Slashdot Mirror


A Lost Civilization Beneath the Persian Gulf?

Phoghat sends news of a new theory that a once-fertile landmass beneath the Persian Gulf may have supported some of the earliest humans outside of Africa. "Perhaps it is no coincidence that the founding of such remarkably well developed communities along the shoreline corresponds with the flooding of the Persian Gulf basin around 8,000 years ago... These new colonists may have come from the heart of the Gulf, displaced by rising water levels that plunged the once fertile landscape beneath the waters of the Indian Ocean."

34 of 277 comments (clear)

  1. this land is a fertile land... by rarel · · Score: 5, Funny

    and we will thrive... and we will call it... "this land"

    1. Re:this land is a fertile land... by Arancaytar · · Score: 3, Funny

      I think we should call it... "your grave"!

    2. Re:this land is a fertile land... by Crudely_Indecent · · Score: 3, Informative

      You said it all wrong! What Wash said next was:

      "Curse your sudden but inevitable betrayal"

      --


      "Lame" - Galaxar
  2. EGADS!!! by Apothem · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's the lost city of... ATLANTA!

  3. Noah, etc by aBaldrich · · Score: 4, Interesting

    So is this the origin of the flood myth? It seems more plausible than the south-east indian origin. I see it as a middle-point between Egypt's myth of Atlantis and the Sumerian flood tale as told in the Epic of Gilgamesh.

    --
    In soviet russia the government regulates the companies.
    1. Re:Noah, etc by eln · · Score: 4, Insightful

      We're the most technologically advanced civilization that ever was, and we still have city-destroying floods even in industrialized nations with some regularity. Before the invention of modern irrigation and damming, massive flooding was even more common and more devastating. Given this, and the fact that basically every ancient civilization has myths involving massive floods, I doubt you could really point to any single event as the origin of any given flood myth with any degree of certainty.

    2. Re:Noah, etc by Yvanhoe · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Interestingly, most civilizations that developped near shorelines have flood myth and most inland civilization don't have it. Floods happen really frequently you know.

      --
      The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
    3. Re:Noah, etc by endymion.nz · · Score: 3, Insightful

      But, the end of the last ice age about 8,000 - 10,000 years ago would have inundated many coastal settlements at about the same time.

      --
      mediocrity rules, man
    4. Re:Noah, etc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      You'd have what, 60 cents at most? ;-)

    5. Re:Noah, etc by millennial · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Yeah, except no. Over 200 civilizations have myths about floods. Most of them are regional only. Few have any mention of saving animals. Some have nothing to do with gods. And many of them bring in elements that are purely fantasy, such as the flood being caused by the tears of thousands of goats. So, nice try, but reality strongly disagrees with you.

      --
      I am scientifically inaccurate.
    6. Re:Noah, etc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Occam's Razor says that evangelical Christians, whose always predate the retelling of the Bible stories in any civilization, simply told the story as part of the various biblical myths and that the locals simply pronounce "Noah" in the best rendition the foibles of their language allow. Every Evangelical is hoping to see a native populace that automatically accepts and corroborates their myths, so the first ones to arrive find similar local tales (what! You had a flood many years ago too! Damn, must be the exact same one God told us about, no, the guy isn't named B'Xorri, he was Noah. No-ah. Say it right and you get fed tonight." "Nu-aagh" "Very good try."

      Then those evangelicals shove off and a hundred years later a new crop arrives, and the name's been changed because that was how a generation got help from the magic people.

      If God killed everyone but Noah and his wife,

        - Why do we have different languages?
        - Who (other than Noah and his wife) was a witness to these events?
        - Why do we have different races/colors of people? I though Man was incapable of genetic drift, being made in the image of God and all, but if there were only two survivors of the Flood...?
        - Why do we have known things like genetic inbreeding of recessive traits, and if there were only two of each animal (including humans) why didn't they die out of horrible inbred mutations within a handful of generations?
        - Why do people still believe any of this as any kind of science when it consistently and constantly refutes observable events? "The Lord Works In Mysterious Ways" is OK for a civilization that doesn't understand the world around them, but it's not like we're short on credible, observation-based theories that can explain things in much more likely terms than "Then A Miracle Happened".

      The Noah myth is like any other, it's a retelling of an amalgam of stories based loosely on some historically significant event or series of significant events that have been pasted together into one event in centuries of retelling over dozens of generations of word-of-mouth tradition.

      The use of Occam's Razor by someone who denies observable fact and engages in increasing contortions to explain everything in terms of a magical ghost just never ceases to amaze me.

    7. Re:Noah, etc by telomerewhythere · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This reminds me of the "Telephone" game. Start by saying something in one person's ear and go in a circle. What do you get at the end? Not the same story. Now, let's try a variation of this with something modern. Like JFK's assassination. Most people agree he was shot and killed, but that is where the agreement ends. But it still happened. So if you have 200+ different stories, but they all agree on flood and humans survive, 1)expect differences and 2) they might be onto something.

      Or another way, 200 people run out of a building and tell you, "there's a fire" and then you get 4 or 5 different basic scenarios from the 200.... It's highly likely that there is a fire.

    8. Re:Noah, etc by Black+Parrot · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually, over 200 civilizations have the same flood myth with similar details: one man (couple, family, etc.) is told by God that he will flood the entire earth. He builds a wooden vessel and survives (with or without animals) and everyone else dies. Even the man's name is Nue in Hawaii and Nuah in China.

      This kind of correlation between people speaking different languages living in all continents is hard to ignore. Occam's razor says there was a global flood and the man (probably named Noah) saw everyone around him die and believed that God's forewarning saved him, at the very least.

      Before we apply Ockham's Razor we have to filter out the made-up evidence. Yes, there are lots of flood myths and some have interesting elements in common. But no, there's not the kind of consistency biblical literalists like to believe there is.

      Then, for whatever similar myths remain, Ockham's Razor would probably recommend cultural dissemination. That might be problematic in some cases, but then any claim that the myths represent the same event require an equal degree of dissemination.

      Occam's razor says there was a global flood and the man (probably named Noah) saw everyone around him die and believed that God's forewarning saved him, at the very least.

      Both geology and genetics tell us that there has never been a global flood. Every living species would have a genetic bottleneck from the time of the flood, and that isn't what we find.

      More importantly, the biblical flood story portrays YHWH as an evil fuck-up. Why bother with a flood when he could just wish the evildoers out of existence? Why drown all the world's babies and kittens? Why didn't this solution to the problem of evil actually work???

      If apologists for divinity had any sense they would distance themselves from the flood story even faster than the more secular minded do.

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    9. Re:Noah, etc by yuje · · Score: 5, Informative

      It refers to a goddess named Nuwa: It sounds like just cherry-picking of selected elements that are convenient. The Chinese myth of Nuwa seems superficially similar in pronunciation to Noah, but the myth is nothing like Noah. For one thing, Nuwa is a woman, not a man, and is a creator-deity, which is expressly counter to Christian theology.

      Chinese mythology does have some myths about floods, but they involve the Yellow Emperor teaching the commoners irrigation and flood control (of the Yellow River, not the sea) in order to bring about the creation of civilization.

      Christian creationists like to mix and match selected similar elements from myths, ignoring the rest, and use that as reason to support the "fact" of the Great Flood. At best this is ignorant, and at worse sheer dishonesty.

  4. Quick! by Renaissance+2K · · Score: 3, Funny

    Let's drill for oil there!

  5. Re:A book? by jcampbelly · · Score: 3, Informative

    It was a work of fiction by HP Lovecraft called "The Nameless City"

    Cool story - a lot of his stuff can be found fulltext on the internet, but here's the Wikipedia entry: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Nameless_City

  6. Re:Attempt at justifying religion again? by CyberBill · · Score: 3, Informative

    There was not a single female ("Eve") alive at that time, there were at least thousands of females, and those females were all reproducing.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mitochondrial_Eve

    This image explains it pretty well:

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:MatrilinealAncestor.PNG

    --
    -Bill
  7. Re:Attempt at justifying religion again? by Eivind+Eklund · · Score: 4, Funny

    Well, all the Y chromosomes trace back to a single male, too. The only problem for the Adam-Eve myth is that they lived 150,000 years apart, so likely they were not married.

    --
    Doubting the existence of evolution is like doubting the existence of China: It just shows that you're uninformed.
  8. Re:Old testament .... by MachDelta · · Score: 5, Funny

    Does this mean that we'll have radicals from major religions rowing around the indian ocean in dinghies, firing mortars at eachother while screaming "GET OFF MY HOLY WATER, INFIDEL!"
    ?

    'Cuz its honestly not a bad idea.

  9. It's the lost city... by Cryacin · · Score: 3, Funny

    of Atlanta!

    --
    Science advances one funeral at a time- Max Planck
  10. Knock it off with the pseudoscience by jcampbelly · · Score: 5, Informative

    Here's a link to the abstract just to nip all this 3rd and 4th hand speculation about flood myths and Atlantis: http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/657397

    It's great for bringing public attention but not so great for highlighting the actual science behind the pop sci article.

  11. Re:So... by oldspewey · · Score: 3, Funny

    the original PIE speakers were from Eastern Europe near the Caspian Sea

    I've heard of Klipsche, Mission, and PSB, but you must be talking about some kind of hardcore audiophile gear there.

    --
    If libertarians are so opposed to effective government, why don't they all move to Somalia?
  12. Perhaps "eden" ... by perpenso · · Score: 3, Interesting

    So is this the origin of the flood myth?

    The folks who once lived in what is now the Black Sea would probably want to share the credit for that one. They seem to have had a similar flood event.

    FWIW some geologists who compared the old testament to satellite images found some evidence suggesting that the rivers identifying the location of eden are consistent with rivers (current and ancient) converging on a location now in the Persian Gulf.

  13. Unscientific to dismiss legends and myth ... by perpenso · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So is this the origin of the flood myth?

    Or another attempt at lending credence to the myth, by people of a faith where it's central?

    It is unscientific to dismiss a theory because it lends credence to religious beliefs. Do you realize that the current cosmological theory for the origin of the universe, the "big bang" theory, was initially dismissed by the "leading scientists" of the day because (1) it was developed by a roman catholic priest and (2) it seemed too close to the "creation myth of genesis". The term "big bang" was coined by these "leading scientists" to mock the theory.

    Secondly, many myths and legends have a bit of truth behind them. Sometimes based on a multigenerational telling of historical events and sometimes as an attempt to explain things beyond a culture's scientific understanding. A real scientist tries to interpret myths and legends, not ignore or dismiss them.

    1. Re:Unscientific to dismiss legends and myth ... by perpenso · · Score: 5, Informative

      Citation please. Seriously. This would be very useful these days.

      "Monsignor Georges Henri Joseph Édouard Lemaître ( lemaitre.ogg (helpinfo) July 17, 1894 – June 20, 1966) was a Belgian Roman Catholic priest, honorary prelate, professor of physics and astronomer at the Catholic University of Louvain. He sometimes used the title Abbé or Monseigneur. Lemaître was the first scientist to propose what became known as the Big Bang theory of the origin of the Universe, which he called his 'hypothesis of the primeval atom'."
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georges_Lemaitre

      "The Big Bang is a scientific theory, and as such is dependent on its agreement with observations. But as a theory which addresses the origins of reality, it has always carried theological and philosophical implications. In the 1920s and 1930s almost every major cosmologist preferred an eternal steady state Universe, and several complained that the beginning of time implied by the Big Bang imported religious concepts into physics; this objection was later repeated by supporters of the steady state theory."
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_bang

  14. Re:So... by MaskedSlacker · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Is this place which was flooded where the Indo-European language roots come from?

    No. There are too many cold weather/northern animal words shared across IE languages. The north Caspian Sea area is the most likely, though there are other possibilities. Any area as far south as the Persian Gulf though is highly unlikely based on weather/animal words shared across IE languages.

    Though it may be where Proto-Semitic language roots come from (Hebrew, Aramaic, Arabic, Syriac, Assryian, etc.), but there is extensive debate on that as well (whether Afroasiatic languages like the Semitic family formed in Africa and moved north, or the Middle East and moved south).

    Also, Helen didn't sink any ships. The phrase is 'launched a thousand ships.'

  15. ONE != ONLY ancestor by mangu · · Score: 4, Informative

    No matter how you try to spin it, the mitochondrial DNA of modern humans trace back to "ONE" female.

    To say we all descend from ONE woman does not mean she was the ONLY woman on earth at the time.

    Look at it this way: all my brothers, sisters, and cousins descend from my grandmother. But we have TWO grandmothers. Capisce?

  16. Re:Attempt at justifying religion again? by MightyMartian · · Score: 3, Informative

    Except that it's hard to reconcile the story with the fact that Noah and the "Eve" figure lived over a hundred thousand years apart.

    The Noah story is a myth. The Flood story is a myth. The Adam and Eve story is a myth. It's pointless to try to force fit science to myth, or myth to science.

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  17. Re:Attempt at justifying religion again? by ByteSlicer · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'm afraid you misunderstand what 'mitochondrial Eve' entails.
    It simply means that all living humans have some mitochondrial DNA in common, which they all inherited from a single female ancestor.
    It does not mean there was only one female ancestor.
    That common ancestor lived at the same time with other females (and males), some of which passed on their mitochondrial DNA to people living today, just not to all of them.

  18. Silly to assume bias because scientist has faith by perpenso · · Score: 4, Insightful

    >Until I hear about a few geologists supporting this, I read this as Yet Another attempt at trying to legitimize the Abrahamic religion flood myth. That the man behind this was educated at the Southern Methodist University makes it, in my opinion, more likely that there's a bias here.

    You realize you are engaging in the same bias practiced by those who dismissed the big bang theory because it was formulated by a roman catholic priest and seemed too close to the story of genesis? I am not vouching for this guy from SMU, just offering something for you to consider when you learn that a scientist has faith. Newton comes to mind too.

    Also what is wrong with myth? They are sometimes a pre-literate pre-scientific civilization's attempt to pass along observations from one generation to the next. A real scientist would try to interpret the myth, not dismiss it.

  19. Re:Attempt at justifying religion again? by Arker · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Archaeologists study Geology intensely, and any team of size will include a Geologist.

    Also Southern Methodist is a great place for archæology, home to Lewis Binford among others. The Methodist church isnt fundamentalist and doesnt have a problem with science.

    So you were offbase on every point.

    --
    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
    Friends don't let friends enable ecmascript.
  20. Re:So... by MightyMartian · · Score: 5, Informative

    The oldest languages around the Persian Gulf are not Semitic. The oldest language that can be attested are Sumerian and Elamite, which are both isolates, with know perceivable connection to any other spoken language. The Akkadians and other Semitic tribes were later invaders that seized Sumer, though they largely retained the Sumerian religion and the language as a sort of liturgical language (much like Latin was to become after the fall of Rome). No one can be quite certain where the Semitic languages arose, though the parent Afro-Asiatic family appears to come East Africa, and the Semitic languages may have arisen in the Arabian Peninsula.

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  21. Re:So... by Guido+von+Guido · · Score: 4, Informative

    The oldest languages around the Persian Gulf are Semitic, so it's unlikely the forerunners of the Indo-Europeans lived in the hypothetical valley now sitting under the waves.

    The Sumerians, the Hurrians and the Elamites want to have a word with you. (None of their languages were remotely Indo-European, but they weren't Semitic, either.)

  22. Re:Old testament .... by Sebilrazen · · Score: 3, Funny

    You're kidding right? The FSM is Cthulhu's public relations image. "Noodled appendages" is the non-scary way of saying "tentacles of death."

    --
    "There are no facts, only interpretations." --Friedrich Nietzsche.