did he make it easy to understand, he went much deeper in depth and really helped me a lot. This man is a hero, at the very least. hopefully people join him in other subjects and make it even greater.

      --
      Where is the mod rating for "scary"? Also, ...
    3. Re:Hey I used him to learn partial derivatives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That may be because partial derivatives are a very simple concept.

  4. Tip for kdawson by andy1307 · · Score: 4, Funny
    Kahn = Jewish

    Khan = Muslim

    1. Re:Tip for kdawson by EvanED · · Score: 2, Informative

      Khan = Muslim

      Or a genetically-engineered Indian.

    2. Re:Tip for kdawson by JanneM · · Score: 3, Funny

      Kan = Japanese

      Can = beer coming right up

      --
      Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
    3. Re:Tip for kdawson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      kann = German

      kant = German

      kan = kant

    4. Re:Tip for kdawson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oliver_Kahn

      may have Jewish ancestors, but I doubt

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genghis_Khan

      was Muslim :p

      And these is the K(h*)a(h*)ns we real people know.

    5. Re:Tip for kdawson by shri · · Score: 1

      Time for a movie quote... "My name is Khan and I'm not Jewish"

    6. Re:Tip for kdawson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Khaaaaaaaaaaaaan!!!

      - Kirk

    7. Re:Tip for kdawson by fishexe · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Khan = Muslim

      Or a genetically-engineered Indian.

      Or a Genghis.

      --
      "I don't care about the Constitution!" --Bill O'Reilly, November 17, 2009
    8. Re:Tip for kdawson by value_added · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Kahn = Jewish

      Khan = Muslim

      Last I checked, "Muslim" was recognised as neither an ethnicity, nor a nationality. But don't get that in the way of trying to make life simple for yourself or others.

      Salman Khan, IIRC, was born in New Awlins, and his parents are from some province in India. Someone else can add to that if they're so inclined.

      Either way, he's an amazing guy. The word would be a better place if there more "Muslims" like him around. ;-)

    9. Re:Tip for kdawson by blackraven14250 · · Score: 1

      So, are you saying Genghis Khan was a Muslim?

    10. Re:Tip for kdawson by Third+Position · · Score: 3, Informative

      TFA says:

      Khan's mother is from Calcutta; his father was a pediatrician from Bangladesh. His parents divorced when he was 3, and his father died when he was only 13. By high school, he was growing up in a New Orleans suburb with a hardworking single mother and a fiercely protective elder sister.

      --
      American Third Position
      Finally, a real choice!
    11. Re:Tip for kdawson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Kahn = Jewish

      Khan = Muslim

      Last I checked, "Muslim" was recognised as neither an ethnicity, nor a nationality. But don't get that in the way of trying to make life simple for yourself or others.

      Salman Khan, IIRC, was born in New Awlins, and his parents are from some province in India. Someone else can add to that if they're so inclined.

      Either way, he's an amazing guy. The word would be a better place if there more "Muslims" like him around. ;-)

      Last I check, neither Jewish or Muslim were either an ethnicity nor a nationality. They are both religions.

    12. Re:Tip for kdawson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or if you want to be US Politically Correct and legally safe

      Kahn = Good Guy
      Khan = Bad Guy

      Remember that the US Supreme Court has ruled that just talking to a terrorist means you have provided 'material support' under the terms of the US Patriot Act. Thanks, Chief Justice John Roberts and all the principled members of COngress and Executive.

      http://original.antiwar.com/henderson/2010/06/27/supreme-mediocrity/

      Better be safe than sorry.

    13. Re:Tip for kdawson by xigxag · · Score: 3, Interesting

      In his FAQ, Khan says about his religion, "If you believe in trying to make the best of the finite number of years we have on this planet (while not making it any worse for anyone else), think that pride and self-righteousness are the cause of most conflict and negativity, and are humbled by the vastness and mystery of the Universe, then I'm the same religion as you."

      In other words, he's an atheist. ;)

      --
      There are two kinds of people: 1) those who start arrays with one and 1) those who start them with zero.
    14. Re:Tip for kdawson by kasimbaba · · Score: 1, Informative

      Check again. Jewish is an ethnicity.

    15. Re:Tip for kdawson by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Kahn = Jewish

      Khan = Muslim

      Caan = Rollerball / Dragons' Den.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    16. Re:Tip for kdawson by andy1307 · · Score: 1

      You don't think it's important for kdawson to at least get his name right?

    17. Re:Tip for kdawson by asliarun · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      On a slightly different note, I find it a little sad that slashdot contributors are able to correctly spell Nordic/Germanic names with umlauts and complex non-English vowels (immediate example: Piratbyrån), but screw up the spelling of a name as simple as Khan.

      To be fair, we all (at least us geeks) tend to pay special attention to spelling when we see a non-English symbol in a name. Nonetheless, please do ask yourself if you are unconsciously trying to be Euro-centric. It helps to become more aware of popular names and cultures around the world, especially as we are so well connected in today's world, and because our world is truly become a multi-cultural place.

      The correct way to say Khan is something like "Khaaah-n" (not "caan"). Most names and words in the Indian subcontinent (Afghanistan, Pakistan, India, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka) requires you to speak from the stomach, which is quite different from the way Americans and some Europeans tend to speak. From what little I know, the family name "Khan" is mostly found in Afghanistan and parts of Pakistan, although it is quite common in India as well. Khans are also considered to be "Pathans" or "Pashtuns" - known to have a strong code of conduct, pride (in a good way), fierce, loyal, living life to the fullest, extremely hospitable, and also physically tall and strong (you will find a lot of them playing sports).

      On a different note, hats off to what Salman Khan and what he is doing. He's actually quit a high paying job to devote his energy and attention full-time to follow his passion. The world definitely needs more people like him.

    18. Re:Tip for kdawson by Rysc · · Score: 1

      And Judaism is a religion, as long as we're being pedantic.

      --
      I want my Cowboyneal
    19. Re:Tip for kdawson by O('_')O_Bush · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think the point he was making is that any intellectual that has considered their place in life and moral philosophy are alike where it matters, regardless of religious creed or lack thereof.

      I'm a Baptist, and I share those beliefs. So do many atheists, Hindus, Muslims, and others.

      Religion just isn't important when forming a viewpoint about someone, and only causes problems if one falls into the "pride and self-righteousness" category.

      --
      while(1) attack(People.Sandy);
    20. Re:Tip for kdawson by bsDaemon · · Score: 1

      No, but his descendants that conquered Persia then were instrumental in spreading the religion, especially into India and further east into Asia.

    21. Re:Tip for kdawson by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Informative

      On a slightly different note, I find it a little sad that slashdot contributors are able to correctly spell Nordic/Germanic names with umlauts and complex non-English vowels (immediate example: Piratbyrån), but screw up the spelling of a name as simple as Khan

      We don't spell words like Piratbyrån, we copy and paste them. But we don't do that with a simple, short name, because anyone can get Kahn right. Er Kon. Er...

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    22. Re:Tip for kdawson by perryizgr8 · · Score: 1

      Time for a movie quote...

      "My name is Khan and I'm a terrorist!!1"

      ftfy.

      --
      Wealth is the gift that keeps on giving.
    23. Re:Tip for kdawson by perryizgr8 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      what he said ^^
      seriously people, most religious, god-believing individuals have these exact same notions and concepts like you atheists. please stop pretending to be enlightened elitist bastards.

      --
      Wealth is the gift that keeps on giving.
    24. Re:Tip for kdawson by Jawnn · · Score: 3, Insightful

      In other words, he's an atheist. ;)

      I don't see where he stated anything of the sort. Quite the contrary, I see the thoughtful musings of an agnostic in his statements. It may also be that he is a most devout Pastafarian, but recognizes that an inflexible adherence to any dogma, including the one that insists that there is no deity, is quite literally a fool's errand.

    25. Re:Tip for kdawson by mcgrew · · Score: 2

      In other words, he's an atheist. ;)

      Or Bhuddist of Hindu. I'm not sure of the Hindu religion, but Bhuddists worship life, and that statement would fit their philosophy completely.

    26. Re:Tip for kdawson by asliarun · · Score: 1

      Fair enough. I mentioned this in my previous post as well. It goes the other way around too, I've seen too many Asians unable to properly pronounce a common American name. I meant my earlier comment to be constructive - wasn't implying anything.

      Just that Khan is probably as easy to spell as John. You hardly ever see anyone misspelling it Jhon (which is actually how it is pronounced!).

    27. Re:Tip for kdawson by Afell001 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Atheist - a person who denies or disbelieves the existence of a supreme being or beings.

      Agnostic - a person who holds that the existence of the ultimate cause, as god, and the essential nature of things are unknown and unknowable, or that human knowledge is limited to experience.

      Pride - a high or inordinate opinion of one's own dignity, importance, merit, or superiority, whether as cherished in the mind or as displayed in bearing, conduct, etc.

      Self-righteousness - confident of one's own righteousness, esp. when smugly moralistic and intolerant of the opinions and behavior of others.

      Mr. Khan isn't saying he doesn't believe in God, nor is he saying that God is unknowable...what he is saying, is that it doesn't matter what you think about God, but what does matter is how our existence on this earth impacts the other people living here, and if we have their welfare in our hearts, and we have the humility to see past our differences, then it doesn't matter to what diety (or none at all) we attribute this to, in the end we share the same goal, and that is what really matters.

      The true enemy of society isn't religion, but rather the sociopaths who manipulate it to their own ends. They are difficult to recognize until they finally play their hands and the damage is done, but these are the people who have given religion a bad name. They take the religious zealots and turn them into weapons that tear down and destroy all that society has built. We have seen this in all the major religions to date, as well as almost any cultural divide where a schism can be made and exploited by people who want to manipulate the masses to their own ends (i.e., race, sex, creed, etc.).

      That is why those of us who carry our faith close to their hearts need to be wary of anyone who tries to speak to that faith. We should always question the motives of anyone who tries to persuade us to their way of thinking. Look to the motives of such individuals, and look to how they treat with those around them. This is where religion fails.

    28. Re:Tip for kdawson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lol@ some of these comments. WHY SO SERIOUS GUYS.

      "In other words, he's an atheist. ;)" -- WINK.

      Obviously xiqxaq was kiding around.

      And Kahn's real religion (or lack )is none of our business.

    29. Re:Tip for kdawson by bytesex · · Score: 1

      What are recognized ethnicities, and who recognizes them ?

      --
      Religion is what happens when nature strikes and groupthink goes wrong.
    30. Re:Tip for kdawson by schwit1 · · Score: 1

      You did notice that John Paul Stevens was on the same side as Roberts in the decision.

      I do wonder how an attorney can defend a client accused of being a terrorist without running afoul of this ruling.

    31. Re:Tip for kdawson by mrops · · Score: 1

      Actually Salman Khan is as typical a muslim name from the Indian sub-continent as it gets.

      Not saying what this particular individual practices/believes. I would love to see more Muslim doing the kind of work he is, once in a while rest of us Muslims don't have to bury our head in the sand when a news story hits the media about some insane F&$*$ blowing himself up.

    32. Re:Tip for kdawson by dido · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The funny thing is 'kan' can mean in Japanese a can or tin as well, if it's written using the kanji U+7F36. Oddly enough it's not one of the many wasei-eigo terms Japanese imported from English, as it's really one of the on-yomi (Chinese) readings of that kanji. The technical term for such a thing is a false cognate. It's written '', just in case Slashdot ever stops being one of the last few sites to survive to the 21st century while remaining stubbornly ignorant of Unicode.

      --
      Qu'on me donne six lignes écrites de la main du plus honnête homme, j'y trouverai de quoi le faire pendre.
    33. Re:Tip for kdawson by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      Khan is likely to be ignoring the inherent conflicts in his religion with the many other religions (which the collective members various religions do when they lack the power to eradicate other religions) or he may be a deist who believes god exists and sort of rolls his own religion based on a foundation of some other religion (perhaps islam) where he picks the parts he likes and ignores the parts he doesn't like. By the adherents of the religion, he's a heretic and viewed as going to hell (or not going to heaven).

      I'm looking forward to listening to some of his lectures.

      Right now I'm watching/listening to Michael Sandel ("Justice") and it's an easily accessible philosophy class in the spirit of Khan's easily accessible math classes.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    34. Re:Tip for kdawson by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 2, Funny

      I find it amusing that they can spell such names but have loost the ability to spell loose.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    35. Re:Tip for kdawson by pauljlucas · · Score: 1

      I'm a Baptist, and I share those beliefs.

      So you support gay marriage then? (To not support it would be "making the [finite number of years we have on this planet] worse for somebody else" by denying marriage to everyone who wants it.)

      --
      If you reply, do so only to what I explicitly wrote. If I didn't write it, don't assume or infer it.
    36. Re:Tip for kdawson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A Buddhist is an atheist, by definition.

    37. Re:Tip for kdawson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What are recognized ethnicities, and who recognizes them ?

      I would say that's any people who identify themselves with a common name and/or lineage.

      If the group can answer "we are the so-and-sos" with a single name, that counts.

      Incidentally, this is why some revolutionaries in the USA were reluctant to call their new union a "nation."

    38. Re:Tip for kdawson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Last I checked, "Muslim" was recognised as neither an ethnicity, nor a nationality.

      Neither is Christianity, but I think it's pretty safe to say Matthew is a Christian name. Anyway, you're missing the point... or just being pedantic. lol

    39. Re:Tip for kdawson by Shotgun · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      I don't "support" it. I don't care. I believe homosexuality is a sinful activity, but I also believe that I have no right to try to control your activity. I know liberals can't stand to have someone tell them, "I don't like what you're doing, but it's none of my business."; but, I don't care. Do what makes you feel good. It's none of my business. Yes, I do believe that your behavior is an indication that you will go to Hell.

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    40. Re:Tip for kdawson by compro01 · · Score: 1

      Just that Khan is probably as easy to spell as John. You hardly ever see anyone misspelling it Jhon (which is actually how it is pronounced!).

      Yes, but a better comparison is how many people mix up "Jon" and "John". Both "Khan" and "Kahn" are actual names.

      As a side note, Jhon is also an actual, though uncommon, name.

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    41. Re:Tip for kdawson by pauljlucas · · Score: 1

      I don't "support" it.

      So if there was (or would be) a ballot initiative in your state to legalize same-sex marriage, did you (or would you) vote (or have voted) for it, against it, or abstain? If you vote(d) against it, then your earlier statement about "sharing those beliefs" was a lie.

      Yes, I do believe that your behavior is an indication that you will go to Hell.

      I never said it was my behavior. I could be straight but have a gay or lesbian brother, sister, son, or daughter whose rights I don't want to see denied by bigots like you who believe in imaginary friends in the sky.

      --
      If you reply, do so only to what I explicitly wrote. If I didn't write it, don't assume or infer it.
    42. Re:Tip for kdawson by Peach+Rings · · Score: 1

      How many religious, god-believing individuals have two masters degrees and two bachelor's degrees from MIT?

    43. Re:Tip for kdawson by SpeZek · · Score: 1

      Yes, I do believe that your behavior is an indication that you will go to Hell.

      If that's the case, then you're misguided, and have no faith in what Jesus taught (which, incidentally, means that you are the one that's going to hell).

      Judge not, lest ye be judged. As long as a person asks Jesus for forgiveness for any sin, they are allowed into heaven. Indeed, it's a bit fuzzy whether they have to ask, or just accept Jesus' forgiveness, but regardless, no sin, no matter how severe (there is no severity in the eyes of the biblical god, all sin is equal, with the single exception of renouncing faith, because he's a narcissistic bastard) is an auto gateway to hell.

      And, indeed, "I don't "support" it. I don't care" would lose you major points, since while judging is a sin, not trying to save souls through the methods taught by Jesus (love, compassion, tolerance) is ignoring one of the principle tenets of Christianity.

      Damning other people by your own laziness or ignorance or apathy, I'd say, is a greater moral sin than homosexuality. They're not hurting you, but, according to your faith, you're damning them.

    44. Re:Tip for kdawson by Quirkz · · Score: 1

      If you can convert to it, it's not really an ethnicity. Sometimes it gets treated as such, but it's a spectacularly bad correlation to attempt to draw.

    45. Re:Tip for kdawson by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 1

      If you can convert to it, it's not really an ethnicity.

      You can convert to Judaism. Such a thing doesn't make you an ethnic Jew.

    46. Re:Tip for kdawson by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 1

      Er, excuse me, but who gives a shit what his religion or ethnicity is? If his name was John Smith would we be having a speculative conversation about his religion? Give it a freaking rest, /. racists!

      --
      Drill baby drill - on Mars
    47. Re:Tip for kdawson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can = beer coming right up

      Gives a whole new meaning to "yes, we can", doesn't it...

      Although I've got to say that with American beer, the way it's "coming right up" is perhaps not the kind you might expect. ;) (Just give me my German braü, dammit!)

    48. Re:Tip for kdawson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try to sign up for an account on J-Date then tell me that being Jewish is not an ethnicity. They have subsections of Jewish descent.

    49. Re:Tip for kdawson by robi2106 · · Score: 1

      Does it matter? And are you saying that anyone with religious opinions is too dumb to obtain that level of intellectual achievement?

      srsl? I know I'm not supposed to feed the trolls... i'd rather just squish them.

    50. Re:Tip for kdawson by O('_')O_Bush · · Score: 1

      Yes, but that's because I'm also a libertarian. I have no right to tell someone else that they cannot do something just because my religion disagrees with it.

      --
      while(1) attack(People.Sandy);
    51. Re:Tip for kdawson by O('_')O_Bush · · Score: 1

      Why are you telling me this?

      I have not made any assertions about his religion, and nor do I care. I was merely clarifying his insight.

      --
      while(1) attack(People.Sandy);
    52. Re:Tip for kdawson by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 1

      Someone started a discussion about his race/religion and you joined in with it. You should have known better. The correct response to anyone taking part in a discussion about a man's religion that came about just because he has a funny name is "stop being such a racist."

      --
      Drill baby drill - on Mars
    53. Re:Tip for kdawson by xigxag · · Score: 1

      I was half-kidding about him being an atheist, hence the winking emoticon. Only half-kidding because it's my experience that when someone refuses to straightfowardly confess their faith, they tend to be some sort of atheist/agnostic person. IOW "most religious, god-believing individuals" will unhesitatingly tell you their religion straight off instead of doing a "Universal Goodness" strip tease. And keep in mind it's in his FAQ, Khan went out of his way to be coy.

      So no, I personally don't think that decent ethics are the sole province of atheists. But nor do I agree with Khan's assertion that all us 'good people' are essentially the same religion. I think that minimizing the differences in what we all believe does us no good in the end.

      Having said that, I stand in awe of his secular accomplishments.

      --
      There are two kinds of people: 1) those who start arrays with one and 1) those who start them with zero.
    54. Re:Tip for kdawson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> Khan = Muslim
      >> Or a genetically-engineered Indian.

      > Or a Genghis.

      Or a Chaka. ...but not a Madeline!

    55. Re:Tip for kdawson by Shotgun · · Score: 1

      To answer SpeZek and pauljlucas at once:

      "And whosoever shall not receive you, nor hear your words, when ye depart out of that house or city, shake off the dust of your feet."

      Would you forgive an unrepentant child molester, and then let him babysit your 5yr old daughter? Why would a just God not separate evil doers from those who are at least truly repentant? Is your imagination so limited that the only reason you can see for separating the just and unjust is that God is a "narcissistic bastard"?

      The whole of the Old Testament is instruction that men cannot be righteous of their own accord, but the Christian Bible teaches that God is forgiving. That was the whole point of "I'll give the Jews a chance. Ok. Try again. Ok. One more time." That is the one overriding theme of the Old Testament.

      With the New Testament, God decided that he would accept punishment for the sins of those people who would be repentant. It's a get out of hell free card, but not really. You have to truly have a change of heart and try to live a just life as described by God.

      When I tell you homosexuality is a sin as described by God through the Bible, you can accept it or not. My commission is to inform you, not force you to accept any teaching. I realize that liberals like yourself can't stand for someone to disagree with you, and then not care that you're wrong, but it is what it is. I find your understanding of "love, compassion, [and] tolerance" to be extremely shallow. If your understanding of "tolerance" were not so shallow, you might be able to understand what it means to disagree with someone yet not be angry at them. To be clear, I've not damned you in any way, whatsoever. I have no power to damn you or anyone. Homosexuality is a sin. Willfully sinning is a rejection of the salvation offered by God. Your damnation lies in the choices you make with the information just offered. You have the power in your own hands. I've shaken the dust from my feet. I can walk away and not feel a need to throw insults over my shoulder at you.

      If there were a ballot initiative, I would abstain. The government has no place in marriage. It is a religious establishment. Politically, marriage was originally an institution used to arbitrate parentage. Two people proclaimed in a public ceremony that they were wed, then everyone knew who was responsible for any kids that popped up. That application is antiquated, but marriage continues on the inertia of tradition. Parentage disagreements today should be settled on the basis of DNA tests (and welfare denied to unwed mothers until they've named the daddy, who'll then be held responsible for child support).

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    56. Re:Tip for kdawson by davidbofinger · · Score: 1

      Last I checked, "Muslim" was recognised as neither an ethnicity, nor a nationality. But don't get that in the way of trying to make life simple for yourself or others.

      I think if anything you're the one who is oversimplifying, by assuming names are determined by ethnicity or nationality rather than by religion. In fact, many names are inspired by religion, Mohammed being the most obvious example.

      That said, "Khan" isn't really from Islam but from Central Asia. It was carried by Turks and Mongols wherever they conquered. I'm guessing Indians named Khan get it from the Mughals, who got it from Afghanistan, who got it from the Seljuq Turks. Who happened to be muslim, but that's probably not relevant to the name.

  5. 'Feynman' level? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    When people stumble out of his lectures looking like they've been hit by a bus, then he'll have reached the 'Feynman' level. Right now IMHO he's already doing a better job of addressing normal students.

    1. Re:'Feynman' level? by moteyalpha · · Score: 4, Interesting

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Feynman_Lectures_on_Physics Feynman is astounding and had a natural grasp of the science. One of the strangest things I learned was that there is a 100 volt per meter field everywhere on the Earth.
      I have viewed some of the videos at Kahn Academy and it is nice to see worked out examples as this is the best way to teach. Simply stating the relationships doesn't ever seem to help me.
      Like programming, I have to write something before I really understand what it means. if("Khan"=="Kahn"){P=NP;kdawson=editor}

    2. Re:'Feynman' level? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      A testimonial from the Khan academy home page. "My eldest kid is dancing around in my room here because she is so excited that she finally found someone that teaches like this."

      I've listened to both Khan and Feynman and I found Khan way better.

    3. Re:'Feynman' level? by camperdave · · Score: 1

      One of the strangest things I learned was that there is a 100 volt per meter field everywhere on the Earth.

      So all I have to do is stick a wire in the air and I can power my transistor radio?

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    4. Re:'Feynman' level? by perryizgr8 · · Score: 1

      just because idiots like you don't understand feynmann does not mean he is a bad teacher. myself, i learnt much more from feynman than any other teacher.

      --
      Wealth is the gift that keeps on giving.
    5. Re:'Feynman' level? by Bitmanhome · · Score: 1

      Reading the article, the answer appears to be yes. I must assume there's not much current available, otherwise everything would be powered by wires in the air.

      --
      Not that this wasn't entirely predictable.
    6. Re:'Feynman' level? by damburger · · Score: 1

      Sadly, that won't work. As soon as the wire is exposed to the field, the charge carriers in the wire move to neutralize the field inside the wire. The critical difference between a 100V potential in the atmosphere and a 100V battery is that in the battery, you not only have the potential but you also have a chemical reaction that will maintain the potential as fast as the circuit it is connected to would neutralize it. This process results in a constant flow of charge carriers i.e. a current.

      That is the key difference between a wire held static in an electric field and a circuit connected to a battery; there is potential (voltage) in both cases but only current in the case of the battery. You can also think of it in terms of energy conservation; Power P=IV and thus if you have a voltage but no source of energy, current I must equal zero, and your radio remains unpowered.

      --
      If we can put a man on the moon, why can't we shoot people for Apollo-related non-sequiturs?
  6. Everything Old is New again by KarmaOverDogma · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think this is a very interesting way of bringing and old, maybe ancient, method of teaching back to the fore again.

    If I recall correctly, Socrates taught by answering questions and encouraging new ones, not just spouting knowledge according to a set curricula, like we do today.

    If used well, this strikes me as having a real impact for learning, and teaching, in a more natural way. I for one would love to see more of this kind of thing going on and being acknowledged as a legitimate and effective way to teach and learn.

    I wish him and the viewers all the best.

    --
    uR iGn0ranc3, Their Power
    1. Re:Everything Old is New again by Loomismeister · · Score: 0

      Professors today also teach by answering questions and encouraging new ones, as well as spouting knowledge according to a set curricula. Much like what Socrates would and should have been doing.

    2. Re:Everything Old is New again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not just spouting knowledge according to a set curricula

      What tended to happen in my classes was the opposite. The teacher would constantly ask questions designed to engage, despite the fact that everyone was too cool to answer them. After a few cricket chirps, the prof would just answer the question, write a few things down, and ask another one. You'd think college classrooms wouldn't feature that, but as someone who left and came back when I was a bit older, that's what I witnessed.

      I'm actually left wondering how a series of video lectures could claim to be more interactive than a real classroom, even a bad one. :P

      But this reminds me, if you're into CS at all and dig nontraditional teaching, check out The Little Schemer. I'll bet a fair number of people here would also recommend it. It's pseudo-socratic in that everything is either a question or an answer, but the really neat thing is that all definitions are given after the examples, which is great for programming constructs since sometimes even the examples are abstract.

    3. Re:Everything Old is New again by Dialecticus · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If I recall correctly, Socrates taught by answering questions and encouraging new ones, ...

      By modern standards he would most likely have been labeled a troll. After all, aren't trolls using a form of Socratic irony to spur debate?

    4. Re:Everything Old is New again by wmitty · · Score: 3, Informative

      If I recall correctly, Socrates taught by answering questions and encouraging new ones, not just spouting knowledge according to a set curricula, like we do today.

      Socrates was unusual then and now in that he tought by asking questions encourage his students to think for themselves and discover answers on their own.

      While what Khan is doing is great and praisworthy, it is not the Socratic method.

    5. Re:Everything Old is New again by TheTurtlesMoves · · Score: 1

      Socrates wasn't teaching engineers or doctors, etc.

      Would you be happy with a doctor working on you, that never asked about spleens 'cus they are boring... when operating on your spleen.

      When you complete a course, you are supose to have some minimum level of "competence" in the subject. Not just know more than before.

      --
      The Grey Goo disaster happened 3 billion years ago. This rock is covered in self replicating machines!
    6. Re:Everything Old is New again by fwarren · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      I was between jobs and attened a community college for a year. For the most part, what a waste of time. I found any "Dummies" or "Learn xxxx in 24 hours" or "Learn xxx in 30 days" book better than the textbooks the college used. It seems like they had a plan

      1. Collect a tuition
      2. Sell you a "text book"
      3. The textbook is a bit of reading, then homework and a test.
      4. The instructor was there to a) Repeat in Class what was in the book b) answer questions for the slower students about homework assignments c) grade homework.
      5. Move at such a pace that after reading, writing, testing on a topic, in 2 weeks you could not remember what you had done.
      6. Believe you had master of a topic even when you got 3 out of 10 questions wrong. (The guy who is wrong 30% of the time gets the same degree as the guy who is only wrong 2% of the time).

      In my "vocational" CIS degree course work I had an instructor who only knew what Microsoft has told him to believe. And Instructor who said the book sucked but would not talk about anything that was NOT in the book. It was fustrating talking to a man with 30 years experience who would not tell me anything useful.

      It was a total waste of time. I did not realize college was paying someone to verify I answered questiosn correctly to prove I read a chapter and a final test to prove I learned something. Maybe it is because I am 43 and not 19. But I KNOW if I have learned anything or not, I don't need 30 distracting questions for some to grade. I need to "apply" what I have leanred. Since I knew more than the instructors on many of the topics, and anytime I had a question they either did not know the answer to it, or dodged it, I was paying $75.00 a credit hour for a proctor to score my work not an instructor to teach me anything useful.

      Examples:
      10 weeks to learn how to install Windows Vista and set up printers and file sharing.
      10 weeks to learn how to install Windows Server 2008 and set up DHCP, DNS, printers and file sharing
      20 weeks to learn how to run Visual Dev Studio, and write a small application with variables, loops, subroutines and can open and read a text file.

      I can lean more on any of these topics in 10 weeks of reading Slashdot than what I learned in class. I will never fear going up against a college graduate who graduated from the local community college.

      I am all for anyone who will explain things the way I think and record it and put it up on Youtube. Especially since you can actualy email them anything you dont' follow or have a question about and there is a possibility or receiving some feedback.

      --
      vi + /etc over regedit any day of the week.
    7. Re:Everything Old is New again by Fred_A · · Score: 1

      10 weeks to learn how to install Windows Vista and set up printers and file sharing.

      *Weeks* ?

      I've never installed Vista, much less set up printers and file sharing, having never used Windows as a server (more of a Unix guy) but I'm fairly sure it wouldn't take me 10 weeks.

      I'm pretty confident most casual users could do it in a couple hours by poking around a bit.

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    8. Re:Everything Old is New again by dargaud · · Score: 1

      If I recall correctly, Socrates taught by answering questions and encouraging new ones, not just spouting knowledge according to a set curricula, like we do today.

      Yes, but that worked on a one to one basis. If you apply that to a roomfull of students you'll facepalm yourself with the stupidity of most questions and just waste your time.

      --
      Non-Linux Penguins ?
    9. Re:Everything Old is New again by repapetilto · · Score: 1

      Eventually it boils down to knowing how other (expert) people figure things out... once you know enough to do that any class will be pointless besides any philosophical aspect people can argue about. Still everything is set up so that it is usually in your advantage in the long run to pay for that piece of paper. Think about societies perspective, there is a reason for it whether right or wrong.

    10. Re:Everything Old is New again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not, sure if this is like this everywhere you go, but my psychology courses were all taught in this method and I of course learned a lot. Most of the other classes I took outside of it were not. Go figure?

    11. Re:Everything Old is New again by js_sebastian · · Score: 1

      If I recall correctly, Socrates taught by answering questions and encouraging new ones, ...

      By modern standards he would most likely have been labeled a troll. After all, aren't trolls using a form of Socratic irony to spur debate?

      They modded him troll at the time too. Unfortunately at the time the penalty was death...

    12. Re:Everything Old is New again by nashv · · Score: 1

      Well, at least that Socrates method is still followed in Europe at the Graduate levels. There are no courses to complete, but rather many many seminars that you can attend and learn yourself for your research.

      --
      Entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem.
    13. Re:Everything Old is New again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not so far from the truth. Socrates was sentenced to death after all.

      I'm glad we don't have the death penalty anymore (in this commenter's country, anyway), but boy do I sometimes wish it could be applied to trolls ;)

    14. Re:Everything Old is New again by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, we are not sure how much Socrates used what we know as the "Socratic Method" since most of our examples are from the writings of Plato (where he uses Socrates as a character in dialogues designed to present a point that Plato wanted to make). Socrates left no writings and for the most part all we know about him is what was said about him in the writings of his students works on philosophy.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    15. Re:Everything Old is New again by bsDaemon · · Score: 1

      Socrates didn't have standardized tests or "no child left behind," and he produced Aristotle. We have had to poach talent since the end of the cold war, and in fact, we probably only one that because we swiped all the smart Nazis before the Russians could get them. I mean, look at Khan himself. Here's the child of a single-parent immigrant who has multiple BS degrees in Electrical Engineering, Computer Science and Mathematics from MIT, then masters in Computer Science and Electrical Engineering, and a Harvard MBA (which is probably what makes him the big bucks...).

      From the foreign students I knew at school and since, or the students who's parents were immigrants (especially the Asian variety), this isn't too far out of the norm for them. Frankly, I applaud this guy for taking all that knowledge, turning around, and helping to give it away like this. It's amazing, and consistent with the best traditions of science and education. I have a feeling if I had that many degrees, I'd probably be trying to protect my 'competitive advantage' or something. When I see people like this, I feel ashamed not only of myself for not fully taking advantage of all the educational opportunities that were presented to me, but also sad for my country because large swaths of my generation just don't even seem to care. Then again, Obama's no Kennedy, though Bush was a pretty good Nixon, and so my generation lacks the motivation and inspiration that the Gemini and Apollo programs helped give to my parents' generation. It also doesn't help that our enemy isn't remotely competent enough to actually destroy our civilization, just trick us into screwing our selves over. To paraphrase 'M' in Casino Royale, 'I miss the Cold War.'

    16. Re:Everything Old is New again by pikine · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I tried to do what Socrates would do as a teaching fellow. A student complained in the course evaluation that I should not ask questions before they learn about the subject. I also took a top-down approach, reviewing course material in a way hoping that if a student is interested or needed to know more, he would ask questions to clarify. Several students commented that I glossed over detail and that I was too vague. A number of students thought I was boring. I tried to explore related knowledge that they wouldn't find on textbook, and a few students said that I digressed, and I went off tangent.

      On the positive side, one student did comment that he found my method of teaching intellectually challenging, and that he learned a lot, which he described as a strength.

      Socrates would not have wanted to teach students who only want to be spoon fed, who do not want to learn, who only want to get good grades, and eventually their diploma, so they could work for an industry that they're just in it for the money. Students nowadays feel entitled. Entitled to be knowledgeable without making the effort to learn. Entitled to get good grades without learning anything. Entitled to get diploma without passing courses. Entitled to get a job. Entitled to get high salary. Entitled to get their material satisfaction. And finally, entitled to blame everyone else including their college professor if they don't get what they want.

      --
      I once had a signature.
    17. Re:Everything Old is New again by bsDaemon · · Score: 1

      wait... Plato taught Aristotle, not Socrates... see, my mind is leaking out my ear. At least I remembered.

    18. Re:Everything Old is New again by dominious · · Score: 1

      They modded him troll at the time too

      What? They had /. ?

    19. Re:Everything Old is New again by fwarren · · Score: 1

      Which is what makes me despair. With apologies to H.L. Mencken, "The public should not witness the making of a CIS degree nor of sausages." The more I know about getting this piece of paper the more I think that I will be going to work for idiots if they use having one of these degrees as an indicator of any type of competency in a subject.

      I have done some consulting work in the past. It is funny. A full time job for $20 an hour plus benefits, requires a degree. But if you have a friend recommend you to someone important, you can "consult" for the company at $50.00 an hour and never need to prove any education.

      --
      vi + /etc over regedit any day of the week.
    20. Re:Everything Old is New again by fwarren · · Score: 1

      Week 1: The different versions of windows Vista and what they do and do not have in them.

      Week 2: Whats new in Windows Vista

      Week 3: Disk Volumes and Partitioning Schemes

      Week 4: Performing an Upgrade Install

      Week 5: Performing a Clean Install

      Week 6: Setting up a Dual Boot System

      Week 7: Networking

      Week 8: File Permissions

      Week 9: Sharing Files

      Week 10: Printing

      If you have ever installed windows from scratch, then Weeks 1 to 4 should take a single 2 hour lecture to cover. The problem is most of the class has never done an install. So now we are back to massive quantities of reading, and questions just to make sure they understand how to partition a drive. When actually doing a nuke and paves (partition and install windows) will get you there much faster than the read/homework/test cycle.

      --
      vi + /etc over regedit any day of the week.
    21. Re:Everything Old is New again by CharlyFoxtrot · · Score: 1

      Memorization has always been a part of education even in Ancient Greece : "The first task of the scholastikos was to acquire a liberal education through diligent reading (and even memorization) of the classics of Greek literature."

      That quote is from the introduction to a translation of the oldest joke book in the world. Read it, you'll see your attitude towards students isn't exactly new.

      --
      If all else fails, immortality can always be assured by spectacular error.
    22. Re:Everything Old is New again by JayWilmont · · Score: 1

      I personally find the purely-socratic style of teaching extremely frustrating.

      I've never been graded in such a class by how well I took part in the discussion. Usually the "interesting out of textbook material" never makes it on the exam and the "confusing stuff in the textbook that I wish the instructor would discuss in class but doesn't" is the majority of the exam (and therefore, my grade).

      Maybe instead of blaming students (many of whom are going into many thousands of dollars in debt to hear you speak) for wanting to be "spoon fed", maybe you should think about how good of a job you actually did.

      By actually *listening* to your students' seemingly reasonable feedback you would be able to refine your technique, so your students would get more out of your class and you would become a better teacher.

    23. Re:Everything Old is New again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Especially since you can actualy email them anything you dont' follow or have a question about and there is a possibility or receiving some feedback.

      That was the greatest benefit school had for me. Not that the hoops they make you jump through are the right ones for your brain to grasp the material well, or that the pace is just right, but that when I did have a problem, I could pester the prof until it finally clicked.

      I suppose it depends on the size and type of school. I went to a small liberal arts college and basically dropped out and then went back for CS and excelled. It wasn't MIT, but I had lots of one-on-one time with cs and math phds, partly because of the size of the school. They could just say "bug a TA" or "ask the mailing list."

      I can lean more on any of these topics in 10 weeks of reading Slashdot than what I learned in class.

      Ok, now you're trolling :)

      But seriously, I think there is an unfortunate effect that these kinds of sites have where you only ever hear people argue about different approaches, and because you can follow the argument, you assume that you've picked up the details of those approaches by context. But most of the time these people are oversimplifying, or just plain wrong, and you have no criteria for figuring that out. Yesterday someone said that Objective-C runs in a virtual machine, "like Java," because it targets LLVM. If you didn't know better, you might say, "JVM, LLVM, hey why not!" But it was horribly, horribly wrong.

      (In any case, Khan Academy looks to be pretty great and I will definitely be making use of this stuff, so I'm with you there. But note that he has an MBA, a MS in ECE, and a BS in both ECE and math, so, definitely more of a resource than your average Slashdotter :P)

    24. Re:Everything Old is New again by Bitmanhome · · Score: 1

      You don't need Slashdot to be able to moderate.

      --
      Not that this wasn't entirely predictable.
    25. Re:Everything Old is New again by pikine · · Score: 1

      Maybe instead of blaming students (many of whom are going into many thousands of dollars in debt to hear you speak) for wanting to be "spoon fed", maybe you should think about how good of a job you actually did.

      There is a fallacy in your argument. You assume that by blaming my students, I must have done a bad job teaching. The conclusion about my teaching skill may or may not be true, but it could not be justified by my comments towards my students alone. It would only be plausible if I told you I did this, and you tell me I could have done that. Even so, that only suggests room for improvement and not necessarily indicates that the baseline performance before the improvement was poor.

      How do you appease a group of students, some of which says I covered too much X, and some says I didn't cover enough X? Do you find contradictory feedback reasonable?

      I still maintain that the students are paying for things they could neither appreciate nor afford. Going to school is just a dumb decision for most of them. I hope you really get your money's worth of education. Sometimes it means you have to humble yourself and admit that you could have done better to learn from the teacher, not that the teacher could have done better to teach you.

      --
      I once had a signature.
    26. Re:Everything Old is New again by pikine · · Score: 1

      The preface of the new translation of Philagrius is interesting to read. The translation you referenced was mentioned on Slashdot a while ago, something about the earliest dead parrot sketch. I read this translation from 1920 but I skipped the introduction.

      --
      I once had a signature.
    27. Re:Everything Old is New again by JayWilmont · · Score: 1

      I assume that it is nearly impossible to do an exemplary job teaching one course for one semester. It takes time to refine one's personal teaching style and to figure out what parts of the subject students grasp easily and which parts are more difficult. Nobody's teaching is perfect, so I assume that most of the criticism is legitimate.

      Contradictory feedback is to be expected. Rather than ignoring it though, the proper response is to think critically to see if there were times where you did too much of X and other times you did too little of X. Sure, in the end you will probably have to ignore some of the feedback - but that doesn't mean it doesn't merit careful consideration before deciding in the end that you couldn't or shouldn't have done anything about it.

      For example, if the A+ students had complained you were going to slowly and explaining things too much, but the B & C students were very happy with the explanations and needed them to keep from getting a much lower grade, then the explanations should be kept - though thought should be given as to how to keep the first group of students from getting bored when they are given.

      Doing an excellent job at teaching a group of people a variety of related but not always similar things is something that is inherently challenging to do.

    28. Re:Everything Old is New again by pikine · · Score: 1

      I assume that it is nearly impossible to do an exemplary job teaching one course for one semester.

      In practice, the department rotates teaching fellow as well as the professor teaching the course every semester except for certain highly specialized courses. However, past experiences in teaching carries over to new subjects. I've done about 8 semesters already. The first few times I did see some improvements needed on my part. The more I did it, the more I realize that teacher-student is a mutual relationship, and unrequited teaching won't do the student any good.

      For example, if the A+ students had complained you were going to slowly and explaining things too much, but the B & C students were very happy with the explanations and needed them to keep from getting a much lower grade, then the explanations should be kept

      That makes sense, but here is the problem with our feedback system: you don't know who reported the feedback because evaluations are written anonymously.

      Students are also inherently myopic; no student sees the big picture. One student self-identified as a smart student but sympathized for other slower students that I went too fast. He failed to consider that I also spent time outside of the classroom to help with the slower ones. I've always used up my classroom time, and it's not like I was rushing to get myself out of the class.

      --
      I once had a signature.
  7. Gee I wonder who could've posted this one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Original article: 70k views per day
    Original Slashdot submission: 70k views per day
    Front page post after editing: Over 100k views per day

    Stay classy, kdawson.

    1. Re:Gee I wonder who could've posted this one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      too bad there's no "douchebag -1" mod

    2. Re:Gee I wonder who could've posted this one by blackraven14250 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Deliberately editing the submission to exaggerate a number by that much is messed up. I can see increasing 95k to 100k for the sake of simplicity, but seriously, 70k to 100k?

    3. Re:Gee I wonder who could've posted this one by Chowderbags · · Score: 1

      He's hoping /. readers will click the link. He's sadly mistaken.

    4. Re:Gee I wonder who could've posted this one by Quirkz · · Score: 1

      What, you've never seen the Slashdot effect in action? If this post doesn't increase it from 70k to over 100k views per day, I'll eat my metaphorical hat. The advertising markup is just part of the standard Slashdot services.

  8. I wish... by spiffydudex · · Score: 5, Informative

    I had knowledge of this site sooner. My Linear Algebra professor was horrible at giving lectures.(I wasn't the only one who thought so) After reviewing some of the linear material, Khans videos are helpful even after several weeks of summer. In fact the videos on the Gram-Schmidt helped explain what I completely missed the first time.

    I congratulate you Khan for your hard work to help educate the people of the world. I know it will serve me well in the upcoming year.

    1. Re:I wish... by TheTurtlesMoves · · Score: 3, Funny

      So you passed linear algebra, but fail at google foo? ;)

      --
      The Grey Goo disaster happened 3 billion years ago. This rock is covered in self replicating machines!
    2. Re:I wish... by MoeDumb · · Score: 0

      Khan ought to get a life........ time achievement award!

      --
      Mod Me Up. You'll make a grown man cry.
    3. Re:I wish... by spiffydudex · · Score: 1

      Haha, Google was like my primary teacher. I am predominantly an auditory learner, so while Google was good for providing information. I wasn't able to fully grasp the concepts that were being taught. I spent many a nights on various websites trying to understand the material.

      The book that I had for the class seemed to expect full knowledge and understanding of the concepts before they were brought up in the book. It didn't make much sense to me.

    4. Re:I wish... by spiffydudex · · Score: 1

      Oh, and yes I passed :)

  9. Does he tech Klingon? by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 3, Funny

    Does he tech Klingon?

    1. Re:Does he tech Klingon? by jcwayne · · Score: 5, Funny

      No, but he do tech English.

      --
      Failure to follow this advice may result in non-deterministic behavior.
    2. Re:Does he tech Klingon? by noidentity · · Score: 2, Funny

      Be easy on the guy; he's a native Romulan trying to improve his relations with Kingons, sheesh.

    3. Re:Does he tech Klingon? by mcgrew · · Score: 2, Informative

      My hovercraft is full of eels!

    4. Re:Does he tech Klingon? by colinrichardday · · Score: 1

      I don't believe so, or else he would have a "thermodynamics is a topic best served cold" lecture.

  10. Spell it correctly. Its Khan. by MasterOfUniverse · · Score: 5, Informative

    not kahn.

    --
    "There is no flag large enough to cover the shame of killing innocent people."--Howard Zinn
    1. Re:Spell it correctly. Its Khan. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      mod parent up!

    2. Re:Spell it correctly. Its Khan. by fishexe · · Score: 1

      not kahn.

      Somehow, they managed to spell it right in the link url but wrong in the text, every single time. Amazing.

      --
      "I don't care about the Constitution!" --Bill O'Reilly, November 17, 2009
    3. Re:Spell it correctly. Its Khan. by blake182 · · Score: 2, Funny

      not kahn.

      It's KHAAAAAAAAN!

    4. Re:Spell it correctly. Its Khan. by gopla · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      There was a recent Indian movie which revolved around the name Khan. Its called 'My name is Khan'.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/My_Name_Is_Khan

      http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1188996/

      And all Khans are not terrorists

      Gopla

    5. Re:Spell it correctly. Its Khan. by gopla · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      There was a recent Indian movie which revolved around the name Khan. Its called 'My name is Khan'.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/My_Name_Is_Khan

      http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1188996/

      And all Khans are not terrorists

      Gopla

    6. Re:Spell it correctly. Its Khan. by Danny+Rathjens · · Score: 1

      Rule #47 of the internet - you will make at least one spelling or grammatical error in a post where you are whining about someone else's misspelling. :)

  11. Web programmers, You can help! by KPexEA · · Score: 5, Informative
    1. Re:Web programmers, You can help! by 16K+Ram+Pack · · Score: 1

      I'll have to upload my changes to the Kobayashi Maru

  12. Slashdot QC Fail, but Thanks Anway by VoxMagis · · Score: 2, Informative

    Would have been nice if they had spelled the name right. My GOD, KDawson didn't even have to do anything like actually verify or read the site to review, he could have just looked at the two links in the damn summary.

    Still, I had heard inklings of something like this somewhere before, but never hunted it down. Thanks for providing it. As someone that came to a mind-boggling late interest in actually learning any real math, I may have found a place to spend some serious time.

    Thanks so much to Mr. Khan - a noble and important effort to drag those of us in dark ignorance into some level of glimmer.

    --
    -- I really need to bleed off some of this /. karma.
  13. Khaaaaaaaaaan!!!!!! by lennier · · Score: 4, Funny

    From Youtube's heart I vlog at thee.

    --
    You are not a brain: http://books.google.com/books?id=2oV61CeDx-YC
  14. Well, then... by djupedal · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    ...can we get this guy to take a few weeks out of his regular schedule to please teach the fundamentals surrounding iPhone development so the tidal wave of bone head questions on the dev forums can be brought down...just a little...thanks.

    1. Re:Well, then... by Lobachevsky · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't it go against the non-profit ethos to advocate a for-profit dev platform?

    2. Re:Well, then... by saihung · · Score: 1

      No. That tidal wave will never stop rolling in, bringing in wave after wave of new responses to three-year-old posts, all saying "I am having this problem too, please email me at isuckdonkeys@aol.com with solution."

  15. Instructional Design by BlueBoxSW.com · · Score: 4, Informative

    In addition to the things listed above, he obviously has a pretty good grasp of instructional design principles.

    I watched a couple videos, and has either studied it or learned from trial and error somewhere along the line.

    Let us not forget this important glue that holds together solid instruction of any kind.

    1. Re:Instructional Design by RichMan · · Score: 4, Informative

      > and has either studied it or learned from trial and error somewhere along the line.

      It is explained in the FAQ which is linked from the slashdot summary that he uses the youtube time profile of the videos to refine the process.

      Also doing an Masters in EE/CS will usually get you a fair amount of time in front of a class doing the problem solving sessions if not actually lecturing for the undergrads. That is a lot of practical trial and error in the teaching process.

  16. Re:Tip for kadwson by Qubit · · Score: 2, Funny

    I, for one, I think that kadwson is doing a fine job with his spelling in these articles.

    --

    coding is life /* the rest is */
  17. Last name wrong. Not 'Kahn' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's Khan, not Kahn, a world of difference, please get it right slashdot eds. This is a geek site with attention to detail.

    1. Re:Last name wrong. Not 'Kahn' by Fex303 · · Score: 1

      This is a geek site with attention to detail.

      Well, you got the first part of that statement right...

  18. not for everyone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The Khan Academy is a not-for-profit organization with the mission of providing a high quality education to anyone, anywhere."

    except in china or wherever youtube is blocked

  19. It's kinda sad... by Maestro4k · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That the first thing I thought when I read he licenses it all under Creative Commons was "Bet ASCAP would be pissed about that".

    But this is a wonderful thing he's doing, kudos to him and I wish him luck. Will have to check out some of his lectures sometime.

    1. Re:It's kinda sad... by CoolGopher · · Score: 3, Funny

      That the first thing I thought when I read he licenses it all under Creative Commons was "Bet ASCAP would be pissed about that".

      Am I the only who reads that acronym as Ass-Cap?

    2. Re:It's kinda sad... by laejoh · · Score: 1

      Yes, Not even goatse himself would read that as Ass-Cap!

    3. Re:It's kinda sad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is there another way to read it?

    4. Re:It's kinda sad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Am I the only who reads that acronym as Ass-Cap?

      NOW you're not! ASHOL!

    5. Re:It's kinda sad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trust me, everyone who runs a venue that has to pay this protection racket pronounces it as Ass-Cap. In fact I don't believe I have heard it spoken any other way.

    6. Re:It's kinda sad... by Attila+Dimedici · · Score: 1

      Actually, I usually insert an R into that. I'll leave it to you to figure out where.

      --
      The truth is that all men having power ought to be mistrusted. James Madison
    7. Re:It's kinda sad... by imakemusic · · Score: 1

      You're not. What with ASSCRAP and SCROTUS I sometimes wonder if I should be reading /. at work...

      --
      Brain surgery - it's not rocket science!
    8. Re:It's kinda sad... by eihab · · Score: 1

      Actually, I usually insert an R into that. I'll leave it to you to figure out where.

      What is ASCAPR? :P

      On a serious note, Khan Academy is wonderful. I only wish the content could be organized in a prerequisite manner across different topics (e.g. basic algebra before calculus, etc.). I guess I'll check the issue tracker, and maybe even send a patch or two :)

      --
      If you can't mod them join them.
    9. Re:It's kinda sad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sorry, I can see the acronym quiet clearly, but I keep reading "ass-hat".

    10. Re:It's kinda sad... by moortak · · Score: 1

      The exercises are arranged that way.

      --
      Xavier Rabourdin for president 2012
  20. Took some time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    .. but done them all.
    Ask me anything you want!

    1. Re:Took some time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What year did Napoleon abdicate?

  21. "he explains how he knows he is being effective" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    His FAQ claims that the key indicator for his effectiveness is individual people telling him he is being effective.

    This sounds more like a humanities than an orthodox economics assessment of labour productivity.

  22. Re:Youtube? by rtfa-troll · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Is it possible to ask that just a bit nicely???

    Is there a place where I can get the videos without a flash wrapper? It would be really appreciated? If not, would someone be willing to set it up so that this Kahn guy doesn't have to spend his time doing it? If not, does someone have 20TB or so of space and a really big connection so I can set up torrents for this.

    I mean the guy's obviously put quite a bit of effort into this.. the effort to write a bit more tha.... oh get off my lawn :-)

    --
    =~ s,(.*),<sarcasm>$1</sarcasm>,g if any_point_you_wish();
  23. Re:Youtube? by wisty · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Torrents would be good if you were in a place where youtube was blocked ... like about 1/4 of the world's internet users.

  24. Re:Youtube? by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 3, Informative
  25. Damn Trekkies. . . by saisuman · · Score: 1

    . . . it's "KHAN", not "KAHN".

    1. Re:Damn Trekkies. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's spelled Khan in Trek too bub.

    2. Re:Damn Trekkies. . . by east+coast · · Score: 1

      I always thought it was "KHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAN!!!"

      Sorry, the echo tag doesn't seem to be working.

      --
      Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
  26. PoV of Maths Faculty by kipling · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I work at a University, teaching Maths across many levels.

    Khan's screencasts are nice - patient demos of how to do standard calculations. They are fairly traditional in some ways - 21st century chalk+talk.

    They are mostly useful for the "what to do" as even these contain enough of the "why" to put it in context.

    They complement what we do in formal classes, so we are happy to informally refer students on to them.

    --
    -- open source? sounds like the real book --
  27. w00t by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hmm maybe I can pass trigonometry now with khans help

  28. Re:Youtube? by Stooshie · · Score: 1

    He did say "plz". :-)

    --
    America, Home of the Brave. ... .and the Squaw.
  29. Re:Everything Old is New again -- But why? by popo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    When I read stories like this though, I'm forced to ask the question: Why lectures?

    For me, studying from hypertext is infinitely more effective. I can pause whenever I like, check additional sources, cross-reference, backtrack, etc.

    Personally, I think the hypertext is the greatest educational medium ever created. Universities clearly prefer lectures for a variety of (I would say) self-interested reasons. But unless you simply learn 'better' from spoken dialogue -- which is fine -- I think lectures are a very dated medium which are difficult to edit, expand upon and randomly access.

    Access to lectures is great. I'm glad Kahn is doing this. But IMHO the true educational power of the web exists in the web's original, native medium: Hypertext.

    --
    ------ The best brain training is now totally free : )
  30. Increase in number of views by Nofip · · Score: 1

    "With over 100,000 video views a day" I'm not sure, but I'm guessing that slashdotting will increase that number quite a bit.

  31. Thank you! by Some1too · · Score: 4, Informative

    I can't say that enough! As an older person who was returning to university your mathematics and physics exercises and videos were a life saver! I truly appreciate all the hard work and effort you've put into your educational materials (website, videos, lessons etc). They helped me immensely and I don't doubt for a second they will continue to do so when I finally begin my full time studies in September. It's people such as yourself that really help make a positive difference in our world. You're inspirational, thank you and keep up the excellent work. One last time: Thank you, thank you, thank you. Some1too.

  32. PoV of Maths Degree. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So can I get a degree from this "Kahn" Academy?

  33. FAQ - How can you help? by asadsalm · · Score: 4, Informative

    From the site:

    ==============

    How can I/you help?

    The biggest thing is getting the word out. The students who use the site seem to really get excited by how quickly and deeply they can learn from it. Right now (5/2010), there are about 200,000 students using the site per month; no reason why it shouldn't be 20 million!

    If you like to code or work on user interface design, you might be able to help on the Khan Academy applications which we are doing as an open source project

  34. Re:Youtube? by Rysc · · Score: 2

    Why is parent modded offtopic?

      - someone posts videos of free content on youtube
      - youtube is not a very free place
      - someone else requests the videos be delivered in a less restricted manner

    Sounds topical to me.

    --
    I want my Cowboyneal
  35. Bangladesh is a country by walmass · · Score: 1

    Kahn = Jewish

    Khan = Muslim

    Last I checked, "Muslim" was recognised as neither an ethnicity, nor a nationality. But don't get that in the way of trying to make life simple for yourself or others.

    Salman Khan, IIRC, was born in New Awlins, and his parents are from some province in India. Someone else can add to that if they're so inclined.

    Either way, he's an amazing guy. The word would be a better place if there more "Muslims" like him around. ;-)

    His mother is from the Indian state of West Bengal, his father is from Bangladesh, which is a country

  36. Re:Youtube? by rant64 · · Score: 1

    Plz and thx. Next thing you know he'll be handing out free coffee.

  37. Re:Youtube? by genmax · · Score: 1

    One way to ask nicely is to spell his name right -- "Khan" not Kahn. In your defense, its misspelled once as Kahn in the summary.

  38. Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I often doubt charity events and whatlike, but after seeing many videos of Khan and reading his small autobiography, I kinda trust him. I believe he's doing this for the sheer pleasure of teaching.

  39. Re:Everything Old is New again -- But why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lectures are very valuable for many if not most people. Different people are different types of learners. On the other hand, whether universities should still have people lecture the same intro classes over and over again when the lectures could just be taped is a different question. It seems to make more sense to allocate personal to answering students' questions. (Obviously, there are subject-specific differences as well.)

  40. Re: Lectures + Web by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It's a question in educational design.

    Lectures are just "Auditory Articles". The start of any educational module is a "TFA". Let's just presume the minimum = 1 sentence. If it's really hard (like an equation) the instructor should stop and either explain, or "wait for next week after it gels". (In really scary cases it "never gels" and then you just say "I'm not good at that". In "rolling thunder" topics like History, no one sentence is earth shattering, but reading something like Thorstein Veblen in the original might get you 3/4 of the way through until you say "Wait, What?"

    In a really good .edu , the lectures would be recorded and posted so you don't have to scribble furiously. Then you just go investigating your own personal hyperlinks, and either ask them in lecture if they're right "centrally on topic" or office hours if they're baroque. The Prof knows he can't just stand there in silence for 45 minutes. It's like radio dead air. The savviest prof I had "repeated the book" - but she picked the parts she *knew* were "loaded bear traps" and then hyperkinetically amped up the mood until people stopped protecting their egos and really dug into it.

    I agree the modern web is just a powerhouse - I daresay the 5 years I've spent on Slashdot is damn near equivalent to a course's worth of CS for NonMajors 101.

    --
    My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
  41. He Does Good Work by MrTripps · · Score: 1

    I remember checking out a couple of his lectures after hearing the story on NPR. They have come in handy on some topics where the examples I have aren't enough to fully explain the concept.

    --
    "I'm not a quack, I'm a mad scientist! There's a difference." - Dr. Cockroach
  42. Re:Someone should educate this man MOD UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Parent's not offtopic adobe bitches!

  43. Re:Youtube? by wealthychef · · Score: 1

    Why is parent modded offtopic?

    Probably because everything you said had to be gleaned by implication -- the poster just made a request without any background for it. People misheard it as rude and demanding apparently.

    --
    Currently hooked on AMP
  44. This should be the way of the future... by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Teaching in the future, will be more tailored to the individual, learning what he needs to forgetting about what he does not....
    What I also see happening in the near future with this sort of teaching is that you will end up with many people overlapping knowledge..and collaborating more, if I know about general physics but buddy beside me knows more, for my present day problem I will consult with him, and he will have his use, where as the rest will be what I learned from this style course, unless I want to specialize, then I become like buddy for THAT specialization, not forgetting what I already know in many other fields...

    Sort of like star trek, where self worth and social stature, is based more on what you know, so if you study to know more, you will be used more hence become more important within the community... I consider this to be the wave of the future....no more books, no more
    schools per se...more just learning off the web, then applying your craft, and knowledge to the problem at hand...

    Need to do taxes, read up all about it, then if you are still uncertain about a point, that point will be smaller and quicker to review with a specialist, then going to see an accountant for ALL your taxes...

  45. sounds like Amazon.com "super-reviewers" by peter303 · · Score: 1

    Theres a competition to see who can review the most new books on Amazon. If you crunch the numbers they would have had to spend hundreds of thousands of dollars for the retail cost of these books plus every hour of the year reading the books and typing the reviews.

  46. ClickToFlash (if you're using Safari Mac) by alispguru · · Score: 2, Informative

    If you're using Safari on a Mac, install ClickToFlash, which in addition to letting you leave Flash off until you absolutely need it, shows YouTube video with an H.264 wrapper.

    --

    To a Lisp hacker, XML is S-expressions in drag.
  47. Online / TV Lectures by bjs555 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I stumbled across the Khan lectures a couple of months ago and I think they're great. Many thanks to Salman Khan.

    Another series of lectures that appeared on television about 30 years ago is a show called The Mechanical Universe. They're not as deep as some of the Khan lectures but a bit more polished (not that it matters a lot). The Mechanical Universe lectures are available online at:
    http://www.learner.org/resources/series42.html

    Too bad there isn't more of this kind of material on television. Maybe one of the cable companies could buy the Khan lectures and make them available as an on-demand feature.

  48. Re:Youtube? by mcgrew · · Score: 1

    It's modded "troll" now. If your comment looks like it was posted by a twelve year old, you'll be modded down (and I, for one, thank the moderators). Note that your comment, as well as links to what the apparent juvenile asked for, are modded up. If he had simply said "is there a torrent of this?" he would not have been modded down, and possibly would have been modded up.

  49. worth every penny by Qwell · · Score: 1

    I've watched a good deal of the calculus videos. They are very good. He does a great job explaining things.

    I even donated a few bucks. I suggest doing the same. It's well worth it.

    --
    As of 10/06/03, I hate COBOL developers.
  50. Re:Youtube? by rtfa-troll · · Score: 1

    The scary thing is you are probably right. This is probably about as polite as some people know how to be. The point I realised that is the point I realised I have joined the "get off my lawn" brigade on Slasdot ... at little over thirty.

    --
    =~ s,(.*),<sarcasm>$1</sarcasm>,g if any_point_you_wish();
  51. Not All Muslims are Terrorists! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not all Muslims are terrorists. Here is an example of a Muslim doing a Jihad against illiteracy, a Muslim who is helping humanity gain knowledge (regardless of their beliefs).

    1. Re:Not All Muslims are Terrorists! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since when are all Muslims of the belief of a Jihad against anything?

  52. I'm against it by zogger · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Of course I am also against state "license" of straight marriages as well. Unconstitutional crapola.

    Why the two camps don't join together and demand the END of licenses to love and live with someone else is beyond me. They are both demanding to have LESS RIGHTS than what you are freely born with. Marriage is between you and partner(s) and your community and that should be it.

    It's none of the government's business *at all* who you marry, and a violation of civil rights IMO-1st amendment, 5th, 6th, 8th, 9th- to require some permission/permit/license from big brother to get married. Violates all of them one way or the other.

    Every single solitary law/regulation whatever that is on the books regarding some government "marriage license" should be stricken and be made null.

    USA marriage licenses are an archaic holdover from extremely racist jim crow miscegenation "don't mix the races" so called "laws". The same with gun control laws, they all started out with trying to deny born - with second amendment rights to people of other than Caucasian extraction.

    Any contractural living arrangements, child care provisions, insurance, economic issues, whatever, are just that..and can be handled with a normal contract. There is no reason whatsoever for any marriage "license" other than overreaching big brother action.

    But you see, it is much preferable for big brother and the two corrupt criminal political party gangs, who make up big brother, to keep people divided and conquered, so that's why both political gangs insist and demand to have a "license" for a born-with right.

    1. Re:I'm against it by pauljlucas · · Score: 1

      Your argument is disingenuous because straight marriage is here to stay. That aside, marriage does have the upside of granting all the separate legal rights that come with it, e.g., inheritance, power of attorney, health benefits, etc. So since all of those things still have to be regulated by the government anyway, your argument is doubly disingenuous.

      --
      If you reply, do so only to what I explicitly wrote. If I didn't write it, don't assume or infer it.
    2. Re:I'm against it by JimFive · · Score: 1

      Of course I am also against state "license" of straight marriages as well.

      So am I, to an extent. I see no constitutional problem with the state licensing a civil union to allow the state to keep track of kinship for inheritance purposes. That civil union should have nothing to do with religious marriage and should apply to both homosexual and heterosexual couples.

      It's none of the government's business *at all* who you marry, and a violation of civil rights IMO-1st amendment, 5th, 6th, 8th, 9th- to require some permission/permit/license from big brother to get married.

      You do realize that there is no requirement to get a marriage license in order to have a religious marriage ceremony? The marriage license declares to the state that these two people are now next of kin and confers other legal benefits.

      USA marriage licenses are an archaic holdover from extremely racist jim crow miscegenation

      No, marriage licenses are a way for the state to determine inheritance priority and kinship. State involvement in marriage contracts has been occuring for hundreds, if not thousands of years. While the rules have certainly been used to perpetuate prejudice the main concerns of the state are money and property.
      --
      JimFive

      --
      Please stop using the word theory when you mean hypothesis.
  53. Re:Youtube? by rtfa-troll · · Score: 1

    Mea kulpa; very sorry please forgive me Mr Khan. I even read the article (to check if I couldn't find a linked torrent to troll the poster with), went back and copied from K Dawson. Oh the irony of having a nick which means I can blame only my own failure. I shall find an appropriate punishment for a troll. Go and read 4chan or dive off a bridge or something ..

    P.S. In searching around I have found that

    • the Khan Academy is a nonprofit, so if you do like the videos and manage to download them then please do donate (see FAQ and donate link at top of page (paypal only unfortunately).
    • the videos have only just been clearly opened up - thanks to David Wiley (and again Salman Khan) for that; it's really important people follow up issues like this as early as possible.
    • They are "working on having the content mirrored somewhere other than YouTube" (see FAQ again)
    • there are quite a few Khan academy torrents already up on the pirate bay
    • quite a few of the torrents listed below seem to go through registration etc so aren't exactly free.

    I'd hope that someone starts downloading and manages to put all these up on a traditional download site (ibiblio or something?) and / or torrents.

    --
    =~ s,(.*),<sarcasm>$1</sarcasm>,g if any_point_you_wish();
  54. Re:Youtube? by acheron12 · · Score: 1

    Aha! Proof that releasing content under an open license encourages piracy! [/ASCAP]

    --
    there is no god but truth, and reality is its prophet
  55. Re:Youtube? by Rysc · · Score: 1

    I find behavior like that to be offensive, discriminatory and illogical. You don't mod as a troll or offtopic because someone uses all caps, fails to spell, writes in 31337, etc.. You don't dismiss someone's ideas because you don't like their face!

    I know it's done, but it ought not to be and I thought slashdot was better than that.

    --
    I want my Cowboyneal
  56. Re:Youtube? by Rysc · · Score: 1

    Rude and demanding... and on topic.

    A stylistic choice to write your post like a lolcats image should not have any impact on how it's modded.

    --
    I want my Cowboyneal
  57. A modest suggestion for slashdotters by DiamondGeezer · · Score: 1

    Clearly Salman Khan is a teaching genius and his educational materials are a precious gift for the (Internet) world.

    Every slashdotter should donate at least a dollar to say thank you. I have.

    --
    Tubby or not tubby. Fat is the question