Slashdot Mirror


The Unstoppable 'Tech Support' Scam

Barence writes "A pernicious new type of scam is targeting British computer owners, reports PC Pro. The con is both fiendishly clever and ridiculously simple. The fraudster cold-calls the customer and tells them that Microsoft has detected a virus on their PC, then invites them to download a piece of remote-assistance software. No doubt reassured by the lines of indecipherable code flitting across their screen, the caller assures the customer they can make the virus vanish – but first, of course, they want payment. £185 to be precise. The spoof site behind the scam is approved by McAfee's Site Advisor and bears Microsoft logos, something which both companies have failed to act upon. Meanwhile, an assortment of British regulators have said there is nothing they can do to stop it."

74 of 312 comments (clear)

  1. Scum by lobiusmoop · · Score: 2, Insightful

    God, there are some real scumbags in the world.

    --
    "I bless every day that I continue to live, for every day is pure profit."
    1. Re:Scum by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yeah. What morally responsible individual would ruin the good name of Microsoft?

    2. Re:Scum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      God, there are some real scumbags in the world.

      And a lot of fools.

    3. Re:Scum by causality · · Score: 4, Insightful

      God, there are some real scumbags in the world.

      Yes, but they are non-violent and require the cooperation of their "victims". Thus, they are like ticks, leeches, mosquitoes, flies, and worms: they are unpleasant and downright nasty but they serve a purpose. They provide a limiting function. They disincentivize ignorance and stupidity by making it more painful, just like those natural pests disincentivize improper sanitation. By becoming knowledgable and savvy, the "victim" can have total control over whether he/she is successfully targeted.

      Really now, all it would take is a small amount of healthy skepticism. Let's assume the scammer is so good that there are no other "tells". A user would only need to say to the scammer "Microsoft found a virus on my PC did they? Let me get back to you" and then call Microsoft. As unpleasant as calling Microsoft would be, it beats giving money to a scammer. It's the same well-known principle used for dealing with suspicious communications from banks. If you don't know if that e-mail is really from your bank because you don't have the technical skill to determine that, then you ignore it and call your bank at their published phone number. Then it doesn't matter if it's the most clever phishing e-mail in the world.

      It doesn't exactly require a genius to understand these things. It just requires that one not leap blindly into what they do not understand while expecting a good result. That's general advice for life, not just computing. I personally believe that almost everyone is capable of understanding these simple concepts, they just can't be bothered to think. Perhaps they need a little incentive. Perhaps by providing one the scammers are serving a purpose, even though I fully agree with you that they are scumbags. That's why I'd liken them to a carrion-eater or a parasite.

      --
      It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
    4. Re:Scum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      They disincentivize ignorance and stupidity by making it more painful, just like those natural pests disincentivize improper sanitation./quote?

      Yet the only reason why we care to disincentivize ignorance and stupidity is because those scammers exist. Your logic is viciously circular. They need to exist to protect people from themselves?

    5. Re:Scum by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yeah. What morally responsible individual would ruin the good name of Microsoft?

      I'm not sure, but I think you just called Microsoft's development staff "morally irresponsible." That's not very nice. ;)

    6. Re:Scum by grumbel · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes, but they are non-violent and require the cooperation of their "victims".

      So does robbing somebody with an unloaded gun.

    7. Re:Scum by causality · · Score: 5, Interesting

      They disincentivize ignorance and stupidity by making it more painful, just like those natural pests disincentivize improper sanitation./quote?

      Yet the only reason why we care to disincentivize ignorance and stupidity is because those scammers exist. Your logic is viciously circular. They need to exist to protect people from themselves?

      I'm glad you raised this point. It's a good one, to be sure.

      Being wise and savvy and seeking understanding is the natural state of human beings. The widespread ignorance and stupidity is what I might call "unnaturally natural". The proof is that by not viewing ignorance and gullibility as problems in need of correction, people leave themselves vulnerable to this type of scam. The scammers do not create this vulnerability. They merely capitalize on it. They see that something is out of order and that this creates room for them to operate. Otherwise their dubious "enterprise" would never get off the ground.

      The ignorance and stupidity is a disease state. The scammers are the disease that can thrive in the environment of that disease state. They are symptoms, not the actual problem. It's absurdity itself to say that the only reason to eschew ignorance and stupidity is because these scammers exist. Have you no concept of how much better our world would be if ignorance and stupidity were not such powerful forces in shaping it?

      The personal shortcomings that scammers exploit go far, far beyond computing. They also play important roles in politics, the economy, interpersonal relationships, you name it. It just so happens that computing provides a convenient entry point for that ignorance and stupidity to come under attack since it is generally encouraged in other realms like politics.

      --
      It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
    8. Re:Scum by commodore64_love · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This is what the government-run schools are supposed to eliminate: Ignorance. But instead they ended-up glorified babysitting zones.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    9. Re:Scum by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 2, Funny

      So, what you're saying is that we need scammers to scam people to protect them scammers?

      I gotta better idea. Why don't we just start telling everyone that they can rid their PCs of viruses and malware if they scrub it in the bathtub with the power on?

    10. Re:Scum by sakdoctor · · Score: 2, Funny

      Whilst I am going to have to flog myself for XKCD linking...

      WE RUN LINUX!

    11. Re:Scum by causality · · Score: 3, Interesting

      They are far worse than that and it is definitely by careful design.

      In fact I'd say that the public schools bear more responsibility than anyone else for the widespread ignorance and gullibility that these scammers feed on. A truly tough-minded population familiar with critical thinking, logic, and argumentation would not so easily fall for these scams. They also wouldn't support anything our politicians of today are pushing for. So you see that'd be really inconvenient for our increasingly centralized society *spits*.

      --
      It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
    12. Re:Scum by sorak · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Doesn't that seem like circular logic to you? Con artists are good because they teach us not to trust con artists?

    13. Re:Scum by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Funny

      The government-run schools in the USA are designed to be indoctrination stations and they function brilliantly. They produce a steady stream of soldiers and criminals in addition to undesirables like journalists and human rights lawyers. Meanwhile, those who know utilize private tutors, home schooling, and/or private schooling so that their children receive an education in using their minds.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    14. Re:Scum by the_humeister · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I don't know where these people are going to school. I went to a public school in the USA, went to a decent university, grad school, and now job that actually utilizes critical thinking skills. I, and my high school friends, didn't turn out to be the fools that you would assume that we would be by going through public schools at each step. It's more likely that being ignorant is the easy way out and that's what people would rather choose instead.

    15. Re:Scum by Zen_Sorcere · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What public schools did you go to? Any? Because I went through the public school system growing up, in several different cities and states (navy brat; family moved all the time), and I did just fine. No criminal or soldier elements for me, nor the friends I had made in the later grades. I feel there is an undeserved slight on the public school system...I'm not sure if it's from the media focusing on inner-city, run down schools, or from some Right leaning political propoganda. Myself, I think home schooling is a horrible idea, and those I've known to be home schooled are more sociopath-leaning than any other people I know.

    16. Re:Scum by causality · · Score: 2, Informative

      "Yes, but they are non-violent and require the cooperation of their 'victims'... They provide a limiting function. They disincentivize ignorance and stupidity by making it more painful, just like those natural pests disincentivize improper sanitation. By becoming knowledgable and savvy, the 'victim' can have total control over whether he/she is successfully targeted."

      You're a fucking sociopath. Have a little empathy or fuck off.

      I have enough empathy to be honest about their weakness. Would you prefer I help them to remain in denial so that they forever remain victims? It's amazing how angry people sometimes become when you tell a victim that he/she doesn't have to be a victim anymore. You'd think that would be welcome news, a message of hope.

      I get it alright. I understand your point of view while you fail to grasp mine. You think that when I say "you were vulnerable to this scam because of a weakness or shortcoming, but that can be corrected and you can eliminate your vulnerability" that I am assigning blame. You think I am pointing a finger and am happy to see this happen. Not really. I merely accept the futility of trying to catch and shut down all present and future scammers and take instead an approach you might call "harden the targets".

      I also reject the notion that an individual has to be a helpless victim, at the mercy of anyone who would wish to do him/her harm. To tell people that they are helpless victims who can do nothing to better their own situation, who will always be exploited by criminals, who are completely screwed since the regulators won't protect them and they cannot protect themselves, well, I say that is sociopathy. It's telling them that they are forever doomed to just bend over and take it. Does it ever occur to you that this victim mentality is precisely why we have so many petty criminals?

      My longing to live in a kinder, wiser, more sane world is beyond my power of expressing it. Really, there are not words for how badly I wish to see that. The way to get from here to there is to be honest about our weaknesses and our problems, to seek realistic solutions to them. This absolutely includes the notion that an individual can better himself or herself, that honesty about one's shortcomings and understanding one's weaknesses is the first step towards overcoming them. It's not "blaming the victim". It's "empowering the victim". And you can't stand it, can you?

      You can call me names some more if it makes you feel better. When you do that, all I see is an equal who is extremely determined to be an inferior. If you should get over that you won't receive an "I told you so" from me. You'd put a smile on my face.

      --
      It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
    17. Re:Scum by insertwackynamehere · · Score: 3, Informative

      Um actually it would be violent because coercing someone by displaying a firearm has the implicit attachment of "do what I say or I will shoot you". If you fuck around and hold someone up with a toy gun and think you can get cutesy with the police saying "hang on officers let me remember just what those ACLU videos told me about getting arrested oh and by the way it was a toy gun lol so you guys cant even get me in trouble" you would be in for a shitty surprise. Fucking around with toy guns can get you in trouble; for example making them appear real and threatening someone with violence is also illegal even if you had no intention or ability to follow through.

    18. Re:Scum by insertwackynamehere · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's a bit easier to act like weeding people out based on how they fall victim to crime is a good thing when you are a hundred percent sure that you wouldn't fall for the crime discussed. On Slashdot, people act like they are smarter than crime because they don't fall for phone scams and banner ads but maybe they would fall victim to bullets that weren't aimed at them but.. oh shit look you walked in the wrong area at the wrong time of night! Well aren't you glad those nice guntoting thugs taught you a valuable lesson? Plus so much criminal shit happens to people who don't deserve it, but hey anyone dumb enough to not know how to use a computer (aka has a different focus in life then me) deserves to get ripped off.

    19. Re:Scum by causality · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I don't know where these people are going to school. I went to a public school in the USA, went to a decent university, grad school, and now job that actually utilizes critical thinking skills. I, and my high school friends, didn't turn out to be the fools that you would assume that we would be by going through public schools at each step. It's more likely that being ignorant is the easy way out and that's what people would rather choose instead.

      I'm grateful that you and some others are raising such good points in this discussion. I usually enjoy participating in Slashdot but not usually this much. For that I am glad, for this is truly stimulating.

      What I would point out here is a particular disconnect. My high school also taught some critical thinking skills, though in narrow and very specific applications. By that I mean, they were utilized only at the request of some kind of authority figure. There always had to be a "gun to the head" in the form of a failing grade or an angry boss at work. This is still a passive approach to life.

      My same fellow students who took the same courses I did were still extremely suggestible and susceptible to the propaganda techniques of advertising. Despite good grades in any classes that discussed critical thinking, they still valued conformity much more than individualism. That tells me they were able to mechanically go through the motions but did not embrace critical thinking in any real way. They did not take it to heart and see its tremendous value. They merely paid lip service to it in order to appease a teacher or a boss.

      It's the difference between passively waiting for a teacher or other person to decide to show you a skill, versus seeking it yourself for its own sake. It's the folly of believing that critical thought and being tough-minded is all about passing a class or doing a job. It's a failure to comprehend the true meaning of those things, seeing only their surface in the form of utilitarian application, a memorized series of steps, a procedure, something you are required to do rather than something you gladly embrace.

      Most of all, the majority of my fellow students viewed education as something they received from school. They did not see schooling as a supplement to their own personal quest to better themselves even when no one is looking. In short, they were still dependent on others to show them how to think rather than discovering it for themselves by hungering and thirsting for it. That dependence is exactly what public schools want to instill, even while they teach the skills that could otherwise overcome it. In that way they make a sort of mockery of those skills.

      Ignorance is not really the easy way out; it just has a certain allure because it involves less up-front effort. I tell you the truth, the avoidable suffering that the ignorant experience is far worse than the effort of bettering oneself. So are the network effects on society when you have so many ignorant people.

      --
      It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
    20. Re:Scum by Pentium100 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes, stealing is stealing, rape is rape etc and the criminal is to blame, but:

      If I left a lot of cash in my car (plainly visible) and the doors unlocked and the money got stolen then a lot of people would ridicule me for doing it even though the thief is to blame because he still broke the law, but I should have anticipated it and hid the money or taken it with me. There is a reason why a bank keeps the money in a safe and why the clients would blame the bank if it kept the money in an unlocked box and the money got stolen.

    21. Re:Scum by mcgrew · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Your attitude is just plain wrong.

      Yes, but they are non-violent

      There are worse things than violence. I'd rather be punched in the face than ripped off for thousands of dollars. There is no difference between an armed robbery and an unarmed robbery; stealing is stealing whether you use a gun or a computer.

      require the cooperation of their "victims".

      Trickery is not co-operation. I've met some damned smooth fraudsters in my time. And the fraudsters make one suspicious of the honest as well as the scum; I caused some embarrassment Sunday Night because of my unwillingness to trust caused by my being taken before.

      They disincentivize ignorance and stupidity by making it more painful

      EVERYONE is ignorant. Nobody knows everything. ANYONE can be fooled, even you, Mister Untouchable Knowitall. And stupidity is incurable; you sound like one of those people who would kill deformed babies because of their deformity.

      just like those natural pests disincentivize improper sanitation.

      There's your ignorance showing, son. No amount of sanitation will rid you of fleas and ticks, nor will it rid you of their diseases.

      It doesn't exactly require a genius to understand these things.

      Half of the world's population have two digit IQs, and are easy prey for the other half. If I were dishonest I'd have no trouble at all getting rich. You would have all those "subhumans" killed? I'd rather the world do away with heartless bastards like scammers, armed robbers, and you.

      How that inaccurate flamebait got modded +4 insightful is beyond me.

    22. Re:Scum by Lord+Ender · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Visiting "that neighborhood" is active participation. Drinking the drink someone gave you is "active participation."

      Your post is absolute drivel. Scamming old people with Alzheimer's disease out of hundreds of dollars does not serve a social purpose. It is bad in any light. You are a moron.

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    23. Re:Scum by mcgrew · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's worse than that; his logic is deeply flawed. Con artists teach us not to trust ANYONE, and that is not a good thing.

    24. Re:Scum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I have enough empathy to be honest about their weakness. Would you prefer I help them to remain in denial so that they forever remain victims? It's amazing how angry people sometimes become when you tell a victim that he/she doesn't have to be a victim anymore. You'd think that would be welcome news, a message of hope.

      Except you are doing nothing to help people either identify or overcome their weaknesses before they are harmed. Instead, you are creating a baroque rationalization to legitimize your own indifference to the harm being committed to a fellow human being, as gullible and foolish as they may be. This is why your position isn't a message of hope because it boils down to "Meh, why should I care what happens to those losers anyway?"

      I also reject the notion that an individual has to be a helpless victim, at the mercy of anyone who would wish to do him/her harm. To tell people that they are helpless victims who can do nothing to better their own situation, who will always be exploited by criminals, who are completely screwed since the regulators won't protect them and they cannot protect themselves, well, I say that is sociopathy. It's telling them that they are forever doomed to just bend over and take it. Does it ever occur to you that this victim mentality is precisely why we have so many petty criminals?

      My longing to live in a kinder, wiser, more sane world is beyond my power of expressing it. Really, there are not words for how badly I wish to see that. The way to get from here to there is to be honest about our weaknesses and our problems, to seek realistic solutions to them. This absolutely includes the notion that an individual can better himself or herself, that honesty about one's shortcomings and understanding one's weaknesses is the first step towards overcoming them. It's not "blaming the victim". It's "empowering the victim". And you can't stand it, can you?

      I see, so it's either a nanny-state or the jungle with no other options available? How about you as an informed and savvy computer user, who by their own admission longs "to live live in a kinder, wiser, more sane world is beyond my power of expressing it", could help by giving a class on how to spot potential computer fraud? No matter what your situation is currently, you probably have the ability to teach people like this how not to be a victim. For example you could approach your local service/charity groups in your community or even a community college. If nothing else, you could record a tutorial on the subject and host it on a personal web-site.

      In the unlikely event that you are already doing something to actually proactively help people, I offer a preemptive apology. Yet, due to the nature of your post it probably isn't warranted.

      In conclusion, you certainly a have the right to your indifference towards others and no one can or should force you to care about anyone else. However, at least have the decency to be honest about your indifference and not use some faux-intellectual smoke-screen to pretend that you, or these criminals for that matter, are really doing the people harmed by fraud some sort of favor!

    25. Re:Scum by Flyerman · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Adjusting for cost-of-living is pointless as long as all the states in USA use the same currency. You'll find some area in the US where the COL is the same as whatever area in England you choose.

    26. Re:Scum by DittoBox · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I pity the ignorant. I do not pity the willfully ignorant, but I pity the ignorant.

      Although with some common sense one could tell this is a scam, your very presence here means your use and understanding of technology far exceeds that of the median average, in nearly any western country. You needn't be an ass about that.

      --
      Good. Cheap. Fast. Pick Two.
    27. Re:Scum by manicb · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's common assault in the UK, and I believe the law is similar in the US. (Sorry for wiki link, lots of references on legal sites but not as clear.) In assault the victim only has to believe that they can receive an injury, by malice or recklessness. If said injury is dealt, that is battery (or worse). When people say "assault" they usually mean "assault and battery" as it is rarely brought to court on its own.

    28. Re:Scum by totally+bogus+dude · · Score: 2, Informative

      The story below that recently appeared on Not Always Right seems appropriate:

      (A customer is wondering why her anti-virus is asking her to purchase the program.)
      Me: "What is the name of your anti-virus?"
      Customer: "It is [name of a well-known fake anti-virus program]."
      Me: "Ma'am, that is a fake anti-virus. Do not purchase that program because it will not protect your computer."
      Customer: "No! Why do you want me to disable my anti-virus? I will not get rid of it! It's keeping my computer safe! I already purchased it three times and it still wants me to pay again! All I want to know is how to stop it from asking me to pay!"

  2. Unfortunately, it works. by arhhook · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You can only do so much to save the end-user from themselves.

  3. Wow by Rik+Sweeney · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How dumb do you have to be to fall for this one? The kind of people falling for these must be same ones who fall for the "suspicious activity in your bank account" scam.

    Nothing to see here, move along.

    1. Re:Wow by IshmaelDS · · Score: 5, Informative

      You would be surprised how many there are. I work as a network admin and I have dealt with some .... interesting?.... people. One emailed me to tell me their email wasn't working. Yes I know we have all read it in a comic but it's true. I had one of the CFO's I did some work for fill in and almost send a scam bank email form. He at the last second called me to see if I thought it was legit. sigh. I have had people call me up in a panic cause the system was "doing something illegal and they didn't want to get in trouble" (illegal exception errors). I could go on and on. This doesn't surprise me at all. A lot of people when it comes to anything to do with a computer are struck dumb immeditatly and stop using whatever intelligence they have.

      --
      letting an idiot know they are an idiot is not a game... it's a responsibility. - by Kristopeit, M. D. (1892582)
    2. Re:Wow by Spad · · Score: 5, Insightful

      A lot of it is psychological; users convince themselves that computers are too complicated for them to understand, so they are.

      We had an app at work that ran on a Windows CE-based palmtop that nurses used to record patient notes on their visits and then synced back to a server when they got back to base. The users never had any problems with this at all. Then, when the palmtops were up for replacement, they swapped them out for notebooks running XP with exactly the same app (newer version, same UI) and sync process and suddenly none of the users were able to cope any more.

      Despite the fact that the processes were identical, they saw the notebooks as "proper" computers as opposed to the palmtops that were just electronic notepads in their minds and they convinced themselves that as a proper computer it was too complex for them to understand. So much of the trouble with technology is users creating barriers in their own minds and it's largely of "our" own making for trying to convince users throughout the 90s that computers were easy to use and would do everything for them, when we all know that isn't true.

    3. Re:Wow by tibit · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I'm out of mod points, but the above is very insightful. I can relate seeing, on many occasions, where a dead simple UI, no more complex than say that of an ATM, becomes utterly confounding just because it's being presented with a PC in sight. In one case: as long as the PC was hidden, and the UI was accessed via a touchscreen --- everything was fine. As soon as mouse, keyboard and the PC case became visible, people would say that "something broke" and that I should bring it back to the "way it was before". This was a big eye opener when it comes to usability: users are not rational. Not at all.

      --
      A successful API design takes a mixture of software design and pedagogy.
    4. Re:Wow by DavidTC · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's the big secret of people who are 'knowledgeable' about computer.

      50% of the time when 'help' someone do something, like send email...we don't know anything any more than they do. we're just reading the damn screen and doing what the logical thing would be, and we're not scared of doing the wrong thing. I mean, people ask me to help them send an attachment using a webmail system I'd never seen before:
      Why don't you click on the 'Attach file' link there and select the file? Okay, where'd you save the file? Okay, select it, and then type something in the body, and press send. There you go. Yes, that's me, a computer genius, reading the screen like that and having the ability to use common dialog boxes.(1)

      And another 25% of the time we're solving problems by applying basic computer knowledge. Like, very basic. Like 'able to learn in 10 hours' basic. Stuff like 'The World Wide Web works by your computer talking to another computer through even more computers.' and 'Video files tend to about 10 times as big as mp3s per minute.' and 'Wireless signals are often encrypted'.

      And another 20% of the time it's stuff we've either run into before, and thus know what to do, or we fricking google it. Lacking the basic computer knowledge above just turns that 25% into this also. (I'm often like this on a Mac.)

      There is almost no 'skill' involved at all. Half of it is just a willingness to say 'Okay, this looks right, let's try that'.

      Only about 5% of the stuff people who are 'knowledgeable' about computers do for others as 'tech support', mainly stuff like buying/building computers, and programming, and other 'creative' stuff where you aren't fixing something that's broken, actually require any skill.

      I mean, I have a younger brother who doesn't have any formal computer training outside of high school and an Office class for his associate degree. He's an auto mechanic.

      But he grew up with a nerd and a half-nerd, so he knows how to operate his computer, and any questions from him are things like 'Should I go with AGP or should I pay more for PCI-E?' and 'This game is giving some sort of Direct X error on startup, and all I can find are suggestions to reinstall it and Direct X...which I've done. Ideas?'. This is because he learned 'the secret' to solve computer problems: Do the obvious thing, and if you don't know what that is, google what's wrong. And backup your computer so if it blows up, you can just reinstall.

      1) Yes, yes, we've all fallen prey to the stupid inability to see things right in front of us, and someone else points it out instantly, but I'm not talking about that here.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    5. Re:Wow by Hatta · · Score: 3, Insightful

      A lot of it is psychological; users convince themselves that computers are too complicated for them to understand, so they are.

      Where does this perception come from? Nothing is too complicated to understand if you work at it. I think people are just lazy and don't want to work at understanding the world around them.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
  4. Duh by kieran · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The only thing you need to stop this unstoppable scam is for people to be unwilling to shell out a significant sum of money to some c**t who calls them up out of the blue.

    I mean, £185, when you didn't know there was anything wrong with your computer in the first place? You'd need to have more money than brains to shell out for that.

    1. Re:Duh by blueg3 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Part of the scam is that they get you to download the remote-control software before they tell you they'll charge you. At that point, they can hold your computer hostage.

    2. Re:Duh by jtownatpunk.net · · Score: 3, Funny

      Well, I've been doing the more brains than money thing for quite a while and I'd like to try it the other way around just to see what all the hype is about. There are so many of those people out there I figure they must be on to something.

    3. Re:Duh by Richard_at_work · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The only thing you need to stop this unstoppable scam is for people to be unwilling to shell out a significant sum of money to some c**t who calls them up out of the blue.

      I mean, £185, when you didn't know there was anything wrong with your computer in the first place? You'd need to have more money than brains to shell out for that.

      Its no different to being told by a cold calling builder that your roof is sagging and needs several thousands of pounds of repairs done to make it safe. House owner coughs up, builder potters around in the attic for a day and legs it. One house owner that is a lot of money down for no reason other than fraud.

      Unfortunately, these seem to be being reported in the news all too often today :(

  5. I hate this sort of swindle by thewils · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's like the one where some dubious company persuades you to install some new version of their operating system claiming that it's super fast and totally secure, etc. etc. and then after six months your machine crawls to a halt unless you give them more money for the next version which is faster, more secure, etc. etc.

    Oh wait...

    --
    Once I was a four stone apology. Now I am two separate gorillas.
    1. Re:I hate this sort of swindle by Kjella · · Score: 3, Insightful

      and then after six months your machine crawls to a halt unless you give them more money for the next version

      Six months? Well, that eliminates Windows at least. And OSX 10.3-6 have been on a two year cycle. The only OS I know that releases every six months as clockwork is Ubuntu, but I think you're doing it wrong...

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  6. And ... by Spiked_Three · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What is the difference between this and the tech support offered by most companies?

    --
    slashdot troll = you make a compelling argument I do not like the implications of.
    1. Re:And ... by jpyeck · · Score: 2, Funny

      You actually get to talk to a person on the phone?

    2. Re:And ... by Jedi+Alec · · Score: 2, Interesting

      - They only call out as call backs to customers

      Note that this isn't *entirely* true ;-)

      I used to often work evenings and folks would call and complain that their cable connection(and thus internet as well) would be out. Policy was that for a singular problem we'd drop by within 2 working days but in the case of an outage where multiple homes were affected we'd drag some poor mechanic from behind his 'taters and be on site within 2 hours.

      Obviously every customer would loudly proclaim that the entire street was having issues, so at one point I devised a devious plot consisting of calling 1 or 2 random neighbours to inquire about the state of their cable signal :)

      --

      People replying to my sig annoy me. That's why I change it all the time.
  7. Re:Can't Do Much by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Perhaps they could get the people who have been scammed to report the telephone number and work with the teleco's to find out where the scammers are hiding?

    This worked in my city when Scammers would steal wallets and purses and then call later claiming to be the police, and to meet them in "unmarked white police vans".

    It's true, you can't fix stupid - but the smarter ones can... you know... at least provide useful information aiding in the capture.

  8. Creative energy by osullish · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Its funny how much creativity goes into these scams - they're more elaborate than any morally acceptable way of making money! I'm sure that creative energy could be used in a more positive way. However its probably the case that these scams feel easier than positive work.

    --
    It's hard enough to remember my opinions, never mind the reasons for them..
    1. Re:Creative energy by aicrules · · Score: 4, Interesting

      the problem with morally acceptable of making money is that they often morally tie you to the person paying you in some way. And therefor to keep morally on the up and up, you continue to have to make morally right decisions and actions. Scams, however, it's just a matter of how far you can string a person before you move on to the next one. And you seldom have to worry about silly things like reporting taxes and employing people, though some scams do get that large that they employee people who unwittingly (sure, right) participate. Still easier than providing a useful service that works to make customers happy.

    2. Re:Creative energy by kenrblan · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Generating $280US or £185 in a matter of minutes without much technical skill is a pretty good payout. Not many jobs pay that well outside of the CEO class. These guys could easily be making $8000/day. At that rate they could make over $2Milllion in US dollars in a year just treating it like an 8 hour per day, 5 days per week job. I have to put more creativity and effort into my job and don't get anywhere near that kind of payback.

      --
      Make everything as simple as possible, but not simpler. - Albert Einstein
    3. Re:Creative energy by PRMan · · Score: 2, Interesting

      But then they go to prison and make nothing for the next 5-10 years.

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
  9. Re:Can't Do Much by countertrolling · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This does provide yet another argument against the camp which thinks that understanding the tools they use is not important.

    The message I get from all this is that computers really aren't ready for prime time. They're more like automobiles from the first decade of the 1900s.

    --
    For justice, we must go to Don Corleone
  10. Same here in the states by gregthebunny · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I get calls once or twice per month that start out like this. I usually just yell "NOOOOO" like I'm dying into the phone and promptly hang up. It's good for a chuckle.

    But seriously, warn all your normie friends about this. My parents were surprised such a thing would be a scam, and my mom's sister even got popped for $90 by these people. Of course, after I told her about it and she tried to call them back, the number was "no longer in service".

    Education about the scam is the only way to avoid it.

    1. Re:Same here in the states by blennidae · · Score: 3, Funny

      If you have never heard of Tom Mabe and his response to telemarketers, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mkdoogjic4I

      --
      Rejoice in your insanity, there really is no other way
  11. Gullible would be an understatement by Kenoli · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ... and tells them that Microsoft has detected a virus on their PC

    Believing that Microsoft knows or cares if your machine has a virus is flat out ignorant. Being okay with the idea that Microsoft could monitor you is even worse.
    Never mind shelling out hundreds to an stranger for doing nothing -- how many people are really so dense?

    1. Re:Gullible would be an understatement by BVis · · Score: 2, Funny

      Lots and lots of people. People shop at Walmart, for crying out loud.

      --
      Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups.
  12. Same thing, but not techie by nomorecwrd · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Sounds exactly like a telephone scam now happening here in Chile.

    They call old people telling them that their grandson is involved in some sort of a car accident, and need money for bail or pay the affected part for the damages, anyway they tell them that if they don't get the money his/her beloved grandson will be in jail for a long time

    Then, they ask for the address to send a messenger to pick up the payment, in terms of cash, LCD TV, Blu-ray, etc.

    And people fell for it... even the ones without a grandson :-)

  13. Re:All your money are belong to us by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How exactly does open source prevent social engineering scams?

  14. Re:Can't stop it? by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I believe what they meant by that comment is that there is nothing regulators can do to stop people for falling for social engineering scams. In what way do you presume them to be able to do so?

  15. Re:Can't Do Much by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    How so?

    People still don't understand cars and if ANYTHING goes wrong with them, they don't know why.
    Consider, also, that a computer's software is custom to each person as they add in more software packages and settings.
    That's roughly akin to someone buying a car and having custom parts put on without knowing much of what they do. They still have no clue when something goes wrong.

    How many people can do much more maintenance on their car than fixing a flat tire? That's not much different than someone knowing how to run an antivirus once in awhile, imo.

    Just like the poster you're replying to was saying, it is important to understand the tools we use so we know how the things we use work.
    If we don't understand that then we're just as much in the dark be in computer trouble or car trouble.

  16. Re:Can't Do Much by Richard_at_work · · Score: 3, Insightful

    So you think an automobile scam along similar lines today wouldn't work? Get the list of automobile type ownership from the licensing authority (most sell this information, or its easily available elsewhere), cold call the owner and inform them that a voluntary safety notice has been issued on their vehicle, would they like priority booking for just $99 over the phone...

    Uninformed people are still uninformed, regardless of how long the technologies been around.

  17. Re:Can't Do Much by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Are you implying that there are no dishonest garage-men who charge $700 for replacing a $35 part? And that there are no car enthusiasts who spend their free time tinkering?

  18. Not even remotely new by damn_registrars · · Score: 3, Informative

    The spoof site behind the scam is approved by McAfee's Site Advisor and bears Microsoft logos, something which both companies have failed to act upon

    Spammers have been doing the same thing for years. The "Canadian Pharmacy" sites always claim to be "verified by visa", "hacker safe", "bbb approved", etc... Any half-wit knows how to copy the logos from some other web page and use them to make your page look more legit than it really is.

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
  19. Re:Can't Do Much by kaoshin · · Score: 2, Funny

    The message I get from all this is that computers really aren't ready for prime time. They're more like automobiles from the first decade of the 1900s.

    The message I get is that users really aren't ready for prime time. They're more like prehistoric monkeys.

  20. Re:All your money are belong to us by nj_peeps · · Score: 3, Funny

    Sacamer: Hi this is M$, we have detected a virus on your PC.
    Callie: Really? What version of winblows am I using right now?
    Scamer: Windows XP.
    Callie: Try again there buddy, I use Linux. (click)

    --
    "Anyone who trades liberty for security deserves neither liberty nor security" --Benjamin Franklin
  21. Re:All your money are belong to us by Disgruntled+Goats · · Score: 2, Insightful

    To counter with an example from the real world just look at the malware infections of people installing screensavers for ubuntu. Where was the magic open source pixie dust to stop them. Oh yeah it doesn't exist.

  22. Run text by clownface · · Score: 2, Interesting

    My mother-in-law had a call like this last year - they told her to type "temp spyware" and "prefetch unwanted" into the Run box on her PC to prove it was infected..

  23. Our system says "don't go there" by Animats · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The actual site mentioned is thenerdsupport.com

    I ran them through our SiteTruth system. Here's what comes out. "Rating: "Site ownership unknown or questionable. No Location. ... This certificate identifies the domain only, not the actual business. No street address found on the site."

    Compare the SiteTruth results for Geek Squad. Street addresses found, found in the US business directory, found in Open Directory.

    It's not that hard to sort out the phony business sites from the real ones. You have to check business databases, not just the Web, for business legitimacy. If you just look at the web, you get bogus results like this: McAfee SiteAdvisor: "We tested this site and didn't find any significant problems." The site itself doesn't try to attack the user, so McAfee says it's good to go.

  24. This is actually what happens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    Actually, they kept calling me for weeks, every couple of days. Here's what actually happens.

    It's a Bangladesh call centre.

    They call up and say that a problem on my computer has been reported to them. Of course, I know this is not true. But one time, I went along with it to find out what they were up to.

    They actually talk you through getting the windows event log up on the screen - and make you count the "error" entries. Of course there are error entries.

    So, they say, that proves you have a problem. My parents, for example, would be completely convinced at this point.

    Then they make you go to a web site, and download a remote control application. At that point I hung up. There is no way I'm giving control of my PC over to some whackjob on the phone.

    They kept calling for about two weeks, every couple of days. We're on the do not call list - which in the UK means its illegal for them to call us. And they call asking for "Mr Bruce" after I answer - my wife's name and mine are different, and the phone is in her name.

    The last time they called I asked to speak to their "manager" and I told them to look out the window because the police are coming to get them. What else am I going to do? Then they finally stopped calling.

    1. Re:This is actually what happens by Stipe · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Similar experience here - they called, got me to run event viewer. I lied and told them there were only Info and Warning messages - but he still exclaimed "OMG! you have a virus!" it was when he said "Now, it's very important - do not click anywhere or your computer will break" that I couldn't hold back and gave him a rant at how ludicrous he was being and asking what he's trying to scam. They hung up.

      Of course, warnings and errors are completely run of the mill in Event Viewer (mine are mostly the DHCP service noting that I lose my address whenever I suspend my laptop)

  25. Re:Can't Do Much by asdf7890 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Such scams are at least tried. I've had two calls to my house in the last year telling me that my car's warranty is due to expire and if I want to continue it I have to renew before the expiry date or it will cost more then twice as much to renew after that date. Would I like to renew now by card over the phone? I do not own a car and have never owned a car.

    On both occasions I asked played concerned for a moment and asked "which of the cars?" at which point they hung up - obviously anyone asking any questions just makes them run as they don't have any real data other than name and phone number. Once you ask a questions about something they should know if they were who they hope the intended victim thinks they are their "cover" is blown, but they only need a few people who are not cynical/careful enough to check details in order for the operation to be profitable and said victim is no wiser until they try claim on the warranty by which time the scammers have long gone and covered their tracks.

  26. More like this by Sloppy · · Score: 2, Funny

    Scammer: Microsoft detected a virus on your PC.
    Callie: OMG, Microsoft ssh'd to my box, guessed a login name and password, and then escalated from that user's privileges to the point where they had read access to everything, thereby allowing them to scan my whole filesystem hierarchy for viruses?
    Scammer: Yep.
    Callie: Holy crap, that means I'm compromised! How do I close the hole that Microsoft used?
    Scammer: Download this program, chmod +x it, and sudo run it.
    Callie: Ok!

    --
    As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
  27. Yes we can stop it by Simonetta · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Meanwhile, an assortment of British regulators have said there is nothing they can do to stop it.

        Yes, there is something that we can do to stop this kind of activity. Find the people who are doing it and kill them. That usually stops it.

        We don't need the people who are doing this. They don't contribute anything. They won't be missed by anybody. And if it means that their kids will be growing up without a daddy, well, then kill the kids too. They're only children, and the apple doesn't fall far from the tree. Save the future generations grief.

        While it sounds extreme and tongue-in-cheek, it's not. I realize that it feels horrible to order and facilitate the extra-judicial execution of financial criminals. But it is a feeling that decreases with each new asshole that we stuff into the wood chipper. It's good for the computer community. It gives faith to the general people that we can police our own industry. We 'take out the trash'. Gangsters do this kind of thing all the time. Plus there are too many people in the world already. These jerks won't be missed.

  28. We're so smart by AnAdventurer · · Score: 2, Informative

    I don't give out information over the phone. PERIOD. Even companies I pay, if I forget to mail out a check and they ask I make a payment over the phone, I ask them if a bill has been emailed of USPS'ed. If they say yes, I say thank you, I will pay it when I get it. If they ask me to "verify" my account details, I ask them to go first. Like asking for the 3rd set of numbers on my card in question or my first 3 SS numbers. They always tell me they have to verify my identity first and I simply tell them that they called me. Then I point out that I have no way to verify who they say they are, the response is almost always "but we are Bank of America, why would I say I am if I am not, I really am!". Rarely do they understand my point: They called me and are asking for money over the phone.

    --
    6.8SPC TR of 550, l xwind at 6, drift rt at 26" drops 77". AT has 503 ft-lbs at 1403 fps. FT 0.86
  29. This started months ago... by aug24 · · Score: 2, Informative

    ...when I and several other people submitted it to slashdot, complete with links to the PC Pro story that ran in February IIRC.

    Thanks for the public service announcement Timothy.

    If only it had been put out when it was first starting, hundreds of other people might have been warned.

    Grrrrr.
    Justin.

    --
    You're only jealous cos the little penguins are talking to me.