Slashdot Mirror


Experiment Shows Not Washing Jeans for 15 Months is Disgusting But Safe

dbune writes "Young people who argue with their parents over wearing the same pair of smelly jeans can now cite the work of a 20-year old University of Alberta student who wore the same jeans for 15 months straight. From the article: 'Josh Le wore the same pair of jeans to break in the raw denim, so it would wrap the contours of his body, leaving distinct wear lines. He had his textile professor test the jeans for bacteria before washing them for the first time. The results showed high counts of five different kinds of bacteria, but nothing in the range of being considered a health hazard."

258 comments

  1. Reason by kimvette · · Score: 3, Funny

    Here's the reason:

    He moved out of his mom's basement and didn't visit home for 15 months. He explained away his stinky jeans as a science experiment. ;)

    --
    The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    1. Re:Reason by o'reor · · Score: 0

      This is SLAASHDOOOOOOTT !!...

      --
      In Soviet Russia, our new overlords are belong to all your base.
    2. Re:Reason by sycodon · · Score: 2

      I had to sit next to idiots like this in high school AND college.

      --
      When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
    3. Re:Reason by Lumpy · · Score: 0

      That is the most accurate term for these people.... Idiots.

      They are proof that higher education does not make you smart.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    4. Re:Reason by sangreal66 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I don't think the group that buys $300 raw denim jeans really intersects with the "mom's basement" group

    5. Re:Reason by icebike · · Score: 1

      I don't think the group that buys $300 raw denim jeans really intersects with the "mom's basement" group

      Or with the groups "has girlfriend" or "wants girlfriend".

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    6. Re:Reason by whereiswaldo · · Score: 2

      Just using a urinal and having some urine spray on my pants disgusts me. Imagine 15 months worth of just that alone.

    7. Re:Reason by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 1

      Just using a urinal and having some urine spray on my pants disgusts me. Imagine 15 months worth of just that alone.

      Urine is sterile - There's no bacteria in it. It does contain compounds that can cause mild skin irritation ("diaper rash") but it's largely harmless.

    8. Re:Reason by maxume · · Score: 3, Funny

      Are you sure you aren't misusing a wall?

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    9. Re:Reason by CornflakeJustice · · Score: 1

      It's stuff like this that makes me phobic of public restrooms... Blech...

    10. Re:Reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Raw denim jeans can be had for as little as 20 bucks.

    11. Re:Reason by repapetilto · · Score: 3, Informative

      urine is sterile when it leaves your body but it also contains bacteria food so whatever urine gets on grows bacteria.

    12. Re:Reason by Philomage · · Score: 1

      Not only urine, but mere sweat contains uric acid and so the jeans must have developed that distinctive ammonia based "stale urine" scent.

      Urine being sterile or not, still stinks. And old urine stinks more.

    13. Re:Reason by TheLink · · Score: 2

      I think you miss an important point. There's typically no bacteria in properly cooked food either, but typically still goes bad (unless it's dried/smoked/cured/pickled/frozen/chilled etc).

      It's a matter of whether pathogenic/undesirable[1] bacteria grows significantly better on denim with urine on it, than denim without.

      [1] Some bacteria do not cause disease but they might make stuff smelly or do other unwanted stuff.

      --
    14. Re:Reason by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 2

      Just using a urinal and having some urine spray on my pants disgusts me. Imagine 15 months worth of just that alone.

      Urine is sterile - There's no bacteria in it. It does contain compounds that can cause mild skin irritation ("diaper rash") but it's largely harmless.

      I have mod points, but unfortunately I couldn't find a "+1, informative but disgusting" selection.

      --
      #DeleteChrome
    15. Re:Reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      please ser, your sig is hurting me

    16. Re:Reason by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      At first I figured you were obviously trolling ... but now I gotta ask: why, exactly, would you classify "these people" as "idiots"?

    17. Re:Reason by jschmitz · · Score: 0

      "Oh my it disgusts me" - you sound like a total pansy - try being on punk rock tour for 18 months it will toughen you up

    18. Re:Reason by TheCRAIGGERS · · Score: 5, Insightful

      At first I figured you were obviously trolling ... but now I gotta ask: why, exactly, would you classify "these people" as "idiots"?

      Because they are not like him.

    19. Re:Reason by CatsupBoy · · Score: 3, Funny
      Reminds me of a Churchill quote....

      Young man (seeing Churchill leaving the bathroom without washing his hands): At Eton they taught us to wash our hands after using the toilet.
      Churchill: At Harrow they taught us not to piss on our hands.

    20. Re:Reason by kimvette · · Score: 1

      That is thoroughly disgusting. I hope to god for the sake of people who had to sit near this guy that he does not ever eat asparagus. Also, I feel sorry for anyone who had to sit on that seat after him.

      I for one cannot believe the level of bacteria is no higher than jeans washed after only one or two wearings.

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    21. Re:Reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is the most accurate term for these people.... Idiots.

      I would've said hippies. Idiots are just dumb and might simply forget to wash their pants, but smelly, filthy, stinking hippies intentionally don't practice good hygiene because it's unnatural and too bourgeois.

    22. Re:Reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      anyone who walks around in dirty, smelly clothes all the time w/o a good reason (such as, they've been doing a lot of manual labor) is an idiot. Hippies are some of the most lazy and nasty people I have had the unfortunate experience meeting. It is as if soap, water, and washing are alien concepts.

    23. Re:Reason by repapetilto · · Score: 1

      Know anything more about this kind of stuff? Like for example I always wondered if I could tell if I was having trouble digesting something based on the different smells of shit and things like that. The sulfurish smell would be sulfide compounds from protein, the kinda sweet smell would by butyric acid and other short chain fatty acids from fat and oils. I know theres a couple others though.

    24. Re:Reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but are not 300$ raw denim jeans , aren't they ? ;)

    25. Re:Reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +5 Brutally honest.

      Sounds like somebody never made it through college and is now bitter at all the others that have.

    26. Re:Reason by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

      Sounds like an accuracy issue rather than a hygiene issue. Are you honestly saying you can't use a urinal without pissing on your jeans? Because I use urinals all the time without that ever happening.

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    27. Re:Reason by Splab · · Score: 2

      You are what you eat.

      Try eating asparagus, your urine will reak, each some brussels sprouts and your farts will drive your neighbour insane.

      Drink a lot of coke and your sweat will turn white clohtes yellow when you sweat.

      Also another fun experiment is to cut up some garlic and just hold it in your hand, within a short while you will start tasting garlic. (My mom teaches chemistry and has shown all sorts of neat trick that helps her students understand the dangers of what they are doing)

    28. Re:Reason by aristotle-dude · · Score: 1

      Reminds me of a Churchill quote....

      Young man (seeing Churchill leaving the bathroom without washing his hands): At Eton they taught us to wash our hands after using the toilet.

                  Churchill: At Harrow they taught us not to piss on our hands.

      It is not the urine that is a concern but rather the bacteria on your junk which gets transferred to your hands. I assume that you touch your junk when you take a piss and that you walk around wearing cloths. Bacteria tends to grow during the day in the nether regions which is why it is good to take a shower every day and why you should wash your hands after taking a piss.

      --
      Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
    29. Re:Reason by Gabrill · · Score: 1

      Even if it's mom's $300?

      --
      Always going forward, 'cause we can't find reverse.
    30. Re:Reason by Americano · · Score: 1

      It's very unlikely that there is no back-spray that lands on your pants. Taking a leak (and, incidentally - FLUSHING) cause droplets to spray up and out of the toilet.

      Unless you're literally hung like a horse and can stand clear across the room from the urinal, it's virtually guaranteed that some spray will find its way back to your pants.

      We're not talking "pissed your pants" amounts of spray, but do the math over 15 months, and add up the volume of a couple drops a day, splashed at random between your knees and belt.

    31. Re:Reason by St.Creed · · Score: 1

      The cutting up garlic thing is great - I bet those students realize that handling lethal stuff unprotected gets it into their bloodstream REAL QUICK and will be a bit more cautious as of then.

      --
      Therefore, by the (faulty) logic you're using, you're just a cow with a keyboard - osu-neko (2604)
    32. Re:Reason by Stihdjia · · Score: 1

      'Cause rubbing saponified animal fat on your body every day is completely natural! /sarcasm

      --
      I see the fnords!
    33. Re:Reason by Tassach · · Score: 1

      Maybe you should learn to use the toilet without urinating on yourself. Most of us manage to do it well before kindergarten, but I guess there are always a few slow learners.

      --
      Why is it that the proponents of "one nation under God" are so eager to get rid of "liberty and justice for all"?
    34. Re:Reason by Antonovich · · Score: 1

      Actually asparagus is a tricky one - if anyone reads this at work then ask around: Some people smell it, some don't. I will probably get it mixed up but I believe it's a recessive gene thing. /.!

    35. Re:Reason by camperslo · · Score: 1

      Q: What's the most important thing to learn in chemistry?
      A: Never lick the spoon.

    36. Re:Reason by X0563511 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If you've got something growing on your penis that you wouldn't want anywhere else, it's time to see the doctor...

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    37. Re:Reason by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Things break down over that 15 months. Add onto that that whatever is living on there is consuming it, and excreting the waste as that lovely smell you associate with it.

      It's not an airtight vault.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    38. Re:Reason by geekoid · · Score: 1

      It's as natural as a computer.

      Why do you think natural better? it seldom is.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    39. Re:Reason by geekoid · · Score: 1

      "Drink a lot of coke and your sweat will turn white clohtes yellow when you sweat."
      bullshit.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    40. Re:Reason by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Both of them should have gone to a college that understands germ theory.

      Wash you hands.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    41. Re:Reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      'Cause rubbing saponified animal fat on your body every day is completely natural! /sarcasm

      I know right???

      The process is fucking stupid... if you're dirty, sure,
      please wash... if you stink or have something on you
      that just shouldn't be... wash...

      But if you're sitting in a cool basement, haven't moved
      more than 10 muscle groups in 16 hours... u probably
      just don't need a shower.

      Use water and some type of cleanser to take the
      surface oil and skin off... then when u get out of the
      shower, your skin is so dry you rub lotion on with
      your hand and voila, fresh coat of oil and skin.

      I shower about once a week, wash clothes once a
      month (just cause I have a ton of clothes I'm able
      to stretch it that long), save a ton of water.

      And yeah, posting AC, lol... can't let a future
      employer see this one.

      -ANonCow

    42. Re:Reason by AlienIntelligence · · Score: 1

      Drink a lot of coke and your sweat will turn white clohtes yellow when you sweat.

      Aside from your mum and your observations of yellow pits
      do you have a valid citation?

      I'm sure current belief is proteins in the sweat cause the
      stains... which is vetted by enzymatic detergents.

      Unless the effect is that the pH of the soda enhances
      the protein effect and it's not JUST coke as you state.

      -AI

      --
      For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion
    43. Re:Reason by Danieljury3 · · Score: 1

      Here's the reason:

      He moved out of his mom's basement and didn't visit home for 15 months. He explained away his stinky jeans as a science experiment. ;)

      Its funny because it's true.

    44. Re:Reason by Stihdjia · · Score: 2

      I'm not saying people should never wash, but washing more than is necessary (very seldom) keeps the immune system from being used as regularly, making it weaker at them times when it's really needed. It costs money, and dries the skin. People pay $5 for soap, and then another $5 to replace the skin oil that is needed for homeostasis. For what? Because you want to smell like an Irish Spring? I'd rather smell like a human, I'm not ashamed to be one.

      --
      I see the fnords!
    45. Re:Reason by arth1 · · Score: 1

      There could be a correlation without there being a causation.
      A possibility is that people who drink a lot of the stuff tend to become fat, and fat people produce more sebum.

    46. Re:Reason by arth1 · · Score: 1

      Wash your hands before you handle your schlong.
      Seriously, if you don't, you transfer a lot of nasty stuff to a moist and warm environment with ideal conditions for the nastiness to grow. In which case, out of consideration for mankind, please wash your hands after touching it, and stay the hell away from women.

    47. Re:Reason by sjwt · · Score: 1

      Solution?

      Don't use cheep shity crap soap's.

      Also check you'r waters hardness, If its different to what you grew up on, you can feel a lot dyer then you real are, its just the body being used to one effect.

      --
      You have 5 Moderator Points!
      Which Helpless Linux zealot/MS basher do you want to mod down today?
    48. Re:Reason by sjwt · · Score: 1

      Sounds recessive, about 22% of the population.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asparagus#Urine_effects

      --
      You have 5 Moderator Points!
      Which Helpless Linux zealot/MS basher do you want to mod down today?
    49. Re:Reason by sjwt · · Score: 2

      Reminds me of a Churchill quote....

      Young man (seeing Churchill leaving the bathroom without washing his hands): At Eton they taught us to wash our hands after using the toilet.

                  Churchill: At Harrow they taught us not to piss on our hands.

      It is not the urine that is a concern but rather the bacteria on your junk which gets transferred to your hands. I assume that you touch your junk when you take a piss and that you walk around wearing cloths. Bacteria tends to grow during the day in the nether regions which is why it is good to take a shower every day and why you should wash your hands after taking a piss.

      I think you have that wrong, its the bacteria that is growing on everything and anything you touched, esp. in a public restroom that you don't want on your hands, if its on your junk, its properly already on your hands.

      --
      You have 5 Moderator Points!
      Which Helpless Linux zealot/MS basher do you want to mod down today?
    50. Re:Reason by sjwt · · Score: 1

      dude, he is talking about splash back, you know, a stream of a liquid, hitting a hard surface, small drops emerge and spreed out in all directions.

      Sure, these nice raised high ones are better, as your stream doesn't brake up as much, but try pissing on the old school floor level ones in shorts, you will feel what he is talking about.

      Or hear is an experiment, next time your alone in a rest room, grab some toilet paper, and hang it down in front of you, watch and be amazed/shamed.

      --
      You have 5 Moderator Points!
      Which Helpless Linux zealot/MS basher do you want to mod down today?
    51. Re:Reason by TheLink · · Score: 1

      There's also this: http://ehs.okstate.edu/news/KAREN.HTM
      Interestingly enough the above link had the uni recommend neoprene gloves but this link says neoprene is not good enough: http://www.osha.gov/dts/hib/hib_data/hib19980309.html

      --
    52. Re:Reason by SquirrelDeth · · Score: 1

      the summer when I was 18 was a weird one. But to get to the point I only could afford 1 pair of pant's and I wore them for 6 months. Occasionally I would try and steam clean the stains out of them while I was wearing them at the bar I worked at cleaning tables and steam cleaning the floor. People used to wonder how I kept my clothes so clean. I was not an idiot I just didn't have any money and eating a chicken burger at KFC every Friday was more important to me than going to the laundry mat as that was my only good meal every week. I'm glad your parents could afford to pay your way though school so you would not be an "idiot" as well.

    53. Re:Reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obviously, you don't play any sweaty sports!

    54. Re:Reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are what you eat.

      Try eating asparagus, your urine will reak, each some brussels sprouts and your farts will drive your neighbour insane.

      Drink a lot of coke and your sweat will turn white clohtes yellow when you sweat.

      Also another fun experiment is to cut up some garlic and just hold it in your hand, within a short while you will start tasting garlic. (My mom teaches chemistry and has shown all sorts of neat trick that helps her students understand the dangers of what they are doing)

      Exactly how does your mom go about doing the fart and urine experiments with her students?

    55. Re:Reason by tonique · · Score: 1

      I studied chemistry. It didn't happen to me but a co-student happened to lick the back of her hand after weighting oxalic acid. Fortunately it wasn't anything worse... She said it tasted rather sour.

    56. Re:Reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AND there are some of us that have peculiar anatomy. Say, the urine stream divides in two (going right and left) at slow velocities. It's all too easy to cause splashing and wet floors.

      This is caused by having an elongated meatus.

      This is why I, at home, always pee sitting down.

    57. Re:Reason by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Good, because he's talking bollocks; it's only sterile when it's fresh, and it doesn't stay that way for long. Piss is a soda bottle and check it after a week or so if you don't believe me.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    58. Re:Reason by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Don't use cheep shity crap soap's.

      Don't use their what?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    59. Re:Reason by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      My gran was hospitalized with a bad gastro infection, and the nurse knew which one it was before the lab tests came back. Apparently some kinds have a distinct "olfactory signature". Bugs, not nurses.

      Also, I'll assume you don't have children. When they fill their diapers or the potty it's all too obvious what they ate at school/playgroup.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    60. Re:Reason by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      A possibility is that people who drink a lot of the stuff tend to become fat, and fat people produce more sebum.

      That *is* a causation, don't parrot things without understanding them.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    61. Re:Reason by arth1 · · Score: 1

      Try to have a cup of coffee (or Coke(TM)) before posting.

      Sebum causing clothing stains is a causation.
      Obesity increasing sebum is a (weak) causation.
      People drinking lots of Coke tending to become fat is a correlation, even though it looks like a causation.
      You don't know whether there's an external cause increasing Coke consumption and, say, eating more and burning less calories. Like smoking weed. Or depression. Or Diabetes.

    62. Re:Reason by whtvr · · Score: 1

      this, my good sir, is one of those things that makes perfect sense when said with a lot of passion and yet it doesnt quite work in practice...

    63. Re:Reason by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      eating a chicken burger at KFC every Friday was more important to me than going to the laundry mat as that was my only good meal every week. I'm glad your parents could afford to pay your way though school so you would not be an "idiot" as well.

      A few pinches of detergent in a bucket of water, soak for an hour, rub them a bit, especially any stains, rinse, hang up on a line. I did that for years when I was backpacking. Cost: 5 minutes of time and about $1 a year in detergent at most. Never used a laundromat. After I settle down in a place, I buy a used washing machine, pay for themselves in month if your alternative is a laundromat, and you can sell them for what you bought it for when you leave.

    64. Re:Reason by kasparov · · Score: 1

      Actually, it does. Many people do not exert themselves enough to produce a significant amount of sweat. Many people work indoors where the climate is controlled and there is very little dirt. Most of the moist bits are covered with undergarments that are washed regularly. Jeans can be worn many, many, many times without acquiring dirt or smell. My skin is much happier if I shower every other day. I tend to shower every morning anyway because it helps me wake up. But, my skin is always very dry when I do. I sit around and write code from home all day. I don't really tend to pick up a lot of dirt or odor unless I work out (which obviously requires a shower and clean clothes--but I don't wear my jeans to work out).

      --
      There's no place I can be, since I found Serenity.
    65. Re:Reason by Tirs · · Score: 2

      [...] a human, I'm not ashamed to be one.

      NO? Not even a little bit?

      Dude, where's your dignity?

      --
      Strength, balance, courage and reason. If you know what's this about, contact me!
    66. Re:Reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As if an old Etonian would use the vulgar "toilet".

    67. Re:Reason by nomorecwrd · · Score: 1

      Anyone familiar with the spanish movie "Torrente" should know this.

      You should wash your hands before not after

    68. Re:Reason by Philomage · · Score: 1

      As a matter of fact, yes... I can always tell when I had Mini-wheats the night before by the scent of wheat wafting up from the morning pee.

      Or like one of the other replies, asparagus is well known for carrying its smell through to your urine.

      Trained dogs are used to detect cancer in people - so the idea of smelling out disease is not new.

      After a really good steak, I smell like prime beef (sweating gravy?). Hence the vegetarians complaining about "meat stink".

      It's amazing what a person can observe if one pays attention.

    69. Re:Reason by LoadWB · · Score: 1

      Whether true or not, I always made a fun argument about washing hands before using the bathroom. I wash every morning and then carefully pack my clean stuff into clean underwear. On the other hand, my hands do not get such protection, so which should more afraid of the other: my clean and packed stuff, or my hands which touch God-knows-what all day long before unpacking my clean stuff?

    70. Re:Reason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know that you can rinse off in the shower without using soap, right? I only use soap on my armpits + crotch, the rest just gets rinsed and incidental soap from shampoo. The only time I ever actually get soaped up is when I'm sharing the shower with my wife, as she likes to rub soap all over me. And then makes me repeat the process on her :)

    71. Re:Reason by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Try to have a cup of coffee (or Coke(TM)) before posting.

      Tell you what, why don't you try a cup of go fuck yourself?

      You don't know whether there's an external cause increasing Coke consumption

      LOL. Do you know the word cause is related to causation? If there's a cause, something's causing it. That's causation.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  2. No mention of what his girlfriend thought by winkydink · · Score: 1

    Oh wait

    --

    "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

  3. Washing by RazzleFrog · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I was my clothes because I want to smell nice. Not because I am afraid of getting sick from them.

    1. Re:Washing by sharkey · · Score: 5, Funny

      I was my clothes...

      You were?

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    2. Re:Washing by mark72005 · · Score: 1, Troll

      I for one welcome our subject/typo agreement overlords

    3. Re:Washing by camperdave · · Score: 1

      I was my clothes because I want to smell nice. Not because I am afraid of getting sick from them.

      My brother uses febreze on his hockey stuff, plus he has a bounce sheet in the hockey bag. Apparently he doesn't need to wash it nearly as often. However, he lives two hours away... downwind... so I can't guarantee this from personal experience.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    4. Re:Washing by grub · · Score: 2

      Does he also spray himself with Axe thinking that's as good as a shower?

      --
      Trolling is a art,
    5. Re:Washing by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1

      So why don't you just spray it with some deodorant and skip washing?

      --
      sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    6. Re:Washing by redmid17 · · Score: 1

      I was my clothes because I want to smell nice. Not because I am afraid of getting sick from them.

      Dude that's what febreze is for...

    7. Re:Washing by Xphile101361 · · Score: 3, Informative

      He said he wanted to smell nice. Since when does febreze smell nice?

    8. Re:Washing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Febreze on hockey gear just masks the odor -- it doesn't get rid of the source of the stench.

      I've never washed my gear, but it doesn't stink. I hang it up to dry after games, and every 4-6 months, I dunk it in a bath of Mirazyme before hanging it to dry.

    9. Re:Washing by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      Indeed. Also, though it might not be a health hazard per se, the general feeling of dirtiness does effect my well being. I realize that its' probably psychological/stress related, but for example if I wake up on a weekend and don't shower until noon for example (whereas normally I shower before work a few hours earlier than that), I will without fail be starting to develop a bad headache. Just the general bad feeling of being unclean will affect me.

      Same with clothes. I'll admit that once or twice - particularly in college - I've been in a rush and just threw on a pair of jeans or socks that I wore the day before (never did exceed 2 wearings though). Without fail, I would be not feeling well by the end of the day. Again, probably stress related, but still.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    10. Re:Washing by RazzleFrog · · Score: 1

      Because to many people, including myself, any overwhelming chemical scents aren't nice either. I often choose non-scented antiperspirants and detergents for that reason. I also don't like candles, air fresheners, etc. but I love the smell of food cooking or real flowers.

    11. Re:Washing by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      Sports equipment is a bit different. When you use it, you're often sweaty and smelly anyways, so a little extra stench isn't all that hard to tolerate. When I played football in high school I only washed my practice jersey and pants about once per week too.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    12. Re:Washing by Mitchell314 · · Score: 3, Funny

      It isn't?

      --
      I read TFA and all I got was this lousy cookie
    13. Re:Washing by hankwang · · Score: 2

      if I wake up on a weekend and don't shower until noon for example (whereas normally I shower before work a few hours earlier than that), I will without fail be starting to develop a bad headache.

      Sounds more like caffeine withdrawal symptoms.

    14. Re:Washing by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 3, Funny

      I was my clothes

      And so can you!

    15. Re:Washing by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

      Nah, I'm not a coffee drinker, and the headache will fade right away within 15 minutes of taking a shower.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    16. Re:Washing by kwoff · · Score: 1

      Maybe you're dehydrated

    17. Re:Washing by repapetilto · · Score: 1

      Maybe hes got sinus issues and the moisture in the air once a day clears it up. He could try getting an humidifier.

    18. Re:Washing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You need help, seriously. If you start experiencing physical pain for delaying your shower for a couple of hours, or not feeling well after using the same pair of jeans for two days, you really need help. That's not normal.

    19. Re:Washing by saucercrab · · Score: 1

      I was my clothes

      Then WHO WAS PHONE?

    20. Re:Washing by ideaz · · Score: 1

      I 'wash'...

    21. Re:Washing by Facegarden · · Score: 1

      No, that's Old Spice.

      --
      Worldwide Military budgets: $2100 billion. Worldwide Space Exploration budgets: $38 billion. Really, world? Really?
    22. Re:Washing by davemc168 · · Score: 1

      There see the bacteria have ganged up and formed a human.... all hail

    23. Re:Washing by porky_pig_jr · · Score: 2

      Yeah. You are what you wear.

    24. Re:Washing by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      But don't forget to accidentally yourself, which is a critical component in the transition.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    25. Re:Washing by Waccoon · · Score: 1

      I've heard of clothes making the man, but this is ridiculous.

    26. Re:Washing by wiredlogic · · Score: 1

      Overuse of Febreeze can damage cotton fabrics. The best approach with sports equipment is to use 91% alcohol in a spray bottle after every use. That will kill of most of the offensive odor.

      --
      I am becoming gerund, destroyer of verbs.
    27. Re:Washing by geekoid · · Score: 1

      And he made a fine poncho.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    28. Re:Washing by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      Reminds me of a joke:

      "While in Africa, I shot an elephant in my pajamas. How the elephant got into my pajamas, I'll never know.
         

    29. Re:Washing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was[h] my clothes because I want to smell nice.

      Dear Righteous Perfumey Smelling Person

      You know... I'm happy someone said something...

      I really am glad that you wash your clothes in your fucking perfumey ass detergent and then
      throw them in the dryer with that damn dryer cloth that adds just the right amount of extra fucking
      smell.

      Do you people realize that the reason there are soooo many scents out there is because, da da daaaa
      NOT EVERYONE LIKES THE SAME SMELLS!

      And there are people that have sensitivity to those fragrances and have allergies. Can't name a single
      allergy to BO.

      So, I'm so happy at your righteous use of things to make your little bubble smell "better" but just remember
      your bubble ain't airtight!

    30. Re:Washing by arth1 · · Score: 1

      Burma Shave

    31. Re:Washing by sjwt · · Score: 1

      Can't name a single allergy to BO

      I can, I've encounter BO that give's me many of the same reactions those stupid hypoallergenic ppl claim to have.

      BO so bad, I feel sick, my skin feels like its itching all over, and I start to develop a rash, then prolonged espouse makes me start feeling weak and irritated.

      Try working in hospitality, its not as fun as the movies make it.

      --
      You have 5 Moderator Points!
      Which Helpless Linux zealot/MS basher do you want to mod down today?
    32. Re:Washing by crazyvas · · Score: 1

      Yes, he was his clothes. After all, you are what you wear (were)....

    33. Re:Washing by Troed · · Score: 1

      FYI; Taking a shower every day is bad for your skin. Really.

    34. Re:Washing by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      John Galt? Spartacus?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    35. Re:Washing by MBGMorden · · Score: 0

      My skin is fine. Not taking a showing every day is disgusting. Really.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    36. Re:Washing by Troed · · Score: 1

      Yeah, why let science and facts stand in the way of random social conventions that are bad for you :)

    37. Re:Washing by MBGMorden · · Score: 0

      I'd seriously question what "science and facts" you're referring to. As a matter of fact, I can say with experience that for anyone with seborraic dermatitus, if you don't wash your skin every day it will break out into a rash.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    38. Re:Washing by Troed · · Score: 2

      Feel free to actually research the topic before posting then. As to your specific skin condition that's completely beside the point. You're correct in that it's alleviated by removing oil from the skin but the norm is for the skin to _become_ rashed if oil is removed by excessive showering (see link below).

      Tell me, do you believe in evolution? If so, do you believe the human skin evolved under daily wash&soap conditions?

      http://www.pharmacytimes.com/issue/pharmacy/2001/2001-11/2001-11-6820

    39. Re:Washing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are not your fucking kahkis.

  4. Scientific Method by ryu1232 · · Score: 1

    I want to see his control group.
    What was the bacteria content when he first bought the jeans?
    How many other people tried them on before he bought them ?
    What did he wash them with initially ?
    Did he wear the jean continually for 15 moths, or did he take them off daily?
    Where were they stored when not in use? This experiment can only be valid if they were stored nightly, scrunched up in a ball on the floor of an un vacuumed dorm room.

    1. Re:Scientific Method by countSudoku() · · Score: 1

      This is a job for the Myth Busters! We need a jean control group and 36 pairs of sterilized Levi 501s, STAT!

      I only wear mine at work, sitting in a clean chair (more or less), and swap them out every other day for a two week period. Unless food or dirt stains appear, then they get washed again. 15 months of daily wearing without a research grant? That's just nasty.

      --
      This is the NSA, we're gonna geet U h@x0r5! Also, what is a h@x0r5?
    2. Re:Scientific Method by WhoEvrIwant2b · · Score: 1

      Got to love the publicity of a study with a n of 1. Seriously how is this considered research? A. the bacteria would probably survive the freezing, it is more the molds that would die off and lower the smell. B. Five different kinds of bacteria can be five strains of E coli when he forgot to wipe or five nasty varied ones. C. Why no enumeration on the bacteria? There could have been 1 or millions. Really the biggest thing would be how much moisture was in them when they were stored for the night. I wonder if when he froze them he had an auto defrosting freezer that takes the moisture out of the air? Also definitely a nasty study that I think they should force on all first year bio students to up their N values. They are not going to get laid anyways.

    3. Re:Scientific Method by sjwt · · Score: 1

      Make that White 501's.. Lets add another dimension to this.

      --
      You have 5 Moderator Points!
      Which Helpless Linux zealot/MS basher do you want to mod down today?
  5. Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm so ashamed to be from Calgary right now.

    1. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Speaking as a Torontonian, you ought to be ashamed be from Calgary all the time.

    2. Re:Wow by inerlogic · · Score: 3, Funny

      EWWWWW.... who let these canadians on our interwebs?

    3. Re:Wow by kevinmenzel · · Score: 1

      Speaking as someone who used to live in Toronto, given the results of the last set of mayoral elections, I'm pretty sure Toronto should be one of the most ashamed populations in North America outside of Peterborough.

    4. Re:Wow by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I agree. All the whining after Ford won the election was really embarrassing.

    5. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm so ashamed to be from Calgary right now.

      First, you should always be ashamed to be from Calgary.

      Second, the University of Alberta is in Edmonton. If you came from a real city, you might know that.

    6. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      as a guy who like to visit Montreal, let me tell you that you should both be ashamed, most of your girls do not swallow after giving a blowjob

    7. Re:Wow by DamienNightbane · · Score: 1

      The Oilers and Flames both suck, so you should be ashamed regardless. That goes for you too, Toronto.

  6. It is bad for your health in a different way by phantomfive · · Score: 3, Informative

    The salt from your sweat (over time) will build up on the fabric of the pants, and then when you walk it will start to chafe your skin. It can be quite painful.

    --
    "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    1. Re:It is bad for your health in a different way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't sweat in your jeans. Problem solved!

    2. Re:It is bad for your health in a different way by jiteo · · Score: 1

      How do you even know that?

    3. Re:It is bad for your health in a different way by Delarth799 · · Score: 1

      Let me remind you that your on Slashdot

    4. Re:It is bad for your health in a different way by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      I won't ask how you learned that fact.

    5. Re:It is bad for your health in a different way by skine · · Score: 1

      According to TFS, he's from Alberta.

      I don't think there's any reason to worry about sweat.

    6. Re:It is bad for your health in a different way by smellotron · · Score: 1

      Let me remind you that your on Slashdot

      Yeah, the website full of loosers!

    7. Re:It is bad for your health in a different way by Capt.DrumkenBum · · Score: 1

      You have obviously never been to Alberta in Summer.

      --
      If I were God, wouldn't I protect my churches from acts of me?
    8. Re:It is bad for your health in a different way by Jason+Kimball · · Score: 1

      Let me remind you that you're on Slashdot.

  7. Re:Asian people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Why do you need an ethnic qualifier on that?

  8. Altered results? by chemicaldave · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Did he botch the results when he repeatedly threw his jeans in a freezer?

    When his jeans got a bit funky smelling, Le's solution was to put them in the freezer. "There were times when it had a bad odour, like in the seventh month," he said. "That's when I threw it in the freezer and magically when it came out it was odourless."

    I know very little about microbiology, but could that have significantly affected growth rates of all/certain types of bateria or killed them altogether?

    1. Re:Altered results? by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 2

      I know very little about microbiology, but could that have significantly affected growth rates of all/certain types of bateria or killed them altogether?

      Yeah, I'm betting that's the case. Certain types of bacteria can't live in below-freezing temperatures.

    2. Re:Altered results? by repapetilto · · Score: 2

      yes, when the ice crystals form the envelope of water that surrounds your proteins and dna and such is disrupted, causing them to unfold and probably not refold correctly upon thawing. So the cell will not be able to function and die. Also ice is less dense than water so the cell may swell up and burst during the freezing process. Bacteria have cell walls though so they are more sturdy. Likely at least a few would survive. Also when the pants were removed from the freezer all the smelly molecules had low kinetic energy and so less of them were diffusing off into the air making them difficult to smell. Finally water vapor would condense on the pants then evaporate as they warmed up, carrying some of the bacteria and smelly molecules with it which is kind of like washing and drying clothes without any detergent.

    3. Re:Altered results? by gorzek · · Score: 1

      Some bacteria are killed by cold and others just have their reproduction slowed/stopped.

      In any case, bacteria themselves aren't what produce odor, it's their waste products. Think about that. You stink because bacteria are doing number two all over your body, but especially under your armpits and around your crotch and ass.

      If freezing reduces/eliminates odor, then the waste products of the bacteria are just undergoing a chemical change that makes them not stink anymore. Its effect on the bacteria themselves is a separate issue, although with fewer bacteria there will obviously be fewer smelly byproducts.

    4. Re:Altered results? by Nailer235 · · Score: 1

      Guess he has to repeat the experiment now.

    5. Re:Altered results? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't it the same as going outside during a cold winter day?

    6. Re:Altered results? by jsegal205 · · Score: 1

      Maybe he had baking soda in the freezer.

    7. Re:Altered results? by need4mospd · · Score: 1

      Could he have perhaps used some kind of detergent/water mixture to get rid of the smell instead of putting them in the freezer? Applying a combination of heat and air would help dry them quickly so that he could wear them again within a couple hours.

    8. Re:Altered results? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this still is a very geeky thing to do ;-)

    9. Re:Altered results? by sjames · · Score: 1

      That could be. However I'm fairly sure that anyone who ever ate ice cream at his place hurled when TFA came out.

    10. Re:Altered results? by Brownstar · · Score: 1

      Only if your body is not giving off any heat.

      But if that were the case, then smelly jeans would be the least of your problems.

    11. Re:Altered results? by dadioflex · · Score: 1

      No! It WAS magic. Jeeze. RTFA.

  9. Questionable testing method by confused+one · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Article indicated he put the jeans into the freezer when they would start to stink. This would kill some of the bacteria and partially invalidates his test.

    1. Re:Questionable testing method by sangreal66 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Doesn't really invalidate his test, since this is a standard technique for people breaking in unwashed raw denim jeans. Presumably he was testing the safety of that practice and not the safety of simply being grimy and never washing your clothes

    2. Re:Questionable testing method by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 4, Insightful

      What the hell? The test had a sample size of one, just one. Obviously it had no control group to compare it with. It is just an anecdote. Not an experiment, it can not be used to advance any hypothesis. And you find fault with some itsy bitsy thing like throwing it in the freezer? This stupid thing does not deserve a posting in slashdot. May be in some mid-morning talk shows where bored housewives gasp at the idea of not washing jeans for 15 months. It definitely does not deserve your response. And stupidest thing in all this is me taking time to write a reply in the middle of my work day.

      --
      sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    3. Re:Questionable testing method by LongSpleen · · Score: 1

      I hope his friends know now to eat frozen foods at his house. "This ice pop has a flavor I can't put my finger on"

    4. Re:Questionable testing method by LongSpleen · · Score: 1

      er know NOT to eat...

    5. Re:Questionable testing method by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The test was for not washing jeans. He didn't wash them. What's next; you're going to invalidate the test because he wore underwear instead of going commando? Or because he avoided eating curries?

    6. Re:Questionable testing method by Nemyst · · Score: 1

      Rumors say he attempted to get funding for a larger scale experiment, but surprisingly all his pleas were faced with refusal.

      Science isn't what it used to be...

    7. Re:Questionable testing method by schlachter · · Score: 1

      wonder if would have been better to put it in the oven for a bit instead of the freezer...wrt killing bacteria and reducing smell

      --
      My God can beat up your God. Just kidding...don't take offense. I know there's no God.
    8. Re:Questionable testing method by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Considering they have found bacteria a mile below the ice caps, I would doubt a freezer which cools down to -4 degrees Fahrenheit would have much effect.

    9. Re:Questionable testing method by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Control group would be the thousands of people who bought the same jeans and washed them regularly....

    10. Re:Questionable testing method by __aaqvdr516 · · Score: 1

      It might partially invalidate his results but it opens up a whole new market for coin freezing (laundry).

    11. Re:Questionable testing method by noidentity · · Score: 1

      No, it just shows that what he tested wasn't merely not washing jeans for 15 months, but doing that and putting them in the freezer regularly. So, to all of you who go 15 months without washing jeans and freeze them regularly, you're OK!

    12. Re:Questionable testing method by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And stupidest thing in all this is me taking time to write a reply in the middle of my work day.

      Yeah - probably so. Another point I'd bring up is that the 5 kinds of bacteria he had growing may well have been protecting against nastier ones that could have colonized if the jeans were sterile, or possibly colonized by friendlier (to the undesirable bacteria) hosts.

      To control for that kind of thing would require quite a bit more effort than a single sample checked one time.

    13. Re:Questionable testing method by Guil+Rarey · · Score: 1

      With respect to sample size, similar experiments have been repeated, admittedly in the field under uncontrolled circumstances, several million times over at least the last 5 decades, approximately 100% of the occasions the utility of function of quarters for beer money exceeded the utility function for quarters for laundry money among male college students

      --
      Do not taunt Happy Fun Ball
    14. Re:Questionable testing method by sjwt · · Score: 1

      If its a 'real' experiment like he was claiming, it is ever invalidated or not, no partial about it.

      He fucked it, the balls been doped, no ignoble prize for him!

      --
      You have 5 Moderator Points!
      Which Helpless Linux zealot/MS basher do you want to mod down today?
    15. Re:Questionable testing method by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +1

    16. Re:Questionable testing method by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can someone explain to me what ‘breaking in’ means? I've tried to Google it, but all the results seem to have to do with debugging. Also, I've been wearing jeans all my life and I just put them on and wear them without having to do any kind of mysterious procedure.

    17. Re:Questionable testing method by ToasterMonkey · · Score: 1

      What the hell? The test had a sample size of one, just one. Obviously it had no control group to compare it with. It is just an anecdote. Not an experiment, it can not be used to advance any hypothesis. And you find fault with some itsy bitsy thing like throwing it in the freezer? This stupid thing does not deserve a posting in slashdot. May be in some mid-morning talk shows where bored housewives gasp at the idea of not washing jeans for 15 months. It definitely does not deserve your response. And stupidest thing in all this is me taking time to write a reply in the middle of my work day.

      What really makes you think Slashdot is better, or even different than a mid-morning radio talk show? Isn't it pretty obvious this is not journalism, and this is not a moderated forum? If you want to call this moderation, consider what a radio talk show with "self moderation" would be like. -1 sounds like a 'tard. +1 I agree. -1 I dislike X people. +1 myself on another account. It would be a blast.

      It's the same damn pattern, present some completely unresearched "news" blurb scraped from who knows where, mix in some opinions and loud talking, invite guests to call in. When someone refuses to take an extreme view and asks for details, hosts and guests alike admit "I'm just going by whats printed in this article here, I don't know." It's not debate. It's not intelligent banter. This is interactive entertainment, to drive people into advertisements, just like a radio talk show.

  10. So now we have... by roc97007 · · Score: 1

    ...one data point.

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
    1. Re:So now we have... by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 1

      Or a single datum even!

  11. Only one pair? by Dan+East · · Score: 1

    The article doesn't make it clear if he only wore that single pair of pants every single day, and if not, how often did he actually wear them? I don't think it is even possible for a pair of jeans to be worn 450 times without completely falling apart, so obviously he must have worn other clothes too.

    --
    Better known as 318230.
    1. Re:Only one pair? by kyrio · · Score: 3, Informative

      I have three pairs of jeans (I had four, but that's a long story). I bought them at the same time, 5-6 years ago. Only one of them ripped wide open at the crotch last year, so now I have only two. I wash(ed) them all regularly.

      Obviously, you're buying shit tier quality jeans.

    2. Re:Only one pair? by DeadCatX2 · · Score: 1

      Maybe it's not wearing the jeans that causes them to be worn out, but overzealous spin cycles in the washer. That may explain why the jeans are still in one piece.

      --
      :(){ :|:& };:
    3. Re:Only one pair? by ShavedOrangutan · · Score: 1

      Just look at the amount of lint in the dryer lint filter. And just as much comes out of the washing machine if you put a lint trap on the discharge hose.

      --
      Godaddy is a scam and a ripoff.
    4. Re:Only one pair? by reeno49 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I absolutely LOVE that going from 4 pairs of jeans to only 3 pairs of jeans is a long story for you. Honestly... you, sir, just made my cube-dewlling day more tolerable.

      Thank you.

      --
      I should have been a girl, with the way I can dance... my moves are amazing!
    5. Re:Only one pair? by Zugok · · Score: 1

      I only insist on buying front loader washing machines because the absence of an agitator means there is less wear and tear on clothes. (Plus you can stuff way more clothes in it, cleaner wash and more power and water efficient).

      --
      "I just can't sit while people are saying nonsense in a meeting without saying it's nonsense" J Watson, Sci Am 288:(4)51
    6. Re:Only one pair? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      define shit tier.

      I pay 10 dollars for my denim, they last 3 years. I usually hve 4 at any given time and where them whenever I'm not wearing short, or going some lpace where I like to dress up.

      SO if you're pay 28 dollars, ad getting 5 years, were even. If you are paying 60 dollars, then you my friend, are a sucker.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    7. Re:Only one pair? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      ok, I need to go home, apparently my hands and fingers have entered into some sort of cabal to screw up my posts.

      So, if you pay 18 dollars and get 5 years, we are even. If t you are paying over 30, then you are a sucker who is getting fleeced because of an emotional attachment to cotton.

      If you are paying under 18, let me know where you're buying your jeans!

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    8. Re:Only one pair? by arth1 · · Score: 1

      Use a condensation dryer too. Not only does it use a mere fraction of the electricity compared to a hot air exhaust dryer, but it also is far gentler on the clothes. You don't even need a lint filter - what little lint there is goes out with the water.

    9. Re:Only one pair? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've three pairs that I still wear regularly that are ten years old... way to make me feel old... my caption is "obsolete"... perfect...

    10. Re:Only one pair? by jbeach · · Score: 1

      That, and perhaps you're not buying jeans that are a bit too small for you...like I am. ahem.

      --
      The Invisible Hand of the Free Market is what punches workers in the nuts.
    11. Re:Only one pair? by kyrio · · Score: 1

      Buy jeans that fit you. I wear from 28-32 depending on the brand. Make sure you have high quality jeans that fit, don't just assume they fit from the size on the label.

    12. Re:Only one pair? by kyrio · · Score: 1

      Five years and going, so your calculation for $30+ would be very incorrect, seeing as these last two pairs will be going on for another five years (where you've still purchased many more).

      Quality work != high prices in all situations but high prices almost never equal, in clothing, quality work. If you are paying $10 for your denim and it looks nice, and it's lasting 3 years, then good for you. If the denim you are buying is hideous as fuck tapered jeans then you are a fool regardless of the quality or price.

      You can get Guess or other brands like that and they cost a fortune. They may even look good but their quality is shit tier (less than one year).

      You can get Buffalo jeans (and other quality brands) and if they are on sale they will be around the $50 mark (or lower) and they will last an extremely long time. They will also always look good if you get a classic cut.

      If you're getting Levi's jeans (or some other ballhair brand) and they are tapered, then they should be around $30 or less at all times. The problem is that they are so ugly that even if the quality wasn't low they would not be worth it. Some Levi's jeans may be higher quality (especially if you find some from a couple of decades ago) but I'm pretty sure these days they are just a shit tier brand.

      The whole point is that if you have high quality jeans, and they look good, then you can wear them for at least a tenth of your lifetime before they are unwearable.

      I only just retired another ten year old pair of jeans six months ago and I bought that one for about $30.

      As I said earlier, I wash them regularly in hot or cold with liquid or powder soap and I sometimes dry them in the dryer and sometimes I would hang dry them (I tend to like the way they feel when dried on the line).

    13. Re:Only one pair? by RealGrouchy · · Score: 1

      I absolutely LOVE that going from 4 pairs of jeans to only 3 pairs of jeans is a long story for you.

      He cut the fourth pair off at the knees, so now they're shorts.

      - RG>

      --
      Hey pal, this isn't a pleasantforest, so don't waste my time with pleasantries!
    14. Re:Only one pair? by Capt.DrumkenBum · · Score: 1

      I hang dry all my pants. If I don't the legs get too short and I look like I am getting ready for a flood. Then I toss them in the dryer for 5 minutes just to soften them up a bit.

      --
      If I were God, wouldn't I protect my churches from acts of me?
  12. Certainly qualifies for Geek of the Year by ackthpt · · Score: 1

    I find in a humid client jeans will smell within days. In a dry climate perhaps not for a week. He must have been detectable, downwind, for miles.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:Certainly qualifies for Geek of the Year by kaiidth · · Score: 1

      I find in a humid client jeans will smell within days.

      What job title do you have? I doubt there's a large waiting line for a job that requires you to put on jeans and then spend days immersed in damp clientele.

    2. Re:Certainly qualifies for Geek of the Year by Plekto · · Score: 1

      Perhaps he works as a crew member for Discovery Channel?

    3. Re:Certainly qualifies for Geek of the Year by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      "a job that requires you to put on jeans and then spend days immersed in damp clientele."

      Sounds like a job I once had on a fishing trawler. Jeans were not a problem but finding a jumper that would last more than a couple of trips before the sleves rotted and fell off was quite a challenge.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    4. Re:Certainly qualifies for Geek of the Year by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK, and you perceived the dying fish as your clients?

  13. NSFW? by snsh · · Score: 1

    I guess it depends how you define "safe"

  14. Yay! by supersloshy · · Score: 5, Funny

    Now I never have to leave my parents' basement^W^W girlfriend's house due to health concerns! Take that, mom! Err, hot girlfriend that I definitely have! :D

    --
    "Our country is not nearly so overrun with the bigoted as it is overrun with the broadminded." -Archbishop Fulton Sheen
    1. Re:Yay! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your mom is your girlfriend?

    2. Re:Yay! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is nothing better than swapping mom's basement for girlfriend's basement. It only becomes a problem when you marry your girlfriend, then you get a job and can only stay in the basment for the weekend, and the wife pesters you about playing with the kids OUTSIDE.
      Dammit, what can I do?
      I guess the only reasonable thing to do is to find a mistress with a nice basement.

    3. Re:Yay! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      turn in your geek card, you mean to use ^H, not ^W.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C0_and_C1_control_codes

    4. Re:Yay! by Phroggy · · Score: 2

      It is you who are mistaken, I'm afraid. In vi, pressing control-W deletes the previous word.

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
  15. congrats by Krau+Ming · · Score: 1

    on your custom made wear lines. your jeans are now super fashionable...oh but wait it took so long to break in your jeans that now it's no longer super fashionable to have custom made wear lines. put the jeans away and wait another year for the fashion cycle to deem them super fashionable again.

  16. BO PLENTY by scharkalvin · · Score: 1

    It might be safe, but I would imagine people kept far upwind of him!

  17. Sure... by Arctech · · Score: 1

    Maybe you can smell like a hobo and not be a public health hazard, but... you still have hobo-stank all over you.

  18. Onion Article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Reading the title in my RSS feed, I thought it was an onion article.

  19. Fear by Chemisor · · Score: 1

    Clearly, the bacteria were scared off by the smell.

  20. Textile professor by Megahard · · Score: 2

    He must be fun at parties.

    --
    I eat only the real part of complex carbohydrates.
  21. Obligatory pop reference by applewax · · Score: 2

    Maybe he's a Neil Diamond fan?

    1. Re:Obligatory pop reference by inerlogic · · Score: 1

      ahhh, and the radio at work is playing ND right now...... "Sweet Caroline" though....

  22. Did they check for arthropods? by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

    n/t

    --
    Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  23. Bacteria is not the only issue by MalikyeMoon · · Score: 1

    Aside from common sense, there are other issues that may arise from unwashed pants. Fungal problems are among the first that come to mind. Ever seen a boy with 15-month jock itch spread over his legs?

    1. Re:Bacteria is not the only issue by arth1 · · Score: 1

      Ever seen a boy with 15-month jock itch spread over his legs?

      Dude, many of us here are old enough to remember back when "in" jeans were so tight that you had to put them on wet, and you had to have a friend help you pull them on with pliers, and a shoehorn to get the cuffs over your heels. Sit? Forget about it. You had to slouch, because the pants wouldn't let you bend. Combine with half-calf mosquito hunter boots, equally tight.

      I can't remember whether that was before or after 5" 5 lb platform shoes and flares. It was definitely after terylenes and Nehru jackets.

  24. Healthy? That depends... by swarm · · Score: 1

    Healthiness depends on what you do in them. They could become very unhealthy quickly if he wore them while disposing of medical waste, sewage, or fast food leftovers.

  25. Is he waiting around to be a millionaire? by blindseer · · Score: 1

    He's got patches on the patches of his old blue jeans.
    They used to be new.
    They used to be blue.
    And they used to be clean.

    --
    I am armed because I am free. I am free because I am armed.
  26. Alberta is cold by VocationalZero · · Score: 1

    University of Alberta student

    Something tells me that if he had conducted this experiment a few hundred miles south and spent any reasonable amount of time outside he would have had different results entirely.

    1. Re:Alberta is cold by thirty-seven · · Score: 1

      University of Alberta student

      Something tells me that if he had conducted this experiment a few hundred miles south and spent any reasonable amount of time outside he would have had different results entirely.

      A few hundred? Roughly 200 miles south of the main campus of the University of Alberta (in Edmonton) is Calgary. About 300 miles south is Lethbridge, Alberta. Even 500 miles south and you're in Great Falls, Montana. None of those places is likely to be significantly warmer than the University of Alberta.

      --

      Atheism is a religion to the same extent that not collecting stamps is a hobby.

    2. Re:Alberta is cold by VocationalZero · · Score: 1

      Here at the /., there is pedantry for every hyperbole. Alright, replace "a few hundred miles" with "a bit".

  27. Does he know about shrinkage? by realsilly · · Score: 1

    I mean, wouldn't his junk shrink from putting on stiff frozen jeans?

    --
    Life takes interesting turns, but the most interest is when you're off the beaten path.
    1. Re:Does he know about shrinkage? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's asian. Can't shrink much more than that.

      And we're obviously getting the best and brightest coming to our shores.

  28. Re:Asian people by inerlogic · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    yes, because white people can't be very fuckable or very nice, black people can't be very smart or nice, latinos are never hansom (sic), asians however, can always be all 6....

  29. Gay or just a dork? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "They're called skinny jeans...they're kinda in right now."

    "They're kinda not"

  30. Edmonton is Fscking cold most of the year by flyingfsck · · Score: 2

    The U of A is in Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. So I guess that 90% of the time his jeans were frozen anyway, not just the short periods in the freezer.

    --
    Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
    1. Re:Edmonton is Fscking cold most of the year by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dude,
      first off -- yes it gets cold in Edmonton, in the WINTER time. Edmonton is not Antartica.

      Second, I think we can safely assume that he DID NOT LIVE OUTDOORS or was OUTDOORS ALL THE TIME, even if it was freezing outside. The heat from his body would prevent his pants from freezing.

    2. Re:Edmonton is Fscking cold most of the year by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey flyingfsck, look at me - I'm a Canadian, we live in the North Pole in igloo's, have husky's driving us around and hunt moose for a living ... In case you didn't realize, I was being sarcastic.

  31. I'm not sure about that by Moraelin · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure about that. I'm pretty sure one of the admins here has been trying a similar test for the last 10 years or so. albeit in 12 month runs by the looks of it. It's kinda hard not to notice that once a year his hair goes from, pretty much, something almost solidified in a helmet to fluffy and you can tell the pattern on his shirt.

    So far he hasn't published anything in a microbiology journal, but I'm sure that when he does, the results of all those twelve-month runs will advance science seriously ;)

    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
    1. Re:I'm not sure about that by arth1 · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure there are people here who haven't cleaned their mouse pad or steering wheel in more than 15 months.
      Or chair fabric, for that matter.

      And what about hats and boots? Not to mention wristwatch bands?

      Truth is, most of us are dirty pigs in one way or another.

  32. results non conclusive by alta · · Score: 1

    Ok, it seems like they're saying "go wear jeans for 15 months without washing, they'll be safe"

    Ok, what if you work in a chicken processing plant.
    What if you work in a laboratory that deals with human excrement.

    Please people, don't start using this study as an excuse...

    --
    Do not meddle in the affairs of sysadmins, for they are subtle, and quick to anger.
  33. Re:Asian people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yes. QED.

  34. And the tragedy is... by rgbatduke · · Score: 1

    ...that even today, even on slashdot, people can't say "anecdotal evidence" and dump this result in their own personal /dev/null.

    I want to see a few hundred pairs of jeans worn by all sorts of people with different personal habits and occupations -- some who wear underwear, some who don't, some who shovel horse manure for a living, some who work construction in the hot, sweaty south. I'd bet that 20% of them would end up with that colorful affliction known as "crotch rot" -- any of various fungal infections -- and of course this would instantly become chronic as they'd constantly reinfect themselves. Then there are the various mites that would be living on the sloughed skin cells packed into the weave, the bacteria (harmful or otherwise) fed by the trapped sweat and spilled food and drink and french fry grease wiped off on the thighs, and...

    ...what if you got actually sick while wearing them, or got lice, or...

    Even in the dirty old dark ages, they would wash clothes once or twice a year. Just yuk. And "bad science" yuk at that to draw a conclusion from an N of one.

    rgb

    --
    Even when the experts all agree, they may well be mistaken. --- Bertrand Russell.
  35. People WASH jeans? by jschmitz · · Score: 1

    Wait people WASH jeans?

  36. Re: by ideaz · · Score: 1

    he did exploit the best thing about denim jeans

  37. Tons of fascinating research going on and... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the media picks up on some kid with bad hygiene and calls it science. /slowclap

  38. In other news... by alienzed · · Score: 1

    geeks with strange science projects still not getting any.

    --
    Never say never. Ah!! I did it again!
  39. Mmmm by DarthVain · · Score: 1

    I bet it made everything in his freezer taste better though!

  40. Car analogy needed by 517714 · · Score: 1

    I don't understand this, could someone please give me a car analogy so I don't have to think too hard?

    --
    The US government have made it clear that we have no inalienable rights; any we do not defend vigorously will be taken.
    1. Re:Car analogy needed by EmagGeek · · Score: 1

      It's like when you never change the oil in your car, because when the engine fails, it will leave very unique and trendy explosion marks all over the inside of the engine compartment, based entirely on your own unique trendy driving style.

    2. Re:Car analogy needed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its like dirt on a car. The car will be safe if you don't wash it for 15 months. Only so much will stick and the rest will fall off due to rain/snow or other "natural processes."

  41. I think we can safely assume by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That he did not go commando during this experiment, or the bacterial count would have been a bit different.

  42. Your Ignorance is Almost Blinding! by ethameta · · Score: 0

    Seriously, if you can't keep a piece of clothing clean without the washing machine, maybe you should stick to polyester so we can just hose you down like the barn animals you are? Now I know most of you don't know the first thing about fashion and think a pair of khaki's and a golf polo will make the girls scream. Here in Edmonton though, we are cow shit free and most of us don't roll around in the streets. Is 15 months too long? Yup. But he did this to prove that, for those of us that prefer our jeans to be of quality and proper fit, it is possible to safely break in a good pair of jeans. But hey guys, stick to you $15 Levis and striped shirts and you can throw them in the washer and wreck them five times a day if you like!

    1. Re:Your Ignorance is Almost Blinding! by ethameta · · Score: 1

      Oh, and please stop pissing your jeans.

  43. What about no soap and shampoo? by antdude · · Score: 1

    I recently read that people don't use soap and shampoo when washing and showering, and yet they were better/fine. Weird.

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  44. Nothing new by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nothing new here folks. Hippies have been not washing clothes for years!

  45. Re:I'm mostly concerned about by Isaac+Remuant · · Score: 1

    the smell...

    What if someone smoked around him? Where did he sit? etc, etc.

    --
    "Science can amuse and fascinate us all, but it is engineering that changes the world. " - Asimov.
  46. my grad school office mate did that over a month by peter303 · · Score: 1

    the smell was unbearable after a few weeks

  47. It's a long story by Cajun+Hell · · Score: 5, Funny

    It was a dark and stormy night. I had just finished washing jeans #2 which I had bought 4-5 years earlier, and inspected them. Being better than shit tier quality, they were, as expected, still in good condition. Even the crotch was in good condition and showed no signs that it might dramatically fail at some inconvenient time. As is typical for dark and story nights, there was a conspicous lack of sunlight and very high humidity, so I knew the jeans would not dry on the line outside. I put them into the dryer, along with some other clothes, and I was careful to add a fabric softener sheet as well. Just as the dryer started rumbling, I heard the phone ring.

    "Hello?"

    "Hi, Kyrio, this is Reeno."

    I was ecstatic. "Hey Reeno!! Good to hear from you finally! What have you been up to?" I had not heard from Reeno in a very long time. We had a falling out many years ago, over some dumb topic like jean quality tiers or something, but that was all water under the bridge, now.

    "Well, I have been writing a novel."

    "No shit, really?! What's it about?" I was intrigued.

    "Oh, I don't think I can sum it up very briefly. Here, let me read it to you."

    #include "war and peace.txt"

    As Reeno's scratchy voice managed to croak out the final words, I noticed the sunlight shining through the window next to my phone charger (the batteries had long ago failed) and the eery silence that had so long dominated the house after the dryer had finished. What was there to say? I didn't have the heart to tell Reeno that his novel sounded an awful lot like another one written by Tolstoy. It was a very awkward situation -- awkward like realizing that you're not wearing any pants. I went to the dryer and took out good ol' reliable jeans #2.

    "Well, Reeno, that's quite a story. I'm glad you called. But I need to go now. Later, dude!"

    "Good bye, Kyrio," he said, and I pressed the "END" button on the phone.

    Exhausted, I walked out my door into the bright and calm day. A pity; the line would certainly be able to dry my jeans now, but there was no need. That's when I noticed that the storm had blown down the drying line. I bent down to pick up the end so that I could re-tie it, when to my annoyance, there was a terrible ripping sound and the brisk air blew into my crotch.

    "Oh no! Jeans #2! Noooo!!" I wailed. I know that some people buy shit tier quality jeans, so they never grow attached to their garments during their ephemeral lifetimes, but it's different for me. I had these jeans for half a decade! Crying and heartbroken, I ran back into the house and picked up the phone.

    "Reeno! My jeans! I'm down from four pairs to only three," I brokenly told him through sobs.

    "Oh my god! What happened?!"

    "It's a long story," I began, and that's when I heard it. The bastard was laughing at me. Laughing!

    --
    "Believe me!" -- Donald Trump
    1. Re:It's a long story by Gabrill · · Score: 1

      Well done! I tip my hat to you. Unfortunately, I'd already commented, or I'd mod you up.

      --
      Always going forward, 'cause we can't find reverse.
    2. Re:It's a long story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      please mod parent up funny!!

    3. Re:It's a long story by rdwulfe · · Score: 1

      Definitely. That's.. one epic jeans story. Truly epic and amazing. This needs to be archived somewhere. Thank you, Cajun Hell.

    4. Re:It's a long story by kyrio · · Score: 1

      Not quite but well done.

    5. Re:It's a long story by reeno49 · · Score: 1

      /slow clap

      Epic.

      --
      I should have been a girl, with the way I can dance... my moves are amazing!
  48. When I want to test for bacteria... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...I go to a TEXTILE Professor!!! Yeah, and when I want to know about cloth, I go as a microbiologist! Yeah, that's the ticket.

  49. Bacteria jeans keep VD's away by Cryacin · · Score: 1

    Because they stink so bad, there's no WAY this guy would even get close to getting laid.

    --
    Science advances one funeral at a time- Max Planck
  50. Those jeans are by v(*_*)vvvv · · Score: 1

    Absolutely Beautiful.

    No wonder he has a big smile on his face. And why am I not surprised he is Asian! (denim geek reference)

    I'm interested in knowing what jeans they are.

  51. Thought this was an Onion article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I saw it on Facebook update and swore it was an Onion article until It showed up on my Slashdot RSS feed.

  52. Freezing or spraying with Lysol doesn't count by deodiaus2 · · Score: 1

    I guess his next experiment which will be greatly anticipated is how long can he go on without taking a shower or changing his underwear.

  53. I hope he wore undies... by akayani · · Score: 1

    A 15 month skid mark... GAWD I hope he wore undies!

  54. Skin irritation by ChrisMaple · · Score: 1

    When I was young I'd get a rash from wearing jeans for a week. It wasn't from bacteria, just from the dirt a kid picks up playing. Our idiot family doctor diagnosed it as psoriasis.

    --
    Contribute to civilization: ari.aynrand.org/donate
  55. Microwave? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wouldn't that be more effective than the freezer for decimating bacteria? Metal parts could be a problem, but microwaves tolerate some metal if it's not too big or spiky. I wonder if the bacteria themselves contain enough water to be killed, even if the pants are dry. But if he's been wearing them for months they're probably soaked anyway. Or is he allowed to take them off at night?

    As for not washing one's clothes, I've gone crunchy for some years and I was surprised how many people I met who found that hot. At some point I found out that bathing is fun, but it's not a necessity. Wash your ass, wash your hands, brush your teeth, leave the rest alone. Your skin will thank you.

  56. Re:Pathogen control by conureman · · Score: 1

    I always drop the lid before I flush, because of the invisible plume of spray that rises up and out. I've trained the rest of the household as well.

    --
    The cost of that cleanup, of course, will be borne by taxpayers, not industry.
  57. Re:Asian people by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    They can be very smart, very cute, very hansom

    They drive cabs?

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  58. Re:Asian people by santax · · Score: 1

    I am afraid that if I would make a joke to that, I would get another troll mod ;)

  59. He ruined the experiment! by seandiggity · · Score: 1

    "There were times when it had a bad odour, like in the seventh month," he said. "That's when I threw it in the freezer and magically when it came out it was odourless."
    ^ that's a cop-out, and it ruins the results. Not that it's much of an experiment anyway.

    --
    Geeks like to think that they can ignore politics, you can leave politics alone, but politics won't leave you alone.-rms
  60. Idle is pants. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Idle is pants. Proof that correlation IS causation!!

  61. ONLY A SMELLY ASIA WOULD DO THIS.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    damn smelly..