Slashdot Mirror


South Korean Cartoonists Cry Foul Over Edgy Simpsons Intro

theodp writes "When asked to animate a dark commentary about labor practices in Asia's cartoon industry — the edgy title sequence for the Simpsons' episode 'MoneyBART' — staff from the South Korean production company Akom raised a rare protest. Even after being toned down, the sequence created by British graffiti artist Banksy depicted a dungeon-like complex where droning Asian animators worked in sweatshops, rats scurried around with human bones, kittens were spliced up into Bart Simpson dolls, and a gaunt unicorn punched holes into DVDs. The satire, Akom founder and president Nelson Shin argued, gave the impression that Asian artists slave away in subpar sweatshops when they actually animate much of The Simpsons every week in high-tech workshops in downtown Seoul. Still, South Korean animators make one-third the salaries of their American counterparts, and Shin declined to comment on the full extent of the work his company has outsourced to SEK, a state-run animation studio of North Korea. Some argue that the Banksy sequence's gray and forlorn atmosphere more accurately depicts the sweatshop-like conditions in North Korea."

208 of 299 comments (clear)

  1. I'm pretty sure... by contra_mundi · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Nobody actually thought they were using unicorns to make DVDs.

    1. Re:I'm pretty sure... by Nidi62 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Of course not. Everyone knows unicorns are really used. They're killed, their horns ground up, and the powder made into the elixir that keeps Larry King alive.

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    2. Re:I'm pretty sure... by Xenious · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure that was f-in hilarious!

      --
      -Xen
    3. Re:I'm pretty sure... by fishexe · · Score: 1

      Of course not. Everyone knows unicorns are really used. They're killed, their horns ground up, and the powder made into the elixir that keeps Larry King alive.

      Well, at least they were, until they went extinct. That's why he retired: he realized after his current supply runs out he's done, and he didn't want to disintegrate live on air.

      --
      "I don't care about the Constitution!" --Bill O'Reilly, November 17, 2009
    4. Re:I'm pretty sure... by pookemon · · Score: 1

      Yep - This "Shin" took offense to their work environment being depicted as a sweat shop (which has been done before in the simpsons in "The Barber Shop of Horrors" IIRC) - but not at the depiction of them "Splicing" (WTF - Shredding more like it) kittens.

      --
      dnuof eruc rof aixelsid
    5. Re:I'm pretty sure... by Dahamma · · Score: 1

      Close - but the unicorns aren't killed, they are tended in their later years by the sisters at Radiant Farms until they pass naturally.

    6. Re:I'm pretty sure... by Have+Brain+Will+Rent · · Score: 1

      I thought the commentary was on the practices of 20th Century Fox seeing as how that was the name over the prison camp at the very end - for the most part it seemed like they were the ones being blamed, not the people they hired to do the dirty work.

      --
      The tyrant will always find a pretext for his tyranny - Aesop
    7. Re:I'm pretty sure... by darknb · · Score: 1

      This isn't the first time the Simpsons have done this either. In an filler clip show episode hosted by Troy McClure there is a scene where sweatshop animators in Korea toil over their work while armed guards look on. According to the DVD commentary many of the animators were upset with this and the scene was almost completely scrapped.

  2. Modern South Korea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    South Korea often gets downplayed, and I'm not sure why. After having lived in Korea for three years, I've got to say that Seoul is just as advanced as any other city I've visited, and in some ways, more so. (And in some ways, less so. But, well. You win some, you lose some.) I'll admit that the minimum wage here is pretty ridiculously tiny compared to back home, but even so, the standard of living is pretty damned decent.

    I'd love to live in Seoul. It's so vibrant, and the newest apartment complexes are ridiculously nice. Too bad they're also ridiculously expensive, even by North American standards.

    1. Re:Modern South Korea by mangamuscle · · Score: 3, Insightful

      A job maybe? Oh, you still have yours, do not worry, we will ship it to asia befeore you know it.

    2. Re:Modern South Korea by MadAhab · · Score: 1

      Ridiculous by North American standards?

      Clearly you aren't posting from Trump Tower, etc.

      --
      Expanding a vast wasteland since 1996.
    3. Re:Modern South Korea by hedwards · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I wish I could mod you up. That's precisely the problem. We're engaging in a race to the bottom, and ultimately only the upper classes benefit from it. It doesn't matter that Americans work harder and are more productive as a whole than any of the Asian nations. Because corporate interests are OK shipping shoddy products which may include toxic substances and the high casualty rate the jobs are shipped over seas anyways.

    4. Re:Modern South Korea by blackraven14250 · · Score: 1

      That's the thing about the corporate system that many people fail to realize. It's very easy to get a corporation to change what they're doing if there's a coordinated effort by consumers to choose not to buy from a certain manufacturer until practices are changed.

    5. Re:Modern South Korea by schon · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That's the thing about the corporate system that many people fail to realize. It's very easy to get a corporation to change what they're doing if there's a coordinated effort by consumers to choose not to buy from a certain manufacturer until practices are changed.

      That's the thing about the corporate system that corporate apologists people fail to realize. It's almost impossible to get a coordinated effort by consumers because the corporations have so more damn money than individuals, and can drown out any opposition to their pracices.

    6. Re:Modern South Korea by jamesh · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's very easy to get a corporation to change what they're doing if there's a coordinated effort by consumers to choose not to buy from a certain manufacturer until practices are changed.

      It's not so easy to get consumers to not buy from certain manufacturers though. People buy the cheapest goods they can find that will do the job without giving a thought to the fact that they are robbing from themselves.

    7. Re:Modern South Korea by Jafafa+Hots · · Score: 1

      But why we ARE more productive? How is productivity measured?
      Not from the employee's point of view, but from the employer's.

      If you are the most productive worker from the employer's point of view, you are LESS productive for yourself.

      Most productive means least well compensated for the value you produce.

      --
      This space available.
    8. Re:Modern South Korea by Dahamma · · Score: 1

      Our average blue collar (often union) worker in NO WAY works harder than the average Chinese contemporary, be it factory, trucking, construction/public works, etc. And in the rare cases they do, they get time and a half to double time.

      Not that I think that's a slight on the American worker or noble sacrifice by the Chinese worker... it's just a fact. They work their asses off for fractional pay (even adjusted for cost of living) with almost no benefits, little to no overtime, and often, no life whatsoever outside of work. If we don't acknowledge and understand that fact then we're never going to fix it on either end.

      Personally, I think it sucks. But the only way to improve the situation is to get EVERYONE involved. I'm tired of peopple who blame "the corporations" and then go to the cheapest discount store to buy the cheapest products available. The fact is, these companies build what sells the best, and apparently price matters more than anything else. As long as the collective American consumer market has that attitude nothing will change, and it's not the responsibility of the "corporate interests" to solve it.

    9. Re:Modern South Korea by Froomb · · Score: 3, Informative

      As a expat resident of Seoul who has been coming to Korea since 1976, I'll second this. The ROK has made huge strides over the past generations, from desperate poverty to relative wealth. South Korea is a member of the OECD and will host the G20 summit next month. There is a large and vibrant middle class, the economy is growing at a nice clip (~6%) and Korean companies are kicking Japan's corporate ass. Americans largely aren't tuned into Korean popular culture, but much of the rest of Asia is, with 1000s of Japanese, Chinese, Thai, Taiwanese, HKer, etc. arriving daily to shop and hang out in places made famous in Korean TV soaps and films. Essentially life is very good here (as a university professor) and a welcome relief from the insane political rhetoric in the U.S. There is universal literacy here, with a majority of South Korean high school grads going to university, although admittedly unemployment post-graduation can be daunting. The big problem in South Korea is the high cost of real estate, with an average 2-bedroom apartment in Seoul going for between $500K - $750K and 3-bedrooms, often over $1m in nicer neighborhood. For those not already in the real estate market, it's almost impossible to buy in without support from relatives.

      North Korea is another story, but even there a nascent market economy has arisen in the past decade, joint ventures with the South, show long-term promise, new universities have been founded with foreign support, and likely gains substantial economic support from NK refugees abroad. The NK workers lucky enough to work on animation likely enjoy a privileged status and consider themselves fortunate. It's the famers who have the hardest lot, as the north has never been all that productive given the harsh climate, and the small scale of production together with lack of advanced machinery and fertilizer put them at a major disadvantage.

    10. Re:Modern South Korea by the_humeister · · Score: 1

      First off, you only have four walls? No roof or ceiling. It must suck when it rains.

      Second, what about free Swedish massage therapists?

    11. Re:Modern South Korea by blackraven14250 · · Score: 1

      The fact that it's easy to change the behaviors of a capitalist system in theory means the theory has a flawed assumption. That flawed assumption is that people care even 10% of the time.

      However, when things do eventually get to the breaking point, consumers (aka voters) will change the system, given a democratic government is coupled with the capitalist economic system and that corporate interests don't override the people's interests. That's why capitalism in the US hasn't failed so far, and part of the reason many are worried about the future of the US.

    12. Re:Modern South Korea by bendodge · · Score: 1

      Corporations don't get money just for existing and being evil. They get it from customers. Now, unless they have a monopoly, they must be doing something to attract those customers. Perhaps you are in a minority that doesn't want to be a customer?

      --
      The government can't save you.
    13. Re:Modern South Korea by Corbets · · Score: 1

      That's the thing about the corporate system that many people fail to realize. It's very easy to get a corporation to change what they're doing if there's a coordinated effort by consumers to choose not to buy from a certain manufacturer until practices are changed.

      That's the thing about the corporate system that corporate apologists people fail to realize. It's almost impossible to get a coordinated effort by consumers because the corporations have so more damn money than individuals, and can drown out any opposition to their pracices.

      If they had so much money that they didn't care about people buying their product, they would stop making it. I don't know anyone who runs a business just for the sake of dealing with government headaches, angry customers, employee difficulties, etc.

      I suggest an alternative view: that not enough people find the actions of the companies you're referring to offensive, and therefore not enough people participate in your coordinated efforts. i.e. it's just not important to most other people.

    14. Re:Modern South Korea by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      After having lived in Korea for three years, I've got to say that Seoul is just as advanced as any other city I've visited

      I shouldn't have to point this out - but since you make it necessary: "South Korea" != "Seoul" in the same that "California" != "Los Angeles".

    15. Re:Modern South Korea by rve · · Score: 1

      the newest apartment complexes ... ridiculously expensive, even by North American standards.

      What's that supposed to mean? For the same price as my western European 2 bedroom apartment, I could have bought a massive ranch in Texas, complete with cows, or a single family home with a garden and some trees in upstate New York. Housing is cheap in North America.

    16. Re:Modern South Korea by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      well, we're happy for you.

      but, uhm, we need to start taking care of OUR OWN.

      the other countries do. why don't we? what IS wrong with us that we continue this 'race to the bottom'.

      I don't think people really begruge other countries from having their success, but we don't think its fair that its simply a shift of wealth away from america. if korea (et al) are successful, fine; but its not successful on honorable reasons. it has been stealing jobs and there's no way to compete when you NEED healthcare in the US and that, alone, is enough to disbalance things unfairly.

      fair is fair.

      but the way its been 'worked out' is anything but fair.

      although I do hear that ceo's are having the fucking TIME OF THEIR LIVES this decade.

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    17. Re:Modern South Korea by kiddygrinder · · Score: 2, Insightful

      i'm pretty sure they're not "stealing jobs" most down home america mom and pop loving business entities are quite happy to hand them over.

      --
      This is a joke. I am joking. Joke joke joke.
    18. Re:Modern South Korea by makomk · · Score: 1

      If they had so much money that they didn't care about people buying their product, they would stop making it.

      Oh, they care about people buying it. The number of people you could actually get to stop buying it is just an insignificant drop in the ocean, though. Remember that the exact same kind of people own and run the media, they're often friends with the owners of the really big corporations, and they're more than happy to ignore any issues or even obfuscate them with bad information until consumers can't figure out what not to buy.

    19. Re:Modern South Korea by Froomb · · Score: 5, Interesting

      if korea (et al) are successful, fine; but its not successful on honorable reasons. it has been stealing jobs and there's no way to compete when you NEED healthcare in the US and that, alone, is enough to disbalance things unfairly.

      I sympathize with your frustration, but have felt this for America likely long before you. The small Kansas town in which I grew up (pop. 150) flourished in my father's lifetime with a bank, hotel, drug store, barber, etc. But by my youth in the 1960s, only two repair garages and a tavern remained; essentially it was a ghost town, and even lost its high school. Thanks to the automobile and better roads (an ICBM station nearby got us asphalt roads), almost all the jobs were "outsourced" to the big city, Tokpeka. Then in my late adolescence the same happened to Topeka, when the Goodyear tire plant (once the largest in the world) scaled back its production, putting Topeka on the skids and the economic energy went to Kansas City, Chicago, and the coasts. And this was the 1970s. This hollowing out process due to changing technology, mobility of capital and labor has continued in the U.S. for the past century and likely will continue apace globally, as borders become less relevant. Some companies, such as Apple and Catepillar have been able have been able to adapt and create products desired around the world, others such Zenith and RCA have fallen into senescence.

      I'm not sure what you mean by "honorable reasons", but the meme that Asians cheat at trade hasn't really been a fair observation since even the GATT says in the 1980s and certainly not since the WTO began in 1995. Basically the reason South Koreans got ahead was because even though they have few resources they worked harder than everyone in the world, saved as much as they could, and sacrificed for higher education. Among other things they created world-class steelmaking, shipbuilding, and semiconductor industries out of nothing, using mostly Japanese capital and technology, since the U.S. viewed them as foolish to have such ambitions from the 1960s.

      At present, South Korea does more trade with China than the U.S., and they are one of the few countries that manage a balance of payments surplus with China because they produce goods that the Chinese want to buy. Moreover, the largest group of foreign students in China are South Koreans and the largest group of foreign students in South Korea are Chinese. South Korea remains firmly in the U.S. camp militarily and is grateful for the troops stationed here (though they get almost no credit in the U.S. for the sizable contingent of troops they sent to Vietnam and Iraq), but over time, the U.S. is gradually becoming much less important to the nation's future, as evidenced by the Free Trade Agreement (FTA) they recently signed with the European Union, while the prospective one with the U.S. is stalled, largely due to protectionist sentiments.

      South Korea is by no means perfect and they go overboard at time on anti-American issues such as fears of beef BSE contamination, but on the whole they are a hard-working, highly educated people who deserve the success they have achieved by dint of great efforts over decades.

    20. Re:Modern South Korea by crossmr · · Score: 1

      The big problem in South Korea is the high cost of real estate, with an average 2-bedroom apartment in Seoul going for between $500K - $750K and 3-bedrooms, often over $1m in nicer neighborhood. For those not already in the real estate market, it's almost impossible to buy in without support from relatives.

      I see this as a good thing.

      It is very easy to get into the market without a family. It's not easy to step into a mansion without a family. However, I find the Korean system to be far superior in the long-term. Let's look at an example:
      I get an apartment in western city X
      I pay, for example, $1200 deposit, and $1200 a month in rent. It is very common to pay deposit equal to 1 month's rent.

      At the end of 1 year, I leave.
      I paid $14400 in rent, and get my $1200 back. I move to a new apartment, and do it all over again.

      in Korea I have to pay $10000 deposit for an entry level place big enough for a couple. However, I'm only paying $600 rent.
      At the end of 1 year, (I can't leave, they typically have 2 year contracts, but anyway)
      I paid $7200 in rent, and I get my $10000 rent back.

      However, after 2 years, I've saved like a bugger, and let's say I know have an additional $20,000 to put on a deposit, perfectly doable here due to cost of living.
      Now I drop $30000 on a deposit and as a result, my monthly rent drops to $400.
      I'm now paying $4800 a year for rent and I get my $30000 back.
      during which time I've saved up $20k more.
      I drop that back in and now I'm putting down $50000. With $50000 down and paying $200 a month, you can get a decent place.

      That's after 4 years in the market and not pissing your money away. If you got married at a typical age, you'd be prime to have a kid at that age and your place would be more than adequate.

      Korea uses a stepping stone real estate market.

      the western system is a very flat system in which you can never get ahead. The high deposit system and low monthly rent assures the average person can upgrade their living accommodations while not pissing away all their money.
       

    21. Re:Modern South Korea by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      No, we like to pretend that a) there is no choice because everybody is doing it, and b) it's not really happening because we didn't see it, my eyes are closed, lalala

      WalMart sells a shittier version of this product for $5 less. $5!

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    22. Re:Modern South Korea by Magada · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you have not thought this through. It IS a race to the bottom and it does not matter whether a market is served by one or more producers.

        Once one of the producers starts cutting corners to reduce unit costs (not prices, mind you, just costs), the others will follow (because the first one to cut will post a Great Quarter (tm) and so their shares will rise and everyone else's directors and CEOs will look like limp-dicks in the eyes of the almighty Shareholder) and before you know it, ALL the meat you could possibly buy is tainted with growth hormones, pesticides and/or antibiotics. Welcome to the miracle of the FreeMarket(sm).

      --
      Something bad is coming when people are suddenly anxious to tell the truth.
    23. Re:Modern South Korea by TheLink · · Score: 1

      I personally find it hilarious that it's often the same people who think that voters aren't voting for the right parties and yet think those same voters would be able to vote "correctly", regularly and consistently with their wallets.

      Note: I'm not saying the voters aren't voting correctly. To me the US voters have been voting for what they want and getting what they voted for. The Two Parties have got the votes of more than 95% of the voters. If the voters really get that pissed off with both parties, they could actually vote for someone else. Even if that someone else doesn't win, if 30% of the votes go elsewhere, the Two Parties might change accordingly. Or the other voters might say "hey that party might actually have a shot, I'll vote for them in the next election if the Two Parties are crap".

      --
    24. Re:Modern South Korea by oldhack · · Score: 1

      Them Koreans are turning out some damn good movies. Just saw couple by a dude named "Bong" :-) Seriously, I'm impressed - though sucks having to "read" the movies.

      Hollywood seriously needs to step up.

      --
      Fuck systemd. Fuck Redhat. Fuck Soylent, too. Wait, scratch the last one.
    25. Re:Modern South Korea by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      no the reason why it's hard to get a coordinated response is that nobody really cares. which is great, so the simpsons, family guy and all can keep airing.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    26. Re:Modern South Korea by Mikey48 · · Score: 1

      I suspect it may have something to do with North Korea being in the news so much and then confusion about the whole North/South thing among much of the population.

    27. Re:Modern South Korea by operagost · · Score: 1

      So what happens if you can't pay what's essentially an entire year's rent in advance? Live on the street?

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    28. Re:Modern South Korea by crossmr · · Score: 1

      Not at all. Most Koreans live with their parents until they're married/have a decent job. For most people saving 10K after a year of work isn't really that hard unless you're pissing money away. That's all it takes to get into a place.

      For those who don't have the deposit, there are lower deposit places but you're starting very far down the rung. The monthly will be higher/it'll be hole to live in.

      Alternatively for those who have to go to work not near their family, they can live in things called goshiwons, which are essentially dorm rooms.
      Costs around $200-$400 a month, depending on quality, basically the size of a small dorm room for 1 person. You get a single bed, closet, the higher end ones give you a private shower. You get free internet, TV, heat, air conditioning, basic food, laundry, and other facilities.

      As a culture they're quite accustomed to living with their parents until they are 25-30. The parents are also saving quite a bit to help them get their first place. Korea is based on a savings culture.

      However anyone who wants to get into it with an average starting job can save up enough deposit for that first rung after only a years work. Even if they were living in a goshiwon away from their family. There are alternatives. We might not like them. However, my first year here, I decided to stick it out in a goshiwon and you'd think it was tiny, but actually it was okay. I wouldn't trade it for the larger place I have now, but I didn't go crazy and got settled just fine.

  3. I didn't think.. by JPalms · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I didn't think the intro was specifically directed at Korea, but just sweat shops in general. Although I'm sure North Korea is nothing short of horrible.

  4. Why not in America? by OrangeTide · · Score: 4, Funny

    We need to take a stand and start producing cartoons in sweatshops here in America!

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    1. Re:Why not in America? by antifoidulus · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually South Park is pretty much totally made in the USA. They basically do everything in CG(Simpsons is still done with cel animation, but the color is now done digitally). Thats how South Park can actually parody fairly recent events, a show can be created within a week, for the Simpsons it usually takes about a year to go from script to finished product, a huge chunk of that is the time it takes to do the animation.

    2. Re:Why not in America? by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      unacceptable, it is not done in a sweatshop.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  5. Send in the subs by MyLongNickName · · Score: 1

    Hell, if they won't do anything about North Korea murdering dozens of their people in the sub attack, they won't do anything about a silly comic.

    --
    See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    1. Re:Send in the subs by flyingkillerrobots · · Score: 1

      It's much easier to fight your friends than to fight your enemies.

      --
      "It is a good thing for an uneducated man to read books of quotations..." -Winston Churchill
    2. Re:Send in the subs by hedwards · · Score: 1

      There's a lot of South Koreans that genuinely have no idea what goes on in North Korea. There's a significant number of them that want reunification, not understanding that the two peoples are about as related at this point as say the French and Zimbabweans. And that it would almost certainly require the South Koreans to subvert themselves to North Korean rule.

    3. Re:Send in the subs by MightyMartian · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Even if North Korea reunited under South Korean rule, like German reunification, it would make the economic woes of German reunification seem insignificant. We're talking about a broke country, a complete basket case of an economy, a country that has lived under six decades of centralized tyranny. I wonder how many South Koreans would want to take on that burden. I know there are lot of West Germans who were, within a few years, a lot less enthusiastic about Reunification.

      But I have my doubts that we'll see the two Koreas joined any time soon. North Korea has mastered a pretty good strategy using its on-again-off-again nuclear program to extort needed aid from South Korea and other nations, and as long as everyone keeps throwing it life lines, it basically underwrites the Kim Dynasty and the Generals that support it.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    4. Re:Send in the subs by Dails · · Score: 1

      Talking with South Korean sailors, they almost universally say that "the only way we would team up with North Korea is to attack Japan." That's right, they feel a stronger bond with fellow Koreans (who regularly kidnap South Koreans, send special forces into South Korea, shoot provocative missile tests around South Korea, occasionally SINK SK WARSHIPS) than with their Japanese allies with whom they train, share military technology (which by the way is a mostly one-way trade), and have much, much stronger economic bonds.

      How many South Koreans would want to take on the burden of nK? More than you might think.

    5. Re:Send in the subs by crossmr · · Score: 1

      I wonder how many South Koreans would want to take on that burden. I know there are lot of West Germans who were, within a few years, a lot less enthusiastic about Reunification.

      West Germans and South Koreans aren't even in the same boat. Korea is a collectivist society. Their parents lived and died for the country to make it what it was today because that was best for Koreans. if they were faced with a similar situation again, they'd buckle up and make it happen.

      While the younger generation is getting more individualistic you can still see the duty in them when push comes to shove.

    6. Re:Send in the subs by hcdejong · · Score: 1

      Still, there was a massive cost to the German reunification, see e.g. this article. The Bundesrepublik spent DM 1 trillion on this over the first 10 years. 20 years after reunification, eastern Germany is still struggling.

      And that's with a society that was functioning reasonably before. North Korea won't be a market worth operating in for years because nobody can afford anything. There aren't many assets worth selling or investing in either.

  6. Truth hurts. by sethstorm · · Score: 2, Insightful

    and Shin declined to comment on the full extent of the work his company has outsourced to SEK, a state-run animation studio of North Korea

    The hallmark of outsourcing, dishonesty. Shin needs to come clean first.

    That's what you get for Third World offshoring. Yes, that means South Korea too.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
    1. Re:Truth hurts. by SailorSpork · · Score: 1

      South Korea? 3rd world? I bet you think the Japanese still live in mud huts, too. A quick look placed South Korea at ~$18,000 GDP per capita, only about half of the US. North Korea is ~$1,000 per capita. If you call South Korea 3rd world, you're calling countries with similar economic profiles like Portugal and most of Eastern Europe 3rd world as well.

    2. Re:Truth hurts. by hedwards · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That's an insult to the third world. North Korea is worse than most third world nations in pretty much every way.

    3. Re:Truth hurts. by TheClarkster · · Score: 2, Informative

      Um, wow. He was talking about South Korea outsourcing to North Korea, calling North Korea 3rd world.

    4. Re:Truth hurts. by neumayr · · Score: 1

      GDP per capita is a poor indicater for a country's development.
      Guess I should add I'm not calling South Korea 3rd world, since you tend to jump to that conclussion.

      --
      Truth arises more readily from error than from confusion. -Francis Bacon
    5. Re:Truth hurts. by blackraven14250 · · Score: 1

      I find it remarkable that a South Korean company is outsourcing to North Korea, to be honest.

    6. Re:Truth hurts. by theheadlessrabbit · · Score: 1

      That's what you get for Third World offshoring. Yes, that means South Korea too.

      South Korea? 3rd world?

      I was watching TV on my cellphone while riding the subway. I could hit record, change channels, go back, rewind, hit play. And this was back in 2007. And it cost me less than $30/month.
      My classroom had 2 giant interactive touch screen displays.
      This was a public school in a small village in the middle of nowhere, not some rich urban private school.

      The minimum wage might be low, and the work hours long, but from what I saw, the standard of living for a middle-class Korean family is on about the same as any middle-class North American family. (although the lower-class Koreans do seem to have it worse than North Americans do.)

      To me, calling a nation full of people with PVRs in their pockets "3rd world" is ridiculous.

      --
      -I only code in BASIC.-
    7. Re:Truth hurts. by GiveBenADollar · · Score: 1

      GDP per capita may not indicate development, but when it does not it does indicate social divide. Either a country is not developed enough to produce things in volume, or it does produce things in volume but there are only an elite few who are doing it and everyone else lives like a pauper. Remember GDP includes things like food and covers EVERYTHING made by a country not just things exported. I'm not saying South Korea is a 3rd world country either, just that GDP does mean something.

    8. Re:Truth hurts. by the_humeister · · Score: 1

      I'm not too sure about that. Sierra Leone, Liberia, Somalia, or North Korea. Which one of those four would you rather live in?

    9. Re:Truth hurts. by Froomb · · Score: 1

      To me, calling a nation full of people with PVRs in their pockets "3rd world" is ridiculous.

      Amen. Ride the green subway line in southern Seoul during rush hour and note how at least three out of four commuters are using their wired-in gadgets. More to economic point, South Korea is a member of the rich countries clubs, including the OECD and is hosting the G20 summit next month. I'm not sure what definition the "3rd world" held by grandfather poster is, but South Korea is not it. Try the Philippines, Laos, Myanmar, Nepal, etc. and s/he'd be much closer.

    10. Re:Truth hurts. by geekoid · · Score: 1

      The Simpsons gets money from advertising. Advertising product I may buy. I don't mind paying the addition 10 cents of product increase if that's what it takes for them to keep the animation in the US. Honestly, if it mean that had to double the cost of advertising, I still don't think it would raise the price of goods a dime.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    11. Re:Truth hurts. by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Yes, it's a 3rd world country. Maybe you need to look up the definitions of third world? Or , you know, keep looking like an idiot.

      I have no idea why you think mud huts have anything to do with it.

      With the exceptions of the big cities, the Asian Tigers still have large undeveloped areas.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  7. Sorry, you deserve all the flak you get and more by sethstorm · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Shin was disappointed. The satire, he and other animators have since argued, gave the impression that Asian artists slave away in subpar sweatshops when, in fact, they animate much of The Simpsons every week in high-tech workshops in downtown Seoul. "Most of the content was about degrading people from Korea, China, Mexico and Vietnam," Shin fumed. "If Banksy wants to criticize these things ... I suggest that he learn more about it first."

    Perhaps Shin should learn more about the First World, and what it knows about those countries. It isn't good.

    Besides, if Banksy went to do his research, he'd get endless varieties of the same Potemkin Village. Not the actual conditions that Shin is wrong about on the large scale..

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  8. Banksy is right and you know it. by sethstorm · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The problem is that they're "among, not "are". More people in the US/UK get what those countries reserve for the few and well connected.

    In the US, we don't need Potemkin Villages, but those countries sure do.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
    1. Re:Banksy is right and you know it. by Shikaku · · Score: 1

      Goddamn it Japan, instead of making this statement forlorn like it should be, I am thinking of a stupidly giant video game character that likes to pierce the heavens.

      HEAVENLY POTEMKIN BUSTA!

    2. Re:Banksy is right and you know it. by TheVelvetFlamebait · · Score: 2, Informative

      I am genuinely sorry that I read your post.

      --
      You know, there is a difference between trolling and pointing out the flaws in your reasoning. Just saying.
    3. Re:Banksy is right and you know it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Why is this being marked troll?

      Ask a migrant farmworker in the U.S.? Those "Potemkin villages" pop up in unusual places, if not in identical form.

    4. Re:Banksy is right and you know it. by Gizzmonic · · Score: 1

      Yeah, everyone knows the true humorists just regurgitate Simpsons or Family Guy quotes. How dare he suggest that 'reading comprehension' jokes are hackneyed! I, for one, welcome our new reading comprehension joke overloads!

      --
      (-1, Raw and Uncut is the only way to read)
    5. Re:Banksy is right and you know it. by MoellerPlesset2 · · Score: 4, Informative

      The problem is that they're "among, not "are". More people in the US/UK get what those countries reserve for the few and well connected. In the US, we don't need Potemkin Villages, but those countries sure do.

      WTF? Are you seriously lumping together North and South Korea in terms of living standards?
      Did I miss something? When did South Korea cease to be a first-world democracy?
      You don't need to be 'well-connected' to buy something in South Korea. You go to the store, and you buy it. It's a friggin market-economy.

      Making 1/3 of a US wage does not mean you're a developing nation. People in Portugal make 1/3 of the average US salary,
      if you make a raw dollar comparsion, and they aren't starving. They have homes, cars, computers, phones, etc. Same in South Korea.
      Maybe not two cars, and maybe not the latest computer, and maybe a smaller home, etc. But they're by no means poor.

      By all means, speak up on behalf of the North Koreans, who have no say in their government or situation, but talking that way about South Korea is just condescending.
      They're one of the richest nations in the world, and the second-richest nation in Asia.

    6. Re:Banksy is right and you know it. by nacturation · · Score: 1

      Oddly enough, I initially read that as Pokemon Villages and was quite glad I've never experienced such an abomination.

      Hahahahahaha! Bravo sir, bravo! Reading comprehension jokes are always so original and hilarious. Some people say that if you've seen one, you've seen all of them, or that it's right there in black-and-white that it doesn't really say "Pokemon", but they just don't have your special sense of humor.

      My special sense of honor? Oh, wait...

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    7. Re:Banksy is right and you know it. by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 3, Informative

      More people in the US/UK get what those countries reserve for the few and well connected.

      South Korea is actually a more advanced country both technologically and economically than either the UK or the US. Given the unemployment rate in the latter countries, I think it's places like London and New York that are the Potemkin Villages. Take a trip to Glasgow or Detroit the next time you're in these places and see the Banksky intro behind the screen.

      --
      May the Maths Be with you!
    8. Re:Banksy is right and you know it. by ffreeloader · · Score: 1

      The problem is that they're "among, not "are". More people in the US/UK get what those countries reserve for the few and well connected.

      In the US, we don't need Potemkin Villages, but those countries sure do.

      You mind explaining this? How is it a failure to be among the best? Magic Johnson, Bob Cousy, Walt Frazier, Earl Monroe, and John Stockton are among the best basketball players the NBA has ever known. They're each failures because they are "among", but not "are", the best?

      --
      "while democracy seeks equality in liberty, socialism seeks equality in restraint and servitude." de Tocqueville
    9. Re:Banksy is right and you know it. by mjwx · · Score: 3, Insightful

      if you make a raw dollar comparison, and they aren't starving.

      Plus things get a lot cheaper being that close to China and SE Asia. Electronics in Korea can easily cost half of what they do in the west.

      Paying 1/3 in wages means you cut 2/3 of the cost of keeping someone in store to sell something or to move it. The cost of manpower accounts for quite a bit of prices in the west.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    10. Re:Banksy is right and you know it. by kriston · · Score: 1

      I am compelled to demand that you read, or at least enjoy, this comic about animation shops in North Korea:
      http://www.amazon.com/Pyongyang-Journey-North-Guy-Delisle/dp/1896597890

      --

      Kriston

  9. Re:Asians by Fieryphoenix · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Sounds to me less insult and more comedic hyperbole. Not an attempt to depict

  10. Satire. by Seumas · · Score: 1

    Does anyone in Korea understand what SATIRE fucking is?

    1. Re:Satire. by WrongSizeGlass · · Score: 3, Funny

      Does anyone in Korea understand what SATIRE fucking is?

      Isn't that when you get screwed by a comedian?

    2. Re:Satire. by readin · · Score: 5, Funny

      Does anyone in Korea understand what SATIRE fucking is?

      Isn't that when you get screwed by a comedian?

      No, its when you get screwed by a half-man half-goat. It's illegal in most countries.

      --
      I often don't like the choices people make, but I like the fact that people make choices. That's why I'm a conservative.
    3. Re:Satire. by wierd_w · · Score: 2, Funny

      No, thats a Satyr. Honest mistake, really. I can totally see how that might happen-- wait, not I cant. Nevermind.

    4. Re:Satire. by theheadlessrabbit · · Score: 1

      Does anyone in Korea understand what SATIRE fucking is?

      I lived/worked in Korea for a year.
      One of the first things they told us about the Korean language/culture is that sarcasm does not exist.
      That's not exactly the same thing as satire, but most of the comedy shows were things like "how many lemons can you squash with your face in 30 seconds" or "how close will you get to a cobra while pouring milk on it's head".
      Obviously, as a non-native Korean speaker, I wouldn't get any of the spoken humour if I came across it, but I would be able to tell something was going on if a character spoke and the audience started laughing. I never had that experience. From what I saw, satire and sarcasm weren't the comedic norm. slapstick was.

      --
      -I only code in BASIC.-
    5. Re:Satire. by trytoguess · · Score: 1

      No clue, but satire is supposed to contain at least a grain of truth. If a country with better labor laws than the U.S created a similar animation depicting the country as a third world hovel.. Well, I won't be offended, but I could certainly understand if it pisses people off.

    6. Re:Satire. by Seumas · · Score: 1

      They weren't implying that Korea is as it was depicted in the animation. How that went over people's heads astounds me. When I saw it the week it came out, I just sort of shrugged and thought it was sad how many years it has been since the Simpsons had managed to be edgy and interesting and how this was such a bland attempt at humor.

      The Simpsons poking fun at the idea that they are responsible for some sort of animation-sweat-shop from the dark ages operating in Korea that tortures unicorns is the same style of humor as if Barack Obama made a joke about his birth certificate. Not because he's saying "I'm not really an American har har har!", but because he'd be attempting to humorously highlight ludicrous the implication is.

    7. Re:Satire. by trytoguess · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Poking fun at animation sweat shops may or may not be funny, but it isn't satire. The whole point of that is to mock or exaggerate negative things to educate and/or cause change. When has Korean/Asian animation studio practices needed to be scrutinized for controversy and corruption? It'll need to be pretty blatant if folks in the West know about it.

      So if it aint satire what exactly is it? I'd go for needless negative portrayal of Korean/Asian animation studios analogous to criticizing American labor issues by portraying us as slaves. Too over the top to be taken seriously perhaps, but not a good thing either.

    8. Re:Satire. by UnanimousCoward · · Score: 1

      Your comment it telling. Lumping all Koreans into the "misremembered" bucket. That's exactly why kind of SATIRE is dangerous, because the unwashed masses that watch the Simpsons (as opposed to the well-informed /. crowd) will NOT take it as tongue-and-cheek, but rather lump all Asians together as those slanty-eyed, gray-wearing drones that Banksy depicts. Satire like the Onion is different since it is directed to a self-selecting crowd. Satire in the mainstream adds to dangerous stereotyping, shit perpetuated by the mainstream media that Asian-Americans have been fighting for decades.

      --
      Twelve-and-three-quarter inches. Unyielding. This wand belonged to Bellatrix Lestrange.
    9. Re:Satire. by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      It's a good question. Is there a culture of irony and satire in Korea? Different countries do have different forms of humour after all. Even between very similar cultures such as the US and Britain, there are some types of joke that simply don't translate.

  11. Re:Asians by jaymzter · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How would you like it if your job, country and culture was stereotyped into the guilt-ridden nonsense that The Simpsons aired? There's really something wrong when people feel proud about how much guilt they have or how much they can hate their own society/culture. This same idiocy even made it into TFS:

    ...still, South Korean animators make one-third the salaries of their American counterparts...

    Where exactly is the requirement that everyone in the world makes the same as their "American counterparts"? Is it because everywhere in the world is the same as America, with the same taxes, costs and currency value? Utter rubbish.

    --
    If thou see a fair woman pay court to her, for thus thou wilt obtain love
  12. Can we stop... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Can we stop comparing wages based on actual dollar figures, and compare based on standard of living (or something else)?

    I make 25% less as a System Administrator in a small remote town than were I working in downtown Toronto.

    But my house costs $200,000 as opposed to $1,000,000 for a house or condo in Toronto. Do I bitch that I don't make the same wage? No, because overall I I have the same standard of living / quality of life as everyone else (even better, I have a place to park!).

    Yes, food costs about the same (maybe 3% less), cars cost the same, etc, but when a good 40% of what I spent my income on (house, property taxes) is far less, it works.

    1. Re:Can we stop... by hedwards · · Score: 1

      I'd mod you up if I could. Wages tend to mirror the cost of living to some extent. And while not all expenses are equivalent, some things are difficult or impossible to avoid. You're going to pay for food and some sort of shelter in virtually any case, same goes for health care and other basic necessities. It really doesn't matter whether you pay for them individually or via taxation per se, just the total amount you're paying for cost of living.

    2. Re:Can we stop... by Bill_the_Engineer · · Score: 1

      Can we stop comparing wages based on actual dollar figures, and compare based on standard of living (or something else)?

      How about the lack of standard of living?

      No minimum wage, no pesky labor laws, and no inconvenient safety regulations. That's where the real savings are realized.

      --
      These comments are my own and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of my employer or colleagues...
    3. Re:Can we stop... by neumayr · · Score: 1

      GDP is a bad factor for a country's prosperity, right. For more reasons than what that figure can actually buy, it also doesn't say anything about the social infrastructure, sustainability of the economy, how that wealth is distributed...
      It's been a bad factor for a very long time, but it seems every replacement is outdated by the time it approaches mainstream use.

      --
      Truth arises more readily from error than from confusion. -Francis Bacon
    4. Re:Can we stop... by timeOday · · Score: 1

      I make 25% less as a System Administrator in a small remote town than were I working in downtown Toronto. But my house costs $200,000 as opposed to $1,000,000 for a house or condo in Toronto.

      While you have a good point, remember this: around the end of your career, you will own a home worth about $200,000, whereas that counterpart in Toronto will own a home worth $1M. He can move to your neighborhood and buy the whole block if he wants, or retire on a ranch. Where I live, it is Californians who are well known for coming into town with truckloads of cash from selling out of expensive markets. Then they take over.

    5. Re:Can we stop... by Dongbu104 · · Score: 1

      Can we stop comparing wages based on actual dollar figures, and compare based on standard of living (or something else)?

      According to a survey by Mercer, Seoul ranks 14th among large world cities for cost of living. The other U.S. cities in the top 100 are:

      New York, NY 27th

      Los Angeles, CA 55th

      White Plains. NY 83rd

      Chicago, IL 91st

      San Francisco, CA 93rd

      Miami, FL 100th

      I think they're justified in having a complaint.

    6. Re:Can we stop... by OnePumpChump · · Score: 1

      But it is a good indicator of how much wealth there is available to be extracted from a country by people who are above worrying about cost of living.

    7. Re:Can we stop... by bm_luethke · · Score: 1

      True to some extent - but as someone who lives in said small comunity here is what happens:

      Person A - which you describe - comes in and buys a great deal of things of up. They have all sorts of "grand" ideas about making this a cheap place to live that is just like home. They distribute that money to 10 or more locals and then go to city/county council meetings and expect to be "heard" (and sometimes give good money to be done so too). Turns out that not only did they have to give away thier money to do so but they now are a handful against the crowd and they ... fail in their quest. Life goes on, there is one transplant amongst the myriad that like where they are and unless they can convince the locals that their way is the Right One they aren't going to work.

      At best they may form their own local groups and our system of trying to concentrate power locally may allow them to make their own regulations (I can certainly point you towards communities that do so), but even then they end up not working. For instance, we have a huge issue with Game - namely deer that eat everything and stand in the road (which them get hit by cars and cause serious injury and deaths). Most communities allow them to be hunted under managed guidelines - they get good fees from licenses and the population is controlled. Not so from those 1m+ transplants from California - deer need to be trapped and moved elsewhere. Turns out "elsewhere" doesn't want your deer as they have all they can deal with now - so they are stuck with them. There isn't a large enough portion of Tennessee they can buy to move them.

      Ultimately there is a point where economies of scale just do not work. For people who are in the "poor" areas it is difficult to move up (in some cases the sale of your property - even in 100% is in equity - isn't enough for a down payment for the new area) and for those in "rich" areas they think they cant take over. In the end you still end up being one person - in some economies that can mean a lot, in others not so much. In our system - of which your post is in response too - it turns out we are one person and money rarely gets as much as people think it does. After all in order to leverage it you *must* use at and at that point you empower *many* who do not feel the way you do (and if they do feel the way you do, then it wasn't your money that got it done). In South Korea - no idea. Even then in the long run the influx of money (and resultant flow of jobs from one expensive area to another cheap one) will only stabilize global costs.

      --
      ------- Sorry about the spelling, I suffer from two problems. Dyslexia makes it difficult to spell well, lazy makes it
    8. Re:Can we stop... by moonbender · · Score: 1

      You're overgeneralizing. What you're saying might be true for some areas of the world, but I doubt any of it is true for most urban Chinese. And even if you're living in a shack, often you'll have to pay some sort of rent, possibly not to the owner of the land.

      --
      Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
    9. Re:Can we stop... by crossmr · · Score: 1

      no, they're not. Those rankings are garbage. I've lived here for 3 years and living here is so cheap compared to anywhere in North America it's not even funny.

      Those rankings were mostly done by idiots.

    10. Re:Can we stop... by OnePumpChump · · Score: 1

      I didn't say it was an indicator of how much wealth exists, I said it was an indicator of how much can be extracted by people who don't give a shit. GDP indicates the value of transactions. It is in those transactions that the opportunity to remove wealth from a group exists. GDP is a very useful measure for the purpose of making the wealthy wealthier.

    11. Re:Can we stop... by Thing+1 · · Score: 1

      You only pay a lot for health care if you don't understand breathing and fingertips.

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
  13. Re:Asians by MadAhab · · Score: 1

    Well good on you for insulting China. Always a smart rhetorical strategy to deflect on someone else.

    Then there's this: "Still, South Korean animators make one-third the salaries of their American counterparts, and Shin declined to comment on the full extend of the work his company has oursourced to SEK, a state-run animation studio of North Korea."

    Your outrage is a little excessive given that. And you could have addressed that. But didn't. /i got paid 3 times what you did for trolling comment boards //relax, kid, that's satire.

    --
    Expanding a vast wasteland since 1996.
  14. Youtube link by Tapewolf · · Score: 5, Informative
    For those who don't get to see anything on Hulu, this appears to be the intro in question:

    Moneybart intro

    1. Re:Youtube link by meuhlavache · · Score: 5, Informative
  15. Re:Asians by hedwards · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I haven't seen it, but I'm curious as to why virtually all cartoons these days are colored in South Korea. Strikes me that depicting it in such an allegorical way is somewhat appropriate.

    Being a colorist is not easy, but it's hardly in the same league creatively with the folks that do the writing and modeling for the series. It sounds like it's away of pointing out that it's like working in the salt mines of the cartoon industry.

  16. Re:Asians by MoonBuggy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The summary says that the South Korean animators are re-outsourcing an unspecified amount (could be a majority for all we know) of the workload to North Korea; for all you know it was this practise that was being commented on, not the South Korean studios themselves.

  17. Or maybe... by Black+Parrot · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ...it's just another Simpson's Halloween "horror" story.

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    1. Re:Or maybe... by geekoid · · Score: 1

      I hear you. I'm fucking 46 and god damn sports reality TV shows are STILL interrupting my cartoons^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H Animated features.

      There is like 20 fucking cable shows just for sports. Move the damn games to one of those channels.

      .

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  18. Re:Asians by AnonymousClown · · Score: 3, Insightful
    I'm not sure what your point was in the beginning, but doesn't the whole Simpsons show stereotype the US and Americans? The whole show is about making fun of Americans and our society.

    I agree with the second part completely.

    --
    RIP America

    July 4, 1776 - September 11, 2001

  19. Interesting... by RedBear · · Score: 1

    What blows my mind is that there is a supposed "animation studio" in North-frickin-Korea. I thought they barely even had electricity up there, much less any sort of higher technology trade going on with the rest of the world. Interesting. Shows what I know.

    1. Re:Interesting... by gman003 · · Score: 1

      North Korea is an... odd country. It's mostly a developing nation, with people still struggling to get reliable electricity, and a good chunk of the food is imported since the state-run agriculture is... about as bad as every prior state-run agriculture. But then you've got some parts where it's about equal to the US in the fifties. Namely, anything military, and anything the "Glorious Leader" thinks will make his country seem less backwards. Thus, animation studios, even some video-game studios. And, of course, nuclear weapons.

  20. Re:Asians by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

    Not everything is the same, but all the neat toys are. An iPhone is no cheaper in South Korea than in the states.

  21. Re:Asians by binarylarry · · Score: 1, Insightful

    yeah but cost of living has to be factored in.

    I wouldn't be surprised if animators from South *Dakota* made 1/3 the salaries of the Simpsons animators in california.

    --
    Mod me down, my New Earth Global Warmingist friends!
  22. Clerks Animated.. by neumayr · · Score: 1

    ..has done it too, and I'm sure there were others. So why single out The Simpsons? Seems stupid, especially when outsourcing to NK.

    --
    Truth arises more readily from error than from confusion. -Francis Bacon
    1. Re:Clerks Animated.. by neumayr · · Score: 1

      Touché

      --
      Truth arises more readily from error than from confusion. -Francis Bacon
    2. Re:Clerks Animated.. by ildon · · Score: 1

      The Clerks version was funnier, too.

  23. It wasn't South Korea by readin · · Score: 3, Funny

    It wasn't South Korea in the cartoon, it was China. South Korea doesn't have pandas. (They do have unicorns, but that's a state secret.)

    --
    I often don't like the choices people make, but I like the fact that people make choices. That's why I'm a conservative.
  24. Re:Asians by digitalchinky · · Score: 1

    I take it you've never read uncyclopedia entries about whatever country it is you come from. Lighten up a little, we are all human on the inside.

  25. Re:I'm pretty sure... eh!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    > I'm pretty sure that was f-in hilarious!

    What are you talking about?

    There's no f in hilarious...

  26. Even cheaper by phorm · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Actually, I moved from Toronto to a rather small town too. One thing I've found about the big city is that you really get *screwed* if you're working on salary (which is pretty much the norm). So while you may be making less per-annum, you may actually be making more overall depending on how much extra-time you put in.

    As for the costs. Food seems a bit more where I am (no local Chinese market), but not incredibly much. A car may cost the same or a bit more, gas is a little higher, but the cost of insurance is nearly *HALF* that of a bigger city. Houses are obviously cheaper, and parking is free, but that does come as a trade-off for crappy transit. Not that I consider the TTC to be overly great, but at least it took me under an hour to get to work downtown by transit (despite being almost in Scarborough, at the edge of Toronto).

    Another big factor is the people. In many big cities the overall attitude seems to be "everyone for himself" followed by that others are fair game. In a smaller city, choices are less, but those who actively screw over the customers tend fare less well. Customer-friendly businesses also tend to get good word-of-mouth.

    There are some things I miss about the bigger city, but there's a lot to be said for smaller places too.

  27. Well you see .. by nu1x · · Score: 1

    No. You see, son, unicorns have these horns and .. The life and death of unicorns depicted. Not advisable for little girls.

    Also, the title of the anime seems misspelled.

    --
    I have nothing to lose but my bindings.
    1. Re:Well you see .. by linuxrocks123 · · Score: 1

      Okay, before anyone clicks that link, note that it is weird even relative to other Japanese cultural exports. I'd put it at about the level of tentacle porn, but more disturbing. Yes, more disturbing than tentacle porn. Oh, and it's NSFW.

      I'm going to just say you probably don't want to click that. And even if you're not at work, you'll be reaching for brain bleach afterwards. You've been warned.

      ---linuxrocks123

      --
      vi ~/.emacs # I'm probably going to Hell for this.
  28. Outdated reference by Fartypants · · Score: 1

    "Still, South Korean animators make one-third the salaries of their American counterparts"

    Er... what American counterparts?

    1. Re:Outdated reference by gman003 · · Score: 1

      Pixar.

    2. Re:Outdated reference by kiddygrinder · · Score: 1

      i'm guessing that's a joke, but it's kind of funny to watch the extra footage on up compared to monsters vs aliens, for up they actually flew the main animators down to look at the environment they were supposed to be animating for a couple months, in monsters vs aliens, they talk about how they tried to make a good movie despite their bosses trying to screw down on every possible dollar they could. i'm not sure where i'm going with this, but i found it amusing.

      --
      This is a joke. I am joking. Joke joke joke.
    3. Re:Outdated reference by XnavxeMiyyep · · Score: 1

      And, strangely enough, almost everything produced by Pixar is an instant hit, loved by children, adults, and critics.

      --
      I put the 't' in electrical engineering.
  29. Re:Asians by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

    How would you like it if your job, country and culture was stereotyped into the guilt-ridden nonsense that The Simpsons aired?

    How many vacations are they from having insulted every nation on earth? Aside from insulting the U.S.A. with every frame of Homer since 1989...

    "Gotta go: Quebec's got the bomb!" -Clinton
    "Our money sure is gay!" -Colombian Kidnaper
    "And so on, and so forth." -Scrameustache

    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

  30. Streisand Effect by jamesh · · Score: 1

    Where does it say South Korea? Maybe it was the way the faces were drawn or the uniforms, or maybe the Simpsons are animated using labour in South Korea (not something i'm aware of) or some other clue that I missed but it just looked like a generic Asian sweatshop to me. Having kicked up a fuss, the whole world is going to know it was South Korea now, even if that wasn't the intent.

  31. Come on now - we don't know either by dbIII · · Score: 2, Informative

    WE genuinely have no idea what goes on in North Korea and can only rely on little bits of information. Even the Chinese mother of a friend of mine that originally came from the place and lived on the other side of the river from North Korea didn't know much more than rumour and a few stories from refugees after it became impossible to contact relatives and unsafe to travel back. The refugees don't seem to know a lot beyond what happens in their own towns - information and movement is tightly controlled and they are flooded with disinformation. North Korea used to export food to China but now survival of many seems to have been dependant on food aid for many years now.
    While the older generations know that Kim is not a God the penalties for saying so appear to be severe, so it looks like we've got a couple of generations of highly xenophobic worshippers of Kim the God King that blame all problems on the USA, Japan etc.
    So to sum up we don't really know either so even the above is thrown together from what journalists tried to find out on escorted visits or from refugees that only got to see a small portion of the picture (which is very scary on it's own - not being permitted to talk to relatives in other parts of the country etc.). We can only guess at what is inside from what effects it has on the outside, so we know something horrible is within but we really don't know how bad.

  32. Re:Asians by MacGyver2210 · · Score: 1

    Yes, because Unicorns exist! And Fox uses their horns to punch DVD holes!

    --
    If the only way you can accept an assertion is by faith, then you are conceding that it can't be taken on its own merits
  33. Re:Asians by shaitand · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "Where exactly is the requirement that everyone in the world makes the same as their "American counterparts"?"

    Say what you will but the bottom line is that this an American show created by American talent but the American animators are going hungry while South Koreans work their jobs.

  34. Re:Asians by mybecq · · Score: 5, Insightful

    How would you like it if your job, country and culture was stereotyped into the guilt-ridden nonsense that The Simpsons aired?

    Apparently Americans have been liking it for the past 20+ years.

  35. Re:Asians by bunbuntheminilop · · Score: 1

    In that case, wouldn't it have to be comedic?

  36. Re:Asians by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 3, Insightful

    How would you like it if your job, country and culture was stereotyped into the guilt-ridden nonsense that The Simpsons aired?

    I'm an American. I read about how I'm fat, arrogant, ignorant, overworked, and lazy every day. I don't even get the benefit of any of those stereotypes being that I use an old haggard unicorn to bring me my beer. I'm not very sympathetic on this one.

    --

    "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

  37. I rather think this targets China by erroneus · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Without knowing much of the detail provided here, I would have assumed the depiction was China. But the general impression I get is that much of Asia's mass-labor forces are more or less like this... well not exactly like this, but the impression is about the same when compared to any remaining mass-labor forces in the U.S. I happen to work for a Japanese company at present and I have to say, they are a LOT less fun. In fact, my boss is Korean and he seems to feel very strongly against the notion of "convenience" when working as he has said quite specifically that the company is not here for our convenience, that we are here for the company's convenience. That philosophy speaks volumes to me.

    My company is most certainly "less fun" because of the asian notion of what a workplace should be like. And yes, "overtime" is expected and nearly everyone is exempt.

    1. Re:I rather think this targets China by GiveBenADollar · · Score: 1

      So the Simpsons producers/writers can't tell the difference between China and South Korea? Better not tell the South Korean animators I bet that would be a much bigger insult!

    2. Re:I rather think this targets China by 1s44c · · Score: 1

      So the Simpsons producers/writers can't tell the difference between China and South Korea?

      For the most part Americans can't tell the difference between China, South Korea, Japan, Thailand, Malaysia, Singapore, or anywhere else in Asia. They seem to think it's all China.

  38. Re:Non-Americans by tompaulco · · Score: 1

    Maybe I am missing something, but didn't this intro actually already air? It sure sounds very familiar.

    --
    If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
  39. Re:Asians by MichaelSmith · · Score: 2, Insightful

    As an Australian I thought the satire in Bart vs Australia fell on its arse as well but we can see that The Simpsons does this to everybody so it would be wrong for us to be left out.

  40. Re:Asians by tompaulco · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You're right. I mean they get every single detail of American society exactly right, from the fat, lazy balding guy who loses his job every week and spends every night in a bar, to the town that has the tallest mountain in the world, a gorge comparable to the grand canyon, frozen winters, a vast desert, picturesque beaches, is landlocked, and so forth. Yet somehow, they manage to get the state of Korean technology wrong. Go figure.

    --
    If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
  41. Re:Asians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    PFFFFT.

    "You are welcome"?

    Fuck off. USA didn't fight in Korea for Korea's benefit. They fought for their own. Now South Korea is being used as an US military base and South Korea is paying for it.

    Now stop spreading false sentiments. It was USA who divided the country in half in the first place.

  42. Re:Asians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Many people in this thread are quick to decry the intro. But have they actually watched it? Take a look.

    The conditions depicted are atrocious. Ridiculously so. It's clearly a joke. I mean, a unicorn being used to punch holes in DVDs? Kittens tossed into a wood chipper to make filler for toys? The terrible conditions are so over-the-top that it's pretty clearly not meant to represent reality. One could view it as social commentary regarding poor working conditions in Asian sweat-shots. Or, one could view it as commentary on the ridiculous notions that well-meaning, but ultimately uninformed, westerners develop in their heads about working conditions in Asian.

    It seems to me that the satire is meant to insult at many levels (this is typical for The Simpsons, which tries to make fun of as many different people as possible). The intro is making fun of FOX for using cheap overseas labor. It's drawing attention to the comparatively worse working conditions in those outsourced labor markets. And it's making fun of people's erroneous/exaggerated notions of how bad those labor conditions actually are. And it's just trying to be silly with ridiculous depictions of misery. It's comedy, after all.

    You may not think it's particularly funny. But after watching it, it should be pretty clear how absurd they were intentionally being.

  43. Re:Asians by GiveBenADollar · · Score: 1

    I could be working in New York City right now for the same salary I am now and be considered poor, where I'm at it's an awesome salary. Cost of living compared to wages means a whole lot more than wages outright. Sure I might not have all the toys I could, but neither can most New Yorkers. Also I doubt that the iPhone is the cool thing in South Korea after all they develop the new cool toys, look at Japan! If I could get a better job that payed half of what I earn now in a place with a quarter of the cost of living I'd jump on it.

  44. Par for the course? by Have+Brain+Will+Rent · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Shin argued, gave the impression that Asian artists slave away in subpar sweatshops when they actually animate

    ... in par sweat-shops? Subpar sweatshops not having all the amenities of an average sweatshop?

    --
    The tyrant will always find a pretext for his tyranny - Aesop
  45. Groening's real message... don't watch! by Have+Brain+Will+Rent · · Score: 3, Funny

    It seems to me that Matt Groening was trying to tell us that the Simpsons and other Fox products are produced using slave labour and that we should therefore stop watching all such products since the existence of those products depend on other human beings suffering. I'm with ya Matt! No more 20th Century Fox products for me!!!

    --
    The tyrant will always find a pretext for his tyranny - Aesop
    1. Re:Groening's real message... don't watch! by kiddygrinder · · Score: 1

      does matt even work on simpsons any more? if he does i'll bet you 50 kerbillion dollars he wishes the thing would just die about 50000 times more than you do.

      --
      This is a joke. I am joking. Joke joke joke.
    2. Re:Groening's real message... don't watch! by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I'll take that action. Did you ever read his labor of love Live is Hell? When I saw the Banksy intro I almost cried tears of hilarity because it really took me back to the sense of humor of those comics. Yet honestly, most Simpsons episodes contain at least one old-style dig at consumer culture, and some are just packed full of them. I think Groening enjoys his soap box. It's not like he needs more money.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  46. Re:Asians by Jafafa+Hots · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You know what?
    You wouldn't have batted an eyelash if he had used the same exact depictions but it was supposed to be taking place at a Walmart in Lubbock, not somewhere in Asia.

    Why? The difference is that if placed in Walmart in Lubbock, it would have clearly been meant to have been judged as satire and not as a depiction of reality.

    Whereas when placed in Asia, it is clearly meant to be judged as satire and not an actual depiction of reality - but the satire is missed by those blinded by a defensive reflex to whine about anything related to a place they have feelings of insecurity, self-consciousness, nationalism or racial pride in.

    (Actually in the Lubbock example there would be a few whining idiots from TX complaining that "Lubbock isn't really like that!" but we've learned not give people like that the time of day.

    --
    This space available.
  47. Re:Asians by Swave+An+deBwoner · · Score: 1

    How would you like it if your job, country and culture was stereotyped into the guilt-ridden nonsense that The Simpsons aired? There's really something wrong when people feel proud about how much guilt they have or how much they can hate their own society/culture. This same idiocy even made it into TFS:

    ...still, South Korean animators make one-third the salaries of their American counterparts...

    Where exactly is the requirement that everyone in the world makes the same as their "American counterparts"? Is it because everywhere in the world is the same as America, with the same taxes, costs and currency value? Utter rubbish.

    Well, according to:

    http://www.ninecash.net/global-cost-of-living-rank-of-300-international-locations-world-wide-september-2010.html

    which provides global "cost of living" rankings, Seoul is ranked #24, with New York at #21, San Francisco at #63, Boston at #66, Washington DC at #77, all the way down to Indianapolis at #279. So, yes, I guess in this case it's a fair comparison.

  48. Re:100% of Japanese Anime is South Korean Made! by trytoguess · · Score: 1

    Seiyu are voice actors, and need to be "homegrown" so to speak. Japan outsources for the exact same reason America, France, Britain, etc does; it's simply cheaper. And no, the Japanese government has made no such outlandish claims recently.

  49. Re:Asians by DDLKermit007 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Ummm ok...lets factor in COL. In the list of top 50 most expensive cities, Seoul ranks 14! To give you some perspective, New York is 27 with Los Angeles bringing up 55. Please do a little research before talking about COL.

    http://www.citymayors.com/features/cost_survey.html

    I really wish we could have seen the full unbridled version of the opening. Maybe some storyboards will surface eventually. I'll bet you almost anything that the North Korean animation operations are pretty substantial given they didn't want to talk about it for good reason, and their conditions I'd bet are pretty horrid. Watch the Simpsons? Support North Korea! Wooooooo what a publicity campaign!

  50. Re:Asians by DDLKermit007 · · Score: 1

    Last I checked it was the American Taxpayer that was paying for it. Japan & South Korea got a pretty sweetheart deal getting USA to cover the bulk of their defense. They would be far more like the other surrounding countries if they didn't have free protection they'd both resemble the Philippines allot more if not for it.

  51. Re:Asians by gmhowell · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think in the Australia episode (somewhere in the first couple of seasons?) the subject of ridicule wasn't so much Australia as it was stereotypical American views of Australia.

    --
    Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
  52. Isn't it a little late to be getting pissy? by OnePumpChump · · Score: 3, Interesting

    So who animated the edgy Simpsons intro?

  53. Re:Asians by Cylix · · Score: 1

    Not all of us....

    --
    "You should always go to other people's funerals; otherwise, they won't come to yours." -- Yogi Berra
  54. Re:Asians by cgenman · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How would you like it if your job, country, and culture was stereotyped into the guilt-ridden nonsense that The Simpsons aired?

    Isn't that what they air every week?

    Banksy got a high profile forum, and he used it to spur discussions about how we treat emerging labor markets. Considering he had a sickly unicorn punching DVD holes, do you really think he was saying "this is the way that it is?" It seems to me like his point was that we take for granted the objects around us, but have a profound ignorance about their origins. And he managed to do this in a way that A: got into a mainstream production, B: got people talking, and C: actually educated people, albeit indirectly. I know far more about the actual conditions in animation shops of South Korea than I had before this intro was released.

  55. Re:Asians by AvitarX · · Score: 1

    http://www.nicerent.com/mn_seoul_real_estate_advenced/advenced_list.asp?strFind=find

    Looks like it'd be hard to live on 1/3 of a decent US salary.

    (I searched for small (under 700 sqft) 1 bedroom, in high rise)

    I know plenty in NYC doing just fine in the 40k/year range (not having a car saves them a whole lot). And they're rents aren't too bad (only a bout 4k/year per a bedroom more than where I am, which is fairly average).

    I don't think big cities anywhere have a low cost of living, because the rent is so damned much.

    --
    Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
  56. Re:Asians by korean.ian · · Score: 3, Interesting

    That cost of living index is for American Expatriates. Additionally, the most expensive city is in Angola. From the article's intro:
    "29 June 2010: Angola's capital city Luanda has replaced Tokyo as the most expensive city in the world for US expatriates according to the latest Cost of Living Survey from Mercer." I mean, they even have Shanghai ranked higher than NYC.

    Having lived in Seoul for 10 years very comfortably on what can be described as a typical salary for the Korean middle class, I will tell you that the cost of living for people who aren't gouging their companies' expense accounts is much cheaper than comparable cities in North America.

  57. Re:Asians by dafing · · Score: 1

    Technologically advanced, maybe, depending on how you look at it, as there is tremendous disparity between the cities and the countryside in that regard.

    A remote mountain in Nepal has better 3G service than San Francisco, a large progressive city in "the world's only superpower"...

    Asia in general is on the rise, better catch up!

    --
    --- ...or a new slashdot signature. Dear aunt, let's set so double the killer delete select all
  58. Re:Asians by Greyfox · · Score: 3, Insightful
    How would you like it if your job, country and culture was stereotyped into the guilt-ridden nonsense that The Simpsons aired?

    It is, every week...

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  59. Re:Asians by oldhack · · Score: 1

    Hush.

    --
    Fuck systemd. Fuck Redhat. Fuck Soylent, too. Wait, scratch the last one.
  60. Re:Asians by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

    Where exactly is the requirement that everyone in the world makes the same as their "American counterparts"?

    totally missing the point.

    come back in 20 years when YOUR job is gone.

    the rest of us have felt this pain and we're *starting* to get angry enough to demand change.

    of course, we have no power. the companies are now in control with the government cheering them on. YAY, GO RICH GUYS!

    fuck all for the rest.

    yeah, we like watching our american culture be reduced right in front of our eyed.

    WAKE THE FUCK UP. if we don't begin taking care of our own, you think the ROW will?

    come on. be real. or be in a bread line in 20 yrs or less.

    --

    --
    "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
  61. Re:Asians by YttriumOxide · · Score: 2, Insightful

    (I searched for small (under 700 sqft) 1 bedroom, in high rise)

    Of course, then there's the matter of deciding what's "small"... 700 square feet = 65 square metres. I currently live in a 1 bedroom apartment with my girlfriend here in Hannover, Germany, and we've got about 60 square metres (645 square feet) which is quite comfortable for the both of us. Living alone before I met her, I had a 45 square metre place (485 square feet) that was more than adequate.
    We're expecting our first child in April though, so are now looking for somewhere significantly larger.

    I'm aware that people in some other places are used to MUCH larger places. I myself grew up in southern NZ, where the concept of renting anything less than a complete 3 bedroom house never would have crossed my mind - even as a single guy who couldn't possibly have used all that space. It's just a matter of adjusting, and now I really don't know what I'd do with somewhere larger if we weren't having this child.

    --
    My book about LSD and Self-Discovery
    Also on facebook as: DroppingAcidDaleBewan
  62. Re:Asians by jcl-xen0n · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I haven't seen it, but I'm curious as to why virtually all cartoons these days are colored in South Korea. Strikes me that depicting it in such an allegorical way is somewhat appropriate. Being a colorist is not easy, but it's hardly in the same league creatively with the folks that do the writing and modeling for the series. It sounds like it's away of pointing out that it's like working in the salt mines of the cartoon industry.

    Interestingly, a lot of Japanese animation (which, in the past, was traditionally outsourced to Korea) is now being outsourced to places like Vietnam. Not sure if that indicated the Koreans have their hands full doing American animation, or if the other countries are simply cheaper.

  63. Re:Asians by kiddygrinder · · Score: 1

    americans could live quite comfortably on an asian worker's salary if they moved to korea though. on your other comments: no shit, companies are greedy.

    --
    This is a joke. I am joking. Joke joke joke.
  64. Re:Asians by kiddygrinder · · Score: 1

    yeah, the unicorn totally gave it away.

    --
    This is a joke. I am joking. Joke joke joke.
  65. Re:Asians by kiddygrinder · · Score: 1

    i think we broke their access database

    --
    This is a joke. I am joking. Joke joke joke.
  66. Re:Asians by kiddygrinder · · Score: 2, Informative

    i'm pretty sure making cheap crap by hiring the cheapest workers is the american culture atm, maybe you're thinking of the 50's?

    --
    This is a joke. I am joking. Joke joke joke.
  67. Re:Asians by Restil · · Score: 1

    By that standard, they're probably making more than me.

    -Restil

    --
    Play with my webcams and lights here
  68. 3G on a mountain vs san francisco? by Dever · · Score: 1
    have you ever waited for a bus on everest? their public transportation system is atrocious...i had to walk almost 30,000 ft...in the snow

    the hillside i live on with a single 3G enabled tower near it has better coverage than most of the world. cities. countries.

    and a remote mountain? that's actually a very specific mountain, out of the many 'remote mountains' in the world.

    and let me tell you, the night life is teh SUCK

    trolled!

    you were trolling, riiiiiight?

    --
    - I'd prefer not to.
  69. Re:Asians by flabbergast · · Score: 1

    I think I get the "guilt-ridden nonsense" the parent is talking about. At the bottom of it is the West's (and by West I mean US, Canada, and Europe) perception of everyone else as third world and somehow the West has to "save" the rest of the world.

    So, the depiction of cartoonists in "Asia"* as being in what can be aptly described as one of Dante's circles of hell is really condescending. It is a trigger for Western guilt; that idea that the rest of the world is suffering for us, when in reality, a place like South Korea isn't much different from the US.

    To put things in a different perspective, S. Korea's GDP is about the same as Spain and they have about the same number of people (49M S. Koreas vs 46M Spaniards). But, you would never depict Spain in the same light as South Korea.

    *As an aside, as a person of Korean descent I already knew that the Simpsons was produced in S. Korea, and wasn't particularly happy with the depiction either. Maybe Banksy has been to that side of the planet and was really playing it tongue in cheek, but I doubt it. For me it fits hand in hand with what I've noticed about many of my white friends: Asia is still some ass backwards, third world continent, and differentiating between the cultures and countries is too hard. Its easier to lump all black hair, chinky eyed people together to form a homogeneous group than to understand even the basic history of the region.

  70. Re:Asians by 1s44c · · Score: 1

    I'm an American. I read about how I'm fat, arrogant, ignorant, overworked, and lazy every day. I don't even get the benefit of any of those stereotypes being that I use an old haggard unicorn to bring me my beer. I'm not very sympathetic on this one.

    The American stereotype is: fat, arrogant, ignorant, and lazy. Right or wrong overworked isn't in there.

    Oh, and don't forget gun obsessed.

  71. Re:Asians by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 2, Informative

    It was USA who divided the country in half in the first place.

    No, it was USA and USSR. And the alternative would be having the Korean War several years earlier.

  72. Re:Asians by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 4, Insightful

    How would you like it if your job, country and culture was stereotyped into the guilt-ridden nonsense that The Simpsons aired?

    I'm Russian. I think it would be hilarious.

  73. Re:Asians by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 3, Insightful

    That survey is based on costs for American expatriates. Completely irrelevant for a local cost-of-living comparison.

  74. Re:Asians by trytoguess · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Meh, even in that sense I say it's a fail. For some useful info on North Korean animation studios something like "Pyongyang: A Journey in North Korea" (where the author actually lived and worked with N. Korean animators) exists.

  75. Re:Asians by blackest_k · · Score: 3, Informative

    Banksy is quite well travelled e.g the West Bank. He has a great talent for producing funny and thought provoking work. Tongue in cheek, yes he does that, Do you really think he was aiming at south Korea with that intro or at Fox or Rupert Murdoch?

    http://www.hmss.com/films/carver/ you might like to read this, in tomorrow never dies Elliot Carver , is often viewed as being based on Rupert Murdoch taken to an extreme. Banksy has started with the premise if Rupert Murdoch was an evil megalomaniac, determined to be as evil as possible how would he produce the Simpsons (if he could get away with it)?

    The whole situation is actually pretty funny. Murdoch paid for Banksy to produce the intro , Fox executives thought great we are being cool and trendy having banksy do this intro, obviously no one really thinks the simpsons is produced like that.

    The show gets broadcast and there is a bit of a panic as the realisation comes that people do think Murdochs evil empire works that way. Clips get pulled from youtube according to http://www.sheknows.com/entertainment/articles/819130/Banksy-produces-seething-social-commentary-on-The-Simpsons

    and now we get the story well the show is outsourced but the Korean animators do live quite well by Korean standards and its not made in a sweatshop. Damage control?

    Now as for Korean history, why would people in other countries be taught about that? You probably know nothing of British, Irish or Icelandic history either, no reason for you to know either. Even in the UK for example there is limited teaching of British history and the bad bits are hardly mentioned.

    There is a massive disconnect between reality and how actual people live their lives. There are rich and poor all over the world. Come to any western country in any city and you will see that there are people getting by, people making millions, and people begging in the streets.

    Apparently there are less homeless people on the streets in the centre of London these days due to the use of Asbo's - Londons getting cleaned up ready for the 2012 Olympics, my source a Lawyer representing some of these people.

    You see just to live our own lives we have to largely ignore the plight of people in our own countries, let alone worry about people on the other side of the planet.

    You know even the guys who go serve in places like Afghanistan and Iraq most had a choice of unemployment and poverty or joining up.

    It's a messed up world we live in, and most of us are just doing the best we can.

  76. Not necessarily by phorm · · Score: 1

    A lot of that depends on how one invests money. The difference between my wage here and what I made in the "big city" isn't actually that difference. It essentially comes out to one of two scenarios:
    a) Assuming I put down the same percentage of income, I could have a house paid off here a lot quicker than in Toronto if I bought something comparable in terms of size etc
    b) Within the same time-frame, I could have a place in Toronto that was a lot smaller than here, but comparable in price. Probably a condo-apartment on the edge of the city

    When accounting for the cost of car insurance and many other things, I'm making less but taking home *more* than if I lived in the big city. Big mortgages also mean big interest too, so the only one getting rich in the long-run would've been the bank.

    Now back in my hometown I did see situations where a lot of people from the more pricey cities were coming in and buying up real-estate. The end result is that local prices went up astronomically, so actually those who had bought a $200,000 house ended up with one worth over $500,000... but that only really help if you've moved to somewhere that hasn't gone up so much.

  77. Re:Asians by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

    A remote mountain in Nepal has better 3G service than San Francisco, a large progressive city in "the world's only superpower"...

    Aside from the fact that- as the other reply pointed out- this only applies to one, very well-known "remote mountain", there's also the fact that signal coverage within cities is generally much harder and patchier than it is on a mountain where the only major obstacle is... the mountain itself.

    --
    "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
  78. Re:Asians by HalifaxRage · · Score: 1

    I don't think big cities anywhere have a low cost of living, because the rent is TOO DAMN HIGH!

    Fixed that for you. (see also http://www.rentistoodamnhigh.org/)

    --
    bomb the us up set someone
  79. Re:Asians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    How would you like it if your job, country and culture was stereotyped into the guilt-ridden nonsense that The Simpsons aired?

    I'm Russian. I think it would be hilarious.

    "In Soviet-Russia, the Simpsons makes YOU laugh!"
    ...wait...

  80. Re:Asians by xaxa · · Score: 1

    Also loud, insensitive towards other people's cultures, and materialistic.

    (According to the Internet I'm supposed to drink tea, protect the queen, avoid the dentist, be gay, ride a bicycle, wear clothes that fit, never speak my opinion directly, be witty, drunk, and expect respect for my country. I'm happy with most of that.)

  81. South korea isn't that bad by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 1

    And their wealth distribution amongst the top and bottom 10% is better than the US with fewer people below the poverty line.

    http://www.nationsencyclopedia.com/economies/Asia-and-the-Pacific/Korea-South-POVERTY-AND-WEALTH.html

    http://www.nationsencyclopedia.com/Americas/United-States-INCOME.html

    I know Banksy is from the UK but the Simpsons are a US show created by US citizens.

    Besides I assumed it was a dig at Fox more than a dig at South Korea or China.

  82. It's a comdey cartoon show, get over it by Nyder · · Score: 1

    Um, The Simpson's is a comedy Cartoon show, they do tend to poke fun at various things all the time. You don't hear the comic fan boys bitching.

    The only reason they are bitching is probably because it hits close to home, and that's not The Simpson's producers fault, that's there own fault.

    But of cry babies with barely any talent if you ask me. Swear to god all the anime from korea looks the same, at least jap's artist tend to make different looking anime.

    --
    Be seeing you...
  83. Re:Asians by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    Not sure if that indicated the Koreans have their hands full doing American animation, or if the other countries are simply cheaper.

    It's called "supply and demand"

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  84. Re:Asians by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    I think in the Australia episode (somewhere in the first couple of seasons?) the subject of ridicule wasn't so much Australia as it was stereotypical American views of Australia.

    Wait, are you trying to tell me that if you insult Australia they don't lace on a giant boot and kick you in the arse in front of the embassy?

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  85. Re:Asians by h4rm0ny · · Score: 1

    That doesn't actually answer in any way the GP's question of whether S. Korea is saturated with other work and can't meet demand, or whether they are beind undercut by the Vietnamese.

    --

    Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
  86. Re:Asians by crossmr · · Score: 5, Informative

    Yes do a little research. Those cost of living indexes are garbage. I've lived in Korea for nearly 3 years now, after having spent most of my adult life paying for things in big city Canada, and Korea is ridiculously cheap compared to North American cities.

    That last one of these I read claimed a dozen eggs in Seoul cost something like $4. I don't know where they found those eggs, but I can get a dozen, regular price, for about $1.45 USD with exchange at the local megamart, and I've never seen a dozen for $4 anywhere. Even at 7-11.

    They also claimed a can of beer was $3, when I can walk to the 7-11 and get a can of domestic for about 90 cents.

    The fact of the matter is that the cost of living in South Korea is very low compared to any major city back home.

    The only thing that is truly expensive is getting into real-estate, but it works out better. Korea works on a Key money system. Want a western sized apartment,2 bedrooms? Probably cost you 100,000$ in deposit. But you'll likely pay no rent with that, and you'll get that $100,000.
    This is where people get confused.

    They ignore the fact that a great deal of daily living costs are tiny compared to other cities.

    you want to have a quality meal at a sit down restaurant with lots of vegetables, and unlimited side dishes? about $4.50.
    Prime time movies are only around $8, with assigned seating and a couple's combo that only costs $5. Internet, cheaper, faster, better.

    The utilities on my 1 bedroom place are so cheap it's laughable. $6 a month in water, $8 in gas, $20 in electricity.

    Transit?
    $0.83 gets you on the subway/bus and unless you're going a really long distance that's it. Over something like 12-15 km, starts to add 9 cents per few kms.

    Some local buses are only about 40 cents to get on.

    If you buy things that aren't part of the local taste, it's expensive. A local shop might be $5 for a good meal, but you go to Outback steakhouse here, and the prices are high, but that's not a good comparison.

    As for computers, since I just bought a new one here, I priced it online to compare the online retailer here and newegg in the US. on a $1600 machine, buying identical parts between the countries, the price difference was only $80.

    once you started adding in neweggs high shipping prices, the price differences became almost nothing.

    local shipping and even international shipping here is ridiculously cheap. I can send anything anywhere in the country for peanuts.

    packages I've sent to Canada have costed like 1/3 of what my parents paid for an equal package there to send here.

    inter-city transportation is very cheap here as well. Buses/trains cost 1/2 to 1/3 what you'd pay in Canada for similar distances.

    These cost of living indexes are clearly made by people who don't have a clue, and once you've actually lived in some of these places you'll realize how out to lunch they are.

    More than likely they're not shopping like a local. If you want to make those kinds of comparisons its 17x more expensive to live in any western city since a bottle of soju is like $17 in any bar there, but you can get it for about 90 cents here.

     

  87. Re:Asians by Rasvar · · Score: 1

    This is more of the South Koreans misunderstanding American culture than the other way around. You have a satire aimed at showing Americans, the target audience, how 20th Century Fox, as a proxy for just about any large multinational corporation, exploits labor in a foreign land for profit. Satire tends to go for hyperbole to make a point. The American people do not think anything about how the process to create the items they consume actually occurs. Most people are smart enough to understand that is not really how it works. It is also not like they could depict another animation property to satire. The guilt is not meant to be placed on the people of Asia as much as it meant to be put on the American audience itself.

  88. Sweatshops? by RMingin · · Score: 1

    I swear to Yog-Sothoth, when I read, I saw this:

    The satire, Akom founder and president Nelson Shin argued, gave the impression that Asian artists slave away in subpar sweatshops when they actually animate much of The Simpsons every week in high-tech sweatshops in downtown Seoul.

    --
    The preceding comment is my own, and in no way construes an opinon of the Emperor of Mankind.
  89. Korean maps by DavMz · · Score: 1

    Koreas probably won't reunite soon in reality, but their maps show only one country.
    If you look at maps of Korea (from 6:30, it's in japanese but you can still see the maps) either made by the South or the North, there is no division between the two countries.
    From what I understand, they still think of themselves as one people.

  90. Re:Asians by mjwx · · Score: 1

    Wait, are you trying to tell me that if you insult Australia they don't lace on a giant boot and kick you in the arse in front of the embassy?

    That is a punishment only reserved for the worst of offenders, oh and Americans (this includes you, Canada and Mexico).

    --
    Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
  91. Re:Asians by mjwx · · Score: 1

    I think in the Australia episode (somewhere in the first couple of seasons?) the subject of ridicule wasn't so much Australia as it was stereotypical American views of Australia.

    I agree with the GP that the episode in question was not very funny but we Australian's dont complain about these kinds of things, that wouldn't be very Australian.

    The Simpsons takes the piss out of everyone, as the GP said but they tend to have a go at US stereotype more often then other countries, I think quite a few of the jokes are things only a foreigner will get (non-USian, where I am you are the foreigner (yes I may live in Soviet Russia OR Soviet Russia may live in you)).

    --
    Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
  92. Re:Asians by Boogaroo · · Score: 1

    It's been done and it is hilarious: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hWTFG3J1CP8
    It's the Complete History Of The Soviet Union, Arranged To The Melody Of Tetris

  93. Re:Asians by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

    What would be the cost for a meal for two at a normal middle of the road establishment?

    I find this to often be a great way to compare COL, not very exactly but gives a good feel for it.

  94. Re:Asians by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

    Right or wrong overworked isn't in there.

    Uh, yes it is. Go look it up. It's extra amusing because people often put that right after 'lazy'.

    --

    "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

  95. Re:Asians by zippthorne · · Score: 1

    Korea was UN operation. The first, IIRC.

    --
    Can you be Even More Awesome?!
  96. Re:Asians by yuje · · Score: 2, Informative

    It was USA who divided the country in half in the first place.

    You're welcome yet again. If it wasn't for the US demands for the division in the first place, Korea would already have been united........by the Russians who were invading Japanese territory during the last days of World War 2 and in a rush to occupy as much land as possible. The division saved the southern half of the country from the fate of their grass-and-tree-bark-eating northern neighbors.

  97. Everywhere soon by sesshomaru · · Score: 1

    Some argue that the Banksy sequence's gray and forlorn atmosphere more accurately depicts the sweatshop-like conditions in _________.

    Coming soon to a country near you, thanks to Austerity (tm).

    --
    "MIT betrayed all of its basic principles."
  98. Re:All this time they never realized by LBt1st · · Score: 1

    Agreed. This a silly stereotyping and nothing more. This is no different then making jokes about blacks eating chicken, whites sucking at basketball, jews being tight with money, etc, etc. It doesn't mean it's true. It's just a stereotype. Chill out and laugh a little.

  99. Re:Asians by dafing · · Score: 1

    Again though, there is something to be said when pretty much the entire world has GOOD broadband and cellphone reception...except in the USA...

    This shouldn't be brushed away, "oh well, you cant win them all HA!", something should be done, vote with your wallet! The USA must close the 3G access gap!

    --
    --- ...or a new slashdot signature. Dear aunt, let's set so double the killer delete select all
  100. Re:Asians by GiveBenADollar · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The Simpsons has been using absurdity to escape ridicule on political issues for year. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Cartridge_Family or http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Much_Apu_About_Nothing The absurdity is there to avoid a fight not to change the message, the show's commentary is pretty much as you see it minus the unicorn and the kittens. The intro was so horrific I couldn't even chuckle about the absurdity. I think somewhere around season 6 the writers went off the deep end and haven't been back since. I don't mind opposing political viewpoints in my comedy, but I do mind being hammered with politics when I want a laugh.

  101. Re:Asians by Twisted64 · · Score: 1

    Because Korean animators are GOOD. Even Japan outsources animation to Korea.

    --
    Consciousness is a myth. Trust me.
  102. Re:Asians by Thing+1 · · Score: 1

    In soviet Russia, hilarious thinks it is you! Horrorshow, and all that; videe well.

    --
    I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
  103. Re:Asians by raodin · · Score: 1

    Now as for Korean history, why would people in other countries be taught about that? You probably know nothing of British, Irish or Icelandic history either, no reason for you to know either. Even in the UK for example there is limited teaching of British history and the bad bits are hardly mentioned.

    I don't know, I recall covering some European history when I was in (American) high school. Primarily French and English history and how it relates to the formation of modern politics in the US.

    Zero coverage of Korean history though, that much is true.

  104. Re:Asians by jrumney · · Score: 1

    What would be the cost for a meal for two at a normal middle of the road establishment?

    Roadkill is free for anyone willing to eat it in Seoul.

  105. Hypocrites by geekoid · · Score: 1

    It's always fun making money making fun of people...until it's you. The all of a sudden it's not fair, or funny.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  106. Re:Asians by DDLKermit007 · · Score: 1

    And thats life. It's a bit dickish, but it happens. Seriously, safest country on Earth. It's one reason I LOVE Japan. Worst thing most women have worry about there is a random groping on a train.

  107. Re:Asians by DDLKermit007 · · Score: 1

    No, the only reason were there is because of China. North Korea is a joke by comparison. I say this of course about two countries I enjoy heavily. Japan is by far my fav country.

  108. Re:Asians by DDLKermit007 · · Score: 1

    Did you even read the summary all the way? The company contracts out a good chunk of the operation to North Korea, and will not say what or how much.

  109. Re:Asians by TheoMurpse · · Score: 1

    Did you even read the summary all the way?

    Are you new here?

  110. Re:Asians by WarlockD · · Score: 1

    Comes and goes, at-least with Japan. If they like Korea that year their stuff goes to get made there. Vietnam is starting to be kind of the "safe" pick for businesses.

    Remember, unlike here, they have a strong nationalism streak. So if China or Korea leaders start dising them they all get up an arms. Americans just care about price and stability.

    I think we use Korea because it is cheap but also it has higher tech/quality living standards. That tends to produce a more skilled labor force vs Vietnam that is starting to be like Japan was after ww2.

  111. Re:Asians by korean.ian · · Score: 1

    Forgot about this thread sorry. Although it's difficult to compare costs somewhat due to differences in eating habits, a meal for two at a standard Korean restaurant would be anywhere from 12-20 dollars. No tipping. No tax.
    Non-Korean establishments tend to be pricier, but you can get a decent steak for two plus a bottle of wine for around 40-50 dollars. Again, no tipping required. No tax either. Whats on the bill is what you pay.