Slashdot Mirror


Kindle Allowing Chinese Unfettered Access To Web

jcl-xen0n writes "Apparently, some Chinese Kindle owners have discovered that they are able to access banned sites such as Twitter and Facebook without a problem. The article speculates that Amazon may be operating a local equivalent to Amazon Whispernet with a Chinese 3G provider. Professor Lawrence Yeung Kwan, of the University of Hong Kong's electrical and electronic engineering department, told the paper that mainland internet patrols might have overlooked the gadget (perhaps because they consider it solely a tool to purchase books). How long before Kindle traffic is locked down?"

138 comments

  1. Now that everyone is talking about it... by __aagmrb7289 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'd guess it won't be long. Is there any reason that people needed to publish this information? Is this stuff that people "must know" - to the point where it's worth getting it shut down? This seems pretty dumb to me.

    1. Re:Now that everyone is talking about it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      The Chinese government isn't too web savy. They've quoted The Onion in the past as a news source. They probably think Slashdot has typing tutorials.

    2. Re:Now that everyone is talking about it... by santax · · Score: 1

      Do you have sources/proof of that? I would love to know :)

    3. Re:Now that everyone is talking about it... by WarJolt · · Score: 1

      Seems kinda hypocritical that someone who reads /. would shut down a means to freely access information. Sadly, I wouldn't be surprised it was shut down tomorrow..

    4. Re:Now that everyone is talking about it... by Jason_D_Berg · · Score: 0

      I'd guess it won't be long. Is there any reason that people needed to publish this information? Is this stuff that people "must know" - to the point where it's worth getting it shut down? This seems pretty dumb to me.

      Anybody savvy enough to buy a Kindle just to get to Twitter is probably also savvy enough to use Tor or Freegate in order to access it as well. This was a loophole, but not a significant one.

    5. Re:Now that everyone is talking about it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If only there was a site with news for nerds that could break it.

    6. Re:Now that everyone is talking about it... by MoonBuggy · · Score: 4, Informative

      Here's a Wired article talking about the mistake. That said, suggesting that a government with an (apparently) moderately effective web filter "isn't too web savy" on the basis of a newspaper's screw up 8 years ago might be taking things a little far.

    7. Re:Now that everyone is talking about it... by amRadioHed · · Score: 1

      The fact that they aren't familiar with English language satire doesn't say much about their web savvy. I'm sure their comprehension of Chinese language websites is good enough to pick up on this news..

      --
      We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
    8. Re:Now that everyone is talking about it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since when is anything ever hidden on the web? Someone's big mouth is gonna open at some point. It's not like this kind of 'discovery' is protected to the same extent as say, an iOS jailbreak exploit. We're talking about widely available functionality on a widely spread mainstream device, in a country with 10 digit population.

    9. Re:Now that everyone is talking about it... by santax · · Score: 1

      Lol! thank you :)

    10. Re:Now that everyone is talking about it... by jcl-xen0n · · Score: 1

      If it's made it into a mainstream Australian paper (that's half cobbled together from wire sources) then it's fair to say it's already well known....

    11. Re:Now that everyone is talking about it... by contra_mundi · · Score: 2, Funny

      Wait. So we would should censor ourselves about how they could get around their censorship?

      I think the room is spinning.

    12. Re:Now that everyone is talking about it... by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 0

      In Soviet Russia, Kindle reads YOU!

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    13. Re:Now that everyone is talking about it... by nloop · · Score: 0, Troll

      Tor still exists, Slashdot didn't ruin the interwebs in China. Keep posting on stories you don't understand.

    14. Re:Now that everyone is talking about it... by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      Never mistake an employee doing the old copy-and-paste with incompetence. In addition, Chinese have difficulty understanding sarcasm as a cultural issue. Go ahead and laugh at their lack of "savy" (sic) though. I'm sure the racism would be approved.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    15. Re:Now that everyone is talking about it... by Rod+Beauvex · · Score: 1

      Y'know, I pointed this out in one of the last secret things that got discussed, and my karma went straight through the floor.

    16. Re:Now that everyone is talking about it... by Grapplebeam · · Score: 1

      Though your point makes sense, I'm fairly sure Slashdot is banned in China. It will take a little longer for them to catch this as people resubmit the information elsewhere.

      --
      There is no -1 Disagree.
    17. Re:Now that everyone is talking about it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stop f$&%ing saying "savvy". You're driving me nuts.

    18. Re:Now that everyone is talking about it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      You, and quite a few other people, seem to think that only /. is publicizing this. Exactly how often does /. post exclusives or act in any way other than as a news aggregation website?

      Also, imagine if only 50 people knew about this. It spread slowly through word of mouth and *eventually* the government shuts it down after, I dunno, 50,000 people learn about it and use it for 3-4 months. They complain, but what can they do? Other than go to jail for dissension.

      Now, how about if it's published everywhere and a million people find out about it at once? A million, two million, three, whatever millions of people find out about it because it's so widespread and the Chinese government shuts it down in a week. Three million people cry out in protest. Could something positive happen? Possibly.

      The idea that we should hide the news so the government can't find out about it is ridiculous. It just means that when they *do* find out, very few people will be affected leading to a feeling of "no one cares". We should publicize it as much as we can so that, when the shit hits the fan, at least someone out there's got your back.

      If you're scheduling an event, you want as many people as you want with you. You don't try to hide it and show up with 20 people. You scream it from the rooftops and end up with a million.

    19. Re:Now that everyone is talking about it... by causality · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Tor still exists, Slashdot didn't ruin the interwebs in China. Keep posting on stories you don't understand.

      I'm not so sure how secure Tor would be against a state government large and powerful enough to monitor large portions of the Internet at once. Its real-time nature leaves it open to timing attacks among other things like compromised (primarily exit) nodes.

      --
      It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
    20. Re:Now that everyone is talking about it... by Homburg · · Score: 2, Informative

      The report linked to here is based on an article in the South China Morning Post - I think it's a fair bet that if a Hong Kong newspaper knows, the Chinese government also knows.

    21. Re:Now that everyone is talking about it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, I'm seeing and writing this from China, while having twitter and facebook showing a great 404 on the next tabs...

      --R

    22. Re:Now that everyone is talking about it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is there any reason that people needed to publish this information?

      That guy is a professor, publish or perish, got it?

    23. Re:Now that everyone is talking about it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By the time the story hits the old Slashdot, the PLA great wall team has already siezed all the kindles in the country, rounded up the users of these devices for re-education, rounded up the retailers for re-education, banned further sale of the devices, and the government has started a reverse-engineering program to create a similar device for the home market, but with full green-dam protection, and of course, complete respect and obedience to the great firewall.

    24. Re:Now that everyone is talking about it... by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

      You've some interesting issues with words, friend.

      Fortunately, professional help is available for this sort of thing.

      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    25. Re:Now that everyone is talking about it... by Neil+Boekend · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I have a feeling the people who decide what will be banned in china will only decide what is banned for OTHER Chinese people. They will have all the "Free Tibet" sites available for themselves.

      --
      Well, I might have a way, but it only works on a semi spherical planet in a vacuum.
    26. Re:Now that everyone is talking about it... by arndawg · · Score: 1

      In Soviet Russia, this was never funny.

    27. Re:Now that everyone is talking about it... by erroneus · · Score: 1

      This is definitely one of those situations where reporting is irresponsible. It is a certainty that the Kindle users in China will suffer or Amazon.com will suffer or both by putting this news out in this way.

      It would have been better to collect the facts about the story and wait until the actual or eventual closing of that hole before reporting on it. There would still be a story and it wouldn't be a direct contributor to the problem which this story is actually about. I think whoever put that out should be ashamed. While it's possibly true that no one will be killed over this, it is quite possible that people may be jailed over this if it is suspected that any people involved did this intentionally to circumvent China's censor filters.

      It would do no good to complain to the Australian news paper... run a Google on the headline and you will see it's pretty much everywhere... at the bottom of the article, you will see AFP. We may never know who the jackass was who put this story out.

    28. Re:Now that everyone is talking about it... by easyTree · · Score: 1

      Uhh... In Soviet Russia, funny was never this?

    29. Re:Now that everyone is talking about it... by easyTree · · Score: 1

      I guess that by the standards of openness and freedom set by the Chinese government, The Kindle looks relatively open and free from restriction. I guess there had to be something which fit that criterion :D

    30. Re:Now that everyone is talking about it... by GPLHost-Thomas · · Score: 1

      Do you really think there's nobody reading the web in China? Think twice. Few DAYS after the news about Opera Mini having the same "issue" being posted on slashdot, its proxy has been blocked, and Opera had to make a new version taking the Great Firewall of China into account. Would you mind giving your source that proves the government is that stupid, as is asking the person just right next to my post?

    31. Re:Now that everyone is talking about it... by GPLHost-Thomas · · Score: 1

      Tor is simply blocked if you don't have a specific entry node. So it's not really working well...

    32. Re:Now that everyone is talking about it... by AHuxley · · Score: 2, Funny

      In Soviet Russia Bezos deletes you.
      In State Capitalist China Kindle reports you.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
    33. Re:Now that everyone is talking about it... by tchdab1 · · Score: 1

      No, we should discuss their censorship.
      But the discussion should be encrypted.

    34. Re:Now that everyone is talking about it... by xnpu · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Some holes aren't to be closed. Foreign simcards roaming to an uncensored Internet is not a new thing. Neither are VPN services. With the exception of some politically funded organizations who offered these services for free, these routes have _never_ been blocked. (I've been using them in China since 1997.)

      The idea of censorship is not to restrict information from everybody. It's to prevent the masses from rebelling against the government. Those are two very different objectives.

      The government wants to prevent bad news in Chinese from spreading like wildfire and upsetting a billion people. But they don't care about a few million relatively educated people with money to spend to bypass the GFW. It's the same group of people who can afford to travel abroad, etc. Why bother restricting them.

    35. Re:Now that everyone is talking about it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    36. Re:Now that everyone is talking about it... by kenh · · Score: 1

      Agreed - too many times reporters confuse "the public has a right to know" with "look at me! I'm such a good reporter I found out something no one else knew!"

      I imagine unfettered access will be gone as early as the end of the week - anyone want to bet that a Chinese embassy worker or their children here in the US won't notice this story?

      This will be past-tense ASAP!

      --
      Ken
    37. Re:Now that everyone is talking about it... by RichiH · · Score: 1

      Tor generates fake throw-away traffic fro exactly this reason. As long as you only look at text, you should be fine. Especially if you use 5 layers or more.

    38. Re:Now that everyone is talking about it... by JackieBrown · · Score: 1

      If you're scheduling an event, you want as many people as you want with you. You don't try to hide it and show up with 20 people. You scream it from the rooftops and end up with a million.

      Or you have unions, Opera, and the Huffington Post bus people in...

    39. Re:Now that everyone is talking about it... by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      Now, how about if it's published everywhere and a million people find out about it at once?

      A million Chinese have Kindles? Anyway, if Chinese people want to circumvent the Great Firewall, there are plenty of ways they can do so using various proxies and normal PCs.

    40. Re:Now that everyone is talking about it... by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 1

      The Chinese government isn't too web savy.

      What planet are you living on? The Chinese government understands the web, its power and potential, better than any other entity in the world. They also understand how to control it.

      Whatever fubs the PR department engage in, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology is Orwellian in its efficiency, and you can expect this hole to be plugged by the end of the week at the latest.

      --
      May the Maths Be with you!
    41. Re:Now that everyone is talking about it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Chinese government isn't too web savy. They've quoted The Onion in the past as a news source. They probably think Slashdot has typing tutorials.

      That is just awesome and hilarious!

    42. Re:Now that everyone is talking about it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As with all things, those compromises were made in the interest of a functional system. If you read the original onion routing paper, they compared it to an earlier system (name escapes me) which enforced stricter privacy guarantees (timing attacks were impossible). Unfortunately, it also caused latency to go to hell.

      I'm not sure if this ever made it into Tor, but timing attacks aren't impossible to block. You just have to compromise on some other metric.

    43. Re:Now that everyone is talking about it... by 19061969 · · Score: 1

      What professional help is that? Hiring a hit-man to bump off people who use the word "savvy"?

      That's silly. We'd have to bump off all the PHBs in the world...

      Okay, maybe not the best argument...

      --
      bang goes my karma... again...
    44. Re:Now that everyone is talking about it... by jeffmeden · · Score: 1

      Facebook, most of wikipedia, and select parts of certain high profile news sites are the ones that get blocked. Slashdot, (at least when I was there) is certainly not consequential enough to bother blocking. FYI.

    45. Re:Now that everyone is talking about it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... people use it for this purpose every day.

    46. Re:Now that everyone is talking about it... by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1

      Everyone knows what a PHB is. Do you know what a PHA is? It's a Pointy-Haired Asteroid.

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
    47. Re:Now that everyone is talking about it... by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

      There's a "one click" joke in here, waiting to be told.

      The "Soviet Russia" is a throwaway - of course! I do like the general resonance with the notion that the Kindle, in a very real and significant way DOES read "you".

      The tracking/advertising/selling model of Amazon is a borderline-insidious intrusion into privacy. The data is collected, presumably forever, and when combined with some interpretations of the Federal wiretapping laws, may someday stand as witness against you.

      There is a very real connection between Kindle and a nascent version of the 1984 Telescreen. Of course, this is true of the web-browser, itself.

      I leave you with Jacques Vallees:

      You may think of yourself as a user of Google, Facebook or Amazon, but you are actually their product.

      Sure, Google will provide you with search results, but they are not in the search business; they are in the advertising business. Their profits come from marketing firms that buy your behavior.

      Similarly, Amazon is not in the book business, although they will send you the books you've ordered. They are in the personal information business.

      The assets of modern web-based companies are the intimate profiles of those who "use" them, like you and me. Time to forget the nice pronouncements like "Do no evil" that accompany the wholesale destruction of privacy now taking place on the web, or rather within the walled gardens that companies like Facebook, Google and Apple are erecting around us on the web. Compared to them, the Chinese censors re-inventing their Great Wall are a bunch of sissies.

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    48. Re:Now that everyone is talking about it... by eos3fan · · Score: 1

      Why'd you write this for everyone to see? Now they'll know!

    49. Re:Now that everyone is talking about it... by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Yes when John Poindexter's Information Awareness Office was exposed, they just privatised the back end :)

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  2. duh! by Lopton · · Score: 4, Insightful

    so lets blow their chance at accessing the internet freely by advertising it on every site known to man

    1. Re:duh! by Musically_ut · · Score: 1

      so lets blow their chance at accessing the internet freely by advertising it on every site known to man

      You too are in a way advertising it. (And me.) (And the next guy) ...

      --
      Never trust a spiritual leader who cannot dance -- Mr. Miyagi
    2. Re:duh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go ahead, see if they care.

      The main reason the firewall works is because it has a big support among the population. A lot of people think that it is necessary to protect the youth from malicious content.
      It is more or less the same situation as the war agains terrorism in U.S. All you have to do is say "Think of the children!" and you get the support you need from a majority of the population.

    3. Re:duh! by Neil+Boekend · · Score: 1

      Somehow this made me think of:
      Brian: "You are all individuals"
      Audience chants: "We are all individuals"
      One man says: "No I'm not!"

      --
      Well, I might have a way, but it only works on a semi spherical planet in a vacuum.
    4. Re:duh! by Phopojijo · · Score: 1

      There was no next ... ffffff.

    5. Re:duh! by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      The UK and many European countries have their own national firewalls too, built on very similar technology - they allow the managing organisations to not only block any website they want, but to even return a false 404 message to make it appear to be a technical problem rather than deliberate filtering. The excuse for this is, of course, that it's the only way to block child porn. Naturally, there is no accountability at all, because the list of blocked addresses contains child porn sites and thus may never be made public.

    6. Re:duh! by Synonymous+Homonym · · Score: 1

      Not only are the lists of blocked sites not made public (except on WikiLeaks etc), they are compiled and assembled at the sole discretion of the police, with virtually no oversight by the government.

      And in Italy, gamling on foreign web sites is officially blocked as well.

      The blocks are easy to circumvent, though. Just change your DNS.

      PS: You forgot Australia.

    7. Re:duh! by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      Not the british system - our Cleanfeed works by intercepting traffic to specified IP addresses, then redirecting it through a transparent proxy that does URL-level filtering. There's no way around it except by proxying through a computer outside of the country.

  3. Not long by Gregg+Alan · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It's almost too bad this information has been released. On the plus side there could be many people that could grab some information, now that it's public, before it gets blocked. On the other hand, if they don't already know about this workaround they might not ever find out since the normal access to the internet is censored.

    Giving myself a headache I am!

    --
    Here before all but 8486 of you.
    1. Re:Not long by causality · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It's almost too bad this information has been released. On the plus side there could be many people that could grab some information, now that it's public, before it gets blocked. On the other hand, if they don't already know about this workaround they might not ever find out since the normal access to the internet is censored.

      Censorship is the least of their problems. Information that is blocked because it is censored can also have attempts to access it logged. That's more than feasible with such a powerful state. Then those who attempt to access it can be located, interrogated, "re-educated", "disappeared", etc. A message stating "this has been blocked" or an artificial error accessing a perfectly functional site is pretty damned tame by comparison to what could happen.

      --
      It is a miracle that curiosity survives formal education. - Einstein
    2. Re:Not long by GPLHost-Thomas · · Score: 1

      Slashdot isn't censored ... yet. The censorship is still a black list, and not a white list, luckily.

    3. Re:Not long by kj_kabaje · · Score: 1

      Are you referring to China alone? I fail to see how this is different from many other "democratic" nations.

    4. Re:Not long by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      peoples, banners ads to many mainsteam western sites are marketing VPN services. During the last year or so these ads have been entirely in simplified chinese.

      If you wanted access to outside web, and didn't know how to make it happen by now you'd have to be pretty stupid.

      most people here can easily workaround the greatwall, but very few locals actually care. Youku, tuduo and renren (ok, renren is a bit shit) all work just fine, infact they're fast and entirely localized. baidu is actually far more useful than google in many aspects (crazy! i know, and i am a westerner). most of the joe-six-packs here are a-okay with the web as it is in china.

      i guess the "you don't know what you're missing" arguement still applies, but its not the 1984 people here on slashdot seem to think.

    5. Re:Not long by Synonymous+Homonym · · Score: 1

      located, interrogated, "re-educated", "disappeared", etc.

      The word is "harmonized".

  4. In other news from China by santax · · Score: 1

    China has discovered that some kindle-owners had accessed forbidden sites. They have kindlied been dealt with. China is safe once again.

  5. Depends.. by sosaited · · Score: 1

    How long before Kindle traffic is locked down?

    Well that depends on how much popular Slashdot is among Chinese officials, but not very long I suppose. Maybe a new saying will get popularized there: They were slashdotted before they could enjoy their freedom

  6. Please self censor.... by ChapterS · · Score: 0

    Censorship of the few (and uninvolved) for the good of the many.
    just kill this story here, ok?

  7. No time at all by gbrandt · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Now that you mentioned it here, it probably won't take long at all.

    1. Re:No time at all by Cylix · · Score: 1

      It's not like anyone at amazon reads slashdot.....

      --
      "You should always go to other people's funerals; otherwise, they won't come to yours." -- Yogi Berra
    2. Re:No time at all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, but the great firewall of China logs many hits here, and a URL like Kindle-Allowing-Chinese-Unfettered-Access-To-Web is bound to catch someone's attention

    3. Re:No time at all by pspahn · · Score: 3, Funny

      and a URL like Kindle-Allowing-Chinese-Unfettered-Access-To-Web is bound to catch someone's attention

      I am eager to see their translation of "unfettered". Maybe they'll just think it means "not for feet" or something, and that the kindle just lets people use the web while laying on a sofa. That should be okay with them, right?

      --
      Someone flopped a steamer in the gene pool.
    4. Re:No time at all by suomynonAyletamitlU · · Score: 1

      Well, they'll understand if they just RTFA... I mean, RTFS... I mean, uh...

      Yeah, maybe they won't even notice.

  8. Not long at all by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It will happen like this:

    Chinese Government: If you want to do business in our country, you need to prevent people from accessing certain websites on their Kindles
    Amazon: Oh, yes, that is already a feature, we just have not used it yet. Are there any books that we should delete from Kindles in China?

    --
    Palm trees and 8
    1. Re:Not long at all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      why can't the REST OF THE WORLD (with few exceptions, such as cuba, iran, DPRK) tell china: "if you want to do business with US, you WILL have free speech, a free press and you WILL open up the great firewall".

    2. Re:Not long at all by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      Because China will reply, "We refuse. Either do business with us and make billions of dollars, or don't and face the wrath of your shareholders."

    3. Re:Not long at all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We've already had this discussion; the fact is, China needs the world more than the world needs China. Manufacturing would just be moved to Singapore, India, or any other developing country where taxes are lax and labor is cheap.

    4. Re:Not long at all by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well, let's see. The United States does business with Saudi Arabia, despite the abysmal human rights record of that country. The United States has installed several cruel dictators in South America, to help protect corporate interests there. The list of cruel, tyrannical governments that the United States has provided direct aid to or has kept open trade with is long. Why should China be any different, I wonder? What interest does the USA have in free speech or free press, or dismantling firewalls?

      --
      Palm trees and 8
    5. Re:Not long at all by LVSlushdat · · Score: 1

      Or more likely: "We refuse.. AND we're going to foreclose on all the billions of dollars we've been lending you....."

      --
      THANK YOU, Edward Snowden!! Americans owe you a debt of gratitude (whether they know it or not..)
  9. ineffective by resfilter · · Score: 1

    i find it hilarious that slashdot documents all these major breaches of the firewall, and subsequent "ha ha china has a stupid oppressive government, praise capitalism" type comments, but is not blocked by the firewall itself.

    1. Re:ineffective by amRadioHed · · Score: 1

      My understanding is that China doesn't care about English language websites. For example, only Chinese language search results are censored by Google.

      --
      We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
    2. Re:ineffective by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      Isn't that . . . odd? I mean, don't virtually all of their schools teach English at some level?

      Seems like a big hole in their censorship plan.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    3. Re:ineffective by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      The purpose of China's Golden Shield (what you are incorrectly calling a firewall) is not to keep Chinese people in. It is to keep foreigners OUT. Just wait for the first big net-war. China will shut the world off and go on its merry way. Its citizens will be able to conduct banking, buy from taobao, email each other, etc. Export business will be affected, true, but that is becoming less and less important as China develops its internal markets. The golden days of exporting are over, finished, done. The rest of us hairy, freakish barbarians will be sitting at home, angry because we can't post our feelings on twitter, and discovering all the wonderful ways that life doesn't work without the internet.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    4. Re:ineffective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sorry, are you high?

    5. Re:ineffective by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      It could be a nationalistic type thing. They look down on westerners and don't take non-chinese content seriously.

    6. Re:ineffective by xnpu · · Score: 1

      LOL. Tiny detail though: it's American Cisco staff in the US of A which still does all the maintenance. I know first hand they have full access, including to the block lists, filters, etc.

    7. Re:ineffective by xnpu · · Score: 1

      Yes a lot of schools teach some English, but aside from the middle-to-upper class youth in the big cities, nobody will actually use it. When was the last time you Googled in French to find out what the french media write about your own country? It's just not something you do that quickly. And if you did, how far did 2 years of french class really get you when it comes to reading political articles?

      Chinese material simply spreads much, much faster and hence gets most of the censors attention.

    8. Re:ineffective by GPLHost-Thomas · · Score: 1

      I regret to say that your understanding is wrong. China blocks a lot more than only content in Chinese.

      By the way, the current situation is that when you do some "politically incorrect" queries on Google, you got flagged to have the full of Google HK blocked all together. Otherwise, you can search whatever you want, since Google HK isn't blocked at all (until you search for the wrong things). No need to tell here what's wrong to search, you guys all know and it has been discussed many times.

    9. Re:ineffective by amRadioHed · · Score: 1

      Am I wrong about English language Google searches not being blocked in China? I didn't mean to say that they don't block any English language content, just that it isn't a high priority and much of it does remain unfiltered.

      --
      We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
    10. Re:ineffective by mrogers · · Score: 1
      Please consider uploading some information about Cisco's involvement to WikiLeaks (or any other site that you trust to preserve your anonymity).

      Pressuring American companies to end their involvement in internet censorship would be more effective in the long term than a 40ft shipping container full of Kindles, and would help to undermine some of the "USA good, China evil" hypocrisy surrounding this issue.

    11. Re:ineffective by poity · · Score: 1

      Search google (.cn .hk or otherwise) through a Chinese ISP and you will get server timeouts with forbidden phrases like "tiananmen 4.6". If you keep doing it the entire domain is blocked for you for 10 to 15 minutes. Confirmed it myself in July of this year.

      --
      your thin skin doesn't make me a troll
    12. Re:ineffective by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      When was the last time you Googled in French to find out what the french media write about your own country?

      Never. That said, you can bet that if I knew that the English results of my searches were being heavily censored yet the French versions were not, I WOULD be doing a lot of communication in French.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
  10. Somewhat relatively by contra_mundi · · Score: 1

    Will USA soon have a Great Firewall of its own?

    http://demandprogress.org/blacklist/

    1. Re:Somewhat relatively by EdIII · · Score: 0, Troll

      Will USA soon have a Great Firewall of its own?

      http://demandprogress.org/blacklist/

      It already does. It's called the DMCA. Why firewall something, which requires enormous support and resources amongst the ISPs, when you can leverage bullshit copyright laws and corrupt, vile, organizations like the RIAA and simply delude the companies hosting objectionable content without due process?

      Censorship exists now.

  11. This hole is a good thing by QuantumBeep · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...So don't make a bloody article about it, ya bastards!

    1. Re:This hole is a good thing by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

      It's ok, I'm pretty sure we don't read Slashdot.

      Uhh, I mean they.

      --
      Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
  12. catch 22 by Essequemodeia · · Score: 1

    It's a catch 22. How else are people going to learn about it if nobody talks about it and if people talk about it it's gonna get yanked. Wow. I read that sentence and realized how depressingly accurately it describes truth in American politics.

    1. Re:catch 22 by eyenot · · Score: 1

      so. you really think slashdot is how the chinese people tell each other about underground internet.

      --
      "Stratigraphically the origin of agriculture and thermonuclear destruction will appear essentially simultaneous" -- Lee
  13. I for one... by saleenS281 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    am glad this professor was so kind as to point out this loophole to the communist rulers. Had he not mentioned the *loophole*, it may have been months, years, or even DECADES before communications of the unfiltered kind could've been shutdown with the outside world!

    1. Re:I for one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Information just wants to be free, man.

  14. Howz about now-ish... by nickdwaters · · Score: 1

    "How long before Kindle traffic is locked down?" Naturally, reporting it really helped the Chinese people. Fair and balanced. Alive but in a prison camp.

  15. "How long before Kindle traffic is locked down?" by Spaham · · Score: 1

    "How long before Kindle traffic is locked down?"

    Done.

  16. Works for Droid too by kefler · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Was just in China last week. Own a CDMA Droid 1, which was on international roaming (1x speed). I noticed I could access facebook, so I tried a few other things. Long story short, I was able to access the wikipedia article on Tienamen square while IN tienamen square. Well, briefly then I put the phone away and got out of sight.

    1. Re:Works for Droid too by xnpu · · Score: 5, Informative

      Like I said in my other post. Anyone using any device with a non-Chinese simcard has full Internet access.

      You don't have to put your phone out of sight - it's fully legal as long as you do not share your device or the content retrieved with a Chinese national.

    2. Re:Works for Droid too by Remus+Shepherd · · Score: 1

      Does this imply that there are two levels of internet access in China -- full access for those rich enough to afford high-tech gadgets, but severely restricted access for the poor?

      --
      Genocide Man -- Life is funny. Death is funnier. Mass murder can be hilarious.
  17. Slashdot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    YOU! Are a BLAAAAAABBERMOUTH! A Blab-ber-mouuuth! You - BLABBERMOUTH!!1!

    1. Re:Slashdot... by dgower2 · · Score: 1

      Has anyone googled "Kindle China"? This story is posted everywhere.

      --

      Proverbs 21:19 It is better to dwell in the wilderness, than with a contentious and an angry woman.

  18. The advent of new technology by alysacooks · · Score: 1

    This was meant to be, as with the advent and the use of better technology and gadgets the security or the arrangements needs to be beefed up to have some good benefits or stop them from accessing the sites banned in China for the people there. The technology has been moving ahead at such a rate that by the time the people get accustomed and used to one the new one on the block might have already been waiting for them. designer girls shoes

  19. Not so hypothetical... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So should Australians consider purchasing Kindles in the near future?

  20. This has been possible for years by xnpu · · Score: 5, Informative

    This has nothing to do with the kindle and everything with foreign simcards.

    Foreign simcards have always been able to access the uncensored Internet in China, simply due to how roaming works. (Likewise a Chinese simcard in a western country will still find the Internet in it's censored form.) European pre-paid simcards have been traded in China for years now.

    Of course an article about a 'belgian simcard' isn't nearly as internesting as the Kindle or i-Anything, but this is non-news nontheless.

  21. Anyone who cares about free access... by plasticsquirrel · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Anyone who cares about free access to the Internet has some method around the Great Firewall. VPN services are even advertised quite freely in China for foreigners over there (maybe because the officials can't read them). Anyways, despite what many westerners would expect, the Chinese themselves often support the government's general ability to block access to websites. Much like in America, these things are framed as actions taken for the good of the nation, and just like the Americans, the majority will accept that. I had a discussion about this when I was in China, and I was the only one who disagreed with the firewall. Nobody really seemed to miss anything, and they asked me which sites are blocked. I rattled off a few like YouTube and Blogger, but they hadn't heard of them. For video sites, they use Youku and Tudou. For blogs and the like, QQ's services are popular. Perhaps the only exception to any of this is that some younger people like to get around the firewall so they can use Facebook as well (FB is blocked in China), but the Chinese have their own social networking site that is more popular there (RenRen). China is a whole different animal.

    --
    Systemd: the PulseAudio of init systems
    1. Re:Anyone who cares about free access... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I made the same experience while living in China. Most people don't care about not being able to read about Tienanmen or Falungong or what ever. They DO get pissed if things get blocked they like like Youtube or Facebook, but generally "it's good for the nation to protect Chinese from biased western influence".

      Fun fact: I'm from Germany and nobody ever complained here not being able to google for right-wing websites like Stormfront*, etc and many people do support the upcoming child-porn firewall which is not really much different from the Chinese version.

      * "Aus Rechtsgründen hat Google 3 Ergebnis(se) von dieser Seite entfernt. Weitere Informationen über diese Rechtsgründe finden Sie unter ChillingEffects.org."
          ~"For legal reasons, Google removed 3 result(s) from this page. For more information on these legal reasons, see ChillingEffects.org."

    2. Re:Anyone who cares about free access... by mSparks43 · · Score: 1

      I wonder how much of this was a concern for your motives in questioning them, Chinese outside of China certainly have a problem with words they post on blogs being changed as they post them. I'd guess its very similar inside, but the desire to express their plans for a new revolution to people they haven't really met before will be somewhat less.

    3. Re:Anyone who cares about free access... by tsj5j · · Score: 1, Insightful

      For people who find the Chinese people accepting censorship hard to imagine, just picture the numerous Americans who still think the Patriot Act exists to protect them.

      America's on it's "Road to China", albeit in the name of terrorism, copyright and "protecting the children".

    4. Re:Anyone who cares about free access... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is another reason that IP laws in China will never be enforced for foreign companies either. If China's government can't control something, they'll just have some local guy remake it in a "Chinese version" and make it the Official Supported Platform. And of course, this version will have censorware and full tracking built-in from the start to help minimize the governmental impact of dissent. Once that local version is made (or even before, depending on the "danger to society") then the firewalls will block all access to the "other version" - IP laws, patents, and copyright be damned. Of course, IP, patent, and copyright laws are granted by the country you are in, so China's perfectly within their rights to do this (barring global trade deals, etc).

    5. Re:Anyone who cares about free access... by dgower2 · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I always wonder whether people with this viewpoint are willingly blind and deaf, or if some dark force is blinding you. Do you think 9/11 (AND all the other terrorism enacted on Americans and others) is fake? Do you believe that is was the US govt? I don't understand. The suicide bombs, car bombs, etc. are on TV and all over the web for everyone to see. What don't you understand? Can anyone actually say that their freedoms have been encroached upon in a demonstrable way because of the Patriot act? My theory is this: people like you feel more intelligent by charging the govt with conspiratorial intentions. It makes you feel like you're ahead of the game, that nobody can get one over on you; yet, you will never provide proof of any of these insinuations. You need a "bad guy" to throw stones at, yet when there exists one that couldn't be more perfect to hate (radical islamists who hate us for our freedom, faith, or simply because they were brainwashed to, you still choose to point your finger at a govt that is trying to protect you from those that want to "chop your neck" because you have different beliefs and ways of life. Can anyone here provide an example of how the Patriot act has altered their way of life?

      --

      Proverbs 21:19 It is better to dwell in the wilderness, than with a contentious and an angry woman.

    6. Re:Anyone who cares about free access... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can anyone here provide an example of how the Patriot act has altered their way of life?

      Here? Trick question, right?

  22. "How long before Kindle traffic is locked down?" by jones_supa · · Score: 1

    In 3, 2, 1...

  23. Thank You, Thank You, Thank You by hyades1 · · Score: 1

    The government and internal security forces of the Peoples' Republic of China wish to thank all of you for your help. Much appreciated.

    --
    I've calculated my velocity with such exquisite precision that I have no idea where I am.
  24. How long before Kindle traffic is locked down? by crusher-1 · · Score: 1

    I don't know... how long would it take to write new filter rules and reconfigure a few handfuls of firewalls? Probably about the same time it took to post this article!!!!

  25. They have their own Facebook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Would any of you Americans complain or even care if the US gov. blocked Chinas most popular social networking site through the Great Iron Curtain Firewall? Didn't think so... China has more than 1.3 BILLION citizens. They manage.

  26. Some people can't STFU by CuteSteveJobs · · Score: 0

    > How long before Kindle traffic is locked down?

    Thanks to OP, not long. I really don't see the need to publicise underground information like this given they know it will lead to it being shutdown. OP is basically daring the Chinese authorities to do just that. And so I award him the Jeff Young Award for Stupidity on Slashdot.

    Yes; Demonstrating Stupidity ahead of his time, jryoung@gmail.com posted this story telling all any sundry where you could get free textbooks on the net. Within days of his post the site was shutdown. What exactly did he think would happen? Cookies and Candy and a Party in the Street? http://news.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/07/01/1838205 http://www.jeffyoung.net/

    Sadly in this case the price isn't textbooks but a peoples' freedom. Well done, Sir!

    1. Re:Some people can't STFU by eyenot · · Score: 1

      amen. fucking morons these days. you know what? scratch that. that's not a moron. that person really, cruelly, likes the idea that they just shit all over some downtrodden poor person's parade, the kind of person who slavers over news stories that go on in gruesome detail about abductions, rape and torture all without ever making any political statements or calls to action in print.

      --
      "Stratigraphically the origin of agriculture and thermonuclear destruction will appear essentially simultaneous" -- Lee
  27. Known known by surveyork · · Score: 1

    This should have remained an unknown unknown by the world and the Chinese authorities. Now it's become a known known for them. Or something like that. My head hurts. Good bye, free access through Kindle. We barely knew ye.

    --
    2019 is going to be the year of Linux on the desktop.
  28. Not long at all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well now that some genius reported it in slashdot, I'd say not very long before they put the lid on it.

    Facepalm

    Almost as much as reporting the bittorrent app that slipped through onto the applestore.

  29. Amazon as anonymous proxy? by chiph · · Score: 1

    What this says to me is that Amazon is routing/tunneling the traffic from the web browser on the Kindle through their servers. If the browser on the Kindle (WiFi/3G) were to access banned sites directly, they'd be hitting the Chinese content firewall.

    Chip H.

    1. Re:Amazon as anonymous proxy? by amaiman · · Score: 1

      All Kindle browser traffic does go through an Amazon proxy and always has. Going to whatismyip.com from my Kindle returned 8.18.145.128 which is an Amazon proxy server (as opposed to the Sprint address I would get if I went to the same address using a Sprint Overdrive which uses the same 3G network). They do this for a number of reasons, including giving them the ability to control how much data the Kindle devices can consume (they can block content types and sites; for example, you cannot download PDF files to the Kindle through the browser).

      The end result, unfortunately, will probably be for China to block the Kindle browser altogether, since they wouldn't be able to easily filter the traffic (unless it's not using SSL, in which case they probably could but it will be clunky). Otherwise, Amazon would have to cooperate and do the filtering on their end.

  30. Worldwide 3G access and more by _critic · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I returned to Shanghai from the US and Tokyo recently and was shocked to discover that not only did the 3G China networks bypass the great firewall, but the kindle 3G access fired up easily in all three countries with absolutely no cost to me! . . . FREE 3G . . . Worldwide . . . as far as I can tell. The kindle has already paid for itself. w00t!

  31. MOD PARENT ALMOST by cyclomedia · · Score: 1

    The broad point is a valid one, that a large part of the purpose of the great firewall is keeping the rest-of-world from being able to see what's going on IN china, blocking their citizens uploading pictures to sites like twitpic prevents the rest-of-world from seeing mobile phone photos of things that make the chinese gov't look bad, for example

    --
    If you don't risk failure you don't risk success.
  32. economic/protectionist by electrosoccertux · · Score: 1

    So that raises another question, maybe the reasons for blocking are protectionist rather than censorist? They don't mind the idea of "Facebook" but want their own running instead (because its Chinese, but also because it's probably easier to control). Maybe some of both.

  33. Not so useful on a Kindle by cdrguru · · Score: 1

    A huge problem with the Kindle in China is that it does not handle Unicode. There are no Unicode fonts on the device. And all of the font hacks have been disabled with the latest software.

    So, as long as they are reading in English the Kindle is fine. Non-English? Well, that language they speak in the UK is probably OK. Italian probably works mostly. Maybe French. But Cyrillic is a no-go. As is Japanese and Chinese.

    Web pages aren't going to display very well that way in China.

  34. This is why I'm a supporter of the 2nd amendment by leereyno · · Score: 1

    The organized crime outfit that currently rules China does so because its people lack the political power that comes from the barrel of a gun.

    --
    Muslim community leaders warn of backlash from tomorrow morning's terrorist attack.
  35. Of course this means.... by jafiwam · · Score: 1

    There's probably a proxy for Amazon G3 services in other countries too. Amazon can therefore watch what you do on the web with a kindle, and censor/edit/inject ads if they want to as well.

  36. Chinese do care about censorship! by tpg0007 · · Score: 1

    When you look at all the claims of this and that poll showing majority don't care or support it, you have to think about how they are conducted. Unless in a sufficiently anonymous setting they are very careful about what they say, particularly to foreigners, partly due to saving face and partly due to the potential of having your secret method to access banned websites plastered all over creation. Censorship is so prevalent that the most popular IM client over there actively prohibits you from saying certain key words and posting links it deems dangerous. People still get the point across by using a wide variety of puns or pictures. They put up with it because for most it's not enough to risk life and limb over, YET.

  37. SSH much? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This just in: China also doesn't block SSH, allowing people with servers out of the country unfettered access to the web!

  38. thanks, slashdot. *gong* by eyenot · · Score: 1

    you know, some things just don't need god damned reporting to help them along. fucking yellow journalism.

    --
    "Stratigraphically the origin of agriculture and thermonuclear destruction will appear essentially simultaneous" -- Lee