Slashdot Mirror


Gestures With Multitouch In Ubuntu 10.10

jitendraharlalka writes "Mark Shuttleworth recently announced on his blog that the first cut of Canonical's UTouch framework is ready and will be available in Ubuntu Maverick. He goes on to talk about the development of 'touch language' by the design team. The 'touch language' will allow the chaining of basic gestures to create complex gestures. The approach is quite different from the single magic gestures implemented elsewhere. In Maverick, a few Gtk applications will support gesture-based scrolling."

185 comments

  1. One gesture by dasdumper · · Score: 5, Funny

    Maybe I can stop using the same gesture when my wifi card does not work.

    1. Re:One gesture by mjwx · · Score: 0

      Maybe I can stop using the same gesture when my wifi card does not work.

      Last time I checked, Windows does not support that gesture, which is why I tend to use Ubuntu wherever possible.

      However the last time I gave Windows the "Dead Rat" gesture, a voice said "welcome Mr Balmer".

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    2. Re:One gesture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Why stop now?

      Microsoft loves these astroturfing efforts.

  2. Hardware support is still weak by vlueboy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Other than specialty devices, hardware support is not even on the map.
    I believe W7 already supports multitouch, joining the mac bandwagon. So, how long until non-laptops, non-cellphones start shipping with that, so that we can see an explosion in programmer response and API's?

    Oh, and while we wait, it'd be good to find where I can buy a USB pad currently to add multi-touch support for a Windows desktop. Thanks

    1. Re:Hardware support is still weak by Yvan256 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Where I can buy a USB pad currently to add multi-touch support for a Windows desktop?

      http://www.apple.com/magictrackpad/

      They mention "for your Mac" but a quick search shows that Apple has Windows drivers available.

    2. Re:Hardware support is still weak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ummmm... Mac bandwagon? Where are the Mac multi-touch displays? My HP TouchSmart works under Linux, but not multi-touch (that only worked under Windows 7). If you mean touchpads, Synaptic is the name you're looking for, not Mac, and Ubuntu already supports multitouch on that. If you want a tablet for your PC look into Wacom stuff. If you want a monitor, there are plenty, just Google TouchScreen Monitor.

    3. Re:Hardware support is still weak by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      They mention "for your Mac" but a quick search shows that Apple has Windows drivers available.

      Thats because plenty of Mac's run Windows.

      They didn't say 'For Mac OS X'.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    4. Re:Hardware support is still weak by Kepesk · · Score: 1

      Don't worry; 5 minutes after this is released, someone out there will start porting it to the iPhone.

      Porting it to the iPhone: the newest, hottest fad.

    5. Re:Hardware support is still weak by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      www.apple.com
      www.wacom.com

      Start there, both sell multitouch devices that work great in Windows. Dell and HP also sells some machines with multitouch built in.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    6. Re:Hardware support is still weak by Ethanol-fueled · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Speaking of drivers, I bought an HP printer with claims to support only Mac and Windows. Lo and behold, turns out there is a 'NIX driver, HPLIP, that is very similar to typical Windows drivers in that it is a unified center of settings and even shows the HP logo in Ubuntu's taskbar.

      Familiar-feeling stuff like that goes a long way toward spreading desktop Linux adoption. Yet, for some reason, they don't simply add it to their standard driver CD.

    7. Re:Hardware support is still weak by morari · · Score: 1

      Wacom makes fairly inexpensive touchpads. Actually, if I remember correctly, most of their Bamboo line can even be purchased without a stylus. Essentially you can cheap out and not get any of the actually useful, artistic features to quench your touchy-feelie desires. :P

      --
      "He who can destroy a thing, controls a thing." --Paul Atreides, Dune
    8. Re:Hardware support is still weak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wacom has pretty good multitouch devices, i recently bought the bamboo fun touch, very nifty...
      not that i use multitouch, it is a little to tiring for my hand...

    9. Re:Hardware support is still weak by hairyfeet · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You know, I probably shouldn't feed the coward, but what the fuck, I'm bored. Show me ANY Linux where I can take a mix of totally random hardware thrown together and hand my 67 year old clueless dad the disc and have him install it PERFECTLY, without a SINGLE fuckup or hardware issue, and then we'll talk. Because dad didn't want to wait until the weekend and installed Windows 7 HP without a SINGLE issue. It installed ALL the drivers automatically and even told him at first boot he didn't have an AV and pointed him to several free ones.

      As for TFA, the problem with Ubuntu, at least the last time I used it (gave up on Ubuntu and Linux at 9.04) is NOT all the bling bling, it is the drivers. With Windows if there isn't a driver you can have it go to windows update and download it and install it, ALL GUI all the way. Action Center will even point out the problem so you don't have to even open up Control Panel anymore.

      With Linux at the slightest hint of trouble it runs back to CLI like a child running to its mommy, and in this day and age average folks just ain't gonna deal with that CLI bullshit. Hell most folks walking into the shop won't even open control panel because they think its scary, you honestly think they'll go for "open up bash and type" BS? Especially considering it often has to be "tweaked" because it was designed for "hardware A rev b" and you have (which the average user will NEVER know) "Hardware D Rev G" so you have to "fix" a bunch of crap?

      I really hoped that Canonical would do for Linux what Apple did for NeXT, but it is pretty obvious now that just ain't gonna be the case. Considering Shuttleworth has made it clear he wants Canonical self sustaining I honestly wouldn't be surprised if Ubuntu ends up being dumped on the community and Canonical goes strictly servers. It is pretty clear, at least to me, that the amount of R&D and bug fixing required to bring Ubuntu up to OSX and Windows 7 levels of polish is simply astronomical, and you ain't gonna get a bunch of volunteers to do the dirty suck jobs like bug fixing.

      After setting up 4 Ubuntu boxes in my shop and running them from 6-9.04 in the hopes that like Apple and early OSX it would keep jumping up in quality, and instead finding a "three steps forward, 2 steps back" situation where one thing would get fixed while killing two others, not to mention tons of show stoppers like hardware that worked in 8 dying hard in 9, I have to admit I gave up. If it would take me, a guy that has dealt with PCs since the days of the 4MHz Intel CPUs, so much pain and headaches, how would my customers ever deal? I'm certainly not gonna give away lifetime support because Canonical can't keep from breaking drivers from one rev to the next (check out the Dell Ubuntu boxes. Notice they DISABLE the Canonical repos? That is because Canonical can't even be counted on not to break their OEM MACHINES. Great Q&A there guys) and if it takes more than a couple of hours to deal with it costs me more than a copy of Windows 7 Home.

      Until someone does to a Linux distro what Jobs did with NeXT I'm gonna have to say I stand by my beliefs...Linux is GREAT on servers and SUCKS on desktops. Maybe if you are a geek or have a CS degree and don't mind playing "hunt the fix" when the latest updates break your wireless and sound it would be okay, but how many average folks are gonna fit that profile?

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    10. Re:Hardware support is still weak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The driver (ppd) is included, but not the administration center, as not all Ubuntu user use HP printers.

    11. Re:Hardware support is still weak by turbidostato · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "Show me ANY Linux where I can take a mix of totally random hardware thrown together and hand my 67 year old clueless dad the disc and have him install it PERFECTLY, without a SINGLE fuckup or hardware issue, and then we'll talk."

      Show me FIRST the Windows where I can take a mix of totally random hardware thrown together and hand my 67 year old clueless dad the disc and have him install it PERFECTLY, without a SINGLE fuckup or hardware issue.

    12. Re:Hardware support is still weak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Proof that Slashdot isn't as biased as we thought: anti-linux trolls get modded +4 insightful on a Linux story. Fascinating.
       
      It’s unfortunate that every time someone wants to talk about Linux, they seem interested in only one metric: can Average Joe use it? I don’t know. Can your theoretical person use Linux? My theoretical person is wearing a Barney the Dinosaur costume, so he’s not in any capacity to use any computer until he takes that thing off. Maybe he could operate a one-button Mac mouse, but my bets are on “no.”
       
      Meanwhile, we can swap Linux stories back and forth until the cows come home, but the truth of the matter is that Linux on the Desktop will never become popular because most of the world doesn't understand what an operating system is, and it's beyond their abilities to switch to a new one. You can pick your own reason for not using it; fine. But don't pretend like you have some magical solution to fix the thing you hate so dearly.

    13. Re:Hardware support is still weak by Stormwatch · · Score: 2, Informative

      plenty of Macs run Windows.

      Plenty of PCs runs Mac OS X too... it just takes a lil' hack.

    14. Re:Hardware support is still weak by Narksos · · Score: 3, Funny

      "Show me ANY Linux where I can take a mix of totally random hardware thrown together and hand my 67 year old clueless dad the disc and have him install it PERFECTLY, without a SINGLE fuckup or hardware issue, and then we'll talk."

      Show me FIRST the Windows where I can take a mix of totally random hardware thrown together and hand my 67 year old clueless dad the disc and have him install it PERFECTLY, without a SINGLE fuckup or hardware issue.

      And then let said 67 year old clueless dad on the internet for 30 minutes and see if it still runs.

    15. Re:Hardware support is still weak by TheCycoONE · · Score: 1

      I believe the gp stated Windows 7 fit that criteria...

    16. Re:Hardware support is still weak by Saltheart_Foamfollow · · Score: 1

      Dude: Thank you for clearly stating my exact thoughts...

      --
      Digitronically yours, Saltheart Foamfollower
    17. Re:Hardware support is still weak by Minwee · · Score: 3, Informative

      Then I want some of whatever he is smoking.

    18. Re:Hardware support is still weak by westlake · · Score: 2, Informative

      Show me ANY Linux where I can take a mix of totally random hardware thrown together and hand my 67 year old clueless dad the disc and have him install it PERFECTLY, without a SINGLE fuckup or hardware issue, and then we'll talk.

      True story.

      Not long back I tried the Ubuntu Windows Installer

      The installer appeared to hang on an indecipherable hard drive error. It could not be closed or canceled short of killing the process in Task Manager.

      The Ubuntu site and forums were no help - so on to Google.

      A half hour or so later I found a solution. It seems that the installer treats any internal or external, occupied or unoccupied, flash card slot as a hard drive.

      The work around is to click "Cancel" as often as necessary to get the job done.

      65 clicks later I began to see daylight.

      25 clicks later I had 32 bit Unbuntu dual-booting with 64 bit Windows 7.

      It did not make a good first impression.

    19. Re:Hardware support is still weak by Kitkoan · · Score: 1

      I haven't had driver issues with my franken-desktop with Ubuntu since 9.04 (A HP m7640n, granted all thats left of that system is the motherboard, HD and DVD drive, changed all the RAM, graphic cards, PSU, added a wireless USB drive, and have an external sound card). Windows 7 took a few hours to find the wireless drivers (I dual boot both, Windows for my games since I tend to have issues with it, Ubuntu never seems to have issues for me). I'm wanting to ask you what your idea of "random hardware" is, and then question why a 67 year old clueless dad is using "random hardware" since everyone I know that is clueless about computers isn't going to build their own system which is pretty much the only time you'll have the hopes of using "random hardware". Anyone who is clueless about computers is going to use a pre-built system that uses pretty standard, easy to find parts since those are the cheapest and those are going to be the best supported. As for your other comments about Ubuntu and needing to play "hunt the fix", aside from DVD playback, I haven't had issues right out of the box and not have had to play "hunt the fix". Mind giving me an example or two of which ones you needed to do that for?

      As for Dell, you don't suppose it was Microsoft leaning on them with OS prices as to why they disabled the Canonical repos? Remember, according to Dell a little while ago you should only be using Ubuntu if your interesting in open source programming.

      --
      Attention... all grammer nazi"s! Is they're anything; wrong with: my post,
    20. Re:Hardware support is still weak by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      GP is using bad anecdotal evidence, there are PLENTY of hardware mixes that will throw windows for a loop, or where the only drivers are awful (ie, HP MFC printers, SoundMAX cards, anything eMachines).

      GP has some points, but Ubuntu 10.04 actually has incredible support for hardware, working with 90% of devices without any downloads whatsoever. You can plug 3G usb modems in and have them "just work" without any 3rd party bull (appears in network manager and everything).

    21. Re:Hardware support is still weak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ummmm... Mac bandwagon? Where are the Mac multi-touch displays? My HP TouchSmart works under Linux, but not multi-touch (that only worked under Windows 7). If you mean touchpads, Synaptic is the name you're looking for, not Mac, and Ubuntu already supports multitouch on that. If you want a tablet for your PC look into Wacom stuff. If you want a monitor, there are plenty, just Google TouchScreen Monitor.

      Your forgetting, this is Apple and Slashdot, we're just waiting for everyone to make them and then Apple to make them last and then declare that they did it first and just forget anyone did them before. Like tablets, smartphones, ect...

    22. Re:Hardware support is still weak by EEPROMS · · Score: 1

      my parents are in their mid 60's and I installed Windows 7 on a home brew i7 machine I built them (i visited them during my holidays and built the machine and they live +900km from me) and trust me, no way in a million years would they have got all their hardware working. Right after the installing windows 7 the mouse driver would make the machine stall, then don't get me started on the video and keyboard drivers going ape shit. Recently my mum (aged 64) purchased a printer and installed the "windows 7" drivers and guess what "it doesnt work". Prints one page then the print cache shits itself. Tracked the problem down to Microsoft playing funny buggers with printers and the hardware makers not keeping things (installer problem) up-to-date. Funnily enough mum booted up into Linux (installed just in case windows self destructs) and the same printer works fine, no drivers needed. Also when I installed Ubuntu 10.04 "everything worked" it even asked me if I wanted to install the propriety ATi drivers. So now my mum prints in Linux because Windows crashes if she prints more than 1 job and it wont be fixed until my next visit later this year.

    23. Re:Hardware support is still weak by mjwx · · Score: 1

      I believe the gp stated Windows 7 fit that criteria...

      The GP did also state that it must "install PERFECTLY".

      Oh wait... He didn't specify that it needs to run acceptably.

      As you were.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    24. Re:Hardware support is still weak by westlake · · Score: 0, Troll

      Show me FIRST the Windows where I can take a mix of totally random hardware thrown together and hand my 67 year old clueless dad the disc and have him install it PERFECTLY, without a SINGLE fuckup or hardware issue.

      Your Dad buys the OEM Windows system bundle.

      He can choose from 94 desktops and 187 laptops shopping Walmart.com alone.

      It works out of the box or is returned to the vendor.

      He may chance the free upgrade-in-place from 64 bit Vista to 64 bit Windows 7, as I did, and discover that the geek's horror stories are mostly pure fantasy.

    25. Re:Hardware support is still weak by dugjohnson · · Score: 1

      Agreeing with parent...Installing on Linux and Windows is for people who want or need flexibility and are willing to put up with some effort to make that happen.
      If said 67 year old clueless dad wants to use a computer, he's probably clueless enough to just buy a box with what he needs installed already on it. Or if he REALLY wants to be limited, he can buy an Apple iPad. Since he's clueless, he won't mix the flexibility.
      And since he's clueless, he'd never figure out multi-touch anyway, so it's a non-issue for him.
      If all we are trying to do is serve aforementioned clueless dad, then we can stop all research and development now. You've taken a lot of pressure off the computer industry. Thanks.

      --
      My brain is overly lubricated
    26. Re:Hardware support is still weak by jedidiah · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Vendor specific nonsense that ignores the standard interfaces across all operating systems (MacOS included) does squat to encourage adoption of Linux. If anything, lack of this sort of nonsense for Linux is actually a considerable net gain. Incidentally, Linux has been using the "MacOS printing system" since before Apple was.

      If it were up to HP, I wouldn't be able to use my all-in-one as a network printer under Linux either.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    27. Re:Hardware support is still weak by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      > As for the sibling post suggesting running it on the internet for 30 minutes and then seeing how it works: are you still living in 2004?

      Nope. The Windows shortcut vulnerability is a 2010 problem.

      Windows 7 is still the same old broken promises.

      Some email phishing attempt will likely be the culprit enabled with a pervasive "execute first, ask questions later" mentality in Windows.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    28. Re:Hardware support is still weak by abigor · · Score: 0, Troll

      It's obvious to anyone with a functioning brain and mainstream work requirements that desktop Linux is bogus. Its defenders are typically people who don't do much except browse echo-chamber sites like Slashdot. It's fair to compare them to Amiga defenders, gold bugs, 9/11 conspiracy people and pretty much every other crank category out there.

    29. Re:Hardware support is still weak by fishexe · · Score: 1

      Show me ANY Linux where I can take a mix of totally random hardware thrown together and hand my 67 year old clueless dad the disc and have him install it PERFECTLY, without a SINGLE fuckup or hardware issue, and then we'll talk.

      Show me ANY windows where you can do the same, and then we'll talk.

      Because dad didn't want to wait until the weekend and installed Windows 7 HP without a SINGLE issue.

      Somehow, I suspect the hardware in that box wasn't selected at random. Either way, I recently re-installed Windows XP from the original media (packaged with the computer) after the system got irreparably hosed by a virus that no AV software would remove, and then attempted to reinstall the Wi-fi drivers from the original drivers disc, but the system couldn't find the fscking drivers. On the same media whose SOLE PURPOSE was to contain those drivers. After hours of wrangling with this during finals week, I told my wife (whose computer I was working with) that I would put Ubuntu on after my exams. While I was away she got bored and put it on herself, without a hitch. So I would say our anecdotal evidence cancels out, and YMMV is the true lesson here. And given both our experiences, I would say the problem with Ubuntu isn't lack of drivers, it's that it doesn't come pre-installed on nearly every new PC like Windows does.

      --
      "I don't care about the Constitution!" --Bill O'Reilly, November 17, 2009
    30. Re:Hardware support is still weak by adamofgreyskull · · Score: 1

      Your Dad buys the OEM Windows system bundle.

      Fail. The person you quoted perfectly addressed the hyperbolic complaint that a 67 year old could not install a Linux distribution on a random collection of hardware by pointing out that doing the same with any version of Windows would be equally hit-and-miss. (I contend that it would actually be more hit-and-miss. Slackware 13.* worked on my hardware out of the box. Windows 7 didn't, I had to download drivers for my network card from within Linux. I couldn't find drivers for my old Creative Soundblaster 1024 soundcard at all, so I ended up replacing it.)

      The fact that one can buy Windows pre-installed on a machine is almost completely irrelevant because there are (or were, at least) a number of companies selling Linux pre-installed on tried and tested hardware. The fact that there aren't as many of them has as much to do with hardware compatibility as it has to do with currency fluctuations in central Europe in the post-war period. I submit that it has more to do with people's familiarity with Windows and their fear of change coupled with the legacy of Microsoft's monopolistic history, i.e. overwhelming dominance of the desktop OS market and the popular mis-conception that they and Apple are the only shows in town.

    31. Re:Hardware support is still weak by hairyfeet · · Score: 0, Troll

      Yep, I MUST be a horrible troll for daring to point out the LAST thing Ubuntu needs is more bling bling bullshit, instead of saying "Gee, isn't Linux perfect and problem free? Well Biff it sure is, and Ubuntu is the bestest ever!". Yeah, I'm sure things will improve greatly if everyone pretends REAL hard. Hey, you want the specs for dad's PC? Because I'll be happy to give them to you. I know them by heart since pretty much everything but the CPU and RAM amount is a twinkie to mine so I could test new software on mine before letting it loose on his. The specs are thus....ECS Business Class motherboard with 4Gb of RAM and an HD3200 onboard, a Phenom 9650 quad I believe (that and the amount of RAM are the only differences between his and mine, I went for the Phenom II 965 quad and 8Gb) Realtek sound and networking, and a 500Gb HDD.

      So I'm sorry, you can spread your FUD all you want, or stick your head in the sand and pretend Windows is still like Win98, but that simply ain't reality anymore. My dad didn't need a SINGLE DRIVER, those that Windows 7 HP didn't have it got from windows Update at first boot, He had to answer a grand total of THREE questions, and those were simple "personalize your software" type of questions, and as I said at first boot it pointed out he didn't have an AV and brought up a page with several free and pay AVs. So if you aren't trying to troll I suggest you try Windows 7. It has to be the easiest Windows I've ever had to deal with, built in disc imaging, hell everything on that OS is designed for ease of use. Webcams, even a USB TV Tuner, Windows just pops up a "hey, would you like me to get a driver for you?" and takes care of things. It even popped up a "You have plugged in a headset mike. Would you like to learn about the built in voice recognition?" and walked dad through teaching Windows 7 to respond to his voice.

      So show me where you can take a random collection of NEW hardware, not some circa 1999 dumpster junk, hand a disc to a completely clueless user, and have them set it up with NO help, then I'll believe you, but until then I want to see with my own eyes just like I did with dad and Windows 7. The ONLY thing I had to do when I got there on Saturday was set up his Firefox and ABP,l since he didn't know where to go to get it (for those with clueless users I suggest Ninite with totally automated installers for most of the popular apps. Just tell them which boxes to check and run it) but everything else was done. NO yellow exclamations in device manager, NO viruses (dad followed the first run pop up and installed MSFT Security essentials) just a perfectly running PC.

      As I said I hoped that Canonical would do for Linux what Jobs did for NeXT or what Ballmer has with windows 7, but it seems like it is the same old headaches, just with some new bling bling on top. It certainly isn't any easier for a new user to set up by themselves than Debian or any other Distro. I had real hopes, which is why I set up no less than 4 boxes, all with different hardware, to run Ubuntu from 6-9.04. I really believed the "Linux for humans" bull and as a retailer I hoped that Shuttleworth would open a "third way" and do for Linux what Jobs did for NeXT. Instead what we got was a whole lot of bling bling, an OS that even the OEMs can't update from the Canonical repos because of lousy QA, in short I think we all got...well not really anything.

      Linux has been out there for 15 years now, and on the desktop it is still lower than the margin for error. You can lie to yourself and say it is a MSFT conspiracy, or that OEMs prefer paying Redmond, but any normal company would ask "What are we doing wrong? Why aren't we gaining numbers?" and do what they had to to address those issues. Instead you get labeled a troll for saying anything other than "Gee isn't Linux swell?" and nerds telling you with a straight face that users should be forced to "embrace the power of CLI" like it is the fucking force or something. Give me a damned break.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    32. Re:Hardware support is still weak by JohnFluxx · · Score: 3, Interesting

      > My dad didn't need a SINGLE DRIVER, those that Windows 7 HP didn't have it got from windows Update at first boot,

      Yay, anecdotal evidence! There are plenty of people for whom Ubuntu installs perfectly too. That is why you are being a troll.

      I've always had problems installing Windows - I think I'm unlucky.

      I recently bought a usb WIFI device from Japan to get on the internet. Windows did not have the drivers and the drivers that came with it only worked on the Japanese version of windows. I had to spend several days doing registry hacks to force it to install.

      On Linux I plugged it in and it worked.

    33. Re:Hardware support is still weak by gagol · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Ever tried to install Ubuntu with only Wifi access? Yep, impossible, that is why one of my friend is still on Windows as his only connection available is a community wireless in his building. You need the net to download the wireless network drivers first. That because of political preference of Cannonical. This is the biggest flaw so far.

      --
      Tomorrow is another day...
    34. Re:Hardware support is still weak by MeNeXT · · Score: 1

      Show me FIRST the Windows where I can take a mix of totally random hardware thrown together and hand my 67 year old clueless dad the disc and have him install it PERFECTLY, without a SINGLE fuckup or hardware issue.

      Your Dad buys the OEM Windows system bundle.

      He can choose from 94 desktops and 187 laptops shopping Walmart.com alone.

      It works out of the box or is returned to the vendor.

      He may chance the free upgrade-in-place from 64 bit Vista to 64 bit Windows 7, as I did, and discover that the geek's horror stories are mostly pure fantasy.

      Unless it happens to you.

      --
      DRM? No thanks, I'll just get it somewhere else...
    35. Re:Hardware support is still weak by kayoshiii · · Score: 1

      you had a better experience with Windows 7 than me. I recently built a new computer for my mum. Both Lan and sound were not detected out of the box unlike every Linux Distro I have used in the last 5 years.
      Don't get me wrong Ubuntu could do with a lot of improvement but Windows and even Mac are not perfect either.

    36. Re:Hardware support is still weak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Having used Ubuntu/Debian for the past few years, installing windows can be quite challenging. Its amazing the amount of work that needs to be done just to get a fresh install of a windows usable. Having just installed ubuntu 10.04 I have a fully functional server/programming/bioinformatics machine in about 30 minutes. Doing a fresh install of windows XP seems to take a good two afternoons worth of effort tracking down all the software updates and restarts and only then do I have a really sweet office 2007 setup. Additionally, you would be surprised about the amount of random useless hardware that just works in ubuntu, where in windows you will need to hunt down drivers. Additionally, I would like to state that trying to run a linux box like a windows box is a little silly and frustrating. If you really want that obscure devise to work or you just want to use buggy adobe products (flash), go use windows or get a Mac; trying to make linux something it is not misses the point and is bound to disappoint.

    37. Re:Hardware support is still weak by FrostDust · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't it be possible for him to download the Linux drivers for his card while using Windows, put it on a USB drive, and then use that to install the drivers once Ubuntu's installed?

      Also, it may not be a "political preference". You can only fit so many drivers on the install CD, alongside all of the other data.

    38. Re:Hardware support is still weak by dave87656 · · Score: 1

      I ran the Live-CD on my laptop with only Wifi. I didn't install it that way. I used Wubi so I couldn't say the it would install, but it supported my Wifi out of the box on the Live-CD so the driver is definitely there.

    39. Re:Hardware support is still weak by dave87656 · · Score: 1

      You know, I probably shouldn't feed the coward, but what the fuck, I'm bored. Show me ANY Linux where I can take a mix of totally random hardware thrown together and hand my 67 year old clueless dad the disc and have him install it PERFECTLY, without a SINGLE fuckup or hardware issue, and then we'll talk.

      Ok, I'll bite ...

      Try taking a Windows CD and doing that with any random set of hardware. You will literally spend hours downloading drivers. What I can say is that my hardware PC, Network card, Video Card, Printer installed out of the box in 10 minutes with Ubuntu. I couldn't even access the network with Windows XP (I haven't tried it with Vista or Win 7 which are probably better). In any case, my Windows 7 notebook did not support my printer out of the box (had to download the driver).

      Window itself has very poor device support. Since it is so widespread, however, most hardware vendors have drivers for it, which is not always the case with Linux.

    40. Re:Hardware support is still weak by dave87656 · · Score: 1

      These are people who buy a PC with Windows installed and assume that Windows installation is where you enter your PC name and login name.

      A windows fanboy friend of mine used to deride Linux. Until his PC stopped working and he reloaded Windows (XP at the time). The PC couldn't even recognize his network card. So he called me up so I could download the driver for his network card, which I did on my Ubuntu box.

      He was also quite impressed with Linux's virtual desktops, though he had a hard time admitting it after failing to find a Windows equivalent. But, being a Windows fanboy, they will never concede that linux is better at anything, so he promptly showed that Windows can do that just as well, all you need it a dual-port video card and two monitors!

    41. Re:Hardware support is still weak by Vancorps · · Score: 1

      I'll second this, 10.04 was a dramatic improvement in hardware support. If only multi-monitor support could work without me having to log out and back in. Windows still does multi-monitor the best and it's only improved with Windows 7.

      As a side note I found with 10.04 that bluetooth tethering with my cell phone worked out of the box using the Network Manager wizard. It's come a long ways since I would also remove it and install WICD.

    42. Re:Hardware support is still weak by cK-Gunslinger · · Score: 1

      *shrug*

      I bought a new $330 15.6" dual-core Acer laptop from Wal-Mart on Sunday and without even booting to Windows 7, I inserted a Linux Mint 9 CD, formatted the HD, installed the OS and had a fully-working laptop with video, sound, 3D, wireless, and webcam working 100% without even a single reboot or driver download.

      I don't see it getting much easier than that.

    43. Re:Hardware support is still weak by dave87656 · · Score: 1

      My laptop has a dual-boot. My wifi sometimes doesn't work under Windows 7 but it always works on Ubuntu. Go figure.

      There are some things I like better about Win 7 than Ubuntu, but, support for hardware is easier with Ubuntu. All I had to do to install my Brother HL-5050 printer was to plug it in. Shortly after plugging it in, a message comes that my printer "Brother HL-5050" is installed and ready to use.

    44. Re:Hardware support is still weak by hairyfeet · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Oh don't get me wrong, I'm not saying Windows doesn't have plenty of problems. As a PC builder, repairman, and retailer I'd love to have the developers at Redmond by the ear all day just to point out problems that need addressed.

      What I'm saying is, and by a fairly large margin, MSFT has tried their damnedest to put the user and their experience at the top of the list. If there is a problem? There is nearly always a nice GUI or a wizard that will hold the users hand. Problem in Linux? Oh boy are you fucked. Be prepared to spend hours digging through man pages, trawling forums (IF you are lucky enough to have a PC that works enough to surf that is) and having to "tweak" a bunch of "fixes" that frankly no user should have to deal with in the first fucking place. Oh and I hope you like staring at that God Damned blinking cursor, because the ONLY help you'll get 9 times out of 10 is "open up bash and type" this bunch of shit that rarely works without "tweaking" Yeah, that's really helpful. Thanks.

      I may not say this correctly, and sorry if I get it wrong because I can't find your post, but an old Linux guy here said it best...Windows and OSX are USER centric, whereas Linux and Unix are PROCESS centric. That is whereas OSX and Windows actually try to help the user, even if they get it wrong, ALL Linux cares about is the process. Grep, pipes, Bash, it is all about the job, and frankly fuck the user if he/she don't like it. while this works fine on servers and HPCs, where you have guys with tons of degrees getting paid $$$$ to deal with that shit, on a desktop? Most folks would rather spill hot coffee on their crotch than deal with that 70s era hacker bullshit.

      THAT is why I had such hopes for Ubuntu. Shuttleworth talked all this bullshit about "Linux for humans" and how he was gonna put his money behind making a real Linux desktop, and like a dumbass I believed him. My bad, as I looked at Jobs and how he took BSD and made a badass OS that now is kicking ass on laptops and cell phones. I figured if Jobs could do it, and with Shuttleworth rallying the troops (as all you hear is how Linux guys think their OS is so great and could kick ass if given a chance) we would truly get a USER centric Linux, with nice GUIs that would help even the most clueless user enjoy the enhanced security along with the ease of use of a Windows 7 or OSX. Instead what we got is just like TFA, more and more "Wow, isn't that cool!" shit that lasts exactly until the first problem, and then you are ROYALLY fucked, because as I said the first sign of trouble it is CLI city.

      So believe me, I feel your pain. I have had to deal with some seriously fucked Windows, especially Windows XP and Vista. But it seems like even when they make mistakes MSFT is trying to get it better, just as Apple keeps making OSX a little better each time. But it seems like Linux is just stuck in a rut, with a bunch of ego bullshit and bad attitude holding things back. It never seems to get any better, not really. it never seems to get any easier, the same problems I ran into in early 2000 are still there in 2010 while everyone else just keeps getting better every release. Like I said simple bullshit like having drivers that work in Foo work in Foo+1 which before anyone screams "But...look at XP to windows 7!" you get on average a DECADE for Windows releases, whereas you are lucky to get a year and a half of bug fixes with most distros. Hell even Canonical on LTS leaves you with old apps more than actually getting a real long term stable OS.

      Maybe I'm just a dreamer, maybe I'm just a fool that still remembers when we had real competition like Atari and Commodore and a vibrant PC ecosystem. Maybe one day Linux will get their own Gates or Jobs that'll crack the whip and truly make a "Linux for normal folks" but sadly it is pretty damned clear that Shuttleworth and Ubuntu ain't it. They just keep sticking bling bling bullshit on top of a broken OS and calling it a day. No real QA, crazy 6 month releases, hardware that works in x biting the dust i

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    45. Re:Hardware support is still weak by dave87656 · · Score: 1

      He had to answer a grand total of THREE questions

      What planet are you living on?

      My laptop, which had Win 7 already installed, required a whole lot more than just three questions to "personalize" the installation. I had to reboot it more than three times. Sheesh. That statement alone shows you are an unfortunate windows fanboy who must justify his investment.

      I think Windows 7 has its pluses and minuses and I do use it along with Ubuntu but, for those of us who use and know both, your post is simply way off-base.

    46. Re:Hardware support is still weak by Kitkoan · · Score: 1

      Keeping your complaints as vague as possible... PROBLEM. In your post you claim same old problems. What are those? I haven't seen problems beyond the DVD playback issue which is easily fixed. You've just pretty much went "I had a problem, but it's a secret so it can stay a problem." Thats pretty much trolling, trying to keep your answers as vague as possible so they can't be called is what people typically do when are BSing. So, what DIDN'T work on Ubuntu? You claim hardware then give a list of hardware but refuse to say what part of the hardware didn't work. As I mentioned in one of my others posts, I have a franken-desktop that has many new parts and you know what? Ubuntu recognized them without issue even though they were new. As for proof, how do you propose I do that? Buy a bunch of new equipment and video it for you? Your demands of proof are just as turnable as your "proof" is to us. Show us your proof that you couldn't get Ubuntu to run on 4 different systems. As for your Dell issue, that sounds like a Dell problem that you want to force upon Ubuntu even though THEY DIDN'T CAUSE THE PROBLEM. Thats like my car dealer altering my engine until it doesn't work and I bitch at Ford. Ford didn't cause the problem, the dealer did.

      And please, which post demanded you "embrace the power of CLI" like its the fucking force. Because you sound like your trying to stir up crap while refusing to show proof. Again, this is trolling behavior.

      As for Ubuntu not having nationwide support, its the forums, which there is a link in Firefox to it on the bar by default. Not like you can call up Microsoft or Apple for answers for free anytime you want. And as for the help desks in their personal stores, great if you live by them. Useless when you don't. Also, as for Ubuntus forums, those questions get answered, typically within a few hours and unlike some other companies official forums, you don't need to worry about your posts being deleted.

      And complaining that people are just trying to hide the problems when they want some clarity of the vague "problems"... that is a PROBLEM.

      --
      Attention... all grammer nazi"s! Is they're anything; wrong with: my post,
    47. Re:Hardware support is still weak by dave87656 · · Score: 1

      Sorry to hear that. My ubuntu installed out of the box with WUBI. Though, I know that's not always the case, if you have esoteric hardware. But if you have pretty standard hardware, it works pretty well.

    48. Re:Hardware support is still weak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Right after the installing windows 7 the mouse driver would make the machine stall, then don't get me started on the video and keyboard drivers going ape shit.

      ASUS i7 mobo? Disable EHCI handoff in the BIOS. It's a BIOS bug (and yes it's in the latest version too). Not Windows' fault.

    49. Re:Hardware support is still weak by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, but I'm afraid you are SEVERELY out of date. WinXP is already TWO generations old. It is like comparing Slackware 1 to modern OSX. Oh and I saw you had to download the driver in Windows 7? did you try the little helpful link in Action Center? You wouldn't have even needed to open a web page there, or if you wanted to do it old school you could have gone to device manager and done the same. Hell I recently picked up a USB Tv Tuner and didn't even get to dig the driver CD out of the box before I got a "Would you like me to get drivers?" style pop up in Action Center.

      In the end you can blame the OEMs, Redmond, whomever you like, but if after 15 years you still have less on the desktop than the margin for error I say its time to say "What are we doing wrong?" and working to fix it. As a retailer I'd say lose the CLI, hell make it so the ONLY way to get to CLI is just through flaming hoops to force developers to stop relying on it, make an easy to use GUI for basic problems like drivers, and make a rock solid hardware driver ABI so drivers that work in Ubuntu 9 work in Ubuntu 10 with ZERO effort or hoop jumping. Make it easy for guys like me to sell and support your product and we will. But as it is now all we get is harping and, I swear to God this is true, zealots telling us with a straight face to teach our users to "embrace the POWER of CLI" like it is the fricking force. Like users in 2010 want to deal with that 70s era bullshit.

      Allow me to make a final prediction: In 5 years both Apple and MSFT will have out even better OSes, which will be even easier for even those like my dad to use. Retailers from little guys like me to big Walmart style shops will carry these new OSes, even though it hurts our profits, because it is easy for our customers to use and will equal less returns and hassles for us. Meanwhile in Linux the EXACT SAME problems I have complained about here, like piss poor flaky drivers, too much CLI, lousy user experience, updates breaking hardware, and a general feeling of being unpolished, will STILL be here, just as before, only with more bling on top. And Linux will STILL have lower than the margin for error desktop numbers. I really hope this prediction is proven wrong, but after watching and trying various distros for years now, sadly my guess is it will come 100% true.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    50. Re:Hardware support is still weak by ToasterMonkey · · Score: 2, Informative

      Speaking of drivers, I bought an HP printer with claims to support only Mac and Windows. Lo and behold, turns out there is a 'NIX driver,

      Call HP and ask them why it's not printing with the highest DPI setting (even if it is.. humor me). Then you'll learn the meaning of support.

    51. Re:Hardware support is still weak by ozmanjusri · · Score: 1
      Ever tried to install Ubuntu with only Wifi access?

      Yes.

      Yep, impossible

      No, very easy.

      Where does all this FUD come from?

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    52. Re:Hardware support is still weak by PrecambrianRabbit · · Score: 1

      Out of curiosity, did your dad try installing Ubuntu on that rig? If so, what problems did he encounter?

      I ask because I put together a computer for my mother a few months back, with relatively similar specs, and was pretty impressed with both the Windows 7 and Ubuntu 10 install processes. They were both painless experiences; I can't remember either one being technical at all. I certainly didn't have to muck around with the CLI at all (well, that's not quite true - I did have to do some CLI magic to get a USB wireless stick to work, but in W7 it didn't work because there was simply no driver at all available, so I'd call that one a tie, or in Ubuntu's favor).

      Point is, you've clearly had some bad experiences with Ubuntu, and you're entitled to your opinion, but I really think the whole user experience for Ubuntu is vastly, vastly better for the majority of users than your experience indicates.

    53. Re:Hardware support is still weak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must not do much EDA or video rendering.

    54. Re:Hardware support is still weak by kayoshiii · · Score: 1

      I have a 23 inch monitor that supports multi-touch in front of me right now. As it happens I am running Ubuntu 10.4. So 10.10 may be worth upgrading to...

    55. Re:Hardware support is still weak by ToasterMonkey · · Score: 0, Redundant

      There's my magical solution to something I hate.

      I hate it, because I know it will never change.

    56. Re:Hardware support is still weak by ToasterMonkey · · Score: 1

      You must not match one of his two tests.

    57. Re:Hardware support is still weak by Arrepiadd · · Score: 1

      Well, I've got a 4 year old laptop (Sony Vaio SZ1HP/B, not really the most uncommon thing around) and Ubuntu recognizes everything but the webcam from minute 0. Windows 7 didn't recognize the webcam, just like Ubuntu (and solving this issue involved installing some Windows XP drivers [yes, XP] found on some hard to find forum). On top of that, the wireless card was recognized but didn't work. The solution was deleting the driver, rebooting and letting Windows find it again. This is something I've done dozens of times on other systems so I know it (sometimes) works. For the average Joe if it's already recognized then it must be ok, so they would be with a laptop without wireless network. On top of that Windows 7 feels (and is) much slower and makes the laptop run with cpu fan all the time. Granted, it's not a new laptop so it ends up being slow, but one would guess after 4 years the hardware would be accept as mainstream, no? Yet, Ubuntu got it better. And it's not a random set of parts, just in case you forgot! So, your point was...

    58. Re:Hardware support is still weak by kayoshiii · · Score: 1

      Yes I have...
      On several desktops and a few laptops. Only one machine gave me any problems. For that I just used one of the USB wireless adapters I used for the desktops. My general experience is that more tends to work out of the box on Ubuntu than windows but for some hardware configurations it really sucks and if it isn't supported out of the box it is harder to get running [than windows].

    59. Re:Hardware support is still weak by kiddygrinder · · Score: 3, Interesting

      that's absolute bullshit, my current new windows install has about 4 missing drivers till i bother tracking down my motherboard disc, EVERY SINGLE REQUIRED DRIVER downloaded from the ubuntu repo for my dual boot linux partition and on all 3 linux installs in my house. the only thing that is stopping me from running ubuntu only with no issues is native versions of blizzard and valve games.

      --
      This is a joke. I am joking. Joke joke joke.
    60. Re:Hardware support is still weak by mfraz74 · · Score: 1

      Yes, I have installed Ubuntu on various laptops and netbooks. Only had problems with 2, the first one I had to use the Windows drivers with ndiswrapper as there were no open source drivers around and the company had vanished years ago. The second one worked after I realised that there was a switch on the front of the laptop to turn wifi on!

    61. Re:Hardware support is still weak by vlueboy · · Score: 1

      But the truth of the matter is that Linux on the Desktop will never become popular [...]

      Just like "Unix on the desktop" didn't become mainstream? See MacOS X

      and it's beyond their abilities to switch to a new one

      See MacOS X's switch campaign some years back.

      The main difference is that Apple had several more decades of hardware, software and market EXP than Canonical, and a ton more cash.

      I'm not betting the house on something coming in the next five years, nor Ubuntu being that miracle. I'm just keeping the mind open ready a Linux distro so notable that it will be sold at your local Walmart store near the shelf with those bargain Antivirus bundles we've all seen :)

    62. Re:Hardware support is still weak by imakemusic · · Score: 1

      Speaking of drivers, I bought an HP printer with claims to support only Mac and Windows. Lo and behold, turns out there is a 'NIX driver,

      Hmmm. By "support" did they mean "will only work on mac/pc" or "if it's not working we'll only give you support (i.e. help) if you're on mac/pc as the number of different flavours of Linux make support a headache"?

      --
      Brain surgery - it's not rocket science!
    63. Re:Hardware support is still weak by burisch_research · · Score: 1

      My kingdom for a mod point - mod parent up!!

      --
      char*f="char*f=%c%s%c;main(){printf(f,34,f,34);}";main(){printf(f,34,f,34);}
    64. Re:Hardware support is still weak by hairyfeet · · Score: 0, Redundant

      I'm being a troll and Ubuntu works perfectly, really? Answer me this and answer TRUTHFULLY: when you upgraded from Ubuntu 9 to 10, did ALL the hardware continue to work, with NO errors? Because I'm betting that answer is hell no. FACT: The lifecycle in most distros, including Ubuntu, is incredibly short. Bug fixes are usually only ported to the latest and greatest, so staying on an older release is a PITA and potentially dangerous security wise. FACT: Thanks to EXTREMELY poor QA and relying on volunteers for shit you should NEVER rely on volunteers for, like drivers, the odds of you going from say Ubuntu 8 to Ubuntu 9.04 and not having hardware get fucked is practically ZERO. FACT: thanks to lack of a real hardware ABI (something Apple and MSFT have had for practically forever) drivers can, do, and often will bite it hard hard on upgrades. Meanwhile thanks to the 10 year lifecycle average on windows the odds are the hardware will be in the dumpster before it goes out of support, same with OSX and how they supported the old G4s for quite awhile.

      I'm sorry, but if I was a troll I'd be posting links to RMS eating toe cheese, not practically holding up signs saying "Please fix this!" and hoping that sometime someone will actually listen. Hell I even wrote an article for LinuxInsider pointing out what as a retailer I'd need to sell your product. What I got was "Those are great ideas, you should go do that". Right, like I'm gonna close up my shop, spend 5 years and God knows how much getting a CS degree so that I can completely program my own distro and set up a giant web based business for...what exactly? when I can just sell windows and OSX and save myself about 6 years of classes and countless headaches?

      Maybe one day someone will listen, maybe one day someone will come along and do for Linux what Jobs did for BSD and NeXT. But considering the Linux community's answer to everything is "La la la, I can't hear you, you must be a troll or a shill for teh man!" I seriously doubt it. enjoy your non existent desktop numbers, but don't say those of us in retail never tried to point out the problems that needed addressed, you simply refused to listen and instead spent your time on bling and yet another text editor. Sad.

      Oh and your big anecdote is you bought something built for the Asian market and it didn't work in the USA? Then you might be shocked to learn you can't buy DVDs there either. Its called region lockout and has nothing to do with windows, and everything to do with companies charging different prices for different markets. Sheesh.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    65. Re:Hardware support is still weak by dylan_- · · Score: 1

      It seems that the installer treats any internal or external, occupied or unoccupied, flash card slot as a hard drive.

      Correction: the installer treats anything that Windows assigns a drive letter to as a drive.

      Unfortunately, Windows assigns any internal or external, occupied or unoccupied, flash card slot a drive letter.

      The solution is to disable the card reader in your device manager till the installation is complete. Or you could do it your way if you really like clicking...

      --
      Igor Presnyakov stole my hat
    66. Re:Hardware support is still weak by JohnFluxx · · Score: 1

      > I'm being a troll and Ubuntu works perfectly, really?

      Uh no, I'm saying that Windows doesn't work perfectly, which is something that you're claiming.

      > Oh and your big anecdote is you bought something built for the Asian market and it didn't work in the USA?

      Uh, I live in Japan. And I'm English.

    67. Re:Hardware support is still weak by Laurence0 · · Score: 1

      I can switch to multiple monitors without logging out - I do have to use the resolution tool though. And Compiz crashes and it drops back to Metacity when I go to multiple monitors, so it's certainly not perfect. I think that's due to not having enough graphics memory though.

    68. Re:Hardware support is still weak by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      Whilst I agree the OP is talking nonsense and I can't stand that kind of response - you're being unfair on Ubuntu. Installation on my thrown-together hardware was as simple on Ubuntu as it was on Windows 7. Drivers were installed automatically just fine.

      For codecs, Ubuntu did better - the media player automatically downloads required codes fine. WMP always tries to do this, but I've never once had it succeed, instead leaving me to manually download coded packs from somewhere on the Internet.

      The only time I've needed to use the command line is for techy stuff like development, same as I have to on Windows.

      I really hoped that Canonical would do for Linux what Apple did for NeXT, but it is pretty obvious now that just ain't gonna be the case.

      Add a Fisher Price interface, make it depend on closed source components, and only make it run on expensive PCs that they build? Please no.

      Maybe if you are a geek or have a CS degree and don't mind playing "hunt the fix" when the latest updates break your wireless and sound it would be okay, but how many average folks are gonna fit that profile?

      This was my view of Ubuntu 8-10 years ago, but not anymore. (It was also my view of DOS/Windows about 15-20 years ago...)

    69. Re:Hardware support is still weak by Agent0013 · · Score: 1

      This is a great example of bitching just for the sake of bitching. Sorry! You probably have had problems with computers running Ubuntu. But how can you say that Windows does not have the same problems!!!

      A coworker and I had Windows XP machines that would not install the new HP printer drivers because we had a previous HP printer installed that crapped out. It was an HP driver install exe. They didn't give you just the driver to install through Windows. The install program would just freeze up and never finish. We removed all driver files, did unistall and tried everything we could think of short of an OS reinstall. We just printed to the copier instead and if we needed something it color we would email it to someone who's computer took the drivers. Eventually I set my computer up as a dual boot because I had to work with some Linux files for one of the projects we had. The Ubuntu install detected the printer and worked right out of the box with no downloads or installs necessary.

      Now to me, that is an example where Ubuntu was much, much easier to get working than Windows was. I find that alot. If you just start trying to learn how things work in Linux, how they are different, you start to see that it is easier in a lot of ways.

      Installing software is a ton easier in Linux. It is more like the Apple iTunes store than it is in the Windows world. Except that it is all free.

      --

      -- ssoorrrryy,, dduupplleexx sswwiittcchh oonn.. -Quote found on actual fortune cookie.
    70. Re:Hardware support is still weak by helix2301 · · Score: 1

      I agree Ubuntu Linux is designed to be simple and easy I have seen so many computer illiterate people use it with no issues more than I can say for the average window user. Ubuntu needs better marketing that would defiantly help them out. They are also the first ones to take the chance on the desktop market they are always trying to keep up with the rest of the market.

    71. Re:Hardware support is still weak by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      And I've had to trawl the Internet looking for solutions to Windows problems, whilst Ubuntu works fine.

      I don't understand why the argument has to be one versus the other. They're both pretty good these days. Windows is still my preferred OS, but Ubuntu is not as bad as you make out anymore.

    72. Re:Hardware support is still weak by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      How well does the Windows Ubuntu Installer compare?

    73. Re:Hardware support is still weak by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      "Amiga defenders"? Is that like, people who use Amigas in self-defence, or something?

      The people who are still whining about the Amiga years later are the annoying ones, you mean. I'm sure you had much better fun with your 286 DOS PC. In 2030, you'll probably still be here criticising the 2010 version of Ubuntu.

    74. Re:Hardware support is still weak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it's just a BIOS issue, why did it "magically" work when he installed Ubuntu? Wouldn't that same BIOS issue effect Ubuntu as well, or is it just that Windows isn't appropriately dealing with the hardware ... ?

    75. Re:Hardware support is still weak by JohnnyUK · · Score: 1

      Actually, from what I've read a huge amount of work has been done on multitouch drivers for linux. We use a few different types at work - we had to do some fiddling to get them to work with 9.10 and 10.04 but the kernal revision used in 10.10 has the drivers right in there from the get-go like the EVTouch driver.

    76. Re:Hardware support is still weak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like you built a shitty system with generic crappy parts. Seriously, I built machines with random parts for a living, and have only ran into issues about 3% of the time. Your lack of efficiency in hardware choice should not be used as a generalized example for operating system issues. A computer is the sum of it's parts. I can't blame a cars software system for being shit, when the engine I put in was from a used Ford Pinto.

    77. Re:Hardware support is still weak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it's anything like Apple's Windows support for its Macbook/Macbook Pro touchpads, it'll suck. I have to move my fingers *just right* to make multitouch scrolling work... and curiously, it's a lot easier on the same pad in OSX.

    78. Re:Hardware support is still weak by dave87656 · · Score: 1

      I'm sorry, but I'm afraid you are SEVERELY out of date.

      I spoke recently to a local computer shop about upgrading my Vista laptop to Win7. They offer that service and what they told me (and they do this a lot so I guess they would know) is that they need the better part of the morning to get Win 7 up and running with the correct drivers for the hardware and so on. This was one reason I decided it would be easier and cheaper to just get a new laptop than to upgrade the old one.

      As far as relying on the CLI, all of my admin functions on Ubuntu 10.04 I've done with a GUI. There may still be things that are done with the CLI, but you generally don't need it. But, that argument is like saying a user should never have to deal with the Registry on windows. It's still required especially when something goes wrong. Not exactly something your typical grandfather is going to be good at. If you are still doing everything via the CLI you are not up-to-date.

      Make it easy for guys like me to sell and support your product and we will.

      It's not actually my product and I don't associate myself with Linux or with Windows. I just use what works. I have 60 linux boxes I manage at work (remotely). You set them up and they run until there is a hardware failure or a network issue (like someone unplugs the switch). My job is to write software and I spend 95% of my time doing that. The linux boxes just don't bother us.

      We have about 15 Windows boxes and a full time windows administrator for those 15 boxes. He's constantly running around updating anti-virus, calling MS with issues and so on. Windows is a real headache when it comes to administration. And I've heard similar stories (regarding the high cost of administering windows machines) from others as well.

      And Linux will STILL have lower than the margin for error desktop numbers.

      Since linux is downloaded and copied, the installed base is probably higher. But, it won't reach Windows market-share or probably Mac market share anytime soon for a lot of reasons. True, it's not as polished, but basically it's a chicken-and-egg problem.

      updates breaking hardware

      I've never seen that happen. Not at home and not on the 60 linux boxes we have at work.

    79. Re:Hardware support is still weak by Adm.Wiggin · · Score: 1

      Where are the "Funny" mod points when I need them?

    80. Re:Hardware support is still weak by westlake · · Score: 1

      The solution is to disable the card reader in your device manager till the installation is complete. Or you could do it your way if you really like clicking...

      That's fine and dandy.

      But the installer let you proceed without any warning - and the solution to the problem wasn't to be found on the Ubuntu WUBI site.

      Where it belongs.

      WUBI - remember - was advertised as a safe and simple way to install and uninstall Ubuntu Linux like any ordinary Windows program.

    81. Re:Hardware support is still weak by vlueboy · · Score: 1

      Thanks!
      I worded my original post around little "hardware support" meaning hardware shops creating touchpad peripherals for us to buy.

      The plus side is that the thread is a wealth of info on touchscreens, kernels and my intended topics of touchpad hardware shopping :)
      Thanks also to everyone who contributed

    82. Re:Hardware support is still weak by hairyfeet · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      You want specifics? Be careful what you wish for, you just might get it...Out of the 4 machines I set up, here is what was broken either on first install or broken upon update, ready? ATI Nvidia GPUs, Realtek sound (1 AC97 the other the new HD) 1 Realtek and 2 SiS networking slots, and the Broadcom, which is the most popular by far on laptops? Never did get that fucking thing to work right. Oh and the Sigma sound took nearly 2 days worth of after hours bullshit to get working, only to be completely FUBARed when it updated. Yeah, thanks Ubuntu. Linux for humans my ass.

      As for "Embrace the power of CLI"? I can't remember which forum I got THAT brilliant piece of advice from, but here is something similar. And I quote ""CLI is frankly too strange and complex to the users Linux must attract in order to gain market share." What do you call using Start, Run in the windows environment? This premise the Linux need to be dumb down to get expansion is unfounded. Prior to the Windows GUI we had Dos and a lot of non Techie types ( like myself) found their way. A GUI makes things easy no disagreement here but lets stop with the dumbing down effect. It was this dumbing down effect that lead to virus and spyware that has infested the windows world. Please we need to be creating smarter users not more Techies "

      Now do you know what a NORMAL person, one that doesn't find spending all day staring at a terminal "fun" is gonna say to that bullshit? "How much is Windows Home again?". Look don't blame me if your community is bound and determined to keep Linux at last place, I have NO control over you people. I was asked to write an article about what it would take to get Linux out of last place, and I did only to get the same BS responses we have been seeing from the Linux community for the last DECADE.

      So if it is all just a troll, oh wise one, answer me these questions: Why will NO retailer in USA touch your product with a 100 foot pole huh? They could make more profit without the MSFT tax, I personally pay on average $100 more per PC simply in fees. so why won't we touch your product? Why are you in DEAD LAST, hell even Win2K which is EOL is beating you, on the desktop, even when you give it away? Why? Give you a hint, it is NOT a "massive conspiracy" involving money trucks from Redmond. It is because your user experience sucks ass, that's why! God forbid you making ANYTHING easy for the user, oh fuck no! God forbid there should be simple fucking GUIs or a stable ABI so every update don't make the thing fall down like a house of cards!

      But don't worry, after seeing all the complete delusional behavior, the total denial of the situation, and the venomous hatred spewed towards anyone whose says there is a problem (notice that even though I have been nothing but honest EVERY post in this thread is automatically modded down? Gotta love that Linux groupthink!) I have decided to simply avoid your product like an STD and have blocked the Linux section from my RSS. You can stay here and go "Gee isn't Linux swell, and Ubuntu is the bestest!" all day long, and pat yourself on the back for the 400th text editor, meanwhile the rest of the planet will ignore you like the Amiga guys. It has been 15 YEARS and you are STILL DEAD LAST. Wake the fuck up and find out what you need to do to sell your product!!!!!

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    83. Re:Hardware support is still weak by snadrus · · Score: 1

      I'm running SC2 with no hacks. An honest thanks to Blizzard here.
      Follow the few changes to Wine to get Warcraft 3 FT, WoW, Starcraft running.
      I haven't tried the older ones.
      Have you investigated Valve on Wine? In any case they're coming to Linux "soon".

      --
      Science & open-source build trust from peer review. Learn systems you can trust.
    84. Re:Hardware support is still weak by hairyfeet · · Score: 0, Troll

      I probably shouldn't even be answering you, since everything that doesn't say "Gee isn't Linux swell?" gets downmodded to hell, but I was raised to not be rude. The problem, which seems to be missed completely by everyone here, isn't the INITIAL experience, okay? The initial experience is hunky dory. The problem is what happens when something goes wrong which I've found with Linux in general and Ubuntu in particular to be a damned near daily occurrence. Here is an example, using the box, which as I said I built twinkies just for testing.

      First boot of Ubuntu...Video fucked. Tried to install driver vis GUI by allowing restricted drivers...fucked. Turns out to be reading the onboard and NOT the discrete, which from the looks of Ubuntu forums is yet another problem that has been there awhile and never fixed. surprise. End up in single user mode, put a bunch of CLI bullshit in (which if this was my only computer I would have been fucked, because it is kinda hard to trawl forums with no video) and finally, after 1 hour and 42 minutes, get it working. When I get it all including sound going I get the "updates waiting" or whatever it is called, and not liking unpatched machines on my network, I let it run. Guess what happens? On reboot the sound and video are borked AGAIN...ARRGH!

      The problem, which everyone seems to pretend don't exist, is the driver and troubleshooting options in Linux are piss poor at best. OSX doesn't do this, hell Solaris doesn't do this, but thanks to Linus being an asshat and refusing to allow a stable driver ABI time and time again shit that works in Foo is broken in Foo+1. This is frankly unacceptable and really makes Linux look like a Mickey Mouse hobbyist OS. Everyone else can update without breaking, why can't Linux? Until there is a simple way to fix problems and deal with driver issues VIA GUI, I will continue to warn folks to stay away from Linux it is simply too much of a headache.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    85. Re:Hardware support is still weak by kiddygrinder · · Score: 1

      yeah, you can run them all with wine, i just got sick of the slowdowns

      --
      This is a joke. I am joking. Joke joke joke.
    86. Re:Hardware support is still weak by Kitkoan · · Score: 1

      TO start with, I haven't been online in days (RL issues) so sorry about the delayed answering.

      Now, after getting through your 4th sentence I'm already questioning your legitimacy of if you know what your talking about. Your ATI Nvidia GPUs? Its either an ATI card or an Nvidia card (or did you mean some had ATI and some had Nvidia?). Thats like telling me your Microsoft MacBookPro had an issue. Its either one or the other.

      Then you've mentioned your "Sigma sound". Do you mean the SigmaTel? They went out of business in 2007, but sold their PC audio tech in mid-2006 to Integrated Device Technology. In short, no modern OS is going to support it, I don't even think Vista would support their cards since it was released in November of 2006, months later and they would have expected SigmaTel to update those drivers (which they wouldn't since they didn't make them anymore). I admit, I only started using Ubuntu since 8.04, but your asking a lot for any OS to support that sound card. Similar arguement for the AC'97 since that was retired in 2004. Vista and Windows 7 might support these, but this is old gear that isn't really found anymore so support gets questionable for any OS, let alone Ubuntu.

      The SiS network slot (I'm guessing you meant SiS 900 networking cards) are again really old tech that was built to run on Windows 2000, then got some working drivers for XP and 2003 as an after thought. Again, these won't be supported today and I'm aware that driver support of hardware from pre-2001 is shaky at best. But like your other examples nothing newer won't run it, even Vista would be lucky if possible which is the time line of Ubuntu 6.06. Now since both Ubuntu 6.06 were released in 2006 I'm putting it on driver support-par of Vista, not XP.

      As for "the Broadcom", Broadcom deals in many different things so I might need you to define Broadcom a little better then the companies name.

      Now, this is all just going over your HD that you couldn't get working. The issue is, your answers are still vague to almost impossible to answer and would explain why no forum/person could help you. You need to do more then throw out some company names, more so when the companies in question produce multiple kinds of hardware.

      As for your complaint about being told to "embrace the power of cli", he didn't say that. He said we need to stop dumbing down things, AKA like Windows having you always log into an Administrators account. You can have a GUI that doesn't dumb down the experience and make it easy to break the machine, problem is when the original Windows GUI was made, the internet wasn't really a thought so you could dumb down the experience since without physical access to the machine you couldn't do much. Both Ubuntu and Vista/Windows 7 now do this with the pop-up warnings that show the user that be careful with what your doing since it might be bad, allowing a GUI that helps make things simple and accessible without making problems worse down the road.

      You then complain about "Now do you know what a NORMAL person, one that doesn't find spending all day staring at a terminal "fun" is gonna say to that bullshit?" about CLI to Windows GUI. I'd say to start with, what NORMAL person uses Start, Run on Windows? Normal people go Start, All Programs and then chooses whatever they want. On Ubuntu its click on Applications and click whatever you want. Or if you really need to do the same things as Start, Run just press Alt-F2. You sound like your purposely trying to over-complicate something that doesn't need to be so complex. Like changing a tire on a car, you can either take the tire iron and the carjack and use those to remove/change the tire, or you can take the power drill, drive/push the car onto the car lift, secure the car to the lift, raise the car into the air, remove the entire tire and wheel rims, remove the tire from the rims, add the new tire to the rim, inflate tire, use PSI gauge to make sure tire is at right pressure, ect...

      Why doe

      --
      Attention... all grammer nazi"s! Is they're anything; wrong with: my post,
  3. This is awsome news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Right up there with that decade old troll post about Rob Malda having his dick and nuts cut off for his homosexual lover.

    1. Re:This is awsome news... by sexconker · · Score: 1

      The ol' "nullo" copy-pasta.
      Haven't seen it in a while.

  4. It's just a toy by KiloByte · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Having tried multitouch, it's useless in the long term. It is a nice gimmick to show in an advertisement, but for using it for longer than 15 minutes at a time, it's not a good idea -- you'll hand will get sore in no time.

    Even for mobile devices, there is simply no better thing than the good old keyboard. If you try the on-screen touch thingy on an iPad or most Androids, it may be enough for typing a single line of text. On an N900 with a proper physical keyboard, you're in good shape after several hours of typing. And since you can't have that many distinct gestures, traditional keyboard shortcuts are so much better.

    --
    The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    1. Re:It's just a toy by xianthax · · Score: 1, Informative

      clearly you've never used swype

    2. Re:It's just a toy by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      Swipe sucks for many tasks, I say that as a droid owner who tried it out. Totally useless for anything that is not chatting or emailing. Which is fine for most, but not so great when you are using ssh. Heck, the virtual keyboard period sucks for that kind of use just due to the screen area given up.

    3. Re:It's just a toy by acidrainx · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Well at least you'll be getting some exercise to help combat the onslaught of Cheetos-related heart disease.

    4. Re:It's just a toy by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      shrug, I find learning to type on any device I don't use regularly very frustrating since I have to think about it until I get muscle memory going for it.

      Having used an iPhone for several years now I find it not much worse than using the membrane keyboard on my HTC BlueAngel. The physical keyboard was 'better' but not enough that I care. It could also be that I just remember it as being better. The bumps certainly made it 'feel' better.

      My point is however, while other small keyboards my technically be 'better', once you get used to the device the speed difference is going to be practically nil.

      I don't like typing on a tiny keyboard in general, but my typing rate on my iPhone is probably 60-75% of my full sized keyboard rate when the phone can keep up (iOS has gotten laggy and overall shittier over time :( ).

      I've spent a full day doing RDP using an iPhone because I was stuck in a car driving through the midwest and some servers needed my special touch. Yes, it sucked on the iPhone, but having doing it on the HTC Blue Angel, it sucked there too. Both of them suck after any length of time.

      The iPhone multitouch is worse but not by enough to really matter in my opinion.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    5. Re:It's just a toy by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Multitouch is great. I have a couple of netbooks with multitouch synaptics touchpads. Oh what, you thought multitouch was only for screens? It was around for touchpads first, and it works pretty well there.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    6. Re:It's just a toy by whatajoke · · Score: 1

      On an N900 with a proper physical keyboard, you're in good shape after several hours of typing.

      I have a n900. I can heartily affirm that its keyboard is just made for common lisp + emacs. C/C++ have many special characters for which you have to pop up a virtual keyboard. But common lisp has all needed characters in just the right place in n900's keyboard. Only the quasi quote charater is missing, which is a small tradeoff to make for programming while walking around the house. Offsets the sedentary lifestyle a little.

    7. Re:It's just a toy by shmlco · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Your hand will get sore? You're kidding,right?

      There was probably some guy like you shaking his head thirty years ago. "Mice? Sorry, I tried one and it's totally useless. You always have to take your hand off the keyboard to do anything at all."

      "Not to mention how sore your hand will get mashing buttons and dragging it around your desktop."

      --
      Any sect, cult, or religion will legislate its creed into law if it acquires the political power to do so.
    8. Re:It's just a toy by h4rr4r · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, lots of people still avoid it. Vimperator exists for firefox for a reason.

      Mice suck, gestures suck more.

    9. Re:It's just a toy by KiloByte · · Score: 1

      redefine it.

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    10. Re:It's just a toy by dlevitan · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Multi-touch on my Macbook is great. Two finger scrolling, three finger flipping from page to page makes life significantly easier. Yes, I can do everything with a mouse, but usually don't have mine out if I just have my laptop. And of course I can always use the keyboard, but why when I can do the same thing 10 times faster with a few finger movements.

    11. Re:It's just a toy by JanneM · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Swype is very overrated. Works fine for 90% of what you write (if you're using a well supported language), and makes the remaining 10% a pain to use. If you use more than one language, or want to use uncommon or non-standard vocabulary that 90% drops to something like 60% or worse.

      Besides, swype doesn't need multitouch. I agree with the OP; it's a nice gimmick but not particularly useful.

      --
      Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
    12. Re:It's just a toy by coryking · · Score: 1

      Mutitouch isn't hype! It's potential has barely been scratched!

      Think maps. Big maps. Used on boats for navigation. Pinch to zoom in and out—way more intuitive and way quicker than keyboard and mouse.

      Think retouching photos—way easier to move around a picture with multitouch.

      Think browsing the web—way quicker to click on links and scroll pages than the mouse or keyboard.

      Think healthcare.

      Think of the music industry—put one of those puppies on a soundboard or as the display on your bitchin' keyboard!

      Jesus, people said mice were hype too! They were way, way wrong. In five years, everything will be multitouch.

      By the way, if you need so many gestures and keyboard shortcuts to effectively use a piece of software, that says something about the design of the application, not multitouch..

    13. Re:It's just a toy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats an idiotic statement in so many ways.

    14. Re:It's just a toy by twright0 · · Score: 1

      ...longer than 15 minutes at a time, it's not a good idea -- you'll hand will get sore in no time.

      Maybe they anticipate that their users will have lots of practice making repetitive hand motions for extended periods of time and will be able to avoid this problem. Can't imagine why, though.

    15. Re:It's just a toy by fishexe · · Score: 2, Funny

      Totally useless for anything that is not chatting or emailing. Which is fine for most, but not so great when you are using ssh.

      I consider ssh a type of chatting. When I use ssh, I'm just chatting with my honey...I mean computer...

      --
      "I don't care about the Constitution!" --Bill O'Reilly, November 17, 2009
    16. Re:It's just a toy by xianthax · · Score: 1

      while i realize this is slashdot, chatting and e-mail covers the data entry requirements for 99% of smart phone users. just turn off swype for data entry for your ssh app, at least on the nexus one it remembers your preferred keyboard per app.

    17. Re:It's just a toy by Sam+the+Nemesis · · Score: 1

      There was probably some guy like you shaking his head thirty years ago. "Mice? Sorry, I tried one and it's totally useless. You always have to take your hand off the keyboard to do anything at all."

      Most probably spoken by someone who suffers from RSI - then bane of long time computer users. Mouse is the first thing you should stop using to avoid getting RSI.

    18. Re:It's just a toy by conares · · Score: 0

      Swype is very overrated. Works fine for 90% of what you write (if you're using a well supported language), and makes the remaining 10% a pain to use. I

      Never used Swype but... please, look up overrated in a dictionary. If it works 9 times out of 10 thats the opposite of overrated. OK? Quite frankly now a days anything that works half of the time is a fucking miracle.

      --
      That, that really grinds my gears!
    19. Re:It's just a toy by Filip22012005 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Swype is very overrated. Works fine for 90% of what you write (if you're using a well supported language), and makes the remaining 10% a pain to use.

      Never used Swype but... please, look up XXX in a dictionary. If it works 9 XXX out of 10 thats the opposite of overrated. OK? Quite XXX now a days anything that works half of the time is a fucking XXX.

      This is what happens if around 10% of your words fail. 100% of your paragraphs fail.

      --
      When the policeman of the tie, rule you violate, hello punishment of the kitty?
    20. Re:It's just a toy by Sockatume · · Score: 1

      Multi-touch on maps, or anything else, works really well on the iPhone because it's incredibly specific. It's not like using the mousewheel with a pointer. You touch two points on the image, and they stick to your fingers, so if you pinch on a particular part of a map, it's that part which expands. A lot of companies implimenting multi-touch don't seem to get that this is why Apple's implimentation is so popular. Be interested to see if Ubuntu figured this out.

      I'm not convinced that translates to non-touchscreens though. You'd need a second mouse pointer.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    21. Re:It's just a toy by ivucica · · Score: 1

      Scrolling with two fingers on OSX is a pleasure. It saddens me everytime I use Windows that some schmuck decided that mouse wheel is not a proper axis, but that it's two buttons. Either it's not changeable in Windows, or Apple didn't bother; either way, two-finger analog scroll in OS X is so much more natural and pleasurable to use that it's undescribable to someone who didn't try it. Especially if you take into account that you can do horizontal + vertical scroll at the same time in the most natural panning motion that you'd ordinarily use for scrolling a card if you had a card placed on a thousand little balls.

      Multitouch for typing? Multitouch on screens? I'll pass. Multitouch would be great as a secondary input on a desktop/laptop, and it already is on a specialty device such as a smartphone or a tablet. But as a primary input method on my primary computing machine? Thanks, but no thanks.

      However from what I know, Synaptics drivers already have multitouch on Linux for quite some time; I know I used it at least a year and a half ago. (In fact, Debian forced it upon me; for about a month or two I was wondering why the hell the "old" scroll did not work, until I accidentally used two fingers and realized that it worked.) I can't wait for proper support for multitouch, especially scroll, in Ubuntu.

    22. Re:It's just a toy by whatajoke · · Score: 1

      Done. It rocks. Sorry for offtopic post though.

    23. Re:It's just a toy by Threni · · Score: 1

      You're talking rubbish. I can't stand apps on my HTC Desire which don't support multitouch. It's a piece of piss. Are you disabled? If an piece of hardware requires a lot of typing on a screen then you've bought the wrong hardware, or are using the wrong software.

    24. Re:It's just a toy by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      I agree, I think I'd always prefer a physical keyboard (especially on a tablet/netbook sized device). I also think that most of the benefit is simply having a touchscreen at all, versus not having a touchscreen; the additional benefit of multitouch seems far less. Plus, I'd rather have a resistive screen so I can have extra precision, and not smear my expensive Nokia 5800 screen with the food I've just been eaten. It annoys me that capacitive is unthinkingly assumed to be superior, when they each have their own advantages.

    25. Re:It's just a toy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Multi-touch is awesome on the macbook... as mentioned above, two finger scrolling, three-finger swiping... lots of very useful gestures are possible that makes browsing around much easier and -reduces- finger stress. One of my only complaints with Linux on my macbook is the lack of full multi-touch drivers!

    26. Re:It's just a toy by shmlco · · Score: 1

      That's why the trackpad with multitouch is superior. You're not pressing down firmly with your fingers while trying to perform precise wrist motions at the same time.

      Gentle taps, touches, and swipes are all you need.

      --
      Any sect, cult, or religion will legislate its creed into law if it acquires the political power to do so.
    27. Re:It's just a toy by laddiebuck · · Score: 1

      And given a proper mouse app and a proper keyboard app for any given job, the keyboard app still wins hands down for any task apart from image/video/audio editing and possibly spreadsheets (hard to tell, that: there aren't any modern keyboard-driven spreadsheet apps).

  5. Good job Mark, you've overcomplicated it ... by BitZtream · · Score: 1, Insightful

    So ... as a hint ... if you want to copy Apple ... good for you, no problem with that I'm all for it ... but maybe you might want to consider WHY they do so well.

    You’ll need 4-finger touch or better to get the most out of it

    ... 4 fingers to get the most out of it, I'm not jerking off here, I'm using a touch screen ... what kind of gestures am I making with 4 fingers? Does it learn when I flip off the screen or something?

    Rather than single, magic gestures, we’re making it possible for basic gestures to be chained, or composed, into more sophisticated “sentences”

    ... because the reason multitouch is working so well elsewhere is because it can be made really complicated and hard to troubleshoot and debug. I mean, what developers doesn't want to add another 'language' to their stable to understand.

    And ... GPLv3 so I have to wait for something with license I can use safely in anything because I'm not going to be bothered to learn another SDK and framework that I can only use in apps that I give away. I know I can't give away the only other real alternative out there but I don't care because I can sell those apps and make a fortune.

    If you want people to use things like this then maybe you want to look at why people like the existing ones and why so many apps exist for the existing frameworks ... People don't use the iPhone and love its multitouch because of its 'tech specs', developers nor users.

    --
    Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    1. Re:Good job Mark, you've overcomplicated it ... by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      You can sell GPL3 works. Not sure what your point is.

      The iPhone is not the be all and end all, no matter what your master jobs told you. Check out the android sales numbers for a good example.

    2. Re:Good job Mark, you've overcomplicated it ... by BitZtream · · Score: 0

      No you can't. You can call it 'selling' but the reality of it is you can't really sell any software package under GPL since the first thing that happens is they can copy it and give it away, defeating any reason anyone has to buy it from you.

      Find me one company that makes money 'selling GPL' software.
      Before you quote them, IBM, Novell and RedHat all do not make money selling 'GPL' software. IBM and Novell make their money on the proprietary parts they sell you after Linux and RedHat makes its money off investments it made when everyone went nuts and bought into their ridiculous IPO.

      I don't think the iPhone is the end all be all, there are plenty of problems with it that need solved, but rather than waste time making something like this that turns out to be just another shitty, half implemented too complicated for most devs to use, too complicated for most users to like, 'open source' copy.

      It doesn't have to be a shitty copy, it just is. The fact that its a shitty copy doesn't have anything to do with the iPhone, other than being a bad knock off.

      How you feel about the iPhone really doesn't matter, this is still a shitty knock off where they managed to get a bunch of the bad bits apple left out and ignored the things that make they other implementation good.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    3. Re:Good job Mark, you've overcomplicated it ... by camperdave · · Score: 1

      Before you quote them, IBM, Novell and RedHat all do not make money selling 'GPL' software.

      Nonsense! Any sale of GPL software they make makes them money. Granted, it may not be enough to be considered their main line of business, but still, they make money at it.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    4. Re:Good job Mark, you've overcomplicated it ... by h4rr4r · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Redhat makes half its money from RHEL.

      You can even sell GPL software that uses closed art, for example.

      I have bought GPLed software on my phone, perhaps the dev won't get rich, but so what. We don't need more rich folks, we need more people doing what they love making a decent income.

    5. Re:Good job Mark, you've overcomplicated it ... by basotl · · Score: 1

      Find me one company that makes money 'selling GPL' software.

      http://www.codeweavers.com/ They also contribute nicely back to Wine.

      --
      HTC EVO 4G LTE w/ CM 10.2 | NookColor w/ CM 10.2 | Samsung Epic 4G w/ CM 10.1
    6. Re:Good job Mark, you've overcomplicated it ... by TheEyes · · Score: 1

      You can sell GPL3 works. Not sure what your point is.

      The iPhone is not the be all and end all, no matter what your master jobs told you. Check out the android sales numbers for a good example.

      Note that Android as well only uses the "magic gestures" form of multitouch. It isn't just Apple who has decided that simple, intuitive multitouch additions to a traditional touchscreen are the way to go; everyone has.

      Now, that's not to say this is entirely a bad idea. This actually seems to echo the idea of mouse gestures, a notion that plays well to the niche crowd who is willing to memorize a series of not-necessarily-intuitive commands in order to powerfully interact with the system quickly and efficiently. In other words, the same people who like terminal windows and ssh will like this new multitouch "language;" everyone else will complain that the commands are hidden from normal user interaction unless they're also available via a GUI/menu somewhere.

      Most people don't want to have to learn a new language just to talk with their phone/PC/TV/etc. They have other things to be doing--being parents and workers and social butterflies--they don't interact with computers for enough of their lives to make learning a whole new language worthwhile. This is the lesson that Apple learned long ago, Microsoft has learned more recently, and Ubuntu is finally bringing to the Linux space. The UI Guidelines seem to indicate that they at least understand this:

      "2.2 Gestural heuristics
      To help meet the innate challenges of multi-touch development the following heuristics should be applied to gestural interactions:

      Heuristic name
      Description
      Task frequency
      The simplicity of the gesture should be directly related to the frequency of the action. The most commonly used functions should be mapped to the simplest gestures. The addition of more complex gestures must never degrade the usage of simple gestures.
      Completeness
      Simple gestures must be consistently supported in across the Unity platform. Completeness takes precedence over features; simple gestures must be fully supported before new more advanced gestures are launched. Once a gesture is learnt by a user it should be applicable in all relevant contexts.
      Responsive feedback
      Immediate visual feedback must be provided in response to all gestural actions. Low latency is of critical importance. If a application cannot provide instant low latency feedback it should make use of system visual indication functions.
      Intuitive
      The function performed by a gesture should match a users preconceived expectations of what the gesture should do.
      Resonant
      Similar outcomes should be achievable through similar gestures across the Unity platform. For example a translation or rotation gesture should generally have a translation or rotation consequence where ever it is used.
      Easy to perform and remember
      The basic gesture vocabulary should be minimal with complex actions performed through a sequence of simple, logical gestures.
      Logical
      Gestures should be metaphorically and iconically logical towards the functionality.
      Full single touch support
      All gesture functions must be accessible via single touch. Multi-touch gestures can provide a shortcut, but a user must be able to complete all gesture based user journeys using only a single finger.
      Complementary gesture consideration
      Where something can be manipulated through touch, the full set of complementary gestures should be considered and defined, if only to explicitly ignore such a gesture. For example if you can rotate a object right, consider and define explicitly which function is mapped to a left rotation.
      Predictable
      Gestures should not invoke outcomes that surprise the user."

    7. Re:Good job Mark, you've overcomplicated it ... by mjwx · · Score: 1

      So ... as a hint ... if you want to copy Apple ... good for you, no problem with that I'm all for it

      I do, I need Ubuntu to take the place of my Windows machines, up until 10.04 you were doing well. Apple cannot do this, so copying Apple will not fulfil the functions I and 97% of the market require of Ubuntu.

      4 fingers to get the most out of it, I'm not jerking off here, I'm using a touch screen ... what kind of gestures am I making with 4 fingers?

      2 player game. Possibly even a four player game. There are a bunch of four fingered gestures I can think of, scrunching, spreading fingers, moving two fingers up and keeping the others stationary and that's just with the one hand with both hands (yes, some people use both hands when operating their PC's) you have at least a dozen gestures I can think of off the top of my head. But then again I think the whole touch screen thing is a gimmick and the Keyboard and Mouse will continue to reign supreme.

      because the reason multitouch is working so well elsewhere is because it can be made really complicated and hard to troubleshoot and debug.

      I dont know how you got that out of

      Rather than single, magic gestures, we're making it possible for basic gestures to be chained, or composed, into more sophisticated "sentences"

      I got, we will allow multiple simple tasks to be chained together to perform multiple tasks in succession.

      You are clearly of the "Apple" school of thinking where "Simple" means "Remove functionality". Most of the world doesn't work like this, making something "simple" means "a series of easy to follow steps in a logical order" or simply not requiring specialist knowledge. You can make very complex tasks quite simple by breaking them down into smaller tasks in a logical order. Soratherthenwritinganentiresentanceinonegiantword we use spaces to break it up and create an easy to read, making a complex task simple by breaking it up.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    8. Re:Good job Mark, you've overcomplicated it ... by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      > Most people don't want to have to learn a new language just to talk with their phone/PC/TV/etc.
      > They have other things to be doing--being parents and workers and social butterflies ...that's fine so long as they don't have to do anything remotely interesting or productive. The current Apple approach to interfaces seems limited to the cable TV viewer. Not all of us are that passive and don't want to be limited by what gets pushed to the couch potatoes.

      Anything that presents a non-trivial set of choices will "burden" the couch potato crowd.

      That's kind of how modern GUIs and applications got to their current "unsuitable" state. They graduated from the completely trivial.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    9. Re:Good job Mark, you've overcomplicated it ... by ToasterMonkey · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You are clearly of the "Apple" school of thinking where "Simple" means "Remove functionality". Most of the world doesn't work like this, making something "simple" means "a series of easy to follow steps in a logical order" or simply not requiring specialist knowledge.

      To do this, you'll eventually end up hiding functionality, and be accused of doing the same thing Apple does for the exact same reasons...
      You should think long and hard what "simple" is in the real world instead of the anti-Apple echo chamber where somehow they successfully sell devices that do nothing, easily.
          EX: a car - how much functionality is lost in an automatic vs. manual?

    10. Re:Good job Mark, you've overcomplicated it ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can sell GPL3 works. Not sure what your point is.

      His point is probably that upstream (X.org, freedesktop) is using the MIT (X11) license, which is "incompatible" with GPLv3. This means that none of this effort will ever become "the standard", because it has zero chance of going upstream.

      Add to that the observation that this is yet another example of Canonical adopting a Develop First, Publish Later strategy (or where launchpad is the upstream, and it's hard to see this as a good thing. I want to add that the release announcement was done on a launchpad list, not on a freedesktop list.

      So Canonical is again isolating itself from the community. It seems like only yesterday that there was a public flamewar about Gnome contributions from Canonical. All sophistry aside, from their actions it's clear that they are an Open Source company, not a Free Software company. I fear the real problems for them will come a few years down the road, when upstream has changed in (for them) incompatible ways and the burden of maintaining their "proprietary" additions becomes too much to handle. If they can pull it off, more power to them, but for me this is yet another example of how Canonical "doesn't get it".

    11. Re:Good job Mark, you've overcomplicated it ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      EX: a car - how much functionality is lost in an automatic vs. manual?

      None. Most automatic drive cars still have a gearstick that has more options than only N,P,R.

    12. Re:Good job Mark, you've overcomplicated it ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      spoke too soon:
      http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel/2010-August/012037.html

      And also http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel/2010-August/012048.html

    13. Re:Good job Mark, you've overcomplicated it ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      RedHat makes its money off investments it made when everyone went nuts and bought into their ridiculous IPO.

      Red Hat makes money selling service contracts for GPL software.

    14. Re:Good job Mark, you've overcomplicated it ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      EX: a car - how much functionality is lost in an automatic vs. manual?

      Excellent analogy because the differences seen in a car are about the same as those seen in consumer electronics and software.

      Con:
      - Automatics are heavier
      - Automatics are more complex
      - Automatics are more expensive to buy and maintain
      - Automatics are less efficient (except possibly CVTs)
      - Automatics give the user fewer options (can't move a car with just the starter, can't push start it)
      - Automatics are more likely to be stolen (few car thieves can drive a stick)

      Pro:
      - Automatics are easier to learn
      - Automatics are easier to operate, especially in heavy traffic
      - Automatics operate more reliably (less possibility of operator error)

      A lot of consumer choices balance ease-of-use vs. cost. Apple vs. Linux. Automatic vs. manual. I run Linux on all my boxes and all the cars I've ever owned have had a manual transmission, so you know where I come down on this. But I certainly understand why people buy automatics and Apples.

  6. Were can I buy... by Just_Say_Duhhh · · Score: 3, Informative

    where I can buy a USB pad currently to add multi-touch support for a Windows desktop. Thanks

    From Wacom. I have one of these, and use it on a Windows system. I haven't plugged it into my Lucid system...yet.

    --
    I need trepanation like I need a hole in the head.
    1. Re:Were can I buy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have to compile and install the latest drivers and do some tweaking on the command line to get it working on lucid, and you have to find the how-to in the forums to get it working with gestures.

    2. Re:Were can I buy... by AliasMarlowe · · Score: 2, Informative

      From Wacom. I have one of these, and use it on a Windows system. I haven't plugged it into my Lucid system...yet

      We have a Bamboo One and a Bamboo Fun on two of our Ubuntu systems, and they work fine. In fact, they worked straight out of the box in Jaunty, without any need for extra drivers etc.

      To take advantage of stylus pressure etc., the application must be aware of the stylus, and the pressure/tilt features must be enabled inside the application. Both Gimp and Inkscape support various features, including assigning different tools to each end of the two-ended stylus.

      --
      Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire
  7. Gestures With Multitouch In Ubuntu 10.10 by omar.sahal · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    How about an ARM netbook with Ubuntu on it! Would't that be better than multi-touch? You could even sell it of your website and make some cash out of it! Who knows it may even sell so well shops may want to stock it? putting Linux into public eye.

  8. Re:Most of Ubuntu's "innovations" are like this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    None of those are "foisted" on you, jackass. You can install Kubuntu or Xubuntu if you want KDE or XFCE. You can disable 3D effects with great ease as well. You haven't even tried looking, have you?

  9. Re:Most of Ubuntu's "innovations" are like this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I agree with you generally. The number of fixes and workarounds that ubuntu has spawned and then obsolesced is simply painful. But: compiz at least has gotten better. i've enabled it now and use it during presentations with a wireless mouse. rotate desktop cube and on-screen annotation are especially cool (and useful!) although sadly I haven't gotten to use "paint fire on the screen" yet. :)

    It generally uses between 0-3% of one core of my outdated cpu (1.6GHz, L7500), and is fairly stable.

  10. Maverick? by bhcompy · · Score: 1

    Can I get the companion release: Ubuntu Iceman?

  11. I thought HP made a multitouch ALL-IN-ONE by Alanonfire · · Score: 2, Informative

    I believe it was right around $1000, looked ridiculously like an iMAC and ran Win 7. I remember touching it at the store and being like "wow, now if this was only useful...."

    1. Re:I thought HP made a multitouch ALL-IN-ONE by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      Load a fps on it. Touch heads for headshots. Get banned for using an aimbot.

    2. Re:I thought HP made a multitouch ALL-IN-ONE by jedidiah · · Score: 1

      > I believe it was right around $1000, looked ridiculously like an iMAC and ran Win 7.
      > I remember touching it at the store and being like "wow, now if this was only useful...."

              Yes, every time I see the iThing I lament the fact that it isn't a proper Mac.

              Since Apple has chosen to ignore the power user, then it's up to Microsoft and the
      Linux community to fill the gap for the simple basic circa 1985 features Jobs chose to
      leave out of the current tablet fixation.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  12. Rumor has it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's a secret gesture that will earn you extra lives if you punch it in fast enough during boot up...

  13. Minigames! by VortexCortex · · Score: 5, Funny

    They are introducing multi-touch in 10.10 because in 11.04 the close and minimize buttons
    will run around the borders of your windows and you'll need two hands to catch them.

    This is much better than the current 10.04 "Memory" min-game where you try to remember which side the buttons are on.

    1. Re:Minigames! by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      They are introducing multi-touch in 10.10 because in 11.04 the close and minimize buttons will run around the borders of your windows and you'll need two hands to catch them. This is much better than the current 10.04 "Memory" min-game where you try to remember which side the buttons are on.

      I usually use the Zork like game to turn the recent memory game off. The magic words elude mee at the moment, but they have something to do with sed and gconf.

    2. Re:Minigames! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or you could just use the GUI theme preferences program... but that's less fun.

    3. Re:Minigames! by VortexCortex · · Score: 2, Funny

      Awesome! You just beat level 1.

      Now you get to play Level 2 of the minigame!

      It goes something like this:
      "Buttons are on the left in this versi -- oh yeah I changed them back to the other side with this theme."

      <spoiler>
      In Level 3 you get to add another computer -- "Which computer is this with what button config?"

      In Level 4 you use VNC to provide tech support. Bonus points if your frantic mouse movement causes the client motion sickness.

      Boss Level: Using only your phone you explain how to get the buttons back on the right to your mother-in-law.
      </spoiler>

    4. Re:Minigames! by Woy · · Score: 1

      This is precisely the kind of mocking the new button location in lucid deserves.

      --
      "If God created us in his own image we have more than reciprocated." - Voltaire
    5. Re:Minigames! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are introducing multi-touch in 10.10 because in 11.04 the close and minimize buttons will run around the borders of your windows and you'll need two hands to catch them.

      This is much better than the current 10.04 "Memory" min-game where you try to remember which side the buttons are on.

      Yeah, the 9.10 message popup game was really lame. Supposedly you can't even play it over a remote X11 connection.

    6. Re:Minigames! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And after the You've completed the boss level you gain the remarkable ability of sight, where you can with a single glance see which side of the window the buttons are on.

    7. Re:Minigames! by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      I'll just use the puppet master feat I unlocked from playing so many hours.

  14. Put more effort on the everyday stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are still a boat load of everyday things that should be addressed before they start to put too much effort in bleeding edge technologies that may never actually come to market.

    1. Re:Put more effort on the everyday stuff by jedidiah · · Score: 3, Insightful

      > There are still a boat load of everyday things that should be addressed
      > before they start to put too much effort in bleeding edge technologies
      > that may never actually come to market.

      Got a personal favorite you would like to actually cite or would you prefer to just continue the lame trolling?

      There are already Linux based appliance tablet devices. So it's not like this is just pie in the sky stuff. This is new hardware that needs to be supported like anything else including whatever happens to be your pet "obscure" peripheral.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    2. Re:Put more effort on the everyday stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bleeding edge? It's not the bleeding edge anymore. It's come to market, it's still growing, and something that Ubuntu should support. Besides, why stop Shuttleworth from throwing money at it for Linux's benefit?

  15. Re:Most of Ubuntu's "innovations" are like this. by KiloByte · · Score: 1

    Uhm, Compiz useless? Have you tried it on a computer with a semi-decent graphics card but a lousy CPU? Even on a modern one, without Compiz you often have to wait until windows draw themselves whenever you switch desktops -- with Compiz, it's instanteous. The worst hardware I've seen it on a P4-era Celeron with an nVidia 5600 -- and the speed gains from Compiz there are just insane.

    If it takes 100% CPU, this means you don't have 3D acceleration in working order -- or that you tried to turn on every single gimmick at the same time. The whole point of Compiz is to use the GPU not CPU. Once a window is drawn, it is stored in the texture memory, which means it can be displayed without the main CPU's help. This happens to be what makes switching desktops that fast.

    Gnome vs KDE is another story... and with all of Gnome's downsides, I'd say KDE currently can't hold a candle to it; it's an emacs-vs-vi thing, though.

    --
    The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
  16. Device I/O is great with more I for better O by Kurofuneparry · · Score: 1

    While I don't buy much of the multitouch hype out there, the number of devices supporting multitouch is increasing and Ubuntu/Debian/Linux/etc. can grow best in a growing market. From a business and user attraction perspective, market growth IS the map battle lines are drawn upon .

    I was initially skeptical about the Lenovo S10-3t that we got for my wife and it's touch interface but I've learned to like it. Perhaps we're so down on multitouch because it's still underdeveloped in Winblows 7 etc. Like mentioned in other comments, nothing will replace the rapid input available from the good ol' keyboard, but a new form of input has proven useful in my experience. There were critics of the mouse, originally, for much the same reasons that others are arguing here. This new dynamic of input can be more direct than a mouse and more intuitive and available than a keyboard. This is good especially for novice computer users.

    The size of the iCrap App world and alternative input methods (Wii and other accelerometer technology) demonstrates that this IS an exploding area. The argument that this wont catch on in the desktop world doesn't hold either: the netbook flavor of Ubuntu exists for a narrow purpose and I expect this feature will exist in a similar narrow, non-core niche. I don't think that this is too much of 'jumping on the bandwagon' and I'm excited by the idea of chained commands to make multitouch more meaningful. Then again, I'm an idiot.....

    --
    ...... and idiots rule the world....
  17. Why Gestures? by Rabbidous · · Score: 1

    Gestures are great when used on the screen (as in an iDevice). They feel natural... like you are interacting with a physical picture or list. I am am a bit baffled about how using gestures with my computer will improve the interaction. **Shrugs shoulders**

    1. Re:Why Gestures? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is borderline get a mac nonsense...but bear with me. I have a macbook and gestures RULE. In my mind, they're the equivalent to hotkeys on a keyboard. If you can transition that into any or more likely most generic laptops with modern hardware - it'd be glorious. iDevices actually lack the complexity of a unicorn diamond encrusted apple touchpad. One finger one tap to left click. Two finger tap to right click. I could go on for days...and every once in a while you do something that feels natural and it works.

      In the future, I think computing will be alot more gesture based. If a linux distro can get aboard early in the game - I'm all for it.

      However, you're right in some aspects. If you have a desktop and a hardware mouse. Ubuntu is just farting rainbows. The real key here is laptops and open source tablets (I've heard talk of some but nothing stable...maybe they're not patient enough for the future. Is this a step toward an android equivalent of ubuntu? I doubt it but...it never hurts to put yourself in the game.

  18. Ubuntu is the Windows me of the Linux world by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 0, Informative

    "Show me ANY Linux where I can take a mix of totally random hardware thrown together and hand my 67 year old clueless dad the disc and have him install it PERFECTLY"

    You can't show me ANY OS that meets that criteria. Windows certainly doesn't, but Mandriva Linux comes closest. It certainly supports all your hardware and when you plug a new device in it helpfully offers to grab the driver and support software and install it. It takes longer to install Windows than Mandriva, and when you are done installing Windows your job has just begun, since you still don't have any useful applications installed. With Mandriva I follow a few simple prompts and when I am done pretty much every application I could want is already installed, and it is easy as point and click to put anything else I might want on it. Seriously, the 1990s called and they want their Anti-Linux troll back.

    --
    Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    1. Re:Ubuntu is the Windows me of the Linux world by Vancorps · · Score: 1

      Sweet, now format a 3TB partition without falling to parted... Mandriva ain't the silver bullet you claim, boy did I find that out with my netbook. I settled on Ubuntu netbook edition as I know Ubuntu the best. Hardware support in Linux is pretty flaky but it's pretty flaky in Windows too. Windows 7 has improved the landscape considerably back in Microsoft's favor for hardware compatibility as there is much more driver support on the install DVD. Additionally, the install is now image based so you are incorrect, Mandriva will take longer on the same machine to install although neither take what I consider an arduous amount of time these days.

    2. Re:Ubuntu is the Windows me of the Linux world by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 0

      "Sweet, now format a 3TB partition without falling to parted."

      Mandriva has an Enterprise Edition now.

      "I settled on Ubuntu netbook edition as I know Ubuntu the best."

      So what you are saying is that you settled on a Ford Pinto because you are most familiar with them, and you don't like American cars because they tend to explode when hit from behind. You can't use the Windows me of the Linux world to offer anecdotal condemnation to the entire Linux world, which is alas exactly what you are doing.

      " Hardware support in Linux is pretty flaky"

      It is impossible to take you seriously when you make such ridiculous claims.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    3. Re:Ubuntu is the Windows me of the Linux world by Vancorps · · Score: 1

      Mandriva has support out of the box for 3TB partitions, as does Ubuntu, you just have to use parted or gparted if you like the GUI to create it since fdisk doesn't support it. Your Enterprise edition statement made no difference and if you think Mandriva is a Cadillac compared to Ubuntu then I'll suggest you're the one making ridiculous claims.

      If you actually read what I wrote you'll notice that I'm not condemning the entire Linux world and find it good enough for the majority of my tasks. I've even deployed touch screen kiosks based on Ubuntu that run XBMC which is a great combination so far.

      Futhermore you just condemn Windows 7 despite making obvious statements that you are unfamiliar with the changes in it. You also don't even deny that I can go to my favorite electronics store, buy all the parts for a machine and that I can safely expect it to run just fine on Windows 7 while the same is simply not true on Linux. Of course the example scenario was academic and doesn't really mean all that much but it does make a statement about hardware driver support in Linux. You have to do more research to build a Linux machine. This is especially true with all the software RAID cards out there that even HP Proliants are starting to come with. I always found it funny that a RAID 1 setup with 2 volumes would show has 2 drives in Windows 2003 or 2008 while the same setup with Linux will see 4 drives.

      It's not the fault of the Linux community though as that is just hardware manufacturers behaving badly. Nevertheless it is a reality all Linux folk face despite your evangelical support for Mandriva.

    4. Re:Ubuntu is the Windows me of the Linux world by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 0

      "Your Enterprise edition statement made no difference and if you think Mandriva is a Cadillac compared to Ubuntu then I'll suggest you're the one making ridiculous claims."

      You clearly come from a Windows background.

      "Futhermore you just condemn Windows 7 despite making obvious statements that you are unfamiliar with the changes in it. "

      Show me where I "condemned" Windows 7. I merely stated the blatant fact that Mandriva linux supports just as much hardware, is easier to install and use, and is more secure and stable. Asfar as proprietary garbage goes, Windows 7 is the biggest most beautiful turd in the toilet whithout a doubt.

      "You have to do more research to build a Linux machine."

      Again, you are making bogus claims. I have installed Linux on hundreds computers that people had laying around without a single hitch, but then I actually know what I am doing and don't make ridiculous Windows user claims like "Ubuntu is a good Linux distribution"

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    5. Re:Ubuntu is the Windows me of the Linux world by Vancorps · · Score: 1

      You're humorous. I come from a Linux background actually. The only difference is that I'm not blindly following any particular distro. There is a reason that I have some machines running Ubuntu where it makes sense, others like Asterisk running on CentOS again where it makes sense and still others running Oracle Linux for my databases.

      You seriously expect me to take that drivel? You didn't even fully read what the parent was saying, he wasn't suggesting old machines lying around, he was suggesting new machines. Given than ATI and Nvidia don't have released drivers for their newest cards your statement is rather laughable unless you merely mean that it works on Mandriva even if it's in VESA mode.

      I think you're going to have a hard time quantitively measuring the number of devices supported in Mandriva versus Ubuntu 10.04. Of course you make a lot of logical leaps that make no sense like my statement about Mandriva being a Cadillac compared to Ubuntu and somehow that means I come from a Windows background?

      The problem is that I use a lot of tools, Windows and even OS X are commonly used in my environment, I routinely get to compare and contrast. They all have their pros and cons. Mandriva has gone through it's share of growing pains like all of them going back as far as the Mandrake days. CentOS had a change in leadership and survived, so did Mandriva. Arguing that it is the best is pointless as it's still Linux, if you can make it work in one distro you can almost always make it work in them all.

      At my last review I found that it paled in comparison to either SUSE or Red Hat enterprise products. I'll grant that was a year ago so things can and will have changed which is why I'll do another review when it's time for a new project.

    6. Re:Ubuntu is the Windows me of the Linux world by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 0

      I made no logical leaps. Having been involved in computers since Microsoft was working on Apple BASIC, having used every version of Windows, having written a few device drivers for Windows as well as many for Linux I know that it is not possible to be competent and recommend Ubuntu. The two are mutually exclusive. Here as a hint as to why, and this is but one (albeit major) example: If you use Ubuntu and I hack into any non-privileged account I have immediately also hacked root, since I then only need to do "sudo su -" . The fact that you would even consider using Ubuntu shows that you may have a Linux background, but you have a Windows mentality. Again, no leaps to conclusions, just a series of inarguable facts.

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    7. Re:Ubuntu is the Windows me of the Linux world by Vancorps · · Score: 1

      Clearly you are unaware of Ubuntu's actual problems as only members of the admin group may sudo. Feel free to try again. Of course you go into why you have Windows credentials but again jump to how that somehow makes Ubuntu inferior.

      You are free to hate Ubuntu, I would suggest it is wiser to know what you are hating though.

    8. Re:Ubuntu is the Windows me of the Linux world by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      The fact remains that I have yet to use an installation of Ubuntu where the regular user wasn't part of the admin group. Nobody is saying that Ubuntu security cannot be hardened by a competent admin after installation. The problem is that it is insecure out of the box. Since their target market is newbies, they are therefore making Linux appear to be just as insecure as Windows. That is indicative of a Shuttleworth's Windows mindset.

      I have heard it said time and time again that Windows can be made secure by a competent admin. To a certain limited extent that is true, and it is completely besides the point. It is the "security schmerity" mindset that makes Windows and Ubuntu pure garbage, and Ubuntu renders a wart on the face of legitimate Linux distributions everywhere.

      To paraphrase a well known statesmen: "Those who are willing to sacrifice security for convenience deserve Windows" ;-)

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    9. Re:Ubuntu is the Windows me of the Linux world by Vancorps · · Score: 1

      I think your confused about even basic Linux administration. Of course the first user is an admin. How is this different than setting the root password on installation of any other Linux distro. This is one of the weakest criticisms of Ubuntu I've encountered since the 7.04 days.

      By default when you create a user in Ubuntu it is not granted admin. Only the first user created at install is granted admin by default and this is a safe practice as anything you do in sudo leaves an audit trail. This is good security practice by default, out-of-the-box. The first thing I do on CentOS or Slackware, or any Linux distro is create the sudoers file where you can specify what users can perform what tasks with root level permissions while denying them the ability to do it with all programs. Of course my account can sudo any application, but I'm an admin. Windows 7 is no different, OS X is no different. This is pretty standard industry practice for a desktop or even server OS these days.

      There is very little that is insecure about Ubuntu and especially Ubuntu server out of the box.

  19. Sweet move, Mark! by Rogerborg · · Score: 3, Funny

    Hey, the RT2700 and open source Nvidia drivers are shagged sideways in 10.04 again but fuck fixing that legacy shit, right, because we can focus on adding bells and whistles for hardware that two, maybe three of the actual competent devs and testers currently own! Rock on, buddy!

    --
    If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    1. Re:Sweet move, Mark! by Seth+Kriticos · · Score: 1

      The nouveau NVidia drivers are now way mature enough to deploy on a consumer OS. If you want it to move faster and become stable, contribute to the development at http://nouveau.freedesktop.org/wiki/. The RT2700 drivers seem to be a Kernel issue. See http://kernel.org/ for information on how to contribute. Ubuntu usually ships with recent kernels.

      I don't really know what your problem is, but Canonical is not your nanny. They are a distribution company. Their main focus is to merge Linux based software into a nice, somewhat polished consumer distribution, and I think they do very nice work with that. Especially considering that they only employ 350 people altogether.

      Now if they get profitable some time in the next years (with their business/cloud support, music store and upcoming appstore), they can hire more employees, and focus on other things too. So if you don't feel like contributing with development time, you can also buy products in their stores and support them so they get more resources and do other stuff too.

      Finally: stop bitching around without moving a finger / dollar. You won't change anything with that.

    2. Re:Sweet move, Mark! by Rogerborg · · Score: 1

      Bitch, I be contributing mah mad skillz out the hizzizzy. But thanks for demonstrating exactly why Linux will never, ever be ready for the desktop.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
  20. Bullshit by phorm · · Score: 1

    My older (but still dual-core) yet not officially supported motherboard, disagrees.
    As does my SB-Live 5.1 Surround card (works with the 3rd-party KX Audio driver if you can find it online, but lots of pops and clicking in various situations due to weird surround emulation)

  21. Re:Most of Ubuntu's "innovations" are like this. by jedidiah · · Score: 1

    Stuff like compiz and it's variants on other operating systems remind me of the silliness that was being done with Englightenment in the late 90s. It was silly useless eye candy then and it's silly useless eye candy now despite the fact that it represents a proportionally less waste of system resources. OTOH, an open system allows for anyone to make the experience what they want it to be even if I personally think it shows a total lack of taste.

    --
    A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  22. new improved.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Windows 8 with 3d BSOD gesture out NOW on multitouch

  23. At Long Last! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We are now one step closer to a functional Turing test that anybody can use, namely, I can make various gestures to it, saying "I am not touching you!" and it will actually be able to respond to that. Of course, we still have to work on HOW it responds to that in an appropriate manner. I, for one, will welcome our future neurosis afflicted robotic overlords.

  24. How long until they get sued... by psy0rz · · Score: 1

    ...by apple, microsoft or oracle, claiming to have some broad patent on multitouch and/or gestures?

    After reading http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=10/08/17/0437242 i'm affraid no big company can make anything innovative, without risking a patent lawsuit.

  25. 10.nothing Hardware support by denisbergeron · · Score: 1

    I downgrade my 10.04 to 9.10 because in 10.04 my touch screen and printers that was supported in 9.10 wasn't. I hope for more hw support in new version not less. We all forget about goodies when basic hardware doesn't works.

    --
    Ceci n'est pas une Signature !
  26. Missing the real news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In other words, the suggestion of "Masturbating Meerkat" was NOT chosen.