Slashdot Mirror


Google To End Google.cn Redirect

shmG writes "Google Inc. has announced a 'new approach' in China after the government said the company could no longer automatically redirect users to the unfiltered Hong Kong site. This gives Baidu Inc., which already has a greater than 60% share in Internet search in China, a chance to expand. It has announced new plans to hire US engineers to enhance its technical skills and propel its growth globally." Update: 06/29 18:27 GMT by S : Changed the headline to more accurately reflect what Google is doing. They're ending the redirect and applying for a license renewal, so it's still in question whether they'll actually go dark in China. However, they say they're also looking for ways to continue allowing uncensored search, such as putting a high-profile link to their Hong Kong site on the google.cn landing page.

183 comments

  1. Official Notice and Explanation by eldavojohn · · Score: 4, Informative
    The article is a little confusing on how they're going to change their strategy. The Official Blog has that info:

    We have therefore been looking at possible alternatives, and instead of automatically redirecting all our users, we have started taking a small percentage of them to a landing page on Google.cn that links to Google.com.hk—where users can conduct web search or continue to use Google.cn services like music and text translate, which we can provide locally without filtering. This approach ensures we stay true to our commitment not to censor our results on Google.cn and gives users access to all of our services from one page.

    Over the next few days we’ll end the redirect entirely, taking all our Chinese users to our new landing page—and today we re-submitted our ICP license renewal application based on this approach.

    It's kind of funny, the "landing page" is a false image of a search box and when you click anywhere on the page, you go to Google Hong Kong. How this is okay as opposed to a redirect, I'll never know ... and once that page starts eventually taking users to unfiltered results of Tiananmen Square, I think the Chinese Government will take a few more steps to stop it.

    Of course it looks like ibtimes has a policy that only allows them to link to more ibtimes sites instead of -- you know -- the original source of all their quotes.

    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:Official Notice and Explanation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I sort of get the impression that the person writing that article got to the second paragraph of the blog post and then stopped reading.

    2. Re:Official Notice and Explanation by eldavojohn · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Rather than lose China, I'd comply with the government's wishes and obey the law (i.e. filter). Nice guys who "do no evil" ultimately finish last.

      On the other hand, they have my vocal support. I'm glad I went with an Android based phone. I'm glad I've developed only on Android and not iPhone. I never used Bing. I never used Bing Cashback even though my friends told me it was giving them money back. And I'm glad I've used Google. Given two competing products of the same functionality in the future I'd go with Google's. At the same time I am aware they are flawed, have privacy issues and will play ball with the American government by folding faster than superman on laundry day.

      I'm not a blind stark raving idiot fanboy but upon hearing of Google's commitment to move to unfiltered search results, they have achieved something in my mind and brought themselves to a level of idealism that I identify with.

      Does it hurt their pocketbook? You bet. But to say it does nothing else is disingenuous. You may not consider my admiration monetarily worth anything but it is something.

      --
      My work here is dung.
    3. Re:Official Notice and Explanation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good thing Google is not you, then.

    4. Re:Official Notice and Explanation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I get the feeling that by making the user click to go to the HK site (as opposed to a browser automatically redirecting there), the user will now be punishable for committing a crime. The user is choosing to thwart Chinese censorship by clicking.

      I suspect after the first hundred or so are rounded up and sent for re-education and the word gets out, very few users will choose to click.

    5. Re:Official Notice and Explanation by asukasoryu · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Sounds like Google may be putting their ethical commitments (not filtering) ahead of their desire for profit. I don't think it's such a bad thing to "finish last" if you're still a nice guy at the end of the day. Everyone's got their own priorities.

      --
      There are more things in heaven and earth than are dreamt of in your philosophy.
    6. Re:Official Notice and Explanation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Hear hear. Let Apple help China - maybe their pholosophies will mesh better. Google may have a few holes in its hat, but it's a white hat still.

      Maybe the Chinese will even have trouble finding "U.S. engineers" to help it stumble along in the online world. Gee, haven't there been a lot of brilliant Chinese students studying here in the States? And they're not swarming back to help the motherland? Can't imagine why....

    7. Re:Official Notice and Explanation by clang_jangle · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Rather than lose China, I'd comply with the government's wishes and obey the law (i.e. filter). Nice guys who "do no evil" ultimately finish last.
      --
      My XP PC is slowly dying. Have an old Mac w/ 10.5 you want to get rid of? I'll pay shipping : ) harleykevin@netscape.com

      It's amusing you still believe "nice guys finish last" while you're fine with being evil but have to resort to begging for other people's used, cast-off hardware. The lesson seems to be lost on you, but in a nutshell it's a myth that evil triumphs while good fails. In fact, "good" and "evil" have absolutely nothing to do with success or failure. To believe otherwise is simple superstition.

      --
      Caveat Utilitor
    8. Re:Official Notice and Explanation by russotto · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Rather than lose China, I'd comply with the government's wishes and obey the law (i.e. filter). Nice guys who "do no evil" ultimately finish last.

      Nice guys who capitulate to evil still finish last, and feel bad about themselves besides. If you want to win by being evil, you have to embrace it, not merely capitulate to it.

    9. Re:Official Notice and Explanation by commodore64_love · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yeah that's great, but if they continue following this path of disobeying Chinese law, then by 2020 Baidu will be the world's #1 company with 1.5 billion users while Google is just a has-been (like Atari or Amiga today). Baidu might even gain enough power to come to the US and dominate our market too.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    10. Re:Official Notice and Explanation by russotto · · Score: 1

      In fact, "good" and "evil" have absolutely nothing to do with success or failure. To believe otherwise is simple superstition.

      It's not superstition. It may be false, but it's not simple superstition. To be "good" means (among other things) that you have obligations beyond your own advancement; these obligations can (obviously) interfere with your own advancement. It can be as complex as the whole China thing, or as simple as sabotaging a co-worker (and thus competitor on the corporate ladder). To be evil means you can take any means necessary for your own advancement, constrained only by external forces -- your only commandment is the 11th, "thou shalt not get caught".

    11. Re:Official Notice and Explanation by andy1307 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      China has 1.5 billion people. The population of the world is 6 billion, including 1.2 billion in India who still use google.

    12. Re:Official Notice and Explanation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, you haven't proven it isn't superstition. :)

    13. Re:Official Notice and Explanation by aliquis · · Score: 1

      Yeah! As one of the earths rest ~5 billion people I find it exciting and can't almost help myself waiting for Baidu to launch over here so I can switch out Google!!

    14. Re:Official Notice and Explanation by Jaysyn · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Baidu might even gain enough power to come to the US and dominate our market too.

      Only way this could ever possibly happen is if every other search engine available in the US decided to start charging for access.

      There is a huge difference between buying cheap, shoddily made Chinese manufactured physical objects & trusting a free Chinese search engine.

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
    15. Re:Official Notice and Explanation by Ritz_Just_Ritz · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What's more valuable? 1.5 billion consumers with a very limited purchasing power or developed countries where eyeballs are actually worth paying for?

      I think Google should not submit to Chinese bullying at all. It's not a market worth chasing given the effort and bad karma required to be a participant.

    16. Re:Official Notice and Explanation by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Baidu might even gain enough power to come to the US and dominate our market too.

      Yup. I can't wait to use products from a company who's in the back pocket of the Chinese government.

    17. Re:Official Notice and Explanation by Relyx · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You can still get married and have kids while being a nice guy. In fact it greatly helps!

      Love does not involve hitting a woman over the head with a club and dragging her back to your cave, you know. :)

    18. Re:Official Notice and Explanation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Lost of people choose not to have kids, jackass. What are you, a mindless animal?

    19. Re:Official Notice and Explanation by Myopic · · Score: 1

      Every man has his price. I'd gladly go tell Baidu everything I know. My price for that would be... hmmm... $150K up front and $200K annually, after taxes. If I don't have to actually live in a communist country while helping out, then it's half that amount. Call me, Baidu!

    20. Re:Official Notice and Explanation by Relyx · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The problem is that being selfish and doing everything you believe necessary for your own advancement can backfire. One can easily end up been isolated and left in the cold. In my experience, those who have taken their time to help others, establish trust and rally people around their own interests do better in the long run. You have to give a little to get a little. Selfishness is a huge turnoff.

    21. Re:Official Notice and Explanation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about the search results that get ranked higher in Google because they're buying AdWords and are therefore "more relevant" than another site with the same information not behind a paywall?

    22. Re:Official Notice and Explanation by Myopic · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      evil will always triumph because good is dumb /oblig

    23. Re:Official Notice and Explanation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK that's just funny. 1.5 billion people in China do not use computers. And 1.2 billion in India don't either. I think you'll find that due to economics, lack of power in places, etc. that a LOT fewer than the total population are users of computers / smart phones. Even in the US and Europe the number of computer users is less than the population.

    24. Re:Official Notice and Explanation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you haven't noticed yet, he's a complete fucking retard.

    25. Re:Official Notice and Explanation by russotto · · Score: 1

      The problem is that being selfish and doing everything you believe necessary for your own advancement can backfire. One can easily end up been isolated and left in the cold. In my experience, those who have taken their time to help others, establish trust and rally people around their own interests do better in the long run. You have to give a little to get a little. Selfishness is a huge turnoff.

      Being evil can include long-term thinking of that sort as well. The good person establishes trust because he's trustworthy; the evil one because it is expedient. The good person will remain trustworthy even against his own interests; the evil one sees that trust as an investment and will betray it for a sufficiently large payoff.

      Any successful corrupt politician knows how to play that game.

    26. Re:Official Notice and Explanation by medv4380 · · Score: 1
      So would joining a book burning be alright if it meant getting some money or just getting a head in life be ok?

      If you discard morals in exchange for a dollar then what would stop Google from say selling every one's search data on gay porn and personal data mined local data to say some religious organization who wants to find and cure the gays? Removing ethics from business only causes business to remove any safe guard they may have to stop some disaster from happening.

      It's good that Google is at least standing up for what they believe in rather then surrendering the moral ground

      Rose: Doctor, they've got guns.

      The Doctor: And I haven't. Which makes me the better person, don't you think? They can shoot me dead, but the moral high ground is mine!

    27. Re:Official Notice and Explanation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even in the US and Europe the number of computer users is less than the population.

      No shit.

    28. Re:Official Notice and Explanation by skelterjohn · · Score: 1

      It's a tendency that gets bred out of the population, by and large.

    29. Re:Official Notice and Explanation by D+H+NG · · Score: 1

      At the same time I am aware they [...] will play ball with the American government by folding faster than superman on laundry day.

      Based on their past behavior I'd say you are wrong.

    30. Re:Official Notice and Explanation by ultranova · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Rather than lose China, I'd comply with the government's wishes and obey the law (i.e. filter). Nice guys who "do no evil" ultimately finish last.

      It's not a matter of being nice. It's a matter of having a spine and not selling your principles the second it becomes convenient to do so. And actually bragging that you would... well. I guess you just set the new record for being pathetic. Congratulations.

      I could also comment on how your eagerness to cooperate with the Chinese dictatorship combines with your frequent implications of libertarian leanings to create the picture of a truly pitiful individual, one completely devoid of any values besides personal gain and completely undeserving of any freedom yourself since you're willing to help remove it from others for money, but frankly, why bother? You're not going to care, and anyone else has sufficient knowledge to ignore you and your worthless opinions from now on.

      Crawl back to under the rock you came from, worm.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    31. Re:Official Notice and Explanation by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

      Yea, I know i want to use a search engine which up front tells me it will censor for the powers that be. And that it gives results biased and censored to be pro-communist chinese government position.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    32. Re:Official Notice and Explanation by HiThere · · Score: 1

      It *can* be superstition. It all depends on why you believe as you do.

      OTOH, game theory can show that in some circumstances being good is a benefit, where as in others it's a detriment. But figuring out whether to be good or evil in a circumstance is a sure path to failure unless either time is no consideration, or you've pre-calculated the environment.

      Generally in a social setting people who do good, do well. In many zero-sum situations, however, this isn't true.

      Now as to superstition: Superstition seems to be equivalent to learning thing based on "After this therefore because of this.", though it can be a "social maxims" kind of thing, also. E.g., most people who believe in rabbits feet do so because of the social maxim, but most superstitions don't fall into that category. Most are post hoc ergo propter hoc fallacies. OTOH, "nice guys finish last" seems to be a social maxim kind of belief. Few people can point to someone and say "See, he was a nice guy, and that's why he finished last".

      But there are caveats, e.g.: When teams are competing, it's probably true that the team that believe "nice guys finish last" when interpreted to mean "don't be nice to the guys on the other team", is more likely to win. But if it's applied within the team, the team will be likely to do poorly.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    33. Re:Official Notice and Explanation by shoehornjob · · Score: 1

      Baidu might even gain enough power to come to the US and dominate our market too.

      Oh I seriously doubt that they could do much damage to Google on its' own turf. With the market pretty well locked up here I doubt they could get much of a foothold. If they were so brazen Google would probably outspend them 2:1.

      --
      "We are just a war away from Amerikastan. When god vs god the undoing of man." Dave Mustaine
    34. Re:Official Notice and Explanation by westlake · · Score: 1

      What's more valuable? 1.5 billion consumers with a very limited purchasing power or developed countries where eyeballs are actually worth paying for?

      Not all of China is poor and undeveloped.

      1/3 of 1.5 billion is 500 million. Roughly the same as the population of North America.

       

    35. Re:Official Notice and Explanation by CraftyJack · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Nice guys who "do no evil" ultimately finish last.

      No, actually, they don't. In short: cooperation is beneficial, and it's easier to find cooperative partners if you have a reputation of being "nice". If we're talking about a one-round zero-sum game, then nice guys finish last. Most practical "games" don't fall into that category.

    36. Re:Official Notice and Explanation by Arancaytar · · Score: 1

      It's kind of funny, the "landing page" is a false image of a search box

      Ah, the "our enemies are morons" strategy. I wouldn't bet on its success.

    37. Re:Official Notice and Explanation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Considering the average foxcon worker makes $200 a month, or $2400 a year, and the average US high school drop out makes $20,000 a year. So you need roughly 8 chinese users to equal one high school dropout in terms of buying power. So yes, china has the most number of internet users, however, they are quite literally worthless.

    38. Re:Official Notice and Explanation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Did you type that on your Lenovo laptop?

    39. Re:Official Notice and Explanation by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      Yes, the numbers tell the tale--because 1.5 billion people who make $3-a-day are MUCH more appealing to advertisers than the 1.2 billion people of the Western world and their $100-a-day salaries.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    40. Re:Official Notice and Explanation by asukasoryu · · Score: 1

      Once again, a matter of priorities. If you have to be an asshole to get married, you may be looking for the wrong kind of person. I married someone who appreciates my niceness. And we're not all breeders. Carrying on the family name is trivial to me. In fact, it's idiocracy.
      In response: Here lies commadore64_love. He was a mighty jerk who hailed from a long line of jerks. He spawned 27 little jerks to carry on his legacy. His only contributions to the world were his strong opinions and strong ambition to quell differing opinions. May he rest in peace.

      --
      There are more things in heaven and earth than are dreamt of in your philosophy.
    41. Re:Official Notice and Explanation by shentino · · Score: 1

      And this is exactly why Google can't win.

    42. Re:Official Notice and Explanation by shentino · · Score: 1

      It can even be considered protection of goodwill.

    43. Re:Official Notice and Explanation by mewsenews · · Score: 1

      Yeah that's great, but if they continue following this path of disobeying Chinese law, then by 2020 Baidu will be the world's #1 company with 1.5 billion users while Google is just a has-been (like Atari or Amiga today). Baidu might even gain enough power to come to the US and dominate our market too.

      I'm Canadian and I'm usually up for bashing the Americans, but I don't see this as the eventual outcome. The Internet and high technology are US-centric to the point that Russians write source code using English keywords and the English alphabet. I could see Baidu dominating the Asian markets but I don't see them making in-roads in the USA where there is brainpower (Google et al) providing legitimately better services.

      Now I'm going to don my flame retarded suit to say this: at the end of it all, without idealizing competition, Americans can be almost as protectionist as the Chinese are behaving. If Baidu actually steps up and provides services that can compete fairly, there are many dirty tricks that can be pulled by the US government to keep things local. As of 2005 Canada was USA's largest trading partner and our countries have a list of trade disputes a mile long.

      So.. with both those things in mind I think from either an idealized viewpoint or a more pragmatic viewpoint we aren't likely to see Baidu dominating the global search market by 2020. I don't have a crystal ball but I know the general distrust we have for the Chinese government in North America.

    44. Re:Official Notice and Explanation by RobertM1968 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Love does not involve hitting a woman over the head with a club and dragging her back to your cave, you know. :)

      NOW you tell me!!!!

    45. Re:Official Notice and Explanation by shentino · · Score: 1

      No, it's more like not burning bridges before you've crossed them.

      This is the reason you only Defect in the last round of a Prisoner's Dilemma competition.

    46. Re:Official Notice and Explanation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm... 1.3 billion according to the 2010 census estimate according to wikipedia... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/People's_Republic_of_China

    47. Re:Official Notice and Explanation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The parent post is the greatest reply ever written to commodore64_love.

    48. Re:Official Notice and Explanation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not being a nice guy != beating women.
      But of course a nice guy would think so.

    49. Re:Official Notice and Explanation by Myopic · · Score: 1

      ah, man, I hate getting modded down when a moderator doesn't get the reference. I thought that would be a pretty universal reference. That'll teach me to put the link alongside the joke.

    50. Re:Official Notice and Explanation by CherniyVolk · · Score: 3, Informative

      Considering the average foxcon worker makes $200 a month, or $2400 a year, and the average US high school drop out makes $20,000 a year. So you need roughly 8 chinese users to equal one high school dropout in terms of buying power. So yes, china has the most number of internet users, however, they are quite literally worthless.

      Apparently, this guy has never visited another country other than America.

      That 2400 dollars a year won't work in America, because all of the exorbitant prices we have because we have people making 20,000 a year.

      I was in Thailand in May of 2010. I just got back from Taiwan, three days ago. A double quarter pounder meal in America, specifically California will run you about 10 USD easy (oh and taxes). Do you know how much that exact same meal, at Mc Donalds in Thailand cost? The exchange rate is about 32 to 1, so a Thai national would come to America and 320 baht price tag and think "my god"; you see, in Thailand, that meal (including imported American beef patties) costs maybe 20 baht... less than an American dollar. Oh, did I mention, that's expensive for eating at a restaurant in Thailand too? Food and services is very cheap there, as they are in Taiwan too. Taiwan has a similar exchange rate, Thai Baht is almost 1 to 1.

      Housing? Cost of living? Not so much in Taiwan, but food costs seem regulated to keep them down and affordable in Thailand. So those people only making 2000 baht a year, are still eating far better than upper middle class American families, yes upper middle class. Thai nationals literally can have lobster tail and top sirloin steak every meal every day. How many Americans do you know can afford to eat a 30 dollar Lobster meal every day for every meal?

      Clothes, Thailand and Taiwan both have extensive textile industries... something America used to have but no longer. Clothes are very cheap in these areas, knock-offs or the real thing. The only time things get expensive are in high-class malls (which do not exist in America at all, the Paragon Mall in Thailand has a Lamborghini, Maserati, BMW, Porsche, Lotus and Bentley car dealerships INSIDE the mall... complete with multiple show cars, on the fourth level... you never seen anything that up scale in America) for their own and global wealthy elite. The Taipei 101 mall in Taiwan is absolutely ridiculous that can rival any stupid little American show on high-rollers in Las Vegas; these malls have watch stores that make Cartier look like a cheap Timex watch on the shelf at Wal-Mart.

      So we aren't that high class. We aren't making that much money. Our numbers are very big... but it's akin to a Thai national to brag to you about how much money he drops at the club with his exchange rate being 31 to one... and calling you skimpy. Not fair is it. Nor is it fair for you to use raw numbers to think we have more purchasing power than the chinese who only make 2400 a year. Because, they have PS3s just like you. They have flat screen HDTVs just like you. They have cars, one or two per house hold just like you. Their girls sport Louis Vuitton items, just like the American girl who saves up three or four paychecks to get one herself. They go to clubs, parks and museums, rock concerts and other outings just like you.

      If you think the average Chinese population doesn't have purchasing power... you obviously have not been there and looked around. They have night markets galore. They have their own multi-billion dollar companies that you never heard of. They have more expansion and construction building cities up than you have ever witnessed in America at any point in it's history.

      Do they have poverty? Oh hell yes. So does America. But, then again. In America poverty equals high-crime and ignoble activities... in China, it's mostly just poverty (you don't stand the chance you do in getting mugged, raped or killed there as you do in American ghettos). Most Americans avoid poor areas of their cities... like the plague. So they get online and talk about how poo

    51. Re:Official Notice and Explanation by hkmwbz · · Score: 1

      What's more valuable? 1.5 billion consumers with a very limited purchasing power or developed countries where eyeballs are actually worth paying for?

      Isn't China one of the fastest growing markets? Aren't people getting more and more money to spend? Positioning yourself in China now is vitally important if you want to be part of one of the most important and profitable markets in the future.

      --
      Clever signature text goes here.
    52. Re:Official Notice and Explanation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You, I'm happy to share a country with.

    53. Re:Official Notice and Explanation by andy1307 · · Score: 1

      How is that relevant? Google still need to make $$s, not thai big macs. If the average thai person is living large on 2000$/yr, how is that better for google than an American worker making 20k/yr?

    54. Re:Official Notice and Explanation by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Is that what I've been doing wrong all these years? I better start working on that before the woman gets wise and runs off.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    55. Re:Official Notice and Explanation by Urkki · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's a tendency that gets bred out of the population, by and large.

      Which incidentally is the reason why trying to control human population is rather hopeless in the long term... Our only hope is to develop technology faster than human population grows, because if we don't, we'll hit the carrying capacity of the ecosystem. Even with interstellar travel, expansion probably is ultimately limited by lightspeed in 3 dimensions, which leads to polynomial growth of living volume, while population growth is exponential.

      IOW, we're screwed. Wether we deal with the problem intentionally, or let nature take it's course, it won't be pretty. All I can hope is, we don't hit the limit in my lifetime, perhaps not even in the lifetime of anyone I know directly.

    56. Re:Official Notice and Explanation by zuperduperman · · Score: 1

      I think it is a better than even bet that censorship will end (at least in its current form) in China. Once the citizens become aware of how much the truth is being obscured from them they will demand it and the government will have no way to justify it. Based on this, I think it may eventually be good business decision for Google to refuse to censor. In 15 years when the information revolution happens in China Baidu may be shunned as a willing arm of government censorship while Google will be seen as the path to liberty and truth.

    57. Re:Official Notice and Explanation by Darkman,+Walkin+Dude · · Score: 2, Insightful
      This is a load of bullshit. A lobster in Thailand costs the equivalent of $20 US, thats as much as most people make in three weeks in Thailand.

      Because, they have PS3s just like you. They have flat screen HDTVs just like you. They have cars, one or two per house hold just like you. Their girls sport Louis Vuitton items, just like the American girl who saves up three or four paychecks to get one herself. They go to clubs, parks and museums, rock concerts and other outings just like you.

      No, they really fucking don't. How did this get modded up? The Chinese market isn't just useless because of the vast poverty of the overwhelming majority of its citizens, you can't even sell to them, without partnering up with the party *cough* a local business, and one of the rules of entering the Chinese market is that you have to hand over whatever technological IP you might have. Still on the plus side, trade unions are starting to take hold there after the Foxconn mess, and they will be forced to compete fairly on the international market with the value of their currency. Alternately they can try to sell to Chinese people instead of rich Americans and find out rather rapidly about how keeping most of your workforce at subsistence levels means you're cutting your own nose off to spite your face.

    58. Re:Official Notice and Explanation by Darkman,+Walkin+Dude · · Score: 1

      Boom, headshot. Mod this guy up to 10.

    59. Re:Official Notice and Explanation by DragonWriter · · Score: 1

      Sounds like Google may be putting their ethical commitments (not filtering) ahead of their desire for profit.

      I think Google is putting their long-term ability to make money under the vision that their founders (who also, IIRC, retain disproportionate voting rights) established ahead of short-term returns.

      I think ethics may play a part, here, but I don't think its as simple as ethics vs. profits. I think that ethics shaped their basic business model, which shape their long-term approach to profits, which guides the decision here.

    60. Re:Official Notice and Explanation by victorhooi · · Score: 1

      heya,

      Probably not going to happen.

      I'm Chinese (but not from the mainland), but I deal a lot with mainlanders - friends, uni, colleagues etc, my father's businesses etc.

      The thing is, they've bought into the kool-aid over there. A lot of them *know* it's censored, but they don't want to rock the boat. And culturally, they're heavily money-centric. So since things are going well, in terms of growing monetary power, they don't really care that they're being censored, or oppressed or whatever (unless of course you're some outlawed political group, or Tibetian, or Falun Gong etc., I suppose). As long as the money keeps flowing, they'll suck it up. So as a people, I have little sympathy for them in terms of censorship, and all when they're essentially complicit in it.

      Anyhow, we'll see what happens down the track. Maybe they will open up, but I doubt the current CCP will go down without a fight. Personally, I see more issues with things like the growing sex-ratio imbalance, aging population, pollution problems and rising unemployment/inflation. If those things are enough to convince people that the money will stop, maybe then they'll decided to pipe up.

      Cheers,
      Victor

    61. Re:Official Notice and Explanation by nobodie · · Score: 1

      Why all this matters: I'm in China, I clicked on the blogspot link at the top of the parent post and..... it's blocked, of course, all blogspot and most addresses that include the term "blog" are blocked. We need Google here, we need them as in your face as possible-- that doesn't mean over the top so that they get themselves blocked as well-- that means to maintain a high profile in their opposition to censorship. The worries that I hear about Google having too much personal info seem, well, when the police show up at my door every three months to make sure that I am still living in the apartment that I am registered in, how does that compare to google "knowing too much about me?"

      --
      Subversion of spatial scale luxury decoration ideas.
    62. Re:Official Notice and Explanation by blackest_k · · Score: 1

      Bing Cash back? whats that I googled it, naturally.

      And find it ends today at 9pm (talk about missing the boat its been running 2 years apparently).

      http://advertising.microsoft.com/advertising/bing-cashback

      Microsoft has made significant investments to help consumers make better shopping decisions online, including our groundbreaking launch of the Bing(TM) cashback program two years ago. Bing cashback was a uniquely innovative advertising opportunity that helped advertisers partner with Microsoft to give cash back to customers and drive new sales, while deepening consumer engagement with Bing. We introduced Bing cashback to shake up the search space, and while we had some good results and some great learnings, the program just did not produce the change in user behavior we had hoped to see.

      For these reasons, Microsoft has decided to evolve Bing cashback. After July 30, 2010, we will no longer offer the Bing cashback Search or Shopping advertising programs on the Bing search results or Bing Shopping pages. This will also be the last day consumers will be able to earn cashback rewards.

      guess that means even paying people to use Bing didn't bring users to Bing.

      Microsoft seems to have an image problem these days even this reward program feels sneaky and underhanded.
      Can't be good for advertisers either giving discounts to some of your customers is really going to upset the ones who didn't get the discount.

      hows it feel to be the mug who paid extra ...

      sneaky and underhanded is becoming a common meme when you think of Microsoft.
      whats with the, Windows 7 crappiest version, crappy version, and the you going to pay thru the nose version because its got the features you need version.
      everyone knows that the difference between versions is what Microsoft chooses to disable and thats crappy behavior as is treating all your customers as thieves.

      Seems a major reason that people use microsoft products is because they "have to" or for a simple life at least.

      Google on the other hand have great services and software for free which most of us use everyday which enables them to make money through the ad revenue.

    63. Re:Official Notice and Explanation by asukasoryu · · Score: 1

      I agree, that's why I used the word "may." I wonder how much money it would take before Google switched from "do no evil" to "do less evil."

      --
      There are more things in heaven and earth than are dreamt of in your philosophy.
    64. Re:Official Notice and Explanation by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      Rather than lose China, I'd comply with the government's wishes and obey the law (i.e. filter). Nice guys who "do no evil" ultimately finish last.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    65. Re:Official Notice and Explanation by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      Most women prefer the assholes, not the nice guys, because it's the assholes who exude confidence while the nice guys defer and move to the back of the crowd where they go unnoticed.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    66. Re:Official Notice and Explanation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not true, check your facts.

    67. Re:Official Notice and Explanation by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      Here lies ______. He never got married, never had kids, and his genes/family name stops here. But hey at least he was a "nice guy"

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    68. Re:Official Notice and Explanation by asukasoryu · · Score: 1

      It's deja vu. Eerily similar to your comment #32731350. I still say it's better to do the right thing than bend to the will of China for the money.

      --
      There are more things in heaven and earth than are dreamt of in your philosophy.
    69. Re:Official Notice and Explanation by VJ42 · · Score: 1

      Rather than lose China, I'd comply with the government's wishes and obey the law (i.e. filter). Nice guys who "do no evil" ultimately finish last.

      Is there a reason you posted the exact same thing twice? http://search.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1702180&cid=32730756 Normally I'd put it down to a /. bug, but the posts are an hour apart. It surely can't be anything to do with getting modded down to -1 the first time, could it?

      --
      If I have nothing to hide, you have no reason to search me
  2. Yippee can't wait by TheKidWho · · Score: 3, Funny

    I can't wait!

    Baidu, bringing Chinese internet censorship to you! Today!

    1. Re:Yippee can't wait by sakdoctor · · Score: 1

      No need to wait!

      Baidu, bringing Chinese internet censorship to you since 2000

    2. Re:Yippee can't wait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and if you want FULL results, a small gratuity will give you access to some of them, while a MUCH larger gratuity will give you access to ALL of them...

    3. Re:Yippee can't wait by decipher_saint · · Score: 1

      Oh boy! Another crappy search engine, this time with incomplete results on purpose! Whoopee!!

      --
      crazy dynamite monkey
    4. Re:Yippee can't wait by blair1q · · Score: 1

      I for one welcome our new Chinese overl...

      ...hey, wait just one second there!

    5. Re:Yippee can't wait by xaxa · · Score: 1

      Oh boy! Another crappy search engine, this time with incomplete results on purpose! Whoopee!!

      I hope you're aware that Google filters search results.

      Last week on google.co.uk I got the message saying a result had been removed from view, with a link to Chilling Effects. It was also missing on the .de site, with a similar message. It was missing on the .com site, but there was no message (exactly the same results as the .co.uk site), which surprised me. It was visible on the .se site (one extra result compared to the other sites), although it was a link to a forum which wasn't working.

    6. Re:Yippee can't wait by TheKidWho · · Score: 2, Funny

      You meant to say:

      I for one welcome our superior Chinese benefactors!

    7. Re:Yippee can't wait by UnanimousCoward · · Score: 1

      Yawn...Fox News has been doing it for years for the good ol' USofA...

      Baidu, bringing Chinese internet censorship to you! Today!

      --
      Twelve-and-three-quarter inches. Unyielding. This wand belonged to Bellatrix Lestrange.
  3. China is the model the west wants to emulate by jollyreaper · · Score: 2, Informative

    Fuckface Leiberman and his internet kill switch. Government control of citizen access to information. You can bet your bottom yuan that when China starts producing serious IP they'll crack down on p2p. Their weak enforcement of copyright is simply Chinese mercantilism. Why send money overseas to pay for stuff that can be copied for free? Preserve capital at home. Joe Biden would love to have a Great Firewall of America.

    Very disgusted with both sides of the issue. If we're not getting screwed by military-industrial complex republicans on one side it's entertainment-industrial complex democrats on the other. I find it encouraging that the one singular point far-left progressives and frothing tea-baggers can agree on is that the politicians and lobbyists trying to kill net neutrality are fucking over the American people. There is agreement on that point at least. Representation at the federal level is limited to the special interests with bucks for lobbying and campaign contributions. Left-wing or right-wing, it doesn't matter which one you are. You don't have money, you can go get fucked. Too big to fail, too little to concerned with.

    --
    Kwisatz Haderach
    Sell the spice to CHOAM
    This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    1. Re:China is the model the west wants to emulate by commodore64_love · · Score: 2, Funny

      - You could vote for Libertarian-republicans (like Ron Paul) who would end all wars, bring all soldiers home, and end the military-government hegemony.

      - You could also join the "Free State" project to take-over New Hampshire, kickout the R's and D's, and turn into a Libertarian stronghold.

      - Or you could just keep doing nothing.

      Your choice. :-)

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    2. Re:China is the model the west wants to emulate by FriendlyLurker · · Score: 5, Informative

      "far-left progressives" do not exist in America, at least not by any definition of "left" that the rest of the world is used to. The Overton Window has shifted Americans so far to the right they no longer know what is left unless it is so extreme as to have a Hammer and Sickle stamped on it.

    3. Re:China is the model the west wants to emulate by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

      Preaching to the choir, friend.

      Cut out the swearing, put it on headed paper, and send it to your elected representative. Otherwise, you're just another armchair revolutionary.

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    4. Re:China is the model the west wants to emulate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And pander to 9/11 conspiracy nuts.

      Ron Paul is a freak sideshow, not a serious libertarian candidate.

    5. Re:China is the model the west wants to emulate by Chrisq · · Score: 1

      - You could vote for Libertarian-republicans (like Ron Paul) who would end all wars, bring all soldiers home, and end the military-government hegemony.

      - You could also join the "Free State" project to take-over New Hampshire, kickout the R's and D's, and turn into a Libertarian stronghold.

      - Or you could just keep doing nothing.

      Your choice. :-)

      Change the last one to "just keep doing nothing.except bitch about it" and you will have 99% of the population happy.

    6. Re:China is the model the west wants to emulate by Pojut · · Score: 2, Informative

      Sorry dude...I agree with many of Ron Paul's ideas, but just like any other politician, he promotes and cares only about his own agenda, other people's opinions be damned.

      He listens to other people, he respectfully responds, I'm not denying that...but in the end, if you don't agree with him, there is absolutely no way he would ever change his way. Someone that rigid shouldn't be in charge.

    7. Re:China is the model the west wants to emulate by Darkness404 · · Score: 1

      Because Ron Paul embraces 9/11 conspiracy nuts in some way?

      --
      Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    8. Re:China is the model the west wants to emulate by eln · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Sorry, but as much as I disagree with much of what the current power base does, I'm not quite ready to join a bunch of raving nutters who think the solution is to abolish government entirely or return us to some imagined utopia that never existed where the economy was always stable and everyone was always prosperous (seriously, look up some of the many financial collapses that occurred while we were on the gold standard). Ron Paul has some good ideas but he also has some that range from the wildly impractical to the borderline insane.

      The Free State Project is basically an example of a few hardcore extremists being cheered on by a bunch of the same people you decry: they sit around and complain but when push comes to shove, they do nothing. That project has been around for many years, and so far the vast majority of people who claim to support it aren't moving and have no real concrete plans to move. Even if they somehow got enough people to move they'd quickly realize what has become apparent in some of the tea party organizations: beyond a general anger at the government, the people in the movement agree on very little. They have no unified plan as to how to fix any of our problems other than "kick everyone out and stop taxing me", which is not really a useful plan.

      The people on the extreme right today have the same problem as the extreme left of the 1960s: they're great at protesting and getting attention, but they have no real practical solutions to any of the problems we face. They're heavy on idealism and ideology but very light on pragmatism and reason. They don't represent a feasible alternative to what we have now, which is why they have so much trouble gaining traction beyond their far-right base, and why we're still stuck with the same old government we've always had.

    9. Re:China is the model the west wants to emulate by aliquis · · Score: 1

      Meanwhile in Sweden we for once have a "right" government, something we rarely have, but the explanation for that is fairly easy to figure out using the same webpage:
      http://www.politicalcompass.org/euchart

      (Over (current) "right" is very left for an American.)

    10. Re:China is the model the west wants to emulate by Darkness404 · · Score: 1

      Right, because we all know that the people who are in charge listen to what the people want... Look at Obama, he basically shoved bills down people's throats because he could, I don't consider Obama, Bush, Clinton, etc. to have been all that listening to what people wants. I'm not saying that Ron Paul would be a perfect candidate, but it certainly would be a step in the right direction. People -don't- want costly wars to continue, people -don't- want hyperinflation caused by our country's spending addiction, people -don't- want needless "wars" on "drugs" that cost the tax payers millions, people -want- sane immigration reform so we don't need laws like Arizona's. The American people really only elected Obama because they didn't want another Bush, if they thought that a third party candidate could win, I'm sure that many of them would have voted for a candidate that shared their beliefs.

      Case in point, I wrote to all of my senators, my representative, and the president about various issues. All I got back was essentially a propaganda piece saying that they are voting against what I wish that I should be happy because of it.

      All politicians suck, but really, honestly, I think Ron Paul sucks less than any other major politician we've had in Washington in the last 25 years.

      --
      Taxation is legalized theft, no more, no less.
    11. Re:China is the model the west wants to emulate by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      >>>Ron Paul promotes and cares only about his own agenda, other people's opinions be damned.

      And that makes him different from the rest of us, in what way? We ALL do that - following our own agenda/beliefs. Besides I happen to agree with his agenda (downsize government, pay off the debt, restore freedom in a Pro-Choice fashion, end all wars), so I'm just fine to continue supporting him and others like him. PLUS he keeps getting reelected so apparently his home town likes him too. They are satisfied with how he does his job.

      Did you know he's the only Congressman who *returns* money at the end of each year? Rather than spend the annual congressional allowance on himself or new office furniture, he sends almost all of it back to the People's treasury. We need more representatives like that.

      And less like this dude (Congressman assaults citizen)
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v60oNUoHBYM

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    12. Re:China is the model the west wants to emulate by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      >>>He listens to other people, he respectfully responds, I'm not denying that...but in the end, if you don't agree with him, there is absolutely no way he would ever change his way. Someone that rigid... Oh wait. I thought we were discussing Congressman Paul, not President Obama. Sorry about that.

      ;-)

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    13. Re:China is the model the west wants to emulate by BlueBoxSW.com · · Score: 1

      I'm left. I'm from the US. I know exactly what I am.

    14. Re:China is the model the west wants to emulate by commodore64_love · · Score: 0, Troll

      You merely demonstrate that left and right are not adequate to describe political philosophies.

      For example Democrats are "left" liberal when it comes to sex, but right authoritarian when it comes to sucking money out of your wallet (and fining you for not buying hospitalization, or hybrid cars, or solar panels, or whatever). I would never vote for them because I don't like Authoritarian parties. Their policies remind me of Mussolini ("corporatist" by his own self description). Now maybe that idea could work in the real world, but it strikes me as being very anti-choice.

      As for EU Socialism, this is how I define it:

      - You work your ass off earning money.
      - I sit here and take it from you (weekly handout), while watching TV or the internet
      - Thanks sucker.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    15. Re:China is the model the west wants to emulate by commodore64_love · · Score: 0, Troll

      >>>He listens to other people, he respectfully responds, I'm not denying that...but in the end, if you don't agree with him, there is absolutely no way he would ever change his way... rigid...

      Ooops. I thought we were discussing Congressman Paul, not President Obama. Sorry about that.

      ;-)

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    16. Re:China is the model the west wants to emulate by Pojut · · Score: 1

      All I'm saying is that someone who's views are so set that he would never possibly change them shouldn't be in charge.

      Yes, I'm aware that this is what most politicians do...which is why I rarely vote:-)

    17. Re:China is the model the west wants to emulate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You Paultards are even lulzier than the average internet libertarian.

      Thanks for the laughs.

    18. Re:China is the model the west wants to emulate by Myopic · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There are no serious Libertarian candidates. That's the nature of Libertarianism. No serious, thoughtful person takes that ideology seriously. It makes perfect sense as explained, it just doesn't happen to jive with the reality of human behavior, so it is forever assigned to the minds of people who choose to believe simple platitudes instead of paying attention to the vagaries and difficult-to-explain nuances of human nature.

      And Ron Paul is a great example of that.

    19. Re:China is the model the west wants to emulate by antifoidulus · · Score: 1

      Right on, the creed of the modern politician seems to be, "If reality contradicts our ideology, reality obviously must be wrong". This is why I miss Clinton, he was without a doubt the most pragmatic president in my lifetime*(technically I was alive when Carter was president, but only for a few months).

    20. Re:China is the model the west wants to emulate by Myopic · · Score: 1

      Goodness, it would be awesome if all the Libertarians would move to New Hampshire and squawk to themselves so the rest of us don't have to hear about it anymore. Don't get me wrong, I love New Hampshire, I went to college there and it's a beautiful place. But if we can find a corner of the country to keep all the kooks, that would be swell. Even better, it would be a wonderful teachable example of how that kind of immoderate ideology leads to ruin, but it would be sad to watch a great state go on for probably several decades or longer before its implosion was too much for even Libertarians to ignore. We would all watch in amazement, shaking our heads in disbelief.

    21. Re:China is the model the west wants to emulate by Myopic · · Score: 1

      So true. He is a perfect embodiment of an ideologue.

    22. Re:China is the model the west wants to emulate by tophermeyer · · Score: 1

      Libertarianism is extremely useful as a fringe party. They serve as a reminder to the Republicans that there are actually real people who actually favor small government, and as a reminder to Democrats that there really are genuine conservatives out there. As a serious contender for President? No way. No Libertarian would be able to swing enough "main stream" vote.

      It makes perfect sense as explained, it just doesn't happen to jive with the reality of human behavior

      I have to agree 100%. Its an interesting and attractive ideal (to some), but not realistic in the real world. It serves a purpose though.

    23. Re:China is the model the west wants to emulate by Myopic · · Score: 1

      Is it better to complain to your fellow man, who might listen, or to complain to your representative, who certainly will not?

      I can see it both ways.

    24. Re:China is the model the west wants to emulate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For example Republicans are "right" authoritarian when it comes legislating what you do in your own bedroom, and "right" authoritarian when it comes to sucking money out of your wallet (through corporate monopolies and subsidizing big business and the richest with huge tax breaks). I would never vote for them because I don't like Authoritarian parties. Their policies remind me of Mussolini ("corporatist" by his own self description). Now maybe that idea could work in the real world, but it strikes me as being very anti-choice.

      As for US Conservatism, this is how I define it:

      - You work your ass off earning money for a minimum wage too low to survive on.
      - I sit here and take it from you (as CEO of the same corporation) by charging monopoly prices, while jerking off all day at work and contributing nothing to society
      - Thanks sucker.

      Commodore, thanks again for contributing your idiocy to slashdot.

    25. Re:China is the model the west wants to emulate by phantomfive · · Score: 3, Insightful
      No, they are here, too, they just don't get taken as seriously in the US because Americans tend to put priorities on different things, and don't trust government (this goes for people on the left and the right. No one wants the government to know your search results, for example). Really, look at this quote from that group I linked to:

      Socialism will meet the needs of the great majority of our people and lay the basis for solving our social, economic and environmental problems.

      Now tell me, do you personally as an American trust government to meet the great majority of your needs? I could be wrong, but I don't think many people would say yes.

      The whole dichotomy between left and right is so flawed that it is more a tool used to divide us than anything meaningful. For example, I favor government that works: I don't care if healthcare becomes state-run or remains independent as long as the more serious problems are fixed. I don't care if gays get married or do anything else they want, as long as it's not hurting other people. I do favor freedom to use guns, and all other basic freedoms. I do think we should help people who need help, whether with a welfare program or some weird faith-based initiative like Bush was pushing, I don't care, as long as it works.

      A lot of people don't fit into the left-right mold, and breaking into teams only serves to help those who want us to be fighting (ie. politicians who are always looking for a reason why you should vote against the other guy). Don't give in to their manipulation, instead favor government that works.

      --
      Qxe4
    26. Re:China is the model the west wants to emulate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MOD UP That was a highly enlightening link.

    27. Re:China is the model the west wants to emulate by ultranova · · Score: 1

      - You could vote for Libertarian-republicans (like Ron Paul) who would end all wars, bring all soldiers home, and end the military-government hegemony.

      "Rather than lose China, I'd comply with the government's wishes and obey the law (i.e. filter). Nice guys who "do no evil" ultimately finish last."

      Sorry, but I don't trust your advice, and don't think that anyone should.

      - You could also join the "Free State" project to take-over New Hampshire, kickout the R's and D's, and turn into a Libertarian stronghold.

      "Rather than lose China, I'd comply with the government's wishes and obey the law (i.e. filter). Nice guys who "do no evil" ultimately finish last."

      Sorry, but I don't trust your advice, and don't think that anyone should.

      Your choice. :-)

      Yeah: take the advice of someone who's publicly stated that he's willing to screw over others for profit, or don't.

      Things have consequences, and we all know that you wouldn't want to finish last.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    28. Re:China is the model the west wants to emulate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      According to the parent post, you're all that's left.

    29. Re:China is the model the west wants to emulate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "far-left progressives" do not exist in America, at least not by any definition of "left" that the rest of the world is used to. The Overton Window has shifted Americans so far to the right they no longer know what is left unless it is so extreme as to have a Hammer and Sickle stamped on it.

      It's really telling that, according to politicalcompass.org at least, the perennially quixotic (and about as much as a leftist as you can get in national-level US politics) Dennis Kucinich is overall more libertarian (or less authoritarian) than either other Democrats or any Republicans candidates during the 2008 primaries!

    30. Re:China is the model the west wants to emulate by Myopic · · Score: 1

      Heh, whenever I type something like that it's a crapshoot whether I'll get modded insightful or troll. It's a bit of each, I suppose. Today I win! Tomorrow I'll lose.

    31. Re:China is the model the west wants to emulate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then how do you answer the question of how the interest on debt which you will pay continues to rise as a percentage of the United States national budget? That's the only "borderline insane" strategy I see here. In the near future, I expect to see some states become completely financially insolvent, and it's because of people like you who think that we can continue to fund our current day-to-day living standards through debt.
      This is just not practical or well-thought out.

    32. Re:China is the model the west wants to emulate by eln · · Score: 1

      My rejection of Dr. Paul's ideas is not meant in any way to imply that I agree with our current fiscal policy. There is a middle ground between "spend like drunken sailors and borrow all the money" and "spend nothing and drastically cut everyone's taxes". The fact that everyone ignores the possibility of such a middle ground is part of the reason we seem unable to not only get ourselves out of the hole, but why we can't even seem to keep ourselves from continuing to dig it deeper.

    33. Re:China is the model the west wants to emulate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, I'm from Europe and believe me, in the Americans there are almost no people left of centre. There are a lot of people who call themselves left, but by our standards most of them are right-wing. And I guess that was kind of the point of the Overton Window remark of GP and I'm kind of surprised that you missed that.

    34. Re:China is the model the west wants to emulate by IamLarryboy · · Score: 1

      Okay, who modded this troll up?
      .
      "There are no serious Libertarian candidates"
      Not true. Any sane definition of "serious candidate" would include the successful candidate(s). Ron Paul is a multi-term Congressman. I understand that Libertarian candidates have won numerous lesser offices.
      .
      "No serious, thoughtful person takes that ideology seriously"
      Now you are just being insulting. Replace that ideology with ANY ideology and it still is insulting. Libertarianism, Christianity, Flat Earth. Serious, thoughtful people have believed or believe a lot of weird stuff. That does not mean they are not intelligent or serious or thoughtful only wrong. Instead of insulting them (Yes even us Christians) next time assume that although they may be wrong they believe what they do for a reason. Try to understand them and have a discussion. If you are very lucky they might actually convince you that it is you who are wrong.
      .
      "... minds of people who choose to believe simple platitudes instead of paying attention to the vagaries and difficult-to-explain nuances of human nature."
      Ah, a troll AND a hypocrite!
      .
      Jeff Paetkau
      .
      <offtopic>Why is slashdot stripping out empty newlines?</offtopic>

    35. Re:China is the model the west wants to emulate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is it better to complain to your fellow man, who might listen, or to complain to your representative, who certainly will not?

      My reps respond to me when I write, sometimes directly responding to points I raise in my mail.

      But, perhaps what you mean by listen is actually "vote on matters exactly as I wish them to." Which isn't listening to your opinions, so much as adopting them.

    36. Re:China is the model the west wants to emulate by Myopic · · Score: 1

      Yes, that is what I meant; thank you for helping me be more clear.

    37. Re:China is the model the west wants to emulate by z-j-y · · Score: 1

      anyone who lament the lack of far left in America, is a far left.

    38. Re:China is the model the west wants to emulate by Wowlapalooza · · Score: 1

      Socialism will meet the needs of the great majority of our people and lay the basis for solving our social, economic and environmental problems.

      Now tell me, do you personally as an American trust government to meet the great majority of your needs? I could be wrong, but I don't think many people would say yes.

      Well, first of all, there is a distinction to be made between wants and needs. Beyond that, though, those that deny that government can meet the great majority of the needs of its citizens apparently are blind to the myriad ways in which government already meets those needs, most of which are taken for granted. I'm referring to national defense, clean air/water/food, a functioning economic system (including currency, trade, insurance, banking, enforcement of private contracts, etc.), a functioning transportation system, a functioning telecommunications system, and a long list of other services that government either provides directly to modern society, or at least created and maintains the structure by which private individuals can reliably provide these services to each other.

      I do favor freedom to use guns, and all other basic freedoms.

      I don't think we have a consensus that using guns, in particular, is a "basic" freedom. Arguably, self-defense is a basic freedom, but that's more general and abstract than what you said.

    39. Re:China is the model the west wants to emulate by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      the myriad ways in which government already meets those needs, most of which are taken for granted

      These aren't taken for granted by most people. That's a strawman that is typically set up by people who are trying to make the exact point you are trying to make.

      I don't think we have a consensus that using guns, in particular, is a "basic" freedom.

      Of course not, my statement was a partisan view. Republicans tend to want to keep guns as a basic freedom, Democrats want to relegate it to a second class freedom. Fortunately for the Republicans (and in this case, also for me), the constitution takes the view that it is a basic freedom which makes it difficult to limit them.

      --
      Qxe4
    40. Re:China is the model the west wants to emulate by DragonWriter · · Score: 1

      There are no serious Libertarian candidates. That's the nature of Libertarianism. No serious, thoughtful person takes that ideology seriously.

      No, that's the nature of third parties in the US electoral system. There are plenty of people (leaving out the "No true Scotsman" problem in your statement) who take libertarian ideology seriously, but most of them that want to have the effect of advancing the ideology they believe in end up, at least in terms of voting behavior, as nose-holding Democrats or nose-holding Republicans.

    41. Re:China is the model the west wants to emulate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "in the Americans" - that should be "among the Americans" (or possibly "in the USA"). English is hard.

    42. Re:China is the model the west wants to emulate by CODiNE · · Score: 1

      Even if they somehow got enough people to move they'd quickly realize what has become apparent in some of the tea party organizations: beyond a general anger at the government, the people in the movement agree on very little.

      That's kind of like asking Slashdot users to agree on the One True OS.

      --
      Cwm, fjord-bank glyphs vext quiz
    43. Re:China is the model the west wants to emulate by JesseMcDonald · · Score: 1

      There are no serious Libertarian candidates. That's the nature of Libertarianism. No serious, thoughtful person takes that ideology seriously.

      Well, what did you expect? The concept of a "libertarian" political party (Libertarianism, capital 'L') is a contradiction in terms. The libertarian ideology rejects all aggression, of which political action is a strict subset. Ergo, only those who are incapable of seeing the contradiction or are willing to compromise their supposed beliefs for political power ever become Libertarian candidates.

      Even so, Libertarian Party candidates have been elected to political office, which means your statement that "there are no serious Libertarian candidates" is clearly false. Even at the national level there are politicians currently in office with close ties to the Libertarian Party, which is about as much as can be expected of any third-party candidate in the current two-party electoral system.

      --
      "The state is that great fiction by which everyone tries to live at the expense of everyone else." - Bastiat
  4. Re:Absolutely IMPORTANT! by Pojut · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Might it be a tad dangerous for any one group to control something so vastly powerful and important as the media, something that all by itself can start wars, end wars, sway elections, and tell people what they should fear?

    Might it be a tad dangerous that the media can influence people that severely? Who do you blame...the media for its influence, or the people that allow themselves to be influenced by it?

  5. Slashdot running CPC propaganda? by swb · · Score: 3, Insightful

    That's what this reads like, pro-China PR. Bad round-eye company kicked out, good Chinese company on to world domination!

    The only thing missing is the agitprop poster of the worker leading the masses to victory.

    1. Re:Slashdot running CPC propaganda? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you would be surprised, but from the viewpoint from outside US, almost all us-press looks like agitprop (not mentioning Hollywood), no offense

    2. Re:Slashdot running CPC propaganda? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, heaven forbid that Slashdot does not follow the US-American groupthink that USA = bad, China = good - always, without fail, no matter whether we're looking at the governments, the societies, the nations as such, individual politicians, individual companies, individual managers, individual people, or whatever.

      Yes, even implying that China is not the Great Satan is enemy propaganda. Slashdot is obviously run by terrorist traitors who Hate America(tm).

  6. Not "Changing Strategy" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Changing strategy"?!

    The impression I got from this article is that Google has pretty much, 100% caved in to the Chinese government. They want their business license renewed (this coming Wednesday), so Google will be going back to business as usual and censoring google.cn.

    Way to grab publicity and then not follow through at all, Google.

    1. Re:Not "Changing Strategy" by insufflate10mg · · Score: 0

      Did you even read the article you linked? It says absolutely nothing about caving into China's government; if anything, they are only becoming more rebellious by using such a sneaky way to redirect their users. Once again, I would like to reiterate that the article linked above says absolutely nothing that the AC claims; if anything, I believe the AC simply posted a random link about Google and said that to try to sway people. Read the article he linked -- go for it.

  7. OMG BAIDU Porn! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Baidu: Image search Naked

    I see a bunch of naked men on Baidu! So, that's what the whole pornography ban in China was all about! They're trying to assault our heterosexual christian american values!

    Clearly, Baidu needs to be banned in China as well! Go get them, great leader!

    1. Re:OMG BAIDU Porn! by game+kid · · Score: 1

      It's not porn! It's graceful exhibition of things of nature by the glorious Workers of the People's Republic!

      The great and supreme workforce of nature, guided by the great leader the Paramount Leader, is far too mighty and virile for blonde dyed plastic filth like American "porn"!

      --
      You can hold down the "B" button for continuous firing.
    2. Re:OMG BAIDU Porn! by aliquis · · Score: 1

      by the glorious Workers of the People's Republic!

      No, it was mostly foreigners, atleast the images I checked.

      Probably more like "huhu, crazy ass Brits! Look how they go out naked in their parks!"

  8. Baidu sucks by jdc18 · · Score: 1

    The whole model of Baidu it is not going to work outside of China, restricted searches, you can pay to rank higher, it doesnt work in other languages, and the search engine sucks. You get a lot of false positives in the related searches in between the Great Firewall of China and Baidu. I think not using google and using baidu cripples more the chinese. There are a lot of information usefull in site like blogspot.com that are blocked by default, or even youtube is quite handy for tutorials and howtos.

  9. Re:Absolutely IMPORTANT! by AnonymousClown · · Score: 1

    Who do you blame...the media for its influence, or the people that allow themselves to be influenced by it?

    The people.

    And I think it's even worse when folks discount news from one source but believe another source - all because that particular source has a narrative that agrees with their belief system. No, it's not just Fox News viewers. Folks on the "other side" can be just as culpable.

    And from the handful of Chinese people I know (sample are those who emigrated to the US so there's my grain of salt), they're pretty skeptical of the media and they've given me the impression that the average Chinese citizen is too.

    --
    RIP America

    July 4, 1776 - September 11, 2001

  10. Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This doesn't give Baidu anything. All it does is screw China. This nonsense smacks of the DPRK's "win" in the World Cup.

  11. Re:Absolutely IMPORTANT! by dwandy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Who do you blame...the media for its influence, or the people that allow themselves to be influenced by it?

    If the media were not influential it would be replaced by media that was.
    Those that sit atop the Kingdom got there because they best understood the current game and won it.

    Humans are social creatures, and ultimately a pack animal. I'm beginning to believe that the natural order for humans is in fact some sort of feudal system that has leaders ruling the pack. How the leaders are chosen varies over time but ultimately the Leaders rule the pack.

    I say this in the context that it may be inherent in humans to be influenced (by those in [power|control|influential-position]).
    Further, the more you are a free-thinker, anti/non-social or otherwise a non-conformist the less you are likely to accept this natural order and not only cry out against the injustice of the powerful but wonder why the rest of the people around you don't. And I suspect that most /.ers fall into some variation of this category.

    --
    If you think imaginary property and real property are the same, when does your house become public domain?
  12. Uh, going dark? by roothog · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How on earth is this considered "going dark"? Google will no longer automatically redirect to .hk, but they're doing that specifically so they stay up in China. What's happening is the opposite of going dark.

    1. Re:Uh, going dark? by Mouldy · · Score: 1

      Google need an IPC license to continue to operate 'in the light' - these licenses are given by the Chinese government. Google's license is up for renewal (which they applied for today). They're hoping that by making the redirection to Hong Kong servers manual they'll be on right side of the law and so get a their license renewed.

      The original blog post makes the mention of "going dark" - but that's only if Google's IPC license isn't renewed by the Chinese government.

      The BBC have a good article on this too.

  13. Re:Absolutely IMPORTANT! by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

    Good thing we have multiple outlets then. If you don't like what DNC-NBC is saying you can switch to FOX. If you don't like FOX News you can switch to CNN or PBS. If you don't like them, there's conservative or progressive talk radio. Or the internet which has websites for everything from Communism to Anarchism

    Now is better than some imagined future where government hands-out money (controls) the media.

    --
    "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
  14. Hire US folks? by Seakip18 · · Score: 1

    Honest question:

    Does it really make sense to try and hire US software folks? Is local talent that bad that Baidu looks for US folks or folks outside the US?

    The US has good software folks, but is it really that much better than places like Brazil, etc., where Baidu could probably get a bigger bang for their buck if global growth is a priority?

    --
    import system.cool.Sig;
    1. Re:Hire US folks? by decipher_saint · · Score: 1

      Imagine Baidu building a search engine for various regions where censorship is desired. They'd certainly corner the market on oppressing information (if that's profitable I don't know).

      --
      crazy dynamite monkey
    2. Re:Hire US folks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps they mean abducting Google employees and replicating the google setup on their datacenter?

    3. Re:Hire US folks? by aliquis · · Score: 1

      Maybe it's partly company/brand image?

      Like: "Look at us! We've got the best people out of the US!"

      "this good Chinese farmer/Indian" may not have the same impact.

    4. Re:Hire US folks? by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      > They'd certainly corner the market on oppressing information (if that's
      > profitable I don't know).

      Profitable for the Chinese government? Of course. They'd gain influence over governments that made Baidu the sole permitted search engine in their territories while flooding such nations with pro-Chinese propaganda.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    5. Re:Hire US folks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Every U.S. software engineer under Chinese employment is one less U.S. software engineer being hired to circumvent Chinese censorship, and ultimately, one less stumbling block to the inevitable invasion by the PRC of remaining portions of the world as a means to recover China's investment funding when other countries default due to Chinese financial policy.

      Okay, my tinfoil hat is showing some signs of wear, but even paranoids have enemies, and let's please remember that this IS the PRC we are talking about.

  15. So can i search for Tienanmen square on baidu? by Sri+Ramkrishna · · Score: 1

    I wonder if Baidu will have search results for Tienanmen Square or any other bullshit China is up to? If not, they will lose. :-) sri

    1. Re:So can i search for Tienanmen square on baidu? by insufflate10mg · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The reason I was reading comments was so I could find an appropriate one to reply to. As soon as I read this story, I pulled up both Google and Baidu, and translated Baidu. Searching for Tiananmen Square yields nothing about a massacre, and searching Tiananmen Square Massacre only yields FOUR results. FOUR. A couple of them are regarding civilians volunteering to patrol Tiananmen Square for a holiday or something. I am absolutely blown away and until today had no idea just how bad the censorship is. Incredible.

  16. Re:Absolutely IMPORTANT! by blair1q · · Score: 1

    All we need now is a law that makes blatant lying illegal and we'll be set.

  17. If they really wanted to torque off China by Tisha_AH · · Score: 3, Insightful

    To really rub China the wrong way Google should move all "Chinese" operations to Taiwan with a statement that google.cn will still be available in the one bastion of free Chinese, Taiwan.

    --
    Tisha Hayes
    1. Re:If they really wanted to torque off China by phantomfive · · Score: 2, Informative

      That would annoy the Chinese people, too. Most of them don't have too high an opinion of Taiwan, being fed a daily stream of anti-Taiwan propaganda (and it probably didn't help that at one time Taiwan wanted to 'borrow' nuclear weapons from the US, in order to invade China).

      --
      Qxe4
    2. Re:If they really wanted to torque off China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah, better to say "we are moving to the other China".

    3. Re:If they really wanted to torque off China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Taiwan will ban Google even faster than Chinese government because Taiwan doesn't think that they are part of China. So, they (no one in Taiwan) will allow Google.cn operate in Taiwan. How funny is this :)

    4. Re:If they really wanted to torque off China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Chinese don't have high opinion on Taiwanese because of Taiwanese companies like Foxconn which are known as the more labor abusers than most Chinese domestic companies.

    5. Re:If they really wanted to torque off China by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      And.....this is an exact example of the type of propaganda I am talking about. If you stay in China and read the newspaper, you will see a constant stream of propaganda about how bad Taiwan is.....random stuff like, "Taiwanese fishing labor standards treat fishermen poorly!!!" or strange stuff like that. So don't expect associating yourself with Taiwan to have any positive effect in China.

      --
      Qxe4
    6. Re:If they really wanted to torque off China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not part of, the whole.

      Everybody is agreed that there is only One China. They even agree on its borders. The disagreement is over whether its legitimate government is on the mainland or the island of Taiwan.

    7. Re:If they really wanted to torque off China by readin · · Score: 2, Informative

      Calling Taiwan a bastion of free "Chinese" would make the government of China very happy. They want the world to believe that their plans to annext Taiwan are an attempto "reunify" rather than naked aggression. Oddly their strongest ally is the authoritarian ruling party of Taiwan that migrated from China. They are also helped my too many media sources that give a false impression when they say things like "Taiwan separated from China after the communists' victory in the Chinese civil war in 1949".

      That's like saying France split from Germany in 1945. While technically true, it leaves out the fact that Taiwan had been joined to China a mere 4 years earlier at the end of World War 2. When the Nationalist Chinese took over Taiwan, they clamped down on freedom of speech and spend the next 70 years forcing everyone to learn Chinese and telling them they were part of China.

      CNN has become even more ridiculous saying that "Taiwan began as the remnant of the government that ruled over mainland China until a Communist uprising proved victorious in 1949." Taiwan began long before the Chinese showed up, whether you're talking about the Chinese who took over in 1945 or the Chinese who started migrating in the 1600s (Taiwan has a similar history to South and Central America in that it starting colonized around the same time and unlike the U.S. the native populations were reduced and assimilated rather than nearly eliminated).

      --
      I often don't like the choices people make, but I like the fact that people make choices. That's why I'm a conservative.
    8. Re:If they really wanted to torque off China by readin · · Score: 1

      "and it probably didn't help that at one time Taiwan wanted to 'borrow' nuclear weapons from the US, in order to invade China"

      Taiwan was under an immigrant Chinese dictatorship at the time (the Chinese who arrived in 1945 took over and forced the population to learn Chinese and to say they were Chinese and to bow to the Chinese dicatator). Taiwan (the Taiwanese people) didn't want to invade China. It was the Chinese who had colonized the place who wanted to invade China.

      --
      I often don't like the choices people make, but I like the fact that people make choices. That's why I'm a conservative.
    9. Re:If they really wanted to torque off China by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      It all depends on how you frame it. I was clearly describing it from the point of view of the communists.

      --
      Qxe4
    10. Re:If they really wanted to torque off China by readin · · Score: 1

      "being fed a daily stream of anti-Taiwan propaganda"

      The most damaging propaganda is probably the lie that most Taiwanese want to "reunite" with China but are held back by stubborn government. In fact the government is more pro-China than the population and is working hard to drag the people toward a union they don't want.

      --
      I often don't like the choices people make, but I like the fact that people make choices. That's why I'm a conservative.
    11. Re:If they really wanted to torque off China by readin · · Score: 2, Informative

      "Everybody is agreed that there is only One China. They even agree on its borders."

      Not true. The Chinese who took over Taiwan after World War II and the Chinese who remained in China all agree that Taiwan is part of China, but the Taiwanese people who were in Taiwan prior to 1945 are not so sure. After 70 years of Chinese propaganda and forced Sinicization, they are split between those who say Taiwan is part of China those who say Taiwan and China are separate countries.

      The typical news report in the western media will say Taiwan and China "split" amid "civil war" in 1949. But they were only together for 4 years from 1945 to 1949.

      --
      I often don't like the choices people make, but I like the fact that people make choices. That's why I'm a conservative.
    12. Re:If they really wanted to torque off China by readin · · Score: 1

      "Taiwan will ban Google even faster than Chinese government because Taiwan doesn't think that they are part of China"

      Actualy, the people who would do the banning, the government of Taiwan, thinks Taiwan is part of China. It is the people of Taiwan who think Taiwan is not part of China (though a minority agree with the government).

      --
      I often don't like the choices people make, but I like the fact that people make choices. That's why I'm a conservative.
  18. Thanks But No Thanks by eldavojohn · · Score: 1

    Maybe you should try developing for the iPhone.

    Hey, I'd love to. Could you send me an computer that I can install the development package on? And an iPhone to test? And waive the $100/year App Store fee?

    Maybe you should try searching on Bing.

    I toyed around with it when it first launched, never used it really though. Wasn't satisfied with it evidently I wasn't alone.

    But most of all, maybe you should stop patting yourself on the back for being so closed minded and get outside for a little while

    I am so utterly confused. To date, I do not believe I have purchased a product from Google. I have a Motorola DROID phone with their OS on it, I have used their search engine, I probably have given them ad revenue but I cannot think of a single instance where I've paid Google directly from my pocketbook. There is something closed minded about appreciating this fact?

    What was it that I exhibited that was closed minded?

    ....without your Google Android phone.

    Last Sunday I was canoeing on the Potomac (Brunswick to Point of Rocks) without my DROID. Seriously. Did not want to lose that. Really enjoyed it and heavily recommend it.

    Here's to wishful thinking...

    Thanks for the wishes but I don't really need them. I apologize if my post sounded like I was patting myself on the back. Had Google caved to the Chinese government you probably would have gotten a healthy dosage of me cursing the above facts and lamenting that their just as big of a pile of shit as Apple or Microsoft. At least Google shows a little bit of promise.

    It disturbs me that you were moderated Insightful.

    --
    My work here is dung.
    1. Re:Thanks But No Thanks by mini+me · · Score: 1

      Hey, I'd love to. Could you send me an computer that I can install the development package on? And an iPhone to test? And waive the $100/year App Store fee?

      Insignificant business expenses. Surely your app ideas are good enough to recoup the costs and then some?

  19. Re:Absolutely IMPORTANT! by fritsd · · Score: 1

    Those all sound American. I'm guessing you are, too. Don't you ever read news from sources from outside your own country? Just asking, not trolling..

    --
    To be, or not to be: isn't that quite logical, Slashdot Beta?
  20. What will Google do? by countertrolling · · Score: 1

    Buy into Baidu, of course. And the ad severs are still working..

    --
    For justice, we must go to Don Corleone
  21. Huh? by rgviza · · Score: 0, Troll

    "It has announced new plans to hire US engineers to enhance its technical skills and propel its growth globally."

    I thought the US was comprised of a bunch of fat, lazy, stupid people and behind the curve on technology. Now we're able to enhance the technical skills of foreigners? They must be referring to the foreign students here for a technology education because US citizens are far too stupid. No, I got it! We elected Obama so now we must be smart! /sarcasm off

    --
    Don't kid yourself. It's the size of the regexp AND how you use it that counts.
  22. Re:Absolutely IMPORTANT! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    sounds like you should be browsing with Baidu not Google on principle

  23. God damnit, Slashdot by IsaacD · · Score: 0

    I hate that fucking slider bullshit.

  24. No, the cat does not, in fact, "got my tongue." by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

    > This gives Baidu Inc., which already has a greater than 60% share in Internet search in
    > China, a chance to expand. It has announced new plans to hire US engineers to enhance
    > its technical skills and propel its growth globally.

    China's big, but not bigger than everyone else. Everyone else could:

    1. Don't use Baidu

    2. Ostracize the companies helping Baidu/China and any "US engineers" they hire, as well as any companies that hire said engineers in the future, or deal with them on a business level.

    3. Make all this loudly known to everybody. Someday China's regime will crack, and we need to pre-emptively disable the future apologists' lament that "thems was the times back then."

    --
    (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
  25. Blockaid Baidu (Chinese) Web Crawlers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Should all the countries outside China block Baidu crawlers? Since I don't read Mandarin or Cantonese and the number of users from China to my sight are tiny, it really will not harm China, but if we all do it, perhaps they will learn to be more open?

    BTW, I'm not a fan of Google, but I am a fan of open markets that allow give AND take. China is "taking" and not giving.

    1. Re:Blockaid Baidu (Chinese) Web Crawlers by grumpyman · · Score: 1

      China's giving the world cheap slave labour in result Walmart, cheap electronics...etc. You may not like the thinking but everybody in the western world are taking advantages of it to some degree.

  26. Re:Absolutely IMPORTANT! by Jedi+Alec · · Score: 1

    Not only are they all american, they *all* have an agenda one way or the other.

    I know this might incredible, but how about a news source that just provides...news?

    --

    People replying to my sig annoy me. That's why I change it all the time.
  27. Why not jyst go to HK site?!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if someone wants unfiltered results, why cant he directly go to .hk site?! when google.cn is redirecting user to .hk site (which is uncensored and accessable) then i really dont get the logic of the Chinese! Can some one explain?!! can you hear ...err read... this text behind those great firewalls?!! answer me!!!

    1. Re:Why not jyst go to HK site?!! by victorhooi · · Score: 1

      heya,

      The firewall blocks it...? Or it will shortly. I think this is just a stop-gap.

      Or maybe it's just to educate people about the HK site.

      Cheers,
      Victor

  28. Re:Absolutely IMPORTANT! by DragonWriter · · Score: 1

    Might it be a tad dangerous that the media can influence people that severely? Who do you blame...the media for its influence, or the people that allow themselves to be influenced by it?

    Since when is blame exclusive?

  29. Re:Absolutely IMPORTANT! by Darkman,+Walkin+Dude · · Score: 1

    Further, the more you are a free-thinker, anti/non-social or otherwise a non-conformist the less you are likely to accept this natural order and not only cry out against the injustice of the powerful but wonder why the rest of the people around you don't. And I suspect that most /.ers fall into some variation of this category.

    Bah, rebels are just the leaders of the future. All cries for rebellion are cries for power, so where does that leave the non-conformist/Leader divide?

  30. Run Tiananmen Massacre search on Baidu.com by JumperCable · · Score: 1

    Fine. Everyone go to http://www.baidu.com and search things like:

    tiananmen square massacre pictures

  31. Baidu hiring Americans? by MobyDisk · · Score: 1

    It [Baidu] has announced new plans to hire US engineers to enhance its technical skills and propel its growth globally."

    First of all, stating that they will hire Americans certainly doesn't help the image of China being superior. Secondly, what American would want to work for a Chinese company whose job is to censor search results?

  32. Re:Absolutely IMPORTANT! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jews own and run 96% of all USA media companies.

    When the truth is sinisterly dismissed as flamebait, the intelligent man is obviously skeptical of your declining system.

    Perhaps the Chinese government possess some element of this intelligence.