Oh wait Captain Context, the article only has iPhone stats posted.
Try the index that contains this article and look at the other studies. There's an (admittedly older) article comparing the iPhone with the Blackberry and Treo.
Handheld gadgets with glass panels are fragile. Genius!
VZW has brought out their version of popular GSM phones before. What you get is a watered down, restricted version of the original. My first experience with that was when the Moto Razr came out. I still use my 1st gen razr for cheap international roaming. The one my wife got through VZW is about a notch up from a furniture store prop. At least with the VZW iPhone, that will mean no international roaming (ala Blackberry 8830 - despite it's disabled gps feature intended to "force" you to buy the VZW add-on), unlocking it will be difficult and ultimately pointless, and no simultaneous voice and data.
The WSJ reported that one major reason Apple did not partner with VZW on the iPhone in the beginning boiled down to control over applications. As far as I can tell, VZW is still wrapped around the axle of trying to profit off of proprietary content that is widely available and free elsewhere (if your phone supports it). Their voice and data networks simply rock, but their cobbled up, proprietary phone choices keep me away. Apple and AT&T aren't exactly known for their openness, but at least you get the full feature set.
As far as 3G 4G or 12G, who really cares anymore? None of the providers really can or are willing to deliver anything close to theoretical speeds. When they finally do upgrade, it takes them another year to refresh their phone offerings to really take advantage of any increase. Just take the marketing fluff, multiply by 0.2, and that's what you can expect.
This has happened in the Atlanta, GA. area. Apparently a builder of cluster homes had oriented a few just the right way so that the sun would reflect and focus off the windows of one house and melt the vinyl siding on the adjacent one. There were about 4-5 homes like this in the subdivision IIRC. Big debate with the stupid builder doing many warranty repairs on the siding of house B but refusing to do anything with the windows on house A. What a maroon.
The tethering works as advertised with decent speed. The only downside is not using the iPhone as a WAP (no JB). No big deal as I can share the connection with a PC if I need to. It adds a new ethernet interface both on OSX and Windows XP. The XP change required a restart. The only action taken was to turn the feature "on" in the phone preferences.
I was able to get the update at about 13:30 EDT. The download took about a minute and the upgrade process took about an hour. It appears to do a full backup, wiping and reloading all data on the phone. I have a 16G model with about 11G in use. YMMV. Everything came back to life on completion. About the only minor nuisance was all apps using location services prompted again to allow it.
I went directly to configure the tethering feature and had to change to one of the new data plans. AT&T hasn't added the tethering package to the options list in the account management portal. So I had to call 611 to talk to a live person. About 30 seconds of options and I was connected to an agent that quickly made the requested changes. Once I've had a chance to set it up I'll probably do a follow up post.
Well said. When you go gadget shopping, it's rare to find a perfect match to what you want. So you take a second choice by measuring your patience against the effort required to make it do what you want.
Amazing how many folks go buy stuff then whine about what it could, should, might can do but won't. That really sucks the joy out of what you just bought and doesn't do anything for you that you didn't know about in advance.
The cost of delivering that "free wi-fi" at a hotel just gets baked into the room charge. So now you pay for wi-fi whether you use it or not. Quit kidding yourself that there's some sort of magical value there. That's not to say that economy hotels won't use it as a loss-leader to get your reservation. But I guarantee that free service is on a cost of doing business line on their balance sheet, which is at least offset by your room charge.
Besides that, wi-fi at hotels just sucks to begin with regardless of how you pay for it. Especially at hotels that host conferences. I pay for a 3G card out of my own pocket just so I can get my job done no matter what the wi-fi situation is at my destination. Seriously.. if being able to do your job somewhere isn't worth paying for dependable service (costs me around $40 a month), maybe you need to re-think how valuable your job is, or at least how important having internet service is. There's nothing more priceless than sitting in a conference with 100 other attendees and being the only person in the room with decent internet connection. What's amazing is how many people depend on wi-fi at hotels when it is notoriously bad.
Granted, I do most of my travel in North America so that works for me. On the rare occasion that I go to somewhere else in the world, I just make do without or pay the price for whatever is available. It's usually a short trip and goes on the expense report, and even then normally not every day since I'm usually at an office most times. If I leave North America on a personal trip, I really don't use internet service anyway.
I'm guessing she disconnected. She clearly had just avoided the unpleasant thought that someone somewhere had to pay for that service that she has been using for free all that time. When it finally sunk in, it wasn't what she wanted to hear and just dropped the call.
What is truly a shame is that this is a sample of what a lot of people think - that if it's out there for the taking that it's ok to do so. I liked his comparison to justifying shoplifting at a grocery store. Then this one had the arrogance or ignorance to complain when her "free" service disappeared!
My thoughts exactly. It's a big iPod Touch, or iPhone without the camera and data-only cell port. The functionality ought to be about the same. Not exactly, but that's why there's a features link on the Apple home page. Since it's not for sale yet, that features page will probably change in the coming weeks as well.
Thing is, everyone is so full of Apple hate that they can't process the new product. It's a pretty focused gadget that will appeal to a few and not appeal to many. If the thing doesn't fit into your use habits or brand preferences, don't buy one! I will probably check one out the next time I pass by the Apple store at the mall, but probably won't buy one or even make a special trip to the store to look one over. From what I've seen so far, it's a neat gadget that really doesn't do anything useful enough for me to spend the bucks and buy one.
Don't even get me started on the crappy Motorola data interface too. I still have a GSM razr that was unlocked from Cingular. At least most of it's features weren't crippled. The VZW razr was a mere shadow of the GSM device. I use my GSM razr with cheap pre-pay sim cards when I travel outside North America. The other one I have that used to be my wife's phone when we were on VZW is now an attractive paperweight.
Seriously folks. You either pay for the products or services you want or you don't. The big providers are trying to offer a price point to users that don't need push email or plan to use their cell phone as a broadband hub. The downside is incremental charges to those that can't live without those extras. The smaller providers give you a hell of a deal that has crappy coverage. There ain't no free lunch. Choose one or the other and be happy.
And honestly, I think I threw up a little in my mouth when I read another whine digging into the legaleeze about what "unlimited" means. That is so 2002. Get over it.
That goes for the latest gotta-have phone on the market too. Having switched to AT&T to get the iPhone I coveted, I have no pity on people that complain about the special service terms for the new Droid. At least you know Google will be omnipotent and greedy enough to put more devices out on other networks faster than you can say "Apple".
Tethering is overrated. It's useful as a last resort. Maybe the phones out today pass data better. I tried this using a Treo then later a Blackberry on VZW a couple years ago. The best data rate was barely better than a dialup connection. Plus, on a CDMA tether, a voice call interrupts the data connection. That kinda sucks if you have to share something over a concall. Of course it's intentional that either tethering doesn't work that well or isn't available until its "evaluated." These guys are in business to make profits, not save you money. No matter what they say in the ads.
iPhone is just the most visible because it can be equipped with all sorts of apps that actually work as advertised most times, and people actually use them. If [fill-in-the-blank-other-carrier] supplied an equally useful product, their network would get hammered too.
Personally, I would say the topic of this article hasn't really affected me and I travel a lot. My iPhone on AT&T works at least as good as my previous Blackberry 8830 and Treo before that did on Verizon. The aircard for my laptops consistently works better than the Verizon one did. The only time I've seen crappy data rates is usually at/near an airport where a zillion other people are connecting to the same tower as me. Not too surprising and not worth the effort to whine about.
Is probably having on-board maps. The built in app works great as long as you have a good network connection. Get in an area without 3G and the buiilt-in app gets pretty useless if you're moving.
I have to punch all the ones and zeroes onto a paper tape, tear it off with my teeth, and manually type it in on the tiny Palm keyboard. Apple schmapple.
I'm sorry, but What Terry Childs did was the exact opposite of integrity. In trying to defend his special little toy, he has thrown away any claims to professionalism, integrity, or maturity.
I don't deny that could be the case as well. If so, you're right on all counts.
Two attributes come out of the story for me:
Terry Childs is a pretty smart guy that was backed into a corner. Maybe he built the corner, but it's there just the same and
Management was too bull-headed or stupid to include him in the process of change or, even better, give the guy an escape route that lets everyone save face.
This could explain why the Mayor was able to acquire the passwords with his secret jailhouse meeting. As a professional politician, Gavin Newsom had better know how to negotiate - and that includes giving someone that has a weak position a reasonable escape route to save face. I'm sure the rest of this story will never be told.
I agree with many others that point out the gaps in the headlines. The so called "rest" of the story. This circumstance didn't just develop in a week. This case is a classic story of I/T service immaturity - which could be caused by dastardly BOFH's or equally by incompetent management failing to initiate/fund a proper plan. Or both.
Once you strip away the glorius certifications and acronyms that give you credibility, all that's left is your integrity. Terry Childs has gone to jail to keep his intact. So he's either really stupid or really right.
Within the linked article is a link to the original InfoWorld "scoop" that contains copy from a confidential source. That copy contains statements that back Childs as having proposed and promoted an I/T security policy, which would be a first step toward process maturity (having a process in the first place).
My guess is when the dust settles, the story will be as follows:
For years Childs unsuccessfully tries to bring I/T service maturity to the city
Childs continues keeping things running while excercising some CYA
Management finally gets interested or worried enough to hire a "security manager" who then
Crashes down on Childs to relinquish control unconditionally and without any explanation or bothering to include him in the process (typical PHB approach)
Terry bows up and says "you ain't getting shit from me"
New security manager calls the police while preparing a wooden cross and some 20d nails for Childs' hands and feet.
Slashdot Mirror
Oh wait Captain Context, the article only has iPhone stats posted.
Try the index that contains this article and look at the other studies. There's an (admittedly older) article comparing the iPhone with the Blackberry and Treo.
Handheld gadgets with glass panels are fragile. Genius!
VZW has brought out their version of popular GSM phones before. What you get is a watered down, restricted version of the original. My first experience with that was when the Moto Razr came out. I still use my 1st gen razr for cheap international roaming. The one my wife got through VZW is about a notch up from a furniture store prop. At least with the VZW iPhone, that will mean no international roaming (ala Blackberry 8830 - despite it's disabled gps feature intended to "force" you to buy the VZW add-on), unlocking it will be difficult and ultimately pointless, and no simultaneous voice and data.
The WSJ reported that one major reason Apple did not partner with VZW on the iPhone in the beginning boiled down to control over applications. As far as I can tell, VZW is still wrapped around the axle of trying to profit off of proprietary content that is widely available and free elsewhere (if your phone supports it). Their voice and data networks simply rock, but their cobbled up, proprietary phone choices keep me away. Apple and AT&T aren't exactly known for their openness, but at least you get the full feature set.
As far as 3G 4G or 12G, who really cares anymore? None of the providers really can or are willing to deliver anything close to theoretical speeds. When they finally do upgrade, it takes them another year to refresh their phone offerings to really take advantage of any increase. Just take the marketing fluff, multiply by 0.2, and that's what you can expect.
Don't let those pesky wabbits eat up a bunch of cawwots without paying!
This has happened in the Atlanta, GA. area. Apparently a builder of cluster homes had oriented a few just the right way so that the sun would reflect and focus off the windows of one house and melt the vinyl siding on the adjacent one. There were about 4-5 homes like this in the subdivision IIRC. Big debate with the stupid builder doing many warranty repairs on the siding of house B but refusing to do anything with the windows on house A. What a maroon.
Isn't "stripped" what started the whole thing? srsly
Now that you clicked the link and have a new, hot friend, that might be her in the black suburbans dropping by to say "hi"
The tethering works as advertised with decent speed. The only downside is not using the iPhone as a WAP (no JB). No big deal as I can share the connection with a PC if I need to. It adds a new ethernet interface both on OSX and Windows XP. The XP change required a restart. The only action taken was to turn the feature "on" in the phone preferences.
I was able to get the update at about 13:30 EDT. The download took about a minute and the upgrade process took about an hour. It appears to do a full backup, wiping and reloading all data on the phone. I have a 16G model with about 11G in use. YMMV. Everything came back to life on completion. About the only minor nuisance was all apps using location services prompted again to allow it.
I went directly to configure the tethering feature and had to change to one of the new data plans. AT&T hasn't added the tethering package to the options list in the account management portal. So I had to call 611 to talk to a live person. About 30 seconds of options and I was connected to an agent that quickly made the requested changes. Once I've had a chance to set it up I'll probably do a follow up post.
Most people who legitimately carry concealed wouldn't brandish like that. Keep it put away until your life is threatened.
douchebag +1
Well said. When you go gadget shopping, it's rare to find a perfect match to what you want. So you take a second choice by measuring your patience against the effort required to make it do what you want.
Amazing how many folks go buy stuff then whine about what it could, should, might can do but won't. That really sucks the joy out of what you just bought and doesn't do anything for you that you didn't know about in advance.
The cost of delivering that "free wi-fi" at a hotel just gets baked into the room charge. So now you pay for wi-fi whether you use it or not. Quit kidding yourself that there's some sort of magical value there. That's not to say that economy hotels won't use it as a loss-leader to get your reservation. But I guarantee that free service is on a cost of doing business line on their balance sheet, which is at least offset by your room charge.
Besides that, wi-fi at hotels just sucks to begin with regardless of how you pay for it. Especially at hotels that host conferences. I pay for a 3G card out of my own pocket just so I can get my job done no matter what the wi-fi situation is at my destination. Seriously.. if being able to do your job somewhere isn't worth paying for dependable service (costs me around $40 a month), maybe you need to re-think how valuable your job is, or at least how important having internet service is. There's nothing more priceless than sitting in a conference with 100 other attendees and being the only person in the room with decent internet connection. What's amazing is how many people depend on wi-fi at hotels when it is notoriously bad.
Granted, I do most of my travel in North America so that works for me. On the rare occasion that I go to somewhere else in the world, I just make do without or pay the price for whatever is available. It's usually a short trip and goes on the expense report, and even then normally not every day since I'm usually at an office most times. If I leave North America on a personal trip, I really don't use internet service anyway.
I'm guessing she disconnected. She clearly had just avoided the unpleasant thought that someone somewhere had to pay for that service that she has been using for free all that time. When it finally sunk in, it wasn't what she wanted to hear and just dropped the call.
What is truly a shame is that this is a sample of what a lot of people think - that if it's out there for the taking that it's ok to do so. I liked his comparison to justifying shoplifting at a grocery store. Then this one had the arrogance or ignorance to complain when her "free" service disappeared!
My thoughts exactly. It's a big iPod Touch, or iPhone without the camera and data-only cell port. The functionality ought to be about the same. Not exactly, but that's why there's a features link on the Apple home page. Since it's not for sale yet, that features page will probably change in the coming weeks as well.
Thing is, everyone is so full of Apple hate that they can't process the new product. It's a pretty focused gadget that will appeal to a few and not appeal to many. If the thing doesn't fit into your use habits or brand preferences, don't buy one! I will probably check one out the next time I pass by the Apple store at the mall, but probably won't buy one or even make a special trip to the store to look one over. From what I've seen so far, it's a neat gadget that really doesn't do anything useful enough for me to spend the bucks and buy one.
... it's always your blood all over the floor. Give it a while and they'll have that shiny new gadget patched up real nice!
What side is the pr0n industry on?
I see a special assignment in your future ;-D
Will it blend?
Don't even get me started on the crappy Motorola data interface too. I still have a GSM razr that was unlocked from Cingular. At least most of it's features weren't crippled. The VZW razr was a mere shadow of the GSM device. I use my GSM razr with cheap pre-pay sim cards when I travel outside North America. The other one I have that used to be my wife's phone when we were on VZW is now an attractive paperweight.
Seriously folks. You either pay for the products or services you want or you don't. The big providers are trying to offer a price point to users that don't need push email or plan to use their cell phone as a broadband hub. The downside is incremental charges to those that can't live without those extras. The smaller providers give you a hell of a deal that has crappy coverage. There ain't no free lunch. Choose one or the other and be happy.
And honestly, I think I threw up a little in my mouth when I read another whine digging into the legaleeze about what "unlimited" means. That is so 2002. Get over it.
That goes for the latest gotta-have phone on the market too. Having switched to AT&T to get the iPhone I coveted, I have no pity on people that complain about the special service terms for the new Droid. At least you know Google will be omnipotent and greedy enough to put more devices out on other networks faster than you can say "Apple".
Tethering is overrated. It's useful as a last resort. Maybe the phones out today pass data better. I tried this using a Treo then later a Blackberry on VZW a couple years ago. The best data rate was barely better than a dialup connection. Plus, on a CDMA tether, a voice call interrupts the data connection. That kinda sucks if you have to share something over a concall. Of course it's intentional that either tethering doesn't work that well or isn't available until its "evaluated." These guys are in business to make profits, not save you money. No matter what they say in the ads.
iPhone is just the most visible because it can be equipped with all sorts of apps that actually work as advertised most times, and people actually use them. If [fill-in-the-blank-other-carrier] supplied an equally useful product, their network would get hammered too.
Personally, I would say the topic of this article hasn't really affected me and I travel a lot. My iPhone on AT&T works at least as good as my previous Blackberry 8830 and Treo before that did on Verizon. The aircard for my laptops consistently works better than the Verizon one did. The only time I've seen crappy data rates is usually at/near an airport where a zillion other people are connecting to the same tower as me. Not too surprising and not worth the effort to whine about.
Is probably having on-board maps. The built in app works great as long as you have a good network connection. Get in an area without 3G and the buiilt-in app gets pretty useless if you're moving.
... and I've been wanking to it so often I actually -have- gone blind now and can't tell the versions apart, even on my new widescreen monitor!
I have to punch all the ones and zeroes onto a paper tape, tear it off with my teeth, and manually type it in on the tiny Palm keyboard. Apple schmapple.
I'm sorry, but What Terry Childs did was the exact opposite of integrity. In trying to defend his special little toy, he has thrown away any claims to professionalism, integrity, or maturity.
I don't deny that could be the case as well. If so, you're right on all counts.
Two attributes come out of the story for me:
This could explain why the Mayor was able to acquire the passwords with his secret jailhouse meeting. As a professional politician, Gavin Newsom had better know how to negotiate - and that includes giving someone that has a weak position a reasonable escape route to save face. I'm sure the rest of this story will never be told.
I agree with many others that point out the gaps in the headlines. The so called "rest" of the story. This circumstance didn't just develop in a week. This case is a classic story of I/T service immaturity - which could be caused by dastardly BOFH's or equally by incompetent management failing to initiate/fund a proper plan. Or both.
Once you strip away the glorius certifications and acronyms that give you credibility, all that's left is your integrity. Terry Childs has gone to jail to keep his intact. So he's either really stupid or really right.
Within the linked article is a link to the original InfoWorld "scoop" that contains copy from a confidential source. That copy contains statements that back Childs as having proposed and promoted an I/T security policy, which would be a first step toward process maturity (having a process in the first place).
My guess is when the dust settles, the story will be as follows: