Slashdot Mirror
Download Firefox, Feed a Red Panda
KenW writes "Mozilla has launched a new marketing campaign to promote Firefox: adopting red pandas and putting them on live webcams. The company wants to underline the fact that the red panda is the mascot for its open source browser via a new section on its site called Firefox Live. It's clear that Mozilla is trying to think of new ways to promote its browser ahead of the launch of Firefox 4. The company has been struggling recently as Firefox steadily loses share to Google Chrome."
Chrome, god kills another red panda?
I think of a fox that's ON FIRE and nothing else. Damn pandas.
Oh wait, they mean feed the Red Panda, not feed me. Pity, they look delicious.
It's Firefox, not fox. A fox is a fox, a firefox is another name for a red panda.
When I'm using Firefox, I don't give the slightest shit about red pandas.
The company has been struggling? It seems to me they're doing very well. Perhaps they've lost 1-2% usage share over the past two years, but Chrome is mostly stealing share from IE, not Firefox. Firefox share is holding steady at between 20 to 30%.
What a fool believes, he sees, no wise man has the power to reason away.
I think one of the reasons Chrome is affecting Firefox is the "Shiny new toy syndrome" and FF lack of willingness to support business needs.
If using Chrome becomes as "cool" as it was when Firefox started, then Firefox will be in trouble.
On the business needs side, Firefox is still stalling on:
-an official MSI package for Windows platform (BTW: If FF MSI cannot auto-update, corps will love it more. It's a control thing...)
-official, built-in, GPO support
-official, built-in automated add-on installation
On the JavaScript side, however, FF is doing pretty good lately: http://arewefastyet.com/
Obama's legacy: (N)othing (S)ecure (A)nywhere and (T)error (S)imulation (A)dministration
The company has been struggling recently as Firefox steadily loses share to Google Chrome.
Near as I can tell, Firefox market share has been at a standstill. Chrome has grown at around the pace IE has dropped. Whether that means users have gone IE -> Chrome or IE -> Firefox and Firefox -> Chrome is a bit open, but they're not losing. However with Chrome in the 10-15% range you have to ask how long they'll keep backing Firefox and just go all out on developing Chrome.
Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
Chrome is used only for page testing on my box. It appears that the youngsters at Google have marginalised the 'copy buffer.' Maybe someone who goes to AYSO games, as a parent, should withhold some Google employee's allowance till that child can recite the definition of what "Copy, Cut and Paste" are used for. Until then, Chrome is Cripple-ware.
No, it isn't. The first literal translation of the Chinese glyphs for red panda (in a dialect that doesn't distinguish the red fox from the red panda) to "fire fox" was done long after Firefox came about.
It was called Firefox because the earlier name, Firebird, had too many well-defended trademarks. From Ben Goodger's log in 2004, courtesy of the wayback machine:
"The process began in late November. Mozilla's Chief Architect Brendan Eich had made a commitment to resolve the dispute over Firebird's code name (which was being widely adopted as the browser's actual name) by the 0.8 milestone. Over the span of about 2 weeks a small group at The Mozilla Foundation including Catherine Corre, Bart Decrem, Brendan Eich, Chris Hofmann and myself pored over lists of over two hundred names, many gleaned from the Phoenix to Firebird transition. We reached a point where we had a handful that were the best of that lot, but none of us was entirely satisfied. Searches of the United States Patent and Trademark Office website showed that all of the options we had picked up were potential minefields from a trademark point of view. We refocused our energy on names beginning with "Fire-" in an attempt to preserve the link with the past, and so that we could retain some of our evocative flame imagery.
Ultimately it was Jason Kersey of MozillaZine that came up with the winner. I don't think he was serious with his suggestion, but the naming group liked it well enough. A scan of the USPTO database was positive. We filed for a trademark registration in the United States in December 2003."
Note that from the start of using the name Firefox, the logo has always been of a fox, not a panda. The panda is a backport, possibly to distance themselves from the foxfire culture.
To me Chrome is a cluster fuck of strange software design so the FF guys lost me to Opera.
Opera is faster, more stable and it allows me to place the tabs on the side of the screen instead of the top.
NoScript would be nice but I heard that something similar is in the works and until then I use site specific configuration to keep the really annoying ads at bay.
FF was nice when we had a gaping hole in the browser market but that hole has been plugged a while ago.
Everyone who buys Wild Hunt will receive 16 specially prepared DLCs absolutely for free, regardless of platform.
Red panda - eats, shoots, and leaves.
American Third Position
Finally, a real choice!
"then you hate endangered animals..."
I LOVE endangered animals. Well, given the right condiments.
"This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
Bah, that's probably another urban legend.
I mean like back when they told me that each time I masturbate Jesus kills a kitten. Let me tell you I put some serious effort into it, and the stray cat situation around here seemed entirely unaffected ;)
A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
I'd rather feed hungry people right now.
-- $G
I'm sticking with Firefox. I trust the Mozilla Foundation more than I trust Google.
He only needs a kitty or two a day
Opposing illegal immigration is clearly racist.
"Prediction: within 10 years, Windows will be a Linux distribution." Me, 7-6-2016
No mastershifu tag?
--
"Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
Honestly, genocide bothers me less than those ASPCA commercials. If you can't love and take care of an animal, don't bother having one. I guess that goes for human children as well.
My friend, look at the wikipedia article on the group, do a google search or spend more than 5 seconds on their website and it will be very obvious to you. This is a white power movement and nothing else.
If you can't love and take care of an animal, don't bother having one. I guess that goes for human children as well.
But, children are animals. At least, they're not protozoans and they're not plants or fungi. So unless you've got some other classification than I've read, children are animals. Like cockroaches and adult humans.
Hmmm. I ask myself - are there any organisms which could move between "kingdoms" (in appearance, if not in biological reality) through development? I know that tunicates (chordates, like us, if not vertebrates) for a long time had their sessile adult forms described as unusual corals while their larvae are motile and (fairly obviously) chordate. There are some phyla of affinities I forget but which have developed into adults of a couple of dozen cells whose affinities as simplified "higher" animals has only recently been demonstrated ; I forget their names (Margulis' "five kingdoms" is beside the bed, but it's so deathly boring!), but they're obligate parasites on cephalopod gills.
Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"