Slashdot Mirror


China Pushes Real Name System For Online Games

oxide7 writes "Starting from August 1, Chinese Internet users will have to register using their real names for playing online games, China Daily reported on Saturday. The regulation, issued by the Ministry of Culture on June 22, is said to be part of a nationwide campaign to improve management of the virtual gaming industry and protect minors from unwholesome content. It applies to all multiplayer role-playing and social networking games."

115 comments

  1. So that's why Blizzard wanted RealID... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Oh, and South Korea already does this. But "we" only care about this because this is CHINA and CHINA IS BAD!! Mmmm'kay?

    1. Re:So that's why Blizzard wanted RealID... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who cares? Chinese and Koreans only "play" on-line for Gold Farming.

    2. Re:So that's why Blizzard wanted RealID... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Erm, are we talking about the same South Korea here? The one I'm thinking of is the only country in the world where video game tournaments attract mainstream media attention -- and I'm pretty sure they're farming minerals and vespene gas, not gold.

    3. Re:So that's why Blizzard wanted RealID... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, Because China is moving from a Communist form of government to a Fascists state courtesy of western corporations.

    4. Re:So that's why Blizzard wanted RealID... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I knew it was our fault somehow!

    5. Re:So that's why Blizzard wanted RealID... by John+Saffran · · Score: 3, Insightful

      There's a larger picture at play here rather than some sort of supposed victimisation of china.

      In South Korea the real-name rule was instituted to stop people using their anonymity to harm others through defamataion. The worst case scenario is that the aggrieved party, ie. the defamees, can bring legal suits against malicious rumour mongering. In other words it serves to empower victims, and no more than that.

      To contrast, what's the worst thing that can happen to someone in China? Unfortunately china is still a country where posting the 'wrong' opinion, particularly for political matters, can have some very real-life consequences. Even posting from a pseudo-anonymous location, eg. an internet cafe, can have the police showing up within minutes of making such a post. This specific article might only speak of real-id for online gaming, ostentibly to ensure defamation doesn't happen, but the issue is that it can far too easily be the thin end of the wedge of yet another measure to stifle political dissent through the threat of physical harm. To illustrate the possible consequences, the Ghostnet report into cyberespionage highlighted the case of a tibetan in china who was convicted through evidence 'gathered' via the botnet. Clearly the noose would tighten around freedom of speech when (not if) the measure was extended beyond game forums into the internet as a whole.

      Whilst individuals like yourself might not care about such measures because perhaps it doesn't affect you directly, but there's a clear danger to people who happen to live in china and have a strong social conscience .. this is why articles about censorship in china garner attention, not because people like to 'pick on' china.

    6. Re:So that's why Blizzard wanted RealID... by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      Same shit, new name?

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
  2. Next step? by countertrolling · · Score: 1

    USB Key fob with all your bio data will be required. Of course, we're all for it, right? Only terrorists and pedophiles want privacy...

    --
    For justice, we must go to Don Corleone
    1. Re:Next step? by nog_lorp · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yes, because political activists are going to be kept down and freedom of speech will be DOOOMED if I can't grief in L4D and get away with it!

    2. Re:Next step? by countertrolling · · Score: 1

      It is simply the logical thing to do. Efficiency is the goal. And it will meet as much resistance as your random airport searches. So docile people have become that anyone who opposes the authorities is now looked down upon as a malcontent and a loon, or worse, an enemy collaborator. The mission has indeed been accomplished. Hearts and minds have been won over. The spirit has been dispatched. And complacency, the desire for convenience has become the routine.

      --
      For justice, we must go to Don Corleone
    3. Re:Next step? by AlamedaStone · · Score: 0, Troll

      It is simply the logical thing to do. Efficiency is the goal. And it will meet as much resistance as your random airport searches. So docile people have become that anyone who opposes the authorities is now looked down upon as a malcontent and a loon, or worse, an enemy collaborator. The mission has indeed been accomplished. Hearts and minds have been won over. The spirit has been dispatched. And complacency, the desire for convenience has become the routine.

      tl; dr

      --
      "All these years believing you're the signified monkey, only to find out you're just a big hunk of nobody cares."
  3. Protect people from unwholesome content? by mangu · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Such as democracy and human rights?

    1. Re:Protect people from unwholesome content? by Jackie_Chan_Fan · · Score: 0, Troll

      oh shut up. Freedom is for the wealthy elite, and slavery is for the rest.

    2. Re:Protect people from unwholesome content? by causality · · Score: 3, Insightful

      oh shut up. Freedom is for the wealthy elite, and slavery is for the rest.

      What the wealthy elite have is not freedom, but license. What they own also owns them, and with that comes the fear of loss and the obsessive desire to possess and control more and more. They are as far from free as one can get. If you see them as they truly are then you cannot possibly envy them.

      Real freedom is not political freedom. It's an inner freedom that does not depend on circumstances and events, only on how one faces them. It is not something that others could grant or take away.

      Did you imagine that the elite would spread such misery and fear, manifest such pathological selfishness, and care so much about power over others if they were truly free?

      --
      It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
    3. Re:Protect people from unwholesome content? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe what most people mean when they say only the wealthy are free, perhaps especially in an authoritarian society, is that the wealthy are privileged. They are "free" to do as they like with little or no consequences for their actions.

    4. Re:Protect people from unwholesome content? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You sound like your poor.

    5. Re:Protect people from unwholesome content? by nog_lorp · · Score: 1

      The right to privacy in video games?

    6. Re:Protect people from unwholesome content? by Ethanol-fueled · · Score: 1

      A good example being a certain BP exec who chose to race his Yacht while the environmental and economic lifelihood of our gulf coast went to shit overnight, on his watch.

      Though I agree with grandparent from a philosophical standpoint, I would reluctantly mod him -1 idealist if the option existed.

    7. Re:Protect people from unwholesome content? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      money may not be able to buy happiness but I would rather cry in a ferrari while doing lines off the ass of an expensive call girl

    8. Re:Protect people from unwholesome content? by clarkkent09 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      When you take a trip down from your fantasy fairy land into reality you'll realize that a person with financial security and general liberty to pursue their interests (which may come from money or from political influence or usually both) actually IS more free and more happy than a hungry beggar digging through trash or a political prisoner who is tortured daily. Inner freedom my ass.

      --
      Negative moral value of force outweighs the positive value of good intentions.
    9. Re:Protect people from unwholesome content? by afabbro · · Score: 1

      oh shut up. Freedom is for the wealthy elite, and slavery is for the rest.

      If only! As as American and hence part of the wealthy elite, that would so rock.

      --
      Advice: on VPS providers
    10. Re:Protect people from unwholesome content? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      or a Taxachussetts senator who parked his out of his own state to avoid paying the taxes he says from the other side of his mouth we should pay, or the president who didn't do anything about it, but has already taken 4 vacations....

    11. Re:Protect people from unwholesome content? by causality · · Score: 4, Insightful

      When you take a trip down from your fantasy fairy land into reality you'll realize that a person with financial security and general liberty to pursue their interests (which may come from money or from political influence or usually both) actually IS more free and more happy than a hungry beggar digging through trash or a political prisoner who is tortured daily.

      And in America any degree of that we have enjoyed came about because of men who had so much inner freedom that they had the guts to put their lives on the line and start a revolutionary war in order to build a society around any kind of mundane freedom you have enumerated. They were willing to be considered something like terrorists or treasonous, to fight in war, and also to defy the apathy of 1/3 of their population and the opposition of another 1/3 of their population at that time.

      You understand that dead men don't have any of the political or monetary freedoms you mention? So why would some folks who were already rather well-to-do value something more than their own lives? That's simple. They had inner freedom and it determined how they faced the events and circumstances of the world around them. You cannot subjugate a truly free people. You can only subjugate cowards who fear the threat of force more than they fear a meaningless existence because such people have no inner freedom. That's why they are so compatible with a meaningless existence (like climbing the corporate ladder as a major focus of life) even though many of them sense that there is something wrong with it.

      Admittedly the Founding Fathers are a cliche, mundane, yet concrete illustration of people who understood what I am talking about. Henry David Thoreau and Mahatma Ghandi are more examples, for both were imprisoned yet neither was afraid of prison or deterred by it from doing what they knew to be right. Someone concerned about political freedom exclusively would most certainly want to avoid state-imposed incarceration.

      I am having to resort to this sort of explanation only because you failed to see one thing: I am not arguing against political freedom. I said only that it wasn't what I was referring to. You didn't bother, but had you asked me about political freedom I would say that its only stable form would have to come from a society that values real inner freedom. In other words, political freedom should follow and have its roots in real freedom. If it doesn't, then you get its roller-coaster form where governments start out smaller and freer and eventually become huge and authoritarian until collapsing and being replaced by something else, ad infinitum. That's why a high degree of political freedom has been so fleeting throughout history. At any rate, they are not opposed. They are related.

      Inner freedom my ass.

      I knew when I wrote the previous post that some people would scoff at it. Without a doubt, it can be a hard notion to seriously consider. On that I think we can find some agreement. Where we differ is on the question of whether my writing was truly faulty, or whether the inability to really understand it is a fault in the reader.

      --
      It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
    12. Re:Protect people from unwholesome content? by Martin+Blank · · Score: 1

      Presidents don't get vacations as we think of them. Every day of their "vacation" includes meetings, updates, decisions, calls, and diplomatic messages. The only thing "vacation" means for the president is that he has a little more time to himself that day, insofar as a president can have something like that at all.

      --
      You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
    13. Re:Protect people from unwholesome content? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      you'll realize that a person with financial security and general liberty to pursue their interests (which may come from money or from political influence or usually both) actually IS more free

      And in America any degree of that we have enjoyed came about because of men who had so much inner freedom that they had the guts to put their lives on the line and start a revolutionary war

      Any WHY were the founding fathers able to accomplish this task? Because they were rather well to do and had a good amount of political influence. Inner freedom is one thing but if you want to have an effect on the world outside your head usually more than that is required.

    14. Re:Protect people from unwholesome content? by vuffi_raa · · Score: 1

      What the wealthy elite have is not freedom, but license.

      no, they have major components to freedom that the rest of us don't

      they have time, resources, education and status.
      All of those things give opportunity that those of us that have had to scrap and grew up in the gutter will never be able to compete with. It means that we don't get the same opportunities to succeed or reach our potentials or live in the end as fulfilling of a life. What you are saying in your statement is the kind of thing the fat ugly kid hears from his mom- "they are just making fun of you because they are jealous"- when in actuality they are making fun of you because they are dicks and couldn't care less about you so long as they are having a good time.

    15. Re:Protect people from unwholesome content? by rainmouse · · Score: 1

      There is always people very quick to jump on the anti Chinese government bandwagon and perhaps with good reason, but that doesn't mean human rights or big-brother are reason behind every move. I've worked for an online games company and witnessed first hand some of the truly chilling things paedophiles say and try to get kids to do, some of it really chills your blood as you read it and such grooming attacks were uncommon but still far too frequent as getting prosecutions is very unlikely
      There are no doubt many reasons for this move and I suspect Gold Farming is very likely one of them.
      Some estimates put the number of gold farmers working from China at almost a million and as it is illegal under Chinese law I suspect a big incentive would be to catch and fine these people (ie tax).

    16. Re:Protect people from unwholesome content? by icebraining · · Score: 2, Informative

      About the pedos in online games, Toontown (a MMO for kids) has a nice system: you can't write anything you want, you can just use a very large set of predefined phrases. Unless you know someone IRL, then you can get a code and tell them over phone or IM, and after introducing the code, chat is free between the two.
      In theory, it fixes the problem, although it's probably less fun not to be able to talk freely.

    17. Re:Protect people from unwholesome content? by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      Don't waste your time. Rather than preaching to the choir, you're preaching to the fossilized-brained who will never get your point.

      I'm not saying you should stop talking. Only that you should stop trying to convert most of this crowd, most of whom wouldn't recognize a real principle even AFTER someone shot at them over it.

    18. Re:Protect people from unwholesome content? by uninformedLuddite · · Score: 1

      If you are looking for the truly free take a look at some of the homeless

      --
      The new right fascists are bilingual. They speak English and Bullshit.
    19. Re:Protect people from unwholesome content? by FoxconnGuy · · Score: 0

      Inner freedom my ass.

      Good point!
      Most of us are not Sister Teresa or her followers. I will never have the inner freedom as she had because I am so (and glad to be) ordinary.

    20. Re:Protect people from unwholesome content? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not sure a kid dying of hunger in the street would agree with you.

    21. Re:Protect people from unwholesome content? by ibsteve2u · · Score: 1

      I would disagree, but only to the extent that I have met many wealthy people who are quite content with their wealth and who also agree that all others should have an equal opportunity to become wealthy - and who also agree that making some artificially advantaged is the equivalent of suppressing others.

      The unfortunate fact, akin to the saying that "One bad apple spoils the bunch.", is that at this moment in American history, a tiny minority of truly greedy and truly malicious individuals controls America's "right"...their behavior is so outrageous...so focused on limiting the opportunity available to the American people with artificial wealth-centric barriers (i.e., forcing American labor into competition with nations whose cost of living is far lower as a lever to repress and reduce wages, which in turn ensures that the masses in America will not be able to afford the education required for "the good life" or the health care required for a healthy - and so long - life, etc.) that all of the rest of America's wealthy receive the same label.

      In some ways, the fact that those wealthy who do not see suppressing others as a way to elevate themselves are so "mellow" is a curse upon this nation's future, for if they were to lose their contentment for a moment and truly look into what some of the worst of their economic equals and superiors are trying to do to this country, they would likely feel motivated to crush them.

      And they could...but that presupposition that wealth alone is an indicator of character afflicts them.

      --
      Orwell: "In a Time of Universal Deceit, telling the Truth is a Revolutionary Act"
    22. Re:Protect people from unwholesome content? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As Janis Joplin once wrote

      "Freedom's just another word for nothing left to loose"

    23. Re:Protect people from unwholesome content? by Yvanhoe · · Score: 1

      I'd like to download some human rights in my country, could you provide me with a url ? kthxbye

      --
      The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
    24. Re:Protect people from unwholesome content? by Nursie · · Score: 1

      Maybe they should, maybe that's why they make so many bad decisions.

    25. Re:Protect people from unwholesome content? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you imagine that the elite would spread such misery and fear, manifest such pathological selfishness, and care so much about power over others if they were truly free?

      Bloody communists

    26. Re:Protect people from unwholesome content? by justinlee37 · · Score: 0

      Are you not equally chained to these principles as a greedy man is chained to his money? If you can't stand down from a fight you know you'll lose to stay alive or stay out of prison, then maybe you're not free. The OP had a point; you're more likely to be happy if you've got money than if you've got none and you dig through trash to eat, or if you've been thrown into some King's cell to rot. The person he was responding to had a very narrow view of what's possible with money and what "rich" people are like. They're not all the same.

      Some people pursue money to no end, of course, killing themselves in the process. Money doesn't guarantee happiness, but it can certainly make it easier to obtain, provided you don't sacrifice too much of your time and happiness to get it.

      You idolize Thoreau, but if he'd simply paid his taxes he would have stayed out of jail. I'm sure that you're still paying your taxes, despite the war, bailouts, drug prohibition, and excessive welfare spending. I engage in civil disobedience, but I don't go out of my way to get caught doing it.

      In any case, people do different things with freedom. Just because we don't choose to do the same thing doesn't mean others aren't free.

    27. Re:Protect people from unwholesome content? by Martin+Blank · · Score: 1

      It's the nature of the job, especially as POTUS. The US simply has too much going on, too much to worry about, to be able to do something like that, and it's that way even in peacetime. It's a temp job with long hours, little to no time off, and with such stress that everyone who has taken it in the last 30 years has visibly aged in the first year or so, regardless of their age taking office. The best you can do is hide away in a familiar place as Bush 42 did, or regulate the office hours tightly as Reagan did. I don't know how Clinton did or Obama does handle it, but whatever their choice, it's probably not going to be enough to prevent them from losing a few years at the ends of their lives.

      --
      You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
    28. Re:Protect people from unwholesome content? by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 1

      I didn't miss those points. But IMHO, GP was referring more to what it means to be free, rather than what it means to be rich.

      And I don't idolize Thoreau, though I do at least give him points for putting his money and himself where his mouth was: "Why aren't YOU in here with me?"

      But I disagree on what I believe to be one essential point. I think if you're not willing to stand up and take at least some kind of action, then you are as much a sheep as anyone else, no matter how you justify it to yourself.

      And to anticipate a question: yes, I have done that and still do. Whether other people appreciate the kind of actions I take, I do not know and don't much care. But at least I do. And no, I don't care to go into any more detail than that.

    29. Re:Protect people from unwholesome content? by causality · · Score: 1

      Don't waste your time. Rather than preaching to the choir, you're preaching to the fossilized-brained who will never get your point. I'm not saying you should stop talking. Only that you should stop trying to convert most of this crowd, most of whom wouldn't recognize a real principle even AFTER someone shot at them over it.

      If I needed to convert anyone, requires his agreement or disagreement, or needed any other result, that would be an unhealthy attachment to outcome. Then whether I enjoy having written my posts depends on what the other guy says and does. This amounts to a ceding of control over my inner life to random strangers. It would be living for externals and not out of an inner understanding. Indeed, after talking of real inner freedom, such an unhealthy attachment would make me a hypocrite.

      Unfortunately such attachment to externals is the average person's "normal" method of living. Most could not imagine anything else. I see what is wrong with this and was in no danger of participating in it.

      I am content to offer the chance to see a higher perspective. It is not higher because I say so, but because I have discovered that this is the case and am merely choosing not to deny that. Anyone else can do likewise. If I needed to make sure that the other guy saw things a certain way, and got upset or suffered in any other way when he didn't, then it would be very strong evidence that it is not a higher perspective.

      So I'm not out to win converts. I wouldn't want the mindless follower mentality that they tend to have. Instead I offer a glimpse into something different. What anyone else does with that is their gain or their loss, and which it is depends on the individual. Even if I had direct control over that, it would be wrong to use it. The higher perspective is not available to robots, in other words, and nor should it be.

      If I had been dealing with this individual one-on-one I'd probably not bother with any follow-up after the initial rejection. He's clearly not interested in seeing things this way and I accept that. For all I know, overcoming that type of doubt on his own may be how he will mature as a man. Here, however, there may be many others who would be interested. How I respond to an objection or a rejection could be of value for them. It lets them see that I have something which is not easily shaken, unlike most religions and lifestyles and "isms". Certainly it is of value to me, for it takes a certain awareness to understand something and more awareness still to be able to articulate it.

      I will say one thing that for some reason I think you in particular would appreciate: there are many more people with understanding than the world around you would generally lead you to believe. Such people are often not outspoken. They are defintely not boastful or flamboyant or in-your-face types who tend to get a lot of attention. The media finds it more profitable to appeal to our baser natures, so you don't see them on the evening news. Many (if not most) of them have an inner knowing that they are completely unable to articulate, or could not do so in a way that will withstand childish attempts to belittle and demagogue it.

      So, I don't really know who is reading when I write posts like that. Like I said, I knew someone would scoff at it and was not deterred by this knowledge. I also knew the general outline that such ridicule would take, for that mentality is utterly predictable. None of that took anything away from the joy of writing. Just because there are swine does not mean that all pearls must be hidden from everyone.

      I am aware that I can be long-winded. If you read all of that, thanks for bearing with me. It seemed right to give you a proper response.

      --
      It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
    30. Re:Protect people from unwholesome content? by Rogerborg · · Score: 1

      Dude, that so nearly made it into the Bill of Rights. Then Jefferson had to spend all night trolling Madison with his alt in Worlde of Warcrafte and we ended up with that "well regulated militia" bullshit instead.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    31. Re:Protect people from unwholesome content? by justinlee37 · · Score: 1

      Wait. I was responding to Causality, not you, but you're replying to me as if you are the one who wrote the post I responded to.

      Are you suggesting, perhaps by forgetting to change user handles, that you actually troll Slashdot with several different identities, and then have long-winded conversations with yourself?

      You are about ten kinds of crazy and I'm not even about to get sucked into some time-wasting moral debate with you.

    32. Re:Protect people from unwholesome content? by Fiction916 · · Score: 1

      yes, fine response, but it'd be nice if you could better define inner freedom. if inner freedom does not depend on circumstance or events, where does it come from? this is most certainly an idealist orientation of which there are many critics. Marx argues that inner self is derived from material reality, so experience should be structured to provide freedom in order to produce free individuals--thus political freedom is paramount to build this social structure. conversely, Hegel would say that inner freedom (your term, won't use Hegel's) validates society by finding reason in its form, and that Marx's sort of authoritative structure is no way to possibly run a free society--but again, only political freedom allows individuals to shape society to fit the concept of inner freedom. both rely on common perception, though, one which the poor beggar and the wealthy tycoon couldn't possibly share, but that inner freedom depends on to conceive and political freedom to form.

  4. Wait.. what? by Netshroud · · Score: 1

    The regulation, issued by the Ministry of Culture on June 22, is said to be part of a nationwide campaign to improve management of the virtual gaming industry and protect the minor from unwholesome content. It applies to all multiplayer role-playing and social networking games.

    How does knowing a players name determine if they are a minor or not? It's not like they get something suffixed to their name once they turn 18/21 (select where applicable).

    1. Re:Wait.. what? by happylight · · Score: 1

      Most Asian countries already requires your citizen/license ID number to register for any MMORPG. This is nothing new.

    2. Re:Wait.. what? by tepples · · Score: 1

      Do they take green card numbers from resident aliens? Or do players have to be citizens?

    3. Re:Wait.. what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The regulation, issued by the Ministry of Culture on June 22, is said to be part of a nationwide campaign to improve management of the virtual gaming industry and protect the minor from unwholesome content. It applies to all multiplayer role-playing and social networking games.

      How does knowing a players name determine if they are a minor or not? It's not like they get something suffixed to their name once they turn 18/21 (select where applicable).

      The minor doesn't necessarily need to be the one that's named. It's easier to monitor the producers of unwholesome content when it's not done anonymously.

      Ironically yours,
      Anonymous Coward

    4. Re:Wait.. what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Round eyes? In my MMOGRINDFEST?

      It's more likely than you think.

  5. Where are "bigbrother" and "policestate" tags ? by TheBlackMan · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is definately not about "privacy" or "security". We all know what is the reason for such law, so it should be tagged appropriately.

    1. Re:Where are "bigbrother" and "policestate" tags ? by Savage-Rabbit · · Score: 2

      This is definately not about "privacy" or "security". We all know what is the reason for such law, so it should be tagged appropriately.

      It's about finally finding out who the campers in counter-strike are in real life and where they live.

      --
      Only to idiots, are orders laws.
      -- Henning von Tresckow
    2. Re:Where are "bigbrother" and "policestate" tags ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a "china" tag. That one kind of implies everything we associate with it, such as "big brother" and "police state".

    3. Re:Where are "bigbrother" and "policestate" tags ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's to find all the furries and put them all into one place? That's the hint I'm getting from this...

  6. Of course this is in the best interests by macara · · Score: 0

    of the children, it's China we're talking about here, it's not like it's some country that would steer online information in their own favor.

    1. Re:Of course this is in the best interests by macara · · Score: 0

      of the children, it's China we're talking about here, it's not like it's some country that would steer online information in their own favor.

      ... forgot appropriate sarcasm tags.

    2. Re:Of course this is in the best interests by causality · · Score: 2, Insightful

      of the children, it's China we're talking about here, it's not like it's some country that would steer online information in their own favor.

      Like the USA, it's also not a country that would trust parents to decide what is appropriate for their children, supervise them as needed, and gradually equip them to deal with the online world just as they do for the offline world. No, for that parents are thoroughly inadequate. What you need is a large, faceless, unaccountable state bureaucracy with lots of political power. Then and only then are the children safe. Taking over the role of all parents is surely better than dealing on a case-by-case basis with the small minority of parents who neglect their children.

      Isn't that the message behind every governmental action that uses "for the children" as its basis?

      "The state must declare the child to be the most precious treasure of the people." -- Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf

      --
      It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
    3. Re:Of course this is in the best interests by Jane+Q.+Public · · Score: 2

      "The problem with trying to child-proof the world, is that it makes people neglect the far more important task of world-proofing the child." -- Hugh Daniel

    4. Re:Of course this is in the best interests by causality · · Score: 1

      "The problem with trying to child-proof the world, is that it makes people neglect the far more important task of world-proofing the child." -- Hugh Daniel

      Thank you, madam. I had this one in my quotes file but it was unattributed. That's been fixed now.

      --
      It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
  7. Excellent news by maugle · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Now no politician in the US can even consider supporting it!

    "Ladies and gentleman, my opponent has come out in support of policies implemented in polluting, human rights abusing, communist, totalitarian, job-stealing China! Are you going to let him bring that to our shores?"

    1. Re:Excellent news by Man+On+Pink+Corner · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That's what the Australians thought.

    2. Re:Excellent news by countertrolling · · Score: 1

      Are you going to let him bring that to our shores?

      Waddaya mean "going to"? We already have.. decades ago

      --
      For justice, we must go to Don Corleone
    3. Re:Excellent news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... or not. You remember the great firewall in China? Recently (this year) Biden has said America should have a national firewall like that cause China is doing it.

    4. Re:Excellent news by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Because the US government never does anything the Chinese government does.

      --
      Palm trees and 8
    5. Re:Excellent news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You remember the great firewall in China? Recently (this year) Biden has said America should have a national firewall like that cause China is doing it.

      If you want someone to take a claim like that seriously you really need to provide a citation. A quick Google search turns up nothing so I can only conclude you are lying.

    6. Re:Excellent news by Kell+Bengal · · Score: 4, Informative

      And you know, it's been met with public outcry and made certain politicians quite unpopular. The internet filtering thing was only ever a token appeasement move to get certain conservative elements onboard - now that they've run their course, it's being quietly set aside. Realpolitik rules the day.

      --
      Scientists point out problems, engineers fix them
      altslashdot.org: The future of slashdot.
    7. Re:Excellent news by Snufu · · Score: 1

      I applaud this action and strongly advocate that similar mandates be implemented in our fair country. I'm disgusted by internet cowards hiding behind obvious and ridiculous pseudonyms.

      Sincerely,
      Harold Poindexter Ness, The Third.

    8. Re:Excellent news by Man+On+Pink+Corner · · Score: 1

      And in about a week we'll see another iteration of the same Slashdot story: "Australia: Ruling Party '100% Committed' to Net Filter."

      Eventually it will happen, or not happen... but the real problem is that, because of the indifference of Australian voters, it's possible at all.

    9. Re:Excellent news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      China has an internet "kill switch". Senator Lieberman has made this exact case, America needs this because China has it.
      http://www.google.ca/search?q="right+now+china"+internet+kill+switch

    10. Re:Excellent news by index0 · · Score: 1

      Probably was referring to the story of the internet kill switch that China has and Lieberman supporting the same for America.
      http://www.google.ca/search?q="right+now+china"+internet+kill+switch

    11. Re:Excellent news by Monchanger · · Score: 1

      The "Internet kill switch" is a misguided idea, but it's not about filtering obscene and security-related information. The idea is to implement some kind of "shield" to defend against an attack by outside entities (well let's be honest, an attack sponsored by the Chinese government). The point is basically shutting off router ports which connect the US to (I presume) the rest of the world and put this power in the hands of the president.

      It's quite a silly idea considering the Chinese government likely already owns thousands and thousands of US citizens' home computers. So there's isolating the US does not put our infrastructure out of reach. And considering how long it would take civilian and military bodies to get the president to actually "push the button" by the time he did it'd be far too late.

      This is one of those ideas which only people who don't understand technology can be behind. You can't just translate the real world to the Internet by prefexing "cyber" to anything, and building a "virtual fence" is just one more terrible analogy.

      The military is very aware of the threat (read: "Cyber Command") and any banks not protecting themselves properly deserve to go out of business. The US government should encourage Internet security but this is not the right way. Instead it could try funding of security research, public education (e.g. teach it to kids in school), declare one of those "Internet Security month" things, etc.

  8. Well, how is that going to work? by Anarchduke · · Score: 3, Funny

    "Aren't there about a billion John Lee's in China?"
    ~Mira Sorvino, Replacement Killers

    --
    who prays for Satan? Who in 18 centuries has had the humanity to pray for the 1 sinner that needed it most? ~Mark Twain
    1. Re:Well, how is that going to work? by cthulu_mt · · Score: 1

      More chins than a Chinese MMO.

      --
      Virginia is for lovers. EVE is for griefers.
    2. Re:Well, how is that going to work? by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 1

      In all seriousness, I am going to assume that your legal name carries less weight in China than the number they print on your government assigned ID card.

      --
      Palm trees and 8
    3. Re:Well, how is that going to work? by PPH · · Score: 1

      That's just so wong.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    4. Re:Well, how is that going to work? by haderytn · · Score: 1

      Please explain.

    5. Re:Well, how is that going to work? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      big issue, that our names actually dont identify us, esp in china for this reason (well, some unlucky folks to have absolutely unique names, like a lot of african americans). do we want a single, universal, identifier? i dont. it sounds so clean, so pure, so rational. fuck it. long live robert heinlein, the bastard: when a society starts issuing mandatory universal id's, its time to split. I exist, i dont need to prove myself to anyone, and government exists to serve me (and you) and not the other way around. if they dont need to know, they dont get to know, and that need is determined by ME, not them. well, in theory at least...

    6. Re:Well, how is that going to work? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am going to assume that your legal name carries less weight in China than the number they print on your government assigned ID card.

      Let me assure you, give some angry Chinese netizens one and they can find the other quite quickly. The stuff that goes on in the Chinese Internet makes /b/ look like a cat fanciers newsletter. There are a lot of bored people with computers in China and the license of anonymity is doubled when you sit next to a different stranger each day at an Internet cafe the size of a movie theater.

  9. Overblown, maybe? by sykopomp · · Score: 2, Interesting

    How is this different from the current state of things in the US, where you so often have to register with your own credit card? That seems like it'll cover virtually all cases. Not that it doesn't really suck that players can mostly be tracked down to their real identities or anything, but that's a different story, I think.

    1. Re:Overblown, maybe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      You can buy anonymous game time cards, or anonymous prepaid credit cards (although the government really doesn't like when you do the latter, so they have been killing those programs).

    2. Re:Overblown, maybe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The government isn't requiring the credit card. The game company is, for their own reasons, namely they want to be able to collect money from you.

      And really, the game company DOES NOT care about your ID, they just want the money. So if you can come up with some way to get an anonymous credit card, go for it.

    3. Re:Overblown, maybe? by Martin+Blank · · Score: 1

      What makes you think they've been killing them? They're more available than ever. A few years ago, the easiest way to get them was to go to a local mall to buy them. Now, I can go to the grocery store and get pre-paid Visa, MasterCard, AmEx, and I think Discover, not to mention gift cards for dozens of stores, and some of those gift cards allow me to purchase pre-paid Visa cards. It's a horrible return on investment, but it makes it harder to follow the trail.

      --
      You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
    4. Re:Overblown, maybe? by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 1

      Where are you that you can do these things? And is your geographic location governed by the same Government the parent poster noted?

    5. Re:Overblown, maybe? by Martin+Blank · · Score: 1

      Sykopomp's post referenced the US, suggesting that tracking users via credit cards is already done. The AC posted that anonymous cards can be purchased in a manner strongly suggestive that he was countering the identification in the US. My reply was based on that.

      With that, I am in the US (California to be more specific), and the cards are all over.

      --
      You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
  10. Where's the petition? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No problem, I'm sure an online petition will stop it. The Chinese government always listens to reason from the public.

    1. Re:Where's the petition? by Kell+Bengal · · Score: 3, Funny

      Exactly! People think China's government doesn't care about its citizens or listen to its people, but it's simply not true. They pay great attention to what people say, and responds immediately if anyone expresses discontent.

      --
      Scientists point out problems, engineers fix them
      altslashdot.org: The future of slashdot.
    2. Re:Where's the petition? by danny_lehman · · Score: 1

      i thought i sensed some sarcasm is the first post. i really hope you weren't being sarcastic because i would really like to believe that's true.

    3. Re:Where's the petition? by Martin+Blank · · Score: 1

      It's funny you mention that. Recently, the central government has had to listen to the people. A local official either was or will soon be executed for corruption because of complaints -- even demonstrations! -- on the part of the people in his district. He is not the first, either.

      They certainly won't respond as kindly to another attempt to overthrow the government, but they do sometimes have to pay attention to the people's complaints.

      --
      You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
  11. That's nothing.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... in Sovjet Russia, they require an ejaculate for DNA sampling.

    (there are no girls on the internet)

    1. Re:That's nothing.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Soviet Russia, ejaculate samples you!

  12. Minors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Minors are a censor's favorite tool.

  13. Most American Online Games already have your names by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Most American online games already have your name or can track the players because they pay with credit cards and use the Internet from home.

    In China they use prepaid card which virtually anyone can buy and then play the games at an Internet cafe. I don't agree with the proposal but they are doing the same thing that most counties do by requiring credit card payments.

  14. Stalking has never been easier by CuteSteveJobs · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If you steal my loot in a raid I'll know your real name, and with a bit more googling everything there is to know about you:

    Many of the vast unwashed masses on the net as spectacularly naive about their privacy. Take Gabrielle Romney, ex-lover of a right-wing political party figure in Australia. She wrote a letter to "The Age" bawling that they published her photo: "I am dismayed by the prominent publication of my photograph accompanying the article. To be targeted by a stalker is invasive, intimidating, and terrifying. As a private individual, one of the most debilitating aspects is the constant and unwelcome intrusion into one's life. Publishing my photograph has been a further violation of my privacy and dignity."

    http://www.theage.com.au/victoria/man-sent-more-than-100-sometimes-offensive-messages-to-exlover-20100726-10slv.html

    Fair enough, but type her name into "Google" and you'll find yourself staring at her mug in facebook:

    http://www.facebook.com/people/Gabrielle-Romney/528810959

    Let me repeat what she said: "As a private individual, one of the most debilitating aspects is the constant and unwelcome intrusion into one's life."

    If you're on Facebook, you're not a private individual.

    1. Re:Stalking has never been easier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're on Facebook, you're not a private individual.

      This story is not about Facebook or Google.

    2. Re:Stalking has never been easier by Fumus · · Score: 1

      If you steal my loot in a raid I'll know your real name, and with a bit more googling everything there is to know about you:

      This is actually a good thing in some cases. Now being a dick on the Internet will carry consequences with it. The "Stab someone with a fork over the Internet" device is one step closer.

      On the other hand, voicing your true opinions can also be dangerous so I'm not sure if the gain outweighs the drawbacks.

    3. Re:Stalking has never been easier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're using your real name and info on Facebook, you're not a private individual.

      Fixed that for you.

    4. Re:Stalking has never been easier by Vaphell · · Score: 1

      recently Blizzard tried to push their RealId feature to the official forums which was your real name attached to your battle.net account. Uproad was so huge they had to cave in - big numbers of WoW players were cancelling their subsriptions not to mention Starcraft 2 and Cataclysm preorders and this fiasco was picked up by the mainstream media. To control damage to their bottom line in the light of upcoming releases they put the idea on the backburner.
      Thread with posts of outraged customers grew 1 post every 4 seconds and it was impossible to read as it grew faster than you could consume with your eyes. It hit 50k in 3 days before getting locked and we are talking only about the US forums, european ones had similar threads with thousands of posts.

      People mentioned many other problems with real names on game forums which outweigh overall benefits of people not being a dick on the internet. The most frequent and obvious:
      - women would be harassed by basement trolls who have seen no sunlight simply because they are women
      - minorities would be harassed because of funny names, stereotypes and whatnot
      - minors would be at risk and pedos would have an even easier hunting
      - social stigma of gaming can hurt your professional career because employers always check what the internet has to say about you

    5. Re:Stalking has never been easier by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you RTFA you'll see no mention that you'll have to actually *use* your real name as your character's name or that other players will have access to it. The article seems to suggest that this is more a move to have a government controlled registry linking online accounts to a real person.

      You pretty much already do this when you sign up for billing information but that requires Big Brother to go through a third party. This is much more efficient.

  15. So, what about erhhh double names? by PieterBr · · Score: 1

    Runs out and goes register "Chen": sorry, this name is already taken.

  16. Public vs Private by MDillenbeck · · Score: 2, Interesting

    We are talking about registering for an online game. I see this as a debate of public vs private space, and unfortunately I see many people trying to impose their rights to privacy in public arenas.

    For example, if you are walking down the street and a photographer snaps your photo, do you really have a right to expect privacy? When you walk into a store to buy your gimp outfit, do you really expect the cashier to not see your goods as you buy it or your name when you pass them the credit card?

    Why are they talking about name registration? Protecting minors from unwholesome content is mentioned. So, yes, to a certain degree they want to impose censorship. You know, maybe to prevent minors from seeing explicit gestures or language like the USA's MPAA rating system does with movies.

    Also, it could be used to track down those who are socially unacceptable or political dissidents. I don't know how many times I've overheard these times of conversations in Everquest when I use to play - you know, planning protest marches or talking about the injustice of the communist system while playing dark elf females dressed in all leather armor and using whips. Yeah, if I had a nickle for every time that happened, I'd still be as broke as I am now.

    My wife states a good test from private space to anyone with a bit of modesty and manners that I have expanded to the most likely shameless crowd that visits the web - namely do you feel comfortable walking around totally naked, blowing your nose, and farting all while masturbating to your favorite fetish porn? You wouldn't do this in a store, on a public street, in your back yard, or on a video chat site (unless you're on chatroulette I guess - but then you're a criminal deviant who has no respect for public space).

    An MMO is not a private space unless you develop the software, buy the server, build your own dedicated network lines, and restrict who can have access to it - it is a virtual RPG store holding events. You should not expect to have any privacy there.

    The only issue I would have is if they required you to use your real name for your in-game name. That would defeat the purpose of a MMORPG. However, there is nothing unreasonable about using your real name to register for the game.

    1. Re:Public vs Private by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We are talking about registering for an online game. I see this as a debate of public vs private space, and unfortunately I see many people trying to impose their rights to privacy in public arenas.

      For example, if you are walking down the street and a photographer snaps your photo, do you really have a right to expect privacy?

      Regardless of how you push it, the "if you have nothing to hide" argument isn't getting any less flawed. An MMO account is a private contract between yourself and the MMO publisher, and this is simply the case where a government wants to impose on a MMO user's ability to have an inherently private communication. The fact that you are speaking to the public does not mean you can't be anonymous. If a photographer meets me on the street, then I am standing on a street where anyone may walk, while if I send IP packets nobody else but the recipient will receive them. It's very different from speaking on the street, where I may be overheard, or walking on the street, where I may be seen.

      When you walk into a store to buy your gimp outfit, do you really expect the cashier to not see your goods as you buy it or your name when you pass them the credit card?

      Still private. I can pay by cash, wear sun glasses and a fake moustache. The store clerk would neither be able to recognize me, nor know my name. Giving him my credit card is equivalent to PMing someone with my real name.

      Also, it could be used to track down those who are socially unacceptable or political dissidents. I don't know how many times I've overheard these times of conversations in Everquest when I use to play - you know, planning protest marches or talking about the injustice of the communist system while playing dark elf females dressed in all leather armor and using whips. Yeah, if I had a nickle for every time that happened, I'd still be as broke as I am now.

      "Political dissidents"? You wouldn't happen to work for the Chinese government, wouldn't you?
      If a government isn't doing well, then the people have the full right to rebel against it. A government is, after all, a representative body of it's people and not the other way around. Look at it from another perspective - if the Chinese government is so good to it's people, why would it need to search for political dissidents? Surely a handful of ill mouthed rebels cannot do much to turn a happy and prosperous society against it's masters.

      My wife states a good test from private space to anyone with a bit of modesty and manners that I have expanded to the most likely shameless crowd that visits the web - namely do you feel comfortable walking around totally naked, blowing your nose, and farting all while masturbating to your favorite fetish porn? You wouldn't do this in a store, on a public street, in your back yard, or on a video chat site (unless you're on chatroulette I guess - but then you're a criminal deviant who has no respect for public space).

      And I can do all that in my house without anyone being the wiser. Again, internet communication is private correspondence between two parties. You send a message to a specific target, and nobody else would see it, unless they choose to impose on it by the means of deep package inspection (the equivalent of opening your mail by the postal service). And even if someone chooses to open it, they may still be facing a heavy encryption that would take more than a reasonable amount of time to decrypt.

      An MMO is not a private space unless you develop the software, buy the server, build your own dedicated network lines, and restrict who can have access to it - it is a virtual RPG store holding events. You should not expect to have any privacy there.

      And your argument is?
      In an MMO client, you don't share my personal information with other players, and the service provider doesn't either. This is nothing less of an anonymous private exchange netwo

  17. FYI by euyis · · Score: 2, Interesting

    One can easily find many resident IDs with the associated names on the Internet & in real life. Copy it, validate it, use it, voila.
    And some service providers don't really care about all this real name shit - they just ask for a resident ID in valid format and don't bother to check whether it is associated with the name you provided. There are tools readily available for creation of fake IDs.

  18. Lukewarm policy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is to preserve culture and promote social responsibility on the net. This policy in itself is a good thing bc it helps kids practice real social interaction with more real consequnces whether it be positive or not. Though i have to admit this can be used used to pave way or in conjunction with other Orwellian surveillance methods to control citizens. However China is right to monitor their citizens to this extent lest they want external entities to have more control over their economy and politics through manipulation of mostly uninformed and apathetic citizens (US senate anyone?). China is facing enough political pressure/threats (whether it is for direct benefit for the citizens themselves or as a political weapon for the outside entities is up to debate) to reform its human rights issues and will in time I believe improve to at least a satisfactory level.

  19. Re:Most American Online Games already have your na by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Name one country requiring it in law.

    Companies might as policy. Or, even without actual policy, as a matter of practice, in terms of credit cards.

    But none of that is the same as making it a matter of law.

  20. Simply not actually going to happen... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Things like this pop up all the time in China...there are multiple gov't groups that vie for "attention" and thus "power". One side says "we are going to protect the children from ______". Then the other group goes "No no no you do not have the power to do that - that is our job"...and nothing ever happens. The last version of this was "ID Card Numbers" which is effectively the same thing...It never came to pass either, before that it was "Time limits on MMO games"....never happened...the list goes on and on.

  21. Quora by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This kind of stuff is excused for by websites like quora.com etc which also require real names.

  22. why not ? by Tom · · Score: 1

    I have the same rule for my own online game (no link or I'd be accused of slashvertisement). It's "my home", so to speak, I don't charge for it, but I expect my guests to follow some basic rules of courtesy and one of them is that you give me your actual, real, full name as I give you mine (on the site).

    Nothing forces you to, you can play somewhere else if you don't like the rules in my "home". Which is where the chinese approach of making it mandatory for everything becomes a bit difficult. What if I wouldn't care? I - as the owner of the game should have the choice. Maybe that's a better way than both the mandatory and the "freedom über alles, make it the choice of the players" hysteria.

    No, why should it be the choice of the players? We all know that the majority of people don't need rules for basic etiquette, they will follow it without rules. The rules are there for the minority who don't. So the "freedom" you speak about is only to the benefit of the anti-social assholes you don't want around anyways. I wouldn't let people into my house who refuse to give me their name. Why should I let them into my game?

    --
    Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    1. Re:why not ? by aeschenkarnos · · Score: 1

      Just a guess, but I suspect your name is neither female nor visibly "ethnic".

    2. Re:why not ? by Tom · · Score: 1

      I should have been more clear, my mistake.

      I require players to give their real name to me. It remains their choice if they want it published in the player list or not. Privacy is still an important consideration.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
  23. kinda funny though if you think about it by ILuvRamen · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Realistically with 1 billion people plus extremely commonly repeated, simplistic first and last names in their language, China is going to have sooooo many first and last name repeats that they still won't be able to pin this down to one unique person based on just a name in most cases. Not even close actually. Just because of how things are there compared to here, it could easily be possibly that for any given person in China, it's 100,000 times (or more) more likely that there's at least one other person named exactly that in the country compared to the probability of that happening in the US. Definitely kinda funny if you think about it.

    --
    Google's Super Secret Search Algorithm: SELECT @search_results FROM internet WHERE @search_results = 'good'
  24. insightful ??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We have a proverb here around "money does not make one happy, but having money worry makes one unhappy". I dunno why your drivel was marked insightful. From my family and extended family a lot are wealthy (multi millionaire although no billionaire). And whereas a few of them are groping for more, ABSOLUTELY NONE are unhappy. You are confusing the yellow press picture of rich people with the reality. And the reality is that rich people are (in average) as happy or as unhappy as middle class non-money-worrying people. As for your inner freedom : *MEEEEH*. Real freedom is being *free* from external worry, yes, but there are two way to attain it : wallow in mud and *think* yourself free, or have wealth and be REALLY free of worry.

  25. Re:Most American Online Games already have your na by mpe · · Score: 1

    Most American online games already have your name or can track the players because they pay with credit cards and use the Internet from home.

    But the name on the card need not be a person's "real name". The whole issue of names is far from trivial. Especially when it comes to putting them into computer systems.

  26. so what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So what? This is games. Games, not discussion forums for politics. I usually play under my real name anyway - because it is easy. Can't come up with anything better anyway...

  27. Ok, who ganked and camped the party chairman? by lexsird · · Score: 1

    If they outlaw the /spit emote and t-bagging, then we will know the chairman got powned and camped for sure.

    --
    Take the Red Pill.
  28. Flamebait by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So sad that I'm out of mod points.

    You're one to talk about having a fossilized brain, you crazy, frigid bitch.

    Way to add to the discussion on this one.

  29. Re:Most American Online Games already have your na by Lordnerdzrool · · Score: 1

    Where did you get the idea most American games require credit cards? Very few games actually REQUIRE credit card payments. Customers just tend to use them out of convenience. You can pay for X-Box Live accounts in-store, which more or less throws the "Most American online games" out the window on its own considering how large the X-Box Live userbase is. You can pay with cash in the store. Valve games such as Counter-Strike: Source, Team Fortress 2, Left 4 Dead (2) all can be bought in-store without a credit card as well. Most games offered on Steam have retail versions which often can be bought without credit cards.

    World of Warcraft can be done this way too, I think, but I've only seen cards up to 60 days. Others may exist if you really wanted to do it that way though. And that's basically the other half of American online games. I've seen cards like this for other MMORPG games as well, but sure, not all of them offer these cards.

    There probably are some that fit your description, but it's likely due to the company not seeing much point to releasing cards like those as their userbases are much smaller than WoW's userbase, not because they have some potentially malicious conspiracy to use the information obtained by card purchase. China's reasoning for including real names, on the other hand, is pretty obvious and they'd probably even be fine with telling you they intend to use it to violate people's privacy (just worded in that special kinda China way). American online games that perhaps have access to that information have it not because it was intended, rather, it was easier for the customer to provide it because they wanted to buy the game from their computer desk rather than in a retail store (We're lazy).