Slashdot Mirror


Internet Access While Sailing? (Revisited)

El Genio Malvado writes "10 years ago the question was asked, What is the best way to get Internet while at sea? After reading the responses — and after a decade of technological advancement — is there a better, more reliable method? For someone with the ability to telecommute 100% of the time, then the idea of sailing around the world with a paycheck direct deposited must be getting more and more tempting. What does the community at large have for modern resources for constant streaming internet at sea?"

308 comments

  1. Not just internet by SquarePixel · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I'm actually in the same position. I am able to do all of my work online and my workplace doesn't have a problem with me traveling at the same time. It is really great when you can move to life in a different country for a few months and see various different places and people. It's amazing how much it relies stress too, so it's a win-win for both me and the company.

    But if I went sailing around the world, how do you get everything else too? Food, drinks, health and hygiene stuff, what about getting sex and what do you do if you need emergency help?

    However, it would be great way to start a day by waking up in the morning and take a swim in the sea in middle of nowhere.

    1. Re:Not just internet by dangitman · · Score: 4, Funny

      ... what about getting sex...

      That's what sea cucumbers are for.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    2. Re:Not just internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      But if I went sailing around the world, how do you get everything else too? Food, drinks, health and hygiene stuff, what about getting sex and what do you do if you need emergency help?

      Let me guess, you're in management?

    3. Re:Not just internet by dintech · · Score: 3, Funny

      A+++ yuck. Would spew again.

    4. Re:Not just internet by eldavojohn · · Score: 4, Funny

      It's amazing how much it relies stress too, so it's a win-win for both me and the company.

      I would be afraid that whatever technology you select to stay connected with the source of all your income would suffer from outages too often. I think in this case it would increase stress if anything.

      However, it would be great way to start a day by waking up in the morning and take a swim in the sea in middle of nowhere.

      Middle of the ocean? Why would such a featureless landscape seem any different from another featureless landscape? I would think it would be amazing to go to the Maldives or another resort-y area and take a swim there. But the middle of nowhere ... why?

      what about getting sex

      Please, I'm in the middle of DC and I'm probably getting as much as I'd get in the middle of the ocean. I am posting on Slashdot after all ... I do enjoy how you commoditize it though. "Sir, may I take your order?" "One hot steamy cup of sex, please!"

      --
      My work here is dung.
    5. Re:Not just internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Food, drinks, health and hygiene stuff, what about getting sex and what do you do if you need emergency help?

      What do you think he wants the internet for?

    6. Re:Not just internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... what about getting sex...

      That's what sea cucumbers are for.

      Or sail to a harbor. I heard girls like seaman and mighty pirates.

    7. Re:Not just internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or sail to a harbor. I heard girls like seaman and mighty pirates.

      Been to Halifax last year. In bars the conversations between girls go sortof like this: "The German Marines were awesome last night", "well I prefer the Italians", ...

      Get on a ship, pull into a harbour, find local bars and you score because you're not going to "cling" around, you're "something different as they already know/have seen", more sexual starved and it's easy indulgence for both parties.

      The next morning or a few days later you're back on your ship, fishing for sea-cucumbers anyhow.

    8. Re:Not just internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Sir, may I take your order?" "One hot steamy cup of sex, please!"

      "One fresh sea cucumber coming up!"

    9. Re:Not just internet by couchslug · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "Food, drinks, health and hygiene stuff, what about getting sex "

      Buy them in port like everyone else.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    10. Re:Not just internet by Cwix · · Score: 5, Funny

      If you downloaded copyrighted works illegally while you are sailing does THAT make you a pirate? If you did do such a thing where would the RIAA send the notice?

      Lol this is just a joke, that is all.

      --
      You are entitled to your own opinions, not your own facts.
    11. Re:Not just internet by Threni · · Score: 1

      > Food, drinks, health and hygiene stuff, what about getting sex and what do you do if you need emergency help?

      If you have a big enough gun all those problems sort of take care of themselves.

    12. Re:Not just internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      A better question is this: If you were in international waters is it even a violation of copyright? What jurisdication's rules would be followed? What court could the plaintiffs sue you in? And, after reading this, who is going to go set up a new floating island in international waters with massive bandwidth and call it a "download destination" for a piratical getaway? "Come stay a week with us and torrent every movie and song ever written." BYOS (Bring Your Own Storage).

    13. Re:Not just internet by mcgrew · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I'm in the middle of DC and I'm probably getting as much as I'd get in the middle of the ocean. I am posting on Slashdot after all ... I do enjoy how you commoditize it though. "Sir, may I take your order?" "One hot steamy cup of sex, please!"

      I feel for you; I understand that what with all the high paid bureaucrats and politicians, hookers cost a fortune there. Here in the midwest you can get a cup of hot steamy sex for twenty bucks or even less.

    14. Re:Not just internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "[...]what about getting sex[...]"

      That's what the Internet access is for...

    15. Re:Not just internet by Cidtek · · Score: 1

      Yep that would be quite a thrill watching your boat leave you behind while you swim. Oh, you have a seven mile long anchor chain - nevermind.

    16. Re:Not just internet by heathen_01 · · Score: 1

      again?

    17. Re:Not just internet by russ1337 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      A better question is this: If you were in international waters is it even a violation of copyright? What jurisdication's rules would be followed? What court could the plaintiffs sue you in? And, after reading this, who is going to go set up a new floating island in international waters with massive bandwidth and call it a "download destination" for a piratical getaway? "Come stay a week with us and torrent every movie and song ever written." BYOS (Bring Your Own Storage).

      yeah.... set up a flotilla in international waters and have a LAN party share through an open access point... doesn't need to actually be connect to the Internet.

    18. Re:Not just internet by natehoy · · Score: 1

      IANAL, but I'd assume that you'd probably have an international warrant against you, so don't sail to port in any RIAA-friendly countries or countries that have extradition agreements with same. And, of course, your ISP is subject to the laws of the country in which THEY operate, so you might find your Internet connection cut off if you pick an ISP located in a RIAA-friendly country.

      Plus, well, anything that can work that remotely is going to have some form of usage limits or ridiculously expensive metered usage, and probably isn't going to be terribly fast. "Massive bandwidth," if it's even available, isn't going to come cheap.

      --
      "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
    19. Re:Not just internet by phoenixwade · · Score: 1

      Here in the midwest you can get a cup of hot steamy sex for twenty bucks or even less.

      And think of all the extra stuff you can get for your $20.00.

      --
      A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it will annoy enough people to make it worth the effort.
    20. Re:Not just internet by corbettw · · Score: 2, Funny

      I feel for you; I understand that what with all the high paid bureaucrats and politicians, hookers cost a fortune there. Here in the midwest you can get a cup of hot steamy sex for twenty bucks or even less.

      To be fair, the hot steamy cup of sex in DC is more like slow roasted gourmet coffee that was hand ground and boiled in pure aquifer water then complimented with pure cream and cane sugar. The same thing in the midwest is day-old Wafflehouse sludge that really should've been reheated in the microwave before the waitress spilled half of it on the table when she served it to you.

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
    21. Re:Not just internet by Alioth · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Seascape, not landscape, and it changes all the time.

      The weather changes all the time, the sky changes all the time, the watery bit does everything from being as flat as a billiard table to rather frightening (you must have heard the phrase "mountainous seas". We certainly see a lot on the small island I live on). You get different animals, you can be amazed that there is a bird this far out. Etc.

    22. Re:Not just internet by Snufalufagus+Prime · · Score: 1

      They send the notice via Kraken Overnight.

      --
      "Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend. Inside of a dog, it is too dark to read." -Groucho Marx
    23. Re:Not just internet by Thud457 · · Score: 1

      ability to telecommute 100% == job shipped to India

      --

      the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    24. Re:Not just internet by gravis777 · · Score: 1

      Well, you would technically be in international waters, so you are not under anyone's jurisdiction. I've often wondered what I could get away with if I had a small deserted island somewhere

    25. Re:Not just internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To be fair, the hot steamy cup of sex in DC is more like slow roasted gourmet coffee that was hand ground and boiled in pure aquifer water then complimented with pure cream and cane sugar. The same thing in the midwest is day-old Wafflehouse sludge that really should've been reheated in the microwave before the waitress spilled half of it on the table when she served it to you.

      ... humm, anyone know where I can get a frappe' ?

    26. Re:Not just internet by Unequivocal · · Score: 1

      Not to be too pedantic, but you'd most likely be violating the terms of service of however you are getting on the internet, so while not maybe a civil offense in any country, you'd risk losing your connectivity..

    27. Re:Not just internet by Mysticalfruit · · Score: 1

      Except, even if you went off and bought an island somewhere and got internet access for it, you need to have some upstream provider somewhere. That's who'd they go after...

      So on your island every inhabitant would have GigE to their hut... unfortunately that's about as far as you'd get.

      --
      Yes Francis, the world has gone crazy.
    28. Re:Not just internet by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      A better question is this: If you were in international waters is it even a violation of copyright? What jurisdication's rules would be followed?

      If you used an American 'satellite internet' service, would they then use that as their basis for busting you in their territory?

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    29. Re:Not just internet by b4upoo · · Score: 1

      I don't know how hot and steamy they are but there are skank hookers that try to get into work trucks in Miami. Two dollars is the lowest I have heard of. Naturally your medical issues after partaking in such a treat may well exceed your entire life long earnings.

    30. Re:Not just internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Again!

    31. Re:Not just internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To be fair, the hot steamy cup of sex in DC is more like slow roasted gourmet coffee that was hand ground and boiled in pure aquifer water then complimented with pure cream and cane sugar. The same thing in the midwest is day-old Wafflehouse sludge that really should've been reheated in the microwave before the waitress spilled half of it on the table when she served it to you.

      ... humm, anyone know where I can get a frappe' ?

      I don't really think we have time for a handjob, Joe.

    32. Re:Not just internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And what happens if you do it in international waters?

    33. Re:Not just internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... humm, anyone know where I can get a frappe' ?

      San Francisco, obviously. Although it may not be exactly what you expected.

    34. Re:Not just internet by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      You can get your gourmet hookers here too, and it will cost more, but like everything else your gourmet hooker will cost half as much or less here.

    35. Re:Not just internet by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      And think of all the extra stuff you can get for your $20.00.

      It will cost twice that to take a non-hooker to D'Arcy's for dinner, and you're not assured of getting laid then. If you're not looking for sex, don't hire a hooker.

    36. Re:Not just internet by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      They have those here too, they call them "lot lizards". And sticking your naked johnson into ANY stange woman's snatch is asking for trouble; wrap the damned thing up!

    37. Re:Not just internet by u.hertlein · · Score: 1

      If you did do such a thing where would the RIAA send the notice?

      Your last known ICBM address, derived via geo location? (Probably delivered that way too...)

      --
      Geek by Nature - Linux by Choice.
    38. Re:Not just internet by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      I was going to post something obscene about sea cucumbers, fresh or "soiled"[footnote], then I noticed who you are and decided to make another attempt on the Tionisla Run instead.
      --

      Oolite: Elite-like game. For Mac, Linux and Windows

      Jamesons of the world, unite! You have nothing to lose but your chains.
      And a Cobra MkIII.
      A pretty pathetic, front-mounted, jewellery-engraving laser.
      3 tonnes of pre-packed, dehydrated slaves, some alien artefacts and a Thargoid Invasion fleet in a pear tree.

      [footnote] If you don't get this, go and watch the Blues Brothers again! From the start.

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    39. Re:Not just internet by ptx0 · · Score: 1

      In a world with Mesh routing, this wouldn't be an issue.

    40. Re:Not just internet by uncledrax · · Score: 1

      I hope by 'open access point' you didn't mean WiFi.. you'd prob run out of food and water before everyone could finish swapping Bluray rips at a good size LAN party using WiFi.. especially on the ocean..

      --
      ----- The internet has given everyone the ability to have their voice heard equally as loud.. even if they shouldn't be
    41. Re:Not just internet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kraken and lawyers are both slimy monsters, after all.

  2. 100% if the time on a best effort service? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You cant find wired services that have 100% up times.Good luck with the wireless pipe dream.

    1. Re:100% if the time on a best effort service? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      yes, nothing has 100% uptime, thank you captain obvious. It would also be helpful to let him know that the sea is in fact both blue and wet. And since we're wasting time stating common knowledge, you are a douchebag.

    2. Re:100% if the time on a best effort service? by M8e · · Score: 4, Funny

      You cant find wired services that have 100% up times.Good luck with the wireless tube dream.

      INTERNET IS TUBES!

    3. Re:100% if the time on a best effort service? by fast+turtle · · Score: 1

      Hey Captain Stupid: The Sea is wet but it's not blue. It's green

      --
      Mod me up/Mod me down: I wont frown as I've no crown
  3. If you have to ask... by damn_registrars · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    ... you probably cannot afford it. If you had the money you would probably already know what your options are for that. After all, the kids who have been attempting solo sails around the world haven't exactly been coming from poverty...

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    1. Re:If you have to ask... by Heshler · · Score: 0, Troll

      Right, because rich people are inherently more knowledgeable...

    2. Re:If you have to ask... by damn_registrars · · Score: 1, Funny

      Right, because rich people are inherently more knowledgeable...

      No, they just have the money to buy these kinds of toys. This is the kind of information that you would probably get through the guy who polishes your Bentley every Wednesday. Oh, wait, you don't have your Bentley polished every week? You don't have a Bentley? Yeah, then at your income bracket internet access in the middle of the ocean is likely not possible.

      However I'm pretty sure there have been a couple people over the history of mankind who have sailed around the world without internet access.

      --
      Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    3. Re:If you have to ask... by PopeRatzo · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      After all, the kids who have been attempting solo sails around the world haven't exactly been coming from poverty...

      The last one didn't do so well. Maybe it's time to re-evaluate this "sophomore solo sailing trip around the world" fad among rich kids.

      A 17 year-old Paris Hilton sailing solo around the world is an amusing image. But ever since the South Park episode with Paris Hilton, that's my image of all spoiled rich girls. The finale of the showdown between Mr Slave and Paris is SP at their most wonderful.

      Back on topic, if any of you do manage to sail around the world while telecommuting, could you to me a favor and not Tweet or blog about it? I'd rather not know.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
    4. Re:If you have to ask... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let me guess - you're dumb and poor?

    5. Re:If you have to ask... by maxwell+demon · · Score: 5, Funny

      However I'm pretty sure there have been a couple people over the history of mankind who have sailed around the world without internet access.

      Yes, for example Columbus. Since he had no internet access, he could not just look up his coordinates in Google Earth to find out where he was, and therefore he thought he were in India when he wasn't. Also a quick check in Wikipedia would have shown him that true Indians look quite different, and he would not have mistaken the native Americans for Indians.

      So you see, having internet access is quite important when sailing.

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    6. Re:If you have to ask... by damn_registrars · · Score: 4, Funny

      Also a quick check in Wikipedia would have shown him that true Indians look quite different, and he would not have mistaken the native Americans for Indians.

      Perhaps Columbus had a very-early draft copy of a textbook that would come to be approved by the Texas Board of Education?

      --
      Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    7. Re:If you have to ask... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not really. Plenty of people buy inexpensive boats work a few months out of the year and make just enough to provision and for repairs. I have a friend who has been sailing for 6 years on his 32 ft boat. He is not even close to wealthy. He works 3-5 months on fishing boats and saves his cash then sails the rest of the year. For these types of sailors every penny counts. I think the poster's question is a good one, and something I am interested in learning about.

    8. Re:If you have to ask... by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 1

      This is the kind of information that you would probably get through the guy who polishes your Bentley every Wednesday.

      Wait, if only the rich people hear these options, why would the person polishing the Bentley know it? I don't think someone who works under you is going to try and run you through a sales pitch on why you might want internet while on the seas.

      Regardless of its cost, it would be common knowledge amongst the technological community on whether it's possible. I mean I know I won't be able to afford Virgin's privatized space flights but I know if you want to get into space without being an astronaught thats probably your best bet.

    9. Re:If you have to ask... by GNUALMAFUERTE · · Score: 1

      They didn't have the internets back then, silly. They only had BBS access and usenet (over UUCP)

      --
      WTF am I doing replying to an AC at 5 A.M on a Friday night?
    10. Re:If you have to ask... by PRMan · · Score: 0, Troll

      They're probably the only state teaching the truth about Columbus instead of the liberal native-subjugating BS that only came after him.

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    11. Re:If you have to ask... by PunditGuy · · Score: 1

      The truth, like "discovering" a place where people already lived?

    12. Re:If you have to ask... by Fippy+Darkpaw · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Also a quick check in Wikipedia would have shown him that true Indians look quite different, and he would not have mistaken the native Americans for Indians." Little known fact: Columbus initially created the first Wikipedia entry on "North America", but then some Wikipedia editor deleted it due to "original research".

    13. Re:If you have to ask... by kwbauer · · Score: 1

      Or, like "discovering" forms of matter that always existed.

      Just because some people were already here and that other Europeans had been here but didn't know they were here does not lessen what Columbus did in discovering the "New World."

      I know, it was old and already part of the existing one but we have to write such things so somebody has something to complain about.

    14. Re:If you have to ask... by b0bby · · Score: 1

      In his own journal, Columbus wrote how docile the natives were and how with 50 men you could force them to do what you wished. So he certainly set the stage for the "native-subjugating BS" that came after him.

    15. Re:If you have to ask... by damn_registrars · · Score: 0, Troll

      Clearly a tough crowd today, you probably should have included the tag to make it abundantly clear to the humorless hacks with moderator points today...

      --
      Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    16. Re:If you have to ask... by Bastardchyld · · Score: 2, Funny

      However I'm pretty sure there have been a couple people over the history of mankind who have sailed around the world without internet access.

      Yes, for example Columbus. Since he had no internet access, he could not just look up his coordinates in Google Earth to find out where he was, and therefore he thought he were in India when he wasn't. Also a quick check in Wikipedia would have shown him that true Indians look quite different, and he would not have mistaken the native Americans for Indians.

      So you see, having internet access is quite important when sailing.

      To be honest, Columbus' limitation was not so much the lack of internet access; it was the under-developed state that the Global Positioning System was in at the time (which of course rendered Google Earth nearly worthless). That said you are quite right that a cursory check of Wikipedia would have proven quite helpful in the whole Indian != Indian situation. Imagine the sheepish look on Columbus' face when he asked his hosts for Curry and he was instead offered Corn.

      --
      $diff terrorists hippies
      $
      $rm -rf *terrorists *hippies
    17. Re:If you have to ask... by damn_registrars · · Score: 1

      This is the kind of information that you would probably get through the guy who polishes your Bentley every Wednesday.

      Wait, if only the rich people hear these options, why would the person polishing the Bentley know it?

      Because you wouldn't trust your Bentley to just anyone for its weekly polish, would you? Of course not; you're going to bring you Bentley to the guy who polishes your Rolls-Royce as well. And he didn't get started with your cars, he was polishing your father's Rolls and your mother's Jaguar as well in the earlier days. And since he knows other rich bastards, he has heard other people tell their stories of how they did videoconferencing and halo3 tournaments from the middle of the ocean, so he knows what companies work and what companies don't through them.

      I don't think someone who works under you is going to try and run you through a sales pitch on why you might want internet while on the seas.

      There is no need for a sales pitch. The person who posted this to slashdot already wants internet on the seas; they just don't know yet that they cannot afford it.

      It is too bad I didn't get the memo that today is an official Slashdot Humorless Monday.

      --
      Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    18. Re:If you have to ask... by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 1

      It is too bad I didn't get the memo that today is an official Slashdot Humorless Monday.

      It's a problem all keeners have. There was a really late poker night last night and we do not handle Monday mornings well even when we do get a goods night rest.

      I'll make sure you get a copy of that memo, mmmmkay?

    19. Re:If you have to ask... by potat0man · · Score: 1

      for example Columbus. Since he had no internet access, he could not just look up his coordinates in Google Earth

      He had it. Google had just distributed a beta release.

    20. Re:If you have to ask... by GPSguy · · Score: 1

      No, that would have implied too much accurate information for our Bored of Education folks.

      --
      Never ascribe to malice that which can adequately be explained by tenure.
  4. BGAN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    If you have the money, look into BGAN terminals. Hughes and Thrane & Thrane are the two major manufacturers.

    I'm too lazy to insert links, google is your friend.

    1. Re:BGAN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      "BGAN terminals are not allowed to be used on the open ocean on a moving vessel. Inmarsat has created the FleetBroadband service that uses the I4 satellites for maritime communication."

    2. Re:BGAN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      From wikipedia:
      BGAN terminals are not allowed to be used on the open ocean on a moving vessel. Inmarsat has created the FleetBroadband service that uses the I4 satellites for maritime communication.

    3. Re:BGAN by Albanach · · Score: 5, Informative

      Yes, for near global coverage it looks like Immarsat still rules.

      Here's some pricing:

      http://www.ocens.com/inmarsat/inmarsat_FB_airtime.htm

      Looks like you'd need to be on a fairly good gig, or fill the boat with similarly employed geeks!

    4. Re:BGAN by Albanach · · Score: 1

      It's been pointed out above, than BGAN is only useful for stationary vessels, it cannot be used on the open ocean. For that you need FleetBroadband also from Inmarsat. Needless to say, it's even more expensive.

    5. Re:BGAN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Couldn't agree more. Great service, speedy, reasonably priced (relatively speaking). Used it on the boat many times.

    6. Re:BGAN by chainsaw1 · · Score: 1

      BGAN would probably work on a sailing vessel 8 kts). It works on riveriene craft we have used. The asker unfortunately did not provide details on the displacement and dimensions of the boat used, nor the environment in which it would be used (intercostal? Open ocean? Time of year? Tropical or artic? How much actual connected time is needed to telecommute? Insert other requirement related questions here...)

      Needless to say, any boat / ship that is rocking enough will have difficulty maintaining a signal without an antenna tracker.

      --
      - Sig
    7. Re:BGAN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $13 per MB? That's on the same order of magnitude my phone carrier charges for international roaming...

    8. Re:BGAN by Cwix · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If the middle of the ocean doesnt count as roaming what does?

      --
      You are entitled to your own opinions, not your own facts.
    9. Re:BGAN by Idbar · · Score: 1

      While HUGHES has good history with satellite communications, I'd say that using a BGAN terminal (which appears to be for land) may not correctly work as well on water. As our friends at Apple should learn, radio frequencies have to be carefully analyzed.

      Earth does not reflects RF signals as water. RF bouncing on moving water can become a multipath living hell, thus I'd believe that solutions involving open sea should be better targeted to big boats and should be very conflicting and expensive on small ones.
      But I guess it's worth checking .

    10. Re:BGAN by abarrow · · Score: 1

      The only issue with BGAN offshore is antenna orientation. There are plenty of (expensive) solutions to that problem.

      There are no multipath problems with talking to satellites from an ocean-based antenna, unless you are waaaay north or south and your antenna look angles are very low. Otherwise, you are looking up, away from any real or imagined multipath.

    11. Re:BGAN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hey you: check out http://www.opencpn.org/

      it's a mighty fine cross-platform GPL chart plotter.

    12. Re:BGAN by Quantumplation · · Score: 5, Funny

      Phone calls made in Rome.

    13. Re:BGAN by SpaghettiPattern · · Score: 1

      http://www.ocens.com/inmarsat/inmarsat_FB_airtime.htm

      Hell that's almost as much as Swisscom is charging me for roaming outside Switzerland. No kidding here!

      --

      I hadn't the slightest objection to his spending his time planning massacres for the bourgeoisie... (P.G. Wodehouse)
    14. Re:BGAN by sortius_nod · · Score: 1

      Yeh, when I worked for a media company we had journos in Afghanistan on Immarsat. Not cheap at all, but well worth it if the cost of using is outweighed by the money brought in. I don't see this being the case if you're a geek telecommuting on the open ocean.

      Still a very stupid idea, until sat comms become portable to the masses, this is just a fleeting dream.

    15. Re:BGAN by TheSpoom · · Score: 1

      Holy crap, geek telecommute cruises. *starts a business*

      --
      It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
      - E. Debs
    16. Re:BGAN by mysidia · · Score: 1

      Save the torrenting/movie downloading for when you come ashore and plug in.

      Either that or leech off neighboring boat's unsecured WiFi.

      Better do it very quietly though, depart quickly, and don't leave your name...

    17. Re:BGAN by mysidia · · Score: 1

      Roaming is when you actually leave the planet earth, and the fees are (somewhat) reasonable when in high earth orbit, or on other planets.

      Also, gotta make up for the loss of targeted ad revenue, since geolocation no longer works when you are in orbit.

    18. Re:BGAN by sherpajohn · · Score: 1

      And that is background IP - if you want streaming IP - @256k that's $42 per minute ~ $2500 an hour. Hmmm, I think the hooker in port is gonna be cheaper than the cam show on the high seas!

      --

      Going on means going far
      Going far means returning
    19. Re:BGAN by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

      There is also the possibility of plotting out the course of all major cruise ships and try to sneak up close enough to hop on their free wifi they offer most their onboard clients, although I am not sure about the distance per se, you can add to your range by getting a special antenna like the ones used by cell phone companies to boost your range....then you could hop on for free for a time you need to use it...

      Although this is not an exact method as you are very screwed if you are not at the right place right time, you will however be able to get as much download for free....

    20. Re:BGAN by Weedhopper · · Score: 1

      In my experience, Hughes BGAN units are absolute pieces of shit.

    21. Re:BGAN by chilvence · · Score: 1

      awesome! I'm glad somebody is finally giving the computerised chart plotting 'industry' a kick up the arse. Maxsea and the like are all awful...

    22. Re:BGAN by blueZ3 · · Score: 1

      So, shadow a cruise liner, then?

      --
      Interested in a Flash-based MAME front end? Visit mame.danzbb.com
    23. Re:BGAN by Idbar · · Score: 1

      I think there is. While, I said there may be ways to overcome the problem, it's different to the problem on land given the water has better reflecting characteristics than the land.

    24. Re:BGAN by abarrow · · Score: 1

      As you can see from the text, they are talking elevation angles of 6 to 8 degrees. That's either very far north or on the edge of a footprint.

      We are both right. As I said before, and you proved with your link, there is a multipath effect if the elevation angle is really low. It looks something like reflections you get on point-to-point microwave. As the elevation angle increases, the directivity of the dish pretty much isolates any reflections you might see.

      Trust me on this - I engineered these things for the oil business for 31 years. Multipath on satellite uplinks is the least of your problems when putting a dish on an offshore platform.

    25. Re:BGAN by psm321 · · Score: 1

      Do cruise ships really offer free wifi? Never been on a cruise, but tried looking it up out of curiosity a while ago and all the cruise lines seemed to have exorbitant rates for internet access while on the cruise.

    26. Re:BGAN by yukk · · Score: 1

      ... Either that or leech off neighboring boat's unsecured WiFi.

      Ha ! Gives a whole new meaning to pirating on the open seas. You see a sail in the distance and notice it's following you. A quick look in the telescope/binoculars and you see them pointing a pringle can at you.
      Crap, those pirates are still following us. Can't you lose them ?

      --
      The trouble with the rat race is that even if you win, you're still a rat." Lily Tomlin
    27. Re:BGAN by sznupi · · Score: 1

      until sat comms become portable to the masses, this is just a fleeting dream

      It probably won't. Whatever level of advance in basics of radio technology we might achieve, ground based stations utilising those advances should be ahead.

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    28. Re:BGAN by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

      It depends which you are referring to....carnival offers free wifi, they are also one of the biggest,
      maybe the ones you looked up were not as commercialised?

    29. Re:BGAN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn geeks... ^_^

    30. Re:BGAN by psm321 · · Score: 1

      So in your experience the prices listed here are not accurate? (not trying to be confrontational, just wondering)

      http://www.carnival.com/cms/faq/default.aspx?faq=internet+and+communications

    31. Re:BGAN by b0bby · · Score: 1

      Thanks for that link, I hadn't seen that one & it seems like it should work great for my limited needs in the Bay.

    32. Re:BGAN by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

      it depends what package you get i imagine, i am not a travel agent, although i have traveled on cruises before and never had to pay for internet.

    33. Re:BGAN by ocens · · Score: 1

      "BGAN terminals are not allowed to be used on the open ocean on a moving vessel. Inmarsat has created the FleetBroadband service that uses the I4 satellites for maritime communication."

      BGAN terminals can be used anywhere - even the middle of the ocean - the deal is that you have to point them at the satellite - the Fleet systems are basically the same units only with stabilized antennas to compensate for the movement. OCENS has information and pricing on both systems

    34. Re:BGAN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The choices on an ocean aren't so different to what you get on land. There are fewer options generally and since scarcity drives price you can expect prices to go up.

      Your options in rough speed order are:

      - SSB
      - Satellite Phone such as Iridium / Inmarsat Fleetbroadband
      - VSat system

      ( overview of the sat phones: Satellite Phone Equipment Overview )

      Then of course when you are near shore (10s meters to 10s miles) you have the usual culprits:
      - Wifi
      - GSM cell phones

      All have their pros and conns:
      - SSB is dismally slow and requires a bunch of experience to learn to use. Hard on ships batteries also. However, very long distance cruisers with plenty of time and patience seem to enjoy it. Sailmail is the market leader, but also you have Airmail for hams and smaller providers

      - Iridium is nearly as slow as SSB, but a lot more "instant" and much more like a slow speed dialup internet connection. Reasonably pricey (Iridium Prepay Prices) It's *required* that you use some kind of email acceleration such as ExpressMail or GMN/Ocens or whatever

      - BGAN/Fleetbroadband is near low end broadband speeds, but costs something similar to roaming cell phone prices and so its very cost effective for basic browsing, but not really priced for cruising slashdot daily. However, its about the best you can get for a price in single digits of thousands of dollars

      - VSAT is your big geo stationary satellites that are rented out for sat TV, etc. Providers lease some space and give you a (very) big dish. The dishes need to be pointed extremely accurately, are quite large (60cm to 2m) and for marine use you are talking tens of thousands of dollars for equipment. However, fixed price, large volume contracts can be had for single digit thousands of dollars per month... So if you really are a business and need always on bandwidth then this is your option (think cruiseliner, some merchant vessels, super-yachts). The issue is that the market is fragmented and you need a provider who has rented space on multiple satellites to get anything like reasonable coverage - usually a Fleetbroadband is still needed to complete your coverage...

    35. Re:BGAN by the_wildgoose · · Score: 1

      BGAN and Fleetbroadband are sort of the same system, but priced differently... Several enterprising folks have taken a BGAN (ie land terminal) and mounted it on the kind of tracking platform they sell for RVs to point your dish at the satellite. These are pretty dumb devices which just have a compass and an elevation meter, but people tell me they actually make a BGAN track more quickly and reliably than a proper marine FleetBroadband.... Of course you still need to waterproof your BGAN to make them equivalent... And even then Inmarsat are technically allowed to turn off your BGAN if you use it in the middle of the ocean...

    36. Re:BGAN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, for near global coverage it looks like Immarsat still rules.

      Here's some pricing:

      http://www.ocens.com/inmarsat/inmarsat_FB_airtime.htm

      Looks like you'd need to be on a fairly good gig, or fill the boat with similarly employed geeks!

      http://far-out.ucoz.kz

      http://far-out.ucoz.kz

  5. NMT by etnoy · · Score: 3, Informative

    In some countries the NMT system is still operational and is used by ships for it's excellent coverage (compared to GSM, that is). Don't have any links at the moment, but I know some ships that are using NMT to get an OK network connection when out on the sea. Other than that, I think I remember you can surf using VHF. Don't know about SSB, internet over SSB would be slow but with an awesome coverage. Last resort: Satellite.

    --
    Quantum hacker.
    1. Re:NMT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, last resort would be HAM. Satellite is pretty much the only way to have a consistent internet connection at sea. The NMT system is obviously worthless unless you're only sailing the Nordic seas.

    2. Re:NMT by neurophys · · Score: 4, Informative

      I use the NMT - system as implemented in Scandinavia (http://www.ice.no/). It works all places I sail. It cost approx as an ADSL-connection. I opted for a plan of $30/week when in use (summer and winter holidays) and nothing at other times.

    3. Re:NMT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's illegal to use HAM that way.

    4. Re:NMT by dimethylxanthine · · Score: 0

      In France... (link)

    5. Re:NMT by realityimpaired · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes, but where do you sail? I looked at the wikipedia article and the NMT doesn't seem to be implemented outside of parts of Europe these days, and even when implemented it seems to have a maximum range of about 30km for a cell. Kinda useless if you're in the middle of the Indian ocean, or even in Europe, if you're in parts of the North Sea or the Mediterranean. 30km isn't *that* far in nautical terms.

      The only product that'll work regardless of where the person is actually sailing is something like Inmarsat, as others have said. Chances are that if you're expecting you'll be sailing in an area where cellular coverage is a possibility, you'll probably want to be looking at a UMTS or HSDPA-based Internet access instead of NMT, since you'll find coverage for that in coastal areas in most of the populated parts of the world, whereas NMT doesn't really work in, say, Australia or the Caribbean.

    6. Re:NMT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's the opposite for vhf and ssb. you can get internet email and some limited text feeds over ssb, but the link is very slow. there are several setups using pactor modems to do this. great for weather routing attachments, but not to surf the web with. you are at the mercy of atmospheric conditions for your connectivity strength.

      vhf doesn't quite cut it, although you can get very limited weatherfax over it.

      i have been offshore, and i have used vhf, ssb, and satphone for connectivity. sat phone hands down is the winner of the 3, but still sketchy at times and expensive for data. and no surfing on it either. better off spending the $10k on a dish and the $1k a gig data plan for fleet broadband.

    7. Re:NMT by gravis777 · · Score: 1

      Why would satellite be last resort? Just have some sort of gyro or something to make sure the dish stays pointed at the satellite - you should get halfway decent speeds, and have access from just about anywhere in the world. And at a halfway decent price - if you can convince HughesNet to install on a boat.

    8. Re:NMT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hey you: check out http://www.opencpn.org/

      it is a mighty fine cross-platform GPL chart plotter.

    9. Re:NMT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right this moment, I'm using the "NMT" (CDMA450) network for internet access in the Stockholm Archipelago. The coverage is second to none. Here's a link to the coverage area: http://www.net1.se/privat/tackning.aspx

      Free roaming in Sweden, Norway and Denmark.

      I pay 15$ a month for up to 3mbit.

      If you're gonna be sailing in scandinavia, this is what you will want to have. /Mats

  6. BGAN by chainsaw1 · · Score: 4, Informative

    This was asked sooner than 10 years ago, and I'll repeat my answer to that thread.

    You want BGAN. It's an INMARSAT service. Designed for marine use, but will not be cheap

    http://www.inmarsat.com/Services/Land/BGAN/default.aspx

    --
    - Sig
  7. Geez, call me old fashioned by Dunbal · · Score: 4, Insightful

    But I remember when a Loran-C was high tech. Now people want to stream video from the middle of the Atlantic... Hey, back in the old day we didn't need porn we just brought women with us. Owning a sailboat and cruising the Caribbean went a long way towards getting those panties off!

    But seriously, always have a good old almanac and sextant as a backup. Because if your generator gets fucked, you and your high tech toys are fucked. They never turn off the sun and stars, however ('cept in a storm of course - Murphy's law would have your generator fail in the middle of the hurricane anyway).

    Personally I go sailing to get AWAY from the rest of the world, not to stay connected to it.

    --
    Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    1. Re:Geez, call me old fashioned by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 0

      Given how much generators enjoy things like vibration and being doused with saltwater, you might not even need to invoke Murphy's law...

    2. Re:Geez, call me old fashioned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Leave the sextant and the almac at the nursing home and have a boat with sensible design. If you have a motor sail, besides the motor/generator group keep a set of solar panes like you had a non-motor sailboat. Use proper battery care and storage and decent electronics to control the set. You're safer on a boat correctly designed - and leave past tools to the past.

    3. Re:Geez, call me old fashioned by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Given how much generators enjoy things like vibration and being doused with saltwater, you might not even need to invoke Murphy's law...

      The vibration involved on a boat is jack diddly shit compared to what you have to deal with on a car. You can buy marine generators which have sealed electronics. If you grease up the plug real good with dielectric compound you can even expect them to last for a while.

      On the other hand, even a ruggedized laptop is going to breathe the air, so all your unsealed electronics can be assumed to be on their way out from the moment you bring them on the boat...

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:Geez, call me old fashioned by Overzeetop · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Never underestimate technology that works when completely unpowered and soaked with saltwater.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    5. Re:Geez, call me old fashioned by sukotto · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Don't just *have* the sextant. Make it a habit to take a daily noon sighting and record your distance logger.
      Always assume the GPS is wrong until verified by hand.

      --
      Come play free flash games on Kongregate!
    6. Re:Geez, call me old fashioned by Lumpy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Most boats use the engine as the generator. you fire up the diesel and let it charge the batteries. Very rarely do you have a dedicated generator on the boat. And you want diesel not gasoline...

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    7. Re:Geez, call me old fashioned by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      Leave the sextant and the almac at the nursing home and have a boat with sensible design.

            That's ok. When your sensibly designed boat encounters all those variables that your theoretical boat designer never thought of (because after all you can't get an engineering degree in the middle of the ocean; you tend to get them in nice, air conditioned offices on land), you'll have that "oh shit" moment.

            But then again, it's your life and you are free to risk it as you please. I just hope you don't kill any passengers while you're at it.

            Just like learning how to write by hand is still necessary in the electronic age and learning math is still necessary in the calculator/computer age, having a compass, a ruler and charts, a barometer, a sextant, an almanac and knowing how to use them cannot be a bad idea. The day they save your life you will consider them a good investment. If you disagree then you're just a landlubber pretending to play with boats. There's no such thing as being TOO careful when out at sea.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    8. Re:Geez, call me old fashioned by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Most boats use the engine as the generator. you fire up the diesel and let it charge the batteries. Very rarely do you have a dedicated generator on the boat. And you want diesel not gasoline...

      yeah, I've done a little boat shopping, will not consider gasoline. My luxury sedan and my 3/4 ton pickup are both diesels, I don't want gas cars either. I've definitely seen boats outfitted both ways, though. On any large yacht using the engine to charge the batteries is probably overkill.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    9. Re:Geez, call me old fashioned by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      a boat is jack diddly shit compared to what you have to deal with on a car.

            AFAIK car engines aren't sitting a couple inches above salt-water bilge... And you should know what salt does to cars if you live up north. And that's only a couple weeks per year. Now deal with that 24/7/365 and you begin to understand how fun marine life is, and why boats are the definition of money pits.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    10. Re:Geez, call me old fashioned by FlyingOrca · · Score: 1

      In my experience, most Diesel-powered cruising yachts have a separate Diesel genset. The good reasons for this should be fairly obvious.

      --
      Corruptissima re publica plurimae leges.
    11. Re:Geez, call me old fashioned by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      Very rarely do you have a dedicated generator on the boat.

            You do see them more often on sailboats. On a motorboat you assume the engine is pretty much always on, so you generate the power from the engine. You usually have horsepower to spare anyway. Not so on a sailboat. The engines are usually pretty pathetic (assuming you have an inboard engine at all). Thus the need for a separate generator on bigger boats. Smaller boats just have to make do with batteries (with a whole different range of failure modes right there). Weight is never a problem on a sailboat - it's just more ballast!

            And I agree on the diesel. Leave gasoline for the jet-skis.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    12. Re:Geez, call me old fashioned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only true for small sailboats. Nowday separate gensets are very common.

    13. Re:Geez, call me old fashioned by PseudonymousBraveguy · · Score: 1

      We've spend ages to tell people to make backups even when using a RAID. And you are telling people to go off-shore sailing without taking any backup system? You know, if your RAID crashes and you have no backup, you only lose your data. If your electonics fail in the middle of the ocean (electonics and salt water tend to dislike each other), you have a pretty good chance to lose your life. But yeah, you could save some hundered bucks by not having a sextant!

    14. Re:Geez, call me old fashioned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hey you: check out http://www.opencpn.org/

      it's a mighty fine cross-platform GPL chart plotter.

    15. Re:Geez, call me old fashioned by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      A couple weeks a year?
      Try 3 months+.

    16. Re:Geez, call me old fashioned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had mod points and would have modded you, but there was no -1, ignorant mod.

    17. Re:Geez, call me old fashioned by rk · · Score: 1

      I'm an inveterate landlubber, who works in satellite remote sensing, has a deep understanding of GPS, computerized cartography, and I *adore* sextants, barometers, and compasses.

      Understanding those tools make it easier to have a deeper understanding of modern navigation tools. GP clearly falls in the latter half of the two kinds of fools: "This is old and therefore good", "This is new and therefore better."

    18. Re:Geez, call me old fashioned by Dunbal · · Score: 1

      Try 3 months+.

            I was born in Montreal so I know what winter is. But they don't put salt down every day, either. Nor does it snow every day. Nor are the roads covered in slush every day. Ergo a few weeks.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
  8. Inmarsat BGAN by $pace6host · · Score: 0, Redundant
    Look into Inmarsat, they offer a service called BGAN.

    I'm not sure how expensive it is, but if you're sailing around the world, you probably have a different view of expenses than I do.

    1. Re:Inmarsat BGAN by PseudonymousBraveguy · · Score: 1

      The wikipedia page mentiones $7.5 per megabyte.

    2. Re:Inmarsat BGAN by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure that I've had cell plans that cost more than that, once I went over my "free with contract 5MB allotment for the month"...

  9. Yeah, that's great and all... by thijsh · · Score: 1, Funny

    but now I kinda hate you already...

    1. Re:Yeah, that's great and all... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      I hear you! Great job with such freedom and a sailboat, and still complaining about easy access to hookers, blow and the intertubes. What a jackass!

      (Psssst: I also wish I could trade places)

    2. Re:Yeah, that's great and all... by thijsh · · Score: 1

      (Psssst: I also wish I could trade places)

      Wouldn't we all? :-)

    3. Re:Yeah, that's great and all... by ormondotvos · · Score: 1

      Been there, done that, got pirated. REAL pirated.

  10. Inmarsat FleetBroadband by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    http://www.inmarsat.com/Services/Maritime/FleetBroadband/default.aspx

    1. Re:Inmarsat FleetBroadband by n1ywb · · Score: 5, Informative

      Agreed, Fleet Broadband is your only good option. It's not particularly cheap, though it doubles as a sat phone which you'd probably want anyway. I guess it all depends on how much bandwidth you need vs how much money you make. It's not particularly fast either, 300k-ish if I recall, and it's a shared channel(s). But it's much faster and cheaper than the older F-77 technology.

      Also that equipment isn't the worlds most reliable, you either need to buy two so you can have a backup, or think hard about how much downtime will cost you when you are two weeks out of kerplopistan harbor and nobody there knows how to fix one of these things so you have to get parts flown in air-freight.

      The trouble is most satellites use spot-beams to focus their signals on continental areas, where the people are. They intentionally focus their signals AWAY from the ocean, where the people are not. Services like Hugues Net, etc. They usually work in coastal areas, but that's about it.

      --
      -73, de n1ywb
      www.n1ywb.com
    2. Re:Inmarsat FleetBroadband by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      Any idea why the hardware is that flaky?(fundamentally tricky design problems; because we can; etc?)

      Off the cuff, I would think that somebody selling a very expensive service, to people who probably have their reasons for needing it, where most of the investment is in the satellites, would want the reliability of their ground hardware to be less of a joke, and more of a chuck norris joke...

    3. Re:Inmarsat FleetBroadband by n1ywb · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The ocean is a tough environment.
      The antennas are gyro stabilized and have a lot of moving parts.
      Lighting is common at sea and does terrible things to radios.
      Radios in general get hot and fail sometimes. No ship goes out to sea with only one means of communication, usually 3 or 4.

      --
      -73, de n1ywb
      www.n1ywb.com
    4. Re:Inmarsat FleetBroadband by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can anyone see a price on these? I can't find it. Probably a bad sign...

    5. Re:Inmarsat FleetBroadband by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > The trouble is most satellites use spot-beams to focus their signals on continental areas, where the people are.
      > They intentionally focus their signals AWAY from the ocean, where the people are not.

      I work for Inmarsat (formally known as the 'International **Maritime** Satellite Organization') and I can guarantee you we do NOT 'focus our signals' AWAY from the ocean....

    6. Re:Inmarsat FleetBroadband by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      Yep. Go look at the antenna farm on bigger boats. They aren't there to impress the chicks.

      WD-40 only goes so far.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    7. Re:Inmarsat FleetBroadband by MarbleMunkey · · Score: 1

      Lighting is common at sea and does terrible things to radios.

      Really? I thought it was mostly dark at sea when the sun isn't out..

      /Goes to turn down his lamp so-as to not damage his shortwave..

    8. Re:Inmarsat FleetBroadband by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hey you: check out http://www.opencpn.org/

      it's free (GPL) cross platform chart plotter software, loads all the common chart data formats (BSB/S-57/CM93/...)

      it rocks!

  11. Fear Not - by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anything is possible!

    Just find a way to send a 56K signal over shortwave. (Modem-audio out to radio in, shouldn't be hard.) Have the receiver on land retransmit that signal through a telephone. Dial into a dial-up ISP of your choice, and enjoy the slow.

    1. Re:Fear Not - by n1ywb · · Score: 1

      That will work great, until the FCC raids your house, takes your equipment, and fines you.

      --
      -73, de n1ywb
      www.n1ywb.com
    2. Re:Fear Not - by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      America is not the only country in the world.

    3. Re:Fear Not - by n1ywb · · Score: 1

      ... is not the only country in the world with a wireless enforcement agency belonging to the International Telecommunications Union and bound by international law to regulate eg shortwave users and take a dim view of pirates. You could of course buy a license and comply with the actual regulations, but they're not cheap and pretty onerous, respectively.

      --
      -73, de n1ywb
      www.n1ywb.com
  12. Cut & Splice by Bert64 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Get a diving suit and a pair of wire cutters...
    Dive down to an underwater cable, cut it and splice yourself into the middle of it! High bandwidth internet access at sea.

    --
    http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
    1. Re:Cut & Splice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I hate it when people do that.

      I'll be right in the middle of someth

    2. Re:Cut & Splice by GPSguy · · Score: 1

      Fusion splicing the glass underwater is a bitch. Getting a good cleave at those depths with the diving gloves on is the hardest part, assuming the batteries haven't collapsed (nor your frail body) at those depths.

      --
      Never ascribe to malice that which can adequately be explained by tenure.
  13. Adventure. by AnonymousClown · · Score: 1

    What does the community at large have for modern resources for constant streaming internet at sea?

    You spent all that money on a sailboat and you're going out to sea for an adventure to ....stream content...sit on your ass and watch Youtube videos? To surf the web?!?

    Email: How about go into port?

    For voice (there are family emergencies ) there's satellite phones.

    Entertainment out at sea and if you really have to have stuff, how about ust getting DVDs or Blu-Ray?

    --
    RIP America

    July 4, 1776 - September 11, 2001

    1. Re:Adventure. by vlm · · Score: 1

      The article poster, in addition to assuming he can telecommute, is assuming the only way to get :

      Nautical Charts

      Weather Maps

      Travel Guide type info

      Relevant Current International and Local News (Somali pirates, etc)

      Emergency and Almost-Emergency assistance

      Help locating repair parts for your boat

      is over the internet for free or for a small fee. You could actually get most of what you need out of a ham radio license and the mobile maritime service net. But you'd have to "talk" to other people over the radio, which may or may not be acceptable.

      http://www.mmsn.org/

      Hmm, so your future employers can pay you a staggering amount of money to float your boat, or pay some 3rd worlder with practically zero cost of living to do the same job. Wonder how thats going to turn out.

      Also the original poster seems to think you just put it on autopilot the whole time and "work on the real (computer) job". I don't think the original poster knows much about actual sailing. Unless he is so fabulously wealthy that he's planning on hiring a crew to do all the work for him.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    2. Re:Adventure. by aicrules · · Score: 1

      He wants it for telecommuting. So that he can work while sailing away.

    3. Re:Adventure. by davetucker · · Score: 1

      His work might require a constant connection. For example, he made need IM for collaboration, or access to source control if a programmer, or a network share for various files. Youtube was clearly not the goal.

    4. Re:Adventure. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's for his work. If you'd RTFOP, you'd know that.

    5. Re:Adventure. by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      What part of "telecommute" did you not understand?
      I doubt he gets his money for entertaining himself (otherwise I'd like to know where to get such a job ;-))

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    6. Re:Adventure. by Lumpy · · Score: 2, Funny

      Weather maps... You can get them easily, there are several birds that pass each day that give you nice old SSTV images of your hemisphere.
      Charts, if you left port without them then you deserve to die in the belly of a shark.
      Pirate, sorry but maps.google.com/pirates is not functional... for some reason there are no live traffic reports of pirate locations.

      If you dont have the tools, knowledge, and skill to circumnavigate the globe without internet and radio, then you deserve to die if you embark on such a trip.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    7. Re:Adventure. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Also the original poster seems to think you just put it on autopilot the whole time and "work on the real (computer) job". I don't think the original poster knows much about actual sailing. Unless he is so fabulously wealthy that he's planning on hiring a crew to do all the work for him.

      my understanding is that sailing is much like combat, long stretches of boredom punctuated by terror, where the value of terror varies with the size of the ship. So most of the time that's a working understanding. Of course, the further understanding that you need minimum two people, and that if you only have two then you never get to sleep at the same time while under way, should put most people off sailing, and off of the cheapest yachts. You can get a two-person-sized ocean-capable yacht for a few hundred bucks, but do you want to live that way? Most people don't.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    8. Re:Adventure. by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      In that case though I think the simple truth is that it's not a viable goal. Existing solutions are EXPENSIVE, slow, and of a reliability unsuitable for telecommuting. Sailing around the world is not something you can sensibly do while working at this point in time. It's for people who don't have to work (ie, rich kids or retirees) or people who can stop working long enough to enjoy it without being connected 24/7 (people on vacation).

      However much you make, if you're still working for a living, then give up on working from the middle of the Atlantic (well, as anything but a sailor or a fisherman).

      That said, if e-mail (rather than full web access) is good enough for you, you can get that relatively inexpensively with HAM radio http://www.winlink.org/.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    9. Re:Adventure. by icebraining · · Score: 1

      His work might require a constant connection. For example (...) access to source control if a programmer,

      Still using Subversion?

    10. Re:Adventure. by vlm · · Score: 1

      my understanding is that sailing is much like combat, long stretches of boredom punctuated by terror

      Correction - "my understanding is that sailing is much like combat, long stretches of repetitive preventative maintenance punctuated by terror". Whenever you're not at the helm, of course.

      I have researched this thoroughly, I've read the Pardey's books, etc. It might be a fun retirement plan for me in a couple decades. The original post seemed to just be a whim as opposed to a carefully researched plan. Fact is, for centuries mariners have kept themselves quite exhausted when out on the sea without trying to simultaneously run a full time tele-consulting business in a different timezone... Its roughly an order of magnitude of maintenance work over and above a suburban house. If my house roof leaks I'll be pissed but if my boat hull leaks I'll sink (more or less).

      Its faintly amusing reading the Pardey's books from 40 years ago, explaining how with the near total absence of modern conveniences "the wife" pretty much gets stuck in the cabin the whole time doing cooking / laundry / cleaning. Perhaps, given the current lack of un-liberated women, the stereotypical single slashdot guy might be the perfect modern cruiser, since the lack of women whom would tolerate cruising would not affect a guy whom cannot get a woman under any conditions anyway.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    11. Re:Adventure. by ColdWetDog · · Score: 2, Funny

      You're both wrong. Sailing can be broken down into one, time tested phrase:

      "Sailing is equivalent to standing in a cold shower, ripping up hundred dollar bills".

      (Apologies to those who expected an automotive analogy.)

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    12. Re:Adventure. by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I've heard that to get the experience you should lock yourself in a closet with a wet dog and burn hundred dollar bills. Your nickname goes nicely with this :)

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    13. Re:Adventure. by GPSguy · · Score: 1

      Oh, there are, but the US Navy, and a number of other naval forces, tend to only share amongst themselves.

      --
      Never ascribe to malice that which can adequately be explained by tenure.
    14. Re:Adventure. by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      Actually, being cooped in a sailboat's cabin with an overactive, bored and very wet Labrador Retriever is another story for another time....

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  14. A few solutions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    1. A lot of marina's seem to be starting offer wifi which covers the moorings. So you can at least get online when in port at reasonable speeds.
    2. GSM coverage usually extends at least 10 miles offshore, if you're travelling parallel to the coast (and it depends where in the world you are) you might be able to use GSM networks. Getting hold of local sim cards is much cheaper than paying roaming fees.
    3. Iridium phones can manage dial up internet access at 2400bps for around $1.50 per minute. Globalstar phones will give you 9600bps but (despite the name) coverage is far from global. Thuraya give you "unlimited" internet access for a mere $3550 per month and speeds into hundreds of kilobits per second. Other's have already mentioned Imarsat's BGAN. http://www.satphone.co.uk/index.shtml has good info on all of these.
    4. Try and rig up something over amateur radio and use an AX25 to TCPIP gateway. Speeds will be slow (a few kilobits per second at best) and its likely to be unreliable. But it should be cheap/free.

    1. Re:A few solutions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      4. Try and rig up something over amateur radio and use an AX25 to TCPIP gateway. Speeds will be slow (a few kilobits per second at best) and its likely to be unreliable. But it should be cheap/free.

      OP said he wanted to do work over this link. One of the rules of amateur radio is "non commercial use".

    2. Re:A few solutions by RightSaidFred99 · · Score: 1

      My home internet connection has the same rule, and yet they're fine with me VPN'ing to work. There are various meanings of "commerical use".

    3. Re:A few solutions by Weedhopper · · Score: 1

      3. Iridium phones can manage dial up internet access at 2400bps for around $1.50 per minute. Globalstar phones will give you 9600bps but (despite the name) coverage is far from global. Thuraya give you "unlimited" internet access for a mere $3550 per month and speeds into hundreds of kilobits per second. Other's have already mentioned Imarsat's BGAN. http://www.satphone.co.uk/index.shtml has good info on all of these.

      Hundreds of kbps on a Thuraya? Since when? Plus Thuraya's coverage doesn't extend to the Western hemisphere.

      Globalstar's become very dicey these days, even on land.

      If you want reliable, mobile global data access at a reasonable speed, there's BGAN and that's about it.

    4. Re:A few solutions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      4. Amateur radio regulations(at least in the US) state that amateur radio is not to be used for commercial purposes. Not that anyone will probably realize that you're doing work over your extremely slow ax.25 connection, but I think it's still not technically allowed.

    5. Re:A few solutions by mabs · · Score: 1

      You should add to 4: That no coded communications are allowed over Amateur Radio (AR), everything has to be clear text. AX25 would be horrid over HF, there are plenty of modes on HF that go from 30-1200bps, so facebook might take a while...

      --
      VK3TST
      -- "People aren't stupid. Usually." -- jd
    6. Re:A few solutions by siriuskase · · Score: 1

      Try and rig up something over amateur radio and use an

      Interestingly enough, a lot of hams use a protocol original developed for Yacht sailors. Seamail sends email over a marine radio, hams have adapted it to ham radios. You could probably do commercial work over the marine radio. Check out http://www.seamail.org/

      --
      If you must moderate, please moderate as irrelevent, not something bad, because I'm sure someone will find this interest
    7. Re:A few solutions by siriuskase · · Score: 1

      oops, I meant sailmail, similar sounding name to me, i goofed. http://www.sailmail.com/ I'm a ham, not a sailor.

      --
      If you must moderate, please moderate as irrelevent, not something bad, because I'm sure someone will find this interest
  15. wait for starbucks coffee buoy's with free wifi by Rivalz · · Score: 0

    I think once Starbucks has a store at every 2 miles on every continent they will have to eventually start populating the ocean. Give them a year or two. By then you should be able to float up to their starbucks buoy building and grab a latte and use their wifi.

    1. Re:wait for starbucks coffee buoy's with free wifi by darjen · · Score: 1

      Only when Starbucks reaches the ocean will seasteading finally become a reality. That might be a ways off, though.

    2. Re:wait for starbucks coffee buoy's with free wifi by Maarx · · Score: 1

      Only when Starbucks reaches the ocean will seasteading finally become a reality. That might be a ways off, though.

      Everybody knows how this one turns out.

  16. Thuraya GmPRS by ickleberry · · Score: 1

    Doesn't work everywhere, its slow but somewhat cheaper than BGAN and you only need a handheld satellite phone for it to work.

    but still at $5 per MB I would be writing a script to compress my RSS feeds using PAQ8 so I can download them over TFTP and writing a custom binary protocol IM client to save bandwidth

  17. marine backhoe? by turtleAJ · · Score: 1

    Save the latest maps with undersea comm cables and just tap into them as needed.

  18. Thrane & Thrane SAILOR 500 Fleet Broadband by ChapsRL8 · · Score: 5, Informative

    The million dollar carbon fiber sailboats that compete in the Volvo Ocean Race in 2009 used three systems for voice, data, and fax communications. The one that I recall was Thrane & Thrane SAILOR 500 Fleet Broadband. They would shoot HD video with HD cameras and then upload clips via that system from the middle of the ocean. SAILOR 500 Fleet Broadband is a complete system with bandwidth up to 432kbps and allows phone calls to be placed at the same time. I believe the monthly service fee is upwards of $400 a month excluding equipment fees and installation. http://www.thrane.com/Maritime/Products/Satellite%20Communication/SAILOR%20FleetBroadband/SAILOR%20500%20FleetBroadband.aspx

    1. Re:Thrane & Thrane SAILOR 500 Fleet Broadband by ssbssb · · Score: 1

      Why would you need fax on a boat?

    2. Re:Thrane & Thrane SAILOR 500 Fleet Broadband by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I dunno, for between $16-20K and $450/mo for broadband only those that have million dollar boats can afford one. Maybe when I retire to my liveaboard in five years it'll be more affordable.

    3. Re:Thrane & Thrane SAILOR 500 Fleet Broadband by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thrane&Thrane has 3 different Sailor models, each with its own properties (disclaimer: I worked in the FleetBroadband department)

      Sailor 500 - top model - expensive, fast

      Sailor 250 - medium model, pretty fast compared to the fact it works in the middle of the Pacific, if I remember correctly, you could get 128Kb/s streaming data and of course best-effort background IP data (cheaper)

      Sailor 500 and 250 uses the same transceiver, so they have the same interfaces (4 network, 2 phone, 1 ISDN).

      Sailor 150 - small model for smaller ships = cheaper - limited to a bandwidth of 150Kb/s - no ISDN (who needs that?), 1 phone, 2 network ports

      The good thing about the Sailor terminals is they double as satphones - and they handle the sea quite well - salt water and electronics do not mix

  19. Cruise Ship + Cantenna = ?? by damn_registrars · · Score: 0, Troll

    Perhaps you could get a really good wifi antenna for your boat and then try to stay "just close enough" to a major cruise ship. The large boats usually have wireless internet available, and hacking (or paying for) their access would likely cost you quite a bit less than a provider who will get you online independently in the middle of the ocean.

    Granted, it may be illegal, the cruise line probably won't care for it, it probably isn't very safe or smart, and it means giving up your independence to set your own route. But if internet access in the middle of the ocean is that important to you and your learjet pilot doesn't have a suggestion for you then it might be worth a shot.

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
  20. iridium? by hitmark · · Score: 1

    seems they are aiming directly at this kind of market.

    --
    comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
    1. Re:iridium? by DeathToBill · · Score: 1

      Yes, at about twice the cost per MB as Inmarsat.

      --
      Slashdot - News for Nerds, Stuff that Matters, in ISO-8859-1 Has just realised that beta makes this signature redundant
  21. Iridium NEXT by grumling · · Score: 2, Informative

    If you're willing to wait another 5 years, Iridium is in the process of replacing their constellation:

    http://multivu.prnewswire.com/mnr/iridium/44300/

    --
    "Well, good luck finding a judge that doesn't run a bestiality site."
  22. What does the US Navy use . . . ? by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

    They must have some Internet access at sea. Not that they would want to share it, though.

    Just curious, anyone know?

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    1. Re:What does the US Navy use . . . ? by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      They may use BGAN for moral internet access. The Military has it's own networks for secured communications that are isolated from the internet.
      And no they are not gong to share. From what I have heard they are short of bandwidth as it is.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    2. Re:What does the US Navy use . . . ? by Excelcia · · Score: 1

      They and and we (Canadian Navy) use immarsat for internet & unclas VOIP

    3. Re:What does the US Navy use . . . ? by abarrow · · Score: 1

      They use stabilized VSAT (e.g. http://www.omniaccess.com/en/products/orbit-al7103mkii-stabilized-vsat/ systems, as do a lot of drilling vessels, cargo vessels, cruise ships, etc.

    4. Re:What does the US Navy use . . . ? by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      They may use BGAN for moral internet access.

      Well, that's obviously not going to work for anyone of the Slashdot persuasion. Any other ideas?

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    5. Re:What does the US Navy use . . . ? by enrgeeman · · Score: 1

      They ride on military satellites, run by the Army. Seeing as how they use frequencies licensed to the government, I'm not sure he would be able to just buy something off the shelf to even access them.

      --
      sent from my slashdot browser.
    6. Re:What does the US Navy use . . . ? by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      makes sense. Why reinvent the wheel. I know that the US military also uses Iridium for some communications as well.
      Does immarsat work in the polar regions? I figure that would be or will be important for the Canadian Navy.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    7. Re:What does the US Navy use . . . ? by quiet_guy · · Score: 1

      USN is quickly moving away from INMARSAT. Too slow for our needs today - at this point, only a few ship classes still use it (FFG, some amphibs). Everyone else is using an EHF/SHF link to the Defense Satellite Communications System (DSCS) - several geostationary birds parked over the equator that allow T-1+ access. We share that out based on who is in the area - the big guys (carriers, etc) stay close to T-1 bandwidth, fairly typical for a destroyer-size ship to have something like 512 or less. We have several networks that ride over that data path. But that does need a pair of big antennas under gyro stabilization....since the best setup is a pair of primary SHF with automatic failover to the EHF pair (aimed at a different bird).

  23. Why? by spammeister · · Score: 1

    Why now you are taking one of the most fulfilling passtimes, sailing, and combining with the exact opposite, your job! Combining these two will only result in sailing becoming as tedious as your job and your job now controlling every single part of your life.

    Methinks you should join the merchant marines.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Merchant_Marine/

    --
    I tried to think of a good sig, and this wasn't it.
  24. Australian coverage.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.telstra.com.au/mobile/networks/coverage/outtosea.html

    If your not going too far out to sea, Australia is fairly well covered.

    In order for a service out to sea to work effectively, line of sight to the terrestrial base station is required. This is influenced by the height of the serving base station, land based obstructions such as trees and buildings, as well as the general topography of the land, which can block signals. Coverage will not be reliable over the horizon from a mobile base station even though it may be usable at times.

  25. Intelsat maritime services by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's not cheap, but if you have a large yacht it shouldn't be an issue

    http://www.intelsat.com/services/telecom/mobility/maritime-benefits.asp

  26. Pigeon by retech · · Score: 4, Informative

    If you are ANYWHERE near South Africa, New Zealand or Oz use a carrier pigeon it's faster than access here anyway and heaps cheaper. Plus you won't get nailed when going over your data cap!

    1. Re:Pigeon by maxwell+demon · · Score: 1

      But are there any providers for IPoAC?

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    2. Re:Pigeon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And pray what makes you think us Anonymous Cowards would want to transport your packets?

    3. Re:Pigeon by laejoh · · Score: 1

      And it's all documented! Read the fine RFC 1149 and RFC 2549 :)

    4. Re:Pigeon by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

      New ICT axiom for 3rd world installations: Never underestimate the bandwidth of a cage full of carrier pigeons with 32GB MicroSD cards.

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    5. Re:Pigeon by Rudeboy777 · · Score: 1

      Going over your data cap will result in the drowning of your poor pigeon! Use low-bandwidth protocols!

      --

      From hell's heart I fstab at /dev/hdc

    6. Re:Pigeon by teidou · · Score: 1

      Uhm, I *have* been nailed by a pigeon when it flew over my cap...

    7. Re:Pigeon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No dice. Comcast has been training falcons to intercept your packets.

    8. Re:Pigeon by SEWilco · · Score: 1

      And pray what makes you think us Anonymous Cowards would want to transport your packets?

      Well, look at all the other luggage you're already carrying around.

    9. Re:Pigeon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plus you won't get nailed when going over your data cap!

      No, there is no going over your "data cap" with RFC1149 or RFC2549 - there is a hard limit. Pushing the connection to its limit will result in either a dropped connection (i.e. run out of birds) or heavy* packet losses.

      *pun intended

    10. Re:Pigeon by RightSaidFred99 · · Score: 1

      Great bandwidth, but the latency's a bitch.

  27. Gotta love the irony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Kinda offtopic but funny..
    If any of you read throught the comments of the ask slashdot from 10 years ago you get this jewel

    Satellite Links for anywhere (Score:3)
    by dublin (31215)
    on Wednesday May 31 2000, @08:31AM (#1036605)

    A few years ago, I had the privelege to do one of the coolest consulting gigs of my career. The job was for a global oil company that ships more oil than anyone else, and was very concerned about minimizing environmental damage and having the right command and control structures in place instantly in the event of a spill.

    1. Re:Gotta love the irony by Max+Littlemore · · Score: 3, Funny
      Topical, but my favorite comment is the last one on the page:

      "Warning, unable to connect: Connection reset by pier"...

      Priceless.

      --
      I don't therefore I'm not.
    2. Re:Gotta love the irony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      obviously never tried to get wifi on brighton beach http://www.piertopier.net/

  28. Read up on Abby Sunderland's trip by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They had every aspect of her trip covered, phone systems, internet (she blogged from sea). The only thing unaccounted for was a giant rogue wave that took down her mast, but that could have happened to anyone. They do mention the services that was used by the team.

  29. Re:Cruise Ship + Cantenna = ?? by Lumpy · · Score: 4, Funny

    Arrrr! there be WiFi pirates!

    Hoist the Wifi Jolly roger! Ready the laptop's me maytes this one has load balancing uplinks!

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  30. Re:Cruise Ship + Cantenna = ?? by insufflate10mg · · Score: 1

    Thanks for the laugh on this somber morning.

  31. Why bother... by dimethylxanthine · · Score: 0

    if you can download the entire Wikipedia anyway? wait...

  32. multiple systems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would try to have a combination of systems, SSB, WIFI for when at a marina or anchored in front of someones house broadcasting unsecured (we use this on the Chesapeake Bay a lot, just to get some emails off, not to stream or use much bandwidth. Then a Sat phone (iridium) would be good to have for low coverage areas and cell phone tethering or a data usb plan for around areas with coverage. There are so many people out there that are blogging everyday while out on their adventures, so there is the technology out there, it's a matter of what you can afford and what you need. I've thought about cruising and doing something similar in the future if possible, but to be logged on and working 8 hours would be a lot when on the boat.

  33. Re:Cruise Ship + Cantenna = ?? by phorest · · Score: 1

    Yeah and then they'll call DHS and say they're being followed by a pirate...

    --
    God: When you do things right, people won't be sure you've done anything at all.
  34. Ask Daddy or Your Butler by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm sure if you tracked down "Muffy" on the tennis court, he could help answer your question after wiping sweat from his brow with his cashmere sweater.

    Barring that, just have your butler do your research for you. It's one of the many things you pay him for. Hell, maybe even your chef, your driver, or your masseuse could do it for you too. Every one of them has a better work ethic than you do.

    Sailing is strictly for people with more money than brains. Don't think too hard about this, you might hurt yourself.

    1. Re:Ask Daddy or Your Butler by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spend 2 weeks on a tall ship and then let's hear your opinion, hell spend 2 weeks aboard any sailing ship because it's clear that you haven't.

      Sailing a boat is work. Probably harder work than you've ever done, and people do it for the personal reward.

      Keep talking out of your ass. One day you may actually form an opinion based on experience instead of fiction.

  35. One word: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Iceberg.

  36. Winlink 2000 by DoctorPepper · · Score: 1

    Well, you could get your Amateur Radio license, then you could use Winlink 2000 to send and receive emails while at sea.

    http://www.winlink.org/

    Of course, I personally despise Winlink 2000, because of the robots that never listen to see if other stations are transmitting, before they transmit, but that's just my personal opinion.

    --

    No matter where you go... there you are.
    1. Re:Winlink 2000 by swb311 · · Score: 1

      Winlink is not only ghetto-ly slow, but also trashes our HF bands WAY too much to be considered an asset.

      Also its' proprietary software sucks big hairy balls.

    2. Re:Winlink 2000 by DoctorPepper · · Score: 1

      As a friend of mine is fond of saying, "if you want an argument, pick another subject".

      I'm just providing one potential solution to the submitter's question.

      --

      No matter where you go... there you are.
    3. Re:Winlink 2000 by cbhacking · · Score: 1

      My family have cruised for 9 years now, using Winlink the whole time. It's really awesome being able to get and send email out in the middle of a 3-week passage without any land or other vessels even in VHF (line-of-sight) range. It's undeniably slow (spring the cash for the Pactor-3 modem; it helps substantially), with speeds typically in the neighborhood of 1 kbps (can be a couple multiples better or worse depending on distance, propagation conditions, interference from other users, and the quality of your radio/antenna). You're limited to plain text emails, but attachments are supported (GRIB files are compact meteorological reports that can fit decent levels of detail and coverage in 30 KB and are great for purposes of planning a route; we usually pull one or two a day).

      It *IS* a HAM radio operation, with the limitations that imposes. There's no particular security or privacy, you're not allowed to discuss business matters, there's no guarantee of service, and you must have a General-class (or higher) HAM radio license (your email is callsign@winlink.org, for example on the boat we use KD7NDG {at} winlink {dot} org). On the other hand, the service is provided free of charge (although the equipment isn't cheap, it's better than a satellite phone except possibly over the very short term). They don't provide true Internet access - you don't get an IP address, you can't browse the web or run SSH over it, and it's dependent upon the base station operator having their computer online and connected to their radio (there are usually a few stations reachable at some time of day or another from anywhere though, so even if one goes offline for a bit there's a chance to connect).

      As an alternative to Winlink, there's also a commercial service called Sailmail that uses the same modems and protocols, but operates on the maritime HF bands (rather than the amateur bands). The cost is pretty low, and there's no restriction against commercial use that I know of, but the other limitations (especially lack of privacy) are mostly still there. There are also other restrictions imposed by the (corporate) operators of the base stations. That said, a lot of our cruising friends use it happily enough. http://sailmail.com/

      Both Winlink 2000 and Sailmail use a client called Airmail, which is a basic but functional email client (I'd have called it good back in 2001 when there were still mainstream clients without the ability to spell check as you typed, but it hasn't improved as much as might have been expected during that time). One nice feature of Airmail is that, while it is designed to call over the Pactor modem, it also offers a telnet connection mode for when you have an actual Internet connection; even a dial-up link will be much faster than the radio link, and isn't vulnerable to interference.

      --
      There's no place I could be, since I've found Serenity...
  37. iDirect by falconcy · · Score: 3, Informative

    Forget BGAN, they charge on actual throughput and can be pretty expensive to operate. What you actually need is a SeaTel or similar tracking antenna - this will constantly keep you connected to the satellite as you are mobile, an iDirect http://www.idirect.net/ 3000 series or X3 modem (depends on the provider you use) and a subscription with one of the many providers of such services. The initial setup costs could be a bit pricey, so just look at the hardware cost as an investment. Your best bet is a provider with the ability to actually offer service over multiple satellites covering most of the globe. It can get a bit complicated when switching satellites so choose a company which specializes in Maritime VSAT services, they will be able to advise you on how best to do this.

    1. Re:iDirect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I'd like to see a 3m antennae dome fitted to a sailboat!

    2. Re:iDirect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A few caveats:

      - Gyro-stabilized C-Band antennas for vsat services are 4 meters in diameter and weigh roughly one metric ton. Smaller antennas that operate on higher frequencies lack global coverage, are more prone to bad weather, and still 1-2 meter in size.

      - Be sure not to sail along spotbeam edges.

      - If the mast is between the antenna and the satellite, you'll lose connection because there's only one antenna inside the maritime vsat antennas. (compared to at least 4 in inmarsat's fleet and fleet broadband solutions) Your solution is to turn the ship.

      If you're happy to live with these constraints, and won't sail outside the spotbeams of your airtime provider, get a vsat-based solution. otherwise, your only option is inmarsat. stay away from globalstar, iridium and orbcomm by all means. you can use thuraya if you're going to be in the mediterranean sea.

  38. Lots of choices - None that good by abarrow · · Score: 5, Informative

    Much depends on where you are going to be, exactly what access you want, and how much you are willing to pay.

    Long distance cruisers generally go for SSB-based email (either Sailmail or Winlink) because it's cheap and relatively reliable. Of course, "reliable" in this context means that depending on the HF propagation conditions you can probably get an email message out sometime that day. And you are limited to short, text-only messages. Still, these days you can update blogs, Facebook, etc. via email...

    Other systems like Ocens are also available for email via Iridium.

    After that, if you are offshore and away from GSM coverage, you start talking about real bucks. Inmarsat is the most common. Iridium, Inmarsat, Globalstar, etc. all pretty much have two things in common - they are slow compared to land-based systems and they bill by the bit.. a lot. Streaming video and surfing Spring Break Girls Gone Wild is probably not in the cards. Hell, even checking a webmail email account is not really feasible unless you are Carlos Slim and own a telephone company.

    So, that's a long way of getting around to saying this: In the past 10 years, not a lot has changed. Inshore, close to cell coverage, you can do very well. Offshore, you are still pretty much stuck with the same old systems that were in place 10 years ago, only now they are more expensive. Oh, and in the case of Globalstar, they are also less reliable now.

    1. Re:Lots of choices - None that good by abarrow · · Score: 4, Informative

      Oh, one more thing I forgot to mention - WiFi coverage is getting to be scary ubiquitous. About two weeks ago I had a Skype conversation with a friend on his boat in Tuamotus http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tuamotus, which is basically a circular bump in the water that has a village with about 10 people and two chickens. Pretty much all over the South Pacific they find the same thing: there is usually a somewhat-usable WiFi connection available.

      There are some realities with offshore cruising that still would probably make your round-the-world telecommuting dream possible.

      1. You don't do much during passages except stand watch, sleep and eat. If you think you are going to be able to crank out that last bit of code during a passage, you are kidding yourself. It's either too bumpy or too busy. You don't want to do other things except keep the boat moving toward your destination.

      2. Crusing sailboats spend a very small percentage of their lives making passages. 10% is a lot. Most of the time is spent at anchor or in marinas enjoying the local color. Assuming you are in a place with WiFi, you are pretty much good to go.

      3. You can use text-only email to keep up with things during your passages. That may be enough until you get to where you have better Internet access.

      4. I don't know where you thinking of going, but pretty much your longest passage is going to be around 4 weeks offshore. That's West Coast to the Marquesas. Otherwise, you just won't be out of touch for that long.

    2. Re:Lots of choices - None that good by metrometro · · Score: 1

      As a half-ass sailor who telecommutes, it sounds like cruising up and down the US, Japan or EU coast for a while is a pretty good option. Being in sight of land also makes supply and safety a lot less like a full time job. If you want endless open ocean views, just don't look to starboard.

    3. Re:Lots of choices - None that good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hey: check out http://www.opencpn.org/ [opencpn.org]

      it's a mighty fine cross-platform GPL chart plotter that works with a whole bunch of chart formats (BSB/S-57/CM93/...).

    4. Re:Lots of choices - None that good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Regarding abarrow's message about not being out of touch for that long. When we sailed around the Pacific we spent a lot of time exploring very remote and uninhabited places (smaller islands of FSM or the outer Aleutian islands for example). Fortunately (or unfortunately, depending on your perspective) there are still a shite load of places without internet access, in some of these places a gps is still a foreign concept and dead reckoning with a WW2 era compass is state of the art technology used by the locals to make 100+nm sailing canoe trips from one speck of sand to the next.

  39. reminds me of the SO question... by csrjjsmp · · Score: 1

    Do you also have a cat named Ender?

  40. fiberclass, of course by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just hook up to one of the many fiberclass cables on the sea floor.

  41. Sailing with 3G by swb311 · · Score: 1

    I use 3G for interwebs while sailing... in a lake in Oklahoma.

  42. Re:Cruise Ship + Cantenna = ?? by BBird · · Score: 1

    But th ship is also in the ocean, so maybe you can use the same solution the cruise ship uses.

  43. Re:Get off my seagrass lawn! by SimonInOz · · Score: 5, Interesting

    In 1980 I went sailing. I had made heaps of money in - of all places - Belgium, where we wrote one of the first commercial packet switching networks in the world. It was cool. And no installed base, oh joy.

    Anyway I bought a 30' Iroquois catamaran and set off. I sailed about 2 years, down to the Med, over the Atlantic, around the West Indies. Sometimes single-handed, mostly with 2-4 folk aboard. There may have been some drinking.

    It was, without doubt, a high point of my life, despite the storms, loneliness, terrible food, sunburn. And did I mention the storms?
    No GPS then - we had to use a sextant. I wrote some nice sight reduction programs for it on my HP 41C calculator - you just can't kill off habits, can you?

    Communication - we didn't have no stinking communication! A VHF radio, range about 20miles, and otherwise we could listen to shortwave radio sometimes.
    We could only send the odd postcard from ports, and look - without much hope nor any success - in the poste restante in the main post offices. Phone calls were very expensive and we did this rarely.
    We didn't have comms - there was no internet (we were just inventing networks - inter-networks lay in the future) HF radios would have weighed more than the boat. Food, water more important.

    (And in case you cared ... I ended up selling the boat in the Virgin Islands - it's still sailing in Florida apparently; moving to Australia, where I still am, happily in the sun, still writing the odd bit of code. And I still have the sextant in the garage - it's a lovely thing. The HP41c has not survived. Nor has HP, not really).

    Pah - on-board communication, nah - listen to the waves. Enjoy the quiet. Watch the sky. See the moon rise, blood red, from the sea. Let your mind actually think, perchance dream.

    --
    "Cats like plain crisps"
  44. Revisiting in-field internet access... by TheHawke · · Score: 1

    is rather like whipping a dead horse. Yes, there are sources where you can get the service, but you are going to pay a small ransom and keep paying as you use it. That's the upshot of the deal.
    The downside to it is that you are going to be set back to the good ole days of 56K dialup. No viewing of multimedia stuff, no gaming, save for turn based board games perhaps, and no huge email attachments, both outgoing and incoming.

    Even with the new Iridium birds being fired into orbit, you will never, ever get faster than 256K, maybe 512K. And the ping times? Forget it. 1500ms will be as fast as you can get, even with the low-orbiting Iridium network.

    SATCOM is a no-nonsense, no frills system. You want the speed, you pay the piper.

    --
    First rule of holes; When in one, stop digging.
  45. Something is in the works by larsholm · · Score: 1

    These guys announced some intentions regarding this subject just last week.

    1. Re:Something is in the works by nyctopterus · · Score: 1

      Ha, they've named it NauticCom--say that out loud. Most appropriate, considering the "loneliness" of sailors, and the content of the internet.

  46. plug for OpenCPN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    OT, but any sailors reading this will love it: cross platform GPL'd navigation software that is as good as any other you'd pay too much for. Reads all the common chart formats. Vibrant user/developer community.

    http://www.opencpn.org/

    1. Re:plug for OpenCPN by Jubedgy · · Score: 1

      Looks like an alternative to SeaClear, thanks for the link!

      --
      Si hoc legere scis nimium eruditionis hebes
  47. Re:Cruise Ship + Cantenna = ?? by Cidtek · · Score: 3, Informative

    No sailboat can keep up with a cruse ship. At least not the type of sailboat we're talking about here.

  48. MOD UP by mzs · · Score: 1

    That was beautifully written.

  49. Re:Cruise Ship + Cantenna = ?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Best. Idea. Ever. Now he can be a real pirate!

  50. Crossed the Atlantic in 1969 on a 56 footer.. by the_rajah · · Score: 3, Interesting

    We had very reliable daily communication with home in the US.....via SSB ham radio. No Internet, obviously, or even computers or programmable calculators. In fact, no calculators at all. We did have a nice old Loran A that we used to get fixes at night. We always did a Noon meridian transit to verify our latitude and kept track of distance covered with the taffrail log. No problem finding Barbados dead-on after 28 days at sea. For the older hams who might remember, the rig was a Galaxy GT-550 and the antenna was a Hy-Gain triband vertical. We mostly used 15 meters.

    Our electronics, freezer and refrigerator was powered by a 32 volt battery bank that was recharged via a 15KW diesel generator or the diesel propulsion engine. For entertainment, we had a Zenith Transoceanic radio for BBC, VOA, etc and we had a reel-to-reel tape deck stereo system that we could use when the generator was running as was usually the case at meal time since the main stove was electric.

    --


    "Do the Right Thing. It will gratify some people and astound the rest." - Mark Twain
    1. Re:Crossed the Atlantic in 1969 on a 56 footer.. by GPSguy · · Score: 1

      A GT-550? Late model rig. I used a Galaxy V Mk II...

      --
      Never ascribe to malice that which can adequately be explained by tenure.
  51. RFC 1149 is your friend by ctrl-alt-canc · · Score: 1

    Simply adapt it so that you use bottles launched into the sea rather avians. Implementing it is nothing but an hardware problem, after all.

  52. Ask these guys by rinoid · · Score: 1
    1. Re:Ask these guys by Fahrvergnuugen · · Score: 1

      Mod parent up. Facetime only works over wifi - which means they are using some sort of wireless to 802.11(x) router setup. My guess is they are using a satellite broadband provider considering how choppy that facetime video is.

      --
      Kiteboarding Gear Mention slashdot and get 10% off!
  53. Glad I'm not paying you by GrahamCox · · Score: 1

    For someone with the ability to telecommute 100% of the time, then the idea of sailing around the world with a paycheck direct deposited

    I can't believe anyone could do both of those things competently and simultaneously. I'm glad I'm not paying you, or sharing the oceans with you...

    1. Re:Glad I'm not paying you by metrometro · · Score: 1

      You assume the person working is also the person driving the boat.

    2. Re:Glad I'm not paying you by Pfhorrest · · Score: 1

      Or that the working and driving are happening at the same time.

      Sail from one safe anchor to another during what would be a normal work day day; code or whatever during what would be normal leisure time at night; sleep until dawn, resume sailing. Or, switch up the order and durations as you please. Either way, you don't have to be mixing the difficult parts of sailing and the difficult parts of coding (or whatever) together at the same time; you can alternate.

      --
      -Forrest Cameranesi, Geek of all Trades
      "I am Sam. Sam I am. I do not like trolls, flames, or spam."
  54. Broadband Auto Aiming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.batswireless.com/
    Depending on your pocket book, this might or might not be a solution for you. I don't know that much about the technology beyond they are integrating with wireless broadband equipment to provide live/automatic antenna aiming and signal tracking. I do know they are specifically working on the issue of keeping "offshore" endpoints connected to onshore antenna.

  55. An expert: Travelling geek since the 80's by icebraining · · Score: 1
  56. Islands and Pirates! by Maarx · · Score: 1

    A better question is this: If you were in international waters is it even a violation of copyright? What jurisdication's rules would be followed? What court could the plaintiffs sue you in? And, after reading this, who is going to go set up a new floating island in international waters with massive bandwidth and call it a "download destination" for a piratical getaway? "Come stay a week with us and torrent every movie and song ever written." BYOS (Bring Your Own Storage).

    If memory serves me correctly, The Pirate Bay nearly did exactly that a few years back.

    They didn't, obviously, end up doing it. I was under the impression that the core reason was a circular dependency. Without putting laws respecting basic copyright on the books, established nations would not acknowledge their sovereignty. Without such an acknowledgement, somebody could just sail out there and murder everyone without consequence.

    Do we have a lawyer out there in the crowd who could weigh in on this?

    1. Re:Islands and Pirates! by icebraining · · Score: 3, Informative

      Without such an acknowledgement, somebody could just sail out there and murder everyone without consequence.

      I don't think so:

      The Convention on the High Seas is an international treaty created to codify the rules of international law relating to the high seas, otherwise known as international waters. The treaty was one of four agreed upon at the first United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS I). The treaty was signed 29 April 1958 and entered into force 30 September 1962.

      And the text includes:

      Article 15

      Piracy consists of any of the following acts:

        (1) Any illegal acts of violence, detention or any act of depredation,
      committed for private ends by the crew or the passengers of a private ship
      or a private aircraft, and directed:

        (a) On the high seas, against another ship or aircraft, or against
                persons or property on board such ship or aircraft;
        (b) Against a ship, aircraft, persons or property in a place outside the
                jurisdiction of any State;

        (2) Any act of voluntary participation in the operation of a ship or of an
      aircraft with knowledge of facts making it a pirate ship or aircraft;

        (3) Any act of inciting or of intentionally facilitating an act described
      in sub-paragraph 1 or sub-paragraph 2 of this article.

                                                                  Article 16

      The acts of piracy, as defined in article 15, committed by a warship,
      government ship or government aircraft whose crew has mutinied and taken
      control of the ship or aircraft are assimilated to acts committed by a
      private ship.

  57. Re:Cruise Ship + Cantenna = ?? by houghi · · Score: 1

    If you are on a sailboat, I suggest you sail a few meters in front of an oil tanker. That way they don't see who is stealing their network.

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  58. Re:Get off my seagrass lawn! by Shinobi · · Score: 1

    "Pah - on-board communication, nah - listen to the waves. Enjoy the quiet. Watch the sky. See the moon rise, blood red, from the sea. Let your mind actually think, perchance dream."

    This is something more people need to do. Sailing is not for me, however. For me, it's hiking or skiing. Just going out for a couple of weeks of wandering far away, without electronics and such intruding, and navigating just by map and compass when necessary. Keeps the brain healthy.(It's actually something that bothers me.... how people are weakening their minds by relying more and more on shit like GPS etc, becoming more and more helpless without such gadgets that healthy humans don't really need)

  59. Re:Cruise Ship + Cantenna = ?? by metrometro · · Score: 1

    Cruise ships are fast. They typically zip from port to port and then anchor while swapping people out every 3 nights. Sailboats are not fast.

  60. message in a bottle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just stick your hard drive in a bottle and hopefully someone will pick it up

  61. sounds like its time by dirtyshoes · · Score: 0

    Aquaman shall send your message via dolphin chatter.

  62. Re:Get off my seagrass lawn! by azmodean+1 · · Score: 1

    Nicely written and informative, but has no bearing whatsoever on the original question. The poster needs to be working while on the boat, which means "listening to the waves", while quite pleasant, will not help him meet his work responsibilities that are paying for this maritime expenses.

    As has been mentioned previously in the thread, most people don't have the funds to stop working and sail full time. On the other hand, quite a lot of people have the funds necessary to sail full time if they can keep their jobs. (even more if they fully commit and sell their homes, cars, etc.. and move all of their possessions onto the boat) Therefore the constant and reliable communication with the home company is absolutely essential to the idea.

  63. Re:Cruise Ship + Cantenna = ?? by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

    See those big golf balls on the tops of cruise ships? That's what they use. Probably larger than the presumptive boat in our story. And hella expensive.

    But that does lead into a possible answer to our insane quest - Just buy an apartment on The World and let somebody else deal with the problem.

    --
    Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  64. Re:Cruise Ship + Cantenna = ?? by djlemma · · Score: 1

    Just for your information, if you want to use the wireless internet on a cruise ship the "proper" way you have to be on the ship's manifest and register a unique login.. At least for the entire Royal Carribean/Celebrity/Azamara fleet, you'd have to register again every cruise. That is, unless you use the crew wi-fi, which only has coverage in the lower parts of the ship..

    In any case, I doubt you'd have much luck with mooching the wireless signal from a cruise ship, unless you hacked it. Also, barring hacking, the price is still in the 40-70 cents/minute range and it's pretty slow.

  65. Back in the day by sean.peters · · Score: 1

    When I was first in the Navy we were kind of in this boat (so to speak). GPS hadn't been invented yet, so you were left with Loran (which didn't have worldwide coverage), Omega (which practically never actually worked), or Transit (an earlier SATNAV system). Transit gave you a fix every few hours if it felt like it, but you could go for pretty long periods of time without one. I vividly remember getting ourselves from Pearl Harbor to American Samoa on nothing but the sextant. Very cool.

    The internet was around, but no one had ever heard of it, and we certainly didn't have it. INMARSAT voice/fax comms started showing up on ships soon thereafter, but it was really expensive and we almost never used it.

  66. Concur by sean.peters · · Score: 1

    Taking sun/star lines and reducing them is complicated and difficult to do correctly. You don't want to try to figure it out for the first time when you're at sea with a dead GPS. It takes practice.

  67. Weather fax... by sean.peters · · Score: 1

    One of the primary ways weather charts get sent to ships at sea is via satellite fax. Crazy, I know, but that's why.

  68. A couple of systems by sean.peters · · Score: 1

    The NIPRNET (sort of an oversimplification, but the same thing as the internet) is multiplexed with all sorts of other voice, data, teletype, POTS, etc, and sent over dedicated satellite links in the EHF/SHF/UHF bands. Bigger ships get it 24/7. Smaller ships only get it at certain times when they can get an antenna brought to bear on it. There's also some recreational access to the Internet via Inmarsat, but that's really limited.

  69. Current Reality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am currently living in Mexico aboard my sailboat and have been doing this for a few years. Very few sailors are on the "high seas" for very long periods at a time and you probably wouldn't be working from there, but the Maldives, hell yes. Usually, a passage from one port to another is 1-3 days, otherwise you are in a marina or anchored in a harbor or protected cove. Some of these are populated and have either wifi or GSM service, some are not. Currently, we end up using a mix of technologies based upon where we are. We are typically using wifi via our wifi antenna on the mast or our Telcel GSM card. We also have an SSB/HAM radio with a Pactor modem and can send text email and get weather data while at sea. When we head for the South Pacific in a few years, we will get a Sat phone, but that is more for emergencies than for data access unless the rates come way down and the speeds come way up. The Fleet Broadband systems and such are still too large and expensive for most boaters. I used one while bringing a large motor yacht down from CA to Mexico, we had a 1MB connection or you could pay ungodly amounts and get 2MB but again, the equipment is still too big for most boats. It also had some uptime issues and seemed to lose the satellites every time we made a drastic speed change. Bottom line is, many more people have Sat phones than did 10 years ago, but they still can't use them for surfing and it looks to be some time out before the equipment and pricing model makes sense for the average sized boat and cruiser's wallet.

  70. From the good ship Fugu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The way most long-distance cruisers do it is to use low-bandwidth, text-only email over the SSB when in truly remote locations.
    Once you arrive in a port or island of some kind, you can usually find a wifi signal to do any data uploads.
    There is also a commercial activity and encryption ban on the amateur radio bands. So even if you do want to submit your manuscript to your publisher in clear text from somwhere between San Francisco and Honolulu, it is a no-no. You are likely to hear about it from some basement dweller in Oregon that interceted the transmission and took offence to someone flaunting the rules. Here is a nice little thread of some incensed Hams as an example: http://www.eham.net/articles/6667

    Best to work on it on the boat and send occasional updates while en route and then once anchored and connected to the marina's wifi, upload your work. If that data flow model doesn't meet with your customers' expectations, then you will have to plan your passages accordingly.

    If you want pay-per-byte-but-otherwise-unrestricted global coverage, then the commercial satellite options mentioned in previous replies are the way to go. Not too sure how much work-for-hire one can get done in transit in a smallish boat, though (on the high seas, even 50' can seem awfully small). And anchoring in the lagoon of some deserted atoll in the south pacific has its own set of distractions that can further detract from working... Still the worst day sailing is better than the best day working.

    Fair winds. /J

  71. Re:Pigeon (Documentation that this is true) by SunSpot505 · · Score: 1

    This is in use, although ironically. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/8248056.stm

  72. Telecommute = work, not sail by frist · · Score: 1

    Sailing requires work and attention if you don't want to die. Unfortunately for many, telecommuting == doing anything but work, which makes it so hard for us to get our employers to take telecommuting seriously. So no, sailing around the world while telecommuting probably would not work since you are either going to work or sail but not both. Unless your job was to sail around the world...

    1. Re:Telecommute = work, not sail by Jubedgy · · Score: 1

      IAAOS (I am an offshore sailor)...

      When offshore, there are long (loooong) stretches where you can just sit down and focus on something else. Assuming this boat would have other amenities such as weatherfax, AIS, radar, GPS and auto-helm (which most blue-water cruising boats do have these days, btw), there could be days and days at a time where someone sailing single-handed would be able to do work for as long as desired with the occasional glance around the horizon for bad weather or ships.

      And if you sail with a crew (ie, wife), they can take care of everything while you work.

      Not that I disagree that safe sailing requires constant monitoring, but that becomes second nature pretty quick. After sufficient time on and around boats, you get a feel for when things change even if you aren't paying constant attention. When the wind changes or shifts, the boat feels and acts differently. If a storm closes in on you, the wave state may begin picking up and the barometric pressure will drop (something that can actually be felt). Any competent sailor keeps those little things like that in the back of his mind even if his attention is focused elsewhere.

      --
      Si hoc legere scis nimium eruditionis hebes
  73. Thrane & Thrane SAILOR by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just sailed back from Bermuda on a 40' boat with the Thrane & Thrane SAILOR system. The antenna was about the size of a basketball and mounted on the back rail. It...was...awesome

  74. Celestial Navigation. by catchblue22 · · Score: 1

    ...Make it a habit to take a daily noon sighting and record your distance logger.

    Noon sights are easy to understand, but they do not give a very precise fix. Recording the highest angle of the sun (local noon) gives you your latitude. The time at which it occurs gives you longitude, since local noon occurs at a different time at every different longitude. For a more reliable position line, you should probably shoot the sun when the angle is around 50 degrees or so above the horizon. This involves using some fancy calculations using spherical geometry (or looking the results of those calculations up in a sight reduction table. The basic idea isn't that difficult. Imagine you measure the angle of the sun to be 50 degrees and 30 minutes above the horizon at a particular time (GMT). At that time, the sun is directly overhead of a specific location on the Earth. Now draw a line upwards from that point. Trace a cone centered at that point whose edges are 50 degrees 30 minutes above the horizon. This traces a circle on the globe, centered at the location of the sun. You are somewhere on that circle.

    The above circle might seem so large as to be useless, but here is the trick. Guess your location. It should be a fairly accurate guess, your best guess (assume no GPS). Now you have a guessed longitude and latitude. It is possible to plug that guessed longitude and latitude, along with the time of the sighting into some spherical geometry formulae. These formulae will give you both the direction of the sun's location from your guessed location, AND the angle that the sun would make to the horizon IF you were at your guessed location. Say the direction of the sun is 225 degrees (SW). Draw a line from your guessed position towards the sun, in the direction 225 degrees (SW). If you drew a line perpendicular to that line towards the sun and through your guessed position, that would be the portion of the circle talked about in the previous paragraph, IF you were at your guessed position. Say the calculations told you that at your guessed position, the angle of the sun to the horizon is not 50 degrees 30 minutes, but instead 50 degrees 32 minutes. You measured the altitude to be 50 degrees 30 min, but at your guessed position it would be 50 degrees 32 minutes. This means that the circle you are actually located on is FARTHER AWAY FROM THE CENTER OF THE CIRCLE than the one for your guessed position since your solar angle is 2 minutes SMALLER (remember, picture the cones that make the circle around the sun's position...as you go farther away from the center, the angle of the sun decreases...if you were at the location of the sun on the Earth, the angle would be 90 degrees). And since 2 minutes of latitude equals 2 nautical miles, all you need to do on your map is to draw another line perpendicular to the line you drew towards the sun, but 2 nautical miles farther from the sun. You are somewhere on that line (remember, that perpendicular line represents a small part of the circle traced out by the cone around the sun's location).

    If you want a proper fix, you can read the sun and moon together if they are both visible. Or you can shoot the sun in the morning and the afternoon. Either way, you will get two position lines which will cross near to your actual location. Or you can shoot stars, if you can see the horizon. The tricky part for most people is the calculation of the sun's angle to the horizon at the guessed position, and the calculation of the direction of the sun from your guessed location. There are tables, called sight reduction tables that give you these angles, or you can program the formulae into a calculator, or you can use a navigational calculator. It is possible to use a sextant to find your position within 1 nautical mile, but in real conditions, most people would have trouble getting within 3 to 4 nm. That however is enough in the open ocean for proper navigation.

    I personally enjoy using a sextant. There is something deeply satisfying in using a simple device like a sextant to locate oneself. And these methods will work even if your boat is struck by lightning, and all of your onboard electronics are fried.

    --
    This and no other is the root from which a tyrant springs; when first he appears as a protector - Plato (423 to 327 BC)
    1. Re:Celestial Navigation. by FlyHelicopters · · Score: 1

      I respect all of that... However, I wouldn't be caught sailing around the world in a boat too small to be struck by lighting and not absorb it. I also wouldn't do it without enough backups to not need to worry about a sextent. You DO know the US Navy no longer trains all their navigators to use them, right?

  75. Go satellite by dilvish_the_damned · · Score: 1

    Depending on where you plan to sail, you will need a couple of dish sets ( different LNBs maybe? ), and a couple of terminals so you can switch them up when you go from the americas to asia. You need self aiming dishes, probably with gyros, and accounts with providers like Hughs and Thaicom. The bad news is no one is going to put spot beams in the middle of nowhere, so you will most certainly be in fringe coverage when you get coverage at all.
    Maybe this is s stupid plan.

    --
    I think you underestimate just how much I just dont care.
  76. Re:Cruise Ship + Cantenna = ?? by damn_registrars · · Score: 1

    That was actually a joke. Of course a cruise ship is much faster than any sailboat that someone on slashdot could likely afford. But the likelihood of a slashdot reader affording a very fast ship is about the same likelihood as a slashdot reader being able to afford reasonably fast internet access that works from the middle of the ocean.

    It appears some readers (and readers with mod points) have a case of the Mondays today...

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
  77. Re:Cruise Ship + Cantenna = ?? by Cidtek · · Score: 1

    That comment wasn't aimed just at you even if you weren't joking

    I assume that a lot of non sailors have no knowledge of a sailboat's max speed being limited to a formula using hull length at it's waterline.

    Probably many readers have no idea how fast some large ships can move as well.

    Anyway most sail boat owners are too broke to afford any decent Internet access at sea :)

    Owning a boat is like tearing up $100 bills in a cold shower.

  78. Re:Get off my seagrass lawn! by SimonInOz · · Score: 1

    >> no bearing whatsoever on the original question.

    You haven't been on /. long, have you ...?

    Actually, a little history and perspective is a wonderful thing. It's sobering to recognise that the world wide web, invented a mere couple of decades back (Tim Berners-Lee, 1990), is the source of most of our incomes (slashdotters, at any rate) and much of our entertainment.

    --
    "Cats like plain crisps"
  79. Roming near the docks. by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

    If the middle of the ocean doesnt count as roaming what does?

    What bugs me is when a cruise ship leaves its cell turned on while in port, the phones of people nearby select it as the strongest cell for their service, and they're hit with an oceanic roaming charge while walking about in their own neighborhood. B-b

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  80. Re:Get off my seagrass lawn! by yukk · · Score: 1

    That's a lovely story, but it doesn't solve the OP's requirements to telecommute while out at sea.

    --
    The trouble with the rat race is that even if you win, you're still a rat." Lily Tomlin
  81. KVH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Disclaimer: I work for the company, but KVH (homepage and marine products) is pretty well-regarded in the industry.

  82. RigNet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Simple, a company called RigNet. They are able to keep you connected just about anywhere on the planet. A fast connection is pretty expensive, but it is reliable.

  83. IP over message in a bottle by Viperpete · · Score: 1

    IP over message in a bottle

    You'll have to work out all the packet losses.

    --
    loose: not fitting closely or tightly != lose: to suffer the deprivation of
  84. And by mahadiga · · Score: 1

    iPhone

    --
    I'd like to buy homeland for our 10 million people. http://twitter.com/mahadiga
  85. Re:Cruise Ship + Cantenna = ?? by pamar · · Score: 1

    Yeah, right.

    Cruise ships use a satellite link. Which is used both for Internet connection and cellular phones (assuming you are so rich or desperate that you don't mind the bill, which is really not cheap).

    For the parent who suggests trying to "steal" a bit of bandwith from cruise ships using wifi... do you have an idea of how close you should be to the ship? (hint, hulls are made of steel... and wifi repeaters are set up in the main halls, casinos and other common areas, not outside the hull) so even if you were close enough to touch the hull with your hand I doubt you'll get much (in fact, wifi coverage is a problem even inside the ship itself).

    And if you think that you can actually just "trail" a cruise ship with a sailboat you are either joking or have no idea of what you are talking about.

  86. Re:Cruise Ship + Cantenna = ?? by owlstead · · Score: 1

    "It appears some readers (and readers with mod points) have a case of the Mondays today..."

    Ok, what ever was said before, this comment should get you modded straight into hell.

    It was funny in the film because it is not funny at all.

  87. Re:Cruise Ship + Cantenna = ?? by damn_registrars · · Score: 1

    Ok, what ever was said before, this comment should get you modded straight into hell.

    Too late. The original comment was moderated to -1 before I posted that as a response to egg on the humorless and the mod-bombers. They can't mod it any lower (although they can use this a fodder if they so choose).

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
  88. Heave to! by pestie · · Score: 1

    In a sailboat, one can always heave to.

    1. Re:Heave to! by Cidtek · · Score: 1

      There still are currents that will leave you treading water waving goodbye to your boat.

      Plus you have to lock your wheel or tiller which means a wind shift will screw you up big time.

    2. Re:Heave to! by pestie · · Score: 1

      I can understand the wheel/wind issue, but the current shouldn't have that much effect, since it'd be moving you along with the boat.

    3. Re:Heave to! by Cidtek · · Score: 1

      Your not drifting in the same direction (except maybe when in irons which is different).

      When a sailboat is set in a heave to position, she slows down considerably and keeps moving forward at about 1 to 2 kts, but with a significant amount of drift.

  89. We\ve gotten it through sat-phone easily by aqk · · Score: 0

    I will not bother to read this complete thread - I've already wasted enuf time perusing the first 100 or so "witty" answers from, presumably, landlubbers.
    So you may have gotten replies already similar to mine.
    But we've sailed a 45' yacht several times from Lake Champlain ==> NYC ==> Caribbean and back, (No, not the inland waterway) as well as side trips to Bermuda with our Dell and Toshiba laptop with no damage whatsoever to them from salt. Obviously you do not take the laptop up on deck if the sea is rough.
    My friend has a satellite phone- most of these come with serial port /USB attachment and the software for a PC. The sat-phone is of course a bit more expensive than the usual cell-phone.
    The one we have used is good only for dialup speeds, but we have managed to exchange email on the open seas day and night.
    As well we have hene managesto download UGRIB weather report for displaying on the laptops.

    If you wish hi-speed however, no sure if it's available. Better to bring a big stack of torrented movie AVIs on DVD like we do!

  90. Globe Wireless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The ship I work on uses Globe Wireless;

      "Globe Wireless offers a simple yet powerful communications solution to include our true multi-pipe communications, which combines the best of Inmarsat, Iridium, VSAT, and digital HF radio technologies."

    We run containers from the US gulf and east coast to northern Europe. I know some of the car carriers are using Globe Wireless on the Japan runs.

  91. Seamail by siriuskase · · Score: 1

    If you have an HF marine radio, you can use it to make an internet connection for email. http://www.seamail.org/

    --
    If you must moderate, please moderate as irrelevent, not something bad, because I'm sure someone will find this interest