Slashdot Mirror


Samsung '3D' Memory Coming, 50% Denser

CWmike writes "Samsung on Tuesday announced a new 8GB dual inline memory module (DIMM) that stacks memory chips on top of each other, which increases the density of the memory by 50% compared with conventional DIMM technology. Samsung's new registered or buffered (RDIMM) product is based on its current Green DDR3 DRAM and 40 nanometer (nm)-sized circuitry. The new memory module is aimed at the server and enterprise storage markets. The three-dimensional (3D) chip stacking process is referred to in the memory industry as Through Silicon Via (TSV). Samsung said the TSV process saves up to 40% of the power consumed by a conventional RDIMM. Using the TSV technology will greatly improve chip density in next-generation server systems, Samsung said, making it attractive for high-density, high-performance systems."

28 of 87 comments (clear)

  1. Saves up to 40% power savings? by Ismellpoop · · Score: 2

    Does ram really use that much power.
    Now 40% power savings on the latest 3D accelerator would be awesome. Probably help with heat issue.

    1. Re:Saves up to 40% power savings? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Googling a bit, one test showed 2x1 GB of memory consuming up to 7.28 watts.
      http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/hardware-components,1685-13.html

      For PC, that's practically nothing. For mobile devices, every watt counts.

    2. Re:Saves up to 40% power savings? by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Not just mobile. Newer generations of HTPCs, Plug like devices are using 20W. The AppleTV2 has a 6W power supply. Assume they overspec'ed it by 20%, that's 5W at full tilt.

      7W is a huge % of those numbers.

    3. Re:Saves up to 40% power savings? by Requia · · Score: 2

      How much it is depends on what kind of limits you have. Server power draw can run up against building or power grid limits, at which point every watt counts.

      --
      By all means mod me troll. I'm always happy to see my enemies are afraid to debate me.
    4. Re:Saves up to 40% power savings? by 0123456 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Not just mobile. Newer generations of HTPCs, Plug like devices are using 20W.

      Yeah, I measured my MythTV frontend at 26W from the wall; so if the 4GB of RAM is taking 14W, that would be more than half the total consumption of the entire system.

    5. Re:Saves up to 40% power savings? by ihavnoid · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Additionally, an average server has 2x cpus, 8x memory, while having 0x graphics compared to an average desktop. Another problem is that we are running out of tricks for reducing dram power, which means that the portion of dram power may increase steadily in the near future.

      Even graphic cards have a sizable, high-bandwidth ram on-board.

      Trust me, DRAM power consumption is becoming a serious probpem.

    6. Re:Saves up to 40% power savings? by wagnerrp · · Score: 2

      Your average desktop with 2-4 sticks of 8 or 16 module memory isn't a concern. When you're talking servers with 16 sticks of 36 module memory and ECC, it really adds up.

    7. Re:Saves up to 40% power savings? by MrNemesis · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Out of curiosity, what hardware are you using? I've just picked up one of the new ASRock Vision 3D HTPC's (great little machine for Myth/XBMC; works OotB with Linux for everything except the IR receiver, although for some reason amazon won't publish my review) that pulls 23W from the wall on a bad day, and idles at about 17W at idle. My old C2D-based mATX box pulled more like 50-60W.

      But yeah, I've never been able to quantify those power usages of memory. I think they must take an absolute worst case scenario along the lines of "if every bit was flipped at once" or something like that. DIMMs even run cooler than they used to, making those ubiquitous heatspreaders all the more ephemeral.

      --
      Moderation Total: -1 Troll, +3 Goat
    8. Re:Saves up to 40% power savings? by Ailure · · Score: 3, Funny

      Trust me, DRAM power consumption is becoming a serious probpem.

      So is apparently cosmic rays. ;)

    9. Re:Saves up to 40% power savings? by tom17 · · Score: 3, Funny

      640W should be enough power for anybody.

  2. TIME TO BRING BACK CORE !! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Core memory is static in the true sense of the word. I've got core memory that hasn't changed a bit in 60 years. Punks !! You don't know memory.

    1. Re:TIME TO BRING BACK CORE !! by StormUP · · Score: 5, Funny

      Sounds really slow. When do you expect the bit to finish changing?

    2. Re:TIME TO BRING BACK CORE !! by Arlet · · Score: 2

      With core memory, a read is destructive, so it's not truly static.

  3. Oh great. Dense memory. by DWMorse · · Score: 2, Funny

    It'll fit right in with my ex's computer. Stupid P.O.S. Gateway.

    *takes a deep breath...* NOW WHEN SHE TYPES IN ALL CAPS and overuses LOL ON FOXNEWS.COM and adds a thousand!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! EXCLAMATION POINTS... her memory can be just as dense as she is.

    --
    There's a spot in User Info for World of Warcraft account names? Really?
    1. Re:Oh great. Dense memory. by martas · · Score: 3, Funny

      That's the spirit, let it all out! We're happy to hear to the woes of the few among us who have ever had social contact with the opposite sex ;]

    2. Re:Oh great. Dense memory. by Psicopatico · · Score: 3

      Snippet from a boot sequence:

      CPU: Memory, are you dense?
      Mem: Yes, I am.
      CPU: Derp

      --
      Mastering the English language is fucking easy: all you have to do is to put an f* word in every fucking sentence.
  4. Good news for data centers by nounderscores · · Score: 2

    Anything that reduces the cooling load and the power bill will be welcome.

  5. huzzah by Apothem · · Score: 2

    This is great for the big business side of things, but how soon will we see this on the consumer level? I mean, we keep seeing all these really high spec systems being used for the governments and large operations, but nothing for the little guys? TFA gives no hints.

  6. Great. by olsmeister · · Score: 4, Insightful

    We've added another dimension, and got 50% denser. Sounds like we didn't do our jobs very well.

  7. Re:Cube memory? by wierd_w · · Score: 4, Interesting

    3D geometries have serious issues with line saturation and heat dissipation. This is because of thermal noise, and the increased voltage needed to overcome it. (which in turn, creates more heat.)

    We are already at the point where high performance RAM chips need heat spreaders, and that is with 2D chip geometries that can eliminate heat reasonably efficiently.

    When you start stacking multiple silicon fab layers together, heat builds up in the layers, requiring more voltage to overcome thermal noise, which produces more heat...... You get the idea.

    Without separating the layers with some kind of highly thermally conductive intermediate to pipe the heat out, the insides of the chips become little easy bake ovens, and estimated service life drops radically, as does performance metrics.

    I could see them going 2 levels deep in the geometry, with a special package with heat spreaders on both sides (of the package itself that is- not the DIMM) or something crazy like that-- but I really can't see a big "solid 3D block" of silicon getting plugged anywhere. IF such a technology were to come into being, it would need to be made from something that is damned near to being a room temperature superconductor to keep from being unreliable/a fire hazard from thermal noise.

    Alternatively, it could be done in a photonic computing approach, using optical transistors and optical interconnects... that would solve the heat problem too, but would make servicing the system substantially more difficult.

  8. Yeah, what about using both sides? by ThreeGigs · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I've always wondered if there was a reason why manufacturers didn't use both sides of the silicon for lower powered chips, like memory. Seems like a win-win... twice the component count for the same silicon investment. Yeah, handling might be tricky, but not a showstopper.

    1. Re:Yeah, what about using both sides? by guruevi · · Score: 2

      They already do, buy a bit more dense memory than you're used to (or can afford) and you'll see it happen.

      This I believe is talking about stacking multiple chips on one of the sides, probably in the same packaging as a single chip.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    2. Re:Yeah, what about using both sides? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      They don't use both sides because the back side is where the robot handlers touch the wafer to move it. At several steps in the wafer process it is vacuumed down to chucks to hold the wafer and keep it flat. If you did print on the back the pattern would be damaged by all of the backside handling and ruin the chips back there. There is also the issue of front to back wafer alignment. While I am sure some college kids or some profs will come on and try and quote some things from some text books and sales pamphlets, it is not an easy thing to do and adds an even greater level of complexity to your registration.

      Not to mention that the wafer when it goes through a fab is thicker than when it goes into chips. After it comes out of the fab it goes to back grind before it goes to the diamond saw so there is less to cut though and the finished chips can be thinner. A chip cut and put into a package without that back grind would have issues fitting into some packages. Especially when multiple chips are put into a package.

      When they are talking 3D chips, they are stacking patterns on the same side of the wafer.

  9. Re:Cube memory? by wagnerrp · · Score: 2

    There are patents going back a decade pertaining to using microfluidic ducts as a heat transfer mechanism. Every few months now, there's another article on slashdot about one of the chip giants testing out such manufacturing techniques. Just a few links from a quick googling...

    http://www.xbitlabs.com/news/coolers/display/20031008155430.html
    http://www.electronics-cooling.com/2002/11/electroosmotic-microchannel-cooling-system-for-microprocessors/
    http://www.frostytech.com/articleview.cfm?articleid=2424&page=11
    http://www.w7forums.com/nanotechnology-delivers-revolutionary-pumpless-water-cooling-t6658.html

  10. Re:How long... by RoverDaddy · · Score: 2

    Despite the summary, I don't think they're literally talking about 'stacked chips' in the sense of 2 separate packages here. I have (seriously) a 64KB expansion card for the original IBM PC (1982) that achieves its incredible memory density with stacked chips. A quick look at the link to 'Through Silicon Via" suggests something more like two wafers inside a single plastic package, with vertical traces connecting them together inside the package.

    --
    RETURN without GOSUB in line 1050
  11. Re:I find this funny... by slashdotard · · Score: 2

    they're talking about stacking the dice, not the devices. You know what dice are? They're the little chips of silicon that are then packaged to make the IC's that you typically see and use. Unless you can precisely align and drill little tiny microscopic holes in the dice and electrically connect the one on top to the one on bottom, then you haven't been doing what they're doing. Not even close.

    The closest anyone has ever got to this is stacking small dice on a larger die and wire bonding the pads of one to the other.

    --
    me. --a by-product of public education
  12. Stupid glasses by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 2

    As long as I don't have to wear those stupid glasses, I'm all for this 3D memory.

    --
    You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
  13. Re:I find this funny... by PitaBred · · Score: 2

    Except for the fact that this development is absolutely nothing like what you describe. But hey, who let anything like logic stand in the way of a "I used to do X back in the day" post?