Did the Chinese Military Use Top Gun Footage?
heidaro writes "'As part of its ongoing expansion, has the People's Liberation Army signed up Goose and Maverick? Chinese bloggers are accusing state broadcaster CCTV of using re-purposed footage from the 1986 film Top Gun for a story on a recent air force drill.' Is it just me or are communist nations very skilled at embarrassing themselves?"
Now you've done it ... just wait for Slashdot to be blocked from China!
Seriously, I don't see what being communist has to do with embarrassing yourself. Capitalist nations embarrass themselves pretty damn often too.
First, this seems to be the work of a TV broadcaster, not a nation (certainly not a communist one...) ... does anyone here really think "non-commie" media are any better?
... too, too embarrassing.
:>>
Secondly, apparently it was used as a demonstration of effects of their new missile - using a footage of exploding F-5 is even somewhat fitting, might even be not simply a case of lazy TV crew... (even if not lazy, capturing real hits would be extremely hard for little effect, they aren't particularly "cinema impressive")
And generally, regarding embarrassments - yeah, because in non-commie lands works of visual fiction would never be used in real military contexts, that's unheard of, would be
But yes, you all read that right, their main TV broadcaster is called CCTV / sarcasm meter implodes
PS. BTW, regarding such movies - Les Chevaliers du ciel (aka Sky Fighters), while obviously also with completely redundant plot, is much more enjoyable all-flash-no-substance kind of deal - it has much more spectacular cinematography, nvm lots more minutes of actual flying. Unlike Top Gun (where most flight sequences filming was done from the ground) - in Les Chevaliers du ciel the majority of filming was done from the air, largely via cameras hidden in modified fuel tanks of fighters, to great effect.
Plus it's much less of "a story about a man's struggle with his own homosexuality" (via Quentin Tarantino)
One that hath name thou can not otter
this ought to be good... I want to see the suits show up at a door, knock, and open it to see a tank barrel in their face. (sort of like in the Simpsons episode)
oh wait I forgot, the RIAA doesn't pick on anyone that can defend themselves.
I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
First, this seems to be the work of a TV broadcaster, not a nation (certainly not a communist one...) ... does anyone here really think "non-commie" media are any better?
The difference is that in China, that TV broadcaster IS the government, or at least highly controlled by them. The American media are stupid all by themselves.
Battlemaster--Game with friends in medival realms
...Maverick Gooses You
****
"I'd never want to join a club that would have me as a member" - G. Marx
I beg to differ. China has made all sorts of bellowing noises against things they felt would embarrass them on the international stage. I'm thinking here of the film about the Uighur leader that China demanded an Australian film festival not show, and the film festival's website was suddenly the victim of cyberattacks pretty obviously coming from China.
China is extremely sensitive of its reputation.
The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
The Wall Street Journal has a report including a comparison video.
I was looking forward to a video of a Chinese pilot lip-syncing You've Lost That Loving Feeling.
Have gnu, will travel.
Yes. Big difference. Here the media owns the state and not the other way around.
The American media are stupid all by themselves.
If you assume that the people in control of the US media got where they are by being stupid, you're very wrong. And if you think there aren't endless close ties between the mainstream media and the government, you're even more wrong.
Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
You post appears to be propaganda masquerading as sarcasm. So just in case, I'd like to make the following points:
CCTV stands for China Central Television which is a state run television network. It is communist.
CCTV is the main outlet of propaganda for the government. Western broadcasters may at times use film scenes or in-house produced animations to illustrate a story, but they disclose it as a animation or for illustration purposes only. They are a third-party entity reporting an event, not part of the government trying to fabricate the event.
Your example of Powell's UN presentation doesn't seem applicable, since Powell wasn't the media and that the slide was produced by analysts and not a scene from a movie.
These comments are my own and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of my employer or colleagues...
Riceman?
PS. BTW, regarding such movies - Les Chevaliers du ciel (aka Sky Fighters), while obviously also with completely redundant plot, is much more enjoyable all-flash-no-substance kind of deal - it has much more spectacular cinematography, nvm lots more minutes of actual flying. Unlike Top Gun (where most flight sequences filming was done from the ground) - in Les Chevaliers du ciel the majority of filming was done from the air, largely via cameras hidden in modified fuel tanks of fighters, to great effect.
Anyone who like technology, fighters, sonic boom at ground level, real footage from fighters, post-combustion by night, ... in widescreen should see this awesome movie.
BTW, regarding such movies - Les Chevaliers du ciel (aka Sky Fighters), while obviously also with completely redundant plot, is much more enjoyable all-flash-no-substance kind of deal - it has much more spectacular cinematography, nvm lots more minutes of actual flying.
A movie made 20 years after Top Gun has better effects? Shocking!
Unfortunately, I'm no longer 10 years old, so I doubt I'll enjoy it as much.
Top Gun unless you've watched it in the original Klingon.
Actual cinematography (in this case the results of most basic choices about camera placement) = effects? Since when?
One that hath name thou can not otter
That's brilliant. All government should punch up their official communications with movie and tv show clips. The state of the union address would be much more exciting dubbed over a couple old episodes of the A-Team
Okay, I'll bite. How so?
Everyone seems to have forgotten that the days leading up to the Iraq war were filled with Saddam Hussein making grandiose claims of being close to producing nuclear weapons. They also seem to have forgotten that Hussein used chemical weapons against the Kurds (google "yellow rain iraq'). Unfortunately the US intelligence community was so incapable of gathering any credible evidence to the contrary that we had little choice but to act accordingly. You can also come up with your favorite conspiracy theory about this period. Unfortunately for Hussein, his erratic behavior and his continued and increasingly aggressive stunts against the UN inspectors made the old adage "the devil you know is better than the devil you don't" less applicable. This is why a lot of politicians that are now against the war voted for it originally.
People who are opposed to the war like to revise the history leading up to the event to further vilify the Bush administration. I didn't like the idea of the iraq invasion, but let's face it a lot of the blame falls on Saddam Hussein.
I would like to point out that unlike CCTV, the American news do follow up on their news stories. The American media did questioned the Bush administration about lapses in intelligence within Iraq leading up to the war. The fact that "yellow cake uranium" was never found. No weapons of mass destruction was found (or made public). I could also mention the Valerie Plame scandal...
Again, Just from the fact that the American media eventually questioned the validity of Powell's UN presentation makes your point moot. You'd never see CCTV questioning the actions of the Chinese government.
You reminded me about an old joke that Yakov Smirnoff told, it went something like this "The Soviet Union and US enjoy the same freedom of speech. In Washington D.C. you are allowed to assemble a protest against your American government. In the Soviet Union we are allowed to assemble in Moscow to protest against your American government."
These comments are my own and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of my employer or colleagues...
Could you please put a spelling error in there so that I can complain about it, as it seems you do have a point in this case, and since I don't want to admit it, I must find some typo, spelling, or grammar error to complain about.
Oh! OK is supposed to be capitalized! That's it!