Slashdot Mirror


Geek Culture Will Never Die...or Be Popular

adeelarshad82 writes "Last year CNN wrote an interesting article on how geek culture is now a big part of pop culture, while Patton Oswalt gave his own opinion on how he thinks pop culture has outright co-opted and diluted it. These articles gave birth to a completely different view, which is that geek culture can never truly be part of pop culture. The movies and t-shirts might sell, and everybody might use Facebook, but there will still be a small percentage that loves comics, imports video games, and can build their own computers. In other words, true geeks are much different from the stereotypes we learn about in the movies. The geek culture is not just playing D&D or watching V for Vendetta but also having a bookshelf full of D20 system manuals as well as reading all the Alan Moore material one can find. The fact of the matter is that while geek culture is far from dead, it's not exactly a part of the pop culture either. So, no matter hard media outlets try to make the concept catch on, no matter how many studios try to capitalize on the cultural waves of comic book movies and best-selling video games, there is no such thing as pop culture geekdom."

320 comments

  1. No shit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    n/t

    1. Re:No shit by sortius_nod · · Score: 1

      Pretty much no shit.

      As soon as non-geeks get their hands on geek culture it leaves a horrible taste in the mouth.

      As Chris Griffin said:

      It tastes like a monkey... a monkey that's past it's prime!

    2. Re:No shit by theillien · · Score: 1

      As soon as non-geeks get their hands on geek culture it leaves a horrible taste in the mouth.

      This is one of the reasons I'm not a big fan of Big Bang Theory. They seem to have taken as much geekiness as they could and crammed it into a series. In the process they not only turned geekiness into a farcical mockery but have also co-opted such things as Rock Paper Scissors Lizard Spock making people think that the show's stars/creators came up with the idea when in reality is predates it by at least a decade: http://www.samkass.com/theories/RPSSL.html. I can personally say that I remember reading about it several years ago.

    3. Re:No shit by chronosan · · Score: 1

      Hipster kitty liked Spock before he had pointy ears.

    4. Re:No shit by theillien · · Score: 1

      I'm not claiming to be ahead of the curve and therefore better than the fans of the show. I'm saying that fans of the show who think RPSLS came from the show are clearly wrong.

  2. Well. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and then ytmnd exists to uncannily crossbreed between the two with Picard... at least for the first two years before the "vader no" and the "my bike" crap attracted the baby-drop-on-head types we've come to know from Halo on XBLA.

  3. Remarkable stability! by Kaz+Kylheku · · Score: 4, Funny

    What keeps geek culture from dying or becoming popular?

    Why, it oscillates around a Lagrange point, no doubt.

    1. Re:Remarkable stability! by usul294 · · Score: 1

      Really, I thought it was because geek culture is a marginally stable system. Poles right on j-omega axis/unit circle depending on your analog/digital preference.

    2. Re:Remarkable stability! by jo_ham · · Score: 1

      I would model it more accurately on a harmonic oscillator, with no anharmonic correction.

    3. Re:Remarkable stability! by PachmanP · · Score: 1

      I would model it more accurately on a harmonic oscillator, with no anharmonic correction.

      I would add in some sinusoidal forcing on it. That would give it a noisy oscillation most of the time with occasional very high peaks and very low valleys when everything is in phase.

      --
      You're thinking small. Why miniaturize the laser, when we could instead enlarge the sharks? -John Searle
    4. Re:Remarkable stability! by lennier · · Score: 1

      Home, home on Legrange
      Where the space debris always collects
      We possess, so it seems, two of Man's greatest dreams
      Solar power and zero-g se... ...curity network countermeasures - this is Slashdot, after all.

      --
      You are not a brain: http://books.google.com/books?id=2oV61CeDx-YC
    5. Re:Remarkable stability! by Phoghat · · Score: 1

      You ought to write for "The Big Bang Theory"

      --
      Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
    6. Re:Remarkable stability! by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      You completely and utterly failed to even approach the rhyme or meter of that verse. Yikes!

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
  4. Well, yeah... by lyinhart · · Score: 1

    Geek Culture will obviously never be popular. At least not as long as folks like the incorrigible Patton Oswalt are the standard bearers for it.

    --
    Freedom is drinking a beer in the park when you're supposed to be at work.
    1. Re:Well, yeah... by pjbgravely · · Score: 2

      Then how do you explain the TV show "The big bang theory" being popular? I can't believe it made it through the first season.

      Penny started out as a normal girl and now she is spouting geek culture just like the others and the show is still popular.

      --
      Star Trek, there maybe hope.
    2. Re:Well, yeah... by hedwards · · Score: 1

      That's not geek culture. It involves some sophisticated jokes, but then again that one episode results in Howard getting a robot hand stuck on his dick twice. I think that Red Dwarf being popular is a much better example, or possibly Futurama. But there again there's plenty for a mainstream audience to like.

    3. Re:Well, yeah... by snowraver1 · · Score: 1

      I would describe The Big Bang Theory as being watered down though. Remember at the beginning of the first episode, when they were at a sperm donor clinic so they could raise funds for their fractional T1 line? The science-y things have been watered down, and what is left is thoroughly explained. I think it would have been better if penny stayed that hot neighbour that they couldn't talk to.

      I also like my telephone to be 'Party Line" style, and I still walk to work uphill both ways too...GET OFF MY LAWN, yada yada...

      --
      Copyright 2010. All rights reserved. This comment may not be copied in any way including, but not limited to caching.
    4. Re:Well, yeah... by Joe+Tie. · · Score: 2

      Saying the big bang theory is about geek culture is like saying that Short Circuit 2 is a thoughtful look into the culture of India. They're mainly mocking geek culture, while doing a tired will they/won't they story. Or at least they were when I gave up on it.

      --
      Everything will be taken away from you.
    5. Re:Well, yeah... by Danny+Rathjens · · Score: 1

      Because that's the co-opted and diluted version he is talking about? I couldn't handle more than a few episodes myself.
      e.g. When one of the characters takes something too literally I get the impression that the audience is not meant to laugh at the clever literal joke, but intended to laugh at the character for saying something awkward again which is closer to normal sit-com form.
      (I'm not trying to say it's all about making fun of geeks - maybe they are just trying to target a wider audience.)

    6. Re:Well, yeah... by EdIII · · Score: 1

      Penny started out as a normal girl and now she is spouting geek culture just like the others and the show is still popular.

      Penny could read the ticker from fucking C-SPAN and it would still get at least a million viewers a show.

    7. Re:Well, yeah... by Culture20 · · Score: 2

      I think they do a good job of showing which characters do the "literal" stuff as a joke, and which characters are the jokes for always taking things literally.

    8. Re:Well, yeah... by cHiphead · · Score: 2

      Yeah, besides, at the price of a frac T1, they could just get multiple DSL/cable providers and setup a pfsense box to handle traffic management and have an overall bandwidth surplus, and dynamically allocate gaming across the connections based on latency.

      --

      This is my sig. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    9. Re:Well, yeah... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is a show for idiots to make themselves feel better about themselves by stereotyping smart into socially disadvantaged...
      These people on this show are not geeks at all and nor is the intended audience...
      Popularity's prerequisite is the lowest common denominator...

      M...

    10. Re:Well, yeah... by mcvos · · Score: 2

      I laugh because I recognize it. And then I explain it to my wife.

    11. Re:Well, yeah... by chronosan · · Score: 2

      Not geek culture? They hang out at a comic book store, get the Mars rover stuck, have dedicated Halo nights, Rockband, fight over the time machine from "The Time Machine", ogle Summer Glau on a train, play with lasers, argue about who would win in a fight between X and Y. I think Penny got hooked on WoW at some point.

    12. Re:Well, yeah... by penguinchris · · Score: 1

      Yes, but a lot of geeks (including myself) feel that it's completely alien... I am familiar with all your examples outside of the show, yet when I see stuff like that on the show (I've only seen it a few times, granted), it doesn't connect with me. I wouldn't be surprised if a lot of less geeky types like the show because of the characters and general humor, and have no idea if the things they reference are real or made up. Maybe they even like it because they feel like it makes fun of geeks (they certainly do poke fun at themselves... seems to be one of the main aspects of the humor).

    13. Re:Well, yeah... by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      It's a geeksploitation show. They're not laughing with geeks, they're laughing at geeks.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  5. Can't we all just... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    ...be ourselves? Why the constant need to label everybody? Who cares what constitues a "real geek"?

    1. Re:Can't we all just... by siddesu · · Score: 1

      People are social animals and thrive in groups, because it is usually easier to get shit done with more people together.

      Not that us geeks will know anything about it.

    2. Re:Can't we all just... by somersault · · Score: 2

      Agreed. I've always been a geek, but have never had any exposure to D&D other than the cartoon series. Likewise I don't collect comic books. I think those are more US geek things. I witnessed this whole "people thinking they're geeks when they're not at all" thing recently with fans of the new Dr Who series.. I got fooled into thinking a group of these folks would be like me as they called themselves geeks - but they were simply normal average to low intelligence students who occasionally made some pathetic Dr Who references and took it way too seriously. One even got offended when I pointed out how cheesy it was, despite the fact it's obviously meant to be like that (similar to Red Dwarf, but not as good). I have only seen a couple of episodes of the modern Dr Who btw, I don't watch much new TV outside of movies.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    3. Re:Can't we all just... by somersault · · Score: 1

      It's easy to observe, though it leads to some annoying behaviour.. like wars, and sport.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    4. Re:Can't we all just... by frieko · · Score: 1

      It's funny you phrase it that way, because I've always considered "being unconcerned with labels" to be the true measure of geekiness. Which leads to an interesting paradox..

    5. Re:Can't we all just... by Penguinisto · · Score: 1

      It's easy to observe, though it leads to some annoying behaviour.. like wars, and sport.

      ...and SyFy.

      (Yes, I'm still bitter. No, I do NOT want to talk about it. If it wasn't for the Science/HI/NatGeo and similar channels, I'd have kicked Comcast to the frickin' curb long ago.)

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    6. Re:Can't we all just... by siddesu · · Score: 1

      And, apparently, sex in many cases. Just gross.

    7. Re:Can't we all just... by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      Yes, I always find it humorous when people talk about how awesome the special effects in Dr. Who are.

    8. Re:Can't we all just... by bigstrat2003 · · Score: 1

      One even got offended when I pointed out how cheesy it was, despite the fact it's obviously meant to be like that (similar to Red Dwarf, but not as good).

      That's not what I would classify as "offensive", but I do disagree. I've watched the show, and never felt it was cheesy. A bit heavy on fan service, perhaps, but not cheesy.

      --
      "16MB (fuck off, MiB fascists)" - The Mighty Buzzard
    9. Re:Can't we all just... by somersault · · Score: 1

      The acting is waaaaaaaaay over the top whenever I've seen it.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    10. Re:Can't we all just... by somersault · · Score: 1

      Not to mention that it's a big time sink, with not much to show for it after. Unless you forego contraceptive measures of course.. then it's an even worse time sink.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    11. Re:Can't we all just... by mcvos · · Score: 1

      Agreed. I've always been a geek, but have never had any exposure to D&D other than the cartoon series.

      Don't feel bad. D&D isn't all that great. GURPS and WFRP were a lot more interesting. Nowadays it's Savage Worlds, FATE and Burning Wheel that you should be looking at.

    12. Re:Can't we all just... by easterberry · · Score: 1

      taking some obscure piece of pop culture way too seriously and dropping references in casual conversation despite others probably not getting it? Sounds like geeks to me.
       
      I'm a geek. I don't get along with a lot of other geeks. I don't LIKE a lot of other geeks. Especially ones who complain about how cheesy and unrealistic a monster of the week family show about a 900 year old space wizard who fights trash cans with hilarious voices and plungers for arms with a sonic plotdriver is. They're usually not enjoyable company.
       
      WE KNOW IT'S CHEESY! THAT'S PART OF THE APPEAL!
       
      Just because two people are both geeks doesn't mean they'll automatically get along and be BFFs. I hate several entire fandoms, but that doesn't make the members of those fandoms any less geeky for being in them. No matter how superior I feel to them for like Naruto and having never heard of Evangellion.

    13. Re:Can't we all just... by somersault · · Score: 1
      The thing is that it obviously isn't obscure. Dr Who is very mainstream now. These guys were not intelligent geeky types, they were just guys who all watch Dr Who.

      I wasn't complaining, I just mentioned how cheesy it was and my gf at the time went off. She was a bit highly strung.

      WE KNOW IT'S CHEESY! THAT'S PART OF THE APPEAL!

      Well whoop-de-fscking-do, you just said exactly what I said to her, and in the comment above, and said I enjoy about Red Dwarf, but she said it wasn't cheesy (before admitting a few days later "maybe it is").

      She was not a geek, I just wanted her to be. Most young folk today are good with computers and even like what used to be geeky TV shows and computer games, but that doesn't give them the same geeky mindset that hacker types have. Naruto over Evangelion etc, again it's just what they were brought up on, some anime is very mainstream. Simply liking anime or Dr Who does not make you a geek. Being a geek is kind of about having the hacker mindset where you like to find out how things work, you're usually looking to learn and absorb new things even when you're 60 years old. These guys weren't any of that, they were just normal people who happened to all like Dr Who and say "oh god we're so geeky!".

      --
      which is totally what she said
    14. Re:Can't we all just... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We all have our pedantic little fiefdoms that must war against the others. That too is part of geek culture.

    15. Re:Can't we all just... by Fiduciary · · Score: 1

      It's funny you phrase it that way, because I've always considered "being unconcerned with labels" to be the true measure of geekiness. Which leads to an interesting paradox..

      Star Wars, Star Trek, D&D, Warhammer, Nintendo, Sega, Marvel, DC, AMD, Intel.....

    16. Re:Can't we all just... by easterberry · · Score: 1

      I disagree, normal people are now AWARE Doctor Who exists. They might even now know David Tennant or Matt Smith by name. But they don't, by and large, watch it, and they sure as hell don't reference it in casual conversation. Trust me, my room mate drags me to parties with art and business students. For every one who watches Dr Who there are 20 who give me a blank stare or look at me like a freak when I mention it. Same with Anime. The stuff on Cartoon Network is popularish... kinda. But not really the way Big Bang is. and even the stuff that's well known isn't popular, the people involved in the fandom aren't normal people. They're geeks. People who don't fit into the rest of society. Who obsess over obscure things other people don't care about and get too defensive about their pet shows and don't understand social conventions.
       
      I'm not a hacker type. I don't really CARE how most things work as long as they work. I'm a computer programmer because I'm GOOD at computer programming. I understand complex concepts because I'm smart, not because of any deep inquisitive nature. I spend my free time reading comics, playing video games, going to conventions and watching obscure shows.
       
      You, sir, are confusing geek and nerd.

    17. Re:Can't we all just... by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      For every one who watches Dr Who there are 20 who give me a blank stare or look at me like a freak when I mention it. Same with Anime.

      To be fair, it is generally freaks who like Anime, so they have a point.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    18. Re:Can't we all just... by easterberry · · Score: 1

      I agree entirely. That's my point. Grandparent was claiming anime and Dr Who were mainstream and popular and that it was totally normal for people to watch and be really into them. This is in no way the case and both these things are still the purview of geeks, freaks and nerds.

    19. Re:Can't we all just... by somersault · · Score: 1

      I'm not a hacker type. I don't really CARE how most things work as long as they work. I'm a computer programmer because I'm GOOD at computer programming. I understand complex concepts because I'm smart, not because of any deep inquisitive nature. I spend my free time reading comics, playing video games, going to conventions and watching obscure shows.

      You, sir, are confusing geek and nerd.

      Well, apart from the comics and conventions you've also described me. I also happen to think that comics and conventions are more nerdy than geeky ;) I used to be much more of a hacker though and recently have felt the urge to rekindle my interest in programming for the sake of just programming, rather than simply doing it for my job. Nerd and geek are very similar things though. The current usage of nerd is exactly the same as the usage of "geek" even 10 years ago. I don't mind being called either to be honest.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    20. Re:Can't we all just... by somersault · · Score: 1

      No, I'm saying that some anime is very mainstream (Pokemon for example), and here in the UK, Doctor Who is very mainstream. Maybe Dr Who isn't mainstream in the US, but I know it used to be on Saturday night TV here and probably still is. Our CIO was shocked that I don't watch Dr Who - he assumes it's something geeky too despite watching it and the spin-off show (that I didn't even know existed) himself, and he's much more of a "jock" type than a geek. I really don't think of the modern Dr Who as a geeky thing at all.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    21. Re:Can't we all just... by easterberry · · Score: 1

      Ah. Yeah, in the UK Doctor Who is mainstream. But over here it's still a nerd thing. And any anime that's well known is considered "children's programming" and anyone over 12 who admits to watching it is seen as a tad off.

  6. Hipsters by Admiral+Frosty · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I have to admit, this makes us sound an awful lot like hipsters trying to be on the edge and always being different.

    1. Re:Hipsters by dosius · · Score: 2

      Different? They're just a new kind of same.

      -uso.

      --
      What you hear in the ear, preach from the rooftop Matthew 10.27b
    2. Re:Hipsters by somersault · · Score: 3, Insightful

      There is some overlap. People like to feel special, especially the slightly narcissistic asshats like me.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    3. Re:Hipsters by Rylz · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I have to admit, this makes us sound an awful lot like hipsters trying to be on the edge and always being different.

      This isn't the first time that analogy has been appropriate. Geeks are, after all, known for having huge egos and being a quite exclusive lot. Prior to mainstream acceptance of comic book movies and other aspects of geek culture, just look at how we snubbed script kiddies and noobs on our IRC channels. Much like hipsters snubbing others when outsiders adopt their music or aspects of their culture.

      --
      Sometimes you've gotta roll the hard six.
    4. Re:Hipsters by FatSean · · Score: 2

      What's wrong with aspiring to be different? I never understood the hipster-hate that I've seen on the internet. If they want to dress weird and buy obscure products, why hate on them?

      --
      Blar.
    5. Re:Hipsters by Patch86 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It's pretentious clap-trap, is what it is.

      Geeks identified themselves (or were identified by others) by their hobbies, interests, fictions, and humour, all of which were different from what the "mainstream" people occupied themselves with. The fictions are now best-sellers, the hobbies are widely enjoyed, the interests are more generally interesting, and the humour is printed across the chest of hot women (and men) everywhere. It''s not so much that geekiness has gone mainstream- it's that the mainstream has gotten geekier.

      And surely that's what all (sane) geeks have always wanted? Every time you've frustratedly tried to explain some cunning new technology breakthrough to an acquaintance, and been baffled by how bored they seem- didn't you wish they found it as fascinating as you? Didn't you always want more people to tell jokes that you found funny, and your favourite directors/authors/publishers to have more money to spend on your favourite projects? I never plan on changing myself to match the rest of society, in terms of what I like and what I'm interested in- but if the rest of the world could busy itself aligning to me, that'd be just grand.

      TFA seems to be confusing "geek" with "clever". You can like football and still suck at it, or like rock and be tone-deaf; being good at something isn't pre-requisite to it being your most favourite thing.

      On the other hand, once the "geekdom" of the 20th century has become the mainstream of the 21st, undoubtedly new subcultures will crop up on the fringe. Maybe you can call that "the new geekdom" if you like, but you'd be clutching at straws. It will be it's own thing, and maybe it'll catch on one day too.

    6. Re:Hipsters by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      Aspiring to be different is basically trying to identify as not-something, which is just asinine. Your identity should be about who you are or what groups you choose to associate with, not about being different from some other. This also why I think Jesse Jackson is a tool.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    7. Re:Hipsters by hedwards · · Score: 2

      Geeks don't generally try to be different. Whereas hipsters do and that's one hell of a difference. Plus you get a bunch of geeks together and chances are that the thought patterns are going to be pretty similar, in terms of associative reasoning, even if the interests aren't.

    8. Re:Hipsters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, we love stuff nobody else care about that's it. No hipster analogue here.

    9. Re:Hipsters by DerekLyons · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's pretentious clap-trap, is what it is.

      Geeks identified themselves (or were identified by others) by their hobbies, interests, fictions, and humour, all of which were different from what the "mainstream" people occupied themselves with.

      Well, mostly correct. 'Geeks' used to mean 'obsessively interested in a particular subject' - hence 'computer geek', 'history geek', 'chemistry geek' etc... That term was later pre-empted and perverted by the media and pop culture.
       

      And surely that's what all (sane) geeks have always wanted? Every time you've frustratedly tried to explain some cunning new technology breakthrough to an acquaintance, and been baffled by how bored they seem- didn't you wish they found it as fascinating as you?

      Nope. Because the definition of 'geek' solely as 'obsessively interested in computer technology' is one created by the mass media and pop culture in the 1980's. (See: "Sixteen Candles".)
       

      Didn't you always want more people to tell jokes that you found funny, and your favourite directors/authors/publishers to have more money to spend on your favourite projects?

      On the other hand, once the "geekdom" of the 20th century has become the mainstream of the 21st, undoubtedly new subcultures will crop up on the fringe.

      The idea that 'geek' was a synonym for Otaku ('obsessive fanboy') is a *much* later development, roughly contemporary with the explosion of the 'net into pop culture in the mid/late 90's. (Giving rise to saying such as "you haven't seen/read/heard $MEDIA_PRODUCT? turn in your geek card!".) *That* form of geekdom never died and never went mainstream - it was mainstream and deeply embedded in pop culture from practically Day One of it's existence.

    10. Re:Hipsters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your identity should be about who you are or what groups you choose to associate with, not about being different from some other.

      It should?

    11. Re:Hipsters by similar_name · · Score: 1

      Aspiring to be different is basically trying to identify as not-something, which is just asinine.

      Kids these days. What's wrong with them?

      Your identity should be about who you are or what groups you choose to associate with, not about being different from some other.

      Right you are sir.

      This also why I think Jesse Jackson is a tool.

      I like his reading of Green Eggs and Ham.

    12. Re:Hipsters by rtb61 · · Score: 2

      Geek culture is driven by geeks. Now on the IQ scale 100 is average and geek culture tends to 120 plus, that alone ensures an obvious lack of popularity.

      As for ego, let's be honest having to put up with all the jock straps and cheer leaders at high school and the various other sub 110 crowds, has worn down the humour of geeks when it comes dealing with them. Geeks of course as they get older mellow out and tend to be less put off by associations with the failed jock strap cheerleader crowd et al.

      As for mass media popularity, that's just a PR=B$ (lies for profit) illusion, that's keeps changing at regular cycles so people 'er' marketing victims buy the latest fashionable crap and of course ostracise geeks for failing to do so.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    13. Re:HIPSTERS by mmcxii · · Score: 1

      My experience is that most people who you can term a geek from a glance are rarely intelligent and the 'inside' jokes are normally stale.

      Memes are a terrible form of wit.

    14. Re:Hipsters by Hatta · · Score: 2

      It''s not so much that geekiness has gone mainstream- it's that the mainstream has gotten geekier.

      But they haven't. Does the average person enjoy solving problems and using their imagination more than before? No, they've just adopted the trappings of those who do.

      TFA seems to be confusing "geek" with "clever". You can like football and still suck at it, or like rock and be tone-deaf; being good at something isn't pre-requisite to it being your most favourite thing.

      Clever is a prerequesite for being a geek. There are definitely football geeks, who know all the stats, and all the plays. They may or may not be good at the game, but it's the knowledge that makes them geeks.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    15. Re:Hipsters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But there's no difference at all. Especially here on Slashdot or any other "nerdy" site.

    16. Re:Hipsters by uigrad_2000 · · Score: 1

      On the other hand, once the "geekdom" of the 20th century has become the mainstream of the 21st, undoubtedly new subcultures will crop up on the fringe. Maybe you can call that "the new geekdom" if you like, but you'd be clutching at straws. It will be it's own thing, and maybe it'll catch on one day too.

      You're on the right track, but it's really simpler than this.

      Geek Culture is not a static thing. Part of its definition includes being at least 'x' far from 'mainstream', but not further than 'y'. Obviously 'x', 'y', and 'mainstream' are different to everyone, but most important is that 'mainstream' is always changing. As it changes, different spots may move in and out of the "geek band", but there will always be something within it.

      For example, watch Bryant Gumbel and Katie Couric get their geek on as they discuss what the internet is:

      Today Show, Jan. 1994

      --
      Free unix account: freeshell.org
    17. Re:Hipsters by bzipitidoo · · Score: 2

      TFA focused on geeky games, which I found a little sad, and a little beside the point. The games we choose are only a reflection of our geekiness, not the essence of it.

      I once spent a few Saturdays trying to make Catalan solids out of wood (not easy to shave just the right amount off each surface even when you get the angle correct), and then by pouring glue into paper models (much better, but doing it with one massive blob of epoxy had several problems-- it got pretty hot while it was curing, and some spots never cured perhaps because it hadn't mixed well enough, or because the glue had sat on the shelf too long). Even though it was for more variety of dice, it got me a lot of strange looks and people asking why I did it. Doesn't this qualify as recreation? But if I'd spent that same time playing some game, no one would have thought anything of it.

      --
      Intellectual Property is a monopolistic, selfish, and defective concept. It is "tyranny over the mind of man"
    18. Re:Hipsters by $0.02 · · Score: 1

      Most of the people want to be different, which makes them the same. On the other hand geeks want to be just everybody else, which makes them different.

      --
      If enithin kan gow rong it whil. (Murfey)
    19. Re:Hipsters by zuzulo · · Score: 2

      You bring up a key point. Despite how 'mainstream' the geek has become, if my buddies and i get fired up about something *actually technical or science related* when we are out and about with the gadfly crowd the coolness meter goes down real quick. Doesnt matter how 'cool' people think the geekery is, the evidence still suggests actually being passionate about science and technology isnt going to be your shortcut to the in crowd. Probably never will be, but *that* would be a change i could get excited about. ;-)

      --
      "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
    20. Re:Hipsters by Phaedrus420 · · Score: 0

      Didn't you always want more people to tell jokes that you found funny

      I would love to be able to say "Assuming a spherical cow..." and have it understood that the next thing to come out of my mouth will be an oversimplification. I tried it once, and had to tell the joke, and explain the joke. It ended up being not very funny, and I would have been better off avoiding the simplification in the first place :/

      This is offtopic for this thread, and most of the others I've read, here, but since I've got the text box open: I think it's best if "geek culture," whatever that is, is properly mixed in with the rest of culture.
      Someone here wrote something about 'more people' getting together and getting things done, but if those people all have the same skillset, then the size of the group will tend to have diminishing returns.
      Taking team sports as an example, you have the athletes on the field, each of which will have their own strengths (QB vs. lineman vs. kicker, etc). Then you have referees enforcing the rules. You have the coaches running things, each in their own style. You have the fans, of all kinds, enjoying the game (or not). You have announcers, statisticians, owners, advertisers, marketers, ticket scalpers, fantasy team managers, equipment and merchandise manufacturers, video crews (further subdivision, compare a camera guy to a producer) and most importantly (bias mine), groundskeepers. It takes all of these different kinds of people (Many of which are really some kind of geek, with strong interest and focus on their particular part in the game) to make the sport what it is. 12 Goalies does not a hockey game make, and I'm thinking that too many Oppenheimers spoils The Gadget.

      --
      And what is good, Phaedrus, And what is not good... Need we ask anyone to tell us these things?
    21. Re:Hipsters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well to be real - people who try to pass themselves off as geeks are actually just hipsters. It's an easy test:

      "How do you want people to think of you?"

      Artist: "I want them to forget about me and enjoy my art."
      Nerd: "I want them to think of me as an interesting, thoughtful person with lots of really cool ideas."
      Geek: "I want them to think I am an elf. Or a Jedi! Or a ninja!"

      Hipster: "I want them to think I am an artist, or a geek, or a nerd, or anything that is cooler than them. But ironically, because I don't want them to see how desperate I am."

    22. Re:Hipsters by Thing+1 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, reminds me of that old quote about the non-conformists: "They buy their clothing at the non-conformist's store."

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    23. Re:Hipsters by Thing+1 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Well, mostly correct. 'Geeks' used to mean [...]

      Well, mostly correct. Geeks traditionally meant people who bit the heads off chickens at the circus.

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    24. Re:Hipsters by lennier · · Score: 1

      Aspiring to be different is basically trying to identify as not-something, which is just asinine.

      Except for those darn non-Aristotelians who insist on being both hip and unhip simultaneously.

      --
      You are not a brain: http://books.google.com/books?id=2oV61CeDx-YC
    25. Re:Hipsters by grimdawg · · Score: 2

      Geek culture is driven by geeks. Now on the IQ scale 100 is average and geek culture tends to 120 plus, that alone ensures an obvious lack of popularity.

      As for ego, let's be honest having to put up with all the jock straps and cheer leaders at high school and the various other sub 110 crowds, has worn down the humour of geeks when it comes dealing with them.

      I think your first sentence tells me more about the `ego' thing than any other could.

      --
      There are 10 kinds of people in this world: those who understand binary, and nine other kinds of people.
    26. Re:Hipsters by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      Well, that too... :)

    27. Re:Hipsters by tparkergeum · · Score: 1

      True geeks do not know they are geeks and are not self-conscious about it. We are driven by curiosity to know everything knowable about a subject, for reasons we may not understand. Once the dust settles after a bout of feeding our undeniable intellectual hunger, we may look around and wonder what to do now with all these manuals, all this inter-operable software, all these unmarketable work products. But that is a passing moment, and then we are back to the next fascinating subject that must be fully understood...pop culture is only trying to hit an unaware, moving target in this case.

    28. Re:Hipsters by hedwards · · Score: 1

      And a few of us just don't care one way or the other.

    29. Re:Hipsters by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 1

      well, those guys are just cooler than us.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    30. Re:Hipsters by Phaedrus420 · · Score: 0

      Hey, thanks. I am now the proud owner of a lumpy ball of paper and tape.

      --
      And what is good, Phaedrus, And what is not good... Need we ask anyone to tell us these things?
    31. Re:Hipsters by ravenshrike · · Score: 1

      That's because you used a cow. If you had used a horse it would have been immediately identifiable.

    32. Re:Hipsters by definate · · Score: 1

      I remember teasing other kids that they didn't know various obscure Linux commands, teasing them about being able to do proper socks programming, teasing them about being unable to setup a botnet, etc. I also don't trust people with my machine, mainly because we used to have exploit wars, where if you left your console unlocked for even a second, someone would have loaded you up with a rootkit/trojan of some sort. I remember being so pissed off when a friend wouldn't give me the offsets and commands to edit Duke Nukem 3D in Debug, so that I could see the "titties".

      In fact, I did this once to a kid, and left it on his system for a while. Then he pissed me off, so I formatted his hard drives. LOL, What a little cunt I was (or am?).

      Though all of these skills came in really handy when I started working in IT as a programmer (without doing formal study), hell, I haven't run *nix in years, yet when something *nix/BSD related fucks up at work, I'm the one that gets the call.

      It wasn't about the usefulness of the knowledge, it was about knowing something better than somebody else. Being the ultimate resource amongst friends. In this way, it is a lot like being a hipster. You want to know more than others about some obscure topic, you lord this knowledge over others, and your self image is tied heavily to this.

      Sometimes this resulted in nerd anxiety (knowing you had to be right, and people were judging you on your knowledge), which resulted in learning to bluff, and often resulted in me learning less than I could have.

      In the end, I still love kicking it nerdcore, and am a proponent of the nerd culture.

      --
      This is my footer. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    33. Re:Hipsters by definate · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Codswallop and bulls wool!

      I doubt that the distribution of geeks IQs is much different than that of most others. Unless you're saying geeks are defined by their IQ.

      Most of the geeks I know, myself inclusive, have very average, maybe slightly upper end of average at most, IQs. However, we have the image of being smart, by being the kind of people who will argue anything to the death, be interested in obscure topics, having reasonable analytical skills, and by associating ourselves with that sort of stuff.

      As for being above average. Not necessarily. I've got several friends who don't fit your definition, and are either on the low end of average, or are under average, yet most would describe them as geeks, merely for the over interest in certain topics they have.

      Also IQ measures are fucking retarded.

      Your definition is too rigid, back to the drawing board with you!

      --
      This is my footer. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    34. Re:Hipsters by wolverine1999 · · Score: 1

      I agree that the mainstrame has now gotten much more geekier than before..

      And it's nothing to be ashamed of.

      Geeks really have taken over the world in my opinion. Now everyone talks about email and facebook....

    35. Re:Hipsters by MareLooke · · Score: 1

      Ooooh, do bats count too? Your f(r)iend Ozzy

    36. Re:Hipsters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's called emo u insensit1ve cl0d!

    37. Re:HIPSTERS by ElusiveJoe · · Score: 1

      We enjoy being geeks because it isn't cool

      Wait, what? Geeks become geeks to avoid being cool?! Hipsters doing something, that isn't cool?! Oh, c'mon!

    38. Re:Hipsters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It bugs me that when I gave a shit about fitting in there was no "big bang theory" "nerdfighters" or even "slashdot". Now I'm a fully formed adult and no longer an adolescent in need of friends and support and it all springs up around me like dandelions.

    39. Re:Hipsters by Kjella · · Score: 1

      I doubt that the distribution of geeks IQs is much different than that of most others. Unless you're saying geeks are defined by their IQ.

      Most of the geeks I know, myself inclusive, have (...) reasonable analytical skills, and by associating ourselves with that sort of stuff.

      Hint: That contributes a lot to IQ scores.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    40. Re:Hipsters by lupinstel · · Score: 1

      You wouldn't understand. I was a hipster before being a hipster sold out and went main stream. Now all these kids are wearing their Members Only jackets and I am like "Dude, I was wearing Members Only jackets back in 2008 when I bought one from a 1980's vintage store; try being original". I could go on and on about all the styles these 2011 hipsters are trying to pretend they invented; but it is pointless because they are really obscure and you have probably never heard of them.

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Cthulhu.
    41. Re:Hipsters by Kashgarinn · · Score: 1

      The geeks who use the term on themselves do it because it symbolises their devotion to some hobby they find quaint and not something which is enjoyed by the masses.

      The people who refer to other people as geeks use it because they are socially ingrained into their current hobbies, which have to be and are mass-approved as "normal" hobbies.

      In my view, any expert knowledge which you have on a subject which you have where you don't have to look things up, because you know it so well (obscure d&d mechanics, obscure characters in a manga, obscure football details, obscure baseball details, obscure chess details, obscure poems, obscure fortran references, obscure opera details, obscure golfer details, obscure olympics details) - should stamp you as a geek, and guess what, it should be praiseworthy because it's the human condition to know and learn and love a meme so much that you become an expert on it, even if it's just something stupid like the friends series, or the governing of a country.

      In regards to the OP, the people who wish to be on the outside and remain there, that's more nerds than geeks, and that's not because they want to be different, it's because they don't like people poking into their hobby as they are socially unfriendly to begin with.

    42. Re:Hipsters by definate · · Score: 1

      It sure does, yet correlation is not causation. While you might have reasonable analytical skills, you may get quite bad (relatively) IQ scores.

      Either way, my point stands.

      --
      This is my footer. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    43. Re:Hipsters by Phoghat · · Score: 1
      Geek culture is here to stay,

      it will never die

      It was meant to be that way,

      though I don't know why

      I don't care what people say,

      Geek culture is here to stay

      Excuse me, I'm showing my age here

      --
      Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
    44. Re:Hipsters by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Also IQ measures are fucking retarded.

      Someone just got a "less than genius" score on an IQ test, did they?

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    45. Re:Hipsters by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      What's wrong with aspiring to be different? I never understood the hipster-hate that I've seen on the internet. If they want to dress weird and buy obscure products,

      why hate on them?

      Because they're the sort of cunts who encourage Apple to sell over-priced toys to well-off gullible morons?

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    46. Re:Hipsters by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      Exactly.
      I personally revel in it when people call me a geek perjoratively. Less often in the last 10 years, but I guess it's just "cool" to be a geek now.
      It's all about being yourself, no matter what.

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
    47. Re:Hipsters by penguinchris · · Score: 1

      RE: the spherical cow: I tried a joke like that on slashdot once (it was assuming a spherical/cylindrical penis), and got several whoosh-worthy replies. It may not have been funny, but rather than ignore it (most of my comments are ignored), people chose to reply and question what I meant.

      I, too, would love to be able to regularly make jokes like that "in real life," by the way. It's one slashdot-type joke that I don't think ever gets old. The non-geek equivalent might be "that's what she said" - although that got old real fast when everyone was saying it, now if you're clever you can whip it out unexpectedly and get a great response (I've never said that one myself but I think the comparison is apt).

    48. Re:Hipsters by definate · · Score: 1

      LOL Yea. Which is weird, cuz I speel good n everyfink.

      --
      This is my footer. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    49. Re:Hipsters by Dread_ed · · Score: 1

      Reminds me of high school and the music scene. I listened to music you didn't hear on the radio. It was called "alternative" and sometimes "new wave" by the uninitiated. These no-name, underground, and marginalized bands were The Cure, Depeche Mode, New Order, Nine Inch Nails, REM, U2, Red Hot Chili Peppers, Janes Addiction, Souxsie and the Banshees, The Smiths/Morrisey, Bjork/Sugarcubes, 10,000 Maniacs/Natalie Merchant, No Doubt/Gwen Stefani, The Smashing Pumpkins, and Butthole Surfers.

      Now everyone recognizes these bands. Their music, both old and new, is considered mainstream. I have heard early Cure elevator music. Perry Farrell from Jane's Addiction is on a damn reality show. Trent Reznor (Nine Inch Nails) may win an Oscar this year for the score of The Social Club. The examples are too numerous to list. Needless to say, these musical analogues of the archetypal basement dwelling geek are now industry leaders and serve as seminal inspiration for the young, fresh , hot new things that will form the mainstream of tomorrow.

      This interaction and evolution is relfected in the rise of geek culture in the mainstream. However, the main difference I see is that geek culture is directly shaping our society and catalyzing our future merely by the expression of its core identity. Sepcifically I am referring to the inexorable link between geeks and the technology they not only love, but create. Generous helpings of new, unavoidably ubiquitous, geek-made technology like smart phones, file sharing/P2P, game consoles, social network services (facebook), Bluetooth, navigation systems, WiFi, laptops, everything Apple, and so on (ad nauseam!) not only change the way we interact, relax, work, and play but also, in an almost insidiously seductive way, mold everyone who uses them into and effigy of geek-ness.

      The geekification of America is inevitable, and I, for one, welcome our new geeky overlords.

      --
      When the only tool you have is a claw hammer every problem starts to look like the back of someone's skull.
    50. Re:Hipsters by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Do you know what IQ is most driven by, your own internal brain chemical reward system, ahh, to be in that thinking zone. Smarter is nothing much more than drug addict.

      So higher IQ is not all that much to brag about but it does of course alter your thinking processes and reactions to mass media marketing and adhering to accepted mass consumption norms which inevitably results in sharing mutual irritation with the in crowd and their followers (marketing victims)..

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    51. Re:Hipsters by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      [citation needed]

    52. Re:Hipsters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hipster is a term for someone who doesn't just happen to want something different, or even want to >be different: they want to want to be different.

    53. Re:Hipsters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Geek, dork, nerd definitions, www.phdcomics.com/comics/archive.php?comicid=401

  7. The circle of geekdom by usul294 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Geeks pick up stuff early, the best of it filters into mainstream, then geeks pick up something new.

    1. Re:The circle of geekdom by somersault · · Score: 2

      I think you nailed it, though it doesn't just apply to geeks. Lots of stuff starts out in fringe groups and eventually gains publicity and popularity :)

      --
      which is totally what she said
    2. Re:The circle of geekdom by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      I think you nailed it, though it doesn't just apply to geeks. Lots of stuff starts out in fringe groups and eventually gains publicity and popularity :)

      So. Twitter, Facebook and Paris Hilton are our fault? I am so not believing you.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    3. Re:The circle of geekdom by monkyyy · · Score: 1

      no he never implied that, he said we pick up stuff the main stream would never touch then the "best"(marketable?) of it they steal(then water down)

      --
      warning pointless sig
    4. Re:The circle of geekdom by Penguinisto · · Score: 1

      I think you nailed it, though it doesn't just apply to geeks. Lots of stuff starts out in fringe groups and eventually gains publicity and popularity :)

      There is one thing that most geeks think (well, I think) would have been hella cool to see go mainstream, but it's the one thing we still pretty much still have all to ourselves:

      Desktop Linux.

      (and Free/OpenBSD).

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    5. Re:The circle of geekdom by Gilmoure · · Score: 1

      Damn it! Why does everyone forget about NetBSD?

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    6. Re:The circle of geekdom by Penguinisto · · Score: 1

      Err, well, you have Captain Kirk*, You have Luke Skywalker*, and you have Buck Rogers (err, NetBSD).

      All of 'em cool, all of 'em worthy of youthful adoration as space heroes... but one of 'em just isn't as popular.

      * Note that I'd rather eat live coals than to assign either of these two guys to Linux or FreeBSD.

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    7. Re:The circle of geekdom by djdevon3 · · Score: 1

      I completely agree. It's because we are all hooked into outlets that allow us to stay ahead of the news. It's just one of those things that we do well because we are passionate about tech and science. It's not necessarily that they are behind it's just that we are ahead.

      Here's a good tip to stay years ahead of the game. Every once in a while check out tech companies career pages to see what they are hiring for. I could have told you that Logitech would be coming out with Blutooth and wireless gaming headsets years ago because they were specifically looking for engineers with blutooth and wireless experience. Most companies unknowingly give away what projects they will be working on by requiring specific qualifications in a resume. Right now Google is hiring developers for a new web based operating system. That's just one example of why we are way ahead of the mainstream.

    8. Re:The circle of geekdom by russotto · · Score: 1

      So. Twitter, Facebook and Paris Hilton are our fault? I am so not believing you.

      Twitter and Facebook are both the results of geeks figuring out a way of exploiting the mainstream for cash.

    9. Re:The circle of geekdom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I couldn't agree more! I am a child of the eighties and while most people were listening to hair bands I was listening to the likes of The Cure, The Cult, Depeche mode, Dead Milkmen, REM and other bands that morphed the music scene into what was soon to be called alternative.

    10. Re:The circle of geekdom by fl_litig8r · · Score: 1

      This sounds like Chef describing how black people need to stay one step ahead of white culture. When white people stole "in the house", black people moved on to "in the hizzouse", then "in the hizee", then "in the flibbity flobbity floop."

    11. Re:The circle of geekdom by icebraining · · Score: 1

      Right now Google is hiring developers for a new web based operating system.

      ChromeOS is new?

    12. Re:The circle of geekdom by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Paris Hilton's sex tape was intentionally 'leaked' to give her publicity. No one had heard of her until then. She is her own fault.

      Facebook was not started by a geek, and geeks were not really involved in its success. I'm pretty sure twitter and geekdom are unrelated if not orthagonal, few on /. express anything but disgust for the platform.

    13. Re:The circle of geekdom by djdevon3 · · Score: 1

      It's not ChromeOS.

    14. Re:The circle of geekdom by djdevon3 · · Score: 1

      I was lead to believe it was something completely new. Having never used Chrome because I'm anti-Google at this point and having read the description of the job posting again yeah it could be ChromeOS. :(

    15. Re:The circle of geekdom by hesiod · · Score: 1

      Twitter makes a profit? That's insane and quite unbelievable.

    16. Re:The circle of geekdom by Lanteran · · Score: 1

      I use DragonFlyBSD you insensitive clod!

      --
      "People don't want to learn linux" hasn't been a valid excuse since '03.
  8. Agree by cosm · · Score: 4, Insightful

    There is a definite line of delineation between my friends that use Facebook and my friends that code. The web may have finally gone mainstream, but I find it frustrating that now that it has, all these people using Skype, Facebook, Twitter, and other webby gidget crap all claim to be trendy IT geeks. What has happened is that the tools of the trade that we geeks have known for years finally went mainstream, and the rest of the world thinks they are now 1337 because of it. Not to sound elitist, but the dumb bimbo bitches I see in lecture hall chatting on Facebook are not geeks. They are still dumb bimbo bitches, just with a Web 2.0 platform to spew their idiocy.

    At the end of the day, you should still be nice to geeks, because they will probably manage you one day. Unless your in an MBA program, where you don't actually learn anything but get all the real pay but get to pretend to when you order the latest synergy report on your desk by Monday morning. The geek shall inherit the earth!

    --
    'We are trying to prove ourselves wrong as quickly as possible, because only in that way can we find progress.' RPF
    1. Re:Agree by blair1q · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Well, first of all, geeks were hardly the early adopters of facebook.

      Twitter, maybe. Facebook, no.

      And when "all these people" are using -- nay, customizing -- Eclipse, then they will also be geeks.

      Just because they've picked up the easy stuff, which geeks engineered to be easy to pick up, doesn't make them geeky.

    2. Re:Agree by somersault · · Score: 2

      How is twitter any more geeky than facebook? To me it just seems like another way to waste time - and not in a good way.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    3. Re:Agree by jedidiah · · Score: 2

      No. We were just early adopters of similar much older technology. ...and geeks probably did latch onto Facebook first simply because they're the sort that seek out the new rather than have it handed to them on a silver platter.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    4. Re:Agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      you've just described /.

    5. Re:Agree by LurkerXXX · · Score: 1

      Twitter, maybe. Facebook, no.

      SMSing makes you a geek? Not!

    6. Re:Agree by node+3 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      At the end of the day, you should still be nice to geeks, because they will probably manage you one day.

      That's the geek equivalent of the jocks who think it's ok to do poorly in school, because they'll just go pro. The odds are stacked against you, but it makes for a compelling fantasy.

    7. Re:Agree by Opie812 · · Score: 2

      Here's a tip.

      If you call people "dumb bimbo bitches" do not use the incorrect version of 'your' later in your post. People in glass houses shouldn't throw stones.

      --
      I'm not a nerd. Nerds are smart.
    8. Re:Agree by similar_name · · Score: 1

      SMSing makes you a geek? Not!

      A few years ago I forwarded my friends email to hisnumber@txt.att.net when he didn't have internet so he could still get his emails. Not my geekiest moment, but still no points?

    9. Re:Agree by Dr+Max · · Score: 1

      I completly agree and so does matt groening in one of his lattest futurama epesoides he has the face-space / twit cult call themselves "internet geeks". I would prefer dumb bimbo bitches aswell, but i think this is all we can hope for.

      --
      Rocket Surgeon.
    10. Re:Agree by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      Unless your in an MBA program

      Or a remedial English program.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    11. Re:Agree by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      Really? Most of the geeks I know and associate with (myself included) would rather saw off their own testicles[0] with a reciprocating saw than end up managing someone else, especially the kind of knothead that needs to be told "don't be a douche since your victims will be your bosses one day."

      [0] Yes, I have heard of the fabled she-geek. To date, I have never met one in meatspace.

    12. Re:Agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At the end of the day, you should still be nice to geeks, because they will probably manage you one day.

      That's the geek equivalent of the jocks who think it's ok to do poorly in school, because they'll just go pro. The odds are stacked against you, but it makes for a compelling fantasy.

      The comparison is not the same. In the former example, the subject and object are different entities. In your example, the subject and object are the same.

    13. Re:Agree by Totenglocke · · Score: 1

      People in glass houses shouldn't throw stones.

      Clearly you've never seen The Boondock Saints - otherwise you'd know that the correct saying is "People in glass houses sink ships". And you'd also know that a penny saved is worth two in the bush. ;-)

      --
      "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." ~Thomas Jefferson
    14. Re:Agree by Yhippa · · Score: 1

      By "Eclipse" you mean the IDE and not the movie, right :-)

    15. Re:Agree by manwargi · · Score: 1

      This. The definition of 'geek' has been extremely shallow and slanted up until recent years and the things that used to be accessories to geeks have been simplified enough to become mainstream.

      A decade or two ago computers were for the knowledgeable, precise, and most of all the enthusiastic, but now that the GUI has replaced DOS and computers are adequately drool proofed (not to mention necessary for socializing and business) they are fit for consumption by the masses.

      A decade or two ago video games had shabbier controls, graphics that required imagination, and blips for a soundtrack, but now that the technology allows for detailed graphics and symphonic background music, they are fit for consumption by the masses.

      Classic tabletop fantasy games needed an understanding and management of math and a lot of little numbers just to create a character sheet, much less understand how to play. Now that there are MMOs that have the dirty work covered (not to mention voices and graphics to cover for the unimaginative) they are fit for consumption by the masses.

      So really being a "geek" originally had more to do with how enthusiastic/obsessive one is willing to be with niche hobbies the common person wouldn't appreciate, with a strong tendency towards hobbies that one didn't need to be especially sociable to enjoy. This is the reason why people who go to football games covered in nothing but merchandise of their favored team or will sit out in the snow shirtless and painted in their team's colors are less likely to be considered geeks than a quiet kid with a microscope. And yet for pop culture to digest the idea of the geek, the hobbies more associated with the unsociable and unpopular became part of the geek identity.

    16. Re:Agree by jimmypw · · Score: 1

      She-geek and meatspace. Two words I have to fit in to today's casual conversation.

      On Topic: I also wouldn't like to manage someone else. Having said that though I do enjoy teaching others.

    17. Re:Agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Turn in your geek card if you don't realize that all the fancy web 2.0 applications were already invented before. Web 2.0 just brought it to your webbrowser which reduced features, but opened it to the masses.

    18. Re:Agree by somersault · · Score: 1

      Slashdot can be a big time sink yes, but sometimes you find some really useful or interesting conversations. Twitter could have that too, but the post sizes are limited to 130 (140?) characters and don't follow threads in the same way, so gleaning a similar amount of useful user generated content would take forever. I don't feel the need to keep up to date with celebrities, and I can already find out what my friends had for breakfast on Facebook.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    19. Re:Agree by couchslug · · Score: 1

      Do well enough to get an MBA is so you can rule the geeks chained in the basement and the jocks digging ditches outside.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    20. Re:Agree by m50d · · Score: 1

      Well, first of all, geeks were hardly the early adopters of facebook. Twitter, maybe. Facebook, no.

      Disagree. Back in the days where it still had a The at the start of its name, Facebook was very much a geek thing; of course it was restricted to students at that stage, so maybe you didn't see it.

      --
      I am trolling
    21. Re:Agree by AlexiaDeath · · Score: 1

      Actually, you probably have met she-geeks in the meatspace but you have not noticed them. We don't wear labels on our foreheads and as a male you probably assumed that even mentioning anything technical would make our brains melt so you stick to chick talk and we assume that you are a typical tech-ailen male that would look at you blankly if you asked what OS was on his cell phone so we don't ask and politely excuse ourselves to get some hacking done. I get to have a conversation with every mechanic I hire to work on my car about this. No, I don't need the chick talk. Yes I know what is for and so on. Fortunately, its just once per person as a rule and you can stick with one mechanic for a while. However, I do agree on the point you make. I'd rather remove my ovaries with a kitchen knife than manage other people.

    22. Re:Agree by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      I can already find out what my friends had for breakfast on Facebook.

      I do it via the live CCTV links I've secretly installed into their houses.

      Mwah hah hah hah.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    23. Re:Agree by inline_four · · Score: 1

      Well, aren't you special? We're all very impressed.

      --
      Alexey
    24. Re:Agree by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      Is that why most geeks gain high paying jobs, BECAUSE of their geeking (nearly obsessive-compulsive) on that work subject?

      Nothing stacked against them at all... I'd say it's a no-brainer. Speaking from experience, and I'm sure many others will back me up there.

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
    25. Re:Agree by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      I agree with you.... to me, when the whole Web-2.0 thing came about, I noticed nothing different other than a flash-and-dash webpage in CSS and AJAX. In the end, it does the same thing as done in CGI (perl, C, etc).

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
    26. Re:Agree by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      Your assumptions are unfounded, actually. The facets of my misogyny may run both broad and deep, but I'm not nearly dumb enough to include the assumption of stupidity. I go the other way, and talk to people, male and female, like they *are* geeks. If that's alienating, screw 'em.

    27. Re:Agree by blair1q · · Score: 1

      I didn't see it until it had a few hundred thousand members and was being used by non-geeky students and their parents. Maybe the first few thousand were somewhat geeky, but it spread to non-geek student populations quickly, and from there to their non-student relations. As a whole, its rise is one of the least geeky things on the internet.

      Geeks were on other fora, ignoring the limitations of facebook and the low geek quotient of its clientele. Until it just got so big it could no longer be ignored.

    28. Re:Agree by node+3 · · Score: 1

      It's a myth that most geeks get high paying jobs. Just read any geek forum and you see incessant postings on how expensive non-OSS software is, or how expensive Macs are. If they have actual high paying jobs, but bitch about a $200 Windows license or a $1,300 notebook, they are mad.

  9. Oh, gee, here I thought geeks were uber awesome. by Seumas · · Score: 4, Insightful

    We've bought into the mutual-delusion that geeks are cool, because we've gathered around places like Slashdot over the last fifteen years. If you're a furry and you hang around other furries all the time, you're probably going to have an inaccurate perception that being a furry is more popular and accepted than it really is. Likewise, we geeks have had a way to congregate like never before, thanks to the internet. And because we've been big on technology, we've been doing this longer than most other groups. So, in that time, our self-delusion has thrived.

    The fact is that society may like a few of the things that geeks like, from time to time, but that should not be misconstrued as liking geeks. They may like Kick-Ass and some may even like Catan, but that doesn't mean they like *you*. It just means they like Kick-Ass and Catan.

    An overwhelming portion of the population still thinks of "geek" as a pejorative. How many times have you watched movies or television recently, where "geek" was used as a put-down? Personally, my reality-check was only a few years ago. I did something absurdly dorky and mumbled something about what a geek I am. The girl I was seeing at the time consoled me with a concerned "oh, no, you're not a geek!" the same way you'd say "oh, no, you're not a loser...!" to someone who was just berating themselves and slamming their head against a wall.

    Geeks think geeks are cool. Society thinks a couple things here and there that geeks like are cool. There is no overlapping venn diagram there, where society thinks some of the things geeks like are cool *and* geeks are cool. Accept it and deal with it. Frankly, I'm about fifteen years too old to give a flying fuck who thinks I'm cool or whether or not I'm accepted by anyone. I'd hope the majority here feel the same.

  10. Slashdot and SSD's by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/217883/seagate_solidstate_disks_are_doomed_at_least_for_now.html?tk=out

    Slashdot amongst many other sites makes it hard for new people to post interesting stuff. So we're left with a biased subset of "hip" geeks.

  11. you're exemplifying your trouble by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Geeks don't waste a lot of time on Alan Moore. He doesn't make a lot of sense and gets most of his details wrong. You might as well be an anime fan.

    Geeks read books with words. Iain M. Banks. K.J.Parker. They build with Arduino, or have centrifuges in their garages. Lots of people call themselves geeks who have never improvised a mechanism more advanced than a mashed potato/fork catapult, who don't know whether they'd prefer their sexual operator to be distributive or associative. The truth is that geek culture, like any antipop culture, has to be incredibly diluted to even get on the radar. If you watch your dog playing fetch and you can't help thinking how primitive its locomotion subsystems are (she doesn't really steer with her front legs, she just flexes her torso while she keeps raising and lowering her feet; her hind legs might as well be wheels), you are a geek.

    1. Re:you're exemplifying your trouble by Totenglocke · · Score: 1

      You've obviously never read an Alan Moore book if you deride it for having pictures. He does graphic novels because he wants to focus on the story and not have to write countless paragraphs describing what things look like - it's far easier for him to just show you (you know the old saying, a picture is worth a thousand words).

      --
      "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." ~Thomas Jefferson
    2. Re:you're exemplifying your trouble by mcvos · · Score: 1

      Geeks don't waste a lot of time on Alan Moore. He doesn't make a lot of sense and gets most of his details wrong. You might as well be an anime fan.

      Geeks read books with words. Iain M. Banks. K.J.Parker.

      I think those are nerds. Anime is very much a geek thing. Nerds are more likely to read, I think. Preferably books on math or science.

  12. A Will Never B...or C by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A Will Never B...or C

    wow... see you guys at 4chan...

  13. Well, Duh. by Low+Ranked+Craig · · Score: 0

    The majority of people are stupid, therefore not geeks.

    --
    I still cannot find the droids I am looking for...
  14. Surely there's a difference... by LordNacho · · Score: 2

    between using something like Facebook, and being able to write Facebook? And surely appreciating Big Bang Theory is not the same as being one of the gang?

    1. Re:Surely there's a difference... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And surely appreciating Big Bang Theory is not the same as being one of the gang?

      What if I like the Big Bang Theory, while the average Star Trek episode makes me fall asleep?

      I don't think there ever was a single geek culture. You have role players and live action role players. Amongst them you have people who like to run around with swords and people who like to run around with guns. You have hardware hackers and software hackers. And amongst hardware hackers you have the ones that write code (C, VHDL, Verilog, model-based) and hardware hackers who design circuit boards and analog electronics and those who do all of the above. The only thing they all like to do is to blow stuff up... Software hackers are even more divided.

    2. Re:Surely there's a difference... by mcvos · · Score: 1

      What if I like the Big Bang Theory, while the average Star Trek episode makes me fall asleep?

      Then you're quite normal, I think. I think the main reason for Star Trek's success is that for a long time it was the only SF on TV. TNG was quite sleep-inducing.

    3. Re:Surely there's a difference... by Cant+use+a+slash+wtf · · Score: 1

      That is one TV show that annoys me an incredible amount. Not because of the show itself so much, but the fact that everyone I know now thinks of themselves as 'geeks' after watching it. These are the same people that wouldn't know what a CPU was. The worst part is when I have to explain to someone what a particular joke on BBT was about. Sometimes I wish being a geek wasn't seen as cool, just so I wouldn't have to watch my completely un-geeky friends try to be geeks.

    4. Re:Surely there's a difference... by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      I agree fullheartedly.
      It hurts to watch that show, since it bends and twists anything people think about 'geek'. Besides, they're all just another form of cast from 'friends' in my opinion.

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
  15. In short: by falzer · · Score: 1

    There are those who are geeks-on-the-outside, and geeks-on-the-inside.
    May this thread contain many posts about what ways we outgeek our fellows and grumble about the dilution of obscure skills and subjects by bringing them to larger audiences.

    I'll start: grumble, kids these days and their Arduinos. I'd better use a DSP or FPGA in my next project. And kids these days think FFVII is the pinnacle of classic gaming. Grumble, grumble. *gets fed a mutton chop by Link*

  16. Most Important Comment Ever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    NOBODY FUCKING CARES

    1. Re:Most Important Comment Ever by monkyyy · · Score: 1

      no evidentially some people want to argue

      --
      warning pointless sig
    2. Re:Most Important Comment Ever by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      NOBODY FUCKING CARES

      Group hug time!

      Filter error: Don't use so many caps. It's like YELLING

      WHO CARES?

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    3. Re:Most Important Comment Ever by iammani · · Score: 1

      Looks like you cared enough to comment on it!

  17. I like to think of myself like this... by Stregano · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I am a programmer and have a pretty bad programmer's ego (I try to control it at work though, but we all have weaknesses). We are like Tyler Durden during Project Mayhem where he gives the speech to the politician. Everybody uses the internet now. From 90 year old grandma getting pictures of her grand kids up to, well, people like us who eat/sleep/breath the internet (well, not everybody on /. is a web developer, but for those that are, you).

    Look, the people you are after are the people you depend on. We cook your meals, we haul your trash, we connect your calls, we drive your ambulances. We guard you while you sleep. Do not... f#@k with us.

    That is how us web developers are. Even how the security people are. Server people, network people, the list goes on and on.

    As long as we are around setting things up for the end user, we will always have our culture. There is also this bad "feeling" of the MTV culture becoming a geek. Apparently Jersey Shore is cool to pay attention to, but being a geek is not. I know, I know. I have gotten used to it. But ask yourself this: the Jersey Shore intro, who made that happen? The editting, who made that happen on every episode.

    Us geeks are right on the edge of pop culture. I mean we are right there, but the pop culture fear of not being cool keeps the masses from fully accepting all of our quirks. Like people do not understand us geeks that collect. I collect video games. I had some work people over and had my Genesis/Sega CD/32x combo hooked up, and they asked me if I had a Wii. I have a pretty decent computer, and I kid you not, this is almost word for word what a girl said, "Wow! That is a cool computer. Can I check my Facebook on it super quick?"

    We are and always will be the last picked for kick ball. We will be the ones right on the outside of cool. Almost, but not quite. You know what, I like it out here.

    --
    The world is how you make it
    1. Re:I like to think of myself like this... by markass530 · · Score: 1

      the question is did you let her?

    2. Re:I like to think of myself like this... by digitalhermit · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Interesting comment.. I've been called a geek a long time, though I suspect I'm more of a dork than anything else.

      Geeks to me are those who have passions and are not afraid to indulge them for fear of being considered weird. I know too many people who love a thing but don't want to appear fanatical so never really explore the thing. It's sort of sad, really.

      We're all misfits, I think. I admire those who don't care about what others think when it comes to pursuing their passions.

    3. Re:I like to think of myself like this... by rolfwind · · Score: 2

      I don't like Geek "culture" because it's another thing telling me what I should be into.

      I like what I like, and that is that. I don't want to go from one "mainstream" culture just to look for acceptance into a niche one (of there is many).

      Just don't need it. Whoever decides what is geek, or mainstream, or something else: great. Now leave me out of it.

    4. Re:I like to think of myself like this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're a web developer and call yourself a programmer? Bwahahaha

    5. Re:I like to think of myself like this... by Stregano · · Score: 1

      You are on /. saying that, now you are a geek. The ability to jump into your passion and not care about what happens because of it. That is why I gave some of the examples I did. The person that made the intro movie is right there. I mean right there. It is not like there is some definitive line. Yeah, I am video game collector. I don't play D&D, I don't read comics, the movie lore I consider myself expert at is The Matrix. I have never seen Blade Runner. Star Trek is boring as hell to me. I know, all of this is borderline marking this as troll, but hear my out /.'ers. The joy of being a geek is that we are so wide spread to where you do what you want. It is that passion that drives us. We all know what it is. We have all felt it as geeks. You can practically see your future and that is because you don't dream of it happening, you plan on it happening. You can say geek, dork, nerd, it is all the same to me. You can say, "well, I am more of a dork then a geek". Now, you are a geek in my eyes. No difference in the words in my eyes at all.
      Yes, I have read the breakdowns of the words, but I don't care. We are the ones willing to sit there and watch the Jersey Shore crew act retarded while they get paid $50k per episode (some really do, google it) while we sit there making sure that the edit job we do is amazing even if nobody notices but us.

      We are always there right with the other people, but we are just not quite there. Many of us are the ones that will refuse to assimilate into the culture presented to us, and we will want to be ourselves. When we find out we are not like anybody, it is others that label us.

      I got sick of being labelled, so I just labelled myself. I am completely proud of who I am. I would not change myself for the world, but I would change myself for myself.

      --
      The world is how you make it
    6. Re:I like to think of myself like this... by Penguinisto · · Score: 2

      Apparently Jersey Shore is cool to pay attention to, but being a geek is not.

      One of the two features morally loose women with over-developed mammary glands and tight clothing. The other involves using one's mind in some fashion or another, at sustained levels above that spent by most ordinary human beings.

      You're seriously not perplexed at what the masses tend to choose, are you?

      --
      Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
    7. Re:I like to think of myself like this... by sdguero · · Score: 1

      We will be the ones right on the outside of cool. Almost, but not quite. You know what, I like it out here.

      Me too. It gives perspective. :)

    8. Re:I like to think of myself like this... by spydum · · Score: 1

      Come on man, don't you know that was a parable? He doesn't work with actual women, nor would they come over to play video games.

    9. Re:I like to think of myself like this... by RazorSharp · · Score: 0

      Yeah, what could be more geeky than starting an underground bare-knuckle boxing club?

      I don't get where you got the Tyler Durden thing. You make it sound like geeks are all part of some massive social club that can organize and turn society into anarchy. Those people that haul your trash, connect your calls, and drive your ambulances: most of 'em aren't geeks and your awesome coding skills ain't shit compared to what you depend on them for.

      'Don't fuck with us' my ass. Look how well the Anonymous war on Amazon, Ebay, ect. went. You don't just have a 'pretty bad programmer's ego,' you have a massively out of control ego.

      And tell that bitch who wanted to check her Facebook page to get a fucking iPhone or Android or something. She's just as out of touch as you are.

      I'm a geek and I was never picked last for kickball: those were always the fat kids.

      --
      "From the depths of my skeptical and rationalist soul, I ask the Lord to protect me from California touchie-feeliedom."
    10. Re:I like to think of myself like this... by Thing+1 · · Score: 1

      We are and always will be the last picked for kick ball

      Agreed, and then some: lacking vision in one eye, I was always the last picked for any depth-perception game (i.e., any game where you need to make out a ball against the sky). Now I don't invest much time into paying attention to those (warfare-simulation) games that caused me so much grief as a child.

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    11. Re:I like to think of myself like this... by CodeBuster · · Score: 1

      Since you are a web developer, I have an observation that I wish to share and receive your opinion on. Have you noticed that the people twittering away and constantly updating their Facebook profiles are almost invariably NOT developers, web developers or true IT geeks? I write ASP.NET, SQL, jQuery and C# code all day long and yet I don't even have a Facebook account. Personally I consider Facebook, Twitter and the like to be massive wastes of time. Why would anyone who devotes their life to serious technical pursuits stop and listen to the endless streams of worthless drivel spewing from the Facebook masses? Do they not realize that nobody cares about their beer bong pics (unless it's a potential employer who will now not be hiring them)? It's all a big case of garbage in garbage out if you ask me.

    12. Re:I like to think of myself like this... by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      One of the two features morally loose women

      I disagree with your definition of "moral".

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    13. Re:I like to think of myself like this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Life is too short to be serious all the time.

    14. Re:I like to think of myself like this... by HeckRuler · · Score: 1

      Look, the people you are after are the people you depend on. We move your e-mail, we delete your trash, we connect your websites, we write the drivers for your gadgets. We guard your data while you sleep. Do not... fuck with us.

    15. Re:I like to think of myself like this... by Stregano · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I program all over the board. I do pretty much everything from .Net to PHP to Java and multiple db things (also do front end stuff like jQuery/JS and so on). I made a FB account just so I can stay connected to my family and friends since I moved to a new state. I kept my real name on long enough for everybody to know it is me, then took all personal information off. I check it once a month now if even that. FB games suck. I have a good computer, if I want to play PC games, I will. As for connecting, yeah, not really. I made myself a blog page to share information with others and that is it

      --
      The world is how you make it
    16. Re:I like to think of myself like this... by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      Reminds me of when at a job a couple of years ago, a group of people started saying "oh, it's that Unix geek, it's so cool to have someone to cover our backs!" and stuff like that. Totally cool, of course... but then it turned into "if your a true unix geek, you'll know the monty python lines by heart" and they start spouting off something from one of those movies, and then pointing to me to continue it.
      I look at monty python as light humor, and that's about it. How many f'in times can you say "we are the knights who say ni" or spout off 30 minutes of silly speedy-british-accented movie quotes? And HOW does that mean I'm a true Unix geek?

      I watched documentaries and read the encyclopedia for fun as a teen. I put together circuits as a 7 year old child, and knew the inner workings of everything I touched by dissecting it. I learned Linux back when a shell was the most advanced way to get into it, and I accessed the internet in the early 90's through Minix by writing a dialer application to hit the local VMS system to use the interfact to hit gopher, to get to a veronica server, which hit another server with real shell access.

      HOW does monty python equate to ANY of that? GAH!!!!!

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
    17. Re:I like to think of myself like this... by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      PHP, Java, & C are all programming languages which are used by web developers.
      Mostly Java in today's world in enterprises, however.

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
    18. Re:I like to think of myself like this... by Stregano · · Score: 1

      I smell a troll, but it is cool, it is fun to feed them.

      Hmm, somebody who missed the point. I guess I can explain it. 99% of everything you do on the internet is done and controlled by geeks. This is not specifically going after hackers. You assume that is what I was referring to. Sir, you assumed wrong.

      You also skipped over some of the examples I had. Obviously from the example I gave with Jersey Shore and the intro maker and editor, what happens when you piss them off? Somebody who has been working with that show knows the ins and outs of editting the show together. Mess with them, and they will either leave, or F with your crappy show you love so much. Sure there are more options, but if they leave, you need to bring in another person that knows that show as good as the editor to ensure that everything goes smoothly.

      The web people are the ones behind the scenes, doing everything for you so that you can sit back and enjoy your stay (hence the reference).

      See, I do not know what you do for a living, but it is very apparent that you are either freelance, or not truly in the industry that much. You seem to have a high amount of lacking information about what the people behind the scenes truly do. For us people behind the scenes, it is not a simple click of a button to make everything run for people like you. Sorry, it is not that simple.

      You seem to be trying to distance yourself from what us web developers actually do. That is telling me that you either are not a web developer, or are an IT manager thinking he is part of an IT crew, but really just boss the people around thinking that your "iron fist" is the method to use. Sorry sir, but there is a reason why everybody acts nice to you, they don't want to get fired. They are secretly mad at you behind your back. Sorry, but the truth hurts.

      Also, you seem to be knew at the way the internet works, so let me be the first to say: Welcome to the Internet, where the IT manager has little to know say out here, and us "lackies" are the ones that program your user experience. Please enjoy your stay, and for technical issues, call 1-976-fuckoff

      --
      The world is how you make it
    19. Re:I like to think of myself like this... by Lanteran · · Score: 1

      Web development does not necessarily equal web page design. He could be doing back end server coding, which iirc is often done in java, which, unlike html/css, is a programming language.

      --
      "People don't want to learn linux" hasn't been a valid excuse since '03.
  18. Kids these days... by end15 · · Score: 1

    They think they're geeks just because they like Joss Whedon, or Happy Tree Friends... I remember when to be a real geek we had to bite the heads off chickens!!! pbft!

    --
    All glory to the Hypnotoad!
  19. lölölö i speak latin ^^ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    oh man, when i was 12, it was enough to build a pc, when i got 16, i was mainstream and could speak leet, now i am a trekkie and still, i am mainstream :D what the fuck?
    retro will always be cool, thus geeky stuff will never be outdated nor just pop.

  20. Geeks getting geeked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I will geek your geek up your geek with a geek that geeking geeks.

  21. geek != smart by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know plenty of people who self identify as geeks and aren't that smart...they do, however, seem to have an aversion to showers and moving out of their parents' place.

    Nerds are the smart ones.

    Nerdy geeks are the smart ones that have an aversion to showers and moving out of their parents' basements.

    1. Re:geek != smart by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where I'm from you've got it backwards. Geek does mean being smart whereas nerd just means being uncool.

  22. Wow! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    NOW i know this is really "News for Nerds" !!!!

    ahh c'mon... just bring back good old user tags for stories and some golden Redcode news and we're forgetting the rest of the decadent process you're at ;-)

  23. I was a geek back when it was underground! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Literally. Just ask my mom *Taps ceiling*

  24. Because We are Needed. by www.sorehands.com · · Score: 1

    It is not that being a geek or a nerd is cool. It is that we are needed now, more than ever.

    When I was in high school, my aunt told me that computers are just a passing fad and only rich people had them at home for toys. Now, when her connection is down, or she needs help with Word, she calls me.

    You get asked to help when something is broken, or which new computer/phone/tv to get, or which service to buy.

    Do you think if we were not so needed, we'd be so accepted today?

    1. Re:Because We are Needed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since your aunt is obviously a rich person with a computer at home, I'm sure you are handsomely rewarded for your services.

    2. Re:Because We are Needed. by NekSnappa · · Score: 2

      Oh get over yourself. Anyone who has a speciality gets asked questions, or for advice.

      That goes for plumbers, and electricians. As well as doctors, and lawyers.

      Just because you know about something that Aunt Edna doesn't, doesn't mean that you're the key to society.

      --
      I want to shoot the messenger!
    3. Re:Because We are Needed. by mikael_j · · Score: 1

      Oh get over yourself. Anyone who has a speciality gets asked questions, or for advice. That goes for plumbers, and electricians. As well as doctors, and lawyers.

      So, people expect their plumber friend to spend hours and hundreds of dollars in materials fixing their plumbing? Or for their electrician friend to rewire their home just because he's an electrician? Or their doctor friend to give out free CAT scans and hospital visits? Because that's the level of "advice" a lot of computer geeks are expected to offer. If it was just ten-fifteen minutes of advice that'd be one thing, but often it's ten-fifteen minutes of advice, another twenty minutes trying to explain the advice and then three hours just doing it for them because you gave up on trying to get them to click "Start".

      Do you think your MD friend would give out quick tips on how to deal with the symptoms of a cold if "drink lots of fluids" constantly resulted in you and others immediately trying to drink two gallons of drain cleaner?

      --
      Greylisting is to SMTP as NAT is to IPv4
    4. Re:Because We are Needed. by NekSnappa · · Score: 1

      If it was just ten-fifteen minutes of advice that'd be one thing, but often it's ten-fifteen minutes of advice, another twenty minutes trying to explain the advice and then three hours just doing it for them because you gave up on trying to get them to click "Start".

      So you're equating a little over 3.5 hours of your time with rewiring a house, lying out hundreds of dollars in plumbing supplies, or a hospital visit with CAT scans? That's a bit much don't you think.

      My ex-wife worked in the medical field, and I've seen Dr.s held at bay at social functions for at least an hour at a time by people wanting a free consultation. I'm pretty sure that their time is at least as valuable as yours.

      Now if your friends and relatives expect you to spend hundreds of dollars to solve their gadget/IT problems. Then the problem isn't the strain on your precious time. It's that you need to disown your family and find new friends.

      --
      I want to shoot the messenger!
    5. Re:Because We are Needed. by mikael_j · · Score: 1

      The problem with the "a little over 3.5 hours of your time" is that it's not just once that this happens. And a lot of people who ask for help seem to think that I (and other geeks) should be thankful for the chance to revive their aging desktop.

      With most other fields, from what I've seen at least, there's an expectation of quid pro quo. If your electrician friend helps you with your wiring then you help him with something else (or pay him under the table).

      As for equipment costs, if your friends know you have a lot of computer and electronics gear lying about at home then they seem to assume that you'll have a free spare DVD-ROM drive or power supply for them. After all, you have so much of it.

      Also, I don't think I've ever seen/heard anyone I know in medical professions get similar treatments as the one you describe, the closest I've seen has been when they themselves decide to start talking about their jobs at parties.

      --
      Greylisting is to SMTP as NAT is to IPv4
    6. Re:Because We are Needed. by mcmonkey · · Score: 1

      What if plumbing was as reliable as the average home computer? I get virus definition updates from my doctor at most once a year, yet my computer's anti-virus software updates daily.

      Maybe the tech geeks who help out family and friends spend so much time on it because, rather than an issue of demanding acquaintances, the help being given just isn't that helpful.

      I used to be a bitter geek like so many folks here. Then I realized, when I bought my first house I got help from family who work in Real Estate. I get advice from family who work in the financial industry. I get help from CPAs and lawyers and all sorts of folks who know stuff I don't know.

      It turns out, I also know stuff those people don't know. That does not make me a precious snowflake.

      Get over yourself. You're not that important to the world.

    7. Re:Because We are Needed. by mikael_j · · Score: 1

      What if plumbing was as reliable as the average home computer? I get virus definition updates from my doctor at most once a year, yet my computer's anti-virus software updates daily.

      Well, that's not really my fault now, is it?

      Maybe the tech geeks who help out family and friends spend so much time on it because, rather than an issue of demanding acquaintances, the help being given just isn't that helpful.

      Oh, I should've mentioned that I've stopped giving friends and family tech help with the excuse that I mostly do server-side software development (thus implying that I have no idea how desktop computers work, I'm amazed it works on most people).

      I used to be a bitter geek like so many folks here. Then I realized, when I bought my first house I got help from family who work in Real Estate. I get advice from family who work in the financial industry. I get help from CPAs and lawyers and all sorts of folks who know stuff I don't know.

      I'm not bitter. If you weren't implying I was then perhaps you should've answered another post?

      Also, I've never had any need to get "pro" help from friends and family with the exception of my father on a couple of occasions but even then it's either been "help me lift this" or "so do you think it makes sense to weld this part to this other part?", not exactly hours of his time...

      It turns out, I also know stuff those people don't know. That does not make me a precious snowflake. Get over yourself. You're not that important to the world.

      Speaking of bitter, you sound like a teenager who just read/watched Fight Club for the first time...

      --
      Greylisting is to SMTP as NAT is to IPv4
  25. geek culture by buddyglass · · Score: 1

    Ostensibly I'm a member of this culture, albeit a fringe one. I'm a software developer. I have a math degree. I'm an introvert. I read sci-fi and fantasy literature, but not exclusively. I build my own computers. I frequently don't shave, and I'm not especially fashionable (though not especially unfashionable either). I don't play many graphical computer games, but, unbelievably, I still play a text-based MUD. That said, I find that those who really "embrace" and identify with "geek culture" get on my nerves to a phenomenal degree. Folks who go to ComicCon. Folks who answer "yes" when asked "Are you a 'gamer'?" People who look so stereotypically "nerdy" one wonders if it's intentional. The guy who incessantly quotes Monty Python (or some other geek cult film, e.g. Princess Bride, Firefly, etc.) because he thinks it's funny every dang time. Basically there's a lot of overlap between my interests and those of many "geeks", but I despise "geek culture".

    Am I the only one?

    1. Re:geek culture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yoda spoke of another.

    2. Re:geek culture by justaguylikeme · · Score: 1

      Hear, hear! Exactly spot on!

    3. Re:geek culture by Danny+Rathjens · · Score: 1

      Sounds like you are a hacker - in the old sense of the word we gave up defending on /. :)
      Check out the portrait of J Random hacker:
      http://www.catb.org/jargon/html/appendixb.html
      The entry on geek makes an interesting observation on the distinction between hacker and geek:
      http://www.catb.org/jargon/html/G/geek.html

      This fits in with the distinction the original story seems to be about - separating watered-down pop geek culture from geek culture.

    4. Re:geek culture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are not alone. A lot of people seem to think that what you're good at somehow determines what sort of person you are socially. I've never met anyone who said "Those HVAC specialists, they're all the same," or "Those locksmiths, they're all the same..."

      A lot of people who fit a certain social mold seem to gravitate toward geeky pursuits, but that's A implying B, not B implying A (even if it were true, which I'm not convinced of).

      I've been spoken to like I was some kind of poseur or an idiot, and ridiculed by some Gothic looking dude at Defcon. Imagine the look on his face when I excused myself to take the stage and give my presentation.

    5. Re:geek culture by Jimmy+King · · Score: 1

      While the hacker one describes me nearly perfectly, aside from the hatred of smurfs, it would be interesting to see if you could show the same descriptions with the words hacker and geek removed and see how many other "normal" people think it fits them very closely, too.

    6. Re:geek culture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope, agreed. Except for the fantasy "literature". Only nerds read those.

  26. Nothing to see here, move along. by msauve · · Score: 1

    Alert, "Goth" is nothing like gothic, "punk" isn't a bunch of punks who got together, and "Nerds" is a candy.

    --
    "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
  27. While geek culture may never die.... by Lord_of_the_nerf · · Score: 1

    .....studio executives, Uwe Boll, marketing, EA, hipsters, Comic Con and it's army of bored but attractive spokesmodels are taking it's retainer and giving it a fierce kicking.

    Maybe - just maybe - it will graduate and end up employing all these douchebags as Janitors.

  28. phew, I'm safe by cinderellamanson · · Score: 0

    My D&D collection sits next to a few selected readings from isaac asimov, so there it is - I am NOT a geek.

    --
    Hey buddy, can i bum a karma? ~}CinderellaManson{~
  29. Nerd Vs Geek by markass530 · · Score: 1

    because labels are oh so important, and vital to life, I've always put forth that nerds are into computers, anything tech, education of all sorts, math, science etc. whereas geeks are into D&D, star trek, Monty Python, etc. obviously a lot of people are both, to varying degrees. Personally im about 95% nerd, 5% geek. Welcome any input on this hypothesis.

    1. Re:Nerd Vs Geek by SpeZek · · Score: 1

      What about dorks?

    2. Re:Nerd Vs Geek by mhotchin · · Score: 1

      I thought it had to do with self-awareness.

      A geek doesn't particularly *care* what people think of him/her.

      A nerd is *unaware* of what people think of him/her.

      Discuss!

    3. Re:Nerd Vs Geek by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nerds are smart. Geeks are strange. Hence their origins (wiki "Geek shows").

    4. Re:Nerd Vs Geek by Ash-Fox · · Score: 1

      What about dorks?

      They have whale women to satisfy, not time for socializing.

      --
      Change is certain; progress is not obligatory.
    5. Re:Nerd Vs Geek by markass530 · · Score: 1

      I would say a dork is 100% of both, for better and worse.

    6. Re:Nerd Vs Geek by markass530 · · Score: 1

      nah, cuz in Revenge of the nerds, they knew what the deal was. Maybe use Dork (as someone else wondered where they fit in) as the Unaware?

    7. Re:Nerd Vs Geek by kootsoop · · Score: 1
      --
      "Engineering is the art of making what you want from things you can get" - Jerry Avins
    8. Re:Nerd Vs Geek by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong. Sorry but the biggest difference between a geek and nerd has always been social cluelessness. Geeks have their own social circles and nerds are those stereotypical poindexters.

      Read this
      http://www.greatwhitesnark.com/2010/03/25/difference-between-nerd-dork-and-geek-explained-in-a-venn-diagram/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+greatwhitesnark%2Fyqzr+%28Great+White+Snark%29

    9. Re:Nerd Vs Geek by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So the man who has 'memorised Holy Grail really well' and can 'recite it now and have you ROTFLOL' or is 'fluent in javascript as well as Klingon' should be called 'White and Geeky'?

    10. Re:Nerd Vs Geek by mywhitewolf · · Score: 1

      by that definition I'd be about 80% nerd (engineering ftw), 5% geek, 5% jock, 10% heart throb. I'm just awesome though.

    11. Re:Nerd Vs Geek by gblackwo · · Score: 1

      have you not seen the venn diagram for geeks?

    12. Re:Nerd Vs Geek by markass530 · · Score: 1

      good stuff thanks for the reference,

    13. Re:Nerd Vs Geek by markass530 · · Score: 1

      from a comment below that thing, gotta agree with it hmm, I disagree. First, I think there should be no dweeb. a Dork is merely social ineptitude. There is no obsession. It should just be: Dork – Social ineptitude Nerd – Intelligence Geek – obsession Of course, with this info a Venn diagrom doesn’t work, and Venn diagrams are really cool right now

    14. Re:Nerd Vs Geek by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interesting. My understanding was that it was almost the opposite way round.

      Like "revenge of the nerds", "comic book guy", "D&D" kind of nerds are the kind of guys I don't want to be, and "computer geeks" are the kind of guys everyone turns to to solve their problems and teach them tech stuff, and employers want me for because I know my shit - techo-wise.

      Nerds in the sense of "Lisa Simpson" because she likes Science and Math certainly is a meaning of nerd, though I don't put it in the same category because it is a label put on people by those who are jealous or dumb, rather than describing anything real about someone.

      A D&D playing comic book devouring 30 year old nerd might have no clue academically, as compared to Dr Brian Cox, the "rock star" particle physicist who is a dude from my point of view a geek, but no way in the world a nerd.

  30. Ya know what used to be great about geek culture? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    What used to be great about geeks in general, really, was that they didn't really get into this am-I-or-am-I-not bullpocky. Who cares where the culture lives? There are more and better geek outlets out there than ever. Enjoy the damn moment.

  31. Re:Oh, gee, here I thought geeks were uber awesome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Indeed, we Slashdot geeks do enjoy sucking our own dicks.

  32. HIPSTERS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Face it. We're all hipsters. We enjoy being geeks because it isn't cool and we have our own (intelligent 'inside' jokes). It's what makes us Geeks. Well that and suspenders and glasses and pocket protectors....

  33. Labeling is the problem. by schnikies79 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Be yourself and stop with the labels. I build computers and I code in my spare time, I have a degree in chemistry and love science. I don't like anime, comic books, sci-fi, fantasty and have never played D&D. I played sports in high school.

    Am I a geek? No. Am I a jock? No. I'm me. Fuck off with the labels.

    --
    Gone!
    1. Re:Labeling is the problem. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dumb jock

    2. Re:Labeling is the problem. by michaelbirks · · Score: 1

      There are ~7x10^9 individuals on the planet. It makes things a whole lot simpler, computationally, if we're allowed to categorise them. Sure, there are outliers who don't fit the categorisations, but pfft, it's easier to code for a limited number of exceptions than be forced to hold the whole population-space in memory.

    3. Re:Labeling is the problem. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wish I had mod points. Anyway, it seems labeling is an integral part of our culture. If I label the other person a "geek", a "socialist", a "neoconservative" then I don't actually have to understand what she was really trying to say. It saves time...

    4. Re:Labeling is the problem. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This reminds me of the "I am Canadian" rant that Molson (beer company) used in their adds for a while.

      You can easily find it on YouTube, including spoofs.

      David

    5. Re:Labeling is the problem. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You may dislike it, but if you code in your spare time, I'd label you a "computer geek". The problem, I think, is the mainstream assumption that geeks, of any type, must also be interested in anime, comic books, sci-fi, etc.

    6. Re:Labeling is the problem. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Technically, that makes you a wannabe jock.

    7. Re:Labeling is the problem. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Best comment ever.

    8. Re:Labeling is the problem. by g4b · · Score: 1

      you are a geek who always wanted a girl I suppose. ;)

    9. Re:Labeling is the problem. by Funky+Weasel · · Score: 2

      I label you 'unique', just like the rest of us.

  34. Re:Oh, gee, here I thought geeks were uber awesome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cool. Me too!

  35. What culture? by justaguylikeme · · Score: 1

    I think the whole premise is wrong. True "geeks" aren't doing the things they do because they're trying to be in a specific culture or a niche. I think that generally the type of people who are generally considered to be geeky (myself included) happen to have similar interests and views on life. I haven't ever tried to seek out a culture, per se. Rather, the things that I happen to enjoy (computers, trivia, meticulous detail to esoteric things) tend to lead me to things that are considered geeky. As long as people continue to have a drive to do or participate in those kinds of things, there will always be a culture (whether it be mainstream or a subculture) of geekdom. This, though, like any other culture can still have poseurs. And, just like anyone trying to fit into a given role without feeling truly a part of the heart of it, those are the people who will try to overanalyze the ebb and flow of the culture's status vs. the mainstream.

  36. Re:Oh, gee, here I thought geeks were uber awesome by somersault · · Score: 2

    Yeah I don't care that much, but it's funny when people first say I'm not a geek, then eventually realise I am. Also it was funny to hear a girl recently say she wants a friend just like Sheldon from TBBT. I (and a lot of active /.ers) am a toned down versions of Sheldon, but she obviously wasn't that interested in me. In real life, know-it-all geeks are shunned, so anyone who acts like Sheldon is not accepted into society with open arms, even by those who love TBBT. Most people are too dumb to even know what he's saying apart from when he acts like a baby. Hell, I don't even get some of TBBT (the jokes around string theory - not really read much on it).

    --
    which is totally what she said
  37. I earned the title, thank you. by Lord_of_the_nerf · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I didn't slog through a future ruled by mutant-hating Sentinels, storm the beaches of Klendathu and brave the Three Terrors of the Fire Swamp so that some kid could pick up Halo and call himself a geek.

    When my party came back from the Temple of Elemental Evil, they spat on me.

    1. Re:I earned the title, thank you. by styrotech · · Score: 1

      ... and brave the Three Terrors of the Fire Swamp ...

      At first glance I thought you wrote the Three Tenors of the Fire Swamp, and was trying to figure out if that was a reference to some new initiation test for downloading Opera.

  38. Do not want by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I purposely avoid the kinds of things that will get me pigeonholed as a geek. I know of, and care for, very little about the pop culture driven side of geek. Comic books, sci-fi films, anime and the kinds of crap that end up on G4 not only bore me to death but also, IMHO, give geeks a bad name.

    I also do as much as I can to avoid those who embrace that side of geek culture. I think if you have to stand on your mountain top and scream that you're a geek then you've got issues. Either you're as dumb as a bag of hammers or your as needy as a 4 year old child. The dumb ones really think they are smart. They think they're geniuses, in fact. Tedious to deal with and they're slow to learn when you try to be good enough to correct them on a false assumption. Once they gain your friendship they'll use you as a crutch to support their weak ideas among peers and it comes back to make you look like an idiot.

    Thanks, but no thanks.

  39. Chicken heads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The community at large will just never accept that biting the heads off chickens at the circus is acceptable behavior.

  40. What is it that makes something geeky? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What makes something geeky?

    Is it paying too much attention to minute details? One of the characters on Jersey Shore spends 25 minutes doing his hair. That's not perceived as geeky. Spending 25 minutes tweaking your gdm.conf is.

    Is it doing something that's not in the mainstream? Raving wasn't considered mainstream, but it also wasn't considered geeky. Model shipbuilding? Not in the mainstream, but geeky.

    Is it doing something with a technological focus? Like the article points to, messing with a computer is no longer geeky, but messing with a TI calculator is.

    So far, the only conclusion I can draw about what makes something geeky is that it's taking part in an activity that doesn't have getting laid as a main focus or as a pleasant side effect. I'd like to find an example of something that is considered geeky but also involves potentially seeing some action.

  41. Co-opted is the perfect term by dave562 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Pop culture has co-opted nearly everything worth while from geek culture and moved on. That is what pop culture does once a sub-culture achieves critical mass. In my life time it has happened twice. The first was with raves/electronica/underground dance music. The second was with computers/internet/geeks. In both cases the sub-cultures went from being isolated, to being referenced in 'popular' ways (techno music in commercials, "rave" fashion on television, companies deciding employees need email, grandma wanting to be on AOL).

    The acceptance of computers in popular culture was the biggest change. For raves, even when they were "big" it was still very much a sub-culture. There are only so many people who are ever going to get into heavy bass and recreational drug use. On the other hand computers have leapt from the point where "nobody" (from a pop-culture perspective) wanted to use them, to the point where "everybody" has at least one. Of those who have computers, only a small percentage actually care how they work. The rest just have them because they need one to function in society. That is the co-opting that took place.

    In a more subtle way, society's perspective of IT has shifted. In the late 1990s and early 21st century (before the tech bubble exploded), I used to get recognition from strangers for being in IT. It was one of those jobs where people didn't know much about it, but it sounded cutting edge and cool. Society knew they needed to know how to use computers, so being out ahead of the curve was an advantage. Now IT people are just the work place bitches, a rung or two above the mailroom guys (unless you work for a technology company).

    1. Re:Co-opted is the perfect term by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 1
      There are only so many people who are ever going to get into heavy bass and recreational drug use.

      You're right about the first part at least - I'm a bass player and I can't get into bass as heavy as a synth can put out in the "really LF" range (just doesn't sound or feel "musical" to me).

      As far as recreational drug use - well, I haven't found many people who are really "straight-edge" (as they used to call them in the punk era) outside the Christian fundie communities. It's just that the drugs they use change due to accessibility and acceptability once they get on in years and the friends who supply them get out of the business.

      Now IT people are just the work place bitches, a rung or two above the mailroom guys (unless you work for a technology company).

      Well, at least the non-parenthetical part is true. For the parenthetical part, it all depends which technology company you work for.

      --
      That is all.
  42. Not trying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We don't spend conscious effort on the task of being different or on the edge. We just do what we like.

    THEY can try to imitate us. But they will never really be like us, because they are beneath us. Since 'pop' culture is just an aggregate of what "they" value, it logically follows that there will always be a rift between pop and geek culture.

    So there you have it.

  43. Re:Oh, gee, here I thought geeks were uber awesome by monkyyy · · Score: 1

    howd u get so flexible?

    --
    warning pointless sig
  44. Yes, it's called getting old by Joe+Tie. · · Score: 1

    I love Patton, but he seems to just be having trouble with getting old. If you did a good job with your little subculture when you were young, it winds up bleeding into the mainstream. And, while it's sad, it's just the nature of things that your brain isn't going to be able to keep up with what that subculture you were in has evolved into. Even if it could, you couldn't because you'd be busy raising kids. And if you didn't have kids, then you couldn't because all your friends do and as a result are going to be stagnant. And you can't hang out with the youth, because then you're creepy old dude hanging out with kids. It's just how our species and culture works, no mystery there.

    --
    Everything will be taken away from you.
  45. Re:Oh, gee, here I thought geeks were uber awesome by kubernet3s · · Score: 2

    Well, society has always had a love affair with people who "no one thinks are cool." I'd be suspicious of the claim that the popularity of geek culture as an idea hasn't risen in the last few years. (The ghastly term "geek chic" is evidence enough of this) Of course, no one wants to actually PARTICIPATE in geek culture, they just like the idea. The younger ones among us might recall the fad among high-school girls in the early 00's to claim to like "geeky guys" or "nerds" which usually didn't mean actual geeks but guys with unkempt hair, box glasses, and keds. I absolutely agree that no one thinks actual geeks are cool, but people are certainly enamored of the "Hollywood geek;" the attractive, non-threatening intellectual with habits that derive coolness from hipsteresque retro-fetishism (Star Trek, Silver Age comics, 80's video games).

    Your furry example has one problem: not even furries are ignorant of the fact that everyone hates furries.

    But yeah, people use "geek" as a put down in movies, but people also use "punk" as a put down, and we all know what kind of high school THAT linguistic arc resulted in. Pretty much every teen movie from the eighties onward has a geek or other outcast as its protagonist. People like to think they like geeks because they like to think they have the specialness that comes from being, or being attracted to, social misfits or outcasts. Go to any college campus and you will find hundreds of intellectual loners: no matter how mainstream your interests, no matter how many friends you have, you can talk yourself into thinking you're totally weird and geeky and into stuff that NO ONE LIKES EVER.

    I think that this attitude has been easier to conflate with "geekdom" because geeky pastimes have become socialized. Now, you can do something "nerdy" (which makes you weird and special) without having to deal with any of the social consequences of being weird and special! Most people who own an iPhone or Android phone are not developers, nor do they use these gadgets to pursue technological hobbies, but I have heard many of these people declare what a geek they are because of the time they spend modding or fiddling with said device (which they use to talk to their many friends and coordinate their non-geek interests). Video games, which used to be the province of the unathletic shut in, are increasingly being played by fratboy types, which is why the protagonist of many modern games is some variant of Dickballs McMeathead and his Elite Testicle Squad. But again: playing video games is something weird and special, even though you can now do it with all your friends. While before, being a geek (and hence, SPECIAL!) meant spending lots of time reading books or staring at a computer or other lame, unpopular activities, now we can just engage in a few, safe geeky activities. We aren't GEEKS, of course, just like Sum 41 fans were never punks, but we get to pretend and be part of a secret club for as long as we want to, without having to pay the price of admission.

  46. Gaussian? by alexandre · · Score: 1

    The author could have saved himself a lot of talk by just saying:

    There will always be a 1-2% on either side of a gaussian curve. :P

    1. Re:Gaussian? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I would not want to grow up in these times, however... there's still an undercurrent that is ugly, and could destroy you quickly."

      I'm pretty sure kids have always been shitty to each other. I'm pretty sure that won't change any time soon. I don't understand why supervisors tolerate it. It doesn't build character, it erodes it, unless the child is allowed to actually *do* something about it and comes out on top. But of course that's against the rules.

  47. Mainstream? So what? by SilkBD · · Score: 1

    I pose this response: Who gives a crap?

    I'm a geek, i'm a programmer who loves sci-fi, quantum physics, learning as much about everything as possible (especially anything related to science), I was there when l33t speak was invented by my geek "friends".... and, godamnit, I love Tron.

    And once again, I ask, who gives a crap. What I like is not influenced by what the mainstream like other than the fact that usually the mainstream destroys the integrity of what I used to like...

    I'm a geek and i always will be until I upload my consciousness to the internet hive brain and merge with the source.

    --
    00101010
  48. Re:Oh, gee, here I thought geeks were uber awesome by Gilmoure · · Score: 2

    I gave up on the idea I'd ever be cool shortly after high school. I totally dropped off the radar and moved cross country. Figured in a new town where no one knew me, i could renvent myself Turns out, whoever you go, there you are. A geek born, a geek I'll be until I die.

    --
    I drank what? -- Socrates
  49. Popular culture? by BumpyCarrot · · Score: 1

    Quite frankly, fuck that noise. Have you seen some of the garbage the everyman buys into? Better to be a mutant strain (that isn't even that strange anymore). Seeing otherwise normal people brain-deadened by cheap psychology in staff training, purely because they're dialed in to the mainstream, is sickening. Didn't RTFA.

    --
    Do you see what I did there?
  50. Being popular != Being a geek by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think whats makes a geek a geek is the ability to enjoy things that most people don't because we are smarter, we can distinguish the mainstream crap from things that are really special, which is a really cool thing, like when you look at pictures from the Hubble Telescope, anyway... Bad thing is... that alienates us from the rest( which is the vast majority ). And that sucks, you still have human needs... I have friends over 25 years old that have never kissed a girl much less had sex. That's why I don't like shows like the "Big Bang Theory", where they portrait situations like this... like it's fun stuff, when it's actually quite sad and painful for some.

    1. Re:Being popular != Being a geek by ElusiveJoe · · Score: 1

      like it's fun stuff, when it's actually quite sad and painful for some.

      I believe, the sarcastic humiliation is is a distinctive feature of the British-American humor.

  51. Geek Culture isn't all that popular by grumling · · Score: 1

    When the number of Ham Radio operators exceed the number of cell phone users, I'll consider geek culture mainstream.

    When there are more modified plug in Priuses than unmod'ed, I'll consider geek culture mainstream.

    When there are more people using Slashdot than Facebook, I'll consider geek culture mainstream.

    When the Science Channel has higher ratings than the Superbowl, I'll consider geek culture mainstream.

    --
    "Well, good luck finding a judge that doesn't run a bestiality site."
  52. Re: Desktop linux by presidenteloco · · Score: 0

    Wait a minute,
    I thought the reason that Linux UI has been kept so craptastically over-complicated was to maintain the exclusivity of the geek culture club that can handle it.

    "Of course we could give this a decent UI, you know, we know how to uh huh, but uh what would be the point of that?"

    --

    Where are we going and why are we in a handbasket?
  53. This is pretty much by definition. by node+3 · · Score: 1

    Geek culture can't really die or be popular, because what makes geeks will never go away, nor will it become the norm (unless evolution takes over here, or perhaps there's a monumental societal shift). What makes geeks is a confluence of intelligence, inquisitiveness, and an affinity for certain topics. Not many people will have these traits, but some always will.

    People aren't going to care about things like Open Source software for the same reasons geeks do, for example. Whenever OSS has become popular, it's always been for non-geek centric reasons. So as non-geeks take up technology that was the purview of geeks just a few years ago, they aren't becoming geeks themselves. The technology is adapting to the non-geek, not the other way around.

    Geeks are outliers, pretty much by definition.

  54. Pop Culture? by scarboni888 · · Score: 1

    There's nothing 'popular' about thinking for yourself and deciding what it all means to you through a continual process of constant re-evaluation of never-ending and willful learning as opposed to internalization and regurgitation of some commonly accepted societal values and meanings that only have some vague temporal relevance within your local time-space.

    Actually - scrap that - seems to me there's nothing 'popular' about thinking. Full stop.

    And that's why it will never be pop culture.

  55. Tough to even define a single 'geek culture' by Rubinstien · · Score: 1

    I would have a horrible time even defining a single 'geek culture'. Most of the list in the summary I have nothing to do with and no interest in. I don't fit many of the other generalities either (I bathe every day, have sex with my wife often, and have never lived in my parent's basement, and I don't like asian food). But I have no doubt that the label 'geek' fits me. I do my own thing and don't care about fitting into any particular niche -- geek, pop, or otherwise. Honestly, I think this defines a geek more than most anything else -- an individualist. If that is so, it should follow that the culture of individualists will never become 'popular culture', almost by definition.

    1. Re:Tough to even define a single 'geek culture' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree somewhat. I don't do half the things on that list either. I never identified myself as a geek, other people did that for me and I just came to accept it. But I wouldn't go so far as call it "individualist." Because being an individualist isn't exclusive with being a geek. I think "introverted" is a better word. In my experience, extroverted geeks tend to be called "nerds" or "dweebs," which are considered more derogatory because unlike the geek, they don't understand that no one cares.

      I used to work at a video game store and there was this guy who would always try to push his favorite games on to everybody. A group of guys would come in smelling like pot to buy GTA and he'd tell them how awesome Final Fantasy was. He was much more social than I was but customers preferred dealing with me because I only talked about what they were interested in, not what I was interested in. All too often I'd hear, "Thank God you're here, I was afraid that dweeb/nerd who never shuts up would be working."

      Most people don't mind geeks because they keep to themselves. People hate nerds b/c they evangelize their strange hobbies and bore the shit out of people in the process. Two geeks will discuss a topic of interest for hours with indoor voices. Two nerds will raise their voices to annoyingly loud levels, laugh at each others' dumb jokes nonstop, and gesticulate wildly and constantly cut each other off.

      This etymological examination makes me think that Slashdot should change its motto to "News for Geeks, Stuff that Matters."

    2. Re:Tough to even define a single 'geek culture' by Rubinstien · · Score: 1

      I had not thought of that distinction before, but your observation seems about right. Interesting. Thanks, AC.

  56. You are very much right on the dot there... by denzacar · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The whole "This is geek, but that is not..." or "Nerd is that, that and that but certainly not THAT" results from all those being labels imposed by others.
    Geek, nerd, dork, four-eyes... those were all insults thrown at those who were... well... different.

    Those who were "barking" them didn't bother to clearly define them no more than they would define how exactly to accommodate the suggestion to "go fuck yourself". I mean, couple of ideas do come to mind, but is that really what they were suggesting? And where would I get that much strawberry jello?

    It was a fucking insult. With time it got turned into a badge of distinction. Even honor to some.
    There was no "7th council of nerd, geeks, dorks and other rejects". No rules were defined.
    Whoever wants to define themselves as any of those labels is fine by me - as long as they don't expect of me to like everything else they like because we share one or two points of mutual preference.

    And as long as we are listing preferences - I to build and fix computers (and other stuff) and love science. Any preference I had for chemistry was killed by my high-school teacher.
    Never was any good at sports. I like some anime (mostly on the SF side), some comic books (actually, I prefer some comic books writers), most sci-fi, some fantasy and I too haven't ever played D&D (no local players).

    Does all that make me more or less of a nerd than you? Don't know, don't really care.
    But I do have a lower Slashdot ID. And more importantly, mine is prettier.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    1. Re:You are very much right on the dot there... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The whole "This is geek, but that is not..." or "Nerd is that, that and that but certainly not THAT" results from all those being labels imposed by others...It was a fucking insult. With time it got turned into a badge of distinction. Even honor to some. There was no "7th council of nerd, geeks, dorks and other rejects". No rules were defined.

      You're right, but it also has a taint of something not quite so noble. The people who started the whole, "I'm a geek, but certainly not a nerd" or whatever other distinctions where the ones who were insulted by others with those terms, but decided to turn the insult around to a badge of honor while reserving the right to keep using the insult against others. "Clearly I'm not like THAT guy, I don't use pocket protectors."

  57. Sell their /. account by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of those of u who blah blah blah dont need to be sterotyped to feel good being a nerd, would you give up your sub 10000 /. account number if you have/had one?

    I for one wouldn't and have tried to find some1 selling their /. account on ebay. And is wanting a sub 10000 /. account any worse than insisting on keeping one?

  58. You could have fooled me. by westlake · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Not to sound elitist, but the dumb bimbo bitches I see in lecture hall chatting on Facebook are not geeks. They are still dumb bimbo bitches, just with a Web 2.0 platform to spew their idiocy.

    Misogynist

    3. An adjective describing a person who takes a dislike to females. Usually losers. Pokes at them, makes derogatory remarks about them, and really don't connect to females on a mental level. Misogynist

    1. Re:You could have fooled me. by Totenglocke · · Score: 2

      He did not make a derogatory comments toward females. He made derogatory comments towards stupid females, who are a subset of females. This is no different than him making a comment about stupid people in general. It's quite worrying that you're not only unable to understand this (hence why he said "dumb bimbo bitch"), but that you were actually modded up for your asinine comment.

      --
      "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." ~Thomas Jefferson
    2. Re:You could have fooled me. by disambiguated · · Score: 1

      Nope. He made derogatory comments about women specifically, not about people in general; There is an obvious and consequential difference. The word 'bimbo' is misogynous in itself, as is 'bitch'.

    3. Re:You could have fooled me. by Totenglocke · · Score: 1

      Wow, you really have no real life experience, do you? He was addressing a specific sub-group of girls - a group that are both stupid AND have bad personalities (hence "bimbo" and "bitch"). Would you be crying if he had been talking about men and said "Neanderthal" and "asshole"? No, you wouldn't and you'be well aware of the specific sub-group that he was referring to. There is nothing misogynistic about words to describe a persons mental ability or behavior towards others.

      --
      "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." ~Thomas Jefferson
    4. Re:You could have fooled me. by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      There is nothing misogynistic about words to describe a persons mental ability or behavior towards others.

      Of course there is, you retarded cunt.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  59. natural selection? by zlel · · Score: 1

    Going by this argument, the crucial key to popularizing geek culture would be getting geeks to reproduce, which may pose a slight difficulty...

  60. Doesn't work by RazorSharp · · Score: 1

    These articles are so dumb. Something like geek culture can't be clearly made sense of in an essay. Non-fiction is a horrible medium for explaining social phenomenon, just look at sociology, the saddest excuse for a 'science' in academia. A documentary might work, but essay. . .probably not. Because an essay seeks to be conclusive and there's not much conclusive about social behavior. It's always tendencies and trends. People are individuals, so describing group behavior is a fool's errand because there will always be those who buck the trends.

    Read a work of fiction written by a geek about geeky characters. Or just go out in the real world and meet some geeks (or just visit Slashdot). Those are much better ways to understand "geek culture" than measuring the Spider-Man movies' success.

    My take (which is just as horribly flawed as the article): Pop culture is dead. Who's the biggest rock star in the world right now? Mick Jagger by ticket sales, Lil Wayne by album sales; but neither, really. There's no longer a single sensation the majority of Americans follow. Ever since the late 90s, there hasn't been a music style or movie genre or philosophy to define the current generation. The internet has given people access to explore their own interests with an endless amount of possibilities.

    Geek isn't a term you can objectively define. In an upscale neighborhood the kid that programs is a geek. In a rough neighborhood the kid that plays too many video games is a geek. I guess the closest definition I could make would be 'a social outcast who becomes absorbed in uncommon hobbies.' So, pretty much it's just a term for introverts.

    --
    "From the depths of my skeptical and rationalist soul, I ask the Lord to protect me from California touchie-feeliedom."
  61. before edison by oliverthered · · Score: 1

    geek culture was pop culture, it was pretty much the done way of doing things to be a geek, or worker etc....
    But slowly but surly, advertising and consumerism has taken over and geeks are now called autistic.

    --
    thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    1. Re:before edison by Thing+1 · · Score: 1

      OT: Your signature does not parse. Is it supposed to be "and NT and an"?

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    2. Re:before edison by oliverthered · · Score: 1

      it's to catch NAZIs of the grammatical kind telling me what reality should be.

      'Democracy is a Psychopath, a Neuro Typical and an Autistic choosing reality. Liberty is Savant.'

      Schitzophrenics choose which bits of other peoples realities make them insane.

      --
      thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    3. Re:before edison by oliverthered · · Score: 1

      choose is a comment on free-will. The counter to the NAZI grammar spell checker is that I'm exercising my none-existent free will.

      --
      thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    4. Re:before edison by oliverthered · · Score: 1

      your sig,
      Science is the belief that repeatable observations are a better approximation of reality than a stab in the dark.
      Religion is an attempt at social conditioning or revolution based on an easily manipulated form of poetry.

      If you lookup Hindu vs Buddhism, then apply something similar to Judaism vs Christianity (Christianity coming about not long after Buddhism) [that's in terms of Maya, deity/God, the soul and such]. e.g. God is within you. God is innocents, the innocent beast the lamb. the forked tongue of the reptile of good and evil, truth and lie the manipulator. Before that it was good so it says and in god image.

      And look at things like Jewish money vs let no man buy or sell least he have the mark of the beast.

      --
      thank God the internet isn't a human right.
  62. bah humbug! by ncmathsadist · · Score: 1

    Bah humbug! Geekdom may or may not pay attention to popular culture. Many of us geeks are totally indifferent and ignore this flatulent blast of stupidity. What is popular "culture" anyway? Tits wiggling on a video screen?? Stuff and nonsense.

  63. Go digital by Elary · · Score: 1

    So, it means we must have some value after all, imaginary at least...

  64. Geek Culture? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought I was just playing D&D and fiddling with computers because I liked things like D&D and computers. I didn't know there was a culture to uphold.

  65. Re: Desktop linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ubuntu is pretty simple to use, and kubuntu with kde has all the pretty graphics you could ever want.

  66. Re:Hipsters, Not Geeks by dragonturtle69 · · Score: 1

    There is a definite difference between the geek, one who digs into the minutiae just for the fun of it, and technology users.

    Society is made better due to more communication, even if it is just chat. But being able to post on FB, even on /. using tags, is not geeky.

    --
    "What luck for the rulers that men do not think." - Adolph Hitler
  67. Alan Moore is an overrated..... by scurvyj · · Score: 0

    .....porn writer. Oh! I must not be a geek after all! YEEEEHAAAAA!!!!!

  68. Re:Oh, gee, here I thought geeks were uber awesome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cute geek chicks completly rock the casbah.

  69. WTF? by bronney · · Score: 1

    What makes anyone think the geeks want to be a part of the filthy pop culture. Argh.

  70. Will never die... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gee culture, we never die, we just multiply.

    And integrate...et al.

  71. Awww, somebody having an identity crisis? by Eightbitgnosis · · Score: 1

    The title of geek does not belong just to those who "loves comics, imports video games, and can build their own computers" and play DnD. Let's grow up; it's not 1990 anymore so let's widen our view. Besides, Geeks have existed in many types, and each one having their own set of technical skills. Though it seems like this crowd has integrated the word "geek" into their self identity and can't possibly deal with someone else using the word differently. In doing so they have to fight any new idea of "geekdom" fiercely, lest they loose their identity

    I propose that there are infinite fields of geekdom. I believe that while there is a form of geekdom in playing DnD there is also a large chunk of geekdom in being a model train geek or an investment geek. One does not define the other. And being a geek in one field does not make you a geek in the other field.

    Basically, stop throwing a tizzy over other people using the word geek. Get more specific about who you are; not more territorial

  72. Patton Oswalt by Volntyr · · Score: 1

    I am just trying to figure out when Patton Oswalt became the authoritative opinion on geek culture. I thought Geek culture was always evolving, learning new things before anyone else knew what it did. To me, its just one opinion of a comedian

    1. Re:Patton Oswalt by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      About the same time that Angela Joli, Brad Pitt, and George Cloony became diplomatic ambassadors to the U.N and movie stars became political entities....

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
  73. I'm shocked! by RNLockwood · · Score: 1

    I'm shocked, shocked, to hear that reality and Hollywood's depiction of it may not be congruent. Be still my heart.

    --
    Nate
  74. of geeks and hackers by kartiksinghal · · Score: 1

    but there will still be a small percentage that loves comics, imports video games, and can build their own computers

    Perhaps this cult can still be referred to as hacker culture, since geek culture lost its sense.

  75. Quoting Someone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Recently, I stumbled on the perfect phrase for this story. It's in French, so here's my rough translation: "To those who call themselves geeks because they own an iPhone/iPad: I'm not a farmer simply by having a bottle of milk."

    Source: http://twitter.com/hugolaporte/statuses/28308683112849408

  76. " also having a bookshelf full of D20 system " by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

    Bah.

    Those are consumer droids.

    True geeks make their own maps, their own material.

    Where they go, they don't need roads.

    --
    She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    1. Re:" also having a bookshelf full of D20 system " by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      All you can really say is that geeks are elitist. Because my response was "If it's not 2nd edition, what's the fucking point? I could play GURPS."

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  77. We will change as society tries to be like us by merlock18 · · Score: 1

    I would say that CNN is probably incorrect and Patton Oswalt has a more realistic view of the current State of Geek we are in. What is really popular right now? Whats the new big thing people are into? Maybe its because I recently saw a Michael Cera movie but it seems to me that we are in this year and the last few years. Look at the popularity of "The Big Bang Theory." Now, I know what youre thinking. Look at the populatiry of "The Big Bang Theory" versus Jersey Shore. Snooki even has a book deal... which hurts my soul to type. But we are making headway and people are finding us less annoying, and more "quirky."

    Of course there will always be geeks, regardless of what Patton Oswalt says. Sure, more people think Star Wars is cool now but as society begins to like what we like, what is een as nerdy or geeky changes. I still know very few people who can build their own computer even though Maximum PC puts out a new How-To guide every other week. But now, we have changed what is really geeky. I recently built a computer with a 30GB SSD and 6 2TB HDDs, installed OpenSolaris on it for RAID-Z2 and its half full of anime.

    But I like the idea of the Geek coming into vogue and not being so geeky. Without it, we wouldn't have things like Scott Pilgrim Versus the World movie, would we? No, it wouldn't be profitable. We need to embrace the idea that nerd-dom is becoming popular. All thsi cool new stuff i buy from thinkgeek is all thanks to our loves and passions becoming popular and lucrative. Where would my pizza cutter shaped like the Starship Enterprise be without the masive popularity of Star Trek? A wish in the back of my mind. An itch I cant scratch of wanting something I cant have.

  78. IQ 100 by zodar · · Score: 1

    Popular culture is popular because it appeals to the most people.

    Geek culture is geeky because it appeals to the IQ 120+ crowd.

    A large percentage of the population will never get geek culture, so it will never be popular.

  79. D20 is crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I resent the idea that I have a lot of D20 manuals in my bookshelf. My favourites are Ars Magica and the two Swedish role playing games Coriolis and Drakar och Demoner from Riotminds. I find the gaming dynamics in Dungeon and Dragons to be pretty boring.

  80. Types of Geekdom by Salvo · · Score: 1

    The classical definition of Geek is "a carnival performer who performs sensationally morbid or disgusting acts".
    The modern geek still carries a lot of the aspects of the shocking carnival performer, they specialise in specific aspects of life, generally to the detriment of Mainstream acceptance.
    Role Playing Geeks, Computer Geeks, Comic Geeks, Language Geeks, Automotive Geeks, Art Geeks, Sports Geeks, they are all little niches of people who neglect the mainstream in favour of their own special interests. The Internet has allowed these niches to grow and crystallise into communities. The size and increased visibility of these communities makes them greater targets for Mainstream marketing.

    The fractured nature of geekdom means that there will always be geek culture of some sort. The specialised nature of geekdoms mean that they will never be mainstream.

  81. Re: Desktop linux by somersault · · Score: 1

    Ubuntu is very nice to use as AC said, and surprise surprise, it's now the most popular distro, and being sold with Dell netbooks (at least, last time I checked). Having Linux on phones and tablets will hopefully help to get people interested.

    I don't want them interested just so that I feel accepted - I don't care much what others think of my desktop choice, why should I? I want them interested so that we can get the latest games and software without jumping through hoops. I don't really have anything against commercial closed source software, as long as it's good.

    ffs Slashdot, why do I have to use <em> for italics rather than <i>?

    --
    which is totally what she said
  82. Being a geek is about being alone and afraid by FoolishOwl · · Score: 2

    Being a nerd or a geek, to me, was not in the first place about liking Dungeons & Dragons or computers. It was about getting the shit beaten out of me, every day, by popular kids. It was about my parents telling me I deserved to be beaten up, because I was weak and effeminate. It was about the first-grade teacher angrily sending me back to the classroom on my first day in a new school because I didn't know what "offsides" or "first down" meant. (I'm still not sure what "first down" means.) It was about school administrators calling me in to the office and asking me what I was doing to provoke other kids into beating me up, and how I could change so that I would stop provoking them.

    Being a geek was about enjoying reading because it was my own private pleasure that no one could take from me, except that one time another kid took my book and tore it up. It was about spending hours in the safety of the library. It was about spending hours alone at the creek, watching the aquatic insects, and identifying them from a guidebook. It was about learning to fly a plane via Flight Simulator II, even though I never got a driver's license and could barely handle a bicycle. It was about teaching myself to program in BASIC, years before I knew anyone else with a computer.

    Dungeons & Dragons was about being in a forest or a cave, finding secrets, finding out that you mattered because you had potential. My first encounter with it, and still my lasting image of it, was seeing the title page illustration from the First Edition Advanced Dungeons & Dragons Player's Handbook, of a wise old gnome, sitting on a giant die beneath a tree, peacefully smoking a pipe and reading a book. Why was he smiling? What did he know? Could I ask him, somehow?

    So I'm married and have stepsons now. The older is fourteen, plays volleyball and tennis, skateboards, plays World of Warcraft and Halo III with his friends, and is constantly exchanging text messages with his girlfriend. Once, he said he and his friends were "cool geeks." Lucky for him, he'll never fully understand what an oxymoron that is.

    There was some sickness in children's culture in the 1980s, and I can't entirely account for it. The good parts, the semi-popular culture that has gradually become more popular, is not the full story.

    1. Re:Being a geek is about being alone and afraid by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      You hit it pretty much on the head with that.
      While I didn't grow up exactly the same, it was a rough estimate... and I think quite a few others as well.
      Just looking at the cultural and political shifts that occurred throughout the 20th century, I'm thinking it was the tail-end of the 70's leaving a wake that rifted the 80's badly. The 90's were a good healing point when it came to the technical stuff, with the 'dotcom' boom and becaming 'cool' to do the silicon valley thing. Also a lot less homosexuality jokes now, that I've seen. ('gay' and 'fag' have different proverbial meanings now, even though they do still mean the same thing by "dictionary" definition)

      I would not want to grow up in these times, however... there's still an undercurrent that is ugly, and could destroy you quickly. I don't think I'd make it with the way things are, now. Then again, we as geeks would probably be doing the same thing we did back then... looking into new ideas/technologies/ideologies and obsorbing our entire lives with it.

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
  83. Reigniting the editor wars by jonaskoelker · · Score: 1

    And when "all these people" are using -- nay, customizing -- Eclipse, then they will also be geeks.

    Real geeks implement their own custom version of vim in elisp!

    1. Re:Reigniting the editor wars by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Real geeks write a C to elisp compiler and then recompile vim to run in emacs. And then complain that emacs is bloated.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  84. Re:Oh, gee, here I thought geeks were uber awesome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you're a furry and you hang around other furries all the time, you're probably going to have an inaccurate perception that being a furry is more popular and accepted than it really is.

    You'd be surprised, actually...

    I'm a furry, have been since 1995, and I can't recall a single instance where I had a bad reaction from anyone in real life: friends, family, strangers, fellow students, coworkers, you name it. Maybe the people who would have a bad reaction to it just stayed away from me, but I doubt that.

    Of course a lot is about how you present yourself, too. I'm gay as well, and hardly ever had negative reactions to that, either (other than from 13 year olds, and certain religious fundamentalists) - but then when I talk to people about it, I don't try to come on to them or show them pornographic pictures or anything like that. I'm still the same perfectly normal, likeable guy I always am.

    Same goes for being furry, too. Sure, I like anthropomorphic animals, and I don't hide it. If people are curious, I may show them some comics (say, Sabrina Online), or the photos I took at my last con, or even my tail (yes, I have one - no fursuit, though). I'm not gonna show them any pictures of shitting dicknipples.

    But yeah, I've never had a bad reaction. And based on my own experience, I think it's you that has the inaccurate perception - if you only ever hang around 4chan-ers and the like, of course you're gonna get the idea that furries are universally hated. But in reality? Far from it - some people like them, some people hate them, and the vast majority of people don't know them and will usually react very well when they learn about it, as long as you don't freak them out on purpose.

    Sorry for getting on the soapbox, but I think this needed to be said.

  85. Does it matter? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These kind of labels (geek,loser...) don't exist outside the US.

    1. Re:Does it matter? by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      outside of the US/UK english is not the first language, either.

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
  86. Geek Gamer by Jorth · · Score: 1

    If anyone watched the introduction to Blizcon this year Metzen did a great speech which I enjoyed where he would say "Geek is..." and then show a picture of something classic like a screenshot from a game, or a toy, and you'd hear the crowd react in different waves to the image. Then I realised the simple fact that I watched Blizcon is mostly what makes me a geek

  87. Re:Oh, gee, here I thought geeks were uber awesome by Kjella · · Score: 1

    Sheldon isn't more of a living embodiment of OCD than he's a geek. On a TV show it makes for great comedy, in real life it'd drive you c-r-a-z-y. I have a buddy that's 1/10th of Sheldon and that's plenty...

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  88. "geek" from "gook". "nerd" from other "n-word" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I believe "geek" was derived from "gook" which was perjorative for the enemy Vietnamese in the Vietnam war.
    I believe "nerd" was derived from the other "n-word" which is also perjorative.
    I confront people when they call others "geek" and "nerd" and tell them they are insults.
    They have come to mean "unattractive", "socially inept", and "technically competent".
    I tolerate this "news for nerds" crap on slashdot since there is otherwise useful information on slashdot.
    I am continually suprised by people who refer to themselves as "people persons" with "outstanding social/management
    skills" who then proceed to use the terms "nerd" and "geek" in the next sentence. I hold that my social skills are
    more advanced than theirs as I have not punched them out for this. I merely point out that "nerd" and "geek" are derogatory terms
    for "Tech" people and "Engineers". I also point out that I consider labeling someone a derogatory term a hostile act.
    If it does not stop immediately, I retaliate within the bounds of the law.

  89. On the Bright Side by BJ_Covert_Action · · Score: 1

    On the bright side, more girls are wearing thick rimmed glasses with ironic t-shirts and letting their hair down in an attempt to look semi-geeky/hipster. I can't be the only one who is enjoying that change in style can I?

    1. Re:On the Bright Side by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      You just reminded me of a video I saw of Taylor Swift, dressed up as the "geeky" schoolgirl in the song "you belong with me".
      I don't care how else she dresses, that alone was enough to be engrained in my head forever, in a good way.

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
  90. No code = scene whore by trollertron3000 · · Score: 1

    If you can't write code you're just a scene whore in my trollish opinion. Otherwise you're basically just Whil Wannabe Wheaton hanging out with a bunch of fucking nerds throwing dice. Don't try and spin it like you're a God because you buy shirts from Think Geek and go to Pax in your dickwolf shirt. Pick up a C++ book and become a real man. Hell, at least try to do some Ruby. It's the VB of the Open Source world.

    --
    Tiger Blooded Bi-Winning Machine
  91. Re:Oh, gee, here I thought geeks were uber awesome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your mom.

  92. this reminds me of a quote... by RackinFrackin · · Score: 1

    ... from wayne's world.

    "Was it Kierkegaard or Dick Van Patten who said, 'If you label me, you negate me'?"

  93. Says who? by FatSean · · Score: 1

    They identify as a group which prefers to avoid the most heavily advertised brands and trends. You call them "hipsters" which is their identity as you have named and categorised their identity.

    --
    Blar.