Slashdot Mirror


Baumgartner's Daredevil Parachute Jump From Space Put On Hold

Velcroman1 writes "For years, an Austrian daredevil named Felix Baumgartner has been planning to take a 23-mile plunge from the edge of space — and in the process, become the first parachutist to break the sound barrier, plummeting toward the ground at 760 miles per hour. The engineers and scientists behind The Red Bull Stratos project, an effort to break the record for the highest freefall ever, billed the jump as more than a stunt. The leap from 120,000 feet was to yield volumes of data that would have been used to develop advanced life support systems for future pilots, astronauts, and even space tourists. But a promoter feels that the jump was his idea, and filed a lawsuit in April to prevent the event from taking place. And now Red Bull has pulled the plug on the project, FoxNews.com reports. 'Due to the lawsuit, we have decided to stop the project until this case has been resolved,' Red Bull said."

54 of 248 comments (clear)

  1. WTF by somersault · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So if someone tells you to jump off a bridge, you're not allowed to do do it if they suddenly decide that no actually it was their idea and they want to keep it?

    --
    which is totally what she said
    1. Re:WTF by AMindLost · · Score: 5, Funny

      Are you kidding? I jumped two whole steps on my way downstairs this morning and found the cease and desist letter already waiting for me on the doormat!

    2. Re:WTF by Chrisq · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I think it depends on the detail. If someone came up with detailed plans and engineering drawings of something that would enable you to jump safely off a bridge then they would have rights over this - though you would be free to come up with a different design and do it. I don't know if this is the case here though.

    3. Re:WTF by Eraesr · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No, but apparently commercial interest is involved as well. It's probably not about the sole fact of executing someone else's idea, it's more likely about the money involved with sponsorship deals and stuff like that. If Red Bull is going to get lots of commercial exposure with this and the other party wants a bigger slice of the pie because they came up with the campaign to begin with, then it's understandable that they don't want to be snowed under by a behemoth like Red Bull.

    4. Re:WTF by smallfries · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Playing Devil's Advocate for a second: why shouldn't they? When did we grant Intellectual Property rights to plans for promotional stunts. How exactly does he feel that he has been violated - copyright (not applicable), patent (no applicable).... Unless he got them to sign some sort of contract before showing them the plans he has no protection..... and now I'll probably RTFA to discover which of these was true.

      --
      Slashdot: where don knuth is an idiot because he cant grasp the awesome power of php
    5. Re:WTF by delinear · · Score: 2, Informative

      He doesn't necessarily have to have a winning case, he just has to have enough of a case for it to be worthy of a day in court, and Red Bull are saying they're happy to give him his day in court and are putting the project on hold in the meantime - it could be that RB signed some form of NDA, or that some part of this was covered by copyright or IP, or it could just be a case of sour grapes and the guy will get laughed out of court.

    6. Re:WTF by Mitchell314 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Huh, I was just about to say the same thing. See you in court.

      --
      I read TFA and all I got was this lousy cookie
    7. Re:WTF by DarkKnightRadick · · Score: 2, Funny

      Dangit!

      --
      "There is a way that seems right to a man, but its end is the way of death." Proverbs 16:25 (NKJV)
    8. Re:WTF by rossjudson · · Score: 4, Informative

      The WSJ story has a little more detail than the others. Turns out that Kittinger (the first guy to do anything like this, decades ago) used to work for Daniel Hogan as a consultant on the project. After the meetings with Red Bull, RB informed Hogan that the deal was off, and Kittinger started working for RB on a freshly minted version of the same thing.

      The right answer here is, as usual, "who knows?" It looks like there might really be something to the case, and it needs litigating to resolve the problem.

    9. Re:WTF by nizo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ...there might really be something to the case...

      Like free publicity?

    10. Re:WTF by smallfries · · Score: 2, Informative

      While it would apply to written reproduction of that plan, it would not cover the stunt itself. Copyright is the right to control copying of the written word. Although it has been extended from the written word into other media (for example photographs), it does not yet extend to stunts.

      --
      Slashdot: where don knuth is an idiot because he cant grasp the awesome power of php
  2. "Intellectual property" by MrHanky · · Score: 4, Insightful

    When saying "wouldn't it be cool to do a parachute jump -- from outer space!!11" gives you a monopoly on draining money off the people actually doing it, the concept of "intellectual property" really shows how childish and immature it is.

    1. Re:"Intellectual property" by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It worked for "... using a computer!11"

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    2. Re:"Intellectual property" by imakemusic · · Score: 2, Funny

      You should sue Somersault.

      --
      Brain surgery - it's not rocket science!
  3. Pull the plug by captain_dope_pants · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The promoter who claims it was his idea and Red Bull stole it is, as always, in it for the money. Red Bull should just abandon the whole thing leaving him with the square root of fuck all. It'd save them legal fees too.

    --
    while (true != false) process_more_stupid_code();
    1. Re:Pull the plug by PseudonymousBraveguy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      They invested heavily in the project and the resarch to make this possible. Just to "pull the plug" because some asshole sues them does not only leave the asshole with the "square root of fuck all", but also everybody involved in this project.

      Unfortunately the US is such a big market, else I'd say they should simply pull their producs out of the country and let the sucker try to sue in a more sane jurisdiction.

  4. Solution! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Ok fine! It's your idea...

    Come on. You're going to space!

  5. You need to be a daredevil by Chrisq · · Score: 2, Funny

    You need to be a daredevil to go around with a name like Felix Baumgartner. I'll be buggered if I would.

    1. Re:You need to be a daredevil by PseudonymousBraveguy · · Score: 4, Informative

      Its a pretty ordinary name in german speaking countries. It basically means "The lucky tree gardener". Daredevil indeed.

    2. Re:You need to be a daredevil by sortius_nod · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yes, but in English speaking countries it comes across as "The man who trims arse hair".

    3. Re:You need to be a daredevil by Eskarel · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I don't know about funk and ship, but winker is pretty funny.

    4. Re:You need to be a daredevil by rangek · · Score: 2, Informative

      Its a pretty ordinary name in german speaking countries. It basically means "The lucky tree gardener". Daredevil indeed.

      Yes, but in English speaking countries it comes across as "The man who trims arse hair".

      That is one of the funniest exchanges I have ever read.

  6. Joseph Kittinger by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Nice to see TFA made a nod to Joe.
    Not sure why it was omitted from the summary.

    1. Re:Joseph Kittinger by worf_mo · · Score: 2, Informative

      In the first 1:30 of this video on youtube you see Kittinger's leap, and other videos show parts of the preparation. Truly impressive.

  7. Nice catchy title... by geogob · · Score: 3, Interesting

    but 37 km is nowhere near space in my book. My personal boundary for space is the end of the Mesosphere. Official boundaries oscillate between 80 and 130 km.

    1. Re:Nice catchy title... by FrostedWheat · · Score: 3, Insightful

      As far as the human body is concerned, it may as well be space.

  8. Sick of lawsuits by toQDuj · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Anyone else sick of ridiculous lawsuits? Can we get a public vetting vote for lawsuits to determine whether they are worthwhile or not?

    --
    Every experiment which ends in a big bang is a good experiment.
    1. Re:Sick of lawsuits by somersault · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I refer the poster to YouTube. Pick a video. Basically any video. Now, look at the comments. Do you really want these guys deciding what lawsuits are "worthwhile"? I think they'd actually get more ridiculous. These people are the ones that sue when they accidentally kill their dog in a microwave.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    2. Re:Sick of lawsuits by toQDuj · · Score: 2, Interesting

      True, but you can appoint a weight to their votes through a short questionnaire at the onset of the vote (testing their relevant knowledge level). The questionnaire can be designed in parts, 1/2 general test, and the other quarters by the opposing parties involved.

      --
      Every experiment which ends in a big bang is a good experiment.
  9. The future of IP by khchung · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is what you get for promoting the idea of "Intellectual Property".

    If you can, using IP, stop people from making and selling products, stop people from singing songs, stop people from telling stories that contain certain fictional characters. Then why not stop people from making a jump from space?

    --
    Oliver.
    1. Re:The future of IP by Pharmboy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This is saying: "Have a lifelong childhood dream? Well, that dream belongs to us now, and it is only fair because money changed hands, and we bought and paid for that dream."

      Thank god that Martin Luther King Jr. didn't accept sponsorships.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
  10. Space = 100km above sea level by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Is it possible for Slashdot to avoid the marketing-speak? Space begins 100km (62 miles) above sea level. 36km is not "the edge of space".

    1. Re:Space = 100km above sea level by zebslash · · Score: 4, Insightful

      We're talking about a Foxnews report here... Scientific accuracy is not their priority.

    2. Re:Space = 100km above sea level by geekoid · · Score: 2, Funny

      You can scratch Scientific from the statement.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  11. Why is this tagged Switzerland ? by dafdaf · · Score: 5, Informative

    Baumgartner is (as the article says) Austrian, so is Red Bull... Ah, and by the way. The guy who sued Red Bull for 'prior idea' (or whatever) is named Daniel Hogan. More infos here.

    --
    To error is human, to forgive, beyond the scope of the OS.
  12. Idea not original... by charleylc · · Score: 3, Insightful

    No one can tell me that others have not, at the very least, though about pushing the envelope for free falling from the edge of space and beating Air Force Captain Joseph Kittinger's previous record. Unless the promoter has filed for a patent on the idea of falling from that high, which I highly doubt (even if it is something that could be patented), I don't see what kind of legal claim the promoter would have. Truly, this sounds like an attempt at a greedy money grab. The Austrian skydiver, Felix Baumgartnen, is pretty crazy even considering a stunt like this, though. Breaking the speed of sound, which is apparently highly likely, without being inside an actual machine, is nothing to sneeze at. Plus, in the event of equipment failure, all kinds of fun physical maladies could appear, like the blood boiling and bleeding from the eyes due to low atmospheric preassure or freezing from -140F tempratures. You would think the promoter would be more concerned about the person actually taking the risk rather than his own bank account. But, I guess that would be too much to ask from the greedy corporate world.

  13. This by Trogre · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is why all Intellectual Property laws, with the possible exception of Trademarks, need to be systematically dismantled.

    Starting now.

    --
    "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
  14. A story from Fox News? by ibsteve2u · · Score: 2, Funny

    Uh, did this come from their "It really, truly is news!" side, or from their "It is just opinion." side? I think I better wait for independent verification.

    --
    Orwell: "In a Time of Universal Deceit, telling the Truth is a Revolutionary Act"
  15. Short step? by CaptainNerdCave · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Are you sure you don't mean "leap"?

    Wait... I'm being informed by my attorney that "leap" is too significantly similar to "jump", which is already another's IP. I'm sorry for wasting your time.

  16. Which sound barrier? by cgenman · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Out of curiosity, is the sound barrier here defined as the speed of sound on earth, or the speed at the temperature of air 23 miles up?

    1. Re:Which sound barrier? by MichaelSmith · · Score: 3, Informative

      Out of curiosity, is the sound barrier here defined as the speed of sound on earth, or the speed at the temperature of air 23 miles up?

      Mach one is determined by air pressure primarily and it does depend on altitude. Wolfram won't give me the answer below 0.1 bar of pressure. At 50000 feet the speed is pretty much the same as at sea level. I think 50k feet will be the point where the guy in free fall really starts to decelerate.

  17. The wrong payload!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Can we push a lawyer out at 120,000 feet?

    1. Re:The wrong payload!!! by DMiax · · Score: 2, Funny

      Only if you somehow make it illegal to open the parachute. The if he makes it to the ground alive, disbar him. It's a win-win situation.

  18. Re:They did a space jump in Star Trek (2009) by EdZ · · Score: 2, Informative

    And Project Excelsior occurred even before that.

  19. Trade secrets by Sockatume · · Score: 5, Informative

    He's actually saying that his specific plans for executing the jump were used by Red Bull after they reviewed and rejected the project. Those plans wouldn't be protectable if they were open knowledge, but given that he was shopping the plans around privately, looking for a partnership, the plans constitute a trade secret.

    Trade secrets are the antithesis of most IP law. Once an idea's "out there", the protection disappears, as it should.

    --
    No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
  20. far from it by WindBourne · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Copyrights and patents NEED to remain. The problem with copyrights is that the shear greed is pushing for longer and longer time. And the issue with patents is that it went from physical manifestations that take long times to create, to being applied on software, and methods.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  21. Re:It was my impression.... by PhilHibbs · · Score: 3, Informative

    31 kilometers is less than 23 miles, and he didn't break the speed of sound.

  22. Ground Control to Major Tom? by digitaldc · · Score: 2, Insightful

    FTA: Hogan claims the daredevil stunt would be worth $375 million to $625 million in advertising to any corporate sponsor.
    If this type of lawsuit was as prevalent in the past, NOTHING would be accomplished.
    Again, science and innovation are stifled by simple, unabashed greed.

    --
    He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
  23. Huh? by msauve · · Score: 2, Informative

    "but trade secrets don't have any actual protection under law"

    They certainly do.

    --
    "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    1. Re:Huh? by smallfries · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Last time that I checked Coca-Cola do sell their product in the uk. Here is a description of UK law. So as I already said it is quite insane to pass laws to give protection to "secrets". The best way to protect them is to ensure that they remain secret, not having laws to punish people who leak them.

      --
      Slashdot: where don knuth is an idiot because he cant grasp the awesome power of php
  24. THANK YOU! by GameboyRMH · · Score: 2, Informative

    Mod parent to +5 Informative! Articles talking about Bumgartner's jump ALWAYS say it's the first supersonic skydive, like Joe Kittinger's jump never happened. I'm totally behind Bumgartner's jump but I hate this historical revisionism / severe media amnesia thing that's going on!

    At least the media didn't forget about Yuri Gagarin when SpaceShipOne made its first space flight, so I'm hopeful they won't forget Apollo 11 when the first commercial moon landing takes place.

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  25. Re:They did a space jump in Star Trek (2009) by JWSmythe · · Score: 2, Informative

        I believe Joseph Kittinger and the USAF thought of it (and did it) before Star Trek was even thought of to be a campy space show that'd never last one season.

        {sigh} And fanboys know Star Trek, but they don't know about a guy actually jumping from the edge of space 50 years ago.

    --
    Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
  26. Re:Non Disclosure Agreement by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is an example of something that sounds good in principle, but is difficult in practice. Imagine the scene:

    "Hey Red Bull, I've got a *great* idea for a promotional stunt!"

    "Yeah? What is it?"

    "Sign this NDA and I'll tell you!"

    "An NDA? Go away, kid, you bother me."

  27. More prior art by Muad'Dave · · Score: 3, Funny

    They did a space jump with a Corvette in Heavy Metal back in 1981.

    --
    Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.