Slashdot Mirror
Julian Assange's Online Dating Profile Leaked
Ponca City writes "The Telegraph reports that an online dating profile created by Julian Assange in 2006 has been unearthed from OKCupid disclosing that the WikiLeaks editor sought 'spirited, erotic' women 'from countries that have sustained political turmoil.' Writing under the pseudonym of British science fiction author Harry Harrison, Assange described himself as a 'passionate, and often pig headed activist intellectual.' Assange said he was seeking a 'siren for [a] love affair, children and occasional criminal conspiracy' adding that he was 'directing a consuming, dangerous human rights project which is, as you might expect, male dominated' and added enigmatically: 'I am DANGER, ACHTUNG.' Among Assange's listed interests were the 'structure of reality' and 'chopping up human brains' – although he added the caveat '(neuroscience background)' lest the latter put off potential admirers. 'I like women from countries that have sustained political turmoil,' Assange wrote. 'Western culture seems to forge women that are valueless and inane. OK. Not only women!'"
That actually sounds like a fairly accurate representation of the man. Honesty in an online dating profile? Whodathunkit???
Living With a Nerd
"let me pick your lock with my 256 bit long key"
The only thing gleened from this is that he likes to be in the middle of controversy.
Thats not a good thing, but it does show his motives.
Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
Why?
http://michaelsmith.id.au
As someone who specifically sought a partner from another part of the world, I have to agree with his observation - but it doesn't just apply to women in the West. Adversity breeds maturity, and adversity simply does not exist where a high quality of life is handed to the vast majority of Westerners - men and women alike. There is a reason why the best dating advice for both men and women in North America is to find someone not from this continent.
Apparently the profile was last updated in 2006 - long before Wikileaks hit the big time and all this controversy. The evidence at this stage would suggest that the profile is legit.
Wow, someone who's brave enough to stand up for what he believes in is also brave enough to say what he wants in a woman. We're pissed because sometimes he succeeds, apparently.
BTW, this slashdot story is an example of the things media is doing wrong:
http://zunguzungu.wordpress.com/2010/12/10/there-is-something-to-see-here/
"....Julian Assange is not that important. Don’t give him a Nobel Prize. Don’t demonize him. Don’t line up in solidarity behind someone who may or may not be a serial rapist. Don’t demand the conviction of someone who is only accused of a crime, and needs to be presumed innocent until he is convicted. Demand justice for him — and don’t pretend you know what that is, unless you’re one of the three people who do — but don’t fall into the trap of thinking his conviction, in the long run, has very much to do with the whole host of really important issues that the Wikileaks revelations have brought up. Don’t make him more important than he is.
Wikileaks is only a single part of something that is, on its own terms, very important. They’ve given us a great deal of knowledge about exactly how the American state actually acts, proof that many of the state department’s secrets are simply a way of avoiding democratic oversight, that our diplomatic corps secretly does horrible things in our name. We already had a lot of knowledge of that, but now we have a lot more, and much of it utterly and uniquely damning. Julian Assange is a smart man who’s done some brave things in service of a good cause — and we owe him a debt of gratitude for the gift he’s given us. Thank you, Wikileaks. But that’s all we owe him, and them.
Which is why I want to say this, as clearly as I can: it’s exactly because Assange and Wikileaks are relatively unimportant (compared to the gigantic scandal of the anti-democratic security state in which we now live) that the media has made him into a superstar, has tried to make the entire story about Wikileaks and a single eccentric and interesting character, rather than about the United States government’s actions as a system. The more we focus on him – and I’ve contributed to that, which is why I particularly want to write this post — the more we take attention away from the real story, the substance of the things Wikileaks has revealed....."
slashdot: where everyone yells sarcastic metaphors to themselves to understand the issue
Allright, we get it. He's a bit of a weirdo as far as his love-life is concerned.
Now how is this news? Hooray, he likes a particular subset of the female population. What does this have to do with his ability to run a website which leaks government information?
Does this even have ANYTHING to do with ANYTHING? Is this good proof that he raped/didn't call in the morning/whatever someone?
If you want to discredit someone, find something more useful. Like "Dear Diary, raped a woman today. Felt good about myself"
I do not believe and would never claim that it is a real profile and not a fake, but the title:
Current mission: "Fomenting Revolution."
Is certainly fitting.
after online dating fails, it's on to 'sex by surprise', I suppose...
I get the feeling that he won't be too upset by this coming to light. Someone like Assange probably posts things online with the full knowledge that they could (and probably will) be exposed for the world to see.
I was on the fence about the whole rape-charge thing until I read this article. That online dating profile is no doubt the profile of a rapist.
Assange's tiny role as Roger in Pulp Fiction more than makes up for this.
Someone flopped a steamer in the gene pool.
Even if he comes of as violently histrionic, I can't see the bulk of that ad as anything but an attempt to make himself appear less intimidating to approach. I guess it could be a sign of romantic insecurity if he wrote it like that to preemptively deflect criticism.
Emotions! In your brain!
Let me ask the obvious question. How do you know it's actually his profile?
...Sarah Palin posts to her Facebook: "I knew Assange was a terrorist! Only terrorists chop up human brains!"
$10 says some politician takes something from that profile out of context
"I hope you know how very lucky you are to know me, because I am so incredibly incredible."
The Media? The same Media that leaked the cables is doing that? Ahh you probably want a special kind of media, one that does your bidding. Right!!! Crawl back to the wrong side of History where you came from, dude.
Comparing the private sexual desires of an individual to wholesale deception and fraud of unelected government goons in the name of the people with the intent of changing lives of those who aren't even aware of the backroom dealings isn't close to the same thing.
Not even a little.
More Twoson than Cupertino
A-goddamn-men. I'd upvote, except you went AC, AC. Furthermore, stop calling him Robin Hood of the Digital Age. Robin Hood never held the money he stole for ransom when he was caught. Unlike Assange, who threatened to blow his infoload all over the world if the charges against him weren't dropped. Some hero for justice.
The downside of being killed is the upside of being dead.
As the countless posts calling Assange a douche reveal, it's important to establish that he's a douche. This is called poisoning the well and is meant to discredit more relevant information presented by Assange.
Am I missing something? What is damning about this profile?
I agree about him having an agenda and all that, but this profile is... mundane
Really. Online dating is not rare or anything, this profile is actually quite funny and honest, so what's wrong with it? I'm pretty sure that many Assange-/WL-haters have profiles on such sites and many of them would be more painful to read.
So get over it.
What an asshat you are...
As in, oh *gasp* the governments of the world are acting in their own best interests, as opposed to the interests of those that put them in power... shock... horror. Wake up.
And all you can do is clamor about how this was the wrong guy to expose the actual bullshit you so easily dismiss as general knowledge. I know one thing for sure, you weren't the right guy for the job, because you didn't do it.
It takes slightly crazy people to expose this BS. You have to really, really care about it. There are tons of ways to make a decent living for yourself, and exposing corruptions is by no means the easy route.
In Project Mayhem, your name is Harry Harrison.
"So don't get programmed by anybody but yourself" --Bill S. Preston, Esquire
He threatened to do what now? As far as I'm informed, he has done no such thing. He has a death man's switch which is exactly what it says on the tin and has nothing to do with any charges leveled at him. Now, if he was to suffer an unfortunate and mysterious sudden death...
Thats the whole brilliant point. Everyone spends all their time blasting him and forgets about wikileaks. Its security by misdirection.
That is so not flock of seagulls, sheeeesh. Get your hair styles right (http://www.mamapop.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/mike-score-flock-of-seagulls.jpg)
A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it will annoy enough people to make it worth the effort.
What a douche.
Thank goodness for Adblock Plus: Block Image!
What one fool can do, another can. (Ancient Simian Proverb)
The world's top intelligence agencies are all hard a work digging up dirt on the man .. and they come up with ... his DATING profile ??
echo '[q]sa[ln0=aln80~Psnlbx]16isb572CCB9AE9DB03273snlbxq' |dc
I don't really understand what you are trying to say. You say you fault him as his style is making him the focus more than the information that has been leaked. On the other hand you seem to be saying that the leaks are unimportant. If the leaks are unimportant in the 1st place, why is Julian Assange's fault in this of any concern to you? The ol' cynical "Governements do horible things, is anyone surprised?" angle. Basically anything could be leaked and there would be somebody sitting around acting like the cool guy saying "Yeah, like we didn't already know that the US is hooking warlords up with little boys, psh... old news". Is any leak going to change the world? If it doesn't, do we just act like hipsters that are too cool to give a shit about anything at all?
... then we'll find out that Ron Paul is G. Gordon Liddy and J. Edgar Hoover's love child!
The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
Shouldn't he have already posted this leak on Wikileaks?
Assange had grown despondent that his dating profile hadn't generated much attention. However, for some unknown reason, it's now a topic of discussion worldwide amongst women who all agree with each other that he is a douche. Of course, many of these women proceed to privately email him nude pictures and lewd proposals. Assange is reportedly happy to be out on bail and is having the time of his life.
And moreover, he's unaware that for all his leaks, at least as far as government leaks are concerned, it's all for not. What's going to change? Security protocols and the methods by which they select who has access to data, where and when.
No, that is precisely his goal.
Ultimately wikileaks is not about leaking information. It's about fighting conspiracies. Back in 2006 Assange wrote some essays that explain the motivation for the creation of wikileaks. Assange's operational plan is a form of jiu-jitsu.
He has two core assumptions. First is that authoritarian organisations need secrecy to thrive. Second is that secrecy is a barrier to effective communication. He believes that demonstrating leaks to an authoritarian organisation will cause it to increase its secrecy. Pushed far enough, that secrecy makes the organisation cumbersome and inflexible, allowing opponents to easily get inside its OODA loop. The end result is that the organisation must choose between curbing its authoritarian tendencies or collapse.
You may not agree with his assessments but to say he's unaware of the kind of response wikileaks will provoke is just a total misread of the situation. Understandable since so little of the news coverage bothers to do any better, but still totally off the mark.
When information is power, privacy is freedom.
Fault him all you like, but Assange has ensured that Wikileaks and himself are both household names. A common meme here on slashdot is "I generally support Wikileaks but I think Assange is a douchebag" - well, fair enough, but we're all talking about him aren't we?
"A week in the lab saves an hour in the library"
And in case you haven't noticed, people love to know all about public figures, even really trivial shit. It is the price you pay for fame, more or less. You can't be an enigma, you can't have privacy like you did before. People will want to pry in to your life for no reason other than that you are in the public eye.
In Assanage's case, it'll be all the worse because of how he made his fame. He loves revealing secrets. Some people will find it funny/poetic/whatever to do the same to him.
Main difference between the BSD license and the GPL license: one is from California and the other is from Massachusetts
I'm saying I don't think the leaks are as important as he, and his followers/fans would have us believe. I've yet to see anything come to light that is truly a game changer. Not in the "I'm joe-cool, I already knew that" kind of way, just that, some things I've read are new to me, and others are like "yeah, and???". That's the thing. I think Mr. Assange has done a wonderful job making himself (the person) the focal point for WikiLeaks and I think that if there *was* ever any good to come of that organization, or idea, that it is better served by just putting the information up without spin, without editorializing it, without a lot of fuss. Just put it out there, let it speak for itself. I'm not a fan of WikiLeaks releasing government information, I freely admit that. Not because some Afghan villager will *possibly* get his nuts in a vise for talking to our troops, or because the Taliban will know the location of our troops 8 months ago, but because I'm pessimistic about the government actually *changing* anything. As in, I don't foresee any sweeping changes coming from the government as a result of these releases, so what's the fucking point? Airing dirty laundry? Opening the stall door while the government has its pants down? For what? To mock them? Sure that's fine. But to get them to change their behavior? Sorry, I don't think it's going to happen. Color me jaded.
Since his background has been called into question, and will continue to do so, he's doing himself a disservice by trying to run the show, or direction of WikiLeaks. The more that he claims he wants transparency for the government's of the world, the less he should be surprised and/or upset when the sword cuts in the other direction and the parts of his life that he thought were private and/or trivial are brought to light. It's as though he was on this soapbox claiming foul for all these government secrets that have no real impact or bearing on how the government operates and is shocked when the spotlight gets put back on him. If the information released should speak for itself and I don't think it does. Not without constant attention.
Here in slashdot laughing at someone else pickup lines? Pot calling the kettle black?
Of all the bullets used to shoot the messenger, that particular one should not be used here.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1335888/WikiLeaks-Julian-Assange-release-damaging-secrets-killed-arrested.html
Killed OR Arrested.
No government is stupid enough to kill Assange. Evil, maybe, but not stupid. If he was killed, that would make him a martyr. And it wouldn't matter what information the organization had. His death would reinforce his point beyond control. Now if Assange committed suicide and made it look like a murder, he'd do 1000x more damage to the "convoluted" governments than releasing every secret from every government.
The downside of being killed is the upside of being dead.
Well let me be one of those that goes against the common meme then. I don't support WikiLeaks, I think they're about as effective as pissing in a ceiling fan. And yes Assange is certainly a douche nozzle.
Well I think then, if that is his goal, that he's naive and short-sighted. The governments of the world is a BROAD term, covering governments that have been around for a few hundred years, to countries (and their governments) and institutions that have been around a few thousand years. For the sake of argument, I'd single out the US government and I'm sorry but I'm jaded, I don't believe the US government is going to reach some kind of tipping point, whereby they'd put so many arbitrary roadblocks to information sharing (secret keeping) that they suddenly, collectively, have an epiphany and decide to scrap the whole thing and scale things back or dismantle what they've built altogether.
I understand what you're saying, and I understand now what his goal might be, and I understand that my initial assessment was off the mark, but I think it is Mr. Assange that is off the mark, woefully so, if he thinks he's going to push the government into "painting itself" into a "secret-keeping corner" thus causing it's collapse and/or failure. Seems like his ultimate goal is still transparency in government right? My contention is that a government NEEDS some level of discretion.
Jeez, look at what's NOT there: nothing remotely kinky, nothing disrespectful of ladies, some humor, a HELL of a lot of truth...
?
The only "odd" bit is preference for gals from places that have seen a lot of "reality" and even there, yeah, I see where he's coming from. He's trying to avoid the "vapid" types that care more about the ads in the latest issue of Vanity Fair or whatever than they do about stuff that matters. Not at all odd, given who he is :).
Why would anybody call him a "douche" or whatever based on this?
...though you'll need an OKC account to view it. http://www.okcupid.com/profile/HarryHarrison
Shocked to find that his semi-confidential information has been plastered all over the internet and newspapers.
I wonder what he did that would make people want to do that? ;)
Like I said, his goal is fighting conspiracies. You appear to think he wants 100% transparency, that's a strawman. His goal is improved transparency by forcing organisations to make a choice - make the price of enabling conspiracies through secrecy high enough that organisations will choose the low-overhead of reduced secrecy and thus reduced opportunity for conspiracy.
When information is power, privacy is freedom.
Exactly. If the leaks were of interest then you would have respectable newspapers like the Guardian or New York Times trying to publish them.
btw, what has Wikileaks got to do with some guy's dating profile?
Phillip.
Property for sale in Nice, France
I'd have had more respect had Wikileaks leaked it.
Julian Assange is a nerd!
Doubtless the next revelation will be that he had acne as a teenager. All of which is clear evidence that he is a rapist, terrorist and traitor.
-deane
Because he's a twisted perverted egomaniac.
Tesla was a genius. Edison however was a overrated hack who liked to torture puppies.
http://www.okcupid.com/profile/HarryHarrison
anyone who is able to identify and know one of their undesirable traits as 'pig headed', in an open and direct manner as such, is ok in my book.
it seems he was fully aware of the activities he was engaging in.
Read radical news here
Illegal espionage against U.N. officials. The U.S. putting pressure on the Spanish government to quash investigations into torture and into the deaths of journalists. War crimes by the U.S. military.
If you don't know what WikiLeak has already exposed, you're disqualified from discussion about the topic. Go read the Guardian's coverage and come back when you're educated.
Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
You cannot wash away blood with blood
He's from a small city where you are only two or three degrees of separation from everyone else. If you try to bignote yourself like an American MBA someone will say "I've heard of you, you're the guy my cousin saw do something stupid when you were 15. You're nothing special". It's a habit that looks like has been carried over into his dating profile.
It's amusing that people call him a reclusive attention seeker and egomaniac. I would have been in the same room as the guy on at least a dozen occasions (I took some of the same CS subjects as easy credit engineering electives that year but mostly made paper aeroplanes) but had never heard of him until Wikileaks released the Kenya stuff.
Go up against the powerful, and nothing on you remains out of the public eye.
However, there is a notable flaw in this tactic: It is completely irrelevant to the veracity of Wikileaks' documents whether Assange is a arrogant, horny, conceited, a chauvinist or even a rapist.
Okay, a second flaw: As dating profiles go, this is ridiculously non-scandalous. Calling himself "dangerous" or talking about working in a "male-dominated organization" is hard to twist into even circumstantial evidence of even fantasized rape. The rest suggests a desire for an intellectual and ideological equal. Pretty much the only character flaw one can pin on him from this is narcissism, and that's easy to develop when you grow up smarter than everyone around you and caring about stuff most people don't give a crap about. It's a common hacker trait.
OK, where do I start?
Hint to the lovelorn: don't start a conversation with a potential mate by complaining that none of the women in Australia are good enough for you. That's something you might want to avoid.
Also: looking for women with tragic backgrounds sends creepy vibes, like you're looking for somebody who's used to being a victim.
And how about: saying something that sounds vaguely Jeffry Dalmer-ish then bragging about your "neuroscience background" as if that were a chick magnet is ... just plain weird. Unless you're looking for neuroscience geek chicks, but then you'd better be able to back your claims up.
Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
has there been any confirmation that it's actually his profile, or if it's a parody or fake?
You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
Educated by the Guardian? Seriously?
I am sick and fucking tired about hearing about "conspiracies."
No, there is NOT a conspiracy to keep down information. There is NO conspiracy to oppress people.
Best explained by ignorance, bigotry, and the general confusion of life.
Conspiracy? feh. Incompetence. short sighted incompetence.
Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
Well I have the file, and so far no one has posted the password. Your point is moot since he has in fact been arrested.
Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
I'm sure he didn't mean that to read the way it does and I'm sure that can be said about most people. Internet dating profiles almost always sound creepy / awkward / weird.
Except that it's Sephiroth-white. :)
South Park pokes fun at sacred cows to make a point. Family guy pokes cows to hear them moo.
Oh come on, I love the pic they used for this story, it makes him look like he's enjoying the governments scrambling to cover their ass.
I think it should be the official icon for wikileaks, who's with me?
bragging about your "neuroscience background" as if that were a chick magnet is
What's wrong with wanting to date someone who's intelligent?
South Park pokes fun at sacred cows to make a point. Family guy pokes cows to hear them moo.
No, there is NOT a conspiracy to keep down information. There is NO conspiracy to oppress people.
You watch too many movies. A conspiracy doesn't have to be grandiose. But just because its not grandiose doesn't mean its not harmful.
When information is power, privacy is freedom.
You have to start somewhere. The content of some of the leaks will piss X% of people, these other leaks Y%, and so on. With 250,000 documents, everyone is going find something to piss them off, guaranteed. Once enough public opinion turns against you, change is inevitable. This is how every counterculture gets started, by a slow erosion of government support. This century has proven that sweeping societal change is possible with persistence.
The leaks have proven the government literally lied to our faces, and it's only going to get worse as more leaks are published.
Frankly, these leaks have already spurred otherwise complacent people into getting more involved in politics and commenting on government policies. The game has already changed. A less complacent populace makes for a more honest government.
I'm not sure where you got that idea, but I doubt very much that Assange is shocked that the spotlight is on him. He's intentionally brought the spotlight on him and served as Wikileaks' lightning rod so the other journalists can continue their good work.
Higher Logics: where programming meets science.
Yeah, but that profile is a believable as Santa Clause. But some people, like you, do seem to believe in Santa Clause so why not... It _MIGHT_ be true.
- These characters were randomly selected.
Consider: Someone holds a gun to your head, threatening to shoot you, but in the end doesn't pull the trigger. Just because they didn't shoot you, doesn't make them an instant good guy.
The issue is that Assange (and you) hold for random what Wikileak proponents believe the world should know. Information Wikileak proponents believes should be free. This tactic diminishes the credibility of those involved. Holding the information for ransom effects the exact action that the government performs by keeping the information secret.
If the governments stepped forward and made a deal clearing Assange of all wrongdoing, would he/you/other supporters release the information in the poison pill later on anyway? If yes, and you plan to "shoot the hostage," why should anyone take the threat seriously? Most of all, give credibility where none is due?
The downside of being killed is the upside of being dead.
Steel nerves? Check. Rat? Check. Stainless? Certainly not.
You should turn signatures off.
What? he's interested in fuzzy double-breasted green creatures from Optimus Prime? Whodathunkit?
It must of been during a dry spell.......could happen to anybody
Real men don't need signitures!!!
Are they sure that's not just CowboyNeal's online dating profile? Oh, wait! Why the hell would CowboyNeal even have an online dating profile?!?! Nevermind!
Last Online: Dec. 31, 2006, His inbox is full. Multiple tests taken that seem to be similar to what I know about him. (The Politics Test- Strong Democrat, high in a lot of math, knowledge of Australia 77%, but The GNU Linux Test: 32 - The Newbie) Several pictures of him that are obviously him.. Seems to be real..
Copied from site
Main Profile:
Last Online
Dec. 31, 2006
Ethnicity
—
Height
6' 2" (1.87m).
Body Type
—
Smokes
No
Drinks
Socially
Drugs
Never
Religion
Atheism
Sign
—
Education
—
Job
—
Income
—
Children
—
Pets
—
Speaks
English (Fluently)
My self-summary
WARNING: Want a regular, down to earth guy? Keep moving. I am not the droid you're looking for. Save us both while you still can.
Passionate, and often pig headed activist intellectual seeks siren for love affair, children and occasional criminal conspiracy.
Such a woman should spirited and playful, of high intelligence, though not necessarily formally educated, have spunk, class & inner strength and be able to think strategically about the world and the people she cares about.
I like women from countries that have sustained political turmoil. Western culture seems to forge women that are valueless and inane. OK. Not only women!
Although I am pretty intellectually and physically pugnacious I am very protective of women and children.
I am DANGER, ACHTUNG, and ??????????????!
What I’m doing with my life
Directing a consuming, dangerous human rights project which is, as you might expect, male dominated. Variously professionally involved in international journalism/books, documentaries, cryptography, intelligence agencies, civil rights, political activism, white collar crime and the internet. Formal background in neuroscience, mathematics, physics and philosophy.
I’m really good at
A gentleman never tells.
The first things people usually notice about me
Height. Nordic appearance. Unusual presense. Often carrying mystery brown paper packages tied up with strings; these are a few of my first things.
My favorite books, movies, music, and food
Russian. (D) anything but Russian!
The six things I could never do without
I could adapt to anything except the loss of female company and carbon.
I spend a lot of time thinking about
Changing the world through passion, inspiration and trickery. Travel (33 countries). Structure of reality. Birth and death of the universe (physics background) Ontology. Chopping up human brains (neuroscience background)
On a typical Friday night I am
Working, or in wilderness, which I retain an undying love for. Parties with good friends are glue, otherwise entertainment is less entertaining than working!
The most private thing I’m willing to admit
I have asian teengirl stalkers. Hello.
I’m looking for
Everybody
Ages 22-46
Located anywhere
For new friends
You should message me if
You are a spirited, erotic, non-confomist. Non-conformity is not the adoption of some pre-existing alternative subculture. I seek innate perceptiveness and spunk.
Do not write to me if you are timid. I am too busy. Write to me if you are brave.
36 / M / Straight / Single
Melbourne, Australia (9075 miles)
Tests Results (They have little quizzes on the game that give you a 'score')
s/©//g
... would be by whom and how it was "unearthed".
I think it should be the official icon for wikileaks, who's with me?
Seconded!
Also can we update the other icons while we're at it? Take the borg gear off Bill Gates and put it on Steve Jobs.
"When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
The English government has been around since 1066 with incremental changes since then, and as far as I'm aware that is the oldest surviving government, with the possible exception of a couple of the Cantons that make up what is now Switzerland. So I don't think there are any governments that have been around for a few thousand years. As for institutions, the only one that might qualify is the Roman Catholic Church, which has been around for certainly more than 1000 years but certainly not yet 2000.
And moreover, he's unaware that for all his leaks, at least as far as government leaks are concerned, it's all for not.
Nought--not not.
Their they're doing there hair.
/s/tard = porn junkie? /s/ is 4chan's Sexy Beautiful Women section (I'm assuming that's what's really in there, I'll have to check later...)
"When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
You realize that the insurance file contains un-redacted content right? That's why it hasn't all been released.
"When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
And of course, this can absolutely not be doctored, under any circumstance
as that would be be unfair and take a lot of hacking knowledge,much more then any government
could ever have.... ; }
Actually, not is an unstressed variant of nought.
== Jez ==
Do you miss Firefox? Try Pale Moon.
Minor point: Harry Harrison is American, not British.
www.wavefront-av.com
So he is looking to date Children? Take it easy Assange, ya pervert.
The world is how you make it